05 23 18 Postal Fraud and Breach of Trust + I Double Dog Dare the Territorial United States Supreme Court

05/23/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/postal-fraud-and-breach-of-trust.html

By Anna Von Reitz

One of the most frustrating parts of the current situation is that Americans continue to respect and trust the very people that have betrayed them.

This is what makes “breach of trust” such a difficult and reprehensible crime — difficult in that the victims often resist those who are trying to help them and deny that their beloved “Trustees” would ever cheat or harm them, and reprehensible in that the guilty parties have knowingly traded upon this trust placed in them and in the positions of power entrusted to them to implement the crime.

If the members of Congress had done their actual jobs, if former Presidents had acted with Honor, none of the evils infesting our monetary and political and court systems would exist.  And we, ourselves, had we done our job and been less trusting and more vigilant— this situation wouldn’t exist, either.

One of those who has done his best to truly represent the people who placed their trust in him, New Hampshire Representative Richard Marple, has recently raised the issue of postal fraud and the misuse and abuse of the postal service to deliver bogus court documents and bills–essentially promoting a scam– so a group of us have been discussing and I share my comments below:

It IS both grammar fraud– they know that when they address anything to RICHARD MARPLE they are addressing a public trust that they set up and named after you without your knowledge or consent– and postal fraud.

The use of all capital letters is known as “DOG LATIN”.  In this country it has been used as “American Sign Language.”

If you look it up in Black’s Fourth or in the Chicago Manual of Style you will get an eye-full.  Friends in Australia have tracked its use and misuse all the way back to the Emperor Justinian.  They have an entire WordPress site dedicated to the subject– The Justinian Deception.  It is very well documented.

So when they create a public trust named after you without your knowledge or consent they are creating an “unconscionable” contract.  You are literally not conscious of any of this.

Right out of the box any such contract in any jurisdiction of the law is null and void the moment you object to it, but how are you going to object if you don’t know that any such THING exists?

The one contract that you can’t break is the one you are not aware of.

They know the scam they have set up, but you don’t.  So they send you mail addressed to their PUBLIC TRUST as if you were the Trustee responsible for this, and you mistakenly think it is addressed to you and answer the summons or whatever else without objection so— gotcha!  They shirk off their responsibility for their creation and hang it around your neck instead.

Now, they are committing fraud against average Americans when they set up this whole system and start using a foreign language–DOG LATIN — to secretively mis-address us.  They are committing mail fraud by sending their solicitations through the mail to us “as if” we were the Trustees responsible for IT.

And the only way they get away with this is by pretending that this is all “voluntary” and we are knowingly and willingly allowing them to do this.

It is criminal and may not be excused in terms of private contracts.  An illegal private contract is still illegal.  Slavery and involuntary servitude have both been outlawed worldwide since 1926.   Any contract voluntary of involuntary yielding that result is also null and void.

But we have to object to being bonded and we have to object to any presumption of Trusteeship related to IT and we have to object to the Mail fraud and so on—and how are The People going to do that if (1) they don’t know this ugly foreign system exists and (2) they don’t know they have been targeted and included in this foreign system by these scam artists and (3) they trust and respect the vermin doing this to them and think you are a crackpot when you try to warn them?

A Purgatory Oath is an Ecclesiastical/Canon Law Oath that has no place in a Commercial Court.  Just like Writs don’t work in a Commercial or Administrative Court.

You have three different systems — air, land, and sea — and they all have different conventions — different means of expression, different forms to fill out, different courts to invoke.

A lot of the confusion in the courts comes about because people think they are in one kind of court when in fact they are in another kind of court.  It is necessary to nail them down as to what the declared and actual jurisdiction of the court is before you make ANY reply to them at all, and once they commit to a jurisdiction you have to watch them to make sure they stay in that jurisdiction.  If, after declaring jurisdiction, the judge makes an excuse and gets up and leaves the room and then comes back in, you have to repeat the demand for him to declare the actual jurisdiction of the court again.  They use this as a trick to switch jurisdictions when the court appears to be in continuous session.

All these courts that the Bar Attorney (shipping clerks) operate are commercial courts and the Judges won’t budge from that jurisdiction absent action on your part forcing them to move from Maritime to Admiralty to Ecclesiastical jurisdiction.  Maritime deals with trusts and contracts that are implied, Admiralty deals with actual factual contracts and trusts that are written and present as evidence, Ecclesiastical Courts deal with moral issues and contracts we have with God —- and no judge wants to enter there.

Maritime is the easiest jurisdiction for these yahoos to fudge around in, so that is where they dearly like to stay.  In Admiralty they have to hear the facts, which are often detrimental to the Court’s advantage.  In Ecclesiastical Law the Judge is put at risk and anything up to and including his life can be forfeit, so they avoid going into the realm unless they are utterly desperate and have no choice.

And the moment you enter upon the land and soil jurisdiction of this country they have to vacate — simply dismiss and run — because they have no jurisdiction related to the land and soil at all and are obligated to obey the Law of the Land while on our shores, and they have often abundantly violated the Law of the Land, so best not to even discuss it from their standpoint.

I have had so many of these courts return fees, release bonds and dismiss charges by now that this is set in cement and completely reliable and predictable.  They will not engage any issue on the land and soil jurisdiction nor can they operate any Court in the land and soil jurisdiction, because the Territorial United States has no such jurisdiction delegated to it.

They can only succeed in their objective — which is to traffick you into their jurisdiction and fleece you — if you let them, which means you have to learn how to effectively shut them down and recognize all the tricks they use to weasel you into admitting, accepting, submitting, etc.

Along with re-affirming the land and soil jurisdiction courts owed to this country and populating those courts with properly trained Counselors-at-Law, and properly informed Jury Pools that are aware of and ready to use their nullification powers, we have to re-educate and discipline the Territorial Courts and the members of the Bar Associations.

They do have a job to perform, but unfortunately, they have been usurping and presuming upon the American people and their assets, and have been subjecting millions of innocent people to unconscionable contracts under color of law.

This has to stop and right about now.  It is nothing more or less than a venal international crime spree and if it means confiscating pensions, arresting judges, outlawing the Bar Associations on our shores — whatever it takes, must be done.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 23 18 I Double Dog Dare the Territorial United States Supreme Court

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/i-double-dog-dare-territorial-united.html

 By Anna Von Reitz

Let’s begin this discussion with this realization: you can be a king in one country and a slave in another.

Is that clear enough?

Is it also clear that different countries operate under different laws?

Good.

The United States is and has always been a different country with respect to the Territorial United States.  They function under two separate systems of law.

This leads to a situation where the States (members of The United States land jurisdiction Union) function under a different system than the Territorial States of States (international jurisdiction of the sea).

We have lawyers who are Counselors at Law and Justices (of the Peace) who administer the Public Law, which in a State is known as the General Session Law, even if the “State” is being represented as a Public Trust, and the Public Law generally, known as the Law of the Land.

They have Attorneys at Law and Judges who administer the Private Law, which in a State of State is known as the Statutory Law.  Strictly speaking, only State of State officials, employees and dependents — all known as “residents” of the State of Alaska (for example) are required to obey the Statutory Law.

So you have Counselors at Law and you have Attorneys at Law.  I am a Counselor at Law.

If you occupy an office of the soil or land jurisdiction courts you must be a Counselor at Law and CANNOT be a Bar Attorney.  Period. So there is no basis whatsoever for anyone supposing that I would be or even could be a Bar Attorney.

It is totally ignorant to look for me among the members of the Bar Association.  They can’t operate a State Court and I can’t operate a State of State Court BY DEFINITION.

So, no, I am NOT a member of the Bar, am not required to be a member of the Bar, and could not operate a land or soil jurisdiction court as a member of the Bar.

Bar Attorneys can act as administrators but can’t sit on the bench or otherwise operate in any public capacity in a State Court.

People have become so ignorant that they don’t know the difference between the “Alaska State Court” and the “State of Alaska Court”.

Nor do they know the difference between a Counselor at Law (required to run land and soil jurisdiction courts) and Attorneys at Law (required to run Maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction courts).

Obviously, I know what I am doing, the rules of the Office I am occupying, and the State I serve; just as obviously, I am not serving in nor have I ever claimed to serve in any of the capacities you mention.

And again, there is no factual controversy about this whatsoever.

There are land courts and there are sea courts and this is the way it has always been.

All that has happened is that as more and more Americans have been unknowingly press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, they have unwittingly subjected themselves to the sea courts and the land courts have become rare as hen’s teeth as a result.

That does not mean that my court does not exist– it is clearly established under the General Session Laws of Alaska.  Nor does it mean I am doing anything wrong or making any false claims.  I am not impersonating a judge of any sea jurisdiction court or claiming to be a Bar Member or any other such ignorant meandering.

I am here serving my State– not any “State of State”.

And I am serving the honest Tradesmen engaged in private international trade and the living people who have rejected FDR’s unconscionable New Deal contract and who have returned to the land and soil of Alaska.

And I Double-Dog Dare any member of the (Territorial) United States Supreme Court to say otherwise.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

 


05 21 18 Are we “Federal Children?”

05/22/2018

http://www.truedemocracy.net/td2_4/01a-federal.html

 

While doing some searching on how we are TRACKED by the government (cell phones, etc.) I came across this item I wrote in 2002 that provides more info on how the government goal of TRACKING and controlling American citizens really got started.  I had forgotten I had written this but in finding it today and reading it over I thought some on WGEN might like to review the history of how the *massa’s* devised ways to track us and how to use us as collateral for that national debt – mostly owed to China.  When China calls in the debt we owe to them how many of us will then be placed in Chinese custody to do their bidding?

Jackie Juntti
WGEN   idzrus@earthlink.net
It isn’t who you are –  It is WHOSE you are ! ! !

The Journal of History
Fall 2002 – Volume 2, Issue 4
Table of Contents

Are we “Federal Children?”

 

http://www.truedemocracy.net/td2_4/01a-federal.html

 

By Jackie Juntti

Washington Grassroots Email Network

Are we “Federal Children,” owned by the Government?

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth “registration” or what we now know as the “birth certificate.” It was known as the “Maternity Act” and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for “other purposes.” One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures.

What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating “federal children.” This government, under the doctrine of “Parens Patriae,” now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for “permission” from Daddy government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a “free country.”

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as “official” records.

Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child’s birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States, thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth. In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the “full faith and credit” of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system.

To wit: “Full faith and credit” clause of Constitution U.S. article 4. section 1, requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition cites omitted.

The state claims an interest in every child within it’s jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt United States. We are now designated by this government as “HUMAN RESOURCES,” with a new crop born every year.”

In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that its purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution’s10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several states, held, that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls, not on the state but on her inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the states by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or

is to be, done under it without their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury et. al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. To wit:

  1. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the federal government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of  federal funds for the purposes of the act.

Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED.

By  section 4 of the act, the Children’s Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the plans submitted to it, and for that purpose by its agents to go into the several  states and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT.

(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.

In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the states will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251;

Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44.

The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the states by the Constitution.

Message of President Monroe, May 4, 1822; 4 Elliot’s Debates, p. 525; Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma, 221 U.S.

559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390.

(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529. (3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the states, and it cannot delegate to the states the power to make laws for the United States. In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.

The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The Constitution hasn’t changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above.

Writing letters to elected public servants won’t save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal Constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government.

If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our God given rights to liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But…if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it’s time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written.


05 21 18 The Biggest Back Fire in History

05/21/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-biggest-back-fire-in-history.html
By Anna Von Reitz

THEY, the Territorial United States, planned to vacate the Constitutions — all three of them.

THEY had already moth-balled and usurped upon and taken over the duties of the Federal United States 150 years ago, so that was no problem.  With a little finagling and a lot of unauthorized spending, they figured they could bankrupt both their own corporations and the Municipal United States corporations, too.

Just run up a giant debt, let the corporations acting as providers of “essential government services” — Article IV — go bankrupt, so as to sever any connection to the actual constitutional agreements, and off-load all their corporate debts onto the unwitting backs of the American People.

Then, they planned to boot up a new corporation, call it something deceptive and sexy like THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, charter it in a foreign country like France so nobody would catch on, and then sneak right back in the back door and establish themselves as the Successor to the service contracts they vacated by a process of assumption.

We’d assume that they were our own dear Federal Government, because we’d assumed that twice before.  Why wouldn’t we go for the sop a third time?

Because we woke up and said, “No thanks.”

Hey, they are the ones who usurped upon the actual Federal United States, rendering it inoperative back in 1868.  They are the ones who spent themselves into oblivion and bankruptcy.  We are totally innocent Third Parties.

It’s all, one hundred percent, their own fault that they don’t have a contract.

It’s also their fault that all those juicy “delegated powers” reverted back to the Grantor of those delegated powers, The United States of America (Unincorporated).

They disabled the actual Federal United States via mercenary “war”, fraud, breach of trust and deceit.  They disabled the Territorial United States via bankruptcy.  They disabled the Municipal United States via bankruptcy.  All three.  They vacated all three Constitutions at one time and haven’t got a leg left to stand on.

What’s even more problematic are all the legal entanglements.

Now that we are back on the land and standing in our sovereign capacity and operating our sovereign government, all the many Peace Treaties and Friendship Treaties apply.  The Chief Perpetrators responsible for this mess, the Holy See, the British Crown, the British Monarch, the French Government and the British Crown (Westminster) are all obligated to come to our aid.

They can’t make war against us — not even surreptitious mercenary war — because they are bound by Law and Treaty to provide us with “perpetual friendship and amity”—and in the case of the British Monarch, obligated to act as our Trustee and Protector on the “High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” which includes the province of both Maritime and Admiralty Law.

And if they did make war against us, everyone on the planet would know that they were criminals.

The Chinese and Russians have never liked Britain, for good reason, but they have reason to like the actual Americans.  Our egalitarian philosophy of life and government is far more compatible with their own views.  We also have a somewhat distant but honorable history as honest people who mind our own business and pay our debts.

And wouldn’t that be a relief for the whole world?  Actual Americans at the helm of the actual United States instead of Euro-Scum pretending to “represent” us?

The Russians and the Chinese and in fact all the people on this planet have more than adequate reason to support us against our run amok and misdirected Hired Help.

Not only has the Territorial United States left itself without a contract and without delegated powers, but it has spent the last hundred years telling everyone who would listen that they are a “democracy”.

A democracy only functions by majority rule.  It requires a mandate — 51% of all eligible voters — to take a legal action. And the government of the Territorial United States hasn’t had a mandate for anything it has done in decades, if ever.

So between the fraud and breach of trust they employed in their in-house take over, which is all crime that has no statute of limitations, and their utter lack of a mandate even within their own self-proclaimed democracy, and their already observed lack of contract and delegated power, they are well and truly up a creek without a paddle.

What they intended for others has come home to roost upon them.

And it couldn’t happen to a nicer, more deserving group of people.

That is, of course, said in irony.  They have in fact been ruthless pirates and scourges, who have pillaged and plundered the people at home and neighbors abroad, and then proposed to blame their victims.  The sanctimonious fraud artists are finally exposed for what they are.  And cut off at the knees.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) has summoned the actual States to assemble, and they are doing so.  The Territorial United States is trying every petty little trick in their book to interfere and discredit and gainsay the effort, but it isn’t working.  The American People are waking up.

They are admitting to themselves just how abused they have been, how the fruit of their labor has been siphoned away, how they have been mistreated by police ostensibly hired to protect them, how they have been frightened in their own homes by un-elected agencies, how the quality of their lives and the value of their money has suffered along with their reputation in the rest of the world.  Most of all, they are sick of constant, unending, perpetual war, war, war.

It’s time for peace and it is time for all sentient Americans to join the ranks of those standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual United States.  It’s time for them to overcome the lies that have been told to them and about them, and for everyone concerned to fully recognize the fact that the Territorial United States and its Government no longer “represents” us.

We have, even according to their description of the circumstance, returned home and resumed the operation of our lawful government.

Mr. Trump needs to take our offer to occupy the lawful Office of the President of The United States of America and join with us to finally, for real, drain the swamp and address the fraud and usurpation at the root of it.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 19 18 Holy Moly!!!!!!! This Is the BIG ONE! + The UN Trusteeship + The Public Law and the Private “Law”

05/19/2018

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/holy-moly-this-is-big-one.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial.  It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit.

TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12).

I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven’t studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken.  It doesn’t work the way it should. Specifically, affidavits don’t work.  The courts ignore them.

Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it’s stupid.

First, via the “US Citizen” political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as “decedents” — that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.  Next, they “enfranchised” us — created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us — all that remained  on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.

And the “Rest of the Story is…….”  —- incorporated entities can’t create affidavits. They have no ability to take Oaths, swear to anything, or provide any testimony.

So by enfranchising us, the demons both subjected us to commercial law and rendered us helpless under it.

Quote my new BFF, Magnus….

“…..The Undeniable Fact That Artificial Entities (Corporations) Cannot Take Oaths, They Cannot Make Affidavits. See, E.G., In Re Empire Refining Co., 1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (Sd Cal. 1932) (It Is, Of Course, Conceded That A Corporation Cannot Make An Affidavit In Its Corporate Name. It Is An Inanimate Thing Incapable Of Voicing An Oath); Moya Enterprises, Inc. V. Harry Anderson Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand Restaurant Co. V. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9a T. Bjur C. Slezak, Fletcher Cyclopedia Of Law Of Private Corporations § 4629 (Perm. Ed. 1992) (“A Document Purporting To Be The Affidavit Of A Corporation Is Void, Since A Corporation Cannot Make A Sworn Statement”) – (Footnote Omitted). Rowland V. California Men’s Colony • 506  U.S. 194, 203 (1993).”

And he is absolutely correct!

This, at last, is why there has been no remedy and no hearing for the victims of this fraud scheme.  Commercial law can’t work without an affidavit, and incorporated entities — public trusts and public transmitting utilities — can’t issue affidavits. End of story.

We were totally boxed in, so that the judge couldn’t even hear us.  Literally.  We had no recourse, and only the “appearance” of justice.  They let us talk and run the meter, charged us for their “service”—and left us without any possible relief.

The Bar Association Members — British Merchant Marine Shipping Clerks — colluded with the politicians and the banks to set up the Perfect Crime, an ultimate Identity Theft Scheme that rendered the victims voiceless and helpless and without recourse.

It’s almost funny when you finally see it— a real guffaw-worthy sleight of hand, something so preposterous, so obvious, and yet — unless you had cause to think about both the identity theft and this particular bit of commercial law, you’d never put it together.

So, everyone ever issued a BIRTH CERTIFICATE has been trafficked, impersonated, and defrauded. Every such PERSON ever addressed by one of these COURTS has suffered barratry and been subjected to a foreign jurisdiction and form of law, within which they were specifically disabled and unable to defend themselves.

No more filthy, repugnant, criminal scheme, nothing more unjust, despicable, cynical —- and in the end, cowardly, can be imagined.  They attacked little babies in their cradles and used a petty, pathetic scheme like this to steal them blind and enslave them for life.

Even I am stunned.

But there it is, and there you have it.

We have come full circle at last.

In the end, this is all that anyone needs to know — what they did and how they did it.  That, and the realization of how many million— nay, billions— of innocent people have suffered because of it.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The UN Trusteeship

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-un-trusteeship.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN Trusteeship

According to this mammoth fraud against the American States and People, we just disappeared one day, like the ships of the Dutch East India company or the Templar Fleet before them, and deserted all our property here in America, leaving it behind in the care of our servants for hire — the British-controlled Territorial United States.

As such, we were deemed by those same dishonest servants to have “donated” our “abandoned” estates to the good of whomever, and most likely, to ourselves, should we ever “return” from “over the sea”.

Of course, we were never informed of our purported absence, nor of our supposed donation of our good names and assets.

As Mark Twain noted when this fraud first started — rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated.

In 1976, the traitors responsible for this debacle passed two Acts in the Territorial United States Congress — the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and in tandem with it, the International Organizations Immunities Act.

These two Acts together provide for individual still owed their lawful birthright estates to claim them as “Foreign Sovereigns” —- that is, “foreign” with respect to the Territorial United States, and to otherwise wash the hands of the perpetrators by naming the United Nations as the Trustees responsible for administration of our state laws and assets.

This manipulation (invalid as it is) is the equivalent of taking your money out of one pocket and putting it in the other, as the UN Corporation is owned and operated by the same people and interests as the US Corporation.

So now we are being treated to the spectacle of “UN Commissioners” disguised as County Commissioners arriving on our soil to tell us how to live our lives and how high to jump — except for one important fact.

We, the supposed “Donors” of the Trust they are administering have also seized claim as the “Beneficiaries” of all the Cestui Que Vies and related State assets and invoked the Doctrine of Merger.

This means that when the (merely presumed to be) Donor of a Trust is also the Beneficiary of a Trust, that Donor has the absolute right to collapse the Trust and receive back all the assets of that Trust. This is called a “reversionary trust interest”— which we have, and which we have invoked on the public and international record. We have merged the various entities established in our NAMES and returned them to the land and soil of our birth.

Read that— we have already told the UN to get off our soil and stay off and to prove any legitimate interest granted to them by the foreign Territorial United States Congress acting in Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract.

There is absolutely nothing in the Delegated Powers suggesting that the Territorial United States has now nor ever had any ability to dispose of our assets in any jurisdiction of the law. Therefore, the Territorial United States cannot grant to the UN what was never theirs to grant.

The actual presumed “Donors” have come home and claimed back the entirety of their land and soil as well as their Persons/PERSONS. Kindly inform the United Nations Secretary General and all the new “County Commissioners”.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The Public Law and the Private “Law”

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-public-law-and-private-law.html

By Anna Von Reitz

More mirroring.

Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which “United States” is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.

This process of “mirroring” everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down.  It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been “mirrored” by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name “United States”, too.

This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system.  They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself.

The Public Law is mirrored by their private law.

Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers.  Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers.

These are two different offices, one public, one private, both called “Sheriff”.

Yet another similar names deceit.

The vermin attempt to confuse one with the other, and to convince you that you are subject to their private “club” law, which amounts to the “public policies” of a corporation.

Yesterday, we also discussed the Clearfield Doctrine.  When an entity exercising our delegated powers debases itself and engages in commercial activity as an incorporated entity, it loses any special governmental powers or sovereign immunity and descends to the nature of any other commercial corporation.

Very clearly what has happened here is that private commercial corporations have been entrusted with governmental functions.  They have then hidden behind their government “identity” and used those delegated but still coercive powers to benefit their own bottom lines and protect their own corporate interests at the expense of competitors.

Imagine giving Exxon the ability to act as “the government”?

So how is it possible that you, a free born American, could become liable and subject to the public policies of a foreign corporation merely under hire to provide stipulated governmental services?

By contract — and in this case, undisclosed and unconscionable contract  employing semantic deceit  (Are you a US [Territorial] Citizen?) and improper use of the coercive powers of what appears to be government (You have to sign up for Social Security in order to have a [Federal] job….) to feather the nests and extend coercive power to private corporations.

Reclaiming your Trade Name re-establishes your identity as an American eligible to claim back your birthright estate as a living man or woman, and enables you to then lay claim to the derivative NAMES that the vermin have established “for” you in the following forms:  JOHN DOE (a public charitable trust),  JOHN M. DOE (a public transmitting utility) and JOHN MARK DOE (a constructive foreign grantor trust ESTATE)—-and return all them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth.

This effectively severs the unconscionable contract that they have created for their own benefit and the benefit of their foreign commercial corporation, which is supposed to be providing your States with good faith service, and corrects the falsified public records they have used against you.

Put another way, when you remove your names from their jurisdiction they no longer have a “handle” to seize upon and manipulate you and your assets.  Whatever contract there is, is re-written in your favor.  It is therefore of the utmost urgency and should be of your utmost concern to “come home” and take care of your own affairs, shed yourselves of these unconscionable presumptions, and stand in your true nature again.

If anyone asks, tell them that you have “retired” from all obligations and duties of Territorial and/or Municipal Citizenship and “returned” to your birthright political status on the land and soil of your native state, without prejudice.

This is equivalent to saying— “Hey, fella, you can do what you want to do. If you want to subject yourself to the Queen and be plundered for your trouble, that’s your business.  Leave me to mine. I obey the Public Law, which is sufficient.”

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 18 18 The Historic Trusts the World Economy and You + Yes There Are No States Wake Up Oh Glory Wake Up!!!

05/18/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-historic-trusts-world-economy-and.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Long ago, wealth began accumulating.  It’s a strange thing — wealth.

At a certain point it acquires the “critical accumulation mass” and it grows all by itself, like a cancer.  It goes metastatic. It diversifies.  It builds potential energy like water being backed up by a dam, if it isn’t invested.  And if it is invested, it seeks opportunity much like flowing water, too, pushing into every new nook and cranny it can find.

It should come as no surprise then, that at a certain point, wealth becomes practically “un-spendable” by heirs.

What does one person do with a hundred trillion dollars worth of gold?

There are Seven Covenants in the Bible and so, there are Seven Covenant Trusts.  These are all unimaginably huge.   There are also a couple banks in the world that are literally thousands of years old that have holdings on a scale that can be measured against the Covenant Trusts.

There are at least a dozen Spanish Trusts that legitimately belong to living heirs of those who began the trust accumulation during the days of the Spanish Treasure Ships.  These are not as huge as the Covenant Trusts, but they are still unimaginably huge.   There are other family trusts, like those belonging to the Saudi Royal Family, and the British Royal Family, that are monstrous, too.

Then there are Business Trusts, often set up as “Commonwealth Trusts” among groups of private investors for their heirs or their pet project or cause. Like the Spanish Trusts, they can be several hundred years old and depending on their own peculiar “mission” may or may not share elements similar to family or charitable trusts.

Then there are a few really BIG Charitable Trusts, most of them accumulated by politicians via deceits worked against generations of innocent people.  These trusts pretend to be “charitable” but upon closer examination they are usually used for nefarious purposes — manipulating money and commodity markets, paying for large scale mercenary armies — staffed by people who don’t even know they are acting as mercenaries, buying up public land and resources then used to benefit the players behind this larceny in the name of charity and so on.

Finally, there are Treaty Trusts— these are also called “Restitution Trusts” — and a few of them are really sizable, too.  These are endowments built up from various resources to settle negotiated peace treaties in wars and trade squabbles and things of that nature.

In all, there are about 4,800 Historic Trusts.  Most of the actual Trustees I have spoken to are good people who want to do good things and release back the flow of wealth that has been withheld for so long—- however, the situation is like a person starved almost to death going to an all-you-can-eat Smorgasbord.

The shock of suddenly going from nothing to everything could kill the intended beneficiary. And, the release of so much hoarded actual wealth could render such wealth relatively worthless.

Money, we have to realize— even actual, factual money— is a commodity.  If you flood the market with a commodity, ANY commodity— what happens?  The perceived value of that commodity tanks, and suddenly, gold really could be used for paving bricks and shingles.

Most of the Historic Trust Assets have been used to underwrite banks, especially the ‘central banks” set up by various national governments.  Those banks have foolishly extended vast amounts of credit — up to a thousand times net — of their assets, and now they are hunting and scratching and trying to find new sources of hard assets to keep the “fractional reserve banking” pyramid scheme going.

This has led them to very dishonest schemes employed to seize “Special Deposits” — Historic Trust assets left with the banks in good faith — and use any excuse possible to maintain control of these assets without paying interest.

To quote one of my correspondents, “This situation is crazy…. we are drowning in wealth, and nobody dares to cut any of it loose.”

Well, they’re afraid to, because nobody knows what will happen.  We have lived according to the niggardly “Doctrine of Scarcity” for thousands of years. The floodwaters of wealth are backed up clear to Poughkeepsie. Will the dams hold?  Are the reservoirs sufficient?  What happens when it starts to go?

In order for there to be any good result, the wealth has to be released in a gradual, orderly fashion —  a modest trickle compared to the amount of wealth amassed needs to be aimed at new technologies, pollution clean up, infrastructure improvements,  and economies that have large growth potential — like most of the Third World.  And then, as the world economy “stabilizes” and grows, more wealth is released to fund the new growth.

It has to be like this, because— to use another metaphor — otherwise, you over-fertilize the field and kill everything.  We can literally kill the world economy with too much wealth released too fast.

Now, people in the developed countries will understandably question the big emphasis on public works and infrastructure developments aimed at the Third World when their own infrastructure is crumbling, so some really good projects have to be parceled out for them, too, though it may seem initially that they are undeservedly getting the short end of the stick.  They will catch up and the investments made in their poorer neighbors will bear much fruit for everyone.

In addition, we have proposed a Basic Living Stipend to be made available to everyone on Earth, equivalent to a constantly cost-adjusted amount of $2000 in local currency value per month, per person.  This would immediately place a safety net under all people at risk and largely end chronic desperate poverty on Earth.

The Naysayers say that this would simply increase inflation and to some extent it would, however, Beta Tests have shown that in actual practice, most people have used the extra income in profoundly good ways — taking care of their health, their homes, their families, and improving their educations and their communities. The Niggardly Among Us also say it will encourage “more useless Eaters”.  We say it would help those who need help and provide peace of mind enough so that people can think of better lives and things to do.

We are still battling over that concept, how it could be delivered, etc., but speaking for myself, Individual Living Being Accounts with independent triple layer security delivered by a new blockchain-like technology that can be delivered to each person worldwide via simple hand-held devices makes sense. Decentralizing delivery cuts all the dishonest governments and agencies right out of the loop and aside from local bunko operations, assures that the funds actually get delivered to all the people we intend to help.

The banks that are heavily invested in securities don’t want this new world economy to open up. They want to chisel their way forward and keep the Old Game going, keep operating according to the Doctrine of Scarcity, and playing all their old gambits.  It’s essential that they understand that that isn’t going to happen. This is a new era in human history.  We have outgrown the old system. We can either all work together to make this Transition something good and glorious, or we can senselessly starve together.

One final note.  The existence of all this wealth built up in the Historic Trusts has caused no end of Flim-Flam artists and Wannabe Trustees showing up out of nowhere claiming to be the rightful owners or at least, rightful managers, of all these Historic Trusts.  They’ve come running from all directions like flies on carrion.  Some of them are funded by sleazy bankers and sleazy national governments.  Others are free-lancers or “runners” put up by crime syndicates. Almost all of them sing a good song and dance of peace, love, and joy. Indeed, Satan appears as an angel of light, but you will see what he does and not put faith in what he says.

Because this release has to be a controlled release, the people handling it have to be intelligent, compassionate and wise. This is not a moment in history to try any airy-fairy academic theories, nor is it a time when we can afford to get bogged down in religious or political differences. If this is to work for the good of Mankind, the theorists have to step aside and let those with a more practical and good-hearted character take the stage.

Toward that end, the governments — which with very few exceptions are just corporations at this point — need to stop competing with each other.  Just call a truce. I know that is antithetical to their culture, but that’s what needs to be done for the sake of the whole planet.  For a brief time at least, everyone needs to stop thinking in terms of me, me, me and think about us, us, us.

Let the actual Trustees — all of them — come forward and have their say and together make decisions about whose assets are going to underpin what, and not in the sense of competing for investments, but in the sense of saving the world economy and finding our way forward.

Any one of the major trusts could, if unleashed, destroy the world economy and thereby destroy billions of lives more efficiently than any atom bomb.

It is therefore of the most urgent and utmost importance for all concerned for the governments to stop interfering and trying to cherry pick assets and Trustees and using dishonest tactics to suppress some and advance others.  Nothing good can be built on a criminal basis. Our recent past history and personal experience in life should be sufficient to convince any mature leader that what I am saying is true.

The actual Trustees of the Historic Trusts need to be brought together to hash things out and the political leaders of government service corporations need to stand ready to help implement a sensible plan to restructure the world economy and deploy assets without further argument or delay.  I will pledge our resources toward such a meeting of hearts and minds.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 18 18 Yes There Are No States Wake Up Oh Glory Wake Up!!!

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/yes-there-are-no-states-wake-up-oh.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Thanks for the best laugh I have had in a long time…..

Bill Henshall has concluded an investigation and found out that there are no states!

Hahahahahahahah!

Hello, America?  I love you all!  — But really, this is too droll!

Surely, you realize that the entire concept of a “state” or a “nation” exists only in your head?  That the reality of any such political entity or subdivision or kingdom or country is a legal FICTION?

Surely, you have seen the names and borders of countries shift and change even in your own lifetimes?  Where is “Burma” now?  What happened to “Yugoslavia”?

My sides ache.  My mouth is dry from gasping.

Lord, Lord…..

Yes, it’s true.  There are no states, no provinces, no kingdoms.

And that is why the actual basis of “States” in this country have been summoned to assemble: people.

People create States.  People are states.

If anyone ever challenges you to show them where you own any sovereign piece of land, dig a hole at least six inches deep in the ground, stand in it, and pound on your chest.  Take a photo.

It really is as simple as that.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) is an organization of what?  People.

It is a business structure, an unincorporated Holding Company.  And what’s that?  It’s people organized to do a job, fulfill a function, for still other people who are organized as what?  State and County Jural Assemblies.

Lions and tigers and bears!  Who knew?

Yes, this is why it is so absolutely and urgently NECESSARY and important that you all heed the call and “return home” to the land and soil jurisdiction of your States of the Union (get your political status records corrected) and join your State Jural Assembly—-because you are your States.

Your Jural Assemblies are what create and maintain and give life and breath and authority to your Counties and your States.

If you don’t make the commitment to live on your soil and land, then it stands vacant.

If you don’t make the commitment to occupy the Public Offices of your Counties and States, then foreign corporate employees will be happy to do this “for” you, and claim that you are “absent”.

Which then ALLOWS them to do whatever THEY please with YOUR assets.

Honest to God, this entire country has been bamboozled and our people have been reduced to walking, talking zombies, still more than half asleep–despite me and many, many others banging a gong as loud as we can.

Re-convey your Trade Name to the land and soil of your State.  Seize upon your Assumed Names/NAMES.  The forms you need are already on my website: www.annavonreitz.com, Article 928, Editable documents.

And then, join your State Jural Assembly.  Go to www.national-assembly.net and connect.

You are the sovereigns of this land.  Nobody else on Earth is.  It’s up to you to breathe life and meaning into your States of the Union—and if you don’t do it, nobody else can.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) is still alive and still standing in the doorway like a lion—the lawful government of this country with all four paws on the floor.  But you have to answer her call.  You have to re-boot your States and your States have to re-boot your National States of States.

NOW.

For your edification, and if you are like me, your “Ouch!” sense of humor — I am including the research (thus far) into the profound truth that the “States” do not exist (without you).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajl7bZ8J2ws     Constitutional discussion with Bill and friend–there are NO States, Article I, Section 2, Cl. 3

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/rod-class-gets-fourth-administrative-ruling-govt-offices-are-vacant-all-govt-officials-are-private-contractors/23602

https://organiclaws.org/edsblog/

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 16 18 The Long and Short of All of It 1 and 2 + Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know + Statehood is a Capacity + Another Voice Heard A New Avenue of Relief

05/17/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-long-and-short-of-all-of-it.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Either these people are: (a) my employees, owing me good faith service, or (b) they are foreign commercial mercenaries trespassing upon me and engaging in inland piracy.

In the first case, they are obligated to honor and protect my person and property. That is the only credible reason for any government to exist.

In the second case, they are pirates and every anti-piracy law ever created kicks into gear, including the international treaties that directly obligate both the Holy Sea and the British Monarch and their respective organizations to protect my person and property.

Read that: Checkmate.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


The Long and Short of It All Part 2

http://www.paulstramer.net/search/label/The%20Long%20and%20Short%20of%20It%20All%20–%20Part%202

By Anna Von Reitz

All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there–  what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?

Was it, “I am an American!” — or was it, “I am a United States Citizen!”?

All you United States Army guys — which one are you?

This same question applies to the Air Force, the Navy, even the Coast Guard.

The answer determines whether you are an American and an honorable member of the American Armed Forces  or you are acting in the capacity of a filthy commercial mercenary — albeit, not getting the big bucks of merc wages.

Did anyone ever tell you that when you signed up to enter military service you were enrolled as a mercenary in the employment of commercial corporations

and given a share in the profits via a stock portfolio?  No?

No doubt this is coming as Big News, but yes, the rats set you up with a stock portfolio they were supposed to give to you when you left military service.  The catch is that so far as their records show, you never left their jurisdiction.

This is another example of the criminality infesting every aspect of the “government” corporations — your DD214 is not  a discharge from “US citizenship”.  So you are still snagged.

You have to go back to the head of your branch of service and serve Notice that you have returned to your birthright political status as an American State Citizen.  Otherwise, they just presume that you are a “Lifer” and still obligated to bow, scrape, and salute. And they just keep your stock portfolio and manage it “for” you until you die, at which point they claim it as “abandoned property”.

And you thought you were serving your country all the while you were serving the “US CORP”.  Nobody told you any different, either.  Until now.

So fire up your writing instruments and re-convey your Trade Names to the land and soil of the state where you were born (www.annavonreitz.com, Article #928, Editable pdfs) and give Notice that you left “US Citizenship” behind effective the date of “Discharge” noted on your DD214 and you are owed a stock portfolio and/or income therefrom earned while unwittingly employed as a commercial mercenary.

Direct the Service Branch Office to update your political status records and forward your claim to the Office of Military Settlements. That should put a bulwark in the retirement resources of a lot of American veterans.  And when you get a chance, say, thank you, to the True God.  The rats didn’t intend for it to be any actual benefit to you. They just wanted to stand around and say, “Gee, look at all these accounts nobody ever collected.  What a bunch of patriotic guys!”

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 16 18 Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/here-it-is-again-for-all-those-who-need.html

By Anna Von Reitz

There is a widespread swath of gross ignorance in America populated by True Believers who think that they know all they need to know and devil take the hindmost.

No doubt that is comforting to them and they cling to their suppositions accordingly, like Linus clinging to his Blanket.

—Until, that is, they land in a “US District Court” and are told that they have no constitutional guarantees and other wake up calls come due.

For all of those who think that I am a “Patriot Guru” and that I can’t possibly know what I am talking about despite the abundant factual and actual proof that I do (admittedly not paying federal income tax since 1998, for example) here is a compilation of primary source quotes from people as diverse as Frederick Douglas and JFK in support of the information I am giving you—300 pages worth:

https://www.scribd.com/document/100879878/We-The-Sheeple-Vs-the-Banksters

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 16 18 Statehood is a Capacity

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/statehood-is-capacity.html

By Anna Von Reitz

It really does not matter for the purposes of the Federal Union that Texas came in as a “republic” or a “territory” or a “colony” either — Texas agreed to act as a State of the Federal Union.

Being a “State” is a capacity — for example, you might agree to act in the capacity of an elector, or in the capacity of a wife, or in the capacity of employee in a book store.

In the same way the Body Politic of Texas can act as an independent republic, a State Republic, a State, or a State of State, or a Council of County Governments or, or, or.

Having agreed, Texas joined the Union and has been part of the Union as a member-State ever since.  If it joined some other Union it might be called a “region” or a “borough” or a “principality”.

So in its own internal affairs, Texas functions as a republic— as all the State Republics are supposed to (though largely don’t) and with respect to its relationship with the other States functions as a State of the Federal Union.

I wish people would take the time to understand capacity.  It’s really not that foreign to us.  We all act in different capacities all the time.  Why is it difficult to conceive of our government acting in different capacities?   Especially when it is right in front of us?  We can literally see that “Ohio” is different than “State of Ohio”—right?  So why don’t people pick up on that fact?

I spend a good deal of time explaining the fact that The Texas Republic is a different entity from The Republic of Texas, which is a different entity from Texas, which is different from Texas State, which is different from The State of Texas, which is different from the State of Texas, which is different from the state of texas, which is different from the STATE OF TEXAS or TEXAS…… and you can plug in any other state in place of “Texas” and find the same array of capacities.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 17 18 Another Voice Heard A New Avenue of Relief

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/another-voice-heard-new-avenue-of-relief.html

By Anna Von Reitz

We have determined what was done to us, when, how, by whom.  And now, what goes around, comes around — to quote my Nephew Jonathan’s favorite adage.

I have discussed at some length the pollution of the English Common Law by admixture with British Admiralty and Maritime Law that occurred in the 1750’s and which has given rise to “the King’s Equity Law” — in which the King has all the equity and Judges sit as proxies for the King.

Just as the vermin have mirrored everything else, it turns out that they have mirrored Equity Law, too.

What they call “Equity Law” — their kind of Equity Law — isn’t Equity Law.

I guess we could have all told them that, eh?  — but their semantic deceit and trashing of the entire concept of Equity Law, their defilement of its meaning and reputation, again conceals the truth of the matter.

It turns out that there actually is pure Equity Law and it actually does deliver justice and equity—- unlike their cruel sham that mocks the concept.

Beginning next week, May 22nd, we will all have a precious chance to learn more about Pure Equity — how to invoke it, how to process claims, how to obtain relief and restitution which so many people desperately need.

The introductory call is next Tuesday, May 22nd, at 7:30 CST.  The call in number and access code is:  (712) 775-7035   918810

I asked the instructor to change to Tuesday so that his calls won’t conflict or overlap with the National Assembly calls and he kindly agreed.

The intent is to develop a highly competent core group of students who will be enabled teach and counsel others. Members of the Living Law Firm are being alerted to participate.

Securing practical relief and restitution for all the people who have suffered is one obvious (and large) goal of The Living Law Firm; restoring our lawful government and getting America back on track is another.

These major goals have to work forward in tandem, together.  So while we learn about this new avenue of relief on Tuesday, we still need to keep going with the organizational effort summoning the State Assemblies.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


The Municipal United States Corporation a Lesson About Larry Becraft

05/16/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-municipal-united-states-corporation.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Here’s a good example of how attorneys deliberately avoid and obscure the actual truth and substance of things.   Larry finds an obscure reference somewhere in my writings to the Act of 1871.  It was probably a quote from someone else or part of a list of historical actions undertaken by Congress — he doesn’t say, so it’s impossible to know where he picked this bit up, whether it is in context or not, but he quotes it as something I referenced:

Larry:

Contrary to your present denial, I have specifically quoted an article you wrote that was posted on Crackpot Arnie’s website, which is as follows:

Claim 15. 1871: The Corporate Congress begins to set up shop for itself by creating a separate government for the District of Columbia.  The initial effort fails but seven years later the Washington DC Municipality is created as an independent international city state run as a plenary oligarchy by the members of “Congress”.   Also in 1871, the Corporate Congress claimed to own all United States corporations— 41st “Congress”– Third Session, Chapters 62, 63, 64, and 65.

Anna:

Yes, Larry, Congress did do exactly what I said it did and what a lot of other patriots have said it did — the fact that the unpopularity of their action forced them to repeal the original Act three years later, and caused them to cut it up and pass its substance in a piecemeal fashion in 1878 — is the kind of hair-splitting and deliberate avoidance of the basic truth that does you no credit.

Here for your education — AGAIN — is the entire, truthful history of the Act of 1871:1871 – Act of 1871 —“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 —which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions—- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

It doesn’t really matter, Larry, that the original Act was repealed and then passed in pieces later — what matters is the substance of the Act, which is apparently what you wish to avoid and gainsay: the creation of the US Corp.

And it can only be the creation of the US Corp that we are looking at, Larry, because: the District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, so there was no need to do that in 1871 or 1874 or 1878.

Nowadays, Larry, it isn’t necessary to dig up the entire history of the Act of 1871 to prove that the US Corp exists.  It was emblazoned on every fork and spoon issued to the US Military throughout World War II, painted on canteens, and spray-painted on jeeps.  There are thousands upon thousands of such “admissions” available to anyone who cares to look.

And as if that were not enough, there are many different commercial registries all over the planet.  Dunn and Bradstreet is just one such registry that people can look up from their comfort of their computer console and see for themselves that yes, indeed, what we think of as “the government” is in fact functioning as a commercial corporation in the business of providing “essential government services”.

A small sampling of around a hundred of the DUNNS numbers belonging to the US Corp are listed in the Appendix in the back of my book, “You Know Something Is Wrong When”, and with a little poking on search engines like Manta.com, Edgar.com and Thomas.com people can discover the CAGE and EIN and other proofs of the commercial nature of such things as the “US GOVERNMENT” and the “BLM” and the “STATE OF OHIO”.

People can also search the data bases of the State of Delaware, where most of these corporations maintain registration. It’s all online, Larry.  No need to try to obfuscate or hide the truth anymore.

And while people are at it, they can look up the Clearfield Doctrine, which very clearly enunciates the principle of the law which says that when a government steps down and functions in the capacity of a corporation, it is subject to all the same limitations as any other corporation.

As everyone, even Bob Hurt, can now see, Larry’s hair-splitting does him no credit and serves no truth.  He is simply obfuscating and trying to avoid admission of the fact that the Act of 1871 led to the creation — howbeit, seven years later — of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, more popularly known by its dba “US Corp”.

Well, there it is, folks — the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the Act of 1871, for your knowledge and enjoyment —  so that when some hair-splitting shyster tries to tell you that the Act of 1871 was repeated in 1874 (which it was) you are prepared to tell him the rest of the story just as I told it to Larry.

And I trust that my credibility on the matter now stands heads and tails and nose and whiskers above anything Mr. Becraft might have (left) to say.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com