4-30-2016 8-01-10 AM


By David-William, thelibertybeacon.com
April 15, 2016

Connecticut Attorney, Simeon E. Baldwin, invited a group of 100 Attorneys from 21 states and the District of Columbia to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the American B.A.R. Association. Most of the men were elite corporate lawyers.  Author Jethro K. Lieberman described early ABA membership: “You could become an invitee to membership if you were white, Protestant and native born, preferably with a British surname, and attended the elite law schools such as Harvard, Yale and Columbia; only then did you have a chance of prospering. Catholics, Jews, women and blacks were automatically excluded from membership. This exclusion was necessary to the elite bar’s sense of identity. Any fraternity is defined not only by whom it accepts but also by whom it excludes. The Association also pinned the stigma of immorality on the lower class of lawyers as shysters who talked, dressed and acted differently.”

In 1902 the ABA quit meeting regularly at Saratoga Springs; from that point to 1936 it met in different cities as a means to attract new members.  Thus ABA membership grew to 29,008 in 1936. Other statistics demonstrated the same story.  The bar went from just two sections, each with two officers, to 14 sections with 960 officers in 1935. The number of committees rose from 18 in 1902 to 27 in 1935.  Membership revenues in those years increased from $8,255 to $197,877.66.

The ABA’s fight against the New Deal led more liberal attorneys to start their own society called the National Lawyers Guild.  A mixture of populists, Marxists, and progressive attorneys, mostly on the East Coast, formed the guild in 1937. This move was also motivated by the fact that the ABA represented a largely elite base of lawyers associated with big business while ignoring the legal needs of the lower classes and minorities.

In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.

Black’s Law Dictionaries 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st: “Lawyers:  A person learned in the law as an attorney, counsel, or solicitor, a person licensed to practice law, any person for who for fee or reward, prosecutes or defends, causes in courts of record, or other judicial tribunal, of the United States, or of any other State, or whose business it is to give legal advice, in relation to any case or matter, whatsoever.”  (Act of July 13, 1866 – Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121)

The B.A.R. Association has no Legislative Authority to have been created.  They’re a private corporation.  The Attorners are self appointed!  They gave themselves their authority, and they’re using fraudulent Statutes.  They just came in, took over, and they’re taking full advantage of the fact that no one will dig and read their real history.

THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE!!!  THE B.A.R. IS A PRIVATE INDUSTRY, A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.  They’re trying to make everyone believe they have Congressional Authority, that they simply do not have.

Where in the Statutes at Large were Lawyers, most especially Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, ever given the authority to practice law in the courtroom?  There isn’t even Legislative Authority for the International B.A.R., or the American B.A.R., the British Accreditation Registry, to be created, much less, authority to work in the courts, and to monopolize the courts.  They’re a private corporation, and they issue their own union cards, which they deceptively call “Licenses.”  Imagine a private Carpenter’s Union issuing their own licenses.  This type of monopoly is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton Trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Smith Act.  They’re a SELF-APPOINTED monopoly.  These are foreign Agents registered under F.A.R.A.

As the years passed, these foreign Agents managed to get themselves unlawfully into Offices of Trust so they could shape statutes and codes to suit their agenda, rendering all their unconstitutionally created garbage, null and void, nunc pro tunc.

Article XIII put the teeth into this:

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:  “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”

Article XIII  “If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

Do you have an understanding of what is meant when the original Article XIII says, “such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Does it mean federal citizen of the United States only when it says, “under them, or either of them.” Doesn’t that mean federal (corporation) United States and also unincorporated United States?  So as anyone can read, especially the fraudsters who claim to have gone to law school, THEY’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY DO!  In 1871, the B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banksters created a Military Coup on D.C., setting up the Bankster’s seizure of all commerce.  They’re foreclosed from partity with the living, so they created U.S. citizenship, so all U.S. citizens would be in contract with the Crown, as DEBTORS for the artificial BANKRUPTCY.

A lawyer is some one who studies law. An attorney is someone who holds the profession of attornment, the taking of property, people and goods for it’s owner/master.

Under the Attorney General Manual, while under Martial Law Rule, section 3.2 – 110, History, all one needs is to be learned in the law, not Color of Law.

Every single court case has been based upon fraud.  No B.A.R. Attorner has any legislative authority to prosecute anyone in any court room.  The B.A.R. Attorners do not know law.  They cannot sit at the Bench.  They live in Color of Law!  the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Editions clearly are written to mislead the readers, alleging and suggesting they were created by Congressional Authority, but they weren’t.  Black’s Law 5th has no such history either – Attorney House Counsel, Right to an Attorney, Counsel, Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 was REMOVED!!!  They’re a FRAUD!  No one masquerading as a “Judge,” or “government official” can produce proof of their delegation of authority.  There is no law allowing them to walk into the courtroom, much less to sit at a bench.  They have NO JURISDICTION!  They’re robbing America!  It’s a closed union shop, and an overthrow of our constitutional form of government.  All court cases are Piracy!

The Crown Temple British Accreditation Registry is nothing but a continuing criminal enterprise.  They’re Administrating and monetizing everyone’s Estate Trust for the Bankruptcy created by the Crown Banksters.  They’re weaseling everyone’s consent into being collateral for the DEBT, without full and complete disclosure, under the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913, after they set THEMSELVES up, for themselves, by themselves, with no lawful authority.  They’re imposters!  Black’s Law said they have authority, when they DON’T.  Under the Private Attorney General Act, the people can do what they do.  They have nothing!  They can’t claim the P.A.G. Act, but we can!

Color of Law, is NOT law.  It’s fiction for corporate fictions.  It’s time to prosecute them, under real law, for prosecuting living people under Color of Law.  Again, they’re TERRORISTS, for the foreign Crown Banks.  They are not qualified to hold Offices of Trust.  The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the lower Courts and the Office of Attorney General, but these offices are not to be filled by the B.A.R. Attorners.  The Administrative Procedure Act, Senate Bill 7, says we, people can walk into a Court to represent people, not B.A.R. Attorners.  The law says who can walk into the Courts, and that’s us.

B.A.R. Rule 11: An Attorney cannot represent you!  Corpus Juris Secundum, volume 2, volume 4.  They have no duty to us.  They’re  also in violation of the Patriot Act, Section 800,  Title 18 USC 2331 – TERRORISM.  This violates Title 18 USC 241 and 242 – CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  Also Title 18 USC 1621 – PERJURY.  Also Title 18 USC 1346 – HONEST SERVICE.  Also Title 18 USC 1918 – LOYALTY.  Felony after felony after felony!  In Black’s Law, the Attorneys who wrote the books quoted Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 for “Lawyers” and it’s not even in there!  No matter where an Attorney is involved, in any type of case, it’s FRAUD.  Anything a Lawyer does in a Court room is a FRAUD.  They have no authority to sit at a Bench.  As soon as they tell you that you cannot bring law into the Court room, they just proved they have no Subject Matter Jurisdiction.  They’re nothing but foreign Agents under CITY OF LONDON.


To demonstrate how rotten they really are, look at the material below:

Murdock vs. Pennsylvania explains that no State can make you get a license or pay a fee to exercise your rights.  Forcing someone to join the B.A.R.  and to get a license violates Murdock v.s Pennsylvania, and one’s rights under Article X.  The B.A.R. is under the Crown, not the united States of America.  In the July 1868 Congressional Record, the B.A.R. was never Ratified.  The B.A.R. issues it’s own B.A.R. Cards, not licenses, and their requirements are made by their Rules.

The New Hampshire B.A.R. Supreme Court created it’s own rules for this requirement in the sneakiest way imaginable.  Article 73-a was added to the Constitution.  After the Article passed through the House, AFTER, they weaseled in a clause, “…Rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law.”  That’s how they coerce the B.A.R. agenda upon anyone who wishes to uphold the real rule of law over the foreign B.A.R. Courts.

Well worth mention, there’s a STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Family Court “Rule 1.2 – Waiver of Rules.”  Their rules can be law, then they can waive their rules!  The B.A.R. does what it wants, while the people are oblivious.

Now, the stinking B.A.R. is pushing U.N. upon us like no-one has ever seen before.  They’re nothing but Agents for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Bankster whores who just cannot get enough.  These Pirates are robbing us of our lives.  They’re the ones stealing our homes in fraudclosure.  These are the Pirates stealing our kids.  They’re making money by putting people in prison for smoking a weed that grows in nature.  These creeps need to be prosecuted by everyone until they’re destroyed.

If their authority is not created by law, then they’re not accountable to law.  This is why they rape and plunder everything and everyone.  They do whatever they please.  The only thing they’ll comprehend is PROSECUTION.  Demand their proof of Legislative Authority.  They want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, when THEY DON’T HAVE ONE!!!  All they have is a stinking UNION CARD.  They’re nothing but two bit hoods.  If B.A.R. Attorneys had a real guts, they’d commit more respectable crimes, like snatching purses from little old grandmothers.  Show them no respect, because they don’t deserve any.  They’re ruining America for the Crown.

Much of the material in this Article comes from a great guy, Rod Class.  You’ll hear him in this Video.  This is very important.  Spread this to others, so they can discover Rod’s work.  Enjoy!




10 13 11 flagbar


Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, People vs. Persons



12-5-2015 10-34-35 AM

12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

by Anna Von Reitz

Our Forefathers CHOSE the system of Common Law based on the Law of Moses (Ten Commandments) as the Law of the Land and they chose men to serve as judges from among themselves in every county, state, and region.

If we want to live under that system of law, we have to do the same thing. CHOOSE to live under Common Law, form a jural assembly for our communities as brilliantly summarized by the Michigan Jural Assembly which has already had their Common Law System in place for decades, elect judges to fill the vacant judicial offices, and live accordingly.

This is the way this country was set up and so far as I am concerned, the way it is still supposed to run.  Those who don’t want to accept that are outlaws.  Those who do are law abiding.  Simple as that.

We are free to accept, amend, and reject laws within that system as every jury sees fit. That is why we have JURY NULLIFICATION  built into this whole process.

ANY law passed by ANY legislative body in the Common Law System can be nullified by a body of twelve honest Americans sitting as a jury.  Such a jury can rewrite a law they find unfair or impractical or they can utterly reject one they find unjust, vague, or unworkable.

Jury nullification is where the average people called to jury duty get to enforce their will on the entire system— in Common Law, that is. Also, in Common Law, the judge serves the people– he doesn’t tell them what to do.  He doesn’t interpret the law.  The jury does that.  He listens to the arguments along with the jury, maintains fair rules of evidence and argument, asks questions, but at the end of the day, the JURY makes their own decision and the judge executes their sentence.

That is also why there is no appeal from a jury trial unless substantial new evidence likely to have changed their reasoning comes to light.  The JURY interprets and speaks the law under Common Law and what they decide becomes the law, no ifs, ands, or buts.

The judge is just a referee and servant of the court and the clerk is just that, a clerk keeping good records of the proceedings and testimony, evidence and filings.

There are other marked characteristics of Common Law that you need to be aware of;  Under Common Law, nobody can be summoned to a court without a presentment from a Grand Jury.

Under Common Law, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Under Common Law, there has to be an actual, identifiable injured party— someone has to stand up and accuse you of harming them or their own property.

The only exception is in the case of murder or disabling injury of a victim, such that the injured party cannot bring suit for themselves.

There is no such thing as a “victimless crime” under Common Law.

The Judges in Common Law, (or, to use their proper name, Justices) are not necessarily graduates of any Law School and they cannot be members of the Bar Association, rather,  they are respected members of their community who are trusted to make fair decisions about rules of evidence and argument and to oversee courtroom proceedings so as to guarantee a fair trial.

That’s really their only function, because remember— under Common Law — the people sitting on the jury make all the decisions.  The Justice is just there to organize things properly and impose a level playing field for both sides to get a fair hearing of the issues.

This is the system that we are heir to once we clearly decide to adopt our birthright status as American State Nationals.

But this is NOT the system that we have been living under for the last umpteen years, because we have all been “mistaken on purpose” as “citizens of the United States” instead.

That phrase, a “citizen of the United States” means in the words of Kitchens v. Steele, “a citizen of the federal government”. And the federal government is defined as a corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES.

Such “citizens” live under the international law of the sea, not the Common Law.

In their courts the judge is all-powerful and juries are rubber stamps for him.

The judge interprets the law in these admiralty courts, tells the jury what to think, tells the jury what they may or may not consider as evidence, tells the jury everything but how to wipe their noses.

Their courts operate just as everyone can see them operating—- as prejudicial military tribunals where everyone is considered guilty until proven innocent and where no constitutional guarantees apply.

In their courts, there are endless codes and statutes and regulatory infractions and abundant cases of victim-less crimes.

The majority of cases in such courts never present an actual injured party and both plaintiffs and defendants are represented by attorneys acting as Third Parties giving hearsay evidence that would be immediately thrown out of any Common Law court.

You all know or should know that you are supposed to be operating as people on the land and not as persons on the sea. The Preamble of the Constitution doesn’t read, “We, the Persons…..”

If you are going to live as free people you also have cause to know that you have choices to make both about your political status — “people” or “person”, Common Law or Admiralty or some other law form entirely— and that you are then also required then to know how your chosen system of law works.

You are being misidentified and mis-characterized as “citizens of the United States” with “United States” defined as  “territories and District of Columbia” and you are being treated as  “persons” because you aren’t standing up and declaring your allegiance to your lawful state of the Union and you aren’t filling your vacated public offices and running your own American Common Law Courts.

Mulligan Ex Parte very clearly states that wherever our American Common Law Courts are up and operating, the admiralty courts must cease operating as military tribunals and revert to their proper place as courts merely concerned with actual maritime contracts and other admiralty issues.

These foreign international courts which are doing so much damage to our property and our people are merely opportunists filling a gap that we left open through ignorance. When our courts stand on the land, their courts cannot usurp— but when we allow our Common Law Court System to stand vacant, the cat is away and the rats can play.

I can hear some people asking— what do you mean, our courts are vacant?  How?  When? Why?

It’s simple, really,  It happened through ignorance and pen strokes and greed.

The moment you incorporate anything, it leaves the jurisdiction of the land and sets sail on the international jurisdiction of the sea.  So the simple act of incorporating a county government changes its jurisdiction and its character and its law form.

It never mattered if the “federal government” acted as a corporation because all of its duties assigned by the actual Constitution were international in nature. They were assigned and limited to international jurisdiction and under international law from the start.

The state and county governments on the other hand, are responsible for operating the land jurisdiction. That’s why our states and counties are geographically defined and the reason that they all have borders.

But back in the 1960’s all those organizations that were entrusted with running the state and county governments at that time were seduced by the lure of “Federal Revenue Sharing”—- a cut of the kickbacks from federal racketeering— into signing up as incorporated franchises of the federal government— that is, as franchises of the federal corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC.

Now, just because all those organizations took the bait and obligated themselves and incorporated themselves  and agreed to act as franchises (like Dairy Queen franchises) does NOT mean that you can’t form your own unincorporated state and county governments to do the job you still need done.  The important word here is: “unincorporated”.

The land and Law of the Land and people are all part of the unincorporated Body Politic.  The international

You have to elect Sheriffs to represent the land jurisdiction and to enforce the actual Constitution and Organic Laws, because with the stroke of a pen back in the 1960’s, the Sheriff of the newly incorporated “County” became a law enforcement officer concerned with statutes and regulations and code enforcement instead.  He stopped working for you, and started working for the local federal government corporation franchise instead.

Your Common Law Court System which had existed since the early 1600’s disappeared, too. Why?  Because the people then operating the courts, back circa 1950 to 1965, incorporated them as part of the newly incorporated state and county franchise operations, and thereby converted our courts into an admiralty court system instead.

If you want your Common Law Court System back and functioning and want to send these foreign admiralty courts packing, you have to set your county and state courts up as unincorporated Jural Assemblies.  Thankfully, there have always been Americans who stayed awake.

The Michigan Jural Assembly organized their state and kept it organized through thick and thin. The Nation States Project came forward and filed its claim to Pennsylvania.  The Union States Assembly kept the fires burning on the Eastern Seaboard.  In Texas, in Colorado, in Florida, in Wisconsin, in New Mexico, in California and throughout the land—- by Townships and Parishes and even Home Owner Associations— Americans have kept their local governments alive and denied the corporate interlopers any claim of “exclusive legislative jurisdiction”.

And now that more and more people are waking up and realizing just how far down the tubes things have gotten without their participation, Americans are stepping forward by the millions and doing what needs to be done.

Ignorant men have raised objections to what I and Bruce Doucette and Gary Darby and many other Americans are doing by occupying the vacated offices and acting as judges serving  the American Common Law Court System.  They think that we are somehow impersonating offices in the admiralty court system, which is obviously and abundantly untrue.

They also think that we have to be members of the Bar Associations—- when in fact we can’t be members of the Bar and serve in any American Common Law Court office whatsoever.

They think that we are offering to oppress them in some way or establish an additional unwanted or improper authority over them, but the fact is that they have the same choice they have always had—- they can function as “persons” and submit themselves to international admiralty law, or they can function as “people” and submit themselves to the law of the land.

We are simply choosing our traditional law form and organizing ourselves to provide Common Law Court services for the land jurisdiction of these United States, and thereby exercising a prerogative that has always been ours.

Each one of us has the ability and responsibility to choose our political status and our form of law and to act accordingly. It would be just as wrong for us to force anyone to act as one of the “people” of these United States as it would be wrong for them to force us to act as a “person” under international admiralty law.

Which is the whole point.

They are free to identify themselves as “citizens of the United States” with “United States” defined as “territories and District of Columbia”.  They can operate as “persons” if they want to adopt that status and they can incorporate federal franchise “STATES” to serve their needs. We won’t stop them.

And by the same stroke, we can identify ourselves as members of the “free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States” —– these United States of Wisconsin, Oregon, Texas, and so on, which are the actual organic states of the Union, and we can operate our lawful government owed to the land jurisdiction of this country to serve our needs.

Recently, there has been a flap with the ironically named “National Liberty Alliance” and its leadership.  They have ignorantly and falsely accused us of “insurrection”.   If anyone is guilty of insurrection against these United States, it is those presently operating admiralty courts on our soil and practicing personage-for-profit against the people of this country.

We, the people, are the living, actual, factual government of the people, for the people, and by the people.  There is no such government of the person, for the person, and by the person– a fact that those who adopt “person-hood’ should consider carefully and well.

Believe me, our ancestors had no trouble recognizing how a Common Law court works (think John Wayne) versus how Admiralty Court works!!!  And we have to get to a point where all this is common knowledge now.

So in answer to your question– once people decide to act as people and not as persons, as free men and not slaves, they can also choose the form of law they live under, and can operate that system as it is supposed to operate.

See this article and over 200 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

How To Identify Liars and Fools — They Talk About “Sovereign Citizens”.


by Anna Von Reitz

There is no such thing.

It is a literal impossibility to be a “sovereign” and a “citizen” at the same time.

“Sovereign citizen” is an oxymoron.

The term “sovereign” cancels out the term “citizen” and vice versa.

Look up the legal definition of these two words and it will be absolutely, glaringly, and forever apparent.

So if you hear people talking about “sovereign citizens” or calling me or anyone else a “sovereign citizen”—- you now know for sure that they are in fact either (1) ignorant as Pat’s Pig or (2) are part of the problem and trying to cause trouble by “labeling”—- a propaganda technique which you probably first encountered in grade school.

“Oh, Jenny is a ………” and “Johnny is a…….” and so and so is something else.

Anyone who survived High School should hear this kind of gossip and have a retch response.

I do.

And I immediately “tune out” such people, because Number One— they are divisive, and Number Two, if they don’t know the difference between “sovereign” and “citizen”—-what can they possibly contribute to the conversation?

The phrase that they are probably striving for and getting all bungled up is, “sovereigns without subjects”— from United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay: “…..at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they truly are the sovereigns of this country, but they are sovereigns without subjects.”
quoted in ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999) (2).

Please note— we are talking about “people” being the “sovereigns” of this country, not “persons” being sovereign over themselves or anything else.

That is again why we are owed a government of the people, by the people and for the people, not of the persons, by the persons, and for the persons.

Wake up, wake up, wake up….

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM


Government-Sponsored Corporatism Leading to Rise of Populism



By Daily Bell Staff

Campaign’s Populist Tone Rankles America’s CEOs …  Chief executives at big American companies are increasingly frustrated by the populist tone of the presidential campaign, and concerns are mounting in boardrooms and corner offices that anti-business rhetoric may solidify even after the November election. – Wall Street Journal

This Wall Street Journal article makes the point that Trump has positioned himself at the head of an increasingly anti-business GOP.


The GOP “has been captured by a large number of people who basically do not like big,” said Judd Gregg, a Republican former U.S. senator and governor of New Hampshire, who sits on the board of Honeywell International Inc.

By default, there’s nothing wrong with “big.” Theoretically, big business can mean economies of scale and economic efficiency. The oversized corporations of the US, however, are not natural products of the market. Instead, they are the artificial results of government policy.

As we’ve often pointed out, there are three areas where judicial force has been applied, swelling corporations to titanic sizes.

The first is intellectual property rights.

If corporations had to protect their own trade secrets rather than relying on government to do it for them, it is very probable that many corporations would be a good deal smaller.

The second is corporate personhood.

Corporate personhood makes it a good deal easier for individuals to avoid culpability for corporate acts.

Those lodged within a corporation can often avoid penalties that would otherwise expose them to significant personal jeopardy. Because they stay in charge, continuity isn’t disrupted and exceptionally aggressive corporate strategies can be maintained.

The third area is monopoly central banking.

Monopoly fiat money benefits the world’s largest corporations inordinately. The money coming out of central banks, especially Western central banks, often finds its way to the largest multinationals first, providing significant liquidity to these massive entities.

There are other ways that “big business” is artificially supported and propped up in the West, but these seem to be the most significant.

To claim that the current US “populist” environment is anti-big business is to radically misconstrue the reality of American capitalism.

American capitalism has very little about it that is laissez-faire.

US judicial decisions have created an environment in which gigantic corporations can flourish.

Thomas Jefferson and other founders were so worried about corporate bigness that corporate creation was lodged at the state rather than the federal level.

It was only after the Civil War that judicial decisions began to lay the groundwork for the modern corporate state.

The modern corporate state is almost antithetical to the agrarian republicanism that Jefferson and others had envisioned – a free-market republicanism that was responsible for initial US growth.

This Wall Street Journal radically misrepresents the reality of business in the US and throughout the West.

Rhetoric from Republican candidates has grown more populist and less friendly to big business than at any time in decades, while the Democratic race is being influenced by the rise of liberal Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Some of these instincts gave rise to the tea-party movement in 2009 and sent dozens of more conservative lawmakers to Washington the following year, fueling gridlock on Capitol Hill.

In the past, The Daily Bell has very clearly identified Tea Party sentiments with an underlying free-market instinct present in the US since its founding.

In fact, this sentiment was present in the US long before the Constitution.

Instinctively, people know that “big business” does not present a competitive, free-market profile.

The US and the West generally have developed a system more aptly characterized as “corporatism.”

Entrepreneurialism continues to diminish in the US. Regulations, taxes and the underlying judicial support for larger corporations are making it increasingly difficult for people to make even a modest living.

A recent article over at Infowars, entitled, “Authorities Fear Civil Unrest, Buy Up Gear To Arrest, Disperse, Control Riots,” reported on the growing popular frustration with the direction of US society.

Riot control systems are expected to “generate revenues of over USD 3.5 billion by the end of 2020,” with North America being one of the primary growth areas for upgraded weapons due to “militarization of the police department and other law enforcement agencies.”

The article also mentioned recent comments by top insurer Lloyds in a report warning of a “pandemic of global civil unrest that could go viral, threatening international stability.”

Market-based economies generate entrepreneurial republicanism – a system that encourages both freedom and prosperity.

The US’s “Fortune 500” approach to “big business,” encourages the mingling of government power with titanic private interests. Over time, this trend creates corporatism, which can also be described as fascism.

The inter-locking, anti-freedom environment of modern Western society is generating increasing push-back for a number of reasons. It’s not a trend that will likely diminish.

Conclusion:  As always, we encourage independence – a “prepper” mentality – focused on personal preparedness. What happens to the larger society is beyond your control, but you can have an impact on your own personal environment.           And you should.


There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that the way of life that we all have prepared for is now impossible to sustain, due to the one world order being implemented, so what can we do to stop it? The answer is much simpler than one might suspect. Stop participating! Do not use your credit cards, do not let the media industry scare you, do not waste your money preparing for the end of the world, do what you must to preserve your future, but don’t prepare for armed resistance unless you want to die or rot in prison. We have reached the point where the government totally ignores our complaints, so just refuse to participate in all things that give them more power over you. If we try armed resistance, they will know our every move, our abilities, weapons, amount of supplies to sustain a fight, everything! Be a non-participant in any and everything that makes them more powerful. In short, STARVE THE BEAST! Use your own imagination and stop participating in their game. Just ignore the bastards.

10 13 11 flagbar


The Real Reason Saudi Arabia Killed Doha



By Rakesh Upadhyay

Saudi Arabia single-handedly scuttled the Doha meeting, knowing all along that Iran would not participate, with a valid reason. The Russians and others agreed to proceed without Iran, planning to include them at a later date. So if everything was known beforehand, why did the Saudi’s pour cold water on the aspirations of the remaining members, risking its alienation from Russia and the OPEC community?

Was it simply Saudi enmity toward Iran? Not exactly. Upon closer scrutiny, we can find the Saudi masterstroke behind Doha.

It is well known that Saudi Arabia is heavily dependent on oil revenues, and that those revenues are on the brink of collapse. They have sought financial aid from various international agencies to support their dwindling economy. But the trick here is to determine exactly how desperate the Saudis are. Certainly not as desperate as other countries.

Angola has recently sought support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Venezuela’s struggles started well before crude prices dropped to 12-year lows and is fighting to avoid a disaster. Azerbaijan has also approached the IMF and the World Bank for help.

Nigeria is also seeking the World Bank’s support. Without external support, Iraq will find it difficult to continue its war against the Islamic State (ISIS). Lower oil prices continue to make matters worse, and Iraqi Kurdistan has taken advantage of the situation and works towards independence and beefing up its unilateral export plans. Ecuador is the worst hit, and now the devastating earthquake has crippled the nation. It will need help from the IMF, the World Bank and a few other lenders to reconstruct.

Related: $91 Billion In Capex Cuts, A Serious Hangover For Oil

After a 3.5 percent contraction in 2015, Russia’s gross domestic product will take a further 1.5 percent hit in 2016, as projected by the Central Bank. Kazakhstan is faring no better. Its growth shrunk to 1.2 percent in 2015 from an impressive 6 percent in 2013 and is expected to slow down further to 0.1 percent in 2016.

Most of the participating nations are financially ruined. They have to undertake drastic measures to reduce their dependence on oil. Disaster is imminent.

The Saudis are definitely not immune, even if on the surface disaster isn’t obvious. Saudi Arabia is burning through its reserves at a record pace, but at the same time, it can sustain low prices for the next three to four years. Not only that, it can increase its production by another 2 million barrels per day, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), if more funds are required.

But why the drastic action on the eve of the meeting disregarding the plight of the participating member nations?

Though the real reason for the about face is known only in the secretive halls of the royal palace, consider this:

Saudi Arabia has held the mantle as the world leader in oil for decades, and has largely enjoyed veto power on all things concerning oil. However, since 2014, it has waged a losing battle against the U.S. shale oil drillers, who are phenomenally more resilient than anyone expected.

Related: Low Oil Price Thwarts Wider LNG Adoption in Shipping—For Now

The first signs of the shale producer vulnerability are now, however, becoming visible, with oil production in the U.S. dropping below 9 million barrels a day—the lowest in 18 months. If oil prices continue to remain below $40 per barrel, a few more shale oil producers will fall by the wayside.

But if crude prices rise above $50 per barrel, the shale producers have made their intentions clear, that they will be back in business.

If Saudi Arabia had accepted the deal, oil prices would have jumped to $50/b, giving the shale oil industry a new lease on life. Shale producers would have started pumping at a frantic pace, increasing the glut and pushing oil prices back down.

This whole exercise would permanently dent Saudi Arabia’s reputation as the leading oil player. The baton would have passed to the shale oil drillers—an event that the Saudis simply cannot allow.

With Iran’s return post-sanctions, Saudi Arabia’s leadership in OPEC is under threat. By scuttling the meeting, Saudi Arabia has asserted its supremacy and reminded the OPEC nations just how much power the Saudis still wield.

Related: Oil Price Rally Unwinds As Strike In Kuwait Ends

The Saudis have ascertained their importance in the new cartel as well. They have not let Russia assume sole leadership, they have ensured that they remain at the centre of any decision making in the new cartel.

By voicing their objection to the meeting, Saudi Arabia has attempted to win back the leadership baton from American shale producers. It has shown the OPEC members that it still is the leader, thereby blocking Iran from challenging it, and finally, it has maintained its importance in the new bigger cartel, demanding an equal say in the scheme of things alongside Russia.

The Doha washout was the Saudi masterstroke to regain its importance. However, with many OPEC nations on the edge of collapse, the next OPEC meeting will confirm if the Saudi move was indeed a masterstroke, or if it was just a short-lived power grab.

By Rakesh Upadhyay for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


If you have read both articles I posted today, surely your head is spinning over the natural resource manipulation going on by the tyrants pushing for global control of everything. Here is the bottom line of all this manipulation and theft through control. Either you join up with those who will fight to the death to preserve their freedom or you will die a miserable death from starvation and exposure. Knowledge of what has been going on behind your back because you were too busy pursuing entertainment can only be obtained from reading the works of we who had our heads above the sewer of pleasure. It requires discipline and knowledge to preserve freedom from tyrants. You cannot play in a war!

10 13 11 flagbar


Finally a Simple Fraud Killing Remedy



Finally, Thank God and Thanks to Many People, a Remedy That Cannot Be Stopped or Side-Stepped or Ignored  —- Judge Anna

 First, please be patient with yourself as you read through these facts.  It took years of hard labor by dozens of good people to ferret out each little piece of this.  It’s going to take you at least an hour or two to take it in and follow the logic to its inexorable conclusion.

When you get to the end, you will find a template that lays out the very simple one-page Fraud Killer.  This does not mean that you should abandon your efforts to document your own identity and proper standing and that of your relatives—but you now have in your hands a very powerful means to break the shackles of the Great Fraud.

Definition(s) of “United States” and “UNITED STATES” and “United States of America” and “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”…..

Note the date and by what entity— an “acting” Congress during the Civil War—this was done:

1864— the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning of “state, States and United States” to mean “the territories and District of Columbia”.  (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.

[“US Territories”—- portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states.  Includes all federal installations—military bases, docks, courthouses, etc.]

This was never changed, amended or appealed, so, all references to “state, States, and United States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”.

You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the passage of this 1864 corporate law.

Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly still believe them to mean— after 1864 in “Federal Code”—they generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning.

Three Crucial Definitions, Plus a Fourth in Commerce:

“ The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution.” — Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945)   (This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.)

Additionally…. we have definition (4) thanks to:  The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the 14th Amendment [which the record indicates was never ratified— see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484.]

Please note:  that The  Act of 1871 —“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 — was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions—- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .

When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”—

“That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage—

So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia— thus the birth of the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: 

The only “government” created by the Act of 1871 was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules and structures…….that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES”  is not merely the name of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)— it is the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was created by the “acting Congress” via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since.

Few Americans realize that there are all these definitions for the “United States.” Most have been misled to believe that the term “United States” has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole–However, in Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records.

Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the government of  “the Territories and District of Columbia” have “citizens”?

1873:  U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States (”United States” meaning “territories and District of Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”  (That is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created by legislative action.)

1875 – This definition of  “United States” as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.

1953 – Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383  “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…”

1967 – Also Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646):   A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

[This neatly explains once and for all what a “citizen of the United States” is in federal parlance, as opposed to popular speech, and underlines the need for Americans to forthrightly expatriate from any such “citizenship” and  instead declare their allegiance to the land of their nativity, for example, California or Nevada or Ohio.] 

Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign country. If the party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated or is doing business. If diversity of citizenship exists, it places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

The same duplicitous wordsmithing was done with the words “United States of America”—

From  A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published 1856:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.   (First meaning given):

(1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California.”

 (Fifth meaning): (5)—The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.

So what does all this tell us?  So far as the federal government is concerned the phrase “United States” has meant “the territories and District of Columbia” since 1864, and the “United States Corporation” has been the “government” of the “territories and District of Columbia” since 1877.

A similar thing was done with the phrase “United States of America” in which it was used as the name of this country, but  then also used to name a corporation— the “United States of America, Inc.”

It is these two privately owned and operated corporations which have been bankrupted consecutively— “the United States of America, Inc.” in 1933 and the UNITED STATES entered into insolvency as of March 2015.

When it is announced that the “UNITED STATES” is insolvent, what does that mean?  It means that the corporation operating “as” the government of the “territories and District of Columbia” is insolvent and subject to liquidation of its assets.

And who — or what — is on the hook to pay for all this?

All the “citizens of the UNITED STATES” which this corporation created out of thin air to benefit itself and which it has operated under your names—- JOHN MARK DOE and MABEL HELEN RHODES and JEAN MARIE FITZPATRICK…. as “a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.”

Here you can clearly see that both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. are acting in collusion to bilk and indebt the unsuspecting American People by mischaracterizing them and their political status.

What has been done here is nothing less than “slavery by proxy”.  

A corporate franchise has been named after you, and then, you have been coerced and deceived into accepting the debts of that franchise via a “similar names” deceit. 

Prior to 1933  a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named after a living man called “John Frederick Doe” and  this Foreign Situs Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt  USA, Inc’s debts.  The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation.  In 1999 that bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it.

In approximately 1944 the US. Inc., named a Cestui Que Vie Trust after the living man called “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts.  The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this corporate franchise, too.

This past year, 2015,  President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.  (the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized under the laws of the United Nations City-State) announced the creation of a new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”— a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility named “JOHN F. DOE” operated under the laws of Puerto Rico.

Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given name “John Frederick Doe” and who is in fact the owner and executor of his name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to false charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history.

So…… What to DO about it?

In order to answer that, you need a few more definitions and research….

What is NATIONALITY?  –“That quality or character which arises from the fact of a person’s belonging to a nation or state. Nationality determines the political status of the individual, especially with reference to allegiance; while domicile determines his civil status. Nationality arises either by birth or by naturalization. According to Savigny, “nationality” is also used as opposed to “territoriality,” for the purpose of distinguishing the case of a nation having no national territory.”  –The Law Dictionary.

Please note that nationality can be applied according to the country—the land— where you are born, whereas citizenship is a legal status adopted when you are registered with the government in some country.

Nationality can also be an inheritance from one’s parents as when a child is born to Americans living overseas, but one only becomes a citizen of a country via the adoption of a political status.

You can’t change your nationality, but you can change your citizenship, i.e., political status.

Every American–except first generation immigrants– was born on the land of one of the American states or born to parents or grandparents who were, and so by (1) birthright or by (2) inheritance, every American  is naturally an American State National, and not a “citizen of the United States”.

You are a native of Florida or Wisconsin or Texas….and your proper nationality is as a Floridian, Wisconsinite or Texan….. and so on, and during your lifetime you do not “belong to” the organic state being referenced, instead, the state—the land— belongs to you.

But then, a dirty trick was played on your Mother at the hospital. People she trusted came to her and told her that it was the “law” that she has to sign certain papers.  Unknown to her, those papers register her baby as a “citizen of the United States”—- and we already know what that means. The baby is “seized upon” as a surety backing the debts of the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. and via the illicit copyrighting of his given name, the baby is identified as chattel property belonging to these private mostly foreign owned corporations.

However, fraud vitiates everything.  It destroys all contracts and presumptions.  It taints everything it touches.  All Americans subjected to this undisclosed process have been defrauded and mischaracterized and deprived of their lawful status.  There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and it is recognized as crime in all venues and jurisdictions of law, national and international and global.

Okay, so….

Sorting the Poop from the Shinola….

Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States (read that, “territories and the District of Columbia”), or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States (again, “territories and the District of Columbia”).”  Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals.  Non-citizen nationality status refers only to individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States.

This is all talking about “citizens of the United States” that is, “citizens of the federal government corporation”.

INA § 349 states that a citizen, whether a U.S. citizen by birth or naturalization [JOHN FREDERICK DOE is a U.S. citizen by process of “naturalization”] shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing certain acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality. The fact of intention is critical; it is not the mere performance of the actions mentioned in § 349.

Seven types of conduct are currently listed in the INA as expatriative. The potentially expatriating acts are: (1) applying for and obtaining naturalization in a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (2) making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (3) serving in the military of a foreign country as a commissioned or noncommissioned officer or when the foreign state is engaged in hostilities against the United States; (4) serving in a foreign government position that requires an oath of allegiance to or the nationality of that foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (5) making a formal renunciation of U.S. citizenship to a consular officer outside of the United States; (6) making a formal renunciation of citizenship while in the United States and during time that the United States is involved in a war; and (7) conviction for treason or attempting by force to overthrow the U.S. government [that is, corporation], including conspiracy convictions.

Now, finally, consider this supremely important information regarding the separate and “foreign” status of the United States defined as “territories and District of Columbia” (1864) with regard to the actual several states forming the United States (definition (3) from the Hooven case) —-nailed down by “The Informer”:

A key authority on this question (is the federal “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of the United States?)  is the case of Hanley v. Donoghue, in which the U.S. Supreme Court defined separate bodies of State law as being legally “foreign” with respect to each other:

“No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws;  but they are well understood to be facts which must, like other facts, be proved before they can be received in a court of justice.  [cites omitted]  It is equally well settled that the several states of the Union are to be considered as in this respect foreign to each other, and that the courts of one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take judicial notice of, the laws of another state.”

[Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535]

[6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)]

Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894).  The authors of Corpus Juris Secundum (“CJS”), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to arrive at the following conclusion about the “foreign” corporate status of the federal government:

“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.”  [citing In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287]

[19 C.J.S. 883]

Before you get the idea that this meaning of “foreign” is now totally antiquated, consider the current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, which defines “foreign state” very clearly, as follows:

“The several United States*** are considered “foreign” to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. …  The term “foreign nations,” as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought;  and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule.”

And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50 States as “countries”.  When a State court in Alaska needed a federal judge to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that possible.  In its reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the “Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact states”. Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as “countries”:

(b)   The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) ….  [!!!]

[28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]”  — End quote.

So here is the Big Picture

The government of the “United States” (read that as: “the territories and District of Columbia” per the 1864 redefinition) is a corporation also called the “UNITED STATES” or “U.S. Corp” or “US, Inc.” set up by the Act of 1877.

That corporation doing business as the US, Inc., and a similar corporation operating as the USA, Inc., have been creating “citizens” for themselves out of thin air, defined as corporate “persons” of various kinds, named after living Americans.

All of these foreign corporate franchises named after you are “citizens of the United States” — meaning (4), “citizens of the United States” or as Kitchens v. Steele put it, “citizens of the federal government” [i.e., corporation].

Currently, the US, Inc. version is doing business as a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust under the name “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” name may be, operated out of Puerto Rico.

The USA, Inc. version is doing business as a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility under the name “JOHN F. DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE-INITIAL LAST” name may be.  Again, Puerto Rico, a Commonwealth Protectorate of the United States is operating as a semi-autonomous Home Base for all this crime against Americans.

Take all this information into a nice, big, sticky Ball of Wax and what do you get?

(1) Since “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States”, “HE” can be expatriated by INA 349 (2)  “making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old” and (2) since the actual states of the Union are all foreign countries with respect to the “United States” referenced, you can repatriate “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” to Wisconsin or Illinois or wherever else he rightfully came from by issuing an Oath of Allegiance to the land he was born on—Wisconsin, Texas, etc., and (3) Sending a certified copy of the new Oath of Allegiance signed by John Frederick Doe (your name substituted appropriately) to John Forbes Kerry, the US (Corporation) Secretary of State, telling him that “JOHN” is expatriating and going home and by the way— all his assets are due and owing as a Priority Creditor of the UNITED STATES.  Please send a copy to the United Nations Secretary General and ask him to notify the UN Bankruptcy Trustees presently trying to liquidate the assets of the UNITED STATES, so they can exclude JOHN FREDERICK DOE from the asset roster.

Same thing with “JOHN F. DOE”.

And there isn’t a thing these con artists in suits can say, do, or complain about, because their other option is to admit to their crimes in front of the whole world.

“John Frederick Doe” —is still standing on terra firma, still have your wits about you, and are still able to say that you are a “Citizen of these United States”.


Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance

Whereas “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States” under the Diversity Clause of the Constitution(s) and is the age of majority and whereas such “citizenship” was never desired nor intended nor willingly nor voluntarily entered into, “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” willingly and purposefully renounces all citizenship or other assumed political status related to the United States defined as “the territories and District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864) and its government, a corporation doing business variously as the UNITED STATES, U.S. Corp, US, Inc., etc. formed under the Act of 1877, and does repatriate to the land of HIS birth known as Wisconsin (Texas, etc. as it applies) and does freely affirm HIS allegiance to the same actual and organic state of the Union and does accept HIS true Nationality as an American State National and an American State Vessel in all international commerce owned and operated by Doe, John Frederick of 1121 Petaluma Court, Felsburg, Florida, 10210.

This do I certify, Witness and confirm this _____day of _______, 2016.

______________________________ by John Frederick Doe, all rights reserved.

Notary Witness

Clark County

Florida State

Before me this _____day of ________ 2016 did appear one JOHN FREDERICK DOE and he did establish this Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance freely and without coercion, in Witness whereof I set my sign and seal.

_________________________________Notary; my commission expires on________________________.

Posted by Paul Stramer at 9:51 AM

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Labels: Anna von Reitz, Fraud Killing Remedy, judge anna


Barry PattersonApril 24, 2016 at 10:36 AM

This is perfect! I’m executing mine post haste! A few questions for clarification:
1. Does the Florida address need to be changed to my current address? Or is this the address of the current “owner” of “my name”?
2. Is a separate one of these needed for each iteration, i.e. JOHN FREDERICK DOE and JOHN F. DOE? Or, should I include both iterations/all on the same document?
3. Should I sign using my normal signature, print, or use something different?
Thank you. If I can get mine done, I will help others too!

Barry PattersonApril 24, 2016 at 10:38 AM

One more question. Is there any advantage to using the county I was born in as opposed to the county I currently live in?

Mark ColwellApril 24, 2016 at 10:48 AM

Judge Anna,
What about continuing to use our driver’s licenses or passports as they are in all Caps?

Mark ColwellApril 24, 2016 at 10:57 AM

Would it also be advisable to send a copy to the IRS?

Linda EckertApril 24, 2016 at 2:49 PM

My Goodness .. what a lot of work has been undertaken for the benefit and enlightenment of the people. So many more questions .. we all can learn by undertaking our own venture from here. We appreciate your help and thank you more than words can say. Blessings

Margaret louiseApril 24, 2016 at 3:14 PM

Anna please answer the above questions as they are also mine and probably everyone who reads this. Also, if I was born in one state and have moved to another what state do I list?

More coming in.



10 13 11 flagbar


ALBERT EDWARDS: Central bankers will destroy the “enfeebled” global economy and plunge the world into chaos



4-23-2016 8-33-48 AM.png

By Will Martin

Central bankers are going to destroy the “enfeebled” global economy and cause chaos across the world, according to notorious perma-bear Albert Edwards.

Edwards, a strategist with Societe Generale, is about as bearish as they come.

So far this year he has predicted that the US stock market will fall by 75%, argued that we might be heading for another massive global recession, said China will be forced to float the renminbi, and predicted a “tidal wave” of corporate defaults in the US.

As the voice of the market bears — people who think imbalances in the financial system will lead to a collapse — Edwards’ latest apocalyptic prediction focuses on the role of central bankers in what he sees as an inevitable economic collapse.

In a note sent to clients by Societe Generale on Friday, Edwards doesn’t hold back, saying that he is “utterly depressed.” He calls the ECB’s QE programme quick fix “nonsense,” and stating wearily “I’’m not really sure how much more of this I can take.”

The subject of Edwards’ ire is the world’s central bankers, who have “painted themselves into a corner with their overconfident rhetoric and monetary experiments.”

Here’s Edwards’ introduction (emphasis ours):

I am neither monetarist nor Keynesian. I see merit and demerit in both sides of a very fractious argument. But what I do know is when in the last few weeks I have heard that Janet Yellen sees no bubble in the US, when Ben Bernanke hones and restates his helicopter money speech, and when Mario Draghi says that the ECB’s policy of printing money and negative interest rates was working, I feel utterly depressed (I could also quote similar nonsense from Japan, the UK and China). I have not one scintilla of doubt that these central bankers will destroy the enfeebled world economy with their clumsy interventions and that political chaos will be the ugly result. The only people who will benefit are not investors, but anarchists who will embrace with delight the resulting chaos these policies will bring!

Edwards continues (emphasis ours):

I’’m not really sure how much more of this I can take. So here we are 5, 6 or is it now 7 years into this economic recovery and it still remains pathetically weak. And so it should in the wake of one of the biggest private sector credit bubbles in history. The de-leveraging hangover was always going to be massive and so it is.

Central banks across the globe are currently battling to stimulate inflation and growth by using near- and even sub-zero interest rates, and huge programmes of quantitative easing. So far nothing seems to be the silver bullet for growth, with negative interest rates in particular seen as something of a failure. Edwards argues that as well as failing to help normal people, monetary policy is making the rich richer, stirring anger and resentment among normal people.

Quick-fix monetary QE nonsense has made virtually no difference to the economic recoveries other than to inflate asset prices, make the rich richer, inequality worse and make Joe and Joanna Sixpack want to scream in rage.

He goes on to argue that the anger people are feeling about the weak economic recovery is being translated into support for populist political parties across Europe, echoing the comments of German finance minister Wolfgang Schauble, who last week blamed the ECB’s policies for helping encourage the rise of the extremist Alternative for Germany party.

4-23-2016 8-33-27 AM.png


Schauble reportedly said that he told Mario Draghi “you can attribute 50% of the results of a party that seems to be new and successful in Germany to the design of this [monetary] policy.” Draghi rebuffed that accusation strongly at yesterday’s ECB press conference, and restated the ECB’s independence saying: “We obey the law. Not politicians.”

However, Edwards backs up Schaeuble’s claim, saying: “The people are angry and they are lashing out” adding that people are “rejecting the establishment political parties and candidates at almost every electoral turn and seeking out more extreme alternatives at both ends of the political spectrum.”

The note finishes with Edwards reassert his belief that: “Central bankers are surely taking us down the road to perdition.”

NOW WATCH: Broadway’s biggest hit ‘Hamilton’ is making over $2 million a month — here’s why the producer thinks it could be making a lot more.

 10 13 11 flagbar

The CIA, Terrorism, and the Cold War: The Evil of the National Security State



by Jacob G. Hornberger

The following is Chapter 1 of The Future of Freedom Foundation’s newest ebook, The CIA, Terrorism, and the Cold War: The Evil of the National Security State by Jacob Hornberger. Purchase the book for $1 here.

The two most important words in the lives of the American people for the past 60 years have been “national security.” The term has transformed American society for the worse. It has warped the morals and values of the American people. It has stultified conscience. It has altered the constitutional order. It has produced a democratically elected government that wields totalitarian powers.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to round up people, including citizens, and take them to concentration camps, detention centers, or military dungeons where the government can torture them, incarcerate them indefinitely, and even execute them as suspected terrorists.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to send its military and intelligence forces into any country anywhere in the world, kidnap people residing there, and transport them to a prison for the purpose of torture, indefinite detention, and even execution.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to sneak and peek into people’s homes or businesses without warrants; to monitor their emails, telephone calls, and financial transactions; and to spy on the citizenry.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to support, with money and armaments, totalitarian regimes all over the world and to enter into partnerships with them for the purpose of torturing people whom the U.S. government has kidnapped.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to assassinate anyone it wants, including American citizens, anywhere in the world, including here in the United States.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to impose sanctions and embargoes on any other nation and to severely punish the American people and foreign citizens and foreign companies who violate them.

We now live in a country whose government wields the legal authority to invade and occupy any country on earth, without a congressional declaration of war, for any purpose whatever, including regime change and the securing of resources.

And it’s all justified under the rubric of “national security.”

Most people would concede that that’s not the kind of country that America is supposed to be. The nation was founded as a constitutional republic, one whose governmental powers were extremely limited. In fact, the whole idea of using the Constitution to bring the federal government into existence was to make clear that the government’s powers were limited to those enumerated in the Constitution itself. To make certain that everyone got the point, the American people secured the passage of the Bill of Rights, which further clarified the extreme restrictions on government power.

Four separate amendments in the Bill of Rights address the power of the federal government to take people, both Americans and foreigners, into custody and to inflict harm on them: the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. Due process of law, right to counsel, grand-jury indictments, trial by jury, search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishments, bail, speedy trial — they are all expressly addressed, reflecting how important they were to our American ancestors and to their concept of a free society.

In the age of national security, all of those protections have been rendered moot. They have all been trumped by the concept of national security.

Ironically, the term isn’t even found in the Constitution. One searches in vain for some grant of power anywhere in that document relating to “national security.” It isn’t there. Nonetheless, the government now wields omnipotent powers — powers that the greatest totalitarian dictatorships in history have wielded — under the rubric of “national security.”

With the exception of libertarians, hardly anyone questions or challenges it, including those who profess an ardent allegiance to the Constitution. Consider, for example, the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause. For decades, both libertarians and conservatives have complained that the meaning of that clause has been so expanded as to transform it into a general grant of power enabling the federal government to regulate the most minute, localized aspects of economic activity.

Yet here’s a phrase — “national security” — that isn’t even found in the Constitution, which has been interpreted to grant omnipotent, totalitarian-like powers to the federal government, and conservatives have been rendered mute.

It would be one thing if there had been an amendment to the Constitution stating, “The federal government shall have the power to do whatever it deems necessary in the interests of national security.” At least then one could argue that such totalitarian measures were constitutional.

But that’s not the situation we have here. We have the government coming up with a concept known as “national security,” which it has then used to adopt powers that would otherwise violate the Constitution. It’s as if national security has been made the foundation of the nation. Everything else — the Constitution, society, the citizenry, freedom, prosperity — are then based on that foundation.

The goodness of national security

What is “national security”? No one really knows. There is certainly no precise definition of the term. It’s actually whatever the government says it is. National security is one of the most meaningless, nebulous, nonsensical terms in the English language, but, at the same time, the most important term in the lives of the American people.

All the government has to do is say “national security,” and all discussion and debate shuts down. If the government says that national security is at stake, that’s the end of the story. Federal judges will immediately dismiss lawsuits as soon as the government claims, “The case is a threat to national security, your honor.” Congress will immediately suspend investigations when the government claims that national security is at stake. The Justice Department will defer to the national-security establishment when it raises the issue of national security.

National security, a term not even in the Constitution, trumps everything. It trumps the judiciary. It trumps the legislative branch of government. It trumps federal criminal investigations. This nebulous term, whose meaning is whatever the government wants it be at any particular time, has been made the foundation of American society.

What is the national-security establishment? It is composed of several agencies, two of the main ones being the vast military-industrial establishment and the CIA. Those two entities have done more to transform American life than anything else, even more than the welfare state. They are the entities that enforce the sanctions and embargoes and engage in the invasions, occupations, regime-change operations, coups, assassinations, torture, indefinite incarcerations, renditions, partnerships with totalitarian regimes, and executions — all in the name of “national security.”

One of the most fascinating aspects of all this is how successful the government has been in convincing Americans of two things: that all this is necessary to keep them safe and, at the same time, that America has continued to be a free country notwithstanding the fact that the government has acquired and has exercised totalitarian powers in order to preserve national security.

When Americans see the governments of such countries as the Soviet Union or North Korea wield such powers, they can easily recognize them as being totalitarian in nature. When Americans read that the Soviet government rounded up its own people and sent them into the Gulag, they recoil against the exercise of such totalitarian powers. They have the same reaction when they hear that the North Korean government has tortured people within its prison system. It’s the same when Americans hear that the Chinese government has arrested and incarcerated people for years without charges or trial.

But when the U.S. government does such things or even just claims the authority to do them — in the name of national security — the mindset of the average American automatically shifts. It can’t be evil for the U.S. government to wield such powers because the agents who are wielding them are Americans, not communists. They have an American flag on their lapel. They have children in America’s public schools. They’re doing it to keep us safe. They’re on our side. We wouldn’t be free without them. They’re preserving our national security.

In fact, another fascinating aspect to all this is the mindset of those within the national-security establishment itself. Even though they are wielding the same kinds of powers that are wielded by totalitarian regimes, the last thing in their minds is that they’re doing anything evil or immoral. In their mind, they’re fighting evil in order to preserve security and freedom. Sure, they have to do some unsavory things, but those things are necessary to preserve the nation. Americans are safe and free because of things they’re doing, and we’re supposed to be grateful that they’re doing them.

After all, as advocates of the national-security state often remind us, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. If measures have to be taken to preserve the nation — or the security of the nation — that are inconsistent with the Constitution, then so be it. What good would it do to adhere strictly to the Constitution if, by doing so, the nation were to fall to the terrorists or the communists?

Thus, when officials in totalitarian regimes round people up without charges, incarcerate them indefinitely, torture them, and execute them, what they are doing is evil. But when officials within the U.S. national security state do those same things — and more — they look upon themselves as good and the citizenry look upon them in the same way, simply because they are doing it to advance freedom and to preserve the national security of the United States.

And even then, things are not so clear, at least not when it comes to national security. For example, some foreign totalitarian regimes are considered evil while others are considered good. Consider, for example, Iran and North Korea. In the mindset of the U.S. national-security establishment, they are considered to be evil totalitarian regimes. But then consider, say, Egypt, which has been ruled by a brutal military dictatorship for nearly 30 years, a totalitarian regime that wields the same kind of totalitarian powers that the U.S. government now wields. For decades, Egyptian military and intelligence forces have rounded people up, taken them to prison camps for indefinite detention, tortured them, and executed them, without formal charges and trial.

Nonetheless, the U.S. national-security establishment has long looked on the Egyptian military dictatorship as good, because of its close relationship with the U.S. national-security state. In fact, during the past several decades the U.S. government has sent hundreds of millions of dollars in money and armaments to Egypt to help fund its totalitarian military dictatorship, and there has been close cooperation between the national-security apparatuses of both nations. In fact, Egypt’s national-security state even agreed to serve as one of the U.S. empire’s rendition-torture partners, a relationship that enables U.S. officials to send a kidnapped victim to Egypt for the purpose of torture.

Good regime, bad regime

Sometimes, the nether world of national security becomes even more clouded, with some nations shifting back and forth from good to evil. Consider Iran and Iraq, for example. In 1953, Iran was considered a threat to U.S. national security. Thus, the CIA, one of the principal components of the U.S. national-security establishment, engaged in its first regime-change operation, one that succeeded in ousting Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, from power and installing the shah of Iran into power.

For the next 25 years, Iran was considered good, notwithstanding the fact that the shah’s regime was totalitarian in nature. In fact, the CIA even helped him and his national-security establishment to oppress the Iranian people. When Iranians finally revolted against the domestic tyranny that the U.S. national-security state had foisted upon them, Iran immediately became an evil regime in the eyes of the U.S. national-security establishment, notwithstanding the fact that the new regime wasn’t doing anything different than the shah’s regime had done. During the 1980s, Iraq had a brutal totalitarian regime headed by Saddam Hussein. Nonetheless, it was considered a good regime because it was friendly to the U.S. national-security state. In fact, during that time the relationship was so solid that the United States even sent Iraq biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction so that Saddam could use them to attack Iran (which was considered evil).

Later, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, the U.S. national-security establishment reclassified Iraq as an evil regime. Today, Iraq is headed by a democratically elected regime that exercises the same totalitarian powers that Saddam exercised, but it’s considered to be a good regime because it’s perceived to be on the side of the U.S. national-security state. If it ultimately formally aligns itself with Iran, as many suspect it will, it will find itself back in the ranks of the evil.

How did it all come to this? How did the United States become transformed from a constitutional republic into a national-security state? How did the concept of national security become the guiding star of American life, without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment? How did the national-security establishment — the vast, permanent military-industrial complex and the CIA — come to be the foundation of American society?

More important, is a national-security state truly compatible with the principles of a free society? Did Americans delude themselves into thinking that they could retain a free and safe society with a government that wields totalitarian powers? Did Americans sacrifice their freedom, their security, their values, and their consciences on the altar of national security?

Perhaps most important, has the time come to dismantle the national-security state in order to restore a free, prosperous, peaceful, normal, and harmonious society to our land? Is it time to restore a limited-government, constitutional republic, the type of government that was clearly envisioned by the Founding Fathers?

Let’s examine those questions. Let’s start by focusing on Cuba.

This is Chapter 1 of FFF’s newest ebook, The CIA, Terrorism, and the Cold War: The Evil of the National Security State by Jacob Hornberger. Purchase the book for $1 here.

Share This Article

This post was written by: Jacob G. Hornberger

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News’ Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s show Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email

10 13 11 flagbar.


Thanks To Obama Americas Biggest Source Of Power Is Dying



4-21-2016 11-30-14 AM

Written By: Bob Bryan April 14, 2016

TN Note: It is wrong-headed to blame natural gas for coal’s demise, yet this is liberal dodge to protect Obama. Although it could be one factor, the main wrecking ball has been policies and regulations set in place by the Obama Administration that were specifically designed to kill the industry. As a candidate in 2008, Obama stated, “If someone wants to build a new coal-fired power plant they can, but it will bankrupt them because they will be charged a huge sum for all the greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.” This was not an idle or reckless threat.

This is also in accord with the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda, which calls for zero emissions from carbon sources (coal, oil, natural gas) by 2030. Alternative energy cannot conceivably replace the deficit they are creating, leading to only one conclusion: Energy prices are going to skyrocket and the industrial economy is going to die.

The US’s biggest source of power for everything from your light bulbs to television has finally been unseated, and it may be a sign of things to come.

As suggested by numerous industry signals, coal as a source of energy may be slowly dying.

According to the Energy Information Agency, the US government’s energy-tracking department, 2016 will be the first year coal is not the dominant source of power generation for the US since tracking began in 1950.

“For decades, coal has been the dominant energy source for generating electricity in the United States,” a report from the agency said.

“[The EIA] is now forecasting that 2016 will be the first year that natural-gas-fired generation exceeds coal generation in the United States on an annual basis.”

4-21-2016 11-40-42 AM

Or as the EIA puts it:

Between 2000 and 2008, coal was significantly less expensive than natural gas, and coal supplied about 50% of total U.S. generation. However, beginning in 2009, the gap between coal and natural gas prices narrowed, as large amounts of natural gas produced from shale formations changed the balance between supply and demand in U.S. natural gas markets.

CSX CMO Fredrik Eliasson echoed similar sentiments.

“And so, clearly, based on where natural-gas prices are right now, there’s an economic interest in diverting a lot of the utility plants away from coal, towards natural gas, and in some instances like you pointed out to also to nuclear,” Eliasson said on the call.

The railroad company’s coal revenues have fallen by $1.4 billion in the past four years, and the company is expecting them to drop by another $500 million this year.

This doesn’t take into account the growth of other alternatives, such as solar power and other renewable sources, which according to BP’s 2016 energy outlook could increase as a primary energy source six-fold over the next 20 years.


It is absolutely amazing that an entire Nation could have been brain washed by the media and education industries, but they were, and now the quality of life in America is going to nothing short of miserable! I hope those of you who still support our so called government, and participate in these carnivals euphemistically called elections are proud of your accomplishments. Now you must live in the shit hole you helped build, and watch your children become absolute tyrants, your parents and all other elderly folks eliminated, along with millions of dissidents.  Obuma told us he was going to change America, and for the first time I’m aware of, he wasn’t lying. This pitiful excuse for a human being is laughing his black ass off – – – – for now!

10 13 11 flagbar





4-20-2016 6-31-11 AM

 By Ron Ewart
April 20, 2016

Our last two articles, An Establishment Always Evolves Into An All-powerful Oligarchy and Men In Dark Suits, Blue Smoke and Backroom Deals, ripped the hide off of powerful, wealthy, ambitious men and for good reason. Still, having done so, it must be abundantly obvious to anyone with half an intellect that the huddled masses and the poor don’t build anything. So if it wasn’t for those same powerful, wealthy, ambitious men, steel wouldn’t have been made, skyscrapers, bridges, locomotives and ships would have not been built, oil would not have been refined into gasoline, fuel oil, paints, resins and nylon stockings, and a largely untamed land would have not been tamed. And if it weren’t for the bold financiers who took the huge risks to fund those ventures, none of it would have been possible.

The days of the railroad and land barons of the latter half of the 1800’s and into the early 1900’s was a picture of good and evil working together to build a nation. America grew at an unprecedented rate during this time under the flag of freedom. It seems that no matter what a man could dream up, he could bring it to fruition in this great land, if he was bold, brave, ambitious, a little greedy and sometimes ruthless.

Railroads crisscrossed the land from the Atlantic to the Pacific and to all points on the compass, built out of the steel Andrew Carnegie created in his smelters, smelters fired by the almost un-limited coal that lay under the ground for anyone with the courage to dig it up. The railroad and the “Iron Horse” became the conduit to passenger people and freight all over America, on a ribbon of steel rails and crossties. Nevertheless, it was no easy task. The railroad builders battled Indians, the weather, landowners and the land itself. Routes for the railroad right-of-way became political battles between states, towns and townships. If these powerful men didn’t border on ruthless, the railroad would have never been built.

John D. Rockefeller turned crude oil into the fuel to power our early cars, ships and light our lamps. Westinghouse gave us alternating current generators, created by the genius inventor, Nikola Tesla. Westinghouse and Tesla gave us light at night from light bulbs created by the prolific inventor, Thomas Edison. Charles Goodyear, a self-taught indigent chemist, gave us vulcanized rubber. Samuel Morse gave us the telegraph and his assistant, Alfred Vail, developed the Morse Code. Ford gave us the assembly line and the car and expanded our freedom to reach out across the land at faster and faster speeds. The horse and horse-drawn buggy, wagon and stagecoach became the victim of the railroad and the car. J. P. Morgan, as ruthless as he was, provided the funds for many of these risky ventures. At one point Morgan even bailed out the federal government.

America needed these powerful men to take it from a wilderness, agrarian society to a civilized nation, all the while increasing the standard of living of every American. Our wealth allowed us to become the most powerful nation on earth. Our wealth and our growing standard of living were the envy of every other nation on earth and still are today.

But with the good, came the evil. Workers were viciously exploited, leading to unions. Landowners were run over as if they weren’t there. Suppliers were ripped off. The land was raped. To stop the railroad and land barons, violence broke out in the form of land wars, riots, robbery and sabotage.

Miners and loggers took the resources from the land and left it scarred and ruined. Hydraulic mining tore the land to pieces and sluiced it down into streams, rivers and lakes, poisoning them. Loggers took the giant trees and left the forest floor littered with branches and smaller trees that were in the way when the big ones came crashing down. After a dry summer, the forest floor turned into tinder dry fuel for out-of-control, explosive forest fires.

To stem the tide of these no-rules, free-for-all industrial and land barons, mining companies and loggers, government was forced to pass laws. Now we are not a fan of laws and regulations but when a group of people harm other people and the land on a grand scale, laws become necessary. To slow the industrial barons down, anti-trust laws were passed and monopoly corporations were broken up. Even so, powerful, wealthy and ambitious men find ways around laws and nothing has changed. It has just gotten more subtle and secretive.

In one of our articles a while back we wrote: “When your vision is clouded by an irrational obsession, the first things to leave your soul are honor, morality and virtue.” If powerful, wealthy, ambitious men are obsessed with being powerful, wealthy and ambitious, in most cases their honor, morality and virtue are crowded out of their soul, if they had any in the first place.

And so it was with the railroad and land barons of yesteryear and so it is today with the men and women of the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, every politician and every powerful, wealthy and ambitious man or woman who seek only wealth and power for wealth and power’s sake. If nothing stands in their way, as was the case during the industrial revolution and just as much as it does today, then the powerful get their way. Our representatives can blunt the power of these three groups but only if the people put pressure on those representatives to do so. The problem arises from the fact that so many of our representatives are card-carrying members of these three groups.

The only thing with enough power to stop them is the people themselves. If the people fear the powerful and wealthy industrialist, banker, politician, or bureaucrat, or they don’t care what the powerful do, then the people can get kings, dictators, oligarchies, corruption and slavery in return. In that event, the people get what they deserve.

The hard truth is, without honor in the people, in businessmen and women, or in politicians, a nation is doomed to burn to the ground from the fuel of its own corruption. We stand on the precipice of that failure today.

What has happened to America and our Constitutional Republic? What catalyst or disease transformed politicians into men and women who have become ruthless and devoid of honor? No, not all men are devoid of honor, but way too many of them are. Why have the principles of freedom and liberty become passé, out-of-date, or just plain irrelevant? How is it we have morphed into the false loyalty of “my party, right or wrong, my party.” That’s Nazi stuff, not American. What on earth possessed us to “spit” on the foundation of our liberties, in favor of what …… Security? Comfort? Entertainment? Have we lost our collective minds?

Why do so many Americans think it is perfectly OK to cheat on auto, fire, or medical claims to insurance companies? And we wonder why insurance premiums are so high! Why do we lie on employment or loan applications? Why do we engage in the consumption of illegal drugs that get people killed on both sides of our southern border? It is Americans consuming illegal drugs that drive the violent drug wars, corruption and the killings in Mexico and America.

The reason for all these things is that many of us have lost our honor. A large segment of our American population has lost it by succumbing to the siren call of a “free” lunch from government, in exchange for their votes, when we all know the “lunch” isn’t free. The politicians have lost honor because, in a representative government, politicians are a reflection of the people who vote them into office.

If we do not value honor, integrity and honesty in ourselves, we will not value those very same qualities in our leaders. In today’s world, those men and women without honor, integrity and honesty continue to be elected to public office. Therefore, by our own choice, we allow dishonor and dishonesty to perpetuate itself. Along those same lines we allow powerful, wealthy and ambitious men to deceive us and run all over us and herd us into pens like cattle and sheep. We are cajoled and manipulated by the media, academia, the public schools and our institutions of government that collude with powerful, wealthy and ambitious men.

Have we become a nation of sheep that does not think for themselves and cannot recognize a wolf when they see it? Have we become so numb to reality by drowning in a glutinous diet of entertainment and self-gratification? Does liberty mean so little that we would sacrifice it out of fear and intimidation of those with power over us? Are we so afraid of the bully that we would let him rule us with deception, propaganda, distortions, lies and sometimes force?

Ladies and gentlemen, we cannot expect our politicians, businessmen, or union members to be free of corruption if the American people themselves are corrupt, or hopelessly apathetic. If the American people are without honor, it is quite likely that those they elect to office will also be without honor. It is folly, if not just plain stupid, to expect our representatives to be more perfect than those that put them in office.

Nevertheless, having said all that, a nation still needs powerful, wealthy and ambitious men and women to create, finance, invest, invent, market and build things. The trick is to keep their power, their wealth and their ambition in check. Laws can’t do that alone. Only honorable people who care about their freedom can do that. After over two centuries of trying, we are failing miserably. As a result, our identity as a free nation and a people and our very sovereignty are in grave peril.

Over the last 10 years we have written over 500 articles on freedom, liberty and property rights through our weekly column. Many of those articles touched on honor, morality and virtue and how they are irreplaceable elements to a free society and maintaining liberty, not in a religious context but from a purely pragmatic viewpoint. You can find those articles on our website by title and date HERE, that is of course, if you care about such things as freedom, liberty, property rights, honor, morality and virtue.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”, is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (http://www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached for comment at info@narlo.org.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org


YUP, it’s true: progress depends on good and evil just like a hang-over follows a drinking binge. However, if the citizens had the gumption to read and understand the original Constitution for the united States of America, and the Declaration of Independence they would form a Constitutional Militia and be able to CONTROL the Government assisting the Corporations instead of the people. Thereafter we would have what we were promised and taught in grammar school. A government of the people for the people, Did you somehow miss that in your government controlled education? How about buying one easy to understand book, :You know Something is Wrong When…………..An affidavit of probable Cause By Judge Anna Von Retiz and James Clinton Belcher: read it and join up with thousands of other Americans who finally understand you cannot ignore evil and get good governance. Hell, you cannot even ignore good governance and keep it, because the Bankers Never Sleep! http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1491279184/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk

10 13 11 flagbar


A World War Has Begun Break the Silence.



By John Pilger

April 17, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – I have been filming in the Marshall Islands, which lie north of Australia, in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Whenever I tell people where I have been, they ask, “Where is that?” If I offer a clue by referring to “Bikini”, they say, “You mean the swimsuit.”

Few seem aware that the bikini swimsuit was named to celebrate the nuclear explosions that destroyed Bikini island. Sixty-six nuclear devices were exploded by the United States in the Marshall Islands between 1946 and 1958 — the equivalent of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs every day for twelve years.

Bikini is silent today, mutated and contaminated.  Palm trees grow in a strange grid formation. Nothing moves. There are no birds. The headstones in the old cemetery are alive with radiation. My shoes registered “unsafe” on a Geiger counter.

Standing on the beach, I watched the emerald green of the Pacific fall away into a vast black hole. This was the crater left by the hydrogen bomb they called “Bravo”. The explosion poisoned people and their environment for hundreds of miles, perhaps forever.

On my return journey, I stopped at Honolulu airport and noticed an American magazine called Women’s Health. On the cover was a smiling woman in a bikini swimsuit, and the headline: “You, too, can have a bikini body.”  A few days earlier, in the Marshall Islands, I had interviewed women who had very different “bikini bodies”; each had suffered thyroid cancer and other life-threatening cancers.

Unlike the smiling woman in the magazine, all of them were impoverished: the victims and guinea pigs of a rapacious  superpower that is today more dangerous than ever.

I relate this experience as a warning and to interrupt a distraction that has consumed so many of us.  The founder of modern propaganda, Edward Bernays, described this phenomenon as “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the habits and opinions” of democratic societies. He called it an “invisible government”.

How many people are aware that a world war has begun? At present, it is a war of propaganda, of lies and distraction, but this can change instantaneously with the first mistaken order, the first missile.

In 2009, President Obama stood before an adoring crowd in the centre of Prague, in the heart of Europe. He pledged himself to make “the world free from nuclear weapons”. People cheered and some cried. A torrent of platitudes flowed from the media. Obama was subsequently awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

It was all fake. He was lying.

The Obama administration has built more nuclear weapons, more nuclear warheads, more nuclear delivery systems, more nuclear factories.  Nuclear warhead spending alone rose higher under Obama than under any American president. The cost over thirty years is more than $1 trillion.

A mini nuclear bomb is planned. It is known as the B61 Model 12. There has never been anything like it. General James Cartwright, a former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said, “Going smaller [makes using this nuclear] weapon more thinkable.”

In the last eighteen months, the greatest build-up of military forces since World War Two — led by the United States — is taking place along Russia’s western frontier.  Not since Hitler invaded the Soviet Union have foreign troops presented such a demonstrable threat to Russia.

Ukraine – once part of the Soviet Union –  has become a CIA theme park. Having orchestrated a coup in Kiev, Washington effectively controls a regime that is next door and hostile to Russia: a regime rotten with Nazis, literally. Prominent parliamentary figures in Ukraine are the political descendants of the notorious OUN and UPA fascists. They openly praise Hitler and call for the persecution and expulsion of the Russian speaking minority.

This is seldom news in the West, or it is inverted to suppress the truth.

In Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — next door to Russia – the US military is deploying combat troops, tanks, heavy weapons. This extreme provocation of the world’s second nuclear power is met with silence in the West.

What makes the prospect of nuclear war even more dangerous is a parallel campaign against China.

Seldom a day passes when China is not elevated to the status of a “threat”.  According to Admiral Harry Harris, the US Pacific commander, China is “building a great wall of sand in the South China Sea”.

What he is referring to is China building airstrips in the Spratly Islands, which are the subject of a dispute with the Philippines – a dispute without priority until Washington pressured and bribed the government in Manila and the Pentagon launched a propaganda campaign called “freedom of navigation”.

What does this really mean?  It means freedom for American warships to patrol and dominate the coastal waters of China.  Try to imagine the American reaction if Chinese warships did the same off the coast of California.

I made a film called The War You Don’t See, in which I interviewed distinguished journalists in America and Britain: reporters such as Dan Rather of CBS, Rageh Omar of the BBC, David Rose of the Observer.

The War You Don’t See from John Pilger on Vimeo.

All of them said that had journalists and broadcasters done their job and questioned the propaganda that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction; had the lies of George W. Bush and Tony Blair not been amplified and echoed by journalists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq might not have happened, and  hundreds of thousands of men, women and children would be alive today.

The propaganda laying the ground for a war against Russia and/or  China is no different in principle. To my knowledge, no journalist in the Western “mainstream” — a Dan Rather equivalent, say –asks why China is building airstrips in the South China Sea.

The answer ought to be glaringly obvious. The United States is encircling China with a network of bases, with ballistic missiles, battle groups, nuclear -armed bombers.

This lethal arc extends from Australia to the islands of the Pacific, the Marianas and the Marshalls and Guam, to the Philippines, Thailand, Okinawa, Korea and  across Eurasia to Afghanistan and India. America has hung a noose around the neck of China. This is not news. Silence by media; war by media.

In 2015, in high secrecy, the US and Australia staged the biggest single air-sea military exercise in recent history, known as Talisman Sabre. Its aim was to rehearse an Air-Sea Battle Plan, blocking sea lanes, such as the Straits of Malacca and the Lombok Straits, that cut off China’s access to oil, gas and other vital raw materials from the Middle East and Africa.

In the circus known as the American presidential campaign, Donald Trump is being presented as a lunatic, a fascist.  He is certainly odious; but he is also a media hate figure.  That alone should arouse our scepticism.

Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.

According to one prodigious liberal commentator, Trump is “unleashing the dark forces of violence” in the United States. Unleashing them?

This is the country where toddlers shoot their mothers and the police wage a murderous war against black Americans. This is the country that has attacked and sought to overthrow more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and bombed from Asia to the Middle East, causing the deaths and dispossession of millions of people.

No country can equal this systemic record of violence. Most of America’s wars (almost all of them against defenceless countries) have been launched not by Republican presidents but by liberal Democrats: Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama.

In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described the paramount aim of American foreign policy as “a world substantially made over in [America’s] own image”.  The ideology was messianic Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. Heretics would be converted, subverted, bribed, smeared or crushed.

Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn’t want to go to war with Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system whose vaunted “exceptionalism” is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.

As presidential  election day draws near, Clinton will be hailed as the first female president, regardless of her crimes and lies – just as Barack Obama was lauded as the first black president and liberals swallowed his nonsense about “hope”. And the drool goes on.

Described by the Guardian columnist Owen Jones as “funny, charming, with a coolness that eludes practically every other politician”, Obama the other day sent drones to slaughter 150 people in Somalia.  He kills people usually on Tuesdays, according to the New York Times, when he is handed a list of candidates for death by drone. So cool.

In the 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton threatened to “totally obliterate” Iran with nuclear weapons.  As Secretary of State under Obama, she participated in the overthrow of the democratic government of Honduras. Her contribution to the destruction of Libya in 2011 was almost gleeful. When the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi, was publicly sodomised with a knife – a murder made possible by American logistics – Clinton gloated over his death: “We came, we saw, he died.”

One of Clinton’s closest allies is Madeleine Albright, the former secretary of State, who has attacked young women for not supporting “Hillary”. This is the same Madeleine Albright  who infamously celebrated on TV the death of half a million Iraqi children as “worth it”.

Among Clinton’s biggest backers are the Israel lobby and the arms companies that fuel the violence in the Middle East.  She and her husband have received a fortune from Wall Street. And yet, she is about to be ordained the women’s candidate, to see off the evil Trump, the official demon. Her supporters include distinguished feminists: the likes of Gloria Steinem in the US and Anne Summers in Australia.

A generation ago, a post-modern cult now known as “identity politics” stopped many intelligent, liberal-minded people examining the causes and individuals they supported — such as the fakery of Obama and Clinton;  such as bogus progressive movements like Syriza in Greece, which betrayed the people of that country and allied with their enemies.

Self absorption, a kind of “me-ism”, became the new zeitgeist in privileged western societies and signaled the demise of great collective movements against war, social injustice, inequality,  racism and sexism.

Today, the long sleep may be over. The young are stirring again. Gradually. The thousands in Britain who supported Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader are part of this awakening – as are those who rallied to support Senator Bernie Sanders.

In Britain last week, Jeremy Corbyn’s closest ally, his shadow treasurer John McDonnell, committed a Labour government to pay off the debts of piratical banks and, in effect, to continue so-called austerity.

In the US, Bernie Sanders has promised to support Clinton if or when she’s nominated. He, too, has voted for America’s use of violence against countries when he thinks it’s “right”. He says Obama has done “a great job”.

In Australia, there is a kind of mortuary politics, in which tedious parliamentary games are played out in the media while refugees and Indigenous people are persecuted and inequality grows, along with the danger of war. The government of Malcolm Turnbull has just announced a so-called defence budget of $195 billion that is a drive to war.  There was no debate. Silence.

What has happened to the great tradition of popular direct action, unfettered to parties? Where is the courage, imagination and commitment required to begin the long journey to a better, just and peaceful world? Where are the dissidents in art, film, the theatre, literature?

Where are those who will shatter the silence? Or do we wait until the first nuclear missile is fired?

This is an edited version of an address by John Pilger at the University of Sydney, entitled A World War Has Begun. Follow John Pilger on Twitter @johnpilger



It took me seventy years to confront the life time of propaganda that made a murdered out of so many thousands of my country men, and a coward out of me for not confronting it. Finally I began to stand up and speak out only to be ridiculed and hated which only added fuel to my fight. Now at seventy five I am still committed to a country that beguiled me from childhood along with millions of others, while simultaneously publishing my hatred for the propagandist government that has shamed us into irreparable grief. My admiration for John Pilger goes unannounced due to my lack of intellect to properly praise him, as I am not worthy to even mention his name. The shame we Americans have been infected with continues to hide in the dark recesses of my conscience, as I contemplate the supreme audacity of this moral suicide is the fact that so many Americans still think of themselves as Christians. There will be inexpressible agony when justice arrives in America.

10 13 11 flagbar

Is this how the world is really run You Decide!



See the important legal document at the end of this overview. It will set your hair on fire as you realize that you  have been ROBBED of all your productivity and property all of your lives as slaves and cattle to be plundered under the color of “law”!
Paul Stramer

On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Archbishop wrote:

“I stand with the universal Catholic Church, founded by Christ. All the people whom you accuse of defrauding American citizens were elected by American citizens. That doesn’t mean that what they do is morally right, but the responsibility, finally, rests with the electorate.

God bless you.

Francis Cardinal George, O.M.I.
Archbishop of Chicago”



“My Dear Archbishop George,

I, too, stand with the universal Catholic Church, founded by Christ. My blood seal stands upon the record of the Vatican Chancery Court in Witness of what I am going to show you tonight. I am from a family that has served the Catholic Church since the First Holy Roman Empire, Hereditary Grand Marshals of the Holy Roman Empire, Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. I have myself served as an International Services Agent and as a private attorney in service to his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and now, Pope Francis.

You must believe that I am in deadly earnest both about the seriousness of the criminality engulfing America and the danger this poses to the Church and to the Rule of Law.

The Canon Law of the Church stands above every other form of law, and the Roman Curia above all other courts.

Even the Uniform Commercial Code which was developed by the Curia as a just means to resolve the many international disputes and claims arising from the 1930 bankruptcies of the G-5 nations is copyrighted by Unidroit, a subsidiary of the Vatican.

The organization which failed and which plunged America into this desperate criminality was originally chartered by the Church as a religious non-profit corporation.

We, Sir, are up to our ears in culpability for the circumstance herein discussed, and both the Pope Emeritus and Pope Francis have duly considered all the issues and acting in their temporal capacities, have rendered judgment as international Trustees of The United States Trust (1789) recognizing the Breach of Trust and the criminality which has been practiced against the American States and the American State Citizens.

They have both taken strong action to begin addressing the circumstance.

Pope Benedict XVI acted to create a new office in the Postal Service, establishing a regional Postmaster for North America.

Pope Francis has issued his First Apostolic Letter, the Motu Proprio of July 11, 2013, rewriting the international criminal code as part of his continuing effort to address this situation, and has more recently addressed the United Nations and collapsed the worldwide derivatives market.

This is not about any “responsibility” of the electorate.

It is about the Church’s responsibility to support the Pope in his role as the Ultimate Trustee of the Global Estate, to uphold the Rule of Law, and to make correction for a grave Breach of Trust that continued for 165 years and which has cost millions of innocent lives.

We can only confess our sins, dear Cardinal, admitting as mere mortals our desperate need for grace and rising up each day to do what we can and must.

I direct your attention to the Treaty of Paris which ended the American Revolution and the corollary Treaty of Versailles.

There are three international Trustees named as caretakers of The United States Trust (1789).

They are the Pope, in His Temporal Office, the British Monarch, and The United States Postmaster (Civil).

Now I direct your attention to the Treaty of Westminster (1794) in which the City State of Westminster and the Crown Temple pledge “amity” in “perpetuity” with the newly formed United States.

Next, I direct your attention to the Treaty of Verona (1845) in which the then-Pope and the British Monarch, both Trustees of the American national trust, agreed that the representative form of government was incompatible with Divine Right of Kings and with Papal Supremacy, and so both acted in secretive Breach of Trust.

The British Monarch issued Letters of Marque and Reprisal to the members of the Bar Association (British Crown Commercial Company) which issued licenses to privateers to attack American “vessels” in international jurisdictions of the law. That, Sir, is the genesis of Bar Association Licenses.

A “license” as you must know, is permission to engage in an act which would otherwise be illegal.

The Americans responded by quickly passing an Amendment to their Constitution effectively barring attorneys from holding public office. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln, a Bar attorney, was elected President of the United States (Commercial Company) but could not lawfully act as the President of The United States of America (Major).

This is why representatives of eleven Southern States refused to be seated and left the Congress adjourned sine die.

In 1863, Lincoln was forced to bankrupt the original Trust Management Company doing business as The United States.

After years of bankruptcy reorganization known euphemistically as “reconstruction” a new Trust Management Organization was incorporated by the Church, doing business as the United States of America, Inc.

This entity operated under Church auspices from the end of the Reconstruction to 1912, when the Trust Management Organization was purchased by a consortium of banks doing business as the Federal Reserve.

By 1913 they had pushed through the “Federal Reserve Act” and via legal tender laws began a purposeful agenda to devalue the American Dollar and bankrupt the original corporation doing business as the United States of America, Inc.

In May of 1930, the G-5 nations declared international bankruptcy via joint treaty entered into at the Geneva Conventions.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the representative of the Federal Reserve dba United States of America, Inc.

Three years later, having been elected President, he declared domestic bankruptcy as well.

One of his first acts was to illegally confiscate privately held American gold, which was never repaid.

As the United States of America, Inc. was being prepared for bankruptcy, agents throughout the Congress and the individual states of the Union rushed through a process of “registering franchises”.

They created “states of states” merely named after the actual geographically defined American states. They also created foreign situs trusts named after each and every living American.

At the March 6, 1933, Conference of Governors meeting, the Governors — merely corporate officers of franchises of the bankrupt United States of America, Inc. — pledged the “good faith and credit” of “their States and the citizenry thereof” to stand as sureties for the debts of the United States of America, Inc. during its bankruptcy reorganization.

Imagine that Burger King International went bankrupt in the UK and it called all the local franchise owners together and they all agreed to name their customers as sureties for their corporate debts.

That is what happened in America in 1933. The victims weren’t told a word about this.

The perpetrators were rewarded by the bankers with access to virtually unlimited credit “hypothecated” against the assets of the American States and the private property of the American State Citizens.

All this credit cost the bankers nothing material, as they had inculcated a fiat money system. Issuing credit — “money of account” — cost them nothing but the time to enter digits in an account ledger.

In exchange for this favor to the politicians, they were rewarded with legal tender laws allowing this “system” to exist in America, and given surreptitious title to all real property assets in America, and provided with protection for their activities by the members of the Bar Associations.

In 1944, FDR quit claimed all the juicy service contracts and the assets used to service these governmental service contracts to the IMF.

The IMF took over from the Federal Reserve, gaining control of every logo, name, title, department, and agency of the “United States of America, Inc.” — what Americans believe to be their government — right down to the flag.

They charted a new Trust Management Organization in France doing business as the UNITED STATES, Inc. and moved in. They also took over the “State” franchises and opened their own “STATE OF______” franchises.

For the past 70 years they have enslaved the people of America and plundered the assets of The United States Trust (1789).

The creditors who forced the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. included the World Bank, the International Bank of Development and Reconstruction, and the Federal Reserve — but the priority creditors named in the 1934 Bankruptcy Act were the American States and the American State Citizens.

The banks, being aware of their own schemes, named the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico to act as their chosen Bankruptcy Trustee. (See Federal Title 5 for details.)

The Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico seized all the bogus “States on Paper” and “Americans on Paper” created by the Roosevelt Administration and rolled all the assets presumed to be part of these trusts into Roman Inferior Trusts (Cestui Que Vie Trusts) operated “in the NAME of” the foreign situs trusts Roosevelt created.

Thus, a living man denoted properly as “john quincy adams” was misrepresented as a foreign situs trust doing business as “John Quincy Adams” and then this entity was declared “dead, presumed missing at sea” by the perpetrators of this massive identity theft scheme, and all the assets of “John Quincy Adams” were rolled over into a Roman Inferior Trust doing business as “JOHN QUINCY ADAMS”.

The Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico also “removed” all these Roman Inferior Trusts to Puerto Rico for “safe keeping” where they came under the foreign jurisdiction of the Puerto Rican Commonwealth and the UK. There they were enslaved and taxed for the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico — otherwise known as the “income tax”.

All this was done in the name of winning World War II.

The claims against the American assets supplied the credit to boot up the war industry effort and seizing the ESTATES of the Americans and “redefining” individual Americans as chattel belonging to their own ESTATES allowed a means of conscripting millions of men into the Armed Services.

After the War, nothing changed. The perpetrators never retooled American industry.

They just went on pumping out armaments and selling arms and borrowing money against assets they never owned and enslaving the American people to the tune of Yankee Doodle Dandy.

Over the years the criminality of the arms dealers has become a terrible worldwide problem.

They branched out from simply selling weapons and promoting war, to selling drugs and running gambling and prostitution rings, booze and cigarettes, and every form of vice, violence, and viciousness.

They also used their position of trust as “the government” to manipulate commodity and stock markets, and control natural resources belonging to the American people for private gain.

And the Church is culpable, because at the broader base, the Church knew and did nothing.

It continued to mindlessly operate on the directives established by the Treaty of Verona and never re-examined the disastrous consequences of all this for humanity, much less the hideous theft and abuse practiced upon the Americans — incalculable amounts of labor siphoned off, incalculable material losses, and millions of lives lost or maimed in wars for profit.

To that, you and your peers have turned a blind eye and shrugged, and said, it’s the responsibility of the voters.

The same voters who have been purposefully misled and self-interestedly abused, kept in the dark, manipulated, defrauded, and robbed?

By their EMPLOYEES and those they trusted to act in their behalf? By the Supreme Pontiff, who was obligated by solemn treaty to act as their Trustee?

It’s with good reason that the higher administrators of the Church have been reluctant to expose the criminality or deal with it, for fear that the Church would be blamed.

However, by 2009, the Church was being blamed, effectively and determinedly, until it was all finally brought before Pope Benedict XVI, who accepted responsibility, who exercised his temporal powers, and began dealing with the corruption.

Pope Francis has brought the vitality and vigor and insight needed to the Office and is continuing to bring remedy.

Meanwhile the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. has finally been ended.

The old “Federal Reserve System” is no more, but a new version of “FEDERAL RESERVE” has been organized under UNITED NATIONS auspices and has tried to mount a new round of the same old game in collusion with the IMF.

It’s a funny thing about a “debt-credit” monetary system. When you create a debt for one party, you unavoidably create a debt for another.

So when people talk about the “National Debt” being “$13 or $21 or however many trillion “dollars” that means that somewhere, someone or something, is being CREDITED with that amount of money.

Exactly who and what came to the surface in July of 2011. We have the UCC Filings on file.

The perpetrators rolled the credit side of the “National Debt” over into the “United States Department of the Treasury” and used it to back a new specie of fiat debt note called “US TREASURY NOTES”.

They have attempted, in other words, to initiate another round of the same old scam.

There is little doubt that it was the intention of the two colluding banking cartels — the FEDERAL RESERVE and the IMF — to simply reverse positions: bankrupt the UNITED STATES, INC.

leaving the Roman Inferior Trusts named after the Americans to stand as sureties for the debts of the insolvent UNITED STATES, INC. during another nice, long bankruptcy reorganization.

Intervention by Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis both, together with ever-increasing public awareness of the situation and the fraud, has served to make what is euphemistically called “re-venue” impossible.

In addition to the American State Citizens waking up, the Russians and Chinese and other nations of the BRICS Alliance woke up.

As part of the fraud practiced against the Americans, Canadians, Australians, Japanese, and the populations of most the countries of Western Europe, all bank accounts were converted to the ownership of the banks.

As you now know, if you didn’t before, all bank accounts belonging to “JOHN QUINCY PUBLIC” are in fact accounts belonging to a Puerto Rican ESTATE Trust owned and operated by agencies of the IMF.

This is how Christine LaGarde can speak so nonchalantly about seizing American 401k’s and savings and other retirement accounts: the IMF surreptitiously owns those accounts.

The living Americans who innocently deposited their life savings into those accounts thinking that they were their own private bank accounts have been deceived and defrauded and “presumed” by the perpetrators to “donate” everything in those accounts to “public trusts” operated in their NAMES.

Remember — I am an officer of the Church, too.

I have taken the vow and placed the blood seal on the altar.

This is not a joke.

This is not a rehearsal.

Take what you believe to be “your” check book out of your pocket and a strong magnifying glass and look at what appears to be the signature line — what do you see?

It’s not really a line.

It’s a row of microprint endlessly repeating “authorizing signature”.

Why would that verbiage have to be there, and why would it have to be obscured? To keep the victims from knowing the truth — that all their assets in banks have been unlawfully converted.

You’ve already been told about the Puerto Rican ESTATE Trusts. Now witness the IRS scam.

The living man, john quincy adams, is exempt by law from ever having to pay taxes, and by definition, “income” is profit accrued by corporations.

It is literally impossible for any living American to owe income tax, yet millions upon millions of Americans are robbed, defrauded, harassed, and even imprisoned every year over “income” taxes.

How is this possible?

The JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ESTATE is a trust, a legal fiction entity, a corporation.

Every dime that the living man known as john quincy adams unknowingly “donates” to the bank account belonging to the JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ESTATE is 100% profit for a Puerto Rican trust, and it just so happens that there is an excise tax for the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico.

The monster tax the poor devils for the privilege of giving them their money, and then people like Christine LaGarde sit around drinking champagne and callously discussing exactly how to finesse the seizure of the retirement accounts of millions of innocent American Senior Citizens.

But there are worse things.

Other elements among the criminals have taken out million dollar life insurance policies on every American man, woman and child.

They think they will simply murder a few hundred million of their creditors and collect on the life insurance policies.

Have you heard of the All Seeing? Cardinal George?

I am the left hand of anu:hotep and I will be obeyed in this matter, as will Pope Francis.

There will be no seizure of the American retirement accounts, no false flags, no murder, no mayhem, no scalar weapons deployed.

There will be no deceptive “offers” in commerce seeking to exchange gold for land or human capital under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit.

There will be an end to this criminality and to the complacency of the Church and of the American Cardinals and Archbishops responsible for the mis-administration of the courts.

Or there will be Hell on earth, Cardinal George — literally, and it will not come against the innocent Americans. The Left Hand of God will come for those who are responsible and unrepentant.

The Treaty of Verona is extinguished.

All Bar Association licenses are extinguished.

By order of Pope Francis, all attorneys, all clerks, every member of the judicial system operating these frauds and oppressions became 100% individually and commercially liable as of September 1, 2013.

The banking cartels and governmental services corporations have been given three years to clean up their acts from top to bottom, to come into compliance with the Original Equity contract owed to the Americans, and to stop operating in criminal default.

I suggest that you get over your idea that it is the voter’s responsibility.

May God bless you to the same extent that you bless others.

Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow

Legal Document


Here is the whole letter including the legal document in PDF:


Find more articles from Anna here:  http://annavonreitz.com/

10 13 11 flagbar

Solutions The Peer to Peer Economy



Broc West

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following transcript of Episode 303 of The Corbett Report podcast, “Solutions: The Peer-to-Peer Economy,” was generously provided by Corbett Report listener Tezla. For the mp3 audio of the podcast please CLICK HERE, or you can watch the vodcast in the player below:

Welcome back ladies and gentlemen welcome back to the Corbett Report I’m your host James Corbett of corbettreport.com podcasting to you as always from the sunny climes of western Japan, here on the 27th day of March 2015.

Welcome to Episode 303 of the Corbett Report Podcast: Solutions: The Peer-to-Peer Economy.

Now I’m sure to my regular listeners and viewers, the problem at the root of our economic enslavement will be all too apparent. Centralized bureaucratic institutions of control in the back pockets of the oligarch that sit, vulture-like, atop the global economy.

SIMON LONGDEN: “If you’ve been paying attention to Europe for the last few years you will be aware of the IMF, the world’s financial parachute parent. The all-seeing, all-knowing and apparently bottomless pit of money, for when things in your country get a bit too riot-y.

Except some may argue that that isn’t really the case. Even a fleeting glance at a history book would seem to suggest that things tend to get rather a lot worse, once the IMF was rolled into town. Usually because rather than lending you the money to get you out of a tight spot, like a friend or family member might, they say “Sure, you can have the money, but as long as you do this list of very specific things”, which is a bit more like what a sugar daddy would do.”

(Source: Who is the IMF and did they cause a famine in Africa? – Truthloader | Time reference 0:54)

JAMES CORBETT: “Ask the people of Ethiopia if the IMF World Bank economic therapy of the 1990s worked in their nation’s favor. Ask them about the fire sale of state assets, public utilities, farms and factories, for pennies on the dollar to multinational corporations. Ask them how USAID helped to dump surplus genetically engineered crops that couldn’t be sold in Europe on poor African nations, as ‘charitable food aid’. The extent of the horrors inflicted on Ethiopia by the international financiers almost beggars description.

The banksters weren’t content to carve the country into pieces and sell the scraps to their big business cronies. They then had the audacity to steal the very food off the poor farmers tables, and replace it with GM Frankenfoods that the rest of the world wouldn’t even touch.

This is the real face of austerity.”

(Source: The Meaning of Austerity | Time reference 01:30)

JEFFREY BROWN: “As a government economic advisor, Gikas Hardouvelis helped negotiate some of the budget cuts and austerity measures that Greece agreed to, in order to get international bailouts. Now with the private Euro Bank, he says the swift fall, however necessary, is bringing pain at historic levels.

GIKAS HARDOUVELIS: By the end of 2014 Greece would have a worse depression than the great depression in the US.

JEFFREY BROWN: Worse than the great depression?


Source: Under Austerity, Greeks Feel Unfolding Humanitarian Crisis | Time reference 02:21)

“Now to Ireland where tens of thousands marched in protest at the weekend over harsh austerity measures in response to the country’s financial meltdown. The collapse of a property bubble has seen unemployment reach double figures, and left Ireland with massive debt and a banking system on the verge of collapse. Despite the announcement of the European Union bailout worth more than one hundred billion dollars, there are growing calls for the Prime Minister to stand down.”

(Source: Ireland protest over harsh austerity measures | Time reference 02:48)

“The World Bank has confirmed plans to give Ukraine a two billion dollar finance package this year, reports Radio Free Europe. The loans are tied to introducing a series of reforms which Ukrainian Prime Minister, Yatsenyuk, says will be very difficult. Heating and public transport costs have already been hiked, hitting family budgets already suffering due to a slump in the currency, job cuts and high inflation.”

(Source: Finance For Ukraine: World Bank to loan Ukraine 2 billion USD, adding to existing IMF package | Time reference 03:16)

Yes sadly the problem is all too apparent. But never fear, the solution is also perfectly apparent and is being helpfully provided in an interesting narrative that’s spilling forth across the news feed in recent weeks: centralized bureaucratic institutions of control in the back pockets of the oligarchs that will sit vulture-like atop the global economy!

NATHAN KING: “China’s president along with the officials of 20 other Asian nations, from poverty-stricken Bangladesh to highly developed Singapore, all getting behind the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

HUA CHUNYING (translated): When President Xi Jingping met with the representatives, he pointed out that the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank represents all parties hope, determination and action to work together for development. It’s also an innovative mechanism and will promote better global financial governance. It’s a very meaningful thing.”

(Source: 21 Asian nations on board for China-proposed regional investment bank | Time reference: 04:07)

“Three more European countries have announced that they will join the China-led Asian Infrastructure Development Bank, defying US pressure not to do so.

Last week Washington slammed a similar move by London, saying it’s concerned over, quote “the constant accommodation of China”. Beijing in turn called the American reaction “childish paranoia”.”

(Source: Germany, France and Italy join China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank | Time reference: 04:39)

Speaking on Sunday at the opening of the China Development Forum in Beijing, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said the fund would be delighted to cooperate with the AAIB. She also welcomed Beijing’s efforts to boost investments outside China.

Also on Sunday, World Bank managing director Sri Mulyani Indrawati said they welcome the AIIB initiative and will closely cooperate with the China-proposed institution.

(Source: IMF, World Bank lend support to Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) | Time reference: 5:08)

“Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has called for more cooperation between China and the United States. He made the remarks at the China Development Forum 2015 Economic Summit in Beijing on Saturday.

HENRY KISSINGER: … to talk about our ideas of a common future. But what is also crucial is that we do something together, that there are some joint American and Chinese project on which Chinese and Americans are working together.”

(Source: Henry Kissinger calls for more U.S.-China cooperation | Time reference: 05:39)

‘Oh no, China, please don’t throw us in the briar patch of your globalist institutions, it will completely destroy our age-old quest for global government. Oh, okay, I guess there’s nothing we can do about it. We’ll just have to go along and start cooperating with you and we’ll gradually merge our system with your system behind the scenes. But don’t pay attention to that; Henry Kissinger will take care of that, and everything will be alright. And, oh, I guess we’ll just have to give up on global government after all.’

Really? Really? Is this truly what people believe is going to be the savior of humanity? Unfortunately a lot of people will be tricked into this because the dialectic is extremely effective. You pit a thesis versus an antithesis – a synthesis emerges. If one globalist institution is competing with (or cooperating with) another globalist institution, you’re going to get global government as the end synthesis, inevitably. That is where we are being steered and we’re being asked to believe that this process is inevitable. How else could the global economy possibly be structured? How could it be run? How could it be governed if there weren’t these multilateral institutions in the back pockets of the oligarchs sitting atop them, sucking off the blood from them like vampires. There’s just no other way to do it.

Well I am going to offer a counter-narrative to that narrative today, but in order to do that I think we should take one element of that idea, that there is a certain inevitability to what is happening in the global economy, and actually agree with it. Because I think, when we look at the broad scope and sweep of history, we do see certain inevitabilities that arise, as a result of certain developments, often technological developments that take place. And one very apparent, very easily documentable example of that, from history, is what happened in England in the 18th century.

“In towns across England and the United States a series of extraordinary innovations would alter the way people lived and worked for the next one hundred and fifty years.

Inventors had found new ways to harness nature’s energy. They built new kinds of machines powered by water, steam and coal. The new machines replaced hand-powered tools. They did the same work only cheaper and faster. Much of the work was done outside the home in specially designed buildings – the first factories. Mechanization began in in the textile mills of England, where one machine, attached to a spinning wheel, could do the work of fifty people. Fuel, clothing and food all became more affordable. With the development of locomotives and steamboats, manufactured goods could now be sold halfway around the world. Families moved from the villages of their ancestors to new industrial towns. And a new class of people emerged – workers who produced goods.”

(Source: Turning Points in History – Industrial Revolution | Time reference 08:15)

The Industrial Revolution. So here we have a specific historical precedent for the phenomena that we’re documenting today, namely the idea that technological developments can lead to re-orderings of economic relations, and on top of that complete transformations of society.

There’s no doubt whatsoever that the Industrial Revolution completely changed the face of the globe, and not just eighteenth century England. But as it spread out it changed the way that we think about society, the way society is ordered in many, many, many, many aspects of our daily lives. And some of those changes were for the good, some of them were for the bad, but the interesting part is that right now, through a series of technological developments that have really started to come to the fore in the past few decades, or even the past decade, we are now reordering those relations by rendering the technology, the machinery, the industrial processes that underlay the industrial era economy, obsolete.

What kinds of technological developments could I possibly be referring to? Well let me remind you, I’m a regular guy sitting here in my apartment in Japan talking to you, wherever you are in the world, through a technology sitting here on my desktop, that literally was almost unthinkable a few decades ago. That is revolutionary.

And we’ve talked in the past about how that’s revolutionary in terms of the transference of ideas through society, communication, the media or the rise of the alternative media, but today let’s think about the economic ramifications of this.

And in order to start documenting those economic ramifications , lets give this phenomena a name, and this is always contentious because people always squabble over names or fixate on names or assign too much importance to them, so let’s just try to give it a very apt name, and let’s take our analog today from a technological perspective that I’m sure many people will be somewhat familiar with, or will at least have heard by this point.

That is the idea of peer-to-peer networking, I’m sure many people are familiar with this in the context of peer-to-peer file sharing applications but let’s just get everyone on board.

First we’ll define peer-to-peer networking and then we’ll see how it can relate to the type of economy that is coming into place now, to replace the industrial era economy.

FLAMINGO PROJECT: “What is peer-to-peer? Have you ever heard of peer-to-peer? And do you know what it is?

Let’s meet Alice and Bob. When they think of peer-to-peer, they think about file sharing and pirates. Is there more than file sharing? Peer-to-peer is more than file sharing, you’ll see.

Traditional systems are built in a centralized place, Everything is coordinated by the central entity with all its disadvantages. On the other hand, we have decentralization, which is the common aspect of peer-to-peer systems, with the following properties:

Fault tolerance by design;
Redundancy of data;
Shared resources;
Direct interaction without bottlenecks;
Decentralized management and control;
Self administration.

And what’s more, these advantages are exploited by a multitude of applications and libraries. Those come in many shapes and forms, such as:

Generic peer-to-peer libraries with Lib Jingle, Freepastry,Tomp2p;
Media streaming with Spotify, Bittorrent, Life and Liveshift;
VOIP with Skype and WebRTC;
Financial services with Bitcoin, PPCoin, Litecoin and Currencyfair;
Sharing with Bittorrent, Utorrent, Emule and Pixmoo;
Synchronization with Bitcoin, Sync and Owncloud;
Internet anonymity with Freenet and Tor;
Social network with Diaspora and Friendica

and there are many more. So will you be the next peer?”

(Source: What is P2P? | Time reference 11:57)

Will you be the next peer? It is a good question and it does pertain directly to what we’re talking about today on the podcast, although it may not be immediately apparent why that’s so, so let’s elaborate.

If we look back on that historical phenomenon the Industrial Revolution that we were talking about earlier, what we can see is the formation of a type of centralized network economy, where we have these central servers called factories, where all of materials are brought in, all of the workers congregate, the work happens there, and then the finished products are distributed out to the various nodes on that network -the retail stores, where hopefully there’s a node near you and one day you happen to go there and you happen to be browsing the shelves and you find an item and you purchase it.

Now that is a ridiculously inefficient system if you look at it on that scale, but how else could the industrial economy be organized? We have all of these products that require this industrial machinery and these industrial processes in order to create, so all of this has to happen in these central factories and everyone has to congregate near the factories everyone has to live near the factories so we have the urbanization phenomenon that’s taken place over the past few centuries.

All of this is the logical consequence of a system that requires the central servers. But what if the technological developments that have happened in recent decades are rendering those industrial processes obsolete? This isn’t a theoretical question, this isn’t a rhetorical question, this is a question that is being answered right now by all sorts of different companies, individuals, organizations, people who are competing and cooperating, trying to find answers to that question ‘How do we decentralize the network? What does a peer-to-peer economy look like?’ There are a million, a billion different answers to that question. Here are a few.

FSXSW: “So Sidecar is now live in Austin and a number of other cities nationwide. The whole ride-sharing app that you have – give us briefly how does it work?

NICK ALLEN: Well it’s really simple. To be a driver you go through a bit of a process because safety’s really important to us. So we run background checks and meet all the people.

But then it’s super simple. It’s an app that just connects people who can give a ride with people who need a ride. It’s all donation-based so there’s no payment unless you volunteer it, and its growing like a weed we really love it.”

(Source: SideCar Rides Into SXSW | Time reference – 15:37)

JUSTIN PRIM: “In an average day I might do anywhere between six and twelve deliveries.

PRESENTER: Prim isn’t your average bike messenger, he’s a professional errand-runner. Earning his living doing chores for people who find him using a website called TaskRabbit.

It works like an online marketplace for odd jobs, everything from furniture assembly to housekeeping to sushi delivery. Prices range from a few dollars up to hundreds, and TaskRabbit takes a cut from each transaction.

LEAH BUSQUE: When I started the company back in Boston in 2008, things like collaborative consumption or the sharing economy, those words didn’t even exist yet.

PRESENTER: Technology has ushered in a new era of sharing. Startups like Relayrides let you rent out your car; Airbnb lets you rent out a room in your house, and if you need to rent a bicycle you can do that on Spinlister.”

(Source: Outsource Your Errands: The Life of a TaskRabbit | Time reference – 16:04)

BRAVECAST: “Peer-to-peer lending is the process of making money available to individuals by other individuals, online, without the typical intermediary like a bank or a credit union.

Here’s how the process works. Borrowers visit a peer-to-peer or p2p website, choose a loan amount during the application process, then wait for the investor approval while the application is posted inside the site’s secure listing. Lenders invest in the loan requests that meet their criteria. Once the application and approval is complete, borrowers receive the loan, deposited into their account, then make fixed monthly payments through automatic deduction.

Interest rates are typically set by the lenders, but competition usually take place for the lowest rate. Borrowers enjoy lower costs on their financing, in many cases arranging a loan of up to $35,000 with an interest rate below 7 percent.”

(Source: Peer to Peer Lending – An Introduction | Time reference – 16:53)

CHARLIE SHREM: “When you’re sending money somewhere in the world there are a lot of middlemen involved, and over the years it has become extremely, extremely hard to move money, anything except for cash -when you have cash in your hand and you want to go to a 711, you can buy a stick of gum and it’s really easy to do, but if you want to send money to somewhere like China or the Philippines or Tokyo, it can be really expensive and take a lot of time, unless you’re sending it in small or large amounts.

At the same time try sending $0.30 over the internet, you can’t do it without paying some fees. Even with PayPal it could be up to $0.30 and three percent to do something like that.

So Bitcoin enables strictly peer-to-peer money transfers. You look at something like Remittance. Remittance could cost 9 to 10 percent to send money somewhere in the world. With Bitcoin, as long as I have a Bitcoin wallet on my phone and someone has a Bitcoin wallet somewhere in China, I can send them money – a million dollars, fairly instantly with no fees.”

(Source: Hack the Bank: Bitcoin and the New Peer-to-Peer Economy | Time reference – 17:56)

SHANE HUGHES: “…Now Lou Brown saw in her neighborhood there were lots of gardens that were overgrown. People weren’t looking after their gardens because they were ill or too old or too busy, and she knew people that needed access to land. So she created this matchmaking service, and it was popular, people loved it. And before you knew it, it grew into a website called Landshare and before you knew it we’d got 70,000 people, registered, sharing their land.”

(Source: The unstoppable rise of a collaborative economy | Time reference – 19:02)

CARINE CARMY: “3D printing is exploding because people really just have so much imagination that they couldn’t capitalize before. You can upload your design to our website using a 3D model. We send it to our production facility here in New York or all over the world with our partners, and we send it to you in the mail.

PETER WEIJMARSHAUSEN: “3D printing makes it so accessible for people to have their own products made, that you can make the products that you want for yourself, but you can also start your own business, without any barriers. It doesn’t cost money to start a business, the only time you spend is time you spend designing it, and when people like it you instantly start making money.”

(Source: Shapeways: Design, Create, and Sell All In One Place Using 3D Printing At Its Finest | Time reference – 19:30)

INTERVIEWER: “What does Local Motors do? Explain it to us.

JAY ROGERS: The first and most important thing we do is we have created and manage a community of vehicle enthusiasts, and that community is made up of designers, engineers, fabricators and car lovers. So that’s our first job is to manage that community, and our whole business revolves around it. And then in addition to that we have the first-ever micro-manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona in the United States, the southwest, and it is the proofpoint that a small manufacturing facility can take the ideas from this community and put them into production.

INTERVIEWER: So the people and the users, and everybody else who wants to, or who can do it, can take part in the design of the car and the development of the car?

JAY ROGERS: That’s correct. It’s what we consider to be ‘open source’ automotive and so basically that means everything that we do is open to the community. We manage the process as it goes through so that we make sure the product is finished and up to a standard, but basically all of the data that we have for the car is shared freely with the community, as we start and then all the way through the life of the car, it never ends it always continues, and then if you happen to be a customer of the car you get to come and you take part, a lot of part, in the production of the car itself, so you have your hands on almost every part that goes into the car.”

(Source: Jay Rogers Interview on the Open Source Car – Local Motors | Time reference – 20:05)

I hope you are beginning to appreciate just how potentially disruptive these ideas are to that status quo that we were elaborating at the beginning of today’s podcast. These globalized centralized institutions of control, sitting like vultures atop the global economy, in the back pockets of the oligarchs of course.

How can they be disrupted by other globalized centralized institutions of control? That is a false paradigm. The real answer is to allow people to interact, transact, barter, share, do all of this directly together without the need for the middle men, without the need for the over-arching systems of control. That is the truly revolutionary idea that we can see, in these various other ideas that are springing forth from them, and it doesn’t mean those specific examples we were just looking at, those are just examples they can come they can go, they can change they can be altered.

But it’s the underlying idea itself that is revolutionary, the idea that we can actually communicate directly together in a peer-to-peer network, rather than going through centralized servers. It’s an interesting concept and perhaps the best way to show that it is so potentially, potentially disruptive is to show just how hard those status quo institutions of control are kicking back against these various ideas.

“Uber is facing yet another legal battle, this time in France. A court in Paris is set to rule on its UberPOP service later today. It allows people to offer their cars for ride sharing, but critics say UberPOP uses unlicensed drivers to cut costs, creating unfair competition.”

(Source: Uber sued in France | Time reference – 23:03)

NAOMI BROCKWELL: “But local governments are trying to either ban Airbnb, or regulate it so much that it becomes almost impossible to participate. Bizarrely, Portland, Oregon prohibits Airbnb in all residential areas of the city but allows it in industrial areas, where permanent residents aren’t allowed to live, just as long as there’s off-street parking available and a six foot paved sidewalk between the building and the street.

Austin Texas allows residents to become Airbnb hosts, just as long as they undergo a home inspection, purchase a $285 permit and live in a neighborhood that hasn’t already reached its quota.”

(Source: Airbnb and Its Enemies: Who’s Afraid of a $10-a-Night Sofa? | Time reference – 23:20)

CAROLINE SAID: “One of the biggest most striking things about the ballot initiative is that it actually creates a bounty hunter system, where people, anybody in this, could report somebody for doing Airbnb and if back taxes and fines resulted, they would get 30 percent of that money, and that’s stirred a lot of outrage.

SCOTT SHAFER: I’m sure it would, that’s kind of a snitch-incentive there.”

(Source: KQED: the Push Back Against Airbnb | Time reference 23:53)

MATT VOSKA: “It’s typically done on bulletin boards like at the airport, so pilots say “Hey I’m flying to Martha’s Vineyard next week, anyone that wants to come with -here’s my number”. So we said okay let’s just take that same concept and we’ll put it online.

CBS: But the Federal Aviation Administration said “not so fast”. By accepting paying passengers through websites like Flytenow, the agency believed the small planes were essentially operating as commercial airliners, but without the scrutiny and oversight commercial airlines receive.

In August an FAA lawyer wrote: ‘The website is designed to attract a broad segment of the public interested in transportation by air.’ Tal Reichert, a pilot for almost eleven years, signed up with Flytenow in March.

TAL REICHERT: This is just people sharing their hobby and their passions. This is not commercial aviation. It is impossible for a pilot to make a living flying through Flytenow. Every time a pilot Flytenow through Flytenow the pilot must pay at least their own share of the expenses.

The decision stalled Flytenow’s business, as well as other flight sharing services like Airpooler and pilotsharetheride.com, which had been cleared by a different FAA official in 2005. While pilots can still share costs, a problem now arises if they use the internet to find passengers, says Flytenow’s attorney John Riches.”

(Source: FAA shuts down ride sharing for air travelers | Time reference – 24:11)

“Currently companies can sue for damages if someone is caught recreating and sharing a copyrighted design. Make your own version of a storm trooper from Star Wars and you could face a lawsuit.”

Source: 3-D Printing Craze Prompts Legal Concerns| Time reference – 25:36)

JOHN IADAROLA: “The taxi companies, the traditional yellow cabs and things like that, that is actually a surprisingly large business lobby. In big cities, like LA, when you’re talking about picking up at LAX there’s a lot of yellow cab money in that. And they don’t want the much cheaper, much more reasonably priced, although still not cheap, Uber and Lyft services to usurp that. So they will take their dollars that they have, because they’ve become successful businesses for a number of decades, and they will lobby and they will get these services shut down if people don’t stop that from happening. Honestly this is David versus Goliath here.”

(Source: Uber and Lyft Are in the Establishment’s Crosshairs Again | Time reference – 25:49)

Again sometimes the best way to identify the action is to look for the reaction and the reaction shows that there is a significant amount of kickback that is being received right now, against the idea of people simply sharing what they have, collaborating with each other, transacting directly with each other.

This is a subversive idea, and it’s not just subversive in an economic sense, of course the Hilton hotel chains hate Airbnb because it cuts into their profit or the taxi companies hate Lyft and Uber and all of these because it cuts into their profit. Of course there is that element to it but it is subversive on a much deeper level than that, because the economy is not just about dollars and cents or pesos or yen or whatever – phony tokens of currency that they get passed around in the economy, it is not about that. It is about the relations between people, how people come together, how they interact, how they transact. That is the fundamental question of the organisation of society itself. And for centuries in the industrial era, we have been trained to believe that we can live in a system where ‘Of course you don’t have to know your neighbors, you don’t know them by name, you don’t interact with them, you just live in these highly concentrated urban environments to go to your little factory production centers, whether those be office cubicles or factories or whatever the case may be, and then you go home to your little isolated apartment and you sit there and interact with a computer screen’, that is the society that we’ve been engineered into and I believe quite deliberately.

The taking away of that sense of community that was one of the fundamental underlying aspects of the pre-industrial society that I think was one of the great losses of the Industrial Revolution, but the peer-to-peer economy is one way that we can start to reclaim that sense of community. How so?

DAVID  VAN SETERS: “In fact the poster child for the sharing economy is Airbnb, which is the place-sharing website started by two university graduates who wanted to set up an internet business and they had graduated from the Rhode Island School of Design and they moved to San Francisco, the heart of the Silicon Valley, to make their fortune and they were staying in a place in San Francisco and the landlord decided to raise their rent, and they couldn’t afford the old rent, and they realized that to solve that, they had heard about this design conference that was happening in San Francisco, and there were no rooms, and so they thought ‘Wow, we could offer short stay accommodation and breakfast by buying air mattresses and putting them in front of the bathroom, in front of the kitchen and in the living room’ and so they did that and they went to the news media and actually got some really good publicity and they started to develop this fledgling website called Air Bed and Breakfast, and people start buying airbeds and solving, temporarily, this problem of a shortage of rooms. This carried on for a little while until someone reached out to them and said “Well I don’t really want to do the air mattress and breakfast, I want to just rent my whole place” , and so they said “Well okay we’ll add a feature for that”, and it didn’t quite exactly take off from there but a few months later, then all of a sudden people were starting to use the site and they shortened the name to six letters ‘airbnb’, and now they have over 600,000 rooms, mostly cold places, in their inventory and they’re growing at over a thousand new places a day, and in the next few months they will become larger than the largest hotel group in the world -the Hilton Hotel Group.

Just to show you how viral it is, and they did all that within about five years whereas the Hilton Hotel Group took 95 years to get to their status as the largest accommodation company and they had to build 3900 hotels. Well, Airbnb didn’t even have to buy one, they just went to the crowd and people offered their own space. And of course they are getting supplemental income and people who stay at an Airbnb often pay less than they would at a hotel. So it really is a self-reinforcing kind of enterprise.

INTERVIEWER: And in more interesting places, and the potential of seeing the city or the place, like you’re there, rather than tourists on top at a hotel that looks like a hotel anywhere.

Yes and you get to meet local people so it’s a unique experience. And that’s one of the other great benefits of the sharing economy, it’s that everytime there’s a sharing exchange, people meet each other and it builds community, so there’s a real strong social benefit that happens through sharing economy enterprises as well.”

(Source: The Sharing Economy – By the People, For the People | Time reference – 28:30)

These technologies are enabling different types of transactions and interactions amongst people and perhaps more importantly, more fundamentally, creating new relationships between people, bringing people together in new communities, that would’ve never happened if it weren’t for these types of technological developments.

That is a significant change and one that I attempted to elaborate, in an article on this subject of the peer-to-peer economy, that I wrote for The International Forecaster a month or two ago that I will link up in the shownotes so you can go and read it for yourself.

But let’s just read an excerpt from that where I try to elaborate on this point of the growing sense of community that can come out of this peer-to-peer network economy. So reading from that article:

“To a large extent, people still live in this largely 20th century economic reality: still detached from the product of their labor, still disaffected and disempowered by their life on the corporate treadmill, still detached from their neighbors, their community, and the land around them. Something is still missing from our lives, the appeal of connection with each other and with nature that we all understand as our ancestral past. But the idea of returning to that former way of life—a way of life that allowed for an economy in which artisans and craftsmen thrived and in which people lived in close-knit communities—seems a pipe dream, impossible in a world where we are dependent on the conveniences of modern life. For generations, we have been more or less sold on the idea that the dissatisfaction of our modern, cookie-cutter industrial civilization is not a mere historical contingency, but part of the human condition itself…

…But a new concept of economic organization (and thus a new basis for society itself) is now coming into view. Whereas the Industrial Era made the traditional craftsmen and artisans obsolete and displaced agricultural laborers from their ancestral farms, the Peer-to-Peer era is creating new opportunities for workers to develop and market their own skills and affording those who capitalize on these opportunities the geographical freedom to live where they like…

…This is not just a difference in relationship between producers and consumers in a strictly economic sense; it offers a different way for us to conceptualize and participate in communities and interact with others around us. Through MeetUp, people are finding like-minded people on all sorts of subjects, from cinephiles gathering to discuss movies to birdwatchers organizing expeditions to monetary reformers holding strategy sessions. People are meeting their future spouses through any number of online dating sites. People are teaching themselves calculus through the Khan Academy and learning how to edit home movies via YouTube tutorials. It has never been easier for people to find like-minded people to share interests and passions with, whether those people be halfway around the world or just down the street…

…Any one of these developments taken by itself may seem unimportant, even trivial. But taken together it becomes more apparent that the internet has not provided us with a mere upgrade to the telephone, but a new structure upon which to erect a different type of society. And whereas the industrial society wrenched people away from communities, away from the land, and away from the products of their labor, the Peer-to-Peer society is enabling people to become craftsmen and artisans once again, and reconnecting people to the community around them.”

(Source: The Peer To Peer Economy | Time reference – 32:33)

I know it’s a very sweeping, and very optimistic in some ways, vision of what can come from this technology and these developments, but I think it’s a fair one, and let’s take a look at some, at least one specific example of the types of community organizations that can be fostered to, once again, regain that sense of community that we’ve been so completely wrenched away from in the past few centuries.

As of course I’m sure everyone will be able to understand, it’s not that this sense of community is just going to spring out of nowhere and suddenly people will be talking to their neighbors, it has to be fostered, it has to be cultivated like a like a garden, like a ‘guerilla garden’.

So let’s take a look at a specific example of how that’s being done and we’re going to look at Ozark County, Missouri, which is a very small out-of-the-way type of place, less than 10,000 population where there is an interesting little organisation called Ozarks Neighborly Exchange. It isn’t a large organization by any means but it is making a difference in a local community, for a bunch of people who have found each other through online or other means and are coming together to truly make a difference in their community. And I recently had the opportunity to interview one of the members of this Ozarks Neighborly Exchange, Thomas Freedman, about the community organization, how it came about and how others can use this idea to foster community within their own neighborhoods.

THOMAS FREEDMAN: “Well the Ozarks Neighborly Exchange is just a grass-roots organization and this is the third iteration of it. We’ve tried to start this several times before and this time it’s actually taken off and is growing like wildfire so we’re very pleased with the results that we’ve achieved this year.

One of the chief activies that we do every month, we’ve not done it this month because of the weather being bad, but in the past and pretty much throughout most of the year we have what’s called a Work Party as you mentioned, and the Work Party is nothing more than a Community Member that says “I would like to have some trees cut; some shrubs moved”, or whatever it is – some gardening done, any type of activity, lawn care, whatever is necessary that member says “I would like to have one”, and we schedule a time for it and the group shows up. It’s usually a four hour time on a Saturday morning, or a Saturday afternoon is when we usually schedule these things to be done.

In the winter of this month we actually have done a number of things in lieu of the Work Party. For example we raised some funds to give to a family that was really in dire straits and really needed some clothing for their children. So we raised some funds through that and presented it to them instead of doing a Work Party that particular month.

JAMES CORBETT: Well let’s talk a little bit about the philosophy that underlies a group like this and in the ‘About’ section of the Ozarks Neighborly Exchange there’s a post on ‘Why become a one-member’ and it says ‘No matter where you are in the world there are certain values and basic human needs that we all share: food, shelter, water, cameraderie and love are some of those things. When we get to know our neighbors on a personal level, we begin to care for one another and we can help each other not only survive, but thrive, in life. As a member of Ozarks Neighborly Exchange you become part of a tight community, part of a tribe of people who care for one another and thrive together’ and then it talks about some of the various activities that the O.N.E. group engages in. Tell us from your own perspective in your own words about this idea that underlies this type of community organisation and why other people should start something similar in their own communities.

THOMAS FREEDMAN: Well in a single word its community. I mean it’s really that simple. And in today’s world in the city, I’ve lived in the country here for eight or nine years but before I moved here I lived in the city, and even though you live next door in a condo or whatever, oftentimes you don’t know your neighbors, you live in such a hectic world – a lifestyle – one neighbor might work the second shift you work the first andyou just never see them. It’s just common in our modern world that we don’t actually reach out and have that community spirit anymore, and we’re in a small community here and its contrary, the spirit of O.N.E. is contrary to that city life. It’s very much people helping people, that’s our byline is “Neighbors helping neighbors”.”

(Source: Interview 1011 – Thomas Freedman on Creating a Community Organization | Time reference – 37:11)

Thomas Friedman of the Ozarks Neighborly Exchange, ozarksneighborlyexchange.com.

Alright we’ve looked at a very big idea here today and it’s one that is difficult to articulate in its totality because it’s just so vast.

There are so many different parts and aspects to this that deserve to be talked about in greater length. Not only the idea of the ‘sharing economy’ but the ‘gift economy’, ‘collaborative consumption’, ‘peer-to-peer Commons’ and ‘peer-to-peer production’, all of these different terms and terminology that gets thrown around, all of these ideas that are, to some extent overlapping, to some extent they’re different ideas, they all deserve to be looked at.

But I hope we’ve at least painted the broader picture today of what it is we’re looking at here, which is the fundamental transformation of economic relations, which of course entails a fundamental transformation of our society.

And I don’t want people to walk away from this believing that I’m a Pollyanna-ish utopian who believes ‘we can all sing Kumbaya and be done with it because the revolution is here’, of course not. It’s a step from A to Z and there are many, many interfering steps along the way – many pitfalls, many potential ways that this could go sour or go in the wrong direction.

For example just to name one, I just released a video yesterday about: “The Revolution Will Not Be YouTubed”, talking about the various ways that YouTube, Facebook, Google, all of these different platforms that people have come to rely on, on the internet itself to such a great degree, are of course controlled, manipulated, in bed with the intelligence agencies and the governments, and manipulating your news feeds and all of this type of nonsense to basically stop people from finding communities, spreading information, coming together, interacting in a peer-to-peer economy.

So it is not a straight line. It is not going to be easy. It is not going to be unhalting progress, but I believe there is the chance – the opportunity – that we can use this for the good, that we can start getting around all of those globalist bureaucratic institutions of control, rather than giving in to them.

If you believe that we can do so likewise I invite you to join us here in the peer-to-peer economy where, for example, I am actually making my living thanks to the blessing of all of the viewers out there who can support me directly without having to go through some third-party, whereas in any other era of existence if I was going to be in the media, I would be having to work for some big media corporation that was owned by some Rupert Murdoch or what-have-you, I can now literally directly speak to people out there, and they can directly support me.

That is the best possible model and it is happening right now, I am living breathing proof of it, so it can happen, but we have to understand how valuable what we have right now is, and we have to push it even further, to get rid of that status quo that is perched atop the global economy.

Some very big ideas. I think I’ll leave it there for this week.

Once again I’m James Corbett of corbettreport.com thanking you for joining me, and I look forward to talking to you again very soon.

10 13 11 flagbar


The White House Congress Implicated SCOTUS Justices Impeachable



4-15-2016 11-23-02 AM

Terrorist Cell Infiltrates the White House, Congress Implicated, SCOTUS Justices Impeachable

NEOCON CABAL: A Stone-Cold Terrorist Cell Occupies The U.S. Federal Government

The Fate of the American Republic Depends On Their Immediate
Arrest And Prosecution

4-15-2016 10-49-59 AM

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

State of the Nation

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
— Marcus Tullius Cicero

There has never been a greater threat to these United States of America than the Neocon cabal that infests the very highest reaches of the U.S. Federal Government.
This self-evident fact is now well known by the world community of nations.  Not only Russia, China, India, Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, but all the BRICS-aligned countries are grimly aware of this extremely dangerous state of affairs in the USA.
For this reason the American people must demand their immediate arrest and prosecution. The same bad actors must then be turned over to the ICC at The Hague to face trial for their crime spree committed around the globe since, at very least, September 11, 2001. War crimes of the highest degree and heinous crimes against humanity are only two of the more obvious transgressions against the world community of nations which MUST be prosecuted post haste.
Four Star General Presents Indisputable Case for a Temporary Military Takeover of the U.S. Federal Government …
… After Exposing Covert Scheme to Invade 7 Countries in the Mideast by the U.S. Military and its Proxies (ISIS)


4-15-2016 10-50-49 AM

This camarilla of psychopathic, criminally insane murderers and thieves are guilty for the horrible deaths of millions of people across the planet (e.g the Iraq, Libya, Syria wars). They are likewise culpable for the outright theft of trillions of US Dollars from nations large and small, strong and weak.  Not only are they directly responsible for the murder of upwards of 3000 Americans that occurred during their signature false flag terror attacks on 9/11, they have terrorized the U.S. citizenry with mass shooting and bombings for many years.
Simply put, the American people are effectively faced with a massive, clandestine terrorist cell in the White House … operating within the Congress … acting by proxy within the Supreme Court.  They are a full-blown terrorist cell, which pulls the levers of American political power and presses the buttons of U.S. military might, to bring about the cataclysmic result(s) of their psychotic and out-of-control ambitions.

“Houston, we’ve had a problem.”

Actually, no it’s Washington, D.C. we have an unmitigated ongoing disaster on our hands. And, yes, said disaster is such that the American people have blood on their hands … LOTs of blood as well as ill-gotten gains.  The relentless series of unprovoked wars of aggression has not only turned the entire Middle East into a dystopian apocalyptic wasteland, the same criminal cabal has destabilized all of South and Central America when they’re not turning every square inch of Africa into an enormous killing field.
Quite curiously, the Neocons are even dead set on transforming the European Union into a dysfunctional communist super-state that they can completely control and dominate. Their deepest fear is that the whole Eurozone (especially Germany) and Russia will become the natural trading partners and political collaborators that they ought to be.  In this alliance does the Neocon cabal see their demise as the world’s sole superpower.
STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination

Putin’s Russia is in the crosshairs

There is no other country on Earth that has suffered the assaults and persecution like the Russian Federation.  Not only were the recently released “Panama Papers” a CIA-directed black operation designed to impugn President Putin and prominent Russian citizens, virtually every move they make on the global geopolitical chessboard is made to undermine Russia’s economic position and international stature.  Truly, the Neocons have never been so obsessed with one specific goal as they are with taking down Russia … yet again.
PANAMA PAPERS: A Bogus Sting Operation To Smear Putin And Assad
The USSR communist catastrophe of the last century was undertaken by the very same characters and for the very same reasons—to plunder and pillage the Russian Motherland for it rich natural resources as well as to expropriate their industrial base.  They NWO cabal already attempted to perpetrate this crime against the Russian people by using the presidencies of George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton via predatory Anglo-American capitalism.  After that plan was aborted with the emergence of Vladimir Putin, they went to plan B.  As follows:
Prometheism: The Backbone of the NWO Strategy to Isolate and Conquer Russia

4-15-2016 10-51-14 AM

Just who is the Neocon cabal?

They come from both the right and left sides of the political aisle; they can be arch-conservatives or ultra-liberals.  They hide behind the façade of both Republican and Democrat labels (In each and every case, they are actually RINOs and DINOs). Many of them are hardcore Zionists, others fanatical Christian fundamentalists, still many appear to be hardened Jewish businessmen.  In many cases they are traditional Catholics and in some cases Muslim apostates.  The majority of these Neocon controllers do possess dual citizenry with the Modern State of Israel.
The NWO Neocon cabal is also made up of former and current U.S. Presidents and Secretaries of State, Treasury Secretaries and DOD Secretaries, Corporate CEOs and Chairmen of the Board, Media Magnates and Think Tank Directors, University Presidents and Religious Leaders.  They are also CIA and NSA Directors, DIA and FBI Directors. Most of them belong to the most exclusive clubs in the world to include the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and the Committee of 300. A good number of them are also closet members of the not-so-secret societies such as Skull & Bones, Scroll & Key, Wolf’s Head, St. Elmo, Sphinx Head and Quill and Dagger, as well as various Freemasonry lodges.
These New World Order (NWO) devotees can be found in the upper echelons of every sphere of life throughout American society.  In short, they are everywhere and often functioning completely under the radar. That is where their most destructive work is being done to both the Republic and the international order.
Putin Goes Ballistic In Syria, Obliterates The USA’s Secret ‘Mideast Strategy’
Yes, this thoroughly criminal NWO cabal is comprised of neoconservatives and neoliberals alike, because they are actually of the very same ilk.  They are like the chameleons that the Roman orator Cicero warned us about.  They will turn into any color or shade or hue necessary to advance their covert agenda(s) and implement their NWO scheme for absolute world domination.   Truly, they care about nothing and no one except bringing about the culmination of a One World Government using the USA as their global law enforcement and military arm.
The USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order

The American people must take action …
… Before
Amerika really does becomes the USSA, jewSA

The U.S. electorate is truly responsible for the current predicament.  By repeatedly voting for politicians who are agents of the Neocon cabal, the voters have enabled and greatly empowered them.  Not only have the voters and taxpayers given them their consent, they have provided their tax dollars to wage unlawful wars throughout the world.
So this plight is one of America’s making; therefore, the reversal must come from the body politic.  It cannot happen any other way.   Many Americans have permitted the numerous and odious wars to be conducted — IN THEIR NAME — without appropriate redress or intention to right those terrible wrongs. This serial negligence alone requires the U.S. citizenry to make amends to the world community of nation.  It can only be done by taking action against those who have committed the serious crimes of high treason, state-sponsored terrorism, mass murder and grand larceny on a truly grand scale.
Perhaps the following “Open Letter” ought to be read by We the People so that they can begin to understand the dire necessity of fulfilling their side of the American social contract. Whenever the public trust has been violated so profoundly, the populace has a solemn obligation — both moral and civic — to respond appropriately.
The USA Is Heading Toward A Total Train Wreck
Well, that sacred covenant has not only been irreparably violated, it has been obliterated in broad daylight (also known as the 9/11 false flag terror operation).  Whoever is not aware of this proven fact by now will probably never get it.  Hence, it is now incumbent upon those who know what happened and what must be done to take retributive action and collective initiative. This collective action by the citizenry must be taken soon before it’s too late and Amerika becomes a naked totalitarian state.
The Neocon Zionists Must Be Arrested And Put On Trial For False Flag 9/11 Terrorism

4-15-2016 10-51-38 AM


There can only be one conclusion and it is the very same as the introduction: The barbarians are not at the gates, “the barbarians are inside the gates”.  And they have been operating in that capacity over several decades.  As a matter of fact, their influence has only grown exponentially by the year.  Their handiwork is all around US and growing bolder by the day.  What follows is a very short list of some of their more serious transgressions against the American people.

  • Patriot Act
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • National Defense Authorization Act (aka NDAA)
  • Obamacare
  • Restarting the Cold War with Russia
  • TPA, TPP, and TPIP
  • Immigration and Border Crisis
  • LGBT Agenda
  • George Soros-funded NGOs Funding Race Riots and Election Manipulation
  • Unconstitutional Obama Executive Orders

For additional examples of Neocon mischief and NWO menacing throughout America, the following link provides a fairly exhaustive list of offenses against the Republic.
The Obamanation: How One President Irreparably Destroyed The USA
Lastly, it must be acknowledged that the 2016 presidential election cycle provides what may be the last opportunity to fix this insidious problem, once and for all. However, the solution will not come from the current crop of candidates.  For those who fail to understand this reality, the following link spells it out quite clearly.

2016 Presidential Election: The Greatest CON In U.S. Electoral History

4-15-2016 10-52-05 AM

How, pray tell, will these extraordinary and systemic political, social and economic ills ever be successfully remediated?  Only the most dangerous man in America can fix this!

State of the Nation
April 13, 2016


NWO Cabal Pursues Total Dominion Over The Earth’s Weather And Natural Resources


An Open Letter To The VOTING YOUTH Of America

NEOCON CABAL: A Stone-Cold Terrorist Cell Occupies The U.S. Federal Government | SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary

10 13 11 flagbar


Restoring America In Response to Bill Goode Kingman AZ



12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

by Anna Von Reitz

This is what Bill wrote:

Dear Friends and Family,

There is a specific movement occurring to restore America to the Constitution, and being the optimist I am, I expect it to occur soon (t his year).  This movement is utilizing the court system.  It is not civil disobedience, as was the case at the Oregon Standoff in January.  It most certainly is not a violent revolution, which is totally unworkable.  This process will make use of Common Law, US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

There are generally two types of courts in the United States – Article 3 courts established under Article 3 of the Constitution, and Article 4 courts established with regard to Article 4 of the Constitution.  All of these courts require the application of due process, as called for by the 5th Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime …. without due process of law ….” (my emphasis added)

There are a group of individuals (not government officials in any way), who are attempting to subvert this restoration.  Some of them by name are “Judge” Bruce Doucette, “Judge” Gary Darby, “Judge” Anna Von Reitz and Joaquin Mariano.  The first three of these individuals have themselves attached the title of “Judge” to their names, with no election or appointment to such a position by any civil authority, as is commonly and appropriately practiced in government.  These individuals preach the Constitution, but fail to apply due process in their legal activities, presuming themselves to be Common Law Attorneys.  I personally have seen some of the documents they have attempted to apply, and there is no due process in them.

These individuals are seeking the arrest of presumably corrupt government offic ials by well meaning, but gullible and naive Constitutional sheriffs, without legal indictments, which denies due process to those arrested.  Those government officials may well be corrupt, but they should be allowed due process, just as anyone else.  These erroneous arrests would subvert the real legal process underway to restore the Constitution.

I am calling attention to these individuals to make known the falseness behind them and their erroneous intent.  They should be avoided and ignored.

Bill Goode

Kingman, AZ

This is what Judge Anna replied:

I am willing to guess that Bill Goode of Kingman, Arizona, doesn’t even know the difference between “legal” and “lawful” and that he and everyone else listening to him would benefit greatly from simply looking up the definition of these two words in any online Law Dictionary they choose.

He also obviously doesn’t know that we are each able to serve in any vacated public office of our government on the land so long as we abide by the Public Law and take the Oaths and post the bonds.  He is also assuming that we weren’t elected by those who are lawful constituents in our home counties and/or states—-another big mistake on his part.

Bill is confused, as most people still are, thinking that the United States Government is our government, when in fact, our government merely contracts for services from the United States Government—– a very different situation. And he also makes the common mistake of thinking that their courts are our courts and that we are “United States Citizens” of “citizens of the United States” when in fact we are Ohioans, or Wisconsinites, or Californians— what’s called a “State National” instead.

The fact is that while Mr. Goode and others like him argue endlessly about whether they are citizens with a Big “C” or citizens with a Small “C”, they were never legitimately United States citizens of any stripe at all at any time in their lives, except for time they spent in the military or worked as federal civilian employees.

1953 – Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383  “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…”

Can’t get any plainer than that, can it?

It wasn’t until the early 1900’s when the Insular Tariff Cases were decided that the “Federal United States” came into being on the land jurisdiction at all.  At that time, they formed their own “union” of “American states” called the United States of America (Minor) as opposed to The United States of America (Major), or, as people at the time called it, the “Federal United States” amd the “Continental United States”.

The Federal United States consist of the Seven Insular States plus fifty “inchoate” Federal States—- that is, Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, et alia plus fifty “States” that exist only on paper as incorporated entities.  THAT is what Mr. Obama is talking about when he says the United States has “57 States”.   A lot of you like Mr. Goode thought he was ignorant— didn’t even know that we have fifty states! —-but, no, Mr. Obama knows who he is and what he is doing and the fact is that most of you and Mr. Goode don’t.

This then led to the situation of the United States of America (Minor) having its own “citizens” and the District of Columbia having its own Citizens and on top of that, the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation having its own franchise CITIZENS—– are you all following along and beginning to get the drift here?   These are all “citizens” of foreign entities—a separate foreign “union” of “American states”, a separate foreign municipal corporation, a separate foreign international city-state, none of which has anything to do with your birthright identity or status at all.

The Constitution for the united States of America establishes a contract in which our organic states of the Union hired these “Federal Citizens”  to do certain “essential governmental services” for us—-See Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2.

As far back as the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, there is a clear distinction made between the “free, sovereign, and independent” people of the United States and the “inhabitants”—- British Subjects living here after the Revolutionary War ended.

Everyone is confused because you were fed pablum and George Washington and the Cherry Tree and never bothered to study any history or learn any facts about your own country.  Those in charge of your schools didn’t bother to teach you, either, because it was to their decided advantage for you to be and remain ignorant. Big like ox, dumb like ox, make good workers…..good “subjects”, good “objects of Government”. That’s how they have mischaracterized both who and what you are to the rest of the world and have laid false claims against you and your property.

Mr. Goode also doesn’t seem to be aware that we each have the ability to make Citizen’s Arrests and that people serving as peace officers (land jurisdiction) and as law enforcement officers (sea jurisdiction) have no other rights because of their uniforms.  In other words, we all have the same authority to enforce the Public Law and the same obligation to do so.

That’s why when we find Freebooters on our soil acting in violation of the Constitution and the Treaties which allow their presence here, we step to the plate—- another aspect of law and legality that Mr. Goode doesn’t appear to understand. It’s not a question of any of us taking the law into our own hands.  It’s a matter of the law requiring us to do our duty. When you see a crime being committed and those charged with keeping the peace are not present or don’t respond, make no mistake— you ARE responsible and you DO have a duty to act and prevent crime.

Contrary to what Mr. Goode appears to think, when you see a robbery taking place you aren’t ALLOWED to just stand there like dumb drive cattle with both thumbs hooked behind your suspenders.  You are required to act in defense of innocent life and property—unless you are in fear for your own life.  And even then, you are required to come forward as a Witness and inform the police and given testimony in the matter.

The Federal Courts at both the Federal and the Federal State level are here to serve their citizens who happen to be “residing” here—- all “United States Citizens” are British Subjects who live among us.  They “presume” that we are also choosing to be British Crown Subjects and “citizens” of their little empire until proven otherwise.  And they tax us to death and press-gang us for the “privilege” and this is another matter where Mr. Goode has it all wrong.

1798 –  THE UNITED STATES v. WORRALL, 2 U.S. 384 (1798)

2 U.S. 384 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 384 Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District

“Federal Courts have no common law jurisdiction in criminal cases. The jurisdiction of such Courts is wholly derived from Acts of the Congress. [That is, is statutory.]

The Constitution contains no grant, general or specific, to Congress of power to provide for the punishment of crimes, except (1) piracies and felonies on the high seas,  (2) offenses against the law of nations, (3) treason, and (4) counterfeiting the securities and coin of the United States, no one doubts the power of Congress to “create, define, and punish, crimes and offenses, whenever they shall deem it necessary and proper by law to do so, for effectuating the objects of the Government.” United States v. Worrall, supra; Cf. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 17 U.S. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579; United States v. Hall, 98 U.S. 343, 346, 25 L.Ed. 180.” —  Quoted from Kitchens v. Steele decision.

This confirms that Federal Courts operate exclusively in federal statutory jurisdiction in criminal cases and that the subject matter must be “objects of the Government”. This was established as long ago as 1798 and affirmed again and again, most recently in 1967.  All other “Federal” criminal prosecutions apart from those international complaints–piracy, etc., as listed,  are supposed to be in-house, meant to be applied only to government employees and Federal citizens—- not to us, their employers and benefactors.

The only “Constitution” that applies to us and our actual property and land is “The Constitution for the united States of America”. Notice the word “for” and the small “u” on “united” which is simply used to describe “States of America”—- and even then, the only mention of us is in the Preamble and Bill of Rights, which makes the “Federal Government” responsible for protecting the United States Trust and not infringing upon us, the Beneficiaries thereof.

All the rest of our Constitution is a tri-lateral international treaty and commercial services agreement between our states and the Federales—- and they are currently in Dishonor and Default.

Their  “Constitution of the United States of America” is both a different document and a different kind of document.  It’s a corporate charter, not an international treaty.  It’s “states” are merely franchises of the parent corporation dba United States of America, Incorporated.    It’s “Amendments” are “By-Law Amendments”.  That’s why they don’t require ratification by the organic states on the land.

Please note, Mr. Goode, and everyone else reading this—- that this “Constitution” published in 1868 and which you grew up assuming was “your” Constitution was in fact the Constitutoin of a bankrupt governmental services corporation which ceased to exist in 1999.

Please note, Mr. Goode, and everyone else reading this—-that the “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES” we have all been living under since 1944 was never our constitution, either, and the UNITED STATES, INC., another bankrupt governmental services corporation, has been insolvent since March of 2015 and is currently undergoing liquidation.  The UNITED STATES repealed all the sections of the old Federal Code that everyone is so fond of quoting and kept only Title 50.

Our original states are not dead, not in limbo, not owed any less from the British Monarch, and we are not “United States Citizens”; we are in fact State Nationals and Beneficiaries of the United States Trust.  That is our birthright status and standing and we have every right to stand up and claim it and operate accordingly.

If you want to be identified as a British Crown Subject merely “residing” here as a Federal United States CITIZEN owing your loyalty and allegiance to ELIZABETH II and are content to be listed as slaves and chattel backing the debts of the British Crown, well, just hop to it until you all get blue noses and learn better.  If you want to be identified as British Subjects owing allegiance to Queen Elizabeth and want to spend your life as Merchant Mariners aboard one of her “Vessels in Commerce”, you can hop to that tune, too.  Nobody will stop you.

But if you want your lives and your property and your freedom back, you had all better jerk awake and join in the effort to put these issues to rest and stop participating in THEIR government and taking part in THEIR elections and assuming that you are a “United States Citizen”—–and start participating in your own government, holding your own elections, and calling yourselves “State Nationals” and “Ohioans” and “Californians” again.

Finally, Mr. Goode again assumes that we are not giving these entities and people “Due Process” that is owed to them.  Quite the contrary, Mr. Goode.  We gave them entire years of due process actions and notifications—- not weeks, not months, years, all recorded in international jurisdiction, all published, all filed, all properly recorded.  We took this all the way to the Vatican Chancery Court and the Hague and guess what?  We are absolutely right and the Brits and the Federales are absolutely wrong.

Any wrong-doing here amounting to a national level identity theft and fraud scheme and breach of trust resulting in kidnapping, mischaracterization of innocent non-combatants, unlawful conversion and confiscation of our assets, press-ganging, inland piracy, and conspiracy against the actual Constitution —- is all theirs.

The people you name including Bruce Doucette, Gary Darby, Joaquin Mariano and I have all forgotten more about the law and the history of this country than you will ever bother yourself to know and we do not deserve your false claims, insults, criticisms or ignorant back-biting.  It’s because of us and people like us that you still have a country to come home to and “equal civil rights” —- because without us maintaining our Natural Rights as declared in the Declaration of Independence, there is nothing for your “civil rights” to be “equal” to.

I believe that I have given you all more than enough to research and think about PRIOR to going on any inappropriate face-banging witch hunts against those who are bearing the burdens and risking their lives and peace and acting to HELP you retain your rights and your peace—-and if not, I shall be more than happy to provide you with more.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

10 13 11 flagbar


THE MOST IMPORTANT READ OF YOUR LIFE An Interview with Judge Anna Von Reitz About Our History



12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

By Judge Anna Von Reitz


5:56 We have all had our identities stolen and have all been removed from our natural birth-right jurisdiction on the land to the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea. Our estates have been held in “abeyance” under international law. That has allowed members of the BAR to come in and act in sedition against our lawful government and against us has allowed us to be plundered and pillaged under the laws of international commerce. Here we are thinking we are protected under the Constitution and that we have certain guarantees, but the Constitution is the law of the land.

Once you incorporate anything, including the franchise of a corporation merely named after you, which is what they’ve done, they can then pretend that you are the same as the corporation, which is the crime of personage and they can bring false claims against that person, which is another crime named barratry named after the BAR association. They have been committing this crime against us, they’ve created these persons, these corporations without our knowledge or consent and that is the person being charged in every single court case that you can bring before me. There are only a limited number of these persons out there and they’re trying to create more all the time. Every single court case that I have ever examined, which are many thousands of court cases by now, has been against a person and not against living people. This is what they’re doing. They are using these two crimes basically identity theft. They’re kidnapping us and our land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea, which is a crime known as press-ganging.

You’re history buff friends will be reminded that during the Napoleonic Wars the Queen had need for more people to operate his majesties navy. So the British ships would come into a quiet hamlet and sailors would go ashore and get any able bodied man they could find and press-gang him into service in the Navy.  All of these farmers were being kidnapped to work on the ships on the sea.
This was finally outlawed and it’s been outlawed for nearly two hundred years and yet they’re doing it today. It’s kidnapping and press-ganging on the high seas. And then, they are additionally plundering our assets on the land – our homes, our businesses, our land assets, everything, which is inland piracy – another capital crime.
Just today I was going over the Nuremburg Trials principles. They violated all seven. There could not possibly be a more serious crime. It’s both a commercial crime and a war crime against defenseless, non-combatant civilians. This had been done to us by foreign governments and international banks.  I want everyone to know that the principal banks responsible for this are the Federal Reserve, the World Bank, the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, and the International Monetary Fund. These four banks are the principal conspirators and they have acted in collusion with each other to front governmental services corporations. Now, under the Constitution the Federal government was given certain duties – certain functions to perform, which are called powers, but should more correctly be called abilities or services to perform. Those nineteen enumerated services are all in international jurisdiction. There isn’t a single one of them that has anything to do with the land or the people on the land. Our government was set up so that there was this strict demarcation to make sure that the Federal government did not usurp upon us.
What has happened here is that there is not a functioning Federal government. There is, in fact, just a governmental services corporation providing these nineteen essential governmental services as convened successors to contract. When you don’t question the change -over then that company that took over can operate on the presumption that they have inherited the contract.

If I stood up and said right away, “Hey wait a minute. Who are you? I have a contract with ABC Company, and you’re DBE Corporation. I don’t have a contract with you.” Them we would have to renegotiate, have a new contract or not. This is what was done to us as an entire country.as a nation. Go back to the Civil War. Where are we now?

We have eleven states in the south that are under military occupation and all of the norther states are bankrupt. There is nobody in control of the entire continent except the Grand Army of the Republic – the Union Army and a corporation operating as The United States of America in Washington DC., which is using the remaining members of the old Congress that was elected in 1860 as the Board of Directors.

If you take anything and incorporate it, you take it off the land and straight into the international jurisdiction of the sea. So what is going on here at the end of the Civil War? We’ve got a military that is operating under General Order 100, the Liber Code, which Abraham Lincoln adopted and forced upon his generals just prior to declaring the bankruptcy of the original United States trading company that had been providing governmental services, and you have the Congress operating as The United States of America, Inc., a Delaware corporation. This is what we had at the end of the Civil War. There was no lawful government. We had a military enforcing its rules, its Liber Code instructions and a commercial corporation that is endeavoring to provide the essential government services as a successor to contract.

The carpetbaggers were Northerners who came to the South and basically, they were doing then what they’re doing now.  Right after Lee’s army surrendered at Appomattox – we were taught that this was the end of the Civil War, but in point of fact, that was but the surrender of Lee’s army to Grant’s army. It was an armistice, not a peace treaty. In fact, there is no peace treaty that ever ended the Civil War.

Our Federal government exited stage left, incorporated, and started functioning as a commercial corporation in the governmental services business and under the international jurisdiction of the sea as a corporation. That itself is legal to do, but they also acted as successor to contract as the unincorporated, Federal services company. That altered the nature of the services company. It went from being a services company on the land to being a services corporation on the sea.

There was no public understanding or description of any of this. It was handled as an internal corporate or business issue. As a result, the American people were never really told that this had any wide-range implications nor how their government in those areas was being administered or by whom.  When you elect members to the Congress, that we know as the United States in Congress assembled, the people who attend that Congress are representatives of the land jurisdiction and they are fiduciary entities who are one hundred percent commercially and individually, as people, liable for what they do. If they do anything wrong they can be charged and can lose everything they have and can go to jail and even held for treason if they knowingly do something to undermine the welfare of the individual states they represent or the people they represent.

However, when you go onto the international jurisdiction of the sea, the members of the Congress are operating as United States Congress, not the United States in Congress assembled. The people attending there are but corporate officers. They are private, corporate officers that have been elected to serve on the Board of Trustees for a governmental services corporation. They have no such public office. They have no such fiduciary responsibility or accountability. They can represent you just the way an actor might represent you on the stage. It has no public office. There is no public oath. In fact, if you go look it up, you will see that all the members of Congress are taking their oath to the United States and not the United States of America. This has been a big semantic deceit in a fraudulent con game for a long, long time.

If you get back to what went on in the South after the Civil War and the carpetbaggers . . . Immediately after Grant accepted the surrender of Lee at Appomattox, there was considerable chaos to be dealt with. The only force that was in place that could maintain the peace was the Grand Army of the Republic – Grant’s Union army.

The Congress was put into play even though they were operating only as a governmental services corporation and they went from an “enabling clause” to an “enactment clause.” The Congress ordered district commanders to appoint civilians to act as judges in civil tribunals as military common law tribunals. These civilians, of course, had to be Union sympathizers or actual people from the North who were brought in to act as judges and jury and legislature and all the rest.

The carpetbaggers were people from the North who occupied these positions. Because they were from the North and because for the most part they were vengeful, they used these positions, these seeming public offices, which were actually military offices, to plunder and pillage the southerners. The instruction given by Congress was to deal with the remaining rebels in these southern states.

This international law form, military common law was imposed on the civilian population and this has been called by various euphemistic names: special admiralty, executive admiralty. That was the source of the gold fringe that you see on the flag displayed in all the courthouses. Wherever you see that war flag with the gold fringe on it, they are operating a military tribunal under military common law, which gives them a very free hand to dispose of any property, to jail any people they feel are a threat, abuse the public trust and hold a club over our heads. This is what they have been doing for generations.

However, in 1866 there was an action objecting to this and the Supreme Court in Milligan Ex Parte handed down a decision that said, “Wherever the American Common Law courts are operating it is unconscionable and unnecessary for there to be any form of military law exercised and any such courts must shut down.”  27:23
As you can see, these kinds of courts are very abusive and they are very profitable because they can be used to seize property and take things away from people, be it land, home, businesses, freedom – whatever they want. All these military courts can be used for these evil offices.

Now, we have the answer in our hand. We can turn around and open our Common Law courts and force them to shut down, which is why we have put such an emphasis on restoring our county government and getting our American Common Law courts up and running. When we get our American Common Law courts at the county level up and running we can force them to shut down their Admiralty courts at the county level. When we get our Common Law state courts up and running we can force them to shut down their Federal State courts, which are also operating as military tribunals. This is why it is so important for people to understand the situation with regard to their lawful government. Remember what I said. When you incorporate anything it goes zoom, right out into the international jurisdiction of the sea. It’s no longer operating under the law of the land.

So, what happens? This includes non-profit corporations. All these corporations are operating one hundred percent under the international law of the sea. The Federal corporation that is providing essential governmental services at the Federal level is operating under the international jurisdiction of the sea, international martial common law, to control and abuse people of this country. They could only do this at the federal level initially because the state courts that existed were state courts on the land. The county courts were still on the land. But, in 1965, the Federal corporation had been so successful at its racketeering at the Federal level that it was able to bribe the states and the counties into incorporating as franchises of the Federal corporation in order to receive Federal revenue sharing – that is, kickbacks from Federal racketeering.

About 1965, the last of the states and counties incorporated. When they incorporated they went right out into the international jurisdiction of the sea. This happened very, very quietly. Nobody told you. Nobody announced it and, for the most part, nobody but the lawyers knew that there was any change. Joe Shmow was in the office as mayor and Joe Shmow was still there the next day. The county sheriff’s office was still there. There was no outward sign that really told anyone that we’ve left the jurisdiction of the land behind and the law of the land and we’re no longer protected by the Constitution. This is a problem? Nobody said that. For the most part, nobody knew this but the lawyers.

Here we are in 1965, after the states and counties had incorporated. For a time the most crucial offices other than the offices of the judges come down to the sheriff. We elect the county sheriff on good faith under the presumption that he’s there to keep the peace and enforce the law of the land, the Constitution, the public laws that we all rely upon. But, when the counties incorporated his job phased. He was no longer responsible for enforcing the organic law, which is the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance, and the Land Act of 1785. Those things he is not responsible for enforcing any longer. He’s not responsible for enforcing the Public Statutes at Large anymore. He is now a code, regulation, and statutes enforcer. He went from being a peace-keeping officer on the land to being a code enforcement officer on the sea. Code enforcement is simply the internal administrative law of the corporation. His office went from being a public office to being a private corporate office the same way that the offices of Congress went from being public offices to being private corporate offices.

For a long time they continued to enforce the public organic law and the U.S. Statutes at Large as part of their job because they were used to doing that. But they were also tasked with enforcing all these corporate statutes and regulations and codes. As time went on this became a friction because no man can serve two masters. It’s not really a tenable situation to have a man whose job description is code enforcement officer for a corporation to also be working a public office as sheriff on the land enforcing the Constitution and the Statutes at Large.

Many of these men, the sheriffs of the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s shuffled along trying to do both jobs – one as a voluntary function and the other as the actual job description. This led to Sheriff Richard Mack and another Sheriffs Prinz bringing suits all the way to the United States Supreme Court because they were getting whacked from the corporate managers saying that they could not enforce the Constitution.

They went all the way to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court came back in Mack & Prinz vs. USA, Inc. saying yes, they could enforce the Constitution and other organic laws. But, here’s the thing. They can. They’re enabled to, but will they? Among those men who do, many of them get blackballed by the corporate interests who want a free hand to do whatever they want to do to the rest of us. They also suffer a lot of discrimination on the job. They don’t get the perks. They don’t get the bonuses. They are not part of the crew. The men who struggle along and try to do the right thing voluntarily, and take on the extra job of enforcing the public law and the organic law of this country, really take it in the shorts for being the good guy even though they are enabled to and even though the Supreme Court agrees that they are enabled to. The key office there is sheriff on the land which has been converted to sheriff on the sea, from peacekeeping officer to code enforcement officer.

In 1976, the Congress, operating as a Board of Directors of the United States, Inc. formally released all state law and all state offices to the United Nations. This outrageous action took place via two Acts of Congress (as in play acting). They formalized this as the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA). What this means is that they acknowledged the fact that all of our public offices were vacated. They were vacated by the very Act of the counties and the states incorporating as franchises of the United States, Inc.

As of 1976, they stood up and said, “Okay, all of these offices are vacated. They are not our responsibility anymore. We turn them over to the United Nations for safekeeping. They never told us a word. There was no public announcement. It was just handled like a private business issue.
All of our public offices are vacant. We still have public offices, but they’re vacated. When you go and elect a sheriff to keep the peace and act on your behalf and guarantee your Constitutional rights, you have elected a sheriff of a private corporation to act as a code enforcer for that corporation. You’re paying him for this. Either you have rocks in your head or you need to start doing what needs to be done, which is to fill those vacant public offices with people who are sworn in as public officials who have both accountability and the right and responsibility to exercise those public offices and to bring order and to bring justice back to the American people.

The BAR is guilty on many counts and so is the American BAR Association.  They are more like the foot soldiers. The banks are the real source of the problem.  Their manipulation of currency is the root of the whole issue. Their greed, their profit seeking, their mindless devotion to evil, is what has created this entire mess.  You can take it all back, one hundred percent, to the banks and from there can blame the lawyers, and next the politicians. At each level the blame gets more diluted. The banks started it. The lawyers carried forward on it to profit themselves, and the politicians are kind of split into two groups. There are those who are too clueless to be useful to do anything about it, and those who are corrupt. That’s how all of that sorts out.

Here is a startling fact for everyone. When our land-based government was “set aside” in 1861, the Federal government went into this corporate miasma. It started operating not only on the jurisdiction of the sea, but in the jurisdiction of the sea. Our land-based Constitution was set aside. It wasn’t in any way harmed.  It did not lose its validity. In fact, it had to be in place in order for them to succeed to the service part of the contract. That original constitution was called The Constitution for the united States of America. It was a capital T on “the,” a small “f” on “for,” and a small “u” on the “united.” If you look at that carefully, you see that “The” used in this way means that there is only one. You also see that “united” was used as an adjective to describe the states of America. The actual parties to the constitution are the unincorporated states of America. 47:49 United was just an adjective describing their joint mutual action in support of the constitution.
The word “constitution” has no particular magic to it. The legal meaning to constitution is debt agreement. In this case it was the debt that the states of America, individually and together, assumed when they ordered the nineteen enumerated services from the newly created Federal government. That’s all a constitution really is. It outlined the duties and the people responsible to pay for the services in performance of those duties.

You can have any number of constitutions and indeed we do. In 1868, the corporation operating as the United States of America, Inc. published its constitution called The Constitution of the United States of America. What that is, is not the same as the original constitution, which is a trilateral, international treaty.  What was published in 1868 was a look-alike, sound-alike document called The Constitution of the United States of America, is a corporate charter. Its articles are corporate articles. Its amendments are corporate bylaws. It looks the same, sounds the same to an extent, but it is a different document and a different kind of document from the actual constitution, which underlies the whole thing.

The United States of America, Inc. was bankrupted in 1912. The Federal Reserve Banks came in as the creditors came in and took it over and they sponsored the United States of America, Inc. (with a small “the”) and began operating again under that business name until 1933, when they bankrupted it. That brought us to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that booted up The United States, Inc. and operated that services corporation providing essential governmental services until quite recently. They went into final receivership in March of 2015.

These different services corporations have one after another come in as successive to contract tying back to our initial discussion. Each one of these came back in and began providing essential governmental services. And the American people slept on. So, you started out with The United States of America, Inc. with a capital “The.” It was organized by the Roman Catholic Church, the Holy See, as a non-profit governmental services organization back in 1868. It was bankrupted in 1912 and turned over to the international banks operating the Federal Reserve System – rather the Federal Reserve, I should say.

They basically grabbed hold of our identity and abused our credit and created the bankruptcy that led to the great depression and all of that, on purpose. From the bankers’ standpoint the Great Depression was a wonderful thing. They put their competitors out of business. They got to buy labor for pennies on the dollar. They got to snap up land resources and other businesses. These guys were in fat city over the Depression. They did it just for their own profit. They’re criminals. They’re all criminals.

These people went out there. They did all their stuff and did it under all these business names as The United States with a capital “T,” the United States of America with a small “t.” They even incorporated in foreign countries. If you start looking into this stuff you find that they’ve been playing this game of using and abusing us and our resources, pretending to be what they are not, and operating fast and loose. They have come in here and . . .  Let me give you an example.

The Federal Reserve sponsored the United States of America, Inc.  with a small “t” in “the.” They bankrupted  it in 1933 and 1934.  As part of that, you will see in the Emergency Bankruptcy Act of 1933, and in HJR 192 and elsewhere, they set up a fixed exchange rate for their private currency script known as Federal Reserve Notes.

What is a note? It is a promissory note. It’s an IOU. They printed these things, these Federal Reserve Notes, which are promissory notes of a private banking cartel and they charged us for the privilege of using these private script notes, which are just IOU’s. Then they set up this exchange rate that was fixed. It was a dollar for dollar exchange rate. It was their script, their useless paper promises against our United States Dollars, which were defined as being an ounce of fine silver. They were able to trade their paper promises to pay for our actual gold and silver. In this way they emptied Fort Knox and, by 1971, they had stolen all of our silver reserves too.  Then, they declared bankruptcy when it came time for them to pay back all money due against the promissory notes and named our estates as their surety. They not only stole us blind and used bankruptcy protection they also named us as the ones responsible for their debt. That is what has gone on in this country. That was the 1933 bankruptcy.  Now we’re in the midst of dealing with the United States, the IMF United States, Inc. trying to do the same thing.

Where is all this grant money coming from? It’s coming from racketeering and theft. What they set up was a fiat money system. It’s a debt / credit money system. Every time you pay somebody you give them your debt.  Every time a debt is created an equal credit is created. It’s unavoidable.

When they talk about the national debt, what happened to the national credit? It’s their national debt to us. It’s our national credit against them. We are their priority creditors. They owe us all this money they can never hope to repay. They owe us all this work they syphoned off. They owe us for all the materials they’ve syphoned off – $18 Trillion worth.

That’s the actual fact. All of this was done in our name with them, the very perpetrators of this whole scheme, claiming to be our representatives. We were the victims of the scheme. The supposed priority creditors were the victims. It was all accomplished by fraud and fraud has no statute of limitations. It doesn’t matter if you discover a fraud from a hundred fifty years ago.  You can still come back and claim against any fraud and you can still sue for the probate of the estate. Fraud has no statute of limitations and probate never closes.

An heir to the estate can come back a hundred fifty, two hundred years later and if they have a valid claim they can lay claim to the estate.

These are things that operate in our favor. Before I overwhelm everybody with depression, fear, and desperation and panic here, because, yes, this has happened three times before and they’re trying to pull it again, the appropriate objections have been raised and they have been raised in the right places. That is number one.

They tried to do an end run around the Constitution and just open up our borders and tried to destroy America. The way they did it is the IMF let the United States, Inc. go into receivership without naming a secondary – without naming anyone or anything to act as successor to contract. That left the Federal side of the Constitution contract flapping in the wind, vacated like everything else.

So, we came in and formed a partnership agreement with the American Indian nations as the Federal entity. That sealed up the Constitution again.  Until such time as everybody gets back in the saddle, reforms the land government that we’re owed, and can begin dealing with these large problems, and this huge amount of criminality we’ve suffered, we have in that capacity made several moves. One of them is to / / / ate the odious debt that has accumulated by both the Federal Reserve and the IMF against the American people and against our assets.

An odious debt, as explained in our affidavit of probable cause published in a book called You Know Something is Wrong When . . . An American Affidavit of Probable Cause available on Amazon.com. An odious debt is debt that is created by fraud from which the victims do not benefit.  The American people have been victims. We have been enslaved, we’ve been press-ganged, subjected to inland piracy, suffered unlawful conversion, sedition against our lawful government, and treason.  There is no doubt about it. But we are not guilty and we are not ignorant. We were deliberately kept in the dark. So, as to facilitate the criminal trespass against us and against our government, all the while we have blissfully been unaware of all of these changes and machinations behind our backs, we cannot be held accountable for any of that.

Now that we know the truth we are responsible for owning up and governing ourselves. We have claimed always to be self-governing. Now we have to do the job. We have to get our own government on the land back up and in order to operate again as expeditiously as possible and we can be helped in that by the efforts of a group of people in Michigan who, back at the time of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc., which was settled in 1999, realized that they had to make a claim on the land and its assets. They had to reinstitute their land-based government or lose it.

These people in Michigan formed the Michigan General Jural Assembly and organized their counties on the land and they elected key people to fill the vacant public offices and they placed their claim with the World Court in the Hague. They also gave public notice in the Wall Street Journal and other publications around the world. Because the state of Michigan got its act together they put their foot in the door and preserved the claim for all the other states. 1:04:40 under the equal footing doctrine. What is good for one is good for all. We are all in that contract. So, Michigan saved our bacon.  At the same time, they also began the effort to try to get other states and other counties to organize.  The end result is that they have bequeathed to us precious opportunity and the grounding to continue on the claim to be the United States of America and to retain our jurisdiction.

I had heard about it (Michigan) at the time and had to give a big cry of relief because even then I knew that needed to happen.  It did happen. Thank God because it kept our claim alive and it’s keeping our claim alive giving us the basis to come back in the current situation even though many of our counties are still not organized and our states, generally speaking, are either hobbling along on a skeleton crew or not organized at all.

People are always asking me, “What do we do, what do we do?” Job one is to fill the vacant public offices and we all know basically how to hold elections. So it is really not such a hard job.  You have to be able to explain what has happened to people so they are aware and know why we must go through this process and why they have to serve as volunteers now and why they have to be willing and able to assert their correct political status. It is really not that difficult. You basically know you need those county officers. You need assembly men and women to conduct the business of the county. You need judges to run the county courts and justices of the peace to run the county courts. You need a bailiff, a court recorder, a clerk of the county, a clerk of the court, a coroner. These are all basic county offices and it’s going to seem kind of odd because the courts, at the time being, have other people running another county with the same or very similar name.  It will appear that they are doing the same job, but they are not. As I explained to the sheriff, the sheriff on the land is a peacekeeping officer with the actual public office and authority for the public office. Whereas the sheriff on the sea, operating the corporate office, is just a private corporate officer with a governmental services contract owed to the corporation as a franchise, which is just to enforce the codes and statutes and regulations of that corporation. 1:08:34

1:09:26 The Federal Reserve Banks have reconstituted themselves under the offices of the United Nations city states and they are operating the FEDERAL RESERVE, in all capital letters, under that municipal law, and they then have booted up THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., in all capital letters and they have made a plan to become successor to contract, which we rebutted and rebuffed. 1:10:00

Basically, we have discovered the process and what it takes to reclaim your true political status and to re-convey your estate and your name back off the jurisdiction of the sea and back onto the land and to place it in your control so that they cannot mess with you, which is a wonderful thing. This has just happened very recently and we are very quickly moving to get the process perfected and to get the news out to people so that millions of Americans can come home.

1:11:26 The other thing that has happened in the last couple of weeks is that we have finally figured out how to invoke the bounty hunter clause of the 14th Amendment – their 14th Amendment, the corporation’s 14th Amendment.

Now, remember that I told you that the IMF is doing business as THE UNITED STATES, INC., which went completely insolvent in March of 2015. They are in receivership and are being liquidated by Swiss banks basically.

In the meantime, the Federal Reserve, newly reconstituted, has come forward as doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in all capital letters, and that makes them the successor to contract even though we have formally rebuffed them and refused their service except as voluntary acts on their part. Now we’ve got the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA back in here and we’ve got the Federal Reserve back in here acting as the actual service provider of governmental services.

Their corporate constitution is the one they published in 1868. There is no other. So, they are still obligated. If they are going to operate in the public, they are still operating under the old Federal Code and they’re still operating under that constitution – The Constitution of the United States of America that was published in 1868.

If you look at that very closely you’re going to see some very weird things. You’re going to see the Thirteenth Amendment, which proclaims the abolition of slavery doesn’t actually abolish slavery. It actually enshrines slavery and makes it a part of their government forever.

The 13th Amendment actually said it abolishes slavery except the criminals can be enslaved. Then it leaves it up to the Congress to determine who a criminal is or what criminality is. The Congress could make a law that says breathing is criminal and use that as a means to enslave everyone. They actually use that as a means to make a claim for their corporation and for themselves with absolute despotism.

1:14:21 The second thing you will notice if you go down the page is the 14th Amendment in which they gratuitously confer the status of The United States citizen on everyone. This is the basis of their presumption against you and your estate, and name. They just arbitrarily said, “Oh, you are all a part of our casino. You are all employees. You are all obliged and obligated to us.”  This new person that we’re creating, this thing that has been named after you at the Federal level, is guilty by definition and it is a slave, by definition, and it cannot even question the public debt.

This is the all capital letters name. This is the Federal level trust that they created in the 14th Amendment. When a court brings a charge against the all capital letters name, that public trust that they created without your knowledge of consent, without your parents’ knowledge and consent, without your grandparents’ knowledge and consent, that entity is already guilty. It’s already a debtor.  All that is left to talk about is how much it is going to pay. This is what you see in our courtrooms.

The other interesting thing is when they pull this kind of crap on people in commercial venues they have to give remedy at the same time. So, the remedy is also in the 14th Amendment and that is the bounty hunter clause. That’s also right there in front of you.

The bounty hunter clause has been a cause of debate and concern. People have scratched their heads for generations as to what all of that was really all about and how it can be accessed as a remedy for 14th Amendment citizenship. We finally cracked it. We finally know the process by which people can invoke the bounty hunter clause, set up their own court of record, and go in there and get remedy.

The very first case resulted in a $68 Million judgment in favor of the man who did this and four big law firms were put out of business, approximately 60 lawyers lost their BAR card, and they are all now facing Federal criminal charges. 1:17:35. There is a gag order on it. The guy who did it does not want the notoriety. He has a family to protect. But the process is being fully detailed and it’s going to be employed all across this country. The details of the process will be made public and available to anyone and everyone who has suffered at the hands of these monsters.

The BAR association is about to get its own cum-upin according to their own rules – not with just commercial liens, but with actual criminal charges against people, against BAR members who do this kind of stuff to people – who have acted as predators and pirates on our shores. This is very serious and it is a remedy. 1:18:32  It’s good news for us; it’s bad news for them.

1:19:13 Attorneys tell people what they have to do because the presumption is that the audience members are all acting as 14th Amendment citizens – persons. As persons they are subjects. They are not sovereigns. They are subjects to the whim of the corporation.

When the corporate legislature lays down its almighty hand then you have to do what they say because you are a member of the corporation. If you are enfranchised as a voter and all this other happy horse , , , you know what? Then of course, what they’re saying is absolutely true. If you bought into this and it’s what you agreed to and you’re a good corporation tool, then you have to obey. That’s what you agreed to by contract.

However, if you are not, if you are one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States and you are not an inhabitant, a British subject, a subject of the municipality of the District of Columbia, if you are not a person – a corporation in Federalese, then you are not part of that, You are exempt.  You are literally exempt from all such requirements. That’s the other side of it. That’s what the attorneys are not telling us. Attorneys talk exclusively to persons – to those who have accepted their fate as a corporate entity, a franchisee of the corporation. 1:21:19

The BAR attorneys try to shut us up, but they are not going to be able to do it much longer. Look at how much damage was done. Sixty of them were put out of business with just one action.
1:22:40 There are many people who are concerned and heartbroken about what happened to the little boys from Hickum. Here these murderous thugs, these commercial mercenaries operating under color of law, ambushed a law abiding American on his way to a public meeting and shot him to death in cold blood – premeditated murder on our roads. Here’s this Governor Brown and this judge grasping and this sheriff on the scene All responsible for it with blood on their hands still walking around while Bundy and all the others are charged and threatened with ninety-six years in jail and all this other crapola.

It seems they’re just going to get rolled over. Let me tell you, they are not going to be steamrolled over.  They may be in a Federal jail at this moment, under the false presumption that they are persons, and that they acted as persons, and that they are civilly dead, so far as the land jurisdiction is concerned. But the land jurisdiction is coming back and the land jurisdiction has its authority firmly rooted in the international jurisdiction of the sea as well as on the land. We are coming back after those rats, those criminals in the international jurisdiction of the sea. We are going to commercial lien them up out of existence. We’re going to bring them to trial as war criminals and we are going to seek the absolute relief and restitution that the victims of this are owed. It’s coming. The answer to the whole thing is coming 1:24:38

1:25:12 Average people acting in the public interest can destroy these corporations. Corporations are subject to liquidation. If they operate outside their charter or act in a criminal manner they can be liquidated right down to their eye teeth. Every corporate officer has no public office. They have no immunity. I tried to tell Sheriff Ward the truth before he got involved in all of this. I gave him fair warning twice. You can read my letters to Sheriff David Ward on my website. I told him and I told those FBI agents also. But they chose the Nuremberg defense, “I was just following orders.” The result is it’s going to be the same. They are all going to be tried and will probably end up with their necks under piano wire.

The UNITED STATES is acting like a predator around the world and we are being blamed for it. We are being abused and defrauded and have been subjected to this criminality at home and at the same time are being blamed for the work of the bad actors internationally across the sea. This simply has to stop.



Judge Steve Curry, Colorado wrote Lien on BAR
Once you incorporate anything, including the franchise of a· corporation merely named after you, which is what they’ve done, they can then pretend that you are the same as the corporation, which is the crime of personage and they can bring false claims against that person, which is another crime named barratry named after the BAR association.
They’re kidnapping us and our land assets into the international· jurisdiction of the sea, which is a crime known as press-ganging.
the principal banks responsible for this are the Federal Reserve, the· World Bank, the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, and the International Monetary Fund.
If you take anything and incorporate it, you take it off the land and straight into the international jurisdiction of the sea.·
What is going on here at the end of the Civil War? We’ve got a· military that is operating under General Order 100, the Liber Code, which Abraham Lincoln adopted and forced upon his generals just prior to declaring the bankruptcy of the original United States trading company that had been providing governmental services and you have the Congress operating as The United States of America, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
When you go onto the international jurisdiction of the sea, the· members of the Congress are operating as United States Congress, not the United States in Congress assembled.
In 1866 there was an action objecting to this and the Supreme Court in· Milligan Ex Parte handed down a decision that said, “Wherever the American Common Law courts are operating it is unconscionable and unnecessary for there to be any form of military law exercised and any such courts must shut down.”
We can turn around and open our Common Law courts and force them to shut down.·
All these corporations are operating one hundred percent under the international law of the sea.·
They could only do this at the federal level initially because the state courts that existed were state courts on the land.·
About 1965, the last of the states and counties incorporated. When· they incorporated they went right out into the international jurisdiction of the sea.
In 1976, the Congress, operating as a Board of Directors of the United· States, Inc. formally released all state law and all state offices to the United Nations via two Acts of Congress (as in play acting). They formalized this as the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA). What this means is that they acknowledged the fact that all of our public offices were vacated. They were vacated by the very Act of the counties and the states incorporating as franchises of the United States, Inc.
When our land-based government was “set aside” in 1861, the Federal· government went into this corporate miasma. It started operating not only on the jurisdiction of the sea, but in the jurisdiction of the sea. Our land-based Constitution was set aside. It wasn’t in any way harmed.
That original constitution was called The Constitution for the united· States of America. It was a capital T on “the,” a small “f” on “for,” and a small “u” on the “united.” If you look at that carefully, you see that “The” used in this way means that there is only one. You also see that “united” was used as an adjective to describe the states of America. The actual parties to the constitution are the unincorporated states of America.
In 1868, the corporation operating as the United States of America,· Inc. published its constitution called  The Constitution of the United States of America.
The United States of America, Inc. was bankrupted in 1912. The Federal· Reserve Banks came in as the creditors came in and took it over and they sponsored the United States of America, Inc. (with a small “the”) and began operating again under that business name until 1933, when they bankrupted it. That brought us to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that booted up The United States, Inc. and operated that services corporation providing essential governmental services until quite recently. They went into final receivership in March of 2015.
The United States of America, Inc. with a capital “The.” It was· organized by the Roman Catholic Church, the Holy See as a non-profit governmental services organization back in 1868. It was bankrupted in 1912 and turned over to the international banks operating the Federal Reserve System – rather the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve sponsored the United States of America, Inc. with a· small “t” in “the.” They bankrupted it in 1933 and 1934.  As part of that, you will see in the Emergency Bankruptcy Act of 1934 and in HJR 192 and elsewhere, they set up a fixed exchange rate for their private currency script known as Federal Reserve Notes.
“What do we do, what do we do?” Job one is to fill the vacant public offices and we all know basically how to hold elections.·
You basically know you need those county officers. You need assembly· men and women to conduct the business of the county. You need judges to run the county courts and justices of the peace to run the county courts. You need a bailiff, a court recorder, a clerk of the county, a clerk of the court, a coroner.
An odious debt is debt that is created by fraud from which the victims do not benefit.·
The Federal Reserve Banks have reconstituted themselves under the· offices of the United Nations city states and they are operating the FEDERAL RESERVE, in all capital letters, under that municipal law, and they then have booted up THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., in all capital letters and they have made a plan to become successor to contract, which we rebutted and rebuffed.
Basically, we have discovered the process and what it takes to reclaim· your true political status and to re-convey your estate and your name back off the jurisdiction of the sea and back onto the land and to place it in your control so that they cannot mess with you, which is a wonderful thing. This has just happened very recently and we are very quickly moving to get the process perfected and to get the news out to people so that millions of Americans can come home.
The other thing that has happened in the last couple of weeks is that· we have finally figured out how to invoke the bounty hunter clause of the 14th Amendment – their 14th Amendment, the corporation’s 14th Amendment.
Now, remember that I told you that the IMF is doing business as THE· UNITED STATES, INC., which went completely insolvent in March of 2015. They are in receivership and are being liquidated by Swiss banks basically.
If you look at that very closely you’re going to see some very weird· things. You’re going to see the Thirteenth Amendment, which proclaims the abolition of slavery doesn’t actually abolish slavery. It actually enshrines slavery and makes it a part of their government forever.
The 13th Amendment actually said it abolishes slavery except the· criminals can be enslaved. Then it leaves it up to the Congress to determine who a criminal is or what criminality is. The Congress could make a law that says breathing is criminal and use that as a means to enslave everyone. They actually use that as a means to make a claim for their corporation and for themselves with absolute despotism.
You will notice if you go down the page is the 14th Amendment in which· they gratuitously confer the status of The United States citizen on everyone. This is the basis of their presumption against you and your estate, and name.
When a court brings a charge against the all capital letters name,· that public trust that they created without your knowledge of consent, without your parents’ knowledge and consent, without your grandparents’ knowledge and consent, that entity is already guilty. It’s already a debtor.
When they pull this kind of crap on people in commercial venues they· have to give remedy at the same time. So, the remedy is also in the 14th Amendment and that is the bounty hunter clause.
We finally cracked it. We finally know the process by which people can· invoke the bounty hunter clause, set up their own court of record, and go in there and get remedy.
The very first case resulted in a $68 Million judgment in favor of the· man who did this and four big law firms were put out of business, approximately 60 lawyers lost their BAR card, and they are all now facing Federal criminal charges.

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM

NATO as a War Racket



4-12-2016 9-29-34 AM

NATO Causes Refugees, Then Uses Them As Excuse for More Invasions

Eric Zuesse

NATO is the anti-Russia military club of nations, even after the communist Soviet Union and its military club against the U.S., the Warsaw Pact, ended in 1991 — NATO didn’t reciprocate that by ending itself, as it should have done (and would have done if the U.S. President at the time, George Herbert Walker Bush, had had any basic decency; instead, he said in private, “To hell with that; we won, they didn’t!” but he continued telling Gorbachev that NATO wouldn’t move “one inch to the east” — which promise he was planning to violate, and which his successors have been violating).

With the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact gone, NATO’s claimed raison d’etre was also gone, but NATO shamelessly continued on, and it even has expanded right up to Russia’s borders (just try to imagine what John Fitzgerald Kennedy would have thought if it hadn’t been Soviet nuclear missiles merely in Cuba in 1962, but all surrounding the U.S. — and that’s the situation today but reversed: today’s Russia is in the situation of 1962’s U.S., but even more so, though NATO has the audacity to accuse Russia of ‘aggression’ for, essentially, defending itself from NATO — from the enemies that are increasingly surrounding it!). (Yes, what America has been doing, really, is that bad.)

On April 6th, NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg (son of Norway’s Defense Minister) said that NATO must now expand outside Europe and North America:

Millions fleeing the region in a humanitarian crisis of a magnitude not seen since World War Two.Terrorist groups like ISIL taking hold of ungoverned spaces. And spreading violence across the region and beyond. Inciting attacks on our streets. From Brussels to Istanbul, Paris to San Bernardino. These are attacks on our open societies. On the values we share. 

So our response must be strong.

Who caused those refugees? The U.S. and other NATO nations did. The American White House had been seeking to overthrow the Russia-friendly leaders, specifically in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, but also elsewhere. And now, the refugees from those invasions are flooding into Europe. Oblivious to this reality, Stoltenberg continued:

To protect our territory, we must be willing to project stability beyond our borders. If our neighbours are more stable, we are more secure.

There was stability (and peace, and remarkable and remarkably evenly-distributed prosperity) in Libya under Gaddafi, whom the U.S. and some of its NATO allies killed. There was stability, peace, and moderate prosperity, also in Syria under Assad, whom the U.S. and some of its NATO allies tried  to kill. (Gaddafi and Assad were the two non-sectarian national leaders in the Middle East; NATO downed one, and still tries to down the other.) (The U.S. plan to overthrow the secular government of Syria and replace it by a sectarian, specifically fundamentalist Sunni and Saudi-allied government, had actually been drawn up by the CIA in 1957, but couldn’t be carried out until 2011, and Obama has been putting it into practice ever since.) There was stability throughout the Middle East before the U.S.-led NATO bombing campaign enabled the chaotic opposition forces to capture and kill Gaddafi, and before the U.S., Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE, organized the intended overthrow of the secular (non-sectarian) Shiite leader of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, in order to replace him with imported fundamentalist Sunni jihadists, passionate to establish a fundamentalist-Sunni Islamic state there (a terrorist-state, it inevitably would be, but NATO likes that fine, because it produces yet more of a market for its ‘defense’ contractors such as Lockheed Martin — you scratch my back, Lockheed; I’ll scratch yours, NATO).

NATO is the biggest hoax in the history of the world: it’s an extension of a fascist CIA takeover of the formerly democratic nations, of the United States and Europe, by infiltrating fascists into NATO, and its associated propaganda organs: the Atlantic Council, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, USAID, Open Society Foundations, Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute, and other Establishment (i.e., Western aristocracy-controlled) organizations.

Specifically regarding Russia, Stoltenberg said:

About Russia, we don’t see any imminent threat against any NATO allied country, including the countries in the Eastern part of the Alliance. But what we see is a more assertive Russia responsible for aggressive actions in Ukraine and willing to use military force. Not only invest in Russian military capabilities but also the willingness to use those capabilities to intimidate neighbours, to change borders in Europe, annex Crimea, destabilizing Eastern Ukraine and having troops in Georgia and Moldova and so on. And this, of course, is of great concern and that’s the reason why we are responding and when I say we I mean the United States and Europe together. Before we didn’t have forces in the Eastern part of the Alliance and now we have forces there on a rotational basis. And we have substantially increased our readiness to redeploy forces if needed. So again I’m concerned but as long as we are able to adapt and because we are able to adapt we are in a way responding to those concerns and making sure that the Baltic countries, all NATO allied countries are safe because NATO is there. … Russia is trying to re-establish a sphere of influence around its borders and that’s why they are behaving as they are in Georgia and Moldova and Ukraine. And that’s not acceptable because they are violating international law, they are not respecting the sovereignty and the territorial integrity — the sovereignty and the territorial integrity of independent Nations, countries in Europe and that’s also the reason why it’s important that we respond. At the same time — and we are responding by the biggest re-enforcement of collected defense since the end of the Cold War.  But at the same time I always underline that NATO is not seeking a confrontation with Russia. We will avoid a Cold — new Cold War. [Later he said this:] after the illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea in 2014 NATO decided to suspend all practical cooperation with Russia [but he was saying that there was no ‘new Cold War’, even though he’s surrounding Russia by new enemy countries, which, according to “The Debate on NATO Expansion”, are now to include: Ukraine, Montenegro, Croatia, Macedonia, Georgia, Bosnia and Herzegovin, Serbia; and, possibly also Kosovo, which “will probably be admitted to the Alliance as well.”]

When he said, “Russia is trying to re-establish a sphere of influence around its borders and that’s why they are behaving as they are in Georgia and Moldova and Ukraine,” one can think rationally about that by reversing sides and considering what one should think of “America is trying to re-establish a sphere of influence around its borders and that’s why they are behaving as they are in NAFTA (with Mexico and Canada), and behaved as it did during the Cuban Missile Crisis.” To Stoltenberg: for Russia to think like that is “assertive” and “aggressive.”

Here are the facts regarding specifically “Crimea” there — the NATO club’s current excuse for demonizing Russia (and for Obama’s economic sanctions to crush Russia):

Back in February 2014, Obama overthrew (please click on the link if you have any doubt about anything that’s being said here) the democratically elected President of Russia’s neighbor Ukraine, in an extremely bloody coup, which was at least a year in being set-up, and the rationale for this ‘democratic uprising’ was that that actually democratically elected President was corrupt — but no one mentioned that all of Ukraine’s post-Soviet leaders have been  corrupt. Obama’s agent Victoria Nuland had instructed the U.S. Ambassador in Ukraine whom to get appointed to take over control of Ukraine as soon as the coup would be completed, and that person did become appointed — and top officials of the EU were shocked to find out that it had been a coup. The “armed militias in ski masks” that Obama referred to in the coup (and in the ‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ afterward), were actually his, not Viktor Yanukovych’s (the President whom Obama overthrew); they were America’s mercenaries, not either Yanukovych’s or Russia’s operatives as he pretends they were. And, now, after the extremely bloody civil war that resulted in Ukraine when the regions that had voted overwhelmingly for the President whom Obama overthrew rejected  Obama’s coup-regime and refused to be ruled by it, Ukraine is even more corrupt than it ever was, but, for some mysterious reason, the United States isn’t overthrowing the post-coup government. Obama had gotten what he basically wanted out of his coup: Russia’s ability to pipeline its gas into the EU is now severely hampered by the necessity to establish alternate pipeline-routes. Ukraine is crucial to strangulating Russia, because most of Russia’s gas-pipelines into Europe run through its formerly friendly neighbor, Ukraine, which now is rabidly anti-Russian. So: the coup and ethnic-cleansing and all the rest have been just a part of America’s effort to strangulate Russia; and all of the maimed and dead people are merely collateral damage — no concern of Obama (nor of his NATO).

Furthermore, on 20 February 2014, the peak day of the coup, Crimeans who had been in Kiev demonstrating against overthrowing the President for whom 75% of Crimeans had voted, commissioned a number of buses to take them promptly back to Crimea, especially because the rabidly racist anti-Russian fascists whom the U.S. had hired to carry out the coup terrified them. These buses en-route back to Crimea got stopped by those fascists (from the very same organization that was headed by the man who actually led the coup), who beat the escaping Crimeans bloody and burned at least one of their buses. Some undetermined number of these victims were killed, and many were injured, but there was no official investigation of this event, which became known in Crimea as “The Korsun Massacre” and “The Pogrom of Korsun”; consequently, the Obama-installed coup-regime — which was soon to produce massacres far worse, such as this and this — denies that it happened, but those videos caused Crimeans, who already were against the coup, to be determined to separate from Ukraine and rejoin Russia, of which Crimea had been a part for hundreds of years until the Soviet dictator in 1954 transferred Crimea from Russia to Ukraine (without even asking the Crimean people). (That’s the same dictator, Nikita Khrushchev, whom U.S. President JFK faced down in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962; but, now, U.S. Presidents treat Khrushchev’s arbitrary action in regard to Crimea as presenting a bigger argument for Crimeans to have no right to determine what their government will be than the Scotts do regarding whether it will continue to be par of the UK, or the Catalans do regarding whether it will continue to be in Spain. We’re not bombing the Catalans nor the Scotts for demanding the right of self-determination — just the residents of Donbass for their rejecting the coup that overthrew the man, Yanukovych, for whom they had voted 90%.)

So: NATO and the U.S. regime know that what they are accusing against Russia are lies. They aren’t deluded, nor merely mistaken on the facts. They created the problems; they know they created the problems; and, now, they blame Russia (and leaders who are friendly to Russia) for having caused the problems by Russia’s ‘aggression’, which is simply Russia’s necessary efforts to defend itself against U.S. aggression.

Then, Stoltenberg said that NATO intends to make more official its alliance with the people who sponsor jihadists throughout the world:

I very much believe that we can expand and enhance our cooperation with the Gulf Cooperation Council. I visited the United Arab Emirates a couple of weeks ago and and I think that in a way by helping countries in the region to stabilize the region we are of course also making the countries more secure. The whole idea is that if our, NATO’s neighbourhood is more stable they are more secure and we are more secure so it’s not in a way -security is not you get less of if you share it; you get more security if you create security together. So I strongly believe in us working together with the GCC.

The GCC is run by Saudi Arabia, just as NATO is run by the United States. GCC consists not only of the royals of Saudi Arabis (the al-Sauds), but of the royals of Qatar (the al-Thanis), of Kuwait (the al-Sabahs), of UAE (six royal families), of Bahrain (the al-Khalifas), and of Oman (the bin-Saids). All of them are fundamentalist Sunnis. They are the main competitors against Russia, the world’s largest producer of oil and gas. They, like the U.S. and its allied aristocracies in the various European nations, want to cut Russia out of the world’s largest oil-and-gas market, the EU, and to cut in the GCC royals. The GCC royals also are the main funders of jihadist groups that commit terrorist acts in both the U.S. and Europe — all of which groups are likewise fundamentalist Sunnis, just like their royal paymasters are. The top funder of Al Qaeda prior to 9/11 was — and at least as of 2009 it still remained — the Saud princes and their business-partners. But NATO is allied with them. This is how NATO intends “to project stability beyond our borders”: by becoming even tighter-allied with the funders of international jihadist groups.

So: the refugee problem in Europe is caused by the enemies of the European peoples, and these enemies are the aristocracies of the U.S., the EU, and the GCC.

Stoltenberg was arguing possibly to expand NATO to include the GCC.

He was also asked there about Turkey, which — under Tayyip Erdogan’s dictatorship — is the Saud family’s representative in NATO. A Brookings Institution scholar inquired:

“General Breedlove said recently that he felt the Russians were weaponizing the refugee situation with the aim of destabilizing Europe, and I know NATO has sent some sea patrols in the Aegean recently. But my question is why did it take so long for NATO to respond to such a serious security threat to the European continent when Greece and Turkey, both frontline States, are members of NATO?”

Stoltenberg replied:

Turkey participate in the coalition fighting ISIL. Turkey provides military assets but in addition Turkey provides infrastructure, bases, the Incirlik Base and other facilities for the efforts of the coalition fighting ISIL.  So without Turkey it would have been much more difficult to, for instance, to conduct many of the air strikes and so on fighting ISIL. Second Turkey is the NATO ally most affected by the influx of refugees. They host more than two million, close to three million perhaps refugees and so Turkey is heavily affected by the crisis in Iraq, Syria, ISIL.

Here are the facts on that:

Turkey supplies ISIS. (ISIS is called “ISIL” by the Obama Administration in order to mislead people to think that ISIS wasn’t started by someone who had been enraged by the U.S. invasion and destruction of Iraq in 2003. But ISIS is the usual name, and the second-most common name for it is Daesh, which is the term that the Saud family prefer to use for it. “Daesh” is the Arabic version of “ISIL”: the Sauds are merely deferring, but in Arabic, to U.S. President Obama’s preferred name for the group. However, the actual group, ISIS, hearing the term “Daesh” in Arabic, find it insulting, and have “reportedly threatened to ‘cut out the tongues’ of anyone it hears using the term’.”)

The GCC, those royal families and their retainers, are the funders of international jihad, not only of ISIS, but of Al Qaeda, etc. However, almost all the money that comes into Al Qaeda is from the Sauds.

When asked specifically about Libya, Stoltenberg said:

One issue we have discussed and also discussed during my visit here to Washington this week and also with Secretary Ash Carter was the possibility of NATO providing AWACS support, our surveillance plane. And that is on the table now and it’s going to be addressed in NATO and then we will be able to provide you with a more precise answer but AWACS support in one way or another is now an issue which is discussed in the Alliance.

He put that forward as being part of a necessary response, by NATO, to the infestation of Libya by “ISIL.” He made no mention of the fact that neither ISIS nor any other jihadist groups were allowed in Libya by Gaddafi, nor present there — that the military campaign there by the U.S., France, and Britain, had enabled  the ISIS-infestation of Libya, because what the U.S. and its allies had done had turned it into a failed state.

NATO’s chief propaganda-arm, the Atlantic Council, put it this way about that part of his presentation (where Stoltenberg was talking about the need to bring about closer ties with the GCC):

“Laying the ground for a potential NATO role in Libya — where ISIS has put down roots in a dysfunctional environment that has until recently seen the country divided between two rival governments — Stoltenberg said Libya will need all the help it can get and that the Alliance is ready to step up.” In other words, NATO’s propaganda-arm said: NATO needs to assist the West’s governments to finish the job of taking control over Libya.

That’s a perfect example of: bomb a formerly Russia-friendly country into a failed state; then claim that because it’s a failed state, we’ve now got to take it over — for the benefit of U.S.-dominated international oil companies and the international corporations of aristocrats in countries that are allied with America’s aristocracy. (As regards the publics in any nations, their interests don’t count, according to the people who do count.)

Of course, it makes sense, then, that the GCC royals will now be NATO’s allies in this grand campaign to ‘protect the Western World’.

The enemies of the European peoples are those royal families, and their own and America’s aristocracies. These are the authentic enemies not only of Europeans, but of the American people, too.

But it’s not only those fundamentalist Sunnis. There is also the ceaseless propaganda, and the surging military buildup by NATO against Russia in the nations that border on Russia. For example, see this.

It’s not really country-against-country, such as the powers-that-be pretend; it’s the aristocracy against the public, everywhere. Sectarianism, jihadists, bigotries of all types, are among the main means by which aristocracies become enabled to control the public and turn them into cheap cannon-fodder to achieve their conquests. It’s an ancient technique, and commonly called “Divide and rule.” One public then hates another public. Enslaving the public mentally, by such lies and myths, is the model that every aristocracy has found to be most fruitful, the cheapest way for conquests to be achieved. The cannons might not be cheap (the aristocracy sell those to the taxpayers, the publics, of every country), but the fodder are: the public are a real bargain — they don’t just pay for the weapons, they use them, against some other public.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

10 13 11 flagbar


Trans Atlantic and Trans Pacific Partnerships Complete Corporate World Takeover



Paul Craig Roberts & Eric ZUESSE

As I have emphasized since these “partnerships” were first announced, their purpose is to give corporations immunity from the laws in the countries in which they do business. The principle mechanism of this immunity is the granting of the right to corporations to sue governments and agencies of governments that have laws or regulations that impinge on corporate profits. For example, France’s prohibitions of GMO foods are, under the “partnerships,” “restraints on trade that impinge on corporate profits.

The “partnerships” set up “tribunals” staffed by corporations that are outside the court systems of the sovereign governments. It is in these corporate tribunals that the lawsuits take place. In other words the corporations are judge, jury, and prosecutor. They can’t lose. The “partnerships” set up secret unaccountable governments that are higher and have power over the elected governments.

You can ask yourself how much money the representatives of the countries who “fast-tracked” this system were paid by the corporations and how much the bribes will be to get the agreements approved by the legislators. As you witness American, British, German and other government officials agitate in behalf of corporate rule, you will know that they have been well paid.

Peter Liley, Minister of Trade and Industry in Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government and currently a Conservative member of the British Parliament took the trouble of looking at the Trans-Atlantic partnership and is warning against it. As a politician he cannot speak as forcefully as he might like, but he gives you the picture.

No government representative who has the slightest bit of integrity and patriotism would have approved these agreements, and no legislative body that is not completely corrupt would hand its power and function over to global corporations. Below is Eric Zuesse’s report


British Conservative Breaks Ranks, Opposes TTIP


4-11-2016 10-36-36 AM

By Eric ZUESSE | 09.04.2016

It’s as if, say, during the Republican Administration of US President George Herbert Walker Bush, the person who had negotiated international trade deals for the prior President, the Republican Ronald Reagan, came out publicly against a mega-‘trade’ deal that his fellow-Party-member, President Bush, was ardently trying to get approved. That is extremely breaking ranks, and it happened on Sunday in the UK.

Britain’s former Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1990-92, under Margaret Thatcher and John Major), and current Conservative MP (Member of Parliament), Peter Liley, did it when he blogged on April 3rd at the Conservative Party’s website «Conservative Home»:

«I believe in free trade. Always have, always will. As the only serving MP to have negotiated a successful free trade deal (the Uruguay Round – as Trade and Industry Secretary during the 1990s), I automatically supported the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal currently being negotiated between the USA and EU, assuming it was a free trade agreement.

The more closely I look at it, the more parts of it worry me. Conservatives who believe in free trade should be very wary about endorsing TTIP. And both the Leave and Remain campaigns should look very carefully at its implications for our EU membership.

Let me explain why.

TTIP is not primarily about removing tariffs and quotas. The average tariff levied by the US on goods from Europe is just 2.5 per cent. Getting rid of them would be worthwhile – but no big deal.

It is mainly about harmonizing product specifications and creating a special regime for investment. There is no objection to those things in principle. Insofar as product harmonization means removing rules introduced as hidden protection of a domestic producer,that is fine. But we should not sign away Parliament’s right to protect our citizens from harmful additives, and so forth».

The very core of both Obama’s ‘trade’ deal with Europe, TTIP, and his ‘trade’ deal with Asia, TPP, is precisely that: to sign away legislators’ power to protect the electorate from harmful additives, toxic water and foods and air, unsafe cars, and to preserve environment for themselves and future generations – and more (Lilley is especially concerned because it would abolish Britain’s vaunted public health service. Imagine: a British Conservative is determined to protect that enormously successful socialist program in his country! Flabbergasting, but true.).

The very core of it is to transfer national sovereignty to a worldwide dictatorship of international corporations (three-person corporate-accountable panels of ‘arbitrators’, whose rulings are non-appealable and aren’t required to adhere to any nation’s laws – it’s shocking, but true).

And, for any conservative – whether in Britain or any other country – to oppose that is a very big deal, especially when it’s a former Secretary of State for Trade and Industry.

He goes on to say:

«My three main concerns relate to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System (ISDS). This creates a system of tribunals – special courts – in which large foreign companies can sue governments (but not vice-versa) for pursuing policies which harm their investments.

US companies could sue the UK government should it want to take back into the public sector privately provided services in the NHS, education, and so forth – or open fewer services to private provision. The EU and UK government have denied that this is possible. But a cogent Counsel’s Opinion argues that because these tribunals can award unlimited fines they could exert «a chilling effect» on government decision making. The Left have been particularly irate about this but Conservatives too should be worried. I and other local MPs – all Tories – lobbied successfully to reincorporate into the NHS a disastrously run private Surgicentre (set up by Tony Blair’s Government) serving our constituencies. Under TTIP, a foreign operator could have sued for massive compensation at the expense of our local NHS. Conservatives have rightly been cautious and pragmatic about the extent of private provision particularly in health. It would be electorally disastrous if we back a system which turns out to bring in privatization by the back door.

These tribunals give foreign multinationals their own privileged legal system, too costly for smaller foreign companies (since the average case costs $8 million), and from which UK companies are excluded. Moreover, the ‘judges’ are commercial lawyers who, when not serving on a Tribunal, work for, and are therefore sympathetic to, big companies. Cases are heard largely in secret…

In short, the Government argues (not entirely convincingly) that TTIP tribunals will probably do no harm. No one claims that they will actually do any good – i.e. attract more US investment to the UK or vice versa. The idea that any American companies are afraid to invest here because they do not trust the British legal system or fear expropriation is not credible. Businesses from across the globe choose to make their contracts subject to British law precisely because it is the most trusted. If, as the Government claims, these ISDS tribunals will give the same outcome as British courts they are completely unnecessary…

In or out of the EU, we should question whether ISDS tribunals are necessary, reject the 20-year stabilization clause and insist on excluding the NHS from the treaty (as France has excluded movies). That would be less difficult if Britain leaves the EU and negotiates a parallel treaty – though the simplest thing would be to negotiate a pure free trade agreement restricted to abolishing remaining tariffs».

He comes to this late, after millions of Europeans have already made clear in marches and in numerous public opinion polls that the only way the TTIP can become law in the EU will be if the EU is already a dictatorship – not at all by truly democratic means. But, better late than never.

Unlike Hillary Clinton in the US, who has always worked behind the scenes to pass trade deals that have ISDS in them, and who told Democrats in Congress to follow the lead of Nancy Pelosi, who spoke publicly against Obama’s ‘trade’ deals but was actually whipping in the US House to help the President win Fast Track so they can become passed into law, Lilley doesn’t have the reputation of someone who says one thing in public and does the opposite, behind the scenes, in actual policymaking.

His statement is real – not mere slogans and words. And it will sway policymakers and not merely the voters of his own Party (in order to win that Party’s primary election).

If Obama gets his ‘trade’ deals passed into law, he will be by far the biggest-impact US President since FDR, who introduced Social Security and many other existing programs (and also the Glass-Steagall Act, which FDR’s fellow – but only fake – ‘Democrat’, Bill Clinton annihilated), and who joined with Churchill and Stalin, to defeat global fascism. Obama’s impact will then be perhaps even more evil than FDR’s was good. However, if he fails to pass any of his ‘trade’ deals, then he’ll only be as bad, or nearly as bad, as George W. Bush was, even if he turns out to have been lucky enough to postpone the coming super-crash (toward which his policies are building) till the next person becomes President. Obama is the most conservative Democratic President since James Buchanan – and that’s pretty bad, even if Obama manages to hold off the crash that he has been postponing, until his successor comes in.

In contrast, the Conservative Peter Lilley is a flaming progressive, by comparison, because he certainly is that on the biggest public-policy issue since World War II, which is whether to end or instead expand ISDS. If it’s expanded, then, for example, the recent Paris accord against global warming will be effectively dead. That’s how big a deal this is: not only democracy, but even the continuation of a livable planet, are all on the line now. Obama says one thing, but what he does can be very different.

Tags: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership  UK

10 13 11 flagbar





2-19-2016 10-51-10 AM

2-18-2016 9-54-33 AM

2-18-2016 9-55-50 AM

2-18-2016 9-54-15 AM

2-18-2016 9-53-48 AM

1-31-2016 7-35-42 AM

1-29-2016 4-02-30 PM

1-29-2016 4-05-43 PM

1-15-2016 10-06-22 AM

1-15-2016 10-05-18 AM

1-15-2016 10-02-59 AM

1-1-2016 9-44-17 AM

1-6-2016 6-25-13 PM

12-11-2015 8-53-25 AM

11-25-2015 10-48-26 AM

12-10-2015 9-43-52 AM

11-17-2015 12-18-47 PM

11-2-2015 10-58-00 AM

11-23-2015 8-59-00 AM

11-1-2015 6-55-50 AM

2-25-2016 1-18-50 PM


10 13 11 flagbar

The history of the banking control in the United States



By Alain Pilote

The dictatorship of the bankers and their debt-money system are not limited to one country, but exist in every country in the world. They are working to keep their control tight, since one country freeing itself from this dictatorship and issuing its own interest- and debt-free currency, setting the example of what an honest system could be, would be enough to bring about the worldwide collapse of the bankers’ swindling debt-money system.

This fight of the International Financiers to install their fraudulent debt-money system has been particularly vicious in the United States of America since its very foundation, and historical facts show that several American statesmen were well aware of the dishonest money system the Financiers wanted to impose upon America and of all of its harmful effects. These statesmen were real patriots, who did all that they possibly could to maintain for the USA an honest money system, free from the control of the Financiers. The Financiers did everything in their power to keep in the dark this facet of the history of the United States, for fear that the example of these patriots might still be followed today. Here are some facts that the Financiers would like the population not to know:

The happiest population

4-9-2016 10-05-15 AM

We are in 1750. The United States of America does not yet exist; it is the 13 Colonies on the American continent, forming “New England”, a possession of the motherland, England. Benjamin Franklin wrote about the population of that time: “Impossible to find a happier and more prosperous population on all the surface of the globe.” Going over to England to represent the interests of the Colonies, Franklin was asked how he accounted for the prosperous conditions prevailing in the Colonies, while poverty was rife in the motherland:

“That is simple,” Franklin replied. “In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.”

The English bankers, being informed of that, had a law passed by the British Parliament prohibiting the Colonies from issuing their own money, and ordering them to use only the gold or silver debt-money that was provided in insufficient quantity by the English bankers. The circulating medium of exchange was thus reduced by half.

“In one year,” Franklin stated, “the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.”

Then the Revolutionary War was launched against England, and was followed by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. History textbooks erroneously teach that it was the tax on tea that triggered the American Revolution. But Franklin clearly stated:

“The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters, had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament: which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England, and the Revolutionary War.”

The Founding Fathers of the United States, bearing all these facts in mind, and to protect themselves against the exploitation of the International Bankers, took good care to expressly declare, in the American Constitution, signed at Philadelphia in 1787, Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 5:

“Congress shall have the power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof.”

 The bank of the bankers

4-9-2016 10-04-53 AM

But the bankers did not give up. Their agent, Alexander Hamilton, was named Secretary of Treasury in George Washington’s cabinet, and advocated the establishment of a federal bank to be owned by private interests, and the creation of debt-money with false arguments like: “A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing… The wisdom of the Government will be shown in never trusting itself with the use of so seducing and dangerous an expedient as issuing its own money.” Hamilton also made them believe that only the debt-money issued by private banks would be accepted in dealing abroad.

Thomas Jefferson, the Secretary of State, was strongly opposed to that project, but President Washington was finally won over by Hamilton’s arguments. A federal bank was thus created in 1791, the “Bank of the United States”, with a 20 years’ charter. Although it was termed “Bank of the United States”, it was actually the “bank of the bankers”, since it was not owned by the nation, but by individuals holding the bank’s stocks, the private bankers. This name of “Bank of the United States” was purposely chosen to deceive the American population and to make them believe that they were the owners of the bank, which was not the case. The charter for the Bank of the United States ran out in 1811, and Congress voted against its renewal, thanks to the influence of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson:

4-9-2016 10-04-27 AM

“If Congress,” Jackson said, “has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.”

Thus ended the history of the first Bank of the United States. But the bankers did not play their last card.

The bankers launch the war

Nathan Rothschild, of the Bank of England, issued an ultimatum: “Either the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” Jackson and the American patriots did not believe the power of the international moneylenders could extend so far. “You are a den of thieves-vipers,” Jackson told them. “I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!” Nathan Rothschild issued orders: “Teach these impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to Colonial status.”

The British Government launched the War of 1812 against the United States. Rothschild’s plan was to impoverish the United States through this war to such an extent that the legislators would have to seek financial aid… which, of course, would be forthcoming only in return for the renewal of the charter for the Bank of the United States. Thousands were killed, but what does that matter to Rothschild? He had achieved his objective; the U.S. Congress granted the renewal of the Charter in 1816.

Abraham Lincoln is assassinated

4-9-2016 10-04-10 AM

Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States in 1860, under the promise of abolishing the slavery of the blacks. Eleven southern States, favorable to the human slavery of the black race, then decided to secede from the Union, to withdraw from the United States of America: that was the beginning of the Civil War (1861-1865). Lincoln, being short of money to finance the North’s war effort, went to the bankers of New York, who agreed to lend him money at interest rates varying from 24 to 36 percent. Lincoln refused, knowing perfectly well that this was usury and that it would lead the United States to ruin. But his money problem was still not settled!

His friend in Chicago, Colonel Dick Taylor, came to his rescue and put the solution to him: “Just get Congress to pass a bill authorizing the printing of full legal tender treasury notes, and pay your soldiers with them, and go ahead and win your war with them also.”

This is what Lincoln did, and he won the war: between 1862 and 1863, in full conformity with the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, Lincoln caused $450 million of debt-free Greenbacks to be issued, to conduct the Civil War. (These Treasury notes were called “Greenbacks” by the people because they were printed with green ink on the back.)  

4-9-2016 10-03-48 AM

Lincoln said: “Government, possessing the power to create and issue currency and credit as money, and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not borrow capital at interest as the means of financing governmental work and public enterprise… The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government’s greatest creative opportunity.”

Lincoln called the Greenbacks “the greatest blessing the American people have ever had.” A blessing for all, except for the bankers, since it was putting an end to their racket, to the theft of the nation’s credit and issuing interest-bearing money. So they did everything possible to destroy these Greenbacks and sabotage Lincoln’s work. Lord Goschen, spokesman of the Financiers, wrote in the London Times (Quote taken from Who Rules America by C. K. Howe, and reproduced in Lincoln Money Martyred by Dr. R. E. Search):

“If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. That Government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” (The monarchy of the money lenders.)

First, in order to cast discredit on the Greenbacks, the bankers persuaded Congress to vote, in February of 1862, the “Exception Clause”, which said that the Greenbacks could not be used to pay the interest on the national debt, nor to pay taxes, excises, or import duties. Then, in 1863, having financed the election of enough Senators and Representatives, the bankers got the Congress to revoke the Greenback Law in 1863, and enact in its place the National Banking Act. (Money was then to be issued interest-bearing by privately-owned banks.)

This Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes. Lincoln heatedly protested, but his most urgent objective was to win the war and save the Union, which obliged him to put off till after the war the veto he was planning against this Act and the action he was to take against the bankers. Lincoln nevertheless declared:

“I have two great enemies, the Southern army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. And of the two, the bankers are my greatest foe.”

Lincoln was re-elected President in 1864, and he made it quite clear that he would attack the power of the bankers, once the war was over. The war ended on April 9, 1865, but Lincoln was assassinated five days later, on April 14. A tremendous restriction of credit followed, organized by the banks: the currency in circulation in the country, which was, in 1866, $1,907 million, representing $50.46 for each American citizen, had been reduced to $605 million in 1876, representing $14.60 per capita. The result: in ten years, 56,446 business failures, representing a loss of $2 billion. And as if this was not enough, the bankers reduced the per capita currency in circulation to $6.67 in 1887!

William Jennings Bryan: “The banks ought to get out”

4-9-2016 10-03-25 AM

Lincoln’s example nevertheless remained in several minds, as far along as 1896. That year, the Presidential candidate for the Democrats was William Jennings Bryan, and once again, history textbooks tell us that it was a good thing that he did not succeed in his bid for the Presidency, since he was against the bankers’ “sound money”, the money issued as a debt, and against the gold standard. Bryan said:

“We say in our platform that we believe that the right to coin and issue money is a function of Government. We believe it. Those who are opposed to it tell us that the issue of paper money is a function of the bank, and that the Government ought to get out of the banking business. I tell them that the issue of money is a function of Government, and that the banks ought to get out of the Government business… When we have restored the money of the Constitution, all other necessary reforms will be possible, but until this is done, there is no other reform that can be accomplished.”

The Fed: The most gigantic trust

Finally, on December 23, 1913, the U.S. Congress voted in the Federal Reserve Act, which took away from Congress the power to create money, and which handed over this power to the Federal Reserve Corporation. One of the rare Congressmen who had understood all the issue at stake in this Act, Representative Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. (Rep-Minnesota), father of the famous aviator, said:

4-9-2016 10-03-04 AM

“This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President (Wilson) signs this bill, the invisible government of the Monetary Power will be legalized… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”

The education of the people

What allowed the bankers to finally obtain the complete monopoly of the control of credit in the United States? The ignorance among the population of the money question. John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson, in 1787:

“All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in the Constitution, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.”

Lincoln’s Secretary of Treasury, Salmon P. Chase, stated publicly, shortly after the passage of the National Banking Act, in 1863:

4-9-2016 10-02-43 AM

“My agency in promoting the passage of the National Banking Act was the greatest financial mistake of my life. It has built up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country. It should be repealed, but before that can be accomplished, the people will be arrayed on one side, and the banks on the other, in a contest such as we have never seen before in this country.”

Automobile manufacturer Henry Ford said:

“If the people of the nation understood our banking and monetary system, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

The education of the people, that’s the solution! It is precisely the method advocated by the “Michael” Journal: to build a force in the people through education, so that the sovereign government of each nation will have the courage to stand up to the bankers and issue its own money, as President Lincoln did. If only all those in favour of an honest money system understood their responsibilities for spreading the “Michael” Journal! Social Credit, which would establish an economy where everything is organized to serve the human person, is precisely aiming to develop personal responsibility, to create responsible people. Each mind won over to Social Credit is an advance. Each person formed by Social Credit is a force, and each force acquired is a step towards the victory. And for the last seventy years, how many forces have been acquired!… If all of them were active, it is really before tomorrow morning that we would obtain the implementation of the Social Credit proposals!

As Louis Even wrote in 1960: “The obstacle is neither the financier, nor the politician, nor any avowed enemy. The obstacle lies in the passivity of too many Social Creditors’ who hope for the coming of the triumph of the Cause, but who leave it up to others to promote it.”

In short, it is our refusal to take on our responsibilities that delays the implementation of Social Credit, of an honest money system. “Much will be asked of the man to whom much has been given” (Luke 12:48). Examine your consciences, dear Social Creditors’; personal conversion, one more step, let us take on our responsibilities: the victory has never been so close! Our responsibility is to make Social Credit known to others, by having them subscribe to the “Michael” Journal, the only publication that makes this brilliant solution known.

Social Credit bill passed by
the US Congress in 1932

It is the education of the people that is necessary. Once the pressure from the public is strong enough, all the parties will agree with it. A fine example of this can be found in the Goldsborough bill of 1932, which was described by an author as a “Social Credit bill” and “the closest near-miss monetary reform for the establishment of a real sound money system in the United States”:

“An overwhelming majority of the U.S. Congress (289 to 60) favored it as early as 1932, and in one form or another it has persisted since. Only the futile hope that a confident new President (Roosevelt) could restore prosperity without abandoning the credit-money system America had inherited kept Social Credit from becoming the law of the land. By 1936, when the New Deal (Roosevelt’s solution) had proved incapable of dealing effectively with the Depression, the proponents of Social Credit were back again in strength. The last significant effort to gain its adoption came in 1938.” (W.E. Turner, Stable Money, p. 167.)

Even the dividend and the compensated discount, two essential parts of Social Credit, were mentioned in this bill, which was the “Goldsborough bill”, after the Democratic Representative of Maryland, T. Allan Goldsborough, who presented it in the House for the first time on May 2, 1932.

Two persons who supported the bill especially hold our attention: Robert L. Owen, Senator of Oklahoma from 1907 to 1925 (a national bank director for 46 years), and Charles G. Binderup, Representative of Nebraska. Owen published an article, in March of 1936, in J. J. Harpell’s publication, “The Instructor”, of which Louis Even was the assistant editor. As for Binderup, he gave several speeches on radio in the USA during the Depression, explaining the damaging effects of the control of credit by private interests.

4-9-2016 10-02-13 AM

Robert Owen testified in the House, April 28, 1936: “…the bill which he (Goldsborough) then presented, with the approval of the Committee on Banking and Currency of the House — and I believe it was practically a unanimous report. It was debated for two days in the House, a very simple bill, declaring it to be the policy of the United States to restore and maintain the value of money, and directing the Secretary of the Treasury, the officers of the Federal Reserve Board, and the Reserve banks to make effective that policy. That was all, but enough, and it passed, not by a partisan vote. There were 117 Republicans who voted for that bill (which was presented by a Democrat) and it passed by 289 to 60, and of the 60 who voted against it, only 12, by the will of the people, remain in the Congress.

“It was defeated by the Senate, because it was not really understood. There had not been sufficient discussion of it in public. There was not an organized public opinion in support of it.”

Once again, education is the main issue: Republicans and Democrats alike supported it, so there was no need for a third party or any sort of “Social Credit” party. Moreover, Owen admitted that the only thing that was lacking was the education of the population, a force among the people. That confirms the method used by the “Michael” Journal, advocated by Clifford Hugh Douglas and Louis Even.

The Goldsborough bill was titled: “A bill to restore to Congress its Constitutional power to issue money and regulate the value thereof, to provide monetary income to the people of the United States at a fixed and equitable purchasing power of the dollar, ample at all times to enable the people to buy wanted goods and services at full capacity of the industries and commercial facilities of the United States… The present system of issuing money through private initiative for profit, resulting in recurrent disastrous inflations and deflations, shall cease.”

The bill also made provision for a discount on prices to be compensated to the retailer, and for a national dividend to be issued, beginning at $5 a month (in 1932) to every citizen of the nation. Several groups testified in support of the bill, stressing the bill provided the means of controlling inflation.

Ignorance among the population

The most ardent opponent in the Senate was Carter Glass, a fierce partisan of the Federal Reserve (private control of money) and a former Secretary of the Treasury. Besides, Henry Morgenthau, then Roosevelt’s Secretary of Treasury, who was strongly opposed to any monetary reform, said that Roosevelt’s New Deal should be given a trial first.

What mostly helped the opponents to the bill was the near ignorance of the money question among the population… and even in the Senate.

Some Senators, knowing nothing about the creation of money (credit) by banks, exclaimed: “The Government cannot create money like that! That will cause runaway inflation!” And others, while admitting the necessity for debt-free money, questioned the necessity for a dividend, or the compensated discount. But all these objections actually disappear after a serious study of Social Credit.

Quotes on money

4-9-2016 10-01-41 AM

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws.” — Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founding father of international finance.

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” — US President James Madison.

“The money power denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.” — William Jennings Bryan.

“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.” — US President James A. Garfield.

4-9-2016 10-01-09 AM

“Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit, and with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from the bankers and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and to control credit.” — Sir Josiah Stamp, Director, Bank of England, 1940.

“The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled.” — John K. Galbraith, in “Money: Whence it came, where it went”, p. 29.

“The banks do create money. They have been doing it for a long time, but they didn’t quite realize it, and they did not admit it. Very few did. You will find it in all sorts of documents, financial textbooks, etc. But in the intervening years, and we must all be perfectly frank about these things, there has been a development of thought, until today I doubt very much whether you would get many prominent bankers to attempt to deny that banks create credit.” — H. W. White, Chairman of the Associated Banks of New Zealand, to the New Zealand Monetary Commission, 1955.

Thomas Edison and Henry Ford

Let us bring an end to this lesson with the quotations of two great American citizens.

4-9-2016 10-00-30 AM

Thomas Edison: “Throughout our history some of America’s greatest men have sought to break the Hamiltonian imprint (Alexander Hamilton’s debt-money policy) on our monetary policy in order to substitute a stable money supply measured to the nation’s physical requirements. Lack of public and official understanding, combined with the power of banking interests who have imagined a vested interest in the present chaotic system, have so far thwarted every effort.

“Don’t allow them to confuse you with the cry of `paper money.’ The danger of paper money is precisely the danger of gold — if you get too much it is no good. There is just one rule for money and that is to have enough to carry on all the legitimate trade that is waiting to move. Too little and too much are both bad. But enough to move trade, enough to prevent stagnation, on the one hand, not enough to permit speculation, on the other hand, is the proper ratio…

“If the United States will adopt this policy of increasing its national wealth without contributing to the interest collector — for the whole national debt is made up of interest charges — then you will see an era of progress and prosperity in this country such as could never have come otherwise.”

And a call from Henry Ford: “The youth who can resolve the money question will do more for the world than all the professional soldiers of history.”


I know for a fact that two things are impossible in a free society:





10 13 11 flagbar



Step by Step Emancipation



12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

By Judge Anna Von Reitz

People have been asking me— how do I correct this mess? Let’s look at what should have happened when you were born and what didn’t. Your name should have been recorded on the land jurisdiction of the state you were born in, NOT “registered” as a “vessel” NAME in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea. Your Trade Name should have been recorded in the County Land Recorder’s Office instead and you should have been listed as a State National belonging to— for example, the wisconsin state or the massachusetts commonwealth.

That is what SHOULD have happened, if the United States of America, Inc. run by the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury had been doing their jobs and if their named Successors to contract and Bankruptcy Trustees had been doing their jobs, either.

As it is, they self-interestedly were NOT doing their jobs. So now you have to take things in your own hands and make it perfectly clear to them and to their creditors and to the entire world exactly who and what you are, by going back and doing what should have been done from the outset:

Claim your name(s), record them with the Land Recorder’s Office, and at the same time, declare your political status and emancipation.

First Step:

Declaration of Political Status

To all whom it may concern, i, a living woman known as anna riezinger of big lake, alaska, of sound mind and body, a Caucasian of age, not indigent, not penniless, a landlord having been born on the portion of the North American Continent claimed by the united States of America and under their political dominion and more particularly on the land area recognized to be under the political dominion of the wisconsin state, and having been born politically free and politically independent, i claim to have been born one of the progeny of the People of the United States as they styled and established themselves in the Preamble of The Constitution for the united States of America and am one of the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States as defined in The Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, and am a beneficiary —not of any Public Charitable Trust— but of The United States Trust; i do freely and under penalty of perjury under the Common Law declare that i have never, ever, willingly, knowingly, and intentionally—having first been fully informed of the negative consequences—voluntarily subjected myself or my property to the authority of the British Crown nor any other artificial political or religious or commercial incorporation and i see no convincing evidence that i ever engaged in any process of naturalization as mandated by United States Statute-at-Large stipulated in the public record at SEVENTH CONGRESS, Session 1, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4, April 14, 1802, which would serve to make me or anyone in my family any form of United States Citizen however styled.

As a beneficiary of The United States Trust merely administered by The United States of America i am entitled and enabled to take against any codicil of the Will established by other beneficiaries and i here declare that i have taken against both the Constitution of the United States of America charter and its various By-Law Amendments made since 1868 and the New Deal announced by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1933.

If there should be any evidence to the contrary, let it here be established that any such evidence would only be in existence due to fraud and non-disclosure and adhesion and other improper, unlawful, and illegal contracting practices forbidden by the Common Law, the Law of Admiralty, and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, and all those United Nations Declarations and Treaties that the United States of America, Incorporated, has agreed to —resulting in press-ganging, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, and secretive change of political status resulting in theft from me, the Holder in Due of my paramount identity, and Breach of Trust owed to me. These criminal acts of non-disclosure and self-interested omission resulting in falsified evidence are not consensual, not to my advantage, and not of my intentional making. By many Maxims of Law all such evidences, claims, and contracts are void ab initio and those advancing such claims would be admitted criminals.

Any such documents that might be ascribed to me are lawfully authorized under the universal Law of Necessity as the fruit of the fraudulent practices and claims set forth in the paragraph above and such documents, if there be any, do not establish any valid contract or agreement rendering me subject to any foreign power nor serve to make me a debtor, voluntary conscript, or chattel acting as surety for any artificial en legis entity.

Be it also known that i am a peaceful and non-combatant woman and not an enemy of any state or people and i freely release and discharge all judges and justices from any obligation to impose statutory military law per Section 17 of the Trading With the Enemy Act as Amended by the Banking Emergency Act of 1934 in any case whatsoever brought before them and bearing my name in any style; and, i hereby record that i do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the past, do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the present, and do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the future: i do not consent once, i do not consent twice, i do not consent three times, but i do accept the oaths of all judges and justices to support and defend The Constitution, i do accept their obligation to operate in amity and friendship in perpetuity with respect to me and my person(s) and vessels in commerce guaranteed by The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783, The Treaty of Westminster 1794, and their obligation to perform with good faith under the Bar Association Treaty of 1947.

My principle of law is the American Common Law and my court is a court of record on the land of the united States of America and cannot be construed as the Common Law of Admiralty; i claim the Saving to Suitors Clause of the Northwest Ordinance in all matters and issues pertaining to me and my property.

My money is the United States Silver Dollar. All funds deposited, transferred, or disbursed from accounts associated with me or operated under my name are to be denominated as lawful money and all accounts may only be exercised as fiduciary operating accounts and not interpreted otherwise.

To the extent that others may have criminally misrepresented and mischaracterized me for the purpose of press-ganging me and plundering and pillaging my estate in my artificially contrived absence and caused there to be confusion and false claims regarding my identity, nature, activities and political status i here affirm that i have returned home with a clear conscience and uninterrupted loyalty to my country and there can be no truthful or competent evidence otherwise. As one of those protected by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the corporate charter known as the Constitution of the United States of America and Section 9 of the Trading With the Enemy Act Appendix, i accept the oath of the Alien Property Custodian and the United States Treasurer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America (Inc.) and their obligation to release and return my property free and clear of any damage resulting from their seizure of it, free of all debt, tithes, fees, encumbrances, liens, attachments, secondary titles and deeds held under color of law, involuntary and non-consensual capitulation of my name, forced use of private script in place of lawful money, appointments of usufructs and other impositions, confiscations, and false presumptions made against me and my private property.

It has never been my knowing and free and voluntary Will express or implied to provide any incorporated entity with the benefit of my body or estate — nor was it my free and willing and knowing act to ever subject my son eric belcher of big lake, alaska, to any such presumption. i never deserted my son from the moment of conception nor have i knowingly allowed him to be interpreted as an abandoned vessel subject to maritime salvage by any incorporated entity nor have i voluntarily appointed any such incorporated entity as his Trustee or usufruct at any time.

It has never been my knowing and free and voluntary Will express or implied to grant my power of attorney to any incorporated entity.

As the lawful copyright Holder in Due Course of the Trade Names Anna Riezinger and Anna Maria Riezinger and Anna M. Riezinger and as the creator and Holder of the copyrighted pen names Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz and all derivatives thereof, all autographs, signatures, trademarks, symbols, numbers and seals including all derivatives of any such symbolic representations of me, i consider use of these symbols by anyone pretending to act in my behalf without my explicit and knowing consent obtained under conditions of full disclosure a criminal trespass, infringement, and act of identity theft.

All such exercise of my imprimaturs without my free and knowing consent results in contracts violated by fraud and force. Should any evidences otherwise exist they can only exist as evidence of self-interested crime against me and my nature and estate and as evidence of similar intentional self-interested crime against my progeny as well.

i am set free to exercise my dominion over the jurisdictions of air, land, and sea and no one may otherwise address me or offer any contrary presumption from the beginning to this day and forever afterward: i was, i am, i will be a living heir to the covenant of faith and the covenant of love and i am a true woman of God.

As i am the only one having true and first-hand knowledge of my nature, my Will, my intentions, my knowledge at any given time, my actions, their meaning or anything else about me— every word that drops from my lips concerning me is a Matter of Fact and all else is hearsay.

In support of the above declarations made in truth and with good faith and standing this _______day of April 2016: ____________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. Witness in no way transfers the Issuer of this Declaration from his original jurisdiction on the land and creates no change in the origin of this Declaration.

Witness and Acknowledgement

In the Matanuska-Susitna County of the Alaska State:
Today, the ______day of April in the calendar year 2016 appeared before me, a commissioned Notary, the woman known to me as Anna Riezinger and she did autograph and seal this Declaration of Political Status as shown; _____________________________________Notary; my commission expires on:________________ and my seal is set hereon.


***** i accept the Witness and Acknowledgement of the Notary as an act of good faith service and friendship: _________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger, all rights reserved.*****

Second Step:

Grant and Deed of Trust

i, the living woman, anna of the Lawful House Riezinger, hereby declare that i am the Holder in Due Course of the Trade Names Anna Riezinger and Anna Maria Riezinger and Anna M. Riezinger which were bequeathed to me as gifts by my biological parents the day i was born on June 6th of the calendar year 1956.
i retain the copyright and control of these Trade Names and all associated derivative names, signs, seals, numbers and symbols however styled which in any way claim to represent me or which seem to represent me or my property interests. No use of them in association with me or my private property is allowed absent my explicit and knowing consent obtained under conditions of full disclosure.
i am also the Holder in Due Course of the seal and the trademark clearly imprinted and described below which i retain for my private and exclusive use without exception and these do provide additional proof upon my Will or any public acts that they are executed by me and with my approval

Thumbprint, right hand, seal

Trademark : red, white, and blue bars lower left to upper in red ink. right, three white Hawthorn blossoms in the blue bar.

I also created and retain copyright of the following pen names: Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz as of October 1, 1981.
These marks and symbols and Trade Names and pen names are property belonging to me as of June 6, 1956 or the date of their creation and i fully grant and deed them to together with any derivatives thereof to myself for my own use without exception.
In support of the above declarations made in truth and with good faith and standing this _______day of April 2016: ____________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. Witness in international jurisdiction in no way transfers the Issuer of this Grant and Deed of Trust from her original jurisdiction on the land and creates no change in the origin of this Grant and Deed of Trust.

Witness and Acknowledgement

In the Matanuska County of the Alaska State:
Today, the ______day of March in the calendar year 2016 appeared before me, a commissioned Notary, the woman known to me as Anna Riezinger and she did autograph and seal this Grant and Deed of Trust as shown; _____________________________________Notary; my commission expires on:________________ and my seal is set hereon.


***** i accept the Witness and Acknowledgement of the Notary as an act of good faith service and friendship: _________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.*****

Step 3:

Record of Name(s) Affidavit
In this case the name anna also called anna riezinger and anna maria riezinger refers to a living woman born the sixth of June in the calendar year 1956, a native to wisconsin and second daughter of lavera and emmett of the Lawful House Riezinger, biological heir and beneficiary of her parents, her land, her house, her names, all trademarks and symbols and accounts and earthly estate in sum total:
Anna Maria refers to a living woman born on the land of the county referred to as the magisterial judicial district of Clark County, a beneficiary of the Divine Estate, and the United States Trust, superior to and set apart from all commercial rules and entities.
Anna Maria Riezinger is a Trade Name belonging to the non-combatant living woman bequeathed to her on June 6, 1956 by her biological parents, mistakenly registered as a commercial vessel enfranchised by the State of Wisconsin which was itself a franchise of the bankrupt United States of America, Incorporated, that same year. This Trade Name should have been recorded as an unincorporated business operating on the land jurisdiction of the organic states instead of being registered as a foreign situs trust operating in the foreign jurisdiction of the sea—- a mistake and disservice for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and remedy.
ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER – a non-combatant commercial vessel structured as a Foreign Grantor Trust rightly belonging to the living beneficiary who is the same woman native to wisconsin but mistakenly created as a franchise of the UNITED STATES which acquired all franchises and property of the bankrupt United States of America, Incorporated, and which then acted as a usufruct to establish new franchises benefiting itself – a circumstance for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and cure as required by Article IV of the still potent Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666: “should the dead Man should he be found alive” all property held in his name must be returned to him free and clear of debts, liens, and other encumbrances established by presumed secondary beneficiaries. The establishment of this

ESTATE trust is again a mistake and disservice for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and cure.
ANNA M. RIEZINGER is a public transmitting utility which has been created by USA, INC. acting as an usufruct of yet another merely presumed secondary beneficiary of the living woman and her estate, a mistake and disservice for which she claims full correction and remedy.
Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz are both pen names created by the living woman called anna maria riezinger on or about October 1, 1981, to which she retains all lawful claim and copyright for her use from that day forward.

i, anna, the lawful Holder in Due Course and Entitlement Holder of all property bequeathed to me including my given names and names created by me, being of age and sound mind and body, not indigent, not penniless, not incompetent, and not at fault for the mismanagement and bad faith of those entrusted to care for my property, request immediate correction of the records and reconveyance of all property held or formerly held in my name(s) plus settlement of my accounts reflecting the fact that i am not a decedent, not unknown, and not a pauper.

i, anna, a true woman of God, have never knowingly, willingly, or voluntarily sought any benefit from nor accepted any office or role as an administrator or co-trustee or co-beneficiary of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) established for the benefit of displaced plantation slaves in the wake of the American Civil War, say that I am not a slave or former slave, not an indentured servant of any kind, not under any kind or condition of color, not a corporation, not an artificial person, not a taxpayer, not a United States citizen of any style or stripe, not now and not ever considering such citizenship a benefit, and not subject to the limitations of any civil rights conferred upon me, not seeking welfare, not employed by any franchise of any governmental services corporation, not seeking any corporate privilege, not stateless and not in need of any political asylum, not a member of any political party, religion, or cult, not an enemy toward any people or state.

As i, anna, a true woman of God, am the only one having any first-hand knowledge of my Will, my knowledge, my intentions, or my nature, every word that falls from my lips and every act that proceeds from my hand is a Matter of Fact and all else is hearsay.
So said and so done this ______day of April in the calendar year 2016: by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger:_______________________________________________all rights reserved.

Step 4:

Notice of Emancipation
In accordance with the Emancipation Proclamation issued by Executive Order of President Abraham Lincoln On January 1, 1863 and the still-standing order of Abraham Lincoln acting as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Army and Navy, all Federal Officers and Government Officials in every capacity and at every level are given Notice of the following:
1. “That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.” — President and Commander-in-Chief, Abraham Lincoln (boldface added).
2. That numerous persons named after states and people have been press-ganged, kidnapped, and enslaved for the profit of private, mostly foreign-owned corporations and that those persons have been deliberately manipulated by those responsible so as to bring false claims against the actual states of the union and the actual people of the United States;
3. That all these persons are considered slaves and treated as criminals by definition under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and that they do or have in the past included a foreign situs trust called Anna Maria Riezinger, a Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust called ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, and a public transmitting utility called ANNA M. RIEZINGER;
4. That all these similarly named corporate franchises have been created and operated without the knowing consent and agreement of the free-born living woman anna maria riezinger who was never told about this abuse of her given name this infringement upon her copyright and this disrespect of her position as Holder in Due Course and Entitlement Holder of her earthly estate and who is not at fault for the mismanagement of these corporate franchises;
5. That the living woman anna maria riezinger is not deceived and is owed her freedom and her estate free and clear of all false presumptions, claims, debts, deliberate confusions and acts of personage against her and against her private property including her inherited Trade Names: Anna Riezinger, Anna Maria Riezinger, and Anna M. Riezinger;
6. That the living woman anna maria riezinger relies upon the Emancipation Proclamation to secure the willing and ready assistance she requires of all federal officials and officers at every level including federal state and territory officials to honor and assist in emancipating –that is—liquidating all of the en legis slaves on paper that have been named after her and used as a means to control and defraud her of her natural estate.

Step 5:

Claim of Life Estate
This shows that the life estate of anna maria riezinger dba Anna Maria Riezinger is due and owing to the lawful heir and:
–that the beneficiary stands on the land jurisdiction of the United States;
–that the beneficiary is of age;
–that the beneficiary is not an infant nor a decedent nor a corporation;
–that the beneficiary grants her names and estates to herself:
__________________ anna
Prepared by: anna maria riezinger
for: Anna Maria Riezinger
c/o Post Office Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska RR 99652

[ With a great, big, fat adult footprint autographed: footprint of anna maria riezinger born on six June year of our Lord nineteen hundred fifty-six in neillsville, wisconsin, taken April second of two thousand sixteen in big lake, alaska]

anna maria riezinger, all rights reserved.

Seal the bottom right hand corner of all these documents with your thumbprint and file them with the nearest land recorder’s office and request to pay the nine dollar 1802 tax to reconvey your estate. Get at least three certified copies.

Record these documents along with the Authenticated Long Form Certificate of Live Birth that the State Secretary of State and US Secretary of State have signed as being authentic, and the other documents which Kurt Kallenbach has developed for these purposes.

Taken together these actions provide ironclad documentation that you are you and that you have claimed your estate.

Send a Certified Copy to the United States Treasurer Rosa Gumataotao Rios and a copy of the copy to the Secretary of the Treasury requesting correction of their records and release of your estate.

And if they don’t promptly do so, invoke the office of the United States Marshals acting as Federal Marshals to arrest them for violation of their international fiduciary trust obligations.

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

2-2-2016 1-52-27 PM

10 13 11 flagbar