06 30 18 Confusion About the Indemnity Bond


By Anna Von Reitz

When you operate in commerce –if you ever legitimately do–(remember that “commerce” is business between two incorporated entities) you typically need insurance of some kind — liability insurance, fire insurance, insurance against illness, accident, unemployment, theft, wrongful death, auto insurance, life insurance, casualty insurance, flood insurance…. the list goes on.

When you operate in trade (business between unincorporated parties) you also need protection, which is provided by an indemnity bond.

One way that the rats have worked their system is by making sure that you don’t have an indemnity bond, and therefore “can’t” be operating in a private capacity in international trade.

It’s an “omission” on your part that allows them to presume that you can “only” be operating in commerce as one of their very own franchises, subject to their whims, and their statutes.

So one of the first steps toward becoming truly independent and being able to operate “privately” is the establishment of an indemnity bond. They’ve made this very difficult also. There are few bonding agencies that even know what you are talking about, and those that do are likely to mistake you for a pauper and demand a huge cash bond before they issue an indemnity bond for you.

We, The Living Law Firm, finally put an end to that dodge, by establishing an Indemnity Bond that covers the States of the Union, and thereby everyone living in the States.

When you go into one of their courts to protest their presumption that you are one of their franchises and acting in that capacity “voluntarily” or, otherwise, that you are irresponsible and operating without indemnity–and therefore are “incompetent” and under their control, you present the Court Clerk and the Court Administrator (the Judge) with a copy of your State of the Union Indemnity Bond — RA 393427640 US. If you wish, you can add the name of your birth State, such as Florida, Maine, or Minnesota.

Most of us Joe Averages who have not chosen to create incorporated entities of any kind, can then produce our Deed of Re-Conveyance showing that we have officially and knowingly transferred our Given Trade Name back to the land and soil jurisdiction State where we were born, and also produce our recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) which documents “their” expatriation back to the land and soil jurisdiction, too. This gives a three-pronged defense against any presumption that you are voluntarily acting as one of their franchisees or in any public capacity related to them at all.

This deprives them of all their usual excuses to act “as” your guardians and “assume” Powers of Attorney never granted to them.

There is typically only one other thing needed (besides a backbone) to put them in their places and that is a specific denial of any Power of Attorney. My dear friend, “rb” Young, the Marine I eulogized earlier this month provided the following Revocation:

Know by all men these presents in the interest of/for the Administration of Justice…

In the form of a Letter of wishes regarding: The Revocation of Power of Attorney by: me: rb…

To Whom it may concern:

The Revocation of your Power of Attorney

as per your: [cf] Uniform Power of Attorney Act Section 1101 and Montana Codes Annotated 72-31-310 states: Termination of power of attorney or agent’s authority. (1) A power of attorney terminates when: (c) the principal revokes the power of attorney; (2) An agent’s authority terminates when: (a) the principal revokes the authority; (6) The execution of a power of attorney does not revoke a power of attorney previously executed by the principal unless the subsequent power of attorney provides that the previous power of attorney is revoked or that all other powers of attorney are revoked.[cf]


It is my wish, my order, and my command to any and all such parties: as of this memorial moment; i, me, (us, we) hereby revoke, rescind, remove and deny any and all assumed and/or presumed power(s) of attorney(s) part and parcel, that you think you may or might have had…previously invoked and/or all otherwise utilized are hereby REVOKED from this day forward; dated as now for then. PERIOD.


May our beloved “rb” rest in the peace he has earned with the Savior he loved, and may you all listen and benefit from his hard work, research, dedication, love of country, and love of fellow man.

Every time you have to deal with any court or attorney pressing in upon you and making “presumptions” — issue your version of rb’s Revocation — and present your Deed of Re-Conveyance, your Certificate of Assumed Names/NAMES, and your State’s Private Registered Indemnity Bond.

Make it clear that they are on your soil and your land and they had better “shove off” and leave your “internationally protected person” — alone.

See this article and over 1100 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


JILL ZABRENDAJune 29, 2018 at 5:44 PM

this is also explained by kw in this article,,,,,,,,,,,,,,………………..Greetings,
I have been asked by several men and women to forward to them documents concerning resignation of a registered agent. I feel it is prudent to explain the Facts regarding the instrument known as a Certification of Birth.
Anyone who has studied and researched these matters, for any good length of time, has come to the conclusion that the person represented by the Birth Certificate is not a man, but an artificial person.
It is an entity. A person other than a natural person. While there are many theories of how that entity was created, I believe the simple, more important facts are being overlooked. Particularly one’s relation-ship to it.
I will now address obvious facts.
1) An entity can do no-thing. It must have a representative, an officer, agent, fiduciary or some man or woman to act on it’s behalf.
2) This entity must have a name. The legal name of this Entity is what we refer to as the ALL CAP NAME.
3) All entities, foreign or domestic, must qualify to transact business in your “state”. It must comply with all statutes concerning registration.
4) All entities must have a registered office and a registered agent for service of process.

Once one becomes aware of this entity, Logic must be used.
Congress has stated that a citizen of the United States is a civilly dead entity, Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

We must understand the “entity”.
Where is the proof, token or evidence that this entity exist?
What is the legal name of the entity?
Under what jurisdiction and law was this entity organized?
So let us take a look at the Kentucky Revised Statutes pertaining to entities and organizations doing business in the Commonwealth.
KRS 14A.
14A.1-020 Application.
Each entity and each foreign entity is subject to the provisions of this chapter.
14A.4-010bRegistered office and registered agent required.b
(1) Each entity and each foreign entity qualified to transact business in this
Commonwealth shall continuously maintain in this Commonwealth:
(a) A registered office that may be the same as any of its places of business;
(b) A registered agent, who may be:
1. An individual who resides in this Commonwealth and whose
business address is identical with the registered office; or
2. An entity or foreign entity qualified to transact business in this
Commonwealth whose business address is identical with the
registered office.

14A.4-040bService through registered agent.
(1) An entity’s or foreign entity’s registered agent shall be its agent for service of
process, notice, or demand required or permitted by law to be served on the
entity or foreign entity.

I hope these provisions give a little hint as to your relationship to it. We must understand the Facts.

Let us examine the facts with a better understanding of the entity and the proof of it’s existence.
I was listening to some Judges, attorneys, and law professors discuss the UCC. Here is the link. http://youtu.be/EQM6rjkVjtU . Law professor Linda Rousch was discussing the legal name of a registered organization (see UCC art 9 (def)). Judge Bruce Markell then says… “ the state issues a Birth Certificate.”, being a public record showing the organization was organized.

I will now present my argument and remedy.

Chef-doctor JemichelJune 29, 2018 at 9:09 PM

Does a url exist for:
“Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646”?

UCADIA Ecclesia FoundationJune 29, 2018 at 5:45 PM

Rip off!!! Anne’s trying to rip you folks off.

1FreeManJune 29, 2018 at 7:58 PM

Alright who left the door open? Now look what the cat drug in!

Mike Williams leatherlipsJune 30, 2018 at 12:17 AM

I’ve been studying now for over 20 years, and except for a few things Anna has put out, which deal with history from several thousand years ago, she is dead nuts on point. I’ve seen just about everything out there. I find her to be a breath of fresh air in this world under the control of Satan. If you have been looking at these things as long as myself and Paul Stramer, you can see who is pushing the BS around and poo pooing those who expose the truth. I don’t just take someone’s word for things, so I have seen many of the things in black ink on white paper before I found Anna’s site. Instead of just making some derogitory remarks, present your facts about what is wrong with the information, with research that can be confirmed by others, or just go away.

Dalton ReynoldsJune 30, 2018 at 5:15 AM

This comment has been removed by the author.


Holly ClarkJune 29, 2018 at 5:52 PM

Where can I find a copy of the nond


1FreeManJune 29, 2018 at 7:59 PM

Yes, my question too.

Paul StramerJune 29, 2018 at 10:42 PM


JILL ZABRENDAJune 29, 2018 at 5:52 PM

The Birth certificate is a public record showing the organization was organized, showing it exist. This registered organization, a state agency, was created during the “registration of birth reports and documents” mentioned in KRS 213.046 (1) and 213.051. This Created the “matrix”.see Bl.5th

When You used the Certificate, you became the registered agent and accepted appointment for service of process, your home is now the registered office and you have just complied with some of the requirements mentioned in KRS 14A.

So, While this author cannot go to great lengths to provide the reader of the authorities proving enormous legal ramifications for use of instruments and the legal relationships of the registered agent, this author merely wishes to direct some interested persons to the obvious and easiest remedies available.
If one does not wish to operate an entity, or be a registered agent for an organization, the remedy is simple. A letter of resignation.
Upon the 31st day of receipt of the letter of resignation, you will no longer be the agent for service of process. They cannot serve you process when it is addressed to the entity. Unless the secretary of state has a statement on file signed by the agent accepting the appointment for service of process, service of process is not effective and insufficient , to wit:
14A.4-010bRegistered office and registered agent required
(2) Unless the registered agent signs the document making the appointment, the
appointment of the registered agent or a successor registered agent on whom
process may be given is not effective until the agent delivers a statement in
writing to the Secretary of State accepting the appointment.

And as for the resignation,


JILL ZABRENDAJune 29, 2018 at 5:53 PM

14A.4-030bResignation of registered agent.
(1) A registered agent may resign the appointment by signing and delivering a
statement of resignation to the Secretary of State for filing that may also
provide that the registered office is discontinued.
(2) After filing the statement, the Secretary of State shall mail one (1) copy to the
registered office, if not discontinued, and the other copy to the entity or foreign
entity at its principal office.
(3) The agency appointment shall be terminated, and the registered office
discontinued, if so provided, on the earlier of:
(a) The appointment of a successor registered agent and, if applicable,
registered office; or
(b) The thirty-first day after the date on which the statement of resignation
was filed.
Now for those wanting some other options as resignation may not be a viable choice, your duties and obligations are simple, again, to wit:
14A.4-050bObligations of registered agent.
The duties of a registered agent are to:
(1) Forward to the entity or foreign entity for which it is the registered agent any
service of process, notice, or demand received on its behalf; and
(2) Collect and maintain the information described in KRS 14A.4-010(3).
As agent for the entity, you are the secured party and creditor. See UCC definitions, secured party, creditor. You are a secured party creditor.
I would also state that it is an organization having more than 1 place of business. As we did not issue the bonds controlled by mutual fund managers such as Blackrock and Wells Fargo. Given this fact, please see UCC 9-307. The organization is a debtor and UCC 9-307 determines the location of the debtor.
Once you know where the chief executive office is, maybe now you know where to send all service of process, notices and demands to, that being the main obligations of the registered agent.
That being said, here is an example of a LETTER OF RESIGNATION.

(secretary of state’s name)
Secretary of State for (corporation state) i.e. STATE OF OHIO

Re: Resignation pursuant to KRS 14A.4-030.

Greetings (Mr. or Mrs. Secretary’s Name),

This Statement of Resignation and Claim of Right is presented for filing and shall constitute a public deed record presented for filing.
Whereas certain facts have become known, specifically and particularly the Creation of a Registered Organization having the name (ALL CAPS NAME) and evidence by the Mark, Token, Proof called a Certificate of Birth, being a public record showing the organization was organized, showing it exist, and, Whereas the legal name of that registered organization, a state agency, is styled (ALL CAP NAME), and, Whereas said Facts have caused some agents to believe a legal impossibility, and, Whereas I do not wish to operate any state or government agency, foreign or domestic,
I hereby resign from any real or presumed state or government agency or organization, and will no longer accept service of process, demands or notices addressed to said organization, as registered agent. I hereby resign from the capacity of registered agent and now assume the person, office, and capacity of general executor of the estate of the agency until persons claiming an interest in the organization or the estate thereof, make themselves known.

JILL ZABRENDAJune 29, 2018 at 5:54 PM

Any and all real or presumed Power of Attorney Claimed by any Person is hereby revoked, rescinded and made Void. Any State, Government, Office, Officer, Agency or Agent Shall not conduct the affairs of the Organization without the expressed written Consent of the General executor of the Estate as of this day.
I, (your name), hereby authorize, warrant, and demand that all business and transactions being done within (STATE OF XXXXX), and using the legal name or legal entity identifiers (LEIs) associated with the registered organization cease. Any and all persons under your office are hereby given notice, no office, officer, agency or agent shall in any way operate or conduct any affairs of the organization without the expressed written consent of the acting general executor as of this day.
I am also requesting a full accounting of the organizational accounts to determine the condition and solvency of the organization. Please forward to the executor’s office a certified copy of any accounts known by your office or other agency, or in your possession, including any and all funds, trusts, UCC finance statements, liens, encumbrances, and judgments, etc., concerning the organization. This is a legal request for an accounting of the organization.
To Clarify, I hereby resign the position of registered agent and discontinue any and all registered office(s). Please, if there are any questions of debts owed by the organization, please send all proof of claims and evidences of debt to the chief executive office of the organization for payment, setoff, discharge or settlement, or otherwise-provided for by law.

Thank you for your service,
(seal, signature)

Acting Executor
address for office of the executor.


JILL ZABRENDAJune 29, 2018 at 5:55 PM

sorry, couldn’t get the article in one post.



Jack HamiltonJune 30, 2018 at 12:10 AM

Jill; thank you for posting. This is very interesting and makes a lot of sense to me. Can you provide the site of the original article and who’s “kw”?


Vayah TerraJune 29, 2018 at 7:21 PM

Dear Anna,
Where can one find the court qualified “copy of your State of the Union Indemnity Bond..” thank you.

Paul StramerJune 29, 2018 at 10:43 PM



06 29 18 Head Of Charity Against Sexual Violence Charged For Attempting To Arrange Rape Of Children





 by Tyler Durden

Via Elizabeth Lea Vos of Disobedient Media  

Joel Davis, chairman of the International Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict, has been arrested in New York. He faces charges of enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activity, attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, possession of child pornography and receipt and distribution of child pornography.

According to the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:

“Joel Davis started an organization devoted to stopping sexual violence, while allegedly engaged in the duplicitous behavior of sharing explicit images of infants engaged in sexual activity. Davis also allegedly solicited an undercover officer – whom he thought to be a willing participant – to send sexually explicit videos of his nine-year-old daughter, and even to set up a sexual encounter between himself and a two-year-old. The conduct alleged against Joel Davis is as unfathomable as it is sickening, and as this case demonstrates, law enforcement will keep its watchful eye on the darkest corners of the internet to bring predators to justice.”

“During the course of these conversations, DAVIS told the undercover officers that he was sexually interested in children of all ages.  DAVIS sent the undercover officers sexually explicit photographs of infants and toddlers, including photographs in which the infants and toddlers were engaged in sexual activity with adults. ”

The Daily Mail recounts that  FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William F. Sweeney Jr. stated: “Having started an organization that pushed for the end of sexual violence, Davis displayed the highest degree of hypocrisy by his alleged attempts to sexually exploit multiple minors… As if this wasn’t repulsive enough, Davis allegedly possessed and distributed utterly explicit images of innocent infants and toddlers being sexually abused by adults.”

The US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York commented on the arrest via Twitter: “Joel Davis started an organization devoted to stopping sexual violence, while allegedly engaged in the duplicitous behavior of sharing explicit images of infants engaged in sexual activity. Davis also allegedly solicited an undercover officer – whom he thought to be a willing participant – to send sexually explicit videos of his nine-year-old daughter, and even to set up a sexual encounter between himself and a two-year-old.”

Disobedient Media obtained a full copy of the complaint against Davis, with segments of the document included below, which depict the horrific nature of his conversations with agents who he believed were fellow child abusers: Warning – Contains Triggering Material:

The charity Davis headed, the International Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict, describes their work: “With over 5,000 members, we are the first ever global collaboration between Nobel Peace Laureates, international advocacy organizations, and groups working at the regional and community levels in conflict.”

According to the group’s website, the charity has sent delegations to: “The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, and Colombia, built an extensive network of Survivors United for Action, and demanded fearless political leadership on behalf of victims everywhere.” 

In light of Davis’ horrific statements as recorded in the criminal complaint against him, the contrast between that evidence and the humanitarian sentiments of the Campaign’s website speaks volumes as to the all-too-common facade of humanitarian efforts and the stark reality of abuse against the most vulnerable.

As noted by Lori Handrahan via Twitter, the Campaign’s Steering Committee includes Human Rights Watch, Physicians for Human Rights, the Dr. Denis Mukwege Foundation, Nobel Women’s Initiative, the Global Fund for Women, Youth to End Sexual Violence, The Italian Mine Campaign, Promundo, Every Woman Everywhere, Sofepadi, and Change Center for Health and Gender Equity.

Davis delivered a TEDx talk only two months prior to his arrest. During his address, he states that his first task in the sphere of humanitarian work around sexual violence involved transcribing the stories of rape victims in the Congo. He described one interview in particular, saying: “It was with a nurse, who was representing a victim [of rape] who died in her care. A six-month-old baby girl.” In light of Davis’ recent arrest, the hypocrisy of these sentiments is truly beyond the power of words to express.

Lori Handrahan, a respected humanitarian aid worker, expressed her disgust towards Davis via Twitter, writing:”I know Joel Davis. He had asked me for help starting his #humanitarian career. He was arrested for attempting to arrange the rape of 2 & 9 year girls and trading in videos/images of infant rape.”

Handrahan previously reported on the revelations of abuse in aid work, including the arrest of Peter Dalglish. Disobedient Media spoke with Handrahan, who told us:

“In April I wrote about what the arrest on child sex abuse charges of high-level former UN employee Peter Dalglish’s meant for the #AidToo movement within the humanitarian community. Yesterday, a younger version of Peter Dalglish, Joel Davis, was arrested in New York as he was arranging a meeting with a father with the intent of raping a 2-year-old and an nine-year-old girl. Davis has also been charged on child pornography related charges that included trading in infant rape.

“Davis, like Dalglish, groomed the humanitarian community in order to advance his own criminal agenda of committing crimes against vulnerable children.”

“I expect every organization that hired Davis and supported his organization, Stop Rape in Conflict, to issue a strong and immediately public statement about Davis’s crimes and to take concrete action to ensure they do not continue to support an environment within their institutions that allows pedophiles to groom their staff, board members, and other employees with the intent of using that institution as a cover for child rape.”

Unfortunately, the arrest of Joe Davis is far from the first leader of a charity to be arrested for sex abuses against children.

Disobedient Media previously reported on a particularly infamous scandal that unfolded in 1987, in which the operation of a child porn and child trafficking operation was discovered to have been run from the basement of the UNICEF building in Brussels, Belgium. In that case, the Director of the national committee of UNICEF was charged with “offenses involving what police suspect is an international child prostitution ring.”

In that case,
press reports indicated that the youngest child known to have been abused was just eight months old, while the oldest child was twelve years old. This sickening historical precedent should educate the public as to the chronic and systemic issue of predators at the helms of charities, NGO’s, and other entities and institutions that claim to protect children and the vulnerable but which can all too easily become a vehicle for predation.

Disobedient Media also reported on the testimony of Greg Bucceroni last year. He described in detail the harmful role played by philanthropic organizations in Philadelphia during the 1970’s and 1980’s, recounting the methods by which multiple organizations were used by well-connected pedophiles to access vulnerable youth under the guise of helping them.

In a very real and tragic sense, the arrest of Joe Davis represents the continuation of a sick and parasitic norm in charitable work, non-governmental organizations and other entities who claim to protect the vulnerable, but whose leaders are exposed as predators of the worst kind.

Olddogs Comments!

If I had the authority to deal the appropriate justice to these scumbags, it would be by slowly shoving a red hot two inch diameter steel rod up their ass. This should be the most impossible crime to get away with. If one of my family fell pray to this kind of atrocity I would stretch out their agony for weeks!



06 27 18 As it Began, So it Ends + So Simple, Person or People?


By Anna Von Reitz

Back in the 1860’s in England, an enigmatic figure played an incalculable role in destroying the lives of millions, if not billions of people. His name name was Benjamin Disraeli.

He was an infamous fop and dandy who became an elder statesmen in Britain, Lord of the Exchequer and Prime Minister. His debates with William Gladstone, his chief adversary, are still studied by those interested in Forensics. Those interested in the history of the modern world will study Disraeli, as I did in college, for other reasons.

The long and the short of it is that after Prince Albert died, Queen Victoria became disconsolate. Like King Solomon she despaired of any greater purpose for human life than the grave and became ensnared in a cynical and destructive frame of mind that meshed well with the wit and guile of a man like Disraeli.

Disraeli approached the Queen with a new scheme (or, to be honest, actually a very, very old scheme) to make money for the Crown and then use the financing to conquer India. It would, if one were cynical enough to do it, solve two problems at once — the burgeoning economic and political power of the industrial working class, and the crimp in the royal coffers caused by losing the American Revolutionary War and War of 1812.

All you had to do, was “enfranchise” the working class and convince them that the ability to “vote” was a good thing.

They would be too ignorant and lazy to grasp why it was also a supremely bad thing.

While millions of British workers hailed Disraeli’s enfranchisement as a step forward for the working class, he cynically and very quietly placed claims upon their names and estates, their lands and small businesses, and began using these formerly private assets as chattel to “hypothecate” debt and finance the Raj — the vicious British mercenary forces sent to conquer India.

Hypothecation is a quintessentially evil— and should be illegal —process of making claims against someone else’s property as chattel backing your own debts, without notifying them, and without formally taking title to the property. It’s all done under the table, by a process of “debt assumption”.

Thus the seizure of private property and the de facto enslavement of British workers via this process of enfranchisement was used to finance the conquest of another people half a world away and the entire Indian Subcontinent was soon under the iron hoof of Crown rule.

That’s how the Babylonian Slave System got a new foothold in the modern world and how the current malaise began.

And now we are seeing how it ends.

As has been endlessly repeated, the Territorial and Municipal United States conglomerates have accrued a so-called National Debt of around 21 Trillion Dollars.

At the same time, the Pentagon has “lost” 21 Trillion Dollars.

Let me observe that in a “debt-credit” system, such as the one we have, it is impossible to accrue a debt —national or otherwise — because any debt is instantly expunged by a credit. Every single transaction generates an equal and opposite credit.

So when someone advances the idea that a 21 Trillion dollar National Debt exists, one should immediately ask — what happened to the National Credit?

Now, we know. It was siphoned off and spent by the Pentagon, leaving the hapless American people who earned all that credit in the first place, still holding the bag.

And what was all that money actually used for? To subjugate the entire world, much as India was subjugated a century earlier, to the greed of the Royal Family and all their megalomaniac pals.

The Americans, Aussies, Canadians, Germans, Japanese, and others around the world were all “enfranchised” according to Disraeli’s model. A surreptitious “assumed” title was taken against their names and labor and material property. Debt was hypothecated against these private assets. The resulting wealth was spent on expanding “American” military power, howbeit, all this military power was actually under the secretive, surreptitious command of the British Crown.

Because, remember, the British Territorial United States usurped upon our actual Federal Government in the wake of the Civil War and the Brits have been commandeering everything behind the scenes ever since.

It is well past time for these Odious Debts to be recognized for what they are, and for the British Interlopers and their Allies in this criminality, to be removed from our shores.

And you have a simple choice. Either correct the falsified political status records and reclaim your birthright political status, assemble with like-minded people and give face, force, and body to your land and soil jurisdiction counties and States — or live as slaves of these criminals. Forever.

Their mental and moral illness has reached terminal velocity.

Either put a peaceable and public end to it, or suffer the consequences.

To get started, make your claim to your birthright part of the land jurisdiction record by recording it and re-conveying your Trade Name and all attached Assumed NAMES back to the land and soil of the state where you were born. See Article 928 on my website.

Next, assemble your Counties and your States. Get going by sending an email with your County and State as the subject line to contentmanager1@yahoo.com, or by visiting the forums at


Then join the national reconstruction effort and the national teleconference call every Thursday at nine o’clock Eastern Standard Time: 1-712-770- 4160, access code 226823#.

For additional information about the “missing” National Credit that the Pentagon purloined, please see:

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:


06 27 18 So Simple, Person or People?


By Anna Von Reitz

I have been carrying on a conversation for many days now with Americans who consider themselves “United States Citizens” yet insist on making references to the federal constitutions.

These references almost always include the word “people” or “people’s”, such as the “people’s right to peacefully assemble” or the “people’s right to petition”.

The problem is that thanks to deliberate and self-interested falsification of the public records, nearly all of us have been misidentified as “persons”, not “people”.

Until and unless we all wake up en masse and object, the vermin can get away with this—-and it is very profitable for them, so they have no motivation short of law suits and pitchforks to stop making these insane false claims against us and continuing to act in Gross Breach of Trust.

We must all grasp the fact that “United States Citizens” and especially Municipal “citizens of the United States” have NEVER had any recognized guarantees under any of the constitutions—-and they still don’t.

So, are you operating in the capacity of a Territorial or Municipal United States citizen—- that is, as a “person” merely “residing” here on our shores, obligated to provide us with “essential government services”???

Or are you a native of a sovereign State of the Union, operating in the capacity of a United States National without any obligation of public servitude?

In other words, are you a “person” or one of the “people” of this country?

Bear in mind that PERSONS like “AMY MARIE MARTIN” are foreigners by definition and that they have no constitutional guarantees, can’t own land in the actual States, and can’t elect anyone to serve their interests in any lawful public election.  At most, they can act as shareholders and officers of corporations—- like “The United States of America, Inc.” or the “UNITED STATES, INC.” and participate as “voters” in elections hosted by “political parties”.

Is everyone on the same page?  Beginning to see how you’ve been “impersonated”?  And abused?

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:


06 25 18 The Actual Status Report


By Anna Von Reitz

Let us all realize that, first of all, banks and money are founded on the iniquity of idolatry.  Money is a “symbol” of value the same way that a little stone or carved wood idol is a “symbol” of God.  The same process of idolatry is at the root of the entire idea and use of all forms of money.

Let us also all realize that in the modern world, money is a commodity, like beer or cheese.  There are a gozillion different kinds and brand names of money in exactly the same way as there are brands of beer or cheese, and they all present their own national characters and quirks.

Let us also realize that there is a profound difference between “money” which has a value in-and-of-itself, such as a gold coin that has some intrinsic value in trade, and “legal tender currencies” — like bonds and notes and letters of credit.  And there is additionally, a market in other “securities” — like stocks and commodity futures.

For the past week I have been deluged by circumstance and correspondence to explain what is going on in the banking world.  Well, which banking world?  The world of actual asset-backed money, or the world of legal tender currencies, or the stock market or…..?

If I were to explain in very general terms — there is a Gross Imbalance, at least so far as the bookkeeping is concerned — between actual assets and bonds, notes, and letters of credit.  And there is a terrible, inappropriate, and looking-to-be fatal infringement of investment banking on the rest of the banking world.

Up until the disaster of 2008 and what has been called “The Big Short” on Wall Street, banking — at least in this country — was separated according to function.

We have had traditional trade banks, limited commercial banks, international commercial banks, and investment banks.

It is this last category of banks that demands our attention: investment banks.

Investment banks have always been the shadiest, most irresponsible, most intrinsically dishonest operators on the block, and for decades prior to the 2008 Lehman Brothers et alia debacle, they were prevented by the Glass-Steagall Act from participating in general commerce and co-mingling their operations with banks meant to serve the public and do “straight” transactions among corporate clients.

By “straight” transactions, we imply the honest mundane Point A to Point B transactions we associate with normal banking, devoid of hidden agendas, double escrows, undisclosed usury fees, undisclosed investments made “for” bank customers and shareholders, and similar rotten business practices that no sane country would condone.

In the aftermath of the 2008 mess, Glass-Steagall was repealed and the investment banks were let loose like a pack of wild hyenas to feast upon the flesh of the unsuspecting world.  For many large commercial banks this simply meant the merger of their “investment bank” with their public commercial bank functions.

For some, like Wells Fargo, that had already been skating the edge of the law by abusive use of copyright non-disclosure (Wells Fargo hasn’t been an actual bank for years, but is instead a securities investment firm — an investment bank operating under the trademarked name of the old “Wells Fargo Bank”—otherwise known as a wolf in sheep’s clothing.) the repeal of Glass-Steagall meant coming out of the closet and no longer having to worry about enforcement of the actual law.

Investment banks presume upon their shareholders and especially their depositors to use their deposited assets as assets that can be invested by the bank. There is a (largely undisclosed) quid pro quo, that if you leave your jewels in a deposit box, they belong to the bank as assets that can be used to secure investments for the bank or lines of credit for the bank.  So by removing Glass-Steagall, one of the immediate impacts of merging normal commercial bank functions with investment bank functions was to open up all the depositor’s resources as investment assets.

Oh, you, the unwitting depositors, are now supposed to be investors in the bank, just like you are unwittingly being mischaracterized as corporate franchises of the British Crown Corporation — but never mind that your pants have been dropped and you’ve been bent over.

Merrily, the banks seized upon this incredible windfall of new investment assets and began investing —- mainly on Private Trading Platforms.

What, you may ask, is a “Private Trading Platform”?

These are to a Credit Scheme what unlimited crude oil is to Exxon.

Like most evils, Trading Platforms were initially designed for good reasons.  They were intended to give investors a safe way of using “unused assets” to generate cash for philanthropic projects while also yielding generous profits for the investors — a sop to the Uber Wealthy to make themselves richer with little or no risk, and make themselves out to be philanthropists at the same time.

You have an asset in a bank — say, a ton of physical gold cashiered away back in 1956 — and you agree to “block” this asset for a stated period of time, say, one year.  During that time, the asset will not be available to you to use or withdraw from the bank.  The Trading Platform organization will take possession of the transaction from there on, and will “trade upon” that asset for the next stipulated period of time — in this case, one year — in what amounts to a futures commodity market for assets.

Just like in any commodities futures market, the participants are betting on values and setting values for the assets in trade, making money off the transaction fees, and margins and the 7 to 10 fold expansion of credit that takes place when a bank — acting under the bogus “fractional reserve banking system” — issues the “new money” created out of thin air into the system.

What happened in real life is that a lot of parties who had assets just sitting in bank vaults all over the world jumped on the band wagon.  They were wealthy enough not to need those assets anyway, so why not “block” them and go on the trading platforms?

And the trading platform owners thought, well, why not cut ourselves in for 10, 20, 30…. whatever percent of the trade value?  Guarantee the investors a 100% of return on their blocked assets off the top of the “fractional reserve” — an amount of credit equal in value to the whole investment, plus a percentage of the rest of the fractional reserve created by this process?

And after 2008 and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the investment banks thought— what ho!  We can take all these “unused” depositor assets and go on the Trading Platforms and nobody will be the wiser.

This “system” is so insane, so profitable — on paper — that some investors including the CIA Retirement Fund, simply plunked down a gob of gold back when it all began and “let it ride” indefinitely, with the result that there are now Trading Platform Investment Accounts with 250 zeroes of “credit” standing on the books, and still no visible help to the poor and downtrodden, no relief for the “taxpayers” — just more and more and more credit for these madmen, and more purported debt imposed upon the labor of the people and assets of the world.

The reason that there is no substantial feedback into the world economy is that the Trading Platforms are too profitable at too little risk. And nobody is holding the investors— whether investment banks or individuals — accountable for actually doing philanthropic projects with the money.  They are being allowed to just roll the investments over and over and over.

In terms of investments there is no other show in town that can compare.  So all the giant public employee pension funds and giant State of State “un-budgeted accounts” have been engaged in this hoop-la along with all the investment banks that have surreptitiously seized upon their depositor’s assets—-and blocked and invested their assets “for” them without their knowledge or consent.

Now we come to the issue of the Historic Trusts…. as I have explained before, there are numerous kinds of Historic Trusts, mostly old family trusts, some old business trusts and banking trusts, some government treaty trusts — but what they have in common is that they hearken from a day when actual assets were used as money, and nearly all of the assets belonging to these Historic Trusts have been held as “Special Deposit Accounts” in banks that the banks have used to underwrite their operations.

Historic Trust assets underwrite virtually all central banks on Earth.

Some of you will recall that in 2011 the Chinese Government asked for the return of Chinese gold that the Nationalist Chinese Government left on deposit with the New York Federal Reserve Bank back in 1928.  Initially, the Chinese just wanted to be paid some of the interest they were owed on the deposit, but instead of paying on what was owed, the New York Fed stonewalled.

You may also remember a disturbing similar report wherein the German Government made a similar request for the return of gold held in trust and that they were told they could only receive it back in relatively small installments over a period of years.

What’s happened?  Why are all the actual trustees and owners of the Historic Trusts being similarly stonewalled when they ask for an accounting of their “Special Deposits”?

Because the repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed all the normal commercial banks to morph into investment banks and as investment banks, they seized upon their depositor’s assets and “blocked” them and put them under contract to these private Trading Platforms for periods of years unbeknownst to the victims of these immoral, undisclosed, and non-consensual practices.

It was never the intention of these out-of-control banks to share the proceeds of these surreptitious investments with the victims of these crimes, so what they have been trying to do is to circle the wagons and pretend that the records of these Historic Trusts have been lost, or make up excuses for why neither the assets nor the lines of credit that should be available from these assets are available to the Depositors. Well, the assets are “blocked” for varying periods of time, often years into the future, just like the Chinese and German gold deposits, and the profits from all this have already been contractually divided up between the offending banks and the operators of these “Private Trading Platforms”.

Meanwhile, Ted and Alice and Dick and Kelly are down in the trenches, suffering the hyper-inflation and bearing the purported (but odious) debt caused by this madness, and virtually none of the ‘philanthropic projects” that were the excuse for letting this system exist in the first place are getting done, because the lure of compiling more zeroes is just too attractive to the mentally unhinged bankers and traders among us.

Bottom line: the Glass-Steagall provisions need to be put in place again and the investment banks forced back into their boxes without any ceremony or great deliberation.  The “Private Trading Platforms” need to be shut down as illegal gambling arenas.  The assets need to be returned posthaste to the control and benefit of the actual owners.  The odious debts and non-existent credits need to be wiped off the books.  Those who already profited from this should be dinged for 100% of the profit, and that profit should be held in a Victim’s Fund for the benefit of the people of this world including the permanent end of all taxation, the restoration of the natural environment, and the building up of new beneficial technologies and infrastructure.

Since they couldn’t bring themselves to actually carry through on the charitable and philanthropic projects, we will do it “for” them.

In my opinion the members of the Municipal and Territorial United States “Congress” that allowed this whole situation need to run down a narrow track from DC to Boston being pelted with rotten vegetables the whole way, while their counterparts in London need to run a similar course all the way to Canterbury, where the faithful can seek absolution.

As for the “Roman Pontiffs” and the Conclaves of Cardinals that allowed this — and they are ultimately responsible for this entire mess — no Hot Potato Reaction seeking to wash their hands by closing the Pontifical Office can excuse both what they have done and what they have left undone.

The people and the Earth are owed far better leadership.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:


06 25 18 Domicile The Governing Issue + Please Note Again


By Anna Von Reitz

We have been held — incorrectly — under “municipal law”.  And what is “municipal law”?  It is otherwise described as “private international law”.  Of course, we discovered this and other fun facts some time ago on the road — as Cat Stevens put it — “to find out”, but beyond the names and labels, what does that imply?

A state is governed by public international law — or is supposed to be; a commercial corporation, however, is governed under private international law.

I make a distinction here between commercial corporations which are chartered by states, and international trade organizations which are not chartered and truly privately held unincorporated entities.

Prior to this I have observed that “unincorporated” indicates “sovereign” entities and political status, and that it is entirely possible to be “corporate” without being “incorporated”.

So, in a nutshell, what the vermin have done is to grant us all a franchise — like a Dairy Queen franchise — to operate under our NAMES for their benefit.  This franchise is kept in a perpetual state of subjugation to their private municipal law by their presumption of guardianship over it, and periodically, these franchises are bankrupted for the convenience and profit of the parent organizations.

Our lawful Trade Names, also known as our “Good Names” and “Christian Names”  have thus been infringed upon and have been abused via legal chicanery and transported into the jurisdiction of municipal (private international law) by fraudulent actions undertaken by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration and more recently by actions undertaken by the Obama Administration.

Whereas FDR mischaracterized us as Cestui Que Vie Estate Trusts, Obama has mischaracterized us as Public Transmitting Utilities.  And in both cases nothing is deserved but a firm and resounding, “No way in Hell.” from the American Public.

How to put an end to this pernicious deceit and fraud and victimization?  There are many issues to address, but by far, the most potent (and for them, unanswerable) issue is the issue of domicile.  Where do you choose to live?  And therefore, under what form of law do you live?

You do have a choice.  You have to have a choice guaranteed to you, for any of this to be legal in any sense of the word.

That is why the Expatriation Act was passed by the Rump Congress back in July of 1868 the day before they published their deceitfully disguised Articles of Incorporation as “The United States of America, Inc.” — a Scottish Commercial Corporation — as “The Constitution of the United States of America”.

The main pillar of their deceit has been the presumption that you “voluntarily” chose to live and function as a British Citizen, merely “residing” here for the purpose of providing “essential government services”.

If they and their presumptions were to be believed, nearly all of the American population voluntarily went to work for the Queen and the UK — sans a paycheck or any actual work assignments, of course.

All of this concerns only them and their deceits and their internal issues and workings and multiple bankruptcies.  We are, in fact and in truth, not part of their baileywick at all — they are in fact, part our our baileywick when they come ashore on American soil.

So how have they contrived to rob generations of Americans of the value of their material and intellectual and labor assets?

By making a false claim of domicile.  They signed you up as “citizens” of their version of “United States” when you were a baby in your cradle.  And they have used this falsified public record against you all the days of your lives to make your subject to both municipal and territorial law, instead of the Public Law of your actual state and country.

Thanks to their fraud, deceit, and Gross Breach of Trust, you now have to make a choice — will you be recognized as an American, free men and women owed all the rights, benefits, and property assets of your heritage, or will you continue to let these Euro-trash con artists continue to feed off of you and your country like leeches?

Obviously, you need to change the falsified public records by returning the Birth Certificates to their Sources and by making the declaration of domicile (or as they spelled it back then, “domicil”) and expatriating from their foreign jurisdiction back to the jurisdiction of your birthright.

We have made this Declaration of Domicile part of the Certificate of Assumed Name process, but you must all become aware of the importance of this issue of declaring your domicile as “land and soil” of Georgia, Maine, Texas, etc. — and enabled to bring it forward properly in court.

What advantage does a proper declaration of domicile provide you?

It means you have to be tried under the Public Law, not private international commercial law.  It means that there is no such thing as a “thought crime” or a “victimless crime” or a “statutory infringement”.  It means that you retain the full roster of trial options set forth in Blackstone’s Commentaries, including “Trial by Record”— which, if you have done your homework, will more than adequately prove that you are an American and that you are properly domiciled on the land and soil of your birth state.

That cuts you free of their municipal law, and it also demands that instead of being treated under their territorial law, you are owed The Law of Peace from their military courts, as a Third Party Civilian Non-Combatant having nothing to do with their internecine power struggles and con games.

If you have not actually and factually harmed someone who is bringing complaint or stolen or damaged someone else’s property by your direct actions for which a complaining party appears — there is no case, no prevailing law, and no presumable jurisdiction for THEM to operate it.

You, therefore, have the option of declaring yourself free of their enslavement and their false claims, and merely have to become aware enough of the issues to do so and defend yourself and your assets accordingly.

Here, courtesy a friend to the cause, is the controlling British law summation from Foreign and Domestic Law — a Concise Treatise on Private International Jurisprudence, by John Alderson Foote:

“The ‘right of expatriation’ is not, perhaps, the happiest of phrases, but it is manifest that the feudal theory of indissoluble allegiance had become an anachronism, and a Royal Commission was appointed in May 1868 to inquire into the English laws of naturalisation and allegiance generally.”

“As to domicil for testamentary purposes, or with relation to succession to personal property on intestacy, the law has been considerably modified …”

“British subjects dying in a foreign country shall be deemed for all purposes of testate or intestate succession as to movables to retain the domicil they possessed at the time of going to reside in such foreign country, unless they have resided in such foreign country for a year at least, and shall have made a formal and public written declaration of an intention to become domiciled there.”

“Domicil being a question of fact, it is not competent for individual States to enact restrictions upon, or facilities for, its acquisition ; and such enactments should not, in the tribunals of other States, obtain recognition.”

“The principle that laws are commands addressed to persons, which has been referred to above,(«) renders it important to consider what entities come within that term.”

“With regard to any particular municipal law, a foreign State must be regarded as occupying a position closely analogous to that of a foreign corporation ; the personality of the latter being conferred upon it by its own municipal law, while that of the former is created by the public law of nations.”

“Foreign States, or bodies politic created by international law, occupy a position analogous to that of foreign corporations. In the case of monarchical governments, the Sovereign may be regarded as a corporation sole, representing the State; in the case of democratic or republican governments, the State itself, under its international name or style, as a body politic, may be regarded as a corporation aggregate.”

“Neither a personal Sovereign nor a body politic (or State) may be sued in an English Court, unless the privilege of sovereignty has been waived, expressly or impliedly, by voluntary submission to the jurisdiction or otherwise.”

Bring their BIRTH CERTIFICATE to court and lay it down on a copy of The Holy Bible and on top of that, lay down your Expatriation of your identical NAME from their domicile and back to the land and soil of your birth state. Add the Certificate of Assumed Name on top of that—- and stare the Judge in the eye.

You, as an American, are owed the full faith and credit provided by every municipal and territorial corporation on Earth.  You, as a British Territorial or Municipal “Citizen” are a slave and are owed nothing at all, not even common decency.

You make the choice.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:


06 25 18 Please Note Again


By Anna Von Reitz

I Do NOT “recommend” establishing TDA Accounts UNLESS you actually are a Federal United States Citizen (federal civil or military employee) or dependent (receiving free gratis welfare that you did not in fact pay for from the Federales).

TDA’s are not any kind of Magic Bullet. They have, apparently, been utilized in some cases (so far) to ameliorate debts owed by federal citizens. If you are not a federal citizen— employee or actual dependent — stay out of their system.

The difference is the difference between the relief you get in bankruptcy from debts you ran up irresponsibly, and the relief you get in probate when your property and assets are returned to you free and clear following a hearing to determine your status.

If you actually want to buy Federal bonds, such as Savings Bonds, Treasury Bonds, etc., and have logical need for such an account on a continuing basis, that is what those accounts were primarily designed for.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:


06 23 18 The whole and REAL REASONS behind gun control


by Douglas J. Hagmann

The Constitutional government of the United States has been overthrown, and the American people have been captured. The only question now is what are we, as true Americans believing that our Constitution is the one and only law of the land, going to do about it?

It’s now simply a matter of what the blow back from the tyranny being thrust upon us will look like, how or even if it will play out.
If you are looking for normal political solutions out of this legal, financial, moral and spiritual mess of a country, I believe that time has long passed. If you’re hope rests in a change with the midterm elections, go back to sleep or better yet, increase the dosage of your medication.

It is clearly evident by the actions and inaction of the spineless or compromised leaders in whom you’ve placed your hope and future, and the future of your children and grandchildren, that doing so again will change nothing. We are a captured operation, and partisan politics is nothing more than theater to divert your attention from the iron fist of tyranny that is about to change life as you know it.

You must understand that our nation today is ruled not by democrats or republicans, but by the party of royalty with a European mindset and a Globalist agenda. The morphing from a two-party system into one of elite royalty did not happen overnight, but incrementally and under the proverbial radar of a deliberately distracted public.

Much of what you see, hear and read is a lie so big that you don’t recognize it as a lie, and so bold that it operates without question or impediment right in front of us. There are plenty of writers and talkers who will sugar-coat the lie or participate in political theater for air time, print space or a paycheck, but I refuse to be one of them.

Allow me to walk you through my investigative findings into the “Obama conspiracy” to show you just how deep the lie goes. By the end of this summary report, I hope that you will better understand the lie, the objectives of those involved, and the fate intended for us all.
They are not coming for our guns!

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against… We’re after power and we mean it… There’s no way to rule innocent men.

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone?

But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.” -Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged.

Would you believe me if I wrote that the government is not after our guns? Probably not, as it certainly looks that way with the pending executive orders and new gun legislation. Well, the guns are secondary. I urge you to think bigger, “think outside of the box.” Make no mistake about this, they will come after our guns, but they are coming after us.

By believing in the Constitution, we’ve earned ourselves a spot on the latest incarnation of the White House enemies list. By supporting the Constitution as the ultimate law of the land, we’ve identified ourselves as an enemy of the state. By “clinging” to our guns and Bibles, we pose a danger to the globalist agenda rooted in socialism, fascism and communism.

By understanding that we are being victimized by an out-of-control banking system, we have earned a spot on the “single-cause” terrorist watch list. By becoming informed of the tyranny that exists before us, we have become a threat to their ultimate global objectives.

They are afraid of not just the guns, but of by a well armed and well informed populace that understands the meaning and intent of the Second Amendment. It is the well informed and the well armed that they fear, as they should. The are racing against the clock as we become more informed and better armed. Accordingly, they must act in haste, as they see us rapidly peeling away the layers of lies that have kept them insulated for so long.

Certainly, they will attempt to get our guns, but make no mistake that it’s us, or those unwilling to be serfs, who they are after. Their hunt will be relentless, matching their end-game objective of creating the royal elite while enslaving the unwashed.

Those among us who believe they can talk their way out of an illegal government confiscation by claiming the loss of their guns in some boating accident are self-deluded and not understanding the larger picture. Adherence to this delusion is not only childish and naive, but a dangerous underestimation of the intent of the tyranny that lies before us. We must face what lies ahead like adults and prepare ourselves accordingly.
What lies ahead? “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” -Ecclesiastes 1; 9 (KJV)

The hour is late and time is short. A rapid understanding of the lie and how deep it goes is required right here, right now. We can briefly look at a few key events that not have changed history, but will also reveal the tyrannical playbook of the global elite that has remained unchanged for the past century.

From the attack on Pearl Harbor to the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK, to the Gulf of Tonkin incident through the attack that “changed the world” on September 11, 2001, each event is deeply mired in various levels of deception, controversy, inconsistencies, unanswered questions, and conflicting accounts. The farther we travel away from each event, the less chance the actual truth will ever be made known, at least in time to make a difference.

Even worse, reasonable people seeking sensible and honest answers and wanting nothing less than the complete truth are routinely vilified and forced into accepting the “official” accounts of the various events being questioned.
Two of the most recent relevant issues that remain mired in controversy and off limits to inquiring minds are Obama’s eligibility status and the attacks of September 11, 2001. Despite “official accounts” regarding the former, the issue remains a legitimate controversy to the extent that Barack Hussein Obama II, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, has yet to prove his eligibility to hold office under the Constitution of the United States.

Despite what has been reported or accepted as fact, Obama has never produced authenticated hardcopy documentation of his Certificate of Live Birth, verification of his social security number and related documentation, his selective service documents, or his official passport records.

Even the most hard-core conservatives have long argued that the entire eligibility matter is a fringe issue unworthy of discussion. Much like the previous controversies referenced, we are forbidden to have a sensible discussion on the matter, at least not without obligatory vilification. Yet, vital and relevant questions remain unanswered amid the requisite obfuscation, diversion and yes, vilification.

We are not permitted to know the bona-fides of the man who is tasked with transforming the United States from a Constitutional Republic into a tyrannical kingdom of royalty and serfs. Questions related to his eligibility are never answered. Instead, they are met with accusations of racism and bigotry where none is ever intended or warranted.

Such questions are also met with objections that the issue distracts from other more important issues. What could be more important than the background and eligibility of the man who holds the most powerful position in our country and arguably, the world? Perhaps never allowing these questions to be addressed was the plan from the start. If so, it’s a tactic that certainly fits with information that follows.

Also, there remain very legitimate and very relevant questions about the attack of September 11, 2001, “the event that changed the world.” Instead of being able to hold a rational, thoughtful discourse about valid concerns, any questions are met with accusations that those asking the questions are lunatics enamored by delusions of some grand conspiracy.

Are we not entitled to answers about an event that resulted in the creation of governmental policies and agencies that are responsible for the most intrusive attacks on the liberties of every American?

From the attacks of 9/11 to Obama’s eligibility to even the most basic questions surrounding the recent Sandy Hook school shooting (yes, there are inconsistencies in need of answers), we cannot have a reasonable discussion without being castigated and marginalized as conspiracy nuts. You see that the stage for asking such questions has been set throughout time. After all, who are we, the unwashed masses, to question our “leaders” about anything of substance?

Now, those of us who seek only the truth must fight against the putrid hubris of the likes of Obama and his minions, the Clintons, the Feinsteins, the Cuomos, New York Mayor Bloomberg, and others who hold the reins of power.

To be completely honest and fair, such unbridled hubris extends to those on the right as well, including the members of Bush dynasty, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham and countless others. Again, we are not governed by political parties, but ruled by royalty who have erected firewalls of protection against the common people, us – the serfs.

Although they did not create the current perspective, they most assuredly embraced and advanced it. How dare we, the uninitiated and unwashed, question their words and actions? Their tasks become easier as they have firmly entrenched their advance teams within the press to further their objectives. They know the power of the airwaves and print, and use the likes of Piers Morgan, the chameleon for the modern day Camelot and arguably a man with no love for our Constitutional Republic to do their bidding.

The political right has similar truth suppressors who trade their morals and integrity for a paycheck, and the future of our nation for a promised seat at the table of power. And we, the people who have built this nation with the sweat of our brow and the skin from our knuckles, are scolded like children when we dare ask for the truth.

Such is the perspective or the backdrop from which we must now operate.
Obama: selected? to be the last president.
America is more than a piece of land. It is a mindset, an ideology that was founded on the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. Our founders left England and established our great nation to rid themselves of the oppression we are seeing return with even greater force and oppressiveness.

But something happened to many of us over the years to make us more accepting of the British or European model of governance, which is exactly what we are seeing take over our nation. It is the push for globalism, a global governance, a singular mindset drafted and choreographed by the most rich and powerful families of the world.

As Americans, we’ve been set up. Perhaps it began in 1913, when America was force fed the lie of our current and corrupt monetary system with the establishment of the Federal Reserve. Then came the creation of the Internal Revenue Service, which was a consolidation of power regulating our wealth. From the League of Nations to the United Nations, the push for consolidation of power by the few to rule the many has been the objective.

As we progressed through the Twentieth century, can we now look back and see with increasing clarity that Communist infiltration of nearly every branch of government, our centers of higher learning and all schools, compliments of the creation of the Department of Education, as well as the press? Can we now see with clarity that America, too strong to be taken down from the outside, is being taken down from within?

Can any rational, sane person explain the run-up to, and consequences of the financial crisis of 2008? Our unbridled debt of over 16 TRILLION dollars? As you watch the evening news or listen to political pundits talk of recovery and improving economic conditions, do you wonder what planet they are from, or whether they actually believe their lies? Do you honestly believe that we had fair elections in 2012? How about 2008, 2004 or even 2000?

America was set up from the inside to be destroyed. Our children have been sold into slavery to illegal debt created by a cabal of central banks based… in London. Perhaps that’s the reason Barack Hussein Obama, or whatever his real name is, is so reluctant to show his papers, as perhaps he’s really a British citizen, as his father, who hailed from Kenya, was actually a British subject, which would make Obama a British national.
Could it be that we’ve been taken over once again by the British empire? Is European socialism being used a as a stepping stone to Communism and then to global governance, or a “New World Order?”

When the American dollar collapses, and it must, which country will play a major role in replacing our defunct economic system? Great Britain? So, in one fell swoop, America will become beholden to Great Britain and all of its laws once again.

People like Michael Savage, who is already on Her Majesty’s radar might want to consider those implications. Perhaps that’s why Piers Morgan is smirking and acting as if he owns America.
In any event, what are we, true American patriots and not just keyboard warriors, prepared to do about it? The time to decide is now. The time to act will be soon.

January 18, 2013
Obama Playing Chicken with American Men
By Daren Jonescu

The Obama administration’s current warpath against so-called “gun violence” — which is Newspeak for non-violence committed by non-criminals with their non-illegal private property — is a brazen challenge to America’s manhood. The progressives have apparently decided that this is the moment when they can play their ultimate authoritarian hand, and let the chips fall where they may. They believe, in other words, that this is the moment when they may be able to break America at last, one way or another.

Through Obama’s forceful, smug insistence on taking action in defiance of Congress, along with the aggressive urging to do so from his sycophants in the progressive elite — from the vice president and the senate majority leader on down — the leftists are engaging in a game of chicken with the American spirit that is disturbing both for its immediate intentions and for its revelation of their thought process and game plan.

In light of the well-known fact that their proposals and trial balloons will be judged by millions of Americans to be an outright violation of constitutionally protected liberties — and liberties of the most emotionally trenchant nature, namely those related to the very foundations of limited government — the progressives’ deliberate projection of haste and intransigence on gun control must not merely be taken at face value, and judged on its “merits.” It must also be interpreted — in other words, one must ask precisely what they are hoping to achieve by attacking the most deeply held principles of so many Americans in such a heavy-handed fashion.

It seems to me that there are two plausible interpretations of their open chastisement of “all this debate” over Second Amendment concerns, i.e., their boisterous spitting upon the U.S. Constitution.
The first option is that they believe the citizenry of the once-freest nation on earth will ultimately be first to flinch in this game of chicken, and back down. This is the simplest explanation. Having tested the waters on so many fronts, and prepared the population with generations of propaganda about the evils of guns (and so little clarity about the meaning of limited government) from the educational establishment and the media, the left may have determined that, for all the tough talk, American gun owners will not, in the end, have the nerve to stand firm against a federal order to produce their weapons for registration, to submit their guns and themselves to a federal tracking system, or even, eventually, to relinquish legally-purchased property that has newly been ruled illegal.

The second possibility is that they know the public has not been sufficiently softened up to begin the “peaceful” disarming of America suggested by option one, and are therefore hoping to precipitate the kind of “serious crisis” the Obama administration has vowed never to let go to waste. This second possibility is appearing more likely to be the administration’s real intention each day.

Consider the extent to which the federal government has gone, during the past four years, to brand conservatives, Christians, defenders of the Constitution, gun owners, and in general believers in property rights, as not merely racist and stupid (the usual mantra), but rather as angry, “bitter,” and positively unhinged.

These are not mere insinuations; government representatives, spokesmen, and apologists have been saying such things with increasing directness and frequency since 2008. A “study” funded by DHS expressly lists people who are “reverent of individual liberty” or “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” among the common potential terror threats (p. 9). Obama himself, during his 2008 campaign, suggested in no uncertain terms that “clinging” to a Bible and/or a gun — i.e., believing in God or the right to bear arms — is a clear symptom of serious psychological problems, and equivalent to racism. And of course almost every mass killing over the past couple of years has been blamed on the Tea Party by someone in the media (see here) — until, inevitably, the facts prove otherwise — thereby creating the general impression that the Tea Party is a natural repository of “people on the edge,” regardless of whether they turn out to have committed any crimes.

The Obama team knows full well that its words and actions are causing fear, anger, and heightened vigilance among conservatives. The spikes in gun sales, NRA memberships, and harsh anti-government talk all over the internet are an unmistakable sign of a population preparing for — for something ugly. And yet they push forward, threatening specific action and escalating the anti-gun rhetoric with each passing day.

And the prodding is clever. Prior to this direct assault on the right to bear arms, the single Obama program most hated by constitutionalists was the Affordable Care Act. Now, ingeniously, the left has found a way to bring these two great affronts to individual liberty together under one umbrella. A major focus of Obama’s executive actions on gun violence is the promotion of ObamaCare’s mental health provisions as a suitable mechanism for dealing with preemptive psychiatry, i.e., drugging wayward children, labeling people in their federal government records as mentally ill, and using doctors as informants to track guns in private homes.

In sum, they could not be stoking pre-revolutionary fever any more effectively among that minority of America’s citizenry that still stands by the nation as an idea, rather than merely as a piece of geography, if they had planned to stoke it. The only question remaining, it seems, is where all of this will lead.

Consider the following possibility — common sense dictates that the progressives have already considered it. Someday, federal officers are going to visit the home of a man who owns a so-called “assault-style weapon.” He has a family and a job. He pays his taxes. He has no criminal record. Not even a parking ticket. He purchased his gun legally. He uses it for target shooting. He thinks of it as an investment in the protection of his family and his nation, and his personal stand for constitutional liberty.

The federal officers are going to tell him that his weapon has been banned, that the deadline has passed for him to turn it in at the local police station, and that he must turn it over immediately. He is going to refuse, on the reasonable principle that a man is not obliged to obey a law that fundamentally violates his constitutionally protected rights.

The officers, who will have been trained to regard such “resisters” as hostile and as mentally unstable, will call in for back-up and then give this law-abiding patriot an ultimatum: produce your banned weapon peacefully at once, or be taken into custody on charges of illegal possession of a firearm, and possibly subjected to psychiatric assessment.

If this man gives in and hands the officers his weapon, he will feel for the rest of his life that he has been broken — that when push came to shove, he did not have the courage to stand up for his children’s future. This, in short, is how the federal officials who sent the officers to his door want him to feel, and how they want everyone to feel: weak, ineffectual, emasculated, and submissive. It is how they want you to feel when federal agents molest your wife at the airport, and photograph your pubescent daughter in a naked scanner.

It is how they want you to feel about your “private” health records being permanently on file with a half dozen federal agencies, to be opened at their discretion. It is how they want you to feel about the thousand bank-breaking regulations you are obliged to comb through and comply with in the names of “sustainability,” “social justice,” “anti-discrimination,” and a dozen other fronts in the war on self-governance.

These indignities are meant to ease you through the process of acceptance, of acquiescence, of relinquishing all pretences of inviolable principle in the name of getting along. This scenario — this Conrad-style moment of reckoning for a man, before himself, his wife, and his children — will in fact likely be played out in many variations. Those officers might be coming for high-capacity magazines, for guns reported by a child’s playmate as unsafely stored, guns reported as unregistered, guns owned by people with relatives who have been diagnosed as “depressed” by a doctor, and so on.

Most of the property owners in question will likely give in to the government’s demands, and many of them will do so willingly, believing it their duty to obey the law above all else.

Those who do not comply, on the other hand, will be a test case, at the very least. When the government is challenging a proud man’s dignity, his natural rights, and his courage in the face of a tyrannical demand, they are daring him to become a martyr to his cause. (See Mark Alexander’s declaration at The Patriot Post.) In the authoritarian’s mind, government wins either way. If the man gives in, subservience is reinforced. If he does not, then he can be made an example of, to serve as a stern warning to others.

This is not a moment to be taken lightly. Nor is it one to be welcomed with excessive “bring it on” bravado. America, which is emulating the rest of the West’s decline, but at double-speed in these final stages, has reached the saddest impasse. Unlike other nations, which have passively sold off their freedom for the false security of a smiling, cradle to grave despotism, America has seen it coming, has resisted it with force, and is now about to be dragged off the cliff kicking and screaming.

The challenge facing the men of America — not the mere “males,” but the men — is becoming clearer, starker, and more essential every day. That minority of us in the rest of the world who still care about freedom and modern civilization can only watch, with concern, sadness and hope, as the U.S. federal government, having reached its moment of final metamorphosis — its “fundamental transformation” — stares its patriotic citizens in the eye and says, “I dare you.”

From the land of rebellious individualism of intellect – the land of Madison, Jefferson, Emerson and Melville; to the land of an almost careless abandonment to joy — the land of Astaire, Ellington, Gershwin and Singin’ In the Rain; to the brink of sorrow and downtroddenness, in such a short time, historically speaking. Surely it’s too soon for this glorious run to end.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2013/01/obama_playing_chicken_with_american_men.html at January 26, 2013 – 04:37:20 PM CST


06 22 18 American Un-Intelligence Network. All Actual White Hats Be Aware!


By Anna Von Reitz

I have just issued a short and scathing article explaining to everyone that the Norman Conquest happened.

I know it may be “Big News” to those who dropped out in the Sixth Grade, but if you are an actual “White Hat”, then stop promoting self-interested British Bunko and remember basic historical facts.

King John was not “king” in Britain.  That right was shared by all the Norman Barons who were the conquerors in 1066 and their progeny— their great–great grandsons in the early 1200’s when the whole issue of The Magna Carta and John’s double-dealing with the Pope arose.

All John had was a title — and a title is nothing more than a function of a trust, in this case, the Church’s trust property in England at the time—the churches, monasteries, and other assets of the Roman Catholic Church, together with whatever “commonwealth” wasteland was given to the church’s administration. It does not involve the rest of us then or now.

Those who are misinterpreting or deliberately spreading this gross disinformation about King John need to be shut down–intellectually– with extreme prejudice, because they are knowingly or unknowingly promoting not only a gross falsehood, but are seeking to build a basis for equally false British claims in the present time against our nation.

Britain does not own us any more than “King” John owned the Norman Conquerors, and his actions do not undermine The Magna Carta then or now.

If the idea was not so pernicious, it would be laughable, so let’s all laugh — and tune up your Shinola Sensors and clue in “American Intelligence Network” that they have fallen on their noses and will be known as “American Un-Intelligence Network” and a storefront for the British Bunko Squad until they redeem themselves.

Remember that these Brits work under Roman Civil Law, and one of the main Maxims of Roman Civil Law is: “Let him who will be deceived, be deceived.”

If they can fool you into thinking you are a slave or subject to them, then you are.

If you don’t know the history of the Norman Conquest and The Magna Carta and you believe their false re-telling of it, then that becomes your reality and you naturally fall victim to all their other lies and the false assumptions resulting from them.

It therefore behooves everyone to crack the books and examine the circumstances and know the history and the law so that you recognize it when these people try to pass a Whopper like this whole “King John and the Pope” story off on you.

Remember Amos?  “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”  Remember “Study to make yourself approved.”

A man cannot be lazy and free.

As I explained earlier today, the actual circumstance is that the Britain doesn’t actually own anything related to the United States and was only allowed to exercise “Delegated Power” in the Territorial United States.  Britain acted in Gross Breach of Trust and Fraud and Usurpation against our actual Federal Government and so, abused our Delegated Powers for a hundred and fifty years.

One of its primary abuses was to misuse our Patent Office to create a system of Territorial and Municipal Governments that then “enfranchised” all the commercial corporations.  This nefarious activity was staged out of our Patent Office in the (vain) hope and assumption that Britain would not be detected as the source of this foul scheme and we would be blamed for it, if it ever came to public knowledge.

Well, it has come to public knowledge.  And so has the bankruptcy fraud.  And so have the “Life Force Value Annuities”.  And so has the whole lousy, rotten, immoral, barbaric, fraudulent “Birth Certificate” system.  And so has the “dollar for dollar” exchange rate.  And so has the quasi-military court system.  And so has the role of the “American” Bar Association.  And so has the plot to undermine and vacate the constitutional agreements from the federal side of the equation.

It’s all exposed. And the perpetrators responsible are not the Americans.  The perpetrators are the Brits who usurped upon our Delegated Powers by means of fraud and semantic deceit.

Ironically, as Our Father would have it, because the Brits did all this evil “in our names” and used our Patent and Trademark Office and Copyright Office to do it, we are the actual owners of all the Territorial and Municipal Governments worldwide, and therefore also the owners of the charters of all the commercial corporations that those “governments” issued.  Not the Queen.

Always remember that she held only delegated power. She never had any power of her own on our shores.  She merely operated in Gross Breach of Trust and commercial contract and used our own powers to abuse us and everyone else.

And now that the rats have finally outsmarted themselves by rendering all three levels of the “federal government” incompetent, and by Operation of Law, all the delegated powers have returned to the Delegating Authority, The United States of America [Unincorporated], and we have acknowledged, accepted, and re-conveyed those delegated powers back to our control—-Britain no longer has a word to say to our government, except perhaps — “We’re terribly, terribly sorry. We will be happy to return all the assets that are owed to you.”

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: