By Anna Von Reitz
When dealing with the Federales it is important to remember that all their forms and all their communications are written from their perspective. Thus, when they say “domestic” they are talking about “domestic” with respect to them and their jurisdiction. We are “non-domestic” and “alien” with respect to them.
This results in some very odd ways of referring to us in their Federal Code — for example, calling us “non-resident aliens” in the Tax Code. They are saying that you are not naturally within their jurisdiction. You don’t live in their territory and are foreign with respect to them.
The same applies with courts and juries. They, strictly speaking, have no ability or reason to address you unless you are a Federal employee or dependent. They cannot provide a jury of your peers and have no right to subject you to any of their statutory laws or codes, unless you trespass upon their turf—and what constitutes their turf is highly arguable.
For example, federal highways might in some circumstances be considered within their enforcement area, but since we hold the international land jurisdiction there are vast stretches of interstate highway where they have no business addressing you and your vehicle at all.
They might have a proprietary interest in a Federal Game Management Area, but two steps away on state land, have no authority at all.
We used to be far more aware of these niceties, but we have in recent years suffered “area creep” as the Federales have secretively sought to claim jurisdiction over more and more land and more facilities that are in fact ours and owed to us.
We should not be asleep and allow them to declare all these local, county, and state properties to be federal areas in any sense. This simply adds layers of government to our land and our lives that we do not want or need, but which we get stuck paying for.
They have a motive for extending their service areas and in view of the extra costs and often unwelcome extension of their statutory codes and regulations, we have motive to restrict them. Afterall, do we really need city, county, state, and federal government all “serving” one little spot in Kansas?
Probably not, but like high-pressure magazine salesmen, they will be there “serving” you, if you do not object and they will constantly expand the range of their services, too, so that they can tax you more and exert more power over you and your neighbors.
As I was saying yesterday, people desperately need to start thinking of government in terms of business. It’s here to “serve” you and it is up to you to firmly declare when you have been “served” enough. It’s also up to you to put your foot down and declare where their limits are.
For example, the Municipal United States Government — the oligarchy allowed to Congress which is allowed to rule over the District of Columbia by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of their Constitution– is clearly supposed to be limited to the ten square miles set aside for it.
But thanks to “area creep” they have created entire Municipal STATES OF STATES for themselves and extended their Municipal laws and services all over our states, and then charged us for this “service” and sought to impose all their regulations on us, too.
Well, we can argue all day over whether this is “constitutional” or not, but the quickest way to put an end to it, is to point out that they are vastly overstepping their service area and that we won’t pay for their services and won’t recognize their jurisdiction as anything applicable to us.
This deprives them of both of their prime motivations to be on our land in the first place— which is to charge us for more “services” and gain coercive power over us on a local level.
If we wake up and say, sorry, not paying for it, and furthermore, not subject to it, they are forced to pay for their own activities and their municipal courts— which make their money by enforcing regulations that no average American is subject to — naturally dwindle and die.
Not only do our purses get a break, we can breathe easier, too, and stop worrying about the latest anti-chewing gum laws and federal employee nose-hair regulations.
Just as we deal with obnoxious salesmen trying to sell us other products we don’t want or need, curtailing all this inappropriate and unwanted “government” activity starts with telling the purveyors one little word —- “No.”
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here:
06 14 18 The Kingdom of the Dead
By Anna Von Reitz
My recent article about the Queen occupying The Chair of the Estates really hit a nerve, and apparently most people in the English-speaking world were totally unaware that the Queen has been occupying a different office other than the one required by The Coronation Oath all these years—-though that has to be apparent in retrospect, with or without John Anthony Hill.
I have examined the evidence, too, and it is incontrovertible.
The Queen took the Oath and three days later broke it, on the record. This had the effect of “killing” her role and rule as Christian Monarch and ended her obligation to fulfill the Public Law and her vows made in apparent Bad Faith to the people of the United Kingdom.
Instead of operating in the capacity of Elizabeth the Second, she has been operating in the “dead” corporate capacity of ELIZABETH II. Her Consort, Prince Philip has similarly been operating in a dead corporate capacity for sixty years.
Her chosen Office since then has involved creating bogus claims of abandonment against the land jurisdiction owed to the States and People of the actual United States, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere, while her husband’s role has been to profit from the creation of equally bogus Cestui Que Vie estate trusts, Public Transmitting Utilities, Wards of the State, and similar “derivatives” that yield among other benefits profit from insurance and bottomry bond scams such as “Life Force Value Annuities” that are in fact owed to us and to our ancestors.
Every office and entity is dead or presumed to be dead in this entire matrix of falsehoods and illusions. This is very convenient for the criminals involved in profiteering from this, as the dead cannot defend themselves, cannot be heard in court and cannot bring any claim or complaint against the perpetrators of these vile schemes.
Also, in the case of “dead” corporations and all legal fictions, such as public and private corporate offices, there is no law against any of the most terrible offenses we conceive of. You can murder a corporation and drink its blood, you can rape and strangle a corporation, you can draw and quarter a corporation, you can steal from a corporation and trespass upon it with impunity. You can enslave a corporation and require it to perform in any way you wish.
This, of course, gives the criminals motive to do what they have done to mischaracterize and impersonate and enfranchise billions of people, rendering them all subjects and legal fiction entities in their Kingdom of the Dead—all as an excuse to also pretend that we are not flesh and blood and are not the natural owners of our Trade Names and are in fact dead legal fiction entities subject to criminal abuse and mistreatment at the hands of their henchmen and Priests of the Dead operating the Bar Associations.
Time to break the spell, and become not only alive, but truly aware of the entrenched evil infesting high places.
This evil has been ensconced in the Holy See and in Westminster and in Buckingham Palace where it has silently grown like a cancer for generations, in all the royal houses of Europe it has threaded its web, and those who would not succumb to it — like Czar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm II and Prince Frederick and Princess Diana, they have murdered and warred upon.
This is, in the end, a spiritual war, which must be won in the spirit and in the flesh. Only by steadfastly honoring the Truth and honoring each other can we win. Only by establishing our eternal wisdom, strength, resolve, and determination to have, be, and do what is right, can we overcome. We must reach very deep in our souls and accept the burden of knowing how banal evil is, how mundane its methods, how insidious its creep. And we must oppose it with all our will and all our wit and all our vigilance.
Who could imagine on June 5, 1953 that the radiant young Queen, crowned only three days before, would declaim her true crown and birthright?
Was she perhaps as clueless and misled and misinformed as everyone else?
If these outrages should stand, and the Throne of the United Kingdom be thus dishonored and cast aside—what can it mean for her Successors?
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: