ITS OFFICIAL The state legislature of Georgia Declares the Fraud of Congress – 1957


 Posted by arnierosner             


NO. 45 (Senate Resolution No. 39)

(A Joint Resolution)

A memorial to Congress of the United States of America urging them to enact such legislation as they may deem fit to declare that the 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were never validly adopted and that they are null and void and of no effect.

Whereas, the State of Georgia together with the ten other Southern States declared to have been lately in rebellion against the United States, following the termination of hostilities in 1865, met all the conditions laid down by the President of the United States, in exercise of his Constitutional powers to recognize the governments of states, domestic as well as foreign, for the resumption of practical relations with the government of the United States, as a State and States in proper Constitutional relation to the United States; and

Whereas, when duly elected Senators and Representatives appeared in the Capitol of the United States to take their seats at the time for the opening of the 39th Congress, and again at the time for the openings of the 40th and the 41st Congresses, hostile majorities in both Houses refused to admit them to their seats in manifest violation of Articles I and V of the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, the said Congresses, not being constituted of Senators and Representatives from each State as required by the Supreme Law of the Land, were not, in Constitutional contemplation, anything more than private assemblages unlawfully attempting to exercise the Legislative Power of the United States; and

Whereas, the so-called 39th Congress, which proposed to the Legislatures of several States an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, known as the 14th Amendment, and the so-called 40th Congress, which proposed an amendment known as the 15th Amendment, were without lawful power to propose any amendment whatsoever to the Constitution; and

Whereas, two-thirds of the Members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate, as they should have been constituted, failed to vote for the submission of these amendments; and

Whereas, all proceedings subsequently flowing from these invalid proposals, purporting to establish the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments as valid parts of the Constitution, were null and void and of no effect from the beginning; and

Whereas, furthermore, when these invalid proposals were rejected by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia and twelve other Southern States, as well as of sundry Northern States, the so-called 39th and 40th Congresses, in flagrant disregard of the United States Constitution, by the use of military force, dissolved the duly recognized State Governments in Georgia and nine of the other Southern States and set up military occupation or puppet State governments, which compliantly ratified the invalid proposals, thereby making (at the point of the bayonet) a mockery of Section 4, Article IV of the Constitution, guaranteeing protection to “each of them against invasion”; and

Whereas, further, the pretended ratification of the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments by Georgia and other States whose sovereign powers had been unlawfully seized by force of arms against the peace and dignity of the people of those States, were necessary to give color to the claim of the so-called 40th and 41st Congresses that these so-called amendments had been ratified by three-fourths of the States; and

Whereas, it is a well-established principle of law that the mere lapse of time does not confirm by common acquiescence an invalidly-enacted provision of law just as it does not repeal by general desuetude a provision validly enacted; and

Whereas, the continued recognition of the 14th and 15th Amendments as valid parts of the Constitution of the United States is incompatible with the present day position of the United States as the World’s champion of Constitutional governments resting upon the consent of the people given through their lawful representatives;

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia:

The Congress of the United States is hereby memorialized and respectfully urged to declare that the exclusions of the of the Southern Senators and Representatives from the 39th, 40th and 41st Congresses were malignant acts of arbitrary power and rendered those Congresses invalidly constituted; that the forms of law with which those invalid Congresses attempted to clothe the submission of the 14th and 15th Amendments and to clothe the subsequent acts to compel unwilling States to ratify these invalidly proposed amendments, imparted no validity to these acts and amendments; and that the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are null and void and of no effect.

Be it further resolved that copies of this memorial be transmitted forthwith by the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate of the State of Georgia to the President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the United States, the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives of Congress of the United States, and the Senators and Representatives in Congress from the State of Georgia.

Approved March 8, 1957


Go to for the PDF file

10 13 11 flagbar

State-Wrecked: The Corruption of Capitalism in America


7-28-2014 2-50-04 PM



The Dow Jones and Standard & Poor’s 500 indexes reached record highs on Thursday, having completely erased the losses since the stock market’s last peak, in 2007. But instead of cheering, we should be very afraid.


Indebtedness Dwarfs the Economy

MULTIMEDIA FEATURE: A Gallery of Economic Villains and Heroes

A gallery of “heroes” who championed sound money and fiscal rectitude and “villains” who led the United States down the path of insolvency.

Over the last 13 years, the stock market has twice crashed and touched off a recession: American households lost $5 trillion in the 2000 dot-com bust and more than $7 trillion in the 2007 housing crash. Sooner or later — within a few years, I predict — this latest Wall Street bubble, inflated by an egregious flood of phony money from the Federal Reserve rather than real economic gains, will explode, too.

Since the S.&P. 500 first reached its current level, in March 2000, the mad money printers at the Federal Reserve have expanded their balance sheet sixfold (to $3.2 trillion from $500 billion). Yet during that stretch, economic output has grown by an average of 1.7 percent a year (the slowest since the Civil War); real business investment has crawled forward at only 0.8 percent per year; and the payroll job count has crept up at a negligible 0.1 percent annually. Real median family income growth has dropped 8 percent, and the number of full-time middle class jobs, 6 percent. The real net worth of the “bottom” 90 percent has dropped by one-fourth. The number of food stamp and disability aid recipients has more than doubled, to 59 million, about one in five Americans.

So the Main Street economy is failing while Washington is piling a soaring debt burden on our descendants, unable to rein in either the warfare state or the welfare state or raise the taxes needed to pay the nation’s bills. By default, the Fed has resorted to a radical, uncharted spree of money printing. But the flood of liquidity, instead of spurring banks to lend and corporations to spend, has stayed trapped in the canyons of Wall Street, where it is inflating yet another unsustainable bubble.

When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008. Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.

THIS dyspeptic prospect results from the fact that we are now state-wrecked. With only brief interruptions, we’ve had eight decades of increasingly frenetic fiscal and monetary policy activism intended to counter the cyclical bumps and grinds of the free market and its purported tendency to under produce jobs and economic output. The toll has been heavy.

As the federal government and its central-bank sidekick, the Fed, have groped for one goal after another — smoothing out the business cycle, minimizing inflation and unemployment at the same time, rolling out a giant social insurance blanket, promoting homeownership, subsidizing medical care, propping up old industries (agriculture, automobiles) and fostering new ones (“clean” energy, biotechnology) and, above all, bailing out Wall Street — they have now succumbed to overload, overreach and outside capture by powerful interests. The modern Keynesian state is broke, paralyzed and mired in empty ritual incantations about stimulating “demand,” even as it fosters a mutant crony capitalism that periodically lavishes the top 1 percent with speculative windfalls.

The culprits are bipartisan, though you’d never guess that from the blather that passes for political discourse these days. The state-wreck originated in 1933, when Franklin D. Roosevelt opted for fiat money (currency not fundamentally backed by gold), economic nationalism and capitalist cartels in agriculture and industry.

Under the exigencies of World War II (which did far more to end the Depression than the New Deal did), the state got hugely bloated, but remarkably, the bloat was put into brief remission during a midcentury golden era of sound money and fiscal rectitude with Dwight D. Eisenhower in the White House and William McChesney Martin Jr. at the Fed.

Then came Lyndon B. Johnson’s “guns and butter” excesses, which were intensified over one perfidious weekend at Camp David, Md., in 1971, when Richard M. Nixon essentially defaulted on the nation’s debt obligations by finally ending the convertibility of gold to the dollar. That one act — arguably a sin graver than Watergate — meant the end of national financial discipline and the start of a four-decade spree during which we have lived high on the hog, running a cumulative $8 trillion current-account deficit. In effect, America underwent an internal leveraged buyout, raising our ratio of total debt (public and private) to economic output to about 3.6 from its historic level of about 1.6. Hence the $30 trillion in excess debt (more than half the total debt, $56 trillion) that hangs over the American economy today.

This explosion of borrowing was the stepchild of the floating-money contraption deposited in the Nixon White House by Milton Friedman, the supposed hero of free-market economics who in fact sowed the seed for a never-ending expansion of the money supply. The Fed, which celebrates its centenary this year, fueled a roaring inflation in goods and commodities during the 1970s that was brought under control only by the iron resolve of Paul A. Volcker, its chairman from 1979 to 1987.

Under his successor, the lapsed hero Alan Greenspan, the Fed dropped Friedman’s penurious rules for monetary expansion, keeping interest rates too low for too long and flooding Wall Street with freshly minted cash. What became known as the “Greenspan put” — the implicit assumption that the Fed would step in if asset prices dropped, as they did after the 1987 stock-market crash — was reinforced by the Fed’s unforgivable 1998 bailout of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management.

That Mr. Greenspan’s loose monetary policies didn’t set off inflation was only because domestic prices for goods and labor were crushed by the huge flow of imports from the factories of Asia. By offshoring America’s tradable-goods sector, the Fed kept the Consumer Price Index contained, but also permitted the excess liquidity to foster a roaring inflation in financial assets. Mr. Greenspan’s pandering incited the greatest equity boom in history, with the stock market rising fivefold between the 1987 crash and the 2000 dot-com bust.

Soon Americans stopped saving and consumed everything they earned and all they could borrow. The Asians, burned by their own 1997 financial crisis, were happy to oblige us. They — China and Japan above all — accumulated huge dollar reserves, transforming their central banks into a string of monetary roach motels where sovereign debt goes in but never comes out. We’ve been living on borrowed time — and spending Asians’ borrowed dimes.

This dynamic reinforced the Reaganite shibboleth that “deficits don’t matter” and the fact that nearly $5 trillion of the nation’s $12 trillion in “publicly held” debt is actually sequestered in the vaults of central banks. The destruction of fiscal rectitude under Ronald Reagan — one reason I resigned as his budget chief in 1985 — was the greatest of his many dramatic acts. It created a template for the Republicans’ utter abandonment of the balanced-budget policies of Calvin Coolidge and allowed George W. Bush to dive into the deep end, bankrupting the nation through two misbegotten and unfinanced wars, a giant expansion of Medicare and a tax-cutting spree for the wealthy that turned K Street lobbyists into the de facto office of national tax policy. In effect, the G.O.P. embraced Keynesianism — for the wealthy.

The explosion of the housing market, abetted by phony credit ratings, securitization shenanigans and willful malpractice by mortgage lenders, originators and brokers, has been well documented. Less known is the balance-sheet explosion among the top 10 Wall Street banks during the eight years ending in 2008. Though their tiny sliver of equity capital hardly grew, their dependence on unstable “hot money” soared as the regulatory harness the Glass-Steagall Act had wisely imposed during the Depression was totally dismantled.

Within weeks of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September 2008, Washington, with Wall Street’s gun to its head, propped up the remnants of this financial mess in a panic-stricken melee of bailouts and money-printing that is the single most shameful chapter in American financial history.

There was never a remote threat of a Great Depression 2.0 or of a financial nuclear winter, contrary to the dire warnings of Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed chairman since 2006. The Great Fear — manifested by the stock market plunge when the House voted down the TARP bailout before caving and passing it — was purely another Wall Street concoction. Had President Bush and his Goldman Sachs adviser (a k a Treasury Secretary) Henry M. Paulson Jr. stood firm, the crisis would have burned out on its own and meted out to speculators the losses they so richly deserved. The Main Street banking system was never in serious jeopardy, ATMs were not going dark and the money market industry was not imploding.


Instead, the White House, Congress and the Fed, under Mr. Bush and then President Obama, made a series of desperate, reckless maneuvers that were not only unnecessary but ruinous. The auto bailouts, for example, simply shifted jobs around — particularly to the aging, electorally vital Rust Belt — rather than saving them. The “green energy” component of Mr. Obama’s stimulus was mainly a nearly $1 billion giveaway to crony capitalists, like the venture capitalist John Doerr and the self-proclaimed outer-space visionary Elon Musk, to make new toys for the affluent.

Less than 5 percent of the $800 billion Obama stimulus went to the truly needy for food stamps, earned-income tax credits and other forms of poverty relief. The preponderant share ended up in money dumps to state and local governments, pork-barrel infrastructure projects, business tax loopholes and indiscriminate middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic Keynesians, as intellectually bankrupt as their Republican counterparts (though less hypocritical), had no solution beyond handing out borrowed money to consumers, hoping they would buy a lawn mower, a flat-screen TV or, at least, dinner at Red Lobster.

But even Mr. Obama’s hopelessly glib policies could not match the audacity of the Fed, which dropped interest rates to zero and then digitally printed new money at the astounding rate of $600 million per hour. Fast-money speculators have been “purchasing” giant piles of Treasury debt and mortgage-backed securities, almost entirely by using short-term overnight money borrowed at essentially zero cost, thanks to the Fed. Uncle Ben has lined their pockets.

If and when the Fed — which now promises to get unemployment below 6.5 percent as long as inflation doesn’t exceed 2.5 percent — even hints at shrinking its balance sheet, it will elicit a tidal wave of sell orders, because even a modest drop in bond prices would destroy the arbitrageurs’ profits. Notwithstanding Mr. Bernanke’s assurances about eventually, gradually making a smooth exit, the Fed is domiciled in a monetary prison of its own making.

While the Fed fiddles, Congress burns. Self-titled fiscal hawks like Paul D. Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, are terrified of telling the truth: that the 10-year deficit is actually $15 trillion to $20 trillion, far larger than the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of $7 trillion. Its latest forecast, which imagines 16.4 million new jobs in the next decade, compared with only 2.5 million in the last 10 years, is only one of the more extreme examples of Washington’s delusions.

Even a supposedly “bold” measure — linking the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security payments to a different kind of inflation index — would save just $200 billion over a decade, amounting to hardly 1 percent of the problem. Mr. Ryan’s latest budget shamelessly gives Social Security and Medicare a 10-year pass, notwithstanding that a fair portion of their nearly $19 trillion cost over that decade would go to the affluent elderly. At the same time, his proposal for draconian 30 percent cuts over a decade on the $7 trillion safety net — Medicaid, food stamps and the earned-income tax credit — is another front in the G.O.P.’s war against the 99 percent.

Without any changes, over the next decade or so, the gross federal debt, now nearly $17 trillion, will hurtle toward $30 trillion and soar to 150 percent of gross domestic product from around 105 percent today. Since our constitutional stasis rules out any prospect of a “grand bargain,” the nation’s fiscal collapse will play out incrementally, like a Greek/Cypriot tragedy, in carefully choreographed crises over debt ceilings, continuing resolutions and temporary budgetary patches.

The future is bleak. The greatest construction boom in recorded history — China’s money dump on infrastructure over the last 15 years — is slowing. Brazil, India, Russia, Turkey, South Africa and all the other growing middle-income nations cannot make up for the shortfall in demand. The American machinery of monetary and fiscal stimulus has reached its limits. Japan is sinking into old-age bankruptcy and Europe into welfare-state senescence. The new rulers enthroned in Beijing last year know that after two decades of wild lending, speculation and building, even they will face a day of reckoning, too.

THE state-wreck ahead is a far cry from the “Great Moderation” proclaimed in 2004 by Mr. Bernanke, who predicted that prosperity would be everlasting because the Fed had tamed the business cycle and, as late as March 2007, testified that the impact of the subprime meltdown “seems likely to be contained.” Instead of moderation, what’s at hand is a Great Deformation, arising from a rogue central bank that has abetted the Wall Street casino, crucified savers on a cross of zero interest rates and fueled a global commodity bubble that erodes Main Street living standards through rising food and energy prices — a form of inflation that the Fed fecklessly disregards in calculating inflation.

These policies have brought America to an end-stage metastasis. The way out would be so radical it can’t happen. It would necessitate a sweeping divorce of the state and the market economy. It would require a renunciation of crony capitalism and its first cousin: Keynesian economics in all its forms. The state would need to get out of the business of imperial hubris, economic uplift and social insurance and shift its focus to managing and financing an effective, affordable, means-tested safety net.

All this would require drastic deflation of the realm of politics and the abolition of incumbency itself, because the machinery of the state and the machinery of re-election have become conterminous. Prying them apart would entail sweeping constitutional surgery: amendments to give the president and members of Congress a single six-year term, with no re-election; providing 100 percent public financing for candidates; strictly limiting the duration of campaigns (say, to eight weeks); and prohibiting, for life, lobbying by anyone who has been on a legislative or executive payroll. It would also require overturning Citizens United and mandating that Congress pass a balanced budget, or face an automatic sequester of spending.

It would also require purging the corrosive financialization that has turned the economy into a giant casino since the 1970s. This would mean putting the great Wall Street banks out in the cold to compete as at-risk free enterprises, without access to cheap Fed loans or deposit insurance. Banks would be able to take deposits and make commercial loans, but be banned from trading, underwriting and money management in all its forms.

It would require, finally, benching the Fed’s central planners, and restoring the central bank’s original mission: to provide liquidity in times of crisis but never to buy government debt or try to micromanage the economy. Getting the Fed out of the financial markets is the only way to put free markets and genuine wealth creation back into capitalism.

That, of course, will never happen because there are trillions of dollars of assets,    from Shanghai skyscrapers to Fortune 1000 stocks to the latest housing market “recovery,” artificially propped up by the Fed’s interest-rate repression. The United States is broke — fiscally, morally, intellectually — and the Fed has incited a global currency war (Japan just signed up, the Brazilians and Chinese are angry, and the German-dominated euro zone is crumbling) that will soon overwhelm it. When the latest bubble pops, there will be nothing to stop the collapse. If this sounds like advice to get out of the markets and hide out in cash, it is.


David A. Stockman is a former Republican congressman from Michigan, President Ronald Reagan’s budget director from 1981 to 1985 and the author, most recently, of “The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America.”

10 13 11 flagbar

U. S. CORPORATION Silently Positions for Martial Law as Financial Collapse Arrives in America


By Susanne Posel

The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades now. According to Peter Santilli, an informant who is an ex-marine and worked on portions of the contingency plans known as Rex 84, civil unrest will come after a financial collapse.

The Readiness Exercise 1984, a.k.a. Rex 84, outlines continuity of government wherein the US Constitution is suspended, martial law is declared and the US military command take over state and local governments in order to ensure stabilization of our nation at any cost. Any American who is deemed a “national security threat” would be detained in an interment or FEMA camp.

The author of Rex 84 was Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, National Security Council (NSC) White House aids and NSC liaison to FEMA.

Rex 84 is the plan; the triggers are a series of executive orders . It is the continuity of government under specific contingency strategies that are laid out in various operations guide manuals. Operation Garden Plot is a subprogram of Rex 84.

Twice before, Rex 84 was implemented — during the LA riots and on 9/11. In these scenarios, only small portions of the entire set of documents were used. Within the series of contingency plans, implementation of them depends on the severity of the situation.

Some of the plans include internment camps where all or portions of the active or inactive military bases would be transformed into work camps where all considered to be dissonant would be held. The NORTHCOM army manuals clearly state that NATO forces will be used in every phase of the operation.

According to Santilli, procedures to move conventional, chemical and nuclear bombs across the nation without detection have been facilitated without notice by the US military.

Back in 1986, during his military service where he was involved with weapons transportation, Santilli describes how an unmarked refrigerated trailer driven by a civilian driver was used to transport chemical or conventional weapons to various strategic bases both above and underground.

Santilli was a specialist in aviation deployed weapons, which made him the perfect candidate to the assignment of weapons transportation.

The refrigerated truck, allocated by the administration department on base, was directed to the commissary, where the unsuspecting driver believed that he was transporting food. The weapon was placed at the head of the trailer, and covered up with either food stores (like cans of soup) or body bags. In the event that the truck is stopped en route, the weapon would be well hidden and go undetected by inspectors on the public highways.

A US Marine Corp bill of lading was the paperwork necessary to move the commercial refrigerated truck through weigh stations on public highways without any question. Santilli remembers that there was not one incident where he had to enact any security measures to ensure the delivery was made.

Santilli, who was assigned to ride in the cab of the truck with the driver, says that his orders were to make sure the truck arrived at its destination. He was informed by his superiors that if there were problems concerning potential civil unrest, he was to radio into his superiors for aid by either air or ground support.

Should the situation warrant serious attention; crowd control methods would be implemented.

One possible scenario was the use of cluster bomb units (CBUs) that will emit upon detonation, a “sleep and kill” chemical weapon that will not disturb infrastructure, but is lethal to all living things within the effected zone. Santilli describes these particular 3 unit CBUs as shaped like water-heaters with a coned top and plunger-like device. Once deployed in the air, a parachute assists these CBUs to the targeted area. And when detonated, a deadly chemical gas will kill every human and animal in the specified cordoned area.

This is just one example, says Santilli, as to the lengths the US armed forces are trained to make sure continuity of government is preserved.

Santilli explained that the use of foreign troops on US soil, as described in Rex 84 and other subsequent manuals, would have a two-fold purpose.
Firstly, to provide extra security in designated areas, cities or highways; and secondly, as scapegoats were violent action used against American citizens should the US military be directed to attack civilians.

The refrigerated truck, carrying the chemical or conventional weapon with Santilli riding shotgun travelled to underground bases like the one at Yuma Proving Ground which is a ammunitions testing range for pilots. Nestled underneath the ground is a secret military base.

Santilli explains that his knowledge of Rex 84 provides that within the document, one of the scenarios that would cause a complete suspension of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights and implement martial law would be a financial collapse. He says once the collapse occurs, the US government and defense agencies estimate they have a 72 hour window to activate all procedures to ensure continuity of government as well as a lockdown of the general population as civilian unrest, riots and outbreaks of violence are anticipated.

A source in the Deutsche Bank claims that in 2008 our financial and monetary system completely collapsed and since that time the banking cartels have been “propping up the system” to make it appear as if everything was fine. In reality our stock market and monetary systems are fake; meaning that there is nothing holding them in place except the illusion that they have stabilized since the Stock Market Crash nearly 5 years ago.

Since this time, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in conjunction with FEMA and other federal agencies have been quickly working to set in place their directives of control under a silent martial law.

The Deutsche Bank informant says that the cause for the bailout of the banks was a large sum of cash needed quickly to repay China who had purchased large quantities of mortgage-backed securities that went belly-up when the global scam was realized. When China realized that they had been duped into buying worthless securitized loans which would never be repaid, they demanded the actual property instead. The Chinese were prepared to send their “people” to American shores to seize property as allocated to them through the securitized loan contracts.

To stave this off, the American taxpayers were coerced by former President Bush and former US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. During that incident, the US Senate was told emphatically that they had to approve a $700 million bailout or else martial law would be implemented immediately. That money was funneled through the Federal Reserve Bank and wired to China, as well as other countries that were demanding repayment for the fraudulent securitizations.

To further avert financial catastrophe, as well as more debt or property seizure threats by the Chinese, the Euro was imploded there by plunging most of the European countries into an insurmountable free-fall for which they were never intended to recover.

All the money that those banks claimed they needed to avert collapse was also sent to the Chinese to add to the trillions of dollars lost during the burst of the housing bubble on the global market.

The only saving grace has been the US dollar being the global reserve currency. However, now this prop is showing signs of wear as foreign nations like China, Russia, India and Iran are dealing in gold as currency and purchasing gold on the market at an exponential rate.

In 1970, Henry Kissinger made a deal with the Saudi Arabian government that American debt would be purchased in exchange for cheap oil. Since then Iran has taken control over theOrganization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) by their use of gold as currency which has threatened the direct value of the US dollar as the global reserve currency.

This scenario with Iran coupled with the massive leaps forward in US military presence on American streets and the emergence of FEMA camps across the nation pose an obvious turn of events and explains exactly why we are witnessing the silent implementation of martial law.

The war with Iran has to do with gold, its use as currency and its exposure of the central banking cartel’s lack of gold which defines a fiat currency’s worth. And right now, the US dollar is absolutely worthless.

The Deutsche Bank informant says that the financial collapse that happened in 2008 will be realized here in America very soon. Once that happens, there must be full implementation of marital law to control the potential riots and control over citizens that will be desperate to feed their families.

The attacks of recent on the 2nd Amendment play a significant role in attempting “amicably” to remove the possibility of civilian retaliation against the US military’s presence throughout the nation. However, if they cannot remove the guns from our hands in time, they will continue on with the guidelines set out in Rex 84 with directives to kill any dissenters that refuse to obey. Go to your local law library and look up in its entirety the Federal Emergency Management under Executive Orders 12148 dated July 20,1979.

Susanne Posel is Chief Editor/administrator for Occupy Corporatism. She also writes for Global Reasearch, Activist Post & has appeared on syndicated radio programs such as: BBC World & others.

 Rex 84

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a classified “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers o…

Show More More at Wikipedia

Related Topics

NSPD-51 – The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, created and signed by United States President George W. Bush on May 4, 2007, is a Presidential Directive which claims power to execute procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a “catastrophic emergency”.

COINTELPRO – COINTELPRO was a series of covert, and at times illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.

Non-Detention Act – The Non-Detention Act of 1971 was passed to repeal portions of McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, specifically Title II, the “Emergency Detention Act”. It had allowed for detention of suspected subversives without the normal Constitutional checks required for imprisonment.

Posse Comitatus Act – The Posse Comitatus Act is the United States federal law that was passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction and was updated in 1981. Its intent was to limit the powers of Federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce the state laws.

Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 – The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 was a bill sponsored by Rep. Jane Harman in the 110th United States Congress.

Terrorist Screening Database – The Terrorist Screening Database or TSDB is the central terrorist watchlist consolidated by the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center and used by multiple agencies to compile their specific watchlists and for screening.

Civil detention in the United States

Continuity of government in the United States

Riots and civil disorder in the United States

In partnership with

Rex 84 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a classified “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of …

  2. s. Concentration Camps: Fema and The Rex 84 Program

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to …

  1. com/hardtruth/con_camps_fema.htm

FEMA Camps and REX 84 ( Orders and Locations by State)

A complete list of the orders for Rex 84 and Fema Camps. This Natural Solutions Report gives the orders for Civilian Concentration Camps and the locations by stste for the enslavement of the citizen’s.

  1. com/doc/4311840/FEMA-Camps-and-REX-84-Orders-and-Locations-by-State

REX 84, FEMA Coffins, and Fusion Centers : …

REX 84, FEMA coffins, and fusion centers are realities. These are all part of what could be elements of a soon-to-be government takeover of the country, aka martial law.

  1. com/articles/rex-84-fema-coffins-and-fusion-centers/

Article: Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial …

Article: Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as Financial Collapse Arrives in America – Americans have more & more reason to distrust a Congress which is becoming increasingly malevolent & increasingy hostile to the best interests of the country.

  1. com/articles/Rex-84-Government-Silentl-by-Susanne-Posel-120805-781.html

What is the “Rex 84” program?? – Yahoo

The Rex 84 program is the big reason out of many reasons our Founding Fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment. As long as the people remain armed and as long as the majority of the military is loyal to the Constitution it can never be implemented. … Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise …


» Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You Alex Jones …

Enter Rex 84. This is what the United States government has in place to enact martial law and use Internment Specialists to relocate those who do not comply. According to Wikipedia, Rex 84 (Readiness Exercise 1984) …

  1. com/rex-84-%E2%80%93-your-internment-camp-awaits-you/

Rex 84 – Readiness Exercise 1984 – Plan For Martial Law

Rex 84 Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, is a plan by the United States federal government to test their ability to detain large numbers of refugees or American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency.

  1. com/presentation/news/political_news/rex84_rediness_exercise_1984.htm

The Rex 84 Program – The Moon Pages: Facts Are The Only Truth

The Rex 84 Program . Established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers

  1. com/images/Rex84.pdf

Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as …

by Susanne Posel Global Research August 2, 2012 The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades no…

  1. org/?p=34654

REX 84 | Readiness Exercise 1984 | REX84 –

Rex84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, is a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution in case of National Emergency.

  1. com/rex-84.html

US Concentration Camps FEMA & REX 84 Programs | Alternative

(Before It’s News) There over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty.

  1. com/alternative/2013/06/us-concentration-camps-fema-rex-84-programs-2687970.html

The Rex 84 Program | Obama Traitor to the constitution …

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a mass exodus of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention lefts by FEMA.

  1. com/fear-fema/the-rex-84-program/

Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You …

18 Responses to “Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You” gary Says: August 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 pm. Not mentioned is the parasite power grid currently under construction which shows inclusion ( stimulus funded and mandated)smart grid- GWEN towers- multiple radiofrequency emitting devices …

  1. net/2009/08/20/rex-84-your-internment-camp-awaits-you/

Supreme Court Justice Predicts Return of Internment Camps …

REX-84 is not some conspiracy theory. It is now a part of American history. It is proof that our federal government was discussing contingencies for “FEMA Camps” long before most conspiracy theorists knew what a FEMA camp was.

  1. com/2014/02/scalias-prediction-internment-camps-spark-memories-rex-84-suspension-us-constitution/

REX 84 | Flickr – Photo Sharing!

12 months ago, “Amosunknown” commented under that same image, at another section of this website: Amosunknown wrote: “I just did some research on these facilities.

  1. com/photos/iceblink240/471808297/

Antique REX 84-A cast iron wood burning footed stove /laundry …

Rex 84-A cast iron wood burning footed stove/laundry heater dated around the 1920’s. Unit has a fluted tapered belly, square cast iron legs, an air regulator dampener at the top front to adjust flame and another on the door at the base to insert wood or coal and remove ash.

  1. com/index.cfm?fa=Main.Item&itemid=229&acctid=369

Rex – 84 – SourceWatch

Rex-84 was Oliver North’s 1984 “controversial” “‘readiness exercise’ [that] called for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up and detain 400,000 imaginary ‘refugees,’ in the context of ‘uncontrolled population movements’ over the Mexican border into the United States.

  1. org/index.php?title=Rex-84

Talk:Rex 84 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moved from Main Article Page . This sounds like an urban legend, especially with the use of the orwellian ‘1984’ figure. The link below doesn’t seem authoritative.


Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as …

The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades now. According to Peter Santilli, an informant who is an ex-marine and worked on portions of the contingency plans known as Rex 84, civil unrest will come after a financial collapse …

  1. ca/rex-84-government-silently-positions-for-martial-law-as-financial-collapse-arrives-in-america/32153

Activist Post: REX 84 vs. Globalist Shutdown

Readiness Exercise 1984 (REX-84) is an emergency response program involving the implementation of martial law, the relocation of civilian populations, and the arrest and detainment of segments of the population.

  1. com/2011/10/rex-84-vs-globalist-shutdown.html

Rex 84 FEMA Camps | Continuity of Government – YouTube

F.E.M.A. (Federal Emergency Management Agency) is a cover for a secret “continuity of government” plan in case the American people ever rebelled, that was exposed publicly by Congressman Jack Brooks. It is designed to give all control of government and states over to the president and …

  1. com/watch?v=JfzE_TK-zmQ

Garden Plot & Rex 84 – Constitution Society

Garden Plot & Rex 84. Operation Garden Plot is a general U.S. Army and National Guard plan to respond to major domestic civil disturbances within the United States.

  1. org/abus/garden_plot/garden_plot.htm

Martial Law Watch 2011: Rex 84 / Fusion Centers

Rex84 in short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States, for internment of dissidents and others potentially harmful to the state.


Rex 84 – The Government Concentration Plan for Blacks Revealed

[ Posted On: 2008-09-15 ] Post a Comment (Taylor Media Services) Is it just an urban myth or does America actually have a contingency plan to put millions of African Americans in detention centers in the event of a crisis or widespread social unrest?

  1. com/article-dashboard/Article/Rex-84—The-Government-Concentration-Plan-for-Blacks-Revealed/124484

Rex 84 | Facebook

Rex 84. 73 likes. If you want to contact me regarding this project send me a message at

  1. com/rex84music

Rex 84

Rex 84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987, and subsequently reported on by the “Miami Herald” on July 5, 1987.


REX 84: FEMA Camps and the Threat of Martial Law Didn’t Start With Obama…

Rex 84 was short for “Readiness Exercise 1984.” Allow me to digress for just a minute, because I happened to have two years of Latin in high school.

  1. com/2013/02/06/rex-84-fema-camps-and-the-threat-of-martial-law-didnt-start-with-obama/

The REX 84′ and FEMA

ôquiet coup dÆetat that will end up making the Soviet Union look mild and permissive by comparison,ö they said. A major White House directive, known as Presidential Review Memorandum 32 (PRM 32)…

  1. net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_FEMA11.htm

Richard J Piedra’s Portfolio


  1. tv

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals…

For ENDGAME’s goal of a capacious detention capability is remarkably similar to Oliver North’s controversial Rex-84 “readiness exercise” for COG in 1984.

  1. com/articles/march2006/010306_b_camps.htm

Rex 84 | MetaFilter

Rex 84 September 11, 2005 3:45 AM Subscribe. Back in April monju_bosatsu posted something on FEMA and the REX 84 Program and Concentration Camps in the U.S. So Katrina hits…

  1. com/45016/Rex-84

REX-84 Truth Seekers Blog | Alternative U.S. & Global News

Posted in General News on January 11, 2010 by rex84truthseekers. This message has been sent using the picture and Video service from Verizon Wireless!


American concentration camps

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


Illegal aliens dumped at Tuscon bus station prompts fears of REX 84 activation…

The plan is called REX 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States…

  1. com/illegal-aliens-dumped-tuscon-bus-station-prompts-fears-rex-84-activation-video/

US Concentration Camps

The fate of Rex 84 has never been definitively explained. Rex84 American Concentration Camps. US FEMA Camps by Geopolitical Monitor.

  1. to/b/concentration.html

Rex 84 – Factbites

The Rex 84 Program Knowledge Encompassing The Rex 84 Program We Acuired This All (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08).

  1. com/topics/Rex-84

Rex 84 – “We Are Beyond Your Control” B.H.J. Records – Video Dailymotion

http://www.BlankTV.comRex 84 – “We Are Beyond Your Control” – Like this video? Come see thousands more at the Net’s largest, uncensored, completely d.i.y. music video site,!

  1. com/video/xyfbhw_rex-84-we-are-beyond-your-control-b-h-j-records_music

Rex 84

Rex-84 fue mencionado en las audiciones Iran-Contra en 1987 y subsecuentemente reportados por el Miami Herald el 5 de julio de 1987.

  1. com/dic.nsf/eswiki/1007597

FEMA and REX 84

REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, D.C. Even…

  1. com/showthread.php?t=92112

Paying the Price for Katrina and America’s Shadow Government (REX 84)…

Rex-84 was essentially a secret training operation jointly run by FEMA and the Department of Defense to train 34 federal agencies on how to deal with domestic civil unrest.

  1. com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104×4671967

Rummaging in the Governments attic:

Rex 84.

  1. org

REX 84: Ronald Reagan’s plan to declare martial law and imprison Americans…

It was called REX 84 or the Readiness Exercise 1984, and was set up for a classified “scenario and drill” so the federal government could suspend the United States Constitution while declaring martial law and…

  1. com/article/rex-84-ronald-reagan-s-plan-to-declare-martial-law-and-imprison-americans

Rex 84 Music Videos – Musictonic

Rex84 – Undercover At Sally T’s 12-22-03. Illuminati Freestyle Rex84 Project Natal 666 S… Are You Ready For A Third World War.

  1. com/music/Rex+84

  1. rex_84.

move, you are under control

rex 84.

  1. be

Black Lung – Rex 84 | Free Mp3 Download

On this page you can download “Black Lung – Rex 84” mp3 free. For playing “Black Lung – Rex 84” online click on play button on the mp3 player.

  1. mobi/rex-84-mp3-black-lung

Concentration camps in the u.s.?

Four of the principle civilian concentration camps established under the REX-84 program are located at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas; Ft.

  1. com/concentration.htm

Best of Wikipedia – Rex 84

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a “scenario and drill”, developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law…

  2. S. Concentration Camps, page 1


  1. com/forum/thread59023/pg1


U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS, FEMA and the REX 84 PROGRAM. This is NOT fiction or conspiracist nonsense – this is real.

  1. com/camps.htm


List Of Rex 84 Camps (American Concentration Camps).

  1. com

The Rex 84 Program – PDF documents

The rex 84 program. established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the mexican/us border, they would be quickly rounded up and…

Martial Law – Rex 84

Rex 84 / FEMA’s blueprint for martial law. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

  1. com/911/Articles/1/martial_law__rex_84.htm

Rex 84

Find rex 84 on » rex does best. Hot Searches. » devon megauploads.

  1. com/rex+84


The Rex-84 Alpha Ex-plan (Readiness Exercise 1984, Exercise Plan; otherwise known as a continuity of government plan)…

Rex 84 FEMA Camps | Continuity of Government – Picocent – Contribute with less…

Readiness Exercise 1984 (Rex 84) was an armed forces exercise conducted on behalf of the United States federal government to test our military’s rex 84 fema camps rex 84 camps rex 84 program.

  1. com/fun_page.php?fid=videos&v=JfzE_TK-zmQ
  2. info » Is REX 84 Being Implemented on the U.S. Border?

  1. info/is-rex-84-being-implemented-on-the-u-s-border/

My intro to the wide, wide World Of Blogging | REX 84 Plan For US Martial Law

Rex 84. Planning for future martial law legislation and orders. For many years the globalists, through the federal agencies they control…

  2. sk . Rex – WebInDetail

rex 84 camp locations. rex 84 fema concentration camps. 0.02 Low.

  1. com/ws/

…Conspiracy Theories: Martial Law, FEMA Concentration Camps, REX 84: Could…

Rex 84 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a secretive “scenario and drill”…


Rex 84, FEMA Camps & The Continuity Of Government

Tags: Rex 84. This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 10th, 2014 at 2:16 am and is filed under Video News. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  1. info/rex-84-fema-camps-continuity-government/

Council for National Policy and rex 84

This video does great job exposing the Council for National Policy, but check this out! Oliver north, which was a member of the CNP, was questioned about Rex 84 during the Iran Contra!

  1. com/forums/index.php?topic=10909.0

The People’s History: Iran, the Contras, and Rex-84

Iran, the Contras, and Rex-84. “The common ingredients of the Iran and Contra policies were secrecy, deception, and disdain for the law…

  1. net/2014/03/iran-contras-and-rex-84.html

Download REX 84 Brooks-North-Inouye Iran Contra. video at

Description: Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was written by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, who was both National Security Council White House Aide…

  1. com/video/rex-84-brooks-north-inouye-iran-contra.html

Rex 84

Found 14 files for rex 84. Review these results or try to change your search query.

  1. com/r/rex-84

REX 84 lyrics

REX 84 lyrics and albums. The newest lyrics from REX 84 organised by album. 1 albums, 1 lyrics, including ‘We Are Beyond Your Control’

  1. com/albums/rex+84/

Untitled Document

Readiness Exercise 1984 – Rex 84 Rex 84 is a United States federal government program to test their ability to detain large numbers of American citizens.

  1. com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm

King Alfred Plan

King Alfred Plan…REX 84. KING ALFRED* In the event of widespread and continuing and coordinated racial disturbances in the United States, King Alfred, at the discretion of the President…

  1. com/king_alfred_plan.htm

US Detainment-Consentration Camps

REX-84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra hearings and publicly exposed by the Miami Herald on Sunday July 5th, 1987. REX-84 dovetailed with Operation Garden Plot…

  1. com/camps.html

portland imc – 2005.09.08 – FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited

FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited If you believe the corporate media, FEMA is simply a bungling and inept emergency management agency and its director, Michael Brown…


Executive Orders, REX 84, Garden Plot, Cable Splicer and U.S. concentration…

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in…

  1. com/politics-and-religion/10635-executive-orders-rex-84-garden-plot-cable-splicer-and-u-s-concentration-camps.html

Orwells’1984 and REX 84 FEMA ( Same Thing ) | Terry Ronzio

‘Gerald Celente: Cradle of Democracy Robbed by Bankers. ‘Obama And Hillary’s Great African Military Safari ! ‘Orwells’1984 and REX 84 FEMA ( Same Thing )( 2011 Orwells 1984).

  1. com/?q=node/225

The Federal Reserve. Operation Mockingbird. REX 84. MK ULTRA. FEMA.


Oliver North Questioned – Rex 84 Exposed During Iran Contra – Video

Oliver’s Story – An Official Go Ahead. 84 Views.

  1. com/watch/yt-Ug0IL7k3elQ/oliver_north_questioned_rex_84_exposed_during_iran_contra/

rex 84

Rex 84 Exposed in Questioning of Oliver North During Iran Contra Hearingflv. Public Mass Transportation Rex 84 Fema Camps HR 645 NDAA Agenda 21 22912.


Rex 84.


Win Your War

The Chinese use pigs to predict earthquakes Bohemian Grove Drones Hancock Creech Coltan Tuskegee Experiment Rex 84 Oliver North Boystown Scandal Rothschilds Rand Corporation Oliver…

  1. com
  2. com | U.S. Concentration Camps – FEMA

U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS FEMA AND THE REX 84 PROGRAM by Jim Marrs (For further information, see pages 135 ñ 145 in Jim Marrsí book The War On Freedom).

  1. com/news/fema_concentration_camps.htm

Rex 84 Concentration Death Camps Locations

Afb rex. Designate areas to throw us into gruesome factories of microwaving death. Victim of rex readiness exercise if there over. Million people really happen as war against.


American Concentration Camps

The simulations, known as REX-84 and Night Train 84, were drafted and run by FEMA’s contact person with the National Security Agency, one Lt.

  1. com/library/conspiracy/american-concentration-camps/

Operation Garden Plot – SourceWatch

Operation Garden Plot is a subprogram of Rex 84 Program, which “was established on the reasoning that if a ‘mass exodus’ of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. org/index.php/Operation_Garden_Plot

the thickstubble itches

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a “scenario and drill”, developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law…


FEMA and REX 84 camps? Is this a joke? (Laramie, Cody: tile, gated) – City-Data…

FEMA and REX 84 camps? FEMA and REX 84 camps? Is this a joke? I cruise the web and sometimes get in sites that are on the fringe for, I dunno, nothing better to do.

Delicious1 – FriendFeed

Rex84 US regime ready for martial law. Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America –

  1. com/delicious1

BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria…

FEMA created the Rex 84 program and is who would be in charge of the detention of people should the plan be executed.

  1. com/2014/02/32241-bombshell-government-documents-expose-main-core-fema-list-criteria/

Topic Tag: rex 84 diy kentucky hardcore tour new band

REX84– ky diy

  1. com/forums/topic-tag/rex-84-diy-kentucky-hardcore-tour-new-band/

…FEMA Camps | Prison Camps | Executive Orders | Martial Law | Rex 84…

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. info/192/fema-concentration-camps/

FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Martial Law ‘Executive Orders’

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…

Blackie Ocean

He can also allude to conspiracy theories, martial law, and Rex 84, a civil unrest containment exercise in the 1970′s that continues to spark paranoia in civil libertarians.


Concentration camp idea began with ollie north

While I can’t state that everyone of these if real or fake, I do know that the Rex 84 FEMA detention camps are REAL, or at least the idea of creating them is a real idea.

  1. com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=22116

Troubled Times: Military Bases

REX 84 program, Emergence Custodial Facility. REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility. Ft. Irwin Irwin is a remote Mtn region south of Death Valley, National Monument.

  1. com/theword/tword25b.htm

Академия Тринитаризма — Институт Профессиональной Политики – Статьи…

Oakdale – Rex 84 Program Emergency custodial facility. 90 miles east of San Francisco on Hwy 120. Holds a minimum of 15,000 people.

  1. ru/rus/doc/0228/004a/02280003-02.htm

FEMA Prison Camps

Past examples of such exercises that are frequently cited by Prison Camp conspiracy guys include Rex-82 Proud Saber (where Rex-82 stands for Readiness Exercise, 1982), and Rex-84 Night Train.

  1. com/episodes/4145

“Well what if there is no tomorrow… : Information Clearing House – ICH

What if the newly operational Rex-84 network of high capacity detention camps spread across the nation is permanent?

  1. info/article23216.htm


It seems that Highland Park is home to a closely-guarded government secret – a massive detention facility operated by FEMA, REX-84.

  1. com/deusexhumanrevolution/walkthrough/femadetentioncenter.php

Wall | VK

Black lung – Rex 84.

  1. com/wall-68230636

Research | Learn everything there is to know about Research at

REX Regional express. REX-84.

  1. com/browse/research

NWO Survival Guide

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


Labels: bible, current events, economic crisis, end times, FEMA Capms, God, last days, martial law, New World Order, Obama, prophecy, rapture, revelation, Rex 84, RFID Chips.


Noctambulations | Conservative, political researcher, comments my own

One such program Rex 84 supposedly written by a NSC liaison of FEMA John Brinkerhoff and Col. Oliver North was for the detention of millions.


FEMA Camp Locations (Video & Map & List) | U. S. Politics

Google REX-84 to see how all this started. A related video –

  1. com/u-s-politics/2013/11/fema-camp-alert-november-7-2013-video-2452828.html

Moonie*~’s Journal

01:29pm 05/01/2003. Score Breed 100 Siamese 94 Somali 92 Tonkinese 88 Abyssinian 85 Colorpoint Shorthair 85 Devon Rex 84 Balinese found this test at selectsmart!


FEMA: Child of the Cold War excerpted from the book Inside the Shadow…

The first reports about Rex 84 appeared in the Miami Herald on July 5,1987 (this is the report referred to by Representative Brooks).

  1. com/FBI/FEMA_ITSG.html

Internment Camps Martial Law Concentration Camps for Christians and Patriots

CALIFORNIA Vandenburg AFB – Rex 84 facility, located near Lompoc & Santa Maria. Internment facility is located near the oceanside, close to Space Launch Complex #6, also called “Slick Six”.

  1. com/camps.htm

Donald C Roose III Design – Home

Rex 84. Flash of Lights. Stealing Las Vegas.

  1. com

Concentration Camps For Americans (INFOWARS.COM)

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turnedinto prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


The Kick Them All Out Project – FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations…

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. ARIZONA Ft. Huachuca – 20 miles from Mexican border, 30 miles from Nogales Rex ’84 facility.

  1. com/article.php/Story-FEMA_Camps_Executive_Orders

Congress is kept away from Rex 84 FEMA camp Martial Law plan | Big Brother…

Congress is kept away from Rex 84 FEMA camp Martial Law plan. big brother 2010.

  1. com/?p=498

обзор пользователя cfamiglietti

TIL the US goverment developed a classified contingency plan called Rex 84 which would allow them to implement martial law, suspend the Constitution…

  1. com/user/cfamiglietti

The Expert’s Journal

This is just one of many concentration camps in the U.S. They were established under the REX-84 program. If the President declares martial law…

WeAreAllOne | Just another weblog

REX 84. Posted on July 11, 2008 by weareallonetv. Filed under: military state, mind control, rex 84 | Leave a comment ».


Lord Levy Kidnapped

If this was a dry run for FEMA of Rex 84 it looks a strange distribution.. especially as the diaspora looks to be fairly fixed with the folks being moved, rapidly putting down roots…


What is being planned with all these FEMA camps

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. com/united-states/what-is-being-planned-with-all-these-fema-camps/question-1428579/

Where are all the FEMA camps? | unifiedserenity

The Rex 84 Program (short for Readiness Exercise 1984) was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border…


The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist


 By Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Devereaux23 Jul 2014, 2:45 PM EDT386

The Obama administration has quietly approved a substantial expansion of the terrorist watchlist system, authorizing a secret process that requires neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence” to designate an American or foreigner as a terrorist, according to a key government document obtained by The Intercept.

The “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance,” a 166-page document issued last year by the National Counterterrorism Center, spells out the government’s secret rules for putting individuals on its main terrorist database, as well as the no fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings. The new guidelines allow individuals to be designated as representatives of terror organizations without any evidence they are actually connected to such organizations, and it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to place entire “categories” of people the government is tracking onto the no fly and selectee lists. It broadens the authority of government officials to “nominate” people to the watchlists based on what is vaguely described as “fragmentary information.” It also allows for dead people to be watchlisted.

Over the years, the Obama and Bush Administrations have fiercely resisted disclosing the criteria for placing names on the databases—though the guidelines are officially labeled as unclassified. In May, Attorney General Eric Holder even invoked the state secrets privilege to prevent watchlisting guidelines from being disclosed in litigation launched by an American who was on the no fly list. In an affidavit, Holder called them a “clear roadmap” to the government’s terrorist-tracking apparatus, adding: “The Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed … could cause significant harm to national security.”

The rulebook, which The Intercept is publishing in full, was developed behind closed doors by representatives of the nation’s intelligence, military, and law-enforcement establishment, including the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, and FBI. Emblazoned with the crests of 19 agencies, it offers the most complete and revealing look into the secret history of the government’s terror list policies to date. It reveals a confounding and convoluted system filled with exceptions to its own rules, and it relies on the elastic concept of “reasonable suspicion” as a standard for determining whether someone is a possible threat. Because the government tracks “suspected terrorists” as well as “known terrorists,” individuals can be watchlisted if they are suspected of being a suspected terrorist, or if they are suspected of associating with people who are suspected of terrorism activity.

“Instead of a watchlist limited to actual, known terrorists, the government has built a vast system based on the unproven and flawed premise that it can predict if a person will commit a terrorist act in the future,” says Hina Shamsi, the head of the ACLU’s National Security Project. “On that dangerous theory, the government is secretly blacklisting people as suspected terrorists and giving them the impossible task of proving themselves innocent of a threat they haven’t carried out.” Shamsi, who reviewed the document, added, “These criteria should never have been kept secret.”

The document’s definition of “terrorist” activity includes actions that fall far short of bombing or hijacking. In addition to expected crimes, such as assassination or hostage-taking, the guidelines also define destruction of government property and damaging computers used by financial institutions as activities meriting placement on a list. They also define as terrorism any act that is “dangerous” to property and intended to influence government policy through intimidation.

This combination—a broad definition of what constitutes terrorism and a low threshold for designating someone a terrorist—opens the way to ensnaring innocent people in secret government dragnets. It can also be counterproductive. When resources are devoted to tracking people who are not genuine risks to national security, the actual threats get fewer resources—and might go unnoticed.

“If reasonable suspicion is the only standard you need to label somebody, then it’s a slippery slope we’re sliding down here, because then you can label anybody anything,” says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent with experience running high-profile terrorism investigations. “Because you appear on a telephone list of somebody doesn’t make you a terrorist. That’s the kind of information that gets put in there.”

The fallout is personal too. There are severe consequences for people unfairly labeled a terrorist by the U.S. government, which shares its watchlist data with local law enforcement, foreign governments, and “private entities.” Once the U.S. government secretly labels you a terrorist or terrorist suspect, other institutions tend to treat you as one. It can become difficult to get a job (or simply to stay out of jail). It can become burdensome—or impossible—to travel. And routine encounters with law enforcement can turn into ordeals.

A chart from the “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance”

In 2012 Tim Healy, the former director of the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, described to CBS News how watchlists are used by police officers. “So if you are speeding, you get pulled over, they’ll query that name,” he said. “And if they are encountering a known or suspected terrorist, it will pop up and say call the Terrorist Screening Center…. So now the officer on the street knows he may be dealing with a known or suspected terrorist.” Of course, the problem is that the “known or suspected terrorist” might just be an ordinary citizen who should not be treated as a menace to public safety.

Until 2001, the government did not prioritize building a watchlist system. On 9/11, the government’s list of people barred from flying included just 16 names. Today, the no fly list has swelled to tens of thousands of “known or suspected terrorists” (the guidelines refer to them as KSTs). The selectee list subjects people to extra scrutiny and questioning at airports and border crossings. The government has created several other databases, too. The largest is the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE), which gathers terrorism information from sensitive military and intelligence sources around the world. Because it contains classified information that cannot be widely distributed, there is yet another list, the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB, which has been stripped of TIDE’s classified data so that it can be shared. When government officials refer to “the watchlist,” they are typically referring to the TSDB. (TIDE is the responsibility of the National Counterterrorism Center; the TSDB is managed by the Terrorist Screening Center at the FBI.)

In a statement, a spokesman for the National Counterterrorism Center told The Intercept that “the watchlisting system is an important part of our layered defense to protect the United States against future terrorist attacks” and that “watchlisting continues to mature to meet an evolving, diffuse threat.” He added that U.S. citizens are afforded extra protections to guard against improper listing, and that no one can be placed on a list solely for activities protected by the First Amendment. A representative of the Terrorist Screening Center did not respond to a request for comment.

The system has been criticized for years. In 2004, Sen. Ted Kennedy complained that he was barred from boarding flights on five separate occasions because his name resembled the alias of a suspected terrorist. Two years later, CBS News obtained a copy of the no fly list and reported that it included Bolivian president Evo Morales and Lebanese parliament head Nabih Berri. One of the watchlists snared Mikey Hicks, a Cub Scout who got his first of many airport pat-downs at age two. In 2007, the Justice Department’s inspector general issued a scathing report identifying “significant weaknesses” in the system. And in 2009, after a Nigerian terrorist was able to board a passenger flight to Detroit and nearly detonated a bomb sewn into his underwear despite his name having been placed on the TIDE list, President Obama admitted that there had been a “systemic failure.”

Obama hoped that his response to the “underwear bomber” would be a turning point. In 2010, he gave increased powers and responsibilities to the agencies that nominate individuals to the lists, placing pressure on them to add names. His administration also issued a set of new guidelines for the watchlists. Problems persisted, however. In 2012, the U.S. Government Accountability Office published a report that bluntly noted there was no agency responsible for figuring out “whether watchlist-related screening or vetting is achieving intended results.” The guidelines were revised and expanded in 2013—and a source within the intelligence community subsequently provided a copy to The Intercept.

“Concrete facts are not necessary”

The five chapters and 11 appendices of the “Watchlisting Guidance” are filled with acronyms, legal citations, and numbered paragraphs; it reads like an arcane textbook with a vocabulary all its own. Different types of data on suspected terrorists are referred to as “derogatory information,” “substantive derogatory information,” “extreme derogatory information” and “particularized derogatory information.” The names of suspected terrorists are passed along a bureaucratic ecosystem of “originators,” “nominators,” “aggregators,” “screeners,” and “encountering agencies.” And “upgrade,” usually a happy word for travellers, is repurposed to mean that an individual has been placed on a more restrictive list.

The heart of the document revolves around the rules for placing individuals on a watchlist. “All executive departments and agencies,” the document says, are responsible for collecting and sharing information on terrorist suspects with the National Counterterrorism Center. It sets a low standard—”reasonable suspicion“—for placing names on the watchlists, and offers a multitude of vague, confusing, or contradictory instructions for gauging it. In the chapter on “Minimum Substantive Derogatory Criteria”—even the title is hard to digest—the key sentence on reasonable suspicion offers little clarity:

“To meet the REASONABLE SUSPICION standard, the NOMINATOR, based on the totality of the circumstances, must rely upon articulable intelligence or information which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or has been knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to TERRORISM and/or TERRORIST ACTIVITIES.”

The rulebook makes no effort to define an essential phrase in the passage—”articulable intelligence or information.” After stressing that hunches are not reasonable suspicion and that “there must be an objective factual basis” for labeling someone a terrorist, it goes on to state that no actual facts are required:

“In determining whether a REASONABLE SUSPICION exists, due weight should be given to the specific reasonable inferences that a NOMINATOR is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his/her experience and not on unfounded suspicions or hunches. Although irrefutable evidence or concrete facts are not necessary, to be reasonable, suspicion should be as clear and as fully developed as circumstances permit.”

While the guidelines nominally prohibit nominations based on unreliable information, they explicitly regard “uncorroborated” Facebook or Twitter posts as sufficient grounds for putting an individual on one of the watchlists. “Single source information,” the guidelines state, “including but not limited to ‘walk-in,’ ‘write-in,’ or postings on social media sites, however, should not automatically be discounted … the NOMINATING AGENCY should evaluate the credibility of the source, as well as the nature and specificity of the information, and nominate even if that source is uncorroborated.”

There are a number of loopholes for putting people onto the watchlists even if reasonable suspicion cannot be met.

One is clearly defined: The immediate family of suspected terrorists—their spouses, children, parents, or siblings—may be watchlisted without any suspicion that they themselves are engaged in terrorist activity. But another loophole is quite broad—”associates” who have a defined relationship with a suspected terrorist, but whose involvement in terrorist activity is not known. A third loophole is broader still—individuals with “a possible nexus” to terrorism, but for whom there is not enough “derogatory information” to meet the reasonable suspicion standard.

Americans and foreigners can be nominated for the watchlists if they are associated with a terrorist group, even if that group has not been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. They can also be treated as “representatives” of a terrorist group even if they have “neither membership in nor association with the organization.” The guidelines do helpfully note that certain associations, such as providing janitorial services or delivering packages, are not grounds for being watchlisted.

The nomination system appears to lack meaningful checks and balances. Although government officials have repeatedly said there is a rigorous process for making sure no one is unfairly placed in the databases, the guidelines acknowledge that all nominations of “known terrorists” are considered justified unless the National Counterterrorism Center has evidence to the contrary. In a recent court filing, the government disclosed that there were 468,749 KST nominations in 2013, of which only 4,915 were rejected–a rate of about one percent. The rulebook appears to invert the legal principle of due process, defining nominations as “presumptively valid.”

Profiling categories of people

While the nomination process appears methodical on paper, in practice there is a shortcut around the entire system. Known as a “threat-based expedited upgrade,” it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to elevate entire “categories of people” whose names appear in the larger databases onto the no fly or selectee lists. This can occur, the guidelines state, when there is a “particular threat stream” indicating that a certain type of individual may commit a terrorist act.

This extraordinary power for “categorical watchlisting”—otherwise known as profiling—is vested in the assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, a position formerly held by CIA Director John Brennan that does not require Senate confirmation.

The rulebook does not indicate what “categories of people” have been subjected to threat-based upgrades. It is not clear, for example, whether a category might be as broad as military-age males from Yemen. The guidelines do make clear that American citizens and green card holders are subject to such upgrades, though government officials are required to review their status in an “expedited” procedure. Upgrades can remain in effect for 72 hours before being reviewed by a small committee of senior officials. If approved, they can remain in place for 30 days before a renewal is required, and can continue “until the threat no longer exists.”

“In a set of watchlisting criteria riddled with exceptions that swallow rules, this exception is perhaps the most expansive and certainly one of the most troubling,” Shamsi, the ACLU attorney, says. “It’s reminiscent of the Bush administration’s heavily criticized color-coded threat alerts, except that here, bureaucrats can exercise virtually standard-less authority in secret with specific negative consequences for entire categories of people.”

The National Counterterrorism Center declined to provide any details on the upgrade authority, including how often it has been exercised and for what categories of people.

Pocket litter and scuba gear

The guidelines provide the clearest explanation yet of what is happening when Americans and foreigners are pulled aside at airports and border crossings by government agents. The fifth chapter, titled “Encounter Management and Analysis,” details the type of information that is targeted for collection during “encounters” with people on the watchlists, as well as the different organizations that should collect the data. The Department of Homeland Security is described as having the largest number of encounters, but other authorities, ranging from the State Department and Coast Guard to foreign governments and “certain private entities,” are also involved in assembling “encounter packages” when watchlisted individuals cross their paths. The encounters can be face-to-face meetings or electronic interactions—for instance, when a watchlisted individual applies for a visa.

In addition to data like fingerprints, travel itineraries, identification documents and gun licenses, the rules encourage screeners to acquire health insurance information, drug prescriptions, “any cards with an electronic strip on it (hotel cards, grocery cards, gift cards, frequent flyer cards),” cellphones, email addresses, binoculars, peroxide, bank account numbers, pay stubs, academic transcripts, parking and speeding tickets, and want ads. The digital information singled out for collection includes social media accounts, cell phone lists, speed dial numbers, laptop images, thumb drives, iPods, Kindles, and cameras. All of the information is then uploaded to the TIDE database.

Screeners are also instructed to collect data on any “pocket litter,” scuba gear, EZ Passes, library cards, and the titles of any books, along with information about their condition—”e.g., new, dog-eared, annotated, unopened.” Business cards and conference materials are also targeted, as well as “anything with an account number” and information about any gold or jewelry worn by the watchlisted individual. Even “animal information”—details about pets from veterinarians or tracking chips—is requested. The rulebook also encourages the collection of biometric or biographical data about the travel partners of watchlisted individuals.

The list of government entities that collect this data includes the U.S. Agency for International Development, which is neither an intelligence nor law-enforcement agency. As the rulebook notes, USAID funds foreign aid programs that promote environmentalism, health care, and education. USAID, which presents itself as committed to fighting global poverty, nonetheless appears to serve as a conduit for sensitive intelligence about foreigners.According to the guidelines, “When USAID receives an application seeking financial assistance, prior to granting, these applications are subject to vetting by USAID intelligence analysts at the TSC.” The guidelines do not disclose the volume of names provided by USAID, the type of information it provides, or the number and duties of the “USAID intelligence analysts.”

A USAID spokesman told The Intercept that “in certain high risk countries, such as Afghanistan, USAID has determined that vetting potential partner organizations with the terrorist watchlist is warranted to protect U.S. taxpayer dollars and to minimize the risk of inadvertent funding of terrorism.” He stated that since 2007, the agency has checked “the names and other personal identifying information of key individuals of contractors and grantees, and sub-recipients.”

Death and the watchlist

The government has been widely criticized for making it impossible for people to know why they have been placed on a watchlist, and for making it nearly impossible to get off. The guidelines bluntly state that “the general policy of the U.S. Government is to neither confirm nor deny an individual’s watchlist status.” But the courts have taken exception to the official silence and footdragging: In June, a federal judge described the government’s secretive removal process as unconstitutional and “wholly ineffective.”

The difficulty of getting off the list is highlighted by a passage in the guidelines stating that an individual can be kept on the watchlist, or even placed onto the watchlist, despite being acquitted of a terrorism-related crime. The rulebook justifies this by noting that conviction in U.S. courts requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas watchlisting requires only a reasonable suspicion. Once suspicion is raised, even a jury’s verdict cannot erase it.

Not even death provides a guarantee of getting off the list. The guidelines say the names of dead people will stay on the list if there is reason to believe the deceased’s identity may be used by a suspected terrorist–which the National Counterterrorism Center calls a “demonstrated terrorist tactic.” In fact, for the same reason, the rules permit the deceased spouses of suspected terrorists to be placed onto the list after they have died.

For the living, the process of getting off the watchlist is simple yet opaque. A complaint can be filed through the Department of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Program, which launches an internal review that is not subject to oversight by any court or entity outside the counterterrorism community. The review can result in removal from a watchlist or an adjustment of watchlist status, but the individual will not be told if he or she prevails. The guidelines highlight one of the reasons why it has been difficult to get off the list—if multiple agencies have contributed information on a watchlisted individual, all of them must agree to removing him or her.

If a U.S. citizen is placed on the no fly list while abroad and is turned away from a flight bound for the U.S., the guidelines say they should be referred to the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate, which is prohibited from informing them why they were blocked from flying. According to the rules, these individuals can be granted a “One-Time Waiver” to fly, though they will not be told that they are traveling on a waiver. Back in the United States, they will be unable to board another flight.

The document states that nominating agencies are “under a continuing obligation” to provide exculpatory information when it emerges. It adds that the agencies are expected to conduct annual reviews of watchlisted American citizens and green card holders. It is unclear whether foreigners—or the dead—are reviewed at the same pace. As the rulebook notes, “watchlisting is not an exact science.”

Josh Begley, Lynn Dombek, and Peter Maass contributed to this story.

Photo credits: TSA: G.J. McCarthy/Dallas Morning News/Corbis (2); Guidance: Josh Begley; White House: Win McNamee/Getty Images; Airport: Nick Ut/AP Photo

2013 Watchlisting Guidance (PDF)

10 13 11 flagbar


The Depopulation Agenda


7-25-2014 10-30-35 AM

By Dean Henderson

While the global elite construct underground bunkers, eat organic and hoard seeds in Arctic vaults; the global poor are being slowly starved thanks to high commodity prices and poisoned with genetically modified (GMO) food. Austerity measures aimed largely at the poor are being imposed on all the nations of the world. Weather events grow more deadly and brushfire wars more frequent. An AK-47 can be obtained for $49 in the markets of West Africa. The depopulation campaign of the inbred Illuminati bankers is accelerating.

(Excerpted from Chapter 13: USS Persian Gulf: Big Oil & Their Bankers…)

In 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower, who later warned of a “military-industrial complex”, commissioned a panel of scientists to study the issue of overpopulation.  The scientists put forth Alternatives I, II and III, advocating both the release of deadly viruses and perpetual warfare as means to decrease world population.

The first supposition dovetailed nicely with the pharmaceutical interests of the Rockefellers.  According to Nexus magazine, the Rockefellers own one-half of the US pharmaceutical industry, which would reap billions developing medicines to “battle” the deadly viruses about to be released.

In 1969 the Senate Church Committee discovered that the US Defense Department (DOD) had requested a budget of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars for a program to speed development of new viruses which target and destroy the human immune system.  DOD officials testified before Congress that they planned to produce, “a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could be acquired…Most important is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”  House Bill 5090 authorized the funds and MK-NAOMI was carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Out of this research came the AIDS virus which was targeted at “undesirable elements” of the population. The first AIDS viruses were administered through a massive smallpox vaccine campaign in central and southern Africa by the World Health Organization in 1977.  A year later ads appeared in major US newspapers soliciting “promiscuous gay male volunteers” to take part in a Hepatitis B vaccine study. [1]

The program targeted male homosexuals age 20-40 in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, St. Louis and San Francisco. It was administered by the US Centers for Disease Control which, under its earlier incarnation as the US Public Health Department in Atlanta, oversaw the Tuskegee syphilis experiments on African American males. [2]

San Francisco has been a target of numerous CIA experiments, due to its high population of left-leaning and gay citizens, which the Illuminati views as “undesirables”.  According to Dr. Eva Snead, San Francisco has one of the highest cancer rates in the country.  For years Malathion- first developed by the Nazis- was sprayed over the city by helicopters from the CIA’s Evergreen Air, whose Arizona base is used, according to author William Cooper, as CIA transshipment point for Columbian cocaine.  The mysterious Legionnaire’s Disease occurs often in San Francisco and the CIA’s MK-ULTRA mind control bad acid program was based there.

The intellectual force behind the introduction of AIDS was the Bilderberger Group, which became fixated on population control after WWII. Author Cooper says the Policy Committee of the Bilderbergers gave orders to DOD to introduce the AIDS virus.  The Bilderbergers are close to the Club of Rome, which was founded on a Rockefeller estate near Bellagio, Italy and is backed by the same European Black Nobility who frequent Bilderberger meetings.  A 1968 study by the Club of Rome advocated lowering the birth rate and increasing the death rate.  Club founder Dr. Aurelio Peccei made a top-secret recommendation to introduce a microbe that would attack the auto-immune system, then develop a vaccine as a prophylactic for the global elite. [3]

One month after the 1968 Club of Rome meeting Paul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. The book hints at a draconian depopulation plan in the works.  On page seventeen Ehrlich writes, “The problem could have been avoided by population control…so that a ‘death rate solution’ did not have to occur.”  A year later MK-NAOMI was born.  Peccei himself authored the Club of Rome’s much-touted Global 2000 report, which President Jimmy Carter pushed on his BCCI shakedown cruise of Africa.  Peccei wrote in the report, “Man is now vested with unprecedented, tremendous responsibilities and thrown into the role of moderator of life on the planet- including his own”.

The Bilderbergers were behind the Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy, a driving force at the State Department and administered by the National Security Council.  Pressure is applied to Third World countries to reduce their populations.  Those that do not comply see their US aid withheld or are subject to Pink Plan low-intensity war that targets civilians, especially women of child-bearing age.  In Africa famine and brush-fire wars are encouraged.  AK-47 rifles can be bought at West African markets for under $50.  The same is true in the markets of Peshawar, Pakistan.  In 1975, a year after attending a Club of Rome conference on the topic, Secretary of State Kissinger founded the Office of Population Affairs (OPA).

Latin American OPA case officer Thomas Ferguson spilled the beans on OPA’s agenda when he stated, “There is a single theme behind all our work; we must reduce population levels.  Either they do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut…Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…The professionals aren’t interested in reducing population for humanitarian reasons…Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population.  The quickest way to reduce population is through famine like in Africa.  We go into a country and say, here is your goddamn development plan.  Throw it out the window.  Start looking at your population…if you don’t …then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia”. [4]

Ferguson said of El Salvador, “To accomplish what the State Department deems adequate population control, the civil war (run by CIA) would have to be greatly expanded.  You have to pull all the males into fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing age females.  You are killing a small number of males and not enough fertile females to do the job…If the war went on 30-40 years, you might accomplish something.  Unfortunately, we don’t have too many instances of this to study”.

Report from Iron Mountain

In 1961 Kennedy Administration officials McGeorge Bundy, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk, all CFR and Bilderberger members, led a study group which looked into “the problem of peace”.  The group met at Iron Mountain, a huge underground corporate nuclear shelter near Hudson, New York, where CFR think tank The Hudson Institute is located.  The bunker contains redundant offices in case of nuclear attack for Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell and JP Morgan Chase. [5]  A copy of the group discussions, known as Report from Iron Mountain, was leaked by a participant and published in 1967 by Dial Press.

The report’s authors saw war as necessary and desirable stating “War itself is the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. (War is) the principal organizing force…the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies.”  The group worried that through “ambiguous leadership” the “ruling administrative class” might lose its ability to “rationalize a desired war”, leading to the “actual disestablishment of military institutions”.

The report goes on to say, “…the war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until…we know exactly what we plan to put in its place…The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power…The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. War has served as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary classes.”

Historian Howard Zinn described this conundrum when he wrote, “American capitalism needed international rivalry- and periodic war- to create an artificial community of interest between rich and poor, supplanting the genuine community of interest among the poor that showed itself in sporadic movements”.

The Iron Mountain gang was not the first to discover the virtues of war.  In 1909 the trustees of the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for International Peace met to discuss pre-WWI American life.  Many of the participants were members of Skull & Bones.  They concluded, “There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people…How do we involve the United States in a war?”

The Report from Iron Mountain goes on to propose a proper role for those of the lower classes, crediting military institutions with providing “antisocial elements with an acceptable role in the social structure.  The younger and more dangerous of these hostile social groupings have been kept under control by the Selective Service System…A possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political process, of slavery…The development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.”

The Iron Mountain goons, though thrilled by the idea of slavery, listed as other socioeconomic substitutions for war: a comprehensive social welfare program, a giant open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets, a permanent arms inspection regime, an omnipresent global police and peacekeeping force, massive global environmental pollution which would require a large labor pool to clean up, socially-oriented blood sports and a comprehensive eugenics program. [6]

The Iraqi genocide fulfilled the dreams of the Club of Rome Zero Population Growth maniacs, while also providing a testing ground for two of the war substitutes proposed by the Iron Mountain fascists: an arms inspection regime and UN peacekeepers.  Both concepts gained traction in the international community thanks to the Gulf War.

Let the Iraqi Genocide Begin

Estimates of Iraqi casualties during the Gulf War are sobering.  Some organizations like Greenpeace put the death toll at near one million people.  It was a war in which the media was denied access on a scale never before seen, so casualty figures vary greatly.  According to Tony Murphy, a researcher at the International War Crimes Tribunal, the US attack on Iraq killed 125,000 civilians, while destroying 676 schools, 38 hospitals, 8 major hydroelectric dams, 11 power plants, 119 power substations and half the country’s telephone lines.  The attacks occurred mostly at night when people were most vulnerable.

In the months following the war the death rate of Iraqi children under five tripled.  Thirty-eight percent of these deaths were caused by diarrhea. [7]  Victor Filatov, a Russian journalist reporting for Sovetskaya Rossiya from post-war Baghdad wrote, “What further bloodshed do these barbarians of the 20th century need?  I thought the Americans had changed since Vietnam…but no, they never change.  They remain true to themselves.”

According to former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, the US was found guilty of nineteen war crimes against Iraq before the International War Crimes Tribunal.  The US dropped 88,000 tons of bombs on Iraq during the Gulf War and has rained down countless more bombs since.  Many bombs were tipped with armor piercing depleted uranium (DU) warheads, which may account for chronic Iraqi health problems.  Dr. Siegwart-Horst Gunther, a German physician who came to Iraq to help its people, became gravely ill when he handled just one cigar-sized fragment from a DU warhead.  Dr. Gunther measured the tiny object’s radioactivity to be 11 microSv per hour, whereas an acceptable exposure is no more than 300 microSv per year. [8]  Three hundred tons of DU ammunition was deployed during the war.

Many believe DU is responsible for Gulf War Syndrome, which has killed and permanently injured many US soldiers who fought in the Persian Gulf theater.  Since 2000, nearly 11,000 US Gulf War veterans have died from Gulf War Syndrome, while the Pentagon continues to cover up this travesty.

Satanism & Psychotronic Warfare

The US also tested numerous top-secret high-tech weapons systems in the Gulf theatre, while utilizing some old low-frequency favorites.  When Iraqi ground forces surrendered, many of them were in a state of delirium and lethargy that could have been induced by extremely low-frequency radio waves, which the US used as a weapon as early as the Vietnam conflict.

Yale University and CIA psychiatrist Dr. Jose Delgado studied mind control for the Company during the 1950’s as part of the MK-ULTRA program.  Delgado determined, “Physical control of many brain functions is a demonstrated fact…it is even possible to create and follow intentions…By electronic stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command…by remote control.”

According to a military document written by Colonel Paul Valley and Major Michael Aquino titled From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory, the US Army used an operational weapons system “to map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with US national interests”.  The technique was used to secure the surrender of 29,276 armed Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army soldiers in 1967 and 1968.  The US Navy was also heavily involved in “psychotronic” research. [9]  Many US soldiers who served near the DMZ that divided North and South Vietnam claimed to see UFOs on a regular basis.  The Pentagon Papers revealed that an electronic barrier was placed along the DMZ by the secretive JASON Society.

Major Michael Aquino was an Army psyops specialist in Vietnam, where his unit specialized in drug-inducement, brainwashing, virus injection, brain implants, hypnosis, and use of electromagnetic fields and extremely low-frequency radio waves.  After Vietnam, Aquino moved to San Francisco and founded the Temple of Set.  Set is the ancient Egyptian name for Lucifer.  Aquino was now a senior US Military Intelligence official. [10]  He’d been given a Top Secret security clearance on June, 9, 1981.  Less than a month later an Army intelligence memo revealed that Aquino’s Temple of Set was an off-shoot of Anton La Vey’s Church of Satan, also headquartered in San Francisco. Two other Set members were Willie Browning and Dennis Mann.  Both were Army Intelligence officers.

The Temple of Set was obsessed with military matters and political fascism. It was especially preoccupied with the Nazi Order of the Trapezoid.  Aquino’s “official” job was history professor at Golden Gate College.  The Temple recruited the same Hells Angels who Billy Mellon Hitchcock had used to dole out his bad CIA acid.  Its members frequented prostitutes where they engaged in all manner of sadomasochistic activities. [11]  Director of Army Counter-Intelligence Donald Press revealed that Dennis Mann was assigned to the 306 PSYOPS Battalion and that Aquino was assigned to a top secret program known as Presidio.

Presidio is also the name of a spooky complex in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly frequented as the Soviet Union was falling apart.  Was Aquino part of an operation to “map the mind” of the Soviet Union’s last leader and induce him into proposing bothglasnost and perestroika, the two free market policies that ultimately led to the Soviet Union’s demise?  Remember the curious mark which suddenly appeared on Gorbachev’s forehead?  Was he implanted with some sort of microchip mind-control device to make him think “in accordance with US national interests”?

Such Orwellian technology is marketed on a regular basis throughout the world.  International Healthline Corporation and others sell microchip implants in the US, Russia and Europe.  The Humane Society has adopted a policy of micro-chipping all stray pets. The State of Hawaii requires that all pets be micro-chipped.  Six thousand people in Sweden have accepted a microchip in their hand, which they use for all purchases. Trials are also underway in Japan.  In July 2002, National Public Radio reported a similar trial beginning in Seattle.  Later in 2002, after a rash of suspicious abductions of young girls, BBC reported that a British company plans to implant children with microchips so that their parents can monitor their whereabouts.

Dr. Carl Sanders, a highly acclaimed electronics engineer, revealed that a microchip project he launched to help people with severed spinal cords was taken over by the Bill Colby’s Operation Phoenix in a series of meetings organized by Henry Kissinger.  Sanders says the optimal spot for a microchip implant is just below the hairline on a person’s forehead, since the device can be recharged by changes in body temperatures, which are most pronounced there.  Interestingly, this is the location of the pineal gland or Third Eye.

The 1986 Emigration Control Act grants the President the power to mandate any kind of ID he deems necessary. [12]  Researchers at Southern California have developed a chip which mimics the hippocampus, the part of the brain that deals with memory.  Pentagon officials are interested in using it in experiments to create a “super-soldier”. [13]  Another microchip called Braingate is being implanted in paralyzed people.  It allows them to control their environment by simply thinking. [14]

In Iraq, psychological warfare gave way to slow genocide.  According to UNICEF, as of late 2001, 1.5 million Iraqi children had died as a result of sanctions, while one child in ten died before their first birthday.  Thalassemia, anemia and diarrhea were the biggest killers and could have been prevented were it not for a chronic shortage of blood and medicine in Iraq due to the sanctions.  UN Committee 661 served as arbiter of what constituted a “dual use” item and therefore banned for import into Iraq.  As of 2001, over 1,600 Iraqi contracts with Western companies for medical equipment had been blocked by 661. [15]

The Gulf War decimated Iraq’s sewer and water treatment systems. Iraqis were forced to drink polluted water, leading to numerous health problems.  Iraq was not allowed to import chlorine to clean the water since 661 deemed it a potential chemical weapon.  Electrical power was rationed in three-hour daily increments per household since the Iraqi government couldn’t get the parts it needed to fix its power plants after the US bombed its entire power grid.  With the devaluation of the Iraqi dinar and the ban on the export of 2.4 million barrels of oil per day, the average Iraqi lived on $2.50 a month- enough to buy a pair of shoes.  The only Iraqis not affected were the wealthy elite, who had long ago stashed their savings overseas in US dollars.

UNICEF estimates that 28% of Iraqi children no longer went to school.  Before the war almost all children attended.  Often families could only afford to send one child to school because of the cost of simple things like backpacks, shoes and notebooks.  Rafah Salam Aziz, Director of Mansour Children’s Hospital, said parents were often forced to make similar decisions about their children’s lives.  Aziz said, “Many times it’s easier for a family to let a baby die rather than let the whole family go hungry and get sick.”[16]

In 1996 Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry announced a new military buildup in the Persian Gulf.  Soon cruise missiles were again raining down on Baghdad.  Many nations now grew weary of both US bombing and the sanctions regime, which was brutalizing the Iraqi people while strengthening the grip of Saddam Hussein.  Russian President Boris Yeltsin, whose country signed a deal with Iraq to rebuild its shattered oil sector, said he was disturbed at the use of “extreme and radical force against the Arab world”.  The Russian opposition offered a more scalding appraisal.  Alexander Lebed stating angrily, “The US is like a strong master who spits on everybody.”[17]

Turkey, Jordan and Syria all expressed unease over the new round of bombing.  Even the Saudis, where Islamic fundamentalism was on the rise and two major bombings had occurred at US bases, now refused to allow the US to use its bases to bomb Iraq.  Many countries, including France, began openly flaunting the UN embargo against Iraq in the late 1990’s.

Dennis Halliday, former Assistant Secretary of the UN who initially headed the UN Humanitarian Program to Iraq, resigned his post in protest. He said sanctions were demolishing the very class of Iraqi people who wanted to create a better government in the country.  He was scornful of the UN Oil for Food Program under which the US received 70% of Iraqi oil.  Halliday stated plainly, “We are guilty of committing genocide, through the Security Council, against Iraq.”[18]

Halliday’s 1998 successor was Hans Van Sponeck, who watched as the UN unfurled the UNSCOM arms inspection regime, paid for by Iraqi oil sales.  US inspector Scott Ritter confirmed Iraqi suspicions that UNSCOM was gathering intelligence for CIA and Mossad.  UNSCOM was just the latest CIA tool.  In 1996 the Iraqi government claimed international relief agencies, including the World Food Program, which claimed to be helping the Kurds, were actually CIA operatives attempting to destabilize the country.

In fact the CIA had spent more than $20 million in its support of the Iraqi National Congress, led by long-time CIA surrogate Jalal Talibani’s PKK Kurdish faction. [19]  In January 1997 Iraq uncovered two Mossad spy rings in one month following the attempted assassination of Saddam Hussein’s son. [20]  Hans Van Sponeck had seen enough. He too resigned in protest.

In early 1999 it was revealed that the US had used UNSCOM to plant electronic bugging devices in the Iraqi Ministry of Defense.  Arms inspector Scott Ritter said the CIA was using UNSCOM to “provoke a crisis”.  In December 1998 UNSCOM, faced with the embarrassing accusations of espionage, pulled out of Iraq.  On December 15th the US launched a new round of bombing.  Ritter says intelligence gathered by UNSCOM was used for targeting. UNSCOM spokesman David Kay resurfaced in 2003 calling for a US invasion of Iraq. He now worked for SAIC, which landed numerous Pentagon contracts to rebuild Iraq.

[1] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.166

[2] Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.305

[3] Cooper. p.166

[4] Ibid

[5] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.114

[6] Ibid. 116

[7] “Child Death Rate Jumps in Iraq”. AP. Great Falls Tribune. 9-24-92. p.8

[8] “Depleted Uranium”. Siegwart-Horst Gunther. Covert Action Quarterly. Winter 2001. p.2

[9] Cooper. p.369

[10] Icke. p.221

[11] Cooper. p.361

[12] Icke. p.223

[13] Inquirer. UK. 10-25-05

[14] PhysOrg News. 11-1-95

[15] “Greetings from Missile Street”. Free Speech TV. Boulder, CO. 12-23-01

[16] “US Economic Sanctions Taking Very Human Toll in Iraq”. Great FallsTribune. 9-13-92.

[17] “Slamming Saddam”. Time. 9-16-96. p.31

[18] “The Unfinished War”. CNN. 1-6-02

[19] Evening Edition. National Public Radio. 9-10-96

[20] BBC World News. 1-8-97

Video FEMA Preparing For 200 Million Deaths According To Former Border Patrol Security Agent


Guerilla Girl Ashley, The Pete Santilli Show

 According to former Border Patrol Security expert Zach Taylor, This current so-called border crises is a manufactured crises that has been going on since at least the year 1986 when the Reagan administration was in power, and this is what as known as Asymmetrical Warfare.  Here is a clip from Zack taylor’s interview for the upcoming documentary film called “Back To The Border” 

“This gives people that are trying to get their infrastructure, their personnel, their drugs, their dirty bombs, their biological weapons, their chemical weapons into the United States without being noticed” the opportunity to do so, “because this part of the border is open, it is not being controlled,” the 26-year Border Patrol veteran outlines in the extensive interview.  “If asymmetrical warfare is going to be successful, the first thing that has to be done is to compromise America’s defenses against invasion,” Taylor says, “because they have to have their personnel inside the United States to affect the infrastructure.. they have to affect the degeneration from inside the United States.”

He also wrote this in a June 22,2014  press release by the The National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers are retired Border Patrol Officers 

This invitation to invade America by illegal aliens from Central America has been going on for years with the explicit concurrence of America’s elected officials. The present invasion of thousands of unaccompanied minors is the obvious desired result of the current administration, the United States Senate that passed S-744 and every other elected official in the United States that has not stood up and demanded that the Immigration Laws of the United States be fully enforced and in particular a President that announced that it does not make good sense to enforce Immigration Laws. This is not a humanitarian crisis, this is a manufactured crisis. Any media outlet that calls this a humanitarian crisis is concealing what is actually happening. This is the result of American leaders taking America into a lawless state over time and this latest invasion by opportunistic law breakers is a direct result of their actions. Period.

Read Here:

 10 13 11 flagbar

Great Grand Mother Anna offers some advice


 PART 1 & 2

by arnie rosner

Dear Martha– you will have to forgive everyone. People are understandably upset and rattled when they first realize that their government is a private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned corporation supposedly here to provide governmental services and doing a very poor job of it. In fact, they are in contract default, and strictly speaking, we don’t have to contract with them, pay them, or deal with them at all.

It is outrageous, you must admit. They are our EMPLOYEES and we have let them get away with this?

It also alarms most people to realize that this has been going on and developing ever since the Civil War, that the Roman Catholic Church is involved, that ELIZABETH II has acted in Breach of Trust and against American interests the entire time that Elizabeth II has sat on the British throne—- it IS a lot to take in. And it is unsettling.

But, everyone, please calm down. It has been going on for 150 years, and it won’t all get resolved overnight. Also, though we have all been defrauded and victimized, let’s also own our share of culpability and if we have to “find someone to blame” let the blame start right here with me and you and Roger next door. This has only happened to our country because we did not remain vigilant as Jefferson warned us, and because we found hot cars and sports events to be intrinsically more interesting than history and civics.

Who knew those dull old subjects could be so vitally important?

Anyway, we have a LOT of people to educate and a lot of pieces of the jigsaw puzzle to nail down and a lot of step-by-step local actions to take. Please, let those with specific parts of the puzzle come forward now — those with a knowledge of the original Thirteenth Amendment, come forward and share. Those with insight into the founding of the original United States (Company) and the Treaty of the Delawares, come forward and share. Those who know the IRS Scam well enough to beat it, come forward and share. Those who have fought the fight with the British government, come forward. Those who placed a claim on abandonment on the Office of The United States Postmaster (supposed to be one of three international Trustees defending The United States Trust (1789))—come forward and share.

This is a discovery process, and even those of us who have worked on this diligently for decades find that we have bits and pieces of it wrong. I find out that I have some detail wrong every other week. I expect that to continue to happen. I don’t get upset when it does. I just thank the person who brought the error forward and thank God some other American was watching the game and caring enough to pay attention. We are ALL going to make ERRORS in this process, but let me suggest that when we do, it is not the end of the world and it is not always anyone’s “fault”. A lot of this information has been purposefully obscured, hidden, lost in dusty libraries….to expedite the fraud practiced against us. So any idea that this is simple or easy or fool-proof has to end from the outset and we all have to grasp both HOW MUCH has already been done by Americans who never got paid a dime and who often paid huge fines and spent time in jail to bring us this far, this fast.

Standing here flat-footed, every man, woman, and child in America already owes their heartfelt service in the cause of reclaiming our rightful place as the civil sovereigns on the land of these Several states— owes it to the men who fought and died believing that they were protecting us, owe it to the men like Bill Benson and Tommy Cryer who fought the beast in DC with all they had. Now, it is up to us.

I have suggested a two pronged solution, both a positive and a negative “pole” to provide the currency for this operation.

First, we treat the corporation in Washington, DC as a corporation, because that is all it is. It has acted in contract default and engaged in criminal activities against its employers, so we need to go to France and contact their ministry responsible for chartering corporations and file a complaint requesting liquidation of the UNITED STATES (INC.). This is entirely within our right and within their responsibility, but as Pope Benedict said when first approached about the ongoing Breach of Trust against The United States Trust (1789)—- we have to complain. Someone with standing to complain has to stand up and say, hey, look at this! Otherwise, bureaucrats assume that everything is okay, especially bureaucrats operating in foreign countries.

Second, we need to do what we are already doing. We need to call public townhall meetings in our counties all around the country and educate people about what the government really is, our responsibility to run our own affairs on the land, etc., etc., etc., and we have to give notice and hold elections at the same time we are forming our Jural Societies. There are no American Courts operational, so we have to build them from the ground up. The Grand Juries are organized. Next, the Judges are elected at public meetings of each County, along with a Sheriff and, importantly, a Coroner. Coroners hold a very important civil office. They are the only ones able to remove a sitting Governor from office.

We should be making every effort to educate the members of the law enforcement and military communities, so they understand civil authority and don’t feel threatened. Our civil Sheriffs who hold authority over the land jurisdiction will naturally pull rank on them, but that’s the way it is meant to be. If the men currently serving as law enforcement employees of the private corporations are amenable to taking the Public Oath of Office and serving as real constitutional Sheriffs on the land, and they were born on the land of one of the American States, there is no reason that they can’t serve us. The only question becomes –why do the pass through loop for funding their positions? We don’t need to give our money to a private corporation to cut pay checks and misdirect our own employees to work for them, do we? No. So, there are a lot of details to be resolved, but the end is in view.

Once the American Court System is set up, and Americans are running it— as opposed to members of the BRITISH Bar Association, and the Judges, Sheriffs, and Coroners are in place, we need to do a scene out of the old western movies. Remember where the Sheriff called for a posse and the men of the town all came and the Sheriff deputized them? The words were simple— something like, “I, John Wayne, elected Sheriff of Yuma County, Arizona, hereby deputize you men gathered here today to act as my deputies and to faithfully enforce the Public Laws of Arizona and keep the peace, Answer by saying, “So help me God”.” They all took the pledge and then the Sheriff said something like, “All right then, you are all deputies of Yuma County! Let’s ride!”

So long as the local law enforcement personnel have been duly advised of who you are and what you are doing and why, they haven’t got a leg to stand on to oppose you. In fact, they are honor and duty and paycheck bound to HELP you. It’s just the middlemen in the middle claiming to “represent” you that need to be dealt with—-and that means offering them the chance to take their Public Oath of Office and to assist you, or be removed from any presumed Public Office— publically—-and relegated to their real office as officers of a private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned corporation franchise.

Some of these yahoos will have to be arrested, but that’s their choice.

In tandem with setting up the American Court System we need to seize control of our own monetary system. Do you all understand that the American Dollar still exists? And that it has always been backed by gold or silver? “Federal Reserve Notes” are just look-alike imposters enforced upon you as “legal tender” by a bunch of con artists. Our real money is still alive and well and more valuable than ever.

Did you know that we have always had the right to go to the “US Mint” — which is a private business, too, just under government contract—-plunk down a bunch of silver and have dollars minted? We never had to wait for any “US President” to do it. We are fully capable of doing it ourselves.

The move is on to establish American financial institutions, specifically, the Union Reserve of Texas. These commodity accounting houses allow investors to invest script money in real, hard assets—- and use real money based on those investments. With today’s technology we can follow the rise and fall of commodity values almost instant by instant, and the value of the commodity you invest in is what you have in your private bank account to access as credit on any given day. Sure, the values go up and down, but that’s reality and in the end, reality is all that counts. All this make-believe stuff is just that—legal fiction. You have to decide whether you want to live in the real America, or in the UNITED STATES—- a legal fiction created by foreign lawyers, where “dollars” are debt notes and “spending” them just digs you eternally deeper into debt.

Those who choose to live life as real people and as Americans participating in private banks will be able to sleep at night knowing that they are in control of their own assets and not being traded as chits on the stock market and not subject to confiscation. That’s a pretty good exchange in return for some “volatility” in the market price of commodities.

The Union Reserve of Texas can offer its customers the convenience of a modern debit card based on their investment holdings.

So, although your worthless debt notes will be converted into real assets, and the value of those assets will go up and down every day, you will be able use a debit card at the grocery store and go on about your business more or less as usual—except with the added assurance that your bank account is really yours and that you are invested in something more than hot air coming out of Washington, DC.

Are you all liking this? Is this where you want to go? A new American Dream? Are you willing to work hard every day to make this happen? If so, there’s nothing stopping you. You see, the rats in Washington, DC, now know for sure that the jig is up and that the rest of the world is watching. They know that they have been identified and proven to be criminals. They know that their corporation is in proven contract default. They know that any “false flag” they pull now will be recognized for what it is. They know that their attempt to replace “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES” with “UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTES” is failing and is recognized as a criminal fraud gambit. They know that the two major banking cartels that have colluded together to create this circumstance have been duly investigated, caught in criminal activities, and that both the “FEDERAL RESERVE” and the “INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND” are guilty of fraud, collusion, conspiracy against rights, conspiracy against the Constitution owed to the American State Citizens, unlawful conversion, monopoly inducement, inland piracy, enslavement, unlawful conscription, false advertising, and the list goes on and on and on. They know that their favorite means of enforcing this criminal activity– the IRS, the CIA, certain offices of the DOD— have all been “compromised” and busted.

Vladimir Putin and the Chinese Secretary General and most of the Third World which has suffered and been defrauded just as we have been at home, are all staring down their proverbial gun barrels at the rats in Washington, DC. To date, 177 nations have joined together in economic alliance and many of those same nations have military alignments as well.

The puppet masters of “the United States of America (Minor)” — a consortium of “American states” more normally thought of as “federal” territories and protectorates—- have hit the wall. They are finally caught between a rock and a hard place. The American States and American State Citizens on one side, and most of the rest of the world on the other. What’s a bankster to do?

Many have either chosen or been “encouraged” to commit suicide. Being a senior employee of JP Morgan Bank has become one of the most hazardous professions per capita in the world in recent months. Of course, we don’t advocate harming anyone. We are just here to get our country back and clean up the mess.

Let’s remember “Rosie, the Riveter”. Ladies, you are the rock, the house, upon which America stands. When you put your minds to it and shove, there isn’t a force on earth that can turn your tide.

Men, let’s remember the boys swarming ashore at Normandy, straight into the maws of German artillery and machine gun nests. Are you going to betray them and what they fought for?

It’s D-Day and the war is being fought in your own minds. You have to wake up. You have to start remembering who you really are. You have to get outside the box that FDR and his cronies constructed for you.

The real America known as the united States of America has been at peace for 165 years. Our Congress has no “emergency powers” whatsoever. Our Congress operates as a non-incorporated fully liable Body Politic. Our Congress is solemnly elected by the people inhabiting each State of the Union who qualify to be “electors” —not “voters”—-and guess what? Our united States senators are all accountable to the legislatures of our states. Our army is not called “US Armed Forces Command”—our army is called The Grand Army of the Republic. It is run, staffed, and manned by American State Citizens.

And we just told the Joint Chiefs to bring the GAR out of mothballs and, if necessary, deploy it to seize stockpiles of armaments that corporate “President” Obama has improperly stored on American State property and which he clearly intends to make available to commercial mercenary armies masquerading as “federal agencies”—-FEMA, DHS, and the rest.

We told them to send the bill for this to the UNITED NATIONS dba IMF dba UNITED STATES, because clearly these “institutions” are in contract default and not doing the job that we, their EMPLOYERS, have set for them.

The Office of the Provost Marshal is responsible for coordinating this. Major General David E. Quantock, however, is a lawyer, a member of the BRITISH Bar Association, and so far, predictably enough, he hasn’t been doing his real job— protecting the American States and the American State Citizens. He must be prevailed upon to do so, and so must General Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who can’t figure out whether to lick Obama’s shoes or his ass.

Do you think that the rest of you, if sufficiently motivated—as in, being in fear for your lives—could lend a hand in disseminating this information and expressing your concern to all parties?

Bearing in mind that the members of Congress as it now exists are NOT your representatives, but are instead the representatives of the UNITED STATES Corporation acting as foreign envoys back to you—-isn’t it about time that you told those people that (1) they are in contract default, and (2) they are not representing you, and (3) this horse hooey has to stop?

Regarding “Political Action”


I note all the poor people rushing in and pleading, oh, no, no, no! We have to participate in the electoral process!

The electoral process of what? A private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned commercial corporation run amok?

They say, we have to get so-and-so elected and the Republicans have to take back the Senate…..

They don’t yet perceive the insanity of what they are saying and doing.

We’ve been playing this set up board game for a hundred years. There’s no difference between “Democrats” and “Republicans” anymore, if there ever was. Both are representatives of criminality, corruption, incompetence, and enslavement of real people to serve their corporation. They are the two cattle prods, one right, one left.

It’s important to understand that the Roosevelts, Teddy and FDR, set up this mental box with malice aforethought and were also the authors of much of the semantic deceit and fraud that has engulfed America for three generations. Should it surprise anyone to learn that they were also at the bottom of the development of the present “two party system”?

Will it sound strange to you that both modern “national” political parties got their start in Wisconsin, of all places–and that neither of these parties bear any resemblance to their historical antecedants?   For example, did you know that after the Civil War, it was the Democrats that blocked black Americans from being able to own land and vote, and it was the Republicans who championed that cause and finally pushed it through?

Perhaps you will wonder why such an odd thing exists?

Because in 1848 Wisconsin received a large number of German immigrants who were cast out of Europe for being “Freethinkers and Communists”—-a result of the 1848 Workers Rebellion. These people brought their foreign ideas to Wisconsin, settled in, and promptly began setting up the favorite implement of all Communists—- a divide and conquer strategy. All things are dualistic in this world and people naturally think of things as “good” or “bad”, so it is relatively easy to use this unconscious prejudice and default in our logic systems to our detriment. Unscrupulous politicians just set up “the poles”—or as in this case, “the parties”—and they just drive the sheep from one side of the spectrum to the other.

In very short order they have us wasting our time and energy and passion taking actions which get us nowhere.

Meanwhile, they are pursuing their real agenda of fraud, more deception, and enslavement.

As if this were not obvious enough, in recent years they have instituted the use of “Diebold Voting Machines” — so they don’t even have to worry about the inconvenient evidence of real election results posed by paper ballots. They can just pay off the private companies and union workers who build and service these machines, then sit back and grin and “wait for the election results to come in”.

Are Americans really as stupid as Barack H. Obama supposes?

Please note that even without these nefarious provisions, the ‘votes” of “voters” decide nothing. They are just popularity polls, serving to tell the slavemasters what “sells” to the sheep. “Electors” are the only ones who decide “elections”.

In fact, “Voter Registration” is one of the chief means these rotters use to claim that we are “US citizens” and subject to them and their corporate rules. Any time that you see the words “registration” or “application” be aware that you are giving up something precious in exchange for something either worthless or downright damaging. When you “register” as a “voter”, you automatically identify yourself as someone claiming slave status, and you give up your birthright to function as an “elector”.

So, all of you with ears to hear, get busy and write to the local “Voter Registration Office” and tell them that you made a mistake. You aren’t a “US citizen” nor a “U.S. Citizen”—-you are an American State Citizen—and you rescind your signature on their records and forms accordingly.

If you continue to feel any unreasoning urge to vote in their private corporate elections, please be advised that Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment of their most recent public charter known as the “Constitution for the United States of America” makes it illegal for anyone who is not a “US citizen” —that is, a federal employee, civil or active duty military, Negro, foreign welfare recipient, or natural born inhabitant of a “federal state” like Puerto Rico or “enclave” like Washington, DC—-to vote in THEIR elections.

You’ve most likely been breaking their law all these years and never knew it, and they have gladly let you do it because it gives them an excuse to lay claim to you and your assets and boss you around and hypothecate their debts against your credit and all sorts of other juicy advantages to them at your expense. It also gives them an excuse to arrest you any time they like and charge you for this “crime” secretly in their very own corporate tribunals. What could be more convenient?

So not only do you need to tear up those “Voter Registration Cards” and stop being fooled by all the “political process” hurrah– that is, drop out of political parties, because they, too, are strictly associated with the corporation masquerading as “your” government— you can also stop giving money to THEIR candidates and wasting time spinning your wheels.

If you want the abuse and theft and deceit to be over, you have to re-create your own PUBLIC offices on the land jurisdiction of your States. Run for THOSE offices. Support THOSE candidates.   Just like we have to rebuild the American Court system and the American monetary system, we have to rebuild the American government institutions— because, surprise, surprise—the banks took over the corporation providing you with “governmental services” a long time ago, and they haven’t been doing a good job for you.

A Republic doesn’t run itself and it can’t depend on outside “help”.

If you want to be free, now is the time.

Stop being hoodwinked by these fraud artists and driven “like dumb driven cattle”.

Just say, “No!”

10 13 11 flagbar

The Not So Smart ALEC


7-23-2014 4-59-15 PM

Written by  William F. Jasper

“Limited Government • Free Markets • Federalism.” That is the motto of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which appears on their literature and on the banner of every page of the organization’s website. ALEC’s “about” page expands on that theme, explaining:

The American Legislative Exchange Council works to advance limited government, free markets, and federalism at the state level through a nonpartisan public-private partnership of America’s state legislators, members of the private sector and the general public.

ALEC’s stated philosophy and goals resonate with liberty-minded Americans, which, undoubtedly, is why many politically conservative state legislators and activist citizens look to it for leadership in rolling back the oppressive hand of Big Government. However, the well-funded and well-connected organization is alienating many of its erstwhile supporters by its support for dangerous trade pacts that threaten the sovereignty of the United States, as well as its efforts to promote a constitutional convention, which could result in the complete destruction of our already tattered and battered U.S. Constitution. That could spell the end of any hope to return to limited government, free markets, and responsible federalism.

Founded in 1973, ALEC has just celebrated its 40th anniversary and is experiencing both the joys of prominent national influence and the pains of harsh criticism. The organization can boast a membership that includes more than 2,000 state legislators and hundreds of corporations, as well as dozens of think tanks, foundations, and non-profit organizations.

For the past several years ALEC has been under attack from a gaggle of left-wing organizations — Color of Change, Common Cause, People for the American Way, Progress Now, the Center for Media and Democracy, the Sierra Club — that claim the organization’s corporate ties and corporate funding have put it in the pocket of big business. These and similar groups have lambasted ALEC for its model legislation opposing federal EPA regulations, gun control laws, “green” energy mandates, and “climate change” carbon taxes, and its support for laws supporting voter identification, “Stand Your Ground” protection, school choice, and privatization of public services. Major media outlets, such as the New York Times, Huffington Post, MSNBC, and CNN joined The Nation, Media Matters, and other radical-left detractors in attacking ALEC for these sins against the progressive gospel. The highly politicized shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida in 2012 provided the key event that ALEC’s critics could leverage to crack the organization’s growing impact. Utilizing the media-created furor over the shooting, the left-wing activist groups launched a petition-pressure campaign that spotlighted ALEC’s support for “Stand Your Ground” laws. The result was an exodus, as major corporations and legislators fled ALEC to avoid the controversy.

For many of ALEC’s staunchest supporters, the attacks on the organization — and the liberal-left/progressive sources from which they usually emanate — only prove its bona fides as a defender of free enterprise and constitutional government. They should know better by now. The same alliance of left-wing activists and the liberal establishment media regularly confer legitimacy on false conservatives pseudo-conservatives and business lobbies that promote Big Government by attacking them for not being “progressive” enough. Examples abound: Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Manufacturing Association, the American Medical Association — to name but a very small cohort. These politicians and organizations have excelled at co-opting the rhetoric of free markets and limited government, but often go in exactly the opposite direction. In the remainder of this article, we will examine several of the areas where we contend ALEC is following a similarly deceptive path.

Trading Away Sovereignty

At its Model Policies Annual Meeting 2013, ALEC members adopted a “Resolution Supporting the Successful Negotiation of a Comprehensive and Commercially Meaningful Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).” The summary of the resolution, provided on ALEC’s website, states:

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Agreement has the potential to be the largest trade framework ever negotiated underscoring the importance of ensuring that it is a high standard, comprehensive agreement with strong intellectual property provisions. In keeping with the American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALEC’s) support of the Jeffersonian principle of free markets and ALEC’s past support of a wide variety of trade frameworks, this resolution supports the negotiation and final ratification of such an agreement.

Similarly, the organization has adopted a “Resolution Urging Congress to Pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).” The resolution summary states:

Drawing on ALEC’s guiding free market principles, this resolution calls on Congress to support negotiations for a high standard, comprehensive Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)…. The TPP has the potential to become the benchmark against which future trade frameworks will be measured for years to come.

The TTIP’s promoters portray it as a “trade” agreement between the United States and the 28 member states of the European Union, while the TPP advocates similarly claim they are merely working to expand trade between the United States and 11 Pacific partners: Canada, Mexico, Peru, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam, and Japan. The trade engendered by these agreements, say the promoters, will bring prosperity to all, including millions of promised good-paying jobs. Regular readers of The New American are already well aware of the many dangers posed by the TTIP and the TPP, which are being pushed aggressively by the Obama administration and the usual globalist elites at the New York Times, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Brookings Institution, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Among the many articles we have published, in our print edition and online, are the comprehensive “Secretly Trading Away Our Independence,” from our May 20, 2013 print edition, and the entire special issue of our September 2, 2013 magazine devoted to the topic, “How the Free Trade Agenda Is Knocking Down America” (available as a free pdf download at

One of the most important facts, if not the most important, to know about both the TTIP and TPP is that they would, if adopted, steadily strip away our national sovereignty, allowing the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the United Nations, as well as regional tribunals and regulatory bodies created by these agreements, to override our local, state, and federal laws. This feature alone makes them very subversive, revolutionary proposals that should be opposed by every elected or appointed official who has taken an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” This is no longer a matter of theoretical speculation; as The New American has reported previously, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the WTO agreement have amply proved this. As a result of adopting both of those agreements, NAFTA and WTO rules and rulings increasingly trump our laws.

Liberty-minded Americans who truly believe in the rule of law and the form of limited government envisioned by our Founders should be working to remove our country from these freedom-destroying organizations, not subjecting us to even more of the same. Even if the agreements dealt only with “trade” issues, the structures and procedures they set in place would be pregnant with dangers because they initiate a developing, ongoing process that is a guarantee of “mission creep,” with an ever-expanding transnational bureaucracy claiming ever more power over our personal, local, state, and national affairs. Obama administration officials acknowledge that the TTIP/TPP agreements deal with agriculture, environment, labor, telecommunications, financial services, and much more. And documents that have been leaked thus far have revealed additional dangers, such as TPP draft proposals that would dramatically curtail free speech on the Internet.

Another disturbing feature of both the TTIP and TPP is the secrecy and intrigue that have become their hallmarks. The American people and their elected representatives in Congress have not been allowed access to the TTIP/TPP negotiation process, nor have they been allowed to see the draft text of the agreements. However, the Obama administration has given representatives of major corporations, labor unions, environmental organizations, and other NGO activist “stakeholders” official access to both the negotiation proceedings and the texts. Thus the TTIP and TPP have become a joint project of Big Government, Big Business, Big Labor, and Big Green (although the Big Labor/Big Green contingents pretend to oppose at least some features of the agreements). The secrecy of the TTIP/TPP process is, in and of itself, a huge red flag alerting all except the willfully blind that something is amiss. ALEC should find this aspect of TTIP/TPP thoroughly objectionable, since it has made a pointed commitment to transparency in government. A perusal of ALEC literature and the organization’s “model policies” web page reveals numerous bills sponsored by ALEC devoted to transparency and criticizing officialdom for withholding information from citizens. The Transparency and Government Accountability Act, Local Government Transparency Act, and the Taxpayer Transparency Act are but three of many model bills crafted by ALEC demanding openness and access for citizens.

Yet still another strike against the TTIP and TPP is the explicit admissions by the top promoters that they intend these agreements to initiate an “integration” process that will continually “widen” (adding more nations) and “deepen” (adding more economic, political, and social issues) with time. This is the same widening-deepening integration process that has gradually transformed the Common Market “trade” bloc into the increasingly tyrannical EU leviathan ruled by central authorities in Brussels. And TTIP/TPP champions have repeatedly expressed their hopes of following the EU path toward centralized power. As of yet, ALEC has not explained how it can square its “Limited Government, Free Markets, and Federalism” philosophy with these TTIP/TPP flaws that are completely at variance with it.

Constitutional Malpractice

For many years ALEC has been a leading promoter of the idea that the U.S. Constitution must be amended to require a balanced budget. This, of course, appeals to conservatively minded legislators who recognize that continued liberal spendthrift policies are immoral and unsustainable, and lead our nation toward financial Armageddon. ALEC has used the Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) attraction to argue for an Article V Convention of the States, which constitutionalists (including the editors and writers of this magazine) contend is a dangerous gamble that risks the entire Constitution for an amendment that could not be relied on to rein in Washington, D.C.’s ravenous appetite for spending — even if the convention could be restricted to that one issue. The problem is that, ALEC’s assurances to the contrary, once a constitutional convention  is called, it becomes a power unto itself and there is no way to limit its power to amend, revise, or toss out and completely rewrite the Constitution. ALEC claims that fears of a “runaway convention” of this sort are misplaced, and they have published Article V: A Handbook for State Lawmakers to make their case for a constitutional convention (aka Article V convention). They have also produced a “Resolution for Limitations on Authority of Delegates to a ‘Convention for Proposing Amendments’ (Article V, United States of America Constitution).” This resolution, says ALEC,“will eliminate the possibility of a ‘runaway convention,’ the reason most often cited by scholars for their opposition to an Article V Convention. The resolution restricts delegates to work only on those amendments authorized in their legislative instructions and calls for the immediate recall of any delegate that works on an unauthorized amendment.”

But in making this claim, ALEC is on very shaky ground. This is clear, first of all, from our nation’s own history. Our first — and so far, only — constitutional convention, which took place in Philadelphia in 1787, was a “runaway convention,” despite restrictions on delegates similar to those advocated by ALEC. That gathering, in violation of its mandate, threw out the Articles of Confederation that it had been convened to amend, and drew up a completely new governing document. The fact that the product of that breach of trust turned out to be as sound and salutary as it has proved to be should not incite hope that a repeat of the same process would end so well.

James Madison, often referred to as the “father” of the Constitution, said the contemplation of another constitutional convention caused him to “tremble” due to the violent partisanship and “insidious views” so prevalent in his day. Have things so improved that we should be less concerned in our own day? Who but a fool or a knave would say so? Madison warned:

If a General Convention were to take place for the avowed and sole purpose of revising the Constitution, it would naturally consider itself as having a greater latitude than the Congress appointed to administer and support as well as to amend the system; it would consequently give greater agitation to the public mind; an election into it would be courted by the most violent partizans [sic] on both sides [and] would no doubt contain individuals of insidious views, who under the mask of seeking alterations popular in some parts but inadmissible in other parts of the Union might have a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very foundations of the fabric.

“Under all these circumstances it seems scarcely to be presumeable [sic] that the deliberations of the body could be conducted in harmony, or terminate in the general good,” he averred. “Having witnessed the difficulties and dangers experienced by the first Convention which assembled under every propitious circumstance,” Madison concluded, “I should tremble for the result of a second meeting in the present temper of America, and under all the disadvantages I have mentioned.”

Noted constitutional scholars of our own time from across the political spectrum — from liberal Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and Arthur Goldberg to Professors Lawrence Tribe of Harvard and Gerald Gunther of Stanford (both liberals) to Professors Charles Rice of Notre Dame and Rex Lee of Brigham Young (both conservatives) — have echoed Madison, offering their learned opinions that a constitutional convention cannot be limited in its scope, either by Congress or state legislatures. We can say for certain that regardless of the outcome of such a convention there would be dissatisfied factions that would challenge the final product, causing a constitutional impasse and, most probably, sending the whole issue before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has hardly proven to be a staunch defender of limited government. The end result well could be that our U.S. Constitution, which ALEC claims to support, would become a dead letter if ALEC’s “free trade” agenda  were to come to fruition.

Government-Business Cronyism

Still another area of concern to ALEC’s critics on both the Right and Left is the organization’s support for “public-private partnerships.” ALEC’s model legislation for states promotes a “Public-Private Partnership (P3) Authority Act,” the summary of which states:

This Act establishes a state Partnership Committee and an Office of Public-Private Partnerships to identify and establish public-private partnerships and approve qualified bidders, requests for proposals, and template contracts. The Act is designed to improve public operational efficiency and environmental performance, promote public safety, attract private investment in the state, and minimize governmental liabilities.

In this area, the supposedly “conservative” ALEC is perfectly in step with the “progressive” Obama administration, which has made public-private partnerships (P3) a centerpiece of its statist program. And many of ALEC’s member corporations are also partners in Obama’s Fedgov/Big Business “Manufacturing Innovation” consortiums and other P3 endeavors. Those favored corporate cronies include such well-known names as Boeing, General Electric, Microsoft, Caterpillar, Dow Chemical, ALCOA, and ExxonMobil. Hillary Clinton, while Obama’s secretary of state, launched the administration’s P3 Global Partnership Initiative, spreading hundreds billions of dollars in corporate welfare to the well-connected.

ALEC is in the forefront of spreading the P3 gospel at the state level, along with its progressive partner, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (USCC), which, like ALEC, talks a good game of “free markets” while actually promoting corporate subsidies and economic fascism. “Fascism,” writes Lew Rockwell, president of the genuinely free market-oriented Ludwig von Mises Institute, “is the system of government that cartelizes the private sector, centrally plans the economy to subsidize producers, exalts the police state as the source of order, denies fundamental rights and liberties to individuals, and makes the executive state the unlimited master of society.” And it is precisely this kind of cartelized, centrally planned, fascist economy that the ALEC/USCC/Obama/corporate alliance is producing.

ALEC’s corporate P3 members are well represented by:

• Big Pharma (Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Genetech, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfi­zer);

• Big Farm (Altria Group, Archer Daniels Midland, Kraft Food, J.R. Simplot, ­Monsanto);

• Big Oil (Shell, BP, Peabody, Marathon, Texaco, Tenneco, Chevron, ExxonMobil);

• Big Banking (Bank of America, Coldwell Banker, Wells Fargo, First Chicago NBD);

• Big Gambling (Hollywood Casino Corp., Argosy Gaming Co., Boyd Gaming Corp., GTECH Corp.);

• Big Media (Cox Communications, Comcast, the Wall Street Journal, News Corp., Thompson Reuters, Time Warner Cable);

• Big Insurance (Blue Cross Blue Shield, Farmers Group, GEICO, Liberty Mutual, State Farm, Travelers);

• Big Tech (Yahoo, Facebook, Google, AT&T, eBay, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Sony);

• Big Soda (Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group);

• Big Liquor (Seagram & Sons, Hiram Walker, Miller-Coors);

• Big Box Stores (Best Buy, Home Depot, JC Penney, Lowe’s);

• Big Auto (Ford, GM, Toyota, Chrysler).

ALEC’s critics on the Left erroneously cite these cozy corporate ties as evidence of the corruption inherent in “free market” capitalism. But the ALEC/Obama P3 “partnerships” are the antithesis of genuine free markets, in which entrepreneurs risk their own capital — not that of the captive taxpayers — to build businesses that provide goods and services consumers freely choose to purchase, not those determined for them by politicians and government planners.

ALEC may have started out well with the right intentions to promote free enterprise and limited constitutional government — and some of its proposals still do support those worthy efforts — but, as we have shown here, on some very fundamental issues the organization has drifted far from core beliefs proclaimed in its motto. ALEC members who truly adhere to constitutionalist and free market principles would do well to examine the organization more closely and either direct it back on course or cut ties with it, so as not to support harmful legislation and discredit the principles they profess to support.

Photo at top shows Rep. Kenny Marchant (right) introducing Pres. George W. Bush at an ALEC convention, July 2007: AP Images

This article is an example of the exclusive content that’s only available by subscribing to our print magazine. Twice a month get in-depth features covering the political gamut: education, candidate profiles, immigration, healthcare, foreign policy, guns, etc. Digital as well as print options are available!

10 13 11 flagbar