These corporations that want to Fix the Debt by gutting your retirement

02/28/2013

http://americablog.com/2013/02/list-of-127-corporations-who-want-to-fix-the-debt-by-fixing-your-retirement.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Americablog+%28AMERICAblog+News%29

By  Gaius Publius

The CEOs of the following corporations don’t think they have enough money — perhaps because they don’t have it all. So they got together a little group called “Fix the Debt” to cobble up some more. The source of their added wealth? Your government retirement and medical insurance programs. You know, Social Security and Medicare. ‘Cause all your money don’t yet belong to them; you still have some left.

I wrote about Fix the Debt earlier, the truly bipartisan group that wants Obama to do what he also wants to do, reduce the safety net. The following is a list of corporations who are driven by their millionaire and billionaire CEOs to help him get ‘er done.

The source is the amazing group SourceWatch. Also amazing — the list itself. Take a gander:

A

B

C

C cont.

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

M cont.

N

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

Y

10 13 11 flagbar


These corporations that want to Fix the Debt by gutting your retirement

02/28/2013

http://americablog.com/2013/02/list-of-127-corporations-who-want-to-fix-the-debt-by-fixing-your-retirement.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Americablog+%28AMERICAblog+News%29

By  Gaius Publius

The CEOs of the following corporations don’t think they have enough money — perhaps because they don’t have it all. So they got together a little group called “Fix the Debt” to cobble up some more. The source of their added wealth? Your government retirement and medical insurance programs. You know, Social Security and Medicare. ‘Cause all your money don’t yet belong to them; you still have some left.

I wrote about Fix the Debt earlier, the truly bipartisan group that wants Obama to do what he also wants to do, reduce the safety net. The following is a list of corporations who are driven by their millionaire and billionaire CEOs to help him get ‘er done.

The source is the amazing group SourceWatch. Also amazing — the list itself. Take a gander:

A

B

C

C cont.

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

M cont.

N

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

Y

10 13 11 flagbar


When Did the Soviet Socialist Republic of America Begin?

02/24/2013

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/08/when-did-the-soviet-socialist-republic-of-america-begin/

 End of Cold War and Fall of Soviet Union Staged to Collapse America

By  Gordon Duff,  Senior Editor

ENJOYING THE “CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION

When they called it “Neocon,” the new form of conservatism, it only reminded me of Stalin. It was gulags, controlled press, police state laws, one party rule, all power centralized, everything controlled, a stealth overthrow of America.

The recent $16 trillion robbery from the Federal Reserve System is only a minor part of the proof, history provides a much better canvas. 

Though the audit only proved it this week, it has been known for months. 

Banks around the world, Gaddafi’s personal bank in Libya one of them, got $16 trillion in unauthorized currency to float a world banking system now run by Russia and China.

Can this be proof that the $27 trillion “Wanta” fund existed.  Is there any other possible answer?

Call this a hypothesis, but you will see it as more than that.  It wasn’t Bush that took over during the 2000 coup d’etat by the Supreme Court, the one Newt Gingrich says he will ignore, the one I would disband.

Those who came into power, those behind the Bush regime, appeared from nowhere. They had no history of military service or public participation, just a stealth revolution of home-grown Marxists.

They had no other direction in their entire lives other than to infect the power structure and turn it to their devices, which turned into an inexorable national disaster on behalf of…who?  Not America certainly.

Was Their Goal Reached by Another Group Choosing a Different Path?

Closer to the fact, were one to begin what would be called a “witch hunt,” the theorists that claim parenthood for “Neoconservatism” were the same kids who stood in front of the student union with communist party petitions to get Gus Hall on the national ballot.  Not all of us are blind.

The real purpose, the real plan was to create a fund to overthrow control of congress and put in place a mechanism to buy our government.  Politics now costs billions, not millions and those “billions” now come from “thin air.”

The money came from drugs.   The mechanism for running the drugs was the privatization of the CIA under the control of “Neocon” elements pretending to be conservatives, communists all.

I know communism well.  I grew up in a communist household, the USSR magazine in the mailbox each week, Germany, Hungarian and especially Jewish communists .

All our Jewish friends, every single one were communists.

For those unaware, who don’t know a “kibbutz” is really the same thing as a Soviet “collective,” Israel is and always has been a communist country, hardly the “democracy” of the Middle East as our quite controlled press loves telling us. Throughout the Cold War, Israel and the Soviets kept their close friendship out of the news but it was hardly a secret.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Just ask anyone who has lived there, socialized medicine, political assassinations, compulsory national service and continual terrorism scare tactics to control the population.  Netanyahu is Stalin.

Remember how Russia got “the bomb”?  All that spying, from Pollard onward, even the upcoming Rosen civil trial this week, all showing one thing, that the state of Israel exists as a mechanism of a Soviet Union that never fell at all, a mechanism to empty America’s vaults, America’s banks and send America to destructive wars.

With Friends Like This Who Needs Enemies?

Protecting this enclave is the ADL, the SPLC, AIPAC and other groups that hide behind the holocaust, bringing it up whenever a spy is arrested or as with 9/11, the Mossad’s fingerprints are found all over an act of terrorism, 9/11, the London bombings, in fact much of the world’s terrorism.

Al Qaeda in Yemen is Israel, the bombings in Iraq now, before, as those in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in Egypt, in Nigeria, those in our intelligence systems know very well and also know if a word is spoken, their careers, their very lives end as so many have.

Why be suspicious?

Go visit concentration camps.  It isn’t whether the holocaust was real or not, a controversy many never heard of because scholars who write about it are violently attacked, jailed in many countries, accused of “anti-semitism.”

In the world of truth and freedom, being accused of “anti-semitism” is a badge of honor.  In a laughable attempt to discredit real scholars, organizations like the Anti-Defamation League actually run almost all “white supremacist” organizations along with the most vocal and irresponsible sounding Muslim extremist groups.

Israel, with CIA help, has always run Al Qaeda.  I have many Muslim friends (more Jews actually) but have to admit, Muslims can’t organize anything more complicated than an afternoon tea.

A careful study of world terrorism, and I have certainly done that, shows terrorism as we know it to be part of a destabilization plan aimed to destroy several Muslim nations, destabilize the world monetary system, take over American politics, empower Russia and China and, most of all, give wide control of events to Israel.

This has been the result, this was always the plan.

Back in 1905, a document, said to be a vicious “antisemitic” rag called the “Protocols” was created, found, counterfeited, discovered, you choose…in Russia.  A copy of this is documented, revered by some, hated by most, and continually attacked, every attempt to erase it from history is here.

With it is solid proof, long suppressed, that Israel had some role, maybe a major role, in planning and executing 9/11.  I have privately verified this information with intelligence sources here and in Israel.  They say the destruction of America is necessary.

There is no talk of Zionism, no talk of religion.   All involved are atheists.  It is how all of us were raised, Jews, Communists, in fact any real intellectuals, even the Jesuits when in private admit to atheism.

This is a short video showing the police reports of the arrest of terrorists on 9/11, reports once on CBS and CNN national news.  They are all gone now except here.  Those arrested were flown to Israel the next day after exploding a truck on the George Washington Bridge.

A similar attempt was made on the Lincoln Tunnel, Building 7 at the World Trade Center and the other more controversial and larger incidents which you may or may not have an opinion on.

This short video does a verify simple job.  If it exists and it does, then everything you thought you knew has been categorically disproven and it has.  It ends all controversy in 4 minutes.  This has been reviewed with Russian and Israeli intelligence officers whose responses I will omit out of courtesy.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Do we now know why Governor Keane of New Jersey was appointed to run the 9/11 Commission?  New Jersey Attorney General John Farmer was Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission.

Though these arrests crossed their desks and the investigations that “never happened” were under their authority, neither had any memory of any of it when it came to issuing the final 9/11 Report.

Governor Keane and Lee Hamilton

This one terror attack alone, one “disappeared” from history, on its own was of massive importance. Is this the “smoking gun” proving that the 9/11 Commission was rigged from day one?

One of the reasons I go back to the Protocols, either Abe Foxman’s “vicious counterfeits” or clues to a communist plot over a century old is tied to my visits to concentration camps in Europe with my children, something many parents with social values and, frankly money, have done.

There are books written about the holocaust, some debunking it, some attacking those who question it.

What you find, let’s say, if you visit Auschwitz, is a smokestack that proves ovens were there.  It sits alone, connected to nothing.  Nothing was ever near it, things in the camp are as they were in the 1800s, not just during World War II.

The smokestack and many other “holocaust” proofs were either invented or “recreated,” depending on your point of view.  When was the smokestack built? Stalin built it in 1947.

This is not conjecture.  Were there other ovens, gas chambers that disappeared?  I don’t know, I only know it was vital to Stalin to build gas chambers and create other evidence of a “final solution” to kill 6 million Jews.

Thus, all remaining evidence is “simulated,” not real.  Was it real?  It isn’t for me to say but what I can say is that the holocaust as we know it is a creation of Josef Stalin, a man who may have ordered the killing of 65 million people, including between 3.8 million and 4.2 million Jews.

Soviet Urals factories had death rates of the German concentration camps

You see, when Germany attacked Russia, Poland, Slovakia, the Ukraine and other Soviet held territories, most of Europe’s Jews lived there.

Some civilians, especially those in the Baltics, Belarus and Ukraine welcomed Hitler.  Others were transported, millions, inland to work in factories, really labor camps not unlike Auschwitz or Dachau, factories in the Urals that built tanks and planes, where workers were starved and frozen by the millions.

Were 4 million Jews among them?  Is Josef Stalin dictating history from the grave today?  This is how it seems.

We know the Rosenbergs were executed for giving Russia the atomic bomb and that all the spies involved, inside Russia, in America, were Jewish.

An examination of Israeli history is a curious thing.

Initially, the rebel or “terrorist” groups in Israel, call them “Jewish freedom fighters” if you will, worked for Hitler. He trained and financed them and the Irgun and Hagan-ah were part of the National Socialist Party. 

This is simply history, Hitler wanted German Jews to defeat the British and hundreds of British died in terror attacks during the war.  There is still much bitterness about this, more than is allowed to be reported.

After the war, when the Cold War began, Israel sided two ways, it went to communists in the US State Department to push President Truman into supporting Israeli statehood, and they went to Russia for support, massive support, which allowed Israel to crush their Arab neighbors.

“Tail Gunner’ McCarthy lied about his war service, upping his 12 missions 34 to qualify himself for the Distinguished Flying Cross

We no longer talk about communists in the State Department, about Alger Hiss or Senator Joseph McCarthy and his lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy.

That part of history was erased, debunked, changed, rewritten.

In truth, McCarthy was never close to understanding how thorough penetration of the US government was by communists.

He had everything wrong and history has never repaired this.

Any historian writing about this would be opposing dogma and immediately laughed, or perhaps fired, off campus.

There are dozens of subjects that can get someone in academia fired, too many of them correct historical misconceptions.  We fix only what is considered “politically correct” at the time, like all good little Marxists.

My contention is simple.  I believe that the Project for a New American Century along with the conservative “think tanks” are, in fact, run by Soviet Intelligence even when there is no longer a Soviet Union.

I believe they planned the overthrow of the US, coordinated 9/11 with Israel, created the controlled press, overthrew the constitution, built prison camps around America, pushed the US into Afghanistan as punishment and destroyed our financial system.

Historians will tell you they either know nothing of this or that it was all an accident.

We now live in a world where we have awakened, the west as “losers” in the Cold War, under the thumb of Russia and China who dictate to us because they control the world’s banking system, massive industrial capacity and huge strategic nuclear capabilities.

America’s government is under the control of the Israeli lobby, foreign drug money laundered through a new law passed by the Supreme Court called “Citizens United” and our political candidates are, as any American will tell you, “unsatisfactory.”

Fewer than 10% of Americans approve of our congress. Laws passed during the last 10 years have erased all constitutional rights. We have a press and media under total foreign control.

2-24-2013 8-02-24 AM

 Our sources tell us that our political system is deeply involved in the drug business

Our entire government, the “two party system” is now admittedly entirely free of any real public participation.

Even if elected to office, an “individual” can be “frozen out” by the seniority system and then removed from office through a convenient plane crash, anthrax or a flood of drug money.

America has more people in prison than can be compared to anything.  We have no idea, 10 million or 15 million, we no longer know.

The standard of living in America is plunging, has been for 20 years with most Americans fearing their government, fearing their neighbors, distrusting everyone.

This is Stalin’s communism, carefully organized and sold to America as “neoconservatism,” as Christian Nationalism or Christian Evangelicalism or Zionism.

One side was turned against the other, over and over, until one day we woke up, ten years into war, totally broke, the laughing stock of the world, our government under foreign control, and nobody left to speak up.

Everything is against the law, you can be arrested and have no lawyer, you can be detained forever without charge, even shipped outside the US and tortured for years until you die.

This is the law of the land, signed by a liberal president of African descent.

This is also outlined in the Protocols in 1905, that “counterfeit” document, it is part of a path that is many decades old.

We are left with a nation where 1% own it all, not the party bosses of Moscow but maybe the same thing.

Once, in the Soviet Union, there was a Central Committee of the communist party.  People knew their names, you could see them every May 1, standing there as rows of missiles and tanks rode by.

America doesn’t even have that. We will never know their names.

Editing:  Jim W. Dean

2-24-2013 8-03-01 AM

 They had their troubled times – And we surely have ours.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

The following article Walks Like A Duck Talks Like A Duck By Charlotte Iserbyt will give more insight on this commie takeover. The only pertinent question is What the hell our we going to do about it? Continue sitting on our ass and pretending we really run the country with our votes? Drop your stupid loyalty to the (so called) two party system and continue your education before it’s too late. Is freedom from communism not worth the bloodshed?

It is to me!

After gun confiscation all we can do is bend over and kiss our ass goodbye!

10 13 11 flagbar


Walks Like A Duck Talks Like A Duck

02/24/2013

 Louis Freeh signed the agreement with the KGB in 1994.

February 17, 2012 – 12:16 am

EIGHT YEARS AGO! EIGHT YEARS AGO!

Walks Like A Duck…
Talks Like A Duck…
By Charlotte Iserbyt
NewsWithViews.com
1-13-04
What we are looking at today in the United States of America is a “communist”, not “fascist” takeover of the United States.
We must not fall for left-wing media description of Bush as a “fascist”, although most of his actions fit the “fascist” description since he and his administration have a totalitarian mindset. When we climb on board the United Nations-loving media bandwagon and thoughtlessly repeat its label for Bush, we are playing into UN (communist… yes, the UN is communist) hands. How so? By keeping the sheeple asleep as to what the Bush family is all about, what Bush really is and what his policies really represent. As long as the UN-loving left, including politicians running for President, is successful in conditioning the American people to believe that Bush is a “right wing” Hitler-type fascist who thumbs his nose at the UN, the masses will remain unenlightened regarding Bush’s pro-UN communist agenda, enabling it to continue without a hitch. The powers that be that control the media are not about to allow Bush and his neocon (pro-UN) administration to be identified for what they are since (1) communism is supposed to be dead and (2) communism, the real enemy, if it does still exist, better not be shown to be in partnership with a Republican administration!

If communism is dead, why did Louis Freeh (FBI) sign agreements with the KGB (the world’s most notorious terrorist organization) back in 1994 that virtually merged our police with the Soviet police (KGB)?

Why, for instance, have I not received a response to a letter written eight months ago to Republican Senator Olympia Snowe asking whether or not ex-KGB Chiefs (one of whom, Yevgeny Primakov, has for many years worked closely with Saddam Hussein and was advising Hussein prior to the United States pre-emptive strike on Iraq) are or were working in the Office of Information Awareness, now known as DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, designing an internal passport for Americans, to be used in Bush’s fight against “terrorism”? Senator Snowe should get a gold medal for stonewalling. Exposure of the administration’s use of ex-KGB agents in its fight against terrorism is an issue worthy of a courageous whistleblower of former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill’s stature, but don’t expect Senator Snowe to step up to the plate.

Bill Jasper, who, along with Christopher Story, British journalist and former economic aide to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, (links to Story’s and New American websites) is probably the most knowledgeable individual writing on this subject today, discussed the KGB-FBI merger in an article entitled “Deadly Deception…The myth of the collapse of Communism” which appeared in the September 1995 issue of The New American magazine. (Jasper’s article was basically a review of the highly-respected ex-KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s book “New Lies for Old” which predicted in the minutest detail events…prior to and after Golitsyn’s defection to the West in 1962… major watershed events related to the planned, phony collapse of the Soviet Union necessary for the establishment of a communist world government (Lenin’s international socialism), the finalization of which is staring us in the face today, under the oversight of Republican “conservative, born-again Christian” George Bush. Mark Riebling, author of the fascinating book, “Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA,” says of Golitsyn’s predictions “139 out of 148 predictions were fulfilled by the end of 1993 – an accuracy rate of 94 percent.”

Jasper, in the above mentioned article, wrote regarding the FBI-KGB merger: “‘We are united in purpose and spirit,’ gushed Mr. Freeh following the historic signing. ‘Together, we’re invincible,’ Sergei Stepashin, his Russian counterpart, cooed in reply. With FBI offices now in Moscow and Budapest and others sprouting up in the capitals of “ex”-Communist countries, reciprocity naturally demands that KGB agents should come to America. And come they have, not posing as diplomats, academics, journalists, and businessmen like the hordes of covert KGB agents already ensconced here for decades, mind you, but as gun-toting policemen walking the mean streets of the inner cities and the main streets of small-town America as “partners” in our new police “exchange” programs.”

All Presidents since Dwight Eisenhower have signed agreements with the communist (not fascist) Soviet Union in every area imaginable.

The President of the Ford Foundation, Rowan Gaither, told Norman Dodd, the Research Director of the 1953 congressional committee to investigate the tax-exempt leftwing foundations, that the foundations received their instructions from the White House to spend their money so that the United States could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union. How can that vital piece of documented evidence continue to be ignored by the media unless the media is controlled by those implementing the merger?

Just about every single plank of the Communist Manifesto, necessary for the above merger, has been implemented. Although the Communist Manifesto calls for government/industry partnerships (government control/ownership of the means of production) and the United States government does not yet own private industry, the impact on American industry and on our American lifestyle of the WTO, GATT and NAFTA agreements approaches any impact government ownership might have. Our loss of hundreds of thousands of good manufacturing and intellectual jobs to foreign countries and creation of high unemployment in the United States equals redistribution of wealth called for by Karl Marx. Unemployment and the loss of our strong middle class, for which we have been the envy of the world, is turning America into a Third World, two-class country. The same communist/corporate fascist/ public/private partnerships have changed our traditional academic education system to one modelled on the Soviet polytech (quota) system (school to work agenda which is part of Goals 2000 and the No Child Left Behind legislation). These changes are necessary for the smooth functioning of the global economy (Lenin’s international socialism). These partnerships, by the way, were initiated by the same Republican “conservative” President Ronald Reagan who also signed the very extensive education agreements with Soviet President Gorbachev in 1985. I know since I served in 1982 as a U.S. Dept. of Education liaison with the White House’s Private Sector Initiative (public private partnerships) and was required to attend all its meetings. Since I felt uncomfortable promoting such an agenda, I asked one of Reagan’s staff members in the White House if it was not a corporate fascist agenda? She replied “Well, Charlotte, I guess no one ever looked at it that way.” Public-private partnerships are accepted by communists in the New Russia and are referred to as “state capitalism” (mafia operations) . Denial by Americans that communism is being implemented across the board in the United States hangs by one weak thread, the fact government hasn’t yet expropriated our industry. This pathetic weak thread upholds the sheeple’s media-created belief that communism is dead, Soviet Union fell apart, and that what we are implementing is fascism, not communism.

Needless to say, even with a deliberately dumbed down populace, the following unconstitutional communist (collectivist) agenda would have been difficult to implement had the American people not been lied to regarding the phony collapse of the Soviet Union and the death of communism (the disappearance of our enemy). The present merger with the Soviet Union (our former enemy) could not have taken place unless and until the Soviet Union (our former enemy) disappeared. After the phony demise of our enemy (communism) and in order to keep the merger going and to keep the people from recognizing what was going on, a New Enemy had to be found or created, so enter on the stage “world terrorism”, certainly a brilliant choice for a New Enemy for Americans, although it had been perpetrating its atrocities elsewhere in the world for many years. What patriotic American would not get on his knees and plead with and support the President’s every totalitarian proposal in this battle against an enemy who had actually finally struck us on our home territory? This New Enemy will turn out to be the greatest enemy of all time since it will, and has already started to, deprive Americans of their precious rights under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Big Lie regarding the death of communism had to be told to the world in order to allow communism to be replaced by a totalitarian world government (communist-run police state) which has been on the drawing board for at least 200 years.

Let’s take a look at the rest of the totally unconstitutional communist (United Nations) agenda, some but not all of which has been enabled by the creation of The New Enemy and Patriot Acts I and II designed to protect Americans from The New Enemy:

Open borders, illegal immigration, and most recently, Bush’s proposal for amnesty and benefits for illegal aliens. Immigration, illegal or legal, results in the homogenization of individual nation’s populations and cultures and loss of identity: religion, history, language, political and economic systems. Open borders/illegal immigration has been an essential pillar of world government for over 200 years and without it world government cannot happen. This is probably the most blatant difference between communism and fascism. The communist (collectivist) premise that groups from other nations are more important than individual Americans is carved in stone under Bush’s proposals.

Gun controls, always the No. 1 action taken by dictators, fascist or communist, in order to take over and control a country. Gun controls are also called for in the 1962 Arms Control and Disarmament Act (United States-Soviet Agreement).

Control and theft of private property through environmental agenda.

Regionalism/communism which calls for “unelected council form of government” and the “dropping of borders”. First “model” for world region is European Union which former Soviet President Gorbachev refers to as the New European Soviet. Bush is working on creating the same New American Soviet in this hemisphere (Canada, United States, Latin America). Congressman Tom Tancredo, who with Congressman Ron Paul, is one of our nation’s few constitutionalists, said “There are people in the Bush administration, and in Mexico, and in Congress, who believe that we should do away with borders entirely. Their ultimate goal is to create this hemispheric free trade area consolidating all of North and South America into some kind of United States of the Americas.” In other words, the replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘new World Social Order’ – World [Communist] Government, as called for by Lenin.

U.S. Department of Education’s communist agenda: deliberate creation of moral and academic chaos, communist workforce training for specific jobs (quota system) in planned global economy, and vouchers, for federal control of all schools, private, religious, and home schools.

Government control of our local police, government snooping (invasion of privacy) in our cars, homes, and offices, control of our speech and actions (community oriented policing system…COPS…which is part of KGB-FBI merger).

Government control and restrictions on media, press, tv, radio, with Internet control in the offing. Most, if not all of media is owned/ controlled by members of that elitist group headquartered in New York City, opposite the Soviet Embassy, which is involved in all aspects of our lives.

Government control of all travel but especially our airlines. When will the KGB-designed internal passports be required for citizen travel?

Government control of our churches and private community agencies with Bush’s faith-based initiatives (KGB always controlled Russian Orthodox Church and still does). The Washington Post referred to Bush’s faith-based initiative as “communitarianism” which most dictionaries define as “a communistic form of government.”

Government control of religion in the name of “tolerance.” Freedom of religion has now been turned on its head by the courts to read “freedom for all religions except Christianity.” Communism’s greatest enemy has always been Christianity, which it refers to as the “opiate of the people”.

When will Americans wake up and smell the coffee? Not until they understand that although Bush may act like a fascist, he is NOT a fascist; he is an international socialist (communist), as have been all our Presidents since the last real pro- American President, Calvin Coolidge. Of course, many of our Presidents were, as the sheeple are today, “deliberately” dumbed down, with no understanding of non-revisionist history, and may not have recognized what their “handlers” had persuaded/conditioned them to do…so they walked like ducks, talked like ducks…

Bush, Jr. is, as was his father, Bush, Sr., and his grandfather, Prescott, a member of The Order (Skull & Bones), a secret society at Yale University.

http://www.trineday.com Members of this secret society have held the highest of positions in American government for over 150 years. The Order has supported both isms (fascism and communism) since its goal is economic and political control of all people in this world, i.e., World Government, which can only be implemented by an “ism” political and economic philosophy. The United States of America has a Republican, not an “ism” form of government , so every area of our government, including education, had to be subjected to what we see today: Gorbachev’s collectivist restructuring agenda known as Perestroika.
There should be no stigma attached to any one of us dumbed down sheeple being ignorant since the public schools, universities and media have deliberately and gradually created an ignorant population (sheeple have been victimized) in order to implement Lenin’s international socialism/world government).

However, for us, “the deliberately dumbed down” and victimized population, to persist in our ignorance, in the face of massive, documented evidence to the contrary (Jasper,Story, Golitsyn, Sutton, et al) is plain stupid and dangerous. Anatoliy Golitsyn, in his “New Lies for Old” explains how dangerous such persistence in ignorance could prove to be when he says: “Convergence will be accompanied by blood baths and political re-education camps in Western Europe and the United States. The Soviet strategists are counting on an economic depression in the United States and intend to introduce their reformed model of socialism with a human face as an alternative to the American system during the depression.” The writer finds Golitsyn’s prediction re convergence (merger) very unnerving due to Mark Riebling’s comment (above) that 139 out of 148 of Golitsyn’s predictions were fulfilled by 1993, an accuracy rate of 94%.

Let me close with a relevant quote from George Orwell’s “1984″ which illustrates why those of us who believe in conspiracy and accept the historical facts revealed by Jasper, Story, Golitsyn and Sutton are considered “kooks”. In “1984″, Orwell explains how O’Brien (Winston’s handler) attempted to twist Winston’s (one of the few resisting individualists) mind in order to keep him in ignorance (referred to as “sanity”):

“You are a slow learner, Winston”, said O’Brien gently. “How can I help it?” he (Winston) blubbered. “How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.”

“Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.”

© 2004 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved
Charlotte Iserbyt is the consummate whistleblower. Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms. Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also served in the American Red Cross on Guam and Japan during the Korean War, and in the United States Foreign Service in Belgium and in the Republic of South Africa.

Charlotte Iserbyt is a speaker and writer, best known for her 1985 booklet Back to Basics Reform or OBE: Skinnerian International Curriculum and her 1989 pamphlet Soviets in the Classroom: America’s Latest Education Fad which covered the details of the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Education Agreements which remain in effect to this day. She is a freelance writer and has had articles published in Human Events, The Washington Times, The Bangor Daily News, and included in the record of Congressional hearings. Website:

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

E-Mail: dumbdown@blazenetme.net
To order The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America
700 pages pb, Call: 1-800-955-0116

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/08/when-did-the-soviet-socialist-republic-of-america-begin/

10 13 11 flagbar


Walks Like A Duck Talks Like A Duck

02/24/2013

 Louis Freeh signed the agreement with the KGB in 1994.

February 17, 2012 – 12:16 am

EIGHT YEARS AGO! EIGHT YEARS AGO!

Walks Like A Duck…
Talks Like A Duck…
By Charlotte Iserbyt
NewsWithViews.com
1-13-04
What we are looking at today in the United States of America is a “communist”, not “fascist” takeover of the United States.
We must not fall for left-wing media description of Bush as a “fascist”, although most of his actions fit the “fascist” description since he and his administration have a totalitarian mindset. When we climb on board the United Nations-loving media bandwagon and thoughtlessly repeat its label for Bush, we are playing into UN (communist… yes, the UN is communist) hands. How so? By keeping the sheeple asleep as to what the Bush family is all about, what Bush really is and what his policies really represent. As long as the UN-loving left, including politicians running for President, is successful in conditioning the American people to believe that Bush is a “right wing” Hitler-type fascist who thumbs his nose at the UN, the masses will remain unenlightened regarding Bush’s pro-UN communist agenda, enabling it to continue without a hitch. The powers that be that control the media are not about to allow Bush and his neocon (pro-UN) administration to be identified for what they are since (1) communism is supposed to be dead and (2) communism, the real enemy, if it does still exist, better not be shown to be in partnership with a Republican administration!

If communism is dead, why did Louis Freeh (FBI) sign agreements with the KGB (the world’s most notorious terrorist organization) back in 1994 that virtually merged our police with the Soviet police (KGB)?

Why, for instance, have I not received a response to a letter written eight months ago to Republican Senator Olympia Snowe asking whether or not ex-KGB Chiefs (one of whom, Yevgeny Primakov, has for many years worked closely with Saddam Hussein and was advising Hussein prior to the United States pre-emptive strike on Iraq) are or were working in the Office of Information Awareness, now known as DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, designing an internal passport for Americans, to be used in Bush’s fight against “terrorism”? Senator Snowe should get a gold medal for stonewalling. Exposure of the administration’s use of ex-KGB agents in its fight against terrorism is an issue worthy of a courageous whistleblower of former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill’s stature, but don’t expect Senator Snowe to step up to the plate.

Bill Jasper, who, along with Christopher Story, British journalist and former economic aide to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, (links to Story’s and New American websites) is probably the most knowledgeable individual writing on this subject today, discussed the KGB-FBI merger in an article entitled “Deadly Deception…The myth of the collapse of Communism” which appeared in the September 1995 issue of The New American magazine. (Jasper’s article was basically a review of the highly-respected ex-KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s book “New Lies for Old” which predicted in the minutest detail events…prior to and after Golitsyn’s defection to the West in 1962… major watershed events related to the planned, phony collapse of the Soviet Union necessary for the establishment of a communist world government (Lenin’s international socialism), the finalization of which is staring us in the face today, under the oversight of Republican “conservative, born-again Christian” George Bush. Mark Riebling, author of the fascinating book, “Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA,” says of Golitsyn’s predictions “139 out of 148 predictions were fulfilled by the end of 1993 – an accuracy rate of 94 percent.”

Jasper, in the above mentioned article, wrote regarding the FBI-KGB merger: “‘We are united in purpose and spirit,’ gushed Mr. Freeh following the historic signing. ‘Together, we’re invincible,’ Sergei Stepashin, his Russian counterpart, cooed in reply. With FBI offices now in Moscow and Budapest and others sprouting up in the capitals of “ex”-Communist countries, reciprocity naturally demands that KGB agents should come to America. And come they have, not posing as diplomats, academics, journalists, and businessmen like the hordes of covert KGB agents already ensconced here for decades, mind you, but as gun-toting policemen walking the mean streets of the inner cities and the main streets of small-town America as “partners” in our new police “exchange” programs.”

All Presidents since Dwight Eisenhower have signed agreements with the communist (not fascist) Soviet Union in every area imaginable.

The President of the Ford Foundation, Rowan Gaither, told Norman Dodd, the Research Director of the 1953 congressional committee to investigate the tax-exempt leftwing foundations, that the foundations received their instructions from the White House to spend their money so that the United States could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union. How can that vital piece of documented evidence continue to be ignored by the media unless the media is controlled by those implementing the merger?

Just about every single plank of the Communist Manifesto, necessary for the above merger, has been implemented. Although the Communist Manifesto calls for government/industry partnerships (government control/ownership of the means of production) and the United States government does not yet own private industry, the impact on American industry and on our American lifestyle of the WTO, GATT and NAFTA agreements approaches any impact government ownership might have. Our loss of hundreds of thousands of good manufacturing and intellectual jobs to foreign countries and creation of high unemployment in the United States equals redistribution of wealth called for by Karl Marx. Unemployment and the loss of our strong middle class, for which we have been the envy of the world, is turning America into a Third World, two-class country. The same communist/corporate fascist/ public/private partnerships have changed our traditional academic education system to one modelled on the Soviet polytech (quota) system (school to work agenda which is part of Goals 2000 and the No Child Left Behind legislation). These changes are necessary for the smooth functioning of the global economy (Lenin’s international socialism). These partnerships, by the way, were initiated by the same Republican “conservative” President Ronald Reagan who also signed the very extensive education agreements with Soviet President Gorbachev in 1985. I know since I served in 1982 as a U.S. Dept. of Education liaison with the White House’s Private Sector Initiative (public private partnerships) and was required to attend all its meetings. Since I felt uncomfortable promoting such an agenda, I asked one of Reagan’s staff members in the White House if it was not a corporate fascist agenda? She replied “Well, Charlotte, I guess no one ever looked at it that way.” Public-private partnerships are accepted by communists in the New Russia and are referred to as “state capitalism” (mafia operations) . Denial by Americans that communism is being implemented across the board in the United States hangs by one weak thread, the fact government hasn’t yet expropriated our industry. This pathetic weak thread upholds the sheeple’s media-created belief that communism is dead, Soviet Union fell apart, and that what we are implementing is fascism, not communism.

Needless to say, even with a deliberately dumbed down populace, the following unconstitutional communist (collectivist) agenda would have been difficult to implement had the American people not been lied to regarding the phony collapse of the Soviet Union and the death of communism (the disappearance of our enemy). The present merger with the Soviet Union (our former enemy) could not have taken place unless and until the Soviet Union (our former enemy) disappeared. After the phony demise of our enemy (communism) and in order to keep the merger going and to keep the people from recognizing what was going on, a New Enemy had to be found or created, so enter on the stage “world terrorism”, certainly a brilliant choice for a New Enemy for Americans, although it had been perpetrating its atrocities elsewhere in the world for many years. What patriotic American would not get on his knees and plead with and support the President’s every totalitarian proposal in this battle against an enemy who had actually finally struck us on our home territory? This New Enemy will turn out to be the greatest enemy of all time since it will, and has already started to, deprive Americans of their precious rights under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Big Lie regarding the death of communism had to be told to the world in order to allow communism to be replaced by a totalitarian world government (communist-run police state) which has been on the drawing board for at least 200 years.

Let’s take a look at the rest of the totally unconstitutional communist (United Nations) agenda, some but not all of which has been enabled by the creation of The New Enemy and Patriot Acts I and II designed to protect Americans from The New Enemy:

Open borders, illegal immigration, and most recently, Bush’s proposal for amnesty and benefits for illegal aliens. Immigration, illegal or legal, results in the homogenization of individual nation’s populations and cultures and loss of identity: religion, history, language, political and economic systems. Open borders/illegal immigration has been an essential pillar of world government for over 200 years and without it world government cannot happen. This is probably the most blatant difference between communism and fascism. The communist (collectivist) premise that groups from other nations are more important than individual Americans is carved in stone under Bush’s proposals.

Gun controls, always the No. 1 action taken by dictators, fascist or communist, in order to take over and control a country. Gun controls are also called for in the 1962 Arms Control and Disarmament Act (United States-Soviet Agreement).

Control and theft of private property through environmental agenda.

Regionalism/communism which calls for “unelected council form of government” and the “dropping of borders”. First “model” for world region is European Union which former Soviet President Gorbachev refers to as the New European Soviet. Bush is working on creating the same New American Soviet in this hemisphere (Canada, United States, Latin America). Congressman Tom Tancredo, who with Congressman Ron Paul, is one of our nation’s few constitutionalists, said “There are people in the Bush administration, and in Mexico, and in Congress, who believe that we should do away with borders entirely. Their ultimate goal is to create this hemispheric free trade area consolidating all of North and South America into some kind of United States of the Americas.” In other words, the replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘new World Social Order’ – World [Communist] Government, as called for by Lenin.

U.S. Department of Education’s communist agenda: deliberate creation of moral and academic chaos, communist workforce training for specific jobs (quota system) in planned global economy, and vouchers, for federal control of all schools, private, religious, and home schools.

Government control of our local police, government snooping (invasion of privacy) in our cars, homes, and offices, control of our speech and actions (community oriented policing system…COPS…which is part of KGB-FBI merger).

Government control and restrictions on media, press, tv, radio, with Internet control in the offing. Most, if not all of media is owned/ controlled by members of that elitist group headquartered in New York City, opposite the Soviet Embassy, which is involved in all aspects of our lives.

Government control of all travel but especially our airlines. When will the KGB-designed internal passports be required for citizen travel?

Government control of our churches and private community agencies with Bush’s faith-based initiatives (KGB always controlled Russian Orthodox Church and still does). The Washington Post referred to Bush’s faith-based initiative as “communitarianism” which most dictionaries define as “a communistic form of government.”

Government control of religion in the name of “tolerance.” Freedom of religion has now been turned on its head by the courts to read “freedom for all religions except Christianity.” Communism’s greatest enemy has always been Christianity, which it refers to as the “opiate of the people”.

When will Americans wake up and smell the coffee? Not until they understand that although Bush may act like a fascist, he is NOT a fascist; he is an international socialist (communist), as have been all our Presidents since the last real pro- American President, Calvin Coolidge. Of course, many of our Presidents were, as the sheeple are today, “deliberately” dumbed down, with no understanding of non-revisionist history, and may not have recognized what their “handlers” had persuaded/conditioned them to do…so they walked like ducks, talked like ducks…

Bush, Jr. is, as was his father, Bush, Sr., and his grandfather, Prescott, a member of The Order (Skull & Bones), a secret society at Yale University.

http://www.trineday.com Members of this secret society have held the highest of positions in American government for over 150 years. The Order has supported both isms (fascism and communism) since its goal is economic and political control of all people in this world, i.e., World Government, which can only be implemented by an “ism” political and economic philosophy. The United States of America has a Republican, not an “ism” form of government , so every area of our government, including education, had to be subjected to what we see today: Gorbachev’s collectivist restructuring agenda known as Perestroika.
There should be no stigma attached to any one of us dumbed down sheeple being ignorant since the public schools, universities and media have deliberately and gradually created an ignorant population (sheeple have been victimized) in order to implement Lenin’s international socialism/world government).

However, for us, “the deliberately dumbed down” and victimized population, to persist in our ignorance, in the face of massive, documented evidence to the contrary (Jasper,Story, Golitsyn, Sutton, et al) is plain stupid and dangerous. Anatoliy Golitsyn, in his “New Lies for Old” explains how dangerous such persistence in ignorance could prove to be when he says: “Convergence will be accompanied by blood baths and political re-education camps in Western Europe and the United States. The Soviet strategists are counting on an economic depression in the United States and intend to introduce their reformed model of socialism with a human face as an alternative to the American system during the depression.” The writer finds Golitsyn’s prediction re convergence (merger) very unnerving due to Mark Riebling’s comment (above) that 139 out of 148 of Golitsyn’s predictions were fulfilled by 1993, an accuracy rate of 94%.

Let me close with a relevant quote from George Orwell’s “1984″ which illustrates why those of us who believe in conspiracy and accept the historical facts revealed by Jasper, Story, Golitsyn and Sutton are considered “kooks”. In “1984″, Orwell explains how O’Brien (Winston’s handler) attempted to twist Winston’s (one of the few resisting individualists) mind in order to keep him in ignorance (referred to as “sanity”):

“You are a slow learner, Winston”, said O’Brien gently. “How can I help it?” he (Winston) blubbered. “How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.”

“Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.”

© 2004 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved
Charlotte Iserbyt is the consummate whistleblower. Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms. Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also served in the American Red Cross on Guam and Japan during the Korean War, and in the United States Foreign Service in Belgium and in the Republic of South Africa.

Charlotte Iserbyt is a speaker and writer, best known for her 1985 booklet Back to Basics Reform or OBE: Skinnerian International Curriculum and her 1989 pamphlet Soviets in the Classroom: America’s Latest Education Fad which covered the details of the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Education Agreements which remain in effect to this day. She is a freelance writer and has had articles published in Human Events, The Washington Times, The Bangor Daily News, and included in the record of Congressional hearings. Website:

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

E-Mail: dumbdown@blazenetme.net
To order The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America
700 pages pb, Call: 1-800-955-0116

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/08/when-did-the-soviet-socialist-republic-of-america-begin/

10 13 11 flagbar


We are Preparing for Massive Civil War Says DHS Informant

02/22/2013

http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2012/05/we-are-preparing-for-massive-civil-war.html

 AND

http://www.beaconequity.com/we-are-preparing-for-massive-civil-war-says-dhs-informant-2012-05-03/

 Posted by Charleston Voice

by Allison

2-21-2013 10-28-05 AM

In a riveting interview onTruNews Radio, Wednesday, private investigator Doug Hagmann said high-level, reliable sources told him the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is preparing for “massive civil war” in America.

“Folks, we’re getting ready for one massive economic collapse,” Hagmann told TruNews host Rick Wiles.

“We have problems . . . The federal government is preparing for civil uprising,” he added, “so every time you hear about troop movements, every time you hear about movements of military equipment, the militarization of the police, the buying of the ammunition, all of this is . . . they (DHS) are preparing for a massive uprising.”

Hagmann goes on to say that his sources tell him the concerns of the DHS stem from a collapse of the U.S. dollar and the hyperinflation a collapse in the value of the world’s primary reserve currency implies to a nation of 311 million Americans, who, for the significant portion of the population, is armed.

Uprisings in Greece is, indeed, a problem, but an uprising of armed Americans becomes a matter of serious national security, a point addressed in a recent report by the Pentagon and highlighted as a vulnerability and threat to the U.S. during war-game exercises at the Department of Defense last year, according to one of the DoD’s war-game participants, Jim Rickards, author of Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis.
Through his sources, Hagmann confirmed Rickards’ ongoing thesis of a fear of a U.S. dollar collapse at the hands of the Chinese (U.S. treasury bond holders of approximately $1 trillion) and, possibly, the Russians (threatening to launch a gold-backed ruble as an attractive alternative to the U.S. dollar) in retaliation for aggressive U.S. foreign policy initiatives against China’s and Russia’s strategic allies Iran and Syria.

“The one source that we have I’ve known since 1979,” Hagmann continued.  “He started out as a patrol officer and currently he is now working for a federal agency under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security; he’s in a position to know what policies are being initiated, what policies are being planned at this point, and he’s telling us right now—look, what you’re seeing is just the tip of the iceberg.  We are preparing, we, meaning the government, we are preparing for a massive civil war in this country.”

“There’s no hyperbole here,” he added, echoing Trends Research Institute’s Founder Gerald Celente’s forecast of last year.  Celente expects a collapse of the U.S. dollar and riots in America some time this year.

Since Celente’s ‘Civil War’ prediction of last year, executive orders NDAA and National Defense Resources Preparedness were signed into law by President Obama, which are both politically damaging actions taken by a sitting president.

And most recently, requests made by the DHS for the procurement of 450 million rounds of hollow-point ammunition only fuels speculation of an upcoming tragic event expected on American soil.

These major events, as shocking to the American people as they are, have taken place during an election year.

Escalating preparatory activities by the executive branch and DHS throughout the last decade—from the Patriot Act, to countless executive orders drafted to suspend (or strip) American civil liberties  “are just the beginning” of the nightmare to come, Hagmann said.

He added, “It’s going to get so much worse toward the election, and I’m not even sure we’re going to have an election in this country.  It’s going to be that bad, and this, as well, is coming from my sources.  But one source in particular said, ‘look, you don’t understand how bad it is.’  This stuff is real; these people, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), they are ready to fight the American people.”

TruNews Wiles asked Hagmann: who does the DHS expect to fight, in particular?  Another North versus South, the Yankees against the Confederates?  Hagmann stated the situation is far worse than a struggle between any two factions within the U.S.; it’s an anticipated nationwide emergency event centered on the nation’s currency.

“What they [DHS] are expecting, and again, this is according to my sources, what they’re expecting is the un-sustainability of the American dollar,” Hagmann said.  “And we know for a fact that we can no longer service our debt.  There’s going to be a period of hyperinflation . . . the dollar will be worthless . . . The economic collapse will be so severe, people won’t be ready for this.”

Read more: http://www.beaconequity.com/we-are-preparing-for-massive-civil-war-says-dhs-informant-2012-05-03/#ixzz2LY3lMXZR

Related posts:

  1. FEMA Camps Preparing for Massive Influx of New Arrivals?
  2. Photographer Ernest Withers doubled as FBI informant to spy on civil rights movement
  3. Will Americans Follow French Example Of Mass Civil Unrest?
  4. Americans preparing like never before – are you ready for the unexpected?
  5. UBS: Euro Collapse Could Lead To Martial Law, Civil War
  6. Surviving Civil War II: Preparing for Economic, Political & Social Collapse

Related Posts

Off-Grid Community To Make AR-15s and 1911s

10 13 11 flagbar


This Isn’t Hard Mr President: Do You Think You Can Kill Us on American Soil or Not?

02/22/2013

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/this-isnt-hard-mr-president-do-you-think-you-can-kill-us-on-american-soil-or-not/273207/

The White House won’t say whether it thinks Barack Obama is so empowered.

Does President Obama think that he has the power to kill American citizens on U.S. soil? If he accuses a guy in the Arizona desert or rural Montana of being an Al Qaeda terrorist, is it ever kosher to send a drone over to blow him up, as was done to Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen killed in Yemen? Or is it never okay to drone strike an American citizen to death here in the United States?

It’s an easy question.

Answering it wouldn’t jeopardize national security in any way.

So why do Obama Administration officials keep dodging it?

Asked the question in a Google Plus interview Thursday, Obama himself said, “Well first of all, there has never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.” Duh. But will there ever be? He went on to say that it’s easier to capture accused terrorists in the United States than abroad.

But he still didn’t give a straight answer.

Counterterrorism adviser John Brennan won’t answer either, despite Senator Rand Paul‘s repeated inquiries and vow that he’ll try to block Brennan’s confirmation as CIA director until he gets a response. Here’s how Paul phrased the question: “Do you believe that the president has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil?”

He added, “What about the use of lethal force against a non-U.S. person on U.S. soil?”

He’s been after these answers awhile, so it’s no surprise that he’s also produced variations on the question:

Do you believe that the prohibition on CIA participation in domestic law enforcement, first established by the National Security Act of 1947, would apply to the use of lethal force, especially lethal force directed at an individual on a targeting list, if a U.S. citizen on a targeting list was found to be operating on U.S. soil? What if the individual on the targeting list was a non-U.S. person but found to be operating on U.S. soil? Do you consider such an operation to be domestic law enforcement, or would it only be subject to the president’s wartime powers?

I can’t think of any reason why the Obama Administration would keep dodging this question save one: It believes that, under certain circumstances, perhaps spelled out in a secret legal memo, it is empowered to kill American citizens or non-citizens with drones inside the United States.

And it knows the citizenry would be alarmed by that belief.

Americans know enough about what sometimes happens to innocents when Hellfire missiles explode to want their use restricted to foreign lands where victims can be put in the mental bucket “not like us.” Paul, Senator Ron Wyden, and others are right to keep pressing for an answer. They should have more company. When sex scandals occur, the Washington, D.C., media whips itself into a frenzy getting answers to questions like, “Congressman, is that a picture of your penis in the tweet?” They don’t rest until they get answers!

“Do you think you can kill Americans on U.S. soil?” would seem to be a more important question.

Anyone want to join me in a media frenzy for answers? If Paul tattoos the question on his butt and tweets out a picture, would that help?

(The terrible truth is that, yes, that would totally help.)

 10 13 11 flagbar


This Isn’t Hard Mr President: Do You Think You Can Kill Us on American Soil or Not?

02/22/2013

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/this-isnt-hard-mr-president-do-you-think-you-can-kill-us-on-american-soil-or-not/273207/

The White House won’t say whether it thinks Barack Obama is so empowered.

Does President Obama think that he has the power to kill American citizens on U.S. soil? If he accuses a guy in the Arizona desert or rural Montana of being an Al Qaeda terrorist, is it ever kosher to send a drone over to blow him up, as was done to Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen killed in Yemen? Or is it never okay to drone strike an American citizen to death here in the United States?

It’s an easy question.

Answering it wouldn’t jeopardize national security in any way.

So why do Obama Administration officials keep dodging it?

Asked the question in a Google Plus interview Thursday, Obama himself said, “Well first of all, there has never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.” Duh. But will there ever be? He went on to say that it’s easier to capture accused terrorists in the United States than abroad.

But he still didn’t give a straight answer.

Counterterrorism adviser John Brennan won’t answer either, despite Senator Rand Paul‘s repeated inquiries and vow that he’ll try to block Brennan’s confirmation as CIA director until he gets a response. Here’s how Paul phrased the question: “Do you believe that the president has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil?”

He added, “What about the use of lethal force against a non-U.S. person on U.S. soil?”

He’s been after these answers awhile, so it’s no surprise that he’s also produced variations on the question:

Do you believe that the prohibition on CIA participation in domestic law enforcement, first established by the National Security Act of 1947, would apply to the use of lethal force, especially lethal force directed at an individual on a targeting list, if a U.S. citizen on a targeting list was found to be operating on U.S. soil? What if the individual on the targeting list was a non-U.S. person but found to be operating on U.S. soil? Do you consider such an operation to be domestic law enforcement, or would it only be subject to the president’s wartime powers?

I can’t think of any reason why the Obama Administration would keep dodging this question save one: It believes that, under certain circumstances, perhaps spelled out in a secret legal memo, it is empowered to kill American citizens or non-citizens with drones inside the United States.

And it knows the citizenry would be alarmed by that belief.

Americans know enough about what sometimes happens to innocents when Hellfire missiles explode to want their use restricted to foreign lands where victims can be put in the mental bucket “not like us.” Paul, Senator Ron Wyden, and others are right to keep pressing for an answer. They should have more company. When sex scandals occur, the Washington, D.C., media whips itself into a frenzy getting answers to questions like, “Congressman, is that a picture of your penis in the tweet?” They don’t rest until they get answers!

“Do you think you can kill Americans on U.S. soil?” would seem to be a more important question.

Anyone want to join me in a media frenzy for answers? If Paul tattoos the question on his butt and tweets out a picture, would that help?

(The terrible truth is that, yes, that would totally help.)

 10 13 11 flagbar


The second amendment is not up for debate

02/22/2013

http://thebrennerbrief.com/2013/02/21/the-second-amendment-not-up-for-debate/

Bradlee Dean exposes the Obama administration as the gun criminals, not the American people. Dean also states that the Second Amendment is not up for debate.

“Never trust a government that doesn’t trust its own citizens with guns.”

– Benjamin Franklin

After the president, with help from his fraternizers in the deceptive state-run media, somehow won his re-election campaign, I thought it was important to note the first thing Obama and his administration did was turn its attention to the United Nations gun treaty talks.

Hmm, I wonder … If he really had the support of the American people, why is he so busy trying to disarm those who supposedly love him so much?

And all the while Obama and his administration are busy trying to disarm the American people by conjuring up criminals guilty of some sort of gun crimes as an excuse for new gun legislation.

Well, then, let me help: this administration need not look any further than within its own ranks.

And this, friends, is the very reason we are an armed people.

Fast and Furious

As you know, Attorney General Eric Holder is guilty of putting thousands of assault rifles (AK-47s) into the hands of Mexican drug lords in an attempt to blame the American people for the crimes administration officials are guilty of contriving and committing. As a result, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed, along with hundreds of Mexican civilians, including teens at a birthday party and a Mexican beauty queen.

The state-run media conveniently pulled a media blackout on Fast and Furious, and some Americans gave them a pass and have “forgotten” the atrocities committed upon them by their own government, therefore strengthening tyranny so it might assault the people again on a later date.

Benghazi

The “later date” occurred in Benghazi, when Ambassador Chris Stevens, two Navy SEALs and another U.S. citizen were killed on Sep. 11, 2012.

The Blaze reported:

The details of the September 11 attack that killed four Americans at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi are still murky, and there is certainly more to be known.

Former CIA officer Clare Lopez argues that the key issue is the relationship of the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya with al-Qaida.

That relationship, Lopez argues, could be connected to the rise of Islamic brigades in Syria, who recently created a “Front to Liberate Syria” to wage jihad against the Syrian regime and turn the country into an Islamic state.

The Business Insider stated:

In 2011 the U.S. sold $33.4 billion worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia and $1.7 billion to Qatar as sales tripled to a record high and accounted for nearly 78 percent of all global arms sales.

‘The opposition groups that are receiving most of the lethal aid are exactly the ones we don’t want to have it,’ one American official familiar with the situation told theNew York Times.

So, America, was Ambassador Stevens gun running to extreme jihadists? Was Eric Holder responsible for putting guns into the hands of Mexican drug cartels? You decide.

Long-time gun grab attempt

Holder has been contriving a gun grab for years. For those who didn’t know, it recently came to light that Holder encouraged the media to “brainwash” the youth about how bad guns are when he was a part of Clinton’s anti-gun administration.

What is interesting here is that the young, through Hollywood and video games, are conveniently taught a “thug” mentality and how to commit crimes. In the meantime, corrupt politicians await to trample the Constitution and legislate new policies to disarm the American population, leaving them defenseless when the crimes are committed.

Just look at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, and other examples.

Thomas Jefferson stated that the whole purpose of government is to “ensure your rights,” not to take them away.

What this administration is attempting to do is exactly what Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or any other dictator has done. They blame the weapon rather than the person committing the crimes and all the while subtly encourage criminal activity.

Friends, this is not about guns; it is about control. And this issue is not to be overlooked, because gun rights stand between a free country and an enslaved, possibly an exterminated, people.

The Second Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE State, the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (violated). (emphasis added)

According to Federal Statute Title 10, Chapter 13, Section 311 (a), all males between the ages of 17 and 45 who are either citizens of the United States or have declared their intent to become citizens are members of the “unorganized” or reserve militia.

It is time for America to get out of the debate because there is no debate.

We have rights given unto us by our Creator. Period.

President George Washington, when arming the people of the United States of America, said:

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.

We would do well to heed President Washington’s warning, since over 56 million people in the 20th century were exterminated by their own governments under the guise of gun control.

Sign up for The Brenner Brief newsletter! Free subscription; unsubscribe any time. Connect with conservative, alternative media — we are “rendering the mainstream media useless” at TheBrennerBrief.com!

Related articles

 10 13 11 flagbar


National Day of Resistance Set to Oppose Obama Gun Control

02/22/2013

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/14549-national-day-of-resistance-set-to-oppose-obama-agenda-gun-control

 By Alex Newman

Conservatives, libertarians, Tea Party groups, and liberty-minded citizens are organizing a nationwide “Day of Resistance” on February 23 to oppose President Obama’s radical agenda — especially his “executive order” assaults on the Second Amendment. Organizers say over 50,000 people in more than 30 states have already signed up to participate in an estimated 100 local rallies, with the resistance movement aimed at unifying patriotic Americans from across the political spectrum behind the U.S. Constitution and gun rights.


“On January 16, 2013, President Barack Obama issued 23 executive actions against your 2nd Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms,” explains the “Day of Resistance” website, operated by an organization known as “Stop This Insanity” and by TheTeaParty.net. “He did this without the consent of Congress, which in itself violates the foundation of the Constitution and the co-equal branches of government.”

Due to the lawless assault, organizers say, it is time to get active now. “In response to these unconstitutional actions by the President, on  February 23, 2013, the American people will stand together in defiance to protect the right that protects ALL of our rights, the 2nd Amendment!” the Day of Resistance homepage continues, referring to .223 caliber ammunition used in popular weapons being demonized by Obama and his anti-gun rights allies.

According to organizers, the myriad rallies will be organized locally in an effort to bring neighbors together with each other in defense of American principles. The goal of the local organizing, they said, is to unite communities so they can reassert their right to determine their own destiny free from lawless federal dictates that violate the U.S. Constitution and infringe on the unalienable rights of the people.

Some states will have multiple rallies going on in different cities, the official list shows. Alabama, the first state on the list, for example, already has three official rallies scheduled in different cities. Meanwhile, national organizers are still soliciting help from local volunteers to get even more events off the ground in other areas, with the central website offering users easy tools to get involved, organize local action, or just connect with other like-minded citizens nearby.

Among the organizations that are participating in the Day of Resistance are local and state Tea Party groups, Women Warriors, an anti-political corruption group known as Western Representation, and other conservative organizations and grassroots activists. The upcoming rallies, meanwhile, have already started to receive significant attention in the press, with even the far-left U.K. Guardian writing a story about the effort.

“We’re actually seeing an entirely new crowd of people who weren’t politically active at all,” Day of Resistance organizer Dustin Stockton told the controversial British paper, which devoted much of its “article” to demonizing gun owners and weapons. “All of a sudden they hear the debate move to guns. We’re seeing a lot of people who are outdoorsmen, who probably didn’t vote in the last election, [or] in the last two elections.”

Based on the feedback so far, Stockton said he expects the rallies to be highly significant on the national stage. “From the response that we’ve been getting we believe this is actually going to be larger than the Tea Party wave in 2009,” he said. “We have this whole new group who are involved, and the Second Amendment is really a unifying issue for a lot of Americans, Republicans, independents and even moderate Democrats.”

As mentioned above, one of the groups participating in the Day of Resistance is the conservative-leaning political action committee known as Women Warriors, which recognizes the importance of the right to keep and bear arms — especially for females, who tend to be physically weaker than males and, therefore, more vulnerable to attack. A promotional YouTube video on the rally’s central website features multiple women discussing the Second Amendment and the tens of millions of Americans who refuse to tolerate any further unconstitutional restrictions on the gun rights of law-abiding citizens.

“People who kill will kill with a gun, a car, a knife or anything else they create,” the group’s executive director Tiffiny Rueger told the Guardian, a newspaper that suffered a major blow to its credibility for hyping bogus global-warming hysteria in recent years. “Enacting more bans on guns will not stop bad people — it will leave good people unprotected. If bans on things were successful, there would not be drug users.”

The February 23 date for the nationwide rallies was chosen for multiple reasons, according to organizers. Among the most important: the fact that 2/23 brings to mind .223 caliber ammunition, the bullets used in popular semi-automatic firearms like the AR15 that are being targeted by Obama and certain extremist Democrats in Congress. The date is also a Saturday, allowing working people to attend. It is the day that American forces raised the flag at Iwo Jima in 1945, too.

While the Second Amendment and Obama’s lawless “executive orders” are a primary focus of the rallies, those are hardly the only concerns, organizers said. Indeed, the effort is much, much broader than that. Leaders behind the Day of Resistance say they are hoping to help reignite the passion and outrage of 2009 and 2010 that contributed to major conservative and Tea Party victories in national elections, with extremist Democrats and “moderate” Republicans swept out of office — particularly in the House of Representatives — amid a tsunami of disgust with the federal government.

There are also a lot of other serious issues facing America that organizers want addressed — everything from Obama’s takeover of the nation’s healthcare system to the seemingly never-ending series of scandals swirling around the administration are in the crosshairs. “We think that gives us an opportunity to talk about how ObamaCare is affecting people’s personal privacy and all the other issues the Tea Party movement has to talk about,” Stockton told Breitbart, a major conservative media outlet. “We’ll talk about over-regulation, bailouts, crony capitalism, Benghazi, Fast and Furious.”

For Stockton and countless other Americans, despite a ham-handed cover-up by the administration and its allies in the increasingly discredited establishment press, Operation Fast and Furious is still a big deal that must be properly addressed. The Obama administration scheme, which was first exposed by brave whistle-blowers in the ATF, involved arming certain Mexican drug cartels with heavy American weapons, all paid for with taxpayer money.

Official documents later revealed that the “targets” of the supposedly “botched” operation were already working for the FBI. The resulting violence — hundreds of Mexicans and at least two U.S. law enforcement officers have been murdered with “Fast and Furious” weapons so far — was intended to be used by the administration to demonize the Second Amendment, Justice Department e-mails showed.

In the wake of the explosive revelations, disgraced Attorney General Eric Holder eventually became the first sitting Justice Department chief to be held in criminal contempt of Congress — primarily for his lies and his role in the ongoing cover-up of the scandal. He is currently abusing his position to avoid prosecution. “When the top cop in the country is as crooked as Eric Holder, it really cements our argument that ‘yeah, you really need to not be counting on law enforcement for protection. You need to be taking personal responsibility,’” Stockton explained.

Of course, Stockton and other organizers told reporters that they realize anti-gun rights zealots and their allies in the mainstream media will try to criticize or downplay the effort — if the rallies are covered at all. The establishment press, though, has come under heavy fire for hyping insignificant protests while ignoring or demonizing major efforts to restrain an out-of-control federal government or stop abortion, for example. The public is catching on, too: According to recent polls, the vast majority of Americans no longer trust the major media.

Last month, in the face of a hostile media and government climate, tens of thousands of people rallied at state capitols nationwide in defense of the Second Amendment. At the same time, the public and its elected officials are increasingly stepping up to defend gun rights and defeat Obama’s lawless assault on the constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms.

Hundreds of sheriffs in virtually every state, for example, have publicly vowed to protect the rights of their constituents no matter what unconstitutional “laws” or executive edicts come out of Washington, D.C., or the White House. State governments are taking action too, with well over a dozen legislatures and some governors working to nullify federal assaults on gun rights. Even cities and counties are nullifying gun control in their jurisdictions.

Analysts say the establishment’s exploitation of tragedy led by Obama and the increasingly ridiculed press to push for more infringements on the rights of law-abiding Americans has inadvertently awoken a sleeping giant. The Day of Resistance, like the Guns Across America rallies last month and the quickly expanding nullification movement, may be just the beginning of an awakening that will ultimately contribute to restoring lawful, constitutional government in the United States.

With each passing day, activists say more and more Americans are waking up and getting involved. That trend, meanwhile, is expected to continue accelerating fast. Obama, of course, may think he can do whatever he wants, and mountains of evidence suggest that he does. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that the American people and a growing segment of Congress do not plan to accept it without a fight.     

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.

Related articles:

Pro-Gun Rallies Attended by Thousands at State Capitols

Media Celebrate Tiny Gun Control March, Ignore 500,000 Pro Life

Top 10 “Most Corrupt” List Dominated by Obama Administration

Gun Owners Refuse to Register Under New York Law

Sheriffs and Legislators Are Acting to Nullify Obama Gun Controls

Liberty Coalition Forms to Support Sheriffs Fighting Gun Control

Counties and Cities Now Nullifying Gun Control

States Aim to Nullify Obama Gun Control

Sheriffs Target Obama Gun Control, Vow to Resist

Vast Majority of Gun Owners Would Defy Ban, Poll Shows

“Drug Lords” Targeted in Fast & Furious Worked for FBI

Project Gunrunner Part of Plan to Institute Gun Control

Resistance to the President’s Gun Control Plan Continues to Build

Obama Unveils Assault on Gun Rights

As Obama’s Anti-gun Agenda Emerges, Republican Threatens Impeachment

Obama Executive Orders on Guns Would Spark Mass Resistance

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m damn sick of the Media Industry’s cover-up via no coverage of the slime balls in our government. How about including a national ban on the established media. How about a hundred million people cancelling their newspaper subscriptions, and writing the TV news that you no longer watch their crap. Boycott the whole damn bunch of them. Including their on line subscriptions. The alternative on-line information is all we need. God bless the alternative news agencies.

10 13 11 flagbar


H R 748 would require all persons in the US 18 to 25 to perform national service

02/22/2013

By Angel Clark

There has been speculation regarding President Obama’scitizen army”. In 2008, President Obama made statements regarding a “civilian national security force”. Since that day, many have been curious as to what President Obama had in mind when he made that statement. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY13) may have just given a bit of insight into what was meant when he introduced H.R. 748 last week.

This won’t work – at least, not like it did in the past with a draft. Why not? Because of the right to contract. The right to contract means the right to NOT contract as well.

These days, the young men and women of the country are steeped in computer and communications. And with all this communicating, there will be many of us older folks who will show them how to opt out of Social Security. Without the SSN, it is unlikely that a person will even be accepted if he/she wants to partake.

If the requirements bypass the SSN, so that a young person can be required without a SSN, it will still be necessary to get him/her to sign on the line… or at least to accept by some form of agreement. There will be plenty of us who will show them how to obey the letter of the law, all the while expressly stating that they are not making any agreement to join.

The only thing that might overcome this is if there is formal war declared on the U.S. by some foreign nation. But even then, a person will be able to opt out, though it might be amidst shouts of cowardice or treason from peers and the military. Seems to me that most of this whole thing is designed to put fear into the hearts of the patriots. Therefore, calmly keep an eye on Obama and Government, as usual. And then simply go about your regular job of thwarting their stupidity.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

If the reader does not think our nappy headed scumbag in DC will not turn this Nation one against another, you must have excrement for brains. The total destruction of the American people is his game plan, and he will not quit until he see’s us killing  each other. Wake the fuck up, people!

10 13 11 flagbar


DHS FEMA Raising an Army

02/22/2013

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/02/21/dhsfema-raising-an-army/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

Take a good look at this picture. The US government is training Latino youth as a kind of Hitler Youth or Communist Red Guard to put down American resistance to NWO/Communist tyranny.

The Nazis and the Communists were both Illuminati creations. They both had armed forces loyal to the Party to enforce ruthless discipline on the regular armies. This is a renewal of this pattern.

2-22-2013 9-54-34 AM

By Bruce Lazarus
(Henry makow)

On September 13, 2012, the Dept of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps youth, aka the Homeland Youth.

The federal government calls them FEMA Corps. But they conjure up memories of the Hitler Youth of 1930′s Germany . Regardless of their name, Obama’s Dept of Homeland Security has just graduated its first class of 231 Homeland Youth! Kids, aged 18-24 and recruited from the President’s AmeriCorp volunteers, they represent the first wave of DHS’s “Youth Corps”, designed specifically to create a full time, paid, standing army of FEMA Youth across the country!

On September 13, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps first-responders, “Homeland Youth”. While the idea of having a volunteer force of tens of thousands of volunteers scattered across the country to aid in times of natural disasters sounds great, the details and timing of this new government army is somewhat curious, if not disturbing!

DHS raising an armed army!

The first problem one finds with this ‘new army’ is the fact that they are mere children. Yes, 18 is generally the legal age a person can sign a contract, join the military or be tried as an adult. But ask any parent – an 18, 20 or even a 24 year-old is still a naïve, readily-influenced kid.

The second problem with this announcement and program is its timing. Over the past two years, Obama has signed a number of Executive Orders suspending all civil and Constitutional rights and turning over management of an America under Martial Law to FEMA!

Also in that time, domestic federal agencies under DHS, including FEMA, have ordered billions of rounds of ammunition as well as the corresponding firearms. Admittedly, these new weapons and ammunition are not to be used in some far-off war or to fight forest fires in California , but right here on the streets of America !

2-22-2013 9-55-28 AM

Strange Armored Fighting Vehicles

Individuals around the US have begun reporting the site of strange, new, heavily-armed FEMA fighting vehicles. What would a disaster relief agency like FEMA need with 2,500 brand new GLS armored fighting vehicles? According to the agency’s own mandate, as well as Obama’s recent Executive Order, the answer is ‘population control‘ during a time of Martial Law.

FEMA Concentration Camps 

DHS training agents to overcome inhibition about shooting pregnant women, old men, children

http://www.naturalnews.com/039177_gun_range_targets_pregnant_women_Homeland_Security.html

 DHS Loading up on Ammunition – 5 bullets for every America  – In case they miss you the first time.

Welcome to the FEMA Corps Inaugural Class   Of course, they mask it as “disaster relief” – So why the guns? This puts gun control and illegal immigration into perspective.

10 13 11 flagbar


DHS FEMA Raising an Army

02/22/2013

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/02/21/dhsfema-raising-an-army/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

Take a good look at this picture. The US government is training Latino youth as a kind of Hitler Youth or Communist Red Guard to put down American resistance to NWO/Communist tyranny.

The Nazis and the Communists were both Illuminati creations. They both had armed forces loyal to the Party to enforce ruthless discipline on the regular armies. This is a renewal of this pattern.

2-22-2013 9-54-34 AM

By Bruce Lazarus
(Henry makow)

On September 13, 2012, the Dept of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps youth, aka the Homeland Youth.

The federal government calls them FEMA Corps. But they conjure up memories of the Hitler Youth of 1930′s Germany . Regardless of their name, Obama’s Dept of Homeland Security has just graduated its first class of 231 Homeland Youth! Kids, aged 18-24 and recruited from the President’s AmeriCorp volunteers, they represent the first wave of DHS’s “Youth Corps”, designed specifically to create a full time, paid, standing army of FEMA Youth across the country!

On September 13, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps first-responders, “Homeland Youth”. While the idea of having a volunteer force of tens of thousands of volunteers scattered across the country to aid in times of natural disasters sounds great, the details and timing of this new government army is somewhat curious, if not disturbing!

DHS raising an armed army!

The first problem one finds with this ‘new army’ is the fact that they are mere children. Yes, 18 is generally the legal age a person can sign a contract, join the military or be tried as an adult. But ask any parent – an 18, 20 or even a 24 year-old is still a naïve, readily-influenced kid.

The second problem with this announcement and program is its timing. Over the past two years, Obama has signed a number of Executive Orders suspending all civil and Constitutional rights and turning over management of an America under Martial Law to FEMA!

Also in that time, domestic federal agencies under DHS, including FEMA, have ordered billions of rounds of ammunition as well as the corresponding firearms. Admittedly, these new weapons and ammunition are not to be used in some far-off war or to fight forest fires in California , but right here on the streets of America !

2-22-2013 9-55-28 AM

Strange Armored Fighting Vehicles

Individuals around the US have begun reporting the site of strange, new, heavily-armed FEMA fighting vehicles. What would a disaster relief agency like FEMA need with 2,500 brand new GLS armored fighting vehicles? According to the agency’s own mandate, as well as Obama’s recent Executive Order, the answer is ‘population control‘ during a time of Martial Law.

FEMA Concentration Camps 

DHS training agents to overcome inhibition about shooting pregnant women, old men, children

http://www.naturalnews.com/039177_gun_range_targets_pregnant_women_Homeland_Security.html

 DHS Loading up on Ammunition – 5 bullets for every America  – In case they miss you the first time.

Welcome to the FEMA Corps Inaugural Class   Of course, they mask it as “disaster relief” – So why the guns? This puts gun control and illegal immigration into perspective.

10 13 11 flagbar


You Tell Me – Where’s The Justice?

02/20/2013

http://www.zombie-slayer.com/neal/

By Neal Ross

The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of men than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism. 

Ex parte Milligan (1866)

At the foundation of our civil liberties lies the principle that denies to government officials an exceptional position before the law and which subjects them to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen.
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis (1921)

It is not enough to know that the men applying the standard are honorable and devoted men. This is a government of laws, not of men…It is not without significance that most of the provisions in the Bill of Rights are procedural. It is procedure that spells much of the difference between rule by law and rule by whim or caprice.
Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (1951)

What exactly is justice? According to one dictionary, justice is defined as the legal system, or the act of applying or upholding the law. Can we, as a people, expect, or obtain justice from those who represent us in government? That is the subject I would like to address in this commentary.

Say someone steals something from another person, how does the victim obtain justice? Well, under our system, law enforcement officers will investigate, and hopefully find enough evidence to lead them to the guilty party. They will then apprehend the person, or persons, responsible for stealing said item. Charges will be brought against them and they will be brought to trial. Evidence will be submitted and a jury will decide guilt or innocence.

George Mason, a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, and leading proponent of the Bill of Rights, once said, “In all our associations; in all our agreements let us never lose sight of this fundamental maxim-that all power was originally lodged in, and consequently is derived from, the people.”

Furthermore, in an address at the Virginia Convention, James Madison declared, “It is sufficiently obvious, that persons and property are the two great subjects on which Governments are to act; and that the rights of persons, and the rights of property, are the objects, for the protection of which Government was instituted.”

And finally, James Wilson, one of the first six justices appointed to the Supreme Court by George Washington, stated the following, “Government…should be formed to secure and enlarge the exercise of the natural rights of its members; and every government which has not this in view as its principal object is not a government of the legitimate kind.”

So, how does this tie in to my discussion of justice? It’s quite simple, if the government betrays the sacred trust of the people and, instead of protecting and enlarging our ability to exercise our rights, has diminished, or infringed upon said rights, how do we obtain justice?

In 1850 Frederic Bastiat wrote a brilliant treatise simply entitled The Law. From his work he states, “Each of us has a natural right ­from God ­ to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two.

If every person has the right to defend ­even by force ­his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of collective rights is its reason for existing, its lawfulness ­is based on individual right.”

This is the nature of government, a common force designed to protect the natural rights of man. But, Bastiat continues by saying, “Thus, since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force ­for the same reason­ cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups.”

Therefore, the government, the common force, cannot lawfully destroy the person, liberty, or property of the individual or groups. So, again, how does one obtain justice when the common force, the government, is guilty of violating our rights?

It matters not that the actions of government are done at the request of the majority. As Thomas Jefferson so clearly stated, “The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest breaks up the foundations of society.”

In his Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments, James Madison wrote, “The preservation of a free government requires not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be universally maintained but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive their authority and are tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them and are slaves.” (my emphasis)

In the 1943 case of West Virginia Board of Education vs. Barnette, Justice Robert Jackson ruled, “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to a vote’ they depend on the outcome of no elections.”

Therefore, if the Bill of Rights states that certain rights are unalienable, and outside the scope of powers granted government by we the people, and the government disregards these limits placed upon their powers and enacts laws which infringe upon these rights, how do we obtain justice?

The First Amendment to the Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, states that we have the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” I have petitioned my elected representatives at all levels of government until I am blue in the face and they disregard my petitions. I am not alone, many of the people I speak to daily have also written their elected representatives and demanded that they protect, not infringe upon, our rights. All to no avail, as the government seems intent upon completely doing away with the entire Bill of Rights.

And what makes matters worse is that the majority of the people in this country are so uninformed that they would be at a loss to name five of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights. What is one to do when the majority of the people of a nation are so uninformed or brainwashed, into believing that it is perfectly acceptable for the government to infringe upon the rights of the people when it is done with overwhelming public support? As Carl Sagan once said, “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.”

But, to quote once more from Bastiat, “But, unfortunately, law by no means confines itself to its proper functions. And when it has exceeded its proper functions, it has not done so merely in some inconsequential and debatable matters. The law has gone further than this; it has acted in direct opposition to its own purpose. The law has been used to destroy its own objective: It has been applied to annihilating the justice that it was supposed to maintain; to limiting and destroying rights which its real purpose was to respect.”

There are many quotes as to what a people may do when the law is found to be in opposition to the purpose for which it was instituted, but I will provide only two of them as I feel they are sufficient to get my point across.

Former Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas once said, “When a legislature undertakes to proscribe the exercise of a citizen’s constitutional rights it acts lawlessly and the citizen can take matters into his own hands and proceed on the basis that such a law is no law at all.”

John Locke, whose writings heavily influenced many of our Founding Fathers, said the following in his Treatise on Civil Governments, “…whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience and are left to the common refuge, which God hath provided for all men, against force and violence.”

So, according to these men when we feel that our rights have been violated it is our right to simply disregard the law. That is easier said than done. How does one accomplish this when the entire justice system in this country has been turned on its head and enforces whatever government decrees as being law? How does one convince any law enforcement officer that such and such law is in violation of the Bill of Rights and is therefore invalid? Do you think that argument would work well with agents of the government, such as the FBI, ATF, or Dept. of Homeland Security? Do you think you could avoid having your rights violated at the airport simply because you quoted the Fourth Amendment to your friendly TSA agent?

Again, we are always told that these laws, these infringements upon our rights are done with our best interests, and the public safety, in mind. Yet in a 1911 edition of the North America Review, former Supreme Court Justice Horace H. Lurton clearly stated that, “The contention that…the Constitution is to be disregarded if it stands in the way of that which is deemed of the public advantage…is destructive of the whole theory upon which our American Commonwealths have been founded.”

Not only that, but in the Supreme Court case of U.S. v Robel, the court

ruled, “It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would sanction the subversion of one of the liberties…which makes the defense of the Nation worthwhile.”

Justice William O. Douglass once asked, “Since when have we

Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us?” That is a very

good question.

I am not proposing any solutions to what I am discussing, I am only

asking you to THINK about what I have said. However, ask yourself this, why is it that people such as myself are called radicals, or worse, just because we speak out against these clear abuses of power by our government?

And finally, especially if you are in the current injustice system which

enforces these unconstitutional violations of the rights of the people,

you have taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Ignorance on your part as to the nature and scope of the rights protected by the Bill of Rights will not justify your infringing upon our rights.

We the people may not be able to find justice from the slow, steady

spread of tyranny, not in this lifetime anyway. But ponder long and hard

about something Thomas Jefferson said in his Summary View of the Rights of British America, “God who gave us life, gave us liberty.

And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.”

ABOUT NEAL

 I am just an average guy who is interested in our government’s continuing assault upon our second amendment rights, and the never ending influx of illegal aliens. As I begin researching these issues, I discover more and more what is wrong with this country. This blog is my way of informing others of the problems this nation faces, and of offering my solutions to these problems. This is turning into an educational trip: Please come along for the ride.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

America needs a hundred million more men just like Neal, instead of the self absorbed, heads up their asses, cowards we have now.

 

Visit

 

http://www.zombie-slayer.com/neal/?page_id=2

 

every day!

10 13 11 flagbar


The U S Government Is Preparing For War Against The American People

02/20/2013

http://www.blacklistednews.com/The_U.S._Government_Is_Preparing_For_War_Against_The_American_People/24130/0/0/0/Y/M.html?morestories=obinsite

2-17-2013 11-05-46 AM

At this point there should be very little doubt that the United States government is preparing to wage war against its own people. Earlier this week, news broke about how the Obama regime through the Department of Justice is claiming in a memorandum that they have the power to use drone strikes to kill American citizens under the guise of the so-called war on terror. In fact, the memorandum claims through the use of vague language that they have the power to kill Americans even if they do not have any sort of actionable intelligence confirming that they pose a threat. It has been proven time and time again that the war on terror is a hoax used as a tool to justify endless war and draconian anti-freedom policies domestically. The official story of nearly every alleged terror event that has transpired in the 21st century has been torn apart and criticized by many independent researchers. Not to mention, Al-Qaeda the shadowy terror organization we are constantly told that wants to kill Americans, actually originated from within American intelligence circles. We have also seen the United States, Israel and other Western governments financing and supporting Al-Qaeda type entities. Western support of Al-Qaeda linked rebel groups in both Libya and Syria is well documented and shows what a big joke the war on terror is.

It is no secret that the Department of Homeland Security was originally setup as a force to be used domestically against the American people. In the early 2000s, propaganda was used to sell the formation of this organization as a more effective way to protect the American people from Al-Qaeda. Over time this has been proven to be a complete and total lie considering all of their policies have been directed towards the American people instead of so-called foreign Al-Qaeda terrorists. They’ve left the border wide open, setup unconstitutional checkpoints at airports with naked body scanning devices and have even gone so far as to setup unlawful security checkpoints at bus stations, highways and train stations. In 2012 they purchased 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and just recently ordered another 21.6 million rounds of ammunition to add to their stockpile. The amount of ammunition that they have ordered is enough to wage a war for many years. Since they are not a military organization and they are based domestically here in the United States, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the ammunition is being stored in case they need to use it against the American people. This is all happening at the same time Congress is attempting to shove through several gun control laws that would restrict the average American from purchasing firearms and ammunition. Since the Obama regime and the assorted control freaks in Congress are attempting to dismantle the second amendment on every front, it is entirely hypocritical to see them purchase such a large amount of ammunition.

Going back to the DOJ drone memorandum, the White House Press Secretary Jay Carney actually referred to the policy as legal, ethical and wise. Essentially the Obama regime is claiming that it is lawful and ethical for them to exercise the power of judge, jury and executioner against an American citizen through a drone strike just because they say a person represents a threat. As mentioned previously, they are claiming that they don’t need to have any sort of concrete actionable intelligence. They are basically saying that they can just kill you just because they believe you represent a threat. This is the type of behavior that you would see from war criminals. In fact, numerous reports have confirmed that some of these Obama ordered drone strikes have actually killed innocent women in children proving that they are war criminals. Of course we never saw Obama or the corporate media attempt to humanize the death of the people they killed in these drone strikes in foreign countries. That’s because they’ll only humanize an event if it benefits their agenda. This is why Obama used the alleged Sandy Hook shooting incident and staged a public relations stunt with children when he signed his executive orders on gun control. Humanizing that event enabled them to push their ridiculous gun control program.

Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism John Brennan who is widely considered to be the architect of this disgusting drone strike program has been nominated by Obama to be the next Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Apparently if you agree to participate and engage in war crimes you are elevated to positions of greater authority within the Obama regime.

Let’s not forget that prior to the Obama regime coming into power; the Bush 43 regime implemented U.S. Northern Command which currently claims military authority over North America. This is an institution that would absolutely be unleashed against the American people in the case of mass civil strife. There has even been a bill proposed to implement FEMA camps under the guise of National Emergency Centers in Congress. This would actually help expand the number of government run facilities that are capable of being used to house large numbers of people. Essentially, we are talking about facilities that could be used as concentration camps. Although this particular bill has yet to be officially passed, it was actually just proposed again in the U.S. House of Representatives.

So why is the federal government doing all of these things? The answer is actually very simple. It is no secret that the economy around the world is having severe problems. In the United States there are roughly 50 million people now on food stamps. Students graduating college find themselves in debt and can’t find a decent paying job. Inflation is running wild because of 0% interest rate policies and rampant monetization of debt from the Federal Reserve as well as out of control spending from the criminals in Washington DC. As a result, the cost of goods and services is going through the roof despite absurd claims that inflation is low. People are having an increasingly difficult time getting by and the American middle class is being systematically destroyed because of these policies. It is obvious that this economic system is unsustainable and when the day of reckoning comes, you are going to have millions of angry people out on the streets. Therefore, it is in the interest of the power structure to buy vast quantities of ammunition, set legal precedence for drone strikes against American citizens, expand the authority of the Department of Homeland Security and implement whatever gun control laws they can push through.

There will be a day when the economic system completely unravels and when that happens, millions of Americans who are currently obsessed with breads and circus spectacles, reality television and other junk will immediately become aware of how badly they’ve been screwed. They will direct their anger and outrage towards the federal government and this is why they are preparing for war against the American people. The chances of a civil war happening in the United States is unquestionably becoming a more likely possibility by the day especially when there is zero possibility of any real change happening in Washington DC.

 10 13 11 flagbar


For Land And Country

02/17/2013

02 16 13 For Land And Country

http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/

By Clint Richardson

What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?

For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.

The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.

The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.

The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legalsense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.

“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”

Confused? You are supposed to be.

Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?

“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.

“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380

From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:

Link: http://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/cftc-sees-dodd-frank-reforms-essential-to-reduce-future-risk.html

“International Coordination”

Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.

The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.

We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.

We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimesThe Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.

So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.

If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.

Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.

When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!

So how is this accomplished?

Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…

You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…

In the middle of America…

So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:

“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”

“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:

“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company,of its sovereign characterand takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that characterAs a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereigntyIt acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244

See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”

(Source:http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=507&invol=349)

According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:

“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created.Among the most important areimmortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetualconveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”

(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)

And this legal definition goes on to state:

Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”

And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:

CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interesthe will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation,unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.

(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)

Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).

Can you put the pieces together?

And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:

UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.

Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…

“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.

But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the peoplebut it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.

But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.

Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole CourtSo I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state.These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.

I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”

(Source:http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/54/case.html)

This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!

You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.

For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:

REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s,not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that “the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.

Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!

Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.

On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that aperson is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.“ –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government

And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:

“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”

Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?

Can you imagine…

You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.

Judge (as his gavel smashes down):Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

It goes on to say:

“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”

God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!

This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.

In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???

It states:

“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.

It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said soThey have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire faciaswas necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”

You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!

Judge: Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.

But listen to what was stated even later in this case:

“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence,their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”

Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?

Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts,  allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.

Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to  combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!

So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?

Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.

The “United States” is in the process of becoming  nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.

And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.

In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.

Is it only me that feels this way?

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

–Constitution of the united states of America

“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”

–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”

–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights

“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”

–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”

–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)

So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?

And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?

Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…

And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…

This is what you are truly fighting:

And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):

Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.

In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, February 11th, 2013

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

When one contemplates the logic of this essay and compares it to the impossibility of obtaining justice through lawful means, does that not lend credibility to the essay? We are swamped with reasons for our demise, but it all comes back to THERE IS NO LAWFUL MEANS FOR OUR DEFENSE. We are in the same boat as the framers, and rebellion is the only means left! God help us because the millions of ignorant Americans will support the enemy. What does it take to wake up the people?

10 13 11 flagbar

 


All Roads to Tyranny Begin With Control Over the Internet

02/17/2013

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/

By Dave Hodges

I have often said that  most Americans, seemingly oblivious to the tyrannical takeover of our government in Washington D.C.,  will indeed fight for three things (1) food and water; (2) the right to bear arms; and, (3) access to a free and uncontrolled internet.

The right to bear arms is under serious attack by various levels of government in this country. Our food and water supply are in the process of being horded by the global elite to the point that artificial shortages are in our near future. Most Americans remain oblivious to this plot and how far this plot has progressed to create huge price increases accompanied by artificially created shortages  (e.g. T. Boone Pickens buying up the Ogallalawater aquifer).

2-17-2013 8-27-07 AM

In the past 24 hours, much has been made about the newest attempt to control the internet because the powers that be don’t like the fact that many of us are being successful in waking up our fellow Americans as to the dangers posed by the criminal Obama administration and its unconstitutional policies. Subsequently, in the third leg of the complete subjugation of the American people, Obama is proposing a type of NDAA version of internet control in which one’s website could simply disappear, without due process, and the blogger could be fined and/or imprisoned.

This is not the first time that this criminal government has put the only version of non-censored content left in America under attack. Consider Senator John McCain’s actions over the past several years.

Minister of Propaganda John McCain

Once upon a time,  I received an invitation to attend a victory party in Memphis, for my part in opposing a draconian attempt to censor the internet. The part was to celebratea grassroots victory over a senate bill which would have gutted net neutrality and would have subsequently subjected internet users, internet businesses and internet “bloggers” to the censorship whims of various communications firms (e.g., Verizon Wireless, A T & T, Bell South, etc.).

Six years ago, a strong grassroots movement gathered nearly 2 million signatures and prevented the then lame-duck congress from privatizing the internet at the expense of the American public’s right to self-expression. However, that victory, was short-lived, thanks  to Arizona Senator, John McCain.

McCain Proposed Debtors Prison for Political Activists

At that time, John McCain had introduced a bill that would have fined bloggers up to $300,000 for “offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards”. McCain has publicly expressed his distaste for blogs in the past and this is why any protestation that he was simply aiming to “protect the children” with this legislation fell on deaf ears. His opposition largely to a free internet stemmed from the fact that many, including myself, have been critical of McCain’s in-laws and their past connections to organized crime which ultimately served to fund the rise of McCain’s political career. This fact alone, I believe, explains McCain’s obsession with gaining control over the internet.

McCain’s proposed legislation would have proven to be an effective control mechanism against free speech because comment boards are notoriously hard to moderate and the links are almost impossible to verify because they can change content after initial publication. Also, any site, such as mine, which are critical of criminal government policies,  could have become the target of covert government infiltration by a column of government agents which could have embedded controversial content on any undesirable site  This kind of reminds one of how Hitler burned down the Reichstag and blamed the communists as a means to gain control over the German government which ultimately led to the imposition of totalitarianism.

If the McCain flavor of censorship had passed, this legislation would have marked the end of previously unrestrained opinions. McCain’s proposed censorship hid behind the pretense of protecting children, would have wiped out self-expression on the internet.

McCain’s legislation was referred to as the “Stop the Online Exploitation of Our Children Act.” The legislation demanded that a Stalinist-type army of informants and spies would browse various websites looking for inappropriate internet material which might pose a threat to children. McCain’s internet army would have then passed the information on to the relevant police authorities and subsequent bloggers could be fined $300,000 or face jail time, thus, creating a version of an internet debtors prison .One oversight by the moderator, one day off from the internet, could have spelled doom for the financial future of a blogger. What citizen could have afforded to take that chance? Hence, your right to self-expression would have been sacrificed. Your first amendment right to self-expression is technically still intact. However, the personal affordability to exercise free speech would have been severely jeopardized

If either of these bills had passed, it would have marked the end of internet freedom as we know it today. Therefore, Obama’s most recent attempt to censor the internet is nothing new as it is merely an extension of what McCain began six years ago.

“They’re Back”

If only everybody watched and believed the CNN clown show of news, what a beautiful world it would be according to the globalists. Few citizens would be aware and nobody could effectively question the draconian agenda of the globalists as it is being directed towards humanity.

To that end, the Obama White House has announced the creation of a new interagency working group to address what it calls a growing problem. This new federal interagency group will be led by Quintan Wiktorowicz, who presently serves as the White House senior director for community partnerships on the national security staff. The new group will be called “The Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization” and will be tasked with the implementation of anInternet safety program to address online violent extremism. Wiktorowicz recently stated: “Violent extremist groups ─ like Al Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent “sovereign citizens” ─ are leveraging online tools and resources to propagate messages of violence and division. These groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potentialrecruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment efforts. Some members and supporters of these groups visit mainstream fora to see whether individuals might be recruited or encouraged to commit acts of violence, look for opportunities to draw targets into private exchanges, and exploit popular media like music videos and online video games. Although the Internet offers countless opportunities for Americans to connect, it has also provided violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”

If Wiktorowics were referring exclusively to terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, then no red flags would be raised whatsoever concerning the new program. But he never specified nor defined terms such as “violent supremacist groups” or “violent sovereign citizens.”

“Violent extremist groups ─ like Al Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent “sovereign citizens” ─ are leveraging online tools and resources to propagate messages of violence and division. These groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potential recruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment efforts. Some members and supporters of these groups visit mainstream fora to see whether individuals might be recruited or encouraged to commit acts of violence, look for opportunities to draw targets into private exchanges, and exploit popular media like music videos and online video games. Although the Internet offers countless opportunities for Americans to connect, it has also provided violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”

Wiktorowics is not referring to al Qaeda. He specifically uses the term “violent sovereign citizens.” The term “sovereign citizen” is something that I have previously warned the American public about. You would be wise to visit the following link about what constitutes a dangerous“sovereign citizen” according to this criminal government. This term is already being used by Larimer County, Colorado Eight Circuit Judge,Julie Field, as the justification to steal the child of Stacy Lynne for her activism in her community against an attempted Agenda 21 takeover.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has raised red flags on several occasions as their internal memos referring to conservative Christians who believe the Bible, pro-life citizens who are against abortion, Tea Party activists, Ron Paul supporters, Libertarians, Constitutionalists and political conservatives who believe in a strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as “potential homegrown terrorists.” I believe that these groups, and more, will be the target of Obama’s latest imitation of Stalin.

2-17-2013 8-27-59 AM

This internet censorship intentions of Obama is not about preventing terrorism, this is about shutting you and I up and these policies represents a resurrection of John McCain’s attempt to stop journalists from speaking about the criminal past of his political benefactors which happens to come from his in-laws. In a similar vein, Obama is no doubt tired of seeing the name Barry Sotero in print. Obama has grown weary of reading about his real father, Frank Davis, and the fact that he was a porno producing pervert who happened to occupy a prominent position in the American Communist Party. Obama is tired about reading about his exploits in helping to secure federal funds for Valerie Jarrett when she was Chicago’squeen of the slumlords. But most of all, Obama wants to squelch the internet warning messages which serve to alert the American public as to his intentions of destroying America as we know it and then replacing it with a communist dictatorship which will be devoid of all of our civil liberties. The internet is Obama’s opposition of command and control. Command and control if an enemy is always the first target when a military target is being attacked.

DO YOU NOW UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK BY A CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT?

The Road to Tyranny, Let Me Count the Ways

The Obama administration has declared war upon the Second Amendment through advocating for extreme gun control. This modern day version of the Sheriff of Nottingham has also eviscerated the Fifth Amendment through the passage and the implementation of the NDAA which allows for secret arrests without due process of law. The Sixth and Eighth Amendments are also gone under this President  as evidenced by the fact that this lunatic is directly responsible for themurder of three U.S. citizens that we know of under the NDAA and through the use of drones on Americans. And now, Obama has his sites set on the First Amendment.

What Is a Good Citizen To Do?

Americans must become self-sufficient with regard to food and water to avoid having these essentials used against an uncooperative public as happened in the former Soviet Union. As you may recall, Stalin starved 20 million Ukrainians to death for opposing his tyranny.

2-17-2013 8-28-28 AM

Americans must never surrender their guns, under any circumstances, lest we become vulnerable to attack by the Obama Brown Shirts. However, without free use of the internet, our ability to mount a massive counter movement in opposition to the tyranny which has become pervasive in this country, is seriously compromised. It could, however, be argued that the Founding Fathers launched a successful revolution against  the Crown without the internet. They used the Committees of Correspondence and simple work of mouth. We do have some electronic options available as well. For example, I believe that many of us could become proficient with Shortwave radio as a means to communicate. We can still text and send images via our cell phones. And we could engage in civil disobedience (e.g. mass refusal to pay taxes). We could begin to broadcast from primitively constructed pirate radio stations.

I think Obama and his fellow communists are going to find that stamping out the word of freedom is more difficult than they realize.

 10 13 11 flagbar


ALL WARS ARE BANKERS WARS!

02/15/2013

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php

 NEW! PODCAST OF ‘ALL WARS ARE BANKERS WARS’ FROM JANUARY 14TH, 2013 RADIO SHOW.

Authors Name Not Published

I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III’s Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing bank notes.

“The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the revolution.” — Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to acquire your wealth, and know full well how easy it is to corrupt a nation’s leaders. Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws”, the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild’s chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton. Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the nation’s economy, while enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled their intention to go back to a state issued value based currency on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild against the US Government, “Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!” Financed by the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Britain then launched the war of 1812 to recolonize the United States and force them back into the slavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United States into so much debt they would be forced to accept a new private central bank. And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank issuing the public currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United States. Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation’s money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many British and American soldiers had to die for it.

Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, and poverty by the predations of the private central bank, and in 1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term as President under the slogan, “Jackson And No Bank!” True to his word, Jackson succeeds in blocking the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.

“Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!” — Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States. From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson (February 1834), according to Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkels

Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President to actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second Bank of the United States, there was an attempted assassination which failed when both pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire. Lawrence later said that with Jackson dead, “Money would be more plenty.”

Of course, the public school system is as subservient to the bankers’ wishes to keep certain history from you, just as the corporate media is subservient to Monsanto’s wishes to keep the dangers of GMOs from you, and the global warming cult’s wishes to conceal from you that the Earth has actually been cooling for the last 16 years. Thus is should come as little surprise that much of the real reasons for the events of the Civil War are not well known to the average American.

When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln’s efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at 30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

“If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” — The London Times responding to Lincoln’s decision to issue government Greenbacks to finance the Civil War, rather than agree to private banker’s loans at 30% interest.

In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed government-issued money (Lincoln’s greenbacks).

“Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such prominent daily and weekly newspapers… as will oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are not willing to oppose the Government issue of money.Let the Government issue the coin and the banks issue the paper moneyof the country…[T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money, will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders.” — Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

“It will not do toallow the greenback, as it is called, to circulateas money any length of time, as we cannotcontrol that.” — Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

“Slavery is likely to be abolished by the warpower, and chattel slavery destroyed. This, Iand my European friends are in favor of, forslavery is but the owning of labor and carrieswith it the care for the laborer, while theEuropean plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages.THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLINGTHE MONEY.” — Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on. Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war, and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing greenbacks. Following Lincoln’s assassination, the Greenbacks were pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at interest from the private bankers.

Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply once again under the control of private bankers. Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to “The Federal Reserve” system in order to grant the new bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more “Federal” than Federal Express. Indeed, in 2012, the Federal Reserve successfully rebuffed a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom of Information Act did not apply to the operations of the Federal Reserve. 1913 proved to be a transformative year for the nation’s economy, first with the passage of the 16th “income tax” Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.

“I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment.” – U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a private bank. But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for generous campaign contributions. Wilson later regretted that decision.

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” — Woodrow Wilson 1919

The next year, World War One started, and it is important to remember that prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world war.

World War One started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not unlike the present day United States). Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, it was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable levels. Under government control, investment was guaranteed to internal economic development, and Germany was seen as a major power. So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the prime opponent of World War One, and not just defeated, but its industrial base flattened. Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even though Germany had not actually started the war. This amounted to three times the value of all of Germany itself. Germany’s private central bank, to whom Germany had gone deeply into debt to pay the costs of the war, broke free of government control, and massive inflation followed (mostly triggered by currency speculators) , permanently trapping the German people in endless debt.

When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it opened the door for the National Socialists to take power. Their first financial move was to issue their own state currency which was not borrowed from private central bankers. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry. The media called it “The German Miracle”. TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement in life for the German people and the explosion of German industry, and even named him TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938.

 

Once again, Germany’s industrial output became a threat to Great Britain.

“Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain.” – Winston Churchill in The Times (1919) 

“We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.” – Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

“Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it.” – Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US – General Robert E. Wood)

“This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” – Winston Churchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast)

Germany’s state-issued value based currency was also a direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could break free of private central bankers!

As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany’s economic power looked for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse. Years later, in a spirit of candor, the real reasons for that war were made clear.

“The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.”– Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946) 

“Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit anymore. …We butchered the wrong pig.” -Winston Churchill (The Second World War – Bern, 1960)

As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany. And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their business interests than Roosevelt’s “New Deal” which threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the working and middle class of America. So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead theoverthrow of the US Government and install a “Secretary of General Affairs” who would be answerable to Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest and shut down all labor unions. General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act. When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their friends on Wall Street would deliberatly collapse the still-fragile economy and blame Roosevelt for it. Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the Trading With The Enemy act. The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally released in 1967 and became the inspiration for the movie, “Seven Days in May” but with the true financial villains erased from the script.

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country’s most agile military force — the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of my time being a high–class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. “I suspected I was just a part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service. Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents.” — General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant,1935

As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.

Kennedy’s United States Notes were not borrowed form the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do. All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three, we need to examine the financial dimensions behind the wars.

Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance. The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world’s “go-to” currency, Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946. The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency, obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax. That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold at $35 per ounce.

Of course, the Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper dollars, and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was the result of foreign nations’ obligations to accept the paper notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce. Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which real French products like wine and cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate. Of course, the United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon “temporarily” suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve Notes. This “Nixon shock” effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from the US dollar. Worse, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the nation’s gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that the US Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts. Foreign nations began to get very nervous about their loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any additional money to the United States without some form of collateral. So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as “wilderness zones”, Roadless areas”, Heritage rivers”, “Wetlands”, all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the American people who were technically the owners of those lands. But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to foreign lenders as collateral on the government’s debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.

With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging international demand for the dollar. The United States approached the world’s oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In exchange for only selling their oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations. The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in particular in US Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers. The concept was labeled the “petrodollar”. In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now backing it with oil. Other peoples’ oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has shaped America’s foreign policy in the region ever since.

But as America’s manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other than real estate) anyone wanted to buy. Europe’s cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy US food exports. Israel’s constant belligerence against its neighbors caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep their end of the petrodollar arrangement. Oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to use. Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in 2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the “Oil for food” program instituted following Desert Storm. One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq, lynched Saddam Hussein, and placed Iraq’s oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace in the Mideast to one of unquestioned support for Israel’s aggressions only further eroded confidence in the Petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations started openly talking of oil trade for other global currencies.

Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar. Gaddafi announced that Libya’s oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi ( the object lesson of Saddam’s lynching not being enough of a message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya’s oil output to dollars only. The gold that was to have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.

According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the “dollarification” of the world’s oil nations included seven targets, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran (Venezuela, which dared to sell their oil to China for the Yuan, is a late addition). What is notable about the original seven nations originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of the Bank for International Settlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland. This meant that these nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations’ economies, rather than submit to the international private banks.

Now the bankers’ gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever currency they choose. The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran’s oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a privately owned central bank.

The German government recently asked for the return of some of their gold bullion from the Bank of France and the New York Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return Germany’s gold. The United States has said they will need 8 years to return Germany’s gold. This suggests strongly that the Bank of France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold for other purposes, and they are scrambling to find new gold to cover the shortfall and prevent a gold run. So it is inevitable that suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just happens to be one of the world’s largest gold producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the bankers does not get more obvious than that!

You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (they haven’t; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected government ofMohammad Mosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile’s democratically elected government of President Salvador Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as “crazed lone nuts” to obscure the real agenda.

The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation. That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with which to pay that debt. Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the owners of the Private Central Bank. The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is suppoed to be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of. The same was true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick people into obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate. Now we are entering a time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate. It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be.

But understand this above all; Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper, and the right bribe to the right official.

Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition that the people of a nation be enslaved to the private central banks. Failing that, said ruler will be killed, and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

The so-called “clash of civilizations” we read about on the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it. Indeed the constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in a simple fact. Like the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights Templars private banking system) , Muslims forbid usury, or the lending of money at interest. And that is the reason our government and media insist they must be killed or converted. They refuse to submit to currencies issued at interest. They refuse to be debt slaves.

So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies’ gold. We barely survived the last two world wars. In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their greed?

Apparently so.

Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed and croppled for. The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced deeper and deeper into debt. When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow more to keep the pyramid scheme working. When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow more to rebuild. When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far larger and everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding the rise of Adolf Hitler.

As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will be poverty, hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificed in flames to Mammon.

The path to true peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and a return to the state-issued value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 


The Real State of the Union for February 12 2013

02/15/2013

http://johngaltfla.com/wordpress/2013/02/12/the-real-state-of-the-union-for-february-12-2013/

2-15-2013 10-16-24 AM

by John Galt
February 12, 2013 22:05 ET

Instead of the traditional Republi con versus Demo liar debate which ensues for theatrics on cable news, I thought a more prudent analysis of the State of the Union after Obama’s first term is much more appropriate and realistic as to where our nation is going in the future. Thus I present the following commentary on the State of the Union for the United States of America by analyzing our Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution and their status as of tonight.

1st Amendment:

Condition: Critical

With the repeal of the Zorinsky Amendment to the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, odds are it is only a matter of time when a national emergency is created or declared leaving the government an alleged no choice but to force mainstream and internet broadcaster to either abide by the dictates of the Federal Government regarding content and carrying the broadcasting arm of the Feds or be shut down. The newspapers are already in line and willing to force content on users without regard to accuracy or bias and television, be it cable or broadcast, is no longer a vast wasteland but a willing servant to the political and corporate elites. The silencing of the masses must occur via the seizure of mainstream radio broadcasting and the internet and with the current regime in power, there is little doubt that it is a matter of when, not if.

2nd Amendment:

Condition: Critical

The assault on the right to keep and bear arms started in 2008 but has accelerated to a point where formerly mainstream pundits on conservative commentators have now openly stated that the threat of gun confiscation is now a real possibility. Law abiding citizens are now being called baby killers and mass murders for criminal events that have no relation to the reality of John Q. Public buying a pistol or rifle to protect their family. Wild ideas are being tossed up into the air randomly fromtax credits for turning in firearms to mandatory liability insurance for purchasing firearms. There will be a conflict in the future which brings this issue to a full resolution, sadly it appears to be following the path of other authoritarian regimes throughout history.

3rd Amendment:

Condition: Stable

While there is no consideration or threat of quartering troops in the homes of citizens at this time, do not be surprised if this regime concocts a plan to accelerate foreclosures, be they legal or not, to provide compensation to soldiers as they return or retire with an adequate number of years of service. The administration will have to consider something after the upcoming cut in pay and benefits is implemented and conditions deteriorate for the servicemen and women worldwide.

4th Amendment:

Condition: Dead

There is very little chance that this portion of the Constitution will be saved in anyone’s lifetime who is over forty years of age.

5th Amendment:

Condition: Dead

Excerpt from the 5th Amendment:

… nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process     of  law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The reality? Without due process a citizen’s own private thoughts NOT broadcast via the internet, but possibly intercepted via PRIVATE telephone conversations can and are being used to prosecute Americans in violation of this Amendment and the 4th. Property is seized via roadblocks, checkpoints, and via Eminent Domain without due process nor compensation. Yet the masses remain silent as the “War on Terror” continues its horrific track record as a war on freedom killing few terrorists on American soil.

6th Amendment:

Condition: Dead

The end of America is nigh when a President can order the interception of all personal data without a warrant and prosecuted without ever meeting his or hers accusers. The secret juries, unlawful arrests, use of emergency powers to detain citizens and deny them a speedy trial along with facing or using witnesses is only further proof that the current State of our Nation is critical heading towards dictatorship.

7th Amendment:

Condition: Dead

Truly a sad day when some small awards are won by the common man only to be defied by courts sold to the highest bidder. There are now cases reported on an almost daily basis where mega-corporations working with the political elites defeat legitimate civil court cases making a mockery of this Amendment. If anyone doubts this idea, review the General Motors and Chrysler cases where the Supreme Court refused to hear the cases under the 4th and 7th Amendment appeals nor allow for a jury trial for the plaintiffs when the U.S. Government illegally seized their property (corporate bonds and preferred stocks) without much more than a cursory hearing to advise them to shut up or else.

8th Amendment:

Condition: Dead

Crazy talk about this portion dying also? Hardly. Now the President or an “informed” minion can order an American citizen terminated or detained without due process.

Not so crazy now, is it?

9th Amendment:

Condition: Serious

The Constitution was originally created to protect all of the rights of the people, be they citizens or not within the borders of this nation. However the use of other laws, regulations, and orders created by the government over the last four years, if not the past decade also, have infringed on the rights of all people within this nation and this portion of the Constitution appears doomed to the memories of history books soon to banned or restricted from the masses and reserved for the privileged few.

10th Amendment:

Condition: Critical

God help us all when this Amendment falls, which apparently Obamacare and the new regulatory provisions dreamed up by the President’s cabinet departments are intending to accelerate. The American people think that power emanates from Washington, D.C. now and have no clue that this Amendment was designed to blunt the power of Federalism and worse, authoritarianism. The evolution of the military-industrial complex has now been replaced the greater threat, the paramilitary-financial complex, a dangerous threat to every citizen’s rights and the ability of the states to defend those freedoms intended by our Founders to be protected by the individual states.

In summation, and in this author’s opinion, the condition of a free, civil, and Constitutional United States of America can be summed up in one word:

Critical.

Once it dies, some of us will look fondly back on the memories of freedom and our Founders and not the new version created in a movie studio by propagandists working at the behest of our national government.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

When the pigs are at your door, armed and ready to kill you and your family, will you fight to the death, or get down on your knees and beg for mercy? I pray you will never have to experience that, but if you elect to beg for your life, you are not an American regardless of where you were born, and I am ashamed of you!

Think of all of the millions of men who have died to provide freedom for you. Think of what a miserable life you will have living under tyranny. Think of what your soul will encounter in the next life. OR, have you already decided there is no GOD? A man with no courage is the most miserable of all God’s creatures.

10 13 11 flagbar


Where Does The Hatred Of Constitutionalism Come From?

02/13/2013

2-12-2013 8-17-09 AM

The Constitution of the United States is an undeniably powerful document.  So powerful in fact, that it took establishment elitists with aspirations of globalized governance over a century to diminish the American people’s connection to it.  It’s been a long time coming, but in the new millennium, there is now indeed a subsection of the masses that not only have no relationship to our founding roots, they actually despise those of us who do!

There are a number of reasons for this dangerous development in our culture:  A public school system that rarely if ever teaches children about the revolution, the founders, constitutional liberty, or the virtues of individualism in general.  A mainstream media apparatus that has regurgitated endless anti-constitutional shlock for decades, attacking any person or group that presents a freedom oriented view.  And a governmental structure that has become so corrupt, so openly criminal, that they ignore all aspects of constitutional law without regard, rarely feeling the need to explain themselves.  As a people, we are surrounded daily by the low droning wash-talk of denigration and disdain for our principled foundations.  The wretched ghosts of collectivism and tyranny mumble in our ears from birth to death.  It’s truly a miracle that every man and woman in this nation has not succumbed to the mind numbing hypnotism…

However, our propaganda soaked environment is not the ONLY cause of our self destructive society; many people are themselves to blame.  Severe character flaws and psychological imbalances have left some open to suggestion, manipulation, and fraud.  Their hatred, though fueled in part by the socialization of the establishment, is still theirs to own.

The brutal ignorance on display in mainstream circles against the liberty-minded needs to be addressed.  In my view, the American public is being conditioned to see us as a convenient “enemy” which they can use to project all their internal grief and woe.  Our country is on the verge of collapse, economically, politically, and philosophically.  Corporatized elements of our government and the financial high priests of the international banking sector are behind this calamity, and of course, they don’t plan to take responsibility.  Who better to demonize as the catalyst for all the pain that is coming than the only people who have the awareness and the means to stand against the catastrophe?

There is no doubt in my mind that a great conflict is near, between those of us who value liberty and constitutional protections, and those who would destroy them.  This battle is unlikely to be solved with words.  The anti-constitutionalist rhetoric is becoming so ruthless, so malicious, that it can only lead to a hardening of our own hearts, and an equally forceful response.

Most of us have seen all the mainstream magazines with front page headlines calling for the retirement of the Constitution.  Most of us know about the suggestions by media entities and political opportunists (including Joe Biden) for Barack Obama to bypass congress and the Constitution, implementing possible gun restriction, registration, and confiscation through “executive order” like a common dictator.  There is an obviously brash and violent effort amongst political players today to mold our government into a godlike entity.  But, this is not what concerns me most.  What concerns me is the subversive boiling poison that is leaking into our culture at the local level, creating freedom hating zombies.  Take, for instance, the anti-constitutionalist crusade by a New Hampshire representative against the New Hampshire Free State Project:

What causes someone to hate freedom-loving people so much that they would destroy their own liberties just to drive us away?  Is this not cutting off their own nose just to spite OUR face?  Or, do they even see the loss of freedom for themselves as a bad thing?

And how about Marine Corporal Joshua Boston, who after sending a letter to Dianne Feinstein stating he would not comply with unconstitutional gun restrictions, is now receiving death threats because of his membership in the NRA:

What is the source of the hatred towards constitutionalists?  Where does it originate?  Here are just some of the personal triggers and methodologies within the mind of the anti-freedom advocate which I believe have sullied them beyond repair…

The Anti-Constitutionalist Suffers From An Inferiority Complex

I have found in my role as a Liberty Movement analyst and through literally tens of thousands of debates that anti-constitution advocates are, for the most part, of limited intelligence.  These are the average useful idiots who know little of history, politics, economics, etc., but feel the desperate need to appear as though they are experts on everything.  This usually results in constant attempts to show off for anyone who will pay attention, usually with sound-bites they heard on the nightly news coupled with remedial attacks against the character of those who dare to step outside the mainstream.

The problem is that deep down, they know they are not very bright.  And so, they seek to always travel with the herd on every issue, for if they cannot be smart, they can at least be accepted.  Ironically, if constitutionalism was being pushed by the mainstream, they would automatically change their tune.

It is probable that they have run into a Liberty Movement proponent (most of whom are well versed in history, politics, and economics) at least once in their lives, went in for an attack, and were utterly destroyed.  Their inferiority exposed, they learn to detest anything associated with constitutionalism.

The Anti-Constitutionalist Does Not Like The Idea Of A Law He Cannot Use To His Advantage

Not all anti-constitutionalists are dense.  A limited few are very intelligent, but morally bankrupt.  The Constitution is not just a legal document; it is also an emotional and spiritual document.  If one does not have a relationship with his own conscience and the concept of natural law, then he will discover little in the founding ideals of America that he agrees with.  Some people (usually corrupt politicians and judges) see the law as a weapon to be used against their ideological opponents, whereas constitutionalists see the law as a shield to protect us from such despots.  The Constitution and the Bill Of Rights are both designed to protect our Absolute Freedoms.  That is, freedoms that are inborn and which no person or government is qualified to give as a gift, or take as if they are a privilege.

Nothing angers those who seek power more than a legal framework which they are not allowed to touch, or shift, or “tweak” to suit their private ambitions.

Constitutional protections are not meant to be subject to the “buts” and “what ifs” common in the lesser legal world.  They are not open to debate.  Our rights are not subject to the demands of the so-called “majority”.  Our rights are eternal, and unchangeable.  Anti-constitutionalists attempt to work around the absolutes of the document by implementing subversive law backed by flawed logic.  But, a law which destroys previous constitutional rights is not a law which any individual American is required to follow.  Even an amendment that undermines our civil liberties is not legally binding.  The freedoms put forth in the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights are SET IN STONE (and this includes the right to bear arms in common use of the military of our day).  They cannot be undone without destroying the very fabric of the republic.

The Anti-Constitutionalist Hates Those Who Go Against The Tide, Even If The Tide Is Drowning Us All

Some people are predisposed to be followers.  They do not want to take responsibility for their futures or even their own actions.  They do not like questions.  They do not like dilemmas.  They want to be left to wallow in their own private prisons, where they are comfortably enslaved.

I remember participating in an End The Fed rally in Pittsburgh in early 2008 which was, like most activist rallies, meant to expose the uneducated public to ideas they may not have heard before.  I found it interesting that around a quarter of the people who strolled by our picket line automatically sneered, as if by reflex, even though they had probably never heard our position, or even heard of the Fed.  It dawned on me that they were not angered by our political or economic views.  Instead they were angered by the mere fact that we were there.  We were vocal, and defiant, and a disruption to their daily robot-like routine.  They hated us because we were ruining their fantasy of disconnectedness.

Constitutionalists are predominantly individualists.  We do not cater to collectivist fairy tales.  We do not seek to roll with the tide just for the sake of finding our “place” within the machine.  We do not care about “fitting in” with the mainstream.  This is often confounding and infuriating to those who have labored their whole lives to please “the group”.  They accuse us of being “isolationists” in response.  What they do not comprehend is that illusion and delusion have isolated THEM, while the truth has brought constitutionalists together.

Constitutionalists Are Not Politically Correct 

For the past few decades our society has become engrossed with the idea of “proper language and behavior”.  Of course, their idea of “proper” usually involves ignoring the reality of a thing.  For a Constitutionalist, a spade is a spade, and we tend to call it like we see it.  We don’t bother ourselves with superficial niceties that get in the way of legitimate debate or legitimate change.  We are not “pleasant” and tolerant with those who would kill our freedoms.   We do not pull punches.

We are direct, and sometimes, brutal in our analysis.

In some parts of the Western world (especially the UK) language has become a game, a game of self censorship and deceit.  This game has made its way to the United States in recent years, and Constitutionalists don’t play.  We know that every overtly collectivist society begins with the fear of open expression.  And so, our blunt honesty rattles those invested in the PC culture.  Their ultimate and ideal revenge would be to see us painted as social malcontents; like people who smoke in public, or wear a mullet…

Constitutionalists Are Passionate In Their Beliefs 

A large percentage of men and women in this world have never been truly passionate about anything.  They simply eat, breath, and defecate their way through life, scrounging about the squalor of a broken system for whatever brief moments of comfort they can find.  They have never explored their inner workings or suffered the hardship of individuation.  They have never been forced to seek out an inner strength, a personal treasure, which guides them to a greater purpose.  Everything they think they believe in has been conditioned into them.  Their uniqueness is suppressed, and their characters shallow.  They have never loved an idea, or a principle.

Constitutionalists LOVE liberty and the mechanics of freedom.  We love the values of a sovereign republic and the opportunities that such a system provides when collectivists are removed from the picture.  There is no question or doubt in our minds; we would fight and die to protect the pillars of the Constitution.

When confronted with this kind of passion, the average person is shocked and sometimes appalled.  The idea of unshakable will is frightening to them.  They are so used to compromising in every aspect of their lives that when they run into an uncompromising man, they reel in horror.

That which they see as “fanaticism” is instead an excitement, a boundless joy, a fervent desire to protect something universal and precious.  What they see as “extreme”, we see as essential.

The Anti-Constitutionalist Thinks He Knows What’s Best For All Of Us

Most people who seek to deny and destroy constitutional liberties tend to lean towards a collectivist philosophy.  They are usually socialist, or a variation (Marxist, Fascist), and can be professed members of either major political party.  They believe that their vision of a perfect cultural system is the “correct” vision.  They see the Constitution as “archaic” or “outdated”.  They see it as nothing more than an obstacle to progress which must be toppled.

The “perfect world” that the collectivist strives for functions on centralization: the removal of options until there are no choices left for the common man except those which the collectivist wants him to have.  This world usually suffers from limited free speech, limited civic participation, zero tolerance for dissent, near zero privacy from government eyes, a completely disarmed populous, unaccountable leadership, and the encouragement of informer networks and betrayal for profit.  The goal is to intimidate the whole of a nation into dependence on the system, until every necessity from food to self defense is parceled out by the state.

Collectivists understand one thing very clearly; an America without the Constitution is destined to become a centralized country.

They will, of course, claim this is a gross exaggeration.  They will claim that this time will be different.  That the collectivist experiments of the past, which produced nothing but destruction and genocide of their own populations, are nothing similar to what they are espousing.  They will pretend as if their vision is new, progressive, and far more practical than the vision of the Founding Fathers.   In the end though, all they are promoting is a system as old as history; the feudal kingdom.  The mercantile oligarchy.  The militarized state.

At the height of their vicious sabotage of the republic, they will demonize our very heritage, claiming that it was a sham.  That we were never able to “live up to our beliefs anyway”.  That we are “hypocrites”, and this somehow negates the reverence we give to the Constitution.  Unfortunately for them, we know better.  We understand that the principles of the Constitution are not something we grasp at all times, but rather, something to which we aspire to, and grow into as our nation matures.  They require patience, and wisdom.  They force us to question our own “brilliance”, and our own egos.  They anchor us, preventing us from being swept away in the storms of fear.

There has never been and there will never be a better method of law and governance than that method which defends the individualism and freedom of the people.  The most fantastic of human accomplishments, in technology as well as in philosophy, spring from the nurturing waters of liberty.  Free minds and hearts create.  They refuse to be contained, and the Constitution gives us license to ensure that they will never be contained, even to the point of revolution.

To deny constitutionalism, is to endorse oppression.  May we forever rebel against the agents of “progress”.  May we forever give them something to hate.

10 13 11 flagbar