For want of a compass

08/24/2016

http://therebel.is/news/kaminski

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

Everyone needs to read this and contemplate what this man says here, for he is telling it like it absolutely is.  Some may not like or agree with what he states here, but then, those that don’t apparently either haven’t looked at the evidence, or the history, or they are afraid to pull their heads out of the sand.  I have been researching and studying in an attempt to understand what is the viral cancer in our world, for 16 years, and in the beginning, being raised a Southern Baptist, I never wanted to believe this destruction of morality and our economy, along with the wars, had anything to do with the Jews.  However, as I learned more, and began learning the truth about all of the wars, those in particular; the American Civil War, WWI, and WWII, the pattern that began to develop in my mind, became much more clear, and much more aligned with what I had read, coming from a few Real Historians, here in the states, but much more coming from those that had survived and remembered what was actually going on in the European Nations in those eras.

If Americans in particular don’t wake up, the whole world will collapse into nothing but a Jungle Ghetto where all of us will be living day to day, never knowing when we will be attacked by one, or some of our own level in a Mad Max World that we have allowed the Elite to create for us.  In that world we will find that it will not be Black/White,

Jew/White,Jew/black/Chinese/White/Black/ or any other  commonly thought scenario, but all, against all, at our low level of society, there will be no Middle Class, no Rich or Upper Class, and no Poor Class, but only the Poorest of the Poor, and the Super Elite with their Puppets to make sure we don’t somehow get through the gates of the Elite.  These Elites have been ruling the So-called US Government out of the Inner City of London, through the International Monetary System since 1914, at-least.

Although WWII was a major turning point towards using the US as the World Police Force, that would whip every other nation except Britain, into alignment with the One World Order, controlled by these Khazarian Jewish Bankers, the real jump in control using this same system began in 1969, when Henry Kissinger was sent to meet with the Oil Cartel in the Middle East, to set up the World Currency System, formulated by these International Bankers, and we did not know or understand it (although a few did, and tried to tell it), this would be the start of the avalanche!

Think this is not, would not, or will not be the case?  Read what John says below, and then research it further if you aren’t afraid to.  Remember these people claiming to be God’s chosen, for political reasons, are not Hebrews of the Bible, but those that Jesus said, claim to be Jews but are not, but are the Children of their father The Devil, they are a mixed bloodline of ancient Turks and Mongolians who were run out of the ancient land known as Khazaria in the late 700s by the Russians.  Could this be the reason they hate Russians so much?  Ancient maps show Khazaria to be just above and joining Russia.

I know this all sounds unbelievable, but it has been said that; “Truth is stranger than fiction”, and we all know everything has changed in an almost unbelievable and drastic way in our own lifetimes.

Rene


For want of a compass and the courage to recognize the purveyors of horror

Headlines trumpet our leaders  for who they are: degenerate criminals  serving as models for our children to follow.

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://therebel.is/news/kaminski

I have trouble digesting the pomposities of white supremacists bewailing the loss of their privileged status and left tumbling in the tsunami of cultureless anonymity that America the melting pot has become.

They lost their privileged status because of their immoral behavior. The failure of political society in the world is wholly due to the inability of the white man to operate a just legal system. White people should never be trusted. They are, after all, merely the dupes of the Jews, those Turkic Mongol misanthropes who rule over a half blind society by dangling irresistible carrots in front of semi conscious compulsives. Whites are incapable of running their own lives without being controlled by the Jews. That’s what the Jews say, and what far too many white men believe.

Blacks are dupes, too, being used as saboteurs by Jews to destabilize white societies. With the recent clever invasion of Europe engineered by the Jews and their U.S. robocops, unassimilable aliens from Asia and Africa have cast a heavy net over Europe that will drag all these tiny countries living in the past down to dysfunction and ruin, which is just the way the Jews prefer all the other countries to be — broken and totally dependent upon Jews for survival.

Every day, all these countries are looking a lot more like Palestine. With their kind of peace the Jews are bringing to the world, their emphasis is unquestionably creating rubble where tranquillity previously existed.

No significant local groups are forming in America except for those latent outlaws in black neighborhoods all too eager to burn and loot their own blocks on a moment’s notice, as happened recently in Milwaukee before everyone learned it was a black cop who shot a fleeing black thug. But the inexplicable mayhem continued anyway, as if it was fulfilling some deeply ingrained cultural need to riot and destroy as a way of protesting their severely limited potential for affluence and respectability.

It should be mentioned in future conversations about immigration that blacks and in particular and Third World émigrés in general have a much greater inclination to burn down their own neighborhoods than do the austere white folks who actually built these buildings blacks are burning. It simply would not occur to white people to burn down their own neighborhoods as a way to protest perceived injustices against them. We are looking at the savage social traditions Africa has brought to America.

Once upon a time, it seems, back in the days when heroes seemed actually noble and beneficial and nuns rapped children on their knuckles for chewing gum, people didn’t act up because their leaders were seen to be honorable and society had a structure where everybody learned to fit in, or wash out. Deluded or not, America exuded a sense of respect for itself, which began to plummet with the mainstreaming of blacks.

It is always only when the Jews arrive that people are moved to dissatisfaction, and prone to action that ultimately destroys the relative tranquillity they formerly had. Happened in Russia, happened in America, happening everywhere.

Today’s political heroes are rehabilitated whores and druggies, never quite sure of their own honesty as society raves about their positive qualities. Faggots with drug-addicted doctors blackmailed them into declaring homosexuality normal, and now, like a virus, insensate copulation delivered by Miley Cyrus lures impressionable minds toward what they sell as freedom that consistently turns out be self-destructive and self-delusional addictions.

These public intoxications have overwhelmed family networks and more people wind up alienated, addicted and abandoning their children.

The presidents we have had over the past few decades have been paragons of perversion and doublespeak. A plague of deceitful homosexuals has taken over the government, which has itself devolved into a criminal enterprise of value only to the corrupt politicians who profit from it.

Headlines trumpet our leaders for who they are: degenerate criminals serving as models for our children to follow.

Nowhere other than in the slick funhouse of politics is honesty so little regarded. With no leader at the helm who commands respect for his virtues rather than his secret connections, the population succumbs to the public relations, and pays no attention to the crimes committed for the purpose of enforcing the law.

Nowhere, it seems, has a leader to emerge who can stand above politics and speak to the welfare of us all, and not the social science schemes that raise minorities to majority stakeholders, and regard the rest of the population — the ones who built this country — as just so many inconvenient insurance policies waiting to be cashed in.

Although there has always been a hidden Rothschild tentacle guiding the development of the United States, early Americans managed to establish their own freedom. With the evolution of standardization and corporatization, these freedoms have been lost, these choices are no longer ours to make.

We are wired to the grid. To detach from it is to disengage ourselves from the world. Soon it will be obvious that every individual will be programmed from a central point. Our ability to resist this will determine the degree of freedom we will retain.

We are set up perfectly for a race war. The vampire movies are apt metaphors. The powers that be want you to think of poor people or strangers to be less than human, because that will make them easier to kill, like cockroaches in a shattered home, ready to be shipped to the landfill.

Many have said that in the future we will all be prisoners or guards. Which one will you be?

Isn’t it tragically funny that the only real political leader we’ve had during the past few centuries is the one person who is vilified more than any other, Adolf Hitler.

That’s the degree to which reality has been turned upside down by the Jews who have totally commandeered reality and turned human freedom into a prison camp.

Sad to say but had our Allies lost World War II to Germany, none of the wars that followed would ever have happened, because the forces that won World War II make their living making war, and profit mightily from all the wars they cause.

A real leader would work for the people, not for the bankers. We are desperately waiting for one to come along.

To think that we are actually on the cusp of electing a president whom the law enforcement community refuses to indict for her crimes is the signature of a police state with far more dire plans for its ignorant populace.

No authentic progress toward a peaceful world and a humane society may be undertaken without a meticulous vetting of what the Jews have done to the world. When the world finds out, may God have mercy on their souls.

To a world gone mad we direct this conversation . . .


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

http://therebel.is/news/kaminski

 http://johnkaminski.info/

 http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

 http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm

 http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Why do our best writers remain ignorant of the real reason America is slated for the trash heap. Ladies and gentlemen we are owned lock stock and barrel through the law of the sea by the Banking Cartel, as are most all Nations on earth. These scum-bags have created a system where we humans are reduced to investment contracts and our de-jure government was taken over by the existing de-facto corporation without anyone knowing what was going on. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. and other variations of it are for profit corporations designed to transfer the world’s wealth to the Banking Cartel, killing off all non profitable humans, and wind up owning every asset on earth. This is not that hard to prove, even for the dumb asses watching dancing with the stars. One can only wonder how someone like the above author does not know this in detail.

GO FIGURE!

SPEND ALL OF YOUR FREE TIME HERE

http://www.annavonreitz.com/

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM


The #1 Reason Why America Is Submitting to the New World Order

08/23/2016

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/08/22/the-1-reason-why-america-is-submitting-to-the-new-world-order/

8-23-2016 12-33-20 PM

Why are so many Americans simply giving in to the suspension of our Constitution and the widespread criminality among lur leaders (ie Clinton)?

There is a set of psychological reasons why our people, even those that are seemingly more awake than most, would accept this latest tyranny from their government. We know about cognitive dissonance which prevents people from seeing the totality of a threat and thus inhibiting their personal ability to make the paradigm shift needed to accurately perceive the threat. We also know about bystander apathy which stands as an obstacle to getting involved because in this large country, “someone else will do it”. And there is a third psychological reason which prevents us from getting involved because we have been conditioned that our actions cannot make any difference which is reflective of a condition called, learned helplessness.

The Brainwashing of America

8-23-2016 12-34-21 PM

“Yes we can sacrifice liberty for security. And there is no such thing as a conspiracy.”

Americans have been brainwashed into believing that their government will care for them in their time of need. Has this time in American history been foretold? I believe that it has and that H. G. Wells was the prophetic messenger of the New World Order.

Wells actually understood a concept that modern day psychologists refer to as learned helplessness and he wrote about it in his book, The Time Machine, which was originally published in 1895 and the book was later made into a 1960 hit movie by the same name. The book prophetically told of a time in the distant future where the “normal” inhabitants of the earth would be docile, passive and suffer from the condition that modern day psychologists refer to as “learned helplessness.” What is learned helplessness?

Learned Helplessness

Why won’t America stand up for herself? Why is the country, once a country which possessed courage and conviction, now sitting idly while allowing itself to be taken to the slaughter without so much as a whimper?

The answer to the above question lies in the psychological concept known as “Learned Helplessness” as discovered by Martin Seligman in the 1960’s.

“Learned helplessness” occurs when an animal, or a person, is repeatedly subjected to an aversive stimulus that it cannot escape from. Eventually, the animal will stop trying to avoid the stimulus and behave as if it is utterly helpless to change the situation. Even when opportunities to escape are presented, this learned helplessness will prevent any action”.

8-23-2016 12-33-20 PM

 

Phase One

In the first phase of the learned helplessness experiment, Seligman placed a dog on an electrical grid, shocked the dog and noted that the dog would demonstrate the ability to escape the aversive stimulus.

Phase Two

In the second phase, the dog was barricaded on the grid and was unable to escape the painful shocks. Eventually the dog laid down and passively accepted the shock.

Phase Three

Seligman then removed the barricades and the dog could have easily escaped the shocks. However, the dog, conditioned by the prior set of events, simply laid down and accepted the shocks, without mounting any resistance whatsoever. This, in large part, is where America is at today.

Conclusion

8-23-2016 12-36-51 PM

Unitl America discovers that their actions can and do make a difference, the American sheep will continue to accept their enslavement. Is there anything that can turn this around? Yes, the incessant message of freedom and the exposure of the abject criminality of this establishment as well as the sociopathy of Clinton. All of us need to become missionaries of the truth.

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM


Administrative Tribunals An end run around the constitution

08/22/2016

https://ppjg.me/2016/08/21/administrative-tribunals/

8-22-2016 10-00-44 AM

Marti Oakley

After hours and hours of conferencing this last week with several individuals and groups across the country, regarding the threat that the entire system of probate tribunals poses to the public at large, we have reached the consensus that this unlawful, unconstitutional system, cannot be repaired or made to be fair and equitable and therefore must be disposed of.

We all agreed it was pointless to contact any legislative representative.  These elected officials are all fully aware of the system of human trafficking for profit that occurs daily in the probate system, although they will claim that they do not know.  As our elderly are kidnapped and held in isolation while their estate is plundered by professional predators called “guardians”, our children are subject to being kidnapped at gunpoint by swat teams at the behest of Child Protective Services (CPS).  CPS is now regarded as the largest child trafficking organization on earth. 

Do you really believe your legislators don’t really know?

What are administrative tribunals?

The distinguishing mark of an administrative tribunal is that it possesses a complete, absolute and unfettered discretion and, having no fixed standard to follow, it is guided by its own ideas of policy and expediency. Hence, acting within its proper province and observing any procedural formalities prescribed, it cannot err in substantive matters because there is no standard for it to follow and hence no standard to judge or correct it by.”

Make no mistake about it, Administrative “courts” are not courts at all in the scope of the Constitution. These are specially created tribunals which make their own rules, and do not recognize natural rights and liberties as defined in the Constitution.

Administrative tribunals exist for one primary reason: To void the Constitution and to enable a system of unconstitutional and arbitrary titles, codes, regulations and statutes, all of which are specifically erected to dis-empower the individual to secure all rights and power in a government entity and to deprive ordinary people of their lives, property and freedom.

Beyond this, these tribunals have facilitated the greatest transfer of wealth ever witnessed in this country. With Americans over the age of 60 owning 60% of all real wealth (down from 75% just a few years ago) they have become a lucrative target for the predators whose profits from looting an estate are facilitated and condoned by these fictitious “courts”.

Administrative law,” recently said Judge Cuthbert W. Pound of the Court of Appeals of New York, “implies that branch of modern law under which the executive department of government, acting in a quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial capacity, interferes with the conduct of the individual for the purpose of promoting the well-being of the community. (*What community is he referring to? And administrative statute is not the same as law)

The community whose well-being is being promoted, is comprised of probate judges, family court judges, attorneys, professional predators euphemistically referred to as “guardians”, and a host of agencies and related personnel who all anticipate profiting at least marginally, in the system of human trafficking that is the system of probate. This system includes wills and trusts, family courts of all descriptions, including child support recovery.

Pursuant to the Appointments Clause in Article II, all members of Article III tribunals are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. This alone renders the argument that probate tribunals are constitutional as, void.

There are two significant differences between administrative tribunals and courts:

  1. Administrative tribunals are set up to be less formal, less expensive, and a faster way to resolve disputes than by using the traditional court system.

The truth is, these administrative tribunals are massively expensive to operate. The cost to communities and the state as a whole is a burden on taxpayers not to mention the continuing assault on private individuals and families to accommodate the redistribution of wealth and the government sanctioned system of human trafficking that accompany these activities.

  1. Tribunal members who make decisions (adjudicators) usually have special knowledge about the topic they are asked to consider. Judges, however, are expected to have general knowledge about many areas of law, not particular expertise about the law in the case they are hearing.

No, actually. Tribunal members are seldom required to have special knowledge about anything. While some states “elect” these executive administrators (you call them “judge”) most do not realize that the candidates on the ballot are only those selected for that position by interested party’s. Say for instance, the local BAR Association and the College of Probate Judges. Possibly with additional input from the National Guardianship Association. Tribunal administrators are not required to know the law as they only deal with the statutes and codes.

Know the difference!!

49 The distinction between constitutional courts and legislative courts was first made in American Ins. Co. v. Canter,50 which involved the question of the admiralty jurisdiction of the territorial court of Florida, the judges of which were limited to a four-year term in office. Said Chief Justice Marshall for the Court:

“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts, in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government, can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory belonging to the United States. The jurisdiction with which they are invested, is not a part of that judicial power which is defined in the 3rd article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress, in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.”

Problem is: The states are not territories of the Federal government.

Nevertheless, this same premise was used to construct administrative tribunals within each respective state. The administrative process is a collage of many unrelated legal concepts used to to regulate and adjudicate for the benefit of a protected class predators .

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Notable notes:  Natural Justice

The principles of natural justice include the right to be heard, and the right to an impartial decision maker. A party who has a right to be heard is entitled to sufficient prior notice of the proceeding so that the party has the opportunity to prepare his or her case, attend before a decision maker and make representations. The right to proper notice also includes the right to know the case that must be met; in other words, proper notice will include providing details of the case to the responding party.

An impartial decision-maker is one who is free of a reasonable apprehension of bias, whether personally or institutionally. Reasonable apprehension of personal bias might result when, for instance, a decision maker has a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the proceeding, or a prior relationship with one of the parties.

The Supreme Court has ruled that only Article III courts may render final judgments in cases involving life, liberty, and private property rights, with limited exceptions, as discussed below.

Article I tribunals consist of certain federal courts and other forms of adjudicative bodies. These tribunals, as created by Congress, are of various forms, and have differing levels of independence from the executive and legislative branches. They can be Article I Courts (also called legislative courts) set up by Congress to review agency decisions, military courts-martial appeal courts, ancillary courts with judges appointed by Article III appeals court judges, or administrative agencies

Article I judges are not subject to the Article III protections. For example, these judges do not enjoy life tenure, and Congress may reduce their salaries.The existence of Article I tribunals has been controversial, and their power has been challenged before the United States Supreme Court, which has determined that Article I tribunals may exist, but that their power must be circumscribed and, when a potential deprivation of life, liberty, property, or property interest is involved, their decisions are often subject to ultimate review in an Article III court.  (emphasis mine)

See Sokoloff v. Saxbe, 501 F.2d 571, 574 (2d Cir. 1974).180.

Hart v. McLucas, 535 F.2d 516, 519 http://openjurist.org/535/f2d/516/hart-v-l-mclucas

(9th Cir. 1976).

[T]he elements of [making an] intentional false statement [under a statute that an agency administers] are the first three elements of fraud: falsity,materiality and knowledge. Thus, intentional false statement is a lesser included offense within fraud..

.[F]raud requires at least one additional element, i.e., an intent to deceive

This is simply because jury trials were not integrated into the statutorily created adjudicatory process of the APA.’w a system dominated by administrative law judges and hearing officials, the process simply does not seem, on its face, to require an application of the Seventh Amendment because administrative cases do not arise under the common law. (Emphasis, mine)

“[T]he Seventh Amendment is generally inapplicable in administrative proceedings, where jury trials would be incompatible with the whole concept of administrative adjudication and would substantially interfere with the [agency’s] role in the statutory scheme.”‘

A public right is one in which “the Government is involved in its sovereign capacity under an otherwise valid statute creating enforceable public rights.”

Private rights, on the other hand, are generally “private tort, contract, and property cases.”

For the Court, the interpretation of the Seventh Amendment with respect to the APA was strictly a legal analysis regarding the forum through which a dispute is resolved.

This did not, however, impair Congress from creating and vesting new rights in administrative agencies similar to those preserved under the Seventh Amendment.

The Seventh Amendment was declaratory of the existing law, for it required only that jury trial in suits at common law was to a tribunal other than a court of law-such as an administrative agency-in which facts are not found by juries.

The distinguishing mark of an administrative tribunal is that it possesses a complete, absolute and unfettered discretion and, having no fixed standard to follow, it is guided by its own ideas of policy and expediency. Hence, acting within its proper province and observing any procedural formalities prescribed, it cannot err in substantive matters because there is no standard for it to follow and hence no standard to judge or correct it by.”

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/A/AdministrativeTribunal.aspx

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/26/511/case.html

http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3905&context=californialawreview

10 13 11 flagbar

 


Stealth Euthanasia: Health Care Tyranny in America

08/20/2016

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/08/no_author/will-murdered-health-care-system/

(Hospice, Palliative Care and Health Care Reform)

By Ron Panzer

Selected excerpts, along with bracketed comments by Donald W. Miller, Jr., M.D.

(The bold, italic, and red font text that the author uses in Stealth Euthanasia are copied as is here.)

When the federal government becomes the big HMO itself, test and treatment denials will be the equivalent of death sentences for some, even many. The new health care reform law creates several methods that are likely to result in rationed care under the guise of “limiting expenditures,” or “keeping costs down.” [The power elite’s 2010 “Affordable Care Act” is a giant step towards their goal of installing a government-controlled and run, centralized, single-payer health care system — “the big HMO itself.”]

About 40% of all American deaths now occurring in hospice. [The new politically correct American way to die.]

This book provides a rare glimpse of the realities of health care in America that you will find nowhere else [This is not true. See my 2015 Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons article “Modern Medicine at the Crossroads,” also on LRC, and other articles and books on these realities by other investigators.]

Because of the HIPAA privacy regulations, nobody interested in researching what is actually going on in hospice can get access to the data, so hospices that have an agenda can act without any outside interference or supervision. [This is a key point in the book and an important insight by the author.]

Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, who our President appointed Health Advisor, promotes the “Complete Lives System” that is being implemented to ration care. Donald Berwick, who our President appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is a strong proponent of Comparative Effectiveness Research which will also be used to ration care. Under the new law, “Accountable Care Organizations” [ACOs] are set up which will force very aggressive rationing practices by medical groups. [Despite substantial effort the “Complete Lives System” could not be incorporated in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Furthermore, ACOs are fast going bankrupt.]

Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research institute (PCORI), whose main activities will result in rationed care. [After considerable opposition the IPAB was also removed from the ACA.]

Palliative care (symptom management).

There is one practice that is sweeping through hospices and being very widely used: terminal or palliative sedation. This involves permanently sedating the patient, allowing the patient to dehydrate and die. It looks outwardly peaceful as the patient is made to sleep in a medically-induced coma, but the patient’s death is the result. [Sad. But true.]

The top level policymakers have decided that people will die in hospice or palliative care units and that they will be pushed into hospice through a wide variety of means. $3.6 billion saved in one year. Think that motivates the government? That’s nothing compared to the savings when the people placed into hospice doubles in the years to come. That’s the plan. If patients are hurried along toward death, the savings skyrocket! [To make matter even worse, it will not make much difference in ever-rising medical care costs.]

The “culture of death” that promotes imposing death through euthanasia, assisted-suicide or the Third Way in hospice (terminal sedation) views the pro-life movement as “the enemy.” In fact, they view traditional American society as “the enemy,” something to be manipulated and defeated so that their goals can be achieved. It is clear that traditional American values are pro-life. The Declaration of Independence mentions specifically the right to life!

Its 1994 Charter for Health Care Workers specifically warns against depriving the dying of the “possibility of living his own life, by reducing him to a state of unconsciousness not worthy of a human being. This is why the administration of narcotics for the sole purpose of depriving the dying person of a conscious end is a truly deplorable practice.” [This brings to mind the spirited 2006 movie Two Weeks with Sally Fields, which my wife and I saw recently, from Netflix, which I highly recommend.]

Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider and 96% of its services for pregnant women are abortions.” [The author describes how a fetus, viewed on ultrasound, even in its first three months of life reacts and fights to keep from being aborted by an abortionist.]

But withholding the patient’s regular medications, way before the patient reaches the end, active phase of dying, pushes the patient into a crisis. The patient then appears to be “actively dying” and is then either sedated, given morphine and other opioids, or both, and that un-needed cocktail of medications completely destabilizes the patient, who then dies. The trusting family doesn’t know what happened. Sometimes unneeded laxatives are given to promote uncontrolled diarrhea and contribute to life-threatening dehydration. [Pretty sickening.]

Patient “autonomy.” “Patient Self-Determination.” Haven’t we heard that before? We have. Again, this is the language being used today to justify the legalization of assisted-suicide, the “right to die,” and has been one of the three principles of the federal ethics set forth by the Congressionally-created Belmont Commission in 1978. [Elites are putting the leading component of medical ethics, patient autonomy, to ill effect.].

A denial of nutrition, may, in the long run, become the only effective way to make certain that a large number of biologically tenacious patients actually die.”  “Given the increasingly large pool of superannuated, chronically ill, physically marginal elderly, it could well become the nontreatment of choice.” And it now is the “nontreatment of choice,” implemented in many hospices, hospitals, and nursing homes around the country making “sure” patients who just won’t die “soon enough” actually die. To make it seem more humane, sedation is added. [Said again, this way.]

There is a reason the major media refuses to publish the truth about hospice, palliative care, health care reform and stealth euthanasia. Most of the major media outlets like the Washington Post, ABC News, CNN and others have direct connections to those who support the culture of death approach: George Soros and others. Soros has poured millions into the major media and active journalists are on the boards of directors of Soros-funded organizations. In addition, many journalists support the Third Way stealth euthanasia practiced in many hospice and palliative care units (just “let him go”) and the legalization of euthanasia and assisted-suicide. [The picture of Soros’ face keeps popping up everywhere.]

HIPAA was “sold” to the public with the idea it would protect patient’s private personal information. HIPAA forms a complete wall of silence about what goes on behind closed curtains in doctor’s offices, hospitals, in hospice agencies, nursing homes, assisted living and any clinic of any sort. In 2009, the “HITECH” Act modified the HIPAA Privacy Rule to give it dramatically increased penalties: It’s about the silencing staff that sees what goes on. Employees. Health care workers are not going to talk about problems in health care with the public (say through a news story) unless they wish to risk everything on a casual comment. [I also discuss HIPAA and HITECH in my “Modern Medicine at the Crossroads” article.]

The Washington State “Death With Dignity Act” allows physicians to write prescriptions for a lethal drug and orders the medical examiners to falsely list the cause of death as the illness the patient was suffering from, rather than the lethal drug they took to kill themselves. Falsification of death certificates is nothing new, but openly ordering the medical examiners to lie is new. We hear about falsification of death certificates often from families who report their loved one was killed in a hospice or palliative care setting and then the cause of death is listed as cancer, Alzheimers or some other illness. Just as in the case of falsification of medical charts: whatever is officially listed (as the cause of death) is the truth, because it says so. It doesn’t matter that it’s all a complete lie. If everyone in government simply accepts what the record says, that is what the “official” truth is. Something that could have come right out of the Soviet Union’s propaganda machine. [As a physician/surgeon who practiced medicine in Washington State for 40 years, I am so glad now to be retired.]

[Especially having just turned age 76, talk about a scary graph!]

Not providing services to those the elite decide are not worthy of care is rationing. [Except, of course, the power elites themselves will have their own category of health care, where nothing will be rationed.]

Those who are pushing reform forward believe strongly in the need for entitlement reform. They will ration health care through the “Complete Lives System,” “Cost Efficiency Research”, and by encouraging physicians with financial incentives to get elders into hospice and palliative care sooner than they have been doing. [There is a lot of repetition in this 186,000-word book.]

The President appointed Donald Berwick, the director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). Berwick has a long history of supporting health care reform including the rationing of care. In 1994, he wrote “Eleven Worthy Aims for Clinical Leadership of Health System Reform” and suggested that:

Most metropolitan areas in the United States should reduce the number of centers engaging in cardiac surgery, high-risk obstetrics, neonatal intensive care, organ transplantation, tertiary cancer care, high-level trauma care, and high-technology imaging.[JAMA. 1994;272(10):797-802.]

Berwick stated very plainly in a 2009 interview, “Rethinking Comparative Effectiveness Research” that he supports its use to ration care and bring costs down: “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care–the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.” [The author accurately describes Dr. Berwick; and although he does not dwell on it, comparative effectiveness research is subject to bias and manipulation.]

The real question is whether decisions made by Big Government about the availability of the care you need will be in your interests or the interests of an impersonal government evaluation of what “people of your age” should have access to. Remember, “Comparative Effectiveness Research” may sound reasonable at some point, but when coupled with Ezekiel Emanuel, MD’s “Complete Lives System,” it’s a recipe for disaster. And these types of ways of thinking, so shocking to ordinary citizens, have been promoted for many years. They will be pushed forward by many of the elite whether or not the health care reform law is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. [Repeated. Since declared constitutional, the ACA remains a recipe for disaster and currently is in the process of steadily self-destructing.]

The Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), (also mentioned in the health care reform law as the “Independent Medicare Advisory Board”) with its Presidentially-appointed 15 members, can amass unimaginable power to limit care provided to Medicare recipients. Mark Hemingway has written an April 14, 2011, article, “Obama’s Medicare Plan: Rationing by Bureaucrats — The president’s big plan for Medicare involves unelected bureaucrats making life or death decisions.” Hemingway states that “any recommendations IPAB makes about Medicare spending automatically become law,” and that “IPAB is more and more likely to be a Trojan Horse for the serious command-and-control rationing. [After the extensive dispute, the IPAB is no longer a part of the ACA, i.e., “Obamacare.” The Complete Lives System also has not yet been implemented—see my 2015 article “Modern Medicine at the Crossroads” for more on this.]

An Amazon reviewer of the book writes, “Euthanasia in hospice is horrifyingly real.”

The author addresses subject of stealth euthanasia head-on. But parts of it, as noted, are already outdated. While repetitious, the book is well written, with chilling effect. But this 286-page, 186,000-word manuscript is overly long and could profit from being updated and shortened. Nevertheless, Stealth Euthanasia unflinchingly addresses a very important subject, and in its free online format, the author provides many important links.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Dear Readers, don’t you think it’s time to admit you have been beguiled from kinder-garden, and the lies keep getting bigger and bigger. To hold any loyalty to this government is as dumb as it gets. What will you do when this happens to your parents? Is becoming a  supporter of murder’s all you have to look forward to?

10 13 11 flagbar


Dr William Mount Le Neu Republique and NESARA On the Hot Plate

08/19/2016

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/05/dr-william-mount-le-neu-republique-and.html

12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

This article is a re-print because it is so important to keep this info on the top shelf of your mind.

By Anna Von Reitz

First, Dr. William Mount.  I have heard numerous “reports” and watched several videos that people have sent me over the last two years all issued by this man and absolutely not one of his prognostications bore fruit.

When one considers “the fruits” one must consider whether there are any.  And next, what has occurred by omission— people being scared for nothing, people being hopeful for nothing, and most importantly, people not thinking for themselves and acting in their own best interests while relying on the “intel” being fed to them by Dr. William Mount.

Second, Le Neu Republique, or is it La Neu Republique—-?  “La”, I believe upon reconsideration.  The French have the habit of considering all things that are changeable and secretive, like governments, to be of the feminine gender. Who knows?  Perhaps they are right.

Anyway, the Truth of the matter is that the French Government allowed itself to be used as an accomplice by the British Government back at the end of the Second World War.  Both countries owed a lot of money to the Americans so they were both hot to find a way to defraud us.  And they did.

The French charted both the UN Corporation and the International Monetary Fund doing business as the IMF (which is an agency of the United Nations) well before the United Nations Charter was ever signed.

Think about that. Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

The UNITED STATES, Inc. which sponsored all the STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WHATEVER ELSE franchises and which has been busily providing us with “governmental services” since 1944 — and providing us with a lot of services we never ordered and not providing services we did order and basically overcharging us for everything possible— is owned and operated by the IMF which is in turn owned and operated by the UN Corp which is owned and operated by the World Bank which is owned and operated by Jacob Rothschild who is the pimp for the British Crown Conglomerate.

The French supplied the corporate charters to hide the British aim, and the British provided the mechanisms and the man-power to carry out the fraud scheme against the Americans— the whole fraud of registering our births and creating these bogus corporate entities and operating them in our names and buying and trading them on the stock markets of the world is pure British crime at its best—- press-ganging, inland piracy, semantic decent, reverse trust fraud, identity theft, credit theft— all brought to you by people you thought were your friend and Allies, people you trusted to run the court system for you.

The problem for the French is that because they chartered these infamous corporations, they are responsible for their lawful operation and functioning.

Rather than own up to their responsibility and admitting their guile and culpability, the French Government is attempting to continue to usurp our lawful government and keep all this crap under the rug, by booting up another French “governmental services corporation” and (falsely) advertising it as the “New Republic”.

The advantage of the “New Republic” from their standpoint is that if we are stupid enough to go for it, they can then use it as a means to force us to pay off the odious debts owed by the first French corporation known as the UNITED STATES, Inc. And, they think nobody will be any the wiser.

The Brits are eagerly backing this plan, too, because God-forbid that their seedy underbelly and sanctimonious fraud be exposed to the rest of the world.  We might then all have the good sense to throw off centuries of British Crown domination and fraud and criminality—especially their dominance of the banking and legal industry, the criminal manipulation of which is their main source of income.

We have been snookered senseless by our “Allies”, and that is the sad fact of it. General Dunford has perhaps been drawn into the net or perhaps thought he had no choice but to accept the newest con as a remedy for the old con. I certainly cannot and will not answer for him, nor even presume that he has actually agreed to play a part in this scheme.  There seems to be no credible confirmation one way or another from him.

Somehow, it never occurs to crooks caught red-handed up to their shoulders in the cookie jar that they need to admit their crime.  They need to come forward and just say— we were bombed out after the Second World War, our land ravaged, our cities in ruins.  We had to borrow from the Americans and we did— but we did it in a dishonest way, because otherwise the debt involved would have crushed us and reduced our people to generations of misery.  So that’s what we did and why we did it.  Can we be forgiven?

I think the answer is— yes, but only if you straighten up your act, stop doing this crazy stuff, and finally deal with the bankers and lawyers who have been allowed –and indeed, instructed— to promote all this criminality and fraud.

Otherwise, it is inevitable that the people in all these countries throughout Europe and throughout the world are going to wake up and start tearing down banks brick by brick and gibbeting lawyers on street corners.

We have finally grown up enough to understand that these are not political, ethnic, nor religious issues.  These are issues of self-interested crime being promoted by members of society in positions of trust, both public and private.

So, thumbs down on the French Neu Republique.  What we need is our old American Republic fully restored with no further questions or obligations.

Third, about NESARA…. I have covered this repeatedly, but people don’t want to hear it.  My Mother was intimately involved in the Farm Union Cases that gave rise to the original NESARA legislation.  It was offered as remedy by a lone Congressman and it was laughed out of the Beltway.

Why, the members of Congress asked, should we pay our honest debts to the American People?  We can just seek bankruptcy protection instead—- and that’s what they did.

There’s no question that they have acted as criminals, that they and the banks are guilty of fraud, extortion, personage, unlawful conversion—absolutely none.  It has already been decided long ago by the Supreme Court.

But here is a little history lesson people need to take to heart— the Supreme Court can’t force the Congress to take any positive action.  It can only force the Congress to stop doing a specific wrong thing.  And the Congress, not the Supreme Court, holds the purse strings.

So the Supreme Court can find in your favor all day long, but if the United States of America, Inc., is bankrupt and the dodgy characters who made off with your assets are not willing to make things right using other funds, the old adage about “blood from a turnip” applies.

Of course, the rats should never have been allowed any bankruptcy protection in the first place.  The crimes they committed amount to malicious fraud and should have pierced the “corporate veil” like a knife and ended the bankruptcy proceedings instantly, but instead, the Supreme Court “sealed” the cases and has sat on the whole stinking pile of manure ever since.

The members of “Congress” and Billy Boy Clinton sat there in their posh offices laughing at the defrauded farmers and the millions upon millions of other honest hard-working American families they snookered— they still do.  They think that’s their job and their privilege, since we were so stupid as to vote for them and hand them our proxy as “representatives” instead of fiduciary deputies.

They can do what they like with no accountability at all— until the American People and the American Armed Forces finally wake to hell up.

But back to NESARA….. the only way  that NESARA will ever be passed is if the halls of Washington, DC, are scrubbed clean with bleach and a completely new Congress composed of lawfully elected and fully accountable fiduciary deputies votes for it.

Period.

There is no way that the currently composed Congress will or even can pass the NESARA legislation.

I hear you all scratching your heads and asking— “Wait a minute, Anna, you just said that the members of Congress are free to do whatever they like, including selling us down the drain? What do you mean now that they “can’t” pass NESARA?”

They can’t pass NESARA because that would cost the already insolvent UNITED STATES, Inc., even more than it owes already.  The only way they can pay their secondary creditors is by pretending that their Priority Creditors (you and I) either don’t exist or voluntarily “abandoned” our claims against them, plus, the members of Congress took their Oath to the United States—-not the united States of America.

Look up the “Oath of Office” the members of Congress have taken.  They didn’t pledge their allegiance to you, their “presumed” constituents, nor to this country, either.  They pledged it to the IMF doing business as the “UNITED STATES”.

That’s why they can’t do anything like pass NESARA, even if they wanted to.

Real remedy requires a lot more than “hope and spin and wishful thinking”.  It requires insight and critical thought and meaningful action from all of you.  Just letting the members of “Congress” and the “United Nations” and the “Joint Chiefs” and everyone on your email list know these facts might be the single best thing you could ever do.

See this article and over 200 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM


The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose

08/18/2016

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2950-the-reasons-why-the-globalists-are-destined-to-lose

8-18-2016 10-15-58 AM

By Brandon Smith

Under the surface of almost every sociopolitical and economic event in the world there burns an ever-raging, but often unseen, war. This war, for now, is fought with fiction and with truth, with journalistic combat and with quiet individual deeds. It is defined by two sides which could not be more philosophically or spiritually separate.

On one side is a pervasive network of corporate moguls and elites, banking entities, international financial consortiums, think tanks and political puppets. They work tirelessly to reshape public psychology and society as a whole into something they sometimes call the “New World Order;” a completely and scientifically centralized planet in which they control every aspect of government, trade, life and even moral compass. I often refer to them simply as the “Globalists,” which is how they at times refer to themselves.

On the other side is a movement that has developed organically and instinctively, growing without direct top-down “leadership,” but still guided through example by various teachers and activists, driven by a concrete set of principles based in natural law. It is composed of the religious, the agnostic and even some atheists.  It is soldiered by people of all ethnic and financial backgrounds. These groups are tied together by a singular and resounding belief in the one vital thing they can all agree upon — the inherent and inborn rights of freedom. I call them the “Liberty Movement.”

There are those who think they do not have a dog in this fight, those who ignore it and those who are completely oblivious to it. However, EVERYONE can and will be affected by it, no exceptions. This war is for the future of the human race. Its consequences will determine if the next generation will choose the conditions of their environment and maintain the ability to reach their true potential as individuals or if every aspect of their lives will be micromanaged for them by a faceless, soulless bureaucracy that does not have their best interests at heart.

As you can probably tell, I am not unbiased in my examination of these two sides. While some of the more “academically minded” cynics out there do attempt to marginalize the entire conflict by accusing both sides of simply trying to impose “their ideology” on the rest of humanity, I would say that such people are generally ignorant of what is at stake.

There is in fact an elemental force behind this war. I would even call it a conflagration between good and evil. For a more in-depth analysis on the evil behind globalism, read my article “Are Globalists Evil Or Just Misunderstood.”

Some people don’t adhere to such absolutes or they think good and evil are fantasies created by religion to keep society in check. I have no intention of trying to convince them otherwise. All I can say is, I have seen and experienced these absolutes first hand and, therefore, I have no choice but to remain a believer.

I would also point out that the general experience of most men and women is that the act of organized and legitimate oppression is inherently evil and such actions in the name of satisfying delusional elitist narcissism are even more evil. While these experiences are subjective, they are also universal, regardless of the culture, place or time in history. Most of us feel the same horror and the same defiance when presented with rising tyranny. We can’t necessarily explain why, but we all know.

While I am firmly on the side of liberty and am willing to fight and trade my life to stop the “New World Order” the globalists are so obsessed with, I will not turn this examination of their tactics into a blind or one sided farce. I will point out where the elites are effective just as I will point out where they are ineffective. It would do more harm than good to portray the globalists as “stupid” or bumbling in their efforts. They are not stupid. They are actually astonishingly clever and should not be underestimated.

They are indeed conniving and industrious, but, they are not wise. For if they were wise, they would be able to see the ultimate futility of their goal and the world would be saved decades of tragedy and loss. Their cultism has dulled their senses to reality and they have abandoned truth in the name of control. Here are some of the primary strategies that the globalists are using to gain power and work towards total centralization and why their own mindset has doomed them to failure.

Globalism vs. “Populism”

The globalists have used the method of false dichotomies for centuries to divide nations and peoples against each other in order to derive opportunity from chaos. That said, the above dichotomy is about as close to real as they have ever promoted. As I explained in my article, “Globalists Are Now Openly Demanding New World Order Centralization,” the recent passage of the Brexit referendum in the U.K. has triggered a surge of new propaganda from establishment media outlets.  The thrust of this propaganda is the notion that “populists” are behind the fight against globalization and these populists are going to foster the ruin of nations and the global economy.  That is to say — globalism good, populism bad.

There is a real fight between globalists and those who desire a free, decentralized and voluntary society.  They have just changed some of the labels and the language. We have yet to see how effective this strategy will be for the elites, but it is very useful for them in certain respects.

The wielding of the term “populist” is about as sterilized and distant from “freedom and liberty” as you can get. It denotes not just “nationalism,” but selfish nationalism. And the association people are supposed to make in their minds is that selfish nationalism leads to destructive fascism (i.e. Nazis).  Therefore, when you hear the term “populist,” the globalists hope you will think “Nazi.”

Also, keep in mind that the narrative of the rise of populism coincides with grave warnings from the elites that such movements will cause global economic collapse if they continue to grow. Of course, the elites have been fermenting an economic collapse for years. We have been experiencing many of the effects of it for some time. In a brilliant maneuver, the elites have attempted to re-label the liberty movement as “populist” (Nazis), and use liberty activists as a scapegoat for the fiscal time bomb THEY created.

Will the masses buy it?  I don’t know.  I think that depends on how effectively we expose the strategy before the breakdown becomes too entrenched.  The economic collapse itself has been handled masterfully by the elites, though. There is simply no solution that can prevent it from continuing. Even if every criminal globalist was hanging from a lamp post tomorrow and honest leadership was restored to government, the math cannot be changed and decades of struggle will be required before national economies can be made prosperous again.

Communism vs. Fascism

This is a classic ploy by the globalists to divide a culture against itself and initiate a calamity that can be used as leverage for greater centralization down the road.  If you have any doubts about fascism and communism being engineered, I highly suggest you look into the very well documented analysis of Antony Sutton. I do not have the space here to do his investigations justice.

Today, we see elites like George Soros funding and aiding the latest incarnation of the communist hordes — namely social justice groups like Black Lives Matter.  The collectivist psychosis and Orwellian behavior exhibited by race junkies like BLM and third-wave feminists is thoroughly pissing off conservatives who are tired of being told what to think and how to act every second of every day. And this is the point…

If you want to get a picture of America in 2016, look back at Europe during the 1930’s. Communist provocateurs, some real and some fabricated by the establishment itself, ran rampant in Europe creating labor disintegration and fiscal turmoil. The elites then funded and elevated fascism as the “solution” to communism. Normally even-handed conservatives were so enraged by the communist spitting and ankle biting that they became something just as evil in response.

The U.S. may be on the same path if we are not careful. The latest shootings in Texas will make hay for the globalists. Think about this for a moment — on one side you have Obama telling the liberals that the answer to police brutality is to federalize law enforcement even more that it already is. On the other side, you have some Republicans arguing that a more militarized police presence will help prevent groups like BLM from causing more trouble. Notice that the only solution we are being offered here is more federal presence on our streets?

I do see, though, a rather large weakness in the plan to ignite a communist vs. fascist meltdown in the U.S., and that weakness is the existence of the Liberty Movement itself.  The movement has grown rather sophisticated in its media presence and prevalent in influence. It does have enough sway now to diffuse some aspects of a rise to fascism in the political Right. The only option the elites have is to find a way to co-opt us. If they can manipulate the liberty movement into supporting a fascist system, then they would be very close to winning the entire fight. This would be highly unlikely given the stubbornness of liberty proponents when adhering to their principles.

The elites might be able to get a large part of the public to take sides in their false paradigm, but if they can’t con the millions that make up the liberty movement into the fold, then their job becomes much harder.

Moral Compass vs. Moral Relativism

Moral relativism is perhaps the pinnacle goal of the globalists. Why? Because if you can convince an entire society that their inherent conscience should be ignored and that their inborn feelings of morality are “open to interpretation,” then eventually ANY evil action can be rationalized. When evil becomes “good,” and good becomes evil, evil men will reign supreme.

The problem is, conscience is an inborn psychological product, a result of inherent archetypal dualities universal to almost all people. It is ingrained in our DNA, or our very souls if you believe in such a thing. It cannot be erased easily.

Moral relativism requires a person to treat every scenario as a “gray area.”  This is not practical. Conscience dictates that we treat every situation as potentially unique and act according to what we feel in our hearts is right given the circumstances.  This does not mean, though, that there is no black and white; or that there are no concrete rules.  There is almost always a black and white side to any situation dealing with right and wrong.  Moral “dilemmas” are exceedingly rare.  In fact, I don’t think I have ever encountered a real moral dilemma in history or in personal experience. The only time I ever see moral dilemmas is in movies and television.

Only in television fantasy is moral relativism ever the “only way” to solve a problem. And despite the preponderance of moral relativism in our popular culture, the ideology is still having trouble taking hold.  If it was so easy to undermine conscience, then the NWO would have already achieved complete pacification. We are still far from pacification. Whoever hard-wired our conscience should be applauded.

Collectivism vs. Individualism

The very core of globalism and the NWO is the position that sovereignty and individualism must be sacrificed for the “good of the group”; in other words, they promote collectivism.  Of course, groups by their very nature are abstractions; they only exist as long as the individuals within them recognize them as viable.  Unfortunately, collectivists do not accept this fact because it would mean that the group, no matter how utopian, is not the pinnacle of human existence – rather, the individual is and always will be the pinnacle of human existence.

The elites MUST convince people that individualism is dangerous and that collectivism is the only way to prevent the tragedies wrought by those who wish to be separate.  Of course, most of the tragedies we experience on a national or global scale are actually engineered by the elites, not by wild individuals or sovereign nations looking for trouble.  They then blame the very concept of sovereignty as a barbaric ritual from the past that must be abolished for the sake of all.

In order for the globalists to reinforce the need for collectivism, though, they must engage people on an individual psychological level.  Most human beings have an inherent desire to interact with their fellow man, but they also have an inherent identity and drive to pursue their own development without interference.  We like to be a part of a group as long as our participation is healthy and voluntary and our associations are a matter of choice.

Human beings are instinctively tribal, but we have psychological and biological limits to the size of the tribe we prefer to be a part of.  Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology prevalent in the 1990’s, found that there is a cognitive limit to the number of individuals any one person can maintain stable relationships with.  Dunbar found this number to be between 100 – 200 people.  A limitation also extends to the size of effective groups versus ineffective groups.  He found that effective tribes and communities tend to remain between 500 – 2500 people.

The human mind does not adapt well to a vast tribal groups, and recoils from the idea of a “global tribe”.  The truth is, human beings function far better in smaller groups and they do not like to be forced into participating in any group, let alone larger groups.  This may account for the feeling of isolation that is common among people who live in metropolitan areas.  They are surrounded by millions of neighbors and perhaps hundreds of associates yet they still feel alone because they do not have a functioning tribe of acceptable size.

Vast numbers of people can be tied together by an ideal that resonates with them, which is the only purpose for nations to form (to protect that ideal), but that is as far as the voluntary association goes.  Globalist collectivism is simply unnatural.  People know it unconsciously, they know it is an act of force and oppression, and will invariably move to sabotage its false tribalism as they begin to see its true colors.

Total Control vs. Reality

This is where the globalists philosophy really begins to break down. The elitist pursuit of total information awareness and total social control is truly perverse and insane, and insanity breeds delusion and weakness.  The fact is, they will NEVER complete the goal of complete micro-control. It is mathematically and psychologically impossible.

First, in any system, and in complex systems most of all, there are always elements that cannot be quantified or predicted. To understand this issue, I recommend studying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. To summarize, the uncertainty principle dictates that anyone observing a system in action, even from a distance, can still affect the behavior of that system indirectly or unconsciously in ways they could never predict.  They are also limited by their ability to objectively perceive all available elements of what they observe.  Unknown quantities result, predictability goes out the window and total control of that system becomes unattainable.

This principle also applies to human psychology, as numerous psychoanalysts have discovered when treating patients. The doctor, or the observer, is never able to observe their patient without indirectly affecting the behavior of their patient in unpredictable ways. Therefore, a completely objective analysis of that patient can never be obtained.

What the elites seek is a system by which they can observe and influence all of us in minute detail without triggering a reaction that they wouldn’t expect.  The laws of physics and psychology derail this level of control.  There will always be unknown quantities, free radicals, wild cards, etc. Even a seemingly perfect utopia can be brought down by a single unknown.

To break this down even further to the level of pure mathematics, I recommend study into Kurt Godel and his Incompleteness Proof. This, I believe is the ultimate example of the elites struggling against the fact of unknown quantities and failing.

Godel’s work revolved around either proving or disproving the idea that mathematicians could define “infinity” in mathematical terms. For, if infinity can be defined, then it can be understood in base mathematical axioms, and if infinity can be understood, then the universe in its entirety can be understood. Godel discovered the opposite — his incompleteness proof established once and for all that infinity is a self inclusive paradox that CANNOT be defined through mathematics. Keep in mind that a proof is a set of mathematical laws that can never be broken. Two plus two will always equal four; it will never equal anything else.

Well known globalist Bertrand Russell worked tirelessly to show that the entirety of the universe could be broken down into numbers, writing a three volume monstrosity called the Principia Mathematica.  Russell’s efforts were fruitless and Godel’s proof later crushed his theory. Russell railed against Godel’s proof, but to no avail.

Now, why was an elitist like Russell who openly championed scientific dictatorship so concerned by Godel? Well, because Godel, in mathematical terms, destroyed the very core of the globalist ideology. He proved that the globalist aspirations of godhood would never be realized. There are limits to the knowledge of man, and limits to what he can control.  This is not something globalists can ever accept, for if they did, every effort they have made for decades if not centuries would be pointless.

As mentioned earlier, the issue is one of unknown quantities. Can human society ever be fully dominated? Or, is the act of rebellion against stagnating and oppressive systems a part of nature?  Is it possible that the more the elites wrap the world in a cage, the more they inspire unpredictable reactions that could undermine their authority?

This might explain the establishment’s constant attention to the idea of the “lone wolf” and the damage one person acting outside the dictates of the system can do. This is what the elites fear most: the possibility that despite all their efforts of surveillance and manipulation, individuals and groups may one day be struck by an unpredictable urge to pick up a rifle and put the globalists out of everyone’s misery. No chatter, no electronic trail, no warning.

This is why they are destined to lose. They can never know all the unknowns. They can never control all the free radicals. There will always be rebellion. There will always be a liberty movement. The entirety of their utopian schematic revolves around the need to remove unknowns. They refuse to acknowledge that control at these levels is so frail it becomes useless and mortally dangerous. In their arrogance, they have ignored the warnings of the very sciences they worship and have set their eventual end in stone. While they may leave a considerable path of destruction in their wake, it is already written; they will not win.

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM


Who’s your conspiracy theorist now?? Obama just gave the green light to the UN to use force against Americans in America

08/17/2016

 

7-18-2016 10-39-53 AM

By Marti Oakley

We are now an officially occupied nation.  The attached executive order was signed July 1, 2016.  In collusion with every member of congress, President Obama has forfeited our sovereignty, and commenced the occupation of America by foreign troops issued from the United Nations.

On July 1, 2016 Obama signed an executive order that would allow the UN the right to use force here in America.  This order specifically omits any mention of any restriction of use of force on American citizens.  But the question remains…..Why is the UN on our land, in our communities and why is our military aligned with them?  For what purpose?

For months the reports of convoys on our highways and of train cars loaded with UN and US military equipment have been numerous.  These convoys have traversed the country and have alerted a large portion of the country to the potential for a government coup, effectively taking us down.  Internet trolls and astroturfer’s paid by companies, by  politicians, the government, military contractors and the military itself,  stalk the net with the usual “conspiracy theorist” tags and labels in an effort to derail the conversation and to encourage readers to disregard what was in front of them.  Those reporting were “delusional”, “paranoid”, “tin foil hat” people….and they didn’t see what they said they saw.  Never mind the photos and videos…..they didn’t really see that.  Get it?

Simultaneously, the staged false flag events such as Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, the Pulse Club, to name a few, have occurred in direct correlation to the ongoing attempts to strike down the 2nd Amendment.  Its far easier to overthrow and enslave a country if no one has the means to fight back.

Once Homeland Security was established, all of our law enforcement agencies were brought under their control.  Then it was declared that anyone who mentioned the Constitution, their rights, or who voted for 3rd party candidates were to be viewed as suspect.  Fusion centers were set up across the country to spy on people locally and the massive data collection center was built in Utah that records everything we do.  Millions of us are on terror watch lists of all kinds.  We are the enemy our own government fears most.

Until we turn in our guns, forfeit our sovereignty and set fire to our Constitution, the staged false flag massacres will continue. In other words, give up America! You have been bought, sold, and traded.  And foreign troops are now stationed around the country with the intent of warring with us lest we should be so foolish as to think we are still a free, sovereign nation.

Please read the attached executive order.  Not one congress person has objected to or even mentioned this.  If you think voting in November will change one iota of what is happening right before your eyes, think again.  Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn’t change!

Whitehouse.gov:

UNITED STATES POLICY ON PRE- AND POST-STRIKE MEASURES TO ADDRESS CIVILIAN CASUALTIES IN U.S. OPERATIONS INVOLVING THE USE OF FORCE

 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. United States policy on civilian casualties resulting from U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense is based on our national interests, our values, and our legal obligations. As a Nation, we are steadfastly committed to complying with our obligations under the law of armed conflict, including those that address the protection of civilians, such as the fundamental principles of necessity, humanity, distinction, and proportionality.

The protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent with the effective, efficient, and decisive use of force in pursuit of U.S. national interests. Minimizing civilian casualties can further mission objectives; help maintain the support of partner governments and vulnerable populations, especially in the conduct of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations; and enhance the legitimacy and sustainability of U.S. operations critical to our national security. As a matter of policy, the United States therefore routinely imposes certain heightened policy standards that are more protective than the requirements of the law of armed conflict that relate to the protection of civilians.

Civilian casualties are a tragic and at times unavoidable consequence of the use of force in situations of armed conflict or in the exercise of a state’s inherent right of self-defense. The U.S. Government shall maintain and promote best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, take appropriate steps when such casualties occur, and draw lessons from our operations to further enhance the protection of civilians.

Sec. 2. Policy. In furtherance of U.S. Government efforts to protect civilians in U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense, and with a view toward enhancing such efforts, relevant departments and agencies (agencies) shall continue to take certain measures in present and future operations.

(a) In particular, relevant agencies shall, consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

(i) train personnel, commensurate with their responsibilities, on compliance with legal obligations and policy guidance that address the protection of civilians and on implementation of best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, including through exercises, pre-deployment training, and simulations of complex operational environments that include civilians;

(ii) develop, acquire, and field intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that, by enabling more accurate battlespace awareness, contribute to the protection of civilians;

(iii) develop, acquire, and field weapon systems and other technological capabilities that further enable the discriminate use of force in different operational contexts;

(iv) take feasible precautions in conducting attacks to reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, such as providing warnings to the civilian population (unless the circumstances do not permit), adjusting the timing of attacks, taking steps to ensure military objectives and civilians are clearly distinguished, and taking other measures appropriate to the circumstances; and

(v) conduct assessments that assist in the reduction of civilian casualties by identifying risks to civilians and evaluating efforts to reduce risks to civilians.

(b) In addition to the responsibilities above, relevant agencies shall also, as appropriate and consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

(i) review or investigate incidents involving civilian casualties, including by considering relevant and credible information from all available sources, such as other agencies, partner governments, and nongovernmental organizations, and take measures to mitigate the likelihood of future incidents of civilian casualties;

(ii) acknowledge U.S. Government responsibility for civilian casualties and offer condolences, including ex gratia payments, to civilians who are injured or to the families of civilians who are killed;

(iii) engage with foreign partners to share and learn best practices for reducing the likelihood of and responding to civilian casualties, including through appropriate training and assistance; and

(iv) maintain channels for engagement with the International Committee of the Red Cross and other nongovernmental organizations that operate in conflict zones and encourage such organizations to assist in efforts to distinguish between military objectives and civilians, including by appropriately marking protected facilities, vehicles, and personnel, and by providing updated information on the locations of such facilities and personnel.

Sec. 3. Report on Strikes Undertaken by the U.S. Government Against Terrorist Targets Outside Areas of Active Hostilities.

(a) The Director of National Intelligence (DNI), or such other official as the President may designate, shall obtain from relevant agencies information about the number of strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, as well as assessments of combatant and non-combatant deaths resulting from those strikes, and publicly release an unclassified summary of such information no later than May 1, 2017. By May 1 of each subsequent year, as consistent with the need to protect sources and methods, the DNI shall publicly release a report with the same information for the preceding calendar year.

(b) The annual report shall also include information obtained from relevant agencies regarding the general sources of information and methodology used to conduct these assessments and, as feasible and appropriate, shall address the general reasons for discrepancies between post-strike assessments from the U.S. Government and credible reporting from nongovernmental organizations regarding non-combatant deaths resulting from strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

(c) In preparing a report under this section, the DNI shall review relevant and credible post-strike all-source reporting, including such information from nongovernmental sources, for the purpose of ensuring that this reporting is available to and considered by relevant agencies in their assessment of deaths.

(d) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs may, as appropriate, request that the head of any relevant agency conduct additional reviews related to the intelligence assessments of deaths from strikes against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

Sec. 4. Periodic Consultation. In furtherance of the policies and practices set forth in this order, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, through the National Security Council staff, will convene agencies with relevant defense, counterterrorism, intelligence, legal, civilian protection, and technology expertise to consult on civilian casualty trends, consider potential improvements to U.S. Government civilian casualty mitigation efforts, and, as appropriate, report to the Deputies and Principals Committees, consistent with Presidential Policy Directive 1 or its successor. Specific incidents will not be considered in this context, and will continue to be examined within relevant chains of command.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) The policies and practices set forth above are not intended to alter, and shall be implemented consistent with, the authority and responsibility of commanders and other U.S. personnel to execute their mission as directed by the President or other appropriate authorities, which necessarily includes the inherent right of self-defense and the maintenance of good order and discipline among U.S. personnel. No part of this order modifies the chain of command of the U.S. Armed Forces or the authority of U.S. commanders.

(b) No part of this order modifies priorities in the collection of intelligence or the development, acquisition, or fielding of weapon systems and other technological capabilities.

(c) No part of this order shall prejudice or supplant established procedures pertaining to administrative or criminal investigative or judicial processes in the context of the military justice system or other applicable law and regulation.

(d) The policies set forth in this order are consistent with existing U.S. obligations under international law and are not intended to create new international legal obligations; nor shall anything in this order be construed to derogate from obligations under applicable law, including the law of armed conflict.

(e) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 1, 2016.

6-24-2016 9-06-24 PM

5-10-2016 8-55-33 AM