ITS OFFICIAL The state legislature of Georgia Declares the Fraud of Congress – 1957


 Posted by arnierosner             


NO. 45 (Senate Resolution No. 39)

(A Joint Resolution)

A memorial to Congress of the United States of America urging them to enact such legislation as they may deem fit to declare that the 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were never validly adopted and that they are null and void and of no effect.

Whereas, the State of Georgia together with the ten other Southern States declared to have been lately in rebellion against the United States, following the termination of hostilities in 1865, met all the conditions laid down by the President of the United States, in exercise of his Constitutional powers to recognize the governments of states, domestic as well as foreign, for the resumption of practical relations with the government of the United States, as a State and States in proper Constitutional relation to the United States; and

Whereas, when duly elected Senators and Representatives appeared in the Capitol of the United States to take their seats at the time for the opening of the 39th Congress, and again at the time for the openings of the 40th and the 41st Congresses, hostile majorities in both Houses refused to admit them to their seats in manifest violation of Articles I and V of the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, the said Congresses, not being constituted of Senators and Representatives from each State as required by the Supreme Law of the Land, were not, in Constitutional contemplation, anything more than private assemblages unlawfully attempting to exercise the Legislative Power of the United States; and

Whereas, the so-called 39th Congress, which proposed to the Legislatures of several States an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, known as the 14th Amendment, and the so-called 40th Congress, which proposed an amendment known as the 15th Amendment, were without lawful power to propose any amendment whatsoever to the Constitution; and

Whereas, two-thirds of the Members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate, as they should have been constituted, failed to vote for the submission of these amendments; and

Whereas, all proceedings subsequently flowing from these invalid proposals, purporting to establish the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments as valid parts of the Constitution, were null and void and of no effect from the beginning; and

Whereas, furthermore, when these invalid proposals were rejected by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia and twelve other Southern States, as well as of sundry Northern States, the so-called 39th and 40th Congresses, in flagrant disregard of the United States Constitution, by the use of military force, dissolved the duly recognized State Governments in Georgia and nine of the other Southern States and set up military occupation or puppet State governments, which compliantly ratified the invalid proposals, thereby making (at the point of the bayonet) a mockery of Section 4, Article IV of the Constitution, guaranteeing protection to “each of them against invasion”; and

Whereas, further, the pretended ratification of the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments by Georgia and other States whose sovereign powers had been unlawfully seized by force of arms against the peace and dignity of the people of those States, were necessary to give color to the claim of the so-called 40th and 41st Congresses that these so-called amendments had been ratified by three-fourths of the States; and

Whereas, it is a well-established principle of law that the mere lapse of time does not confirm by common acquiescence an invalidly-enacted provision of law just as it does not repeal by general desuetude a provision validly enacted; and

Whereas, the continued recognition of the 14th and 15th Amendments as valid parts of the Constitution of the United States is incompatible with the present day position of the United States as the World’s champion of Constitutional governments resting upon the consent of the people given through their lawful representatives;

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia:

The Congress of the United States is hereby memorialized and respectfully urged to declare that the exclusions of the of the Southern Senators and Representatives from the 39th, 40th and 41st Congresses were malignant acts of arbitrary power and rendered those Congresses invalidly constituted; that the forms of law with which those invalid Congresses attempted to clothe the submission of the 14th and 15th Amendments and to clothe the subsequent acts to compel unwilling States to ratify these invalidly proposed amendments, imparted no validity to these acts and amendments; and that the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are null and void and of no effect.

Be it further resolved that copies of this memorial be transmitted forthwith by the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate of the State of Georgia to the President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the United States, the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives of Congress of the United States, and the Senators and Representatives in Congress from the State of Georgia.

Approved March 8, 1957


Go to for the PDF file

10 13 11 flagbar

State-Wrecked: The Corruption of Capitalism in America


7-28-2014 2-50-04 PM



The Dow Jones and Standard & Poor’s 500 indexes reached record highs on Thursday, having completely erased the losses since the stock market’s last peak, in 2007. But instead of cheering, we should be very afraid.


Indebtedness Dwarfs the Economy

MULTIMEDIA FEATURE: A Gallery of Economic Villains and Heroes

A gallery of “heroes” who championed sound money and fiscal rectitude and “villains” who led the United States down the path of insolvency.

Over the last 13 years, the stock market has twice crashed and touched off a recession: American households lost $5 trillion in the 2000 dot-com bust and more than $7 trillion in the 2007 housing crash. Sooner or later — within a few years, I predict — this latest Wall Street bubble, inflated by an egregious flood of phony money from the Federal Reserve rather than real economic gains, will explode, too.

Since the S.&P. 500 first reached its current level, in March 2000, the mad money printers at the Federal Reserve have expanded their balance sheet sixfold (to $3.2 trillion from $500 billion). Yet during that stretch, economic output has grown by an average of 1.7 percent a year (the slowest since the Civil War); real business investment has crawled forward at only 0.8 percent per year; and the payroll job count has crept up at a negligible 0.1 percent annually. Real median family income growth has dropped 8 percent, and the number of full-time middle class jobs, 6 percent. The real net worth of the “bottom” 90 percent has dropped by one-fourth. The number of food stamp and disability aid recipients has more than doubled, to 59 million, about one in five Americans.

So the Main Street economy is failing while Washington is piling a soaring debt burden on our descendants, unable to rein in either the warfare state or the welfare state or raise the taxes needed to pay the nation’s bills. By default, the Fed has resorted to a radical, uncharted spree of money printing. But the flood of liquidity, instead of spurring banks to lend and corporations to spend, has stayed trapped in the canyons of Wall Street, where it is inflating yet another unsustainable bubble.

When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008. Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.

THIS dyspeptic prospect results from the fact that we are now state-wrecked. With only brief interruptions, we’ve had eight decades of increasingly frenetic fiscal and monetary policy activism intended to counter the cyclical bumps and grinds of the free market and its purported tendency to under produce jobs and economic output. The toll has been heavy.

As the federal government and its central-bank sidekick, the Fed, have groped for one goal after another — smoothing out the business cycle, minimizing inflation and unemployment at the same time, rolling out a giant social insurance blanket, promoting homeownership, subsidizing medical care, propping up old industries (agriculture, automobiles) and fostering new ones (“clean” energy, biotechnology) and, above all, bailing out Wall Street — they have now succumbed to overload, overreach and outside capture by powerful interests. The modern Keynesian state is broke, paralyzed and mired in empty ritual incantations about stimulating “demand,” even as it fosters a mutant crony capitalism that periodically lavishes the top 1 percent with speculative windfalls.

The culprits are bipartisan, though you’d never guess that from the blather that passes for political discourse these days. The state-wreck originated in 1933, when Franklin D. Roosevelt opted for fiat money (currency not fundamentally backed by gold), economic nationalism and capitalist cartels in agriculture and industry.

Under the exigencies of World War II (which did far more to end the Depression than the New Deal did), the state got hugely bloated, but remarkably, the bloat was put into brief remission during a midcentury golden era of sound money and fiscal rectitude with Dwight D. Eisenhower in the White House and William McChesney Martin Jr. at the Fed.

Then came Lyndon B. Johnson’s “guns and butter” excesses, which were intensified over one perfidious weekend at Camp David, Md., in 1971, when Richard M. Nixon essentially defaulted on the nation’s debt obligations by finally ending the convertibility of gold to the dollar. That one act — arguably a sin graver than Watergate — meant the end of national financial discipline and the start of a four-decade spree during which we have lived high on the hog, running a cumulative $8 trillion current-account deficit. In effect, America underwent an internal leveraged buyout, raising our ratio of total debt (public and private) to economic output to about 3.6 from its historic level of about 1.6. Hence the $30 trillion in excess debt (more than half the total debt, $56 trillion) that hangs over the American economy today.

This explosion of borrowing was the stepchild of the floating-money contraption deposited in the Nixon White House by Milton Friedman, the supposed hero of free-market economics who in fact sowed the seed for a never-ending expansion of the money supply. The Fed, which celebrates its centenary this year, fueled a roaring inflation in goods and commodities during the 1970s that was brought under control only by the iron resolve of Paul A. Volcker, its chairman from 1979 to 1987.

Under his successor, the lapsed hero Alan Greenspan, the Fed dropped Friedman’s penurious rules for monetary expansion, keeping interest rates too low for too long and flooding Wall Street with freshly minted cash. What became known as the “Greenspan put” — the implicit assumption that the Fed would step in if asset prices dropped, as they did after the 1987 stock-market crash — was reinforced by the Fed’s unforgivable 1998 bailout of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management.

That Mr. Greenspan’s loose monetary policies didn’t set off inflation was only because domestic prices for goods and labor were crushed by the huge flow of imports from the factories of Asia. By offshoring America’s tradable-goods sector, the Fed kept the Consumer Price Index contained, but also permitted the excess liquidity to foster a roaring inflation in financial assets. Mr. Greenspan’s pandering incited the greatest equity boom in history, with the stock market rising fivefold between the 1987 crash and the 2000 dot-com bust.

Soon Americans stopped saving and consumed everything they earned and all they could borrow. The Asians, burned by their own 1997 financial crisis, were happy to oblige us. They — China and Japan above all — accumulated huge dollar reserves, transforming their central banks into a string of monetary roach motels where sovereign debt goes in but never comes out. We’ve been living on borrowed time — and spending Asians’ borrowed dimes.

This dynamic reinforced the Reaganite shibboleth that “deficits don’t matter” and the fact that nearly $5 trillion of the nation’s $12 trillion in “publicly held” debt is actually sequestered in the vaults of central banks. The destruction of fiscal rectitude under Ronald Reagan — one reason I resigned as his budget chief in 1985 — was the greatest of his many dramatic acts. It created a template for the Republicans’ utter abandonment of the balanced-budget policies of Calvin Coolidge and allowed George W. Bush to dive into the deep end, bankrupting the nation through two misbegotten and unfinanced wars, a giant expansion of Medicare and a tax-cutting spree for the wealthy that turned K Street lobbyists into the de facto office of national tax policy. In effect, the G.O.P. embraced Keynesianism — for the wealthy.

The explosion of the housing market, abetted by phony credit ratings, securitization shenanigans and willful malpractice by mortgage lenders, originators and brokers, has been well documented. Less known is the balance-sheet explosion among the top 10 Wall Street banks during the eight years ending in 2008. Though their tiny sliver of equity capital hardly grew, their dependence on unstable “hot money” soared as the regulatory harness the Glass-Steagall Act had wisely imposed during the Depression was totally dismantled.

Within weeks of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September 2008, Washington, with Wall Street’s gun to its head, propped up the remnants of this financial mess in a panic-stricken melee of bailouts and money-printing that is the single most shameful chapter in American financial history.

There was never a remote threat of a Great Depression 2.0 or of a financial nuclear winter, contrary to the dire warnings of Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed chairman since 2006. The Great Fear — manifested by the stock market plunge when the House voted down the TARP bailout before caving and passing it — was purely another Wall Street concoction. Had President Bush and his Goldman Sachs adviser (a k a Treasury Secretary) Henry M. Paulson Jr. stood firm, the crisis would have burned out on its own and meted out to speculators the losses they so richly deserved. The Main Street banking system was never in serious jeopardy, ATMs were not going dark and the money market industry was not imploding.


Instead, the White House, Congress and the Fed, under Mr. Bush and then President Obama, made a series of desperate, reckless maneuvers that were not only unnecessary but ruinous. The auto bailouts, for example, simply shifted jobs around — particularly to the aging, electorally vital Rust Belt — rather than saving them. The “green energy” component of Mr. Obama’s stimulus was mainly a nearly $1 billion giveaway to crony capitalists, like the venture capitalist John Doerr and the self-proclaimed outer-space visionary Elon Musk, to make new toys for the affluent.

Less than 5 percent of the $800 billion Obama stimulus went to the truly needy for food stamps, earned-income tax credits and other forms of poverty relief. The preponderant share ended up in money dumps to state and local governments, pork-barrel infrastructure projects, business tax loopholes and indiscriminate middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic Keynesians, as intellectually bankrupt as their Republican counterparts (though less hypocritical), had no solution beyond handing out borrowed money to consumers, hoping they would buy a lawn mower, a flat-screen TV or, at least, dinner at Red Lobster.

But even Mr. Obama’s hopelessly glib policies could not match the audacity of the Fed, which dropped interest rates to zero and then digitally printed new money at the astounding rate of $600 million per hour. Fast-money speculators have been “purchasing” giant piles of Treasury debt and mortgage-backed securities, almost entirely by using short-term overnight money borrowed at essentially zero cost, thanks to the Fed. Uncle Ben has lined their pockets.

If and when the Fed — which now promises to get unemployment below 6.5 percent as long as inflation doesn’t exceed 2.5 percent — even hints at shrinking its balance sheet, it will elicit a tidal wave of sell orders, because even a modest drop in bond prices would destroy the arbitrageurs’ profits. Notwithstanding Mr. Bernanke’s assurances about eventually, gradually making a smooth exit, the Fed is domiciled in a monetary prison of its own making.

While the Fed fiddles, Congress burns. Self-titled fiscal hawks like Paul D. Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, are terrified of telling the truth: that the 10-year deficit is actually $15 trillion to $20 trillion, far larger than the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of $7 trillion. Its latest forecast, which imagines 16.4 million new jobs in the next decade, compared with only 2.5 million in the last 10 years, is only one of the more extreme examples of Washington’s delusions.

Even a supposedly “bold” measure — linking the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security payments to a different kind of inflation index — would save just $200 billion over a decade, amounting to hardly 1 percent of the problem. Mr. Ryan’s latest budget shamelessly gives Social Security and Medicare a 10-year pass, notwithstanding that a fair portion of their nearly $19 trillion cost over that decade would go to the affluent elderly. At the same time, his proposal for draconian 30 percent cuts over a decade on the $7 trillion safety net — Medicaid, food stamps and the earned-income tax credit — is another front in the G.O.P.’s war against the 99 percent.

Without any changes, over the next decade or so, the gross federal debt, now nearly $17 trillion, will hurtle toward $30 trillion and soar to 150 percent of gross domestic product from around 105 percent today. Since our constitutional stasis rules out any prospect of a “grand bargain,” the nation’s fiscal collapse will play out incrementally, like a Greek/Cypriot tragedy, in carefully choreographed crises over debt ceilings, continuing resolutions and temporary budgetary patches.

The future is bleak. The greatest construction boom in recorded history — China’s money dump on infrastructure over the last 15 years — is slowing. Brazil, India, Russia, Turkey, South Africa and all the other growing middle-income nations cannot make up for the shortfall in demand. The American machinery of monetary and fiscal stimulus has reached its limits. Japan is sinking into old-age bankruptcy and Europe into welfare-state senescence. The new rulers enthroned in Beijing last year know that after two decades of wild lending, speculation and building, even they will face a day of reckoning, too.

THE state-wreck ahead is a far cry from the “Great Moderation” proclaimed in 2004 by Mr. Bernanke, who predicted that prosperity would be everlasting because the Fed had tamed the business cycle and, as late as March 2007, testified that the impact of the subprime meltdown “seems likely to be contained.” Instead of moderation, what’s at hand is a Great Deformation, arising from a rogue central bank that has abetted the Wall Street casino, crucified savers on a cross of zero interest rates and fueled a global commodity bubble that erodes Main Street living standards through rising food and energy prices — a form of inflation that the Fed fecklessly disregards in calculating inflation.

These policies have brought America to an end-stage metastasis. The way out would be so radical it can’t happen. It would necessitate a sweeping divorce of the state and the market economy. It would require a renunciation of crony capitalism and its first cousin: Keynesian economics in all its forms. The state would need to get out of the business of imperial hubris, economic uplift and social insurance and shift its focus to managing and financing an effective, affordable, means-tested safety net.

All this would require drastic deflation of the realm of politics and the abolition of incumbency itself, because the machinery of the state and the machinery of re-election have become conterminous. Prying them apart would entail sweeping constitutional surgery: amendments to give the president and members of Congress a single six-year term, with no re-election; providing 100 percent public financing for candidates; strictly limiting the duration of campaigns (say, to eight weeks); and prohibiting, for life, lobbying by anyone who has been on a legislative or executive payroll. It would also require overturning Citizens United and mandating that Congress pass a balanced budget, or face an automatic sequester of spending.

It would also require purging the corrosive financialization that has turned the economy into a giant casino since the 1970s. This would mean putting the great Wall Street banks out in the cold to compete as at-risk free enterprises, without access to cheap Fed loans or deposit insurance. Banks would be able to take deposits and make commercial loans, but be banned from trading, underwriting and money management in all its forms.

It would require, finally, benching the Fed’s central planners, and restoring the central bank’s original mission: to provide liquidity in times of crisis but never to buy government debt or try to micromanage the economy. Getting the Fed out of the financial markets is the only way to put free markets and genuine wealth creation back into capitalism.

That, of course, will never happen because there are trillions of dollars of assets,    from Shanghai skyscrapers to Fortune 1000 stocks to the latest housing market “recovery,” artificially propped up by the Fed’s interest-rate repression. The United States is broke — fiscally, morally, intellectually — and the Fed has incited a global currency war (Japan just signed up, the Brazilians and Chinese are angry, and the German-dominated euro zone is crumbling) that will soon overwhelm it. When the latest bubble pops, there will be nothing to stop the collapse. If this sounds like advice to get out of the markets and hide out in cash, it is.


David A. Stockman is a former Republican congressman from Michigan, President Ronald Reagan’s budget director from 1981 to 1985 and the author, most recently, of “The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America.”

10 13 11 flagbar

U. S. CORPORATION Silently Positions for Martial Law as Financial Collapse Arrives in America


By Susanne Posel

The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades now. According to Peter Santilli, an informant who is an ex-marine and worked on portions of the contingency plans known as Rex 84, civil unrest will come after a financial collapse.

The Readiness Exercise 1984, a.k.a. Rex 84, outlines continuity of government wherein the US Constitution is suspended, martial law is declared and the US military command take over state and local governments in order to ensure stabilization of our nation at any cost. Any American who is deemed a “national security threat” would be detained in an interment or FEMA camp.

The author of Rex 84 was Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, National Security Council (NSC) White House aids and NSC liaison to FEMA.

Rex 84 is the plan; the triggers are a series of executive orders . It is the continuity of government under specific contingency strategies that are laid out in various operations guide manuals. Operation Garden Plot is a subprogram of Rex 84.

Twice before, Rex 84 was implemented — during the LA riots and on 9/11. In these scenarios, only small portions of the entire set of documents were used. Within the series of contingency plans, implementation of them depends on the severity of the situation.

Some of the plans include internment camps where all or portions of the active or inactive military bases would be transformed into work camps where all considered to be dissonant would be held. The NORTHCOM army manuals clearly state that NATO forces will be used in every phase of the operation.

According to Santilli, procedures to move conventional, chemical and nuclear bombs across the nation without detection have been facilitated without notice by the US military.

Back in 1986, during his military service where he was involved with weapons transportation, Santilli describes how an unmarked refrigerated trailer driven by a civilian driver was used to transport chemical or conventional weapons to various strategic bases both above and underground.

Santilli was a specialist in aviation deployed weapons, which made him the perfect candidate to the assignment of weapons transportation.

The refrigerated truck, allocated by the administration department on base, was directed to the commissary, where the unsuspecting driver believed that he was transporting food. The weapon was placed at the head of the trailer, and covered up with either food stores (like cans of soup) or body bags. In the event that the truck is stopped en route, the weapon would be well hidden and go undetected by inspectors on the public highways.

A US Marine Corp bill of lading was the paperwork necessary to move the commercial refrigerated truck through weigh stations on public highways without any question. Santilli remembers that there was not one incident where he had to enact any security measures to ensure the delivery was made.

Santilli, who was assigned to ride in the cab of the truck with the driver, says that his orders were to make sure the truck arrived at its destination. He was informed by his superiors that if there were problems concerning potential civil unrest, he was to radio into his superiors for aid by either air or ground support.

Should the situation warrant serious attention; crowd control methods would be implemented.

One possible scenario was the use of cluster bomb units (CBUs) that will emit upon detonation, a “sleep and kill” chemical weapon that will not disturb infrastructure, but is lethal to all living things within the effected zone. Santilli describes these particular 3 unit CBUs as shaped like water-heaters with a coned top and plunger-like device. Once deployed in the air, a parachute assists these CBUs to the targeted area. And when detonated, a deadly chemical gas will kill every human and animal in the specified cordoned area.

This is just one example, says Santilli, as to the lengths the US armed forces are trained to make sure continuity of government is preserved.

Santilli explained that the use of foreign troops on US soil, as described in Rex 84 and other subsequent manuals, would have a two-fold purpose.
Firstly, to provide extra security in designated areas, cities or highways; and secondly, as scapegoats were violent action used against American citizens should the US military be directed to attack civilians.

The refrigerated truck, carrying the chemical or conventional weapon with Santilli riding shotgun travelled to underground bases like the one at Yuma Proving Ground which is a ammunitions testing range for pilots. Nestled underneath the ground is a secret military base.

Santilli explains that his knowledge of Rex 84 provides that within the document, one of the scenarios that would cause a complete suspension of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights and implement martial law would be a financial collapse. He says once the collapse occurs, the US government and defense agencies estimate they have a 72 hour window to activate all procedures to ensure continuity of government as well as a lockdown of the general population as civilian unrest, riots and outbreaks of violence are anticipated.

A source in the Deutsche Bank claims that in 2008 our financial and monetary system completely collapsed and since that time the banking cartels have been “propping up the system” to make it appear as if everything was fine. In reality our stock market and monetary systems are fake; meaning that there is nothing holding them in place except the illusion that they have stabilized since the Stock Market Crash nearly 5 years ago.

Since this time, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in conjunction with FEMA and other federal agencies have been quickly working to set in place their directives of control under a silent martial law.

The Deutsche Bank informant says that the cause for the bailout of the banks was a large sum of cash needed quickly to repay China who had purchased large quantities of mortgage-backed securities that went belly-up when the global scam was realized. When China realized that they had been duped into buying worthless securitized loans which would never be repaid, they demanded the actual property instead. The Chinese were prepared to send their “people” to American shores to seize property as allocated to them through the securitized loan contracts.

To stave this off, the American taxpayers were coerced by former President Bush and former US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. During that incident, the US Senate was told emphatically that they had to approve a $700 million bailout or else martial law would be implemented immediately. That money was funneled through the Federal Reserve Bank and wired to China, as well as other countries that were demanding repayment for the fraudulent securitizations.

To further avert financial catastrophe, as well as more debt or property seizure threats by the Chinese, the Euro was imploded there by plunging most of the European countries into an insurmountable free-fall for which they were never intended to recover.

All the money that those banks claimed they needed to avert collapse was also sent to the Chinese to add to the trillions of dollars lost during the burst of the housing bubble on the global market.

The only saving grace has been the US dollar being the global reserve currency. However, now this prop is showing signs of wear as foreign nations like China, Russia, India and Iran are dealing in gold as currency and purchasing gold on the market at an exponential rate.

In 1970, Henry Kissinger made a deal with the Saudi Arabian government that American debt would be purchased in exchange for cheap oil. Since then Iran has taken control over theOrganization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) by their use of gold as currency which has threatened the direct value of the US dollar as the global reserve currency.

This scenario with Iran coupled with the massive leaps forward in US military presence on American streets and the emergence of FEMA camps across the nation pose an obvious turn of events and explains exactly why we are witnessing the silent implementation of martial law.

The war with Iran has to do with gold, its use as currency and its exposure of the central banking cartel’s lack of gold which defines a fiat currency’s worth. And right now, the US dollar is absolutely worthless.

The Deutsche Bank informant says that the financial collapse that happened in 2008 will be realized here in America very soon. Once that happens, there must be full implementation of marital law to control the potential riots and control over citizens that will be desperate to feed their families.

The attacks of recent on the 2nd Amendment play a significant role in attempting “amicably” to remove the possibility of civilian retaliation against the US military’s presence throughout the nation. However, if they cannot remove the guns from our hands in time, they will continue on with the guidelines set out in Rex 84 with directives to kill any dissenters that refuse to obey. Go to your local law library and look up in its entirety the Federal Emergency Management under Executive Orders 12148 dated July 20,1979.

Susanne Posel is Chief Editor/administrator for Occupy Corporatism. She also writes for Global Reasearch, Activist Post & has appeared on syndicated radio programs such as: BBC World & others.

 Rex 84

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a classified “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers o…

Show More More at Wikipedia

Related Topics

NSPD-51 – The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, created and signed by United States President George W. Bush on May 4, 2007, is a Presidential Directive which claims power to execute procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a “catastrophic emergency”.

COINTELPRO – COINTELPRO was a series of covert, and at times illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.

Non-Detention Act – The Non-Detention Act of 1971 was passed to repeal portions of McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, specifically Title II, the “Emergency Detention Act”. It had allowed for detention of suspected subversives without the normal Constitutional checks required for imprisonment.

Posse Comitatus Act – The Posse Comitatus Act is the United States federal law that was passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction and was updated in 1981. Its intent was to limit the powers of Federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce the state laws.

Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 – The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 was a bill sponsored by Rep. Jane Harman in the 110th United States Congress.

Terrorist Screening Database – The Terrorist Screening Database or TSDB is the central terrorist watchlist consolidated by the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center and used by multiple agencies to compile their specific watchlists and for screening.

Civil detention in the United States

Continuity of government in the United States

Riots and civil disorder in the United States

In partnership with

Rex 84 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a classified “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of …

  2. s. Concentration Camps: Fema and The Rex 84 Program

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to …

  1. com/hardtruth/con_camps_fema.htm

FEMA Camps and REX 84 ( Orders and Locations by State)

A complete list of the orders for Rex 84 and Fema Camps. This Natural Solutions Report gives the orders for Civilian Concentration Camps and the locations by stste for the enslavement of the citizen’s.

  1. com/doc/4311840/FEMA-Camps-and-REX-84-Orders-and-Locations-by-State

REX 84, FEMA Coffins, and Fusion Centers : …

REX 84, FEMA coffins, and fusion centers are realities. These are all part of what could be elements of a soon-to-be government takeover of the country, aka martial law.

  1. com/articles/rex-84-fema-coffins-and-fusion-centers/

Article: Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial …

Article: Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as Financial Collapse Arrives in America – Americans have more & more reason to distrust a Congress which is becoming increasingly malevolent & increasingy hostile to the best interests of the country.

  1. com/articles/Rex-84-Government-Silentl-by-Susanne-Posel-120805-781.html

What is the “Rex 84” program?? – Yahoo

The Rex 84 program is the big reason out of many reasons our Founding Fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment. As long as the people remain armed and as long as the majority of the military is loyal to the Constitution it can never be implemented. … Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise …


» Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You Alex Jones …

Enter Rex 84. This is what the United States government has in place to enact martial law and use Internment Specialists to relocate those who do not comply. According to Wikipedia, Rex 84 (Readiness Exercise 1984) …

  1. com/rex-84-%E2%80%93-your-internment-camp-awaits-you/

Rex 84 – Readiness Exercise 1984 – Plan For Martial Law

Rex 84 Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, is a plan by the United States federal government to test their ability to detain large numbers of refugees or American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency.

  1. com/presentation/news/political_news/rex84_rediness_exercise_1984.htm

The Rex 84 Program – The Moon Pages: Facts Are The Only Truth

The Rex 84 Program . Established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers

  1. com/images/Rex84.pdf

Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as …

by Susanne Posel Global Research August 2, 2012 The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades no…

  1. org/?p=34654

REX 84 | Readiness Exercise 1984 | REX84 –

Rex84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, is a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution in case of National Emergency.

  1. com/rex-84.html

US Concentration Camps FEMA & REX 84 Programs | Alternative

(Before It’s News) There over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty.

  1. com/alternative/2013/06/us-concentration-camps-fema-rex-84-programs-2687970.html

The Rex 84 Program | Obama Traitor to the constitution …

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a mass exodus of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention lefts by FEMA.

  1. com/fear-fema/the-rex-84-program/

Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You …

18 Responses to “Rex 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You” gary Says: August 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 pm. Not mentioned is the parasite power grid currently under construction which shows inclusion ( stimulus funded and mandated)smart grid- GWEN towers- multiple radiofrequency emitting devices …

  1. net/2009/08/20/rex-84-your-internment-camp-awaits-you/

Supreme Court Justice Predicts Return of Internment Camps …

REX-84 is not some conspiracy theory. It is now a part of American history. It is proof that our federal government was discussing contingencies for “FEMA Camps” long before most conspiracy theorists knew what a FEMA camp was.

  1. com/2014/02/scalias-prediction-internment-camps-spark-memories-rex-84-suspension-us-constitution/

REX 84 | Flickr – Photo Sharing!

12 months ago, “Amosunknown” commented under that same image, at another section of this website: Amosunknown wrote: “I just did some research on these facilities.

  1. com/photos/iceblink240/471808297/

Antique REX 84-A cast iron wood burning footed stove /laundry …

Rex 84-A cast iron wood burning footed stove/laundry heater dated around the 1920’s. Unit has a fluted tapered belly, square cast iron legs, an air regulator dampener at the top front to adjust flame and another on the door at the base to insert wood or coal and remove ash.

  1. com/index.cfm?fa=Main.Item&itemid=229&acctid=369

Rex – 84 – SourceWatch

Rex-84 was Oliver North’s 1984 “controversial” “‘readiness exercise’ [that] called for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up and detain 400,000 imaginary ‘refugees,’ in the context of ‘uncontrolled population movements’ over the Mexican border into the United States.

  1. org/index.php?title=Rex-84

Talk:Rex 84 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moved from Main Article Page . This sounds like an urban legend, especially with the use of the orwellian ‘1984’ figure. The link below doesn’t seem authoritative.


Rex 84: Government Silently Positions for Martial Law as …

The US government has been scheming on how to provide for continuity of government for many decades now. According to Peter Santilli, an informant who is an ex-marine and worked on portions of the contingency plans known as Rex 84, civil unrest will come after a financial collapse …

  1. ca/rex-84-government-silently-positions-for-martial-law-as-financial-collapse-arrives-in-america/32153

Activist Post: REX 84 vs. Globalist Shutdown

Readiness Exercise 1984 (REX-84) is an emergency response program involving the implementation of martial law, the relocation of civilian populations, and the arrest and detainment of segments of the population.

  1. com/2011/10/rex-84-vs-globalist-shutdown.html

Rex 84 FEMA Camps | Continuity of Government – YouTube

F.E.M.A. (Federal Emergency Management Agency) is a cover for a secret “continuity of government” plan in case the American people ever rebelled, that was exposed publicly by Congressman Jack Brooks. It is designed to give all control of government and states over to the president and …

  1. com/watch?v=JfzE_TK-zmQ

Garden Plot & Rex 84 – Constitution Society

Garden Plot & Rex 84. Operation Garden Plot is a general U.S. Army and National Guard plan to respond to major domestic civil disturbances within the United States.

  1. org/abus/garden_plot/garden_plot.htm

Martial Law Watch 2011: Rex 84 / Fusion Centers

Rex84 in short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States, for internment of dissidents and others potentially harmful to the state.


Rex 84 – The Government Concentration Plan for Blacks Revealed

[ Posted On: 2008-09-15 ] Post a Comment (Taylor Media Services) Is it just an urban myth or does America actually have a contingency plan to put millions of African Americans in detention centers in the event of a crisis or widespread social unrest?

  1. com/article-dashboard/Article/Rex-84—The-Government-Concentration-Plan-for-Blacks-Revealed/124484

Rex 84 | Facebook

Rex 84. 73 likes. If you want to contact me regarding this project send me a message at

  1. com/rex84music

Rex 84

Rex 84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987, and subsequently reported on by the “Miami Herald” on July 5, 1987.


REX 84: FEMA Camps and the Threat of Martial Law Didn’t Start With Obama…

Rex 84 was short for “Readiness Exercise 1984.” Allow me to digress for just a minute, because I happened to have two years of Latin in high school.

  1. com/2013/02/06/rex-84-fema-camps-and-the-threat-of-martial-law-didnt-start-with-obama/

The REX 84′ and FEMA

ôquiet coup dÆetat that will end up making the Soviet Union look mild and permissive by comparison,ö they said. A major White House directive, known as Presidential Review Memorandum 32 (PRM 32)…

  1. net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_FEMA11.htm

Richard J Piedra’s Portfolio


  1. tv

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals…

For ENDGAME’s goal of a capacious detention capability is remarkably similar to Oliver North’s controversial Rex-84 “readiness exercise” for COG in 1984.

  1. com/articles/march2006/010306_b_camps.htm

Rex 84 | MetaFilter

Rex 84 September 11, 2005 3:45 AM Subscribe. Back in April monju_bosatsu posted something on FEMA and the REX 84 Program and Concentration Camps in the U.S. So Katrina hits…

  1. com/45016/Rex-84

REX-84 Truth Seekers Blog | Alternative U.S. & Global News

Posted in General News on January 11, 2010 by rex84truthseekers. This message has been sent using the picture and Video service from Verizon Wireless!


American concentration camps

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


Illegal aliens dumped at Tuscon bus station prompts fears of REX 84 activation…

The plan is called REX 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States…

  1. com/illegal-aliens-dumped-tuscon-bus-station-prompts-fears-rex-84-activation-video/

US Concentration Camps

The fate of Rex 84 has never been definitively explained. Rex84 American Concentration Camps. US FEMA Camps by Geopolitical Monitor.

  1. to/b/concentration.html

Rex 84 – Factbites

The Rex 84 Program Knowledge Encompassing The Rex 84 Program We Acuired This All (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08).

  1. com/topics/Rex-84

Rex 84 – “We Are Beyond Your Control” B.H.J. Records – Video Dailymotion

http://www.BlankTV.comRex 84 – “We Are Beyond Your Control” – Like this video? Come see thousands more at the Net’s largest, uncensored, completely d.i.y. music video site,!

  1. com/video/xyfbhw_rex-84-we-are-beyond-your-control-b-h-j-records_music

Rex 84

Rex-84 fue mencionado en las audiciones Iran-Contra en 1987 y subsecuentemente reportados por el Miami Herald el 5 de julio de 1987.

  1. com/dic.nsf/eswiki/1007597

FEMA and REX 84

REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, D.C. Even…

  1. com/showthread.php?t=92112

Paying the Price for Katrina and America’s Shadow Government (REX 84)…

Rex-84 was essentially a secret training operation jointly run by FEMA and the Department of Defense to train 34 federal agencies on how to deal with domestic civil unrest.

  1. com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104×4671967

Rummaging in the Governments attic:

Rex 84.

  1. org

REX 84: Ronald Reagan’s plan to declare martial law and imprison Americans…

It was called REX 84 or the Readiness Exercise 1984, and was set up for a classified “scenario and drill” so the federal government could suspend the United States Constitution while declaring martial law and…

  1. com/article/rex-84-ronald-reagan-s-plan-to-declare-martial-law-and-imprison-americans

Rex 84 Music Videos – Musictonic

Rex84 – Undercover At Sally T’s 12-22-03. Illuminati Freestyle Rex84 Project Natal 666 S… Are You Ready For A Third World War.

  1. com/music/Rex+84

  1. rex_84.

move, you are under control

rex 84.

  1. be

Black Lung – Rex 84 | Free Mp3 Download

On this page you can download “Black Lung – Rex 84” mp3 free. For playing “Black Lung – Rex 84” online click on play button on the mp3 player.

  1. mobi/rex-84-mp3-black-lung

Concentration camps in the u.s.?

Four of the principle civilian concentration camps established under the REX-84 program are located at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas; Ft.

  1. com/concentration.htm

Best of Wikipedia – Rex 84

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a “scenario and drill”, developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law…

  2. S. Concentration Camps, page 1


  1. com/forum/thread59023/pg1


U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS, FEMA and the REX 84 PROGRAM. This is NOT fiction or conspiracist nonsense – this is real.

  1. com/camps.htm


List Of Rex 84 Camps (American Concentration Camps).

  1. com

The Rex 84 Program – PDF documents

The rex 84 program. established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the mexican/us border, they would be quickly rounded up and…

Martial Law – Rex 84

Rex 84 / FEMA’s blueprint for martial law. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

  1. com/911/Articles/1/martial_law__rex_84.htm

Rex 84

Find rex 84 on » rex does best. Hot Searches. » devon megauploads.

  1. com/rex+84


The Rex-84 Alpha Ex-plan (Readiness Exercise 1984, Exercise Plan; otherwise known as a continuity of government plan)…

Rex 84 FEMA Camps | Continuity of Government – Picocent – Contribute with less…

Readiness Exercise 1984 (Rex 84) was an armed forces exercise conducted on behalf of the United States federal government to test our military’s rex 84 fema camps rex 84 camps rex 84 program.

  1. com/fun_page.php?fid=videos&v=JfzE_TK-zmQ
  2. info » Is REX 84 Being Implemented on the U.S. Border?

  1. info/is-rex-84-being-implemented-on-the-u-s-border/

My intro to the wide, wide World Of Blogging | REX 84 Plan For US Martial Law

Rex 84. Planning for future martial law legislation and orders. For many years the globalists, through the federal agencies they control…

  2. sk . Rex – WebInDetail

rex 84 camp locations. rex 84 fema concentration camps. 0.02 Low.

  1. com/ws/

…Conspiracy Theories: Martial Law, FEMA Concentration Camps, REX 84: Could…

Rex 84 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a secretive “scenario and drill”…


Rex 84, FEMA Camps & The Continuity Of Government

Tags: Rex 84. This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 10th, 2014 at 2:16 am and is filed under Video News. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  1. info/rex-84-fema-camps-continuity-government/

Council for National Policy and rex 84

This video does great job exposing the Council for National Policy, but check this out! Oliver north, which was a member of the CNP, was questioned about Rex 84 during the Iran Contra!

  1. com/forums/index.php?topic=10909.0

The People’s History: Iran, the Contras, and Rex-84

Iran, the Contras, and Rex-84. “The common ingredients of the Iran and Contra policies were secrecy, deception, and disdain for the law…

  1. net/2014/03/iran-contras-and-rex-84.html

Download REX 84 Brooks-North-Inouye Iran Contra. video at

Description: Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was written by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, who was both National Security Council White House Aide…

  1. com/video/rex-84-brooks-north-inouye-iran-contra.html

Rex 84

Found 14 files for rex 84. Review these results or try to change your search query.

  1. com/r/rex-84

REX 84 lyrics

REX 84 lyrics and albums. The newest lyrics from REX 84 organised by album. 1 albums, 1 lyrics, including ‘We Are Beyond Your Control’

  1. com/albums/rex+84/

Untitled Document

Readiness Exercise 1984 – Rex 84 Rex 84 is a United States federal government program to test their ability to detain large numbers of American citizens.

  1. com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm

King Alfred Plan

King Alfred Plan…REX 84. KING ALFRED* In the event of widespread and continuing and coordinated racial disturbances in the United States, King Alfred, at the discretion of the President…

  1. com/king_alfred_plan.htm

US Detainment-Consentration Camps

REX-84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra hearings and publicly exposed by the Miami Herald on Sunday July 5th, 1987. REX-84 dovetailed with Operation Garden Plot…

  1. com/camps.html

portland imc – 2005.09.08 – FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited

FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited If you believe the corporate media, FEMA is simply a bungling and inept emergency management agency and its director, Michael Brown…


Executive Orders, REX 84, Garden Plot, Cable Splicer and U.S. concentration…

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in…

  1. com/politics-and-religion/10635-executive-orders-rex-84-garden-plot-cable-splicer-and-u-s-concentration-camps.html

Orwells’1984 and REX 84 FEMA ( Same Thing ) | Terry Ronzio

‘Gerald Celente: Cradle of Democracy Robbed by Bankers. ‘Obama And Hillary’s Great African Military Safari ! ‘Orwells’1984 and REX 84 FEMA ( Same Thing )( 2011 Orwells 1984).

  1. com/?q=node/225

The Federal Reserve. Operation Mockingbird. REX 84. MK ULTRA. FEMA.


Oliver North Questioned – Rex 84 Exposed During Iran Contra – Video

Oliver’s Story – An Official Go Ahead. 84 Views.

  1. com/watch/yt-Ug0IL7k3elQ/oliver_north_questioned_rex_84_exposed_during_iran_contra/

rex 84

Rex 84 Exposed in Questioning of Oliver North During Iran Contra Hearingflv. Public Mass Transportation Rex 84 Fema Camps HR 645 NDAA Agenda 21 22912.


Rex 84.


Win Your War

The Chinese use pigs to predict earthquakes Bohemian Grove Drones Hancock Creech Coltan Tuskegee Experiment Rex 84 Oliver North Boystown Scandal Rothschilds Rand Corporation Oliver…

  1. com
  2. com | U.S. Concentration Camps – FEMA

U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS FEMA AND THE REX 84 PROGRAM by Jim Marrs (For further information, see pages 135 ñ 145 in Jim Marrsí book The War On Freedom).

  1. com/news/fema_concentration_camps.htm

Rex 84 Concentration Death Camps Locations

Afb rex. Designate areas to throw us into gruesome factories of microwaving death. Victim of rex readiness exercise if there over. Million people really happen as war against.


American Concentration Camps

The simulations, known as REX-84 and Night Train 84, were drafted and run by FEMA’s contact person with the National Security Agency, one Lt.

  1. com/library/conspiracy/american-concentration-camps/

Operation Garden Plot – SourceWatch

Operation Garden Plot is a subprogram of Rex 84 Program, which “was established on the reasoning that if a ‘mass exodus’ of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. org/index.php/Operation_Garden_Plot

the thickstubble itches

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a “scenario and drill”, developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law…


FEMA and REX 84 camps? Is this a joke? (Laramie, Cody: tile, gated) – City-Data…

FEMA and REX 84 camps? FEMA and REX 84 camps? Is this a joke? I cruise the web and sometimes get in sites that are on the fringe for, I dunno, nothing better to do.

Delicious1 – FriendFeed

Rex84 US regime ready for martial law. Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America –

  1. com/delicious1

BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria…

FEMA created the Rex 84 program and is who would be in charge of the detention of people should the plan be executed.

  1. com/2014/02/32241-bombshell-government-documents-expose-main-core-fema-list-criteria/

Topic Tag: rex 84 diy kentucky hardcore tour new band

REX84– ky diy

  1. com/forums/topic-tag/rex-84-diy-kentucky-hardcore-tour-new-band/

…FEMA Camps | Prison Camps | Executive Orders | Martial Law | Rex 84…

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. info/192/fema-concentration-camps/

FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Martial Law ‘Executive Orders’

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…

Blackie Ocean

He can also allude to conspiracy theories, martial law, and Rex 84, a civil unrest containment exercise in the 1970′s that continues to spark paranoia in civil libertarians.


Concentration camp idea began with ollie north

While I can’t state that everyone of these if real or fake, I do know that the Rex 84 FEMA detention camps are REAL, or at least the idea of creating them is a real idea.

  1. com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=22116

Troubled Times: Military Bases

REX 84 program, Emergence Custodial Facility. REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility. Ft. Irwin Irwin is a remote Mtn region south of Death Valley, National Monument.

  1. com/theword/tword25b.htm

Академия Тринитаризма — Институт Профессиональной Политики – Статьи…

Oakdale – Rex 84 Program Emergency custodial facility. 90 miles east of San Francisco on Hwy 120. Holds a minimum of 15,000 people.

  1. ru/rus/doc/0228/004a/02280003-02.htm

FEMA Prison Camps

Past examples of such exercises that are frequently cited by Prison Camp conspiracy guys include Rex-82 Proud Saber (where Rex-82 stands for Readiness Exercise, 1982), and Rex-84 Night Train.

  1. com/episodes/4145

“Well what if there is no tomorrow… : Information Clearing House – ICH

What if the newly operational Rex-84 network of high capacity detention camps spread across the nation is permanent?

  1. info/article23216.htm


It seems that Highland Park is home to a closely-guarded government secret – a massive detention facility operated by FEMA, REX-84.

  1. com/deusexhumanrevolution/walkthrough/femadetentioncenter.php

Wall | VK

Black lung – Rex 84.

  1. com/wall-68230636

Research | Learn everything there is to know about Research at

REX Regional express. REX-84.

  1. com/browse/research

NWO Survival Guide

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


Labels: bible, current events, economic crisis, end times, FEMA Capms, God, last days, martial law, New World Order, Obama, prophecy, rapture, revelation, Rex 84, RFID Chips.


Noctambulations | Conservative, political researcher, comments my own

One such program Rex 84 supposedly written by a NSC liaison of FEMA John Brinkerhoff and Col. Oliver North was for the detention of millions.


FEMA Camp Locations (Video & Map & List) | U. S. Politics

Google REX-84 to see how all this started. A related video –

  1. com/u-s-politics/2013/11/fema-camp-alert-november-7-2013-video-2452828.html

Moonie*~’s Journal

01:29pm 05/01/2003. Score Breed 100 Siamese 94 Somali 92 Tonkinese 88 Abyssinian 85 Colorpoint Shorthair 85 Devon Rex 84 Balinese found this test at selectsmart!


FEMA: Child of the Cold War excerpted from the book Inside the Shadow…

The first reports about Rex 84 appeared in the Miami Herald on July 5,1987 (this is the report referred to by Representative Brooks).

  1. com/FBI/FEMA_ITSG.html

Internment Camps Martial Law Concentration Camps for Christians and Patriots

CALIFORNIA Vandenburg AFB – Rex 84 facility, located near Lompoc & Santa Maria. Internment facility is located near the oceanside, close to Space Launch Complex #6, also called “Slick Six”.

  1. com/camps.htm

Donald C Roose III Design – Home

Rex 84. Flash of Lights. Stealing Las Vegas.

  1. com

Concentration Camps For Americans (INFOWARS.COM)

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turnedinto prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program…


The Kick Them All Out Project – FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations…

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. ARIZONA Ft. Huachuca – 20 miles from Mexican border, 30 miles from Nogales Rex ’84 facility.

  1. com/article.php/Story-FEMA_Camps_Executive_Orders

Congress is kept away from Rex 84 FEMA camp Martial Law plan | Big Brother…

Congress is kept away from Rex 84 FEMA camp Martial Law plan. big brother 2010.

  1. com/?p=498

обзор пользователя cfamiglietti

TIL the US goverment developed a classified contingency plan called Rex 84 which would allow them to implement martial law, suspend the Constitution…

  1. com/user/cfamiglietti

The Expert’s Journal

This is just one of many concentration camps in the U.S. They were established under the REX-84 program. If the President declares martial law…

WeAreAllOne | Just another weblog

REX 84. Posted on July 11, 2008 by weareallonetv. Filed under: military state, mind control, rex 84 | Leave a comment ».


Lord Levy Kidnapped

If this was a dry run for FEMA of Rex 84 it looks a strange distribution.. especially as the diaspora looks to be fairly fixed with the folks being moved, rapidly putting down roots…


What is being planned with all these FEMA camps

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

  1. com/united-states/what-is-being-planned-with-all-these-fema-camps/question-1428579/

Where are all the FEMA camps? | unifiedserenity

The Rex 84 Program (short for Readiness Exercise 1984) was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border…


The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist


 By Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Devereaux23 Jul 2014, 2:45 PM EDT386

The Obama administration has quietly approved a substantial expansion of the terrorist watchlist system, authorizing a secret process that requires neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence” to designate an American or foreigner as a terrorist, according to a key government document obtained by The Intercept.

The “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance,” a 166-page document issued last year by the National Counterterrorism Center, spells out the government’s secret rules for putting individuals on its main terrorist database, as well as the no fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings. The new guidelines allow individuals to be designated as representatives of terror organizations without any evidence they are actually connected to such organizations, and it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to place entire “categories” of people the government is tracking onto the no fly and selectee lists. It broadens the authority of government officials to “nominate” people to the watchlists based on what is vaguely described as “fragmentary information.” It also allows for dead people to be watchlisted.

Over the years, the Obama and Bush Administrations have fiercely resisted disclosing the criteria for placing names on the databases—though the guidelines are officially labeled as unclassified. In May, Attorney General Eric Holder even invoked the state secrets privilege to prevent watchlisting guidelines from being disclosed in litigation launched by an American who was on the no fly list. In an affidavit, Holder called them a “clear roadmap” to the government’s terrorist-tracking apparatus, adding: “The Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed … could cause significant harm to national security.”

The rulebook, which The Intercept is publishing in full, was developed behind closed doors by representatives of the nation’s intelligence, military, and law-enforcement establishment, including the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, and FBI. Emblazoned with the crests of 19 agencies, it offers the most complete and revealing look into the secret history of the government’s terror list policies to date. It reveals a confounding and convoluted system filled with exceptions to its own rules, and it relies on the elastic concept of “reasonable suspicion” as a standard for determining whether someone is a possible threat. Because the government tracks “suspected terrorists” as well as “known terrorists,” individuals can be watchlisted if they are suspected of being a suspected terrorist, or if they are suspected of associating with people who are suspected of terrorism activity.

“Instead of a watchlist limited to actual, known terrorists, the government has built a vast system based on the unproven and flawed premise that it can predict if a person will commit a terrorist act in the future,” says Hina Shamsi, the head of the ACLU’s National Security Project. “On that dangerous theory, the government is secretly blacklisting people as suspected terrorists and giving them the impossible task of proving themselves innocent of a threat they haven’t carried out.” Shamsi, who reviewed the document, added, “These criteria should never have been kept secret.”

The document’s definition of “terrorist” activity includes actions that fall far short of bombing or hijacking. In addition to expected crimes, such as assassination or hostage-taking, the guidelines also define destruction of government property and damaging computers used by financial institutions as activities meriting placement on a list. They also define as terrorism any act that is “dangerous” to property and intended to influence government policy through intimidation.

This combination—a broad definition of what constitutes terrorism and a low threshold for designating someone a terrorist—opens the way to ensnaring innocent people in secret government dragnets. It can also be counterproductive. When resources are devoted to tracking people who are not genuine risks to national security, the actual threats get fewer resources—and might go unnoticed.

“If reasonable suspicion is the only standard you need to label somebody, then it’s a slippery slope we’re sliding down here, because then you can label anybody anything,” says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent with experience running high-profile terrorism investigations. “Because you appear on a telephone list of somebody doesn’t make you a terrorist. That’s the kind of information that gets put in there.”

The fallout is personal too. There are severe consequences for people unfairly labeled a terrorist by the U.S. government, which shares its watchlist data with local law enforcement, foreign governments, and “private entities.” Once the U.S. government secretly labels you a terrorist or terrorist suspect, other institutions tend to treat you as one. It can become difficult to get a job (or simply to stay out of jail). It can become burdensome—or impossible—to travel. And routine encounters with law enforcement can turn into ordeals.

A chart from the “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance”

In 2012 Tim Healy, the former director of the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, described to CBS News how watchlists are used by police officers. “So if you are speeding, you get pulled over, they’ll query that name,” he said. “And if they are encountering a known or suspected terrorist, it will pop up and say call the Terrorist Screening Center…. So now the officer on the street knows he may be dealing with a known or suspected terrorist.” Of course, the problem is that the “known or suspected terrorist” might just be an ordinary citizen who should not be treated as a menace to public safety.

Until 2001, the government did not prioritize building a watchlist system. On 9/11, the government’s list of people barred from flying included just 16 names. Today, the no fly list has swelled to tens of thousands of “known or suspected terrorists” (the guidelines refer to them as KSTs). The selectee list subjects people to extra scrutiny and questioning at airports and border crossings. The government has created several other databases, too. The largest is the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE), which gathers terrorism information from sensitive military and intelligence sources around the world. Because it contains classified information that cannot be widely distributed, there is yet another list, the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB, which has been stripped of TIDE’s classified data so that it can be shared. When government officials refer to “the watchlist,” they are typically referring to the TSDB. (TIDE is the responsibility of the National Counterterrorism Center; the TSDB is managed by the Terrorist Screening Center at the FBI.)

In a statement, a spokesman for the National Counterterrorism Center told The Intercept that “the watchlisting system is an important part of our layered defense to protect the United States against future terrorist attacks” and that “watchlisting continues to mature to meet an evolving, diffuse threat.” He added that U.S. citizens are afforded extra protections to guard against improper listing, and that no one can be placed on a list solely for activities protected by the First Amendment. A representative of the Terrorist Screening Center did not respond to a request for comment.

The system has been criticized for years. In 2004, Sen. Ted Kennedy complained that he was barred from boarding flights on five separate occasions because his name resembled the alias of a suspected terrorist. Two years later, CBS News obtained a copy of the no fly list and reported that it included Bolivian president Evo Morales and Lebanese parliament head Nabih Berri. One of the watchlists snared Mikey Hicks, a Cub Scout who got his first of many airport pat-downs at age two. In 2007, the Justice Department’s inspector general issued a scathing report identifying “significant weaknesses” in the system. And in 2009, after a Nigerian terrorist was able to board a passenger flight to Detroit and nearly detonated a bomb sewn into his underwear despite his name having been placed on the TIDE list, President Obama admitted that there had been a “systemic failure.”

Obama hoped that his response to the “underwear bomber” would be a turning point. In 2010, he gave increased powers and responsibilities to the agencies that nominate individuals to the lists, placing pressure on them to add names. His administration also issued a set of new guidelines for the watchlists. Problems persisted, however. In 2012, the U.S. Government Accountability Office published a report that bluntly noted there was no agency responsible for figuring out “whether watchlist-related screening or vetting is achieving intended results.” The guidelines were revised and expanded in 2013—and a source within the intelligence community subsequently provided a copy to The Intercept.

“Concrete facts are not necessary”

The five chapters and 11 appendices of the “Watchlisting Guidance” are filled with acronyms, legal citations, and numbered paragraphs; it reads like an arcane textbook with a vocabulary all its own. Different types of data on suspected terrorists are referred to as “derogatory information,” “substantive derogatory information,” “extreme derogatory information” and “particularized derogatory information.” The names of suspected terrorists are passed along a bureaucratic ecosystem of “originators,” “nominators,” “aggregators,” “screeners,” and “encountering agencies.” And “upgrade,” usually a happy word for travellers, is repurposed to mean that an individual has been placed on a more restrictive list.

The heart of the document revolves around the rules for placing individuals on a watchlist. “All executive departments and agencies,” the document says, are responsible for collecting and sharing information on terrorist suspects with the National Counterterrorism Center. It sets a low standard—”reasonable suspicion“—for placing names on the watchlists, and offers a multitude of vague, confusing, or contradictory instructions for gauging it. In the chapter on “Minimum Substantive Derogatory Criteria”—even the title is hard to digest—the key sentence on reasonable suspicion offers little clarity:

“To meet the REASONABLE SUSPICION standard, the NOMINATOR, based on the totality of the circumstances, must rely upon articulable intelligence or information which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or has been knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to TERRORISM and/or TERRORIST ACTIVITIES.”

The rulebook makes no effort to define an essential phrase in the passage—”articulable intelligence or information.” After stressing that hunches are not reasonable suspicion and that “there must be an objective factual basis” for labeling someone a terrorist, it goes on to state that no actual facts are required:

“In determining whether a REASONABLE SUSPICION exists, due weight should be given to the specific reasonable inferences that a NOMINATOR is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his/her experience and not on unfounded suspicions or hunches. Although irrefutable evidence or concrete facts are not necessary, to be reasonable, suspicion should be as clear and as fully developed as circumstances permit.”

While the guidelines nominally prohibit nominations based on unreliable information, they explicitly regard “uncorroborated” Facebook or Twitter posts as sufficient grounds for putting an individual on one of the watchlists. “Single source information,” the guidelines state, “including but not limited to ‘walk-in,’ ‘write-in,’ or postings on social media sites, however, should not automatically be discounted … the NOMINATING AGENCY should evaluate the credibility of the source, as well as the nature and specificity of the information, and nominate even if that source is uncorroborated.”

There are a number of loopholes for putting people onto the watchlists even if reasonable suspicion cannot be met.

One is clearly defined: The immediate family of suspected terrorists—their spouses, children, parents, or siblings—may be watchlisted without any suspicion that they themselves are engaged in terrorist activity. But another loophole is quite broad—”associates” who have a defined relationship with a suspected terrorist, but whose involvement in terrorist activity is not known. A third loophole is broader still—individuals with “a possible nexus” to terrorism, but for whom there is not enough “derogatory information” to meet the reasonable suspicion standard.

Americans and foreigners can be nominated for the watchlists if they are associated with a terrorist group, even if that group has not been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. They can also be treated as “representatives” of a terrorist group even if they have “neither membership in nor association with the organization.” The guidelines do helpfully note that certain associations, such as providing janitorial services or delivering packages, are not grounds for being watchlisted.

The nomination system appears to lack meaningful checks and balances. Although government officials have repeatedly said there is a rigorous process for making sure no one is unfairly placed in the databases, the guidelines acknowledge that all nominations of “known terrorists” are considered justified unless the National Counterterrorism Center has evidence to the contrary. In a recent court filing, the government disclosed that there were 468,749 KST nominations in 2013, of which only 4,915 were rejected–a rate of about one percent. The rulebook appears to invert the legal principle of due process, defining nominations as “presumptively valid.”

Profiling categories of people

While the nomination process appears methodical on paper, in practice there is a shortcut around the entire system. Known as a “threat-based expedited upgrade,” it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to elevate entire “categories of people” whose names appear in the larger databases onto the no fly or selectee lists. This can occur, the guidelines state, when there is a “particular threat stream” indicating that a certain type of individual may commit a terrorist act.

This extraordinary power for “categorical watchlisting”—otherwise known as profiling—is vested in the assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, a position formerly held by CIA Director John Brennan that does not require Senate confirmation.

The rulebook does not indicate what “categories of people” have been subjected to threat-based upgrades. It is not clear, for example, whether a category might be as broad as military-age males from Yemen. The guidelines do make clear that American citizens and green card holders are subject to such upgrades, though government officials are required to review their status in an “expedited” procedure. Upgrades can remain in effect for 72 hours before being reviewed by a small committee of senior officials. If approved, they can remain in place for 30 days before a renewal is required, and can continue “until the threat no longer exists.”

“In a set of watchlisting criteria riddled with exceptions that swallow rules, this exception is perhaps the most expansive and certainly one of the most troubling,” Shamsi, the ACLU attorney, says. “It’s reminiscent of the Bush administration’s heavily criticized color-coded threat alerts, except that here, bureaucrats can exercise virtually standard-less authority in secret with specific negative consequences for entire categories of people.”

The National Counterterrorism Center declined to provide any details on the upgrade authority, including how often it has been exercised and for what categories of people.

Pocket litter and scuba gear

The guidelines provide the clearest explanation yet of what is happening when Americans and foreigners are pulled aside at airports and border crossings by government agents. The fifth chapter, titled “Encounter Management and Analysis,” details the type of information that is targeted for collection during “encounters” with people on the watchlists, as well as the different organizations that should collect the data. The Department of Homeland Security is described as having the largest number of encounters, but other authorities, ranging from the State Department and Coast Guard to foreign governments and “certain private entities,” are also involved in assembling “encounter packages” when watchlisted individuals cross their paths. The encounters can be face-to-face meetings or electronic interactions—for instance, when a watchlisted individual applies for a visa.

In addition to data like fingerprints, travel itineraries, identification documents and gun licenses, the rules encourage screeners to acquire health insurance information, drug prescriptions, “any cards with an electronic strip on it (hotel cards, grocery cards, gift cards, frequent flyer cards),” cellphones, email addresses, binoculars, peroxide, bank account numbers, pay stubs, academic transcripts, parking and speeding tickets, and want ads. The digital information singled out for collection includes social media accounts, cell phone lists, speed dial numbers, laptop images, thumb drives, iPods, Kindles, and cameras. All of the information is then uploaded to the TIDE database.

Screeners are also instructed to collect data on any “pocket litter,” scuba gear, EZ Passes, library cards, and the titles of any books, along with information about their condition—”e.g., new, dog-eared, annotated, unopened.” Business cards and conference materials are also targeted, as well as “anything with an account number” and information about any gold or jewelry worn by the watchlisted individual. Even “animal information”—details about pets from veterinarians or tracking chips—is requested. The rulebook also encourages the collection of biometric or biographical data about the travel partners of watchlisted individuals.

The list of government entities that collect this data includes the U.S. Agency for International Development, which is neither an intelligence nor law-enforcement agency. As the rulebook notes, USAID funds foreign aid programs that promote environmentalism, health care, and education. USAID, which presents itself as committed to fighting global poverty, nonetheless appears to serve as a conduit for sensitive intelligence about foreigners.According to the guidelines, “When USAID receives an application seeking financial assistance, prior to granting, these applications are subject to vetting by USAID intelligence analysts at the TSC.” The guidelines do not disclose the volume of names provided by USAID, the type of information it provides, or the number and duties of the “USAID intelligence analysts.”

A USAID spokesman told The Intercept that “in certain high risk countries, such as Afghanistan, USAID has determined that vetting potential partner organizations with the terrorist watchlist is warranted to protect U.S. taxpayer dollars and to minimize the risk of inadvertent funding of terrorism.” He stated that since 2007, the agency has checked “the names and other personal identifying information of key individuals of contractors and grantees, and sub-recipients.”

Death and the watchlist

The government has been widely criticized for making it impossible for people to know why they have been placed on a watchlist, and for making it nearly impossible to get off. The guidelines bluntly state that “the general policy of the U.S. Government is to neither confirm nor deny an individual’s watchlist status.” But the courts have taken exception to the official silence and footdragging: In June, a federal judge described the government’s secretive removal process as unconstitutional and “wholly ineffective.”

The difficulty of getting off the list is highlighted by a passage in the guidelines stating that an individual can be kept on the watchlist, or even placed onto the watchlist, despite being acquitted of a terrorism-related crime. The rulebook justifies this by noting that conviction in U.S. courts requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas watchlisting requires only a reasonable suspicion. Once suspicion is raised, even a jury’s verdict cannot erase it.

Not even death provides a guarantee of getting off the list. The guidelines say the names of dead people will stay on the list if there is reason to believe the deceased’s identity may be used by a suspected terrorist–which the National Counterterrorism Center calls a “demonstrated terrorist tactic.” In fact, for the same reason, the rules permit the deceased spouses of suspected terrorists to be placed onto the list after they have died.

For the living, the process of getting off the watchlist is simple yet opaque. A complaint can be filed through the Department of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Program, which launches an internal review that is not subject to oversight by any court or entity outside the counterterrorism community. The review can result in removal from a watchlist or an adjustment of watchlist status, but the individual will not be told if he or she prevails. The guidelines highlight one of the reasons why it has been difficult to get off the list—if multiple agencies have contributed information on a watchlisted individual, all of them must agree to removing him or her.

If a U.S. citizen is placed on the no fly list while abroad and is turned away from a flight bound for the U.S., the guidelines say they should be referred to the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate, which is prohibited from informing them why they were blocked from flying. According to the rules, these individuals can be granted a “One-Time Waiver” to fly, though they will not be told that they are traveling on a waiver. Back in the United States, they will be unable to board another flight.

The document states that nominating agencies are “under a continuing obligation” to provide exculpatory information when it emerges. It adds that the agencies are expected to conduct annual reviews of watchlisted American citizens and green card holders. It is unclear whether foreigners—or the dead—are reviewed at the same pace. As the rulebook notes, “watchlisting is not an exact science.”

Josh Begley, Lynn Dombek, and Peter Maass contributed to this story.

Photo credits: TSA: G.J. McCarthy/Dallas Morning News/Corbis (2); Guidance: Josh Begley; White House: Win McNamee/Getty Images; Airport: Nick Ut/AP Photo

2013 Watchlisting Guidance (PDF)

10 13 11 flagbar


The Depopulation Agenda


7-25-2014 10-30-35 AM

By Dean Henderson

While the global elite construct underground bunkers, eat organic and hoard seeds in Arctic vaults; the global poor are being slowly starved thanks to high commodity prices and poisoned with genetically modified (GMO) food. Austerity measures aimed largely at the poor are being imposed on all the nations of the world. Weather events grow more deadly and brushfire wars more frequent. An AK-47 can be obtained for $49 in the markets of West Africa. The depopulation campaign of the inbred Illuminati bankers is accelerating.

(Excerpted from Chapter 13: USS Persian Gulf: Big Oil & Their Bankers…)

In 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower, who later warned of a “military-industrial complex”, commissioned a panel of scientists to study the issue of overpopulation.  The scientists put forth Alternatives I, II and III, advocating both the release of deadly viruses and perpetual warfare as means to decrease world population.

The first supposition dovetailed nicely with the pharmaceutical interests of the Rockefellers.  According to Nexus magazine, the Rockefellers own one-half of the US pharmaceutical industry, which would reap billions developing medicines to “battle” the deadly viruses about to be released.

In 1969 the Senate Church Committee discovered that the US Defense Department (DOD) had requested a budget of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars for a program to speed development of new viruses which target and destroy the human immune system.  DOD officials testified before Congress that they planned to produce, “a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could be acquired…Most important is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”  House Bill 5090 authorized the funds and MK-NAOMI was carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Out of this research came the AIDS virus which was targeted at “undesirable elements” of the population. The first AIDS viruses were administered through a massive smallpox vaccine campaign in central and southern Africa by the World Health Organization in 1977.  A year later ads appeared in major US newspapers soliciting “promiscuous gay male volunteers” to take part in a Hepatitis B vaccine study. [1]

The program targeted male homosexuals age 20-40 in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, St. Louis and San Francisco. It was administered by the US Centers for Disease Control which, under its earlier incarnation as the US Public Health Department in Atlanta, oversaw the Tuskegee syphilis experiments on African American males. [2]

San Francisco has been a target of numerous CIA experiments, due to its high population of left-leaning and gay citizens, which the Illuminati views as “undesirables”.  According to Dr. Eva Snead, San Francisco has one of the highest cancer rates in the country.  For years Malathion- first developed by the Nazis- was sprayed over the city by helicopters from the CIA’s Evergreen Air, whose Arizona base is used, according to author William Cooper, as CIA transshipment point for Columbian cocaine.  The mysterious Legionnaire’s Disease occurs often in San Francisco and the CIA’s MK-ULTRA mind control bad acid program was based there.

The intellectual force behind the introduction of AIDS was the Bilderberger Group, which became fixated on population control after WWII. Author Cooper says the Policy Committee of the Bilderbergers gave orders to DOD to introduce the AIDS virus.  The Bilderbergers are close to the Club of Rome, which was founded on a Rockefeller estate near Bellagio, Italy and is backed by the same European Black Nobility who frequent Bilderberger meetings.  A 1968 study by the Club of Rome advocated lowering the birth rate and increasing the death rate.  Club founder Dr. Aurelio Peccei made a top-secret recommendation to introduce a microbe that would attack the auto-immune system, then develop a vaccine as a prophylactic for the global elite. [3]

One month after the 1968 Club of Rome meeting Paul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. The book hints at a draconian depopulation plan in the works.  On page seventeen Ehrlich writes, “The problem could have been avoided by population control…so that a ‘death rate solution’ did not have to occur.”  A year later MK-NAOMI was born.  Peccei himself authored the Club of Rome’s much-touted Global 2000 report, which President Jimmy Carter pushed on his BCCI shakedown cruise of Africa.  Peccei wrote in the report, “Man is now vested with unprecedented, tremendous responsibilities and thrown into the role of moderator of life on the planet- including his own”.

The Bilderbergers were behind the Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy, a driving force at the State Department and administered by the National Security Council.  Pressure is applied to Third World countries to reduce their populations.  Those that do not comply see their US aid withheld or are subject to Pink Plan low-intensity war that targets civilians, especially women of child-bearing age.  In Africa famine and brush-fire wars are encouraged.  AK-47 rifles can be bought at West African markets for under $50.  The same is true in the markets of Peshawar, Pakistan.  In 1975, a year after attending a Club of Rome conference on the topic, Secretary of State Kissinger founded the Office of Population Affairs (OPA).

Latin American OPA case officer Thomas Ferguson spilled the beans on OPA’s agenda when he stated, “There is a single theme behind all our work; we must reduce population levels.  Either they do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut…Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…The professionals aren’t interested in reducing population for humanitarian reasons…Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population.  The quickest way to reduce population is through famine like in Africa.  We go into a country and say, here is your goddamn development plan.  Throw it out the window.  Start looking at your population…if you don’t …then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia”. [4]

Ferguson said of El Salvador, “To accomplish what the State Department deems adequate population control, the civil war (run by CIA) would have to be greatly expanded.  You have to pull all the males into fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing age females.  You are killing a small number of males and not enough fertile females to do the job…If the war went on 30-40 years, you might accomplish something.  Unfortunately, we don’t have too many instances of this to study”.

Report from Iron Mountain

In 1961 Kennedy Administration officials McGeorge Bundy, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk, all CFR and Bilderberger members, led a study group which looked into “the problem of peace”.  The group met at Iron Mountain, a huge underground corporate nuclear shelter near Hudson, New York, where CFR think tank The Hudson Institute is located.  The bunker contains redundant offices in case of nuclear attack for Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell and JP Morgan Chase. [5]  A copy of the group discussions, known as Report from Iron Mountain, was leaked by a participant and published in 1967 by Dial Press.

The report’s authors saw war as necessary and desirable stating “War itself is the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. (War is) the principal organizing force…the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies.”  The group worried that through “ambiguous leadership” the “ruling administrative class” might lose its ability to “rationalize a desired war”, leading to the “actual disestablishment of military institutions”.

The report goes on to say, “…the war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until…we know exactly what we plan to put in its place…The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power…The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. War has served as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary classes.”

Historian Howard Zinn described this conundrum when he wrote, “American capitalism needed international rivalry- and periodic war- to create an artificial community of interest between rich and poor, supplanting the genuine community of interest among the poor that showed itself in sporadic movements”.

The Iron Mountain gang was not the first to discover the virtues of war.  In 1909 the trustees of the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for International Peace met to discuss pre-WWI American life.  Many of the participants were members of Skull & Bones.  They concluded, “There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people…How do we involve the United States in a war?”

The Report from Iron Mountain goes on to propose a proper role for those of the lower classes, crediting military institutions with providing “antisocial elements with an acceptable role in the social structure.  The younger and more dangerous of these hostile social groupings have been kept under control by the Selective Service System…A possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political process, of slavery…The development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.”

The Iron Mountain goons, though thrilled by the idea of slavery, listed as other socioeconomic substitutions for war: a comprehensive social welfare program, a giant open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets, a permanent arms inspection regime, an omnipresent global police and peacekeeping force, massive global environmental pollution which would require a large labor pool to clean up, socially-oriented blood sports and a comprehensive eugenics program. [6]

The Iraqi genocide fulfilled the dreams of the Club of Rome Zero Population Growth maniacs, while also providing a testing ground for two of the war substitutes proposed by the Iron Mountain fascists: an arms inspection regime and UN peacekeepers.  Both concepts gained traction in the international community thanks to the Gulf War.

Let the Iraqi Genocide Begin

Estimates of Iraqi casualties during the Gulf War are sobering.  Some organizations like Greenpeace put the death toll at near one million people.  It was a war in which the media was denied access on a scale never before seen, so casualty figures vary greatly.  According to Tony Murphy, a researcher at the International War Crimes Tribunal, the US attack on Iraq killed 125,000 civilians, while destroying 676 schools, 38 hospitals, 8 major hydroelectric dams, 11 power plants, 119 power substations and half the country’s telephone lines.  The attacks occurred mostly at night when people were most vulnerable.

In the months following the war the death rate of Iraqi children under five tripled.  Thirty-eight percent of these deaths were caused by diarrhea. [7]  Victor Filatov, a Russian journalist reporting for Sovetskaya Rossiya from post-war Baghdad wrote, “What further bloodshed do these barbarians of the 20th century need?  I thought the Americans had changed since Vietnam…but no, they never change.  They remain true to themselves.”

According to former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, the US was found guilty of nineteen war crimes against Iraq before the International War Crimes Tribunal.  The US dropped 88,000 tons of bombs on Iraq during the Gulf War and has rained down countless more bombs since.  Many bombs were tipped with armor piercing depleted uranium (DU) warheads, which may account for chronic Iraqi health problems.  Dr. Siegwart-Horst Gunther, a German physician who came to Iraq to help its people, became gravely ill when he handled just one cigar-sized fragment from a DU warhead.  Dr. Gunther measured the tiny object’s radioactivity to be 11 microSv per hour, whereas an acceptable exposure is no more than 300 microSv per year. [8]  Three hundred tons of DU ammunition was deployed during the war.

Many believe DU is responsible for Gulf War Syndrome, which has killed and permanently injured many US soldiers who fought in the Persian Gulf theater.  Since 2000, nearly 11,000 US Gulf War veterans have died from Gulf War Syndrome, while the Pentagon continues to cover up this travesty.

Satanism & Psychotronic Warfare

The US also tested numerous top-secret high-tech weapons systems in the Gulf theatre, while utilizing some old low-frequency favorites.  When Iraqi ground forces surrendered, many of them were in a state of delirium and lethargy that could have been induced by extremely low-frequency radio waves, which the US used as a weapon as early as the Vietnam conflict.

Yale University and CIA psychiatrist Dr. Jose Delgado studied mind control for the Company during the 1950’s as part of the MK-ULTRA program.  Delgado determined, “Physical control of many brain functions is a demonstrated fact…it is even possible to create and follow intentions…By electronic stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command…by remote control.”

According to a military document written by Colonel Paul Valley and Major Michael Aquino titled From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory, the US Army used an operational weapons system “to map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with US national interests”.  The technique was used to secure the surrender of 29,276 armed Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army soldiers in 1967 and 1968.  The US Navy was also heavily involved in “psychotronic” research. [9]  Many US soldiers who served near the DMZ that divided North and South Vietnam claimed to see UFOs on a regular basis.  The Pentagon Papers revealed that an electronic barrier was placed along the DMZ by the secretive JASON Society.

Major Michael Aquino was an Army psyops specialist in Vietnam, where his unit specialized in drug-inducement, brainwashing, virus injection, brain implants, hypnosis, and use of electromagnetic fields and extremely low-frequency radio waves.  After Vietnam, Aquino moved to San Francisco and founded the Temple of Set.  Set is the ancient Egyptian name for Lucifer.  Aquino was now a senior US Military Intelligence official. [10]  He’d been given a Top Secret security clearance on June, 9, 1981.  Less than a month later an Army intelligence memo revealed that Aquino’s Temple of Set was an off-shoot of Anton La Vey’s Church of Satan, also headquartered in San Francisco. Two other Set members were Willie Browning and Dennis Mann.  Both were Army Intelligence officers.

The Temple of Set was obsessed with military matters and political fascism. It was especially preoccupied with the Nazi Order of the Trapezoid.  Aquino’s “official” job was history professor at Golden Gate College.  The Temple recruited the same Hells Angels who Billy Mellon Hitchcock had used to dole out his bad CIA acid.  Its members frequented prostitutes where they engaged in all manner of sadomasochistic activities. [11]  Director of Army Counter-Intelligence Donald Press revealed that Dennis Mann was assigned to the 306 PSYOPS Battalion and that Aquino was assigned to a top secret program known as Presidio.

Presidio is also the name of a spooky complex in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly frequented as the Soviet Union was falling apart.  Was Aquino part of an operation to “map the mind” of the Soviet Union’s last leader and induce him into proposing bothglasnost and perestroika, the two free market policies that ultimately led to the Soviet Union’s demise?  Remember the curious mark which suddenly appeared on Gorbachev’s forehead?  Was he implanted with some sort of microchip mind-control device to make him think “in accordance with US national interests”?

Such Orwellian technology is marketed on a regular basis throughout the world.  International Healthline Corporation and others sell microchip implants in the US, Russia and Europe.  The Humane Society has adopted a policy of micro-chipping all stray pets. The State of Hawaii requires that all pets be micro-chipped.  Six thousand people in Sweden have accepted a microchip in their hand, which they use for all purchases. Trials are also underway in Japan.  In July 2002, National Public Radio reported a similar trial beginning in Seattle.  Later in 2002, after a rash of suspicious abductions of young girls, BBC reported that a British company plans to implant children with microchips so that their parents can monitor their whereabouts.

Dr. Carl Sanders, a highly acclaimed electronics engineer, revealed that a microchip project he launched to help people with severed spinal cords was taken over by the Bill Colby’s Operation Phoenix in a series of meetings organized by Henry Kissinger.  Sanders says the optimal spot for a microchip implant is just below the hairline on a person’s forehead, since the device can be recharged by changes in body temperatures, which are most pronounced there.  Interestingly, this is the location of the pineal gland or Third Eye.

The 1986 Emigration Control Act grants the President the power to mandate any kind of ID he deems necessary. [12]  Researchers at Southern California have developed a chip which mimics the hippocampus, the part of the brain that deals with memory.  Pentagon officials are interested in using it in experiments to create a “super-soldier”. [13]  Another microchip called Braingate is being implanted in paralyzed people.  It allows them to control their environment by simply thinking. [14]

In Iraq, psychological warfare gave way to slow genocide.  According to UNICEF, as of late 2001, 1.5 million Iraqi children had died as a result of sanctions, while one child in ten died before their first birthday.  Thalassemia, anemia and diarrhea were the biggest killers and could have been prevented were it not for a chronic shortage of blood and medicine in Iraq due to the sanctions.  UN Committee 661 served as arbiter of what constituted a “dual use” item and therefore banned for import into Iraq.  As of 2001, over 1,600 Iraqi contracts with Western companies for medical equipment had been blocked by 661. [15]

The Gulf War decimated Iraq’s sewer and water treatment systems. Iraqis were forced to drink polluted water, leading to numerous health problems.  Iraq was not allowed to import chlorine to clean the water since 661 deemed it a potential chemical weapon.  Electrical power was rationed in three-hour daily increments per household since the Iraqi government couldn’t get the parts it needed to fix its power plants after the US bombed its entire power grid.  With the devaluation of the Iraqi dinar and the ban on the export of 2.4 million barrels of oil per day, the average Iraqi lived on $2.50 a month- enough to buy a pair of shoes.  The only Iraqis not affected were the wealthy elite, who had long ago stashed their savings overseas in US dollars.

UNICEF estimates that 28% of Iraqi children no longer went to school.  Before the war almost all children attended.  Often families could only afford to send one child to school because of the cost of simple things like backpacks, shoes and notebooks.  Rafah Salam Aziz, Director of Mansour Children’s Hospital, said parents were often forced to make similar decisions about their children’s lives.  Aziz said, “Many times it’s easier for a family to let a baby die rather than let the whole family go hungry and get sick.”[16]

In 1996 Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry announced a new military buildup in the Persian Gulf.  Soon cruise missiles were again raining down on Baghdad.  Many nations now grew weary of both US bombing and the sanctions regime, which was brutalizing the Iraqi people while strengthening the grip of Saddam Hussein.  Russian President Boris Yeltsin, whose country signed a deal with Iraq to rebuild its shattered oil sector, said he was disturbed at the use of “extreme and radical force against the Arab world”.  The Russian opposition offered a more scalding appraisal.  Alexander Lebed stating angrily, “The US is like a strong master who spits on everybody.”[17]

Turkey, Jordan and Syria all expressed unease over the new round of bombing.  Even the Saudis, where Islamic fundamentalism was on the rise and two major bombings had occurred at US bases, now refused to allow the US to use its bases to bomb Iraq.  Many countries, including France, began openly flaunting the UN embargo against Iraq in the late 1990’s.

Dennis Halliday, former Assistant Secretary of the UN who initially headed the UN Humanitarian Program to Iraq, resigned his post in protest. He said sanctions were demolishing the very class of Iraqi people who wanted to create a better government in the country.  He was scornful of the UN Oil for Food Program under which the US received 70% of Iraqi oil.  Halliday stated plainly, “We are guilty of committing genocide, through the Security Council, against Iraq.”[18]

Halliday’s 1998 successor was Hans Van Sponeck, who watched as the UN unfurled the UNSCOM arms inspection regime, paid for by Iraqi oil sales.  US inspector Scott Ritter confirmed Iraqi suspicions that UNSCOM was gathering intelligence for CIA and Mossad.  UNSCOM was just the latest CIA tool.  In 1996 the Iraqi government claimed international relief agencies, including the World Food Program, which claimed to be helping the Kurds, were actually CIA operatives attempting to destabilize the country.

In fact the CIA had spent more than $20 million in its support of the Iraqi National Congress, led by long-time CIA surrogate Jalal Talibani’s PKK Kurdish faction. [19]  In January 1997 Iraq uncovered two Mossad spy rings in one month following the attempted assassination of Saddam Hussein’s son. [20]  Hans Van Sponeck had seen enough. He too resigned in protest.

In early 1999 it was revealed that the US had used UNSCOM to plant electronic bugging devices in the Iraqi Ministry of Defense.  Arms inspector Scott Ritter said the CIA was using UNSCOM to “provoke a crisis”.  In December 1998 UNSCOM, faced with the embarrassing accusations of espionage, pulled out of Iraq.  On December 15th the US launched a new round of bombing.  Ritter says intelligence gathered by UNSCOM was used for targeting. UNSCOM spokesman David Kay resurfaced in 2003 calling for a US invasion of Iraq. He now worked for SAIC, which landed numerous Pentagon contracts to rebuild Iraq.

[1] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.166

[2] Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.305

[3] Cooper. p.166

[4] Ibid

[5] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.114

[6] Ibid. 116

[7] “Child Death Rate Jumps in Iraq”. AP. Great Falls Tribune. 9-24-92. p.8

[8] “Depleted Uranium”. Siegwart-Horst Gunther. Covert Action Quarterly. Winter 2001. p.2

[9] Cooper. p.369

[10] Icke. p.221

[11] Cooper. p.361

[12] Icke. p.223

[13] Inquirer. UK. 10-25-05

[14] PhysOrg News. 11-1-95

[15] “Greetings from Missile Street”. Free Speech TV. Boulder, CO. 12-23-01

[16] “US Economic Sanctions Taking Very Human Toll in Iraq”. Great FallsTribune. 9-13-92.

[17] “Slamming Saddam”. Time. 9-16-96. p.31

[18] “The Unfinished War”. CNN. 1-6-02

[19] Evening Edition. National Public Radio. 9-10-96

[20] BBC World News. 1-8-97

Video FEMA Preparing For 200 Million Deaths According To Former Border Patrol Security Agent


Guerilla Girl Ashley, The Pete Santilli Show

 According to former Border Patrol Security expert Zach Taylor, This current so-called border crises is a manufactured crises that has been going on since at least the year 1986 when the Reagan administration was in power, and this is what as known as Asymmetrical Warfare.  Here is a clip from Zack taylor’s interview for the upcoming documentary film called “Back To The Border” 

“This gives people that are trying to get their infrastructure, their personnel, their drugs, their dirty bombs, their biological weapons, their chemical weapons into the United States without being noticed” the opportunity to do so, “because this part of the border is open, it is not being controlled,” the 26-year Border Patrol veteran outlines in the extensive interview.  “If asymmetrical warfare is going to be successful, the first thing that has to be done is to compromise America’s defenses against invasion,” Taylor says, “because they have to have their personnel inside the United States to affect the infrastructure.. they have to affect the degeneration from inside the United States.”

He also wrote this in a June 22,2014  press release by the The National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers are retired Border Patrol Officers 

This invitation to invade America by illegal aliens from Central America has been going on for years with the explicit concurrence of America’s elected officials. The present invasion of thousands of unaccompanied minors is the obvious desired result of the current administration, the United States Senate that passed S-744 and every other elected official in the United States that has not stood up and demanded that the Immigration Laws of the United States be fully enforced and in particular a President that announced that it does not make good sense to enforce Immigration Laws. This is not a humanitarian crisis, this is a manufactured crisis. Any media outlet that calls this a humanitarian crisis is concealing what is actually happening. This is the result of American leaders taking America into a lawless state over time and this latest invasion by opportunistic law breakers is a direct result of their actions. Period.

Read Here:

 10 13 11 flagbar

Great Grand Mother Anna offers some advice


 PART 1 & 2

by arnie rosner

Dear Martha– you will have to forgive everyone. People are understandably upset and rattled when they first realize that their government is a private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned corporation supposedly here to provide governmental services and doing a very poor job of it. In fact, they are in contract default, and strictly speaking, we don’t have to contract with them, pay them, or deal with them at all.

It is outrageous, you must admit. They are our EMPLOYEES and we have let them get away with this?

It also alarms most people to realize that this has been going on and developing ever since the Civil War, that the Roman Catholic Church is involved, that ELIZABETH II has acted in Breach of Trust and against American interests the entire time that Elizabeth II has sat on the British throne—- it IS a lot to take in. And it is unsettling.

But, everyone, please calm down. It has been going on for 150 years, and it won’t all get resolved overnight. Also, though we have all been defrauded and victimized, let’s also own our share of culpability and if we have to “find someone to blame” let the blame start right here with me and you and Roger next door. This has only happened to our country because we did not remain vigilant as Jefferson warned us, and because we found hot cars and sports events to be intrinsically more interesting than history and civics.

Who knew those dull old subjects could be so vitally important?

Anyway, we have a LOT of people to educate and a lot of pieces of the jigsaw puzzle to nail down and a lot of step-by-step local actions to take. Please, let those with specific parts of the puzzle come forward now — those with a knowledge of the original Thirteenth Amendment, come forward and share. Those with insight into the founding of the original United States (Company) and the Treaty of the Delawares, come forward and share. Those who know the IRS Scam well enough to beat it, come forward and share. Those who have fought the fight with the British government, come forward. Those who placed a claim on abandonment on the Office of The United States Postmaster (supposed to be one of three international Trustees defending The United States Trust (1789))—come forward and share.

This is a discovery process, and even those of us who have worked on this diligently for decades find that we have bits and pieces of it wrong. I find out that I have some detail wrong every other week. I expect that to continue to happen. I don’t get upset when it does. I just thank the person who brought the error forward and thank God some other American was watching the game and caring enough to pay attention. We are ALL going to make ERRORS in this process, but let me suggest that when we do, it is not the end of the world and it is not always anyone’s “fault”. A lot of this information has been purposefully obscured, hidden, lost in dusty libraries….to expedite the fraud practiced against us. So any idea that this is simple or easy or fool-proof has to end from the outset and we all have to grasp both HOW MUCH has already been done by Americans who never got paid a dime and who often paid huge fines and spent time in jail to bring us this far, this fast.

Standing here flat-footed, every man, woman, and child in America already owes their heartfelt service in the cause of reclaiming our rightful place as the civil sovereigns on the land of these Several states— owes it to the men who fought and died believing that they were protecting us, owe it to the men like Bill Benson and Tommy Cryer who fought the beast in DC with all they had. Now, it is up to us.

I have suggested a two pronged solution, both a positive and a negative “pole” to provide the currency for this operation.

First, we treat the corporation in Washington, DC as a corporation, because that is all it is. It has acted in contract default and engaged in criminal activities against its employers, so we need to go to France and contact their ministry responsible for chartering corporations and file a complaint requesting liquidation of the UNITED STATES (INC.). This is entirely within our right and within their responsibility, but as Pope Benedict said when first approached about the ongoing Breach of Trust against The United States Trust (1789)—- we have to complain. Someone with standing to complain has to stand up and say, hey, look at this! Otherwise, bureaucrats assume that everything is okay, especially bureaucrats operating in foreign countries.

Second, we need to do what we are already doing. We need to call public townhall meetings in our counties all around the country and educate people about what the government really is, our responsibility to run our own affairs on the land, etc., etc., etc., and we have to give notice and hold elections at the same time we are forming our Jural Societies. There are no American Courts operational, so we have to build them from the ground up. The Grand Juries are organized. Next, the Judges are elected at public meetings of each County, along with a Sheriff and, importantly, a Coroner. Coroners hold a very important civil office. They are the only ones able to remove a sitting Governor from office.

We should be making every effort to educate the members of the law enforcement and military communities, so they understand civil authority and don’t feel threatened. Our civil Sheriffs who hold authority over the land jurisdiction will naturally pull rank on them, but that’s the way it is meant to be. If the men currently serving as law enforcement employees of the private corporations are amenable to taking the Public Oath of Office and serving as real constitutional Sheriffs on the land, and they were born on the land of one of the American States, there is no reason that they can’t serve us. The only question becomes –why do the pass through loop for funding their positions? We don’t need to give our money to a private corporation to cut pay checks and misdirect our own employees to work for them, do we? No. So, there are a lot of details to be resolved, but the end is in view.

Once the American Court System is set up, and Americans are running it— as opposed to members of the BRITISH Bar Association, and the Judges, Sheriffs, and Coroners are in place, we need to do a scene out of the old western movies. Remember where the Sheriff called for a posse and the men of the town all came and the Sheriff deputized them? The words were simple— something like, “I, John Wayne, elected Sheriff of Yuma County, Arizona, hereby deputize you men gathered here today to act as my deputies and to faithfully enforce the Public Laws of Arizona and keep the peace, Answer by saying, “So help me God”.” They all took the pledge and then the Sheriff said something like, “All right then, you are all deputies of Yuma County! Let’s ride!”

So long as the local law enforcement personnel have been duly advised of who you are and what you are doing and why, they haven’t got a leg to stand on to oppose you. In fact, they are honor and duty and paycheck bound to HELP you. It’s just the middlemen in the middle claiming to “represent” you that need to be dealt with—-and that means offering them the chance to take their Public Oath of Office and to assist you, or be removed from any presumed Public Office— publically—-and relegated to their real office as officers of a private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned corporation franchise.

Some of these yahoos will have to be arrested, but that’s their choice.

In tandem with setting up the American Court System we need to seize control of our own monetary system. Do you all understand that the American Dollar still exists? And that it has always been backed by gold or silver? “Federal Reserve Notes” are just look-alike imposters enforced upon you as “legal tender” by a bunch of con artists. Our real money is still alive and well and more valuable than ever.

Did you know that we have always had the right to go to the “US Mint” — which is a private business, too, just under government contract—-plunk down a bunch of silver and have dollars minted? We never had to wait for any “US President” to do it. We are fully capable of doing it ourselves.

The move is on to establish American financial institutions, specifically, the Union Reserve of Texas. These commodity accounting houses allow investors to invest script money in real, hard assets—- and use real money based on those investments. With today’s technology we can follow the rise and fall of commodity values almost instant by instant, and the value of the commodity you invest in is what you have in your private bank account to access as credit on any given day. Sure, the values go up and down, but that’s reality and in the end, reality is all that counts. All this make-believe stuff is just that—legal fiction. You have to decide whether you want to live in the real America, or in the UNITED STATES—- a legal fiction created by foreign lawyers, where “dollars” are debt notes and “spending” them just digs you eternally deeper into debt.

Those who choose to live life as real people and as Americans participating in private banks will be able to sleep at night knowing that they are in control of their own assets and not being traded as chits on the stock market and not subject to confiscation. That’s a pretty good exchange in return for some “volatility” in the market price of commodities.

The Union Reserve of Texas can offer its customers the convenience of a modern debit card based on their investment holdings.

So, although your worthless debt notes will be converted into real assets, and the value of those assets will go up and down every day, you will be able use a debit card at the grocery store and go on about your business more or less as usual—except with the added assurance that your bank account is really yours and that you are invested in something more than hot air coming out of Washington, DC.

Are you all liking this? Is this where you want to go? A new American Dream? Are you willing to work hard every day to make this happen? If so, there’s nothing stopping you. You see, the rats in Washington, DC, now know for sure that the jig is up and that the rest of the world is watching. They know that they have been identified and proven to be criminals. They know that their corporation is in proven contract default. They know that any “false flag” they pull now will be recognized for what it is. They know that their attempt to replace “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES” with “UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTES” is failing and is recognized as a criminal fraud gambit. They know that the two major banking cartels that have colluded together to create this circumstance have been duly investigated, caught in criminal activities, and that both the “FEDERAL RESERVE” and the “INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND” are guilty of fraud, collusion, conspiracy against rights, conspiracy against the Constitution owed to the American State Citizens, unlawful conversion, monopoly inducement, inland piracy, enslavement, unlawful conscription, false advertising, and the list goes on and on and on. They know that their favorite means of enforcing this criminal activity– the IRS, the CIA, certain offices of the DOD— have all been “compromised” and busted.

Vladimir Putin and the Chinese Secretary General and most of the Third World which has suffered and been defrauded just as we have been at home, are all staring down their proverbial gun barrels at the rats in Washington, DC. To date, 177 nations have joined together in economic alliance and many of those same nations have military alignments as well.

The puppet masters of “the United States of America (Minor)” — a consortium of “American states” more normally thought of as “federal” territories and protectorates—- have hit the wall. They are finally caught between a rock and a hard place. The American States and American State Citizens on one side, and most of the rest of the world on the other. What’s a bankster to do?

Many have either chosen or been “encouraged” to commit suicide. Being a senior employee of JP Morgan Bank has become one of the most hazardous professions per capita in the world in recent months. Of course, we don’t advocate harming anyone. We are just here to get our country back and clean up the mess.

Let’s remember “Rosie, the Riveter”. Ladies, you are the rock, the house, upon which America stands. When you put your minds to it and shove, there isn’t a force on earth that can turn your tide.

Men, let’s remember the boys swarming ashore at Normandy, straight into the maws of German artillery and machine gun nests. Are you going to betray them and what they fought for?

It’s D-Day and the war is being fought in your own minds. You have to wake up. You have to start remembering who you really are. You have to get outside the box that FDR and his cronies constructed for you.

The real America known as the united States of America has been at peace for 165 years. Our Congress has no “emergency powers” whatsoever. Our Congress operates as a non-incorporated fully liable Body Politic. Our Congress is solemnly elected by the people inhabiting each State of the Union who qualify to be “electors” —not “voters”—-and guess what? Our united States senators are all accountable to the legislatures of our states. Our army is not called “US Armed Forces Command”—our army is called The Grand Army of the Republic. It is run, staffed, and manned by American State Citizens.

And we just told the Joint Chiefs to bring the GAR out of mothballs and, if necessary, deploy it to seize stockpiles of armaments that corporate “President” Obama has improperly stored on American State property and which he clearly intends to make available to commercial mercenary armies masquerading as “federal agencies”—-FEMA, DHS, and the rest.

We told them to send the bill for this to the UNITED NATIONS dba IMF dba UNITED STATES, because clearly these “institutions” are in contract default and not doing the job that we, their EMPLOYERS, have set for them.

The Office of the Provost Marshal is responsible for coordinating this. Major General David E. Quantock, however, is a lawyer, a member of the BRITISH Bar Association, and so far, predictably enough, he hasn’t been doing his real job— protecting the American States and the American State Citizens. He must be prevailed upon to do so, and so must General Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who can’t figure out whether to lick Obama’s shoes or his ass.

Do you think that the rest of you, if sufficiently motivated—as in, being in fear for your lives—could lend a hand in disseminating this information and expressing your concern to all parties?

Bearing in mind that the members of Congress as it now exists are NOT your representatives, but are instead the representatives of the UNITED STATES Corporation acting as foreign envoys back to you—-isn’t it about time that you told those people that (1) they are in contract default, and (2) they are not representing you, and (3) this horse hooey has to stop?

Regarding “Political Action”


I note all the poor people rushing in and pleading, oh, no, no, no! We have to participate in the electoral process!

The electoral process of what? A private, for-profit, mostly foreign owned commercial corporation run amok?

They say, we have to get so-and-so elected and the Republicans have to take back the Senate…..

They don’t yet perceive the insanity of what they are saying and doing.

We’ve been playing this set up board game for a hundred years. There’s no difference between “Democrats” and “Republicans” anymore, if there ever was. Both are representatives of criminality, corruption, incompetence, and enslavement of real people to serve their corporation. They are the two cattle prods, one right, one left.

It’s important to understand that the Roosevelts, Teddy and FDR, set up this mental box with malice aforethought and were also the authors of much of the semantic deceit and fraud that has engulfed America for three generations. Should it surprise anyone to learn that they were also at the bottom of the development of the present “two party system”?

Will it sound strange to you that both modern “national” political parties got their start in Wisconsin, of all places–and that neither of these parties bear any resemblance to their historical antecedants?   For example, did you know that after the Civil War, it was the Democrats that blocked black Americans from being able to own land and vote, and it was the Republicans who championed that cause and finally pushed it through?

Perhaps you will wonder why such an odd thing exists?

Because in 1848 Wisconsin received a large number of German immigrants who were cast out of Europe for being “Freethinkers and Communists”—-a result of the 1848 Workers Rebellion. These people brought their foreign ideas to Wisconsin, settled in, and promptly began setting up the favorite implement of all Communists—- a divide and conquer strategy. All things are dualistic in this world and people naturally think of things as “good” or “bad”, so it is relatively easy to use this unconscious prejudice and default in our logic systems to our detriment. Unscrupulous politicians just set up “the poles”—or as in this case, “the parties”—and they just drive the sheep from one side of the spectrum to the other.

In very short order they have us wasting our time and energy and passion taking actions which get us nowhere.

Meanwhile, they are pursuing their real agenda of fraud, more deception, and enslavement.

As if this were not obvious enough, in recent years they have instituted the use of “Diebold Voting Machines” — so they don’t even have to worry about the inconvenient evidence of real election results posed by paper ballots. They can just pay off the private companies and union workers who build and service these machines, then sit back and grin and “wait for the election results to come in”.

Are Americans really as stupid as Barack H. Obama supposes?

Please note that even without these nefarious provisions, the ‘votes” of “voters” decide nothing. They are just popularity polls, serving to tell the slavemasters what “sells” to the sheep. “Electors” are the only ones who decide “elections”.

In fact, “Voter Registration” is one of the chief means these rotters use to claim that we are “US citizens” and subject to them and their corporate rules. Any time that you see the words “registration” or “application” be aware that you are giving up something precious in exchange for something either worthless or downright damaging. When you “register” as a “voter”, you automatically identify yourself as someone claiming slave status, and you give up your birthright to function as an “elector”.

So, all of you with ears to hear, get busy and write to the local “Voter Registration Office” and tell them that you made a mistake. You aren’t a “US citizen” nor a “U.S. Citizen”—-you are an American State Citizen—and you rescind your signature on their records and forms accordingly.

If you continue to feel any unreasoning urge to vote in their private corporate elections, please be advised that Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment of their most recent public charter known as the “Constitution for the United States of America” makes it illegal for anyone who is not a “US citizen” —that is, a federal employee, civil or active duty military, Negro, foreign welfare recipient, or natural born inhabitant of a “federal state” like Puerto Rico or “enclave” like Washington, DC—-to vote in THEIR elections.

You’ve most likely been breaking their law all these years and never knew it, and they have gladly let you do it because it gives them an excuse to lay claim to you and your assets and boss you around and hypothecate their debts against your credit and all sorts of other juicy advantages to them at your expense. It also gives them an excuse to arrest you any time they like and charge you for this “crime” secretly in their very own corporate tribunals. What could be more convenient?

So not only do you need to tear up those “Voter Registration Cards” and stop being fooled by all the “political process” hurrah– that is, drop out of political parties, because they, too, are strictly associated with the corporation masquerading as “your” government— you can also stop giving money to THEIR candidates and wasting time spinning your wheels.

If you want the abuse and theft and deceit to be over, you have to re-create your own PUBLIC offices on the land jurisdiction of your States. Run for THOSE offices. Support THOSE candidates.   Just like we have to rebuild the American Court system and the American monetary system, we have to rebuild the American government institutions— because, surprise, surprise—the banks took over the corporation providing you with “governmental services” a long time ago, and they haven’t been doing a good job for you.

A Republic doesn’t run itself and it can’t depend on outside “help”.

If you want to be free, now is the time.

Stop being hoodwinked by these fraud artists and driven “like dumb driven cattle”.

Just say, “No!”

10 13 11 flagbar

The Not So Smart ALEC


7-23-2014 4-59-15 PM

Written by  William F. Jasper

“Limited Government • Free Markets • Federalism.” That is the motto of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which appears on their literature and on the banner of every page of the organization’s website. ALEC’s “about” page expands on that theme, explaining:

The American Legislative Exchange Council works to advance limited government, free markets, and federalism at the state level through a nonpartisan public-private partnership of America’s state legislators, members of the private sector and the general public.

ALEC’s stated philosophy and goals resonate with liberty-minded Americans, which, undoubtedly, is why many politically conservative state legislators and activist citizens look to it for leadership in rolling back the oppressive hand of Big Government. However, the well-funded and well-connected organization is alienating many of its erstwhile supporters by its support for dangerous trade pacts that threaten the sovereignty of the United States, as well as its efforts to promote a constitutional convention, which could result in the complete destruction of our already tattered and battered U.S. Constitution. That could spell the end of any hope to return to limited government, free markets, and responsible federalism.

Founded in 1973, ALEC has just celebrated its 40th anniversary and is experiencing both the joys of prominent national influence and the pains of harsh criticism. The organization can boast a membership that includes more than 2,000 state legislators and hundreds of corporations, as well as dozens of think tanks, foundations, and non-profit organizations.

For the past several years ALEC has been under attack from a gaggle of left-wing organizations — Color of Change, Common Cause, People for the American Way, Progress Now, the Center for Media and Democracy, the Sierra Club — that claim the organization’s corporate ties and corporate funding have put it in the pocket of big business. These and similar groups have lambasted ALEC for its model legislation opposing federal EPA regulations, gun control laws, “green” energy mandates, and “climate change” carbon taxes, and its support for laws supporting voter identification, “Stand Your Ground” protection, school choice, and privatization of public services. Major media outlets, such as the New York Times, Huffington Post, MSNBC, and CNN joined The Nation, Media Matters, and other radical-left detractors in attacking ALEC for these sins against the progressive gospel. The highly politicized shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida in 2012 provided the key event that ALEC’s critics could leverage to crack the organization’s growing impact. Utilizing the media-created furor over the shooting, the left-wing activist groups launched a petition-pressure campaign that spotlighted ALEC’s support for “Stand Your Ground” laws. The result was an exodus, as major corporations and legislators fled ALEC to avoid the controversy.

For many of ALEC’s staunchest supporters, the attacks on the organization — and the liberal-left/progressive sources from which they usually emanate — only prove its bona fides as a defender of free enterprise and constitutional government. They should know better by now. The same alliance of left-wing activists and the liberal establishment media regularly confer legitimacy on false conservatives pseudo-conservatives and business lobbies that promote Big Government by attacking them for not being “progressive” enough. Examples abound: Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Manufacturing Association, the American Medical Association — to name but a very small cohort. These politicians and organizations have excelled at co-opting the rhetoric of free markets and limited government, but often go in exactly the opposite direction. In the remainder of this article, we will examine several of the areas where we contend ALEC is following a similarly deceptive path.

Trading Away Sovereignty

At its Model Policies Annual Meeting 2013, ALEC members adopted a “Resolution Supporting the Successful Negotiation of a Comprehensive and Commercially Meaningful Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).” The summary of the resolution, provided on ALEC’s website, states:

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Agreement has the potential to be the largest trade framework ever negotiated underscoring the importance of ensuring that it is a high standard, comprehensive agreement with strong intellectual property provisions. In keeping with the American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALEC’s) support of the Jeffersonian principle of free markets and ALEC’s past support of a wide variety of trade frameworks, this resolution supports the negotiation and final ratification of such an agreement.

Similarly, the organization has adopted a “Resolution Urging Congress to Pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).” The resolution summary states:

Drawing on ALEC’s guiding free market principles, this resolution calls on Congress to support negotiations for a high standard, comprehensive Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)…. The TPP has the potential to become the benchmark against which future trade frameworks will be measured for years to come.

The TTIP’s promoters portray it as a “trade” agreement between the United States and the 28 member states of the European Union, while the TPP advocates similarly claim they are merely working to expand trade between the United States and 11 Pacific partners: Canada, Mexico, Peru, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam, and Japan. The trade engendered by these agreements, say the promoters, will bring prosperity to all, including millions of promised good-paying jobs. Regular readers of The New American are already well aware of the many dangers posed by the TTIP and the TPP, which are being pushed aggressively by the Obama administration and the usual globalist elites at the New York Times, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Brookings Institution, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Among the many articles we have published, in our print edition and online, are the comprehensive “Secretly Trading Away Our Independence,” from our May 20, 2013 print edition, and the entire special issue of our September 2, 2013 magazine devoted to the topic, “How the Free Trade Agenda Is Knocking Down America” (available as a free pdf download at

One of the most important facts, if not the most important, to know about both the TTIP and TPP is that they would, if adopted, steadily strip away our national sovereignty, allowing the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the United Nations, as well as regional tribunals and regulatory bodies created by these agreements, to override our local, state, and federal laws. This feature alone makes them very subversive, revolutionary proposals that should be opposed by every elected or appointed official who has taken an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” This is no longer a matter of theoretical speculation; as The New American has reported previously, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the WTO agreement have amply proved this. As a result of adopting both of those agreements, NAFTA and WTO rules and rulings increasingly trump our laws.

Liberty-minded Americans who truly believe in the rule of law and the form of limited government envisioned by our Founders should be working to remove our country from these freedom-destroying organizations, not subjecting us to even more of the same. Even if the agreements dealt only with “trade” issues, the structures and procedures they set in place would be pregnant with dangers because they initiate a developing, ongoing process that is a guarantee of “mission creep,” with an ever-expanding transnational bureaucracy claiming ever more power over our personal, local, state, and national affairs. Obama administration officials acknowledge that the TTIP/TPP agreements deal with agriculture, environment, labor, telecommunications, financial services, and much more. And documents that have been leaked thus far have revealed additional dangers, such as TPP draft proposals that would dramatically curtail free speech on the Internet.

Another disturbing feature of both the TTIP and TPP is the secrecy and intrigue that have become their hallmarks. The American people and their elected representatives in Congress have not been allowed access to the TTIP/TPP negotiation process, nor have they been allowed to see the draft text of the agreements. However, the Obama administration has given representatives of major corporations, labor unions, environmental organizations, and other NGO activist “stakeholders” official access to both the negotiation proceedings and the texts. Thus the TTIP and TPP have become a joint project of Big Government, Big Business, Big Labor, and Big Green (although the Big Labor/Big Green contingents pretend to oppose at least some features of the agreements). The secrecy of the TTIP/TPP process is, in and of itself, a huge red flag alerting all except the willfully blind that something is amiss. ALEC should find this aspect of TTIP/TPP thoroughly objectionable, since it has made a pointed commitment to transparency in government. A perusal of ALEC literature and the organization’s “model policies” web page reveals numerous bills sponsored by ALEC devoted to transparency and criticizing officialdom for withholding information from citizens. The Transparency and Government Accountability Act, Local Government Transparency Act, and the Taxpayer Transparency Act are but three of many model bills crafted by ALEC demanding openness and access for citizens.

Yet still another strike against the TTIP and TPP is the explicit admissions by the top promoters that they intend these agreements to initiate an “integration” process that will continually “widen” (adding more nations) and “deepen” (adding more economic, political, and social issues) with time. This is the same widening-deepening integration process that has gradually transformed the Common Market “trade” bloc into the increasingly tyrannical EU leviathan ruled by central authorities in Brussels. And TTIP/TPP champions have repeatedly expressed their hopes of following the EU path toward centralized power. As of yet, ALEC has not explained how it can square its “Limited Government, Free Markets, and Federalism” philosophy with these TTIP/TPP flaws that are completely at variance with it.

Constitutional Malpractice

For many years ALEC has been a leading promoter of the idea that the U.S. Constitution must be amended to require a balanced budget. This, of course, appeals to conservatively minded legislators who recognize that continued liberal spendthrift policies are immoral and unsustainable, and lead our nation toward financial Armageddon. ALEC has used the Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) attraction to argue for an Article V Convention of the States, which constitutionalists (including the editors and writers of this magazine) contend is a dangerous gamble that risks the entire Constitution for an amendment that could not be relied on to rein in Washington, D.C.’s ravenous appetite for spending — even if the convention could be restricted to that one issue. The problem is that, ALEC’s assurances to the contrary, once a constitutional convention  is called, it becomes a power unto itself and there is no way to limit its power to amend, revise, or toss out and completely rewrite the Constitution. ALEC claims that fears of a “runaway convention” of this sort are misplaced, and they have published Article V: A Handbook for State Lawmakers to make their case for a constitutional convention (aka Article V convention). They have also produced a “Resolution for Limitations on Authority of Delegates to a ‘Convention for Proposing Amendments’ (Article V, United States of America Constitution).” This resolution, says ALEC,“will eliminate the possibility of a ‘runaway convention,’ the reason most often cited by scholars for their opposition to an Article V Convention. The resolution restricts delegates to work only on those amendments authorized in their legislative instructions and calls for the immediate recall of any delegate that works on an unauthorized amendment.”

But in making this claim, ALEC is on very shaky ground. This is clear, first of all, from our nation’s own history. Our first — and so far, only — constitutional convention, which took place in Philadelphia in 1787, was a “runaway convention,” despite restrictions on delegates similar to those advocated by ALEC. That gathering, in violation of its mandate, threw out the Articles of Confederation that it had been convened to amend, and drew up a completely new governing document. The fact that the product of that breach of trust turned out to be as sound and salutary as it has proved to be should not incite hope that a repeat of the same process would end so well.

James Madison, often referred to as the “father” of the Constitution, said the contemplation of another constitutional convention caused him to “tremble” due to the violent partisanship and “insidious views” so prevalent in his day. Have things so improved that we should be less concerned in our own day? Who but a fool or a knave would say so? Madison warned:

If a General Convention were to take place for the avowed and sole purpose of revising the Constitution, it would naturally consider itself as having a greater latitude than the Congress appointed to administer and support as well as to amend the system; it would consequently give greater agitation to the public mind; an election into it would be courted by the most violent partizans [sic] on both sides [and] would no doubt contain individuals of insidious views, who under the mask of seeking alterations popular in some parts but inadmissible in other parts of the Union might have a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very foundations of the fabric.

“Under all these circumstances it seems scarcely to be presumeable [sic] that the deliberations of the body could be conducted in harmony, or terminate in the general good,” he averred. “Having witnessed the difficulties and dangers experienced by the first Convention which assembled under every propitious circumstance,” Madison concluded, “I should tremble for the result of a second meeting in the present temper of America, and under all the disadvantages I have mentioned.”

Noted constitutional scholars of our own time from across the political spectrum — from liberal Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and Arthur Goldberg to Professors Lawrence Tribe of Harvard and Gerald Gunther of Stanford (both liberals) to Professors Charles Rice of Notre Dame and Rex Lee of Brigham Young (both conservatives) — have echoed Madison, offering their learned opinions that a constitutional convention cannot be limited in its scope, either by Congress or state legislatures. We can say for certain that regardless of the outcome of such a convention there would be dissatisfied factions that would challenge the final product, causing a constitutional impasse and, most probably, sending the whole issue before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has hardly proven to be a staunch defender of limited government. The end result well could be that our U.S. Constitution, which ALEC claims to support, would become a dead letter if ALEC’s “free trade” agenda  were to come to fruition.

Government-Business Cronyism

Still another area of concern to ALEC’s critics on both the Right and Left is the organization’s support for “public-private partnerships.” ALEC’s model legislation for states promotes a “Public-Private Partnership (P3) Authority Act,” the summary of which states:

This Act establishes a state Partnership Committee and an Office of Public-Private Partnerships to identify and establish public-private partnerships and approve qualified bidders, requests for proposals, and template contracts. The Act is designed to improve public operational efficiency and environmental performance, promote public safety, attract private investment in the state, and minimize governmental liabilities.

In this area, the supposedly “conservative” ALEC is perfectly in step with the “progressive” Obama administration, which has made public-private partnerships (P3) a centerpiece of its statist program. And many of ALEC’s member corporations are also partners in Obama’s Fedgov/Big Business “Manufacturing Innovation” consortiums and other P3 endeavors. Those favored corporate cronies include such well-known names as Boeing, General Electric, Microsoft, Caterpillar, Dow Chemical, ALCOA, and ExxonMobil. Hillary Clinton, while Obama’s secretary of state, launched the administration’s P3 Global Partnership Initiative, spreading hundreds billions of dollars in corporate welfare to the well-connected.

ALEC is in the forefront of spreading the P3 gospel at the state level, along with its progressive partner, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (USCC), which, like ALEC, talks a good game of “free markets” while actually promoting corporate subsidies and economic fascism. “Fascism,” writes Lew Rockwell, president of the genuinely free market-oriented Ludwig von Mises Institute, “is the system of government that cartelizes the private sector, centrally plans the economy to subsidize producers, exalts the police state as the source of order, denies fundamental rights and liberties to individuals, and makes the executive state the unlimited master of society.” And it is precisely this kind of cartelized, centrally planned, fascist economy that the ALEC/USCC/Obama/corporate alliance is producing.

ALEC’s corporate P3 members are well represented by:

• Big Pharma (Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Genetech, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfi­zer);

• Big Farm (Altria Group, Archer Daniels Midland, Kraft Food, J.R. Simplot, ­Monsanto);

• Big Oil (Shell, BP, Peabody, Marathon, Texaco, Tenneco, Chevron, ExxonMobil);

• Big Banking (Bank of America, Coldwell Banker, Wells Fargo, First Chicago NBD);

• Big Gambling (Hollywood Casino Corp., Argosy Gaming Co., Boyd Gaming Corp., GTECH Corp.);

• Big Media (Cox Communications, Comcast, the Wall Street Journal, News Corp., Thompson Reuters, Time Warner Cable);

• Big Insurance (Blue Cross Blue Shield, Farmers Group, GEICO, Liberty Mutual, State Farm, Travelers);

• Big Tech (Yahoo, Facebook, Google, AT&T, eBay, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Sony);

• Big Soda (Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group);

• Big Liquor (Seagram & Sons, Hiram Walker, Miller-Coors);

• Big Box Stores (Best Buy, Home Depot, JC Penney, Lowe’s);

• Big Auto (Ford, GM, Toyota, Chrysler).

ALEC’s critics on the Left erroneously cite these cozy corporate ties as evidence of the corruption inherent in “free market” capitalism. But the ALEC/Obama P3 “partnerships” are the antithesis of genuine free markets, in which entrepreneurs risk their own capital — not that of the captive taxpayers — to build businesses that provide goods and services consumers freely choose to purchase, not those determined for them by politicians and government planners.

ALEC may have started out well with the right intentions to promote free enterprise and limited constitutional government — and some of its proposals still do support those worthy efforts — but, as we have shown here, on some very fundamental issues the organization has drifted far from core beliefs proclaimed in its motto. ALEC members who truly adhere to constitutionalist and free market principles would do well to examine the organization more closely and either direct it back on course or cut ties with it, so as not to support harmful legislation and discredit the principles they profess to support.

Photo at top shows Rep. Kenny Marchant (right) introducing Pres. George W. Bush at an ALEC convention, July 2007: AP Images

This article is an example of the exclusive content that’s only available by subscribing to our print magazine. Twice a month get in-depth features covering the political gamut: education, candidate profiles, immigration, healthcare, foreign policy, guns, etc. Digital as well as print options are available!

10 13 11 flagbar


Confirmed General Carter F Ham Appointed Joint Chiefs Noticed by order of Grand Jury.


Signed…Sealed…Proof of Delivery…


Posted: July 3, 2014 | Author: David Robinson |

RELEASED BY: Admin. David Robinson, 207-798-4695
3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine, 04011

For JULY 4, 2014

ON June 19, 2014 the organic American states of the Union — known as The United States of America exercising plenary civil power upon the land — issued Orders to all Members of the domestic Police Forces, US Marshals Service, the Provost Marshal, members of the American Bar Association, and the American Armed Services; and Appointed General Carter F. Ham to lead and command The Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) and its successors under the guidance of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and with their full support.

The Orders stipulated that should it become necessary to suppress commercial mercenary forces operating under the guise of being federal government agencies — including but not limited to the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, etc. — General Ham shall assume immediate command and control of all armed forces and services owed to The United States of America stationed in North America and shall join them under his Command as The Grand Army of the Republic. And that all forces of air, land, and sea are to be employed.

Any cost or loss suffered as a result of deployment of The Grand Army of the Republic shall be charged as previously stipulated.

All effort shall be made by The Grand Army of the Republic to spare life and property while undertaking any action whatsoever within the states of the Union without exception.

The GAR is uniquely enabled by these Orders to operate on the land of the fifty (50) organic states for the purposes of securing the lives and property of the American States and American State Citizens. The GAR is not a foreign army and is composed primarily of American State Citizens.

If they are required to take field positions, the local commanders are ordered to make every effort to communicate the basis of their authority and the reasons for their presence on American State soil to ensure a prompt cessation of hostilities and a widespread understanding of the usurpation’s and acts of fraud which have led to any conflict.

All parties must be brought to understand the nature of the federal government, the limitations of its authority, and their own obligation to act in favor of the organic states of the Union.

The Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) shall continue to operate under General Orders 100 known as the Lieber Code, extant from the pen of the last Republic President, Abraham Lincoln.

No orders, Executive or otherwise, issued by Barack H. Obama pretending authority on the land of the American States while operating as “President” of the UNITED STATES Corporation nor as the “President” of the United States of America, are owed any performance by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Ham, or any Ordinary.

All plainly stated grants of contractual authority evident in The Constitution for the united States of America remain in place, subject to good faith performance of the accompanying obligations and treaties.

Mr. Obama is the “President” of a governmental services corporation under contract to provide stipulated services to the organic states and is on their payroll. He otherwise acts as a foreign dignitary representing the United States of America, Inc. In neither of these capacities is he allowed any granted authority to impose upon American State Citizens, endanger American State property, or command mercenary forces on American State soil — however veiled as federal civilian service agencies.

The Orders require the Joint Chiefs of Staff and General Ham to commence measures to disarm federal civilian agency personnel and to seize control of the vast stockpiles of arms which have been improperly amassed by “the Department of Homeland Security”, FEMA, and other agencies employed by the UNITED STATES.

The only federal agency allowed free egress on the land of the American States is the U.S. Marshals Service, and then only when their personnel are engaged in their duty to protect the U.S. Mail and sworn to act as constitutional officers. All other federal agency personnel are limited to unarmed service until further notice.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff are directed to communicate these General Civil Orders directly to Mr. Obama, the members of the “US Congress”, the administrators of all “federal” agencies, the members of the “Supreme Court” and those acting as “Governors” to compel their rapid understanding and cooperation.

Any expense or damage incurred by these organic states or any American State Citizen as a result of actions undertaken by any federal agency personnel acting as armed mercenaries on American State soil will be understood as the result of violent crimes committed against the peaceful inhabitants of the land and will incur immediate judgment liquidating the assets of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Federal Reserve (FEDERAL RESERVE) in payment of the stipulated reparations. Such crimes shall also be considered contract default increasing the public debt subject to bounty.

Any and all corporate officers of the UNITED STATES or any successor organization(s) inheriting “federal” service contracts who support, condone, or promote such crimes against the American States or against American State Citizens shall be subject to arrest and prosecution for commercial and violent crimes.

All foreign officials operating as elected or appointed officials of the United States of America (minor) who support, condone, or promote such crimes against the American States or against American State Citizens shall be subject to arrest, confiscation of their assets, and deportation to Puerto Rico, Guam, or such other “states” as may be willing to receive them.

Such “foreign officials” include members of the American and British Bar Associations who were licensed to act as privateers against the interests of the American States and the American State Citizens from 1845 to 2013 in flagrant Breach of Trust. All such licenses are now extinguished. Members of the Bar Associations are required to cease and desist assaults against the American States and American State Citizens and shall be subject to arrest, confiscation, and deportation otherwise.

Insomuch as corporate officers operating the United States of America, Incorporated, and the UNITED STATES have contrived under conditions of fraud and semantic deceit to re-venue the estates of the American States and living American State Citizens to the foreign jurisdiction of the United States of America (minor) they are found guilty of capital crimes, including acts of fraud and treason committed between 1933 and 1945, and are condemned posthumously.

Insomuch as elected officials operating the United States of America (minor) have similarly committed war crimes against the American States and their peaceful inhabitants during the same time period, they stand condemned posthumously.

No enforcement upon any American State or American State Citizen is owed as a result of any “Act” of any “Congress” operating as the sovereign government of the United States of America (minor) nor as the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees of any incorporated entity whatsoever.

All those (E)states and ESTATES erroneously believed to represent the American States and American State Citizens and which were conveyed by fraud and legal deceit to the United States of America (minor) and more recently to the City-State of the United Nations, are re-venued without exception to the geographically defined American States and the American State Citizens where they shall remain in perpetuity as assets belonging to the rightful and lawful beneficiaries.

All legal fiction entities however structured and named after the American States and American State Citizens are returned to them and their control, free and clear of any debt, promise, encumbrance or obligation alleged against them as a result of false claims made “in their behalf” by officers of the United States of America, Inc. and the UNITED STATES, INC. or by any foreign officials operating the United States of America (minor), or the United Nations City State falsely claiming to “represent” them or have jurisdiction over them.

The current circumstance is in part the result of criminal acts engaged in 150 years ago, which resulted in the commercial enslavement of African Americans who were summarily claimed as chattels backing “US government” debt in the wake of the Civil War. Despite every act of abolition and declaration of prohibition against both peonage and slavery, it has been the policy of the “US government” to enslave its citizens and to operate as a rogue state among the nations of the world.

Instead of freeing African Americans the sum total result of the Civil War was to vastly expand public sector ownership of slaves, giving rise to the outrageous and improper claims that have been made against the American States and the American State Citizens that we are dealing with today.

It is uniquely fitting that The Grand Army of the Republic is recalled to settle this circumstance in favor of the people.

These Orders were addressed to and received by:

Joint Chief of Staff
9999 Joint Staff
Washington, DC 20318 – 9999

7012 3460 0003 4344 3512 – JUN 19 2014

For a more detailed report read:
DISCLOSURE 101: What You Need To Know

10 13 11 flagbar



7-21-2014 10-46-54 AM

By Dave Hodges

What was revealed in the previous article should shake the confidence that the public has in the DEA and the federal government as a whole. My DEA insider has revealed that there is massive, unchecked banking fraud and money laundering occurring within our financial institutions. Our banks are run like a Mafia protection racket. If you doubt the accuracy of this statement, ask yourself why are we witnessing a massive kill off of banking officials from the nation’s largest banks? The answer is simple, dead men tell no tales.

The following is not entertainment reading. This is a systematic report which details certain DEA operations and it is the story of how justice is muted when it comes to drug trafficking. There is complicity in these illegal enterprises from official government and corporate entities, particularly the banks. If being amused is the goal of your reading, today, you might want to skip over this article. However, if you truly desire to begin to get an idea of how things work, then you will not be disappointed.

Before revealing the partial extent that money fraud has been revealed to me, let’s review the major facts as ascertained by my DEA informant.

1. The SANCHEZ-Paredes drug cartel provides the bulk of drugs to the Sinaloa cartel.

2. The SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel is protected by the American trained Peruvian military and has strong ties to Hamas, an international terrorist organization.

3. The last three DEA special agents who attempted to investigate the SANCHEZ-Paredes were fired by DEA station director, Patrick Stenkamp. The leaders of the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel travel freely to the United States and own homes in the country. This would require the State Department and the DEA “to look the other way”.

4. In Chicago district court testimony, it was revealed that the Sinaloa cartel struck a deal with the DEA to provide intelligence on other cartel drug shipments in exchange for a guarantee for shipping in 80% of its drugs to the United States without interference. As outrageous as this claim was, the validation of this fact did not require the revelation of an informant. The media coverage of this event is overwhelming, even if it was  mostly ignored by the MSM. Defenders of the deal say that this is the cost of catching most of the drug dealers and drug shipments. Skeptics see the DEA as being involved in protecting the drug shipments of the elite from competition.

This installment reveals, to some extent, the existence of an elaborate money laundering scheme which must exist in order to legitimize the drug profits.

Before presenting the money laundering schemes, let’s first take a look at banking laws that the average American citizen must follow.

The Banking Regulations That You Must Follow

There are definitive banking regulations that you, as an American, must follow. If you do not, you go to prison for a very long time.  Let’s review the draconian regulations that you must follow, but the federal government and its agencies, such as the DEA and the State Department have no similar restrictions.

Cash Transaction Report (CRT)

Federal law requires that a bank file a report based upon any withdrawal or deposit of $10,000 or more on any single given day. The law was designed to put a damper on money laundering, sophisticated counterfeiting and other federal crimes.

To remain in compliance with the law, financial institutions must obtain personal identification, information about the transaction and the social security number of the person conducting the transaction.

Technically, there is no federal law prohibiting the use of large amounts of cash. However, a CTR must be filed in ALL cases of cash transaction regardless of the reason underlying the transaction. This means your cash transaction will be on the radar. And when the feds come knocking, it will be up to you to prove your innocence as there will be a presumption of guilt because, more than likely, your accounts will be frozen or seized by the federal government.

Structuring and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)

There will undoubtedly be some geniuses whose math ability will tell them that all they have to do is to withdraw $9,999.99 and the bank and its protector, the federal government will be none the wiser. It is not quite that simple. Here are a few examples of structuring violations that one should be aware of:

1. Barry S. has obtained $15,000 in cash he obtained from selling his truck. He knows that if he deposits $15,000 in cash, his financial institution will be required to file a CTR. Instead he deposits $7,500 in cash in the morning with one financial institution employee and comes back to the financial institution later in the day to another employee to deposit the remaining $7,500, hoping to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Barry should have used multiple accounts to conduct this transaction. The Feds will be visiting Barry.
2. Hillary C. needs $16,000 in cash to pay for supplies for her arts and crafts business. Hillary cashes an $8,000 personal check at a financial institution on a Monday. She subsequently cashes another $8,000 personal check at the bank the following day. Hillary is careful to have cashed the two checks on different days and structured the transactions in an attempt to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Hillary should have made irregular deposits on staggered days. The Feds will be visiting Hillary.
3. A married couple, Bill and Hillary, sell a vehicle for $12,000 in cash. To evade the CTR reporting requirement, Bill and Hillary structure their transactions using different accounts. Bill deposits $8,000 of that money into his and Hillary’s joint account in the morning. Later that day, Hillary deposits $1,500 into the joint account, then $2,500 into her sister’s account, which is later transferred to Bill and Hillary’s joint account at the same bank. Again, Bill and Hillary should have used multiple banks. The Feds will be visiting Bill and Hillary.

The aggregate total of the three transactions totals more than the $10,000 threshold, therefore, a SAR would be filed by the bank and you would be the subject of a federal investigation as all three of the above cases clearly violate the federal banking laws related to structuring. It is a federal crime to break up transactions into smaller amounts for the purpose of evading the CTR reporting requirement. In these instances, the bank is required to file a SAR which serves to notify the federal government of an individual’s attempt to structure deposits or withdrawals by circumventing the $10,000 reporting requirement.

Structuring transactions to prevent a CTR from being reported can result in imprisonment for not more than five years and/or a fine of up to $250,000. If structuring involves more than $100,000 in a twelve month period or is performed while violating another law of the federal government, the penalty is doubled.

The Draconian Enforcement of Banking Laws

Much like the enforcement of our tax laws, the federal government’s enforcement of its banking laws as it relates to CTR’s, SAR’s and subsequent structuring is quite draconian. Civilian asset forfeiture laws come into play. The government can seize your bank accounts while it determines if a crime has been committed. There is no more presumption of innocence. The government can literally seize your assets in perpetuity without an order of the court. Of course, you could try and sue, but you will be up against the deep pockets of the federal government and the case could take years. By the time your case is decided, the financial banking crisis that you are so desperately trying to avoid by withdrawing your money, could be over.

In the following paragraphs, you will quickly see that that the drug cartels and the agencies of the federal government do not play by the same rules as you and I.

The DEA Runs Interference for Money Launderers

In subsequent voice and written communications, my DEA insider source revealed the following, “We identified a Peruvian Sanchez-Paredes cartel money laundering storefront in Miami called “Pacific Gateway”.  Pacific Gateway is a known money laundering source.  An analysis of Pacific Gateway yielded an unpublished telephone party line number located in Lima, Peru that was owned by the Sanchez-Paredes gold mine company, Minersa San Simon. Telephone analysis showed that this number was communicating with stateside numbers connected to a dozen DEA, FBI and ICE cases involving drugs, money laundering and organized crime”. Subsequently, the DEA agents in Peru concluded that they had found “dirty agents” in these three federal agencies who were helping the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel and the elite in this country who profit from drug trafficking, to launder their drug profits inside of the United States. Pacific Gateway was the port of entry for laundered Peruvian drug money and the DEA office in Lima had the proof as well being able to identify members of the FBI, DEA and ICE as participants in this plot.

Very quickly, the DEA special agents in Peru learned that major U.S. financial institutions were involved in the money laundering scheme. The DEA informant went on to say that, “We also noted that Peruvians associated with Pacific Gateway were operating in Phoenix and Connecticut.  Phoenix made sense because of its proximity to the border and the easy access to the Sinaloa cartel and the need to launder money was obvious. However, the Connecticut connection made no sense, that is until one follows the flow of money. A financial analysis demonstrated that Met-Mex Penoles, a Mexican gold company, is headquartered in Connecticut. Met-Mex Penoles underwrites the retirement system for the entire Peruvian Military.” This is how the Peruvian military is paid off.

(Editor’s Note: I have learned that Met-Mex Penoles is connected to Goldman Sachs and its partner, Wells Fargo Wachovia. Hence, we see the drug money now making it into the major players of the American financial system. And this is only one of the major ways that drug money was being laundered into major American banks). Outside of my DEA informant, I can prove these major banks, turned money laundering institutions, go even deeper. and are more deeply involved in this plot than anyone can imagine.)

State Department Complicity

It is at this point, that it is important to mention that the State Department is complicit in these money laundering schemes. It should be noted that all overseas financial transactions by the DEA must first be approved by the State Department. This means that nobody gets investigated, outside the United States, unless the State Department sanctions the expenditure. This gives the State Department complete power to kill any investigation and the State Department has done just that with regard to the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel.

My DEA insider source further stated that, “The report which I submitted on my last day in the office was never published and a month after I submitted it the telephone number which we monitored went dead. All my efforts to find out why the report was not published were stonewalled by DEA management as there was no money in which to conduct an investigation.  Remember, the State Department controls all foreign DEA spending. Further, it was revealed in Part One that the known criminals and leaders of the SANCHEZ-Paredes traveled freely to the United States where they also own homes. This would take State Department cooperation as well”.

The DEA informant went on to describe how a Peruvian generated report he filed led to the bust of a SANCHEZ-Paredes/Sinaloa drug ring in New York. He stated that “Prior to leaving Lima I provided a draft to DEA New York who used the information to seize $30 million dollars all of which was subsequently returned to the Sanchez-Paredes. This can be confirmed by news reports and official Southern a district of New York press releases”. One needs to understand that the State Department could not block the funding of the New York investigation because the operation was domestic. However, despite a money laundering asset seizure of $30 million dollars, the money was returned to the drug cartel(s). This means that the Department of Justice had to intervene. Why was the money returned to these criminals? Remember, in Part One, the Sinaloa cartel members gave testimony in a Chicago court  that they had reached an agreement to provide intelligence information to the DEA in exchange to bring their drugs into this country.

The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI Are Involved In the Cover-Up

Serendipitously, I have interviewed John Cruz on a number of occasions on my radio show and much of the money laundering plot revealed to me by the DEA informant, was stumbled upon by Mr. Cruz. John Cruz was a former Vice President at HSBC bank in New York. John discovered that many of the accounts under his purview were money laundering enterprises in which the address for a series of bank accounts were no more than an abandoned houses or buildings with nothing more than a phone line. His investigation demonstrated that the Sinaloa cartel was the primary player in the money laundering on the part of HSBC bank. When Cruz approached senior level management at HSBC, he was told to keep his mouth shut or he would lose his job. John subsequently went to DHS and the FBI where he was ignored and he was fired by HSBC. He then went to the Manhattan District Attorney and he was advised to drop the matter because this was too dangerous to pursue. Cruz has written a book about his ordeal. The Cruz case also exposed the fact that these cartel members steal identities in order to open these “fake” accounts at HSBC bank. This is significant because we always hear that identity theft is such an important issue and that the government is doing everything they can do to mitigate the danger, when in fact, these same government entities are complicit in the crime.

Last year, I interviewed decorated ex-FBI and DEA operative, Robert Mazur. Mazur was involved in the taking down of the Pablo Escobar cartel. He also participated in busting the BCCI banking scandal. On my show, Mazur named off a half a dozen large banks that are complicit in money laundering drug money. In the final analysis, the DEA insider’s story is not really needed to make the case that our entire financial system is a criminal enterprise system. However, his revelations show the operation details and how legitimate law enforcement agents cannot really do their job.


HSBC bank is the “bankers bank”. This means that Bank of America, JP Morgan, etc., bank with HSBC. If they are dirty, then the whole banking system is dirty. These are the banks that comprise the Federal Reserve which runs our financial system.

In this article, we have seen the cooperation of DEA, the State Department, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. If legitimate DEA special agents do not have anywhere to turn with their field work discoveries, then how can any American trust the financial system? People have criticized me for advocating for getting as much of your money out of this corrupt financial system as possible. Perhaps the defenders of the system, may want to take a second look at a criminal system that they put so much faith in.

The American financial system is a criminal enterprise endeavor. Both federal and corporate entities have conspired to break this nation’s laws. You are expected to follow the laws as they are related to CTR’s, SAR’s and structuring. However, the federal government breaks every one of these laws on a daily basis. It is a case of rules for thee but not for me!

One might also want to ask what do the multitude of dead bankers have to do with this plot?

In addition to these revelations, the DHS insider also gave me details on how the DEA will be involved in upcoming gun confiscation, the Continuity of Government for the false flag events which could be coming and the preparations for mass detentions in this country. The DEA is so dirty that they even eat their own. More on these issues in a future installment on this series.

10 13 11 flagbar


The Reasons We Fight The New World Order


Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. — H.G. Wells,The New World Order (1940)

By Brandon Smith

Activist Post

Throughout our lives and throughout our culture, we are conditioned to rally around concepts of false division. We are led to believe that Democrats and Republicans are separate and opposing parties, yet they are actually two branches of the same political-control mechanism. We are led to believe that two nations such as the United States and Russia are geopolitical enemies, when, in fact, they are two puppet governments under the dominance of the same international financiers. Finally, we are told that the international bankers themselves are somehow separated by borders and philosophies, when the reality is all central banks answer to a singular authority: the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

We are regaled with stories of constant conflict and division. Yet the truth is there is only one battle that matters, only one battle that has ever mattered: the battle between those people who seek to control others and those people who simply wish to be left alone.

The “New World Order” is a concept created not in the minds of “conspiracy theorists” but in the minds of those who seek to control others. These are the self-appointed elite who fancy themselves grandly qualified to determine the destiny of every man, woman and child at the expense of individual freedom and self-determination.  Such elites are often very open about their globalist intentions and ambitions, much like author H.G. Wells, a socialist member of the Fabian Society and friend to the internationalist establishment who put forth his blueprint for world governance in the book quoted above.  In this article, I would like to examine the nature of our war with the elite and why their theories on social engineering are illogical, inadequate and, in many cases, malicious and destructive.

The ‘Greater Good’

I have always found it fascinating that while elitists and NWO champions constantly proclaim that morality is relative and that conscience is not inherent, somehow they are the ones who possess the proper definition of the “greater good.” If “good” is in all cases relative, then wouldn’t the “greater good” also be entirely relative? This inconsistency in their reasoning does not seem to stop them from forcing the masses through propaganda or violence to accept their version of better judgment.
As many psychologists and anthropologists (including Carl Jung and Steven Pinker) have proven over decades of study, moral compass and conscience are not mere products of environment; they are inborn ideals outside of the realm of environmental influences. The greater good is inherently and intuitively felt by most people. Whether one listens to this voice of conscience is up to the individual.

It is no accident that NWO elites end up contradicting themselves by claiming morality to be meaningless while pronouncing THEIR personal morality to be pure. In order to obtain power over others, they must first convince members of the public that they are empty vessels without meaning or direction. They must convince the masses to ignore their inner voice of conscience. Only then will the public sacrifice freedoms to purchase answers they don’t really need from elites who don’t really have them.


I don’t claim to know what ideology would make a perfect society, and I certainly don’t know the exact solutions needed to get there. What I do know, though, is that no one else knows either.

Whenever anyone takes a stage to announce that only he has the answers to the world’s problems, I cannot help but be suspicious of his motives. Rarely, if ever, do I hear these people suggest that more liberty and more individualism will make a better future. Instead, their solution always entails less freedom, more control, and more force in order to mold society towards their vision.

The utopia offered by the power elite invariably demands a collectivist mindset that the individual must give up his self-determination and independence so the group can survive and thrive. The problem is no society, culture or collective can exist without the efforts and contributions of individuals. Therefore, the liberty and prosperity of the individual is far more important than the safety or even existence of the group.

The elites understand this fact, which is why they do reserve some individuality (for their own tiny circle).

No matter the guise presented — whether it be socialism, communism, fascism or some amalgamation of each — the goal is always the same: collectivism and slavery for the masses and unrestrained gluttony for the oligarchs.

The Philosophy Of Force

If your idea of a better society is a good and rational one, you should not need to use force in order to get people to accept it. Only intrinsically destructive ideas require the use of force to frighten the public into compliance. The NWO is an idea that relies entirely on force.

Globalization has been consistently sold to us as part of the natural progression of mankind, yet this “natural progression” is always advanced through the use of lies, manipulation, fear and violence. The NWO concept is one of complete centralization; a centralization that cannot be achieved without the use of terror, for who would support the creation of a malicious global power authority unless he was terrorized into doing so?

The only morally acceptable use of force is the use of force to defend against attack. As the NWO relentlessly presses forward its attack on our freedoms, we, the defenders, are labeled “violent extremists” if we refuse to go along quietly. The NWO’s dependency on force to promote its values makes it an inherently flawed methodology derived from ignorance and psychopathy, rather than wisdom and truth.

Dishonesty As Policy

As with the use of violence, the use of lies to achieve success automatically poisons whatever good may have been had through one’s efforts. The elites commonly shrug off this logic by convincing each other that there is such a thing as a “noble lie” (both Saul Alinsky and Leo Strauss, the gatekeepers of the false left/right paradigm, promoted the use of “noble lies”) and that the masses need to be misled so that they can be fooled into doing what is best for themselves and the world. This is, of course, a sociopathic game of self-aggrandizement.

Lies are rarely, if ever, exploited by people who want to make the lives of other men better; lies are used by people who want to make their own lives better at the expense of others. Add to this the egomaniacal assertion that the elites are lying for “our own good” when they are actually only out to elevate their power, and what you get is a stereotypical abusive relationship on a global scale.

Methodologies that have legitimate benefits to mankind deliberately seek truth and do not need to hide behind a veil of misinformation and misdirection. If a methodology requires secrecy, occultism and deceit in order to establish itself in a culture, then it is most likely a negative influence on that culture, not a positive one.

The Hands Of The Few

Why does humanity need a select elite at all? What purpose does this oligarchy really serve? Is centralized power really as efficient and practical as it is painted to be? Or is it actually a hindrance to mankind and an obstacle in our quest to better ourselves? Champions of the NWO argue that global governance is inevitable and that sovereignty in any form is the cause of all our ills. However, I find when I look back at the finer points of history (the points they don’t teach you in college textbooks), the true cause of most of the world’s ills is obviously the existence of elitist groups.

The “efficiency” of centralization is useful only to those at the top of the pyramid, because it generally stands on a vast maze of impassable bureaucracy. It has to. No hyper-condensed authority structure can survive if the citizenry is not made dependent on it. Centralization makes life harder for everyone by removing our ability to provide our own essentials and make our own choices. That is to say, centralization removes all alternative options from the system, until the only easy path left is to bow down to the establishment.

I have never seen a solid example of centralization of power resulting in a better society or happier people. I have also never come across a select group of leaders intelligent enough and compassionate enough to oversee and micromanage the intricate workings of the whole of the Earth. There is no use for the elite, so one must ask why we keep them around?

The Opposite View

Arguing over what should be done about the state of the world is a fruitless endeavor until one considers what should be done about the state of his own life. As long as men are stricken by bias, selfish desire and lack of awareness, they will never be able to determine what is best for other people. The opposing philosophy to the NWO, the philosophy of the Liberty Movement, holds that no one has the right to impose his particular version of a perfect society on anyone else. As soon as someone does, he has committed a grievous attack against individual liberty — an attack that must be answered.

Our answer is simply that the people who want to control others be removed from positions of control and that the people who want to be left alone just be left alone. Association and participation should always be voluntary; otherwise, society loses value. This is not anarchy in the sense that consequence is removed. Rather, the rights of the individual become paramount; and the liberties of the one take precedence over the ever vaporous demands of some abstract group.

The most common retort to this principle of valuing the individual over collective fear is that “someone” must apply and enforce a structure of law and accountability, otherwise, society will “fall apart” into a vortex of madness and chaos.  And perhaps that is true, though self-governance has never been allowed to exist in the history of man without immediate interference from elitist groups, so no one really knows for certain what would happen.

Doing away with overt government control, however, does not mean we do away with “law”.  Natural law, as with conscience, exists in our very biological and spiritual being, and does not require a central authority in order to be defined.  Natural law supersedes the laws of men.  In fact, the only man-made laws worth following are derived from natural law.  The primary tenet of natural law is that no one has the right to impede or erode the inherent liberties of other individuals, as long as they also respect natural laws.  The second any person violates the inborn rights of another, he has committed a trespass against natural law.  His trespasses against government authority are secondary, if not meaningless.  When one understands the unassailable existence and preeminence of natural law, he quickly discovers how trivial governments really are.

The ONLY reason for any government to exist is to safeguard individual freedom. Period. The original intent of America’s Founding Fathers was to establish a Nation that fostered this ideal. When government or oligarchy steps outside the bounds of this mandate, it is no longer providing the service it was originally designed for; and it must be dismantled. Unfortunately, it is a universal rule that uncompromising tyranny must often be met with uncompromising revolution.

When a new system arises that cannibalizes the old, enslaves our future, uses aggression against us and mutilates our founding principles in the name of arbitrary progress, that new system must be defied and ultimately destroyed. The NWO ideology represents one of the most egregious crimes against humanity of all time, posing in drag as our greatest hope. It is based, fundamentally, on everything that makes life terrible for the common man and everything our inherent conscience fights against.

We would be far better served as a species if we were to turn our back on the NWO altogether and move swiftly in the opposite direction. Imagine what tomorrow would be like if there were no controllers, no statists, no despots and no philosopher kings. Imagine a tomorrow where people respect the natural-born rights of others. Imagine a tomorrow where people’s irrational fears are not allowed to inhibit other people’s freedoms. Imagine a tomorrow where interactions between citizens and government are rare or nonexistent. Imagine if we could live our days in peace, independently building our own destinies, in which our successes and failures are our own, rather than the property of the collective. It may not be a perfect world, or a utopia, but I suspect it would be a much better place than we live in today.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: Alt-Market, where this article first appeared, is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense.

Join today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.


You may step back from reality because it can be barbaric, but when tyrants flourish and good peaceful men fail, and are enslaved, nothing but horrible violence will stop them, and that’s why I have been saying for years that the International Investment Banking Cartel must be eliminated right down to their heirs so they will not rebuild their empire. Leave their heirs dead broke and distribute the Bankers fortunes to the people. As always, if you must kill a snake, cut off it’s head. The thirteen families must go the way of all extinct creatures. And let us not forget their minions who have reaped untold rewards. Let them rot in prisons until they are no more. People like Daddy Bush and his putrid sons, Bill Clinton, and countless others must pay the price for their treachery. And what is their treachery?


 10 13 11 flagbar




7-18-2014 4-51-09 PM

It all began 13.5 years ago when a friend wanted me to take one of a recent liter his dog had burdened him with. I finally relented because my wife was still in grief over the death of our last dog and I thought this would help her adjust.

Little did I know when I went to pick her out that she was the only one left and the runt of the litter. We went out to the barn and searched around, but no puppy was to be found, so we were headed back to the house and I saw a large dog food bag in the grass that the pups had dragged out and in spite of there being no wind it was moving. I walked over to it and taped it with my foot only to be greeted with the most ferocious growl I had ever heard. Peeping inside I saw this tiny little Jack Russell – Chihuahua mix and my heart seemed to leap inside me as my mind said, That is the most beautiful puppy I’ve ever seen. She looked like a squirrel that had swallowed a softball!

Being the runt and looking nothing like the rest of the litter, this little fireball was accustomed to fighting for her food and the contents of that bag was hers and hers alone.

I picked her up and off we went to the vet for a stomach pumping job. The vet however said it was no big deal and she would soon go to sleep and wake up hungry again. He was correct to a fault, because this little pup woke up starving the rest of her life, and we’re talking 4am feeding time for the next 13.5 years. It’s a good thing I have always been an early riser because my wife sleeps like a dead woman till 8am.

That aside, she felt the same instant affection I did when I brought her home. We debated on a name and soon decided on Molly, and by then she was as hooked as I was. I will brag a little here and tell you this little dog never lacked anything she wanted and spent the next week sleeping on my chest every night. Finally, I went to the store and bought her a day bed of her own with much emphasis on  (HER OWN) because she would jump in and growl like a lion any time anyone (even us) would lay a hand on it, right up to the day she died. Her food bowl was also a dangerous thing to touch, even empty! At bed time when she finally got big enough for it to be safe, I let her share my bed the rest of her life.

Other than that, she was the most loving dog in the world. However, she had no use for anyone else but us, except for a neighbor friend who is well over six feet tall and very partial to small dogs. This gentle giant was the only person she would let touch her except us.

Soon she decided that the door bell was an alarm and would go ballistic every time it sounded, including any door bell on TV that happened to ring. She would run to the door and scare the pants off most people when I opened the inner door. She never got close to anyone but she would raise hell until I told her to shut up. Mind you this little twerp was not much bigger than a squirrel back then. Going outside was of no interest to her because she was so intent on guarding the inside.

It was not long until my wife brought home a little green rubber dog toy that looked like a fat spider and squeaked when squeezed. When ever she decided to go find a dark place to hide and snooze, we would squeeze the spider and here she would come, full speed ahead. She instinctively retrieved it when I would toss it around the house, and proudly lay it at my feet. She was soon to show that she was the smartest dog ever to walk the earth as far as we were concerned, and would pick it up and walk around and around the house looking for a place to hide the spider so she could snooze undisturbed.

I could write a huge volume of the times and trials of Molly; but this, is not the place to show so much sentiment. Needless to say, this little dog wound us around her paw and stole our hearts and full attention her entire life.

She gave us 13.5 years of unspeakable joy, and three weeks of unspeakable fear as her enlarged heart and an intestinal infection gradually made her totally lethargic. After the vet was sure she had expired he left us alone for a while and returned with her file and told us on her first checkup she weighted 2.12 lbs. Other than the surgeon who removed part of a disc in her neck, he was the only vet she ever had, and we were always amazed at how she would tolerate his exams when we knew she would bite the crap out of us if we tried. I have the scars to prove it, but never once felt any serious anger. She had her own sense of dignity, and knew how to protect it. God bless her!

In a world as screwed up as ours is, every human being should have this experience, because real soul shaking grief will soften the hardest of hearts and strengthen the soft ones. However, not hearing those little claws clicking on the floor behind me as I move around the house is something I will never get used to. I have never given this kind of consideration, permissiveness, attention, and love to any other animal, and damn few humans. What an injustice it is that she is dead, and OBUMA is still alive and healthy!  Just imagine that in a few short years, Americans may be eating their pets rather than starve.

All because they are too chicken shit to rebel.

7-18-2014 10-59-45 AM

7-18-2014 10-21-15 AM

7-18-2014 10-45-58 AM

7-18-2014 10-30-13 AM

7-18-2014 10-25-01 AM

7-18-2014 10-28-16 AM

7-18-2014 10-35-29 AM

7-18-2014 10-43-50 AM

7-18-2014 10-49-51 AM


Obama Conspires To Control Republicans From Attacking His Muslim Jihadist Brother


 By Walid Shoebat

If ever there existed a scandal that dirtied up both Republicans and Democrats, it was Iran-Contra. In fact, it dirtied up both the Clintons and the Bushes. Both families – along with their respective parties – are so dirtied up that they dare not expose the President’s brother. If you believe the extremely compelling tale of Terry Reed, an intelligence asset in the operation intended to circumvent Congress to provide weapons to the contras in Central America who were trying to defeat Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, they’re very dirty indeed.

Reed says the weapons for hostages angle was played up to put a humanitarian face on an operation that blew up in the face of the Reagan administration in 1986-87.

Read on if you’ve ever beat your head against the wall while trying to figure out why Republicans don’t fight; when both sides are dirty no one is willing to come clean. It’s the domestic, political equivalent of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).

*Spoiler Alert*
*Intended for those who haven’t read COMPROMISED: Clinton, Bush and the CIA by Terry Reed and John Cummings but plan to. Whether you read on or not, you are encouraged to read that incredibly detailed and documented work.*

When ONE MAN Defeated the Justice Department
Those who are inclined to dismiss Reed’s claims should know that he beat the Department of Justice in federal court, despite the judge’s attempt to help the Feds win.

Reed alleges that in 1983, then Vice President George H.W. Bush authorized an operation – through Oliver North – to manufacture untraceable weapons in Mena, Arkansas and have them covertly shipped to the Contras in Nicaragua. For his troubles, then Governor Bill Clinton looked the other way and in return, had his palms greased. However, in true Clintonian fashion, Bill got greedy. Local law enforcement, media, and others began snooping around a bit too much as well.

As a result, in 1986, the operation was moved to Mexico, where Reed would operate from after setting up a manufacturing plant. Little did he know that he was also being set up as a patsy in a CIA-run drug trafficking operation. Sure enough, when Reed discovered a shipment of cocaine bound for the U.S. in his warehouse, he sought a divorce from the CIA.

After a chain of events, Reed was indeed setup and indicted on mail fraud charges and accused of drug trafficking. If there is one thing that comes through in COMPROMISED, it’s that Reed was an extremely intelligent man. Despite multiple attempts by federal judge Frank Theis to help the prosecuting attorney Robin Fowler, Reed was acquitted after being told by Theis in the judge’s chambers that he would be found innocent if he

1.) refused a jury trial and…
2.) agreed not to talk to the media for 30 days.

Reed expressed more anger than relief. He knew he had the feds on the ropes and wanted to prove his case but his attorney Marilyn Trubey threatened to walk if he went that way, so he begrudgingly took the acquittal.

How did he put Fowler to shame? After Trubey subpoenaed practically every federal agency with a three-letter acronym, the first of two very serious blows to the George H.W. Bush administration took place:

Trubey relayed to Terry, “(Fowler) just got a call from FBI Agent Wayne Barlow in Oklahoma City. This is great news, Terry. Not only does Barlow say he knows you, but his contact with you involved classified information what he won’t discuss over Robin’s unsecure phone. He made Robin go over to the FBI office in Wichita in order to discuss it on a secure line. Terry, I think we got ’em on the run.” COMPROMISED, p. 454

This was massive. In order for the Bush administration to get Reed, it had to be able to maintain deniability relative to Reed being an intelligence asset; it was check. The next wound was self-inflicted by the feds, though practically unavoidable, and would lead to check mate. The government invoked the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), which prohibits indicted government agents from blackmailing the government with classified information; it was an admission that Reed had such information.

The mail fraud charges stemmed from what Reed called “Project Donation” that was introduced to him by Oliver North in 1983. Reed was to declare a plane stolen and collect insurance money as part of the operation in Mena. When the plane was later “found” by the feds, it was the basis for their case against Reed. The problem was two tail numbers associated with the plane (there should only be one):

…Trubey had added to the subpoena a request to “state whether either plane appears on the list of aircraft used covertly in the Contra operation in Nicaragua.”

It was check mate.

The problem with calling this a conspiracy “theory” is that the Feds did what they never do –  surrender.

Want more? Here is an excerpt from a 60 Minutes report circa 1993 in which Mike Wallace interviewed Robert Bonner, former head of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Bonner alleged that the CIA was trafficking in cocaine without the DEA’s knowledge, which is itself a crime:

Even the mainstream media’s gospel – the New York Times – reported on such operations.

When the Dirty get Desperate
In this season’s ’24: Live Another Day’, CIA station chief in London Steve Navarro (played by Benjamin Bratt) is composed and unsuspected of being ‘dirty’ but he is. When one of the analysts gets too close, Navarro sends him on bogus mission to pick up a package. In reality, the analyst was being set up and the package was an assassin’s bullet.

Navarro had two options:

  1. Murder to protect his own hide or…
  2. Come clean at great expense to that hide.

He chose option number one but it went wrong. The bodies of both the analyst and the assassin were found at the scene. Navarro was suddenly very desperate because the assassin, once identified, would be tied to him. There was no option number two. At this point, self-preservation meant a willingness to put the lives of hundreds of millions of people at risk. It is the quintessential metaphor for any dirty politician who knows the ugly truth but refuses to reveal it.

In exchange for his escape, Navarro had to place an ‘override device’ – that could unleash hell on earth – into the wrong hands.

That went wrong too, though Navarro was apprehended by Jack Bauer only after the ‘override device’ had been handed off.

Note: Last year, John Guandolo reported that in the mid-1990′s – while a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia – current CIA Director John Brennan converted to Islam. It is not known if Bratt’s character was a subtle jab at Brennan.

Here is Guandolo making the shocking claim about Brennan:

Sudan and Iran-Contra
Barack Obama knows what happened in Mena, AR and he knows just how dirty the Bushes and the Clintons are. If he doesn’t know, he can certainly have access to it.

If there is a figure who represents the early days of the operations run by Reagan’s CIA and Clinton’s Arkansas, Robert “Bud” McFarlane certainly qualifies. He was Reagan’s National Security Advisor from 1983-1985. As reported, he was so distraught after the Iran-Contra scandal made it to the front pages that he attempted suicide in 1987.

At about the time Obama was being elected in 2008, McFarlane was being solicited by Sudan, according to the Washington Post (it is illegal for Americans to deal with Sudan because of its inclusion on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list):

In November 2008, McFarlane recounted in an e-mail, he was approached by a former business partner, Albino Aboug, on behalf of Sudan’s government.

“Albino asked whether I was willing to discuss with senior representatives from the Khartoum government how to foster negotiations between Khartoum and the Darfur rebel groups and also how to move toward renewed diplomatic negotiations between our countries,” McFarlane wrote. “I agreed to do so.”

In early 2009, there was extensive correspondence via email between McFarlane and a man Sudanese official named Mohammed H. Babiker:

In early January, Aboug and McFarlane met in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, with Babiker, who is currently stationed as a Sudanese diplomat in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; it is unclear whether a Qatari representative was present, and McFarlane declined to provide details. The Qatari Embassy in Washington did not respond to telephone messages.

What followed was a month-long exchange of e-mails and documents between McFarlane and Babiker, culminating with McFarlane’s contract with Qatar. Sudanese officials asked McFarlane to approach four former U.S. diplomats to ask whether they were interested in assisting in the effort… all four men turned McFarlane down.

It would later be learned that Babiker was an intelligence operative for Sudan, according to CNN.

It’s quite clear that one of the main objectives of Sudan in its negotiations with McFarlane was getting off the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. The Obama administration has been working very hard at this for years, as has reported. It would certainly free up the President’s brother to deal with Sudan more openly.

As has reported, in the months prior to Barack Obama’s election in 2008 and McFarlane’s dealings with Sudan, Barack’s brother Malik Obama founded the Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) in the home of Ray Baysden, a registered Republican who worked in the Intelligence Community and in Diplomatic Security for the U.S. State Department. As the operations that would lead to the exposure of the Iran-Contra scandal were being carried out in the U.S., Baysden was stationed in Karachi, Pakistan within the same time frame that Obama would have visited Karachi while attending Columbia University, according to the Associated Press.

Malik Obama and the BHOF ran into trouble when in 2011, it was learned that BHOF had not filed the proper paperwork for its 501(c)(3) status. Within 30 days, the paperwork was filed; Baysden was listed as the Executive Director. Beleaguered and disgraced IRS official Lois Lerner saw to it that the BHOF had been illegally granted that status. This issue was certainly compounded by the fact that Malik not only has dealings with Sudan but is a key figure in an organization run by its President, a wanted international war criminal.

Last year, made a shocking discovery when leaked photos of Malik from 2010 revealed that he was not only doing business with Sudan but was a key figure in an organization run by its President Omar al-Bashir, a wanted international war criminal. As the Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), Malik attended the 2010 IDO Conference presided over by none other than al-Bashir.

Who better to provide cover for the President’s brother and his involvement with a State Sponsor of Terrorism than a man in McFarlane who is the face of a very dirty Washington establishment. He holds secrets that would be devastating to the legacies of Presidents 40 – 43 (Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush). As Reagan’s National Security Advisor from 1983-85, McFarlane has information that connects all four administrations; Barack Obama knows this.

Just this past May 30th, McFarlane attended an event put on by the International Center for Religion and Diplomacy (ICRD). The purpose of the event was to honor none other than stealth jihadist and Ground Zero mosque imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. The Vice President of the ICRD is Abubaker Y. Ahmed Al Shingieti, who served as a high ranking official for al-Bashir from 1990-98 (both before and after Sudan placed on the Terrorism list). Shingieti also has a history that includes time as Executive Director with the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), as reported by

We here at have been beside ourselves, trying to figure out why no member of Congress has expressed even the remotest interest in getting to the bottom of the IRS scandal by following the paper trail of Malik Obama’s foundation. One reason – and we concede there may be several – may have to do with McFarlane’s role in dealing with Sudan. The answer may be the unwritten warning inherent in Robert McFarlane being the man to help get Sudan off the naughty list.

McFarlane’s mere existence in that capacity sends a subtle yet not-so-subtle message to anyone thinking about introducing the Malik Obama dynamic into the IRS scandal that Iran-Contra mud will be slung if they do. Both scandals are as equally explosive – Mutually Assured Destruction.

A lot of people – and five Presidential legacies (to include Obama’s) – would suffer significant damage if not total destruction.

As we have repeatedly pointed out, House Ways and Means Committee member Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) – a committee investigating the IRS scandal – has referred to the claims against Malik as “spot on”. Yet, Kelly continues to refuse to introduce this development into the discourse. In fact, last month, when questioningIRS Commissioner John Koskinen at a committee hearing, Kelly made no mention of it but did manage to give Koskinen a hug.

Listen to Kelly on August 29, 2013 as he confidently asserts that the claims against Malik Obama are “spot on” during a radio town hall in his district:

Another very curious development relative to the refusal to expose this scandal came courtesy of the attorney for Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote who has been persecuted and harassed by the IRS. As Engelbrecht’s attorney, Cleta Mitchell should seek the best defense for her client.

Back on February 11th, we contacted Mitchell’s office by phone to pass along our explosive discovery about the Barack H. Obama Foundation’s tax exempt status and how it was obtained. We explained to Mitchell’s assistant why the case was so important. We even walked her through the case and showed her the photos. By contrasting the treatment Engelbrecht had received from the IRS with the treatment Malik Obama – who was implicated in working with Sudan’s government – had received, Engelbrecht had a winning strategy.

Yet, like so many politicians that seem more concerned about self-preservation than they do about the welfare of more than 300 million Americans, Mitchell has not implemented it.


*Ben Barrack contributed to this article.

10 13 11 flagbar

The Head Of The Central Bank Of The World Warns That Another Great Financial Crisis May Be Coming


6-18-2014 6-27-06 AM

Michael Snyder

Activist Post

Most people have never heard of Jaime Caruana even though he is the head of an immensely powerful organization.  He has been serving as the General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements since 2009, and he will continue in that role until 2017.  The Bank for International Settlements is a rather boring name, and very few people realize that it is at the very core of our centrally-planned global financial system.  So when Jaime Caruana speaks, people should listen.

And the fact that he recently warned that the global financial system is currently “more fragile” in many ways than it was just prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers should set off all sorts of alarm bells.  Speaking of the financial markets, Caruana ominously declared that “it is hard to avoid the sense of a puzzling disconnect between the markets’ buoyancy and underlying economic developments globally” and he noted that “markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”.  In other words, he is saying what I have been saying for so long. The behavior of the financial markets has become completely divorced from economic reality, and at some point there is going to be a massive correction.

So why would the head of ‘the central bank of the world’ choose this moment to issue such a chilling warning?

Does he know something that the rest of us do not?

According to a recent article in the Telegraph by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Caruana is extremely concerned about rising debt levels and the current level of euphoria in the financial markets…

The world economy is just as vulnerable to a financial crisis as it was in 2007, with the added danger that debt ratios are now far higher and emerging markets have been drawn into the fire as well, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.

Jaime Caruana, head of the Swiss-based financial watchdog, said investors were ignoring the risk of monetary tightening in their voracious hunt for yield.

“Markets seem to be considering only a very narrow spectrum of potential outcomes. They have become convinced that monetary conditions will remain easy for a very long time, and may be taking more assurance than central banks wish to give,” he told The Telegraph.

Mr Caruana said the international system is in many ways more fragile than it was in the build-up to the Lehman crisis. Debt ratios in the developed economies have risen by 20 percentage points to 275pc of GDP since then.

And you know what?

Caruana is certainly correct to be warning us about these things.

As I have written about previously, the total amount of government debt in the world has grown by about 40 percent since the last recession, and the “too big to fail banks” have collectively gotten 37 percent larger since that time.

The U.S. national debt has grown from about 10 trillion dollars trillion dollars”>to more than 17.5 trillion dollars, and even the Bank for International Settlements admits that the global derivatives bubble has grown to at least 710 trillion dollars.

The massive financial imbalances that we were facing during the last crisis have not been fixed.  Instead, they have gotten much, much worse.

But should we trust the Bank for International Settlements?

Of course not.

This is a very secretive organization that very few people know about but that possesses absolutely enormous power. The following is a brief overview of the Bank for International Settlements from one of my previous articles entitled “Who Controls The Money? An Unelected, Unaccountable Central Bank Of The World Secretly Does“…

An immensely powerful international organization that most people have never even heard of secretly controls the money supply of the entire globe.  It is called the Bank for International Settlements, and it is the central bank of central banks.  It is located in Basel, Switzerland, but it also has branches in Hong Kong and Mexico City.  It is essentially an unelected, unaccountable central bank of the world that has complete immunity from taxation and from national laws.  Even Wikipedia admits that “it is not accountable to any single national government.”  The Bank for International Settlements was used to launder money for the Nazis during World War II, but these days the main purpose of the BIS is to guide and direct the centrally-planned global financial system.  Today, 58 global central banks belong to the BIS, and it has far more power over how the U.S. economy (or any other economy for that matter) will perform over the course of the next year than any politician does.  Every two months, the central bankers of the world gather in Basel for another “Global Economy Meeting”.  During those meetings, decisions are made which affect every man, woman and child on the planet, and yet none of us have any say in what goes on.  The Bank for International Settlements is an organization that was founded by the global elite and it operates for the benefit of the global elite, and it is intended to be one of the key cornerstones of the emerging one world economic system.

The role that the Bank for International Settlements is playing today was envisioned by the global elite long ago.  In another previous article, I quoted from a book that Georgetown University history professor Carroll Quigley wrote in 1975 entitled Tragedy & Hope in which he discussed how the BIS was to one day become “the apex” of the global financial system….

[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

And it is interesting to note that Professor Quigley was not against the system that the elite were setting up.  He was just an academic that was trying to accurately convey what he had learned about how the global system works.

Sadly, the system that Quigley wrote about all the way back in 1975 has fully blossomed today. Every two months, the central bankers of the world travel to Switzerland for “Global Economy Meetings” in Basel.  Most people have never heard of them, but these Global Economy Meetings were actually discussed in the Wall Street Journal

Every two months, more than a dozen bankers meet here on Sunday evenings to talk and dine on the 18th floor of a cylindrical building looking out on the Rhine.

The dinner discussions on money and economics are more than academic. At the table are the chiefs of the world’s biggest central banks, representing countries that annually produce more than $51 trillion of gross domestic product, three-quarters of the world’s economic output.

So how do you feel about the fact that the central bankers of the world regularly gather to plot their next moves for the global economy?

Should an unelected group of central bankers that has no accountability to any national government really have so much power?

Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…

This article first appeared here at the Economic Collapse Blog.  Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.

10 13 11 flagbar



 By: Devvy

Several years ago, I made my usual trek to the post office. One of the little cards was in my PO box letting me know I had a package to pick up. The lady at the counter handed me the box and off I went to my vehicle. When I went to put the box on the front seat, I was shocked to see a big orange piece of tape with a label that read: Opened by U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

What was in the box? Several books I ordered from Amazon for my research. When I got home and opened the box, all I saw was the books and copy of the ordering invoice, but boy was I PO’d. I called a friend of mine who is an attorney and he said if it ever happens again, let him know and he will sue on my behalf.

By what authority does that monstrous, massive waste of money called the Department of Fatherland (aka Homeland) Security have to open my mail? The deliberately named, spit in our faces, “Patriot” Act. It is one of the most draconian pieces of legislation ever passed and signed into law by lawbreakers – the Outlaw Congress and George Bush, Jr (October 26, 2001):

Amendment IV: Searches, Seizures and Warrants (Post 9/11)

“As discussed earlier, the Patriot Act includes provisions such as the “Sneak and Peak” clause that permits police to enter and search a person’s home with a secret search warrant and without informing the person for months afterwards. Then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft gave legitimacy to these “black bag jobs,” which were a throwback to former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. Also under the “Sneak and Peak” provision, the FBI, with a warrant, can secretly enter a person’s home and plant a “Magic Lantern” on the computer. These devices (also known as the keystone logger) are almost impossible to detect and, once installed, create a record of every time a key is pressed on the computer. This record can then be recovered by the FBI during their next break-in. These “legal” break-ins and uses of “Magic Lanterns” are not limited to terrorists but are used in regular criminal investigations of American citizens as well.

“Police raids of American homes have greatly increased. Often the police even fail to knock and announce their presence before breaking down doors. In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that evidence found by police officers who enter a home to execute a search warrant without first following the requirement to “knock and announce” can be used at trial, despite that constitutional violation. And cities and towns across America are installing 24-hour surveillance cameras that watch your every move, making it possible for the government to “search” you anytime you’re in public and to track, document and record your movements­ who you meet with and where you go. There are obvious parallels between these developments and the general search warrant exercised by the British during the colonial period, which was so despised by Americans.

“Under the USA Patriot Act, the FBI initially could obtain a warrant from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which allowed the FBI to secure lists of books borrowed and bought by patrons from libraries and bookstores. The librarian or bookstore owner was prohibited from informing anyone, including the person whose privacy had been breached, that such a search had occurred. A much lower standard of proof than the normal “probable cause” was initially required for such searches. It has now been further reduced to having to be “relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation.”

No More Asking for Permission To Speak

“In our own post 9/11 era, the chief instrument of repression of personal freedom has been the government’s signature anti-terror legislation: the Patriot Act. It was born in secrecy, as members of the House of Representatives were given 15 minutes to read its 300 pages before voting on it in October 2001, and it operates in silence, as those who suffer under it cannot speak about it.

“The Patriot Act permits FBI agents to write their own search warrants and gives those warrants the patriotic and harmless-sounding name of national security letters (NSLs). This authorization is in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says that the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures, and that that security can only be violated by a search warrant issued by a neutral judge and based upon probable cause of crime.

“The probable cause requirement compels the feds to acquire evidence of criminal behavior about the person whose records they seek, so as to prevent politically motivated invasions of privacy and fishing expeditions like those that were common in the colonial era. Judges are free, of course, to sign the requested warrant, to modify it and sign it, or to reject it if it lacks the underlying probable cause.

“The very concept of a search warrant authorized by law enforcement and not by the courts is directly and profoundly antithetical to the Constitution — no matter what the warrant is called. Yet, that’s what Congress and President Bush made lawful when they gave us the Patriot Act.”

The Department of Fatherland Security is a Leviathan monster that not only sucks down tens of billions of borrowed dollars every year, it is an agency that is so incompetent, if it weren’t so serious, one would laugh:

“Securing and Managing Our Borders – The Budget continues the Administration’s unwavering commitment to protect the Nation’s borders. Security of our borders and ports of entry, on air, land, and sea, are the Nation’s primary defenses against illegal entry of people, weapons, drugs and other contraband. Good border security is both a barrier to terrorist threats, drug traffickers, transnational criminal organizations, and other threats to national security and public safety, and a facilitator for the movement of lawful trade and commerce. As the efforts of smuggling organizations are now responsible for almost all of those who cross the border illegally, coordination across the federal government and between the federal government and state and local law enforcement is more important than ever. As a result of recent investments, there is more manpower, technology, and infrastructure on our borders than ever before.

“FY 2015 Budget includes salaries, benefits, and operating costs for 21,370 Border Patrol agents and 25,775 CBP officers. The Budget also includes resources to complete the hiring of up to 2,000 new Customs and Border Protection officers which commenced in FY 2014, and an additional 2,000 officers funded by fees in FY 2015, resulting in faster processing and inspecting of passengers and cargo at U.S. ports of entry, as well as more seizures of illegal items, such as drugs, guns, and counterfeit goods. In addition, the Budget includes $362 million to maintain the necessary infrastructure and technology along the Nation’s borders to ensure that law enforcement personnel are able to accomplish their objective as rapidly as possible without impediments.

“To secure the Nation’s maritime borders and 4.5 million nautical square miles of maritime territory, the Budget invests in recapitalization of U.S. Coast Guard assets including the eighth National Security Cutter, operations and maintenance funding for six new Fast Response Cutters (FRCs), which will provide critical maritime border security along the Southeast and Gulf Coasts, and $110 million to construct 2 additional FRCs which would bring the total number of FRCs procured under that recapitalization program to 32.

“Enforcing and Administering Our Immigration Laws – The Budget supports the Administration’s unprecedented efforts tostreamline and facilitate the legal immigration process while enforcing U.S. immigration laws through the smart and effective use of resources. To facilitate legal immigration, DHS has streamlined and modernized immigration benefits processes, strengthened fraud protections, and extended humanitarian protections to asylees, refugees, and crime victims. To reduce demand for illegal employment, DHS has implemented worksite enforcement strategies while enhancing voluntary use of the E-Verify system. To make the best use of limited resources, DHS has targeted enforcement efforts on the removal of criminal aliens who pose a threat to national security or public safety, and those who have recently crossed the border or are repeat violators.

“In this respect, the Budget includes funds for a more cost-effective Alternatives to Detention program, for low-risk individuals under various forms of intensive supervision or electronic monitoring rather than in detention. The Budget includes funds to maintain nationwide implementation of the Secure Communities program in order to identify and remove criminal aliens, including those incarcerated in Federal, state, and local prisons, ensuring that criminal aliens are not released back into the U. S.”

Department of Homeland Security? What security?

“Homeland Security” – For What and For Whom?

UNACCEPTABLE: Illegals Released In U.S. Given Three Years Until Court Date

“Overwhelmed U.S. courts are giving illegal aliens up to three years to show up for immigration hearings after they’ve been released in the U.S. and the court dates will only increase further into the future. The courts are buried under a massive backlog due to the sharp increase in illegal immigration according to the AP and considering that the 90% of illegals who miss their court dates are rarely prosecuted anyway, the U.S. has effectively established a de facto amnesty program which will only ensure that more illegal immigrants cross into America.”

Department of Homeland “Security” my arse. Every illegal should be turned around AT the border and not allowed on U.S. soil. Our border patrol shouldn’t be 45 miles INLAND, but right there at the hot spots 24/7 right along with the Texas Army National Guard, the Texas State Guard and the constitutional militia except we don’t have one. The same goes for Arizona and New Mexico. Forget California. Useful fools run their state legislature and the biggest one is sitting in the governor’s seat.

Sheriff Babeu: Feds Releasing Criminals Deported 10-15 Times into Arizona

“On Tuesday’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” on the Fox News Channel, Pinal County, AZ Sheriff Paul Babeu reported that the federal government has released criminal illegal aliens into his community and that his officers have arrested individuals who have already been deported 10 or 15 times. He said “[the federal government] has released dangerous violent criminals right in my county and they refuse to give me the names of these criminals, and that there are “cartel scouts…ushering the drugs through all the way up to Phoenix” within the county. Babeu added, “We have a guy just yesterday we arrested and everyday 10 times deported, 15 times deported, because there are no consequences for breaking the law.”

Why TX Gov Perry Won’t Put Natl Guard On Border (Please note: Here in Texas we have: “The Texas State Guard (TXSG) is one of three components of the Texas Military Forces (TXMF), reporting to The Texas Adjutant General located at Texas Military Forces HQ, Camp Mabry (Austin), Texas. The Commander in Chief of the Texas Military Forces is the Governor of Texas. The other two branches are the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) and the Texas Air National Guard (TXANG).”

In the meantime, terrorists are coming across the border and some where down the line, we will see more tragedy here on home soil. Dick Cheney: There Will Be Another ‘Massive Attack’ On America That’s ‘Far Deadlier’ Than 9/11. “During the interview, Cheney stated that he is worried that there will be another 9/11 and that “the next time, it will be with far deadlier weapons than airline tickets and box cutters.” Another pathological liar. Neither airline tickets, box cutters or those commercial airplanes brought town the twin towers or Building 7.

Judge Jeanine Pirro, FOX network, gave one of her outstanding opening statements, July 12, 2014, excoriating the criminal impostor president about the current, massive invasion of illegal hordes. She is absolutely right about gang recruiting as well as terrorists crossing over and diseased kids being shipped to your city or town. It’s worth listening to because she is right on point.

Did I feel violated when I saw that orange tape and sticker: Opened by U.S. Department of Homeland Security? You bet I did. Was I singled out because of who I am? I don’t know, but what I do know is the evil police state being erected and enforced against we the people is all a result of September 11, 2001. An event that could not have succeeded without inside help and I don’t give a tinker’s damn who calls me all the usual labels. I am not one of the lemmings out there who walks lock step to the tune of a tyrannical government that no longer represents we the people and swallows whole cloth their endless lies. There is honor in seeking the truth. There is no honor in ignoring the truth in favor of comfortable denial.

That’s why it’s imperative we continue to educate as many Americans as possible about 9/11 and the lies that have been fed to the American people. How can YOU do that? Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have outstanding materials you can order (no, they’re not millionaires or even billionaires like George Soros) to hand out. So, yes, they do have to charge, but their materials are in color, professionally done and more importantly, they contain the truth, not propaganda.

I recently purchased 100 copies of the special newspaper they put together, 100 of the ‘Did You Know a 3rd Tower Fell on 9/11?’ and 100 of the Evidence List Twin Towers cards. They have been distributed around my small town and across several Western states. They have some excellent DVDs that help people to understand why those planes could not have brought down the twin towers and more.

If you’re traveling, leave a half dozen on the bench one sees inside rest stops. People pick up free newspapers all the time; I know because I’ve watched folks do just that. If you’re a trucker or use trucker facilities at big gas stops, leave a half dozen in the trucker’s lounge. Hand them out at any function, group get together, gun shows – where you legally can. I say legally because it’s against the law to put anything other than stamped U.S. mail in mail boxes. Paper this country with those educational materials that focus on science and common sense until we built such a back lash, a real investigation will finally happen; see 9/11 Truth Seekers: The ‘Lunatic Fringe’ is Whom?

It took over 50 years for the truth to come out about FDR allowing the bombing of Pearl Harbor. It took decades for the truth to come out that LBJ lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Both to draw us into wars America wanted to part of. We cannot allow more decades to pass for the whole and real truth about 9/11 is exposed to the world and prosecute those responsible under the fullest extent of the law. All the spying on we the people, the Nazi ‘Patriot’ Act, NDAA – all a direct result of 9/11. If we are going to topple the towers of lies, we have to reach millions who will no longer stand for those lies.

There is another documentary I found on line. A German production with English subtitles. Quite interesting begins at 14:00 into the film about air traffic controller, Pete Zalewski. There are a lot of people around the world who also want the truth about 9/11. It is a well done documentary as some of the others I’ve mentioned in my columns. Those people in that German documentary sound like Americans: they aren’t swallowing the bilge being fed to them about 9/11.

I know money is tight, but get together with like minded family or a group you belong to and share the cost, which seriously, A & E for 9/11 Truth’s excellent educational hand outs are dirt cheap for the qualify of information they so generously have put together. John and I lived on a very fixed income, but I spent the money because if only 10% or 20% of those who read the truth tell ten people they know who tell ten more, pretty soon you’ve reached hundreds of thousands. We need to make it millions until the government’s fairy tale collapses.


Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 1
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 2
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 3
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 4
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 5
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 6
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 7
Why Do Good People Become Silent­or Worse­about 9/11? – Part 8

Important links:

1 – A must read: Shocking, hidden agenda behind border crisis
Top Cold War defector explains devious reason for mass immigration
2 – Murder Suspects, Sex Offenders, Gang Members Caught at Border
3 – Border Patrol Agents Test Positive for Diseases Carried by Illegal Aliens

Click here to visit home page.

© 2014 – and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn’t left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Devvy’s regularly posted new columns are on her site at: You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

E-mail is:


I can’t begin to describe how depressing it is to see so many otherwise intelligent people hang on to the Constitution myth. One would think that our country’s history would bring this outright lie to a screeching halt; this must be proof that the heart is stronger than the mind. The Constitution is still worshiped more than the Bible ever was; although the ungodly are making much progress. How much proof do the hard heads need before they admit to the truth? I guess the only joy of getting old is the knowledge I won’t have to endure this crap much longer! There has never been a piece of paper that could protect the weak from the strong, and there never will be. It’s all a bunch a lie’s. Be ready when your door is busted down and scumbag cops come in shooting, so you can take a few with you. That’s as good as it’s going to get, until a hundred million sheep wake up. Payback will be a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10 13 11 flagbar

Big Central Bankers The Root of Pure Evil The Major Source of Instability around the World.


 By Truther

It is time to look past the puppet leaders who are just the willing accomplices to carry out the plan for a world government creating order out of chaos. This is how the super wealthy operate through political puppets to carry out the agenda to rule the world. They can only do this by creating crisis and instability in sovereign nations who do not play ball with the bankers.

7-11-2014 8-29-28 AM

John D. Rockefeller said”Competition is a sin”

They will not allow any country to have a currency that competes with their debt based currency scheme and threatens their monopoly on controlling the money supply. They accomplish this through their tax free foundations funding NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations). These organizations are foreign agents of a power outside the jurisdiction, foment ethnic or sectarian violence playing divide and conquer in order to try to overthrow governments that does not want a central bank.

Michael Rivero’s essay of “All wars are banker’s Wars” outlines what the Private Central Bankers did to start World War I and II. This writing is a must read to understand  what  the central bankers do in order to control the people.

It is now 2014 and now since the creation of the internet. The Bankers can no longer hide in the shadows behind their puppet leaders. Their plan and devices they use to destabilize nations that refuse to go along with the oligarchs are being exposed. Populations are pushing back against austerity under a banker imposed financial dictatorship of debt slavery.

The Bankers have been behind the overthrow in Libya when President Gaddafi  wanted to have a gold backed currency for the development for African continent. This was a threat to the central banking establishment that did not want an asset backed currency competing with their fiat money that is created out of nothing.

The Bankers wasted no time sending in Al Qaeda, destabilizing the country by  overthrowing the government, and putting in place a pro central banker leadership making sure the wealth and the nations gold was taken out of the country.

When the Ukrainian government rejected the offer to join N.A.T.O and the European Union. They made the choice of entering into an agreement with Russia, that was far more attracting and beneficial than going with the parasitic EU that will loot the nation’s wealth by austerity of high taxes being burden to pay for a banker debt the people do not owe. A debt impossible to pay by design, to keep people in slavery to the banks.

Through the NGOs, the US State Department, and George Soros who is an agent for the Bankers, they sent in people from outside the Ukraine to stage protest, and to provoke violence against the police in Kiev. As a result the elected government has been overthrown.

Now there is an illegitimate government not elected, selected by the Bankers to govern Ukraine. Chechen fighters, mercenaries all funded by the central bankers through the US State the Department and NGOs for the purpose to provoke an incident to drag Russia into proxy war with the western powers to make President Putin look bad.

In Russia, through NGOs outside of Russia funding protest against President Putin trying to destabilize the country in an attempt to topple the Russian Federation. The Russian Parliament passed a law telling NGOs outside of Russia to  register as foreign agents in order to keep them in check, preventing these groups from fomenting the divide and conquer strategy in Russia to maintain stability.

Why? It is because Russia is the anti central banker power that is the threat to the oligarchs. This is why Russia has been able to prevent wars from starting in Iran, Syria and containing the Ukrainian crisis from escalating into Russia.

The tried to start a war with Syria by using a false flag chemical attack as a reason to overthrow President Assad the first time. This action was planned as a smoke screen also to conceal the looting of bank accounts in Cyprus to prop up the Zombie bankers.

The Bankers through operatives in Syria tried to stage another chemical attack with the hope of invading the country. Russia stepped up, the US Military  and the public outcry against another war stopped the Bankers starting a war in Syria.

The tried to start a war with Iran over a Nuclear Weapons program being a threat to Israel was hogwash. The reason why they wanted to start a war with Iran was because the decided to sell oil in Euros and other currencies by passing the Petro dollar bypassing the Bretton Woods agreement. They knew Iran would tank the economy in America because they controlled the price of crude oil.

There are constant attacks on pipelines in Africa to manipulate the price of light sweet crude oil.

There are famines in Greece and other countries that serve the Banks where the oligarchs by design are creating artificial scarcity, by cutting off the resources to control the people.

The Bankers who control the governments through the World Bank, the IMF are the source of all evil and destabilization around the world.

It would not surprise me, that through unlimited funding of the Rockefeller, and Ford Foundations, are behind the mass influx of illegal crossings from Central and South America coming up through Mexico. To the point of an epidemic of diseases these people are bringing and the sudden population surge in the Southwest of America and Texas because the border is not secured.

They are trying to create a crisis to bankrupt the country because of the demand of social services. These illegal migrants are depleting the financial resources of local municipalities and Hospitals to the point they are going broke. Are they trying to bring in UN Peacekeepers to occupy the border. Are they trying to make a crisis so bad in the southwestern states of riots and pandemics; trying to destabilize the southwestern states with a race war using the illegal alien population as a political weapon to break the will and wage economic warfare against the American people?

Are the Bankers are hoping the American  people would welcome United Nations intervention with peacekeepers on the border to stop the created humanitarian crisis perpetrated by the US government? All this with the bankers trying to bring down the United States any way possible to bring in the North American Union. Something the American people never consented to that is being implemented in secret because once it is all exposed in the light of truth. The globalist plans will fall apart. I believe America will survive and prevail against the bankers. Get ready for many battles to come and do not lose heart.

The good news is the bankers are being exposed. They no longer have the luxury hiding behind  their puppet leaders calling the shots in the shadows. The curtain has been pulled back. The controlled media they own are imploding losing their audience. The print media like the New York Times no longer controls the narrative. The new independent citizen journalist media has taken over the agenda.  Their fiat money is coming to an end. They are desperate trying to start wars, trying to destabilize the country because the world is waking up to their schemes.

Now we know the source that is the root of all evil. It is the bankers. It is time we shake off the shackles of debt slavery like the early Americans did breaking away from the Bank of England who was the cause of much trouble in the world back then.


Except for the claim that Russia is not part of the central banking scheme, this is a very good article, backed up by excellent articles, so follow the links folks and get educated.

 10 13 11 flagbar

Rockwell on the State, the Military, and Propaganda


by Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. on July 12, 2014

Editor’s note: this is a transcript of this interview, courtesy of The Tom Woods Show.

TOM WOODS: This book Against the State: An Anarcho-Capitalist Manifesto is getting plaudits from everybody. Charles Goyette likes it, Ron Paul likes it, I like it. Everybody who reads it seems to be thrilled with it. It’s readable in the sense that it’s got interesting, compelling, punchy prose. It’s packed with information, and it’s short enough that the length of it is not daunting. It doesn’t put people off. By the way, length of books does not always put people off. It amazes me how many people read The Creature from Jekyll Island. It amazes G. Edward Griffin how many people read that book. But all the more will read a book of this length. I am really pleased about it.

So I want to continue our conversation because we peeled away only a few layers of the onion last time, and I want to start off with a concept that we talked about on this program just a couple of weeks ago in connection with Teddy Roosevelt. We had the author of a little book called American Fascist talking about Teddy Roosevelt, and I wanted to give him a chance to show that his use of the word fascism was not just hyperbole. That even though we’re not necessarily talking about Hitler himself, there are ideas in fascism that are present to a greater or lesser extent in various regimes. What are you talking about when you say American fascism? What do you have in mind?

LEW ROCKWELL: Well, of course, as you and your interviewee pointed out, fascism comes from the Progressive Era. It’s not a coincidence that Teddy Roosevelt came to power in that time, and this is when Mussolini developed his ideas. This is before Hitler. So fascism antedates Hitler, and it’s not just an epithet. It is an actual, maybe not a very systematic, but it’s definitely an ideological system, a political system, and an economic system. Mussolini himself said really it’s better described as corporatism than fascism because they represented the melding of state power and corporate power, of course, under the politicians and applied against everybody else in society. So what is fascism? And I think the American system, certainly Teddy Roosevelt had his fascist impulses.

Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was entirely fascist. It really was ripped off from Mussolini, and it benefited the big companies that were in cahoots with the federal government—hurt all the companies and the consumers and everybody else who was not in cahoots, and it set out to change American capitalism, and they didn’t do it. So now I would say there have been many, many advances in fascism. The fact that we don’t have death camps is not a refutation that the American political and economic system is not fascist. So it’s the corporate state. It’s a combination of the welfare state, of massive regulation of business, of hatred of the other—in our case maybe it’s Muslims, Islamists and so forth who allegedly justify total surveillance and total control of the American population. It’s government that—in Mussolini’s case it was the labor unions, big business, and government in a combine. Thank goodness in our own country the labor unions are not a significant force anymore and are becoming less and less. But nevertheless, we have big corporations and big government cooperating together against the rest of us. It also involves militarism. Unfortunately most people accept as just the norm, the worship of the police and the military and the so-called first responders. That’s entirely a fascist impulse. The idea that we’re supposed to think that these are higher-level beings, they are far better and more significant people than just regular, what Will Grigg calls “the mundanes.” That it should be—and it’s perfectly plausible and really moral that it’s a far more serious crime to, say, touch your elbow to a cop who’s arresting you, and therefore you’re resisting arrest, than it would ever be to touch a regular person with your elbow by mistake. It’s the glorification. It’s the constant warfare system, the constant wars going on everywhere—Mussolini, Hitler, Teddy Roosevelt all believed that war was in some sense the highest result of civilization, that not only was the flowering of civilization—war—but that it advanced civilization. Well, it advances something, not of course civilization. So the constant wars, the constant militarism, military worship, and planning by the government and the big corporations of all of economic life, and then we have the total surveillance state, and we have unfortunately what is still, as compared to some other regimes, a soft fascism, but it’s becoming increasingly hard, and it’s more than slightly alarming.

On the other hand, I think there’s more and more, especially young people are becoming awakened to what the American system is, what it’s become, how their own lives are being stunted by it, their own economic possibilities in the future—and Ron Paul, of course, is the major factor in this.

All the ideas of the great libertarians and Austrians, Murray Rothbard and everybody else, they are, of course, the foundation for all of this. But Ron by all of his work has awakened the young people not only in this country but all around the world as to the importance of freedom, how it’s being attacked, and why we don’t want a corporate state, a fascist state. Why it goes against every value of decency, and religion, and the Golden Rule, and it just is an attack on, of course, private property, which is the real basis of civilization, of course, not war. You don’t actually have, for the most part, government ownership of the means of production, that is, you have the TVA. You have the VA single payer socialized medical system.

There are some aspects of the American economy that are classically socialist, but mostly private ownership remains in the hands of the private sector. Control is increasingly in the hands of the government, so that whatever government agency we look at, whether it’s the EPA, or the IRS, or OSHA, or the Treasury Department, the Interior Department, all of them, are massively increasing in power, and business people today have to worry first and foremost not what their customers are thinking and might want, but what is the government thinking and what might the government do to them. So they spend vast resources, vast amounts of time that should go into new products and services to attract the consumer and satisfy consumer wants, go into worrying about the government. Hans Hoppe met recently with, I won’t name him, but an important billionaire who’s interested in Hans’s ideas, and he had a lot of the businessmen associated with him, and Hans said all of them were terrified of the government. They were very, very concerned about what might happen to them. For example, if they spoke out, and I think this is what’s—this is the kind of country that we’ve developed. It is a fascist system. On the other hand, it’s sort of theglorification of falsehood so that there’s—and we do have the truth on our side, so that’s, of course, extremely important, and I actually think the future can be bright just because of young people resisting this system. They don’t like the surveillance. They don’t like the wars. Paulianism is spreading. Also, the ideas of anarcho-capitalism are spreading. There have been more attacks on private-property anarchism, libertarian anarchism, or as Murray Rothbard called it, anarcho-capitalism, than I think has ever, certainly in my lifetime, I have ever seen.

The media, whether it’s the New York Times down to Salon or up from Salon, or whatever, many of them, the New Republic, many of these publications and intellectuals, public intellectuals, are attacking our ideas. If they didn’t worry about us, of course, they wouldn’t bother to attack. They are worried about it. They are worried about its appeal to young people. They are worried about the fact that young people and Ron Paul made it possible for conservatives to be antiwar. Everybody had been brainwashed from the time of Bill Buckley that if you weren’t pro-war, you were pro-communist. You were just the worst kind of bad guy. We had to be at war everywhere all the time, and that’s the right way. Of course, it’s not the right way. It’s obviously not the right way. War is, I would argue, nothing but mass murder, and it’s not a good idea. Thank goodness most of us are not equipped to go kill people. It’s why veterans don’t ever want to talk about whatever happened to them. They don’t want to talk about what they were forced to do—what they saw. It’s so horrifying, and it affects them badly for the rest of their lives. It’s why we see so many suicides among veterans, suicides among troops. And then, of course, there’s all the people who are being killed. We’re only supposed to worry about American casualties. For example, I saw something on Drudge the other day talking about, you know, was Iraq worth it, sorry I don’t have the figures exactly, but something like 4,800 Americans killed—68,000 wounded. But, of course, there probably have been a million people killed in Iraq. The British medical journal Lancet had a very, very good study of this. This is some years ago. It’s certainly hundreds and hundreds of thousands of innocents, people with their arms and legs blown off among the ones who are still surviving. People’s homes destroyed, businesses destroyed, and now, of course, in Iraq we see the alleged al Qaeda taking over and hilariously the Iraqi army just taking their uniforms off and getting out. They don’t want to kill. They don’t want to be killed.

So many, many interesting things happening in the world. The state is actually having trouble. They believe, of course, that everything can be solved by the gun at the head. So all of that takes care of everything. If they have the power to put a gun to your head, that will just solve everything. But of course, it doesn’t solve everything, even for the state. They require people’s active consent, or at least passive consent for what they are doing. That consent, I would argue, is evaporating, especially among young people. They are worried about the ideas of freedom. So I think, as Murray points out, all throughout human history there’s been the struggle between power and market. This is nothing new. It’s a struggle that will never be won this side of heaven, I’m afraid. But certainly we can make progress. We can reduce the amount of evil in the world, and the state, I would argue, is mankind’s greatest earthly enemy. There are spiritual enemies that are more important, but from the standpoint of human enemies, it’s the state, and so I think there’s every reason to look forward to the future because of young people—and also some of us older people are waking up, too, to what’s been done.

Fred Reed did a wonderful column the other day about how many veterans are waking up to the fact that they were used. They weren’t actually serving the country, protecting freedom, and all the rest of the lies that are told. They were misused, and they were misused for terrible and evil things. So I think people are waking up. The Internet continues to be very important as much as the government is trying to restrict it, and people are reading, people are learning. I think libertarianism is spreading, and I think it worries the bad guys, and that’s a good thing, because they should be worried.

WOODS: Lew, I had Bob Higgs on some months ago on the program, and he’s an example of somebody whose thought really did evolve over the years. He was always a limited-government libertarian, but I asked him: you’ve obviously really radicalized over the past five to ten years; what happened? And he said that it finally hit him — and I might add parenthetically, it’s very, very rare for an academic to really have second thoughts about anything. You just double down for your whole career. But he said that as he was doing scholarly work in the field of economics and sometimes economic history, he was describing the state in ways that he realized had no connection to reality at all. He was going along with the standard academic approach to the state, and he realized that this is not how the state is. These are not the state’s motivations. The state is not composed of the sorts of people that the theorists assume that it is. So he’s just abandoned it completely, and he’s entirely a Rockwellian at this point, entirely a Rothbardian in his outlook. And his Facebook updates are some of the best parts of my day, sometimes, even though they can be depressing.

On the military issue, sometimes you and I feel like we’re making a lot of progress, and we certainly are. But one thing that deflates me is the ubiquity of the military worship. It is everywhere. It’s in every sector of society. The military people get discounts on coffee. They get discounts on sandwiches. They get special consideration when they board a plane, and even the progressives, the ones who are supposed to be antiwar, will lamely clap for them on the airplane. And look, I’m sorry: I am just not clapping. And the conservatives, by the way, the conservatives will be against some regulatory agencies, and this regulatory agency is a bunch of thugs, and we don’t like these government employees, but this other branch of government employees can do no wrong. You’ve got to stand up and salute. You’ve got to applaud. They are sacrificing for our freedoms. These pieties are repeated even by people who ostensibly oppose the wars. Thanks for your service. What are you talking about? Am I living in an Orwell novel? What can we do about this?

ROCKWELL: You know, as Joe Sobran pointed out, conservatives are against government programs unless they involve killing people.

WOODS: Yeah. (laughs)

ROCKWELL: So this is what the state specializes in. In fact, I think people who are killers or who enjoy sending others to kill are attracted to the state. Maybe they become hit men for the mafia, but mostly they become politicians, and they actually enjoy starting wars. They enjoy having people killed. They are some people who feel that people like FDR or Bob Dole, who are themselves disabled, sometimes have an impulse. They don’t mind sending strong, young guys off to be mutilated. That they actually like it. So it’s very, very unfortunate. The military worship is, yes, I have never seen anything like it in my life. America’s always been a very militaristic country. It’s not true, for example, that veterans were spit upon when they came back from Vietnam. That’s all just a lie. I can tell you. I was there. The idea that hippies were being nasty to veterans who could beat them up—just, believe me, it didn’t happen. Even then the veterans were exempt, and the troops were exempt from people who always wanted to blame the government. Although, if we listen to Ron Paul’s favorite antiwar song, “The Universal Soldier,” it couldn’t happen without the soldiers. If the soldiers refuse to kill, the whole war operation comes to a halt. It doesn’t matter how big Lockheed-Martin or the rest of these munitions manufacturers are. It doesn’t matter how many people at the Pentagon. They need the soldiers.

So good for Bowe Bergdahl — the guy who apparently sought to change his job, or as they put it in military-speak, desert. And he didn’t want to kill anymore, and he didn’t want to be part of the killing, and of course, he didn’t want to be killed, either. They term that cowardice. Although it seems to me a perfectly healthy and normal reaction. So there’s a tremendous amount of propagandizing that goes on. The military training, in fact, as Fred Reed pointed out, consists largely in attempting to suppress the conscience. That’s the job of the chaplains in the military: to suppress the conscience. If we can think of the basic libertarian insight about government, it’s allowed to do everything that we know among ourselves in the private world are crimes. Say an escaped criminal is hiding in somebody’s apartment building. You can’t just bomb the apartment building to get the guy. The state calls it collateral damage. You can’t commit murder. Murder is a crime even if you’re wearing a government uniform. So maybe we have a hope of at least some of these soldiers realizing that they’re being sent out to commit crimes. And of course, they come back with all of these horrible mental problems, and obviously physical problems a lot of times, too. Then we see the government promoting the hiring of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan as police because they will have the right attitude towards the people—which is, of course, not to protect and serve but to control. This is why they have the militarization, the uniforms, the military vehicles that they have, the military weapons—all designed against the people. So the state always fears its own people most. It doesn’t actually fear the Russkies or whoever is the enemy of the moment. It always fears the people, which is why all the propaganda is aimed at us, and of course, as in this military worship, it’s successful. But America, I am sorry to say, has always been a hotbed of military worship. It’s one of the faults of our country.

WOODS: Well Lew, in our society you don’t win any popularity contests by saying that maybe, just maybe, the troops might bear some moral responsibility here. I do understand that there is so much propaganda that it’s possible that somebody could really not know, not understand the moral significance of what he is doing. But that can go only so far. If you’re going to sign up for a job that you know involves killing people, you’ve got at least crack open a book. You’ve got to look at the history of the area that you’re going to bomb, have some remote sense of what’s going on there. I have distant relatives who have been in the military who have not got the first clue about anything in the world other than the U.S. is great and rah, rah, rah.

You mentioned “The Universal Soldier.” I am sure you will recall at Ron Paul’s Rally for the Republic in 2008 he had Aimee Allen sing that song because he has always appreciated that song. Then in his own remarks—I was really moved by this—he said that he sometimes looked back on his own time as a flight surgeon in the military and asked himself, “Was I the universal soldier?” That in my own small way, I enabled this. Maybe I should have just said no to the whole thing. And again, how unusual is it for somebody in his ’70s to look back and say, in public no less, maybe I did something that was seriously wrong, and I looked back on it, and I wish I had it to do over again.

ROCKWELL: And this, by the way, is a man who became a physician so he would never be called upon to kill people for the government. Ron was interested in many—he might have become another kind of scientist. He might have done many other things. He might have become a businessman, a successful businessman, too, but that’s why he became a doctor. So that was his—of course, this comes about through introspection. I don’t think you—of course, obviously I am for reading books—your book, my book, many of Rothbard’s. It’s essential. But can we also know from introspection? Isn’t this the Catholic doctrine of the natural law? Certain things are written on the human heart by God. One of them is, it’s not a good thing to kill people. Murder is a problem. It’s why these kids get brainwashed. A lot of times, because of the Fed and other government economic policies, they don’t have any kind of economic future in the private economy, or that’s what they feel, and so they joined for that reason. If something is in your economic interest, of course, it’s very easy to think it’s okay, and everybody is trained to believe that anybody who is resisting the U.S. is an untermensch who deserves to be killed, deserves to have his throat slit, and that’s true of his wife and children and his grandparents and so forth, too. They made the mistake of Leonard Peikoff, the horrible guy who is Ayn Rand’s successor as the head of the Ayn Rand Institute, who said you can kill everybody. He was for nuking all Arabs, and I guess he still is, but he was arguing for this. And he was asked the question about non-combatants. He said they are living in that country; therefore, they are responsible.

WOODS: Yeah, so he takes the leftist view that just by standing somewhere, you’ve consented to the regime. That’s the most totalitarian view of all, and also, from some of these official Randians — I don’t want to get complaints from ordinary Objectivists; I’m talking about the official mouthpieces of various Objectivist organizations — we hear repeatedly the use of the term “terrorist countries.” Now, these are the same people who call themselves individualists, and yet they speak in this horrifying collective about “terrorist countries.” And then, as you say, repeatedly you see Objectivist scholars saying we should not worry for a moment about collateral damage. And this is the school that portrays itself as the philosophy of reason. Heaven help us!

ROCKWELL: (laughs) No, of course, it’s true. And if we’re going to start to talk about terrorist countries, I don’t think you’re talking about the country, but terrorist regimes — why isn’t the U.S. right at the top of the list? If we think of the U.S.’s official definition of terrorism — and by the way, it has to be non-state. They start right off by saying it’s a non-state thing, terrorism. And it’s the use of violence or the threat of violence against civilian populations and civilian targets to attempt to bring about political change. Well, what’s the U.S. doing in all its wars? I mean, ordering all the drones and so forth, and when they bomb a wedding party, they feel that they can just give the surviving families a couple thousand dollars, and that’s fine. And everybody is trained to think it doesn’t matter. They are gooks. They are not really human. So it’s a horrendous—the National Socialists didn’t invent this sort of attitude. Maybe it’s always been present in the human heart, along with some other bad things.

WOODS: It’s intensified by the state.

ROCKWELL: Well, the state, of course, lives off it. This is the source of the state’s power. That and the drive towards egalitarianism is another one. But war, yes, it’s famously said war is the health of the state. War is sort of the foundation of the state. War is the essence of the state. I always find it interesting that there’s so many troops in Washington, D.C., that they are only allowed—they are ordered, in fact—that you must, of course, wear your uniform on Tuesday, but not the other days of the week, because if all the soldiers and Marines, and Navy guys, and Air Force guys wore their uniforms every day, the place would look like an armed camp. And of course it is an armed camp, and it’s engaged in what Jack Douglas calls the annihilation of nations. Look what they’ve done to Iraq and Afghanistan. We even hear rumors about a possible first strike using atomic weapons against Russia to eliminate them once and for all as one of the few countries that’s actually challenging the U.S. desire to rule the globe through global domination. Certainly, many, many political leaders and dictators have been accused of wanting to rule the globe, and maybe they all do, but very few of them have had the wherewithal. The U.S. government actually has the wherewithal and has pretty much achieved it, world domination and world rule, and I guess they want to rule the solar system and the universe, too. But the two countries that are giving them trouble and not obeying are China and Russia. So there are people who in the evil Herman Kahn’s neocon view think the unthinkable. That is this sort of routine use of atomic weapons against civilian populations as a way to control opposition in other countries.

Bob Higgs has said in a tremendous talk to the Mises University last summer at the Mises Institute —and you can see it online at — he thought the U.S. state was actually capable of exterminating life on Earth. They were actually so crazy as well as evil with all their—just to take one aspect: in Fort Dietrich, Maryland there’s this vast government enterprise, and there are others in other parts of the country, too, that exist only to create deadly diseases. And there’s a bunch of government scientists right now who are engaging in attempting to restore the Spanish flu virus that came about as a result of World War I and that killed 50 million people. That’s sort of erased from history and from people’s memories because the whole thing was so unbelievably horrendous in this country, too, by the way. I had people from my family in those days died from this, too, and I think this was true of almost every American family. So these scientists funded by the government are attempting to bring this virus back. Only the government would do that. You can’t imagine a private company doing that. This is the government. So they produce biological weapons. They produce chemical weapons. There have even been efforts to bring about diseases and bacteria that would attack different ethnic groups like Arabs or whatever. So Dr. Evil doesn’t quite describe these people.

WOODS: Lew, early on, before they launched the war in Afghanistan, we know that there was a slide show that was shown to Condi Rice and Rumsfeld, and it was called “Thinking Outside the Box: Poison the Food Supply.” This was just considered a possible policy option that they might consider. As we’ve been talking it’s occurred to me that very often we hear people say, I believe in the free market, but the one issue where I just had trouble coming on board with you guys was foreign policy, was war. That was the last hurdle for me, and then when I finally saw it, then I joined with you guys. Isn’t it funny? And that was true for me, too, by the way. But isn’t it funny that it should be that way? That we’ve been so bamboozled by the state that the worst thing that it does is the thing we have the most difficulty letting go of. Why shouldn’t war be the first thing that we see as wrong? And then the minimum wage be the last one? Isn’t it funny that it goes the other way?

ROCKWELL: Yeah, it is funny, and I can remember one of the first acts of the Bush regime when it attacked Iraq was to bomb and destroy every single waste treatment facility in the country.

WOODS: Right.

ROCKWELL: In order to cause disease, in order to make sure that the water couldn’t be pure. It’s why, of course, long before there was a military attack, baby food, medicine, all kinds of things were banned from being exported to Iraq. So this is the fabled sanctions, which are also evil, which also violate the moral law. Another way to think of anarcho-capitalism or libertarianism is the state and its employees are not above the moral law. The moral law applies to them just as much as it does to the rest of us. This is very difficult for people to accept. Even clergymen have a difficult time. In fact, some of the worst defenders of the war system are some of the clergy.

WOODS: Oh, yeah. And that’s been true for a long time. Even the progressive Social Gospel clergy were so in favor of World War I, the rhetoric would shock you.

ROCKWELL: No, it’s true. Of course, they were all in favor of it, and they actually thought it would build the Kingdom of God on Earth. Rothbard writes a lot about this in his history of thought and otherwise. But they thought that building the Kingdom of God on Earth can be done by the state, and the most important and best thing the state did was to kill people. So that would bring the reign of God. Well, not quite. So it’s the reign of the devil or something that they’re actually promoting.

10 13 11 flagbar



7-10-2014 2-52-40 PM

By Lloyd Marcus

My fellow Americans, we are all bit players in the making of a metaphoric slasher movie, “Obama Unchained” starring Barack Hussein Obama.

Here is a summary of the movie. It is a heartwarming tale about how the mainstream media and Democratic Party suckered America into electing their extreme far-left dream president; a Trojan Horse in the form of a black man.

Once in the Oval Office, Obama began incrementally implementing his socialist/progressive agenda and iron-fist pressure on Americans to conform. Everyone, including a 175 year old order of elderly Catholic nuns were forced to comply to Obama’s decreed anti-biblical new moral standards or face termination. Only donors, labor unions and favored friends of his royal Obamaness totaling over 2000 are unlawfully granted exemptions from his tyrannical overreaches hidden in Obamacare.

Unchained from pretending to be a moderate to get reelected, Obama is releasing his judgment and rage upon America; wielding his executive pen sword, causing a bloody massacre of our economy, national security, world standing, freedoms, liberty and culture.

Now totally unrestrained, with lawless abandonment, Obama dishes out what he believes is well-deserved revenge on America for her crimes against the rest of the world. Obama is delivering the retribution spoken of by his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright who said, “America’s chickens have come home to roost.”

Pundits say Obama is merely incompetent. They site highly unfavorable approval polling to conclude that Obama’s presidency is in deep trouble. Political analysts believe dismal poll numbers will force Obama to back away from his intensely focused savage attack on America as founded; his vowed fundamental transformation of America. These sycophant, apologist or naive talking heads are missing the point. Obama does not give a rat’s you know what about polling. Nor does he fear lawsuits, Congress, impeachment or anything else.

Remember Michael Jackson’s famous line, “I’m not like other guys”? Obama believes he is not like other presidents. I am Barack Obama, the first black president. I can do whatever I please and no one is going to stop me. Period!

“Obama Unchained”, the movie, is directed by Unknown Socialists/Progressives.

Obama’s supporting cast includes Eric (cited in criminal and civil contempt of Congress) Holder as the corrupt partisan head of the DOJ. Lois (Wicked Witch of America) Lerner as the corrupt, vindictive and evil IRS enforcer. Kathleen (Yes, you will fund abortions against your faith) Sebelius as the totally incompetent head of the botched Obamacare roll-out. Jay (please don’t make me go out there and lie again with a straight face) Carney as Obama’s Press Secretary. This just in, Carney has been replaced by understudy liar, Josh Ernest.

If the metaphoric Socialists/Progressive’s movie were to snag a Best Song nomination, their song would be titled, “I Believe I Can Lie” performed by Barack Obama. A real trailblazer, Obama is the first U.S. President awarded, “Liar of the Year”.

In my metaphoric scenario, the buzz in DC would declare “Obama Unchained” a shoe in for Best Picture. However, the sentimental payback favorite for Best Picture would be “Sixty-Six Years A Liberal” starring Hilary (don’t asked me about Benghazi) Clinton.

Folks, while I have taken a humorous approach to describing Obama’s Revenge War on America, the situation is extremely serious. The solution is quite simple. It is push back, push back, push back politically. While the Tea Party remains fully engaged, what strong courageous conservative will emerge to lead the charge?

We who love America are metaphorically in the process of producing our own movie titled, “November 4, 2014: Independence Day.”

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman –

© 2014 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved


 Self proclaimed Black Unhyphenated American, Lloyd Marcus is a featured columnist on American Thinker, Renew America, Canadian Free Press and numerous other Internet websites. A speaker, activist, singer/songwriter, recording artist and entertainer, Marcus was a featured act on the historical 2009 Tea Party Expressed Tour. The finale event was the Sept. 12th Taxpayers March and Rally in Washington DC where Marcus performed for a million people.

His appearances include FoxNews, CNN, PJTV and numerous TV and radio programs. He emcees and performs his patriotic original songs at rallies and special events across America. He was the featured entertainment at the 2009 Free Republic National Convention. Marcus’ mission is to use his God given gifts to spread the “truth” that Conservatism is best for all Americans. He resides in Central Florida.

An elected official, Marcus is Chairman for Precinct 424, Volusia County Florida. He is also Creative Director for the Republican Executive Committee of Volusia County.

Lloyd Marcus, Singer/Songwriter of the national “American Tea Party Anthem.” President, NAACPC (National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of Color)




10 13 11 flagbar


Eleven Tactics Used by the Mainstream Media to Manufacture Consent for the Oligarchy


7-10-2014 10-16-36 AM

By Sigmund Fraud

Activist Post

The mainstream media is aging and collapsing under the weight of its own hubris and arrogance. Now entirely formulaic in presentation and predictable in substance, the ‘major’ outlets of news, which are monopolized under only a small handful of corporations, serve the purpose of misleading the public on important issues and manufacturing consent for government and the oligarchs.

The public is still largely numb to this reality, and in a wicked catch-22 for modern man, many people are still addicted to the very media that serves as the primary weapon of social control against them.

The tide is turning, however, and to help break the spell we bring you this comprehensive list of 11 tactics used against the public by the mainstream media to coerce consensus, divide, conquer, ridicule and stifle truthful or meaningful conversation about the state of our world.

1. Lying by Omission – What is not on the nightly news? This is the most important question to ask when consuming mainstream media. The average hour-long broadcast consists of 48 minutes or less of actual news programming, minus, of course, the chit-chatting, the expensive motion graphics and the bumpers, highlights and story recaps. With a formula like this, full of pomp and grandstanding, the impression given is that if it does not make it on the nightly news, then it is not of significance. The most obvious way in which the mainstream media manufactures consent for policy makers and advertisers is by omitting from the news reel those stories and perspectives which may compromise the broadcasters’ agenda, whatever that may be.

2. Controlling the Debate – Who is arguing, and for what cause? News programs are businesses just like anything else and, as such, news executives keep a go-to list of  contacts to fulfill any necessary role in a program or segment. If the government needs credibility, they roll out an ex-president and remind you that he has ‘gravitas.’ If the military-industrial complex needs a voice, then they roll out a familiar think-tanker to interject in a debate with a common-sense perspective in favor of national security. If something is too complicated for public consumption, then they open the Rolodex to the ‘experts’ page and shuffle some know-it-all in front of the camera. The media is laden with groomed pundits, so-called opinion leaders, and commentators, and each one has a definite reputation, each one resonates with a specific target audience, and each one fills a predictable role in a conversation. Program guests are very well vetted, and news is a science, a very lucrative science that excels in giving the impression of a diversity in ideas while keeping the debate sequestered in a very well-constructed box. The characters in this box make all the difference.

3. Selecting the Right Anchors, Casters and Presenters – Our lives have been pegged to the dollar, and as such, a ‘good job’ is valued above many genuine virtues. People like to keep their jobs, as do news anchors and newscasters, and since news is, again, a business, the voices and faces on news programs are hired to perform a role, a job description, a task. They are not employed to pursue morally driven journalism for the benefit of society. If they perform as they are required, they advance and gain more exposure. If they rock the boat, there are a thousand other hungry job-seekers champing at the bit to replace them and do exactly they are hired to do. News anchoring is a job like anything else, and those at the forefront are the best at playing the role.

4. Scripting and Synchronizing News – One of the creepier and more blatant efforts to homogenize thought and manufacture consent is to script the news at high level, then distribute these scripts to manydifferent locales and anchors to read verbatim, while they feign authenticity. This is partially a result of the business decision to save money by employing as few actual news gatherers as possible, but is also a key part of the strategy to achieve conformity amongst people of different backgrounds and interests. The government has also been known to interject itself into the chain of command for selecting which news scripts are to be disseminated to the public. This is the most fundamental characteristic of propaganda, and is rather embarrassing to witness once you realize just how disingenuous your local news presenters are and just how easily duped most people are.

5. Politicizing Everything – Language is the greatest weapon of social control, and with mainstream media, powerfully debilitating language is pushed into every corner of our consciousness. Conservative vs. Liberal. Democrat vs. Republican. Right-winger vs. Left-winger. Good vs. Bad. Left vs. Right. Right vs. Wrong. White vs. Black. And so on. Ad nauseam. The truth is that ideas and opinions are as vastly different as grains of sand on a beach, yet the media intentionally frames every issue in terms of a phony left-right paradigm that has been constructed to pigeon hole complex ideas and interests into a cheapened thought prison. No unorthodox idea or point of view can reach critical mass because everything is automatically framed in a ‘with us or against us’ mindset, turning people against each other for no reason other than to appeal to our desire to be on the winning team. The mainstream media is the chief party responsible for creating the constructs of ‘left’ and ‘right,’ which have been tightly integrated into our social consciousness as a means of achieving divisiveness and disagreement among the populace. This is the chief tactic of divide and conquer, and when people are compelled on any issue to ‘pick a team’ and fight the rivalry to its bitter end, many opportunities for true progress are lost and the populace is easily goaded into a position favorable to the elite.

6. Using the Language of Separation and Labels – Sometime in the 1990s, the mainstream mediastopped referring to people as ‘people’ or even as ‘citizens’ and began calling everyone ‘consumers.’ Once again, language is important to shaping reality, and as ‘consumers’ our role in the affairs of business and state are reduced to hapless bystanders whose job it is to choose and reject, not interject and affect. We’ve all heard the label ‘conspiracy theorist,’ which is the most popular label used when an idea or story is unfavorable to the mainstream media and the interests that back them up. You are a ‘conspiracy theorist’ if you ask questions, assimilate facts in a logical manner, or pursue justice outside of the main flow of public discourse on a popular issue. This type of language is also part of the process of politicizing everything, and by also labeling people in accordance with their country of origin, religion, skin color, economic class, or whatever else, more wedges of division are driven into the populace, deflating our inherent power in numbers.

7. Asking the Wrong Questions – Press access to ‘important’ people in our society is tightly regulated, and the powers-that-be don’t like to be confronted with unexpected and hard questions. For this, the mainstream media dutifully uses its access to people in high places to ask softball, trivial, nonsensical, ignorant questions about irrelevant and superfluous issues. Independent media is winning the long race against corporate/fascist propagandized media because people are naturally inclined to resonate with common sense and truth, which is not at all what corporate mainline media is involved with. White House correspondents shouldn’t waste our time and insult our intelligence by asking a war-time president about his pet dog or a recent golfing trip. But they do, all the time.

8. Closing the Book Too Soon – Moving an important or complicated issue from the front page as quickly as possible is a common strategy to remove touchy subjects from the public conversation. Sadly, our national attention span is at an all-time low, mostly because we’ve been trained to move from issue to issue with lightening speed, never soaking up any one thing for too long. With such a short-term memory, it is easy to protect a politician, forget a genocide, ignore the long-term effects of a bank bailout, and so on, just by moving onto to something new. Once the media has signaled that a story has been resolved or adequately discussed, then any afterthought, individual investigation, or further inquiry is labeled as extremist and ignored.

9. Triviality and Distraction – With all of the important decisions being made daily by powerful people, decisions that genuinely affect quality of life for many people, the news outlets are steadfastlydevoted to engaging in gossip, entertainment, murders and acts of violence, car accidents, disasters and other pablum. The body politic is kept confused by celebrity happenings, endless sports contests and other such pageantry, and the media uses these many forms of distractions to fill time and brain space so that important issues are seen as a drag or as a downer, and never given proper reflection. This is so ubiquitous in our society nowadays that there really is no escape.

10. Outright Lying – When all else fails, just lie, make it up as you go along, sell your air time to the highest bidder, and never look back. In the Internet age, people are pretty keen on fact checking, rebutting, arguing, and gathering stats, and there are enough facts available to prove any side to any story. In fact, this has become an art form for major media, and the ability to gather facts in accordance with an agenda is a profitable skill for the mainstream media. Lying has always worked, and the bigger the lie, the more likely it is to be believed.

11. Bonus – Eye Candy and Mind Melting – This one is a bonus and part of the new era of network news. Rather than employ virtuous gumshoes and hardcore reporters of truth, mainstream media instead invests in graphic artists to make each frame of the broadcast an over-designed motion collage of brain-melting info overload. Staying focused on what the anchor or guest is actually saying is impossible. By design, the news is presented in a mad shotgun blast of competing signals, and your attention is split in ten directions with tickers, bubbles, stock footage, gyrating lights and special effects. The point here is to exhaust the mind with over-stimulation so that the brain cannot function methodically and cannot process an issue beyond the shallow surface. This is also known as hypnotism, or mind-control.


News is a commodity just like everything else these days, and although many still believe the point of news is to inform, it is important to accept the hard truth that the purpose of the news is really just to sell something, be it a product, an idea, a candidate, a public image, a war, or whatever. For this, the mainstream media is focused on first deciding which issues are to be discussed in the public forum, then by using a bagful of tricks to shape people’s perceptions of an issue, the media divides us and pits us against each other while leading us into consent for an underlying and hidden agenda.

Sigmund Fraud is a survivor of modern psychiatry and a dedicated mental activist. He is a staff writer for, where this first appeared, and where he indulges in the possibility of a massive shift towards a more psychologically aware future for mankind.

 10 13 11 flagbar




7-8-2014 12-23-06 PM

By Dave Hodges

The Benghazi scandal will eventually find the light of day. It is the story that will not die because some very powerful people are determined that the truth be brought out in order to promote regime change related to the Obama administration.

Cries for Help Ignored

Three times Ambassador Chris Stevens begged for more military protection and three times, then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, denied Stevens cries for help. Clinton did not respond to requests for help by saying no, she responded by not responding to the pleas through official channels.

Stevens had long been a CIA asset who had run guns to al-Qaeda for the purposes of gaining assistance for the CIA inspired led regime changes in Libya and then in Syria. This is nothing new and has been widely reported.

It is not a secret that the CIA’s propensity to use rogue forces to accomplish a foreign policy objective  (i.e., regime change) is not new. The fact that the CIA engages in drug trafficking to fund such an operation is also not new as the American public was introduced to the existence of Air America, Iran-Contra and the nefarious actions of Lt. Colonel Oliver North in televised congressional hearings during the Reagan administration.

What was not known at the time of Iran-Contra, was that the CIA was convicted, through its paramilitary assets and civilian contractor liaisons (e.g. Blackwater, DynCorp, Wachovia Wells Fargo and Halliburton), not only with drug trafficking but sex trafficking to raise the money to  arm al-Qaeda in the attack upon Libya and then Syria. Part Three will stunningly reveal that every major bank is involved all the way up to the Federal Reserve. This article deals solely with why the military leadership would like to promote regime change.

Iran Contra, Same Song, Different Verse

On May 1, 2014, Tosh Plumlee told Alex Jones and his audience that he has firsthand knowledge of US gun running and ancillary drug running to support Black Ops operations in the Middle East. This is the same exact pattern which was utilized to fuel the Iran-Contra Affair in which the Russian backed Sandinistas would be opposed by the Contra using funds derived from CIA basked drug operations which led to the rise of drug-related street gangs in South Central LA in which cocaine became the main commodity. The implication is that the same thing was going on at the time of Ambassador Stevens death in that Stevens was running guns to al-Qaeda. However, there was one more key element of CIA funding which would be used to fund the of proxy forces for the purpose or regime change and that would child sex trafficking.

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney Was the First Notable to Expose These Crimes of the Century

Former Representative Cynthia McKinney was told in 2006 by then Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, that it was not President Bush’s policy of the Bush administration to award companies, with a track record of human trafficking with government contracts. Yet, the practice continues, government contracts are still awarded even as innocent children sex trafficked. are sold into a life of slavery at the behest of Halliburton, DynCorp, Wachovia Wells Fargo  and other multinational corporations with close ties to the political and corporate elite.

In 2006, McKinney grilled the Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, with the following question: “Well how do you explain the fact that DynCorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts?” This question was posed to Rumsfeld AFTER McKinney had pointed out that several multinational corporations, with close ties to the elite, had already been busted for selling innocent children into a life of child sex slavery. The heated exchange takes place here.

Drug running and child sex trafficking are big business. As the reader will discover, later in this article, the money is skimmed, laundered and used to promote regime change through the use of proxy forces such as al-Qaeda. If one can be made to understand this process, then one can understand the power of the shadow government and how it effectively operates as the supreme fourth branch of government.

US Military Leadership Is In Survival Mode

As Ambassador Chris Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, AFRICOM commander, General Hamm, had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was in charge of facilitating an arms transfer between the CIA and its proxy representatives (e.g. Chris Stevens) was under attack.

The military does not give a damn about drug running and child sex trafficking. However, they do care about their careers and the preservation of the military as an independent and viable entity. The firing of 260+ senior command officers by Obama, serves to threaten this viability. The presence of UN vehicles and troops also threaten the viability of the US military.

From the perspective of the military, the Obama administration is the mortal enemy of the viability and independence of the American military.

According to the same sources who accurately told me that Admiral Gayoutte and General Hamm were launching a rescue mission designed to save Chris Stevens when they were arrested by CIA personnel serving in their ranks, these men wanted to save Stevens to expose Obama’s betrayal of this country and it ideals, namely, to bring to light drug running, child sex trafficking in order to fund the purchase of arms to be used by proxy forces in promoting regime change.. This was an old-fashioned coup attempt. By saving Stevens, Hamm could have leveraged this information to obtain an American regime change based on these explosive revelations. We know that much of the former military leadership in this country favors a regime change which would remove Obama from power.

If one cares to do the research, I was reporting on these facts that Obama had survived a coup attempt at this time. A few months later, people like Glenn Beck decided they would publish similar information after criticizing me a few months earlier for printing what they would eventually publish. These same insider sources are telling me that child sex trafficking was helping to support the arming of the rebels in Libya and Syria. Yes, I am saying that General Hamm was part of plot which would have brought down Obama and Clinton in one fell swoop. This was an attempted military coup just as I had previously reported.

When General Ham received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he made plans to commit mutiny and go ahead with the rescue of Stevens. And as he did, he was arrested within minutes of contravening the order by his second in command, General Rodriquez. Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and  air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.”

The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, their replacements required approval from the Senate. Also, at that time, the Middle East was considered to be a war zone in which it was believed that the US was trying to provoke Syria and/or Iran into attacking the US so we could have the pretext for invasion. Therefore, this should be considered to be an event of epic proportions.

There are key questions about the mutiny on Benghazi which need to be answered:

1. Did Hamm and Gayouette commit mutiny in a war zone?

Answer: Without question!

2. Where did Hamm and Gayouette fit into the power structure of the military?

Answer: In a war zone, these two men represented two of the top four commanders in the region. Hamm would have overseen any military incursion into Syria or Iran. When Obama fired the two leaders, he effectively gutted his military command structure in the region.

3. Did Hamm and Gayouette’s conspiracy to commit mutiny in the face standing presidential orders occur in isolation?

Answer:  Only a person with absolutely no knowledge of military command structure would be so naive to believe this assertion. The military builds in redundant chains of command which overlap. There is no way that Hamm and Gayouette’s mutiny was occurring without the knowledge of their superiors as well as the NSA, which explains how the Obama administration learned of this betrayal and moved to arrest both men before any rescue effort could have been launched.

4. Why were key leaders in the military willing to risk their careers in this mutiny?

Answer: Because every senior command military officer was being faced with the continual acquisition and control of our military by outside forces and this threatened the upward mobility of the more aggressive commanders and it threatened the very viability of the military itself.

Hillary Clinton

When Hillary “What does it matter?” Clinton was unable to contain the fall out, and subsequent cover up from Ambassador Stevens death, she was out as Secretary of State and John “Ketchup” Kerry was in. The appointment of Kerry was a brilliant move by an otherwise bumbling set of attempts to cover up the murder of Stevens.

During the Reagan administration, Kerry led a congressional investigation which ultimately led to the conviction and exposure of Air America and the nefarious Iran-Contra Affair which was led by the CIA in violation against the laws of this nation. Kerry’s appointment to the Secretary of State position would ease the fears of a cover up because he had previously blown the lid off of a similar Benghazi operation over 25 years ago. On the surface, Kerry was the perfect choice if the administration wanted to avoid allegations of any further allegations of a Benghazi cover up. Unfortunately, for the Obama administration, the seemingly brilliant appointment of Kerry did not throw the investigative dogs off of the Benghazi trail and it is the scandal, along with the IRS scandal, that will just not go away. This undying attention on this story happened thanks to tips provided to journalists such as myself by disenfranchised and former US military,

If there is ever a revolution in this country involving elements of the US  military vs. the blue helmeted foreign (i.e. Russian, Chinese, et al.) assets, these disenfranchised elements of the military, will need the popular support of the people to win. Hence, the elite behind Obama need to be exposed.


There are two more important questions to ask:

1. Why did Stevens have to die?

Answer: The administration discovered that the military was providing back-channel information to journalists in order to expose that this administration was doing business with al-Qaeda for the purposes of regime change. Steven was killed less than two months before the election of Obama to a second term. Can one only imagine what the public backlash would have been if Stevens had been rescued, stayed angry and told all in retaliation?

2. Ultimately, why would the military want to save a CIA drug runner and sex trafficker?

Answer: Stevens could have been leveraged to bring down the present administration which poses such a dire threat to the careers of the military’s leadership.


In Part Three, I will expose the irrefutable and publicly available proof that Stevens was sex-trafficking for the CIA in order to promote regime change.

The sources supporting the allegations of drug-running and child sex trafficking in order to raise and launder the money associated with promoting regime change continue to be former representative, Cynthia McKinney, a quiet but damning Senate Subcommittee Report, a senior banking official from one of the major banks and your common sense.

If you want one more reason as to why there are so many dead banksters, you may get your wish in Part Three.




7-8-2014 3-28-21 PM

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall

Part 3: What is the Federal Reserve

An old saying tells us, “A rose by any other name is still a rose.”

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about the Federal Reserve System. First, most people refer to it as the Federal Reserve Bank. It is not a bank. It is a system. Second, the Federal Reserve System is not federal. It is a privately held corporation owned by bankers… most of whose names are seen on Wall Street (though international banks now own larger and larger shares of the Federal Reserve System, placing control of America’s economy in the hands of non-American foreigners).

Before talking about what the Federal Reserve System does, one other important fact needs to be mentioned: The Federal Reserve is an unlawful organization. Before you jump to the conclusion that I’m into conspiracy theories, let’s take a look at the Constitution of the United States. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution says the following:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

As you can see, THE CONGRESS, not the Federal Reserve System, “shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts (which means taxes) and Excises” (which is taxes on consumer goods). Article 1 Section 8 says THE CONGRESS, not an organization called the Federal Reserve, is to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin.”

When the people of America want to change the Constitution, how do they do it?

The Constitution says CONGRESS has the responsibility for our money and its value. If we want an organization called the Federal Reserve System to assume responsibility for these things, what do we need to do to make it constitutionally possible – to make it lawful? If you said “We need to pass an Amendment to the Constitution if we want to change it,” you’re exactly right! Was an Amendment to the Constitution passed by the Congress and sent to each of the states for a vote of the people before the Federal Reserve System was created by Congress? Again, if you said “no,” you’re absolutely correct

Interestingly, we had a “national bank” twice in our history – a national bank that performed the functions of a central bank (which is what the Federal Reserve is supposed to be). In the history of the two central banks in early American history, the Congress wasn’t yet so corrupted and it placed a 20 year contract on “The First Bank of the United States” after George Washington signed it into being. In 1816, the Second Bank of the United States was created. Both were so hated by the public, they were done away with when their 20 year contracts ended.

The current mess we have – the Federal Reserve System – started with a trip to Jekyll Island in 1910, three years before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act. These are the men who went to Jekyll Island and plotted to establish a central bank in America: Senator Nelson Aldrich, former Harvard University professor of economics Dr. A. Piatt Andrew, J.P. Morgan & Co. partner Henry P. Davison, National City Bank (today Citibank) president Frank A. Vanderlip, and Kuhn, Loeb and Co. partner, Paul M. Warburg (representing the interests of the Rothschilds).

On December 23, 1913 – most of the Congress had gone home for the holidays so there is a question as to whether a quorum was even present for this vote – the Congress voted for the Federal Reserve Act. So the Federal Reserve System is unconstitutional and unlawful. That’s no conspiracy theory; it’s proven, in the black and white text of the Constitution and the red of the blood our Founders shed for our Republic of the United States of America.

There is nothing unusual about Congress overstepping its authority. Remember the lowering of the age required to vote – from 21 to 18? The Congress passed that, too. One of the states complained that Congress was overstepping, trying to change what the Constitution says. The Supreme Court agreed and the Congress did what was necessary and sent an Amendment to each state for a vote of the people. That’s what should have been done if they wanted to legitimize the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

A recent audit showed that during the period from December 1, 2007 through July 21, 2010 the Fed made $16 trillion dollars in loans to US banks and corporations and to foreign banks. Foreign banks? That’s right… foreign banks. The bank bailout of September 2008 was nothing compared to secret loans made by the Federal Reserve System about which the Congress was never informed. To place this extraordinary sum in perspective, the US GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is about $14 trillion. The US total national debt is about $18 trillion.

Thanks to Congressman Ron Paul who kept pressure on the House of Representatives to pass legislation ordering the General Accounting Office audit of the Fed,

The loans were to cover up secret bank and corporate bailouts. They were made to prevent the banks and corporations who borrowed the money from bankruptcy. The money was loaned at nearly zero percent (.01%) interest – as in 1/10th of 1%.

Citigroup, Inc (Citibank): $2.5 trillion
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion
Merrill Lynch & Co.: $1.949 trillion
Bank of America Corporation: $1.344 trillion
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion
Bear Sterns Companies, Inc.: $853 billion
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: $814 billion
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (UK): 541 billion
JPMorgan Chase: $391 billion
Deutsche Bank AG (Germany): $354 billion
United Bank of Switzerland AG: $287 billion
Credit Suisse Group AG (Switzerland): $262 billion
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. – NYC: $183 billion
Bank of Scotland PLC (UK): $181 billion
BNP Paribas SA (France): $175 billion
Dexia SA (Belgium): $105 billion
Wachovia Corporation: $142 billion
Dresdner Bank AG (Germany) $123 billion
Societe Generale SA (France): $124 billion

So, now that we know the Federal Reserve System is not only unlawful under the Constitution and we also know it takes part in unlawful activities involving banks and corporations around the world over which it has no jurisdiction, let’s look at how it is structured.

7-9-2014 12-37-26 PM

 President Woodrow Wilson.

The Federal Reserve Act was passed on December 22, 1913 by Congress… just prior to its annual Christmas recess. It was signed into law the next day, December 23rd, by President Woodrow Wilson.

The Act transferred the right to print currency from the United States Congress to an independent and privately-owned entity calling itself a bank but which is not a bank – changing the Constitution which cannot be changed without Amending it. The Fed is somewhat federal in form, but is very privately owned and operated. President Wilson lived to regret signing The Federal Reserve Act and, on his deathbed, made the following statement:

“I am a most unhappy man.

“I have unwittingly ruined my country.

“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.

“We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.

“No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

Basically, the Federal Reserve System was given a cleverly deceptive name and gave Americans a private money monopoly which is owned by its member banks but controlled by too big to jail banksters. It is run utilizing a highly complex system designed to ignore or evade truth rather than being transparent. In truth, the Federal Reserve System has unlimited drawing rights on the full faith and credit of the United States – in case you haven’t thought about what that means, “full faith and credit” means on your back and on my back.

Our tax dollars pay the interest on the Federal Reserve System’s loan interest charged to the government. This right to sell Treasury Bonds and otherwise manage the American economy by creating money whenever it wants so it can give $16 trillion to foreign banks and corporations costs the Fed nothing… but the government pays the Fed for the right to borrow money from it. We taxpayers pay interest on those loans! Sounds crazy, doesn’t it? It is crazy! You know what’s even more crazy? We, the American taxpayer, are on the line for paying the debts of the Federal Reserve System. At least, that’s what they say. I happen to think we are not and will explain why in a separate article about immoral debt, but in the meantime, why do Americans tolerate this kind of nonsense?

The Federal Reserve System is comprised of 7 Governors who serve as the Board of Governors and who meet in Washington, DC. The 7 Governors are nominated to the position by the President of the United States and are confirmed by the Senate. Since today it is an accepted fact of life that Presidential appointments are political favors or payoffs, the political nature of the Federal Reserve System should surprise no one.

All U.S. banks are regulated by the Federal Reserve, directly or indirectly. Only those banks that are nationally-chartered are required by law to be members. New York’s Wall Street banks own a majority share of the Fed. The larger the member bank, the more Federal Reserve corporate stock it owns and the greater degree of control it exercises over the Fed’s policies. If you’ve wondered why New York banks seem to have so much control over the Fed, perhaps that helps you understand. If you’ve wondered why Wall Street’s investment banks were so anxious to become part of the commercial banking industry – it is commercial, not investment banks, that hold stock in the Federal Reserve System – now you know why Phil Gramm (who was R-TX and an economist to boot) had to get the Gramm, Leach, Blyley Act passed to replace the Glass Steagall Act (which prevented investment banks from merging with commercial banks).

In my opinion, one of the best things the American people could do to regain control of their system of finance would be to eliminate the Federal Reserve System and absorb the duties and activities into the Treasury Department, putting Congress once again on the line as the Constitution requires. That way, they wouldn’t be able to hide behind the skirts of The Federal Reserve System, acting as if they have no control over the economic choices of our nation. I have grave doubts as to the honesty and integrity of the Treasury Department, though. There is a better solution called “state banks.” I started researching and writing about them about four years ago. I will write an article about state banks for this series.

Under such a system, Congress would have no way to run away from or otherwise hide from its ill-gotten monetary decisions designed to buy the votes of idiots who don’t understand that “Thou shalt not covet…” means you shouldn’t put your welfare hand in your neighbor’s pocket and take what is his to use for your own benefit – and that includes free cell phones.

As you vote next November, remember this: It is career politicians who allowed the 100th anniversary of the Federal Reserve System to pass without any attempt to end the contract (which can be purchased at any time – but unless I’m mistaken, there was a 100 year contract that should have ended on December 23, 2013).

This has nothing to do with Republican or Democrat. This has to do with corrupted politicians who need to be put out to pasture… politicians who do what their Party tells them – and both political parties are corrupted and give money only to candidates they can control – rather than doing what’s right for the people. One good rule of thumb: If a candidate has sufficient funds to pay for a lot of advertising, No Senator should serve more than two terms; no Member of the House longer than four terms.

If you vote for Members of Congress who exceed these terms, you’re part of the problem.

Click here for part —–> 12, 3, 4,

© 2014 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall began her career in 1956 as a journalist with the Wyoming Eagle in Cheyenne. During her 20 years (plus) as a banker and bank consultant, she wrote extensively for The American Banker, Bank Marketing Magazine, Trust Marketing Magazine, was U.S. Consulting Editor for Private Banker International (London/Dublin), and other major banking industry publications. She has written seven non-fiction books about banking and taught private banking at Colorado University for the American Bankers Association. She has authored seven banking books, one dog book, and two works of fiction (about banking, of course). She has served on numerous Boards in her community.

Barnewall is the former editor of The National Peace Officer Magazine and as a journalist has written guest editorials for the Denver Post, Rocky Mountain News and Newsweek, among others. On the Internet, she has written for News With Views, World Net Daily, Canada Free Press, Christian Business Daily, Business Reform, and others. She has been quoted in Time, Forbes, Wall Street Journal and other national and international publications. She can be found in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who of American Women, Who’s Who in Finance and Business, and Who’s Who in the World.

Web site:


 10 13 11 flagbar