Rogue Sabre Truth and Lies Land and Sea

03/31/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/rogue-sabre-truth-and-lies-land-and-sea.html

By Anna Von Reitz

In our present condition it is impossible for us to know the whole truth about anything.  That’s why nobody should ever take the oath to “tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”.  We can’t know the whole truth, so we can’t speak the whole truth, either.

And if we can’t speak it, forget writing it down.

Truth is absolute in that there is a total truth that is factual, and yet, the best we can do is subjectively experience it.  No two people see the truth exactly the same way, because we see it through our own unique lens of life and being.

At best, as more honest people experience the truth and share what they perceive, we can hope to get a closer approximation of it and a more informed opinion about it.

Our ancestors fully realized that all names are fictional.

There is a woman we call “Anna”, but “Anna” is not the woman.  You could just as well call the same woman “Emily” or “Ruth”.   There is a piece of land called “Bavaria” but you could just as well call it “Schwarzwalderland”.

This is the eternal truth behind the famous line, “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.”  It turns out that it really doesn’t matter what you call me, as long as it’s not Late for Supper.

This circumstantial dilemma of being compelled to represent actual fact— a woman or a piece of land or a tree— with a fictional name— is a real pain in the logic sensors. And, as it turns out, it opens up endless conflicts and opportunities for fraud and graft.

Names are intrinsically imprecise and arbitrary and dishonest.  At some level, we all know that, but we continue to use names because we need a means to identify and categorize things in the world around us.

We couldn’t communicate about anything outside our immediate surroundings otherwise. It would be impossible to reference “Bob Johnston in Baltimore” or talk about something that happened “the day before yesterday” much less project our thoughts into the future.

It would not be possible for me to convey the thought of a “cedar tree draped in snow” to you, except that we both accept a name for “cedar tree” and “snow” and have a common concept of what it means to “drape” something.

Are misunderstandings possible with such a system?  They are unavoidable.

What if “cedar tree” in my language means “maple sugar” in yours?

What if I am talking about “Baltimore, Maryland” and you are talking about “Baltimore, Oregon”?

To improve upon this situation somewhat our ancestors took up the practice of using what are called “descriptive names” or “Lawful names” as opposed to “Legal names”.

Instead of using a simple fiction like “Anna Maria Riezinger” to stand for me and my immediate patrilineal ancestors, you might say, “Anna Maria, the daughter of Emmett and LaVera, of the House Riezinger, born in the town of Black River Falls, in Adams Township, in Jackson County, in Wisconsin, one of the United States of America,  in the white two-story farmhouse standing on the north side of the confluence of Levis Creek and the Black River, two minutes before midnight on the 6th of June in the Anno Domini year of 1956.

With each tidbit of descriptive information you hone in closer to the target, making it less and less likely that this “Anna Maria Riezinger” could be mistaken for any other “Anna Maria Riezinger”, but this is also very cumbersome and still imperfect.

There are 72 names of God in the Bible, each one describing a different attribute of our Father, and it still does not come close.

So we are imperfect beings with imperfect means.

We should probably just let it go with that, but we don’t.

Instead, we pretend to be able to know things we can’t know and do things we can’t do.

This in turn gives rise to much of the false pride, conflict, and confusion in our world.

It doesn’t matter if you call something “Unity States of the World” or “United States of America” or “Buckwheat Fields of Mars”.  It’s all equally fictitious.

If you try to describe what you mean by these names by saying, “the forty-eight contiguous land jurisdiction states plus the land jurisdiction states of Alaska and Hawaii” or “the fifty-seven inchoate Territorial states” or “all the Buckwheat fields on the planet Mars” —- it is only nominally better.

Now Russell-Jay:Gould and David-Wynn:Miller have noticed the mathematical fact that three is an uneven number and that our grammar is not correct.  They have used this to overturn all sorts of contracts.  I say, bully for them.

But then, they turn right around and try to make new contracts. They claim that if they just correct the grammar and get that right,  the new contracts they make will be valid and their meaning will be certain.

Not so.

The discovery that all contracts are invalid is not new, and it’s not just because of faulty grammar.

Show me someone who knows for sure where he is going to be and what financial condition he is going to be in thirty years from now and I will show you someone competent to sign a mortgage contract.

Poof!  There went the whole mortgage and foreclosure machine right out the door.

There isn’t a competent mortgage signatory on planet Earth, and we all have cause to know it.

Not only is our grammar fraudulent, we are incompetent to sign contracts, and whether we use legal names which are pure fiction or we use descriptions, we can’t actually identify parties to contracts, either.

We don’t even know where we are or what time it is.  Literally.

Naming a street or giving a house a numbered address is just as gratuitous and arbitrary as naming a stuffed doll “Polly” or a dog “Fido”.  What makes this “2390 South Park Road” and not “1637 Birch Street”?

I’ll tell you that in the local case, it’s a middle-aged woman driving around in a cheap car arbitrarily assigning street names and addresses for a foreign corporation calling itself the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

So what?  It’s my land and house.  What if I want to call it “Spruce House 0606”?

Obviously, there is a misunderstanding about where I and my property are located, the name of the place, and the number associated with it.

Who gave the “Matanuska-Susitna Borough” (which is who and what exactly?) any right to locate, identify, or put a name or a number on my house and land parcel? I didn’t. Did you?

Come to that, what kind of a map are they using?  Old Mercator, New Mercator, GPS coordinates, Metes and Bounds or WTG or WTF?

You see, we don’t know where we are, we just pretend to know according to some system we dream up based on this or that organizational scheme—- and then we write up contracts based on things we don’t know and can’t know and pretend for the sake of argument that this process results in “valid and binding contracts” that don’t exist and can’t exist by definition.

Then we always date these things and pretend that we know what time it is, too.  Are you using the Hebrew calendar, the Gregorian calendar, the Julian calendar, the Universal Time calendar, or the Eskimo Dog Fur calendar?

I rest my case.

The fact is that our fundamental limitations render contracts of all kinds invalid.  It’s not just the grammar that is screw ball.  It’s the entire concept.

The sooner we realize this, the sooner we can put a lot of scam artists and people who make fat livings off this bull poopy out of business.  Lord hasten the day.

I applaud Russell-Jay:Gould and David-Wynn:Miller for being awake and trying to introduce some standard of sanity and logic, but they haven’t followed the logic chain far enough.

Rewriting the original Constitution in Parse Syntax after registering it (and giving up ownership interest in Parse Syntax to whatever entity registered it) and then copyrighting Parse Syntax (exactly who or what is competent to grant a copyright?) and then claiming that you have now created a valid Constitution by translating the document using Parse Syntax grammar— is silly.

It’s wonderful, but it is silly.

Well-intentioned as it is, it is just another process of enclosure, not that much different from what the lawyers did back in 1868 by “adopting” the Constitution as the basis of their articles of incorporation for The United States of America, Inc. and then the United States of America, Inc. and then the United States, Inc. and then the United States of America E Pluribus Unum, Inc. and then E Pluribus Unum the United States of America, Inc. and…..ad infinitum.

We’ve been there and done that and don’t need to go again.

Whatever the governmental services corporation holding up the federal side of the services agreement calls itself is immaterial.  However it structures itself is immaterial.  Whether it uses Parse Syntax or speaks in Swahili or uses Esperante is immaterial, too.

What matters is that it obeys its limitations and provides Good Faith service.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Olddogs Comments!

What is this, Life sucks and then you die? Come on Anna before you confuse the confused. They are short on patience and expect only directions. Thinking is foreign to their nature. Imposing obligations on them is far better than mind games.


To Kevin 1 RE: Mission Priorities, Militias, and Continental Marshals

03/30/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/to-kevin-re-mission-priorities-militias.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Kevin– you and your friends are correct that you SHOULD be working first on getting your counties organized. That is precisely the mission I asked Bruce Doucette to undertake almost a year ago. And I gave him contact with the oldest functioning Post-Civil War Jural Assembly to help develop a solid program for all the other counties to follow.

That is what I focused on as the most urgent need. Instead of getting in contact with the already up and functioning and correctly organized Jural Assembly in Michigan, he and Roger Dowdell and others spent months blithering around trying to re-create the wheel.

When Bruce discussed the Continental Marshals program with me, I assumed that he knew what he was talking about and that he was NOT talking about the state militias which are a separate force and work in a separate jurisdiction.

I agree with you that the priority SHOULD be to organize the state militias and to do that in tandem with organizing the Jural Assemblies. For your information every American above the age of 21 is expected to either join their state militia and carry a gun or work in a support position.

It therefore makes sense that you build the militia at the same time you build the jural assemblies — but since they didn’t do what I asked them to do with the jural assemblies, diddly squat got done organizing the militias, too.

By all means, run don’t walk — get your local county jural assembly and your local militia set up and functioning FIRST.

The reason that I thought we were organizing Continental Marshals TOO was that most of the crimes that are causing so much suffering– identity theft, foreclosures, bank fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, kidnapping and inland piracy are all crimes that occur in international jurisdiction.

It is for lack of “Federal” aka “Continental Marshals” that the vermin are having a field day, so that is why I thought the push was on the form the Marshals Service.

You guys must be thicker than bricks when it comes to doing your own research.  If you are looking for “Federal Postal District Courts” why don’t you bother to put those words into your search box and visit a few browsers?

These courts not only exist, I have served on them in the past.

Thanks to Russell Gould we have never completely lost our Federal Postal District Courts. And thanks to my husband and me the rats have not been able to successfully claim that our land jurisdiction states no longer exist.

I have been working very hard in international jurisdiction for months to reclaim our assets from the IMF and the UNITED STATES bankruptcy.  I have been working equally hard to secure funding for all 50 states and 3100 counties and everything we need to be fully operational again.

I can’t do it all.

So here is what I suggest– you guys who joined the Marshals program thinking it was the state militias— just leave and turn your attention to building your county jural assemblies and your local militias and after that, work on building your state assemblies and state militias.

You should all have plenty to do and thanks to me and the 50 States Claim you should shortly have what you need to do the work in paid positions with offices and support.

What I further suggest is that you leave the Marshals program alone and stop blaming Marshal Haywood. I have investigated and she did absolutely nothing wrong.

The people who are now blaming her are the very same ones who failed in the mission I gave them– organizing the counties and militias. That suggests to me that (1) they are unable or unwilling to follow simple instructions and do the grunt work or (2) it was their intent to mislead and undermine the effort from the start.

Either way, Bella Haywood has done her actual job and done it well and the Continental Marshals program will continue under her guidance and under the authority of the Federal Postal District Courts.  Those who want to work in international jurisdiction and think they have the experience to qualify are welcome to apply and those who have been successfully vetted into the program are welcome to stay or go as they please.

We will not gild any lilies or bow to what amounts to a witch hunt and ill-informed public opinion.

Any idea that you have that I am ill-informed or “just making things up” needs to be tempered with the certain knowledge that I have been in these trenches since you were a child and if I was wrong about any of it, talking through my hat about ANY of it, I would have been arrested like so many others have been and would be cooling my jets in a federal jail like Thomas Deegan and so many others.

The proof is in the pudding, and available on the internet if you bother to read the Rogue Sabre Special Ops Report and bother to plug the words “Federal Postal District Court” into your browser.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


New Law Means You Could be the Subject of a Vaccine or Medication Experiment Without Your Informed Consent

03/29/2017

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/03/daisy-luther/youre-govt-lab-rat/

By Daisy Luther

The Organic Prepper

A new law quietly passed last December contains a waiver of informed consent that eliminates the requirement of pharmaceutical companies to let you know if a medication or vaccine given to you or your child is experimental.

Wow. One last Christmas surprise from President Obama.

This is according to Section 3024, “Informed Consent Waiver for Clinical Investigations” of H.R. 32, the “21st Century Cures Act.” Here’s the wording of the text:

Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.

Who the heck gets to decide what “minimal risk” is? The pharmaceutical companies? The FDA? Medical professionals? How incredibly patronizing.

I don’t know about you, but before taking medication or allowing my children to, I want to know all of the details. What are the risks? What are the potential side effects? What is the worst thing that could happen if we don’t take it?

I want to be fully informed and make my own decision, and anything less than that is a type of condescension that makes my blood boil. My children and I are not Big Pharma’s lab rats.

I hadn’t heard a thing about this until my friend Melissa from Truthstream Media send me the horrifying video below and I knew that I had to let you folks know right away.  Sign up here to stay up to date with the latest news and information that relates to your freedom and well-being.

Robert F Kennedy Jr Says 70 per cent Of News Advertising Revenue Comes From Big Pharma

http://www.trueactivist.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-says-70-of-news-advertising-revenue-comes-from-big-pharma/

By John Vibes

Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr, son of Robert Francis “Bobby” Kennedy, and nephew of John F Kennedy has been speaking out strongly against big pharma in recent public appearances. Robert Kennedy is a long time environmental activist who has been outspoken on a number of topics for most of his life.

Speaking with former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura on an episode of “Off The Grid“, Kennedy revealed that 70% of ad revenue for major news networks comes from big pharma.

I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election years, 70% of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads. And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news, you’ll see they become just a vehicle for selling pharmaceuticals. He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account,Kennedy said.

Robert F Kennedy Jr. testified before the Vermont House Health Care Committee on May 5, 2015, discussing big pharma’s influence in the CDC. A video of his testimony can be viewed below:

Like many of the business issues we are facing today, the problem with the drug industry is that it is controlled by a government protected corporate cartel. This allows a select few corporations to dominate the market, preventing entrepreneurs from developing new products that could threaten this monopoly. Without having to worry about any kind of competition this cartel can make their products as harmful and ineffective as they like. Thanks to government protections they are able to make their products more addicting and less effective so they can create return customers and extend their profits. If a medication is effective in curing a patient then they won’t continually use and purchase that drug because they will have no need to do so. However, if the drug is mediocre and has addictive properties then it will become a regular part of the patient’s monthly budget.

This deceptive strategy proved to be quite lucrative so the drug companies launched a massive advertising campaign to peddle a wide variety of ineffective and unnecessary drugs to a trusting and ignorant public. This industry actually spends more money on advertising than they do on research and development every single year. That fact alone shows that they are more interested in making sales than producing a well-researched and effective drug. Today’s television and radio commercial spots are dominated by advertisements for mediocre pharmaceuticals. Companies pay billions of dollars per year on advertising alone and their investment comes back many times over. This advertising budget includes “incentives” for personal care providers to overwrite prescriptions, or in other words bribes for doctors to sell more drugs.

Think about it this way, on MSNBC you are seeing the views that would benefit Microsoft and General Electric, on FOX you are seeing views that would benefit News Corp and on CNN you are seeing views that would benefit Time Warner.

Additionally, you have more multinational corporations with their own agendas advertising on their network, providing a source of income that the broadcasters come to depend on. For example, major military contractors like Northrop Grumman or Boeing have tons of commercials all over the mainstream news, but what average citizen has any interest in the products that these companies have to offer? Are rocket launchers and aircraft carriers on the average American’s shopping list? Of course not!

Well, then why do these military contractors spend so much money on television advertisements? So they can use those advertising dollars as leverage against the broadcaster, in order to control how their corporation is presented in the news. If a broadcaster is being paid millions of dollars per month by Boeing to run their commercials then they aren’t going to be able to say anything negative about the war, it’s that simple.

John Vibes writes for True Activist and is an author, researcher and investigative journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture and the drug war.

This article (Robert F Kennedy Jr. Says 70% Of News Advertising Revenue Comes From Big Pharma) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TrueActivist.com.


Nine Reasons the “Living, Breathing” Constitution View is a Lie + How America Will End

03/28/2017

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2017/03/27/the-living-breathing-lie/

By Mike Maharrey

The confirmation hearings for Supreme Court justice nominee Neil Gorsuch have reinvigorated the debate about how to properly interpret the Constitution. The nominee’s reputation as an “originalist” has progressives whipped up into frenzy and once again aggressively peddling the myth of a “living, breathing Constitution.”

For whatever reason, Cosmopolitan decided to take a break from peddling soft literary porn to weigh in on the fray. In a recent article titled 9 Reasons Constitutional Originalism is Bullsh*t, Cosmo senior political writer Jill Filipovic manages to cram an astonishing amount of constitutional ignorance into a single column.

Filipovic touts herself as a “non-practicing lawyer.” Like many in the legal profession, she suffers from “J.D. impairment” – J.D. referring to Juris Doctor, the title conferred on law school graduates. I don’t doubt that she knows plenty about the law, but her most recent tome reveals she knows virtually nothing about the Constitution. They don’t teach that in law school. For the majority of law students, constitutional law starts with Marbury v. Madison, and consists wholly of precedents and pronouncements handed down by the politically-connected lawyers employed by the federal government.

Like most American lawyers, Filipovic seem to think federal judges are demigods tasked with breathing life into the living, breathing Constitution.

To support her legal position – a necessary foundation for her progressive politics – Filipovic rummages around in the debris left inside her mind after a successful foray through law school and plucks out nine reasons “originalism is bullsh*t.” She claims the “writers of the Constitution” didn’t expect Americans to defer to their intent, but that they “arguably intended for it to be a living document.”

Filipovic’s entire article rests on this fairy tale.

In fact, the American colonists fought the Revolution to extricate themselves from a political system based on a “living breathing” constitution. In the British system, the government was sovereign, not the people. No distinction between “the constitution or frame of government” and “the system of laws” existed. They were one and the same. Every act of Parliament was, in essence, part of the constitution. It was an absurdity to argue an act of Parliament was “unconstitutional.” Since it was sovereign, anything Parliament did was, by definition, constitutional. In fact, parliamentary acts became part of the constitutional structure. Put in simple terms, the British system operated based on a “living breathing” constitution, formed and defined by the government itself – specifically parliament.

This is precisely the kind of government people like Filipovic want. Just substitute “Supreme Court” for “Parliament” and you have the British system.

But the Americans built their system on a completely different political framework. The concept of written constitutions evolved in the years after the Declaration of Independence precisely so governments would not have the ability to define their own powers. With a written constitution, governmental powers can only be expanded by an act of the people – not the government itself.

Before taking apart Filipovic’s nine points, we should first define the term originalism.

To read the Constitution through an originalist framework means we seek to interpret and apply it in the way people understood it at the time of ratification. In other words, we look at what supporters said each provision meant as they were “selling” the Constitution to the people and trying to overcome intense opposition to ratification. The assertions of supporters served as the basis upon which the ratifiers – the elected representatives of the people – agreed to adopt the Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution is essentially a contract forming a union of states. In any contract, provisions have a fixed meaning. When you sign on the dotted line, you expect them to remain constant over time. When disputes arise, you always attempt to ascertain what the parties believed they were agreeing to. The ratifiers acted with this expectation.

James Wilson was a Pennsylvania lawyer and politician. He was a key member of the Philadelphia Convention that drafted the Constitution, and one of the most influential supporters during the ratification process. His State House Yard Speech laid the foundation for the ratification effort. In 1790 and 1791, Wilson delivered a series of lectures titled Of the Study of Law in the United States. In one of these lectures, he asserted this was the proper way to interpret legal documents.

“The first and governing maxim in the interpretation of a statute is to discover the meaning of those who made it.”

Think about it. Would you sign a living, breathing mortgage? Would you enter into a living, breathing employment contract? Would you sign a living, breathing agreement with a builder to build an addition on your house?

Of course not! Because you would have no idea what that contract really means. And you certainly wouldn’t agree that the other party to the contract gets to decide how it will be interpreted.

Filipovic’s nine assertions notwithstanding, originalism offers the only interpretive alternative that makes sense in the context of America’s founding principles and the Constitution’s contractual nature.

So let’s break down Filipovic’s nine reasons originalism is bullsh*t.

  1. No one is really an originalist.

Filipovic has a point here – at least in the world of judges and lawyers.

In fact, Gorsuch doesn’t really count as an originalist. He utilizes more of a textualist approach. He interprets the constitution based on the words of the text, not necessarily the understanding of the ratifiers. Hanging the modern meaning of words on constitutional text can create interpretations that stray far from the original understanding. For instance, the word commerce encompasses a much wider range of action today than it did in the late 1700s.

Furthermore, even the most conservative jurists tend to uphold precedent, even when it diverges from the original intent. Gorsuch said he believes Roe v. Wade should stand on precedent. But relying solely on precedent does not represent the thinking of an originalist.

But when Filipovic says no one is an originalist, she really means people like Gorsuch don’t stick to the original meaning consistently because they have a political agenda. She uses an absurd “originalist” construction of the Second Amendment to make this point.

“Until recently, judges generally interpreted the Second Amendment according to the same narrow interpretation many historians say the founders held, as evidenced by the text itself: that the Second Amendment doesn’t give individuals the right to bear arms, but rather provides for the right of well-regulated militia to exist. There’s also significant historical evidence that the framers didn’t intend to protect individual rights to bear arms.”

Notice the bait-and-switch in the quote. Filipovic relies on a textualist approach to make part of her argument, not an originalist interpretation.

At any rate, I seriously doubt Filipovic has read “many historians,” and I would bet dollars to donuts she’s never read one who does not adhere to her political worldview. The notion that the founding generation somehow rejected an individual right to keep and bear arms, and that the Second Amendment only applied to a select group of people known as “the militia” does not stand up to historical scrutiny. I would suggest Filipovic should actually read what important figures in the founding era wrote instead of relying on historians that confirm her bias.  I could write an entire essay on this subject alone. For more on the original meaning of the Second Amendment, click HERE, HERE and HERE.

  1. Societies evolve, and that’s a good thing.

“And our laws should reflect that evolution.”

I agree. So did the framers and ratifiers of the Constitution. That’s why they included an amendment process. But no founder ever said the Supreme Court, or the president, or Congress, should have the authority to change the Constitution on a whim by their own authority. If you want to “evolve” the Constitution – amend it.

  1. Words evolve to reflect changing norms.

James Madison, widely considered the “Father of the Constitution,” called bullsh*t on this idea in a letter to Henry Lee dated June 25, 1824.

“I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution. And if that be not the guide in expounding it, there can be no security for a consistent and stable, more than for a faithful exercise of its powers. If the meaning of the text be sought in the changeable meaning of the words composing it, it is evident that the shape and attributes of the Government must partake of the changes to which the words and phrases of all living languages are constantly subject. What a metamorphosis would be produced in the code of law if all its ancient phraseology were to be taken in its modern sense!”

  1. Technology evolves, and the law has to keep up.

See No. 2

  1. Originalism is a cover for legal discrimination.

No progressive analysis of constitutional originalism would be complete without blowing the “racist” dog whistle. That seems to be the main purpose of this assertion, because the point she makes has nothing to do with originalism.

“A strictly textual reading of a law isn’t neutral; it also invites in the reader’s own biases and assumptions. And when that reader is looking to the historical record for the original meaning, well, a lot of our laws originally allowed a lot of terrible acts.”

Again, note the bait-and-switch. She argues here against textualism, not originalism. Beyond that, I can make this exact same argument against the “living breathing” constitution. It allows a lot of terrible acts. Just ask the more than 100,000 Japanese Americans who spent WWII locked behind barbed wire. In fact, the events she cites as proof of the dangers of originalism actually did happen within the context of a living breathing constitution! Proponents of an elastic Constitution always use it to expand government power. Just sit back and think of all the evil caused by excessive power. Originalism and limited government aren’t the problem here.

  1. Not even the founders were originalists.

“The framers of the Constitution didn’t offer any instructions for how to interpret the document, nor did they get into specifics on what each of its provisions meant. Instead, they proffered broad concepts that, two centuries later, remain broadly applicable.”

Filipovic should read the ratification debates. They reveal the very specific, intended meaning of nearly every constitutional clause. Heck, just pick up a copy of the Federalist Papers for a start. This assertion goes beyond absurd. And yes, the founding generation did tell us how to interpret the document. Go back to No. 3 and re-read what the “Father of the Constitution” wrote – specific instructions on how to interpret the document. Or, if you prefer, how about Thomas Jefferson? Granted, he wasn’t a framer, but I think he at least qualifies was an influential founder.

“On every question of construction let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”

Apparently, Jefferson – a founder – was an originalist.

  1. The founders weren’t fortune tellers and couldn’t predict every possible legal issue.

See No. 2.

  1. No one really wants to live in an originalist country.

Fundamentally, originalists hold the Constitution created a union of sovereign states with a general government of limited, enumerated powers. Most political authority remains with state governments and the people themselves. I think a lot of Americans would prefer a decentralized political system as opposed to living under a monopoly government dictating every aspect of their lives from inside the Beltway.

  1. A Constitution that doesn’t reflect changing norms and realities is a Constitution that would eventually prove itself ineffectual and irrelevant.

See No. 2

Conclusion

Progressives want a living, breathing Constitution because they want to mold society into their own image. They crave power. Originalism constrains power. And despite their lip-service to constitutional fidelity, conservatives want the same thing – power.

But the rule of law requires consistency. Otherwise, government becomes arbitrary. When the limits on government power become subject to reinterpretation by the government itself, it becomes limitless in power and authority.

That’s exactly what we have today. The federal government makes up things as it goes along. The feds claim the power to tell you what kind of light bulb you can use and how much water you can have in your toilet.

They fight undeclared wars all around the world.

And they spy on virtually everybody in America.

All based on this living, breathing lie.

Mike Maharrey

Michael Maharrey [send him email] is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center.He proudly resides in the original home of the Principles of ’98 – Kentucky.See his blog archive here and his article archive here.He is the author of the book, Our Last Hope: Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty. You can visit his personal website at MichaelMaharrey.com and like him on Facebook HERE


Olddogs Comments!

I agree with the author, a living breathing Constitution is the brain fart of idiots.


 

How America Will End

http://themasterplanbook.com/archives/page1.htm

The following is an analysis of what has been learned about the pattern America will follow on the path to its demise and final resting place. But America isn’t just going to end, it will, and already is, morphing into a new entity which will be complete divorced from its original founding principles and culture.

The Foundations of God, Family, Country

The three virtues listed in the subtitle is what America used to aspire to be. Because of our sinful nature, America never achieved great heights with regard to the attainment of our ideals, but at least the ideals were in place.

These three goals dominated our goals. This is no longer true as witchcraft now occupies an equal position to Christianity. Over half of our children grow up in a broken home and our children attend schools who no longer teach or aspire to the ideal of American execellence. America is no longer a nation of rules. It is a nation of power, greed and avarice. Every perversion is embraced and those that still aspire to traditional values (e.g. Christian, pro-Constitution) are labeled as domestic terrorists in such government documents as the 2008 MIAC Report. Up is down and down is up.

Russian defectors warned us this would be coming as the Communist/Muslim Brotherhood influence dominate the national agenda and in particular, the Democractic party that has been selected to complete the takedown of America.

America has become a rudderless ship of amoral and immoral people cast adrift in a sea depravity and Satanic principles.

Control of the Media

Where a 1968 Brady Bunch TV episode was the FIRST ever TV show to display a husband and wife sleeping in the same bed, today’s displays on TV regarding language, sexual behavior and adherence to the rule of law are virtually non-existent. We make fun of classic TV shows such as Leave It to Beaver, yet, this used to be the Happy Days norm.

Instead of entertainment that reflected a consensus of moral values being displayed in our TV shows, literature and movies, these entities are now the trend setters. The smug concept of Hollywood is on full display as they  continue to take America to new depths of depravity and I am speaking about Breeder Babies, trafficking and far left attitudes that are hypercritical of anything representing God, family and country. A nation that follows the values of Hollywood is a lost nation.

The News Media

For a nation to lose its way and descend into traditional one-world globalism that is decidedly Satanic in nature, the flow of information must be controlled. And thanks to Bill Clinton, the FCC broadcast regulations had to be changed and they were in the mid 1990’s when Bill Clinton permitted regulations to be struck down that prevented unlimited media ownership by a select few. It used to be illegal to own a newspaper and a radio station in the same market, or one TV station and one radio station. TODAY, SIX MEN CONTROL 95%+ OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. And again, anything that represents traditional American values is cast in a negative light as the people are bombarded with the relentless brainwashing of messages that promote Godless behavior and the acceptance of the New World Order agenda and America, for the most part, has become “Dumb unto death” as Steve Quayle likes to call it.

Most of America does not even know that their country is being destroyed along with their collective futures. This is not about riding out a bad economic cycle while waiting for the good ‘ole days to return. This is not about American downturn, this is about an American takedown.

In the course of my life, I have witnessed many a dying person rally and almost appear to be on the road to recovery, only to give in to the deadly onslaught brought about by a failed immune system. This is what America just encountered with the election of Donald Trump. For one shining moment, America threw off the propaganda shackles and did just enough to get Donald Trump elected and then they went back to sleep. The role of the Independent Media (IM) cannot be overstated when it came to getting Trump elected. The IM gave the previously ignorant and downtrodden a gathering place as Trump’s the America first message was repeated over and over.

Lapsed Into a Coma

Trump was elected and then America went back to sleep. The politically ignorant just assumed that Donald Trump would ride in on his white horse and save the day.

Trump faces a hostile Congress that is owned by the corporations that are sponsoring the American-job-killing free trade agreements and espouse totally open borders no matter what the cost. The only way that the Trump agenda could be implemented was to change Congress (2016), or have the public intimidate Congress with unelection (2016-2018). To accomplish the latter, if just half the people that voted for Trump would send a daily email, or make a daily call to one of their elected representatives, these so-called representatives of the people would be afraid to come out of their Congressional offices. They could be intimidated by the public. If that strategy failed, and it wouldn’t, then voting out all incumbents in 2018 could produce the same result in that we could find a willing Congress to implement fair trade deals and enforce reasonable immigration laws that protect and benefit the citizens of this nation. But most Americans probably don’t even know who the incumbent is and we are slipping back to step one as the country goes back to sleep. America just went through the phase where it rallied from death’s doorstep only to slip into its final coma.

The Globalists Are Taking Out the Eyes and Ears of the People

The globalists rightfully blame the IM for getting Trump elected and delaying their takeover of the country. Now the social media giants of Facebook, Youtube and Twitter are dismantling the IM one broadcaster, one writer, one activist at a time. Trump gave the country a chance to become a nation of activists and instead we are a nation of slacktivists.

With the ongoing take down of the IM (e.g. Alex Jones, Paul Watson, Lisa Haven and myself to name a few), the Rip Van Winkles’ of this country will nobody to awaken them from their slumber for the final battle. Within 6 months, the eyes and ears of the people will likely be all but gone. The people will never know what hit them and they certainly will not have a centralized rallying point from which to organize against this planned and final takeover.

Some have asked me why don’t the globalists just takeover right now all at once. The main answer to that question is that the globalists are not plundering the resources and the labor of the people. When the last bit of blood has been squeezed from the last turnip, the end will come swiftly.

When the final resources are gone and the citizen journalists are out of the way, the path to national Armageddon will continue at breakneck speed.

Jade Helm 15 and UWEX 16

During Jade Helm 15, I warned the country that these were drills designed to eliminate any vestige of resistance against the New World Order takedown of the country. This is where the country will come to understand the reasons for the NDAA and the FEMA camps. We will soon enter America’s darkest hour.

What is standing in the way? The answer is Donald Trump. However, the Deep State has managed to create such a quagmire that Trump can get nothing done. And America’s political fickleness will rear its ugly head to give the Democrats control of the House in 2018. And when that happens, Donald Trump will be impeached. Today’s Russian allegations are laying the framework for impeachment. November of 2018 will become the D-Day to destruction. The globalists have tipped their hand. They will use the Russian threat to impose virtual martial law. All opposition to the coming war of depopulation will be silenced. As Bill Ayers, Obama’s political benefactor, predicted, millions will disappear.

The Great War of Depopulation

America has one last task to perform before it is laid to rest. It must start the great war of depopulation. Remember, the globalists have repeatedly stated that they want to reduce the population by 90% and by any means possible. Out of the ashes will arise the Phoenix of the New World Order.

What Lies Ahead?

Christianity will be outlawed and every perversion including pedophilia will be openly practiced. The world will embrace the new religion of GAIA. A new servant class, drawn from the small number of “deplorables” will service the new elite who will have morphed into some form of existence which will be the result of transhumanism. Satan will firmly be in control of planet.

Could these be the “final days”, I am not sure, but I would not bet against it.

Cognitive dissonance and bystander apathy have their hidden price. Just think how history could have been different if America had seized the opportunity to support Trump, but that door is quickly closing and it is closing for the final time. God gave us one final chance to get it right and we are collectively slapping away the hand of God and embracing Satanism by default. There is no third option. If you can’t get on board with saving America, at least get on board with saving your soul

The Master Plan by Al Duncan www.themasterplanbook.com

 

 

 


Oh America! What Has Become Of Your People?

03/27/2017

http://www.federalobserver.com/2017/03/26/oh-america-what-has-become-of-your-people/#more-32315

By Neal Ross

In 1821 Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Spencer Roane in which he said, “Time indeed changes manners and notions and so far we must expect institutions to bend to them. But time produces also corruption of principles, and against this it is the duty of good citizens to be ever on the watch, and if the gangrene is to prevail at last, let the day be kept off as long as possible.”

I have often wondered how the people of this country would react to a political debate between someone like Thomas Jefferson and any of the leading political figures from either the Republican or Democratic parties. Although I can pretty much guess the outcome, it would be interesting to see just how small a percentage of Americans who would support Jefferson’s views on the purposes for which government was established and the nature of their rights.

Since our Founders affixed their signatures to the Declaration of Independence two hundred forty one years have passed. Over the course of that short span of human existence the beliefs and principles of the people of this country have shifted dramatically from one of a people who cherished, and would die defending their liberty, to a people who willingly accept, and even ask for our government to enact laws which restrict it.

It is this shift in the core beliefs of we as a people which Jefferson referred to as a gangrene to which all good citizens must be on the watch for. Whenever there is a political discussion, or debate, the subjects being discussed are always the issues; health care, immigration reform, job creation, the war on terror, and a whole litany of others. How many times have you heard any political candidate mention that they will seek to repeal any of the government programs which restrict your liberty? More importantly, would you vote for a candidate who campaigned upon that promise, and that promise alone?

Liberty has many definitions, but among them is the ability to fully exercise all your rights without interference by others. Any serious student of American History would know that liberty was the driving force which caused our Founders to seek their independence from Great Britain, and which led some of them to demand that a Bill of Rights be included in our Constitution to protect certain unalienable rights. Liberty was of such importance that it led Patrick Henry to declare, “Give me liberty or give me death.” Liberty was of such importance to Mr. Henry that he preferred death to the alternative. How many Americans alive today could say the same, and actually mean it?

Yet those who participated in establishing our Republic felt that liberty ought to be the end for which government was instituted. In 1791 James Wilson, (signer of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution), wrote, “Government … should be formed to secure and enlarge the exercise of the natural rights of its members; and every government which has not this in view as its principal object is not a government of the legitimate kind.”

Do you understand those words? If your government does not seek to expand your ability to freely exercise your natural rights, then it is NOT legitimate! It does not matter that the candidate you voted for is in any particular office within that government; if government as an entity does anything which restricts your liberty, then government as a whole is illegitimate.

When the American people go to the polls to cast their votes, they are voting based upon how they feel about the issues, and how a particular candidate aligns with their own personal views on those issues. Unfortunately they are disregarding the most important issue of all; is the candidate they vote for going to enlarge, or restrict their liberty.

All these issues that people base their votes upon pale in significance in comparison to whether government will secure or restrict what remains of their liberty. On June 5, 1788 Patrick Henry said something, that if every American took to heart when they voted, America would not have half the problems it does today, “You are not to inquire how your trade may be increased, nor how you are to become a great and powerful people, but how your liberties can be secured; for liberty ought to be the direct end of your Government.”

But the sad truth is that most Americans do not want liberty. They do not want liberty because liberty comes with a cost; the cost of responsibility for your own actions. Of all the core beliefs that guided our Founders in establishing our Republic, the idea of self-reliance, self-determination is at the root of them all. Liberty, if it is anything at all, is the ability to make your own way in life without imposing upon others the burden of subsidizing you when you do not achieve success.

Throughout our history great men have spoken of how self reliance is a vital characteristic of a truly free people. In his first Inaugural Address, Thomas Jefferson told the people, “A wise and frugal government … shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”

If that isn’t clear enough, then perhaps this quote from Jefferson’s letter to M.L. Hommande in 1787 will clarify things, “The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits.”

In a letter written on March 5, 1792, James Madison stated, “The class of citizens who provide at once their own food and their own raiment, may be viewed as the most truly independent and happy. They are more: they are the best basis of public liberty, and the strongest bulwark of public safety. It follows, that the greater the proportion of this class to the whole society, the more free, the more independent, and the more happy must be the society itself.”

Therefore, the reverse must also be true; the more people rely upon government for some, or all of their needs, the less free they become. The old saying the you don’t bite the hand that feeds you rings so true in that regard; people are less likely to resist governmental intrusion upon their liberty if they are dependent upon government subsidies for their existence.

Yet there are those among society who believe it is the responsibility of society, and therefore of government, to provide for the needs of all those less fortunate. How many government programs have been instituted which hand out money to those in need? How many government programs have been instituted which do things which are the responsibility of the people to provide for themselves?

People call me heartless and cruel because I say it is no part of government’s authority to provide these things for people; but that is not the case. One of the greatest gifts one can bestow upon another is freedom; but freedom entails accepting responsibility for your own survival. The more one becomes reliant, or dependent upon government funds, the less free they are.

In 1766 Benjamin Franklin wrote, “I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.” (Source: On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor, 29 November 1766)

How often do we blame society for all the ills which people suffer today? It was the parents fault, it was societies fault, and therefore people deserve a helping hand, a government handout, to make up for all the things they were deprived of in life.

Yet Theodore Roosevelt once said, “If an American is to amount to anything he must rely upon himself, and not upon the State; he must take pride in his own work, instead of sitting idle to envy the luck of others. He must face life with resolute courage, win victory if he can, and accept defeat if he must, without seeking to place on his fellow man a responsibility which is not theirs.”

How many times have you heard the saying that the rich should pay more in taxes? Where is the incentive to achieve success, obtain riches, if in so doing the government is going to take a larger percentage of your earnings than they do from someone making minimum wage? When our Founders wrote the Constitution they declared that all direct taxes, (of which category an income tax falls under), must be apportioned; that is divided equally amongst the States, or the people. How can you say that making the rich pay more for the support of their government is in accordance with what our Founders believed?

Again, if that is not sufficient to prove my point, maybe this quote from a letter by Jefferson to Joseph Milligan will clarify things, “To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.”

It is an honorable trait that one should feel sympathy and charity for those in need. But it is not the function of government to provide those things. George Washington once said, “Let your heart feel for the afflictions and distress of everyone, and let your hand give in proportion to your purse.”

As a young member of the House of Representatives, James Madison stated, “The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.”

If that isn’t clear enough, maybe something former President Grover Cleveland said will be, “It is the responsibility of the citizens to support their government. It is not the responsibility of the government to support its citizens.”

I have often wondered how those today who have this whole entitlement mentality would have fared had they been among those who disembarked the Mayflower in 1620; or been among the mass migration of immigrants to the U.S. in the 1920’s who passed through the Ellis Island facility.

I know what I’m about to say will piss some off, but I would be remiss in my duty to tell the whole truth if I didn’t say it. It is true that immigration is what made America into the country it is today; after all, weren’t the first settlers to Plymouth immigrants from England? But there is a vast difference between the early immigrants who came to this country and many of those who come here today. Those who came after the establishment of the Plymouth Colony came for the freedom that living here offered; and which they would later fight to defend.

Of those who came to the U.S. in the mass migration of people who passed through Ellis Island, most came with nothing but the desire for a chance to achieve success based upon their wit and their desire to work hard to achieve it. Many, upon arriving, bent down and kissed the ground under their feet as a sign of their devotion to this country, and the severing of ties with their native lands.

Of those who come here today, how many do you think truly love America? How many do you think would rather die than to hold their hands out and ask for assistance from the land that has so graciously accepted them into her bosom? You may not like it, but America is under no obligation to allow anyone to come to this country; the right to emigrate here is a privilege, not a right; and as a privilege it should be earned by your loyalty and devotion to American values and beliefs.

In 1917 Theodore Roosevelt stated, “From the melting pot of life in this free land all men and woman of all nations who come hither emerge as Americans and nothing else. They must have renounced completely and without reserve all allegiance to the land from which they or their forefathers came. And it is a binding duty on every citizen of this country in every important crisis to act solidly with all his fellow Americans, having regard only to the honor and interest of America, treating every other nation purely on its conduct in that crisis, without reference to his ancestral predilections or antipathies. If he does not act, he is false to the teachings and lives of Washington and Lincoln; he is not entitled to any part or lot in our country and he should be sent out of it.”

Yeah, I know with today’s politically correct multicultural society, that is considered offensive. But that right there is part of the problem, as Jefferson said in the earlier quote I provided, we have undergone a corruption of principles; and the things our Founders believed no longer apply today.

How else can you explain the fact that a Circuit Court Judge, (Richard Posner), who holds his position as an appointment by the president of the United States, would say, “I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation. Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century…Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights … do not speak to today.” This guy holds his position because of the provisions within the Constitution; yet he has the nerve to say that it no longer applies today?

But is he not but a reflection of the overall sentiments of most Americans? How high a percentage of the people living in America today do you think have actually read the Constitution and Bill of Rights? Among those that have, how many do you think have taken the time to research them to the extent some of us have?

Yet these same people vote, and go around saying that they are making ‘informed decisions‘? They have the audacity to say that their beliefs reflect American values and that the values held by a bunch of old dead guys from 200 years ago no longer apply.

As historian Charles Austin Beard lamented, “You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.”

Oh America, what has become of your people?

Almost a year after the Declaration of Independence was signed, John Adams wrote a letter to his wife in which he said, “Posterity! You will never know, how much it cost the present Generation, to preserve your Freedom! I hope you will make a good Use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven, that I ever took half the Pains to preserve it.”

From the lack of intelligent responses to my articles to the continued voting for candidates that repeatedly ignore their oaths of office and violate the Constitution, it is painfully clear to me that very few people in this country give a rats ass about the Constitutional limitations that document places upon government; nor do they care about the fact that the liberty which the government was designed to secure has all but been stripped away from them.

Unless that changes, unless there is a drastic turnaround in the way people think about government, then this country, and the freedom it was established to secure, is doomed.

Neal Ross, Student of history, politics, patriot and staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment. Send all comments to: bonsai@syix.com.

If you liked Neal’s latest column, maybe you’ll like his latest booklet: The Civil War: (The Truth You Have Not Been Told) AND don’t forget to pick up your copy of ROSS: Unmasked – An Angry American Speaks Out – and stay tuned – Neal has a new, greatly expanded book coming soon dealing with the harsh truths about the so-called American Civil War of 1861-1865. Life continues to expand for this prolific writer and guardian of TRUE American history.


AN EXPOSE’ ON LEGAL FRAUD

03/26/2017

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

APFN c/o  6630 W. CACTUS RD. SUITE B107-760, GLENDALE, AZ 85304

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!

THE LAWYER’S SECRET OATH

THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED OR PUBLISHED:

Investigate: Lawyers Guild of Great Britain

and any ties to the American Bar Association.

“BAR” stands for “British Accreditation Research”

[02/21/1999] A federal judge in Texas has moved to out law Quicken Family Lawyer, a legal software program. The reason. It was too helpful. Judge Barefoot Sanders determined that by helping people fill our their legal documents, the program treads illegally on lawyers’ turf. Specifically, it violates law that bar anyone but licensed lawyers from giving legal advise. The case was brought by a lawyers’ group, whose interest is clear enough. Lawyers typically charge anywhere from $100 to $650 an hour. Quicken costs $29.95 for life.

The Legal monopoly: An American Bar Association committee on non-lawyer practice in 1995 noted that enforcement of unauthorized practice laws declined after 1970, but rose again

in the ‘90s. Recent cases suggest the trend continues.

“The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue” U.S. v. Lopez

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/pdf/preface.pdf

THE LAWYER’S SECRET OATH

Any Judge, Government Agent, or Bureaucrat Who Had Sworn to

Uphold the Constitution for the United States Who is

Violating that Oath is Guilty of Treason.

The Penalty is still DEATH BY HANGING.

You are weighed in the balance and are found wanting.

Daniel 5:27

Woe, unto you lawyers! for ye have taken away the key to

knowledge; ye entered [the Kingdom of God] not in yourselves,

and them that were entering in ye [have] hindered.

Luke 11:52

AN EXPOSE’ ON THE LEGAL FRAUD PERPETRATED ON ALL AMERICANS

Edited, altered and enhanced significantly from audio tape by a private non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, non-individual, pursuant to any real or imaginary statutory regulations.

Let’s get right to the point. The courts only recognize two classes of people in the United States today.

DEBTORS AND CREDITORS

The concept and status of DEBTORS AND CREDITORS is very important for you to understand. Every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or anything else they might dream up to charge you where you find yourself in front of a court – IT IS AN EQUITY COURT, administering commercial law having a debtor/creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we have an equity court but not an equity court as referred to in the Constitution of the U.S. or any of the legal documents before 1938.

All the courts of this once great land have been

changed starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in

Erie R.R. v. Thompkins, 304 U.S 64 (1938)

give you background which led to this decision. Some of this information is from the Ben Freeman tapes of 1989. They are excellent tapes if you have them. Ben used to talk about “legislative democracy.” I couldn’t find a definition for legislative democracy. It bothered me. However, by listening to his tapes as well as other tapes. I began to see the fraud that is being perpetrated on all of us Americans. Please understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year continuous fraud. It doesn’t happen just once in a while. This fraud is constantly upon you all your life. Whether you are aware of it or not, this fraud is perpetually and incessantly upon you and your family.

U.S. Inc. Goes To Geneva 1930’s

In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know the history of its inception. It goes like this: from 1928 – 1932 there were five years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva, Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find them because they don’t publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelt’s job was to put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two years earlier. The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy. Now, this doesn’t mean the bankruptcy wasn’t implemented before 1938 with the Erie RR v. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn in during the month of January, 1933. He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as the “The Banking Holiday,” and proceeded in pulling in gold coin out of circulation. That was the beginning of the United States Public Policy for bankruptcy.

Roosevelt Stacks Supreme Court

It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937-1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme Court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to enlarge the number of Justices and he tried to change the slant of the Justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case which would support their bankruptcy problem.

Their was resistance to Roosevelt’s court stacking efforts. Some of the Justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new procedure for the law of the land.

The “Mother Corporation”

Goes Bankrupt

A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states). This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington, D.C. (the headquarters of the corporation called “The United States”). Since the United States Corporation, having established it headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the corporate state governments of the Union). The corporate state governments didn’t have to vote on the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason of Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. (Note: The writer has taken the liberty of using the term “Mother Corporation” to communicate the interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her associated corporate States. It is my understanding that the States created the Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the Federal Government has taken control of her “Creators,” the States.) She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade names the following: “United States”, “U.S.”, “U.S.A.”, “United States of America”, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, Feds, Federal Government. She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office, etc., etc., etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the I.R.S. and her state corporations, to the United Nations and the International Bankers as payment for her debt. The UN and the International Bankers use this money and services for various world wide projects to include war. War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans for controlling people on her world property.

U.S. Inc. Declares Bankruptcy

The corporate U.S., then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva, to decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of corporate several states were not in attendance. If the states had their own power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have been represented at Geneva. The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever Washington D.C. agree to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a club member, they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government corporate group in 1938. The several states only needed a representative in Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington, D.C. The delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the mother corporation located in Washington, D.C., the seat and headquarters of the Federal Corporate Government. And, presto BANKRUPTCY was declared for all.

From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the Federal level so that the states would rely on the Federal decision and use this decision as justification for the bankruptcy process within the states.

Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)

Emerges as the Law of the Land

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html

By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in 1930 could be up-held and administered. That’s why the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedence, all appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at Large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie R.R. v. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from the preface of the 1990 Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th edition.

The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in the light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962 and 1966.

The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere between 1930 and 1940, I don’t recall, but by the early 40’s and during the war, this committee was working to form the UCC and got it ready to put on the market. The UCC is the law merchant’s code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the new law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This Legal Committee of lawyers put everything; Negotiable Instruments, Security, Sales, Contracts/Agreements, and the whole mess under the UCC. That’s where the “Uniform” word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as well as being uniform with the District of Columbia. It doesn’t mean you didn’t have the uniform instrument laws on the books before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By the middle 1960’s, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt the newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the law of the land. The states fully understood they had to administrate bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks or so after Kennedy was killed.

Your Lawyer’s Secret Oath?

What was the effect and the significance of the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1939. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers (who were members of the American Bar Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain) created, formed and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain. Since the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case was decided; the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same.

It has been reported (source unknown to the writer) that every lawyer in existence and every lawyer coming up has to take a SECRET OATH to support the bankruptcy. This seems to make sense after read about Mr. Sweet’s CASE FILE DISAPPEARANCE discussed below. There is more to it. Not only do they promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges also promise never to reveal who the true creditor party is in the bankruptcy proceedings. In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principal of the proceedings. This is where you can get them for not making an appearance in court. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, than there is no way the defendant is able to know the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE AND THE CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information. That’s why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will say, “It’s not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can’t give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer.”

Hire a Lawyer?

The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer, who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and cause. How will you ever find out the nature and cause? You won’t! Why? If the true nature and cause of the action against you is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the nature and cause. The true creditor will have to say, “It’s a bankruptcy proceeding.” That declaration then opens the door for you to question, “Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?” In this country, the courts on every level from the justice of the peace level all the way up – even into the International Law arena (called the World Court), are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate United States debt.

What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer to the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for the true creditor (the International Bankers). Then have the attorney put into the record the true nature and cause of the proceedings against you on that particular day.

The International Banksters told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn’t agree to declare bankruptcy, the banksters threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The banksters made an offer they couldn’t refuse!

To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression. The bankers said, “Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way. You just accept the bankruptcy and we’ll let you out of the depression. If you don’t, you’re on your own.” So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the International banksters had them by the throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years they would pass statutes and legislation for the implantation of the bankruptcy in favor of the International banksters.

Now, i would say that the key banksters were Rothchild and family and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal Reserve Banksters. Who were more specifically involved as key banksters and their agents is pure conjure on my part but it really doesn’t matter at this point. The point is, there was an international bankruptcy and an international conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer the countries accepted the offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though they were solvent while in fact the representative countries were bankrupt.

The Snare

The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate, the same way they did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign banksters simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself a “CITIZEN” or a “RESIDENT” of the corporate U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are given a Social Security Number which ties you to certain meager “benefits” and “privileges.” Then, the banksters con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements. These slick paper agreement establishes your “voluntary” indebtedness to the bankster creditor.

If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme, because you don’t like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in court to list the true nature and cause of action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course) is administrating the bankruptcy which the government agreed per the Geneva meetings. The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is set up in such a way that the TRUE CREDITOR IS PROTECTED and never has to make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the right to pledge you (your body and labor) in indebtedness (bondage/servitude). Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came first; signed in secrecy. THEN Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could make decisions based on new controlling law of bankruptcy. It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional case. It is now a bankruptcy case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised as a constitutional case.

The Fraud

The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding for the benefit of the bankster creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said, “NO. We will not give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody, a decision not only affecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within the corporate state governments. This, by the way is fraud. It wouldn’t be fraud if the government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice when I say corporate “government” I don’t mean you and me. You and I are not the corporate government. The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is a neutral government zone known as the capitai ci, the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat of the corporate Federal Government. The capitai ci, the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state government. if the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate state government want to join forces and declare bankruptcy that’s not fraud. This is their corporate business.

However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy but do not disclose to you, me, and every other American, that they have so declared bankruptcy. Further they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get you and every other American in this country to pledge to pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility, not the responsibility of Americans, the people.

U.S. Inc. is Distinct and Separate

From PRIVATE AMERICANS

“We the People” who created and signed the contract/compact/agreement of, by, and for the Constitutional Corporation (U.S.); using the trade name of the “United States of America”, is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE from Americans or the unenfranchised people of America. The private natural American people did not create the corporation of the United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the creation of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has located its U.S. headquarters in Washington, D.C. Virginia state (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States Corporation. Notice, here, we have a state giving something of value (land) to the United States. The United States Corporation agreed in the Constitutional contract, to protect the states. Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the states and the people by deception and at the will of their foreign banksters with whom they have been doing business. Our fore fathers gave their lives and property to prevent enslavement. Today, we are again enslaved.

Private natural American people have been tricked, deceived, and setup to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their knowledge and lawful consent. That is FRAUD. All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by “Public Policy” of by and for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).

The Mother Corporation’s

“Public Policy”

The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington, D.C. The states use state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of Washington D.C. Public Policy and only public policy is being administered against you in the corporate courts today. The public policy that is dictated by all the courts from the smallest to the most powerful courts in the world, is public policy. This is why I said, in another tape that the Russian people would be enslaved into indebtedness. What will happen is that it will become public policy in Russia to have the people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians will be forced to promise to pay these debts. They will be forced to pay off on those corporate debts. Corporate Public Policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate Public Policy is forever a Corporate Public Policy and the laws that have been passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy. Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public policy. The public policy OF (belonging to) the United States corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF (belonging to) America, the Republic.

The Erie RR. v. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938 have been public policy decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when F.D.R. came in office, he brought in public policy. He established that it was the public policy of the government to call in all the gold. It was the public policy of the Government in Washington, D.C. (the Federal Government) to give our government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be compatible with the Federal legal system.

The Monkey – Wrench

This is why, when people like us go to court without being represented by a lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into the corporate administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S. administration of their corporate bankruptcy. That’s why you’ll find stamped on many if not all our briefs,

“THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER

CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS.”

The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or file a claim we’re not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The arguments we put forth predate 1938. We come in with Constitutional law, etc. All these early cases support our rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers, and judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before 1938.

The International Banksters’

Corporate Plantation

U.S.A. Style

Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the bankruptcy for the benefit of the bankster creditors and to protect the bankster creditor. Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the corporate legislatures, “I want a law passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the longest period possible.” it doesn’t behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor producing debtors to die at an average age of 30 years. What would happen to the banksters’ lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc. on the entire funding and lending process if the average American life span was only 30 years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2 1/2 times the current consumer population to equal their current take. The banksters would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or even more. Maybe the banksters would need 2 Billion Americans because the individual can’t contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the creditor could collect on the debt for only 12 years.

Now, if the banksters can just get people to live an average of 70 years you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they contract and for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With this situation, the bankster creditor can now float loans worth 50 years of potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years. The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care of. The creditor doesn’t want the population to decrease per say, unless, it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in anther’s name and then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people.

For example let’s consider the AIDS problem today among the black people. What better group to inject AIDS into than the black people? Read the Stracker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don’t you understand that the blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have reached the max of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone over their limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public housing, medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. Now, the situation is that instead of paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can’t collect any revenue?

The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of these people. You must provide them with welfare, etc. Why? Because when you, as a member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be passed which says the minorities must be taken care of; then the corporate legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these people taken care of. Therefore, when given the chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a chance, therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges and opportunities. This is what these people need to make them socially, politically, and economically equal with every one else. The legislatures have passed all kinds of statutes providing for hugh indebtedness and they float the indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone in to challenge them; telling them that it is not your public policy to assume the debts of other people.

On the contrary, all the court decisions coming out, indicate it is the corporate public policy and it is your willingness to support the corporate public policy to pay off these debts. Remember, “public” means of and for the corporate Government. It does not mean of and for private people. “Public” means corporate government. It is corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they are talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge against this corporate created debt.

The Real Estate Snare

How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These bankster creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy, that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this the sam way they get away with any other case that is brought before the court, whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever. Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving information and jurisdiction to the banksters through their agents. The instruments (forms) you signed include, but are not limited to the following: social security registration, use of the social security number, IRS forms, driver license, traffic citation, jury duty, voter registration, using their address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc. The banksters then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you, without you ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true creditor. What’s more, you are never informed as to whom the true creditor is and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the paperwork that you are filling out.

If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find that you promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you originally acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never promised to pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never promised to pay taxes to the creditor. You did. In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the deed stating the true nature and cause of the action.

Since you made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for property taxes. You don’t realize that the only way they can bill you for taxes is through your own stupidity of AGREEING to pay the tax. You volunteered. They took advantage of you, conning you to promise to pay property taxes. When they send you their bill, they are coming against you for the collection of the promise you made to the creditor. Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank. The bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn’t loaned you anything. It was not their credit to loan. This is why the bank can’t loan credit. There is a credit involved, but not the banks credit. It is the credit of the International banksters. The international banksters are making you the loan based upon their operation of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have against you personally as well as your property.

Now, let’s say you are not aware of your remedies provided for you within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to dishonor the county’s presentment of the tax bill. You don’t pay your tax bill. You therefore just sit on it and don’t do or say anything. A couple of years go by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or else in a certain period of time your property will be taken from you and put up for a tax sale. Now here is what is interesting – If you don’t pay your tax bill, and they contact you asking you to pay it and you don’t pay it, they will declare you in default. It is based on that default as provided in the UCC that they sell your property for the tax (rent).

However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state the true nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they have developed a legal procedure which is based upon YOUR PROMISE TO PAY. The procedure provides that they don’t have to come to the court to get a court order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor never makes an appearance in court. The reality is, you are denied any possibility of appearing in court to exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the creditor under “public policy.” To ask if it is under “public policy,” just what is “public policy”? And how did you (as an international banker) become “creditor” to me and everyone else in this country (American people). They don’t want you to ask the real creditor (the International Banksters), to PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS upon which your personal debt is established. If they were forced to go into court, they would have to produce the deed or mortgage showing you KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY, and VOLUNTARILY promised to pay the corporate public debt. You did not KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY, and VOLUNTARILY promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930’s. This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is, that, there was absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it through their deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense, permeates the education system and the new media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you are a statutory “U.S. Citizen” and “resident of the United States.”(INCORPORATED).

YOUR SIGNATURE IS

YOUR MOST VALUABLE PROPERTY

Your “property” is pledged for the rest of your life upon your signature and your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The banksters don’t even bother to go to court. They leave it up to the agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to perform. If you don’t pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress THAT YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY? Did your government teachers ever tell you, that any time you sign any document, you should sign it “without prejudice”, or with “All Rights Reserved” above your signature. This means you are reserving you God given unalienable rights (rights which cannot be transferred) and all other rights for which your fore fathers died. The Corporate U.S. Government provides, or at least pretends to provide, for this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) at 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this area. It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate “Public” schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have set the snare to COMPEL YOU INTO PAYING THEIR DEBT. The Corporate “Public” schools are strictly designed for their Corporate citizens/subjects. That is, the Corporate U.S. Public School citizens. Notice all the emphasis on being a “good” citizen.

Basically all their teachers and their students are trained to produce labor and material in exchange for valueless green paper called “money.” It is not money, it functions “AS” money. Lawful money must be backed by something of value. Banksters take your labor, services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the “full faith and confidence of the United States Government” (THE MOTHER CORPORATION). I do not have faith of confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL CHARTER, enslaving the sovereign American people into THEIR bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the corporate government’s bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically impossible to pay off. You and your family are in continual financial bondage to the international banksters. They love it so! Black’s Law Dictionary 1990, defines “Money Changers” as: – business of a banker….today handled by the international departments of banks.” Let me think for a moment, what did Christ do to the “Money Changers”? Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with their activity. Three days later Christ was crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money chargers. Kennedy was slaughtered for interfering with the money changes.

The Brother’s Case

In my brother’s case he was never in default as he never made the promise in the common law deed to pay taxes, therefore, the man who bought the property is moving against my brother through an attorney who is claiming that my brother never redeemed the property. His attorney had followed procedure by publishing the property tax notice in the newspaper for three printings. Now they show up in court to get the court to declare default. After a default judgment, the attorney’s client then has right to the property.

Now, my brother comes in and challenges this action. The problem is, the man who bought the property, is trying to claim the property when in fact he is not the original creditor. He is not the person who said my brother was in default or that he owed a tax in the first place. Now when my brother comes in and challenges the new buyer, the court rules that the new buyer is not required to produce any documents in support of his cause. The only documents they are required to produce are the documents related to procedure of foreclosure. Do you understand? There is no court case where the true creditor has to make an appearance. You cannot question or challenge the true creditor.

When you do go to court, the person you are allowed to question is the person who bought the property. THe buyer is not required to produce documents because the only one who would be required to do so, is the true creditor. Now you are in the position of fighting yourself in court. This is a very clever way for the creditor to avoid the courts in order to settle the dispute for his claim against you. This is also very clever way to avoid naming the true claimant; true plaintiff. The true plaintiff is the international bankster. The international banksters claim they have a claim against my brother’s property because my brother’s property has been pledged by the state as collateral for the corporate debts under the bankruptcy to the international banksters.

Once my brother removed his property from their jurisdiction and venue by claiming back all his rights, titles and interest, the only way that they would be able to stand a chance, would be for the original claimants (international banksters) to make an appearance through their attorney. Then, for my brother to require their attorney to place in the record, a statement, identifying the true nature and cause for their actions. The courts and the attorneys have cleverly avoided this process.

Remember, when you are dealing in bankruptcy, slight of hand, lies, and deception you have to protest to the head man in all of this action, just like the Watergate tapes. Everybody tried to protect Nixon, the head dog. It is the same in this bankruptcy scam, they all have to protect the International Banksters. The proof that this is true is that (1) My brother is now in front of the court of appeals, the attorney for the people who bought the property, has already said, the buyers should not be required to present the authority establishing the State of Maryland’s authority to tax property and to collect these taxes; This statement is the tip-off for how they are attempting to protect the International Banksters. Since the International Banksters never had to appear in court, they never were required to show where they got the right to pledge everybody’s property into the United States corporate debt. The buyer’s attorney says his client should not have to produce and this court should not demand, that he has to produce. Guess what. The court will agree with the buyer’s attorney. They don’t have to do it. They have to protect everybody’s butt.

The attorney never cited one case before 1953. The attorney put a lot of cases in his paperwork but nothing is cited before 1938. Most of the cites are since 1963, when the State of Maryland passed the UCC. All of the cites were in the 70’s and 80’s. A few cites were in the late 60’s and one in the 50’s. This lawyer knew what was going on. That’s why, no matter what happens, someone in the court will stamp on the paperwork that this case can not be cited in other cases. This case is not to be reported in the legal reports.

The Cover-up

There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn’t have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the case freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the fraud. This is why you can’t hire an attorney. An Attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.

“Trust Me.”

“I’m here to help you.”

“I have the governments permission to practice law.”

“I’m a Member of the Bar.”

The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer’s will cite no cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in cooperate public policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of BULL ROAR. The lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy by supporting it, even at your expense. The lawyers can’t go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.

For all cases cited, those in the U.S. Code or the state annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they only selected those cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that way. After the last 30-4-50 years of cases after cases having been decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial information and argument to prove the fraud?

Blood in the Streets?

Can you imagine how damaging it be, if they allowed your case to be cited in another case, or if the they allowed the public to examine a copy of your brief, that discloses evidence of the fraud? This exposure would render null and void everything for which they have worked so hard. Wouldn’t this exposure make the people mad? Wouldn’t this exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets? Especially in the cities where the poor people have been really taken by this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is that the case never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns and shoot the SOB’s.

Mr. Sweet’s Case Disappeared!

There is a man, let’s say his name is Sweet. He has been investigating the corporate government activities for over 12 years on a full time basis. Now, let’s look at Sweet’s recent case. He won his case. He went into court and defended his common law lien on his property so as to be compatible with statutory law. The judge said, “However, since you presented me with a lien on your property, I will stipulate that the county is the owner of your property with the provision that all liens be satisfied.” Sweet was very happy about the judgment. Sweet doesn’t care if the county is the owner of the property because the county can’t take the property for the next 90 years. The county can’t take the property away from him because of his common law lien on the property. Sweet is free to use it, rent it, whatever. If the county really wants the property, they have to satisfy the lien first. However, there is a problem regarding setting a precedent. Sweet went back a couple of weeks later and asked them to punch up his case number. Guess what? The case number had disappeared! The reason the case number had disappeared is that after the judge ruled the county owned the property, subject to the lien, it became a case that goes against the corporate county bankruptcy public policy.

Since Sweet placed a lien on his own property, he is the one who has to be paid off first – not the county! The county is now required to satisfy the lien before the county is allowed to take possession of the property. The property is probably not worth the price of the lien. This would not satisfy the true creditors, the International Banksters. If the county pays Sweet off first, the city has to on their records a $75,000.00 deficit. The true creditors wouldn’t like that deficit. They certainly wouldn’t like the fact that Sweet’s clever maneuver had out foxed the foxes.

What if one hundred, two hundred, a thousand, or ten thousand, people in this state/republic would just put a common law lien on their property and then stopped paying taxes; then cited Sweet’s case. It would set a precedent. Let the county have the property as long as the judge makes the judgment subject to existing liens. In this situation, the county would end up holding all this property but could have no use of it. No rent. No taxes. All deficient. The bankster creditors certainly don’t want this scenario. The banksters don’t want any cases administered except through the application of bankruptcy procedure. The banksters want your rights, privileges, and due process strictly administered by and through the corporate courts under their corporate public policy, international bankruptcy procedure. The International Banksters and their UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENTS don’t want any evidence on the record, showing how you can get out from under them. Any revenue collecting individual or agency such as the courts, judges, lawyers, law enforcement officers, and tax collectors who are attempting to take money from you as a private American must be registered as a foreign agent. If they are not duly registered and properly identified, they are involved in EXTORATION AND TREASON against private Americans.

How Sweet It is!

As part of Sweet’s maneuver, he filled out a financing statement using the UCC-1 form, whereby he put his wife and himself as debtors and creditors. Now, the legal situation is switched. The UCC-1 Financing record Sweet filed with the state, shows Sweet and his wife, as being parties of interest recorded with the state rather than the presumption that the international banksters are the parties of interest.

There is an office within each corporate state (Secretary of State) that handles the UCC-1 forms for personal property and the county recorders office who records the UCC-1 against real property. Since Sweet is listed on corporate state records as the debtor and the creditor on his own property, his property can’t be put up in any way for collateral against any debts claimed by the banksters. The reason is that the International Banksters and their flunky agents, now, cannot prove that Sweet’s property is debt property of the bank or the corporate county. The property is encumbered by Sweet’s lien. Thereby, the property cannot be put up against any debt claims, until it is not encumbered by Sweet’s lien. Sweet’s property is not free and clear of all liens. The result is that for all practical purposes, the property is now Sweet’s, being unencumbered by any further demand for payment of taxes. Sweet has not paid property taxes for many years. Sweet is now his own creditor. And Sweet is his own debtor. Therefore, the International Banksters along with the county corporate thieves are knocked out for the stealing process. How sweet it is! Congratulations to Mr. Sweet!

You may want to do it the way Sweet did. If you own property, you will need to get your deed and a common law lien, then fill out a UCC-1 Form. Then file it with the Secretary of State for personal property and the county recorder for real property. This seems to be the only way for you to get out from under being a debtor of these bastardly Corporate Foreign International Banksters. The judges have to know what’s going on. The only way this scheme can work is to have all the lawyers and judges pledge to uphold the corporate bankruptcy public policy. The banksters just can’t allow lawyers in a legal system who refuse to uphold the bankruptcy policy. These renegade lawyers would have to be quickly weeded out. They certainly have a neat little system going here in America. The Land of the Fee and the Home of the Slave.

Attention: Law Student

I hope you’re listening to this tape, Law Student. You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope you’re listening closely, because here is the legal system you’re headed to serve, and serve you will. You said you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath they’re taking, in secret, behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the “business of the court” as judges and lawyers. Now, you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the bankruptcy. If you want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer, I can tell you this, they will weed you out at the very beginning if you don’t bring in your paperwork under the bankruptcy procedures. If you try to defend your clients and try to help your clients they will get rid of you. The will pull your license. So you spent all that money and time going to school under the guise of helping people and you’re wasting your time. Without that license you can’t go into a courtroom. I would think about this.

Traffic Citation

Regarding the UCC-1 Form, you can also file it against your car. Wouldn’t that be a kick in the tail if you went into court for a traffic citation where you had signed “without prejudice UCC 1-207”. And you had refused [abatement] the traffic citation using the UCC in your procedure by having signed “without prejudice” and having gone home and sent in your refusal for cause without dishonor of the presentment of the traffic citation. Now let’s say you are in front of the judge. The judge says, “What’s this refusal for cause stuff all about?” The judge won’t want any mention that the citation was issued under bankruptcy. He is afraid you’ll mention the bankruptcy issue. The reason you refused for cause without dishonor the traffic citation, is that it was issued to you under bankruptcy corporate public policy. He won’t get in to that. When you get before the judge, you just state you have removed yourself from the bankruptcy. Tell him that your auto is no longer pledged for collateral against the debt. He’ll say, “Oh yeah. What are you talking about?” That’s when you hand him the UCC-1 Form that you had filed with the state. This UCC-1 Form will show that you are the debtor and the creditor on your auto. Now what happened? The corporate county/state can/t collect on the traffic citation debt instrument. Why? Because, now that you’re the creditor on the ticket, if they collect a $100.00 fine, they have to pay you the amount of the fine. How sweet it is! You’re the creditor aren’t you? People have done this. Of course, there is no record, no paper trail, in such cases. It is not cited. The corporate Bankster’s agents, clerks, lawyers, judges, etc. take the information out of the records as soon as you beat them at their own game.

The Lawyer’s Guild Connection

The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is not concerned primarily with what happens in any case on the local level. However, when a case leaves the local level, by that, I mean the state court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court, and goes to the appeals court, it would appear that the American Bar Association takes notice of the case. It would seem that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that any action brought on an appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain, which is the legal arm of the Rothchild’s Dynasty, be able to monitor and administrate the corporate Bankruptcy. It would appear that the American Bar Association would be compelled to review all appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under the common law or the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be immediately stamped on the back that “this case is not to be cited or published.” I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in such cases. The justice department maybe able to do that in Washington, D.C. I can’t see where any judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or lable the case as one not to be cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the American Bar Association.

The Bankruptcy Accounting System

Now, Joe Law Student, if your still attending classes and have a good professor, ask him about just where the stamp comes from that you’ve seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is tampering with the law? There is one thing certain, the creditor and or his agents are watching these cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books. When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the creditor, the corporate International Banksters. This is just one of the Bankster’s state side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is charged with the responsibilities to keep track of the debt. All the states have to send reports to Washington, D.C. Washington D.C., itself, has to send reports to the GAO. Take a look at your state Comptroller’s Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I found it in the library located in the city of the corporate state capital. Look under “Trust Fund” for each state sub-corporation like the state courts, HRS, Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State Department Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes, fines, fees, licenses, etc.). There are millions and billions of your hard earned worthless Federal Reserve Notes, “dollars”, being held in “trust.” This money is being siphoned off into the coffers of the International Banksters while the corporate government officials are hounding you for more taxes.

All this accounting system is not so the people will know what is going on. The accounting reports are for rthe Bankster creditors to keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from. The Banksters want to know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from what sources. This accounting if the purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5. All this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a week. These M’s are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount of debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and how exactly just what is going on in their domain.

It all makes sense. Don’t the banksters hir bill collectors? Creditors hire bill collectors to snoop around to see why you’re not paying. They want to know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much will be coming in. How much will they collect? They want to know who will pay and who won’t. The whole system is nothing but credit and debt.

The World Credit Union

Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of the governments around the world are going to unite. They will create one big giant credit union for collecting the debt for the International Banksters. We have allowed ourselves to get into this very sad situation, but that is the way it is.

And put on NOTICE of the bankruptcy…………

Attn: “Public Servant”

On the night of December 23, 1913, the U.S. Congress committed perhaps the greatest act of treason in history. It surrendered the nation’s sovereignty and sold the American people into slavery to a cabal of arch-charlatan bankers who proceeded to plunder, bankrupt, and conquer the nation with a money swindle.

The “money” the banks issue is merely bookkeeping entries. It cost them nothing and is not backed by their wealth, efforts, property, or risk. It is not redeemable except in more debt paper. The Federal Reserve Act forced us to pay compound interest on thin air. We now use worthless “notes” backed by our own credit that we cannot own and are made subject to compelled performance for the “privilege.”

From 1913 until 1933 the U.S. paid the “interest” with more and more gold. The structured inevitability soon transpired; the Treasury was empty, the debt was greater than ever, and the U.S. declared bankruptcy. In exchange for using notes belonging to bankers who create them out of nothing on our own credit, we are forced to repay in substance (labor, property, land, businesses, resources – life) in ever-increasing amounts. This may be the greatest heist and fraud of all time.

When a government goes bankrupt, it looses its sovereignty. In 1933 the U.S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt’s Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 confirmed in Perry v. U.S. (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912, as well as 31 United States Code (USC) 5112, 5119 and 12 USC 95a.

The bankrupt U.S. went into receivership, reorganized in favor of its creditors and new owners. 1913 turned over America lock, stock, and barrel to a handful of criminals whose avowed intent from the beginning was to plunder, bankrupt, conquer, and enslave the people of the United States of America and eliminate the nation from the face of the earth. The goal was, and is, to absorb America into a one-world private commercial government, a “New World Order.”

With the Erie RR v. Thompkins case of 1938 the Supreme Court confirmed their success; we are now in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III courts, and Republic. The Bill of Rights has been statutized into “civil rights” in commerce.

America has been stolen. We have been made slaves: permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered “commercial persons,” “residents,” and corporate franchisees known as “citizens of the United States” under the so-called “14th Amendment.” Said “Amendment” (which was never ratified – see Congressional Record, June 13, 1967; Dyett v. Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v. Phillips, (1975) affirmed a citizenship ???????????.

Instructions and Options

  1. Instructions.

This chain letter consists of two aspects:

  1. A copy of these “Instructions and Options” and the letter to “Public Servants” should be sent to as many friends and associates as you wish.
  2. Send Copies of the “Public Servant” letter (without Instructions) to as many “public servants” as possible. Send to local, State, and Federal governments – police, councilmen, mayors, district attorneys, State and Federal Agencies, Congressman, Senators, judges, lawyers, etc. Anyone in position of “authority.”

Send also to the media – newspapers, news magazines, TV, radio, etc. It is important that those in “power” know what they are doing and that we know that they know.

The point of this is to inform Americans of their extreme plight. We have no more country. It has been stolen – along with our lives, rights, and property. That is not paranoia, exaggeration, or hyperbole. It is the tragic truth. As a result, all “officials” are either fools or knaves, and they should no longer be compled with or the System considered legitimate.

  1. Options

We have been defrauded and conned out of everything – our rights, freedoms, property, and country. We have the following options:

  1. Do Nothing, remain naive-suckers, keep believing the monstrous absurdity that the “government” is our friend, represents us, or we have any ownership of and control over it. In this case we will remain slaves and become ever-increasingly hopeless with each passing instant as our legal entanglements and financial indebtedness grow. The end of this path is ruin.
  2. Trust that those in power, who now own and run the world, will have a change of heart, surrender their wealth and power and give our freedom, property, and rights back to us.
  3. Expect, hope, or pray for divine intervention (how can we expect God to care and do anything if we don’t?)
  4. Try to fight our way out. This is an inferior option, as governments, posing as “protectors,” have bled their people dry to pay for the greatest assemblage of weapons of destruction in world history, which are now arrayed against us.
  5. We can think our way out, wake up from our stupor, take legal/moral measures to withdraw from the System, and not accept any benefits or engage in any involvement with it.

The “Declaration of Independence” Jefferson wrote:

“. . whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, . .” Never has there been a more treacherous and insidious System than that which has conquered this country without Americans even knowing they have been defeated. No one, however, needs any document or other party to justify his own “Declaration of Independence.” Freedom is everyone’s innate right and responsibility. Only each individual has free will over his own life, and an obligation of stewardship for its care.

What sane man would turn over power to strangers to invent and impose the rules by which he is to be made to live? Moreover, no one has any right to delegate or “vote” for any individuals or institutions to exert power over other human beings. Life, death, economy, justice, law, and human fulfillment are at issue. Everyone is consummately justified in questioning the basis of rules imposed on him.

Suggestions for Action:

  1. Read, learn, contact “Patriot” groups for information;
  2. Realize that we have been had. Abandon totally all and every shred of the delusion that the Government is yours, represents your interests, is legitimate, or is anything other than what it actually is: the machinery for administering your permanent conquest, plunder, bankruptcy, and enslavement.
  3. Do not pay any taxes. Every penny you pay in taxes, to your State or the Federal Government, goes to pay the phony, fraudulent “National Debt,” which is unredeemable. Every cent goes to enrich the insatiable coffers of a group of arch-charlatans who have stolen our country and us along with it. All taxes go to finance America’s plunder and subjugation. Instead of 1040’s or other tax forms send a copy of the “Public Servants” letter with a blank tax form.

This letter is the result of many years of legal research. What is stated barley scratches the surface. If you wish to know more, the following books can give you a start:

U.S. of A. the Republic – How You Lost It, How You Get It Back! by Lee Brobst. $15.00 Post-paid. Write: Agro-Bio Systems, POB 1250 Grass Valley, California, 95945;

Conspirator’s Hierarchy – The Committee of 300,

Jack Coleman, 1-800-942-0821;

Secrets of the Federal Reserve (and numerous other books) by Eustace Mullins, Bankers Research Institute, POB 1105, Staunton, Virginia.

RESEARCH MATERIAL TO GET COPIES OF:

  1. Treaties between the United States and others in Geneva, Switzerland from 1928 to 1932.
  2. Minutes of the same meetings as in No. 1, specifically for the year 1930.
  3. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
  4. House Joint Resolution No. 192 of June 5, 1933.
  5. Presidential Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260.
  6. 31 USC 5112 and 5119, and 12 USC 95a.
  7. Case Law to Copy:
  8. Erie R.R. v. Thompkins, (1938)
  9. Perry v. U.S., (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912
  10. Dyett v. Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267
  11. State of Utah v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936 (1975)
  12. Benedicts on Admiralty

Investigate; the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain and any ties to the American Bar Association.

Lawyers’ Secret Oath? An Expose’
http://www.theawaregroup.com/lawyersecretoath.htm

Secret Courts – Secret Law
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretcourts.htm

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE – ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html

HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS AGAINST YOU: http://web.archive.org/web/20010331004334/http://www.divorcehelp.com/SC/C14System.html

FIGA ON LINE: (Hartford Van Dyke Updates) http://web.archive.org/web/20001206021500/earth.vol.com/~rangguid/figja.htm

Comprehensive Destination for Legal Information
http://web.archive.org/web/20001115052500/http://www11.law.com/
America Media Columnists (500) Listed By Names
http://www.blueagle.com/

=========================================

US Star Chambers
THE SECRET COURT IS BOOMING! – “Imagine a secret court made up of anonymous judges chosen by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and empowered to grant wiretaps, approve break-ins, tap psychiatrist’s offices and bug homes — all without probable cause.

“The hearings are conducted in secret without notification of the proposed target and without due process, since the subject of the investigation can’t challenge the evidence or answer the charges brought against them.

“Such a secret court does in fact exist. It was created in 1978 under a law entitled the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, that was designed to limit the abuses of authority made legion by the administration of former President Richard Nixon and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover…”

Hmmmm. Maybe that should read, “…was designed to give the appearance of limiting the abuses of authority made legion by the administration of former President Richard Nixon and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover.”

THE SECRET COURT IS BOOMING!
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/archive5,30,00,6,9,00.htm#THE%20SECRET%20COURT%20IS%20BOOMING!%20[Defendants%20unnamed.]
#THE SECRET COURT IS BOOMING! [Defendants unnamed.]

The Declaration of Independence
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/declaration.htm

******************************

Royal oath soon no bar to lawyers

Tuesday 11 April 2000

Most lawyers can’t wait to start their careers, but Carl Moller has kept his on hold for more than a year on a point of principle. Now he feels his patience has been rewarded.

The Victorian Government has announced that it will change the rules that require law graduates to swear allegiance to the Queen before they can practise. The change means that Mr Moller, a staunch republican who has spent the past year working as a legal clerk because he refused to swear the oath, can now join the ranks of the state’s lawyers.

“This is exciting for me … I’d be a lot happier, of course, if Australia was a republic,” he says.

Mr Moller, 28, was due to be admitted as a solicitor and barrister a year ago when he applied for an exemption from swearing the oath. The Supreme Court refused and the Court of Appeal rejected Mr Moller’s subsequent appeal.

But Attorney-General Rob Hulls has agreed to change the rules, although the reforms are not expected to make it through State Parliament until the spring session.

Mr Moller says that while many of his friends and peers agreed with his views about the oath, they urged him to do the practical thing and “cross his fingers” during the admission ceremony.

That was never an option, the conscientious objector insists. White lies might be OK for some, but he says plenty of people also “see the asset-stripping of companies as an acceptable form of conduct”.

Mr Moller was a government-selected delegate to the Constitutional Convention, but he argues his opposition to the oath has never just been about the republic.

“This is about the solemnity of the oath. You don’t take an oath you don’t believe in. That would be perjury,” he says.

Mr Moller does not see himself as a radical, pointing out that only three other Australian states still require the oath, and that England abolished the requirement in 1868.

“It doesn’t add anything to the practice or the profession … If you are going to impose an oath, it should have meaning and it should have substance. It would be better to have no oath than to have an empty oath,” he says.

Mr Hulls says he has not decided whether to scrap the oath entirely, replace it with an oath of allegiance to Australia, or merely make it optional.

“My department will look at it. I think there are some royalists out there who would still want to swear allegiance. But we’ll have a look at all of the options,” he says.

Mr Moller says he just wants to concentrate on becoming a solicitor with his firm Clayton Utz, which supported him during his campaign. http://web.archive.org/web/20001205001200/http://theage.com.au/news/20000411/A60926-2000Apr10.html

******************************

This document records the official surrender,
on June 7, 1949, of Florida’s third branch of
government, the Supreme Court of Florida,
to a private professional trade group formerly
known as the Florida State Bar Association and
now known as The Florida Bar. This government
takeover set the stage for the present day graft
and corruption now found in Florida’s judicial system:
http://www.ablelegalforms.com/40so2d902.htm

=========================================

TREASON: THE INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY OF THE LAWYERS

TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN

http://www.peoples-rights.com/doc12.htm

“The Law”!

FIVE WORDS AND TEN COMMANDMENTS TO VICTORY:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/thelaw.htm

The Current Federal Court System –
Why you get the run around, and XXXXXX in the end!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/court_sys.htm
Who Is Running America?
http://web.archive.org/web/20020803180803/http://www.nidlink.com/~bobhard/usfraud.html

An Oath is an Oath is an Oath
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/oath.htm

LEGAL DOCUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/US_legal.htm

An Essay on the TRIAL BY JURY 12 Parts
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/trial1.htm

CONFESSIONS OF A JUDGE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Judge.htm

THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/bcolony.htm
The Lawyers Secret Oath
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm
Judge gets orders from England

FEDERAL JUDGE STATES
IN COURT THAT
HE GETS HIS ORDERS
FROM ENGLAND

717-567-7675. 5/98: [quoting]

During the trial of James and Sharon Patterson, (Case 6:97-CR-51) William Wayne Justice, Judge of the United States District Court Texas-Eastern Division when presented with law stated: “I take my orders from
England. This is not a law this court goes by.”

For all of those who did not believe that the United States was under Great Britain here it is straight from the mouth of a Federal Judge. How much more evidence ‘do you need?’ America has never been Free. The Revolutionary war was a fraud perpetrated on the American people. The war’s purpose was to centralize power and make the people easier to control. All Federal Judges, Congressmen, U.S. Attorneys, State Judges, Legislators and most Attorneys know this and are in fact British Agents. Their job is to keep the people in line and to be productive slaves which they (The British Agents) are greatly compensated for. The police do not know that they work for Great Britain they too have been decieved so don’t attack them.

It is time for everyone in America to know the Truth. Let us all work together in exposing the British Empire. Please re-fax and e-mail this release to every Attorney, Judge, and Legislator in your area to let them know they have been unmasked. Please get out your Yellow Pages and start faxing everyone in your area and also read this release over every radio show possible. We have printed thousands of evidence packages and mailed them across America that prove that the United States is a British Colony. It is time to send the British back to England. We must work together because if, we do not. we are all doomed.

Your Friend.

Stephen Kinbol Ames Jr.

For More Information: Stephen Kinbol Ames, c/o P.O. Box 5373. Harrisburg. Pennsylvania 17110

Phone: 717-567-7675; Fax-717-567-2564

(And if one needs any further information, see August 22, 1997issue of Intelligence Review article “Britain’s ‘Invisible’ Empire Unleashes The Dogs of War”) [End quoting]

Here is very good verification or what Hatonn has been telling us all along – “from the horse’s mouth”
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/orders-from-england.htm

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/queen.htm

The 545 People Responsible For All of America’s Woes
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/woes.htm

The Orginal 13th Amendment
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/13th.htm

Was the 14th Amendment Ratified?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/14th.htm

Get That Gold Fringe Off My Flag
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm

War Powers Act 1933
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/1933.htm

Secret Courts – Secret Law
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretcourts.htm

The Oath of Office
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/oathofoffice.htm

 

“YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT”
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/silent.htm

The Federal Reserve Is A privately Owned Corporation
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fed_reserve.htm

Travel As A Right
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/travel.htm

Citizens for Judicial Accountability Inc.
http://www.judicialaccountability.org/

The Bankruptcy of the United States
A 39 part Series of documents, pertaining to:
The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International
Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now
operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers.
and much more… http://www.apfn.net/DOC-100_bankruptcy.htm

U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!

American Patriot Friends Network – apfn@apfn.org

“…a network of net workers…”

APFN Sitemap

APFN Message Board

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

E-Mail: APFN@apfn.org


WHAT HAPPENED TO THE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS?

03/25/2017

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron293.htm

By Ron Ewart
March 22, 2017
NewsWithViews.com

Each week we share lunch with a highly experienced, wise, knowledgeable businessman in his seventies and we talk about the issues that many informed Americans talk about. He reads our articles every week and we discuss the articles as they relate to what is going on in our local, national and global world. He often mentions that we write about what is wrong with America, but we never write about the solutions. To that end this current article addresses his concern.

How did we manage to let life and the solutions to our individual and collective problems become so complicated? How is it that only politicians can take the laws of physics, economics and the principles of freedom and liberty and screw them up so badly? Do we have a national or sovereignty death wish? Do we value freedom so little that we will cast it aside for security, political expediency, a socialist agenda, very costly radical environmental policies that erase our liberties, or a one-world-order that bears no relation to the individual rights under our Constitution? Have we become so naive, ignorant, self-absorbed and apathetic that we would succumb to the propaganda from government, where a handout from them, or a new law, carries with it the handcuffs of slavery?

Name a problem and there is, believe it or not, a fairly simple solution, no matter what psychologists, educators, socialists, radical environmentalists, or government tells you. But as we said in our last article, America is so divided, the simple solutions become less likely.

Take illegal immigration for example. The solution is first to vigorously enforce current law and severely punish employers that employ illegal aliens. The second solution is to build a wall. The third solution is to reverse the insane 14th Amendment Supreme Court decision that allows any foreign national, born on American soil, to become a U. S. citizen. The fourth solution is to put the U. S. Army (or national guard) on the border to protect it, completely, with the threat of physical force for violators. The fifth solution is cut off social, educational and medical benefits to illegal aliens across the board. There should be no benefit for breaking our laws, much less amnesty. This removes the magnets that attract them here in the first place. Then maybe we wouldn’t need a wall. None of these solutions are complicated and we didn’t have to write new laws. Would we give a known burglar the keys to our home, along with everything in the refrigerator and our checkbooks, because we have compassion for him? Hardly! Irrational compassion, thrust down our throats by Progressive do-gooders, will be America’s downfall.

Then there’s energy. There is a simple solution. We have more than enough oil in the Northern Hemisphere that is within our economic and environmentally sensitive grasp to meet our daily needs and be free of foreign oil. Drill for it. Build more refineries to process that oil, if needed. Cut gasoline grades down to about three, no more. Build nuclear and natural gas fired power plants. Build more hydroelectric dams for power, irrigation and flood control. Stop subsidies for ethanol and other uneconomic idiotic solutions and let them die a rapid death before these boondoggles drive our taxes up dramatically and drive our food prices out of reach of the average family, just to please a radical environmentalist. And stop this crazy idea of conserving energy. We don’t need to conserve, we have all the energy we need, if we will just go get it. We need to expand our opportunities and horizons, not limit them. Limits are for losers and whiners. America wasn’t built on limits to creativity and innovation, only limits on government power. Of course we need to continue working on economic energy solutions to replace crude oil. New economic technology will come along if we just let the power of our industry and capitalism operate efficiently and without impediments and constant second-guessing from an out-of-control, heavy-handed, stupid government that screws up everything it touches.

The science is unsettled whether man is causing global warming from CO2 emissions, or the burning of fossil fuels. All the emissions from our gasoline-powered cars, or industry, is most likely not killing the planet, as government and the environmentalists would have us believe. Nevertheless, should we work to diminish pollution, of course? But we should only do so if there is a quantifiable scientifically proven benefit to the cost? Unfortunately, government never thinks in quantifiable benefits.

How about welfare? Remove the subsidies for everyone, except those who demonstrate that they can’t take care of themselves. Any person with two arms, two legs and a functioning brain, in good health, does not need a government subsidy. Once and for all, let’s wean those folks off the government teat and let them learn to stand on their own two feet. Sure it can be tough but we will grow stronger as a nation and stronger as individuals if we do. Phase out Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security over the next 10 to 20 years and get people to plan for their medical care and retirement using private markets. If they don’t plan why should the rest of us have to carry them? The greatest incentive in a free country to responsibility, self-reliance and self-sufficiency is an empty wallet, or a hungry belly. This country is headed for the sheer cliff of bankruptcy if we don’t. If America goes bankrupt, you can kiss freedom and liberty goodbye. In the ensuing chaos, your allegedly benevolent government will just declare martial law and suspend the Constitution. But then, they already suspended the Constitution, haven’t they?

Our educational system has become a monumental, propaganda-driven cesspool. Our kids are being indoctrinated by a curriculum that was designed by psychologists, government socialists, educators, radical environmentalists and the one-world-order crowd. We must return our public schools to LOCAL control immediately and get the state and the Feds out of it before it is too late. Teach facts, not political correctness. Teach real truth, not propaganda. Teach our kids how to think, not how to memorize.

And above all, teach them unabashed individualism. Teach them about individual rights and our Constitutional Republic form of government and why freedom is the best environment in which to solve our problems. Socialism, communism, radical environmentalism, the one world order, multi-culturalism and collectivism will, in the end, destroy us. We are free individuals, not robots unless we let these educated idiots take over every aspect of our lives. All these “isms” will just rob us of our individual, creative power.

As we speak, a serious effort is underway by the Trump Administration to repeal and replace Obama Care. One of our readers said that it should just be repealed, not replaced? His argument is, what business does the federal government have being involved in health care in the first place? He’s right of course, unless Americans want to live in a socialist nation and repeal the Constitution. If the states want or need to take care of their less well off citizens, then it is up to the individual states to institute that care, paid for by state taxpayers, not federal taxpayers. States have to balance their budgets, which forces them to limit their spending. The federal government has no budgetary limits and because of that it can run up trillions in debt, which it has. Further, the federal government builds up huge money-sucking bureaucracies, like Medicare and Obama Care that take a minimum of 20% of taxpayer funds in waste, fraud, abuse and corruption before it ever is granted back to the states.

It’s not complicated. Americans have to ask themselves. Do they want to live in a free society that includes individual freedom and individual choices, or do we abdicate our freedom to a government who will make all of our choices for us?

Now let’s take a look at terrorism. The solution is really quite easy. Simply tell every country that harbors terrorists that end up attacking the United States from their country by one or more of their citizens, will face swift and violent military action to eliminate the threat. Period. They either police their own terrorist or suffer the consequences. That is what we did before to protect Americans and American interests. One of our wiser presidents said; “Talk softly, but carry a big stick” It’s about time his policy was put back into practice.

Finally, one of the simple solutions to limit political corruption is to start holding government officials, in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, accountable by punitive actions that include recalls, impeachment, huge fines and incarceration. If they violate the Constitution, and they do all the time, there must be a price to pay, or there is no deterrent from them continuing to do so. As part of that solution, we need to look for and encourage men and women of principle to run for office and support them with our words, deeds and dollars.

There will always be problems that emanate from natural or man-made events. But honorable, intelligent, innovative, creative people, operating under the banner of constitutional freedom, will always find a solution (and usually a fairly simple one) to those problems, if they are free to seek out those solutions. But if we continue to allow special interest groups and government, at any level, to get in our way, then solutions to problems will always be complicated and always carry with them a huge, totally unnecessary price tag.

In a recent article we said this: “The only answer is not in complexity, but in simplicity and fewer laws. Yes, society needs laws to maintain “reasonable” societal order. But as laws increase, after a certain point, order begins to breakdown under its own weight, as people try to comply with often conflicting and confusing laws, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules. And worse, the more laws there are, the more opportunities for emotionally and financially draining lawsuits between aggrieved parties, egged on by lawyers who make their living off of human weakness and interpreting laws that no one else can understand.”

“There is an inviolate law in nature. Complexity in organisms can lead to the emergence of order. Biological evolution and diversity on Earth is a result of that law. However, it has also been shown that too much complexity in these organisms, in almost all cases, leads to chaos and finally extinction.”

“Ultimately, if we continue on the path we tread, we will become as a rogue spider, spinning a web from which we shall be forever entangled. Could that be our final destination? Are we to choke on and become entrapped by our own obsessive/compulsive drive to complexity, or can we learn from the laws of nature?”

If we choose not to employ economic solutions and vigorously defend our freedom, liberty and property rights, our individual freedom will become extinct. There are always reasonable, viable and economic solutions to our problems, if we don’t let politics and special interests get in the way.

 

For some simple solutions, check out our “18 Principles for America” that are patterned after the U. S. Constitution. They represent a simple blue print to solve our individual and collective problems. We open these 18 Principles with the following statement:

“Government today and probably throughout history, due to human failings, has been, is and always will be about “power”, but very seldom about “principle”. However, if we choose to avoid principle, we do so at our own peril. This great land of ours could easily share the same fate unless we return to these principles, for which millions of brave men and women have sacrificed their lives, their limbs and their minds to defend.”

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues and author of this weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America“. Ron is the president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) (www.narlo.org), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, acting as an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. Affiliated NARLO websites are “SAVE THE USA” and “Getting Even With Government” . Ron can be reached for comment HERE.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org


Reasons Billionaire David Rockefeller Won’t Be Missed

03/22/2017

http://www.trueactivist.com/5-reasons-billionaire-david-rockefeller-wont-be-missed/

By True Activist

With New World Order kingpin David Rockefeller dead, here’s a look at the top 5 reasons why he was one of the most despised people on Earth and won’t be missed.

By: Aaron Kesel / We Are Change   With New World Order kingpin David Rockefeller dead, here’s a look at the top 5 reasons why he was one of the most despised people on Earth and won’t be missed.

  1. Founder Of Several Secret Societies

David Rockefeller was a huge part of virtually every secret society of ultra rich on the planet. He was not just a member of the Council Of Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group – he was reportedly the founder. Through these secret societies and others like the occult Bohemian Grove club, Rockefeller conspired to control the media and governments around the world to establish his goal towards a one world government, even once thanking the media for its complicity.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.” He went on to explain: “It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries,” David Rockefeller, said speaking at the June 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany.

  1. Population Control

Rockefeller is no stranger to the agenda of population control. In a speech on September 14, 1994, during the Annual Ambassadors’ Dinner, he discussed how the U.N. should sustain the world’s population, noting that improved public health has caused global life expectancy to rise from 46 years in the 1960s to 60 years at the time. ‘Stabilizing the population’ – as Rockefeller called it – actually meant sterilization, vaccinations, encouraging abortions, using food as a weapon, and viewing disease and war as a means of “correction” to stop population growth.

  1. Rockefeller Foundation was behind unethical experiments on the population

Following up from Rockefeller’s own speech, we have the fact that the Rockefeller Institute was allegedly behind unethical experiments on the population. A few include infecting Guatemalans with STDs, sponsoring a plot by Dr. Cornelius P. Rhoads to infect Puerto Ricans with cancer, an allegation which Rhoads strongly denied and dismissed as a joke.

David Rockefeller joined the Rockefeller Institute board of trustees in 1940, was its chairman from 1950 to 1975, chaired the board’s executive committee from 1975 to 1995, and became honorary chairman and life trustee.

  1. Globalist Connections

Through his influence in various secret societies, Rockefeller established himself as one of the globalists’ main front men. Rockefeller and his affiliates had also admittedly been working against USA interests and setting up a one-world political and economic structure (New World Order). In his book “Memoirs,” Rockefeller admitted to being part of a “secret cabal” of people doing just this:

The Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have specifically been working together in tandem to create means for depopulation through the use of vaccines. Check out the video below of Bill Gates talking about how this could be done. Gates and Rockefeller are both confirmed Bilderberg attendees and could have been collaborating together knowingly.

Additionally, the CIA and Rockefeller family also have a history working together, specifically in regards to the handling of classified information.

The CIA had used the Rockefeller’s barn as a vault to store 327 TOP SECRET and SCI documents covering a variety of topics and even suggested giving Mrs. Rockefeller a top level security clearance. The documents were later moved to the Ford Presidential Library.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BobKXkrt8M

  1. Worldwide Influence

A major study from the Global Policy Forum linked the Rockefeller Foundation as using their money and power to control health and agricultural policies around the globe. Calling them “driving forces behind global multi-stakeholder partnerships, the Global Policy forum says that the “mushrooming of global partnerships and vertical funds… has led to isolated and often poorly coordinated solutions” which they claim have “contributed to the institutional weakening of the United Nations… [and] undermined the implementation of integrated development strategies at national level.”

In short, we know that Rockefeller’s influence at least in the realms of health and agricultural stretched across the globe. Then there is also the issue of the international banking system whose influence spans throughout the world. The Rockefeller family has been labeled as one of the driving actors in this field as well.

After a 1973 trip to China, David Rockefeller praised communist dictator Mao Tse-tung – who had slaughtered over 40 million people. Who knows how many people died at the hands of people financed by David Rockefeller?

 

 


Stealing from the Citizenry: How Government Goons Use Civil Asset Forfeiture to Rob Us Blind

03/21/2017

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f6eb78f457b7b82887b643445&id=3b760e32f2&e=84f74f6a6a

By John W. Whitehead

“Civil forfeiture laws represent one of the most serious assaults on private property rights in the nation today. Under civil forfeiture, police and prosecutors can seize your car or other property, sell it and use the proceeds to fund agency budgets—all without so much as charging you with a crime. Unlike criminal forfeiture, where property is taken after its owner has been found guilty in a court of law, with civil forfeiture, owners need not be charged with or convicted of a crime to lose homes, cars, cash or other property. Americans are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but civil forfeiture turns that principle on its head.  With civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent.”—“ Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture,” Institute for Justice

In jolly old England, Robin Hood stole from the rich to give to the poor.

In modern-day America, greedy government goons steal from the innocent to give to the corrupt under court- and legislature-sanctioned schemes called civil asset forfeiture. In fact, according to The Washington Post, “law enforcement took more stuff from people than burglars did.”

This is how the American police state continues to get rich: by stealing from the citizenry.

Here’s how the whole ugly business works in a nutshell.

First, government agents (usually the police) use a broad array of tactics to profile, identify, target and arrange to encounter (in a traffic stop, on a train, in an airport, in public, or on private property) those  individuals who might be traveling with a significant amount of cash or possess property of value. Second, these government agents—empowered by the courts and the legislatures—seize private property (cash, jewelry, cars, homes and other valuables) they “suspect” may be connected to criminal activity.

Then—and here’s the kicker—whether or not any crime is actually proven to have taken place, without any charges being levied against the property owner, or any real due process afforded the unlucky victim, the property is forfeited to the government, which often divvies it up with the local police who helped with the initial seizure.

It’s a new, twisted form of guilt by association.

Only it’s not the citizenry being accused of wrongdoing, just their money.

What this adds up to is a paradigm in which Americans no longer have to be guilty to be stripped of their property, rights and liberties. All you have to be is in possession of something the government wants.

Motorists have been particularly vulnerable to this modern-day form of highway robbery.

For instance, police stole $201,000 in cash from Lisa Leonard because the money—which Leonard planned to use to buy a house for her son—was being transported on a public highway also used by drug traffickers. Despite the fact that Leonard was innocent of wrongdoing, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the theft on a technicality.

Police stole $50,000 in cash from Amanee Busbee—which she planned to use to complete the purchase of a restaurant—and threatened to hand her child over to CPS if she resisted. She’s one of the few to win most of her money back in court.

Police stole $22,000 in cash from Jerome Chennault—which he planned to use as the down payment on a home—simply because a drug dog had alerted police to its presence in his car. After challenging the seizure in court, Chennault eventually succeeded in having most of his money returned, although the state refused to compensate him for his legal and travel expenses.

Police stole $8,500 in cash and jewelry from Roderick Daniels—which he planned to use to purchase a new car—and threatened him with jail and money-laundering charges if he didn’t sign a waiver forfeiting his property.

Police stole $6,000 in cash from Jennifer Boatright and Ron Henderson and threatened to turn their young children over to Child Protective Services if they resisted.

Tenaha, Texas, is a particular hotbed of highway forfeiture activity, so much so that police officers keep pre-signed, pre-notarized documents on hand so they can fill in what property they are seizing.

As the Huffington Post explains, these police forfeiture operations have become little more than criminal shakedowns:

Police in some jurisdictions have run forfeiture operations that would be difficult to distinguish from criminal shakedowns. Police can pull motorists over, find some amount of cash or other property of value, claim some vague connection to illegal drug activity and then present the motorists with a choice: If they hand over the property, they can be on their way. Otherwise, they face arrest, seizure of property, a drug charge, a probable night in jail, the hassle of multiple return trips to the state or city where they were pulled over, and the cost of hiring a lawyer to fight both the seizure and the criminal charge. It isn’t hard to see why even an innocent motorist would opt to simply hand over the cash and move on.

Unsurprisingly, these asset forfeiture scams have become so profitable for the government that they have expanded their reach beyond the nation’s highways.

According to USA Today, the U.S. Department of Justice received $2.01 billion in forfeited items in 2013, and since 2008 local and state law enforcement nationwide has raked in some $3 billion in forfeitures through the federal “equitable sharing” program.

So now it’s not just drivers who have to worry about getting the shakedown.

Any American unwise enough to travel with significant amounts of cash is fair game for the government pickpockets.

In fact, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been colluding with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and local police departments to seize a small fortune in cash from American travelers using the very tools—scanners, spies and surveillance devices—they claimed were necessary to catch terrorists.

Mind you, TSA agents already have a reputation for stealing from travelers, but clearly the government is not concerned about protecting the citizenry from its own wolfish tendencies.

No, the government isn’t looking to catch criminals. It’s just out for your cold, hard cash.

As USA Today reports, although DEA agents have seized more than $203 million in cash in airports alone since 2006, they almost never make arrests or build criminal cases in connection to the seized cash.

For instance, DEA agents at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport stole $11,000 in cash from college student Charles Clarke—his entire life savings, in fact—simply because they claimed his checked suitcase smelled like marijuana. Apart from the sniff test, no drugs or evidence of criminal activity were found.

Christelle Tillerson was waiting to board a flight from Detroit to Chicago when DEA agents stole $25,000 in cash from her suitcase, money she planned to use to buy a truck. Tillerson was never arrested or charged

Joseph Rivers was traveling on an Amtrak train from Michigan to Los Angeles when police stole $16,000 in cash in a bank envelope—money the 22-year-old had saved up to produce a music when he arrived in Hollywood—based solely on their groundless suspicions that the money could have been associated with drugs.

How does the government know which travelers to target?

Through surveillance of Americans’ domestic travel records, by profiling train and airport passengers, and by relying on a “network of travel-industry informants that extends from ticket counters to back offices.” In one instance, the DEA actually promised to give a TSA security screener a reward for identifying luggage with large sums of cash: the more cash found, the bigger the reward.

Starting to notice a pattern?

First, the government claims it needs more powers and more weapons in order to fight crime and terrorism: the power to spy on Americans’ communications and travel; the ability to carry out virtual and actual strip searches of Americans’ luggage, persons and property; the authority to stop and interrogate travelers for any reason in the name of national security.

Then, when government agents have been given enough powers and weapons to transform them into mini-tyrants, they’re unleashed on an unsuspecting citizenry with few resources to be able to defend themselves or protect their property.

So much for those long-cherished ideals about the assumption of innocence and due process.

For example, the federal government attempted to confiscate Russell Caswell’s family-owned Tewksbury, Massachusetts, motel, insisting that because a small percentage of the motel’s guests had been arrested for drug crimes—15 out of 200,000 visitors in a 14-year span—the motel was a dangerous property. As Reason reports:

This cruel surprise was engineered by Vincent Kelley, a forfeiture specialist at the Drug Enforcement Administration who read about the Motel Caswell in a news report and found that the property, which the Caswells own free and clear, had an assessed value of $1.3 million. So Kelley approached the Tewksbury Police Department with an “equitable sharing” deal: The feds would seize the property and sell it, and the cops would get up to 80 percent of the proceeds.

Thankfully, with the help of a federal judge, Caswell managed to keep his motel out of the government’s clutches, but others are not so fortunate.

Gerald and Royetta Ostipow had their Michigan farm and property seized, including a classic muscle car, and then sold by the local sheriff’s office. As USA Today reports:

The Ostipows were required to provide a $150,000 cash bond before they could begin the legal proceedings to contest the forfeiture and get their property back. But they couldn’t afford to. An appeals court later overturned the Ostipow’s hefty bond requirement… But the ruling didn’t stop the nightmare for the couple who were never charged with a crime. They still had to win a court case seeking the return of hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of property taken from the Ostipow’s rural Michigan home, including a cherished classic car. Eventually, an appeals court found that the property was wrongly forfeited. But it was too later to recover the car. With the odometer mysteriously bearing an additional 56,000 miles, police had already sold the car and spent the proceeds.

Despite the fact that 80 percent of these asset forfeiture cases result in no charge against the property owner, challenging these “takings” in court can cost the owner more than the value of the confiscated property itself. As a result, most property owners either give up the fight or chalk the confiscation up to government corruption, leaving the police and other government officials to reap the benefits.

Under a federal equitable sharing program, police turn asset forfeiture cases over to federal agents who process seizures and then return 80% of the proceeds to the police. Michigan police actually get to keep up to 100% of forfeited property.

This is what has become known as “policing for profit.”

According to USA Today, “Anecdotal evidence suggests that allowing departments to keep forfeiture proceeds may tempt them to use the funds unwisely. For example, consider a 2015 scandal in Romulus, Michigan, where police officers used funds forfeited from illicit drug and prostitution stings to pay for …  illicit drugs and prostitutes.”

Police agencies have also used their ill-gotten gains “to buy guns, armored cars and electronic surveillance gear,” reports The Washington Post. “They have also spent money on luxury vehicles, travel and a clown named Sparkles.”

So what’s to be done?

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we are now ruled by a government so consumed with squeezing every last penny out of the population as to be completely unconcerned if essential freedoms are trampled in the process.

Our freedoms aren’t just being trampled, however.

They’re being eviscerated.

At every turn, “we the people” are getting swindled, cheated, conned, robbed, raided, pickpocketed, mugged, deceived, defrauded, double-crossed and fleeced by governmental and corporate shareholders of the American police state out to make a profit at taxpayer expense.

President Trump has made it clear his loyalties lie with the police, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has previously declared his love for civil asset forfeiture, the Supreme Court keeps marching in lockstep with the police state, and the police unions don’t want their gravy train to go away, so there’s not much hope for federal reform anytime soon.

As always, change will have to begin locally and move upwards.

Some state legislatures (Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Ohio) are beginning to push back against these clearly unconstitutional asset forfeiture schemes. As the National Review reports, “New Mexico now requires a criminal conviction before law enforcement can seize property, while police in Florida must prove “beyond reasonable doubt” that property is linked to a crime before it’s seized.”

More than legislative change, however, what we need is a change of mindset on the part of the citizenry. We need to stop acting like victims and start acting like citizens with rights.

Remember, long before Americans charted their revolutionary course in pursuit of happiness, it was “life, liberty, and property” which constituted the golden triad of essential rights that the government was charged with respecting and protecting.

To the colonists, smarting from mistreatment at the hands of the British crown, protecting their property from governmental abuse was just as critical as preserving their lives and liberties. As the colonists understood, if the government can arbitrarily take away your property, you have no true rights: you’re nothing more than a serf or a slave.

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was born of this need to safeguard against any attempt by the government to unlawfully deprive a citizen of the right to life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Little could our ancestral forebears have imagined that it would take less than three centuries of so-called “independence” to once again render us brow-beaten subjects in bondage to an overlord bent on depriving us of our most inalienable and fundamental rights.

Yet if the government can arbitrarily freeze, seize or lay claim to your property (money, land or possessions) under government asset forfeiture schemes, you have no true rights.

Enough is enough.

This commentary is also

available at http://www.rutherford.org.

ABOUT JOHN WHITEHEAD

Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at http://www.amazon.com. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org. Click here to read more of John Whitehead’s commentaries.

PUBLICATION GUIDELINES AND REPRINT PERMISSION

John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact staff@rutherford.org to obtain reprint permission. Click here to download a print quality image of John W. Whitehead.


About Oaths, Offices, and Civics — “For Court of Record”

03/20/2017
http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/about-oaths-offices-and-civics-for.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29


By Anna Von Reitz

You presume–wrongly, that I designed the oath you took and that I took the same oath.  Not so.  I live in Alaska.  Hello?

The Alaska State Oath is what I took as an oath to serve as an Alaska State Justice, and that is the course I have always recommended to everyone regarding any state court office: take the oath of office required for the land jurisdiction state where you live.  Look it up in the early Session Laws of your state.

How could there be any such thing as a One-Size-Fits-All Oath for all fifty states at the state level?

And yes, if that is what you’ve done, then you have all done it wrong and need to go back and do it right.

I am well and truly stymied how anyone could ever think that they could occupy a state office without taking the public office oath for that state.

I am also well and truly amazed that you think such an office as “Superior Court Judge of the united States of America” exists.

If you missed every civics lesson, every U.S. History lesson, every World History lesson, all of it from third grade onward, how in creation could you miss the fact that there are fifty nation-states?

Earth to “Court of Record”…..Earth to “Court of Record”…… Hello, Houston, we’ve got a problem here….

I am sorry if you have been cheated by the public school system and I am sorry if I have failed to properly address questions that apparently
everyone had, but to be fair to me, nobody asked—- and I thought it was obvious.

Also, I assure you that I am very, very far from being the “first declared de jure judge of the Federal Postal District”.

Up until about sixty years ago what we called “Federal Marshals” and “Federal Courts” were common as dirt and almost all our courts functioned as land jurisdiction courts. It wasn’t until crooks took over the administration of the United States Government and refined their racket to an art back in the 1930’s that the court system owed to the people of this country was quietly usurped by quasi-military tribunals operated under the Reconstruction Acts and private bill collection agencies operated under color of law.

The corruption is bad, “Court of Record”—- and that I will grant, as I have been one of the chief commentators on the subject for a long time, but it seems to me that while the corruption threatens us on one side, our own ignorance cripples us on the other, and if you are going to be an effective defender of this country and the people who live here, you need to go back and study very basic information about the history and government of both.

Start by looking at a political map of the United States and really grasping the fact that those are fifty separate little nations, just like Germany and Italy and France are separate nations.  They all have their own history, their own laws called “Session Laws” –not “Statutes”—and their own offices. Our power lies in the land jurisdiction states.  That is where the people of this country have their vested sovereignty.  And it is only through the actual states that we can apply the Checks and Balances necessary to reform the runaway criminal empire spiraling out of control in the District of Columbia.

Now look at the big familiar outline of the whole United States— that whole thing is represented internationally by two entities: the United States which is responsible for exercising the nineteen enumerated “powers” delegated to it under the actual Constitution, and the United States of America which is responsible for exercising the “undelegated powers” that were retained by the states and the people.

That probably sounds like gobbledygook to you at this moment, but read it over a few times and ponder — “United States” is not the same as the “United States of America”.  Say it several times out loud.

Now get a copy of the Constitution and read it with the understanding that this document set up the so-called United States as a foreign entity on our shores to provide the nineteen government services that the states delegated to it.  The Constitution doesn’t say nary a word about our court system, because that wasn’t the subject of the Constitution.  The Constitution sets up the U.S. Court System which is foreign to us and which is designed to only address Maritime and Admiralty issues (because under the Constitution that is the only jurisdiction granted to the U.S. Courts) and its own in-house administrative courts which are designed to deal with its own employees.

You are now on your way to a firm, basic understanding of who is who and what is what.

If you want to fight corruption, you have to be able to recognize what the healthy, lawful, fully restored government of the states and the people looks like, how it is designed to function, how it is organized, and where your own power lies sleeping within it.

Listen, learn, ask questions, and don’t be afraid to correct mistakes.  If you took the wrong oath, take the right one.  If you didn’t understand the unique nature and importance of your actual state government, go back and learn.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


“There is No Safety You Dumb Bitch” – The Hound

03/18/2017

http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/there-is-no-safety-you-dumb-bitch-the-hound/

THE DAILY BELL

By Joe Jarvis

Take heed of The Hound’s warning, and let it free you. There is no guarantee of a job or safety net, there is no absolute security from evil doers, and there is only so much you can do to prevent accidents and illness. The silver lining is that recognizing this is the best way to cushion yourself from the vulnerabilities of an unpredictable world.

Brienne of Tarth, in Game of Thrones, is noble in her cause, and intends to uphold an oath she swore to Lady Stark to keep her children safe. But she is also a bit naive about the nature of the world in which she lives.

Brienne thinks she can bring Arya to a safe place, wherever that is. But as The Hound so eloquently reminds her:

“There is no safety you dumb bitch. And if you don’t know that by now, you’re the wrong one to watch over her.”

If Brienne thinks she can ever let her guard down, or relax, she will never be safe. There is no destination at which point she and Arya will be ultimately secure. It just does not exist.

And Sandor Clegane–The Hound–is right; if Brienne of Tarth cannot understand this basic fact about the world, she is not capable of keeping Arya safe.

The Hound’s negative view on the danger of the world actually leaves him less vulnerable. He never expects to be safe, and is therefore safer because he is alert to danger.

As rough and tumble as the Hound is, Arya was in fact safe the entire time she was with him. This was no guarantee, its just how it happened, mostly due to the fact that The Hound knows there is no safety to be had, except by vigilance in every moment.

There is no safe place, there is no safe time, and there are no safe people to be with. This keeps him alert and in a secure position to deal with threats.

And although Brienne’s goal is to make Arya even safer, she instead severely wounds the person protecting Arya. Brienne incorrectly judges The Hound to be a danger to Arya, and then fails to secure Arya, leaving her more defenseless than she had been previously.

And through this interaction, Brienne actually proves The Hound’s point. Brienne’s desire to bring Arya to safety created a dangerous situation that could have been avoided if she only realized that safety is a constant effort, and not a destination.

Should We Apply a Lesson From a Fake Story in a Mythical Setting?

In the modern world we are much safer than humans were in the middle ages. And in the real world there are certain things we don’t have to worry about, like white-walkers and dragons.

But unfortunately we do still have to contend with the likes of Cersi and the Lannisters, the Ramsy Boltons, and the treacherous Freys all playing their part in our own “Game of Thrones”.

In our lives, they are usually less murdery and slightly more taciturn in their elitist desire for domination.

The lesson however remains: there is no guarantee of safety (you dumb bitch).

But before you think I am being gloomy and pessimistic, consider the gift of understanding this realization.

In the pursuit of the ultimate goal of “safety” we expose ourselves and society to all sorts of dangers.

For instance, Trump just authorized the CIA to carry out drone strikes without any oversight. Obama had been carrying out drone strikes for years before that, and Bush before him had invaded countries. All of this is supposedly to make us safe. All it really did was create terrorists and pour fuel on the fire when innocent civilians get murdered by the USA’s bombs.

Would there still be terrorists and crazy people without all that provocation? Yes, I’m sure. But the numbers would most likely be lower, and we could focus on actual defense instead of offensive eradication of the source, which only grows the threat.

It is important to understand that in this world, and in this life, there is no destination. Everything is fluid, and constantly changing. We like to imagine a time in the future when we are secure, safe, comfortable, happy and just generally all set.

But the desire for a finish line is elusive; instead we must constantly extract all these things from our daily lives. Safety is no different. Happiness is a lifestyle, as if comfort, security, and yes, safety.

Safety is all relative. We can certainly do things that make us safer, and we can put ourselves at undue risk.

And this goes as much for economics as for physical safety. Don’t expect Social Security to be there for you, have a backup plan. State pensions are on just as shaky ground. Don’t assume large cash holdings are all you need. There is no guarantee that any one currency, stock, or bond remains stable. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, including streams of income, and have a backup plan for worst case scenarios.

At the end of the day, safety comes down to vigilance. Unless you are constantly on alert to those things which threaten your safety, you will be taken by surprise.

How Safety Relates to Liberty

It doesn’t really matter if the person making you less safe is Brienne of Tarth or Cersi Lannister. Cersi, in a sense, is safer to be around, because you understand that she is dangerous, and can protect yourself.

But how can you protect yourself from someone who thinks they have your best interests at heart, whether you like it or not?

Some people will have noble goals and try to force you into their “safe” world that they have flawlessly designed for security. Their ignorance makes you just as vulnerable as Cersi’s malevolence.

We must each be at liberty to look after our own safety. Others will offer us ultimate safety, utopia, and uninterrupted security that we can just accept and then forget about. This will lead us down a path of naivety, ignorance, and vulnerability.

Whether those who lure you into the false sense of security are doing so because their goals are noble, or because their motives are nefarious hardly matters.

To riff off Benjamin Franklin, if you give up liberty in the pursuit of safety, you will get neither.


 Solutions? You Guys Want SOLUTIONS???

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/solutions-you-guys-want-solutions.html

 

By Anna Von Reitz

Solutions? You Guys Want SOLUTIONS?

Well, how about this?

The court system is messed up because it has been turned into a giant debt collection agency run by the creditors of the Federal Government and its “State of State” franchises.

The rest of the story is that they are collecting on fraudulent debts–debts that (1) don’t exist for the most part and (2) aren’t your debts.

Moreover, these courts are being run as quasi-military tribunals in military districts, under the pretense that the “American Civil War” was ever an actual war.

It wasn’t. It was never Declared by the actual Congress and no Peace Treaty ending it exists, either. It was and is nothing but an illegal commercial mercenary operation on our shores that has been enforced and promoted by disloyal military commanders and criminals in Congress and clueless Presidents.

So, given the fact that these “courts” are foreign military tribunals here on our soil as the result of an illegal and immoral commercial mercenary action now 150 years old— and that they are collecting on debts that are odious and fraudulent by nature…..

And given the fact that Donald Trump is now the “Commander in Chief” and able to order the District Commanders to shut these so-called courts down and reopen the courts we are owed….

Why not light a firecracker up Commander-in-Chief Trump’s rump and suggest that he do so, post haste?  Tell him that Judge Anna can show him precisely how and when this system got set up and how it has been abused, and what his power is with respect to ending the hideous mockery that “stands for” a court system in this country right now.

Olddogs Comment!

Any one looking for help from the enemy is peeing in the wind, and D.C. is the heart of the monster. Trump is surrounded by people who would jump off a cliff before allowing him to know the truth. And if he should wise up he is toast. It is up to the people to grow a set and take their country back!


Things We DON’T Have to Research AGAIN

03/17/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/things-we-dont-have-to-research-again.html

By Anna Von Reitz

It has come to my attention that patriotic Americans all over this country are spending time and resources delving into things that have already been delved into and explicitly determined with exactitude and proof.  In the interests of saving a lot of unnecessary effort, I am publishing a list of topics we have firmly and well in hand already.

 

  1. The existence of the original constitution called The Constitution for the united States of America.
  2. The existence of the “original” 13th Amendment, called the Titles of Nobility Amendment.
  3. The current status of the Reclamation Acts (still mostly in force).
  4. The non-existence of a Declaration of War commencing the so-called American Civil War.
  5. The non-existence of a Peace Treaty ending the American Civil War.
  6. The destruction by operation of Law of the original Confederation of States.
  7. The publication of a new “Federal Constitution” called “The Constitution of the United States of America” in 1868, applying to a union of corporate franchises operated as States of States.
  8. The unlawful forced conversion of 11 Southern state legislatures following the Civil War.
  9. The unlawful forced adoption of new “state” constitutions following the Civil War and the usurpation of the original States of America by federal franchises operated as States of States under the same or deceitfully similar names.
  10. The unlawful forced adoption of new names in the form “California State” to designate land jurisdiction states.
  11. The fact that neither the United States nor the United States of America have ever been sovereign nations.  Both have always been associations or federations or confederations of sovereign nations.  Our states of the union are the only sovereign nations here.
  12. Our nationality is based on our states— Texans, Wisconsinites, Minnesotans, etc.
  13. The fact that the required ratification of amendments to the Federal Constitution including the 14th and 16th Amendments by the member states never took place.
  14. The fact that Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Governors of the “States of States” acting as franchises of the United States of America worked a constructive bankruptcy fraud against the actual land jurisdiction states and the American people.
  15. The fact that the Federal Reserve has mercilessly and fraudulently bilked and made false claims in commerce against the American states and people since 1913.
  16. The fact that the members of Congress have served themselves and promoted usurpation against the actual states and people of America.

I am sure there are more topics that have been nailed down already that I am presently not mentioning, but all these above have been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here

www.annavonreitz.com


Rule by Thieves One Week in the Life of the American Kleptocracy

03/16/2017

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f6eb78f457b7b82887b643445&id=fba3480350&e=84f74f6a6a

 By John W. Whitehead
March 13, 2017

“The first and most important thing to understand about politics is this: forget Right, Left, Center, socialism, fascism, or democracy. Every government that exists — or ever existed, or ever will exist — is a kleptocracy, meaning ‘rule by thieves.’ Competing ideologies merely provide different excuses to separate the Productive Class from what they produce. If the taxpayer/voters won’t willingly fork over to end poverty, then maybe they’ll cough up to fight drugs or terrorism. Conflicting ideologies, as presently constituted, are nothing more than a cover for what’s really going on, like the colors of competing gangs.” — Author L. Neil Smith

The American kleptocracy (a government ruled by thieves) continues to suck the American people down a rabbit hole into a parallel universe in which the Constitution is meaningless, the government is all-powerful, and the citizenry is powerless to defend itself against government agents who steal, spy, lie, plunder, kill, abuse and generally inflict mayhem and sow madness on everyone and everything in their sphere.

Case in point: in the same week that Wikileaks dropped its bombshell about the CIA’s use of spy tools to subject law-abiding Americans to all manner of government surveillance and hacking—a revelation that caused barely a ripple of concern among the citizenry—the government quietly and with little fanfare continued to wage its devastating, stomach-churning, debilitating war on the American people.

Incredibly, hardly anyone noticed.

This begs the question: if the government is overstepping its authority, abusing its power, and disregarding the rule of law but no one seems to notice—and no one seems to care—does it matter if the government has become a tyrant?

Here’s my short answer: when government wrongdoing ceases to matter, America will have ceased to be.

Just consider the devastation wrought in one week in the life of our American kleptocracy:

On Monday, March 6, police were given the go-ahead to keep stealing from Americans who were innocent of any wrongdoing.

In refusing to hear a challenge to Texas’ asset forfeiture law, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed Texas police to keep $201,000 in ill-gotten cash primarily on the basis that the seized cash—the proceeds of a home sale—was being transported on a highway associated with illegal drug trade, despite any proof of illegal activity by the owner. Asset forfeiture laws, which have come under intense scrutiny and criticism in recent years, allow the police to seize property “suspected” of being connected to criminal activity without having to prove the owner of the property is guilty of a criminal offense.

On April 1, 2013, James Leonard was driving with a companion, Nicosa Kane, on U.S. Highway 59 in Texas when the vehicle was stopped by a state police officer for allegedly speeding and following another vehicle too closely. A subsequent search of the vehicle disclosed a safe in the trunk, which Leonard explained belonged to his mother, Lisa Leonard, and contained cash. When the police officer contacted Lisa Leonard, she confirmed that the safe’s contents belonged to her, that the contents constituted personal business, and that she would not consent to allowing the officer to open the safe. After police secured a search warrant, the safe was opened and found to contain $201,000 and a bill of sale for a home in Pennsylvania.

Neither the Leonards nor Kane were found to be in possession of illegal drugs. However, the state initiated civil forfeiture proceedings against the $201,100 on the ground that it was substantially connected to criminal activity because Highway 59 is reputed to be a drug corridor. At trial, Lisa Leonard testified that the money was being sent to Texas so that she could use it to purchase a home for her son and Kane. Both the trial and appeals courts affirmed the authority of state officials to seize and keep Leonard’s funds under the state’s asset forfeiture law, basing their ruling on wholly circumstantial evidence and the reputation of Highway 59. Leonard then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to compel Texas to return her money, given that she was innocent of any crime. In refusing to hear the case on a technicality, the Supreme Court turned its back on justice and allowed the practice of policing for profit to continue.

On Tuesday, March 7, hacked information about the surveillance state was met with a collective shrug by the public, a sign of how indifferent the citizenry has become to living in an electronic concentration camp.

Wikileaks confirmed what we’ve suspected all along: the government’s ability to spy on law-abiding Americans is far more invasive than what we’ve been told. According to the Wikileaks Vault 7 data dump, government agencies such as the CIA and the NSA have been spying on the citizenry through our smart TVs, listening in on our phone calls, hacking into our computerized devices (including our cars), and compromising our security systems through the use of Trojan horses, spyware and malware.

As this Wikileaks revelation confirms, we now have a fourth branch of government. This fourth branch came into being without any electoral mandate or constitutional referendum, and yet it possesses superpowers, above and beyond those of any other government agency save the military. It is all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful. It operates beyond the reach of the president, Congress and the courts, and it marches in lockstep with the corporate elite who really call the shots in Washington, DC.

You might know this branch of government as Surveillance, but I prefer “technotyranny,” a term coined by investigative journalist James Bamford to refer to an age of technological tyranny made possible by government secrets, government lies, government spies and their corporate ties. Beware of what you say, what you read, what you write, where you go, and with whom you communicate, because it will all be recorded, stored and used against you eventually, at a time and place of the government’s choosing.

Privacy, as we have known it, is dead.

On Wednesday, March 8, police were given further incentives to use the “fear for my life” rationale as an excuse for shooting unarmed individuals.

Upon arriving on the scene of a nighttime traffic accident, an Alabama police officer shot a driver exiting his car, mistakenly believing the wallet in his hand to be a gun. From the time the driver stumbled out of his car, waving his wallet in the air, to the time he was shot in the abdomen, only six seconds had elapsed. Although the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded “that a reasonable officer in Hancock’s position would have feared for his life,” the video footage makes clear that the courts continue to march in lockstep with the police, because no reasonable person would shoot first and ask questions later.

A report by the Justice Department on police shootings in Philadelphia, which boasts the fourth largest police department in the country, found that half of the unarmed people shot by police over a seven-year span were “shot because the officer saw something (like a cellphone) or some action (like a person pulling at the waist of their pants) and misidentified it as a threat.”

What exactly are we teaching these young officers in the police academy when the slightest thing, whether it be a hand in a pocket, a man running towards them, a flashlight on a keychain, a wallet waved in a hand, or a dehumanizing stare can ignite a strong enough “fear for their safety” to justify doing whatever is deemed necessary to neutralize the threat, even if it means firing on an unarmed person?

On Thursday, March 9, police were given even more leeway in how much damage they can inflict on those they serve and the extent to which they can disregard the Constitution.  

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a police officer who allowed a police dog to maul a homeless man innocent of any wrongdoing. The case arose in 2010 after a police dog attacked a homeless man near an abandoned house where police were tracking a robbery suspect. The cop refused to call off the dog immediately, despite the man’s pleading and the fact that he did not match the description of the robbery suspect. The homeless man suffered deep bites on his hand, arm and thigh, that required a nearly 16-inch skin graft, as well as severe bleeding, bruising, swelling and an arterial blood clot. Incredibly, not only did the court declare that the police officer was protected by qualified immunity, which incentivizes government officials to violate constitutional rights without fear of repercussion, but it had the nerve to suggest that being mauled by a police dog is the equivalent of a lawful Terry stop in which police may stop and hold a person for questioning on the basis of “reasonable suspicion.”

Also on March 9, government officials assured the Michigan Supreme Court that there was nothing unlawful, unreasonable or threatening about the prospect of armed police dressed in SWAT gear knocking on doors at 4 a.m. and “asking” homeowners to engage in warrantless “knock-and-talk” sessions. Although government lawyers insist citizens can choose to say no to such heavy-handed requests by police to conduct unwarranted interrogations, if such coercive tactics are allowed, it would give SWAT teams further incentive to further terrorize anyone even remotely—or mistakenly—suspected of wrongdoing without fear of repercussion.

On Friday, March 10, the military industrial complex continued to wage war abroad, while government agencies, including members of the military, remained embroiled in controversies over sexual misconduct.

A day after military brass defended the U.S.-led raid in Yemen that killed 10 children and at least six women, Gen. Joseph Votel, the head of U.S. Central Command, informed members of Congress that even more U.S. troops were needed in Afghanistan to combat the Taliban. Some 8400 American troops have been stationed in Afghanistan since the U.S. invaded the country post 9/11. Approximately 400 more Marines are being sent to Syria to aid U.S. forces in their fight against ISIS.

That same day, news reports indicated that members of several branches of the U.S. military, including the Marines, have been using online bulletin boards to either share or solicit nude or explicit photos and videos of women in the military. One Facebook page for Marines, which has nearly 30,000 followers, contained graphic language about how the women photographed, some without their knowledge or consent, should be treated. As the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) revealed, “One member of the Facebook group suggested that the service member sneaking the photos should ‘take her out back and pound her out.’ Others suggested more than vaginal sex: ‘And butthole. And throat. And ears. Both of them. Video it though … for science.’” According to CIR, the photo sharing began less than a month after the first Marine infantry unit was assigned women.

The FBI has also been getting in on the photo-sharing gig, only its agents have been distributing child porn, allegedly in an effort to catch consumers of child porn. Curiously, the Department of Justice has opted to drop its case against a man accused of child pornography rather than be forced to disclose the FBI’s tactics for spying on suspected child porn consumers and entrapping them as part of its Operation Pacifier sting. What the case revealed was that for a little while, in its single-minded pursuit of lawbreakers, the FBI became a lawbreaker itself as the largest distributor of child pornography. All told, the FBI uploaded tens of thousands of images of child pornography to the “dark web.”

As reporter Bryan Clark points out:

At the intersection of technology and law, we’ve proven two things as the result of Operation Pacifier: 1. Government bodies have proven their willingness to circumvent — or even break — the law to capture suspected criminals it’s not even willing to prosecute. 2. We’re living in an age where — to agencies like the FBI — criminals and their victims are less important than the tools used to track them down. It’s hard to argue on the side of an alleged pedophile. But in this case, the FBI was the pedophile’s equal. It was the agency, you’ll recall, that disseminated these images to some 150,000 registered members… this means the FBI perpetrated the same heinous crime it attempted to charge others with, all while securing what could result in zero convictions.

Mind you, this was just one week of shootings, degradation, excessive force, abuse of power and complicity in the American police state. Magnify the impact of these events 52 times over, because they are taking place every week in this country, and you will find yourself weak at the knees.

Somewhere over the course of the past 240-plus years, democracy has given way to kleptocracy, and representative government has been rejected in favor of rule by career politicians, corporations and thieves—individuals and entities with little regard for the rights of American citizens.

This dissolution of that sacred covenant between the citizenry and the government—establishing “we the people” as the masters and the government as the servant—didn’t happen overnight. It didn’t happen because of one particular incident or one particular president. It is a process, one that began long ago and continues in the present day, aided and abetted by politicians who have mastered the polarizing art of how to “divide and conquer.”

Unfortunately, there is no magic spell to transport us back to a place and time where “we the people” weren’t merely fodder for a corporate gristmill, operated by government hired hands, whose priorities are money and power.

Our freedoms have become casualties in an all-out war on the American people.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this war is being fought on many fronts, with bullets and tasers, with surveillance cameras and license readers, with intimidation and propaganda, with court rulings and legislation, with the collusion of every bureaucrat on the government’s payroll, and most effectively of all, with the complicity of the American people, who continue to allow themselves to be easily manipulated by their politics, distracted by their pastimes, and acclimated to a world in which government corruption is the norm.

How do we stop the hemorrhaging?

Start by waking up. Pay attention to what’s going on around you. Most of all, think for yourself.

As H. L. Mencken observed:

The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are.


What Has Been Done For You

03/15/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/what-has-been-done-for-you.html

By Anna Von Reitz

First– to all my friends worldwide who are not Christian– bear with me.  I promise that this has a message for you, too, but for reasons that are or will become obvious, I am obliged to speak to and within the confines of Christian history for a moment.

In 1302, Pope Boniface established the world’s first and largest Express Trust called the “Unam Sanctam” Trust.  In this document he claimed that his office was that of Trustee for the whole earth and everything on it.  That is, he claimed to own the air, the birds within in, the sea and all its creatures, and the earth, too, together with all the land animals and people and buildings on it.

He claimed to own it all and to be Christ’s Trustee.

(Editors note,  Here are 4 different translations of the text of the Bull. 
From the 1917 Catholic Encyclopedia:

http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_bo08us.htm )

From The Papal Register, published in 1889 by P. Mury in Revue des Questions Historique p 255-256

https://archive.org/stream/sourcebookofmedi00oggfrich#page/384/mode/2up

From Frederic Austin Ogg (ed.), A Source Book of Medieval History (New York, Cincinnati: American Book Company, 1908), 385–88.

http://media.bloomsbury.com/rep/files/primary-source-39-boniface-unam-sanctam.pdf

In both English and the Latin original.
http://www.americancatholictruthsociety.com/docs/unamsanctum.htm

And the Roman Catholic Church set out to organize the entire world accordingly, and over the next few centuries, created three jurisdictions: air, land, and sea.

The air jurisdiction– beside containing birds — contains spirits and demons, angels, electric currents, sound waves and more—- is global in nature.  That province the Church reserved for itself.   Sins occur in the jurisdiction of the air.

The sea jurisdiction was farmed off to the British Monarch. Debts occur in the jurisdiction of the sea.

The land jurisdiction was farmed off to the Spanish Monarch.  Losses occur in the jurisdiction of the land.

And that, with more or less success, has been the “way of the world” for the last seven centuries.

But wait a minute….. if the Pope in his office is Trustee of the Spirit Realm and in his office as Roman Pontiff the Trustee of the Material Realm…..why aren’t all these bills being paid?

Obviously, Satan has been maintaining a stronghold somewhere.

Ah.

Even though Jesus and Satan played for keeps, it wasn’t the risen Christ that paid for the sins (debts) of the world.  It was a very real, very material man.  A carpenter from Galilee. And he is not here in the flesh to demand payment.

So, the theory was— until He came back in the flesh it was business as usual. Satan just conveniently kept the Keys to the Kingdom of God and operated through the office of the Roman Pontiff, while the Pope held the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.

Sweet.

However, that wasn’t the deal.  If Jesus had made a single misstep on his way to Golgotha, Satan’s victory would have been assured.  He would have reigned forever on Earth, until he destroyed it.

But Jesus carried through on His part of the bargain, paid the price, once and forever and for the whole world—- both goats and sheep, both tares and wheat, His own Followers and the Hindus of India and the Buddhists of Tibet and everyone else, everywhere, for all time.   And–this is important— all jurisdictions.

He absorbed all sins, all debts, all losses.

The Kingdom of Heaven knows no sin, no debt, no loss, no scarcity, no illness, but the Kingdom of God does.

These facts have been plainly stated in the scriptures for centuries and established in the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church along with the Unam Sanctam Trust and the claim of the Popes to be the Trustees of Christ on Earth— His Vicar.

Fine.

So it was time for someone, a Beneficiary acting as Jesus’ Fiduciary Deputy in the flesh, to pull the plug.

Please see the attached Payment Bond.  I presented it to Cardinal Mamberti, the head of the Vatican Chancery Court, as of January 6, 2017.

http://annavonreitz.com/universalpaymentbond.pdf

You will all note from reading the attached Original Copy of the Payment Bond, that it was delivered on the Day of the Three Kings, when the princes of the Earth pay homage to their Redeemer.  You will notice that the Payment Bond lasts for 1,000 years during which the peace of the Kingdom of Heaven and its abundance is to reign and the swords are to be beaten into plowshares.  You will note that it is for redemption of the Kingdom of God, where all the sins and debts and losses are stored up. You will note that it is for all NAMES or Names of any kind.  You will note that it puts an end to the Doctrine of Scarcity, and that it proclaims that the Law of Heaven is in force on Earth: to keep the peace, to love each other, and to do no harm.  And there is no other law we are bound to.

This has been done for each and every one of you regardless of your belief or disbelief, your faith or lack thereof.  You have been dearly bought and are now redeemed, set free of sin, debt, and loss.  The cruelty of Satan’s Rule is ended. A new life lies before you.

In embracing this new life, leave behind the ideas of differences and tribes.

Dear children, note—- we are all unique.  Each one of us is utterly different from all else that is created.  Protect and care for each one, for each one is sacred.  Let all law and caretaking be focused on just each one, not on any group identity.

As long as we define ourselves as members of groups –tribes, nations, etc., we condemn ourselves to a world in which bigger nations will always subjugate smaller nations and larger gangs will punish smaller gangs.  Let this thinking go. Let all tribalism diminish until it is only a dim memory.

In the end, there is only each one of you, utterly precious, utterly unique— and All That Is, that you are part of.

My name “Anna Maria” means the “Grace of Mary”, who, when the angel came to her, said— “Let it be done to me according to your word.”  These words have echoed through the centuries in the hearts and minds and experiences of all those who have given themselves to the Lord of Heaven.

So let it be and let it begin.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com


Vital Terms and History

03/14/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/vital-terms-and-history.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Terms and History You Need to Know —
Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Member, functioned in the office of President of the United States (not the President of the United States of America) from his inauguration in 1861 until his assassination in 1865.
Like Barack Obama, this foreign corporate office is the only one he was eligible to serve as a Bar Member.
Remember that all Bar Members were prohibited from holding public office in our government by the Titles of Nobility Amendment to the original Constitution. They are still precluded from holding any public office in our lawful government. Notice the word “public” in the phrase “public office”. Also note the word “lawful”.
We have fifty “lawful” land jurisdiction governments— owed to each of the the united States of America and the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction owed to their union of states known as the united States of America.
We also have a “legal” international jurisdiction government run by the United States, which is also ultimately owed to the united States of America owed under a contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America.
When you become a member of the Bar, you give up your right to hold any public office in the government of the United States of America, but you can hold any private corporate office you like. So, that is what they have done since 1819.
Count how many Bar Members are currently serving in the US Congress?
What does that tell you about how the US Congress is functioning—-in what capacity it is functioning? The only capacity it CAN be functioning in is as a foreign corporation. And the only offices that a foreign corporation can have are private offices, not public offices.
This is why “Acts of Congress” are referred to as “Public Policies”. They can’t produce Public Law while operating this way.
At the end of the illegal mercenary action known as the American Civil “War” the Southern states lay in ruins, subject to the occupying Union Army. The Northern states were in bankruptcy, subject to Trustees—- members of the “Rump Congress”— acting under the direction of European banking interests.
That’s Ground Zero.
The Reconstruction Acts were passed by these members of the “Rump Congress” and they remain substantially in place to this day.
As part of the Reconstruction Acts, quasi-military tribunals were set up throughout ten military districts established in the South. The military commanders in charge of each district were allowed to appoint civilians loyal to the Union to serve as judges.
The lawfully elected Governors and Legislators of the southern states were forcefully removed from office and other appointees were put in their place. These people then functioned as rubber stamps for whatever the Rump Congress wanted. They were known as “carpetbaggers” because they descended hurriedly from the North and commonly carried their essentials in suitcases made from carpet scraps.
They used their positions to steal whatever the war hadn’t destroyed.
In the next several years the process of “Reconstruction” overseen by the Holy See resulted in all the states re-writing their state constitutions. The original land jurisdiction states were renamed.
The original State of Wisconsin which was one of the united States of America was renamed the Wisconsin State.
A new corporate franchise doing business as a franchise of the United States, Inc. took over the name “State of Wisconsin”.
This corporate franchise joined other such franchises in other states to form a new union calling itself the United States of America.
Please note the use of deceptively similar names throughout and the resulting constructive fraud.
“The Constitution for the united States of America” was left to gather dust and a new “Federal Constitution” was published under the name “The Constitution of the United States of America” in 1868.
This is known as a “succession to contract”.
Now, obviously, the “State of Wisconsin” that was part of this new union of states calling itself the United States of America was not the same as the “State of Wisconsin” that entered the union of states calling itself the “united States of America” in 1848.
That original land jurisdiction “State of Wisconsin” was renamed the “Wisconsin State” and so on for all the states and commonwealths.
The new United States, Inc., corporate franchise operating under the name “State of Wisconsin” took over and operated under the so-called Federal Constitution published in 1868— The Constitution of the United States of America, and nobody was the wiser, because the names “State of Wisconsin” and “State of Wisconsin” were identical.
The rank and file people couldn’t tell the difference and weren’t made privvy to these deceptive actions resulting in foreign corporate franchises being substituted for their own original state of the union.
It was the first big identity theft.
Then, equally, the rank and file people weren’t made aware of the substitution of the “United States of America” for their original union of states known as the “united States of America.”
This was the second big identity theft.
Now the foreign bankers that engineered the bankrupcty of the original States of America were in the driver’s seat and able to direct their Bankruptcy Trustees — the Rump Congress– to do whatever they wanted.
They gutted the Southern States and so began the largely unhindered plundering and pillaging of foreign interests on American soil against the American states and the American people.
From that time on, Congress has functioned in collusion with foreign creditors to pillage and plunder the American states and people.
By the time the Great Depression rolled around, FDR functioning as the President of the United States of America (the one set up in 1868) was ready to kick things up a notch. He decided to bankrupt the United States of America, Inc. and all the “States of States” that had been formed after the Civil War.
The proceedings of the Conference of Governors, March 6, 1933 give full testimony to what the rats did.
FDR bankrupted the United States of America, Inc. and the “Governors”— the foreign franchise operators— agreed to “pledge” the “good faith and credit” of their “states” and the “citizens thereof”.
Of course, those states were federal corporation franchises and the “citizens thereof” were United States Citizens— that is, territorial citizens and federal employees.
But that did not stop the vermin from making false claims against the actual land and private property belonging to the Wisconsin State and the American people.
Once again, foreign creditors swept in like clouds of locusts and placed false titles against every scrap of land, every outbuilding and shed in America.
These “titles” are liens.
The innocent living people of Wisconsin and Minnesota were subjected to mortgages owed by the “State of Wisconsin” and “State of Minnesota”, for example—- basically being forced to pay back debts they never owed for the benefit of these foreign US “State of State” franchises, which in turn were paying off the debts of the United States of America, Inc.
Because the normal rank and file Americans were never given disclosure about any of this, nobody complained. The debts of the foreign United States, Inc. and its franchises were “assumed” by the actual states now operating as the Wisconsin State, Minnesota State, and so on—-and FDR and his cronies who were getting shed of all their debts by palming them off on Mom and Pop weren’t about to complain or tell anyone what they had done.
For the next sixty-six years the foreign creditors of the United States of America, Inc. and its foreign “State of State” franchises milked and bilked the actual American States and people, subjecting them to taxes, mortgages, and utility bills they never owed.
Finally, in 1999, the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc., settled and all debts were discharged. The battered American States and people should have been released from any further “assumption” of debt, but no…. another fraud game had been set up in the meantime.
FDR sold off the interest in the bankrupt “States of States” to the IMF, and the IMF promptly created its own STATES OF STATES. These foreign municipal “STATES” were run out of the Municipality of Washington, DC under names like “STATE OF NEVADA”. And from there, they created— you guessed it — another union of states called the UNITED STATES.
And, once again, because the hapless American people weren’t given any disclosure of these deals being made “in their behalf” by their supposed “representatives”—- still more corporate debts were assessed against them and “hypothecated” against their credit and against the credit of their actual states.
The United States of America , Inc., by and through its various State of State franchises, claimed to own all the U.S. Citzen franchises named like this: John Michael Doe. He was on the hook to pay off their debts.
The UNITED STATES, INC., by and through its various STATE OF STATE franchises claimed to own all the U.S. CITIZEN franchises named like this: JOHN MICHAEL DOE. He was on the hook to pay off all their debts.
And just recently, UNITED STATES President Barack Obama created a whole other fraud, in which THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., claims to own all the US CITIZEN franchises named like this:
JOHN M. DOE and has made them responsible to pay the debts of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
And then I said, “Hell, no.” (Well, it was actually something a bit more profane that I said.)
And I said it loudly.
And I kept on saying it, until yes, the entire world has heard the word coming down from the Far North.
This crappola is at an end.
There is no “succession to contract” except that claimed by the actual American states and people who are the living heirs of the original equity contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America and the successor contract known as The Constitution of the United States of America, which God knows, we paid for, lock, stock, and barrel.
It is all ours, free and clear, and we are NOT accepting the debts of the UNITED STATES, INC. and its STATE OF STATE franchises, nor are we accepting the debts of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and its STATE franchises.
Not happening. The jig is up.
We claim it all and we are in fact and in deed, the Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC., and its franchises and also any other secondaries, derivatives, or successors.
Take YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE with its reference to the “Historic State” and make these vermin aware that its not so “historic”— that it was bankrupted, but didn’t cease to exist any more than you ceased to exist because you were deliberately mischaracterized and misidentified and defrauded by dishonest foreign bankers and treasonous, clueless members of Congress.
And by the way, the bankruptcy of 1933 and its execution by the so-called U.S. Trustees was all fraud, too.
Fraud has no statute of limitations.
Hello?

Olddogs Comments!

I am well aware folks that the info I am re-publishing is depressing and frightening, but look at the up side which is; we only need a hundred million people to learn how to be free and stand up and make demands, So, do not let this cluster F*%k get you down, as it is only your inner rage at being beguiled that will carry you through the process of becoming what you thought you already were.

A FREE AND INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEING!


Truth Is Rare and Hard to Find

03/13/2017

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/03/11/truth-rare-hard-find-paul-craig-roberts/

Paul Craig Roberts

Recent developments show how important and necessary websites such as paulcraigroberts.org are. The latest Wikileaks release of CIA documents code-named Vault 7 reveal that the CIA has the capability and the intent to mask the cyber-attacks it commits by making them seem as if they originated from another source.

This capability destroys the concept of evidence. The CIA can carry out a cyber attack or steal information and leave a fingerprint, so to speak, of the country or person it wants blamed. If the CIA can leave the fingerprint of an innocent party, we must assume the CIA can also put secret documents or child pornography on a person’s computer. Because of the CIA’s capability, henceforth we cannot know if any evidence presented in any trial against any defendant is real of faked. http://www.globalresearch.ca/wikileaks-reveals-cias-umbrage-allows-agency-to-carry-out-false-flag-cyber-attacks/5578786 and
https://www.rt.com/news/380051-assange-malware-cia-fingerprints/

Maria Zakharova points out another reason that sites such as this one are crucial. The fake news promoted by CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC, and all the rest of the Western presstitutes has undermined the credibility of all traditional Western media, leaving only Internet sites that vary in commitment to truth from which the public can form an opinion. In a press conference, Zakharova said that the Western media is shameful, a form of vandalism. She asks if the Western media has yet hit bottom “or can they dive a little lower?” The US media is engaged in “a total disinformation campaign not only for their internal audience, but also for the global audience. . . This is Orwell, 1984. Now we know who he wrote about when he wrote about Big Brother. Big Brother, in America, is now the media, which has stepped so far outside of professional ethics, as well as their own competency. They accuse and judge, based on entirely fabricated lies. . . That which is happening now is a global tragedy, the destruction of trust in the authority of media. What is going to happen in the future?” http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/03/big-brother-is-here-zakharova-warns-of.html

The future of truth lies with websites, such as the one you are reading. This website has faithful donors. They are the people who pushed me out of retirement back into the fray. Many of them make automatic monthly donations. Others have joined them. But most of the people who use this site do not support it.

As we see President Trump collapse on his promise of normalized relations with Russia, we witness another president captured by the military/security complex.

For an individual website to go up against powerful forces controlling billions of dollars requires your support. If you are with me, I need your financial support.

If you have any doubts that the media are a propaganda agency for the ruling elite, note that when Julian Assange released the CIA documents given to WikiLeaks that show the CIA’s ability to blame its hacks on innocent parties, ABC presstitute Brian Ross was uninterested in the documents and attempted to discredit the WikiLeaks release with the question if Assange had ever been paid by the Russian government. Assange replied “no” but that it was a “pretty sad question” which tried to divert from the content of the released documents. “Quite interesting,” Assange said, “to see ABC taking that line.” https://www.rt.com/viral/380044-assange-denies-russian-funding-msm/
In other words, when the CIA’s own documents are presented to the whores who comprise the Western media, the well-trained whores cast aspersion on the person who makes the documents public, not on the crimes of those that the documents reveal.

As I wrote some years ago, “Truth Is Imperiled.” You cannot acquire truth from the Western media, but you can get truth from this site. So support it.


The War on Cash Finds Its General

03/11/2017

https://mises.org/library/war-cash-finds-its-general

Kenneth S. Rogoff
Princeton University Press, 2016

Kenneth Rogoff would sharply disagree with Peale, a character in the 1915 novel It Pays to Advertise, who said that the most beautiful word in the English language is “cash.” For Rogoff, a distinguished monetary economist (and chess grandmaster) who teaches at Harvard, cash, especially in large denominations, ought to be eliminated.

Rogoff has two main arguments for his proposal; but, before examining them, let us look at exactly what he wishes to do. In his suggested plan, which “can be adapted and tweaked in many directions,” “All paper currency is gradually phased out, beginning with all notes of $50 and above (or foreign equivalent), then next the $20 bill, leaving only $1, $5, and (perhaps) $10 bills. … The government provides all individuals the option of access to free basic-function debit card/smartphone accounts, either through banks or through a government option. … Regulatory and legal framework aims to discourage other means of making large-scale payments that can be completely hidden from the government. … Government helps facilitate … real-time clearing for most transactions.”

One word reverberates throughout this proposal: “government.” For Rogoff, the government must combat nefarious characters in the “underground economy,” not to mention tax cheats, who transact business in paper money. Think of all the revenue the government has lost, owing to the selfishness of these miscreants!

The problems posed by the underground economy, Rogoff tells us, are far-reaching in scope: there is a great deal of “missing” cash, mostly in large denominations. “The bulk of US cash in circulation cannot be accounted for by consumer surveys. Obviously, if consumers are holding only a small fraction of all cash outstanding, they cannot possibly be holding more than a small fraction of the $100 bills in circulation, since $100 bills account for nearly 80 percent of the value of US currency.”

Where are the missing $100 bills? Much of it is used in illegal activities, like the drug trade. “The drug trade is a famously cash-intensive business at every level. … The RAND Corporation has estimated the combined size of the market for four major illegal drugs in the United States to be more than $100 billion in 2010. … Eliminating cash would hardly eliminate drug cartels. Nevertheless, it would be a significant blow to their business model at many levels.”

But could we not instead deal with this problem by ending the drug war? In a legal market, could the drug cartels survive? Rogoff has in part anticipated this response, but he rejects it summarily. “Obviously there are other ways of reducing drug-related crime. A simple one would be to legalize marijuana … [but] hard drugs would remain problematic.” The thought that the drug war should be ended entirely has not entered his head.

He might reply in this way: “Even if you crazed libertarians would make all drugs legal, you still have to acknowledge that some activities that should be illegal, like human trafficking, depend on dealing in cash. This fact by itself suffices to justify my proposal.”

And this is not all that concerns Rogoff. Cash transactions enable people to avoid paying taxes. “The largest holdings and use of cash in the domestic underground economy likely derive from residents of all types … who are broadly engaged in legal activities but who are avoiding taxes, regulations, or employment restrictions … the tax gap is sufficiently huge that if eliminating cash can close it by as little as, say, 10 percent, the revenue gains would be quite substantial … the gains would be on the order of $50 billion from federal taxes alone and perhaps another $20 billion for state and local taxes.” Rogoff recognizes that many people do not want tax regulations to be “rigidly enforced” but responds that tax evasion creates a “horizontal equity” problem: if you evade your taxes, others, who do not, will have to pay more. But once again, the libertarian response does not occur to him: taxes are unjust exactions that violate people’s rights.

Suppose, though, that one grants to Rogoff that taxes are legitimate and also that ready access to cash makes some crimes much easier to commit. Has he made his case for the abolition of cash? As he recognizes, the advantages of his proposal must be balanced against concerns about privacy: “It is important to separate out protection from government snooping and protection from relatives, friends, employers, or other private entities. Of course, people will always want to keep some expenditures or income secret from spouses, parents, and friends. The government can perfectly allow such transactions as long as they do not entail recurrent large expenditures and income to be completely hidden from the government.”

Incredibly, he fails to realize that many of us do not want the government to monitor what we are doing. As long as our neighbors cannot snoop on us, everything is fine. Where liberty is concerned, Rogoff just does not “get it.” He points that a critic of his proposals quoted against him Dostoevsky’s remark, “Money is coined liberty,” but notes that the remark in The House of the Dead describes life in prison. “To draw an analogy between life in a Tsarist prison and life in the modern liberal state as a defense of large-denomination notes borders on the absurd.” The modern liberal state is your friend; why worry?

What we have discussed so far is only Rogoff ’s first argument for the abolition of cash: he has another as well. If the economy is in a recession, the monetary authorities may need to “turbocharge” the economy by pushing interest rates down. Doing so, they hope, will stimulate production and increase aggregate demand. But at present an obstacle blocks these plans. The money rate of interest has already fallen to zero. Further reductions require negative rates. But if these are imposed, depositors will withdraw their funds. Why keep money in the bank if part of your money will be confiscated?

Rogoff describes the problem of the “zero bound constraint” in this way: “paper currency can be thought of as a zero-interest-rate bond. … As long as people have the choice of paper money, they are not going to be willing to accept an interest rate that is significantly lower on any kind of bond … the zero bound has essentially crippled monetary policy across the advanced world for much of the past 8 years since the financial crash of 2008. If unconstrained negative rate policy was possible … central banks would never ‘run out of bullets’ (i.e., room to keep cutting interest rates)” (p. 5).

If paper money is eliminated, depositors will no longer be able to withdraw their money. What could be simpler?

It is disappointing that Rogoff fails to mention Austrian arguments that stimulating aggregate demand through monetary expansion is not the appropriate response to recession. He has read Rothbard and cites him on paper money in the colonial period (p. 235, note 26). But the Austrian theory of the business cycle is not
within his range of vision.

He does, though, address an argument by Milton Friedman that is highly relevant to stabilization policy. “Friedman perfectly well understood that monetary policy could be a potent tool for economic stabilization, but he argued that central banks were so incompetent and so prone to inflationary finance that life would be simpler and better if the whole concept of Keynesian activist monetary policy was simply forgotten” (p. 188).

He replies that Friedman’s alternative of limited monetary expansion according to a fixed rule has not worked. Friedman thought that there was a fixed relationship between the quantity of money and prices, but this has not always proved to be the case. Rogoff may be right, but he has not responded to Freidman’s argument against central bank discretion. The fact, if it is one, that a particular alternative to discretionary policy fails is irrelevant. If someone argues that policy A will fail, claiming that alternative B is no better is hardly a response.

Regardless of whether Rogoff ’s way of dealing with the zero bound constraint is economically sound, though, is it not unfair on its face? If you deposit money in a bank, why should it be subject in part to confiscation? Rogoff answers that those who press this objection are victims of a “money illusion”: “Many people will likely regard negative interest rates as a violation of the trust citizens place in their government. … To see negative nominal interest rates as unholy but moderate inflation as just bad is to suffer what economists call ‘money illusion’ ” (emphasis in original). But why not take this point to be an argument against government-mandated inflation rather than, as Rogoff wishes, a defense of negative interest rates? Rogoff complains of the “zero bound constraint,” but he is himself bound by statist assumptions.

Olddogs Comments!

Rogoff is just another government, (“Think Banker”), scumbag employee. In his eyes it is perfectly alright if the people are screwed, murdered, or incarcerated for nothing but wanting to do what ever they want with their money, even though most have no clue that it isn’t their money anyway. Think for a minute folks, is your house yours if you do not have an allodial title, on your car, or other assets? Your money is a way of having independence, which is something the bankers and their government do not want us to have. Keeping absolute control over every facet of our lives is the same as physical slavery.

Allodial Rights & the Unalienable Right to Property

http://www.thesocialleader.com/2010/12/allodial-rights-unalienable-property/Under plenary allodialism, such real property could not be taxed or regulated. This is the basis of a free market. There is no government intervention whatsoever with market-based actions and ownership. If allodial rights in land are stripped from the people then we have a situation of totalitarian government. The four rights of the feudal lords are reapplied, but the names are changed. These are now referred to as taxation, expropriation, escheat and eminent domain. The right of the government to own specific portions of land for specific reasons is clearly spelled out in the Constitution. (This is a topic for another article)However, nowhere is power granted for them to retain public land for unremunerated purposes, nor is power granted for them to regulate private property. This has come from an improper interpretation and construction of the commerce clause.

The power to regulate property is a right reserved to each individual property owner. Not because the government granted it, but because it is unalienable. It is this unregulated pursuit, acquisition, and use of property that defines and enables the pursuit of happiness. A free market world where our unalienable allodial rights are secured is a world, the happiness, success, growth, glory, progress, and order of which we do not now enjoy nor comprehend. Yet, it is a world worth giving our life, fortune, and sacred honor for.” By Kyle Roberts


Anna Goes Queen for a Day…..

03/10/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/anna-goes-queen-for-day.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Someone got down on me for exposing all the fraud and crappola without appearing to have any answers or Go Forward Plan.  Hmmmm….  well, let’s see….. I thought I had one somewhere around here, maybe not written down as so many talking points, but liberally scattered throughout all my writings…. sigh.

There is always one in the crowd….

So pretend that Anna is Queen for a Day….. what would I do with this country and its moribund economy, failing institutions, and ancient infrastructure?

 

 

  1. Repudiate fraudulent and odious debt, so the people of this country don’t get socked with it AGAIN.

 

  1. Go back to the history and repudiate similar actions that have been ongoing since the Civil War and which have been used to fund wars for profit and illegal police actions throughout the world—- and put an end to these abuses.

 

  1. Draw a line so that people can finally understand that there is a difference between the United States of America and the United States— two completely different and separate nations whose only connection is that the United States is under contract to provide nineteen enumerated services to the United States of America.

 

  1. Restore the lawful land jurisdiction government of the United States of America by educating its people and engaging their participation in and support for their own government.  That includes restoring the Common Law Courts.

 

  1. Use international awareness and censure of the United States to compel its compliance with reform.

 

  1. To pay the lawful debts of the United States of America and remove any idea that we are bankrupt or dishonest.

 

  1. To reboot the American Silver Dollar, which is and has always been our lawful currency, as a transitional tool allowing us to move into a mixed currency market. I don’t anticipate that legal tender will disappear or become valueless overnight, nor do I see us packing around bags of gold coins to conduct business.

 

  1. I favor the creation of a Universal Currency without destroying or undermining national currencies.  The beauty of a Universal Currency based on all natural resources and all labor resources on Earth is that unlike our current situation, everyone has something of value to trade, and everyone is a producer in the asset-based currency market. That puts an end to hoarding, supply manipulations, and similar evils.

 

  1. I favor development of ongoingbank-less transactional currencies like Bit Coin.

 

  1. I support outlawing certain kinds of corporations.  They simply shouldn’t exist, because they provide no redeeming value except to allow their shareholders and officers to avoid responsibility for their acts.

 

  1. I would like to see the use of B Corporations— sometimes called “Beneficial Corporations”.  Commercial corporations function for one motive— profit at any cost.  That is not a sufficiently redeeming social value, but as bank CEO’s will tell you, they currently have no choice in the matter.  Restructuring all banks as B Corporations would be one means of instant systemic bank reform.

 

  1. The complete restructuring of all world debt, so as to absorb and redefine and diffuse the ticking time bomb.  I believe that we now have the means to do this and that (1) it harms nobody now and nobody in the future and (2) it allows growth and abundance.  So why not do it?

 

  1. Support the value of marriages and family relationships so that these are supported and rewarded and strengthened instead of being eroded by short-sighted and destructive social service and tax and insurance policies that penalize families and couples.

 

  1. Make education practical and affordable and accessible to all and on a continuing basis.  Education should be enjoyable and available to everyone throughout life.  Reforming it by radically changing its organizational assumptions and funding structures would be very profitable as well as productive and humane. Factory schools don’t work.  Time to change the whole paradigm to one that focuses on community and self-development.

 

  1. Busting big monopolies. Including banks. These corporations know that they are doing things that are illegal and damaging.  The law is already clear. They are now controlling entire sectors of the economy. We are suffering monopoly conditions because the regulators aren’t doing their jobs and are in fact self-interested through employee pension funds.  Time to reform both ends of that dilemma.

 

  1. Outlawing foreign media cartels. Paraphrasing Malcolm X— only a fool lets enemies control their media. American media needs to be American media and it needs to be competitive.  We haven’t had a free press in this country since before the Second World War, both because of illegal government sanctions and because our “presses” have been owned and operated by a few big foreign corporations.  Time for that to end and for the Fourth Estate to resurrect itself.

 

  1. Prosecute destructive guild operations such as the AMA and American Bar Association, which set up closed shop unions under the guise of being professional associations.  An organization that does the recognized crime forbidden by many acts of legislation including Taft-Hartley and Smith Act, etc.– needs to be prosecuted accordingly no matter how they structure their business operations or what excuses they make.

 

  1. Reform “representational” government so that people have a direct voice in the budget process and also have the ability to recall all elected officials including U.S. Senators.

 

  1. Go through the CAFR and AFR’s the various levels of government have been hiding from the public since 1946, audit all the so-called externally and internally managed (slush) funds and resume carriage accounting instead of double accrual accounting.  Use the overflow to end the need for taxation and create a giant infrastructure investment fund to repair roads, bridges, pipelines, railroads, schools, electrical facilities, water utilities, dams, sanitation plants, recycling centers…. and all the other things we need.

 

  1. Once the actual government of the United States of America is restored and fully functioning as it ought to, and enough people are fully informed, hold a Continental Congress and seat Fiduciary Deputies of the states to close loopholes in The Constitution which have allowed the members of Congress to act as criminals and usurpers against the states and people and do it without fear of accountability, formally enroll all the states of the union, end federal proprietary interest in the western states’ land, and restore the guarantees of freedom and state national political status to all Americans regardless of race or ethnicity.

If we can get through that list in the next twenty years, I’ll come up with another…..

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com


An End to My Association with Bruce Doucette and Michael R Hamilton +

03/09/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=An+End+to+My+Association+with+Bruce+Doucette+and+Michael+R+Hamilton

By Anna Von Reitz

I met Bruce Doucette when I invited him to a conference I held in Anchorage, Alaska, last May.  Bruce is a very personable guy, apparently well-intentioned, and eager to get things done.

Unfortunately, what he wanted to get done had nothing to do with why the conference had been called, and he attempted to commandeer it for his purposes.  I had to repeatedly drag things back on track because he couldn’t or wouldn’t keep his own agenda to the sidelines.

The same thing is happening right now.  I have called for the restoration of the American Government of the people, by the people, for the people—- and he and Hamilton and a few others have launched off into to redefine the American Government however they see fit.

It’s not going to work.

Bruce has taken it into his head that he and a few other people on a conference call can just wave their hands and change the meaning and substance of the American Government (change the duties and authorities of the Grand Juries, for example) and bypass and ignore the jurisdictional limitations that have been set in stone for over two hundred years (put State Justices in charge of Continental Marshals, for example).

That is simply not true.  Restoration of a government doesn’t imply redefining and twisting it into something else.

Every single one of us reclaiming our natural birthright status can occupy vacant offices in our own government and serve them faithfully, but we have no authority to change the meaning and nature of the offices we occupy.

If what Bruce is thinking and teaching others to think were true and correct, there would quickly be as many different opinions about what Grand Juries are as there are Grand Juries.  Chaos and constant confusion and conflicts would reign supreme.

There would be no agreement between Michigan and Georgia about what a “Grand Jury” is or how it functions, and in all the over 3000 counties, the situation would be the same.

All valid American Government offices are strictly limited to prevent despotism.  Whatever office Bruce Doucette thinks he occupies—-a land jurisdiction State Justice’s office

doesn’t have duties in international jurisdiction.  None. Zero.

Whatever anyone “thinks” —Grand Juries don’t have control of anything but the duties that Grand Juries are assigned within the American Common Law Courts under the Public Law.

Those who flout the same Public Law that they claim to derive their authority from, are acting in breach of their oaths and have no authority.

And now Bruce and Mr. Hamilton and some others who have confused the functions of state militia with the functions of continental marshals have stumbled into international jurisdiction where they have no vested authority and they are ramming around causing trouble for the Continental Marshals program over –so far as the evidence goes so far — truly petty misunderstandings and false assumptions.

I suspect ego problems are at the bottom of it all, and that having helped start the program and having handed over the baton for it, Bruce Doucette wants to continue to control and direct it even though his office is a land jurisdiction office and the offices of the continental marshals are all in international (sea) jurisdiction.

As for Michael R. Hamilton, I don’t believe that he even has an office apart from the vacancy.  So far as I know there are no active counties in Louisiana and no jural assembles or Grand Juries, either.  So?  What is a justice without a constituency?

Both these men may be well-intentioned.  I would vouch for Bruce that he is.  But, being well-intentioned only goes so far.  One must also respect the rules and observe the limitations built into the government and the offices you say you serve.

I wish to make it perfectly clear that I serve the American states and people and the government they established in 1776 and that I abide by the constitutional agreement they established and that I stand for the Public Law and for Due Process and that I exercise my office within the confines established for it by the Public Law and that I do not condone nor encourage any Grand Jury administrator or any State Justice operating outside their lawful jurisdiction.

Such actions are destructive to the aim of restoring our lawful government.

That is not to say that after the restoration is complete, I don’t have some issues with loopholes in The Constitution that need to be closed or think that our American Government is perfect “as is”.    I don’t.  But I also know that there are ways and means and processes established for the peaceful amendment and negotiation of whatever changes we wish  to make as a nation and that the lawful way and place to address those changes is not on a teleconference call.

I know that single counties don’t make states and single states don’t speak for the whole union of states and that we have rules and definitions, quorums and processes that have to be observed for actions to be valid.

Bruce and Mr. Hamilton have impugned my honor and suggested/inferred  that I am “just protecting Bella Haywood” and that I have some personal ax to grind for defending the limitations our offices, the Public Law, and the Rules of Evidence.

What kind of Justice would I be, if I did not?

From what I have seen so far— Chief Marshal Haywood deserves protection, because she is doing her job and observing her proper jurisdiction and nothing substantial has been proven against her.  It’s that simple.

On the other hand, both Bruce and Michael R. Hamilton have overstepped their

boundaries, asserted authorities they don’t have under the Public Law, and what is even more damning, have taught others to do the same.

Instead of acting as, and within the offices of State Justices, they’ve strayed far, far afield either in ignorance or in arrogance.  And they have refused to correct.

I have spent forty years in the trenches and I have to say that such behavior always, predictably— and rightfully— has consequences.  When you stand on the Law and respect your jurisdiction and respect the limitations of your office, you prosper.

When you do otherwise– you get shot down.

Water flows downhill.

If Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton continue to ignore the limits of their offices and the rightful jurisdiction their offices, they will sooner or later be arrested and prosecuted for it, because the only authority, right, or safety we have derives from the Public Law,  and depends on us knowing and obeying the Public Law, respecting the limits of our offices, and operating in our proper jurisdiction.

I am separating myself from them and their actions and assertions because in my opinion what they are doing —-and what they are encouraging others to do —- is outside the Public Law, outside their jurisdiction, and destructive to the cause of restoring our lawful government.

Whatever it is that they are doing, it is not within the lawful office of State Justices to do.

From this time forward and until such time as a reconciliation may be reached let it be perfectly clear that I do not condone what Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton are doing or teaching, the assumptions they are making, the new powers they are assuming for themselves, nor the new and different duties they are trying to foist off onto the Grand Juries and Continental Marshals.

There is no precedent for such offices or jurisdictions as they are attempting to create, no Public Law in support of it, therefore no delegation of authority related to our already existing American Government (as opposed to US Government) in support of them or what they are doing.

And so, in my view, there is no difference between the corruption that Bruce and Hamilton are introducing and the corruption that the de facto government has allowed; they are now trying to usurp powers never delegated to their offices from within in exactly the same way that the de facto government has usurped power from without.

I will have no part of it.

Always remember that rights and authorities go with limits and responsibilities.  If we expect the United States Government to play by the rules, the Government of the United States of America can do no less.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com


03 09 17 Vetting Think About It.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/vetting-think-about-it.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

By Anna Von Reitz

Bruce Doucette has been running around all over creation, handing out Marshals Oaths and credentials in states where he has no office as a Justice or a Judge.

He has been promising people badges who never went through the vetting process to become a Continental Marshal OR to serve in the state militia, either one.

Is it safe or sane to do this?

No.

It’s not.

You would think that we were kids playing a game and everyone gets a Marshal’s star and a little plastic holster.

What if that man who suddenly has a badge and who is claiming to be a Marshal— is seriously unhinged? Has a criminal record longer than his arm? An IQ of 50? Isn’t an American state national? Is motivated by vengeance? Isn’t who he says he is? Is so ignorant he stinks?

Marshals and Judges, both, need to know their jobs and their history and their law. And they also have to obey the law they purport to uphold.

You can’t just stand on a street corner and hand out badges and think that’s okay. You can’t put people in positions of public trust without vetting and training them.

So there’s another reason why Bruce and I are parting ways and why I don’t approve of Michael R. Hamilton’s equally reckless recruiting ideas, either. If he had his way, we’d all just pay him $50 and he’d make up credentials identifying us as the President of the United States.

Why would he care? He made $25 a pop selling you meaningless credentials you didn’t earn.

Do you want men you can trust in positions of authority over you, or do you think it’s okay to put a stamp of approval on just anybody who wants to play “Marshal” or “Justice” for a day?

And can any of you tell me how these practices by Doucette and Hamilton are going to do anything but endanger good people? Both those who are willing to serve, but don’t have the training for it, and the public, too?

I have come too long and too far to stand here silent, knowing that what these two men are doing will serve to discredit the effort and endanger everyone involved.

I have to object. Loudly.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Olddogs Comments!

At the present time, America’s biggest problem is the near total lack of historical knowledge. That is: the true history of America has not been taught from the get go, and only by diligent research can it be found, which means there are few American’s left who know what America was supposed to be and what true freedom is, and is not. If we are going to restore America to a true, controllable form of freedom from tyranny, then we cannot allow every jackass with a silver tongue deviate from the original intent.


The Situation Report

03/08/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/

By Anna Von Reitz

Today we face cleaning up the biggest Con Game in human history.   For those yet in the dark…..

Following the Revolutionary War the Founding Fathers formed a union of their separate states called The United States of America.

They then created and set apart a separate foreign “federal” government for the benefit of the British King and the Roman Pontiff—–the United States— and gave them the District of Columbia as the headquarters of the United States.  This created a separate foreign “Federal Enclave” on our shores.

They delegated nineteen enumerated “powers” naturally belonging to The United States of America to the United States via a contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America.

These “powers” are duties and services to be performed by the United States on a for-hire basis.  All these delegated authorities are exercised in international jurisdiction of the sea.

Only one delegated power, the Interstate Commerce Clause, allows the United States to have any role in the internal affairs of the states holding the land jurisdiction of this country, and that provision merely stipulates that the United States is to ensure the free flow of commerce between the states.

Thus, the United States is and has always been a subcontractor and a foreign entity with respect to the American union of states.

In 1860 the Roman Pontiff and the British Monarch, by and through their Foreign Agents, the members of the American Bar Association, provoked and launched an illegal commercial mercenary action on our shores known as “The American Civil War”.

Upon closer examination, there is no Declaration of War starting the conflict and no Peace Treaty ending it: the American Civil War was never actually a war.

It was a completely unlawful and illegal police action and the first of a great many similar illegal police actions committed by the United States.

The Reconstruction Acts mandated by the foreign United States Congress have never been repealed and the United States has continued to rape, plunder, pillage, and defraud their loyal employers and benefactors, American states and people.

This shameful violation of international law, breach of trust, and breach of commercial contract has gone on in the sight of God and the international community for 150 years.

It has cost us and the rest of the world untold misery and suffering, hundreds of millions of lives lost, trillions of dollars bilked out of our labor, natural resources, and financial assets—–endless wars for profit, endless schemes to cheat other nations, endless counterfeiting and secretive misuse and abuse of our people and our resources by the British Monarch and Roman Pontiff to enrich themselves at our expense and then, we have been used as instruments to rob, cheat, murder and bilk other nations at their behest.

The evil at the heart of the British Monarchy and the Roman Catholic Church is laid bare for all to see, revealed by their actions in America— and the entire world now has an interest in seeing the predation put to an end.

It is, or should be self-evident, that the “United States” is nothing without the backing of the united States of America—-the actual states and people of this country.   It has no resources that are legitimately its own, and thanks to the criminality, cruelty, depravity, arrogance and violence of its leadership—no friends.

The only way that the United States and its Puppetmasters, the British Monarch and the Roman Pontiff, can hope to survive —is by complete, absolute, and total reform— and by making amends, first to the people and states of America, and then to the entire rest of the world.

The American states and people are not by nature vengeful, but the constructive fraud, inland piracy, unlawful conversion of our assets, disrespect of our retained powers, usurpation of our state and county governments, kidnapping of our children, conscription and control of our resources, infringement of our copyrights and trademarks, unlawful taxation and employment of commercial mercenary forces on our soil must end.

Permanently!

The American Bar Association and the International Bar Association and their memberships, are under a $279 trillion dollar commercial lien for their part in the Great Fraud.

These men and women acting as Undeclared Foreign Agents on our soil, who have enjoyed such unearned trust and prestige throughout America, stand revealed as nothing more than common criminals and con artists engaged in plundering public trusts and profiting themselves from courts run under color of law, penal bonds fraudulently imposed, and the slave labor of criminals—-most of whom committed no real crime at all.

The United States has sunk itself in trillions of dollars of debt, intending to declare bankruptcy and to name the hapless American states and people as their sureties and franchisees again.

That’s not going to happen.

We have exposed their fraud against us and against our parents and grandparents and great-grandparents all the way back to 1860.  Their Bad Faith, criminality, and Breach of Trust are all plain to see.

We have raised the alarm and denied their odious debt.

We have exposed their private Bill Collection agencies being run under color of law as American courts.

We have threaded through the entire process they have used to press-gang and enslave us via identity theft, false commercial claims, and the use of CUSIP Bonds.

We have unraveled the step-by-step money laundering process used by the British Government and the Vatican to profit themselves and the politicians on their payroll.

There can be no doubt that the United States and its leaders here and abroad have functioned as parasites worse than any lampreys lurking in the cold and murky depths of Lake Michigan.

Thanks to the British Monarch, the Lord Mayor of London, and the Roman Pontiff, the United States has been run as a violent crime syndicate on our shores—-a crime syndicate that has run a vast racketeering and commercial fraud scheme against us and then used us as their muscle to enslave other nations.

It has to end.

The Chinese Government must be warned that all that gold the vermin have brought with them during their Exodus to China comes with an insupportable debt and vast international commercial claims attached to it and that the only reason the United States could not pay its Trade Deficit is that it was too busy double-dipping and stealing from the Americans.

They will do the exact same thing to China, too.

How do we know this?

Because the same vile, venal, parasitic fraud scheme has blazed its way across time and space from Ancient Babylon to Jerusalem to Egypt to Carthage to Rome to Ireland to Scotland to Britain to America….. and it is always the same story:   set up the scam, drain the victims dry, pretend to either be your victim or to be the agent of your victim, leave the victims to pay your debts, move on to greener pastures—taking your ill-gotten gains with you and using them to bribe your way into another sweet spot with another government.

They’ve done it in the Mideast, Africa, Europe, America, and now, China—they think it’s your turn.

The game is up here and the hunters have become the hunted.  Even the members of the United States Congress are waking up and realizing how they’ve been snookered and how far down around their ankles their pants are.

Good-morning, America.

See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Olddogs Comments!

Those few of you who have the intelligence and courage to do so, must drop your infatuation with making money and having fun, then bury your minds in this mess and take down the scum that control it. All the info you need has been provided by Anna and other great freedom lovers, so what excuse does anyone have for not demanding the best and brightest get to work?