05 26 18 The Short Short Version

05/26/2018

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-short-short-version.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The scags back in the 30’s made a false claim against our assets by pretending that we were all Territorial United States Citizens by choice — that we all “volunteered” into that status in exchange for the “benefits” of Social Security (which we paid for times ten ourselves) and similar such bogus “benefits” like registering our private cars as property belonging to them and available for them to use as collateral for loans, etc., etc., etc.

They did this with our labor and our land — everything.  And all without telling us.

It would be like being named as the co-signer on a car loan without ever being told a word about it.  It’s an “unconscionable contract” — literally, because there was no “meeting of the minds” possible.  They just did it, and the greedy banks let them do it.

It is totally illegal and unlawful and morally bankrupt to boot.

Okay, so the moment we find out, we can object.  We found out and started objecting immediately.  We went to the Pope. We went to the Queen.  We went to the FBI.  We went to Interpol.  We went to the DOJ.  We went to the UN.  We went to the Inspector Generals.  We went to the Postmasters.

And they all stood there staring at us like we were Mr. Ed — but we have the proof and everything we are telling you is playing out as we speak.

The Historic Trusts are all locked up.  Nobody can get a transaction through to save themselves.

Why?  Because these yahoos, the Governors of the States of States, like the State of Ohio, went bankrupt while in possession of our purportedly “abandoned estates”.  That means that our estates are “presumed to be” property belong to the bankrupt State of Ohio, for example, available for the creditors of the State of Ohio to claim under the rules of maritime commerce.

Using the car loan analogy, everything went along fine as long as the State of Ohio made its payments.  Nobody was the wiser, really.

The moment the State of Ohio goes bankrupt, the payments don’t get made and the co-signers get dunned.  If the co-signers don’t pay, the car then gets repossessed.

If Trump and Company don’t wake up to the game the international bankers are playing, and tell the State of State Governors to release our names and estates Quit Claim and Quiet Title them back to us effective with the day we were born, foreign creditors will own this whole country as a result of this criminal fraud against the American States and people.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

 


05 25 18 As Part of the Ongoing Effort = Attention North Carolina Attorneys

05/25/2018

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/as-part-of-ongoing-effort.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The article re-posted below will help you understand why Rod Class’s Administrative Rulings matter.  The short answer is that  the State of North Carolina admitted that the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is a private subcontractor, and that the State of North Carolina had no direct administrative control over the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and its employees. [Direct administrative control is the responsibility of the parent corporation, dba UNITED STATES and the US Bankruptcy Trustees.]

If you have been following the history, you already know why this is so.

The Territorial United States franchise doing business as “the State of North Carolina” was bankrupted in 1933.  In 1946, it was still “incompetent” due to bankruptcy and the Bankruptcy Trustees appointed a Municipal United States Corporation, the UNITED STATES, INC., and its franchise doing business as the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, to take over the job of providing “essential government services”.

Joe Average in North Carolina didn’t notice or care.  What difference did it make to him who swept the streets and wrote traffic tickets?  It was the same way throughout the country.  People were given no disclosure about any of these arrangements made “for” them.

But as we shall see, private incorporated subcontractors are not subject to the same rules as public institutions— and that gives rise to both the situation confirmed by Rod Class’s efforts, and the situation described below by one angry attorney:

DUN & BRADSTREET: ‘RATING SERVICE’ FOR ALL CORPORATE ENTITIES’

There are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service: D-B is a financial rating service for both ‘public’ and ‘private’ corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B preview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis, and ‘structured settlements’ that there was seemingly anything incoherent with that fact that municipal and utility bonds are integral to D-B rating services.

I never ever stopped to think about or scrutinize that fact, let alone allow my deliberation and research skills to ‘wander’ or ‘wonder’ into research that would have disclosed what we recently found. Part of the ease of discovering the complex web of inter-related inter-locking CORPORATIONS had to do with ease of electronic research over the internet. Years ago, if one wanted to search anything within any of the rating services, including “Moody’s”, Standard & Poors, and Dun & Bradstreet, + others, one would have to either have to be a subscriber to the service in order to manually expedite their search-rating results, or, one would have to pay a fee and cause a search to arise.

D & B ‘ratings’ are affected every time a ‘public hazard bond’, or ‘surety performance bond’, or ‘indemnity bond’ is complained against. An ‘administrative complaint’ is usually all that it takes to cause a ‘tag’ or book entry to be made on any particular bond. Any particular bond, once complained against three or more times, causes a change in underwriting bond ‘risk’. For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to ‘public office’ as ‘Judge’, ‘Clerk of Court’, etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their bond may be ‘pulled’, and due to loss of effective bond or ‘suretyship’, they cannot ‘practice’ or ‘discharge’ the duty of the office held, or occupied.

In short, the bond maker-issuer is the bonding party for the benefit or on behalf of the ‘bondee’, ie. the purported ‘public officer’, ‘employee’, or ‘official’. This would extend as well to all other ‘public employees’ and ‘agents’-‘agencies’, etc. Every ‘person’ being bonded has a Dun & Bradstreet ‘bond rating’. At least it is reasonable to assume such.

Once three complaints are filed against any bond, assuming they are with merit and well supported by fact and ‘law’ of the ‘breach’ of fiduciary duty, the bond is most always pulled or revoked. The ‘servant’ at ‘risk’ by assuming the responsibilities of operating in any ‘official capacity’ or by ‘employment’, can no longer be underwritten as a ‘no risk’ or ‘low risk’ contract.

One incident of ‘breach’ or operating ‘ultra vires’, or ‘without the law’, causes the ‘immunity’ provisions of the written ‘law’ to cease to be effective, because when one violates the law as a ‘public servant’, one’s immunity blanket ceases to apply, thereby leaving the insurer or bondsman or bond issuer exposed to the liability arising from the servant’s acts, which under any ‘breach of law authority’ causes or gives rise to an ‘injury’ which is a civil or criminal commercial liability.

Everything, whether civil or criminal or martial, is a matter of ‘commerce’, and admiralty law is the venue and jurisdiction by which disputes in/of commercial nature are resolved in truth and fact.

All writings of the United States of America and of the UNITED STATES, or any other ‘government unit’ are forms of making an ‘offer to contract’. There is no written matter of material fact or issue of fact that is ‘law’ which is not bonded. There is no ‘office’ or function of ‘civil service’ or ‘public’ function that is not bonded. If the bond is not in existence, the bondee is ‘exposed’ and without ‘coverage’ by any ‘surety’.

Therefore, there is no ‘guarantor’ behind the agent, officer, official, or employee having ‘exposure’, by ‘assumption of risk’, of a material breach or injury in fact by the bondee [person being bonded or insured]. This leaves the person under taint or cloud of operating ‘in the public interest’ without the constitutionally and statutorily required bond, and therefore, in tacit violation of the constitutions and statutes under the scheme of ‘law’.

“Law” applies first and foremost to government, its employees, officers, and agents. In today’s rogue ‘doctrine of necessity’ ‘de facto’ environment, research has proven and documented that no person, performing as an ‘officer of the court’, being an alleged ‘judge’, being a ‘Bar attorney’ of the ABA or the Federal or State Bars, has a bona fide Constitutional Oath.

The Bond that is supposed to be in existence sits atop the Oath. The Oath is not merely ‘incidental’ to the ‘office’ as has been ruled in some States by their corrupt court “officers”. The Oath is what imparts lawful and legal authority to the man/woman coming into ‘holding’ a ‘public office’ and becoming a ‘public official’. A public servant having no proper Oath cannot have a proper Bond to encompass or include those risks associated with the ‘office’, ‘discharge of fiduciary duty’ of the office, and the various levels or elements of ‘law authority’ underlying the office.

Hence, one may take an Oath to any office of the incorporated State, or the UNITED STATES, and not take a preceding Oath to the unincorporated de jure state or United States of America, and operate non/un constitutionally, which is all that has been going on for years, but which was not known or Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 2 of 3 11 April 2008 understood as being a material breach to the People of the State/state, causing or giving rise to material injuries in fact as a consequence of operating ‘ultra vires’, ie. outside the corporate charters and ‘trust indentures’ which create the office in the first place.

In the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, not one judge has taken the necessary Oaths of office, which include the organic ‘state’ de jure republic oath for “North Carolina”, and the subsequent and inferior or ‘lesser’ oath for the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The latter ‘public entity’ has federal character, a Federal Employer Identification Number, a Federal Tax Identification Number, and is a federal ‘instrumentality’ of the CORPORATE ‘UNITED STATES’, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, under definition of 28 U.S.C. §3002(15), AND 26 U.S.C. §§7701 (a)(9) and (10). This documented fact pertains to every judge in every State court, but also applies to most every other ‘public official’ or ‘law enforcement officer’.

I cannot address what other State public pretenders and ‘District Attorneys’ or “Prosecutors” do when bringing a criminal complaint against any “natural person”, which includes CORPORATIONS [YES, they are both the class of ‘person’ under statute ‘law’ definition], but in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, when it is the bringer of the action, the People of the State are never brought in as ‘party to the action’. Only the CORPORATION name is found on the Criminal Complaint or Information form. Only the corporate State is present in the courtroom, trying a case before a CORPORATE JUDGE.

There exists a complete breach and break from the Constitution of North Carolina, because the People of the republic North Carolina and their ‘law’ are not present in the action nor party to it. They are not in the courtroom, nor are they acting through any ‘officer’ of the People, as ‘District Attorney’, which Office alleges to be a ‘servant of the People’. It is NOT. Even the DA does not have the mandatory and proper Constitutional Oath as condition precedent under NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES, which clearly state at Chapter 11, Section 11, there shall be two Constitutional Oaths taken.

Absent performance according to that bonded STATUTE regarding bonded Oaths, leaves a clear and certain risk liability issue for the Bond maker-issuer. Some bonding agent has bonded the Statutes and other writings of the law of the State. Some bond issuer has bonded State ‘employees’, ‘officers’, and ‘public officials’. Some bond issuer has, therefore, “underwritten” risk on the basis of having full knowledge that there exist no Constitutional Oaths beneath the CORPORATE OATH.

One cannot but presume that the bond issuer-maker has full disclosure; after all, ‘they’ have been registered within each State Department of Corporations, do business in all ‘States’ and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and are presumed to know the “LAW”….including the “law of the land”, which under their “UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE” and all secondary ‘Civil’ or ‘Criminal’ Codes, would find itself to be in harmony with their legislative jurisdictional ‘statutes and implementing regulations’ at U.C.C. 1-308, 1-207, and 1- 103, wherein All Rights are Reserved, and the U.C.C. states that it is harmonious with ‘all jurisdictions’, which would include the jurisdiction of the “law of the land”, ‘common law’, and the various common law Constitutions of the underlying several de jure republic ‘states’ of the American union, aka, United States of America.

Why would any bond underwriter knowingly underwrite these CORPORATE STATES, UNITED STATES, all of their ‘sub-corporations’, agents-agencies, instrumentalities, and their ‘law authority’ found in their various ‘writings’, private ‘laws’ etc., to operate a ‘public’ or ‘municipal’ construct as if it were ‘lawful government’, but knowing that it really is not?  [Answer: they have named us– our private ESTATES as the sureties of their bonds, so in order to get relief or restitution for their evil deeds, we have to injure ourselves.]

The underwriters of bonds, therefore, could not allege any defense against a massive intake of related claims by private inhabitants of any of the States or UNITED STATES who have been “compelled” under duress, extreme duress, or risk of extreme duress and prejudice of ‘seizure’, ‘confiscation’ ‘impound’, ‘occupation’, ‘detainment’, or injury or termination by any means of potentially lethal force?

Everyone who has ever been inside a State of North Carolina administrative or judicial ‘law’ proceeding, or been before any ‘clerk’ or ‘judge’ of same, or been prosecuted by any County District Attorney within said State/STATE, has been within a “brutum fulmen”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4t Edition: “brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549.

The “Office of Sheriff” is a most important link between the People of any de jure republic ‘state’ and the Courts, and Offices of the State. However, it has been discovered that many Sheriffs do not, as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any local ‘county’ or County, have a bona fide prior or ‘precedent’ Constitutional Oath to their respective republic state. Or, they may have taken a bona fide Constitutional Oath, and then disclaimed or disavowed it immediately henceforth by taking a CORPORATE Constitutional Oath. “A man cannot serve two masters”.

This same “axiomatic” principal applies to ‘officers’ of the United States as well. How can the newly ‘sworn’ Attorney General of the UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL [a federal corporation] take a Constitutional Oath to the United States, or UNITED STATES, and be held to such an Oath as ‘liable’ for his/her breach of fiduciary duty to the people of the United States of America, or to the franchise corporate trust estate ‘citizens of the UNITED STATES’, when the office ‘holder’ enjoins by contract to the ‘international purposes of Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 3 of 3 11 April 2008 INTERPOL’, under its Constitution [charter-contract] at Article 30 shortly after taking said Oath? Article 30 is quite explicit in meaning and intent. If one understands the “international purposes of INTERPOL” and all other ‘international agencies’ was and is to ‘establish a financial dictatorship within the United States/United States of America’ for the benefit of undisclosed third parties, under jurisdiction and authority of the IMF-U.N, then all of the lower level ‘breach of duty’ by lack of proper Bond and Oath issues would begin to make clear sense. [Jeff Sessions and Steven T. Mnuchin are both Interpol Officers and have renounced all loyalty to this country and its people.]

In short, all alleged ‘public servants’ are serving ‘public policy’ and ‘public administration’ of the ‘laws’ and enforcing those laws to protect the CORPORATION, to the disinterest and detriment of the People, whom have been ‘captured’, ‘searched’, ‘seized’, ‘boarded’ as with a ‘vessel’, and which people have been placed into ‘warehouse storage’ as ‘human capital’ and ‘property’ of the de facto King or “Sovereign”, which/who has conquered and occupied the Office of the People, and subverted and subordinated it into an Office of Inquisition for YOU KNOW WHO!!  [This is an example of the corruption fostered by Satanists within the Roman Catholic Church, of which many Catholics are completely unaware.]

Lacking mandatory Oath, creates liability against the bond of the STATE, and every officer-agent-employee who has come to be ‘employed’ thereby. Breach of any underlying writing of the STATE, or State, or state, as an offer to contract in admiralty venue, is a certain “injury in fact” giving rise to a “material injustice” and resultant ‘liability’. There is no longer any question about ‘risk analysis’ or ‘damage assessment’.

The only real issue is “HOW MUCH IS THE INJURY WORTH”? WHAT PENALTIES should be compelled above the mere “pecuniary” or monetary ‘relief’ to be sought? Treble damages? Punitive damages? Civil or Criminal or BOTH? If Oaths and Bonds have not yet been ascertained for all relevant federal and State officers, agents, and employees, they should be compelled by FOIA request or subpoena duces tecum1 immediately so that the elements of contract and breach of duty by these ‘public servants’ under mandate of relevant Constitutions, statutes, regulations, etc., including the U.C.C. in Admiralty venue can be comprehensively determined; then, a resultant ‘cause of action’ constructed accordingly.

It is further axiomatic that: “Where a liability in equity arises due to injury by any party, and that party does not also provide a “remedy” for said liability, the injured party has the right and standing to create his own remedy”

Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’, “election”, or “appointment”. In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea. Brutum fulmen!!

Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619. A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission]. One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS lacking bona fide Constitutional nexus is without “law authority”, and therefore has no nexus to the Constitutionally protected ‘Right’ of “due process”. Hence, any act or action taken against any one by any alleged ‘official’, ‘officer’, agent’ or ‘employee’ lacking such nexus is subject to CLAIM and/or COUNTER-CLAIM in Admiralty venue and proceeding. The claim, once perfected after ‘exhausting administrative remedy’ is brought against the Bond and the DUN & BRADSTREET rating of that CORPORATE PERSON will be affected as a consequence. The idea is not to seek an illegitimate claim for merely punitive or monetary purposes, but to seek claim on the basis of protest, dispute, redress, relief, and ‘remedy’!!! S

I need only add that since this article and other information like it has come to the surface and Rod Class has definitively proven that the relationship between the State of North Carolina and the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is what it is, the STATE franchises have been forced to enter bankruptcy, too, as the claims against them for the injustices perpetrated by their employees quickly became overwhelming.

This is entirely the fault of those organizations for failure to operate according to the Public Law of this country, and under no circumstance should the people of this country be “presumed” to be sureties liable for the appointments made by foreign bankruptcy trustees and the acts of foreign municipal employees who were never qualified to be bonded or to serve in any public capacity related to us.

The corporations responsible are trying to shuffle off the liabilities created by their often criminally mis-directed employees as well as their own profligate unauthorized spending back onto the victims of this debacle, and we are saying no and saying it in no uncertain terms.

We are not the “sureties” for these interlopers.  We are their Priority Creditors and the Priority Creditors of their parent corporations and affiliates as well.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 24 18 Dispelling Patriot Myths

05/24/2018

https://weexitthematrix.wordpress.com/

Hello Again Truth Seekers:

Over the past few years I have seen many patriot myths survive and even more than that, new people come into the movement, without having done any research of their own and adopt them out of a sheer desire to explain the apparent injustices we see everywhere in our great country.

The Ugly Truth about all that is wrong in government in America, and as far as that goes everywhere in the world is that the people are to blame.   We, more so here in America because we have more freedoms than any other country in the world.

Ultimately, we are all responsible for the way things are in our world.  You only need look in the mirror to find the responsible party.  It should be no surprise to you that when power, such as that given to our representatives in government,  is left unchecked it will almost certainly be abused.

I hear and read on some patriot sites people talking about “strawman this and strawman that” and espousing commercial theories of how to handle taxes, traffic tickets, foreclosures etc. which have been repeatedly been shown not to work.

How does this persist and how as a movement do we evolve?

The first thing we need to realize is that, unwittingly we have selected to participate in everything that is happening.  I know what you are thinking: “I didn’t ask for things to be the way they are,”  but believe me, you have.

My reply would be that –  “By not learning how to make things different, and understanding the power you have to change them, you are agreeing to accept things they way they are.”

That may sound harsh but it’s a reality and we all know it.   If you stay in an abusive relationship, job, friendship etc. you are choosing to accept the situation the way it is and to endure the outcomes.

Some people live in fantasyland thinking their mate, boss, friend will change, when life has taught us that most people do not change unless given a really good reason to do so.

Government is no different and you are fooling yourself if you believe differently.  The something that must change is YOU!  In fact, my experience and history shows that the only thing that will change government is when the people change.

Most people like to sit around and bitch, groan and complain about how bad government is but when you step into your power things can, do and will change.

The first big stumbling block is ignorance.   People are ignorant of the power they possess.   They don’t know what they don’t know.  This is complete ignorance and it is the condition encompasses the vast majority of the American People.

If a determinate human superior… receives ritual obedience from the bulk of a given society,  that determinate human superior is sovereign in that society…”  Blacks 1st Ed under definition of “sovereignty”

Are you giving “ritual obedience” to the government?

I bet you are.  Think about federal and state income tax, traffic tickets, property tax and the list goes on and on.

The second stumbling block is the vast degree of corruption which now exists in our government to keep the People believing that the government is all powerful.   Most people believe this which leads to the next problem.

Surrender.  Because most everyone believes they are powerless to the government (this was a created belief by design and implanted into all the minds of the people) they surrender to it and allow it to control their lives in ways that are unimaginable.  For instance, who has ever read Title 26 the federal tax code and seen the exact place where it says you are required to give up 25%-35% of your pay to the IRS?

Answer: no one!

Because if you had you’d most likely find at least for the vast majority of people it doesn’t apply to you, nevertheless everyone lines up eagerly on April 15th every year to give up a third or more of what they earned the previous year.

Sound insane?  It does to me but people do it every year and for only one reason – ignorance.

What about the guy who rolls through the stop sign and gets a ticket.  Ok, first the stop by the policeman is 20 minutes, so he’s late for work.  Then he has to get to the court house and sit there for an hour or hour and a half to get his “fine.”  If he decides to go to trial, then there is another 2 hours or more in preparation.

Everything the police do in “enforcing” the “driving” issue and “driving infractions” is fraud.  This is not my opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court says so.  You cannot require someone to pay a fee to obtain a license to exercise a right under the Constitution.  PERIOD!

Why don’t people know this?   Ignorance.

Now ignorance is not necessarily a bad thing.   It just means you don’t know.   There is always a point in our lives where we are ignorant of certain things, where we don’t know.   We’ve all been there.   When we graduate from high school we go to college to further our learning, to prepare ourselves for the career we desire.

The same holds true for the Redemption movement.   It is now time to put all the old,  useless ideas behind because they are getting us nowhere.   We are moving into a golden age where the Truth of our power as a People is being revealed and I am here to share it with you.

I offer classes which will propel you into this new age of understanding in such a way as to allow you to see and feel your Power in a very meaningful  and tangible way.

There is no more time to complain about the way things are.  Things are the way they are because You haven’t done anything about it and believe me there is plenty you can do and have the power to do.

I invite you to visit my website to read more about what I teach and about joining my classes.   Here is a link below:

http://weexitthematrix.wordpress.com/

Respectfully,

Neo


05 23 18 Postal Fraud and Breach of Trust + I Double Dog Dare the Territorial United States Supreme Court

05/23/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/postal-fraud-and-breach-of-trust.html

By Anna Von Reitz

One of the most frustrating parts of the current situation is that Americans continue to respect and trust the very people that have betrayed them.

This is what makes “breach of trust” such a difficult and reprehensible crime — difficult in that the victims often resist those who are trying to help them and deny that their beloved “Trustees” would ever cheat or harm them, and reprehensible in that the guilty parties have knowingly traded upon this trust placed in them and in the positions of power entrusted to them to implement the crime.

If the members of Congress had done their actual jobs, if former Presidents had acted with Honor, none of the evils infesting our monetary and political and court systems would exist.  And we, ourselves, had we done our job and been less trusting and more vigilant— this situation wouldn’t exist, either.

One of those who has done his best to truly represent the people who placed their trust in him, New Hampshire Representative Richard Marple, has recently raised the issue of postal fraud and the misuse and abuse of the postal service to deliver bogus court documents and bills–essentially promoting a scam– so a group of us have been discussing and I share my comments below:

It IS both grammar fraud– they know that when they address anything to RICHARD MARPLE they are addressing a public trust that they set up and named after you without your knowledge or consent– and postal fraud.

The use of all capital letters is known as “DOG LATIN”.  In this country it has been used as “American Sign Language.”

If you look it up in Black’s Fourth or in the Chicago Manual of Style you will get an eye-full.  Friends in Australia have tracked its use and misuse all the way back to the Emperor Justinian.  They have an entire WordPress site dedicated to the subject– The Justinian Deception.  It is very well documented.

So when they create a public trust named after you without your knowledge or consent they are creating an “unconscionable” contract.  You are literally not conscious of any of this.

Right out of the box any such contract in any jurisdiction of the law is null and void the moment you object to it, but how are you going to object if you don’t know that any such THING exists?

The one contract that you can’t break is the one you are not aware of.

They know the scam they have set up, but you don’t.  So they send you mail addressed to their PUBLIC TRUST as if you were the Trustee responsible for this, and you mistakenly think it is addressed to you and answer the summons or whatever else without objection so— gotcha!  They shirk off their responsibility for their creation and hang it around your neck instead.

Now, they are committing fraud against average Americans when they set up this whole system and start using a foreign language–DOG LATIN — to secretively mis-address us.  They are committing mail fraud by sending their solicitations through the mail to us “as if” we were the Trustees responsible for IT.

And the only way they get away with this is by pretending that this is all “voluntary” and we are knowingly and willingly allowing them to do this.

It is criminal and may not be excused in terms of private contracts.  An illegal private contract is still illegal.  Slavery and involuntary servitude have both been outlawed worldwide since 1926.   Any contract voluntary of involuntary yielding that result is also null and void.

But we have to object to being bonded and we have to object to any presumption of Trusteeship related to IT and we have to object to the Mail fraud and so on—and how are The People going to do that if (1) they don’t know this ugly foreign system exists and (2) they don’t know they have been targeted and included in this foreign system by these scam artists and (3) they trust and respect the vermin doing this to them and think you are a crackpot when you try to warn them?

A Purgatory Oath is an Ecclesiastical/Canon Law Oath that has no place in a Commercial Court.  Just like Writs don’t work in a Commercial or Administrative Court.

You have three different systems — air, land, and sea — and they all have different conventions — different means of expression, different forms to fill out, different courts to invoke.

A lot of the confusion in the courts comes about because people think they are in one kind of court when in fact they are in another kind of court.  It is necessary to nail them down as to what the declared and actual jurisdiction of the court is before you make ANY reply to them at all, and once they commit to a jurisdiction you have to watch them to make sure they stay in that jurisdiction.  If, after declaring jurisdiction, the judge makes an excuse and gets up and leaves the room and then comes back in, you have to repeat the demand for him to declare the actual jurisdiction of the court again.  They use this as a trick to switch jurisdictions when the court appears to be in continuous session.

All these courts that the Bar Attorney (shipping clerks) operate are commercial courts and the Judges won’t budge from that jurisdiction absent action on your part forcing them to move from Maritime to Admiralty to Ecclesiastical jurisdiction.  Maritime deals with trusts and contracts that are implied, Admiralty deals with actual factual contracts and trusts that are written and present as evidence, Ecclesiastical Courts deal with moral issues and contracts we have with God —- and no judge wants to enter there.

Maritime is the easiest jurisdiction for these yahoos to fudge around in, so that is where they dearly like to stay.  In Admiralty they have to hear the facts, which are often detrimental to the Court’s advantage.  In Ecclesiastical Law the Judge is put at risk and anything up to and including his life can be forfeit, so they avoid going into the realm unless they are utterly desperate and have no choice.

And the moment you enter upon the land and soil jurisdiction of this country they have to vacate — simply dismiss and run — because they have no jurisdiction related to the land and soil at all and are obligated to obey the Law of the Land while on our shores, and they have often abundantly violated the Law of the Land, so best not to even discuss it from their standpoint.

I have had so many of these courts return fees, release bonds and dismiss charges by now that this is set in cement and completely reliable and predictable.  They will not engage any issue on the land and soil jurisdiction nor can they operate any Court in the land and soil jurisdiction, because the Territorial United States has no such jurisdiction delegated to it.

They can only succeed in their objective — which is to traffick you into their jurisdiction and fleece you — if you let them, which means you have to learn how to effectively shut them down and recognize all the tricks they use to weasel you into admitting, accepting, submitting, etc.

Along with re-affirming the land and soil jurisdiction courts owed to this country and populating those courts with properly trained Counselors-at-Law, and properly informed Jury Pools that are aware of and ready to use their nullification powers, we have to re-educate and discipline the Territorial Courts and the members of the Bar Associations.

They do have a job to perform, but unfortunately, they have been usurping and presuming upon the American people and their assets, and have been subjecting millions of innocent people to unconscionable contracts under color of law.

This has to stop and right about now.  It is nothing more or less than a venal international crime spree and if it means confiscating pensions, arresting judges, outlawing the Bar Associations on our shores — whatever it takes, must be done.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 23 18 I Double Dog Dare the Territorial United States Supreme Court

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/i-double-dog-dare-territorial-united.html

 By Anna Von Reitz

Let’s begin this discussion with this realization: you can be a king in one country and a slave in another.

Is that clear enough?

Is it also clear that different countries operate under different laws?

Good.

The United States is and has always been a different country with respect to the Territorial United States.  They function under two separate systems of law.

This leads to a situation where the States (members of The United States land jurisdiction Union) function under a different system than the Territorial States of States (international jurisdiction of the sea).

We have lawyers who are Counselors at Law and Justices (of the Peace) who administer the Public Law, which in a State is known as the General Session Law, even if the “State” is being represented as a Public Trust, and the Public Law generally, known as the Law of the Land.

They have Attorneys at Law and Judges who administer the Private Law, which in a State of State is known as the Statutory Law.  Strictly speaking, only State of State officials, employees and dependents — all known as “residents” of the State of Alaska (for example) are required to obey the Statutory Law.

So you have Counselors at Law and you have Attorneys at Law.  I am a Counselor at Law.

If you occupy an office of the soil or land jurisdiction courts you must be a Counselor at Law and CANNOT be a Bar Attorney.  Period. So there is no basis whatsoever for anyone supposing that I would be or even could be a Bar Attorney.

It is totally ignorant to look for me among the members of the Bar Association.  They can’t operate a State Court and I can’t operate a State of State Court BY DEFINITION.

So, no, I am NOT a member of the Bar, am not required to be a member of the Bar, and could not operate a land or soil jurisdiction court as a member of the Bar.

Bar Attorneys can act as administrators but can’t sit on the bench or otherwise operate in any public capacity in a State Court.

People have become so ignorant that they don’t know the difference between the “Alaska State Court” and the “State of Alaska Court”.

Nor do they know the difference between a Counselor at Law (required to run land and soil jurisdiction courts) and Attorneys at Law (required to run Maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction courts).

Obviously, I know what I am doing, the rules of the Office I am occupying, and the State I serve; just as obviously, I am not serving in nor have I ever claimed to serve in any of the capacities you mention.

And again, there is no factual controversy about this whatsoever.

There are land courts and there are sea courts and this is the way it has always been.

All that has happened is that as more and more Americans have been unknowingly press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, they have unwittingly subjected themselves to the sea courts and the land courts have become rare as hen’s teeth as a result.

That does not mean that my court does not exist– it is clearly established under the General Session Laws of Alaska.  Nor does it mean I am doing anything wrong or making any false claims.  I am not impersonating a judge of any sea jurisdiction court or claiming to be a Bar Member or any other such ignorant meandering.

I am here serving my State– not any “State of State”.

And I am serving the honest Tradesmen engaged in private international trade and the living people who have rejected FDR’s unconscionable New Deal contract and who have returned to the land and soil of Alaska.

And I Double-Dog Dare any member of the (Territorial) United States Supreme Court to say otherwise.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

 


05 21 18 Are we “Federal Children?”

05/22/2018

http://www.truedemocracy.net/td2_4/01a-federal.html

 

While doing some searching on how we are TRACKED by the government (cell phones, etc.) I came across this item I wrote in 2002 that provides more info on how the government goal of TRACKING and controlling American citizens really got started.  I had forgotten I had written this but in finding it today and reading it over I thought some on WGEN might like to review the history of how the *massa’s* devised ways to track us and how to use us as collateral for that national debt – mostly owed to China.  When China calls in the debt we owe to them how many of us will then be placed in Chinese custody to do their bidding?

Jackie Juntti
WGEN   idzrus@earthlink.net
It isn’t who you are –  It is WHOSE you are ! ! !

The Journal of History
Fall 2002 – Volume 2, Issue 4
Table of Contents

Are we “Federal Children?”

 

http://www.truedemocracy.net/td2_4/01a-federal.html

 

By Jackie Juntti

Washington Grassroots Email Network

Are we “Federal Children,” owned by the Government?

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth “registration” or what we now know as the “birth certificate.” It was known as the “Maternity Act” and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for “other purposes.” One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures.

What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating “federal children.” This government, under the doctrine of “Parens Patriae,” now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for “permission” from Daddy government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a “free country.”

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as “official” records.

Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child’s birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States, thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth. In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the “full faith and credit” of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system.

To wit: “Full faith and credit” clause of Constitution U.S. article 4. section 1, requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition cites omitted.

The state claims an interest in every child within it’s jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt United States. We are now designated by this government as “HUMAN RESOURCES,” with a new crop born every year.”

In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that its purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution’s10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several states, held, that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls, not on the state but on her inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the states by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or

is to be, done under it without their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury et. al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. To wit:

  1. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the federal government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of  federal funds for the purposes of the act.

Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED.

By  section 4 of the act, the Children’s Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the plans submitted to it, and for that purpose by its agents to go into the several  states and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT.

(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.

In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the states will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251;

Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44.

The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the states by the Constitution.

Message of President Monroe, May 4, 1822; 4 Elliot’s Debates, p. 525; Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma, 221 U.S.

559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390.

(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529. (3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the states, and it cannot delegate to the states the power to make laws for the United States. In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.

The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The Constitution hasn’t changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above.

Writing letters to elected public servants won’t save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal Constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government.

If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our God given rights to liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But…if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it’s time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written.


05 21 18 The Biggest Back Fire in History

05/21/2018
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-biggest-back-fire-in-history.html
By Anna Von Reitz

THEY, the Territorial United States, planned to vacate the Constitutions — all three of them.

THEY had already moth-balled and usurped upon and taken over the duties of the Federal United States 150 years ago, so that was no problem.  With a little finagling and a lot of unauthorized spending, they figured they could bankrupt both their own corporations and the Municipal United States corporations, too.

Just run up a giant debt, let the corporations acting as providers of “essential government services” — Article IV — go bankrupt, so as to sever any connection to the actual constitutional agreements, and off-load all their corporate debts onto the unwitting backs of the American People.

Then, they planned to boot up a new corporation, call it something deceptive and sexy like THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, charter it in a foreign country like France so nobody would catch on, and then sneak right back in the back door and establish themselves as the Successor to the service contracts they vacated by a process of assumption.

We’d assume that they were our own dear Federal Government, because we’d assumed that twice before.  Why wouldn’t we go for the sop a third time?

Because we woke up and said, “No thanks.”

Hey, they are the ones who usurped upon the actual Federal United States, rendering it inoperative back in 1868.  They are the ones who spent themselves into oblivion and bankruptcy.  We are totally innocent Third Parties.

It’s all, one hundred percent, their own fault that they don’t have a contract.

It’s also their fault that all those juicy “delegated powers” reverted back to the Grantor of those delegated powers, The United States of America (Unincorporated).

They disabled the actual Federal United States via mercenary “war”, fraud, breach of trust and deceit.  They disabled the Territorial United States via bankruptcy.  They disabled the Municipal United States via bankruptcy.  All three.  They vacated all three Constitutions at one time and haven’t got a leg left to stand on.

What’s even more problematic are all the legal entanglements.

Now that we are back on the land and standing in our sovereign capacity and operating our sovereign government, all the many Peace Treaties and Friendship Treaties apply.  The Chief Perpetrators responsible for this mess, the Holy See, the British Crown, the British Monarch, the French Government and the British Crown (Westminster) are all obligated to come to our aid.

They can’t make war against us — not even surreptitious mercenary war — because they are bound by Law and Treaty to provide us with “perpetual friendship and amity”—and in the case of the British Monarch, obligated to act as our Trustee and Protector on the “High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” which includes the province of both Maritime and Admiralty Law.

And if they did make war against us, everyone on the planet would know that they were criminals.

The Chinese and Russians have never liked Britain, for good reason, but they have reason to like the actual Americans.  Our egalitarian philosophy of life and government is far more compatible with their own views.  We also have a somewhat distant but honorable history as honest people who mind our own business and pay our debts.

And wouldn’t that be a relief for the whole world?  Actual Americans at the helm of the actual United States instead of Euro-Scum pretending to “represent” us?

The Russians and the Chinese and in fact all the people on this planet have more than adequate reason to support us against our run amok and misdirected Hired Help.

Not only has the Territorial United States left itself without a contract and without delegated powers, but it has spent the last hundred years telling everyone who would listen that they are a “democracy”.

A democracy only functions by majority rule.  It requires a mandate — 51% of all eligible voters — to take a legal action. And the government of the Territorial United States hasn’t had a mandate for anything it has done in decades, if ever.

So between the fraud and breach of trust they employed in their in-house take over, which is all crime that has no statute of limitations, and their utter lack of a mandate even within their own self-proclaimed democracy, and their already observed lack of contract and delegated power, they are well and truly up a creek without a paddle.

What they intended for others has come home to roost upon them.

And it couldn’t happen to a nicer, more deserving group of people.

That is, of course, said in irony.  They have in fact been ruthless pirates and scourges, who have pillaged and plundered the people at home and neighbors abroad, and then proposed to blame their victims.  The sanctimonious fraud artists are finally exposed for what they are.  And cut off at the knees.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) has summoned the actual States to assemble, and they are doing so.  The Territorial United States is trying every petty little trick in their book to interfere and discredit and gainsay the effort, but it isn’t working.  The American People are waking up.

They are admitting to themselves just how abused they have been, how the fruit of their labor has been siphoned away, how they have been mistreated by police ostensibly hired to protect them, how they have been frightened in their own homes by un-elected agencies, how the quality of their lives and the value of their money has suffered along with their reputation in the rest of the world.  Most of all, they are sick of constant, unending, perpetual war, war, war.

It’s time for peace and it is time for all sentient Americans to join the ranks of those standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual United States.  It’s time for them to overcome the lies that have been told to them and about them, and for everyone concerned to fully recognize the fact that the Territorial United States and its Government no longer “represents” us.

We have, even according to their description of the circumstance, returned home and resumed the operation of our lawful government.

Mr. Trump needs to take our offer to occupy the lawful Office of the President of The United States of America and join with us to finally, for real, drain the swamp and address the fraud and usurpation at the root of it.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


05 19 18 Holy Moly!!!!!!! This Is the BIG ONE! + The UN Trusteeship + The Public Law and the Private “Law”

05/19/2018

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/holy-moly-this-is-big-one.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial.  It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit.

TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12).

I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven’t studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken.  It doesn’t work the way it should. Specifically, affidavits don’t work.  The courts ignore them.

Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it’s stupid.

First, via the “US Citizen” political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as “decedents” — that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.  Next, they “enfranchised” us — created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us — all that remained  on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.

And the “Rest of the Story is…….”  —- incorporated entities can’t create affidavits. They have no ability to take Oaths, swear to anything, or provide any testimony.

So by enfranchising us, the demons both subjected us to commercial law and rendered us helpless under it.

Quote my new BFF, Magnus….

“…..The Undeniable Fact That Artificial Entities (Corporations) Cannot Take Oaths, They Cannot Make Affidavits. See, E.G., In Re Empire Refining Co., 1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (Sd Cal. 1932) (It Is, Of Course, Conceded That A Corporation Cannot Make An Affidavit In Its Corporate Name. It Is An Inanimate Thing Incapable Of Voicing An Oath); Moya Enterprises, Inc. V. Harry Anderson Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand Restaurant Co. V. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9a T. Bjur C. Slezak, Fletcher Cyclopedia Of Law Of Private Corporations § 4629 (Perm. Ed. 1992) (“A Document Purporting To Be The Affidavit Of A Corporation Is Void, Since A Corporation Cannot Make A Sworn Statement”) – (Footnote Omitted). Rowland V. California Men’s Colony • 506  U.S. 194, 203 (1993).”

And he is absolutely correct!

This, at last, is why there has been no remedy and no hearing for the victims of this fraud scheme.  Commercial law can’t work without an affidavit, and incorporated entities — public trusts and public transmitting utilities — can’t issue affidavits. End of story.

We were totally boxed in, so that the judge couldn’t even hear us.  Literally.  We had no recourse, and only the “appearance” of justice.  They let us talk and run the meter, charged us for their “service”—and left us without any possible relief.

The Bar Association Members — British Merchant Marine Shipping Clerks — colluded with the politicians and the banks to set up the Perfect Crime, an ultimate Identity Theft Scheme that rendered the victims voiceless and helpless and without recourse.

It’s almost funny when you finally see it— a real guffaw-worthy sleight of hand, something so preposterous, so obvious, and yet — unless you had cause to think about both the identity theft and this particular bit of commercial law, you’d never put it together.

So, everyone ever issued a BIRTH CERTIFICATE has been trafficked, impersonated, and defrauded. Every such PERSON ever addressed by one of these COURTS has suffered barratry and been subjected to a foreign jurisdiction and form of law, within which they were specifically disabled and unable to defend themselves.

No more filthy, repugnant, criminal scheme, nothing more unjust, despicable, cynical —- and in the end, cowardly, can be imagined.  They attacked little babies in their cradles and used a petty, pathetic scheme like this to steal them blind and enslave them for life.

Even I am stunned.

But there it is, and there you have it.

We have come full circle at last.

In the end, this is all that anyone needs to know — what they did and how they did it.  That, and the realization of how many million— nay, billions— of innocent people have suffered because of it.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The UN Trusteeship

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-un-trusteeship.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN Trusteeship

According to this mammoth fraud against the American States and People, we just disappeared one day, like the ships of the Dutch East India company or the Templar Fleet before them, and deserted all our property here in America, leaving it behind in the care of our servants for hire — the British-controlled Territorial United States.

As such, we were deemed by those same dishonest servants to have “donated” our “abandoned” estates to the good of whomever, and most likely, to ourselves, should we ever “return” from “over the sea”.

Of course, we were never informed of our purported absence, nor of our supposed donation of our good names and assets.

As Mark Twain noted when this fraud first started — rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated.

In 1976, the traitors responsible for this debacle passed two Acts in the Territorial United States Congress — the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and in tandem with it, the International Organizations Immunities Act.

These two Acts together provide for individual still owed their lawful birthright estates to claim them as “Foreign Sovereigns” —- that is, “foreign” with respect to the Territorial United States, and to otherwise wash the hands of the perpetrators by naming the United Nations as the Trustees responsible for administration of our state laws and assets.

This manipulation (invalid as it is) is the equivalent of taking your money out of one pocket and putting it in the other, as the UN Corporation is owned and operated by the same people and interests as the US Corporation.

So now we are being treated to the spectacle of “UN Commissioners” disguised as County Commissioners arriving on our soil to tell us how to live our lives and how high to jump — except for one important fact.

We, the supposed “Donors” of the Trust they are administering have also seized claim as the “Beneficiaries” of all the Cestui Que Vies and related State assets and invoked the Doctrine of Merger.

This means that when the (merely presumed to be) Donor of a Trust is also the Beneficiary of a Trust, that Donor has the absolute right to collapse the Trust and receive back all the assets of that Trust. This is called a “reversionary trust interest”— which we have, and which we have invoked on the public and international record. We have merged the various entities established in our NAMES and returned them to the land and soil of our birth.

Read that— we have already told the UN to get off our soil and stay off and to prove any legitimate interest granted to them by the foreign Territorial United States Congress acting in Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract.

There is absolutely nothing in the Delegated Powers suggesting that the Territorial United States has now nor ever had any ability to dispose of our assets in any jurisdiction of the law. Therefore, the Territorial United States cannot grant to the UN what was never theirs to grant.

The actual presumed “Donors” have come home and claimed back the entirety of their land and soil as well as their Persons/PERSONS. Kindly inform the United Nations Secretary General and all the new “County Commissioners”.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The Public Law and the Private “Law”

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-public-law-and-private-law.html

By Anna Von Reitz

More mirroring.

Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which “United States” is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.

This process of “mirroring” everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down.  It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been “mirrored” by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name “United States”, too.

This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system.  They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself.

The Public Law is mirrored by their private law.

Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers.  Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers.

These are two different offices, one public, one private, both called “Sheriff”.

Yet another similar names deceit.

The vermin attempt to confuse one with the other, and to convince you that you are subject to their private “club” law, which amounts to the “public policies” of a corporation.

Yesterday, we also discussed the Clearfield Doctrine.  When an entity exercising our delegated powers debases itself and engages in commercial activity as an incorporated entity, it loses any special governmental powers or sovereign immunity and descends to the nature of any other commercial corporation.

Very clearly what has happened here is that private commercial corporations have been entrusted with governmental functions.  They have then hidden behind their government “identity” and used those delegated but still coercive powers to benefit their own bottom lines and protect their own corporate interests at the expense of competitors.

Imagine giving Exxon the ability to act as “the government”?

So how is it possible that you, a free born American, could become liable and subject to the public policies of a foreign corporation merely under hire to provide stipulated governmental services?

By contract — and in this case, undisclosed and unconscionable contract  employing semantic deceit  (Are you a US [Territorial] Citizen?) and improper use of the coercive powers of what appears to be government (You have to sign up for Social Security in order to have a [Federal] job….) to feather the nests and extend coercive power to private corporations.

Reclaiming your Trade Name re-establishes your identity as an American eligible to claim back your birthright estate as a living man or woman, and enables you to then lay claim to the derivative NAMES that the vermin have established “for” you in the following forms:  JOHN DOE (a public charitable trust),  JOHN M. DOE (a public transmitting utility) and JOHN MARK DOE (a constructive foreign grantor trust ESTATE)—-and return all them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth.

This effectively severs the unconscionable contract that they have created for their own benefit and the benefit of their foreign commercial corporation, which is supposed to be providing your States with good faith service, and corrects the falsified public records they have used against you.

Put another way, when you remove your names from their jurisdiction they no longer have a “handle” to seize upon and manipulate you and your assets.  Whatever contract there is, is re-written in your favor.  It is therefore of the utmost urgency and should be of your utmost concern to “come home” and take care of your own affairs, shed yourselves of these unconscionable presumptions, and stand in your true nature again.

If anyone asks, tell them that you have “retired” from all obligations and duties of Territorial and/or Municipal Citizenship and “returned” to your birthright political status on the land and soil of your native state, without prejudice.

This is equivalent to saying— “Hey, fella, you can do what you want to do. If you want to subject yourself to the Queen and be plundered for your trouble, that’s your business.  Leave me to mine. I obey the Public Law, which is sufficient.”

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com