Who Is Running America?

11/30/2017

http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

Those of you who are died in the wool believers of the lies we were taught in school, newspapers, television and people you love should wake up and smell the poop; and here it is in plain text. Don’t you think it’s time to wake up and smell the stench you love so dearly?

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States,
and the New World Order

From Archive Sources

Who is running America? Have you ever asked that question?

Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, “Government As Parent”, as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the assets of the American people, their person, and of our country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as “debt money” by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation, the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the banking interests, and the Internal Revenue Service, the system’s collection agency.

Now you know who is running America!

You might want to take exception to the name on the marquee at the entrance to 55 Water Street.

??? . . . “Tower of Power” . . . ???

Another thing to think about — who owns the media and the news you are fed???
Guess Who???         An Independent Press??? Ha!!!

Did you ever hear of the Independent Treasury Act of 1920? No, you say…. Hmmmmmmm….?

The Independent Treasury Act of 1920 suspended the de jure (meaning “by right of legal establishment”) Treasury Department of the United States government. Our Congress turned the treasury department over to a private corporation, which when seen in its true light, is a fascist monopolistic cartel, the Federal Reserve and their agents. The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept secret from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests, and NONE is held by the United States Treasury:

Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

The Federal Reserve is at the root of most of our present statutory regulations, “laws”, in the control and regulation of virtually all aspects of human activity in the United States, through successively socialistic constructions laid upon the Commerce clause of the Constitution. Basically, the Federal Reserve is the “STATE” of the United States.

See “Our Enemy, The STATE” by Albert J. Nock – 1935, his Classic Critique Distinguishing “Government” from the “STATE.”

See Also Charts in Text Format of Interlocking Directorships and Family Linkages taken from Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.”

See Also Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins.

Thomas Jefferson once said:

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)

Jefferson’s prophesy has come true.

How did this happen? ……Hmmmmm….. Well, that is going to take a while to explain.

All our law is private law, written by The National Law Institute, Law Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of Foreign Banking interests. They have come to this position of writing the law by fraudulently deleting the “Titles of Nobility and Honour” Thirteenth Amendment from the Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and Bankers controlling all three branches of our government. Most of our law comes directly through the Hague or the U.N. Almost all U.N. treaties have been codified into the U.S. codes. That’s where all our educational programs originate. The U.N. controls our education system.

The Federal Register Act was created by Pres. Roosevelt in 1935. Title 3 sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave himself the power to create federal agencies and appoint a head of the agency. He then re-delegated his authority to make law (statutory regulations) to those agency heads. One big problem there, the president has no constitutional authority to make law. Under the Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a felony breach.

The president then gave the agencies the authority to tax. We now have government by appointment running this country. This is the shadow government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to as government by appointment. This type of government represents taxation without representation.

Perhaps this is why some people believe the Constitution was suspended. It wasn’t suspended, it was buried in bureaucratic red tape.

Now, it is an historical fact that with the Declaration of Independence, to provide a united effort during and after the War for Independence, the Colonies as independent nations joined together under the Articles of Confederation, and as Independent Sovereign States drew up constitutions which formed governments to serve the people of each former colony. The Articles of Confederation, after a period of 8 years, were determined to have several flaws. The Congress of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to correct the flaws. The Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of Confederation as directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to write an entirely new Constitution, which when ratified by the State Conventions of the Freemen of the Individual States, created the Federal government to serve them in those areas where the States operating individually could not effectively serve. In this new Constitution the people and the States delegated to the Federal government certain responsibilities, reserving all rights not so enumerated to the States and to the People in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. As a consequence, the responsibility of the State became one of protecting the people from the tyranny of federal government, to insure that the federal government did not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This worked fairly effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.

The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court Administrators, the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and State Legislators, and the Governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of the Council of State Governments. The Council of State Governments is located at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into the National Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the Bar Association.

The movement for uniform state laws dates back more than a century. The Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as 1881, but it was nearly a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of the ABA in 1889, that the legal community made its formal motion to work for uniformity in the then 44 state union. New York was the first state to move, appointing three commissioners in 1890. Other states soon heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the first Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York, in 1892. The commissioners wasted no time. They urged adoption of three acts and proposed raising the marrying age to 18 for males and 16 for females. They also adopted a table of weights and measures, noting that with the exception of wheat, legal weights of a bushel varied in all the states.

By the turn of the century, 33 states and two territories had appointed commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only Nevada and the Territory of Alaska still had not; they came aboard in 1912.

100 YEARS OF UNIFORM LAWS
An Abridged Chronology

1890 – New York state legislature passes first state act authorizing governor to appoint three commissioners. The American Bar Association (ABA)recommends that other states follow New York’s lead.

1891 – Connecticut’s Lyman D. Brewster named to chair newly-created ABA committee on uniform law. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Delaware appoint commissioners.

1892 – First conference held in Saratoga Springs New York. Above states plus Georgia attend formal meeting.

1893 – Committees appointed on such subjects as wills, marriage and divorce, commercial law, descent and distribution.

1895 – Conference requests committee on commercial law be formed. Drafts, Negotiable Instrument Law, precursor to Article 3 of Uniform Commercial Code.

1896 – Negotiable Instrument Law approved by Conference. First time that a uniform act is adopted in every state and the District of Columbia.

1897 – For the first time, Commissioners urged to work toward enactment of uniform legislation in their states.

1898/1899 – Sessions devoted to the consideration of proposed divorce legislation.

1899 – At the end of the 1890s, 33 of the existing 45 states and two territories had appointed uniform law commissioners and eight uniform acts had been drafted, each enacted in at least one state. All these acts were subsequently superseded or declared obsolete.

1900 – Uniform Divorce Procedure Act adopted. Louis B. Brandeis begins five years of service as member of Massachusetts commission.

1901 – Woodrow Wilson begins tenure (until 1908) as commissioner from New Jersey.

1903 – ABA makes first appropriation in support of work of Conference. James Barr Ames of Harvard Law School commissioned to draft the Uniform Partnership Act.

1905 – Samuel W. Pennypacker, Pennsylvania Governor, invites other governors to send delegation to a national divorce conference–meets twice in 1906; three acts endorsed.

1906 – First roll call by states as Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act is approved. Legal scholar Roscoe Pound serves for one year as a commissioner from Nebraska.

1907 – Uniform Desertion Act and Non-Support Act and Uniform Marriage Act authorized. Act Regulating Annulment of Marriage of Divorce adopted. Also, Act Providing for the Return of Marriage Statistics, Act Providing for the Return of Divorce Statistics.

1908 – Work begins on Uniform Corporation Act.

1910 – Twenty uniform acts approved in decade of the teens. The Uniform Partnership Act, begun in 1906, was completed by William Draper Lewis, Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

1911 – Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act and Uniform Child Labor Act approved.

1912 – Uniform Marriage Evasion Act adopted. Woodrow Wilson, commissioner from New Jersey from 1901 to 1908 elected U.S. President in a landslide.

1914 – Uniform Partnership Act completed. Will be adopted by all the states. Also Foreign Acknowledgement Act, Cold Storage Act, Workmens’s Compensation Act.

1915 – Name changed to National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Constitution and by-laws completely revised. Each act now must be considered section by section during at least two annual meetings.

1916 – Uniform Limited Partnership Act as well as Extradition of Persons of Unsound Minds Act approved, also Land Registration Act.

1917 – Uniform Flag Act approved.

1918 – Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act approved.

1920 – Certain Acts withdrawn; others declared obsolete. After pruning, 26 acts remain as recommended for passage in state legislatures.

1930 – During the 30s, Conference adopts 31 acts.

1935 – Conference entered into agreement with American Law Institute for cooperative drafting of acts in area of common interest.

1936 – After revisions, withdrawals and acts declared obsolete, 53 uniform acts remained as recommended for approval.

On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning “COMMON LAW” in the federal government.

“THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE, WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW or a part of LAW OF TORTS.” (See: ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)

The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties. The members and associates of the Bar thereafter formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and further, to amend laws “to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to accomplish similar objectives”, including hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is known today as “One Form of Action.” [See: Constitution and By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, see also Colorado Methods of Practice, West Publishing, Vol. 4, pages 2-3, Authors Comments.]

1939 – ABA gets more involved in approval of uniform law products. Thirty-nine acts are presented to the Board of Governors of the ABA for consideration and approval. During the same year, all acts on aeronautics and motor vehicles are eliminated as well as the Land Registration Act, Child Labor Act of 1930, Uniform Divorce Jurisdiction Act, Firearms Act, Marriage Act and more. Six acts are reclassified as Model acts.

1940 – At start of decade, after deletions, etc., 53 acts out of 93 which had been approved since the group’s founding remain on the books. Drafting committee for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) approved.

1941 – Speaking of the Commercial Code project, the Conference president states: “….this is the most important and the most far reaching project on which the conference has ever embarked.” It would take the major part of the next 10 tear period to complete.

1942 – UCC effort begins in earnest with completion of work on the revised Uniform Sales Act.

1943 – Members of the conference participate in drafting committee in Washington, D.C. to work on legislation which the government might desire in connection with the war effort. No new acts.

1944 – Conference receives $150,000 grant from the Falk Foundation of Pittsburgh to support work on the UCC.

1945 – No annual meeting for the first time due to difficulties of civilian transport during the war.

1946 – Falk Foundation increases its support of the UCC with an additional $100,000.

1947 – Uniform Law Conference (ULC) and American Law Institute join in partnership to put all the components together for the UCC. Uniform Divorce Recognition Act approved.

1950 – Approval of the Uniform Marriage License Application Act, Uniform Adoption Act and the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). The latter has been one of the most successful ULC products.

1951 – On May 18, during a joint meeting with the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C., the UCC was approved. Later that year the ABA formally approved the code as well. Considered the outstanding accomplishment of the Conference, the Code remains the ULC’s signature product.

One of the Uniform Laws drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute governing commercial transactions (including sales and leasing of goods, transfer of funds, commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk transfers, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and secured transactions), The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted in whole or substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg. 1531) In essence, all court decisions are based on commercial law or business law and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly calling this new law Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, it is called Statutory Jurisdiction.

America as a bankrupt nation is owned completely by its creditors.

The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State governments. Do you have a Birth Certificate? They own you too.

1952 – Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure approved—first venture of the Conference into this area of the law.

1953 – Pennsylvania the first state to enact the UCC. Uniform Rules of Evidence adopted.

1954 – Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act approved.

1956 – Gift to Minors Act approved. Will be adopted in every state. For the first time, ULC enters the field of international law.

1957 – Massachusetts becomes second state to enact the UCC, after revisions by the Editorial Board.

1958 – Uniform Securities Act approved.

1960 – Uniform Paternity Act passed. by 1960, UCC enacted in Kentucky, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

1961 – Permanent Editorial Board on the UCC formed—8 more states pass UCC. Constitution amended to provide that all members of Conference must be members of the bar.

1962 – Four more states adopt UCC, including New York. Probate Code project approved.

1963 – Third comprehensive law project approved, on retail installment sales, consumer credit, small loans and usury. Eleven more UCC states. William H. Renquist begins term as commissioner from Arizona; serves until 1968.

1964 – Special Committee of Uniform Divorce and Marriage laws recommends that a study of divorce law be authorized and that funds be sought. One more UCC state.

1965 – Divorce and Marriage Law committee instructed to commence drafting if funds can be obtained for the project. Thirteen more UCC states.

1966 – Five more UCC states.

1968 – Much of annual meeting devoted to the Uniform Consumer Credit Code and the Uniform Probate Code —two projects nearing completion. By 1968, 49 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted the UCC—only exception being Louisiana. A big year. Other developments in 1968: the Consumer Credit Code is approved as well as revisions to the Anatomical Gift Act, Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and revisions to URESA.

1969 – Probate Code approved. Preliminary analysis of the uniform marriage and divorce legislation distributed.

1970 – Controlled Substances Act and Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act approved.

1971 – Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Act approved.

1972 – Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Disposition of Community Property Rights At Death Act and UMVARA, the Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act approved.

1973 – Uniform Parentage Act supersedes Paternity Act. Uniform Crime Victims Reparations Act approved.

1974 – Conference approves Rules of Criminal Procedure and Eminent Domain Code. Louisiana, the only state not to adopt the Uniform Commercial Code due to difficulties in reconciling its provisions with those of the Civil Code, adopts Articles 1,3,4,5,7, and 8.

1975 – Uniform Land Transactions Act approved.

1976 – Major revision of the Uniform Partnership Act approved; also Uniform Simplification of Land Transfers and Uniform Class Action Acts.

1978 – Uniform Brain Death and Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act approved.

1979 – Uniform Trade Secrets and Durable Power of Attorney acts among those approved.

1980 – Determination of Death Act supersedes 1978 Brain Death Act. Uniform Planned Community Act, Model Real Estate Time-Share Act and Model Periodic Payment of Judgments Act also adopted.

1981 – Two important updated acts approved: new Model State Administration Procedure and Unclaimed Property Acts. Also two new acts: the Model Real Estate Cooperative Act and the Uniform Conservation Easement Act.

1982 – Uniform Condominium and Planned Community Acts and Model Real Estate Cooperative Act combined into the Uniform Common Interest Ownership act.

The enumerated, specified, and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgepodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland. This was the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just as 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between Actions At Law and Suits in Equity, this CHANGE WOULD ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY.” (See: Federal Rules of Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17. Also see Federalist Papers, No. 83, Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress, Oct. 14th, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms, July 16, 1775, Declaration Of Independence, July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 669)

1983 – Uniform Marital Property Act and Uniform Premarital agreement Act approved. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act replaces the uniformly enacted Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.

1984 – Uniform Statutory Will Act approved; new Uniform fraudulent Transfer Act supersedes Fraudulent Conveyance Act of 1918.

1985 – Uniform Health-Care Information Act, Uniform Land Security Interest act, Uniform Personal Property Leasing Act and Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act approved.

1986 – New drafting effort to revise Articles 3 and 4 of the UCC and draft new provisions begins.

1987 – Approval of the revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act approved as well as new Uniform Custodial Trust Act, Uniform Construction Lien Act and Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities Act. Also revision of Rules of Criminal Procedure.

1988 – Final approval of amendments to the Uniform Securities Act and amendments to Article 6 of the UCC dealing with bulk sales. Conference also approves Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act and Uniform Punitive and Unknown Fathers Act and takes on the controversial issue of surrogate mother contracts with Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.

1989 – Article 4A of the UCC, dealing with electronic funds transfers, approved. Also approved: amendments to the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, authorizing withdrawal of life support by a surrogate decision maker; the Uniform Pretrial Detention Act, confining violent criminals before trial; the Uniform Non-probate Transfers on Death Act and amendments to Article VI of the Uniform Probate Code.

1990 – Major revision of 1970 Uniform Controlled Substances Act– the law in 46 jurisdictions– approved. Substantial revision of UCC Article 3 also approved, as well as an updated Article II of the Uniform Probate Code, to keep pace with current thinking on marital property.

This private corruption of the law has occurred despite the Constitutional responsibility conferred on Congress by Article I, Section 8 of the Federal Constitution which states that it is Congress that “makes all Laws.”

What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws seem to be a good Idea.

Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue…..

An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans

THE COURTS RECOGNIZE ONLY TWO CLASSES OF PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY: DEBTORS AND CREDITORS

The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very important to understand.

Every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or anything else government might dream up to charge you where you find yourself in front of a court. It is an equity court, administrating commercial law having a debtor-creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we have an equity court but not an equity court as defined by the Constitution of the United States or any other legal documents before 1938.

All the courts of this once great land have been changed starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V. THOMPKINS. I’ll give you background which led to this decision. There is a terrible FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year continuous fraud. This fraud is constantly upon you all your life. It doesn’t just happen once in a while. This fraud is perpetually and incessantly upon you and your family.

U.S. INC. GOES TO GENEVA 1930’s

In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know the history of its inception.

It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find them because they don’t publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelt’s job was to put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two years earlier. The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy. Now. this doesn’t mean the bankruptcy wasn’t implemented before 1938 with the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn in during the month of January 1933. He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as ‘The Banking Holiday,” and proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That was the beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for bankruptcy.. Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 & Executive Order 6260 “Trading With The Enemy Act.”

ROOSEVELT STACKS SUPREME COURT

It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937 – 1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case which would support their bankruptcy problem.

There was resistance to Roosevelt’s court stacking efforts. Some of the justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new procedure for the law of the land. See also The UCC Connection

THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES GOES BANKRUPT

A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states). This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C, (the headquarters of the corporation called “The United States”).

Since the United States Corporation, having established its headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the corporate state governments of the Union). The corporate state governments didn’t have to vote on the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason of the Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. (Note: the liberty of using the term “Mother Corporation” to communicate the interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her associated corporate States has been taken.

It is Historical knowledge that the original Union States created the Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the Federal government has taken control of her “Creators”, the States.) She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade names the following: “United States”, “U.S.”, “U.S.A.”, “United States of America”, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and Federal Government. She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office etc. etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the IRS. and her state corporations, to the United Nations and the International Bankers as payment for her debt. The UN and the International Bankers use this money and services for various world wide projects, including war.

War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans for controlling people in her new world order.

THE U.S. INC. DECLARES BANKRUPTCY

The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva to decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of the corporate several states were in attendance. If the states had their own power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have been represented at Geneva. The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government corporate group in 1930. The several states only needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington D.C. The delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the Federal Corporate Government. And, presto, BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!

From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the Federal level so that the states could then rely on the Federal decision and use this decision within the states as justification for the bankruptcy process within the states.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE EMERGES AS LAW OF THE LAND
Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?

By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in 1930 could be upheld and administered. That’s why the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedent, all appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from the preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th Edition:

“The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962 and 1966”

The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere between 1938 and 1940, I don’t recall, but by the early 40’s and during the war, this committee was working to form the UCC and getting it ready to go on the market. The UCC is the Law Merchant’s code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This Legal Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable Instruments, Security, Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC. That’s where the “Uniform” word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as well as being uniform with the District of Columbia.

It doesn’t mean you didn’t have the uniform instrument laws on the books before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By the middle 1960’s, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the Law of the Land. The states fully understood they had to administrate Bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks after President John F. Kennedy was killed.

YOUR LAWYER’S SECRET OATH???

What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers, who are members of the American Bar Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer’s guild of Great Britain, created, formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a “secret” oath to support bankruptcy. As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information.

That’s why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell you “It’s not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can’t give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer.”

HIRE A LAWYER?

The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the cause? YOU WON’T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say “It’s a bankruptcy proceeding.” The true creditor will have to say, “I’m the creditor and he’s the debtor.”

That declaration would open the door for you to question “Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?” In this country, the courts on every level, from the justice of the peace level all the way up…… even into the International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate United States debt. What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE TRUE CREDITOR, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.

The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn’t agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made an offer they couldn’t refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression.

The Bankers said, “Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way.” “You just accept the bankruptcy and we’ll let you out of the depression. If you don’t, you’re on your own.” So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass statutes and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favor of the international bankers.

Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key bankers were the Rothschild’s and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains that there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were bankrupt.

THE SNARE

The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate? The bankers did it with real estate, the same way they did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign bankers simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself as a “CITIZEN” or a “RESIDENT” of the corporate U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which ties you to certain meager “benefits” and “privileges.”Then, the bankers con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements.

These slick paper agreements establish your “voluntary” indebtedness to the banker creditor. If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme because you don’t like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in court to list the true nature and cause of the action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course) is administrating the bankruptcy to which the government agreed to per the Geneva meetings.

The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never has to make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness (bondage/servitude).

Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came first; signed in secrecy, THEN Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could make decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy. It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional case. It is now a bankrupty case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised as a constitutional case.

THE FRAUD

The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banker creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said, “NO. We will not give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody; a decision not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within the corporate state governments.”

This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn’t be fraud if the government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice: when I say corporate “government” I don’t mean you and me. You and I are not the corporate government. The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat of the corporate Federal Government. The capital of the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state government. If the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate state governments want to join forces and declare bankruptcy that’s not fraud. This is their corporate business.

However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy but do not disclose to you, me, and every other American, that they have so declared bankruptcy.

Further they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get you and every other American in this country to pledge to pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility, not the responsibility of Americans, The People.

U.S. INC. IS DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM PRIVATE AMERICANS

“We the People” who created and signed the contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by, and for the Constitutional Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of the “United States of America,” is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE from Americans or the unenfranchised people of America. The private natural American people did not create the corporation of the United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the creation of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C.

Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States Corporation. Notice here, we have a state giving something of value (land) to the United States. The United Stales Corporation agreed in the Constitutional contract, to protect the States. Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the States and the people by deception and at the will of their foreign bankers with whom they have been doing business. Our forefathers gave their lives and property to prevent enslavement.

Today, we are again enslaved. Private natural American people have been tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their knowledge and lawful consent. That is FRAUD.

All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by “Public Policy” of by and for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).

THE MOTHER CORPORATION’S “PUBLIC POLICY”

The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C. The states use state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of Washington D.C. Public policy and only public policy is being administered against you in the corporate courts today. The public policy that is dictated by all the courts, from the smallest to the most powerful courts in the world, is public policy. This is why I said, in another tape that the Russian people would be enslaved into indebtedness. What will happen is that it will become public policy in Russia to have the people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians will be forced to promise to pay those debts. They will be forced to pay off on those corporate debts. Corporate public policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate public policy is forever a Corporate public policy and the laws that have passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy. Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public policy. The public policy is OF, ( belonging to) the United States corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF (belonging to) America, the Republic.

The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938, have been public policy decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when FDR came into office, he brought in public policy. He established that it was the public policy of the overnment to call in all the gold. It was the public policy of the government to declare a banking holiday. It was the public policy of the Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal Government) to give out government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be compatible with the Federal legal system.

THE MONKEY-WRENCH

This is why, when people like us go to court without being represented by a lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their corporate administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S. administration of their corporate bankruptcy. That’s why you’ll find stamped on many if not all our briefs, “THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS.” The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or file a claim we are not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The arguments we put forth predate 1938.

We come in with Constitutional law etc. All these early cases support our rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers, and judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before 1938.

THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS’
CORPORATE PLANTATION
U.S.A. STYLE

Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker creditors and to protect the banker creditor.

Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the corporate legislatures, “I want a law passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the longest period possible.”

It doesn’t behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor producing debtors die at an average age 30 years. What would happen to the bankers’ lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on the entire funding and lending process if the average American life span was only 30 years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2 1/2 times the current consumer population to equal their current take. The bankers would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion Americans because the individual can’t contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the creditor could collect on the debt for only 12 years.

Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an average of 70 years) you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they contract and for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With this situation, the banker creditor can now float loans worth 50 years of potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years.

The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care of. The creditor doesn’t want the population to decrease per se, unless, it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in another’s name and then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people. For example let’s consider the AIDS problem today among the black people. What better group to inject AIDS into than the black people?

Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don’t you understand that the blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have reached the maximum of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone over their limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public housing, medicaid, medicare, food stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that instead of paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can’t collect any revenue?

The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of these people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because when you, as a member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be passed which says the minorities must be taken care of, then the corporate legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these people taken care of. Therefore, when given the chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a chance, therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges and opportunities.

This is what these people need to make them socially, politically, and economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures have passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they float the indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone into court to challenge them by telling them it is not your public policy to assume the debts of other people. On the contrary, all the court decisions coming put, indicate it is the corporate public policy and it is your willingness to support the corporate public policy to pay off these debts.

Remember, “public” means of and for the corporate Government. It does not mean of and for private people. “Public” means corporate government. It is corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they are talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge against this corporate created debt.

THE REAL ESTATE SNARE

How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These banker creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy, that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this the same way they get away with any other case that is brought before the court, whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever.

Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving information and jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents. The instruments (forms) you signed include, but are not limited to the following: social security registration, use of the social security number, IRS forms, driver license, traffic citation, jury duty, voter registration, using their address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc. The bankers then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you, without you ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true creditor. What’s more, you are never informed as to whom that true creditor is and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the paperwork that you are filling out.

If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find that you promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you originally acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never promised to pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never promised to pay taxes to the creditor. You did.

In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the deed stating the true nature and cause of the action. Since you have made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for property taxes. You don’t realize that the only way they can bill you for taxes is through your own stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. You volunteered. They took advantage of you, conning you to promise to pay properly taxes. When they send you their bill, they are coming against you for the collection of the promise you made to the creditor.

Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank. The bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn’t loaned you anything. It is not their credit to loan. This is why the bank can’t loan credit. There is a credit involved, but not the bank’s credit. It is the credit of the International Bankers. The International bankers are making you the loan based upon their operation of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have against you personally as well as your property. Now, let’s say you get a tax bill and you decide “I’m not going to pay it.” You will find that the courts and the lawyers and the county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor simply by not identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the true creditor, the international banker can make you a credit loan that has no value in reality.

In the case of real property, he claims to loan you the use of your own property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is allowed to do this because you are presumed by statutory law and the banker to be in bankruptcy. This fraud is not revealed because he does not have to make an appearance in court to present and defend his claim. His name is not mentioned in the case.

Let’s say you are not aware of your remedies provided for you within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to dishonor the county’s presentment of the tax bill. You don’t pay your tax bill. You, therefore, just sit on it and don’t do or say anything. A couple of years go by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or else in a certain period of time, your property will be taken from you and put up for tax sale.

Now here is what is interesting…….. If you don’t pay your tax bill and they contact you asking you to pay it and you don’t do it, they will declare that you are in default. It is based on that default, as provided for in the UCC, that they sell your property for the tax (rent).

However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state the true nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they have developed a legal procedure which is based upon your promise to pay. This procedure provides that they don’t have to come to the court to get a court order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor never makes an appearance in court.

The reality is, you are denied any possibility of appearing in court to exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the creditor under “public policy.” To ask if it is under “public policy”, just what is the “public policy?” And how did you (as an international banker) become “creditor” to me and everyone else in this country (American people). They don’t want you to ask the real creditor (the International Bankers), to produce the documents upon which your personal debt is established. If they were forced to go into court, they would have to produce the deed or mortgage showing you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promised to pay the corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930’s.

This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is, that, there was absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it through their deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense, permeates the education system and the news media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you are a statutory “U.S. citizen” and “resident of the United States.” (INCORPORATED).

YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE PROPERTY

Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your signature and your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The bankers don’t even bother to go to court They leave it up to the agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to perform. If you don’t pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is your most valuable personal property? Did your government teachers ever tell you that any time you sign any document, you should sign it “without prejudice,” or with “All Rights Reserved” above your signature. This means you are reserving your God given unalienable rights which cannot be transferred and all other rights for which your forefathers died.

The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends to provide for this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this area. It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate “PUBLIC” schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have set the snare to Compel you into paying their debt. The Corporate “PUBLIC” schools are strictly designed for their Corporate citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.

Notice all the emphases on being a “good” Citizen. Basically all their teachers and their students are trained to produce labor and material in exchange for valueless green paper called “money.” It is not money, it functions “AS” money. Lawful money must be backed by something of value. Bankers take your labor, services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the “full faith and Confidence of the United States Government” THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR Constitutional CHARTER, enslaving the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the corporate government’s bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically impossible to pay Off. You and your family are in continual financial bondage to the international bankers. They love it so!

Black’s Law Dictionary 1990, defines “Money Changers” as: …..business of a banker… today handled by the international departments of banks.” Let me think for a moment, what did Christ do to the Money Changers.” Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with their activity. Three days later he was crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.

Let’s return to the subject of your property, and the tax sale for not paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed (not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you understand the default or you like being in default, you just are in default of the tax payment. So they put your property up for sale. At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids on your property and gets it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to establish. He is required to give you another chance. You have six months and a day to pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay off the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties, interest, fines, etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is yours to continue to pay taxes on the next year.

THE COVER-UP

There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn’t have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the case freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the fraud. That is why you can’t hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.

“TRUST ME”
“I’m Here To Help You.”
“I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law.”
“I’m A Member of the Bar.”

The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer’s will cite no cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit. The lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy even at your expense. The lawyers can’t go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.

For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they are only those selected cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years of cases after cases having been decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial information and argument to prove the fraud?

BLOOD IN THE STREETS?

Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they allowed your case to be cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine a copy of your brief that exposes evidence of the fraud? This exposure would render null and void everything for which they have worked so hard. Wouldn’t this exposure make the people mad? Wouldn’t this exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets? Especially the cities where the poor people have been really taken by this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is that the case never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns and shoot the SOB’s.

ATTENTION: LAW STUDENT!

You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope you’ve read this carefully, because here is the legal system you’re headed to serve, and serve you will. You say you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath they’re taking, in “secret”, behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the “business of the court” as judges and lawyers.

Now you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the bankruptcy. If you want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer, be careful. They will weed you out at the beginning if you don’t bring in your paperwork under the bankruptcy procedures. If you try to defend your clients and try to help your clients they will get rid of you. They will pull your license. So you spent all that money and time going to school under the guise of helping people and you’re wasting your time. Without a license you can’t go into a courtroom. I would think about this if I were you.

THE LAWYERS GUILD CONNECTION

Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is not connected primarily with what happens in any case on the local level. However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is meant, the state court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court; and goes to the appeal’s court, it would appear that the American Bar Association takes notice of the case. It would seem that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that any action brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain, which is the legal arm of the Rothschild’s Dynasty, be able to monitor and administer the corporate bankruptcy. It would appear that the American Bar Association would be compelled to review all appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under common law or the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be immediately stamped on the back that “this case is not to be cited or published.” I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in such cases. The justice department may be able to do that in Washington D.C.. I can’t see where any judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or label the case as one not to be cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the American Bar Association.

THE BANKRUPTCY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you’re still attending classes and you have a good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes from that you’ve seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is tampering with the law. There is one thing certain the creditor and or his agents are watching these cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books. When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the creditor, the corporate International Bankers. This is just one of the Bankers’ state side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another agency they use for this country.

This is where all the accounting goes on to keep track of the debt. All the states have to send reports to Washington D.C. Washington D.C. has to send reports to the (GAO). Take a look at your state Comptroller’s Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I found it in the library located in the city of the corporate state capital. Look under “Trust Fund” for each state sub-corporation like the state courts, IRS, Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State Departmental Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes: fines, fees, licenses, etc.). There are millions and billions of your hard earned worthless federal reserve notes, “dollars”, being held in “trust.”This money is being siphoned off into the coffers of the International Bankers while the corporate government officials are hounding you for more and more tax dollars.

All this accounting system is NOT so the people will know what is going on. The accounting reports are for the bankers and creditors to keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from. The bankers want to know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from what sources. This accounting is the purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a week. These M’s are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount of debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and know exactly what is going on in their domain.

It all makes sense. Don’t the bankers hire bill collectors? Creditors hire bill collectors to snoop around do see why you’re not paying. They want do know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much will be coming in. How much they will collect. They want to know who will pay and who won’t.

THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS NOTHING BUT CREDIT AND DEBT.

THE WORLD CREDIT UNION

Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of the governments around the world are going to unite. They will create one big giant credit union for collecting the debt for the International Bankers. We have allowed ourselves do get into this very sad situation, but THAT IS THE WAY IT IS.

The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. — “State Tamperings with Money Banks” — Herbert Spencer (1820-1903)

WELCOME TO YOUR
NEW WORLD ORDER

This Page on the Web started Dec 7, 1996,
The 55th Anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,
which precipitated the entry of the United States into World War 2.

IN MEMORIAM
Of the many Sovereign Citizens in all wars
Who believed they gave their Oath and their Lives to Defend
The Constitution for the United States against all Enemies,
Both Foreign and Domestic,
In the Preservation of Liberty and Freedom and Justice for All.

Reproduction of all or any parts of the above text may be used for general information.
This HTML presentation is copyright by Barefoot, December 1996


From one judge learn the characters of all.

11/29/2017

http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html#p4

Ex uno disce omnes

The reason why these courts are so intensely servile and corrupt, is, that they are not only parts of, but the veriest creatures of the very governments whose oppression’s they are thus seeking to uphold. They receive their offices and salaries from, and are impeachable and removable by, the very governments upon whose acts they affect to sit in judgment. Of course, no one with his eyes open ever places himself in a position so incompatible with the liberty of declaring his honest opinion, unless he do it with the intention of becoming a mere instrument in the hands of the government for the execution of all its oppression’s.

As proof of this, look at the judicial history of England for the last five hundred years, and of America from its settlement. In all that time (so far as I know, or presume) no bench of judges, (probably not even any single judge,) dependent upon the legislature that passed the statute, has ever declared a single penal statute invalid, on account of its being in conflict either with the common law, which the judges in England have been sworn to preserve, or with the written constitutions, (recognizing men’s natural rights,) which the American judges were under oath to maintain. Every oppression, every atrocity even, that has ever been enacted in either country, by the legislative power, in the shape of a criminal law, (or, indeed, in almost any other shape,) has been as sure of a sanction from the judiciary that was dependent upon, and impeachable by, the legislature that enacted the law, as if there were a physical necessity that the legislative enactment and the judicial sanction should go together. Practically speaking, the sum of their decisions, all and singular, has been, that there are no limits to the power of the government, and that the people have no rights except what the government pleases to allow to them.

It is extreme folly for a people to allow such dependent, servile, and perjured creatures to sit either in civil or criminal trials; but to allow them to sit in criminal trials, and judge  the people’s liberties, is not merely fatuity, – it is suicide.


The Silicon Valley Billionaires Remaking America’s Schools

11/28/2017

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/technology/tech-billionaires-education-zuckerberg-facebook-hastings.html

By NATASHA SINGER

Credit Illustrations by Koren Shadmi

In San Francisco’s public schools, Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce, is giving middle school principals $100,000 “innovation grants” and encouraging them to behave more like start-up founders and less like bureaucrats.

In Maryland, Texas, Virginia and other states, Netflix’s chief, Reed Hastings, is championing a popular math-teaching program where Netflix-like algorithms determine which lessons students see.

And in more than 100 schools nationwide, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief, is testing one of his latest big ideas: software that puts children in charge of their own learning, recasting their teachers as facilitators and mentors.

In the space of just a few years, technology giants have begun remaking the very nature of schooling on a vast scale, using some of the same techniques that have made their companies linchpins of the American economy. Through their philanthropy, they are influencing the subjects that schools teach, the classroom tools that teachers choose and fundamental approaches to learning.

The involvement by some of the wealthiest and most influential titans of the 21st century amounts to a singular experiment in education, with millions of students serving as de facto beta testers for their ideas. Some tech leaders believe that applying an engineering mind-set can improve just about any system, and that their business acumen qualifies them to rethink American education.

Continue reading the main story

“They are experimenting collectively and individually in what kinds of models can produce better results,” said Emmett D. Carson, chief executive of Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which manages donor funds for Mr. Hastings, Mr. Zuckerberg and others. “Given the changes in innovation that are underway with artificial intelligence and automation, we need to try everything we can to find which pathways work.”

But the philanthropic efforts are taking hold so rapidly that there has been little public scrutiny.

Education Disrupted

A series examining how Silicon Valley is gaining influence in public schools.

  • Read Part 1

How Google Took Over the ClassroomMay 13

Tech companies and their founders have been rolling out programs in America’s public schools with relatively few checks and balances, The New York Times found in interviews with more than 100 company executives, government officials, school administrators, researchers, teachers, parents and students.

“They have the power to change policy, but no corresponding check on that power,” said Megan Tompkins-Stange, an assistant professor of public policy at the University of Michigan. “It does subvert the democratic process.”

Furthermore, there is only limited research into whether the tech giants’ programs have actually improved students’ educational results.

One of the broadest philanthropic initiatives directly benefits the tech industry.

Code.org, a major nonprofit group financed with more than $60 million from Silicon Valley luminaries and their companies, has the stated goal of getting every public school in the United States to teach computer science. Its argument is twofold: Students would benefit from these classes, and companies need more programmers.

Together with Microsoft and other partners, Code.org has barnstormed the country, pushing states to change education laws and fund computer science courses. It has also helped more than 120 districts to introduce such curriculums, the group said, and has facilitated training workshops for more than 57,000 teachers. And Code.org’s free coding programs, called Hour of Code, have become wildly popular, drawing more than 100 million students worldwide.

Mr. Hastings of Netflix and other tech executives rejected the idea that they wielded significant influence in education. The mere fact that classroom internet access has improved, Mr. Hastings said, has had a much greater impact in schools than anything tech philanthropists have done.

“In our society as a democracy, I think it is healthy that there is a debate about what are the goals of public education,” Mr. Hastings added.

Captains of American industry have long used their private wealth to remake public education, with lasting and not always beneficial results.

What is different today is that some technology giants have begun pitching their ideas directly to students, teachers and parents — using social media to rally people behind their ideas. Some companies also cultivate teachers to spread the word about their products.

Such strategies help companies and philanthropists alike influence public schools far more quickly than in the past, by creating legions of supporters who can sway legislators and education officials.

Another difference: Some tech moguls are taking a hands-on role in nearly every step of the education supply chain by financing campaigns to alter policy, building learning apps to advance their aims and subsidizing teacher training. This end-to-end influence represents an “almost monopolistic approach to education reform,” said Larry Cuban, an emeritus professor of education at Stanford University. “That is starkly different to earlier generations of philanthropists.”

These efforts coincide with a larger Silicon Valley push to sell computers and software to American schools, a lucrative market projected to reach $21 billion by 2020. Already, more than half of the primary- and secondary-school students in the United States use Google services like Gmail in school.

But many parents and educators said in interviews that they were unaware of the Silicon Valley personalities and money influencing their schools. Among them was Rafranz Davis, executive director of professional and digital learning at Lufkin Independent School District, a public school system in Lufkin, Tex., where students regularly use DreamBox Learning, the math program that Mr. Hastings subsidized, and have tried Code.org’s coding lessons.

“We should be asking a lot more questions about who is behind the curtain,” Ms. Davis said.

‘Think Bigger!’

Photo

Marc Benioff, chief executive of Salesforce.

Mr. Benioff, the billionaire behind Salesforce, had a blunt message for San Francisco’s mayor and its schools superintendent.

It was 2013, and the two city officials had approached Mr. Benioff hoping to persuade him to pony up a few million dollars to install Wi-Fi in schools and buy some classroom laptops. But the request seemed too penny-ante to the software mogul.

“That’s when I had to say, ‘You guys need to think bigger!’” Mr. Benioff recalled in an interview in his San Francisco home. He urged the superintendent to imagine “what nirvana would look like” in his schools, if money were no object.

With that conversation, Mr. Benioff set in motion a transformation of the relationship between philanthropist and public education. He has emerged as a kind of personal venture capitalist to the city’s public schools — one intent on remaking a traditional school bureaucracy in Silicon Valley’s entrepreneurial image.

Mr. Benioff ultimately pledged $100 million over a decade to the San Francisco Unified School District through his company’s nonprofit arm, Salesforce.org. Unlike conventional benefactors, he is hands-on: School district administrators now submit an annual grant wish list to the Salesforce.org board for review. And Mr. Benioff dispenses not just money, but also management prescriptions.

“He’s almost a public-sector V.C.,” said Richard A. Carranza, who was then the superintendent of San Francisco schools.

Mr. Benioff rejected the notion that his approach to education philanthropy was venture-capitalist-like. “We are not giving them a new religion,” Mr. Benioff said. “We are trying to work with them in a smart way and augment what they are doing.”

The partnership with the district kicked off in 2012 when San Francisco’s mayor, Edwin M. Lee, asked Mr. Benioff to help the city’s middle schools. The mayor wanted to give students a better chance at landing tech jobs. And he wanted Mr. Benioff to pay for it.

“I would like to give our kids the opportunity, when they graduate, to see themselves working at those tech companies,” Mr. Lee recalled telling Mr. Benioff.

The idea appealed to Mr. Benioff. At Salesforce, the leading maker of cloud-based customer-relationship management software, he had developed his own model of corporate philanthropy: donating 1 percent of company equity, products and employee time to community programs. A school project would let him test it on a larger stage.

The district has used money from Salesforce.org to hire math teachers and develop a comprehensive computer science curriculum for prekindergarten through 12th grade. Funds have also gone toward installing Wi-Fi in middle schools and hiring tech coaches for teachers.

But Mr. Benioff’s “think bigger” mandate also led to culture clashes. Chief among these: He established a Principal’s Innovation Fund, which awards annual unrestricted grants of $100,000 to the principal at each of the district’s 21 middle and K-8 schools.

The superintendent initially worried that principals might squander the money. In Silicon Valley, “they fully expect nine out of 10 of their innovations to fail,” said Mr. Carranza, who is now superintendent of the much larger Houston public school system. “We don’t have the luxury of failing with people’s kids.”

Administrators subsequently asked principals to select projects that fit with the district’s priorities. Principals have used the grants to start robotics clubs, provide English-tutoring programs for immigrant students and redesign a school library with hangout zones where children can sit with their laptops.

Mr. Benioff said he knew that his methods pushed some administrators beyond their comfort zones. “You’d have the same issue at Salesforce if somebody from the outside came in and said, ‘We’re going to help you to blah-blah-blah,’” he said. “Bureaucrats would try to stop them.”

So far, Salesforce.org has provided about $20 million to the schools. By hiring additional teachers, schools reduced the average class size across eighth-grade math to 24 students from 33 — enabling teachers to give more individualized instruction, district officials said.

“People think school districts are too bureaucratic, can’t be nimble and can’t innovate,” Mr. Carranza said. “We are proving that this is just not true.”

There are limits to Mr. Benioff’s approach: Most school districts will not be able to secure their own billionaire benefactors. But Mr. Benioff said he intended to keep working with local schools for decades to come.

Get the Morning Briefing by Email

What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

“This is not just a sea gull strategy where we are dumping a bunch of money and leaving town,” Mr. Benioff said. “We are in the trenches.”

Trust the Algorithm

Photo

Reed Hastings, chief executive of Netflix.

What does Netflix have in common with a math-teaching program called DreamBox Learning? Both services use algorithms to predict what’s good for their users.

They also share a guardian angel: Mr. Hastings, Netflix’s chief executive.

In 2009, he heard about a start-up that used artificial intelligence to adapt math lessons to students. The math program worked a bit like the software Netflix used to customize its video recommendations.

“It is probably fair to say I recognized the power of personalization maybe more than other people, because I had seen it in my own working life,” Mr. Hastings said in an interview at Netflix’s Los Angeles office.

There was just one problem: DreamBox Learning was running low on cash. So Mr. Hastings stepped in, donating about $11 million to a nonprofit charter-school fund so it could buy the math platform.

Today, more than two million students use the program for supplemental math instruction.

DreamBox takes elements from animated video games, with some math lessons populated by aliens that whoosh about and animals that cluck. When students complete a math lesson successfully, they earn points that they can use to unlock virtual rewards.

Administrators in some districts said that students so enjoyed the math program that some had begged their parents to let them play DreamBox even during trips to the supermarket. But four parents with children in public schools in Baltimore County, Md., said the program was so stimulating that they had curbed its use at home.

“It really can suck a kid in,” said Brenda Peiffer, a former school counselor, whose son, a third grader, was assigned DreamBox for homework. After noticing that he seemed more interested in spending points to customize his avatar than in actually doing math, she put the kibosh on DreamBox. “He’s not doing it at home,” she said.

Jessie Woolley-Wilson, the chief executive of DreamBox, said such concerns were rare. But she recalled a mother once asking if the program was habit-forming, because her daughter was waking her up at 5:30 a.m. asking to play DreamBox. Ms. Woolley-Wilson recommended that parents oversee their children’s screen time.

“There’s no perfect solution for everyone,” she said.

And some experienced teachers said it was preposterous to think that algorithms could be better than skilled teachers at adapting to students’ abilities. “What you are seeing right now is a heavy push to disrupt and diminish the role of teachers as experts,” said Arienne Adamcikova, a high school teacher in San Mateo, Calif.

Mr. Hastings saw it differently.

DreamBox Learning tracks a student’s every click, correct answer, hesitation and error — collecting about 50,000 data points per student per hour — and uses those details to adjust the math lessons it shows. And it uses data to help teachers pinpoint which math concepts students may be struggling with.

Mr. Hastings described DreamBox as a tool teachers could use to gain greater insights into their students, much the way that physicians use medical scans to treat individual patients. “A doctor without an X-ray machine is not as good a doctor,” Mr. Hastings said.

So far there is little proof that such technologies significantly improve achievement. Adaptive learning courseware, for instance, generally did not improve college students’ grades or their likelihood of completing a course, according to a 2016 report on some of these programs by the S.R.I. Education research group.

Is DreamBox effective?

DreamBox is among the minority of digital learning start-ups that have allowed independent academic researchers to examine and publicly report on their data. Still, the platform’s effectiveness is difficult to gauge.

A report from Harvard University’s Center for Education Policy Research concluded that DreamBox use correlated with some improved math scores. But, the researchers cautioned, if those students had more effective teachers even without the technology, “then we might be falsely attributing” student achievement gains “to the software, rather than to the teacher.”

Even so, Ms. Woolley-Wilson, DreamBox’s chief executive, described the study as good news, saying it confirmed encouraging reports from teachers. She pointed out that, unlike DreamBox, many other education start-ups lacked research to prove even the most basic assumption: that their apps did not harm students’ educational results.

“That sounds like a low bar,” Ms. Woolley-Wilson said. “But with the history of education technology, it is not.”

Mr. Hastings (who is a company director but has no financial interest in the math company) said he was enthusiastic about DreamBox’s potential and predicted wider classroom use for the technology as artificial intelligence improved.

Still, he emphasized that he did not view technology generally as a panacea for education. “I’ve always been a little cynical and jaundiced about technology,” Mr. Hastings said. “The tech can help, but it is often oversold.”

Student, Teach Thyself

Photo

Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook.

If Facebook’s Mr. Zuckerberg has his way, children the world over will soon be teaching themselves — using software his company helped build.

It’s a conception that upends a longstanding teaching dynamic. Now educators are no longer classroom leaders, but helpmates.

In public remarks and Facebook posts, Mr. Zuckerberg has described how it works. Students cluster together, working at laptops. They use software to select their own assignments, working at their own pace. And, should they struggle at teaching themselves, teachers are on hand to guide them.

“When you visit a school like this, it feels like the future — it feels like a start-up,” Mr. Zuckerberg told an audience last fall in Peru. “You get the feeling this is how more of the education system should work.”

He is well on his way to achieving this vision. In 2015, 19 American schools introduced the software that Facebook helped develop. This school year, more than 100 schools use it. Next fall, Mr. Zuckerberg said, he expects that “many hundreds of more schools will upgrade.”

The effort began a few years ago with visits by Mr. Zuckerberg and Dr. Priscilla Chan, a pediatrician who is his wife, to Summit Denali, a middle school in Sunnyvale, Calif. There, classrooms lack walls, and students with laptops often zoom around on caster chairs.

“It looks more like a Google or a Facebook than a school,” said Diane Tavenner, chief executive of Summit Public Schools, a nonprofit charter-school network that runs the school.

Mr. Zuckerberg, she said, admired the software that Summit had created for its schools. He offered Ms. Tavenner a team of Facebook engineers to further develop it and make it available free to schools nationwide.

Summit developed its student-directed learning approach after administrators there discovered that their teachers had been so supportive of students, Ms. Tavenner said, that many of its graduates were struggling in college, unprepared to pace themselves or seek help.

That is how Summit’s platform came to show students every lesson they will need to complete for the year. They may tackle lessons in any order. At the end of each unit, they take a 10-question multiple-choice test.

Teachers use the software to track students’ work and may intervene when a child is struggling. One-on-one mentoring helps students make choices and evaluate their progress. In a Facebook post in 2015, Mr. Zuckerberg said that this learning approach “frees up time for teachers to do what they do best — mentor students.”

Not all educators agree. Four former Summit teachers said they found the system problematic. They asked that their names be withheld, saying they feared repercussions for their careers.

At Summit, they said, they were required to teach students cognitive skills (like how to construct an argument) while making students responsible for teaching themselves underlying lesson material (like how diverse plants and animals coexist). But some students raced through lessons without actually understanding basic facts, the teachers said, making it difficult to help them structure arguments on specific topics, like climate change.

Ms. Tavenner of Summit, however, said that was exactly the point: to make students discover for themselves that they cannot succeed on applied projects without learning the fundamentals.

Students think to themselves, “‘Oh, I’ve got to actually go back and deeply understand it,’” Ms. Tavenner said. “Those are the habits of success that we are trying to instill in kids that simply don’t get instilled in the normal system.”

It can be a steep learning curve.

In 2015, Urban Promise Academy, a public middle school in Oakland, Calif., introduced the platform for its sixth graders. But students, accustomed to having a teacher’s guidance, did not know how to pace themselves, said Claire Fisher, the school’s principal.

“Kids were self-pacing to failure,” Ms. Fisher said.

Teachers remedied that by helping students set realistic goals. The school is now happy with the program, she said, and has expanded it to the seventh grade. Even so, Ms. Fisher said, “We definitely have a concern about the quality of the assessments in the curriculum and whether it actually promotes deeper learning.”

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, an organization set up by Dr. Chan and Mr. Zuckerberg to manage their projects in education and other areas, plans to take over Facebook’s engineering role in developing the education software by the end of this year.

Mr. Zuckerberg has big plans in mind for the program. In his Peru speech, he noted that there were only about 25,000 public secondary schools in the United States.

“Our hope over the next decade is to help upgrade a majority of these schools to personalized learning and then start working globally as well,” Mr. Zuckerberg told the audience. “Giving a billion students a personalized education is a great thing to do.”


The United States Civil Flag of Peacetime

11/27/2017

http://www.barefootsworld.net/uscivilflag.html

Declaration of Independence – 1776
Articles of Confederation – 1777
The Constitution for the United States, Its Sources and Its Application
Our Enemy, The State by A. J. Nock
The Classic Critique Distinguishing ‘Government’ from ‘STATE’
Trial By Jury by Lysander Spooner
Undermining The Constitution by Thom. J. Norton
A History of Lawless Government
The Law by Frederick Bastiat

The United States Civil Flag of Peacetime

We the People of the United States,
actually have two national flags, a military flag and a civil flag for peacetime.
They have several important distinctions and meanings.

Almost all Americans think of the Stars and Stripes “Old Glory” as their only flag.

And IT IS BEAUTIFUL!!

The Stars and Stripes originated as a result of a resolution adopted by the Marine Committee of the Second Continental Congress at Philadelphia on June 14, 1777, for use on military installations, on ships, and in battle, directing that a U.S. flag consist of 13 stripes, alternating red and white; that a union be 13 stars, white in a blue field, representing a new Constellation.

Prior to, during the War for Independence, and after under the Articles of Confederation, smuggling was seen as a patriotic duty of the citizens of the thirteen independent and sovereign states, but after the ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a new nation, smuggling needed to be stopped. The new nation depended on the revenue from customs tariffs, duties and taxes on imported goods in order to survive.

In 1790, with the customs laws firmly in place, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton set to work devising adequate means of enforcing the year-old regulations. “A few armed vessels, judiciously stationed at the entrances of our ports,” Hamilton suggested, “might at a small expense be made useful sentinels of our laws.” Congress concurred, and that year appropriated $10,000 to build and maintain a fleet of ten revenue cutters, which were to be placed under the charge of the customs collectors, whose responsibilities would be enforcement of the tariff laws. Along with financial responsibility, Hamilton demanded that the officers be servants of the people. “They [the officers] will always keep in mind that their Countrymen are Freemen and as such are impatient of everything that bears that least mark of a domineering Spirit.”

Nine years later, Congress refined the revenue cutters’ role in customs operations with the passage of the Act of March 2, 1799, known as the Customs Administration Act. In particular, Congress determined “the cutters and boats employed in the service of the revenue shall be distinguished from other vessels by “an ensign and pendant, with such marks thereon as shall be prescribed and directed by the President of the United States.” Additionally, the Act permitted commanders of revenue vessels to fire at other vessels failing to respond “after such pendant and ensign shall be hoisted and a gun fired by such revenue cutter as a signal.” By this act the Revenue Marine (later called the Revenue Cutter Service) ensign served as the seagoing equivalent of a policeman’s badge, the distinctive sign of the vessel’s law enforcement authority.

The job of designing the distinguishing ensign eventually fell upon Oliver Wolcott, who had replaced Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury in 1795. On June 1, 1799, Wolcott submitted his design to President John Adams for approval. Wolcott’s proposal featured an ensign of sixteen stripes, alternating red and white, representing the number of states that had joined the Union by 1799, with the Union to be the Arms of the United States in dark blue on a white field. It is significant that Wolcott turned the arrangement of the stripes ninety degrees to vertical to differentiate the new revenue cutter ensign from the U.S. Flag, to denote civilian authority under the Treasury Department, rather than military authority under the War Department.

Through usage and custom, horizontal stripes had become adopted for use over military posts, and vertical stripes adopted for use over civilian establishments. The Civil Flag, intended for peacetime usage in custom house civilian settings, had vertical stripes with blue stars on a white field. By the Law of the Flag, this design denoted civil jurisdiction under the Constitution and common law as opposed to military jurisdiction under admiralty/military law.

Although intended just for Customs house usage, the new Civil Flag became adopted by both customhouses and merchants, and others who could afford them, to show their civilian nature and not under military control. The practice of using the Customs Flag as a Civil Flag became encoded in law in 1874 when Treasury Secretary William. A. Richardson required all customhouses to display the Civil Flag.

On May 26, 1913, with the approval of Senate Bill S. 2337, (shortly after the fraudulent declaration by Secretary of State Philander Knox, that the 16th Amendment had been ratified, and during the same weeks that the Federal Reserve system and the IRS were established) the U.S. Coast Guard absorbed the Revenue Cutter and the Life Saving – Lighthouse Services, becoming a part of the military forces of the United States, operating under the Treasury Department in time of peace and as a part of the Navy, subject to the orders of the Secretary of the Navy, in time of war.

The Civil Flag used by the cutter service was modified, placing the Coast Guard insignia on the stripes in the field , and was adopted under Coast Guard authority, losing it’s original significance of civilian authority, which by then had long been forgotten. As the Federal government acquired more control over the States and their citizens during and after World War II, by 1951 the original Civil Flag had been phased out completely, it’s existence left as an artifact of time in a few old photographs and a rare mention in old books.

Today, the last vestige of the Civil Flag, the U.S. Coast Guard flag, being under the civil jurisdiction of the Department of Treasury during peacetime, is identical to the revenue cutter ensign, but with the service insignia emblazoned on the stripes in the field.

It is still seen as the shoulder patch of U.S. Customs employees but it too now has the gold fringe signifying Admiralty/Military/Law Merchant jurisdiction.

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, published in 1850 before the War Between The States has this description of the U.S. Civil Flag in the introduction, “The Custom House” —

Salem Custom House – 1850 Salem Custom House – circa 1900

“. . . Here, with a view from its front windows adown this not very enlivening prospect, and thence across the harbour, stands a spacious edifice of brick. From the loftiest point of its roof, during precisely three and a half hours of each forenoon, floats or droops, in breeze or calm, the banner of the republic; but with the thirteen stripes turned vertically, instead of horizontally, and thus indicating that a civil, and not a military, post of Uncle Sam’s government is here established. Its front is ornamented with a portico of half-a-dozen wooden pillars, supporting a balcony, beneath which a flight of wide granite steps descends towards the street Over the entrance hovers an enormous specimen of the American eagle, with outspread wings, a shield before her breast, and, if I recollect aright, a bunch of intermingled thunder- bolts and barbed arrows in each claw. With the customary infirmity of temper that characterizes this unhappy fowl, she appears by the fierceness of her beak and eye, and the general truculency of her attitude, to threaten mischief to the inoffensive community; and especially to warn all citizens careful of their safety against intruding on the premises which she overshadows with her wings. Nevertheless, vixenly as she looks, many people are seeking at this very moment to shelter themselves under the wing of the federal eagle; imagining, I presume, that her bosom has all the softness and snugness of an eiderdown pillow. But she has no great tenderness even in her best of moods, and, sooner or later — oftener soon than late — is apt to fling off her nestlings with a scratch of her claw, a dab of her beak, or a rankling wound from her barbed arrows.”

Before 1940, no U.S. flag, civil or military, flew within the forty-eight states except in federal settings and installations. Only state flags did. Since the 1935 institution of Social Security and the Buck Act of 1940, 4 U.S.C.S. Ch. 4 Sec. 104-113, by clever legal maneuvers the feds have entirely circumvented the U.S. Constitution, and have overlaid federal territorial jurisdiction on the sovereign States, bringing them under the admiralty/military jurisdiction of Law Merchant, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the law of Creditors and Debtors.

Since then the U.S. military flag appears beside, or in place of, the state flags in nearly all locations within the states. All of the state courts and even the municipal ones now openly display it. In the last half century they have more openly declared the military/admiralty law jurisdiction with the addition of the gold fringe to the flag, the military flag of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

Such has been the path that has brought us under the Law of the Military Flag. This should have raised serious questions from many citizens long ago, but we’ve been educated to listen and believe what we are told, not to ask questions, or think for ourselves and search for the truth.

The Flag of Peace
US Civil Flags in 1919 at the end of World War I

US Civil Flag at the Eagle, Alaska custom-house,
on the Yukon River at the Canadian border, circa 1997
Photograph by Walter Kenaston

Treason in Government!! Admiralty on Land!!

The Flags of the Several united States

Dimensions of the US Civil Peace Flag
To Fabricate One Yourself


 11 27 17 HISTORY OF THE US CIVIL FLAG

http://www.uscivilflags.org/articles-history.html

The first U.S. Flag, which denoted civilian versus military purposes, was designed in 1799 by Oliver Wolcott Jr. the Secretary of the Treasury under John Adams. Wolcott’s proposal featured: An ensign, consisting of sixteen alternating red and white stripes representing the number of states that had joined the Union by 1799; and the Union, represented by the small rectangle in the upper left corner, with its Arms (an Eagle) of the United States in dark blue on a white field.

It is significant that Wolcott’s new civilian flag had vertical stripes, not horizontal. This was done so that non-military ships would be easily recognized and not fired upon as they tried to hail and board foreign vessels. This new flag was actively flown on Revenue Cutters, what we now call Coast Guard Cutters. The original purpose of the Revenue Cutter was to collect tariffs and other taxes that were imposed on foreign goods. The Revenue Cutter ensign had vertical stripes to denote civilian authority under the Treasury Department rather than military authority under the War Department.

The First U.S. Civil Flag 1799

In the early days of our nation, horizontal stripes became the accepted practice for use over military posts, and vertical stripes were used over civilian establishments. The use of the Civilian Flag also spread to Merchants and Common citizens to symbolize their Constitutional rights.

The Civil Flag had red and white vertical stripes with blue stars on a white background. By the Law of the Flag, the vertical striped design denoted Roman Civil jurisdiction within Federal territories rather than Military jurisdiction under Admiralty law. The practice of using the Customs Flag as a Civil Flag became encoded law in 1874 when Treasury Secretary William. A. Richardson required all customhouses to display the Civil Flag.

Where did Wolcott get the idea of using vertical stripes from?

Why did Wolcott choose to turn the horizontal stripes of Old Glory ninety degrees? We need to return to the beginnings of the American Revolution to satisfy this query.

In Boston, the Sons of Liberty were the original revolutionary group who sparked the initial rebellion against the British in 1765. The Stamp Act was imposed by the British Parliament to tax all forms of legal documents within their American colonies. The Stamp Act created great unrest in America, especially in Boston, where an effigy of the local stamp agent, Andrew Oliver, was hanged and burned. Eventually, Oliver resigned, his home looted, and the stamps destroyed. The Elm tree Oliver was hung on became known as the “Liberty Tree”.

The Stamp Act rebellion initiated the Stamp Act Congress, which gathered representatives from nine of the thirteen colonies. A petition of rights and grievances was drawn up declaring that the colonists “were entitled to all the inherent rights and liberties of natural born subjects.” The colonies also declared that “no taxes ever have been, or can be constitutionally imposed upon them, but by their respective legislatures,” and that it “was unreasonable and inconsistent; for the people of Great Britain to grant to His Majesty the property of the colonists.”

The petition asserted that extending the courts of ADMIRALTY, the law of the seas, in order to prosecute the Act undermined “the rights and liberties” of the colonists. So, the original “common law flag” was first raised over the Liberty Tree in Boston. The “rebellious stripes”, as the flag came to be called, was the original flag used by the Sons of Liberty, and it had 9 red and white vertical stripes!

Sons of Liberty
“Rebellious Stripes” Flag 1767-1775

Why did they choose red and white vertical stripes as their symbol?

Was the flag with vertical stripes a way of rebelling against the British East India Company? The British-East India Company flag had red and white horizontal stripes with the Union Jack in the upper left-hand corner. The first official flag of the American Revolution was the “Grand Union” flag first flown by General Washington on January 2nd 1776 at Cambridge Massachusetts.

Coincidentally it was also the same EXACT flag as the BRITISH-EAST INDIA COMPANY. It flew for over a year after the signing of the Declaration of Independence! An Anonymous individual of European descent known only as the ‘Professor’ recommended the BEI Company flag to Ben Franklin and the flag committee.

It has been reported that this mysterious individual was none other than Jesuit General Lorenzo Ricci, head of the Jesuit order. General Ricci supposedly had died in a Vatican prison six months prior. Pope Clement XIV the man who suppressed the Jesuit order in 1773 and had General Ricci imprisoned, soon died early 1774, apparently poisoned. The Vatican Treasurer at that time was General Ricci’s, best friend and former classmate Cardinal Braschi. Braschi controlled the Vatican resources as acting Pope during the beginning of the American Revolution..

It appears that the Jesuits via the Vatican bank may have funded the American Revolution. It would explain the seat of the new American government being set up on a Roman-Catholic possession and the institution of Roman-Civil Law as the law of the United States territories. i.e. the District of Columbia.

Grand Union Flag Jan. 2, 1776-1777

Although not a true Sovereign flag, only a State flag with a Common Law seal can directly represent the Common Law. There is an indirect relationship to Individual and state sovereignty with the U.S. Civil Flag.. A solvent federal government flying a Civil flag, implies solvent States/Nations with Sovereign citizens. When we first came across the Civil flag and decided that this flag should be the symbol for all sovereign citizens we looked back to the Sons of Liberty and their “Rebellious Stripes” flag as our example. We wanted a flag that would address the deep need in Americans to awaken and return to a time when our government was not “Big Brother” hidden under the name of the Patriot Act! Just as some surmise how the Sons of Liberty turned the British East India Company’s flag on its side; we also decided to turn Old Glory on its side. We wanted the flag to represent our modern Union of States, we chose to create a flag that had 13 vertical stripes and 50 blue stars on a white background: One star for each Sovereign State of the Union of the united States of America!

U.S. Sovereign Flag, Jan 2004

Our civilian flag is a way of reminding Americans, as well as our leaders, that every man and woman is sovereign and that we are all endowed by our Creator with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This sovereign Civil Flag is a symbol of our desire to return America to the dreams upon which she was founded!

The Stockman


The truth has come out finally and conclusively

11/25/2017
http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/05/the-truth-has-come-out-finally-and.html#more

by Anna Von Reitz

We hope to soon have The Puzzle Project up and running

  • a national level fact-finding mission in support of Public
  • Interest Litigation before the World Court and the UN Trust Committees.

This work only suffers from the common ailment— we all face a
LARGE fraud and its attendant criminality which has taken root in so many
countries and in so many sectors of society that it is natural to see
the “tree” — the so-called judicial system in the U.S. — without
grasping the larger picture.

The problem isn’t just the judicial system running hopelessly amok.

It’s the fact that all so-called “governments” are actually nothing but
privately owned and operated “governmental services corporations”
being run by international banking cartels that have operated under
conditions of secrecy and deceit to co-opt lawful government and
instigate a vast web of fraud and criminality throughout the world.

It’s not just the Federal United States. It’s the “government” of the
UK, CANADA, FRANCE, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN….. all fakes.

The truth has come out finally and conclusively. There are so many
people to thank for that, it beggars description….the rats have
been fully and absolutely exposed. The criminality of the banking
system has been fully documented by The Paradigm Project— Heather
Tucci-Jaref and others. A few American lawyers remained true to the
American cause and a few DOD employees did too, and they all did their
actual jobs. As a result, the bankers are caught, dead in the water.
And the fraud is at an end, no longer something that can be suppressed
and contained by filthy politicians and bankers meeting in secret.

The rats in DC are in a bad position, and more and more of them are
realizing it. 177 nations worldwide have recognized that the “Federal
United States” has acted as a criminal syndicate and that it has been
operating in a form and in a way forbidden by its charter and the
treaty and trust documents allowing its existence, so that it has not
faithfully “represented” the Continental United States and the
American People, but has instead been misusing and abusing Americans
at home and then also misusing American resources including the Armed
Forces as Bullies against other countries, fomenting war for profit,
and engaging in every kind of vice and war profiteering in “target
countries.”

While we Americans have been kept ignorant and clueless by the
perpetrators of these fraud schemes (all of which are easily
recognized as classic bunko schemes executed on an unimaginably
large scale) what I would most like to share with the rest of the
world at this point is that the American People — the People of the
Continental United States as opposed to some elements operating the
Federal United States —-are good people, moral people, peace-loving,
hard-working, God-fearing people. We were lied to, bullied,
purposefully deceived, taxed to death, deprived of basic rights
guaranteed by our actual Constitution, press-ganged into the
international jurisdiction of the sea, and defrauded of our labor and
our actual property assets. We suffered along with the rest of the
world.

Those responsible include the Crown Corporation and its agencies and
subsidiaries, the government of the Inner City of London aka
WESTMINSTER, the Lord Mayor, the Lords of the Admiralty, the British
Monarch dba ELIZABETH II, IMF, FEDERAL RESERVE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., and so on. Please note that the British Monarch is the
American International Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways and that all the abuse we have suffered and which the rest of the
world has endured, too, has been caused by British mismanagement and
war-mongering for profit.

The other thing I would like the world to know is that many American
government officials, even members of Congress, were kept in the dark.
This entire criminal scheme was designed to be operated by just a few
at the top.

Finally, I would like the rest of the world to know that preliminary
estimates indicate that only about 20% of the money appropriated to
fund domestic American welfare relief ever made it to any poor people,
and less than 2% of the money appropriated as foreign aid ever made it
to the intended recipients in other countries.

The American People have been defrauded and had the lion’s share of
their intended assistance to others at home and abroad siphoned off to
fund criminal activities.

The facts are now speaking for themselves. Anyone who wants to argue
with me or cast aspersions and suspicions at me as an individual
should be advised— I am not here to prove anything to anyone and I
am not the issue. The issue is the information. The facts. The
timeline. The fraud. Everyone in receipt of the information has the
basic tools necessary to research these matters for themselves and
they are fully invited to perform their own due diligence.

Numerous people from around the world have been contacting me and
asking for help related to their own governments. The basics of what
we have learned (at least to our satisfaction) is that the System was
introduced in England in 1867 by Benjamin D’israeli, with legislation
resulting in the “enfranchisement” of English workers. At the time, this

 was hailed as a good thing by English Labor Union leaders and other

Progressives who were deceived into thinking that the “right to vote”

was an advancement of the position of the working class.

It was in fact a means of further and officially enslaving the working class

by a process of registration.

If you look up the legal meaning of the word “registration” you will
learn that anytime you register something you are giving it or some
aspect of it up to the ownership or control of the entity keeping the
registration. It is not the same as publicly recording an ownership
interest in a piece of property, for example. Thus, when you “register to vote” you give up your natural right to elect your leaders and in effect hand

your proxy over to whomever cares to exercise it.

The word “enfranchisement” relates to this undisclosed registration
process, too, in terms of “enfranchised voters”, but more darkly, it
is used in the context of incorporation—- and that is what D’israeli
aimed at with the Acts of Parliament involving Enfranchisement. Think of large corporations that are operating in your various countries that have local franchises.

In America, it might be McDonald’s or Dairy Queen or Sears. These corporate franchises are obligated to be pretty much in lock-step with their national and
international parent corporations and they operate under franchise licenses.

Anytime you see the word “license” be aware that it is official permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal— in this case, the franchises receive the license to use the name, logo, recipes, products, etc., of the franchising corporation.

What does it mean to “enfranchise” a human being, in this sense of
“enfranchisement”?

It means to reduce you to an incorporated thing, a subsidiary subject
to the whims of corporate management. It means enslavement, body and
soul. In supposedly equitable exchange you receive the benefit of
voting for your slave masters and whatever privileges they give you,
the right to be taxed and regulated to death, the right to be
conscripted, the right to pay for a million dollar life insurance
policy with the parent corporation named as your beneficiary, and so
many other so-called “benefits” it hardly pays to name them.

This is what we have been dealing with. Thanks to Benjamin D’israeli
and a besotted Queen Victoria.

It also means that the banks, the Bar Associations, the Lords of the
Admiralty and the Lord Mayor and the Queen engaged in a systematic
program of press-ganging land assets into the international
jurisdiction of the sea. This crime has been outlawed—utterly
outlawed worldwide— for 200 years. It carries the death penalty and
they did it anyway, using a pathetic excuse.

Once they had “converted” all the living people and their estate
interests into franchises of the various governmental services
corporations, they could claim that they were justified in their
actions because there is no law against enslaving a corporation.

In actual practice and fact, of course, they did enslave the living
people and all their private property assets. This is how they were
able to enforce “Selective Service” and other forms of “The Draft”
during the Second World War. This is how they have been able to spend
uncontrollably and rack up huge amounts of odious debt against the
civilian populace.

By registering your birth, seizing control of your name, and creating
all sorts of corporate franchises benefiting their own corporations
named after you— they–the bankers and lawyers and politicians
effectively stole your identity and your credit cards.

Now we come to the issue of Odious Debt. Odious Debt is debt created
by fraud of which the victims are unaware and from which they do not
benefit. Much of the so-called “National Debts” around the world are
this form of debt, and Odious Debt is not collectible.

It must be written off and forgiven. This is what is behind Pope
Francis’s declaration of an International Year of Jubilee beginning
December 8, 2015.

Beyond that, we also come to the issue of National Credit. All these
fiat money systems have been operated as debt-credit systems. Every
time you create a debt in such a system you also create a credit.
Therefore, every National Debt is counterbalanced by a National
Credit. Why have you never heard about your National Credit, only your
National Debt? Because the perpetrators fully intended to leave the working people holding the bag while they siphoned off and absconded with not only
the National Credit owed, but the underlying actual physical assets as
well. They won’t be able to do that now, because now you know the truth
about “National Debts” and how those National Debts were accrued by
credit fraud, and you also know that you are owed an equal National
Credit.

Finally, everyone worldwide needs a lesson in the mechanisms of
fraudulent convertible debt. A fraudulent convertible debt is a debt
created by fraud that is converted into new ownership and used by the
perpetrators as investment capital. The most typical example is the
billing you receive every month for electrical service (at least in
America this is true).

What appears to be a bill comes addressed to YOUR NAME in capital
letters and your address. Unknown to you, this “billing statement”
isn’t really a true bill and it isn’t addressed to you. It is
addressed to a franchise of a governmental services corporation and
the “statement” is actually a voucher allowing you to cash in a
“dividend” equal to the amount shown as due and owing— but of course,
you are never told this and you are never told how to fill out the
coupon for credit. Instead, if you don’t submit payment you are
threatened with disconnection, and in this way, you are coerced into
paying the bills of a governmental services corporation’s franchise.

Of course, the utility company submits the bill each month directly
to the “government” and gets paid for servicing the franchise. That’s
payment Number One. Then they send you a billing statement and coerce
you to pay it. That’s payment Number Two. They establish a “capital
credits account” in YOUR name and deposit your payment in that
account. They then use that money as investment capital benefiting
their utility company and prevent you from accessing the capital
credit account you funded. In some cases, the utilities are so crooked
they set the “capital credits” aside and later claim that they are
“unclaimed funds” and abscond with them directly.

Fraudulent convertible debt always involves a double-dipping system
in which a charge gets paid for twice by different parties. In effect,
it gets you, the consumer, both coming and going. You are on the hook
to pay for the “government’s debts” — so as a group you paid for
payment Number One, and as an individual you were forced to provide
payment Number Two as well.

The same exact system of fraudulent convertible debt is used
throughout the mortgage industry. When you create a mortgage, it is
never credited to you— it is registered in YOUR NAME— as being
owned by a government franchise operated under your name, but not
belonging to you. Remember that the governmental services corporation
is the owner of YOUR NAME, which is the incorporated franchise they
are running for their own benefit under your name without your
knowledge or consent.

So you walk in to close what you are told is a loan being made to you,
and what happens? The bank takes your Promissory Note, which has
Actual Cash Value, just like a stack of bank notes, and they cash it.
That’s payment Number One, charged off against “the government”, which
of course passes the entire cost back to you and your brethren in the
form of taxation. Then the bankers come back under false pretense that
they actually loaned you something, and demand that you pay them back
principal and interest for thirty years and claim that you also owe
them a security interest in your property (which you gave them, albeit
under conditions of fraud and deceit and non-disclosure) which they
can foreclose upon if you fail to perform. That’s payment Number Two—so,
in effect, the banks charge you once, then charge you twice, plus
interest, plus a security interest that is undeserved—and you fund
all of it. You fund the first payment through your taxes to the
“government” and you fund the second through more of your labor
“donated” to the account of YOUR NAME and what really, did you
receive?

You received access to credit in a bank account held in YOUR NAME,
but not actually belonging to you, and you spent that credit on a home
and property that is recorded in YOUR NAME but which doesn’t actually
belong to you, either. Both the purported debt and the property belong
to the governmental services corporation’s franchise. You are just an
unpaid volunteer, doing all the work and producing all the credit to
fund these operations, for the benefit of the franchise.
It’s more usury, only this time, owing to the interest payments and
security interest, it’s more like quadruple dipping than double
dipping.

And all this blatant fraud based on semantic deceits and coercion and
racketeering and deceptively similar names has gone on under the noses
of all those you trusted to regulate banking and securities, precisely
because the banks were running the “governmental services
corporations” behind the scenes and were “regulating themselves.”

So what is the answer? Other than becoming aware yourself, spread the
word. There will be too many of us for them to silence and once people
know what went on, they will be stuck for it.

And what to do about replacing these criminal enterprises
masquerading as governments? Well, we all know how our governments are
supposed to be operated and by whom, and for most of us, that means we
have to get involved.

The Americans are busy restoring their actual government on the land
jurisdiction of the Continental United States. It’s our understanding
that Mrs. Merkel is doing her best in Germany and that numerous other
heads of state are grappling with the facts and trying to bring remedy
without bloodshed or disruption. Help them. We are informing the
members of Congress that they have been elected to private corporate
offices instead of public offices which they are meant to serve and
that this has been accomplished by fraud and deceit. They have to
choose their true allegiance and accept their true elected office in
order to serve and represent the interests of the Continental United
States as deputies and fiduciary officers—-and they otherwise have
no capability to enter into any valid contract in our behalf or claim
to represent anyone but themselves and their own little group of
cronies.

Meantime back home we are occupying the vacated public offices we are
owed and we are operating our state and county governments as judges,
sheriffs, bailiffs, clerks, legislators, and many other public offices
under American Common Law.

Action is moving forward on an international basis to end the
criminality, expose the fraud, and bring relief. Please keep your
minds and hearts fixed upon what is good and right and just, and
realize that the vast majority of the people who have been employed by
these corporations have been innocent of the evil they have
unwittingly done. Even many lawyers and judges are completely unaware
that they were doing anything wrong. To echo Jesus Christ, “Forgive
them, for they know not what they do.”

—although they are going to learn very shortly, and be offered a choice!

In closing, I would like to paraphrase King George V — “Keep calm
and get even.” Don’t give way to rage or violence of any kind. Realize
that your grievances have been fully documented and proven and that
the Mills of God grind slowly but exceedingly fine. Those who are
truly guilty cannot escape, those who have acted in error must be
forgiven, and the innocent who have suffered will in the end be
blessed by their own patience and kindness.

Anna Maria Riezinger a/k/a Anna Von Reitz
avannavon@gmail.com


On Death Killing and CopWatch

11/24/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/on-death-killing-and-copwatch.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

 By Anna Von Reitz

I have known too many people for whom death was a blessing to think ill of Death.

I have also grown to realize that none of us would want to live forever, trapped in the same body, stuck in the same identity, polling over the same skill sets, centuries after centuries. How boring and frustrating would that be, with no fresh starts?

Can you imagine arguing with your second wife over your first wife and kids for 800 years?

Being an Accountant for 500 years?

Having the nickname “Binky” for 700 years? (Makes my skin crawl just thinking about it.)

Even if you could maintain a steady-state at age 35 and perfect health “forever” —- there would come a time when you would want to move on and let go. I know it in my own soul. I think that if people are honest, they know the truth.

Now, killing is a different thing.

The reason that we shouldn’t kill isn’t that death is such a horrible-bad-ugly-no-good-awful thing, but because we can’t create life.

If you can’t create life, what right do you have to kill?

It’s not your life to take. It doesn’t belong to you. A murderer is a life-thief, and he can’t even give back what he stole.

Now the rest of the conundrum is what do you do with crazy people and people who murder for fun or for profit?

You can’t leave them running around on the streets, that’s obvious enough. They have to be caught. They have to be stopped.

But what do you do when these characters are hired in jobs of public trust? Layered in like time-bombs ready to go off whenever their imaginations and trigger fingers get the better of them?

And what do you do with soldiers and agency snipers who didn’t learn a thing from the Nuremberg trials? Gung-ho Whack-A-Mole types like Janet Reno and Dr. Strangelove?

These people exist and they are on our payroll, working for “our” government.

That should give everyone reading this cause to pause and itch.

You want people with no conscience and no moral logic sensors to be trained to murder people? You think that’s acceptable? Or sane?

Somehow the Nuremberg Message that “just following orders” isn’t a good enough excuse for genocide and other forms of murder—- needs to get drilled in. And the fact that “agencies” are not actually part of our government needs to be tattooed on sloping foreheads also.

FBI, FEMA, BATF, IRS—– these agencies are all private subcontractors, for-hire enforcement agents, also known as mercenaries—-and they are on our shores, causing trouble for us, because the people who are supposed to be over-seeing their activities are misdirecting them.

Remember Christopher Walken in “Mouse Trap”? Imagine 1500 characters like that who are armed, dangerous, and who think that you are the mouse? And who have bosses who pay them to think that and act accordingly?

There is nothing sacrosanct about all these agencies and the men working in them need a lot better training and focus and direction toward actual useful functions than they are getting. When you have old Nazi Hit-Men and Russian Mafia buying these agencies and controlling their functions, you’ve just stupidly put yourself and your whole country in a world of hurt–and that is just the obvious stuff we need to be concerned about and riding herd on.

No doubt Lon H. (for example) thought he was doing something necessary by drawing down on an innocent young Mother and her baby and trespassing on her private property to do it, but in fact he crossed the line between duty owed to a Commanding Officer and —lacked the logic circuits needed to recognize—the Moral Imperative.

Good men don’t trespass on private property. They don’t shoot innocent unarmed women and babies. They just don’t. Period.

So that right there tells you that these men who are doing these things are criminals in fact and don’t have the brains or the morals to be behind a gun, no matter how accurate their aim may be.

The rule is— if you can’t do it when you aren’t in uniform, you can’t do it when you are in uniform, either.

If it is not lawful for you to trespass on someone’s land and kick down their door and shoot them in their bath tub or stop them on a public road and ambush them when you are off-duty — guess what?

A crime is a crime is a crime and this criminal government and its sub-contracting agencies need to be exposed and hounded and set-upon in court and in public meetings and in every media venue there is until the message gets through the thick rinds and dead hearts on Capitol Hill.

This is why I subscribe to CopWatch.com and why I grill police officers and hold them to high standards. I do this because I know that a few out of control cops are worse than any average gang and better equipped. I also know that these men are often misdirected by their superiors and that they protect their superiors, who are often nothing but nasty little political capos in need of a good rump reaming and a different job.

Most of the police and law enforcement guys I meet are confused or jaded, mentally and morally adrift while holding the power of life and death in their hands. Far too often these “enforcement agents” know more about filing reports and producing revenue quotas and different kinds of ammunition than they know about the job we have actually hired them and their agencies to do.

As with so much else, it is up to us to tell them and make sure they listen real good to their job description— which does not include actions like Ruby Ridge and Waco and the ambush of LaVoy Finicum.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Olddogs Comments!

As far as governments go, we have the worst in the history of humanity and it amazes me that so few have the guts to fight back, even if it is nothing more than being informed so you can relate the truth to the younger generation. Americans if you do not get off your ass and get educated, all hell is going to break out and if you think it is bad now, wait until they have you locked up and waiting for execution just for demanding your freedom.


The Logic of the Thing

11/23/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/the-logic-of-thing.html

By Anna Von Reitz

I’ve got people scattered all over the map and missing the logic of what they are doing and why.

There are two levels of false claims imposed by two separate “US governments”— Territorial United States claims and Municipal United States claims— none of which apply to you unless you actually are a federal citizen.

As a result of those false claims and false legal presumptions you are being hit on all sides with demands and bills and charges galore that you don’t owe.  So you got two choices—- suffer the racketeering until you have nothing left and can’t pay any more extortion, after which they will evict you and turn you out on the street, or, decide to claim your exemption and (nicely) tell them to bug off.

You have to de-construct these claims and find ways to block the BEAST, step-by-step, sequentially.

Maxim of Law: As a thing is bound, so it is unbound.

This is like untying a knot— one of those Chinese knuckle-busters that gets tighter the harder you pull— if you don’t get it straight.

So why send back the Municipal PERSON’S Birth Certificate and appoint Steven T. Mnuchin Fiduciary for it?

To get it out of your hands, so that if THEY drag you or your assets into THEIR courts, you can say—- “Hey, if the prosecutor wants to bring any charges against the DEFENDANT they need to talk to Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury.  He’s the Fiduciary for that ACCOUNT, not me.”

Right.  And is the Prosecutor going to say one word to Steven T. Mnuchin?  No.

Is the Judge going to say anything more to you after having that placed squarely on the table?    Not if he has a brain in his head.

The purpose of that whole exercise is to deprive the rats of their ability to pretend that you are the Fiduciary responsible for paying the bills of the DEFENDANT.

So now you have a potent and provable defense against them playing their typical fraud scheme on you.  You can prove that you aren’t the Fiduciary, so now the only other thing you can be is the Subrogee — the Priority Creditor of the DEFENDANT and the bonds that the Prosecutor has brought forward in order to charge YOU.

Next, you ask, “Will the Prosecutor or Plaintiff please certify me as the Subrogee in writing?”

Bring out that Authenticated BC and put it on top of your pile of paper.  The Judge knows what it is, and about now, he’s beginning to sweat.

“I have the authenticated Indemnity Receipt guaranteed by THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE under the Full Faith and Credit Clause.”

Yeah, well, you sure do.  That’s as good as grenade with the pin out if you know how to use it.

About this time the Prosecutor is: (a) sweating, (b) blustering, (c) red-faced, (d) suddenly pale, (e) making frustrated hand gestures to the judge, who is looking (a) slightly green, (b) very tight-lipped, (c) leaned back in his chair, (d) leaned forward in his chair, peering down, (e) rolling his eyes like a demented bull.

“And I have my recorded Certificate of Assumed Name and recorded claim of the writ of Habeas Corpus enabling me to institute and maintain actions of any kind in the courts of “this” state while maintaining my actual true domicile on the land and soil of these United States….”

Billy-bub-billy-bum and a teedle-dee-dee…..  The bottom just dropped out of the sea.  The poor sharks are flopping around frantically on the mud flat, flipping and twisting and gnashing their teeth.

“If the Plaintiff and the Prosecutor won’t certify me as the Subrogee owed all interest in the DEFENDANT corporation and the bonds of that corporation, I guess I will have to ask the Adjutant General to certify me.”

Look around the court.  Give the Clerk a good stare.   Look the prosecuting attorney up and down.   Give the Judge a good-natured smile as if you were just discussing the nice weather.

“Or ask for all charges to be dismissed because otherwise, the Priority Creditor would be cheated and Justice would be turned upside down and fraud would be committed on the Court by the Prosecutor and the Clerk and the Plaintiff….”

“And I don’t recall granting any consent to the Court Clerk to act as my Porting Authority, either, which means I’ve been mis-addressed, too, doesn’t it?  Yes, I believe so.”

By now, things have gotten awfully quiet.  The Clerk of Court (not the Court Clerk) has probably turned off the recording so there isn’t even a whirring sound anywhere.

“Does the Court have any remedy to offer me?  If not, I will conclude that I have exhausted all remedy.   I will also conclude that the Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and therefore bears the cost of these proceedings.  I will request the bonds be liquidated along with the dismissal of the charges –with prejudice—and ask that the remainder of the funds be sent to me in care of the address you have on file.”

If by some fluke they actually offer you the bonds, waste no time.  Sign them right across the face:

“Accepted for Payment and Settlement of This ACCOUNT Case Number:________” by (Your Name in Upper and Lower Case) all rights reserved. Date it.

And now you just have to break off.  Nod and smile nicely and wish everyone a good-afternoon.  And walk out.  If the judge calls your name— don’t look back, just keep on walking unless some Bailiff is dumb enough to try to block your way and restrain you.  Play the same “I can’t hear you and I can’t see you” game as they play.  And remember Lot’s Wife.

All cool and calm and nice as a field of daisies.

Keeping your freedom and your assets is Job One.  Anything and everything else that comes out of the process is gravy.  As we gain traction and more and more people wake up, the word will spread and the consensus of what to do about it will harden into action demanding correction and mandating change.  The police will know the truth.  The soldiers will know the truth.  The lawyers and bankers will all know the truth.

But the Clincher is that you and your family and your friends and your neighbors will know the truth and the rats among us will know that you know.

That is when you will see the mass exodus from the grain storage facilities.

Until then, try to see the logic of what you are doing and go step by step.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


JFK Bethesda Autopsy Photos not JFK Oswald Framed Warren Report a Sham

11/22/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/jfk-bethesda-autopsy-photos-not-jfk.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Finally.  The Truth Begins to Emerge About JFK.  An Update From Jim Fetzer, USMC, Retired….. via Ambassador Lee E. Wanta:

I don’t usually just hit “Forward” on a message and send it to my List or publish it on my page, but I am making an exception today.

I was seven years-old when the Deed in Dallas went down, and even then, I was sitting in front of the TV saying, “But Mom, this is all phony!  Can’t you see where the bullet came from?”

[I have held my immediate distrust and dislike for LBJ throughout my lifetime.  I never lost the feeling that he had something to do with it besides being next in line.  Maybe we will finally find out exactly what his role in these murders (plural) and cover-ups (plural) was.]

Trump released thousands of files on the JFK Assassination a couple weeks ago.  And guess what?  What we all knew was phony was phony. Oswald was a patsy.  The guy on the slab wasn’t even JFK.  And here is the proof in black and white presented below.

Please pause a moment and think: what you are seeing now has been known by  hundreds if not thousands of Dallas police, federal agency subcontractors, and actual government employees, not to mention the Kennedy family, for over fifty years.  They knew.  They had to know.  So where does that leave us?

What happened to the actual JFK?   Was he kidnapped?  Murdered in cold blood in the Oval Office?   Imprisoned somewhere—here or abroad?   He certainly never re-appeared among the living.  Jackie moved on.  His children grew up.  The nation mourned.

For a brief and shining moment, this one man captured the hearts and inspired the minds of not just Americans, but people all over the world.  And then he was snuffed out like a brightly burning candle, and the world he illuminated guttered into night.

What I felt most of all about this as a small child was righteous anger, a certainty that those who did this— whoever did it, however they did it— deserved to go down in infamy, deserved to be caught, tried, and executed, deserved to have every one of us walk by and spit on their tombstones forever afterward.    I feel the same way about them as I feel about the sniper who shot Randy Weaver’s wife and baby as they stood in the doorway of their own cabin on American soil and the callous vermin who massacred civilians in Vietnam and the adherents of “ISIS” mindlessly beheading and burning what isn’t theirs to kill and more recently the mindless sewer rats who planned the ambush and execution of LaVoy Finicum, an innocent American Rancher exercising his right to attend a public assembly.

Such men do not deserve to live and much less do they deserve to live among us.  We need to wake up.  We need to stop ducking and dodging and hoping that we won’t be next.  We have to find our courage and our resolve to put an end to this criminality in our government once and for all.

Here is the link.

https://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2017/11/jfk-bethesda-autopsy-photos-not-jfk.html

Editors note: I have captured these documents and they are live on my server also but I wanted you to see the original article first because of the animation on the pictures.

Paul Stramer

http://annavonreitz.com/jfk/johnfkennedy.pdf

http://annavonreitz.com/jfk/mydailyprayer2017.pdf

http://annavonreitz.com/jfk/roscoeanim.mp4

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


A Most Valuable Process

11/21/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/a-most-valuable-process.html

By Anna Von Reitz

As you gird up to make your claims stick, watch Winston Shrout’s YouTube video on The GoldFish Report No. 156 about the Writ of Habeas Corpus, November 17, 2017, and how to force the courts to deal with you as a private person. I highly recommend that everyone order the DVD, too.

Also go to

www.InPowerMovement.com to learn how to do a proper Notice of Liability.

These recommendations are about process— the step-by-step building of a claim.

As Winston points out in this referenced video, building a claim in court is like building a house. You have to start out by building a firm foundation. You do this by getting your documents and recordings in place and by presenting the evidence in a logical competent fashion.

Claiming the writ of Habeas Corpus and properly identifying yourself and your capacity to the Court is key to claiming your indemnity (exemption) and the value of the bond that was established in your NAME without your knowing consent.

The first thing you need to realize is that United States District Courts and all the federated state and county courts have no jurisdiction related to the living man, also known as the living soul (L.S.). Any court dealing in statutory law has jurisdiction over corporations that are created by statute and nothing else.

They have asserted jurisdiction over you and your assets by falsely claiming that you are “missing, presumed dead” and then establishing public trusts and public transmitting utilities named after you—- corporations that they can sue and charge and otherwise manipulate under statutory law.

They have also falsified the public records concerning you, which you need to correct either directly in court or by establishing new public records.

Those of you who followed my suggestion that you record your Common Law Copyright Claim with the nearest land recording office already have a claim to the writ of Habeas Corpus in place— subjecting all the courts of “this” state (the territorial or municipal “STATE” or “State”) while retaining your own standing and domicile on the land jurisdiction state.

The simplest approach is always best. For all civil cases and criminal cases not involving direct physical arrest, I recommend not even going to their court, as you can invoke a “special and restricted appearance” under Rule E of the Supplemental Rules and “appear” via a Registered Letter instead.

If the prosecutors bring a charge against any federal PERSON named after you, you send a letter marked “Private and Confidential” back to the Senior Judge of the Court. You will want to use your Christian aka Trade Name–First, Middle, Last– written in Upper and Lower Case, placed in the center of the page with a mailing address set up as “in care of” whatever Post Office Box or street address you care to use right beneath it, and under that the Registered Mail Number you are using to deliver your “special restricted appearance”.

Send a black and white photocopy of your Authenticated Birth Certificate stamped “Private and Confidential” and write “For Administrative Use Only” on it and sign your own Upper and Lower Case First-Middle-Last name across all the seals that appear on that black and white copy of the BC. This is Notice that you have taken control of that “Vessel”.

If you have established your Common Law (Land Jurisdiction) Copyright to your Trade Name by any of the processes I have described (formal correction and deed of re-conveyance, or simply recording your ownership of the Assumed Name(s) with the County Land Recording Office or both) include certified copies of these recorded documents as further evidence that you have taken control as the Holder in Due Course.

In your letter to the Senior Judge you will want to inform him that: (1) charges have been brought against a DEFENDANT corporation that was created and named after your Trade Name without your knowing consent via an unconscionable contract; (2) you are the Party of Interest in Fact and the Subrogee owed all Priority claim and interest against the bonds brought forward by the Prosecutor; (3) you are in fact exempt and known to be an internationally Protected Person; (4) the Clerk does not have your delegated authority to act as your Port Authority in the referenced venue; (5) please send the check for the bond recoupment to you at the address shown above; (6) please investigate and fine the Prosecuting Attorney should it be found that he or she failed to post a Bid Bond and/or failed to fully and truthfully inform the court of the actual Facts.

Thank you, very much, cordially, etc., etc., etc.,

John Michael Doe, a peaceful American state national….

That is the first thing you do when you are accosted by these rats in any civil case, including mortgage cases. Fully inform the Senior Judge so that his cajones are on the line and the court has no plausible deniability if it takes any action resulting in harm to you or your estate.

And since you have a standing claim to writ of Habeas Corpus on the Public Record (assuming that you followed the format we shared and recorded a Certificate of Assumed Name including such a claim) you can even use this in the case of physical arrest.

Just memorize the document number and recording district where you recorded your Certificate of Assumed Name and tell the arresting Officer that the Court is already served your writ of Habeas Corpus on the Public Record (recording number blah-blah-blah, Recording District blah for the blah-blah-blah County and blah-blah State) …..

They have 72 hours to release you and the Sheriff of the County has the obligation to serve Notice to the presiding Judge and the Clerk immediately.

The pieces of the puzzle are coming together and more and more of the pieces are falling into our hands.

See the Certificate of Assumed Name example (you have to add your own NAME/Name and other data) posted on my website. If the local land recording office won’t accept it, go elsewhere, even to another state. In the federated “state of state” system a recording in one is a recording in all. Notice that the claim to the writ of the Habeas Corpus is already built into the Certificate of Assumed Name example.

This process is deadly when used properly against statutory claims and charges. It will not stand against charges involving actual men and women bringing charges of first-hand injury—nor should it.

Always remember— rights go with responsibilities.

You can subrogate federal and state of state corporations with impunity and immunity, but in doing so— remember that you also have obligations to your countrymen and your community. Live in peace and be at peace and let the peace of God be your portion.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


A SPECIAL REPORT ON THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

11/20/2017

WAR AND EMERGENCY POWERS

Researched and Written By

 

Gene Schroder, Alvin Jenkins, Jerry Russell, Ed Petrowsky, Russell Grieder, Darrell Schroder, Walter Marston, Lyml Bitner, Billy Schroder, Van Stafford, Fred Peters, Tinker Spain, Paul Bailey.

Introduction to Dr. Schroder’s Work

 Dr. Eugene Schroder has found the key to why our Constitutionally guaranteed rights are violated daily. It’s the insidious use of “emergency powers”  meant  to  be  used  only  in  time  of  invasion  of  rebellion.

Dr. Schroder proves with the government’s own documents that the Constitution has been effectively set aside since 1933. Eleven presidents, both Democrat and Republican, have used emergency powers for the last

67 years to regulate our daily lives without the inconvenience of Congressional approval. The definition of “emergencies” has been stretched to include economic problems, social imbalances, and perceived threats to the US by any foreign country’s actions, even those on other continents.

Senate Report 93-549, written in 1973, says “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the president may: seize property;…seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control      all transportation  and communication;…restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”

The president can act through Executive Order, Presidential Proclamation, or through his many agencies, which include most of the alphabet agencies.

The framers of the Constitution asserted that Americans have certain inalienable, God-given rights. But under emergency rule, all these rights are declared null and void. The government charges us for these rights by requiring licenses and excessive paperwork, with strings attached, as  long as restrictive and ill-defined requirements are met.

Dr. Schroder’s landmark research is documented in three books: Constitution: Fact or Fiction; War and Emergency Powers Special Report; and War, Central Planning and Corporations – The Corporate State. These may be obtained from Buffalo Creek Press.

I would also suggest a complete and thorough study of “Our Enemy, the State” by Albert J. Nock, “The Law” by Frederick Bastiat, “Trial by  Jury” by Lysander Spooner, “The Declaration of Independence” and of course, “The Constitution For The United States

AMERICAN AGRICULTURE MOVEMENT

 

“Study the Constitution. Let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislatures, and enforced in courts of justice.” Abraham Lincoln

 “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; right derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe” John Adams

 “I believe there are more instances of abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power that by violent and sudden usurpations..” James Madison

A word from the Editor:

 We must give a special thanks to the men who have spent years of their lives bringing this information to the public; and we must not forget the women who are not always in the foreground but without whose undying support and endurance this effort would be impossible. These men and women are true Patriots; they not only need your support but deserve it. Let us remember that the word Patriot as defined by Webster’s  Dictionary as “fellow countryman; a person who loses and loyally or zealously supports his own country”. Not everyone can afford to give the long hours of those on the front lines; many others fear their government. Isn’t it an outrage that the actions of our own government leaders causes many to not trust them? Where have we gone? How much is your freedom worth? If you can not give your time, please give your support. The American Agriculture Movement and many other organizations need your help to continue their efforts to bring about the Restoration of this Nation. A few dollars a month, in the form of purchasing information to pass on to others, is not too much to ask. Wouldn’t it be a tragedy to lose their efforts, from which we will all gain so much, because they were twenty dollars short, and we failed to do our part? Please, become involved; this movement is too important not to do so. We need this Report in the hands of all Americans, so we are not going to copyright it; therefore, permission is hereby granted to reproduce this Report in its entirety. We do ask, however, that you lend your support, if possible, by purchasing an original Report to make copies from so that the quality will be maintained. Thank you.

– Paul Bailey

INTRODUCTION

 To be able to call oneself “American” has long been a source of pride for those fortunate enough to live in this great land. The word “America” has always been synonymous with strength in the defense of our highest ideals of liberty, justice and opportunity, not only for ourselves, but for those throughout the world less fortunate than we.

America’s greatest strength has always been her people, individuals laying their differences aside to work in partnership to achieve common goals. In our greatest moments, it has been our willingness to join together and work as long and as hard as it takes to get the job done, regardless of the cost, that has been the lifeblood of our great land.

From America’s inception, we have been a nation of innovators  unfettered by hidebound convention, a safe harbor for captains unafraid to boldly chart a new :course through untried waters. This courage  to dare greatly to achieve great things has made our nation strong and proud, a leader of men and of nations from the very first days of her  birth. And since the days of her birth, millions of men and women whose hearts yearn for freedom and the opportunity to make a better life for themselves and their families have journeyed, often enduring terrible hardship, to our shores to add their skills and their dreams to the great storehouse of hope known as America.

The Pilgrims, the Founding Fathers, the Pioneers – the brave men and women who have fought and endured to the end in wars both civil and international – this history of heroism and dedication in defense of ideals both personal and national has long been a treasured legacy of bravery and determination against all odds which we have handed down like family heirlooms from generation to generation.

For we are like family, we Americans, often quarreling among ourselves but banding together in times of adversity to support one another and fight side by side against a common foe threatening our way of life. This bold and brash, brave young land has long given its best and brightest to lead our country to its lofty position in the world as a bastion of freedom and a beacon of hope for all the peoples of the Earth.

For many, the dreams they had for America were dreams they never  lived to see fulfilled, but it mattered not to them, for their vision for this nation was meant to last longer and to loom larger than a mere mortal lifespan. Our national vision of integrity and responsibility, of concern  for one’s fellow man, the flame inside that demands of us that we shall not rest until there is peace and justice for all – these are the fundamental stones which form the strong foundation of our national purpose and identity.

And on this foundation rests, not only the hopes of those blessed to live  in this great land, but the hopes of millions throughout the word who believe in, and strive for, a better life for themselves and their children. For hundreds of years, the knowledge that America was there – proud, generous, steadfast, courageous – willing and able to enter the fray wherever human rights were threatened or denied, has given many who may never see her shores the will to endure despite the pain, to continue trying against sometimes insurmountable odds.

Yet without vigilance and constant tender care, even the strongest foundation shows the effects of stress and erosion. Even the most imposing edifice can eventually crumble and fall. So it is with nations, and with a nation’s spirit.

We have seen in this second half of the twentieth century great advances in technology which have impacted every aspect of modern life. Ironically, though we are living in the “age of communication”, it often seems as if we have less time now to talk or listen. For most, modern conveniences haven’t gotten them off the treadmill; they have only made the treadmill go faster.

Quietly, yet rapidly, the small town values of community and common purpose are vanishing. Instead of strength in numbers, we as a nation are increasingly being split into smaller and smaller competing factions, with the cry of “every man for himself’ ringing through the land. It seems that the phrase, “divide and conquer” has taken the place of, “One nation under God indivisible, with truth and justice for all”. Americans are retreating behind the locked doors of their individual homes, afraid to enjoy the sunset for fear of the darkness it brings.

When and where did it all begin to crumble? How and why has America, which once was a nation whose strength united was so much more than the sum of its total parts, begin to break apart into bitterly opposing special interest groups? What will this frightening pattern of disintegration mean to the future of America and of those  who  live within her shores? Let it be remembered, and remembered well, the  words of the Holy Bible: “a house divided against itself cannot stand”. And let us not flinch from facing the truth that we have become a nation desperately divided.

With the long legacy of pride, determination, and strength in unity, how has it now come to this, that we are fighting ourselves? Finally, and most vitally important of all, what can we do to turn the tide before the values and opportunities which others before us fought and died to preserve are washed away in the flood to come?

What you are about to see is the result of years of painstaking and meticulous research on the part of dedicated Americans gravely concerned for this nation’s future. Please listen closely and give your undivided attention to this presentation, for our future as individuals and free citizens of this mighty land depends upon it.

We are not here to showcase personalities the speakers could be any one of you here today. We are, first and last, concerned Americans much like yourselves, taking our stand in defense of the nation we love. Much  effort has been expended, and great hardships endured, by the American Agricultural Movement and many other organizations and individuals to bring this information to the public forum.

There is a wealth of information about many of the problems we face as  a nation today, written from a variety of viewpoints. But as with a deadly illness, there is usually a point of origin, from which the threat first was given life. So it is with the threat we as Americans face today – an illness which could prove fatal if we do not act quickly and in concert to cure the body politic before it dies from the disease within.

Almost all the problems we are facing today can be traced back to a single point of origin, in a time of national trouble and despair. It was at this point, when our nation struggled for its survival, that  the Constitution of the United States of America was effectively canceled.

We are in a State of Emergency!

REPORT

 We are going to begin with a series of documents which are representative of the documents contained in this Report. We will be quoting from, in many cases, Senate and Congressional reports, hearings before National Emergency Committees, Presidential Papers, Statutes at Large, and the United States Code.

The first exhibit is taken from a book written by Carl Brent Swisher — American Constitutional Development, A complete constitutional  history, from the British colonies to the Truman era. Let’s read the first paragraph. It says,

“We may well wonder in view of the precedents now established,” said Charles E. Hughes, (Supreme Court Justice) in 1920, “whether constitutional government as heretofore maintained in this Republic could survive another great war even victoriously waged.”

How could that happen? Surely, if we go out and fight a war and win it, we’d have to end up stronger than the day we started, wouldn’t we? Justice Hughes goes on to say,

“The conflict known as the World War had ended as far as military hostilities were concerned, but was not yet officially terminated. Most of the war statutes were still in effect, many of the emergency organizations were still in operation.”

What is this man talking about when he speaks of “war statutes in effect and emergency organizations still in operation”?

In 1933, Congressman Beck, speaking from the Congressional Record, states,

“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. This means its death. It is the very doctrine that the German chancellor is invoking today in the dying hours of the parliamentary  body of the German republic, namely, that because of an emergency, it should grant to the German chancellor absolute power to pass any law, even though the law contradicts the Constitution of the German republic. Chancellor Hitler is at least frank about it. We pay the Constitution lip- service, but the result is the same.”

Congressman Beck is saying that, of all the damnable heresies that ever existed, this doctrine of emergency has got to be the worst, because once Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. He goes on to say,

“But the Constitution of the united States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes a law, there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its Constitutional powers.”

What bill is Congressman Beck talking about? In 1933, “the House passed the Farm Bill by a vote of more than three to one.” Again, we see the doctrine of emergency. Once an emergency is declared, there is no Constitution.

The CAUSE and EFFECT of the doctrine of emergency is the subject of this Report.

In 1973, in Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973), (Exhibit 2), the first sentence reads,

“Since March the 9th, 1933, the united States has been in a state of declared national emergency.”

Let’s go back to Exhibit 1 just before this. What did that say? It says that if a national emergency is declared, there is no Constitution. Now, let us return to Exhibit 2. Since March the 9th of 1933, the United States has been, in fact, in a state of declared national emergency.

Referring to the middle of this exhibit:

“This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens”

This situation has continued uninterrupted since the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719

In the introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 2):

“A majority of the people of the united States have lived all their lives under emergency rule.”

Remember, this report was produced in 1973. The introduction goes on  to say:

“For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought  into force by states of national emergency.”

The introduction continues:

“And, in the united States, actions taken by the government in times of great crisis have — from, at least, the Civil War — in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.”

How many people were taught that in school? How could it possibly be that something which could suspend our Constitution would not be  taught in school? Amazing, isn’t it?

Where does this (Exhibit 2) come from? Is it possible that, in our Constitution, there could be some section which could contemplate what these previous documents are referring to? In Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of the united States of America, we find the following words:

“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

Habeas Corpus – the Great Writ of Liberty (Latin: …”you have the body.”). This is the writ which guarantees that the government cannot charge us and hold us with any crime, unless they follow the procedure  of due process of law. This writ also says, in effect, that the privilege of due process of law cannot be suspended, and that the government cannot not operate its arbitrary prerogative power against We the People. But we see that the great Writ of Liberty can, in fact, under the Constitution, be suspended when an invasion or a rebellion necessitates it.

In the 5th Amendment to the Constitution (Exhibit 3), it says:

“No Person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise Infamous Crime, unless on a Presentment or Indictment of a Grand Jury, except in Cases arising in the Land or Naval forces or in the Militia, when in actual Service in Time of War or public Danger;…”.

We reserved the charging power for ourselves, didn’t we? We didn’t give that power to the government. And we also said that the government would be powerless to charge one of the citizens or one of the peoples of the united States with a crime unless We, the People, through our grand jury, orders it to do so through an indictment or a presentment. And if We, the People, don’t order it, the government cannot do it. If it tried to do it, we would simply follow the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and they would have to release us, wouldn’t they? They could not hold us.

But let us recall that, in Exhibit 3, it says:

“except in Cases arising in the Land or Naval forces or in the Militia, when in actual Service in Time of War or public Danger;…”

We can see here that the framers of the Constitution were already contemplating times when there would be conditions under which it might be necessary to suspend the guarantees of the Constitution.

Also from Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 2), and remember that our congressmen wrote these reports and these documents and they’re talking about these emergency powers and they say:

“They are quite careful and restrictive on the power, but the power to suspend is specifically contemplated by the Constitution in the Writ of Habeas Corpus.”

Now, this is well known. This is not a concept that was not known to rulers for many, many years. The concepts of constitutional dictatorship went clear back to the Roman Republic. And there, it was determined that, in times of dire emergencies, yes, the constitution and the rights of the people could be suspended, temporarily, until the crisis, whatever its nature, could be resolved.

But once it was done, the Constitution, was to be returned to its peacetime position of authority. In France, the situation under which the constitution could be suspended is called the State of Siege. In Great Britain, it’s called the Defense of the Realm Acts. In Germany, in which Hitler became a dictator, it was simply called Article 48. In the United States, it is called the War Powers.

If that was, in fact, the case, and we are under a war emergency in this country, then there should be evidence of that war emergency in the current law that exists today. That means we should be able to go to the federal code known as the USC or “United States Code”, and find that statute, that law, in existence. If we went to the library today and picked up a copy of 12 USC Section 95b (Exhibit 4), we will find a law which states:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection

(b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, Sec. 1, 48 Stat. 1.)”.

Now, what does this mean? It means that everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has done since the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933, (48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719), or anything that the President or the Secretary of the Treasury is hereafter going to do, is automatically approved and confirmed. Referring back to Exhibit 2, let us remember that, according to the Congressional Record of 1973, the United States has been in a state of national emergency since 1933. Then we realize that 12 USC, Section 95b is current law. This is the law that exists over these united States right this moment.

If that be the case, let us see if we can understand what is being said here. As every action, rule or law put into effect by the President or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th of 1933 has or will be confirmed and approved, let us determine the significance of that date in history. What happened on March the 4th of 1933?

On March the 4th of 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was inaugurated  as President of the United States. Referring to his inaugural address (Exhibit 5), which was given at a time when the country was in the  throes of the Great Depression, we read:

“I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption.

But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis — broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.”

On March the 4th, 1933, at his inaugural, President Roosevelt was saying that he was going to ask Congress for the extraordinary authority available to him under the War Powers Act. Let’s see if he got it.

On March the 5th, President Roosevelt asked for a special and extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038 (Exhibit 6). He called for the special session of Congress to meet on March the 9th at noon. And at that Congress, he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes.

In the enabling portion of that Act (Exhibit 6), it states:

“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the united States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application.”

What is the concept of the rule of necessity, referred to in the enabling portion of the Act as “imperatively necessary speedily”? The rule of necessity is a rule of law which states that necessity knows no law. A good example of the rule of necessity would be the concept of self- defense. The law says, “Thou shalt not kill”. But also know that, if you are in dire danger, in danger of losing your life, then you have the absolute right of self-defense. You have the right to kill to protect your own life. That is the ultimate rule of necessity.

Thus we see that the rule of necessity overrides all other law, and, in fact, allows one to do that which would normally be against the law. So it is reasonable to assume that the wording of the enabling portion of the Act of March 9, 1933, is an indication that what follows is something which will probably be against the law. It will probably be against the Constitution of the United States, or it would not require that the rule of necessity be invoked to enact it.

In the Act of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 6), it further states in Title 1, Section 1:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision

(b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.”

Where have we read those words before?

This is the exact same wording as is found (Exhibit 5) today in Title 12, USC 95b. The language in Title 12, USC 95b is exactly the same as that found in the Act of March 9, 1933, Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1

The Act of March 9, 1933, is still in full force and effect today. We are still under the Rule of Necessity. We are still in a declared state of national emergency, a state of emergency that has existed, uninterrupted, since 1933, or for over sixty years.

As you may remember, the authority to do this is conferred by  Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended. What was the authority which was used to declare and enact the emergency in this Act? If we look at the Act of October 6, 1917 (Exhibit 8), we see that at the top right-hand part of the page, it states that this was:

“An Act To define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for other purposes.

By the year 1917, the United States was involved in World War I; at that point, it was recognized that there were probably enemies of the United States, or allies of enemies of the United States, living within the continental borders of our nation in a time of war.

Therefore, Congress passed this Act which identified who could be declared enemies of the United States, and, in this Act, we gave the government total authority over those enemies to do with as it saw fit.  We also see, however, in Section 2, Subdivision (c) in the middle, and again at the bottom of the page: other than citizens of the united States.”

The Act specifically excluded citizens of the united States, because we realized in 1917 that the citizens of the united States were not enemies. Thus, we were excluded from the war powers over enemies in this Act.

Section 5b of the same Act (Exhibit 8), states:

“That the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, export or earmarkings  of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any form (other than credits relating solely to transactions to be executed wholly within the United States)”.

Again, we see here that citizens, and the transactions of citizens made wholly within the United States, were specifically excluded from the war powers of this Act. We, the People, were not enemies of our country; therefore, the government did not have total authority over us as they were given over our enemies.

It is important to draw attention again to the fact that citizens of the United States in October, 1917, were not called enemies. Consequently the government, under the war powers of this Act, did not have authority over us; we were still protected by the Constitution. Granted, over enemies of this nation, the government was empowered to do anything it deemed necessary, but not over us. The distinction made between enemies of the United States and citizens of the united States will  become crucial later on. Please note the distinction between “United States, and that of “united States”…

In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 8), “Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows;

So we see that they are now going to amend Section 5 (b). Now let’s see how it reads after it’s amended. The amended version of Section 5 (b) reads (emphasis is ours):

“During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person within the (united States) or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof..” (NOTE: later we will discuss that jurisdiction … for now please take note of this important point.).

What just happened? At as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were concerned, the people of the united States were no longer differentiated from any other enemy of the United States. We had lost that crucial distinction. Comparing Exhibit 17 with Exhibit 19, we can see that the phrase which excluded transactions executed wholly within the united States has been removed from the amended version of Section 5 (b) of the Act of March 9, 1933, Section 2, and replaced with “by any person within the united States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof’. All monetary transactions, whether domestic or international in scope, were now placed at the whim of the (President of the United States) through the authority given to him by the Trading with the enemy Act.

NOTE: change of title now! Exactly whom does the President represent in this situation now??)

To summarize this critical point: On October the 6th of 1917, at the beginning of America’s involvement in World War 1, Congress passed a Trading with the enemy Act empowering the government to take control over any and all commercial, monetary or business  transactions conducted by enemies or allies of enemies within our continental borders. That Act also defined the term “enemy” and excluded from that definition citizens of the united States.

In Section 5 (b) of this Act, we see that the President was given  unlimited authority to control the commercial transactions of defined enemies, but we see that credits relating solely to transactions executed wholly within the united States were excluded from that controlling authority. As transactions wholly domestic in nature were excluded from authority, the government had no extraordinary control over the daily business conducted by the citizens of the united States, because we were certainly not enemies.

Citizens of the united States were not enemies of their country in 1917, and the transactions conducted by citizens within this country were not considered to be enemy transactions. But in looking again at Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, (Exhibit 17), we can see that the phrase excluding wholly domestic transactions has been removed from the amended version and replaced with “by any person within the united States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof’.

The people of the united States were now subject to the power of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6,1917, as amended. For the purposes of all commercial, monetary and, in effect, all business transactions, We, the People became the same as the enemy, and were treated no differently. There was no longer any distinction.

It is important here to note that, in the Acts of October 6, 1917 and  March 9, 1933, it states: “during times of war or during any other national emergency declared by the President..”. So we now see that the war powers not only included a period of war, but also a period of “national emergency” as defined by the President of the United States. When either of these two situations occur, the President may, (Exhibit 8)

“through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate or prohibit under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as  defined by the President and export, hoarding, melting or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency by any person within the united States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

What can the President do now to the We, the People, under this  Section? He can do anything he wants to do. It’s purely at his discretion, and he can use any agency or any license that he desires to control it. This is called a constitutional dictatorship.

 In Senate Document 93-549 (Exhibit 2), Congress declared that a serious emergency exists, at:

“48 Stat. 1. The exclusion of domestic transactions, formerly found in the Act, was deleted from Sect. 5 (b) at this time.”

Our Congress wrote that in the year 1973.

Now let’s find out about the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917. Quoting from a Supreme Court decision (Exhibit 9), Stoehr v. Wallace, 1921:

“The Trading With the Enemy Act, originally and as amended, is strictly a war measure, and finds its sanction in the provision empowering Congress “to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water” Const. Art. 1, Sect. 8, cl. 11. P. 241″.

Remember your Constitution? “Congress shall have the power to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal and make all rules concerning the captures on the land and the water of the enemies.” ALL RULES.

 If that be the case, let us look at the memorandum of law that now covers trading with the enemy, the “Memorandum of American Cases and Recent English Cases on The Law of Trading With the Enemy” (Exhibit 11), remembering that we are now the same as the enemy. In this memorandum, we read:

“Every species of intercourse with the enemy is illegal. This prohibition is not limited to mere commercial intercourse.”

This is the case of The Rapid (1814). Additionally,

“No contract is considered as valid between enemies, at least so far as to give them a remedy in the courts of either government, and they have, in the language of the civil law, no ability to sustain a persona standi in judicio.”

In other words, they have no personal rights at law in court. This is the case of The Julia (1813).

In the next case, the case of The Sally (1814) (Exhibit 12), we read the words:

“By the general law of prize, property engaged in an illegal intercourse with the enemy is deemed enemy property. It is of no consequence whether it belong to an ally or to a citizen; the illegal traffic stamps it with the hostile character, and attaches to it all the penal consequences of enemy ownership.”

Reading further in the memorandum, again from the case of The Rapid:

“The law of prize is part of the law of nations. In it, a hostile character is attached to trade, independently of the character of the trader who pursues or directs it. Condemnation to the use of the captor is equally the fate of the property of the belligerent and of the property found engaged in anti-neutral trade. But a citizen or an ally may be engaged in a hostile trade, and thereby involve his property in the fate of those in whose  cause he embarks.”

Again from the memorandum (Exhibit 12):

“The produce of the soil of the hostile territory, as well as other property engaged in the commerce of the hostile power, as the souce of its wealth and strength, are always regarded as legitimate prize, without regard to the domicile of the owner”.

From the case (Exhibit 13) of The William Bagaley (1866):

“In general, during war, contracts with, or powers of attorney or agency from, the enemy executed after outbreak of war are illegal and void; contracts entered into with the enemy prior to the war are either suspended or are absolutely terminated; partnerships with an enemy are dissolved; powers of attorney from the enemy, with certain exceptions, lapse; payments to the enemy (except to agents in the united States appointed prior to the war and confirmed since the war) are illegal and void; all rights of an enemy to sue in the courts are suspended.”

From Senate Report No. 113 (Exhibit 14), in which we find An Act to Define, Regulate, and Punish Trading with the Enemy, and For Other Purposes, we read:

“The trade or commerce regulated or prohibited is defined in Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), page 4. This trade covers almost every imaginable transaction, and is forbidden and made unlawful except when allowed under the form of licenses issued by the Secretary of Commerce (p. 4, sec. 3, line 18). This authorization of trading under licenses constitutes the principal modification of the rule of international law forbidding trade between the citizens of belligerents, for the power to grant such licenses, and therefore exemption from the operation of law,  is given by the bill.”

It says no trade can be conducted or no intercourse can be conducted without a license, because, by mere definition of the enemy, and under the prize law, all intercourse is illegal.

That was the first case we looked at, Exhibit 12, wasn’t it? So once we were declared enemies, all intercourse became illegal for us. The only way we could now do business or any type of legal intercourse was to obtain permission from our government by means of a license. We are certainly required to have a Social Security Card, which is a license to work, and a Driver’s License, which gives the government the ability to restrict travel; all business in which we engage ourselves requires us to have a license, does it not?

Returning once again to the Memorandum of Law: (Exhibit 13)

“But it is necessary always to bear in mind that a war cannot be carried on without hurting somebody, even, at times, our own citizens. The public good, however, must prevail over private gain. As we said in Bishop U. Jones (28 Texas, 294), there cannot be “a war for arms and a peace for commerce.” One of the most important features of the bill is that which provides for the temporary taking over of the enemy property,”.

This point of law is important to keep in mind, for it authorizes the temporary take-over of enemy property. The question is: Once the war terminates, the property must be returned — mustn’t it?

The property that is confiscated, and the belligerent right of the government during the period of war, must be returned when the war terminates. Let us take the case of a ship in harbor; war breaks out, and the Admiral says, “I’m seizing your ship.” Can you stop him? No. But when the war is over, the Admiral must return your ship to you. This point is important to bear in mind, for we will return to, and expand upon, it later in the report.

Reading from (Exhibit 28) Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts Payable in Gold” written in 1933:

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so- called, “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i. e., law,  amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

Who owns all the property? Who owns the property you call “yours”? Who has the authority to mortgage property? Let us continue with a Supreme Court decision, (Exhibit 29) United States v. Russell:

“Private property, the Constitution provides, shall not be taken for public use without just compensation….”

That is the peacetime clause, isn’t it? Further (emphasis is ours),

“Extraordinary and unforeseen occasions arise, however, beyond all doubt, in cases of extreme necessity in time of war or of immediate and impending  public danger, in  which private  property  may  be impressed into the public service, or may be seized or appropriated to public use, or may even be destroyed without the consent of the owner….”

This quote, and indeed this case, provides a vivid illustration of the potential power of the government.

Now, let us return to the period of time after March 4, 1933, and take a close look at what really occurred. On March 4, 1933, in his inaugural address, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt asked for the authority of the war powers, and called a special session of Congress for the purpose of having those powers conferred to him.

On March the 2nd, 1933, however, we find that Herbert Hoover had written a letter to the Federal Reserve Board of New York, asking them for recommendations for action based on the over-all situation at the time. The Federal Reserve Board responded with a resolution (Exhibit

15) which they had adopted, an excerpt from which follows:

“Resolution Adopted By The Federal Reserve Board Of New York. Whereas, in the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the continued and increasing withdrawal of currency and gold from the banks of the country has now created a national emergency….”

In order to fully appreciate the significance of this last quote, we must recall that, in 1913, The Federal Reserve Act was passed, authorizing the creation of a central bank, the thought of which had already been  noted in the Constitution. The basic idea of the central bank was, among other things, for it to act as a secure repository for the gold of the people. We, the People, would bring our gold to the huge, strong vaults of the Federal Reserve, and we would be issued a note which said, in effect, that, at any time we desired, we could bring that note back to the bank and be given back our gold which we had deposited.

Until 1933, that agreement, that contract between the Federal Reserve  and its depositors, was honored. Federal Reserve notes, prior to 1933, were indeed redeemable in gold. After 1933, the situation changed drastically. In 1933, during the depths of the Depression, at the time  when We, the People, were struggling to stay alive and keep our families fed, the bankers began to say, “People are coming in now, wanting their gold, wanting us to honor this contract we have made with them to give them their gold on demand, and this contractual obligation is creating a national emergency.”

How could that happen? Reading from the Public Papers of Herbert Hoover (Exhibit 15):

“Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that, in this emergency, the Federal Reserve Board is hereby requested to urge the President of the United States to declare a bank holiday, Saturday, March 4, and Monday, March 6…”

In other words, President Roosevelt was urged to close down the banking system and make it unavailable for a short period of time. What was to happen during that period of time?

Reading again from the Federal Reserve Board resolution (Exhibit 15), we find a proposal for an executive order, to be worded as follows:

Whereas, it is provided in Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, that “the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange and the export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, *

Now, in any nominal usage of the American language, the standard accepted meaning of a series of three asterisks after a quotation means that what follows also must be quoted exactly, doesn’t it? If it’s not, that’s a fraudulent use of the American language. At that point marked by the red asterisk (*) above, ” began, what did the original Act of October 6,1917 say?

Referring back to Exhibit 19, we find that the remainder of Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6,1917 says:”(other than credits relating solely to transactions to be executed wholly within the united States).”

This portion of Section 5 (b) specifically prohibited the government from taking control of We, the People’s money and transactions, didn’t it?

However, let us now read the remainder of Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended on March 9,1933 (Exhibit 17): “by any person within the united States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Comparing the original with the amended version of Section 5 (b), we can see the full significance of the amended version, wherein the exclusion of domestic transactions from the powers of the Act was deleted, and “any person” became subject to the extraordinary powers conferred by the Act. Further, we can now see that the usage of the original text where the red asterisk is (above), it was, in all likelihood, meant to be deliberately misleading, if not fraudulent in nature.

Further, in the next section of the Federal Reserve Board’s proposal, we find that anyone violating any provision of this Act will be fined not  more than $10,000.00, or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or  both. A severe enough penalty at any time, but one made all the more harsh by the economic conditions in which most Americans found themselves at the time. And where were these alterations and amendments to be found? Not from the government itself, initially; no, they are first to be found in a proposal from the Federal Reserve Board of New York, a banking institution.

Let us recall the chronology of events: Herbert Hoover, in his last days as President of the united States, asked for a recommendation from the Federal Reserve Board of New York, and they responded with their proposals. We see that President Hoover did not act on the recommendation, and believed the actions were “neither justified nor necessary” (Appendix, Public Papers of Herbert Hoover, p. 1088). Let us see what happened; remember on March 4, 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was inaugurated as President of the united States. On March 5, 1933, President Roosevelt called for an extraordinary session of Congress to be held on March 9, 1933, as can be seen in Exhibit 17:

“Whereas, public interests require that the Congress of the united States should be convened in extra session at twelve o’clock, noon, on the Ninth day of March, 1933, to receive such communication as may be made by the Executive.”

On the next day, March 6 ,1933, President Roosevelt issued  Proclamation 2039, which has been included in this report, starting at the bottom of Exhibit 8. In Exhibit 32, we find the following:

“Whereas there have been heavy and unwarranted withdrawals of gold and currency from our banking institutions for the purpose of hoarding . ..”

Right at the beginning, we have a problem. And the problem rests in the question of who should be the judge of whether or not my gold, on deposit at the Federal Reserve, with which I have a contract which says, in effect, that I may withdraw my gold at my discretion, is being withdrawn by me in an “unwarranted” manner. Remember, the people of the united States were in dire economic straits at this point. If I had gold at the Federal Reserve, I would consider withdrawing as much of my  gold as I needed for my family and myself a “warranted” action. But the decision was not left up to We, the People.

It is also important to note that it is stated that the gold is being withdrawn for the “purpose of hoarding”. The significance of this phrase becomes clearer when we reach Proclamation 2039, wherein the term “hoarding” is inserted into the amended version of Section 5 (b). The term, “hoarding”, was not to be found in the original version of Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917. It was a term which was used by President Roosevelt to help support his contention that the United States was in the middle of a national emergency, and his assertion that the extraordinary powers conferred to him by the War Powers Act were needed to deal with that emergency.

Let us now go on to the middle of Proclamation 2039, at the top of the next page, Exhibit 9. In reading from Exhibit 9, we find the following:

“Whereas, it is provided in Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, (40 Stat. L. 411) as amended, ” that the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as be may prescribed, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transaction in foreign exchange and the export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency . . .”exactly as was first proposed by the Federal Reserve Board of New York (Exhibit 31).

If we return to 48 Statute 1 (Exhibit 17), Title 1, Section 1, we find that the amended Section 5 (b) with its added phrase: “by any person within the united States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Is this becoming clearer as to exactly what happened? On March 5, 1933, President Roosevelt called for an extra session of Congress, and  on March 6, 1933, issued Proclamation 2039 (Exhibits 32-33). On March 9th, Roosevelt issued Proclamation 2040. We looked at Proclamation 2039 on Exhibits 32 and 33, and now, on Exhibit 33 (a), let’s see what Roosevelt is talking about in Proclamation 2040:

“Whereas, on March 6, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, by Proclamation declared the existence of a national emergency and proclaimed a bank holiday…”

We see that Roosevelt declared a national emergency and a bank holiday. Let’s read on:

“Whereas, under the Act of March 9, 1933, all Proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President pursuant to the authority conferred  by section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1 91 7, as amended, are approved and confirmed;”

This section of the Proclamation clearly states that all proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President are approved and confirmed, citing the authority of section 5 (b). The key words here being “all” and “approved”. Further:

“Whereas, said national emergency still continues, and it is necessary to take further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933, in order to accomplish such purposes”

We again clearly see that there is more to come, evidenced by the phrase, “further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933 … ” Could this be the beginning of a new deal? Possibly a one-sided deal. How long can this type of action continue? Let’s find out.

“Now, therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, in view of such continuing national emergency and by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) as amended by the Act of March 9, 1933, do hereby proclaim, order, direct and declare that all the terms and provisions of said Proclamation of March 6,1933, and the regulations and orders issued thereunder are hereby continued in full force and effect until further proclamation by the President.”

We now understand that the Proclamation 2039, of March 6, 1933 and Proclamation 2040 of March 9, 1933, will continue until such time as another proclamation is made by “the President”. Note that the term “the President” is not specific to President Roosevelt; it is a generic term which can equally apply to any President from Roosevelt to the present, and beyond.

So here we have President Roosevelt declaring a national emergency (we are now beginning to realize the full significance of those words) and closing the national banks for two days, by Executive Order. Further, he states that the Proclamations bringing about these actions will to continue “in full force and effect” until such time as the President, and only the President, changes the situation.

It is important to note the fact that these Proclamations were made on March 6, 1933, three days before Congress was due to convene its extra session. Yet references are made to such things as the amended Section 5 (b), which had not yet even been confirmed by Congress. President Roosevelt must have been supremely confident of Congress giving confirmation of his actions. And indeed, we find that confidence was justified. *** For on March 9, 1933, without individual Congressmen even having the opportunity to read for themselves the bill they were to confirm, Congress did indeed approve the amendment of Section  5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917. ***

 Referring to the Public Papers of Herbert Hoover (Exhibit 34):

“That those speculators and insiders were right was plain enough later  on. This first contract of the ‘moneychangers with the New Deal netted those who removed their money from the country a profit of up to 60 percent when the dollar was debased.”

Where had our gold gone? Our gold had already been moved offshore! The gold was not in the banks, and when We, the People lined up at the door attempting to have our contracts honored, the deception was exposed. What happened then? The laws were changed to prevent us  from asking again, and the military was brought in to protect the Federal Reserve. We, the People, were declared to be the same as public enemy and placed under military authority.

Going now to another section of 48 Statute 1 (Exhibit 35):

“Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary of the Treasury such action is necessary to protect the currency system of the (U)nited States, the Secretary of the Treasury, in his discretion, may require any or all individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations to pay and deliver to the Treasurer of the United States any or all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by such individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations.” Notice now to whom we refer as “owning” the money!

By this Statute, everyone was required to turn in their gold. Failure to do so would constitute a violation of this provision, such violation to be punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 and imprisonment for not more than ten years. It was a seizure. Whose property may be seized without due process of law under the Trading With the Enemy Act? The enemy’s. Whose gold was seized? Ours — the gold of the people of the united States. Are you seeing the fraud here now?

From the Roosevelt Papers (Exhibit 36):

“During this banking holiday it was at first believed that some form of scrip or emergency currency would be necessary for the conduct of ordinary business. We knew that it would be essential when the banks reopened to have an adequate supply of currency to meet all possible demands of depositors. Consideration was given by government officials and various local agencies to the advisability of issuing clearing house certificates or some similar form of local emergency currency. On March 7, 1933, the Secretary of the Treasury issued a regulation authorizing clearing houses to issue demand certificates against sound assets of the banking institutions, but this authority was not to become effective until March 10th. In many cities, the printing of these certificates was actually begun, but after the passage of the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933 (48 Stat. 1), it became evident that they would not be needed, because the Act made possible the issue of the necessary amount of emergency currency in the form of Federal Reserve banknotes which could be based on any sound assets owned by banks.”

Roosevelt could now issue emergency currency under the Act of March 9, 1933 and this currency was to be called Federal Reserve bank notes. From Title 4 of the Act of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 37):

“Upon the deposit with the Treasurer of the United States, (a) of any direct obligations of the united States or (b) of any notes, drafts, bills of exchange, or bankers’ acceptances acquired under the provisions of this Act, any Federal reserve bank making such deposit in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury shall be entitled to receive from the Comptroller of the currency circulating notes in blank, duly registered and countersigned.”

What is this saying? It says (emphasis is ours): “Upon the deposit with the Treasurer of the United States, (a) of any direct obligation of the united States …” That is a direct obligation of the united States? It’s a treasury note, which is an obligation upon whom? Upon We, the People, to perform. It’s a taxpayer obligation, isn’t it?

Title 4 goes on: “or (b) of any notes, drafts, bills of exchange or bankers’ acceptances . .

What’s a note? If you go to the bank and sign a note on your home, that’s a note, isn’t it? A note is a private obligation upon We, the People. And if the Federal Reserve Bank deposits either (a) public and/or (b) private obligation of We, the People, with the Treasury, the Comptroller of the currency will issue this circulating note endorsed in blank, duly registered and countersigned, an emergency currency based on the (a) public and/or (b) private obligations of the people of the united States.

In the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 38) , we find evidence that our congressmen didn’t even have individual copies of the bill to read, on which they were about to vote. A copy of the bill was passed around for approximately 40 minutes.

Congressman McFadden made the comment,

“Mr. Speaker, I regret that the membership of the House has had no opportunity to consider or even read this bill. The first opportunity I had to know what this legislation is, was when it was read from the clerk’s desk. It is an important banking bill. It is a dictatorship over finance in the united States. It is complete control over the banking system in the united States … It is difficult under the circumstances to discuss this bill. The first section of the bill, as I grasped it, is practically the war powers that were given back in 1917.”

Congressman McFadden later says,

“I would like to ask the chairman of the committee if this is a plan to change the holding of the security back of the Federal Reserve notes to the Treasury of the united States rather than the Federal Reserve agent.”

Keep in mind, here, that, prior to 1933, the Federal Reserve  bank held our gold as security, in return for Federal Reserve gold notes which we could redeem at any time we wanted. Now, however, Congressman McFadden is asking if this proposed bill is a plan to change who’s going to hold the security, from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury.

Chairman Steagall’s response to Congressman McFadden’s question, again from the Congressional Record:

“This provision is for the issuance of Federal Reserve bank notes; and  not for Federal Reserve notes; and the security back of it is the obligations, notes, drafts, bills of exchange, bank acceptances, outlined in the section to which the gentleman has referred.”

We were backed by gold, and our gold was seized, wasn’t it? We were penniless, and now our money would be secured, not by gold, but by notes and obligations on which We, the People, were the collateral security.

Congressman McFadden then questioned,

“Then the new circulation is to be Federal Reserve bank notes and not Federal Reserve notes. Is that true?

Mr. Steagall replied,”Insofar as the provisions of this section are concerned, yes.”

Does that sound familiar?

Next we hear from Congressman Britten, as noted in the Congressional Record (Exhibit 39):

“From my observations of the bill as it was read to the House, it would appear that the amount of bank notes that might be issued by the Federal Reserve System is not limited. That will depend entirely upon the  amount of collateral that is presented from time to time for exchange for bank notes. Is that not correct?”

Who is the collateral? We are – we are chattel, aren’t we? We have no rights. Our rights were suspended along with the Constitution. We became chattel property to the corporate government, our transactions and obligations the collateral for the issuance of Federal Reserve bank notes. i

Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record (Exhibit 40):

“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.”

It now is no wonder that credit became so available after the Depression. It was needed to back our monetary system. Our debts, our obligations, our homes, our jobs – we were now slaves for the system.

From Statutes at Large, in the Congressional Record (Exhibit 41)

“When required to do so by the Secretary of the Treasury, each Federal Reserve agent shall act as agent of the Treasurer of the United States or of the Comptroller of the currency, or both, for the performance of any functions which the Treasurer or the Comptroller may be called upon to perform in carrying out the provisions of this paragraph.”

The Treasury was taken over by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Holding companies, the Depository Trust Co. and the CEDE  Co., hold the assets. We are the collateral – we ourselves and our property.

To summarize briefly: On March 9,1933 the American people in all their domestic, daily, and commercial transactions became the same as the enemy.

The President of the united States, through licenses or any other form, was given the power to regulate and control the actions of enemies. He made We, the People, chattel property; he seized our gold, our property and our rights; and he suspended the Constitution.

 And we know that current law, to this day, says that all proclamations issued heretofore or hereafter by the President or the Secretary of the Treasury are approved and confirmed by Congress. Pretty broad, sweeping approval to be automatic, wouldn’t you agree?

On March 11, 1933, President Roosevelt, in his first radio “Fireside Chat” (Exhibit 42), makes the following statement:

“The Secretary of the Treasury will issue licenses to banks which are members of the Federal Reserve system, whether national bank or state, located in each of the 12 Federal Reserve bank cities, to open Monday morning.”

It was by this action that the Federal Reserve took over the Treasury and the banking system.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines the Bank Holiday of 1933 (Exhibit 42a) in the following words:

“Presidential Proclamations No. 2039, issued March 6, 1933, and No. 2040, issued March 9, 1933, temporarily suspended banking transactions by member banks of the Federal Reserve System. Normal banking functions were resumed on March 13, subject to certain restrictions. The first proclamation, it was held, had no authority in law until the passage on March 9, 1933, of a ratifying act (12 U. S. C. A. Sect. 95b). Anthony Bank of Wiggins, 183 Miss. 883, 184 So. 626. The present law forbids member banks of the Federal Reserve System to transact banking business, except under regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury, during an emergency proclaimed by the President. 12 U.S.C.A. Sect. 95”

Take special note of the last sentence of this definition, especially the phrase,  “present  law”.  The fact  that  banks are  under regulation  of the

Treasury today, is evidence that the state of emergency still exists, by virtue of the definition. Not that, at this point, we need any more  evidence to prove we are still in a declared state of national emergency.

From the Agricultural Adjustment Act of May 12,1933 (Exhibit 43):

“To issue licenses permitting processors, associations of producers and others to engage in the handling, in the current of interstate or foreign commerce, of any agricultural commodity or product thereof . . .”

This is the seizure of the agricultural industry by means of licensing authority.

In the first hundred days of the reign of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, similar seizures by licensing authority were successfully completed  by the government over a plethora of other industries, among them transportation, communications, public utilities, securities, oil, labor, and all natural resources. The first hundred days of FDR saw the nationalization of the united States, its people and its assets. What has Bill Clinton talked about during his campaign and early presidency? His first hundred days.

Now, we know that they took over all contracts, for we have already read in Exhibit 22:

“No contract is considered as valid as between enemies, at least so far as to give them a remedy in the courts of law of either government, and  they have, in the language of civil law, no ability to sustain a persona standi in judicio.”

 They have no personal rights at law. Therefore, we should expect that we would see in the statutes a time when the contract between  the Federal Reserve and We, the People, in which the Federal Reserve had to give us our gold on demand, was made null and void.

Referring to House Joint Resolution 192 (June 5, 1933) (Exhibit 44):

“That (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount of money of the united States measured thereby is declared to be against public policy; and no such policy shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred.”

Indeed, our contract with the Federal Reserve was invalidated at the end of Roosevelt’s hundred days. We lost our right to require our gold back from the bank in which we had deposited it.

Returning once again to the Roosevelt Papers (Exhibit 45):

“This conference of fifty farm leaders met on March 10, 1933. They agreed on recommendations for a bill, which were presented to me at the White House on March 11th by a committee of the conference, who requested me to call upon the Congress for the same broad powers to meet the emergency in agriculture as I had requested for solving the bank crisis.”

What was the “broad powers”? That was the War Powers, wasn’t it? And now we see the farm leaders asking President Roosevelt to use the same War Powers to take control of the agricultural industry. Well, needless to say, he did. We should wonder about all that took place at this conference, for it to result in the eventual acquiescence of farm  leadership to the governmental take-over of their livelihoods.

Reading from the Agricultural Adjustment Act, May the 12th, Declaration of Emergency (Exhibit 46):

“That the present acute economic emergency being in part the consequence of a severe and increasing disparity between the prices of agriculture and other commodities, which disparity has largely destroyed the purchasing power of farmers for industrial products, has  broken down the orderly exchange of commodities, and has seriously impaired the agricultural assets supporting the national credit structure, it is hereby declared that these conditions in the basic industry of agriculture have affected transactions in agricultural commodities with a national public interest, have burdened and obstructed the normal currents of commerce in such commodities and rendered imperative the immediate enactment of Title 1 of this Act.”

Now here we see that he is saying that the agricultural assets support the national credit structure. Did he take the titles of all the land? Remember Contracts Payable in Gold? President Roosevelt needed the support,  and agriculture was critical, because of all the millions of acres  of farmland  at that time, and the value of that farmland. The mortgage on that farmland was what supported the emergency credit. So President Roosevelt had to do something to stabilize the price of land and Federal Reserve Bank notes to create money, didn’t he? So he impressed agriculture into the public interest.

The farming industry was nationalized.

 Continuing with the Agricultural Adjustment Act, Declaration of Emergency (Exhibit 47):

“It is hereby declared to be the public policy of Congress…”

Referring now back to Prize Cases (1862) (2 Black, 674) (Exhibit 24):

“But in defining the meaning of the term ‘enemies’ property,’ we will be led into error if we refer to Fleta or Lord Coke for their definition of the word, ‘enemy’. It is a technical phrase peculiar to prize courts, and depends upon principles of public policy as distinguished from the common law.”

Once the emergency is declared, the common law is abolished, the Constitution is abolished and we fall under the absolute will of Government “public policy”.

 All the government needs to continue is to have public opinion on their side. If public opinion can be kept, in sufficient degree, on the side of the government, statutes, laws and regulations can continue to be passed.  The Constitution has no meaning. The Constitution is suspended. It has been for over 60 years. We’re not under law. Law has been abolished.

We’re under a system of public policy, (War Powers).

So when you go into that courtroom with your Constitution and the common law in your hand, what does that judge tell you? He tells you that you have no persona standi in judicio. You have no personal standing at law. He tells you not to bother bringing the Constitution into his court, because it is not a Constitutional court, but an executive tribunal operating under a totally different jurisdiction.

From Section 93-549 (Exhibit 48) (emphasis is ours):

“Under this procedure we retain Government by law – special, temporary law, perhaps, but law nonetheless. The public may know the extent and the limitations of the powers that can be asserted, and the persons  affected may be informed by the statute of their rights and their duties.”

If you have any rights, the only reason you have them is because they have been statutorily declared, and your duties well spelled out, and if you violate the orders of those statutes, you will be charged, not with a crime, but with an offense.

Again from 93-549, from the words of Mr. Katzenbach (Exhibit 49):

“My recollection is that almost every executive order ever issued straddles on several grounds, but it almost always includes the Trading With the Enemy Act because the language of that act is so broad, it would justify almost anything.”

Speaking on the subject of a challenge to the Act by the people, Justice Clark then says,

“Most difficult from a standpoint of standing to sue. The Court, you might say, has enlarged the standing rule in favor of the litigant. But I don’t think it has reached the point, presently, that would permit many such cases to be litigated to the merits.”

Senator Church then made the comment:

“What you’re saying, then, is that if Congress doesn’t act to standardize, restrict, or eliminate the emergency powers, that no one else is very likely to get a standing in court to contest.”

No persona standi in judicio – no personal standing in the courts.

 Continuing with Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 50):

“The interesting aspect of the legislation lies in the fact that it created a permanent agency designed to eradicate an emergency condition in the sphere of agriculture.”

These agencies, of which there are now thousands, and which now control every aspect of our lives, were ostensibly created as temporary agencies meant to last only as long as the national emergency. They have become, in fact, permanent agencies, as has the state of national emergency itself. As Franklin Delano Roosevelt said: “We will never go back to the old order.” That quote takes on a different meaning in light of what we have seen so far.

In Exhibit 51, Senate Report 93-549, we find a quote from Senator Church:

“If the President can create crimes by fiat and without congressional approval, our system is not much different from that of the Communists, which allegedly threatens our existence.”

We see on this same document, at the bottom right-hand side of the page, as a Title, the words,

“Enormous Scope of Powers…A “Time Bomb”.

Remember, this is Congress’ own document, from the year 1973.

Most people might not look to agriculture to provide them with this type of information. But let us look at Title III of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which is also called the Emergency Farm Mortgage Act of 1933 (Exhibit 52):

“Title III — Financing – And Exercising Power Conferred by Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution: To Coin Money And To Regulate the Value Thereof.”

From Section 43 of Exhibit 52:

“Whenever the President finds upon investigation that the foreign commerce of the united States is adversely affected … and an expansion of credit is necessary to secure by international agreement a stabilization at proper levels of the currencies of various governments, the President is authorized, in his discretion… To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to enter into agreements with the several Federal Reserve banks…”

Remember that in the Constitution it states that Congress has the authority to coin all money and regulate the value thereof. How can it be then that the Executive branch is issuing an emergency currency, and quoting the Constitution as its authority to do so?

Under Section 1 of the same Act (Exhibit 53) we find the following:

“To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to cause to be issued in such amount or amounts as he may from time to time order, United States notes, as provided in the Act entitled “An Act to authorize the issue of United States notes and for the redemption of funding thereof and for funding the floating debt of the united States, approved February 25, 1862, and Acts supplementary thereto and amendatory thereof”

What is the Act of February 25, 1862? It is the Greenback Act of President Abraham Lincoln. Let us remember that, when Abraham Lincoln was elected and inaugurated, he didn’t even have a Congress for the first six weeks. He did not, however, call an extra session of Congress. He issued money, he declared war, he suspended habeas corpus, it was an absolute Constitutional dictatorship. There was not  even a Congress in session for six weeks.

When Lincoln’s Congress came into session six weeks later, they entered the following statement into the Congressional record: “The actions, rules, regulations, licenses, heretofore or hereafter taken, are hereby approved and confirmed…” This is the exact language of March 9,1933 and Title 12, USC, Section 95 (b), today.

We now come to the question of how to terminate these extraordinary powers granted under a declaration of national emergency. We have learned that, in order for the extraordinary powers to be terminated, the national emergency itself must be cancelled. Reading from the Agricultural Act, Section 13 (Exhibit 54):

“This title shall cease to be in effect whenever the President finds and proclaims that the national economic emergency in relation to agriculture has been ended.”

Whenever the President finds by proclamation that the proclamation issued on March 6, 1933 has terminated, it has to terminate through presidential  proclamation  just  as  it  came  into  effect.  Congress  had already delegated all of that authority, and therefore was in no position to take it back.

In Senate Report 93-549, we find the following statement from Congress (Exhibit 55):

“Furthermore, it would be largely futile task unless we have the President’s active collaboration. Having delegated this authority to the President — in ways that permit him to determine how long it shall continue, simply through the device of keeping emergency declarations alive — we now find ourselves in a position where we cannot reclaim the power without the President’s acquiescence. We are unable to terminate these declarations without the President’s signature, so we need a large measure of Presidential cooperation”.

It appears that no President has been willing to give up this extraordinary power, and, if they will not sign the termination proclamation, the access to and usage of, extraordinary powers does not terminate. At least, it has not terminated for over 60 years.

Now, that’s no definite indication that a President from Bill Clinton on might not eventually sign the termination proclamation, but 60 years of experience would lead one to doubt that day will ever come by itself. But the question now to ask is this: How many times have We, the People, asked the President to terminate his access to extraordinary powers, or the situation on which it is based, the declared national emergency? Who has ever demanded that this be done? How many of us even knew that it had been done? And, without the knowledge contained in this report, how long do you think the blindness of the American public to this situation would have continued, and with it, the abolishment of the Constitution? But we’re not quite as in the dark as we were, are we?

In Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 56), we find the following statement from Senator Church:

“These powers, if exercised, would confer upon the President total authority to do anything he pleased.”

Elsewhere in Senate Report 93-549, Senator Church makes the remarkable statement (Exhibit 57):

“Like a loaded gun laying around the house, the plethora of delegated authority and institutions to meet almost every kind of conceivable crisis stand ready for use for purposes other than their original intention … Machiavelli, in his “Discourses of Livy,” acknowledged that great power may have to be given to the Executive if the State is to survive, but warned of great dangers in doing so. He cautioned: Nor is it sufficient if this power be conferred upon good men; for men are frail, and easily corrupted, and then in a short time, he that is absolute may easily corrupt the people.”

Now, a quote from an exclusive reply (Exhibit 58) written May 21, 1973, by the Attorney General of the United States regarding studies undertaken by the Justice Department on the question of the termination of the standing national emergency:

“As a consequence, a “national emergency” is now a practical necessity  in order to carry out what has the regular and normal method of governmental actions. What were intended by Congress as delegations of power to be used only in the most extreme situations, and for the most limited durations, have become everyday powers, and a state of “emergency” has become a permanent condition.”

From United States v. Butler (Supreme Court, 1935) (Exhibit 59):

“A tax, in the general understanding and in the strict  Constitutional sense, is an exaction for the support of government; the term does not connote the expropriation of money from one group to be expended for another, as a necessary means in a plan of regulation, such as the plan for regulating agricultural production set up in the Agricultural Adjustment Act.”

What is being said here is that a tax can all be an exaction for the support of government, not for an expropriation from one group for the use of another. That would be socialism, wouldn’t it?

Quoting further from United States v. Butler (Exhibit 60):

“The regulation of farmer’s activities under the statute, though in form subject to his own will, is in fact coercion through economic pressure;  his right of choice is illusory. Even if a farmer’s consent were purely voluntary, the Act would stand no better. At best it is a scheme for purchasing with federal funds submission to federal regulation of a subject reserved to the states.”

Speaking of contracts, those contracts are coercion contracts. They are adhesion contracts made by a superior over an inferior. They are under the belligerent capacity of government over enemies. They are not valid contracts.

Again from United States v. Butler (Exhibit 61):

“If the novel view of the General Welfare Clause now advanced in support of the tax were accepted, this clause would not only enable Congress to supplant the states in the regulation of agriculture and all other industries as well, but would furnish the means whereby all of the other provisions of the Constitution, sedulously framed to define and  limit the powers of the United States and preserve the powers of the states, could be broken down, the independence of the individual states obliterated, and The Federal United States converted into a central government exercising uncontrolled police power throughout the union superseding all local control over local concerns.”

Please, read the above paragraph again. The understanding of its  meaning is vital.

The United States Supreme Court ruled the New Deal, the nationalization, unconstitutional in the Agricultural Adjustment Act and they turned it down flat. The Supreme Court declared it to be unconstitutional. They said, in effect, “You’re turning the federal government into an uncontrolled police state, exercising uncontrolled police power.” What did Roosevelt do next? He stacked the Supreme Court, didn’t he? And in 1937, United States v. Butler was overturned.

From the 65th Congress, 1st Session Doc. 87, under the section entitled Constitutional Sources of Laws of War, Page 7, Clause II, we find (Exhibit 62):

“The existence of war and the restoration of peace are to be determined by the political department of the government, and such determination is binding and conclusive upon the courts, and deprives the courts of the power of hearing proof and determining as a question of fact either that war exists or has ceased to exist.”

The courts will tell you that is a political question, for they (the courts)  do not have jurisdiction over the common law.

The courts were deprived of the Constitution. They were deprived of the common law. There are now courts of prize over the enemies, and we have no persona standi in judicio. We have no personal standing under the law. Also from the 65th Congress, under the section entitled Constitutional Sources of Laws of War, we find (Exhibit 63):

“When the sovereign authority shall choose to bring it into operation, the judicial department must give effect to its will. But until that will shall be expressed, no power of condemnation can exist in the court.”

Now remember, WE THE PEOPLE are SOVEREIGN, under the Constitution for the united States.”

From Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 64):

“Just how effective a limitation on crisis action this makes of the court is hard to say. In light of the recent war, the court today would seem to be a fairly harmless observer of the emergency activities of the President and Congress. It is highly unlikely that the separation of powers and the 10th Amendment will be called upon again to hamstring the efforts of the government to deal resolutely with a serious national emergency.”

So much for our Constitutional system of checks and balances. And from that same Senate Report, in the section entitled, “Emergency Administration”, a continuation of Exhibit 64:

“Organizationally, in dealing with the depression, it was Roosevelt’s general policy to assign new, emergency functions to newly created agencies, rather than to already existing departments.”

Thus, thousands of “temporary” emergency agencies are now sitting out there with emergency functions to rule us in all cases whatsoever.

Finally, let us look briefly at the courts, specifically with regard to the question of “booty”. The following definition of the term, “prize” is to be found in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (Exhibit 65):

“Goods taken on land from a public enemy are called booty; and the distinction between a prize and booty consists in this, that the former is taken at sea and the latter on land.”

This significance of the distinction between these two terms is critical, a fact which will become quite clear shortly.

Let us now remember that “Congress shall have the power to make rules on all captures on the land and the water.” To reiterate, captures on the land are booty, and captures on the water are prize.

Now, the Constitution says that Congress shall have the power to provide and maintain a navy, even during peacetime. It also says that Congress shall have the power to raise and support an army, but no appropriations of money for that purpose shall be for greater than two years. Here we can see that an army is not a permanent standing body, because, in times of peace, armies were held by the sovereign states as militia. So the United States had a navy during peacetime, but no standing army; we  had instead the individual state militias, both organized and unorganized.

Consequently, the federal government had a standing prize court, due to the fact that it had a standing navy, whether in times of peace or war. But in times of peace, there could be no federal police power over the continental united States, because there was to be no army, and NO jurisdiction over Sovereign American citizens!

From the report “The Law of Civil Government in Territory Subject to Military Occupation by Military Forces of the United States”, published by order of the Secretary of War in 1902, under the heading entitled “The Confiscation of Private Property of Enemies in War” (Exhibit 66), comes the following quote:

“4. Should the President desire to utilize the services of the Federal courts of the *united States* in promoting this purpose or military undertaking, since these courts derive their jurisdiction from Congress and do not constitute a part of the military establishment, they must secure from Congress the necessary action to confer such jurisdiction upon said courts.”

This means that, if the government is going to confiscate property within the continental united States on the land (booty), it must obtain statutory authority.

In this same section (Exhibit 66), we find the following words:

“5. The laws and usages of war make a distinction between enemies’ property captured on the sea and property captured on land. The jurisdiction of the courts of the united States over property captured at  sea is held not to attach to property captured on land in the absence of Congressional action.”

There is no standing prize court over the land. Once war is declared, Congress must give jurisdiction to particular courts over captures on the land by positive Congressional action. To continue with (Exhibit 66):

“The right of confiscation is a sovereign right. In times of peace, the exercise of this right is limited and controlled by the domestic Constitution and institutions of the government. In times of war, when the right is exercised against enemies’ property as a war measure, such right becomes a belligerent right, and as such is not subject to the restrictions imposed by domestic institutions, but is regulated and controlled by the laws and usages of war.”

So we see that our government can operate in two capacities: (a) in its sovereign peacetime capacity, with the limitations placed upon it by the Constitution and restrictions placed upon it by We, the People, or (b) in a wartime capacity, where it may operate in its belligerent capacity governed not by the Constitution, but only by the laws of war.

In Section 1 7 of the Act of October 6, 1 91 7, the Trading With the Enemy Act (Exhibit 67):

“That the district courts of the United States are hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise; and all such orders and decrees; and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act.”

Here we have Congress conferring upon the district courts of the United States the booty jurisdiction, the jurisdiction over enemy property within the continental united States. And at the time of the original, un-amended,

Trading with the Enemy Act, we  were indeed at war, a World war, and so booty jurisdiction over enemies’ property in the courts was appropriate. At that time, remember, we were not yet declared the  enemy. We were excluded from the provisions of the original Act.

In 1934 Congress passed an Act merging equity and law abolishing common law. This Act, known as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Act, was not to come into effect until 6 months after the letter of transmittal from the Supreme Court to Congress. The Supreme Court refused transmittal and the transmittal did not occur until Franklin D. Roosevelt stacked the Supreme Court in 1938 (Exhibits 67(a) and (b)).

But on March the 9th of 1933, the American people were declared to be the public enemy under the amended version of the Trading With the Enemy Act. What jurisdiction were We, the People, then placed under? We were now the booty jurisdiction given to the district courts by Congress. It was no longer be necessary, or of any value at all, to bring the Constitution for the United States with us upon entering a courtroom, for that court was no longer a court of common law, but a tribunal under wartime booty jurisdiction. Take a look at the American flag in most American courtrooms. The gold fringe around our flag designates Admiralty jurisdiction.

Executive Order No. 11677 issued by President Richard M. Nixon August 1, 1972 (Exhibit 68) states:

“Continuing the Regulation of Exports; By virtue of the authority vested in the President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12

U.S.C. 95a), and in view of the continued existence of the national emergencies…”

Later, in the same Executive Order (Exhibit 69), we find the following: under the authority vested in me as President of the United States by Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U. S. C.  95a) Section 5 (b) certainly seems to be an oft-cited support for Presidential authority, doesn’t it? Surely the reason for this can be found by referring back to Exhibit 49, the words of Mr. Katzenbach in Senate Report 93- 549:

“My recollection is that almost every executive order ever issued straddles on several grounds, but it almost always includes the Trading With the Enemy Act because the language of that act is so broad, it would justify almost anything.”

The question here, and it should be a question of grave concern to every Sovereign American, is what type of acts can “almost anything” cover? What has been, and is being, done, by our government under the cloak of authority conferred by Section 5 (b)? By now, I think we are beginning  to know.

Has the termination of the national emergency ever been considered? In Public Law 94412, September 14, 1976 (Exhibit 70), we find that Congress had finally finished their exhaustive study on the national emergencies, and the words of their findings were that they would terminate the existing national emergencies. We should be able to heave  a sigh of relief at this decision, for with the termination of the national emergencies will come the corresponding termination of extraordinary Presidential power, won’t it?

But yet we have learned two difficult lessons: that we are still in the national emergency, and that power, once grasped, is difficult to let go. And so now it should come as no surprise when we read, in the last section of the Act, Section 502 (Exhibit 71), the following words:

“(a): The provisions of this Act shall not apply to the following provisions of law, the powers and authorities conferred thereby and actions taken thereunder (1) Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (1 2 U. S. C. 95a; 50 U. S. C. App. 5b)”

The bleak reality is, the situation has not changed at all.

The alarming situation in which We, the People, find ourselves today causes us to think back to a time over two hundred years ago in our nation’s history when our forefathers were also laboring under the burden of governmental usurpation of individual rights. Their response,  written in 1774, two years before the signing of the Declaration  of Independence, to  the  attempts  of  Great Britain  to retain  extraordinary powers it had held during a time of war became known as the Declaration Of Colonial Rights: Resolutions Of The First Continental Congress, October 14, 1774″ (Exhibit 72). And in that document, we find these words:

“Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British Parliament,  claiming a power of right to bind the people of America, by statute, in all cases whatsoever, hath in some acts expressly imposed taxes on them. and in others, under various pretenses, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies established a board of commissioners, with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of the courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties, but for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county.”

We can see now that we have come full circle to the situation which existed in 1774, but with one crucial difference. In 1774,  Americans were protesting against a colonial power which sought to bind and  control its colony by wartime powers in a time of peace. In 1994, it is our own government (as it was theirs) which has sought, successfully to date, to bind its own people by the same subtle, insidious method.

Article 3, Section 3, of our Constitution states:

“Treason against the united States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No Person shall be convicted of treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Is the Act of March 9, 1933, treason? That would be for the common law courts to decide. At this point in our nation’s history, the point is moot,  for common law, and indeed the Constitution itself, do not  operate or exist at present. Whether governmental acts of theft of the nation’s money, the citizens’ property, and American liberty as an ideal and a reality which have occurred since 1933 is treason against the people of the united States, as the term is defined by the Constitution of the united States cannot even be determined or argued in the legal sense until the Constitution itself is reestablished.

For our part, however, we firmly believe that, “by their fruits ye shall know them”, and on that authority we rest our case.

CONCLUSION

 As you have just witnessed, the United States of America continues to exist in a governmentally ordained state of national emergency. Under such a state of emergency, our Constitution has been set aside, ostensibly for the public good, until the emergency is cancelled.

But, as experience painfully shows, it has not been to the public’s good that our government has used its unrestricted power, unhampered by the Constitution’s restraining force. The governmental edicts and  actions over the past six decades have led us to the desperate state in which we find ourselves today. Besieged on every side, corroding from within, frightened and in despair, we as a nation are being torn asunder.

There IS a national emergency today – one of life and death proportions – but it is NOT the emergency used by our government to continue its abuse of power. It IS this very abuse, this unbridled rape of the American spirit, that is the crux of the emergency we are in today, the cause of all the loss of hope, drug and alcohol addiction, irresponsibility in morality and ethics, lack of respect for life, and violence. But this true emergency cannot be cured by setting aside the Constitution; no, it can only be controlled by returning to the laws of God and Country which have been stolen from us by those in whom we placed our trust to protect the national interest.

We are a nation whose government is based upon those immortal words, “a government of the people, by the people, for the people”. One has  only to walk down the highways and byways of this great land to know all too well that this is not a government of the people or for the people. Actions speak louder than words, and the actions taken over the past decades have resulted in an unparalleled decline of American economic and political power, and a weakening of American values and spirit.

This is NOT a crisis in which the taking up of arms is the best answer. No, this is a situation in which we firmly believe that the pen will be mightier than the sword.

That a state of emergency exists cannot be disputed. That the emergency is one which should concern every American alive cannot be denied.  That we must stand together, laying aside our individual differences, to fight the common foe, is of vital importance, for the time to act is now.

But this is not a battle of swords, but of knowledge, for only when the deception is exposed to the light of day can the healing process begin.

Truth stands tall in the light of day, and it is the truth we bring to you today. Let it be known and understood that it is our intention to make this information available to every concerned Sovereign American who desires to know the true State of the Union. This is an undertaking of immense proportions, but we have dedicated ourselves to bringing this information to the light of day, and with the help of “We, the People”, we will be successful in our efforts.

Every American who is thankful for the opportunity to call themselves American must also accept the responsibility that comes with that title. We the People have not only a right, but a responsibility to each other, to those who have gone before us and and to those who will follow, to learn what our government is doing, and to judge whether actions taken benefit the people who will bear the costs.

We have been in the dark long enough, content to rest on our past glories and let the government take its course. In a way, we have been like children, trusting in our parents to act in our best interest. But as we have too frequently seen in the nightly news, not all parents have their children’s best interest at heart.

The time has come for us to take off our blinders and accept reality, for the time of national reckoning has arrived. The majority of our elected and appointed officials are no more responsible for the current state of affairs than are we. The strings are being manipulated at far higher levels than the positions most officials occupy. They are working with little knowledge or authority, trying to control problems far bigger than even they realize.

Their programs and actions may seek to cure the symptoms, but the time has now come to attack the disease. They are no more guilty than we are, nor will they be any more protected when the nation collapses on us all.

If we blame them for this national emergency, we must also truly blame ourselves, for it is “We, the People” to whom this nation was given and whose duty it was to keep a watchful eye on those who direct the sails of the ship of state. We have, however, fallen asleep, and while we were dreaming the American dream, a band of pirates stole the Constitution and put our people into slavery.

And since that terrible day when our Constitution was cast aside, not one President or Congress, nor one Supreme Court justice has been able or willing to return it to its rightful owners. Given the current state of the union, there is no reason to expect this situation to change unless we ourselves cause it to be so.

Let us put the childish emotions of pity and self-deception away, stand up, stand together and fight back. Now is the time to stop dreaming, and start the long work before us. Now is the time to turn back to the principles and ideals on which this nation was founded, the strong foundation from which our national identity springs.

When does tolerance become anarchy? When does protection become slavery? When is enough enough? Now is when here and now.

Now is the time to return to the laws set forth by God, and throw off  these chains of ignorance and bondage which grip our nation to the point of death. Let us return to the source, the standard of excellence set for us long ago.

Our message to Congress and all elected and appointed officials must be, “Let my people go!”, for we are all laboring under a system which will eventually crush us, regardless of our religion, our sex, or the color of  our skin.

We must let those at all levels of governmental authority know that we have learned of the deception which lies at the core of our national malaise. We must tell them in no uncertain terms that we will tolerate  this great lie no longer, and we must put them on notice that we expect them to resign if they have not the courage and the resolve to help this nation in its hour of need.

We have been fools long enough. Beginning today, no matter how long after that date you see this report, start each and every week without fail to give a copy of this information to at least one person you know. We also ask you to write a letter to Congress telling them to “Let our People go”, or you can use the form letter you will find enclosed in the report.

We must let our elected officials  know that we expect them as  servants of the people to help us re-establish law and order and restore our national pride. They must repeal Proclamation 2039, 2040, and the 12 USC 95(a) and 95(b), thereby cancelling the National Emergency, and re-establish the Constitution for this Nation.

Now is the time for excellence of action. We demand it and will accept nothing less. This is our country, to protect and defend, no matter the cost.

To do nothing, out of fear or apathy, is exactly what those in power are hoping for, for it is ignorance and apathy that the darkness likes best. We must not be a party to the darkness enveloping our nation any longer. We must come into the light, and give our every drop of blood, sweat and tears to bring our nation back with us.

We must acknowledge that if we do nothing, if we are not willing to act now and act boldly, without fear but with faith and a firm resolve, our freedom to act at all may soon be taken away altogether. New bills, new laws are being presented daily which will effectively serve to tighten the chains of bondage already encircling this nation.

My friends, we are not going into slavery we are already there! Make no mistake those in power are already tightening the chains, but they are doing so slowly, quietly and with great caution, for fear of awakening the slumbering lion which is the voice of the American people.

There is yet still time for us to slip loose the chains which bind us, and for us to bring about the restoration of this nation.

If we act, if we make our concerns known and shout out our refusal to accept the future which has been planned for us by those who hold no allegiance to this great land of ours, we can yet demand and see come to pass the day when the state of emergency is cancelled and the Constitution is restored to her rightful place as the watchdog of those for whom absolute power corrupts absolutely.

If we repent of our ignorance and our apathy, and return to the God- given laws on which this nation was founded, we may yet  be  free. Indeed, one can find Gods promise in the book of Second Chronicles Chapter 7 Verse 14:”If my people which are called by my Name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; THEN will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, AND WILL HEAL THEIR LAND.” (emphasis added)

We will continue to hold meetings and offer this information until everyone in America has had an opportunity to hear it and we have set our nation free.

We will not tolerate less. We are Sovereign American Citizens and that means far more than most of us realize.

If at first it seems you are working alone, do not give up, for as this information spreads across the land to the great cities and small towns, you will find yourself in excellent company. You already are as only one, for behind you stand all the heroes of our history who fought and died to keep this nation free.

Again, we must stress that we are not asking you to pick up guns; in fact, we implore you not to, no matter how angry the news of this deception has made you. Turn your anger into a steely resolve, a fierce determination not to give up until the battle has been won.

We are not asking you for any money; that’s their game, the “almighty dollar”. It is the substitution of wealth and possessions for integrity and honor that helped get us into this true state of emergency in which we find ourselves now. We are not asking you for more time than you can give, although we do ask you to give what time you can to get this information out.

What we ask from you is your commitment to stand with those around you to help us restore this nation to her rightful place in history, both that written and that yet to be told. Abraham Lincoln once said, “We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution”.

We must stand together now in this, our national hour of need. As the United States Supreme Court once said, “It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function  of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.”

Each individual, their attitudes and actions, forges their own special link in the great chain of history. Now is the time to add to that precious inheritance of honor and duty which has kept America alive, because the choices we make and the actions we take today are a part of history too – history not yet written.

The vision for America has not died; the “land of the free and the home  of the brave” still exists. There is still time to turn the tide for this great land, but we must join together to make it happen. We have a debt of honor to the past and the future, a call to glory to rescue our homeland from the hands of those who would see her fall. We cannot, we must not fail.

 

 Reproduction of all or any parts of the above text may be used for general information.

 

Available online at: http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/Articles/WarPowersAct.htm and

http://thelastoutpost.com/war-powers/dr-gene-schroeder-war-powers- act.html

Eugene Schroder et al were not aware of the registration of the birth certificate as the means used to obtain the unwitting pledging of our progeny as security for the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE.  This part of the scheme has been revealed by other researchers, including attorney Melvin Stamper in his book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree.


Communications About the Mess For the Military

11/18/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/communications-about-mess-for-military.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Part One  — Uniformed Officers

According to the Field Manuals of the US ARMY/Army your branch of the service is responsible for “supervising” the Bar Association and its members.  This is further confirmed throughout Title 37 of the Federal Code.  They are considered “Uniformed Officers” and they are required to act under your direction, as are doctors, dentists, chiropractors, etc.

So let’s stop the play-acting and pretension that you fellows don’t have the responsibility for what is going on in the courts in this country, because you obviously and self-admittedly do.

I am permanently domiciled on the land and soil of the Wisconsin state where I was born in 1956 and where my Mother was born in 1920 and where my Grandfather was born in 1865 and where my Great-Grandfather homesteaded beginning in 1854.

I have never worked for nor been dependent upon the federal government in my life. I am engaged in no federally regulated profession or occupation. I am an innocent Third Party American civilian who has been harmed by the misadministration of the US Army and US ARMY and its supervision of the activities of the Bar Association and its members on my soil and their usurpations and presumptions made against my person and my property.

You want to claim that you are occupying my land as part of your mandate to protect the peace and preserve the persons and property of the civilian population of this country?  Good.

I am here to inform all of you that you are doing a piss poor job and failing in that aim and that correction must be made to achieve that end.

I am also fulfilling my duty to report crime to the authorities responsible for protecting our persons and our property.

I am also here to make sure that you know who I am, know that I am here living in Alaska, that I have given Notice to the Secretary of State and the Wisconsin Secretary of State and am now also properly informing the Adjutant General responsible for keeping the records and the Port Authorities responsible for maintaining my egress treaty.

My American Trade Name is Anna Maria Riezinger and I own it and all its forms and derivatives including all those variations being used by the federal corporations and agencies.  My claims are plainly stated on the public records of this state and the State of Wisconsin and the State of Illinois and if anyone has any claim that I am not Anna Maria Riezinger and not a native-born American and not owed all the guarantees and protections of the Wisconsin Constitution and the Wisconsin Statehood Compact and am not a Protected Person under international law and am not owed the security and peace of my “vessels” and their “cargo” — then Mister, you better come forward to me with your proof and your counter-complaint right about NOW, because I am thoroughly fed up with all this mischaracterization of me, my husband, my son, and our position with respect to our nationality and non-citizen political status and also fed up with the harassment and privateering and illegal press-ganging being carried out by members of the Bar and doctors acting as undeclared Uniformed Officers on our shores— all of which you fellows are supposed to be overseeing and in all cases supposed to be protecting and preserving our persons and our property.

Am I making myself clear?

Though it passes through the pockets of lots of middle men– bankers, Popes, Queens, and even “International Organizations” — I am one of those paying for your “services” and I am not paying to be misidentified and pillaged as a foreign combatant, shallow-hulled vessel, special purpose vehicle, foreign grantor trust, Puerto Rican ESTATE trust, public transmitting utility or any of the other horseshit you have all cobbled together as a means to fleece and oppress the American Public.

We aren’t the ones in bankruptcy — not now, not ever. We are your actual, factual employers.

The sooner you all realize that FACT and start fulfilling your mandate to protect our persons and our property, the better off everyone concerned it going to be.

So I repeat — I am here to report crime taking place in this Federal District.  These crimes are being perpetuated by members of the American and Alaskan Bar Associations acting under the supervision and oversight of the US Army.  Further crimes are being committed by Uniformed Officers who deceptively appear to be civilians but who are also under the operational control of the US Army.

Now stop trying to tell me that all this horseshit shoved in my face is actually a bouquet of roses.

Finally, I am coming to you to make sure that you and the Adjutant General and all other members and parties and officers and employees of all federal branches of service including the federated states of states operating on our soil are fully aware that any presumed “interregnum” of the government of the people, for the people, and by the people owed the entire land jurisdiction and the reserved powers in international jurisdiction —is at an end.

The government of the actual unincorporated Body Politic of The United States of America is back on the land and moving to restore order and end the criminality to which this entire population has been subjected thanks to deliberate criminal mis-characterization of the people and plundering of property entrusted to the care of the US Army under international treaty and Executive Order.

The Adjutant General bears a primary responsibility for keeping accurate and honest records and I am here to correct the records he has about me and my family.

What he does with the crime report and what you do with it is your duty and business.  I have it all wrapped up and tied with a bow on the proper military forms as an affidavit to the Provost Marshall recorded on the land jurisdiction of the Matanuska-Susitna County and the State of Alaska Land Recorder’s Office.

I simply wish to hand deliver it and other supporting documents and answer any questions you may have.

Part 2:  Status Report

This is an article published and available on my Facebook Page.  It is designed to bring people up to speed concerning the Great Fraud committed against us.  If you have been doddering around assuming that this is all a “civilian matter” and that it has nothing to do with misconduct and dereliction of duty by the military, think again.  As I informed you yesterday, these “Uniformed Officers” who appear to be working in civilian capacities as undeclared Foreign Agents— both the courts and the doctors who are being used as the tools to defraud the American states and people— are supposed to be “supervised” by the Army and regulated by the Coast Guard.   So get to it.  Now.  If you want to get paid and look at yourselves in the mirror—- take action to defend your actual, factual employers.  And remember— without our land jurisdiction, you have no delegated sea jurisdiction to play in.  So you had better jolly well hop to it and defend us and defend our claims to our land jurisdiction or you will have nobody and nothing to come home to.

Property, Property Taxes, and the Whole Picture to Date

I have taken on the task of trying to consolidate everything to date for you. It’s a long article and I don’t want to be bombarded with questions of “How do I…..?” — I want you all to sit down, look at the situation described, and begin figuring things out. Just be quiet, take it all in, and think, think, think—- for yourselves. This is the first step toward being free of all this B.S. —- recognize how arbitrary, false, and silly most of this is, like a children’s game played in deadly earnest by adults. Unfortunately, most Americans have been playing Chess while their employees have been playing Parcheesi — which requires you to learn the new game, which then ultimately allows you to either (1) win the game, and/or (2) flip the table and play whatever game you want to play. They can make you play Parcheesi or you can make them play Chess–after all, they are your employees.

Our identity has been stolen. That resulted in us being reclassified as “US citizens” — as if we were government employees or as if we had been born in Puerto Rico.

This then affected our ability to own land in the states, because “foreigners” can’t actually live here, they can only “reside” here.

Instead, foreigners can have a long-term lease here and be tenants.

So that is how you are identified — as a tenant on your own land, with the State of Whatever as your landlord. Because you are misidentified in the public record, your land holdings are also misidentified and placed into one of three categories: residential, industrial, or agricultural, when your land of any sort should be classified as private property.

As long as you and your land are both misidentified, you will be taken for a “tax payer” and as a “subscriber” and as a “public vessel” and as a “resident” and everything you think of as yours will in fact be owned by and controlled by an organization of interlopers callings themselves the “State of Oregon” or the “State of Michigan”.

First order of business then, is to get yourself back into the right category, and identify yourself as an American state national, not a “US citizen”. This is more difficult than it looks, because the perpetrators of this scheme have made it difficult, yet to enjoy the benefits of their perfidy they have had to leave the door open for you, too.

That’s why there is always remedy available to those who diligently search.

Two layers of “government organizations” have placed these ugly claims on your name and estate. The first of these, known as the Territorial United States, seized hold of the copyright of your name on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, and then used that as a means to seize upon all your other property, too. They excused this Breach of Trust after the bogus “Civil War” —which was never a war, but an illegal commercial action on our shores— in the name of Public Safety to ensure the peace after the “rebels” were defeated. A hundred and fifty years later they are still attempting to use this excuse for stealing control of your name and estate by announcing “wars” against drugs, wars against this and wars against that. It’s all bull, but it serves the purpose of continuing to excuse their inexcusable usurpation against the American states and people.

Where is the door?

The Expatriation Act of July 1868 allows you to sign an Act of State and go back to your original status as an American born on the land of an actual state of the Union.

But remember, they have already seized control of your Given Name, which is also known as a “Trade Name” in their system of things, and they have copyrighted it by “registering” your “birth/berth”.

How do you correct that?

Well, their own records — all those resulting “Certificates of Live Birth”— show that you, the living man, were actually born on a specific day, like August 14, 1967, but the THING named after you wasn’t registered until a few days or weeks afterward—- on the (de) filing date which is also shown. This results in a situation in which the living man has a birth-day and the ESTATE they created “for” him has a birth-date.

There are two peaceful ways out of this box. The first, and the route that I have chosen, is to object to their presumption of trusteeship and usufruct status, return the Birth Certificate (it’s actually an insurance indemnity receipt so you are making an insurance claim for the return of your vested interest in your own estate), and copyright your own name by recording it as an Assumed Name with the land recording office in your county. Every State of State in the Union has statutes about Assumed Names, also known as Business Names, also known as Trade Names, which retain your Common Law Copyright rights……. ah, so….. go back and correct the “mistake” and claim your own Trade Name and copyright it effective with your actual birth-day. This predates their claim by a few days or weeks, so you are finally identified as the true party of interest and Holder in Due Course.

They had to leave this door open, in order to profit from all this chicanery themselves.

Now you are Master of your own “vessel” and nobody can say otherwise, and if they infringe on your copyright in an effort to defraud you, you can call them on it in no uncertain terms with the proof of your recorded Common Law copyright to shove in their astonished faces. Oh, my, Matilda, the horses can talk and the sheep can dance! And their own published documents are the evidence of all this deceit and will-to-plunder.

The second route, which recently opened up and which by mistake, has become yet another tool for the rats to use against you, is PARSE SYNTAX grammar.

As I recently discussed— one enterprising American found his way out of the their maze by creating a new name for himself using (arguably) correct grammar principals as his justification. He left his Given Name which was “Russell Jay Gould” behind and adopted a new name with new punctuation: “Russell-Jay:Gould”. This created a separation between their “person” operated as “RUSSELL JAY GOULD” or “RUSSELL J. GOULD” and his newly created persons “Russell-Jay:Gould” and “Russell-J:Gould”. It has, thus far, created a lasting protective barrier between the living man and the predatory corporations, and if you adopt his system and use PARSE SYNTAX, it can protect you, too.

The problem is that they have turned around and seen it as a new secret language they can operate in and use to defraud you. This is precisely the problem that Russell and I spent five days discussing in Texas. It now becomes necessary for everyone to learn PARSE SYNTAX so that you can defend yourselves in the venue of international law and commerce.

The vermin responsible for all this fraud and rot have had a long tradition of using “Federal Code” — think of actual coded language as in “Code Book” — combined with “Legal-ese”, the language of the lawyers, both of which attach special uncommon meanings to common words to form coded communications which are then used to defraud innocent Americans. The idea of using PARSE SYNTAX grammar for the same purpose was a no-brainer for these rats and they have eagerly accepted it.

According to Russell, this is their new backdoor trick. If you don’t present your claims in PARSE, they ignore them.

Improper grammar, they snort. Incorrect punctuation. Throw it out. Ho-hum. Mere gibberish…..

Well, so is Swahili gibberish to a non-Swahili, and French makes no sense to someone from Iceland who hasn’t studied French. As long as American English is our official language and it has its own punctuation and style conventions, PARSE has to be viewed as a foreign language from our perspective, just like Legalese, Italian, and Dutch. Russell justifies it in terms of being “correct” according to principles of math and logic, but as he also had to admit — it’s just as easy to lie in the language of math as it is to lie using any system of symbolic communication. Such a system only has to be consistent within the framework of its own declared assumptions to be “correct”, so, correctness— as we say in physics— is in the “givens”.

Russell is a righteous man, so he naturally sees the Truth in PARSE. The men we are dealing with naturally see it — and use it—for the exact opposite purposes.

There are advantages to identifying the foreign languages these vermin have been using against us. We have spent years breaking their codes and learning their lingo, so learning PARSE SYNTAX is just the latest challenge, but there is even more profound value in identifying whatever they are throwing at us as foreign language. “Foreign” to us means exactly that—- and serves to make the distinction between Americans and “US citizens” more obvious. RUSSELL-J:GOULD is never going to be recognized as a Proper Noun in American English. The style, form, and punctuation clearly identifies it as PARSE and implies the grammar that goes with it. That alone is a giant step forward toward honesty and truth in commerce.

People will need to make their own decisions about how best to crack the nut and what tools to use to crack it. I think that the strongest tools we have are our own values and sense of justice. No matter what language something is expressed in, whether the grammar is correct or not, we all know when something is unfair. We all recognize the criminality of trespassing on someone else’s assets. And a lie however it is expressed is still a lie.

Picture the scene: Commander Gould and I seated at my kitchen table, both heads bowed. We daily struggle with all that is false and selfish and small-minded in human nature, in ourselves and in others—-but at the same time, we have a glimpse of something in Mankind that is glorious and fine and generous, a part of All That Is.

In the days to come, I recommend that everyone work hard to take advantage of the “exits” that still exist in the standing law, working backwards to (1) claim and record your Common Law copyright to your name however it is styled, ordered, formed, or expressed, and then (2) issuing an Act of Expatriation and recording that as a Deed with the State Secretary of State. If there is anyone out there who is willing to fund the effort, the Living Law Firm can ferret out the statutes guaranteeing Common Law Copyrights in all fifty of the States of States. We can develop effective Acts of State. We can get it all translated into PARSE SYNTAX so the rats have no excuse. We don’t have the manpower, but we could hire enough paralegals and PARSE experts to get it done.

The first step reclaims your copyright interest in your own name (and therefore all the assets attached to it) and puts you in control of it, and the second step uncouples the “presumption” of “residency” and “US citizen” status being associated with your name. The first action gives you the key to unlock the door, the second allows you to walk through the door and lock it behind you. The third action– translation into PARSE– gives them no wiggle room to ignore anything you have done.

There are some additional niceties to be observed. Once you reclaim your name and your proper political status you will need to notify the authorities responsible– the Port Authority for your area (Coast Guard Commandant) and the Adjutant General (responsible for keeping and updating proper records) and the US Postmaster General. There are actually seven (7) Postmaster and Post Master offices, but you address it to the Postmaster General as he is in charge of the military end of things and is the actual Commander of the Coast Guard and Adjutant General’s Office in the Territorial Government that you have to notify about the changes in your status.

If you intend to conduct any kind of business outside your state of the Union you will need to post an Indemnity Bond with the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, and if you go offshore to conduct business of any kind you will need to notify the U.S. Secretary of State and give them notice.

We all need to become very much more aware of the “occupation” of the U.S. Army and the misconduct that has gone on in the international jurisdiction since the so-called American Civil War. By becoming aware and doing our due diligence we can save the world from criminality and predators. We can also exercise our God-given rights and enjoy our privacy and not be harassed.

Going right along with this aim, we all need to learn the “latest and greatest” foreign code—- PARSE SYNTAX—- and use it as Russell intended it to be used, as a defense against falsehood and tyranny.

Once you have yourself free and clear and beyond the reach of the vermin and their false claims against you, you can easily deal with the issue of Property Taxes and Income Taxes being imposed by foreign governments via false presumption and deceit. Once you can be recognized as a natural-born American state national, you can go to the Tax Assessor and claim back your land as the landlord exercising your “reversionary trust interest” —- and demand that it be listed as private property and not annexed as residential, industrial, or agricultural property belonging to the State of State.

If like millions of Americans you still have a mortgage, you have “issues” to resolve. American state nationals are not eligible for mortgages. You are the actual landlords, so any mortgage credits to be applied under any tenancy agreement has to be paid to you, not taken from you. American state nationals are not eligible for Social Security, either, and you should have never been enrolled. American state nationals don’t require or use marriage licenses. And though they are imposed “in the interests of public safety”, American state nationals are not required to use driver licenses, either, unless they are engaged in some business or trade that makes use of the public roads for private gain — commercial trucking operations, taxi and courier services, etc.

The foregoing mish-mash in which you have mistakenly enrolled or taken part in or been coerced to participate in programs meant for “US citizens” results in a lot of entanglements and potential controversies based on adhesion contracts. You were not told that these offers and programs were only for “US citizens” and you were not given full disclosure about which kind of “US citizen” was eligible and other aspects of these sugar-coated lumps of rabbit feces, either. As a result the contracts are invalid. Now what?

We are at the beginning of trying to settle such issues with the organizations responsible.

Those who actually own their homes, ranches, etc., free and clear of mortgage debts can go to the Title Company and request a Certificate of Redemption. They can then correct the Deed and Title to their assets, issue an Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance of Deed, transferring the property back to Stanton County Oregon or Pierce County Idaho or wherever else it is located and defining it as a private land parcel, tax-exempt, and described as……. “according to metes and bounds established by this Deed…..” and as further described as Number 452 Pickle-Lovers Lane (copyright symbol) — whatever name you make up to describe your parcel— belonging to Ted and Marcia (or Bill and Alice or….) Johnson, c/o Post Box 39980 in AnyState, blah, blah, blah. You record your deed in plain simple American English on page with the local land recording office, and you clearly “post” your land with the international black and white sign and “Private Property” signs.

The federal vermin have to recognize your claims, because their own claims depend on your land claims: without a land jurisdiction, they don’t have a delegated sea jurisdiction. And they are even motivated and grateful to see your claims appearing on the land recording district offices, because it is beginning to dawn on them that without us, they are nothing. Without us, they are open to seizure as pirates. Without us, all their State of State claims blow away in the wind.

They will still try to play their “You Can’t See Me” games using PARSE SYNTAX as the excuse. It is therefore important to learn PARSE and follow up with a Corollary Deed written in PARSE and added to the land record so that they can’t discount or “mistake” your meaning about any of this anymore. This would be the equivalent of re-writing your Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance of Deed in a foreign language and recording that for the benefit of the speakers who use that language. A properly translated PARSE deed serves notice to the vermin that the jig is up and that you know what they are doing.

So at last you can achieve that much-desired end of having your employees leave you and your assets alone, and forcing them to get back to work doing the job you hired them to do—- protecting you and your assets instead of bullying, attacking, and robbing you.

And wouldn’t that be a nice change of direction?

This is a long read and explanation of the circumstance and there are still a lot of things up in the air, but the basic outlines of the situation and the proper steps needed to deal with the Mess as it stands are becoming clear. I cannot stress enough that this whole circumstance is a process — not a single step, but many steps. They’ve been diddling around with this for 150 years. You can’t expect to overcome it all in an afternoon.

You need to think it through in a logical sequence and then reverse that sequence. It is a Maxim of Law that “as a THING is bound, so it is unbound”. Well, THINGS, here is your chance.

Reverse their claim and copyright of your name and estate by over-riding with a guaranteed Common Law Copyright pre-dating their claim. Record that. Give notice to the Coast Guard and Adjutant General and U.S. Postmaster General. Reverse their presumption that you are a US citizen with an Act of State returning your name and estate to Wisconsin, Minnesota, or wherever you came from. Record that. Give Notice to the State Secretary of State and U.S. Secretary of State. Reverse their unspoken claim that your land belongs to their franchise operating as a State of State and belongs to a “resident” and is either “residential, industrial, or agricultural” land. Correct the Deed. Record that. Give notice to the Tax Assessor and demand that your parcel be designated as private property and as tax exempt.

Learn PARSE and bring a Notice of the Fact written in PARSE as a translation of your claims and rebuttals and deeds. Record that. If they even think about messing with you, they will see that translation provided for their understanding and go away, far, far away.

So, now, at the end of all this— you are back on solid ground and the sharks have to remain in the sea. You are home at last. The snail is on his thorn. And the pick-pockets are on the run. If you are an honest and peaceful man, that’s what you wanted all along. Be willing to give that to other people, even those you consider to be enemies, and your own peace is assured.

The Rule of Love always overcomes the Rule of Law.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger


The Sides of a Coin Anna Von Reitz

11/16/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/the-sides-of-coin-anna-von-reitz.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Ancient Romans were fascinated by the two sides of a coin.  Here were two faces of the same thing….  Quite a concept, isn’t it?

The two faces of America are the jurisdictions of the land on one side and the jurisdiction of the sea on the other.  And to make it more complicated, part of the sea jurisdiction is under the control of the land jurisdiction– thanks to the so-called reserved powers.

Since 1860 the portion of the sea jurisdiction of America that was entrusted to and operated by the British Monarchs has been operated in fraud.

By Maxim of Law, fraud taints and vitiates everything, even the most solemn contracts known as treaties. Fraud voids all contracts “ab initio”—- “from the beginning”.

There is no statute of limitations that applies to fraud.

It’s like that scene in “The Raiders of the Lost Ark” where the Holy Spirit of God comes out of the Ark of the Covenant and destroys the evil Nazis, leaving Indiana Jones and his girlfriend at peace.

This is the Truth about fraud, and it is universally acknowledged, yet nobody quite seems to know what to do about a fraud this monstrous, this big, impacting virtually everyone on Earth.

Let’s begin by assuring everyone that there is still an American government and that that honest government is responsible for the land jurisdiction of this country.  The whole confusion and uproar is on the “other side of the coin”—- that portion of our government operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea that was entrusted to King George and his Successors. So let’s examine the situation.

The British government kept control of our international commerce (which is business between incorporated entities), our trade policies, our military, our coinage, and provided all the other services that we associate with the nineteen enumerated powers delegated to the federal government which was always as foreign to us as the government of Scotland.

If you never bothered to read or think deeply about The Constitution for the united States of America, please do so now, paying special attention to Article I Section 8 Clause 17, Article IV, and Amendment X.

The British were supposedly here to provide us with “essential government services”, under contract and under condition of trust obligation.  In exchange for all those powers, George III agreed to act as our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways and to protect Americans and American vessels in commerce. (We are considered to be vessels engaged in international trade, not commerce, and our consciousness is our cargo.)

To accomplish this feat of political and commercial compromises, a constitution— a debt agreement— was agreed to, but in 1819 the upstart Americans decided that the members of the British Bar Association were not to be trusted and they passed the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) in that year.  Ever since, members of the Bar have been precluded from serving in our land jurisdiction government in each state and county, but not the portion of the federal government provided by Britain.

Say what?  By now, your head is spinning as you realize that there are members of the Bar sitting on every city council, every assembly, every school board, every state legislature and yes, in the Congress.  And they shouldn’t be there, except for one thing.  They have incorporated the old county and state governments and redefined them as franchises of the parent federal corporations doing business as the USA, Inc. and the UNITED STATES, INC. — not the actual land jurisdiction government owed to you and to this country at all.

So, what you think of as your government is not your government.  It’s their government pretending to be your government.  According to them, we are a nation of 350 million public servants, all here to provide essential government services.

There is the word that you need to keep your eye on: service.

Military service….

Banking service…..

Postal service….

US Marshals service….

Legal service…..

And so on…..

Absolutely every power this foreign entity exercises is a delegated power that they have been allowed to exercise under conditions of contract and trust, which they have violated and breached via semantic deceit, secrecy, and fraud.

So much for the “delegated powers”—- the federal corporations and the federal citizens responsible for providing the services and exercising the delegated powers have failed us, failed their duty, and participated in premeditated racketeering, abuse of bankruptcy protection, and fraudulent hypothecation of debt against us and against our assets.

It was the obvious intent of these monsters to levy their own debts against us and our assets as presumed sureties, and to discharge their debts in bankruptcy—- leaving us and our children’s children to pay for it.

These are acts of crime executed against the American states and people by their own employees under conditions of fraud and breach of trust; but, remember these are all “delegated powers” and those who delegated these powers— the American states and people, their heirs and assigns — have their own ship of state which is reserved to them, their own language (American English), their own law (American Common Law) and their own republican form of government, and all the rest.

Please keep it fixed in your mind that the “federal United States” which includes both the Municipal United States and the Territorial United States are foreign with respect to us.

They can have their own language(s) — their so-called “Federal Code” — and they can have their own “states” called “states of states” which are franchises of deceptively named parent corporations doing business as the USA, Inc. and the UNITED STATES and more recently, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  They can run their affairs as corporations, they can have their own offices, they can hire their own courts, they can promote political parties, they can hire the members of the Bar Associations and carry on however they wish, and as long as they are working for us, they can fly our flag under delegated power—- and none of it has anything to do with us, the actual Americans.

Let that sink in.

Your United States of America has never been bankrupt.  Theirs has. Repeatedly.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


Almost $200 Million Donated to Representatives to Pass TPA

11/15/2017

https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=Almost-200-Million-Donate-by-Paola-Casale-Banking_Congress_Control_Corporations-150620-523.html

 

 

Money in Politics

By Paola Masman      

Many think our government is for sale. However, by taking a look at the facts below provided by the Open Secrets, it is easy to understand where they are coming from. Looking back at Friday the 12th, the House voted on Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), the controversial bill that gives power to the executive branch to negotiate treaties. TPA limit’s Congress’ ability to better a trade deal by subjecting members of Congress to 90 days of reviewing the trade agreement, prohibiting any amendments on the implementing legislation, and giving them an up or down vote. TPA passed with a mere 219-211 vote with only 218 needed to pass. The real shocker comes from the amount of money each Representative received for a yes vote. In total, $197,869,145 was given to Representatives for a yes vote where as $23,065,231 was given in opposition.

  • John Boehner (R-OH) received $5.3 million for a “yea” vote and was the highest paid legislator.
  • Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) received $2.4 million for his “yea” vote.
  • Paul Ryan (R-WI) received $2.4 million for a “yea” vote and came in at the third highest paid legislator.
  • Pat Tiberi (R-OH) follows Paul Ryan, coming in the fourth spot having received $1.6 million for his “yea” vote.

The fifth highest paid legislator is somewhat of a “hero” in comparison to others. Representative Steny Hoyer (D-MD) received $1.6 million for a yes vote and only $282,710 for a no vote. Despite of his high contribution from those in favor of TPA, he still voted a solid nay.

We also have other hero stories.

  • Joe Crowley (D-NY) received 1.3 million for a “yea” vote and only $72,550 for a “nay” vote and he still voted against TPA.
  • Patrick Murphy (D-FL) received 1.1 million for a “yea” vote and only $213,360 for a “nay” vote and still voted against it.
  • Richard Neal D(MA) received $1.1 million for a “yea” vote and a mere $47,625 for a “nay” vote and still voted against it.

Democrats are not the only heroes in this voting session. GOP members spoke very loud and clear.

  • Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) received $541,746 for a “yea” vote and no money at all for a “nay” vote and he still voted “nay!”
  • Andy Harris (R-MD) received $254,803 for a “yea” vote and no money at all for a “nay” vote and he still voted “nay”.
  • Thomas Massie (R-KY) received $250,328 for a “yea” vote and no money at all for a “nay” vote and he still voted “nay.”
  • Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) received $180,832 for a “yea” vote and no money at all for a “nay vote” and she still voted “nay.”

Where did this kind of money come from? Those in favor of TPA were Security Brokers and Investment Companies who donated a whopping $11.3 million dollars for a “yea” vote. Or big banking companies who donated $10.1 million dollars. In other words, Wall Street hashed out millions and millions of dollars to push for the passage of TPA.

Those numbers are absolutely staggering. Corporations are taking control of what policies are approved or blocked in the U.S. We cannot sit around while corporations decide what is “good” for America or not! This is a democracy, not a plutocracy! Contact your representatives and let them know that you do not want them to vote in favor of TPA!

Paola Casale is a graduate of Otterbein University. She works for The Coalition for a Prosperous America as the Media Director who is in charge of overseeing that hidden news is uncovered. Paola meets with members of Congress in D.C. to discuss international trade agreements and how to aim towards fair trade instead of free trade.


The Whiskey Rebellion How Brand New America Tore Up The Bill of Rights

11/14/2017

http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/the-whiskey-rebellion-how-brand-new-america-tore-up-the-bill-of-rights/

By Joe Jarvis

223 years ago, “The Dreadful Night” occurred in Western Pennsylvania, after an uprising called The Whiskey Rebellion.

The United States was brand new. Soldiers who had fought for independence from Great Britain found themselves on opposite sides of a skirmish. Some were having their rights violated practically before the ink was dry on the Bill of Rights. Other Veterans of the Revolution were doing the oppressing at Alexander Hamilton’s behest.

The Whiskey Rebellion saw farmers stand up to an unfair tax handed down by the federal government, and the government responded with the force of a monarchy. It may have all sprung from Alexander Hamilton’s desire for glory. Or Hamilton, the first Secretary of Treasury, may have had other motives for setting the precedent of force which still lives on today.

It all started after the Revolution, in 1791, when the federal government was in debt, and had no official money. The notes they paid to soldiers were worth fractions of what was promised, but many had no choice but to accept the funds and go home in order to try to survive.

But the soldiers were not the only ones who needed to be paid after the war. There were a number of rich investors and bankers who had provided the capital needed to win the Revolution. They too were awaiting repayment.

Alexander Hamilton had a better relationship with these financiers than with the soldiers. Hamilton was one of the leading banking figures of the time. He proposed a tax which would have two purposes. The tax would raise the revenue necessary to pay back the wealthy financiers of the Revolution. But the tax would also bring under the jurisdiction of the federal government a group of pioneers living in rural western Pennsylvania. The tax was to be levied on the production of whiskey, and not just at a commercial level. Everyone who made whiskey owed the tax. This would be the first federal tax on domestic goods.

This was a problem for the people of western Pennsylvania. Most people in this area used whiskey as a currency. Whatever surplus grain a family had would be converted into whiskey in order to preserve it. Whiskey would still have the calories of grain and was drank by almost everyone. It could be used for preserving and making some medicines.

Whiskey didn’t spoil, was widely used, and easy to transport. This made it an ideal currency. No need for banks, no need for paper money the worth of which can be manipulated. These people had tangible goods with intrinsic value absent of government mandate.

But Alexander Hamilton and the federal government insisted that the tax on whiskey be paid in coin.

For western Pennsylvanians, this amounted to an income tax. But even worse, now they had to find a way to convert their whiskey into coin. They had no use for coin since they used whiskey as a currency. But now the federal government would require them to use more time and effort just to pay the tax.

But it gets worse. Producers of whiskey were given a choice. They could pay a flat tax or pay a per gallon price. For commercial distillers who produced a lot of whiskey, the flat rate was cheaper than the per gallon rate. But for individuals, the per gallon rate was cheaper.

This was a political reward that Hamilton gave to commercial whiskey distillers in the area. They would now have the cheapest whiskey available since the flat tax worked out to a lower per gallon rate than home-distillers were forced to pay.

Hamilton did this to gain a foothold of support in the area (his enforcer was a large scale distiller) and to convert the economy of western Pennsylvania away from a whiskey-based currency. The sooner everyone was brought under the jurisdiction of the federal government, the sooner the government could raise money to pay for spending.

The tax destroyed the way of life for your average rural Pennsylvanian. First, they were singled out for a tax that most city dwellers would not be affected by. Next, they were forced to find a way to earn coin in order to pay the tax. Then, the tax made their whiskey more expensive compared to commercial distillers. This meant it was harder to sell, making it harder to convert the whiskey into coin to pay the tax.

Many people from this area moved out west to avoid the intricacies of society and government. Some were veterans of the Revolution. They would not accept this tax.

They were outraged that this tax was levied against them while the Northwest Indian War was going badly for the U.S. making the area unsafe. Seeing the tax as an advantage to grain growers (who owed no tax) and big distillers in the east (who owed a flat rate) also fueled western Pennsylvanian’s anti-federal sentiment.

They decided that if this was the way the new country was to treat its people, they wanted no part in it. They refused to pay the tax and served vigilante justice to tax collectors and other sympathizers of the federal government. They reacted similarly to how the United States reacted to unfair British taxes which sparked the Revolution.

By 1794 the climax of the situation unfolded. A U.S. Marshall was sent to the area and a showdown ensued. Some rebels were shot in a skirmish and their leader, a veteran of the Revolution, was killed. The tax collector and U.S. Marshall were captured only to later escape, and the fury of western Pennsylvanians peaked.

There was talk among the rebels that they should secede from the United States and form their own country. The plan that emerged was a watered down version of protest in which the rebels would march through Pittsburgh nonviolently. This was meant to send a message that they would not back down against what they saw as Hamilton’s attempts to pay back the wealthy by taxing the ordinary citizen.

President George Washington decided it was time to send in the army. A commission he sent to western Pennsylvania returned and recommended using the military to enforce the tax laws, and restore order.

By October 1794 Washington was seeing troops off, and heading back east, much to the dismay of some moderate locals including Congressman William Findley. He saw Washington as a fair president who just wanted to do what was right. Alexander Hamilton was the real force behind the army heading west, according to Findley, who was included on Hamilton’s list of possible rebels to be arrested.

Hamilton went with the army of nearly 20,000 as a civilian adviser. He was instructed by Washington to maintain the utmost discipline among the troops. As they advanced toward their target in western Pennsylvania, Hamilton was to prevent any breach of law by the troops, such as pillaging the countryside.

Officers harshly punished any soldier caught stealing, but the soldiers were doing so because of the lack of rations and clothing. Hamilton decided to solve this by making the theft of these goods legal. According to William Hogeland in his book The Whiskey Rebellion:

The quartermaster corps, [Hamilton] announced, would impress civilian property along the way. Now families watched helplessly as bayonet-wielding soldiers–no longer freelancing thieves but officials, authorized by the president–commandeered hard-won winter supplies of grain, meat, firewood, and blankets on behalf of the government of the United States. A steady, freezing rain meant the arrival of winter. Families whose sustenance was carted away faced grim months ahead (218).

Once the army and Hamilton finally arrived at the target county in western Pennsylvania, they contonued their oppression. They did not care much to follow the due process laid out in the Bill of Rights in new Constitution, despite Hamilton’s assurances to the President.

Many residents had signed oaths of support for the U.S. government. By signing, they risked local vigilante justice. But the U.S. promised that they would be pardoned as punishment was served to the region for failing to pay the new tax, and leading an insurrection against officials of the federal government.

These oaths were ignored and many who had signed them were arrested by Hamilton and the army anyway. A month earlier the first arrests of a few rebels had been made, prompting the most guilty among the rebels to flee. Anyone left in western Pennsylvania had minimal roles in the insurrection, and had certainly not led it. The most violent rebels, who had committed the worst acts against government officials, had already fled.

“The Dreadful Night” began in the middle of the night on November 13, 1794. Hamilton had created three lists of people: those who were not to be arrested, those who would be arrested, and those who were to be brought in as witnesses for questioning. The first list was not provided to the generals. Hamilton gave them the authority to arrest anyone they suspected of having participated in the rebellion, aided the rebels, raised liberty poles, or robbed the mail. He also authorized the troops to arrest local officials who failed to suppress the insurrection. The officers and soldiers who were passed these orders were delighted to finally have some excitement and authority on this trip west.

One particularly unstable officer named White was put in control of  the 40 prisoners which Hamilton thought would give the most valuable intelligence on the whole situation. These prisoners “were brought to a dark log structure” where they were tied up and seated on the muddy floor, and guarded by soldiers instructed to keep the prisoners away from the warmth of the fire. The tavern keeper was told he would be killed if any prisoners received food, and thus for more than two days the sadistic officer in charge:

…starved and dehydrated his shivering, exhausted captives, steadily cursing and castigating them, glorying in their helplessness and describing their imminent hanging. Even White’s troops became concerned about the captives who seemed barely alive (222).

The prisoners were then marched 12 miles in bad weather to be held in another jail, still without being charged with any crime. Following interrogation, most of them were eventually released without any criminal proceedings. This was unsurprising since most of those arrested were indeed innocent.

The arrests and brutality went on for several days throughout western Pennsylvania. This served as a reminder to all residents not to speak out against the federal government. Hamilton made it clear to the presiding judge that regardless of innocence, a good number of detainees would need to be marched back to Philadelphia in order to give the impression that the federal government had accomplished its goal, and put down a violent, unjustified rebellion. The judge held a number of rebels for trial even with what he considered lack of evidence, fearing that the army would revolt if too many prisoners were let go.

The prisoners that remained in custody were marched back to Philadelphia with great show in order to create the illusion of glory. It was essentially a photo op for Hamilton and Washington, who could now say, see, look what we did, look at the problems we solved. The prisoners were paraded on Christmas Day 1794 before 20,000 Philadelphians.

It was a disappointing show to the spectators who knowing that thousands of rebels had marched against the government, were surprised to see only twenty prisoners. Twelve cases went to trial, and two rebels were convicted. The rest weren’t released until 1796. They were left to find their way home if they could afford it. The whiskey tax remained hard to collect until it was repealed in 1801 by President Thomas Jefferson.

From the beginning of this country, the federal government has not been very good at abiding by the Constitution. Clearly, the due process rights of most of the “rebels” arrested were violated. Also violated were the rights of the farmers whose food and property was confiscated along the way in order to supply the army.

Cruel and unusual punishment was used on the prisoners, prior to them even being charged. What a precedent to set at the birth of a “free” country. They tore up the Bill of Rights before the ink had time to set.

With Hamilton’s broad presence in the foundation of the country’s banking and finances, is it any wonder that his vision has led us to where we are today? The government still uses taxes to give some businesses an advantage. The government still levies taxes which are meant to change the way citizens live their lives.

But remember that the government still found it hard to enforce and collect the whiskey tax. And today we can arrange our lives in a similar fashion, and make it difficult for the government to collect their unfair taxes. Let the spirit of rebellion inspire you.

Olddogs Comments

Those of you who have the intelligence and means to protect your rights must band together and teach those who do not, or we will certainly all go down together. The above article is nothing compared to what others have suffered over the years, and what we all will suffer in the near future if we do not stand up and fight back. The international Banking Cartel must be taken down one way or another. Greed is no different than pedophilia.


Diversity And Multiculturalism Decomposing American Society

11/13/2017

Read More Articles by Frosty Wooldridge

And read Olddogs Comments at the end

The call for endless diversity and multiculturalism by America’s elites creates conflict, confusion and bewilderment.  Whether you listen to CNN, NPR and PBS, or read the New York Times, The Atlantic Monthly or Washington Post—those media outlets run sob stories, powder puff pieces and biased accounts of America’s guilt as to racism, xenophobia, Islamophobia and nativism.

You feel a sense of guilt if you cringe at the two words fragmenting Western countries coerced into allowing endless immigration from third world countries.

Never mind that the majority of the world’s poor adds 80,000,000 (million) new babies, net gain, annually by their own choices.  Never mind if they cannot feed, water, educate or house their prolific numbers.  Never mind that they see first world countries as an escape valves for their endless destitute and hopeless citizens.

Diversity: a word that brings joy to anyone who loves different music, movies, animals and assorted foods.  Others like different sports that suit their fancy.  In every realm of personal choices, the world offers diversity of educations, thought, religions and work.

But after centuries of mixing different ethnic groups, diversity becomes a pariah and misnomer.  Every night on local news stations, racial unrest dominates most big cities.

African-Americans struggle with racism in America because they remain a minority ethnic group.  Where they dominate in Africa, other races struggle to survive racism.  Racism in Mexico remains a steadfast component to keep people of color at the lowest economic echelons.  Japan features strong racism, so much so, it does not allow immigration into that country.

In reality, from my worldwide travels, I discovered ‘racism’ stems from biological differences. It stems from tribal dissimilarities.  Every race, when in power, practices racism against subordinate ethnic groups.  Racism plays out in the animal world everywhere on this planet.

At best, humans must come to respect one another when they cannot understand each other.  They must honor each other’s lives while they choose to remain in their own tribes.

Multiculturalism Invading Western Countries

Sweden, once the most peaceful and vibrant country in the world, today, struggles with rapes, crime, car bombings, failing schools, parallel societies, conflicting religions and a fragmenting society.

What changed?  Sweden along with the rest of Europe began immigrating Moslems from the Middle East and Africa.  They imported Indians from the Sub-Continent.  They introduced aberrant cultures and religions into their midst as a grand social experiment by intellectuals bent on proving that ethnic groups and cultures might live in happy celebration of their cultures within an alien culture.

One Moslem imam boasted:  “Sweden will become Europe’s first Moslem caliphate.”

France faces similar consequences to its endless immigration.

French writer Giulio Meo said, “In 2017, the French authorities are sending compensation to more than 2,500 victims of the jihadist attacks in Paris and Saint-Denis, who will be compensated with 64 million euros. Important victories were also attained by anti-terrorism forces. According to an enquiry by the weekly L’Express, in the last two years, 32 terrorist attacks were foiled, 625 firearms were seized, 4,457 people suspected of having jihadist links were searched, and 752 individuals were placed under house arrest. But the general impression is that of a country “failing from within”.

“After two French girls were murdered by an Islamist in Marseille last month, the social commentator wrote that France is experiencing a process of national and civilizational decomposition that authorities have decided to accompany and moderate, without claiming to fight and overthrow it, as if it were unavoidable.”

Fact:  every culture strives for dominance.  When it finds itself in large enough numbers, any culture competes with any adjoining culture. Today, Moslems contend for dominance in every city their numbers grow in Europe.  Moslems struggle for dominance in Australia, Canada and America.  Today, Chinese immigrants in Vancouver, Canada control that city via their majority numbers.  The Canadian Chinese ran native Canadians out of that city with money, businesses, hiring, housing and numbers.  Vancouver no longer remains a Canadian city.

Multiculturalism decomposes any country where it takes a foothold.  It starts small, such as a city like Lewiston, Maine; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Freemont, California and Dearbornistan, Michigan.  Take a look at Spanish Miami, San Diego and Los Angeles.  Look at Chicago, Illinois.

All of them decompose into mini-third world countries: poverty, failing schools, illiteracy, welfare, crime, drugs and loss of the rule of law.

I spoke about the “Perfect Storm Gathering Over America” at a political club last fall.  If you want to be shocked into what’s coming, this 42-minute video needs to be seen all over America.  Why? Because your children face this future with an added 100 million immigrants within 30 years.

Perfect Storm Gathering Over America by Frosty Wooldridge

With every 1.1 million added immigrants added to the USA annually and another 100 million by 2045, our culture cannot nor will it survive the onslaught of multiculturalism.  It’s that simple. We either stop immigration or we become the victims of it.

Welcome to Dearborn, Michigan.

Yet, the United Nations, Lutheran Churches, Catholic Churches and others force those refugees into every town that features a welfare office—knowing full well those refugees cannot and will not become functioning parts of the American workforce.  And worse, those organizations understand that such places like Africa, India and Indochina continue adding 80,000,000 (million) new babies, net gain, annually—so the line of refugees never ends.

View this video to see uselessness of endless immigration. It solves nothing, but in fact exacerbates population growth:

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation.  Take five minutes to see for yourself.

As you can see from the video, no amount of immigration will solve the starvation, misery, suffering or hopelessness of people around the world.  Why? Because they keep adding 80 million, net gain, annually.

But on a sociological level, America, Europe, Canada and Australia find their countries becoming “Everybody Else’s Countries.”  Whether it’s the impact of cultural conflict, religious conflict or linguistic chaos—first world countries will not survive the “Clash of Civilizations.”

As stated, all cultures and ethnic groups compete for dominance.  With 100,000,000 added immigrants from 196 different countries by 2050, the USA finds those millions pulling for their own culture, ethos, language and religions.  America today, already fractures and fragments in the big cities with Black Panthers and Black Lives Matter calling for a separate Black Country.  With the advent of more terrorist Muslims, you will see them demanding Islamic caliphates in the USA much like Europe.

Our country faces ultimately pulling apart at the seams. It will not be able to hold in the center as “Americans.”

Any culture that will not defend itself against displacement through mass immigration faces extinction. That includes both time-tested and successful cultures. Embracing diversity results in cultural suicide. America’s multicultural path guarantees its destruction via cultural clashes and conflict with Islam, Mexican and African cultures that diametrically oppose American culture. The more diverse a country, the more destructive and broken-down its future. The more people, the more it destroys its quality of life and standard of living. The more it adds immigrants, the more destruction to its environment. The more it imports refugees, the faster America, Canada, Europe and Australia lose their own ability to function and worse, their identities. Exponential growth of any civilization leads to ultimate collapse. You see it in Africa, India and China today. You will see it in Europe, Canada, Australia and America in the coming years, “IF” Western countries don’t stop all forms of immigration.

If you don’t want a Paris, France, San Bernardino or Orlando event in your community, it’s time to call for a total “Immigration Shutdown Now.”

Call your senators and House rep:  1 202 224 3121 or 1 888 995 2086. Demand a stop to all immigration and stop to any Syrian immigration.

Definition of slogan:  “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want a total shutdown on all legal and illegal immigration. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them.  We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can save or destroy our civilization.  We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

(Permission to republish this population graph by Roy Beck, www.NumbersUSA.org )

Muslims cannot in any way become Americans. The Koran forbids it.  Their entire context of religious-political Sharia Law demands subjugation to their religion with no allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. The Koran forbids women’s rights, marital choice, free speech, gay rights and religious rights.  Our way of life remains completely out of bounds to Islam. This 4-minute video explains our plight:

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them.  Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers.  We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!”

Share these videos all over America:

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation.  Take five minutes to see for yourself:

“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck

This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a few words, “Mind boggling!”  www.NumbersUSA.org

Take action by joining for free:

America: www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacityNetwork.org

CanadaUnited Kingdom :
  Australia : Sustainable Population Australia

© 2017 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Frosty: frostyw@juno.com

 

Author Email: frostyw@juno.com

Frosty Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and families in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six continents and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His published books include: “HANDBOOK FOR TOURING BICYCLISTS”; “STRIKE THREE! TAKE YOUR BASE”; “IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY CONSEQUENCES”; “MOTORCYCLE ADVENTURE TO ALASKA: INTO THE WIND—A TEEN NOVEL”; “BICYCLING AROUND THE WORLD: TIRE TRACKS FOR YOUR IMAGINATION”; “AN EXTREME ENCOUNTER: ANTARCTICA.” His next book: “TILTING THE STATUE OF LIBERTY INTO A SWAMP.” He lives in Denver, Colorado. His latest book. ‘IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION—DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.’ E:Mail: frostyw@juno.com Website: http://www.FrostyWooldridge.com

Author Email: frostyw@juno.com

Olddogs Comments

When I look back at the attitudes and accomplishments of Americans fifty years ago as compared to our present society it damn near makes me cry from shame. Who in their right mind would have put up with the present delusions created by diversity and multiculturalism back then? One can believe in God, and one can believe in no God, but everyone cannot believe in everything. So I am thrilled to be on the down side of this clusterfuck, knowing I won’t be here when it all goes to hell.


FISCAL BLISS Ignorance is Bliss

11/11/2017

https://ppjg.me

Olde Reb

proliberty@fairpoint.net

“What difference does an increase in the National Debt make? We owe it to ourselves.” Nancy Pelosi has declared. Such a paraphrased statement, reflecting on the exoskeleton structure of the Federal Reserve, ignores the inner historic mechanisms of Rothschild banking, the intense subterfuge and arm-twisting of the Fed’s creation, and the proven destructive forces inherent but hidden therein. 1

The medieval Rothschild Banks established a line of credit for the King provided the King issued a written promise to pay gold, with interest, to the bank at a time in the future. The book-entry Rothschild credit was used to pay for obligations incurred by the king and the credit continued to be circulated in the kingdom between merchants. The bankers sold the king’s interest bearing promise of gold to investors. The promise was renewed on its maturing date and was perpetually rolled-over. 2

VOILA !!! The king made the suppliers of services happy with Rothschild credit; the bankers had the gold; the public had a promise that the king would eventually pay them in gold—which would never happen. 3 Everything went smoothly as long as the bank could sell the promise and the people did not demand the gold. 4 As Benjamin Ginsburg has lamented in FATAL EMBRACE; (bankers) AND THE STATE 5, eventually the schemes, which stole the wealth from the people, would come to a catastrophic climax. 6

The Federal Reserve 7 does the same thing for the U.S. government’s deficit spending. Their wizard is hiding behind Frank Baum’s curtain as obscurant to any public inquiry.8

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will grant credit (not “create money”) in an account of the US government with an amount that the government will pledge. 9 The government will expend the book-entry-credit account (deficit spending) to pay for goods and services consumed by the government. The suppliers are content. Evidence that the supplier has received a credit voucher is obvious. The heading of the currency given to the supplier by a local commercial bank is Federal Reserve Note; i.e., a debt obligation of the Federal Reserve identified as a “tender” (substitute) required by law to be accepted for an imprinted number of dollars. 10

To sell the pledge from the government (the Treasury security) at the highest price, the Federal Reserve will hold an auction but will camouflage it as an auction by the government. Acceptance of bids, determining the interest rate, and the amount of deficit spending permitted is controlled by the BOG.11 Government regulations clearly establish the funds from the auctions are controlled exclusively by the FRBNY; i.e., a franchisee of the BOG. 12

In addition to the approximate $1 trillion annually auctioned for deficit spending (new cash), the roll-over of approximate $10 trillion debt from prior years (publicly held maturing) is annually auctioned and disbursed by the FRBNY. 13

The difference in handling of the two accounts is the supreme camouflage. Funds for roll-over securities are credited by the FRBNY to a government account. The FRBNY then pays the Primary Dealers (from the government account) for their task in collecting the maturing securities from the public. There is no increase in the National Debt nor is there any inflationary resultant from these transactions.

If the funds from deficit spending securities were to be used in redeeming Treasury securities in the market (i.e., paid by the FRBNY to the government), it would eliminate any increase in the National Debt. It would also eliminate any increase in money in circulation (inflation). That clearly does not occur.

WHERE DO FUNDS FROM THE AUCTIONS OF DEFICIT SPENDING SECURITIES GO ??

The only viable dispersal of funds identifiable to this writer is the funds are commingled with funds to select Primary Dealers. If the Primary Dealers include shareholders of a privately held incorporated Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, they would not have to reveal corporate records.14 The profit could be completely hidden from view. 15 The deficit spending amount 16 would be clear profit for the owners of the BOG.

The statutory charter of the Federal Reserve stipulates profit of the operation belongs to the government. Concealment of funds that belong to the government appear to be embezzlement, among other crimes.

Various theories abound on how the purloined funds have been utilized to the detriment of society. 17

If the scheme is not exposed, Wall Street internal memos identify collection of the $20 trillion debt is the “ultimate goal” and would reduce the United States to the status of Greece. 18 Wall Street’s objective in Greece 19 is not to exploit, but is to destroy the nation. 20 Indeed, national sovereignty has been acquiesced by Greece to the Troika (financiers) as the terminal end of Goldman Sach’s “shitty” three billion Euro debt. 21

The proposed Goldman Sachs government budget (whoops, Trump’s budget) includes huge deficit spending increases (increased military spending with cuts in social programs) with unrealistic increases in national productive/tax base.22 This is the same scheme Wall Street and the CIA have used to bankrupt other nations for four decades. 23 The psychopathic Wall Street warmongers demand a humongous deficit busting military expenditure, but this statement may reverse cause and effect. 24 The people will submit to anything if they are induced to fear a foreign threat.

Get ready to kiss your 401(k), your government benefits, your pension, and your bank accounts goodbye, with strikes prohibited, health care costs escalated, perpetual war, mass layoffs (including government personnel), and economic chaos—among other dire occurrences. 25 This is the utopian government controlled by bankers that David Rockefeller 26 so proudly promised for the world in his autobiography MEMOIRS and Carroll Quigley touted in TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

We can rest assured the same scheme is used by the ECB with the Euro.

The US has two options:

The entire situation can be ignored with the public meekly submitting to Wall Street’s collection of the fraudulent $20 trillion National Debt and accept the fate of Greece [Greece has surrendered national sovereignty control to Goldman Sachs/Troika];

or

They can assert public pressure on congress-critters to audit relevant accounts and indict Wall Street.

PS: How can banks with (deficit spending) liquidity that borrowers will not accept for loans laundry the money? Well, they can buy stocks (and watch the price go up and say the corporations are buying their own stock) or they can buy bonds (and watch the yield go down as demand increases). Have you seen any evidence of this happening ?

 Ignorance is Bliss Footnotes

1 European origin of the Federal Reserve is well known. Ref. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

2 http://www.barefootsworld.net/fs_m_ch_08.html

3 In fact, the “king” has been known to confiscate the public gold in “the public interest.”

4 After the hook was set, the bankers would clandestinely demand token payments of gold from the king until his coffers were emptied and he was bankrupt. After the king was bankrupt and the people resisted increased taxes, bankers (who controlled the roll-over of prior debt and the paying of interest) would demand the king sell his assets to the bankers (for the banker’s make-believe book entry credit) at fire-sale prices (as in Greece) so interest on the king’s promises could be paid. Consider the irony of it. For the king to have a bit of purchasing power to advance the kingdom, the kingdom was lost. The people finally wised up and revolted.

5 The Magna Carta as a rebellion against the war-mongering of London financiers is an interesting observation by Ben. It has been omitted from history books. 1000 years hasn’t changed financiers’ war-mongering obsession. Ref. Douglas Valentine, CIA AS ORGANIZED CRIME ; https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/07/08/us-state-war-july-2017; http://farmwars.info/?p=15338 A FACE FOR THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT.

6 A debt-based national economy without specie backing is a Ponzi scheme inherently destined for bankruptcy but that is another story. Ref. https://www.scribd.com/doc/99860711/rip-off-by-the-fed-5-rtf. p4.

7 The “Federal Reserve” name is a first camouflage to disguise the bank with a facade of government agency for sovereign immunity and to mitigate public animosity from bankers exposure. The claim of agency status does not appear to comply with Supreme Court adjudication of parameters for agencies. Nor is status of agency available for the economic benefit of private entities. The status of the BOG is not known to have been adjudicated. Ref. https://www.scribd.com/doc/153024003/Amended-Complaint-Federal-Reserve-whistleblower

8 A favorite line is the government borrows money. It is impossible to see that what was not there before the event could be borrowed. It would appear that the Fed put up no legal consideration for the agreement. A contract without legal consideration by both parties is void from its inception. Nor can it be rational that the Federal Reserve had $20 trillion a century ago while they purchase $100 Ben Franklins for 15 cents each from the US government. [The Fed does not ‘print money’ (sic); it buys it from the government.] Another inane concept is that the government borrows from the public. If there is any logic to this concept, how is the public then in debt ? Dr. Daniel R. Sanches, a frequent economics writer for the Philadelphia FRB, recently circulated such a perfidious writing—but not on the FRB website.

9 A Treasury Bill, Bond, or Note backed by the taxing power of the U.S. President Nixon removed the pledge of gold. Cynics might conclude the banks had confiscated the government’s gold by that time.

10 These FR Notes were at one time identified as commercial paper (a legal identification denoting no asset backing by the issuer). Then they carried a covenant of redeemable for gold or silver, then the promise was redeemable for lawful money, now identified as a legal tender (a substitute for money) for public or private debts. What you have is what you get.

11 To the surprise of President Clinton. Appointees to the BOG are made from a short list alleged submitted to the government by the Wall Street owners of the corporate Board of Governors.

12 The 1992 GAO report reveals the FRBNY electronically receives auction bids [ http://www.gao.gov/assets/90/82783.pdf ] and 31 CFR 375.3 grants unlimited exclusive authority to disburse auction funds.

13 Ref. https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/annceresult/press/press_cashpydwn.htm The tabulated entries do not include government account holdings. The public holds 72.41% of total government debt.

14 NOTE: The 12 Federal Reserve banks have been adjudicated as privately owned corporations each with a board of directors of nine members (also identified as franchisees). The private ownership of the FRBNY has been the subject of numerous writers. This should not be confused with the privately owned closely held corporate ownership of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve alleged herein. The BOG can remove any director of any FR bank without cause or recourse. Administrative and regulatory control is statutorily vested in the Board of Governors. A query of “Who owns the Fed ?” allows an evasion of the allegation.

The gold hoard at IMF is 2,814 metric tons. The IMF, controlled by Wall Street, want $64 billion from the U.S. government.

15 Audit reports (by professional accounting firms) of the Federal Reserve are conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the BOG. The relevant accounts are private client accounts, not operational accounts, and have never been audited.

16 The funds exceed $4.4 billion daily. [ $1.6 trillion deficit divided by 365 days is $4.4 billion.]

17 Ref. http://farmwars.info/?p=15338 A FACE FOR THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT ; GLOBALIZATION OF POVERTY and GLOBALIZATION OF WAR, both by Michel Chossudovsky;

18 http://www.gregpalast.com/larry-summers-and-the-secret-end-game-memo ;. http://farmwars.info/?p=12078 NEW WORLD ORDER DEAD AHEAD

19 It was started with a mere $2.8 billion loan foisted by Goldman Sachs and known to be unpayable. http://america.aljazeera.com/blogs/scrutineer/2015/7/14/did-wall-street-enable-greek-debt-crisis.html

20 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47023.htm . It is the pound of flesh from the Merchant of Venice.

21 http://99getsmart.com/life-in-a-modern-day-debt-colony-the-truth-about-greece/ Smedley Butler declined an offer from Wall Street to be the leader of a U.S. coup in the 1930’s. Ref. WAR IS A RACKET by Smedley Butler.

22http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mark-sanford-trump-budget_us_5925b607e4b00c8df2a10b40 ; http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-budget-is-unrealistic-economists-say/ Robert K. Wilcox alleges in TARGET PATTON that Patton was assassinated by the U.S. government because of his planned crusade against U.S. war mongering.

23 John Perkins, CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN. Congressional funding of some covert foreign political action by the CIA in the 1980’s is detailed in https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/13/reagan-documents-shed-light-on-u-s-meddling/.

24 https://consortiumnews.com/2016/08/15/us-war-crimes-or-normalized-deviance/ Robert Stinnett in DAY OF DECEIT presents with government documents that FDR and his cronies on Wall Street developed a 17 month agenda to pressure Japan to hostile action. Codes were broken; Pearl was not a surprise. Douglas Valentine in CIA AS ORGANIZED CRIME concludes the CIA has repeatedly initiated US military action for the economic benefit of Wall Street. Nomi Prins relates in ALL THE PRESIDENTS BANKERS that World War I was foisted on the US to safeguard many billions in loans by Wall Street with a set-up false flag HMS Lusitania. THE GLOBALIZATION OF WAR by Michel Chossudovsky. David Swanson gives a lengthy list of US invasions. Ref. http://davidswanson.org/warlist/.

25 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article42782.htm Bankers have successfully lobbied for bankers to receive super priority, including for derivatives, in the event of government default.

26 David is the grandson of Nelson Aldrich, the godfather of the Federal Reserve system. Did he inherit Nelson’s stake in the system/BOG?

Share this:

Related

RIP-OFF BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE: How they stole it all! In “CORPORATIONS”

Nationalized retirement accounts: The coming confiscation of the retirement savings of the middle class In “corruption”

FEDERAL RESERVE HIDES PROFITS FROM INFLATION In “Fed Reserve & Fiat Currency”


Calls For Gun Control Are Screams Of Terror By Communists

11/10/2017
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             https://newswithviews.com/calls-for-gun-control-are-screams-of-terror-by-communists/

Read More Articles by Andrew Wallace

The establishment families controlling our government are traitors who know they are guilty of all manner of crimes against the people and our Constitution. These elites are well aware that America’s founders gave us guns to defend ourselves against them and a rogue government. They are petrified of being shot dead as the people learn of their corruption and treason. I don’t advocate violence, but as the Rule of Law no longer exists in Washington DC, and increasing numbers of people learn the truth, history teaches that violence and revolution cannot be far behind.

The corrupt and unconstitutional establishment families control major corporations, banks, educational institutions, tax free foundations, judges, elected democrat and republican officials, appointed bureaucrats and officials, many high ranking military officers, other fellow travelers, et al. Many establishment families with unlimited wealth and power existing today, were the major cause and financial beneficiaries of our Civil War, which except for some propaganda late in the war, had not a damn thing to do with slavery. These establishment families have also initiated and benefited from every other military action by this country. The aristocracy and their fellow travelers swim in the blood and sweat of our people.

Even a cursory examination of our history from before the Civil War to the present will show anyone with an open mind how the American People have lost their lives, freedom, and property to enrich the criminal elite and their fellow travelers in the establishment families.

Just look at one year…1913, when the Private Federal Reserve Bank, income tax, direct election of senators, and tax-free foundations were created. These actions caused the Great Depression, unconstitutional money, and protected the wealthy from paying taxes, or losing control.

This is how a continuing aristocracy was founded, maintained and funded in America.  Without these actions, a hard working family here more than 100 years should have been in good financial shape, but most were robbed of their savings and constitutional rights in a number of ways by the establishment families during the Great Depression, and continuing to this very day.

Every single problem in our country can be eliminated by following the United States Constitution. Continued Failure to obey the Constitution, word for word, as written, will result in civil war, drugs, death, hunger, poverty and much suffering. The only bonus would be the people’s reaction, ending the blood sucking establishment traitors and their minions.

A large percentage of Americans are brain washed people in both parties, who have been effectively duped by communists (read democrats) and deadbeat criminals. People who have been indoctrinated by schools and misled by fake news media are useless idiots. Our constitution is not compatible with communism, socialism, or Islam. Our constitution is the greatest document ever written, second only to the Holy Bible.

It is impossible for our best writers to convince most of their own family members, much less the poor living in our communist cities of the truth.  Those who have been indoctrinated as communists by media and schools, are on a path to death and destruction. Communism and socialism have NEVER worked starting with the Mayflower Compact of the pilgrims at Cape Cod in 1620.

Kelleigh Nelson, a noted writer, told me that “A woman’s heart should be so hidden in God, that a man has to seek Him just to find her.” Communism by its own words, does not, and cannot, tolerate family life based upon loving marriages between men and women as detailed in the Bible and our founding documents.  Communist, socialist, and democrat followers of the establishment promote a hedonistic “hook up” culture that results in tax funded chaos contrary to our constitution.

Like most men I was born with a God given attraction to women and an appreciation of beautiful women. But, unlike many in communist cities, I was also taught to respect women.

Greedy females have used their sex appeal for thousands of years to get what they want from men. All of God’s and man’s laws on common prostitution apply to both participants in the recent sex scandals. It is prostitution, when would be adult actresses and news readers, who are not threatened with force or loss of employment, give sexual favors to powerful men (Johns) in return for the opportunity to earn great wealth.

I find it difficult to accept that many Hollywood and media stars traded sexual favors for unfair advantage over other more principled women. Then, years later they sue the John when their star fades in public. Women who use their bodies to gain advantage over decent women are whores and cowards, certainly not role models for young girls and families.

Decent women, who have been directly denied the opportunity for wealth and fame by the actions of whores and Johns, now have the information to sue both parties. Woman appreciate polite comments from men. They used to respond to unwanted disrespect by slapping the man hard, or giving him a knee to the groin. Contrary to popular opinion, women are competitive, and dress mostly for effect on other women.

Poor people living in our communist cities without the benefit of honest media, church teaching, decent schools, jobs, and families consisting of a husband and wife are doomed. This society is ruled by the dictum, “that if a girl is old enough to bleed, she is old enough to breed.” Fifteen-year-old or younger single mothers are little benefit to anyone.

MOST government departments are unconstitutional, and ALL OF THEM function contrary to the constitution using an unconstitutional concept called “ THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.” Elected officials, appointed bureaucrats, and judges who allow this lawlessness are certainly traitors.

The information that follows is taken from “What is the Administrative State?” by Prof. Paul A. Rahe dated September 9, 2010.

Our Republic is based upon the doctrine of the separation of powers.  It is based on a functional division of governmental powers between the legislature which makes laws, the executive, which enforces them and the judiciary, which judges particular cases.

At the heart of the doctrine underpinning our Constitution is the principle that powers cannot be delegated—that the legislature cannot execute the laws or judge particular cases, that the executive cannot make laws or judge particular cases, and the judiciary cannot make or execute laws.

When I suggest that the administrative state be eliminated, I mean that we should return to constitutional government and the separation of powers…..

The Rahe article I just quoted above, is only one and one-half pages in length, and I strongly recommend that you read it. I can guarantee that no one can take legitimate exception to a single word written by Dr. Rahe.

Based upon the absolute truth of Dr. Rahe’s article alone, it is unquestionable fact that the officials of all three branches of government ( except for President Donald J. Trump and his team) are functioning unconstitutionally as traitors, and subverting our constitution for personal wealth and power.

Put another way, everything department officials do is done under the guise of the administrative state which is unconstitutional, making everyone in government a damn traitor. It is no consolation to the American people that they are being screwed unlawfully by officials who are establishment communist traitors and are above the law.

Government must obey every detail of the constitution if we wish to save our country, prosperity, and even our lives. Every single violation of our constitution by the criminal establishment brings us closer to destruction and civil war.

Democrats want illegal’s for low class voters, republicans want illegal’s for cheap labor resulting in lower wages, murders, drug deaths, and major increases in crime, et al.

Taxing the hell out of those who work to give to those who could work but don’t is not proper, nor is it viable long term.

Federal government handouts are so large that most recipients will not accept private employment, which causes real hardship for employers.

Judges who ignore the constitution and think they make the law must be terminated (otherwise they will be taken out by the revolt they helped to cause).

The FBI is corrupt, does not enforce the rule of law, and must be replaced with the militia of the several states as stipulated in our constitution ( Failure to terminate the FBI would be the major cause of a revolution).

End the income tax and IRS. Replace the lost revenue with tariffs as used so successfully in the past and by our founders.

Do not allow government to screw the people with digital money, bail-ins, confiscation of 401k’s, IRA’s, and bank deposits. End unjustified unlawful asset seizures.

Terminate the private Federal Reserve Bank and fiat currency, replace with real money as stipulated in our constitution.

Terminate unconstitutional use of the administrative state governance in all departments of government.

Terminate all unconstitutional departments of the federal government.

Many Muslims are decent people, but they must repudiate the evil parts of the Qur’an that are contrary to our constitution, as well as their call for Sharia Law, death to infidels, et al.  Until they join Americans in supporting our constitution, many will not trust them.

End all immigration for 25 years, deport all illegals, and end all government benefits for illegals. Our people will no longer tolerate the crimes and hardships caused by these criminals, who benefit both parties of the establishment.

I live my life in accordance with the rule of law, our constitution, and God’s laws. I have never advocated the use of force against the government or anyone else. But I do fear for my life if any of the really corrupt members of government perceive my writing to be a threat to their power.

© 2017 Andrew Wallace – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Andrew Wallace: natlmktg@gte.net

Olddogs Comments

By reading between the lines it is apparent you worry about being “taken out” by the powers that be, and that is surely possible, but with your comprehension of our God given rights it is to your advantage. Once your education is complete about the status of our government you will lose all fear and rejoice in your fight for freedom. Therefore I recommend you spend some time on the following web site as it will empower you like never before.

http://www.annavonreitz.com/

Only those who know the real enemy will win the fight.

olddog@anationbeguiled.com


What is In Our Schools?

11/09/2017

https://newswithviews.com/whats-in-our-schools/

Read More Articles by Karen Schoen

While everyone focuses on college, let’s focus on the real problem, K-12. Every coup d’etat has roots in school.  The progressive/communist/globalists/socialist (POGS) agenda calls for rewriting history.  The children must be indoctrinated. The children must be coerced. The children must be trained to give up individual choice. They must think the same, get the same grades and have the same future outcome.  One problem… if everyone is the same, what makes individuals different?  The only identifier left is visual. RACE becomes the tool of choice. Children trained in social justice (which is Anti-American) become racist adults, dividing people into groups demanding results from those groups.

Racism MUST BE LEARNED. Racism is trained in school through psychological manipulation using technology.  There are 400 data points that are monitored, re-monitored, analyzed, re-analyzed, reconfigured constantly making inferences to nudge and then monitor reactions. We see this happing now as males are being coached to take classes to remove those horrid masculine traits.  I can just imagine what horrible actions these men will be responsible for in the future as they lose their self esteem and have to ‘prove’ their existence in some manner.

[ Order: Exposing the Global Road to Ruin Through Education, DVD]

A dumb populace is mandated deliberately because POGS follow Lenin, “”Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” – Vladimir Lenin.  It is no surprise why students favor socialism. THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TAUGHT.

Why the children?  Once children are indoctrinated, “Group Think” takes over and going against the crowd is intolerable.  Actually anyone not a believer is evil and should not be tolerated. If I said NFL, you should understand why continuing this communist education will destroy America. America’s children ARE BEING TAUGHT TO HATE AMERICA. “American social engineers have systematically gone about destroying the intellect of millions of American children for the purpose of leading the American people into a socialist world government controlled by behavioral and social scientists…..”  Charlotte Iserbyt, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. http://deliberatedumbingdown.com/

As I review some of the texts the students use, I find the biggest error is omission. If a child is not taught the constitution, they have no idea what it means.  How can they fight for something they have no clue exists?  Aside from spitting in America’s face, the students are fighting a cause that has no merit.  Just like the Trump/Russia story is a lie, so is their education.  When you use a lie to create a policy, the policy will fail.  Let’s correct a few misguided points…

  1. There is no guarantee of free speech in a private work place. If you use free speech to offend, you will face consequences. Free speech refers to a public form.
  2. Article IV Section 4:  The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union, A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT.  America IS NOT a democracy.
  3. Illegals have NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS:  “The Citizenship Clause is the first sentence of Section 1 in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”.  Subject to the jurisdiction thereof is the key.  An illegal is not subject to the jurisdiction of America, they are subjects of their home country.  They have not pledged allegiance to America. When you start with an illegal act, everything that follows is illegal.
  4. Common Sense:  Sadly, statistics/statistical analysis show (one reason not to teach math) Blacks commit more crimes. Therefore Blacks have more interaction with the police.  The problem is not with the police; it is with their life experiences i.e: broken home, morality, education. Let’s tackle the problem, not the symptom.
  5. There are no statistics to support NFL players claim.  America is not ramped with racism. Yes there are isolated incidents. But if Blacks commit more crimes, then it stands to reason they interact more with the police.
  6. When an ideology, like the one the POGS promote “individual sameness”, the only way to identify/be individual with differences is visual by race.  You no longer can be identified by ability. You must be identified by race. America identifies by ability. POGS identify by race.

As much as we are told that the problems we suffer today are new, the reality is these are just the same problems suffered from the past. Same policy; new name.  Only now are we getting a glimpse of the truth.  Russians are influencing our government.  They have been influencing our government for a long time. But not just the government, they are in education and bureaucratic policies as well. I have put together some omitted facts that will help us to understand our world today.

Education Update 52% Say Textbooks More Concerned With Political Correctness

The Government is experimenting with our kid’s brains.  And we are letting them. The following link is to an education time line so you can connect the dots.

[ Order: Exposing the Global Road to Ruin Through Education, DVD]

The timeline: Timeline for education

Here are some highlights:

1885   Democrat President Grover Cleveland condemned Islamic terrorism committed against Armenian Christians in Turkey, December 2, 1895:

“Massacres of Christians in Armenia and the development there … of a spirit of fanatic hostility to Christian influences naturally excited apprehension …

1916Socialist and Islam join forces:

Socialist influence within the Sarekat Islam was already evident at the movement’s congress in 1916, where the Prophet Muhammad was proclaimed to be “the father of Socialism and the pioneer of democracy” and “the Socialist par excellence.”

He certainly excelled at wealth redistribution.

In Java and elsewhere, “Islam” provided a banner for Muslim merchants to contest economic encroachment by non-Muslims New York Times: What killed promise Muslim Daniel Greenfield

1918 – Rockefeller & Carnegie Foundation planned the demise of Traditional Academic Education – Rockefeller to be in charge of US – Carnegie International Education.

1934 Carnegie Institute releases its pamphlet Conclusions recommending changing history to social studies infusing “social justice and acceptable behavior through psychology into our schools. Read Conclusions on http://www.americandeception.com, read Charlotte Iserbyt’s summary: http://abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.com/2015/08/carnegies-communist-manifesto-for.html

1945 – Creation of the United Nations and playing a very large role in that was the U.S. Chamber of Commerce along with cooperation from the Carnegie Foundation for International Peace and the Rockefeller Foundation. Large banks and trusts could see future profits for themselves if they cooperated with the Chamber. UNESCO was to implement worldwide education programs. With the population scattered, the plan was to use Climate Change to scare the public in order to push sustainability (control). Sustainable developments (once called city-states in Union of Socialist Republics aka USSR aka Russia) would become mega cities where millions could live in a government controlled environment. Elimination of the auto (less mobility) and private property (for fairness) is the indoctrinated utopia now sought by the elite.   Detroit was to be the role model.  Huge cities run by corrupt politicians are now filled with the uber rich and poor.  Disease, garbage, feces, urine homeless, bordered buildings, crime now litter once magnificent mega cities like Detroit, NYC, Chicago, Atlanta.

1958 Eisenhower sent a delegation to the Soviet Union (USSR) for a cultural exchange.  What was brought back, was studied and later implemented.  This was the beginning of the school –to-work training programming used unsuccessfully in the USSR.

1950’s-1970’s – MK ULTRA was the program used by the CIA. Experimenting on humans, intended to identify and develop drugs, alcohol, stick and poke tattoos, and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control. Organized through the Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project coordinated with the Special Operations Division of the U.S. Army’s Chemical Corps. The program began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967 and officially halted in 1973. The program engaged in many illegal activities;  in particular it used unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects, which led to controversy regarding its legitimacy.  MKUltra used numerous methodologies to manipulate people’s mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture. Subliminal messaging was the tool of choice in a variety of films and documentaries.   https://www.wanttoknow.info/050626mkultra

1960-1975… Teaching became a draft exempt job.  Unsuspecting new teachers were trained in the Modern Education promoted by John Dewey focusing on psychological manipulation training for the desired outcome of the populace. The PC culture was implemented. Dewey’s NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH (which I attended) was the training ground for unsuspecting future teachers were trained to integrate the media and Hollywood into our lessons.  Today you can not see a movie, series or documentary which does not carry some government message especially climate.

1976 – The Russian book, The Scientific and Technological Revolution and the Revolution in Education, translated and imported to the U.S.A., helped lay the foundation for the philosophy behind Outcome-based Education.

1978 – Project Global 2000:  Planning for a New Century, in which Robert Muller (United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for 40 years) and Margaret Mead (American cultural anthropologist) challenged the people of the world to prepare for the year 2000 by a ‘worldwide collaborative process of unparalleled thinking, education and planning for a just and sustainable human world order.’

1979 – Jimmy Carter – Signs into law the Federal Department of Education. American education begins to decline.

1989 – Shirley McClune from the McRel Foundation told the Association of Governors that education was now changed:

♠  from individualism to collectivism,
♠  from fact to value,
♠  from education to training.

Bush 41 was President. Clinton was president of the National Governors Association. Jeb Bush, FL GOV, partnered Florida with UNESCO to promote sustainability in all subject areas. America was always in the top 10 worldwide.  After implementation of these plans America is 27-40.

1996 Hillary Rodam Clinton mentored by Marxist Saul Alinsky published her book:  “It Takes A Village”.  She prompted parents to give their child to the school (state). After all the state knows best.

Americans follow: “An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people.” … Thomas Jefferson: …

POGS: “Uneducated people require more from their govt” Uneducated people vote to get more. POGS lie and do not deliver. But POGS know  A lie told often enough becomes the truth. — Vladimir Ilyich Lenin . Uneducated people accept the lies as truth.

[ Order: Exposing the Global Road to Ruin Through Education, DVD]

After the failures of School to Work, Goals 2000, Sustainable America, No Child Left Behind, UNESCO partnered with Bill Gates/Microsoft and created an experimental/education program the ultimate dumbing machine: Worldwide Common Core.

2004:   Bill Gates signed a Microsoft / UNESCO (United Nations Educational Science and Cultural Organization) agreement for worldwide Common Core while we were told:  “This is state led. The governors asked for it.”  Gates started his solicitation for H1B visas saying Americans are too stupid to work, they need to compete globally to become global citizens setting the stage for open borders.

2005 Jeb Bush delivered Florida to UNESCO in a partnership agreement pledging Florida to be the most sustainable state.  Sustainability programs entered the schools under the new NCLB/Common Core.

The purpose of education: Money, Power, Control

The NEA stated that their goal is more money for the Association. Every administration unveils a new federal education program. A new name is given to the old soviet education model of training to work.  New books, new programs, new supplemental materials, new assessments, new classes with a cost of billions to the taxpayer are making millions for the publishers, editors, coders, etc.

Using the technique called the Hegelian Dialectic, scaring people into submission by having scientists regulate the outcome (the ends justify the means) the man made, global warming, climate change crisis was escalated into new heights.   Christina Figueres, UN Climate VP, said that the purpose of the UN climate policy is to remake the world economy, to redistribute the wealth of the WEST.      Why are we teaching this in school? Because in order to buy into the very lucrative green energy, sustainability industry you need the scare of climate change. The purpose of the sustainability program is to eliminate private property: land, business, person.  Private property is not fair.  The government makes everything fair.  You learn this in school.

The UN Johannesburg Implementation Plan page 108, calls for NGOs, Non- profits and regional Councils aka COGS – Councils of Government to implement the climate control plan crucial for eliminating local governments. NGA and CCSSO re examples of NGO’s.  Regional councils were called Soviets.

2007 – Gates & Eli Broad Foundations pledged $60M to inject their education vision into the 2008 campaigns.

 2008 – Gates Foundation awarded the Hunt Institute for Educ. Leadership $2.2M to work with the governors and other “stakeholders” to promote the adoption of the national standards. The following month the Hunt Institute and the NGA hosted a symposium to explore education strategies 

 2008 – The National Governors Association, (NGA aka a lobby group) state education commissioners and other groups begin accepting the common standards in math and English language arts for grades K-12. written by David Coleman and Linda Darling Hammond (NOT educators)

This UNESCO/UN policy needed a way to implement its program in America. The POGS created NGO’s and regional councils (Non-government organizations) to help eliminate elected officials. (* There is no need for elected officials, policies are created by direct referendum.  People can vote on line. Majority rules.) In the name of sustainability, learned in schools by state/UN partnerships, grown children now in government, are unknowingly implementing phases of control. Others just comply.  By complying, we give the new “experts”: Water Management Districts, Army Corp of Engineers, IRS power over us.   We live with their regulation mistakes.  How can people given erroneous information solve a problem? Wait, but it is what they learn in school so it must be true…Our future suffers from the mistakes.  Bill Gates Mistakes.  Generations decline. As a result of eliminating the life skills required like:  responsibility, self esteem, self respect, respect of others, innovation, curiosity we now have lost generations of non-functioning kids.

The school is following Marx

Money buys the Media, Hollywood, thousands of organizations and K-12, universities and corporations. With the schools pushing social programs not education, and all of these outlets indoctrinating 24/7, the populace becomes lost and can only speak in the verbiage they were told to use. The more the populace believes they are the ONLY GOOD and everyone who does not believe along with them are evil.  Control is complete.

See the lists of texts used in our schools. Do you know what your students are reading?  Look at the center of the page for links to textbook reviews.

“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American’s freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight.” President John Fitzgerald Kennedy – In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination. This speech is rarely mentioned.

[ Order: Exposing the Global Road to Ruin Through Education, DVD]

 For current information : http://americanfreedomwatchradio.com/?page_id=137

 What can you do?

Share the Message: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanstatesman

Run For Office.   Support people not parties. 

 Volunteer to lobby Tallahassee 2018  (or your state legislators).

Contact Joe Rosario for details  786- 651-6947

Transportation provided all we need is you…

 Go to school board meetings.  What are the kids reading?

Use quotes from our founders etc. with your family.

 Textbook reviewers are needed.

New Florida Law HR989 lets residents have input in textbooks and curricula.

The CCS/Florida Sunshine State Standards advocates are furious.

Textbook reviews can go to school boards, and lobby legislators.

Join FloridaCitizensAlliance.com

New Florida law lets residents challenge school textbooks

Roy White from Texas is conducting the training for the textbook reviewers.

Please tell volunteers to email Roy to sign up for on-line classes.

tnt.textbooks@gmail.com  Problem? call 214.924.9033

The Magnet for illegal immigration is WORK.. Sign the petition for Florida to require EVerify http://www.floridiansforeverifynow.org/

Unsure of anything, call me, 954-864-0530 or email kbschoen@bellsouth.net

Listen to: American Freedom Watch Radio

Call to hear the show:  347-857-4364     press 1 to join the show

Or listen on line: 

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanstatesman

blogtalkradio.com/americanstatesman            

Show Name:  American Freedom Watch Radio

Please send out and like
facebook.com/americanfreedomwatchradio

© 2017 Karen Schoen – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Karen Schoen: kbschoen@bellsouth.net


Something to think about…………

11/08/2017

Read message at the end of pictures! These are the pictures of the crucifixion of Christ, Sculptured from metal by a man near Amarillo , TX . The crosses are made of metal also. The man did this out of the kindness of his heart. Someone donated the land on which to erect them.

One Texas millionaire donated the land, a second Texas millionaire provided the funds. It’s more than just a BC2.5-million-pound steel hallelujah — it’s also a heaven-scraping billboard.   1000s stop daily – 1,000,000s stop annually.  Two Texans who had a vision and executed their vision.

There is always someone stopped here to visit, pray, or meditate. Trucks, buses, or single vehicles.

Groom is a tiny town on I-40, but gets lots of visitors because of this.

IN CHEMISTRY, HE TURNED WATER TO WINE.

What an incredible display. This could be one of the last surviving Christian symbols in the country!
This is about 70 miles from Amarillo outside of town called Groom, TX.

IN ECONOMICS, HE DISPROVED THE LAW OF DIMINISHING RETURN BY FEEDING 5000 MEN WITH 2 FISHES & 5 LOAVES OF BREAD.

SO, WHO IS HE?

The Greatest Man in History, Jesus had no servants, yet they called Him Master.

Had no degree, yet they called Him Teacher.

He had no medicines, yet they called Him Healer.

He had no army, yet kings feared Him..

He won no military battles, yet He conquered the world.

He committed no crime, yet they crucified Him.

He was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today…

I feel honored to serve such a Leader who loves us!

If you believe in God and in Jesus Christ His Son,

you may wish to send it on….

The hand that will send this message to
everybody shall not labor in vain.

If not, I pity you!

Eternity is a long time to be miserable!


Transgenders In The Military Who Decides?

11/07/2017

https://newswithviews.com/transgenders-in-the-military-who-decides/

Read More Articles by Publius Huldah

In a case now pending before the US District Court for the District of Columbia,[1] the trial judge recently granted a preliminary injunction which purports to temporarily stop the Trump Administration from banning so-called “transgender” persons from serving in the Military.

But we will look at the real issue:  Does the Judicial Branch of the federal government have constitutional authority to require the Legislative and Executive Branches of the federal government to permit transgender persons to serve in the Military?

Instead of going along with what everybody says – or expounding on one’s personal views on the topic –let us consult and obey the US Constitution:

  • Article I, Section 8, clauses 11 – 13, delegate to Congress the powers to declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, make rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; raise and support Armies; and to provide and maintain a Navy.
  • Article I, Section 8, clause 14, delegates to Congress the power “To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;”
  • Article II, Section 2, clause 1, says, “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States…”

In Federalist Paper No 69 (6th para), Alexander Hamilton says:

“…The President is to be commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States. … his authority … would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first General and admiral of the Confederacy…”

So! All the powers over the Military which have been delegated by the Constitution are vested in the Legislative and Executive Branches of the federal government.

The Judicial Branch has no role to play in the organizing and operation of the Military Forces.

Pursuant to Article I, Section 8, clauses 11-14, Congress alone has the delegated authority to decide who may serve in the Military. If Congress issues Rules banning transgender persons from serving, then it is the President’s job, as Commander in Chief, to enforce those rules.

Accordingly, instead of participating in the litigation before the federal district court, the Trump Administration should instruct the federal judge on the long-forgotten concept of “Separation of Powers” and advise the court, “You have no jurisdiction over the Military – we will not participate.

1- Military courts and military lawyers in a nutshell

The Judicial Branch of the federal government was created by Article III, US Constitution.  That Article created the supreme Court, and authorized Congress to ordain and establish, from time to time, such inferior courts as needed.  Pursuant to that authority, Congress has established 94 federal district courts (where most federal trials are conducted), and 13 US Circuit Courts of Appeals.

The US Military has its own court system which is not part of the Judicial Branch of the federal government.  The military courts are “Article I Courts” created by Congress in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).[2]  They consist of trial courts where courts-martial are conducted; each Branch of Service has its own “Court of Criminal Appeals”; and the “US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces” hears appeals from the Services’ Courts of Criminal Appeals.

And when military commanders need legal advice, they get it from their own Service lawyers (this is one of the duties of lawyers in the Judge Advocate Generals’ Corps).

The Judicial Branch of the federal government has no constitutional authority over the US Military.

2- Federalist Paper No. 80 and the meaning of “arising under”

Some may assert that the Judicial Branch has authority to determine who may serve in the Military because Article III, Section 2, clause 1 says,

“The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases…arising under this Constitution and the Laws of the United States…”

But they would be wrong.  In Federalist No. 80, Alexander Hamilton explains the jurisdiction of the courts created by Article III: In the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 13th paragraphs, he shows that the purpose of the language quoted just above is to authorize the Judicial Branch to enforce the Constitutionnot re-write it; and to enforce constitutional federal lawsnot re-write them.

Furthermore, in Federalist No. 81 (8th para), Hamilton addresses judicial encroachments on legislative authority, and reminds us that such encroachments need never be a problem because of the courts’ “total incapacity to support its usurpations by force”; and because Congress may protect the Country from usurping federal judges by impeaching, trying, convicting, and removing them from office.

3- Political Questions

Accordingly, when a power is vested by the Constitution in the Legislative or Executive Branches [the “political branches”] the federal courts [the “legal branch”] have traditionally refused to interfere.

In Martin v. Mott, 25 US 19 (1827), the Supreme Court considered the Militia Act of 1795 which authorized the President to call forth the militia when he judged it necessary to repel an invasion.[3]  The Court pointed out that the power had been confided [entrusted] by Congress to the President, and

“We are all of opinion, that the authority to decide whether the exigency has arisen, belongs exclusively to the President, and that his decision is conclusive upon all other persons.”

In Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253 (1829), which involved a dispute between the United States and Spain over territory, the Court held that once those departments [Executive and Legislative Branches] “which are entrusted with the foreign intercourse of the nation” have asserted rights of dominion over territory, “it is not in its own courts that this construction is to be denied”.  “A question … respecting the boundaries of nations, is … more a political than a legal question; and … the courts of every country must respect the pronounced will of the legislature.”

Likewise, the power to determine who may serve in the Military has been delegated to the Legislative Branch of the federal government i.e., Congress. The Judicial Branch may not substitute its judgment for the Will of the Legislative Branch; and if it attempts to do so, Congress should employ the remedies suggested by Hamilton in Federalist No. 81.

4- The President’s “check” on the federal courts

Finally, let’s look at Federalist No. 78 (6th para) where Hamilton – unlike the pundits of today – tells us the Truth about the powers of federal courts:

“…The judiciary … has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.” [boldface mine; caps are Hamilton’s] [4]

An informed President who is a manly man will ignore ultra vires orders of the Judicial Branch.

5- Conclusion

Let us put the federal courts in their proper place!  Congress and the President have the recognized power to refuse to go along with unconstitutional or ultra vires acts of the Judicial Branch; and their Oaths of office require them to do so. Congress also has the power to rid us of usurping federal judges via the impeachment process.

Endnotes:

1- The US District Court for the District of Columbia was established by Congress pursuant to Art. III, §1, US Constitution.

2- Congress’ authority to create the Military Courts is derived from Art. I, §8, cl. 14, US Constitution.

3- Article I, §8, clause 15, delegates to Congress the power, “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.”

4- I trust you see why Hamilton is viciously smeared. The relentless attacks on our Framers have a purpose: Take them down – and our Foundation is destroyed.  Hamilton wrote most of The Federalist Papers, which Madison and Jefferson recognized as the best evidence of the genuine meaning of our Constitution.  What effect do these constant attacks on Hamilton have on peoples’ respect for The Federalist Papers?  Beware of false friends and jealous men who undermine our Foundation.

© 2017 Publius Huldah – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Publius Huldah: publiushuldah@gmail.com

Olddogs Comments

As we can plainly see from experience, The Constitution has been set aside due to the Lack of real education, which results in everyone sticking their UNEDUCATED nose in the Constitution and then prefer to have their laws change as the wind blows, which is the result of the media industry blowing every issue up to accommodate their view of human behavior. Laws are meant to be permanent not changed according to whims of the dumb and ignorant.