Armageddon Is Two and One half Minutes Away and Playing Chicken with Nuclear Annihilation

07/25/2017
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/07/25/armageddon-two-one-half-minutes-away/

Paul Craig Roberts

Are you ready to die? You and I are going to die and not from old age, because our fellow Americans are so stupid, ignorant, and brainwashed that they believe the lies that are leading us to our certain destruction. This is what the Atomic Scientists tell us. And they are right.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-doomsday-clock-two-and-a-half-minutes-to-midnight-ever-closer-to-nuclear-war/5600715

Can you comprehend the absurdity? President Trump is under full-scale attack from the military/security complex, the US presstitute media, the Democratic Party, and from many Republicans, such as Republican Senator from South Carolina Lindsey Graham and Republican Senator from Arizona John McCain simply because President Trump wants to reduce the dangerous tensions between the two major nuclear powers.

What explains the total lack of concern for their own lives on the part of the populations in South Carolina and Arizona who send to the Senate and keep sending to the Senate two morons determined to provoke war between the US and Russia?

It should send shivers up your spine that you can ask this same question about all 50 states, and almost all congressional districts.

You can ask the same question about the bordello known as “the American media.” There will be no one alive to post or to read the headlines of the war that they are helping to promote.

The United States and the rest of the world with it along with all life on earth are being sent to their graves by the total failure of American leadership.

What is wrong with Americans that they cannot understand that any “leader” who provokes war with a major nuclear power should be instantly institutionalized as criminally insane?

Why do Americans sit night after night in front of the TV absorbing lies that commit them beyond all doubt to their deaths?

America has failed itself and the world!

Olddogs Comments!

Every one of you reading this should forget about your fears of aggravating your friends and send this by email to everyone you know. There is no excuse for people who just ignore everything they’re too lazy to read. And if they get mad at you, erase them from your lives. I do not pretend to know what the Russians are going to do, but past experience with the idiot traitors in D.C. is all I need to be very concerned. I do not want my family to fry in a nuclear blast. How about yours?


Playing Chicken with

Nuclear Annihilation

Norman SOLOMON

Any truthful way to say it will sound worse than ghastly: We live in a world where one person could decide to begin a nuclear war — quickly killing several hundred million people and condemning vast numbers of others to slower painful deaths.

Illustration by Chesley Bonestell of nuclear bombs detonating over New York City, entitled “Hiroshima U.S.A.” Colliers, Aug. 5, 1950

Given the macabre insanity of this ongoing situation, most people don’t like to talk about it or even think about it. In that zone of denial, U.S. news media keep detouring around a crucial reality: No matter what you think of Donald Trump or Vladimir Putin, they hold the whole world in their hands with a nuclear button.

If the presidents of the United States and Russia spiral into escalating conflicts between the two countries, the world is much more likely to blow up. Yet many American critics of Trump have gotten into baiting him as Putin’s flunky while goading him to prove otherwise. A new barrage of that baiting and goading is now about to begin — taking aim at any wisps of possible détente — in connection with the announced meeting between Trump and Putin at the G-20 summit in Germany at the end of this week.

Big picture: This moment in human history is not about Trump. It’s not about Putin. It’s not about whether you despise either or neither or both. What’s at stake in the dynamics between them is life on this planet.

Over the weekend, more than 10,000 people signed a petition under the heading “Tell Trump and Putin: Negotiate, Don’t Escalate.” The petition was written by RootsAction to be concise and to the point: “We vehemently urge you to take a constructive approach to your planned meeting at the G-20 summit. Whatever our differences, we must reduce rather than increase the risks of nuclear war. The future of humanity is at stake.”

A war between the world’s two nuclear superpowers could extinguish human life on a gigantic scale while plunging the Earth into cataclysmic “nuclear winter.”

“Recent scientific studies have found that a war fought with the deployed U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals would leave Earth virtually uninhabitable,” wrote Steven Starr, a senior scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility. “In fact, NASA computer models have shown that even a ‘successful’ first strike by Washington or Moscow would inflict catastrophic environmental damage that would make agriculture impossible and cause mass starvation.”

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists explains why, since last year, it has moved the risk-estimate “Doomsday Clock” even closer to apocalyptic midnight — citing as a major factor the escalation of tensions between the U.S. and Russian governments.

So, the imminent meeting between Trump and Putin will affect the chances that the young people we love — and so many others around the world — will have a future. And whether later generations will even exist.

I put it this way in a recent article for The Nation: “Whatever the truth may be about Russian interference in the U.S. election last year, an overarching truth continues to bind the fates of Russians, Americans and the rest of humanity. No matter how much we might wish to forget or deny it, we are tied together by a fraying thread of relations between two nations that possess 93 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons. Right now it is not popular to say so, but we desperately need each other to enhance the odds of human survival.”

In that overall context, stoking hostility toward Russia is, uh, rather short-sighted. Wouldn’t it be much better for the meeting between Trump and Putin to bring Washington and Moscow closer to détente rather than bringing us closer to nuclear annihilation?

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

When are the American people going to wake the hell up and get rid of the USA Corporation? We were promised a Republic and all we have ever had is a bunch of thieving liars. Are we so damn lazy we will let them destroy us?

AMERICA, WAKE THE HELL UP!


When Push comes to Shove CAFR1 NATIONAL POST

07/24/2017

http://CAFR1.com/wpcts.html

by Walter Burien – CAFR1

Our country, the USA is at a crossroads. What is at stake is the perceived reality we are all spoon-fed vs. the reality of truth.

Truth is not a propagandized agenda that is slanted to such an extent to be outright false. Truth is simple reality when the before mentioned agenda layers are stripped away.

I have closely watch the news from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, and other news outlets over the last 6-months to clearly spot the biased propagandized presented agenda as would pertain to our President, Donald Trump.

As we all know, a campaign to smear Mr. Trump was aggressively exerted by key individuals from the center of corrupted political control machine in place prior to the election. Bottom line? … They did not succeed and  in fact their obvious tactics polarized the American people to organize the population to make sure Mr. Trump succeeded in his bid for President of the USA.

Did that inherently corrupted machine evaporate when Mr. Trump took office? No it did not. What it did though was to organize a singular strategy to tie the hands of Mr. Trump through utilizing a well planed, agreed upon, and focused attack whereby through repetition over and over again in so many words was structured to convince the population that the World was not round but flat. My statement here may seem a little to simple but in “fact” is how the objective game is simply played out by the syndicate gang.

The object is through repetition and supposed debate on the issue, designed to “implant” in the minds of the population that a serious issue exists when in fact none does. In doing so it accomplishes several objectives:

1.It swamps Mr. Trump with “time consuming” thought and effort from both him and his administration in response. In doing so, it stalls the progression of our Presidents efforts to accomplish his campaign promises.

2. When the political gangs of our Senate and Congress see the effectiveness of the focused attack, those who were fence sitters, will tend to lean towards the agenda of the attack further complicating the effectiveness of Mr. Trump when it comes down to votes on an issue. It appears that Push has come to Shove in resolving these issues of the controlled effort to marginalize the effectiveness of our President, Mr. Donald Trump.

3. The intended effect such an agenda has on the population through the open spoon-feeding of the agenda from the corrupted political machine is to diminish support for our President through convincing the population through repetition that an issue exists when “in fact” none does. The one issue focused attack?…. Russia’s involvement in the election. (And I am confident five or more other plans are being held as bakups to be used as time goes by and are needed to be used by the gang)

So let us examine the “reality” of facts:

1. In every Presidential election that has taken place over the last 100-years, especially in the USA, the world community, every country on the planet has expressed their “Nay” or “Yea” regarding the candidates running for office. Was Russia pro Trump? Yes. Were many other Countries around the world pro Trump? Yes. It would be nice for the news media to compile that list and make it very public.

I will note that financial contributions that came in for Mr. Trump were primarily from the USA whereby for Mr. Obama (emphasis added), Mr. Bill Clinton, and his wife Hillary when they ran for President, massive amounts of contributions came in from foriegn countries, Soviet block countries, Asian Countries, and especially some of the mid-east countries. For the Bush’s, massive contributions came in from Corporate entities both domestic and foriegn. (But then war assured for those Corporate interests is very profitable)

Who has the cleanest record of financial backing from the US Population and NOT foriegn or Corporate interests?

ANSWER: Mr. Trump

Health Care: Obama care as it is called was designed to be the most profitable, (massively profitable) in all respects for government institutional investment funds. USA government, both local and Federal are the primary investors with the insurance, health-care, and medical provider industries. When Obama-care was put in place, billions came rolling in “designed” to enhance the profits within those government institutional investment accounts at the direct expense of the USA population.

So is Mr. Trump running into opposition regarding modifying the “Goose that lays the Golden eggs” for government institutional investment funds to the tune of a few trillion dollars in government profits since it was implemented and projected to accomplish over the next several years? Well that is a “no brain effort”  for an answer..

Mr. Trump is in a position of a rock in a hard spot regarding this issue. On one hand if he “qualified” to the population the scope and size of the government institutional investment funds “collective” trillion’s of dollars of participation for “profit” from Obama-care; Presidents for attempting that type of disclosure have been quickly destroyed or assassinated for less. On the other hand to sway the political syndicate players, that in the alternative truly benefiting the population per health-care at a low cost where in effect it would substantially diminish those massive profits coming in for the government’s institutional investment funds, is to say the least,  a very difficult up-hill battle. The “Art of Making the Deal” will be put to a true test of Mr. Trump’s abilities here.

Building the Wall and having Mexico pay for it: Well, that is a pretty simple thing to do. Step-one is to impose a 1.5% import tariff of Mexican goods coming into the USA, In doing so it in a small way helps USA interests from  being under-cut by cheaper Mexican goods and those funds collected are specifically designated to build the wall. (To the tune of 1.5%). Step-two, and this is a big one, the value of all confiscated drugs caught coming across the border from Mexico is added as a separate levy to the tariff on a semi-annual basis.

Which will add more revenue for quick completion of the wall. The 1.5% import tariff or the drug confiscation value add on? Time will tell… But I am confident that drug seizures will go up substantially with that value added levy in place. Also the Mexican government may just be motivated to fight drug trafficking coming from their country going into the USA due to that levy. So what is holding this back from being implemented?  Again, it boils down to USA Government institutional investment fund profits generated from Mexico.

What the USA population needs to comprehend, is that back in the 80’s, the Mexican Peso was intentionally driven down through the floor by USA Institutional investment fund manipulation (funds traded domestic AND Internationally) through the world currency derivative markets. When the Peso was driven down to a very small fraction of its previous value, the USA Government institutional Investment funds came in with several hundred billions of dollars buying up and investing in several Mexican Industry groups for pennies on the dollar based on the currency manipulation that took place.

Then the currency manipulation ceased, the Peso rebounded, NAFTA was implemented in 1993 and GATT was utilized, and the flood gates for Mexican goods coming into the USA were opened. After that was done by the end of the 80’s and the beginning of the 90’s almost everything you picked up in Walmart or K-Mart said “Made in Mexico”.  Investment returns for those new owners of those industry groups by investment, and orders being directed to the same, the added value of the rebound in the Peso,  and the cheap labor available in Mexico, profits soared. We are talking 600% to 3000% on some of those investments “per-year”.

After 5-years, and then for the next 15-years with the flood gates being opened, USA Government institutional fund profits were in the trillions of dollars from the original investment take-over accomplished through the Mexican Peso currency manipulation played out at the beginning of the 80’s.

So, what does a 1.5% tariff effect? ANSWER: The return generated for those now trillions of dollars in value held collectively by USA government Institutional investment funds in place within Mexico. That is why the silence is deafening per the building of the Wall.

Could Mexico in retaliation move to seize those assets standing of USA government institutional investment funds? Yes. Additionally back in the early 80’s when the Mexican government was crying uncle due to the Peso being driven down through the floor, the US Government advanced the Mexican government 50-billion dollars, and then got them for another 50-billion dollar+ on a loan where it was specifically repayable in crude-oil locked in at $10 per barrel for repayment of the total loan. If a good portion of that loan was outstanding, could the Mexican Government in retaliation default on it? Yes, they could.

So, when Push comes to Shove between the USA and Mexico, Mexico has some pretty good leverage to hold over the USA’s head. But then in over-all reality, if Push comes to Shove, in light of military inequality, Mexico may just make a good new State to the Union and no wall would be necessary. I am sure many a Texan would want to participate in that one if it became necessary to do so, but then the Mexican Government would quickly realize the error of their ways if that potential was being put on the drawing board..

When truth is presented, and most importantly “comprehended”, the “Big Picture” comes to light and the implications therein understood.

The “Bottom line” comes down to “Who Benefits”? Is it the USA population, or the USA Government Corporate Institutional fund’s for profit interests? (Due to the money and wealth involved)

Well, again we saw what played out before the election and what is being playing out since the election. As it has come to be known: “The Fake News” in cooperation with the entrenched political gang is predominantly moving along to systematically marginalize Mr. Trump and his effectiveness as our President. The syndicated corporate Government “for profit” gang in DC and across the land has their plan in place and will continue it’s implementation until they are forcefully stopped. Keep in mind they have played the same game for over 70-years and the trillions of dollars that have and continue to change hands through cooperating with the game is well in place and tuned like a Stradivarius violin. That is what Mr. Trump in all reality is up against.

What is needed in the “Push come to Shove” effort from the American population?

Take names and addresses. The game being played out once comprehended is very obvious. Let those you spot cooperating with the game, know in no uncertain terms that you are not very happy with them. In fact let them know you are out-right disgusted with them, and you think they are an insult to the American population. For a starter that will have a positive effect.

Cooperative players with the game are effected by their established cash flow being diminished. I have noticed ABC and their talking heads being one of the clearly smug, methodical players in perpetuating of the game. The corporate sponsors that buy ad-time on ABC, let them know your feelings as expressed in #1, requesting they pull their ads from ABC.

Let all know that are cooperating with the game, done so by them knowingly, willingly, and intentionally, that their cooperation has consequences diminishing the USA’s standing with the population domestically and in the World’s opinion of the USA. Additionally, that cooperation with the embedded inherently corrupted political machine will additionally have UN-intended consequences as to the basic cohesiveness held by the masses making up the population. A cohesiveness that for hundreds of years has maintained the prosperity (That has been perpetually diminishing) we all have enjoyed since the USA’s creation as a nation to date. I note as history proves, Rome fell after looting 2/3rds of the known world, and when the looting became thin from their conquests, the looting was turned inward towards the wealth held in Rome, against each other, and Rome fell.

Mr. Trump as our President needs our 110% commitment behind his efforts and in support of his integrity. The methodical diminishing and attempts to “set up” a repetitive spoon-fed meaningless issue as if it were an issue to accomplish the political objective  from those “specific” cooperative players to thwart Mr. Trump’s effectiveness to benefit the USA Population  needs to stop and will only stop when those perpetuating the same are directly confronted to do so. A universal law is: “An object in motion stays in motion unless countered by an equal or greater force”.

I say it is about time that the DC gang learns clearly who and what is the greatest force within the USA. That being the collected consciousness coming from the population of the USA. Throw the organized false agenda spoon-feeding out the window.. Throw the “divide and conquer” spoon-feeding we all have been getting for decades out the window.

Mr. Trump has promised to: “Make America Great again”. I have always believed that America was always great. But based on the effects of an inherently corrupted political system that is running way out of control for decades extorting the wealth of it’s own peoples, their is MUCH room for improvement. Let us all help Mr. Trump and his administration “Clean up the Swamp” and establish a structured government that is more in line to directly benefit the USA and more specifically, the Population “of the USA”.

We are all “Masterfully Entertained” by the implanted gang to be off in La-La land and under ultimate distraction as “they” laugh all the way to the bank every day, week, month, and year. They have been doing so for decades as the tears, stress, and diminishing of the population’s wealth and holdings proportionally erodes and worsens.

I don’t know about you, but I would be a whole lot happier if the population’s laughter and big smiles erupted into a consistent and perpetual roar as the standard. The trend that is in place now, needs to be reversed and reversed with true applied force, done so within the best of our abilities to do so.

Please share this communication with those that you know. Post to chat and news sites so that as many individuals can see it to thus comprehend what is disclosed within. Censorship will be at play, but then that is what force is all about. Breaking through and over-riding the opposition presented..

The majority of the American population needs to see this communication. Will that happen? You and all that read this communication will determine that “realty” in your efforts of breaking through the digital communication censorship in place today. There is no “Masterful entertainment” here. Just some of the “realty” that may turn the tide for assisting our President, Mr. Donald Trump towards effective action as “We The People” intended…

Who knows, our efforts may just free up his time and focus to where he and his administration may be able to assist in making the TRFA designed to retire taxation across the land go into effect sooner than later throughout “our” nation.

Again, “Throw the “divide and conquer” spoon-feeding we all have been getting for decades out the window.” It only serves the syndicate and weakens us as a peoples of this planet Earth.

United we stand, divided we fall. So it appears, emphasis given, unity between all is the way to go for optimum unified force to be applied to effect the desired changes needed. As far as this issue is concerned, there are no Blacks, Whites, Asian, Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus, or any sect or breed, there is only one force; The Peoples of the USA united, united to stand for a common end. That end being prosperity for all peoples of the USA in opposition to an inherently corrupted government for profit, operating outside of the interests of it’s own peoples.

Sent FYI and Truly Yours,

Walter J. Burien, Jr.

  1. O. Box 2112

Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel: (928) 458-5854 Arizona

Websites: CAFR1.com  and TRFA.us


Complete List of BANKS Owned or Controlled by the Rothschild Family

07/22/2017

http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html

“Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws” – Baron M.A. Rothschild

Before proceeding, I suggest you reading the following list of articles:

  1. The Complete History of the ‘House Of Rothschild’
  2. The Complete History of the Freemasonry and the Creation of the New World Order
  3. The Entire ILLUMINATI History
  4. Everything about the Rothschild Zionism
    5. How the Rothschilds Became the Secret Rulers of the World

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Came Roon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States
The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest)
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia
Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

The FED and the IRS

Virtually unknown to the general public is the fact that the US Federal Reserve is a privately owned company, siting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws.

This privately owned company (controlled by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans) prints the money FOR the US Government, which pays them interest for the “favor.” This means that if we would reset the nation’s debt today and would begin reprinting money, we would be in debt to the FED from the very first dollar loaned to our Government.

Also, most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency.

To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed).

Its main goal is to make sure the American people pay their tax and be good little slaves.

You can read more on the subject here.

In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:

“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”

There followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson’s life. Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren:

“The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me.”

This was the beginning of a pattern of intrigue that would plague the White House itself over the coming decades. Both Lincoln and JFK have been murdered for trying to rid the country of banksters.

Read everything on the subject here.

The world’s Megabanks

There are two Megabanks that offer loans to all the countries around the planet, the World Bank and the IMF. The first one is jointly owned by the world’s top banking families, with the Rothschilds at the very top, while the second one is privately owned by the Rothschilds alone.

These two Megabanks offer loans to “developing countries” and use their almost impossible-to-pay-back interests to get their hands on the real wealth: land and precious metals.

But that’s not all! An important part of their plan is to also exploit a country’s natural resources (like petrol or gas) via their covertly-owned companies, refine them, and sell them back to the same country, making a huge profit.

But in order for these companies to operate optimally, they need a solid infrastructure, which is usually lacking in the so called “developing countries.” So before the banksters even offer the almost impossible-to-pay-back loans, they make sure that most of the money will be invested in — you’ve guessed it — infrastructure.

These “negotiations” are carried out by the so called “Economic Hitmen”, who succeed by handsomely rewarding (i.e. bribing) or threatening with death those who are in the position to sell away their country.

For more information on the subject, I suggest reading the Confessions of an Economic Hitman.

The one bank that rules them all, the “Bank for International Settlement,” is — obviously — controlled by the Rothschilds and it is nicknamed the “Tower of Basel.”

The true power of the Rothschilds goes FAR beyond the Banking Empire

If you are not yet amazed by the power of the Rothschilds (I know you are), please know that they are also behind all wars since Napoleon. That’s when they’ve discovered just how profitable it is to finance both sides of a war and they’ve been doing it ever since.

In 1849, Guttle Schnapper, the wife of Mayer Amschel stated:

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”

So, the world is still at war because it is very, very profitable to the Rothschilds and their parasite bankster bloodlines. And for as long as we will continue to use money, the world will never know peace.

It is shocking for many to find out that the United States of America is a corporation ruled from abroad. Its original name was the Virginia Company and it was owned by the British Crown (it should not be mistaken for the Queen, which functions largely in a ceremonial capacity only).

The British Crown donated the company to the Vatican, which gave the exploitation rights back to the Crown. The US Presidents are appointed CEOs and their business is to make money for the British Crown and the Vatican, who take their share of the profits every year.

The British Crown covertly rules the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state, know as The City of London. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England. Guess who is controlling the Bank of England? Yup, the Rothschilds!

(Read everything on the subject here).

In 1815, Nathan Mayer made the following statement:

“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

The House of Rothschild is really at the top of the pyramid of power. They are behind the New World Order and the complete domination of the world agenda. They are behind the European Union and the Euro and they are behind the idea of a North American Union and the Amero. They are controlling all of the world’s secret services and their private army is NATO.

Very, very impressive!

Now, what would you say if I told you that we can crumble their empire to dust overnight, without any sort of violence?

By HumansAreFree.com / Source: Educate Yourself


THE NEXT GENERATION OF CURRENCY

07/21/2017

THE FUTURE OF MONEY

By Michael V. Copeland

Partner, Andreessen Horowitz

Not since the arrival of the almighty dollar has currency been poised for a more dramatic leap forward.

There was a time when people happily used chickens, pigs, or a nice pile of lumber as payment for a cow, some clothes, or anything else of value. And then some smart people got behind a breakthrough—they introduced currency.

Swatches of buckskin, stamped pieces of gold, and later, paper notes—these were a mighty intellectual and technological leap ahead from that clucking bird. It may not seem like it in today’s world, where cash has a whiff of the downright prehistoric, but paper currency was mind-blowing in its heyday—the first U.S. government-issued currency debuted during the Civil War—because of its advanced features: It was lightweight, portable, reliable (hyper-inflationary events notwithstanding), efficient, and powerful. These are descriptors we might apply to the latest smart-phone today.

The point is, currency for hundreds of years has been an evolving form of technology, with the faster, better, cheaper underpinnings found in all great technologies. But arguably, not since the arrival of the greenback has currency been poised for a more dramatic leap forward. Digital currency is finally taking hold.

Driven by two massive technological waves—the Internet and the mobile phone—digital currency is bringing banking to the unbanked; it’s making new forms of transactions financially feasible; and it’s allowing currency to do things it could never do when trapped in a physical form.

With digital currency as the stream through which value flows, barriers to truly global trade are poised to fall. The knock-on effect is that the advantage that developed nations held for so long—as hubs through which value of all kinds move—is weakening. As with all forms of digital goods, it’s the most connected nation, or company, or individual that has the power. That does not necessarily mean the nations and companies that have traditionally led the global economy will continue to lead. The fastest, most secure data exchange will win—wherever it may be.

Digital currency acts as a catalyst for all kinds of businesses—large, small, legal, and not so legal. It’s enabling a whole new wave of competition. Whether you are running the corporate show, or investing in it, be prepared to take digital currency on, or be prepared to be left behind.

 

The digital currency everyone has heard of lately is Bitcoin, but there are many other forms this new platform takes. Each has its network within which it is exchanged. For Bitcoin that is the Internet, and by extension, the globe. For others it might be a single country, a company, or a game (hard to call it a currency if you can’t get it out of the game, but it’s pretty close). At a high level, what all these currencies have in common is the conversion of value into ones and zeros, into digital data. That in itself isn’t revolutionary. Banking today is mostly a function of moving around digital data. Where it gets far more interesting is when smart software hooks into that data and emerges on the front-end as new services serving networks of people and organizations—that’s when new digital currencies will be able to take on properties we’ve never seen. For example, banking without any banks.

In the U.S. with banks on every other downtown corner, it is hard to wrap your head around the fact that more than 2.5 billion people worldwide don’t have bank accounts. What they do have, however, are mobile phones. Take a form of digital currency, introduce some software that allows value to be exchanged on phones between people and businesses, and all of a sudden “money” is moving where it never has. That is the case in Kenya with the digital currency M-Pesa (“M” stands for mobile, “Pesa” is Swahili for money).

Launched in 2007 by the nation’s largest wireless carrier, Safaricom, M-Pesa is a service that allows registered users to do things like deposit money in accounts, transfer money person-to-person, or to one of tens of thousands of shops that take the digital currency. You put value in; it resides on the network (so if you lose your phone you don’t lose your money) and you take it out on your phone.

Even more interesting is that the service has led to a wide variety of businesses being built on top of it that couldn’t have been anticipated—such as shops and bars, travel insurance on animals being brought to market by farmers, and of course lots of money transfers from the city to relatives in rural areas. Saving for later—to buy a home, or to buy that thing to start a business—is another byproduct of this form of digital currency. M-Pesa’s success has been phenomenal. Recent statistics show that fully one-quarter of the Kenyan economy flows through M-Pesa.

Other countries are taking a crack at a similar mobile digital currency. Vodacom (majority owned by UK-based Vodafone, which owns a minority stake of Safaricom) has launched M-Pesa in other African nations, as well as India and parts of Eastern Europe. In Latin America, Ecuador recently announced it would launch a nationwide digital currency, residing largely on people’s smartphones to accompany the U.S. dollars that are the country’s official currency. The hope is that a digital currency will bring the same safety and ease of monetary transfer that the M-Pesa has to Kenyans to the roughly 40% of Ecuadoreans who don’t have access to a bank account. Plus, it offers Ecuadoreans the opportunity to start saving. The difference in Ecuador is that the Bank of Ecuador is backing the digital currency, essentially bypassing the big commercial banks in the nation, at least for now.

Olddogs Comments!

This is a very smooth presentation for the dull and ignorant. However, did this information above say anything about intrinsic value? Digits are not anything of value by their selves. Now let’s consider that little problem most people have no idea exist. Value is established by a physical object, and digits don’t have any physical object. This is nothing short of a government/Bank merger to fleece and control capital. When you try to buy something physical without something physical to trade, you have nothing. The ignorant public it seems have no idea they have been scammed. When a bank guarantees each digit is backed by so many ounces of gold or silver or some other valuable physical object, then we are still in control of our wealth, other wise and the banks own you, and the government protects them. That’s what governments are folks, a security company for the Banks. Or, you might call them the Bankers Army!!! IT IS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE OF America and the rest of the Nations to wake the hell up. America is not the Land of the free and the home of the brave, it is the land of the elites, and the home of their slaves. That’s US!!! There are many other people in various countries who are a part of the elites, but those who control the money are the ones with the biggest stick. Hence, Let me issue and control a Nations currency and I care not who makes its laws. “Mayer Amschel Rothschild” Now when they trade your currency for digits, you have nothing tangible!!!

Tangible: “capable of being given a physical existence.” “something that has a physical form, especially a financial asset.”

Imagine getting this text on your phone from the P.D. or bank: Mr. Jones, if you are sited for one more speeding violation, your digits will disappear!


Attorney Tells All: How the U.S. Courts Shield Big Pharma from Liability

07/20/2017
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2017/07/19/attorney-tells-all-how-the-u-s-courts-shield-big-pharma-from-liability/#more-11548

By Shane Ellison, The People’s Chemist

It’s not easy to sue Big Pharma.  But, legal firm Baum Hedlund has been doing it for years.  Unfortunately, as pharmaceutical deceit and side-effects grow, it’s getting exponentially more difficult. After all, using prescription drugs as prescribed is the top killer in the USA.

I reached out to attorney Michael Baum to get a behind-the-scenes look at how this growing monster is shielded from liability by our court system.  Baum generously agreed to share his candid insights.  If you or a loved one are taking prescription meds — make sure you read this interview closely.

     Michael L. Baum

TPC #1: Does the court system protect the pharmaceutical industry from liability? If so, how?

Mr. Baum: Yes. The court system has made it very expensive for claims to be made against pharmaceutical companies for injuries. For instance, drug lawsuits require expert testimony from a person with a related PhD and/or MD level education. Otherwise, the case may be thrown out before going to trial.

This makes suing drug companies pricey because the experts charge high hourly rates to offset the “cost” of going up against the same entities that pay for grants, lucrative industry jobs and coveted academic positions.

Furthermore, many judges now have gate-keeping authority to reject cutting-edge science that goes against the status-quo — what the rest of the scientific community “believes.” Drug companies are able to foster “established beliefs” with hundreds of millions of dollars in marketing aimed at physicians, medical journals, academic opinion leaders, and professional organizations of scientists.  Once those marketed messages become pervasive, use of the drug becomes the standard of care. So overcoming that impression is like convincing a court the emperor is not wearing new clothes, which can be very difficult.

TPC #2: What are the ramifications of this conflict, on the average U.S. citizen?

Mr. Baum: The expense itself can make bringing an individual case prohibitive. We now have to combine cases to spread the cost. Unfortunately, courts (and legislative actions) have whittled away using these class actions for drug injuries. They now say that each person’s damage is unique and not common across a class, even if they suffer the same injury, e.g. a heart attack.

Combining many claimants into lawsuits is still possible, but it requires enough similarly injured people to justify a consolidated action. Finding lawyers qualified and willing to take on the detailed investigation and pay out the expense of engaging experts is itself a big hurdle. Drug companies can afford to make lawsuits long and difficult, so financing such litigation with qualified, available lawyers can be a barrier to an average U.S. citizen pursuing a drug case.

There’s also the pill-popping culture that causes an additional barrier. Many injuries occur after a person has been prescribed a number of drugs. Separating out one drug’s effect from another adds another level of complication. Thus, many law firms and courts will reject cases unless it is clear that the likely culprit is one particular drug.

TPC #3: If a drug has been proven ineffective and dangerous in a court of law, why is it still on the market?

Mr. Baum: A court is not the FDA, so it does not have the power to recall a drug. An individual court finding that the drug was not effective and harmful to one person may not indicate that there are others that may benefit from the drug. So court cases are not used to dictate what can or can’t be on the market.

Most drugs are essentially dangerous chemicals that have benefits that outweigh their risks. If court trials show that a warning was not adequate, labeling can be modified to address that.

In the context of pediatric prescribing of an antidepressant like Paxil or Celexa, litigation showed that the drugs did not out-perform placebo. It also showed that they doubled the risk of suicidal behavior. Eventually, the FDA required a black box warning about the risks, but the marketing and clinical experience of the placebo effect convinced many doctors to keep prescribing them. Plus, the studies proven false in litigation don’t necessarily end up getting corrected or withdrawn.

One such infamous study, Paxil 329, is still published and cited by other studies in favor of the drug, despite widespread recognition that it was ghostwritten and contained false information. Again, the marketing created the impression of safety and efficacy. A counter-marketing campaign has not occurred to correct the mis-impressions created by the initial marketing and ghostwritten articles.

TPC #4: How do drug companies get away with false advertising? Has a pharmaceutical company ever been convicted in court for false advertising?

Mr. Baum: I guess the short answer is they get away with it until they get caught. Whistleblower cases and product liability lawsuits have exposed many fraudulent campaigns, resulting in large fines or verdicts. I think many of the methods used during the 90’s and up till recently (ghostwriting, bribing with dinners, entertainment tickets, trips, or opinion leader status) have been curtailed to some degree by such lawsuits.

As with many frauds, they are coated with some truth — they used self-funded and ghostwritten or controlled study results to promote benefits and minimize risks. Once published by cooperative journals, the studies can be circulated by sales representatives to physicians. It takes a while for the courts and scientific community to catch up with these tricks, if ever.

TPC #5: In your experiencing suing drug companies (whose dangerous drugs are APPROVED by the FDA) — would you say the FDA is doing its job at protecting patients?

Mr. Baum: There are some elements of the FDA that are trying to protect consumers. Other factions consider the pharmaceutical companies to be their “clients” since the FDA is partially funded by the companies through the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA).

The volume of work the FDA must do to monitor the risks — with all the drugs already on the market, plus the drugs trying to get on the market — can result in subtle problems getting masked by “summaries” of data provided by the companies. In other words, an overworked FDA can end up simply relaying information spoon fed to them by Big Pharma. This is counter to what the FDA was set up for, which was to act as a non-biased third party to business interests.

TPC #6: Does a black box warning really have much influence over whether or not people choose to take the drug? (Does anyone even bother to READ those warnings?)

Mr. Baum: A black box warning is a good step in the right direction. But it may not be enough to overcome the misimpression created by the massive marketing campaigns that preceded the black box warnings. This is a clear case of Mark Twain’s observation, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

TPC #7: Is the lack of sufficient warning on medications the biggest problem here? Or is it that drug makers are allowed to sell products that require such warnings in the first place?

Mr. Baum: Any medication may have risks that are worth taking for the needed benefits — antibiotics can prevent an infection from becoming fatal, but they adversely affect other useful bacteria in the gut. Adequate warnings with appropriate guidance make it possible for drugs with some harmful side effects to be used effectively and safely.

The problem I see is the excess influence of pharmaceutical money in the marketing, medical education, professional publications, public media direct-to-consumer advertising, political donations, and lobbyists. These have resulted in a system that enables drug dangers to go uncorrected too long at the expense of public health.

TPC #8: What do you personally believe needs to CHANGE about the pharmaceutical drug industry as a whole?

Mr. Baum: I think it would be useful to stop direct-to-consumer advertising. The current media  are too dependent on Pharma marketing dollars. Therefore, they are unable and unwilling to critically analyze proclaimed benefits and potential harms of drugs. This has crushed unbiased reporting and journalism. Intrepid reporters’ stories can end up not getting aired to protect the advertising income.

Further, pharmaceutical companies should not be allowed to fund “educational” dinners, seminars, or continuing medical education on drugs they have a profit motive to positively influence.

Ghostwriting of clinical trial results needs to be exposed. The patient data from clinical trials (with patient identifying information protected) should be available so that scientists can see what actually happened, not just the spin that the pharmaceutical marketing departments were able to maneuver into print.

Lobbyist armies should be curtailed to prevent excessive legislative influence. Approval boards and advisory committees should not have members on the payroll of pharmaceutical companies, directly or indirectly. Company documents obtained in litigation should be more easily made public, especially when they don’t involve actual trade secrets and would affect public safety.

Author Shane Ellison was a chemist for the pharmaceutical industry. He left that career to pursue investigating and creating natural cures with his extensive knowledge of organic chemistry. Shane authored the book

Over-The-Counter Natural Cures Expanded Edition . His website is

The People’s Chemist.

Olddogs Comments!

When will the people wake up and figure out there is no difference between big pharma, big food processors and the government. They are all FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS and the bigger they get the more power they have.   WAKE UP AND SMELL THE SEWAGE! The more people they hire, the more ideas they create to drain your income and your freedom. If you work for the government you are an AMERICAN ENEMY OF FREEDOM. We have ways to reverse this catastrophe if you would only study and learn the truth.


Maduro’s Arrogance Enabled by Venezuelan Citizen Disarmament Edicts

07/19/2017

https://www.oathkeepers.org/maduros-arrogance-enabled-venezuelan-citizen-disarmament-edicts/

Is it any wonder Maduro’s country is in the toilet — and out of toilet paper? (Nicolás Maduro/Facebook)

by David Codrea

“Venezuela’s opposition called on Monday for a national strike against President Nicolás Maduro in an escalation of protests after a massive symbolic referendum at the weekend,” Reuters reported Monday. “After months of demonstrations that have led to nearly 100 deaths, the Democratic Unity coalition said it brought 7.6 million people out on Sunday for an unofficial vote intended to de-legitimize a leader they call a dictator.”

When thugs get power they all seem to dress the part. (Nicolás Maduro/Twitter)

True to form, Maduro’s arrogant response showed him acting the part.

“Though polls show the opposition has majority support and his foes repeatedly call for a free and fair election as their top demand, Maduro insists they are U.S. pawns intent on sabotaging the economy and bringing him down through violence,” Reuters explained. “[He] dismissed Sunday’s event as an internal exercise by the opposition with no bearing on his government.”

Blaming opponents for self-created problems is standard operating practice for national socialists everywhere. Look at how the manufactured outrage in this country is all about supposed Russian hacking of Hillary Clinton’s emails, rather than the criminal activity she engaged in and then destroyed evidence of.

The inevitable cycle (Orwell & Goode)

So when his communist policies bring about the predictable shortages (he once dispatched troops to seize a toilet paper factory!), he points the finger at “hoarding of essential commodities” by the private sector. Government thieves accusing rightful property owners of greed is another bit of “progressive” SOP.

And to back that up, Venezuela employs enough of what our gun-grabbers call “common sense gun safety laws” to make Michael Bloomberg’s shark eyes roll back to show their whites. And as is always the case, it’s not that they’re “anti-gun.” They like guns just fine as long as they’re the “only ones” controlling them:

“Socialist Venezuelan Leader Steps Up Arming of Supporters After Outlawing, Confiscating Civilian Guns Maduro plans to arm 400,000 supporters amid protests and unrest”

¿Armas para que? Fidel Castro knew quite well. (Photo from GUNS Magazine, March 1959 issue)

As much as leftists here disparage the concept of militias as being extremist haters, that’s only when they espouse Constitutional principles.

There’s hope that some Venezuelans know the score, unlike the useful idiot majority that gave a monster like Maduro, and Hugo Chavez before him, an effective monopoly of violence. Per Gun Policy.org, there are anywhere between an estimated 1,100,000 and 2,700,000 “illicit” guns in Venezuela (what Michael Bloomberg calls “illegal guns” and we ought to start referring to as “undocumented,” just to throw their subversive crap back in their faces). That means there could be anywhere between four to 10 guns per 100 people that the “government” has been unable to seize.

It’s probably unrealistic to expect that a nation so deep in the hole will experience a sudden surge of freedom, and with hundreds of thousands of supporters  bearing arms (assuming that figure wasn’t a lie to make the force appear more formidable than it is), it appears that when someone finally does smoke a Maduro,  fierce internal conflict will be the result.

Hopefully what we won’t see, because of those “illicit guns,” is genocide directed against the minority that believes in the freedom of individuals to pursue their own lives, liberty and happiness. Or, an influx of displaced and Marxist “refugees” into this country…

What the collectivists have done to Venezuela they hope to do to this country and to the world. Based on the success they’ve enjoyed everywhere else, it would appear the United States, with its Constitution, is humanity’s last best hope. No wonder those who believe that are treated with such derision, scorn and hate by those whose agenda is to control.

If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

About Author

David Codrea

David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (WarOnGuns.com), and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.

Olddogs Comments!

Only stupid people trust governments to protect them!

 

 


Trump Right To Protect America With Travel Ban

07/18/2017

https://newswithviews.com/trump-right-to-protect-america-with-travel-ban/

Read More Articles by Amil Imani

There has been a nonstop discussion about President Trump’s temporary proposed ban of the entry of persons from six Muslim majority nations. While I applaud President Trump for his courageous stand on this important issue, I am disappointed that he did not go far enough.

Here’s Trump’s grand mistake in my opinion:

There are 57 Muslim nations and they all share the same mantra about Islam. They have a common Islamic psychological milieu, and called an Islamic “diet.”

Islamic Diet

People as a group or as individuals are different and none is perfectly healthy psychologically. We all have a loose wheel or two as we travel the bumpy road of life. Yet, most people manage to stay on course most of the time, with perhaps a stop or two at a repair shop of a mental health professional.

Most psychological disorders are exaggerations, deficits or surfeits of the generally accepted norm—whatever the norm may be. When caution, for instance, is practiced past suspicion, then we have paranoia; when reasonable fear is exercised beyond any justification, then there is phobia. The degree and severity of a condition frequently determine the presence or absence of psychopathology.

As mentioned above, Muslims share a particular common Islamic psychological milieu, whether they live in Islamic lands or in societies predominantly non-Islamic. The psychological condition of any Muslim group or individual is directly dependent on the kind and amount of Islamic diet they consume. The Islamic diet has numerous ingredients—some of which are wholesale, some are dangerously toxic, and some are between the two extremes, but they all share exactly the same Islamic fatalism. That’s the will of “Allah.”

Islam Fatalistic View

One of the greatest subtle, yet important differences between the Muslim’s mindset and that of the people in the West is the extent to which Muslims are fatalistic. There is hardly a statement that a Muslim makes without being conditional—conditional on the will of Allah. (Inshallah) “I shall see you tomorrow, Allah willing,” (Inshallah) “You will make it home, Allah willing,” (Inshallah) “Things will work out, Allah willing,” (Inshallah) and on and on and on. To the Muslim, Allah is on the job—on every job. Allah, with his invisible mighty hand, literally does and runs everything.

Allah’s hand is above all other hands, adorns every imaginable space in Islamic lands—a telling point about the Muslim’s fatalism and submission to the omnipotent omnipresent hand. If something happens, it is Allah’s will. If it doesn’t, it is Allah’s will. The rank and file Muslim has little will of his own. It absolves him of any and all responsibility. This mentality is in stark contrast with the “take charge” and “can do” mentality characteristic of Americans and other Western societies.

Islam’s Ideology

Islamic ideology is a creed of an ignorant people in a primitive and barbaric age. It is fixated in time and place; it harbors the ambition of taking the 21st century world back 14 centuries and ruling it by its dogma of violence, intolerance, injustice and death. And all 57 Muslim nations share this view, not just six countries on Trump’s list.

The Left

Well, the Muslims’ allies, America’s left keep asserting that America was built by immigrants from all nations. Here are the facts: the vast majority of those voluntary immigrants were White Christians with a heady leavening of Jews. These groups shared a developed and developing drive in support of “equal justice under the law” and strong traditions against such crimes as murder, genocide, rape, unjust war, robbery, theft and other crimes easily understood by most sane persons.

For the most part, these European immigrants also developed a nation which individuals and private organizations provide help to the unfortunate without regard to race, color, nationality, etc.

Let’s look at history: the number of Muslims who came to the United States (before 1918, when our nation was well established) was too little to be statistically meaningful. Besides, Muslims don’t come here to live and work peacefully; they come here to make Islam the law of the land.

By now, many ordinary Americans are beginning to comprehend that Islam commands a “Perpetual War” (Jihad) against “unbelievers” and allows, encourages and commands those waging Jihad to use murder, rape, genocide, torture and other horrors to forward the world conquest goal of Islam.

The claim that the immigration of Muslims is another face of that incoming as built our nation is another example of “Tell a lie often enough and it becomes the truth” as has been attributed to such lovers of liberty as V. Lenin and A. Hitler.

What should Americans do?

Islam in its fourteen hundred years of existence has never been the religion of peace. It has always been at war with infidels. A never-ending war. What should Americans do? They should demand that politicians, Islamic apologists, and paid-for media sycophants do not abuse freedom by lying about Islam. When these people portray Islam as a religion of peace, they are lying through their teeth. Just take a quick look at Islam’s history as well as what is happening today in Islamic lands. Islam is not a religion of peace and it has never been. Islam is violent, oppressive, racist, and irrational at best.
Islam and Women

It is also a fact that Islam teaches that it is proper to sexually use girls as young as nine-years-of-age, that women must have inferior status to males as witnesses in courts and in shares of inheritances and that husbands may beat their wife or wives when those males deem it necessary.

Women are relegated in Islam to a second-class status, depriving them of many rights enjoyed by men. Thus, life goes on for Muslim women with all the trappings of Islamic misogyny. Such is the plight of women under Islam. There is hardly the need to provide an exhaustive list of Islamic misogynies to qualify it as a shameful, discriminatory and oppressive religious apartheid.

Holy Land Foundation Trial (HLFT)                

Perhaps one of the most important outcomes of the HLFT was that the FBI reevaluated its relationship with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), after significant evidence emerged during the trial about CAIR’s links to the U.S. – Hamas infrastructure. Again, like some other religious minorities, Muslims are not well-known for extending “charity” to others. However, and in the USA, Muslims have been found guilty of sending “charitable contributions” to terrorist groups.

Toxic mind of Muslim leaders

Over the years, Islamic leaders have found it expedient to feed the masses mainly the toxic ingredients to further their own interests. Individuals and groups, for instance, have used the immense energizing power of hatred to rally the faithful; the cohesive force of polarization to create in-group solidarity; and, the great utility value of blaming others for their real and perceived misfortunes. Jews have been their favorite and handy scapegoats from day one. To this day, as true fascists, like the Nazis, Muslims blame just about everything on Jews.

It is for this present and imminent danger that the free people of the world must rise and do all they can to preserve their birthright of liberty. Muslims in non-Islamic lands may seem harmless, and many of them indeed are. Yet, Islam compels its leaders to uphold and promote its tenets at any and all costs to anyone. It is for this reason that on the one hand the Islamic governments sign the U.N. Charter that condemns apartheid, and on the other hand, they violate every provision of it when they are in power.

Small Victory for the Trump Administration

On June 26. 2017, The Supreme Court asserted it will decide the fate of President Trump’s revised travel ban, agreeing to hear arguments over immigration cases that were filed in federal courts in Hawaii and Maryland and allowing parts of the ban that has been on hold since March to take effect.

On July 15, 2017. “Lawyer General Jeff Sessions discharges explanations after Hawaii Judge puts new limits on the Trump Administrations’ travel restriction from six Muslim Countries.”

President Donald Trump is on the right track.  It is a matter of national security, not just politics. But I believe he should vet every Muslim majority country attempting to enter the US, not just these six.

© 2017 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

Olddogs Comments!

What kind of idiot would not agree with every word written above?

The real reason for this is not an exaggeration of consideration for the rag heads, it is the subversive tactics of the New World Order group of International Central Bankers hell bent on controlling the entire planet and has already infiltrated our society and government. If the reader still has an ounce of common sense you will have to admit America is on the brink of total social destruction from which there will be no return unless you get your head out of your ass and see the light. False patriotism is a symptom of the intellectual vacuum between your ears. By the way, if you take personal offense at my comments, the only reason the Cartels are getting away with our destruction is because Americans are too damn lazy to study the issues. Turn off the TV and protect your future by learning what is really going on in politics. Then you will be as pissed off as I am and look for ways to incite rebellion.