15 Signs That We Live During A Time Of Rampant Government Paranoia

10/30/2014

by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,

How does it feel to live under a government that is getting even more paranoid with each passing day?  Yes, we live in a world that is becoming increasingly unstable, but that is no excuse for how ultra-paranoid the federal government has become.  Today, every single one of us is viewed as a “potential threat” by the government.  As a result, the government feels the need to intercept our emails, record our phone calls and track our expenditures.  But they aren’t just spying on individuals.  The government keeps tabs on thousands of organizations all over the planet, it spies on our enemies and our allies, and it even spies on itself. The American people are told that the emerging Big Brother police state is for our safety, but the truth is that it isn’t there to protect us.  It is there to protect them.  Our government has become kind of like a crazy rich uncle that is constantly spying on everyone else in the family because he believes that they are “out to get him”.  The following are 15 signs that we live during a time of rampant government paranoia…

#1 Former CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson says that the federal government was so concerned about her reporting on Benghazi, Fast and Furious and other Obama scandals that they hacked her computer, monitored every keystroke and even planted classified material in an apparent attempt to potentially frame her.

#2 The United States has become the nation of the “permanent emergency”.  In fact, there has been at least one “state of emergency” in effect in this country since 1979.

#3 In America today, almost everyone is considered to be a criminal.  At this point, nearly one out of every three Americans has a file in the FBI’s master criminal database.

#4 Most people don’t realize this, but the FBI also systematically records talk radio programs.  The FBI says that it is looking for “potential evidence”.

#5 In Wisconsin, 24 armed police officers are an armored military vehicle were recently sent to collect a civil judgment from a 75-year-old retiree.  It is being reported that officials feared that he might be “ argumentative“.

#6 According to guidelines that were recently made public, purchasing Amtrak train tickets with cash is considered to be “ suspicious activity” and needs to be reported to the authorities.

#7 The IRS can now seize your bank accounts on suspicion alone.  If you are successful fighting the IRS in court, you might get your money back years later.

#8 Thousands of Americans have their mail spied on by the U.S. Postal Service.  If you are on “the list”, all of your mail and packages are shown to a supervisor before they are delivered to you.

#9 Most people don’t realize that the U.S. border is now considered to be a “Constitution-free zone” where officials can freely grab your computer and copy your hard drive.

#10 The feds have apparently become extremely concerned about what all of us are saying on the Internet.  In fact, they have even been caught manipulating discussions on Reddit and editing Wikipedia.

#11 The U.S. government has become so paranoid that it even spies on our European allies.  Needless to say, our allies over in Europe are quite upset about this but we continue to do it.

#12 To the government, each citizen is a “potential threat”, and this justifies the militarization of our entire society.  The following is an excerpt from an excellent commentary by John Whitehead

Just take a stroll through your city’s downtown. Spend an afternoon in your local mall. Get in your car and drive to your parents’ house. Catch the next flight to that business conference. While you’re doing so, pay careful attention to how you and your fellow citizens are treated by government officials ­the ones whose salaries you are paying.

You might walk past a police officer outfitted in tactical gear, holding an assault rifle, or drive past a police cruiser scanning license plates. There might be a surveillance camera on the street corner tracking your movements. At the airport, you may be put through your paces by government agents who will want to either pat you down or run scans of your body. And each time you make a call or send a text message, your communications will most likely be logged and filed. When you return home, you might find that government agents have been questioning your neighbors about you, as part of a “census” questionnaire. After you retire to sleep, you might find yourself awakened by a SWAT team crashing through your door (you’ll later discover they were at the wrong address), and if you make the mistake of reaching for your eyeglasses, you might find yourself shot by a cop who felt threatened.

Is this the behavior of a government that respects you? One that looks upon you as having inviolate rights? One that regards you as its employer, its master, its purpose for being?

 I don’t think so. While this hyper-militarization of the government is being sold to the public as a means of preventing terrorism and maintaining national security, it is little more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing. In fact, as I document in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, what we are dealing with is a police state disguised as a benevolent democracy, a run-away government hyped up on its own power and afraid of its citizenry, whose policies are dictated more by paranoia than need.

#13 As our police departments have become militarized, SWAT team deployments have gone through the roof.  As I wrote about recently, there were only about 3,000 SWAT raids in the United States back in 1980.  But today, there are more than 80,000 SWAT raids per year in this country.

#14 The federal government is so paranoid that it is actually spying on itself.  The “Insider Threat Program” encourages federal employees to closely watch one another and to report any hint of suspicious activity

The federal effort, called the Insider Threat Program, was launched in October 2011, and it certainly hasn’t diminished since Edward Snowden disclosed details of the National Security Agency’s domestic spying. As McClatchy reporters Marisa Taylor and Jonathan S. Landay have described, federal employees and contractors are encouraged to keep an eye on allegedly suspicious indicators in their co-workers’ lives, from financial troubles to divorce. A brochure produced by the Defense Security Service, titled “INSIDER THREATS: Combating the ENEMY within your organization,” sums up the spirit of the program: “It is better to have reported overzealously than never to have reported at all.”

#15 Last, but certainly not least, there is the matter of the NSA constantly spying on all of us.  The NSA is monitoring and recording billions of our phone calls and emails, and most Americans don’t seem to care.  But they should care.  I like how an article in the New York Post described what is happening to our society…

Through a combination of fear, cowardice, political opportunism and bureaucratic metastasis, the erstwhile land of the free has been transformed into a nation of closely watched subjects ­ a country of 300 million potential criminals, whose daily activities need constant monitoring.

 Once the most secret of organizations, the NSA has become even more famous than the CIA, the public face of Big Brother himself. At its headquarters on Savage Road in Fort Meade, Md., its omnivorous Black Widow supercomputer grabs up data both foreign and domestic, while its new $2 billion data center near Bluffdale, Utah ­ the highly classified Intelligence Community Comprehensive National Cyber-security Initiative Data Center ­ houses, well, just about everything. As James Bamford wrote in Wired magazine two years ago, as the center was being completed:

 “Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private e-mails, cell-phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails ­ parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital ‘pocket litter.’ ”

10 13 11 flagbar


WITHOUT LIBERTY WE MIGHT AS WELL BE DEAD

10/29/2014

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron176.htm

[This is a revision to an article we wrote in October 2008]

10-29-2014 3-07-22 PM

By Ron Ewart
October 29, 2014
NewsWithViews.com

PROLOGUE: In less than a week Americans who care about their freedom will be faced with one of the most important choices they will ever make since the American Revolution. If you sit out this election, the other side will win. If you vote for a third party candidate, the other side will win. If you write in a candidate, the other side will win. Conservatives are by no means perfect and are at best, the lesser of two evils. But at least they generally believe in the founding principles of freedom. Conservatives believe in individual, unalienable rights as the gift from their creator. The other side believes in the collective and the absolute rule of the majority ….. the mob. The following story will give you an idea where America is headed, unless conservatives like you come out en masse on November 4th and relegate the other side to obscurity.

“In the shackle room of the jailhouse, the jailer snaps the handcuffs around your wrists and attaches them to the chain around your waste. You tremble in anticipation of what comes next. The jailer then reaches for the leg irons, and one by one, closes them tightly around your ankles. Your anxiety rises even further. All through this process, you keep telling the jailer that you are innocent. Paying no attention to your pleadings, the jailer impersonally grabs you by the arm and pulls you out the door. You struggle to walk because the chain connecting the leg irons is very short, forcing you to shuffle. The people in the hallway and on the walkway outside stare at you with disdain in their eyes, but you can’t see the dread in their hearts. Paralyzing fear grips you as you approach the steps to the gallows. You balk at the bottom of the stairs but the jailer pulls on you harder, making you stumble up the stairs.”

“At the top of the stairs, the jailer walks you over to a trap door and tells you to stand there. He pulls a black hood over your head and then roughly places the thick hangman’s noose around your neck and pulls it tight. You are now blind and more than just afraid. You are terrified. Each beat of your rapidly-beating heart reverberates in your head like a loud drum. You contemplate your last few minutes on Earth and visions of your whole life parade in a kaleidoscope of images in your mind. In pure anguish, you think of what will happen to your wife and kids when you are gone. You let out a soft moan at the thought.”

“How is it you find yourself in this situation, when all you had done was to speak out against the government? How did a once-free society find itself in a police state where every single unalienable right had been stripped from the people, one Amendment at a time? What happened to freedom, liberty and justice, the pursuit of happiness and the promise of our sacred Constitution? Was this Cuba or Red China? You say to yourself, ‘…..what happened to my individual rights? Why didn’t someone fight for them?'”

“As you finally accept your fate, you flinch as the jailer whispers something in your ear through the hood, but you can’t believe what he is saying. He said he had been given the authority to grant clemency and that all I would have to do to be saved from the gallows was to denounce freedom and liberty. Nevertheless, I would still have to wear the handcuffs and leg irons whenever I was outside my cell, for the rest of my life. Knowing full well what the consequences of my next act would be, I rose up tall, took a deep breath and through the hood, told the jailer that without liberty, I might as well be dead. And then I said, in almost a scream, “Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death.”

“To my utter surprise, the crowd around the gallows, who, in the beginning, looked on me with disgust, started to repeat my statement, chanting it over and over again. And each time their voices grew louder and louder. In an act of pure solidarity, somehow triggered by what I said, they rushed the gallows, tore the guns from the guards and stopped the jailer as he was reaching for the lever that would open the trap door. I had been saved. I had been saved by an idea. I had been saved by a concept that is as old as civilization itself. I had been saved by the irresistible siren call of freedom.”

“A few in the crowd removed the noose around my neck, lifted the hood off my head and then unlocked my shackles and chains. They led me down off the gallows platform and lifted me up on their shoulders like a hero and marched me through the streets, as a sign of protest to the authorities. I was free at last and free because I took a stand against tyranny, even though it could have meant my death. The people who witnessed this injustice finally realized that they would also have to take a stand to protect their own freedom, if liberty was to prevail for each of them and future generations.”

Yes, of course, the foregoing was fiction but don’t think it can’t happen in America. The story illustrates what can happen in a country when the leaders are free to do anything they want to do, because the people refused to hold the leaders accountable.

But most people, faced with the choice of slavery or freedom, will eventually seek freedom. Americans tore themselves away from the tyranny of England, at great cost. From that conflict arose the most powerful nation on Earth, conceived in liberty; a nation built on the recognition of the inviolate natural rights of man, but an idea that has been left to rust in the history books……. for now.

If there were only a way for the cry, “Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death” to infect every man, woman and child in America and get them to rise up and storm the“gallows of politics and politicians” and tear that “gallows” down with the same vigor and determination that President Reagan told Russia’s Gorbechev to “Tear Down This Wall.” And this they must do before no man is safe from persecution for speaking out against a government, a government that is Hell bent on the systematic destruction of a free society.

If comfort and security are more important than freedom and liberty, then we give our consent to be enslaved. If being entertained is more important than taking an active interest in what our leaders have done and are doing, we deserve whatever those leaders inflict upon us. Should we turn our heads away from our duty to preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States and the freedom and liberty it guarantees, we perpetrate a grave injustice on ourselves and on our children and grandchildren.

Americans have three choices, if freedom and liberty are to be preserved; 1) replace the current leaders with new ones that will respect and defend the Constitution; or 2) in a wholesale, massive act of solidarity, protest in the spirit of a national Boston Tea Party and take away the “fuel”, our money, that “funds” those leaders who violate their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution; or lastly, 3) be prepared for a bloody civil war or revolution. The third choice is fraught with uncertainty and is the least likely to succeed.

Most of the other side’s current slate of mid-term candidates are clueless as to what America really is and for what it stands. Most of the local, state and federal legislators continue to lead us into financial oblivion and abject slavery, based on premises and policies far removed from the mandates of our constitution. We must ask why it is, throughout our entire civilized history, we find it necessary to always have to rest control from our leaders by force, who eventually go out of control? Will we never learn from history, that the price of liberty still is and always will be, eternal vigilance? We are 315,000,000 strong but are irreparably weakened by irrational division. We either come together and agree on sound economic and political principles, or we will disintegrate into chaos and servitude. The bottomless canyon we are about to fall into is just over the next hill and there will be no rescue attempts, should we fall.

Before it is too late, we need to hear once again, all across this once-great land of ours, the rallying cry of our early ancestors that won our freedom at such a huge sacrifice;“Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death.” But those carrying this torch and making this cry must know in detail, just what liberty really means. What the Founding Fathers laid out for us in our Constitution was indeed, the design, or blueprint if you will, for individual liberty.(No it is not perfect) However, what we have in America today is nothing more than a socialist collective. It is the antithesis of liberty. We have let the powerful, the ideologues and the educated idiots take over this country, with the help of a government that funds and supports them. If we want to take back this country and restore it to a Constitutional Republic, conservatives are going to have to fight for it and not just at the voting booth.

Never have so many been so complicit in their own demise. Never has so many been so ignorant of the evil that lurks in the hearts of men of wealth, influence and power, when left to their own resources and without being held accountable for their actions by the people. Never have so many been so guilty of thinking that they can get something for free without paying a price. And the price they pay is their own enslavement. As was said several times in the movie “Forrest Gump”, “Stupid is As Stupid Does”. The question is, will the history books write America’s epitaph with, “here lies the remains of a once-free, powerful nation, that died a wrenching death because of just plain stupidity?”

If you don’t consider yourself stupid and agree with our assessment, make the mid-term elections a rallying cry for “Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death.” Let all of America hear from you so that conservatives don’t feel like the only thing they hear is the sound of their own voices echoing back to them from the walls of an empty canyon. If you don’t want to see America die a slow, painful death, then let’s build a conservative army to save it with only one thing in their minds, “Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death.”

America is infected with several cancers; the cancers of abuse of power, corruption, greed and stupidity. Let’s cut out these cancers with good old American courage and intellect. For the last 10 years we have been on the cutting edge of confronting those cancers with our weekly column and the highly informative NARLO website. Throughout those 10 years we have come to the conclusion that most people are willing to give lip service to confronting government, but aren’t willing to put their feet in the “water”. Killing a cancer requires painful, aggressive action wherein the cure almost kills the “body” before it eradicates the cancer. This is America’s reality. This is where we are and where will stay without painful, aggressive action by those who know what must be done.

© 2014 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”, is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (http://www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached for comment atinfo@narlo.org.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org

10 13 11 flagbar

 


“The Truth as I see it.”

10/28/2014

THE LEFT AND RIGHT COLUMNS ARE DIFFERENT ARTICLES IN SEQUENCE 

Updated The First day of the Ninth month, anno Domini Two thousand fourteen
http://www.usavsus.info/

American Governance
Both systems concurrently exist today.  However, the corporate system has been gaining predominance in the last 70 years.  Many Sovereigns (We the people) have contracted with the corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and or without full disclosure given. Once you learn the difference, you may have to make a decision for yourself, family, and posterity.  That decision may require changes in how you conduct yourself.  You will have to undo what has been done to make your Sovereign status known.  This is not taught in the corporate government’s public school system, because you are not to know.

 The elite of the “One World government” corporate system want
and need to have power and control over the population (masses)
they call “Human Resources.”

Original CORPORATE
Description DESCRIPTION
union of the several states
the states united
united states in Congress assembled
these united States of America
The united states of America
The United States of America
The United States
(intent or defined to be the original or organic)
the UNITED STATES
the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(all capital letters–a fiction–a corporation)
the United States of America
the United States
(intent or defined to be the corporate US),
Started with:
Declaration of Independence in 1776,
Articles of Confederation in 1778,
and the Constitution in 1787Initially, the land was British colonized and then separated into independent Free states; which on July 4, 1776 became sovereign states united.
Started with:
Gettysburg Address in 1864,
and the Incorporation of
District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under theEmergency War Powers Act and theReconstruction Acts.
Then reorganized June 11, 1878
–16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62
a “Republic
having its beginning with the colonial resistance against England’s tyrannical government.Major opposition against British control began with The Stamp Act, established by British parliament on March 22, 1765–Taxation without representation, followed by the Declaratory Act, the Boston Massacre of 1770, and the Tea Act passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773 to save the East Indian Company from bankruptcy.

Resistance continued with the Quartering Act established by Parliament on June 2, 1774, requiring American colonists to provide shelter to British troops and horses when requested.

From September 5 to October 25, 1774 Twelve colonies, all but Georgia, sent 56 delegates to Philadelphia to participate in the First Continental Congress. The purpose of the First Continental Congress was to debate and plan a unified response to British policy and actions.

On March 25, 1775, Patrick Henry delivered his “give me liberty or give me death” speech to the Virginia Assembly in Richmond.

Various conflicts took place
and blood continued to be shed.

On May 10, 1775, The Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia. Delegates from all thirteen colonies were present.

After signing the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, and winning the revolutionary war which ended with the Paris Peace Treaty signed September 3, 1783, all American colonists became free, Sovereign people, endowed with the same rights that the King of England had.

Also, via the Treaty of Paris in September of 1783, King George parted with the Northwest Territory which was unsettled and not yet colonized. The Northwest Ordinance was set in place in July of 1787 to govern the territory until such a time the territory became states united with the initial thirteen.

“… at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects, and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty … Sovereignty is the right to govern; a nation or State sovereign is the person or persons in whom that resides. In Europe, the sovereignty is generally ascribed to the Prince; here, it rests with the people; there, the sovereign actually administers the government; here, never in a single instance; our Governors are the agents of the people, and, at most, stand in the same relation to their sovereign in which regents in Europe stand to their sovereigns. Their Princes have personal powers, dignities, and preeminences; our rulers have none but official; nor do they partake in the sovereignty otherwise, or in any other capacity, than as private citizens.”

–Supreme Court of the United States
2 US 419 (February 1794)
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chief Justice: Jay, John
Argued: February 5, 1793
Decided: February 18, 1793

Four Organic Written Laws
of the 50 states united are:
Declaration of Independence, July 4,1776,
Articles of Confederation, Nov. 15,1777,
The Constitution, Sept. 17, 1787
Northwest Ordinance, July 13, 1787
These Organic Laws are also found in the
United States Code, Volume 1
Also, Wikipedia; search for “Organic Laws”

a ” Corporation
with a legislature was established,
with all the apparatus of a distinct government created (Incorporated) by (Presidential) Legislative Act,
February 21, 1871
Forty-first Congress, Session III,
Chapter 62, page 419On June 20, 1874, the President with advice of Senate abolished and replaced the 1871 government with a commission consisting of three persons.
18 Stat. at L. 116, chap. 337

A subsequent act approved June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102, chap. 180) was enacted stating that the District of Columbia should ‘remain and continue a municipal corporation,’ as provided in 2 of the Revised Statutes relating to said District
(brought forward from the act of 1871)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CAMDEN IRON WORKS,
181 U.S. 453 (1901)
http://supreme.justia.com/us/181/453/case.html

METROPOLITAN R CO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 132 U.S. 231 (1889)
http://supreme.justia.com/us/132/1/case.html

Corporate Officers
” … But by the Act of June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. chap. 180), a permanent form of government for the District was established. It provided …and that the commissioners therein provided for should be deemed and taken as officers of such corporation.”
The District of Columbia v. Henry E. Woodbury,
136 U.S. 472 (1890)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/woodbury.htm

United States” is the “District of Columbia” incorporated.
“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785,
Also: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287

In UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28,
in Section 3002 Definitions,
it states the following:
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;

To incorporate means to become
a part of something bigger

Some people believe
it is incorporated with England
or the crown
and the paperwork
is filed in Puerto Rico.

This so-called government is
an imposter
posing and or masquerading
as the original government.

Some call it the
insurgent governmental system

” As Charles Evans Hughes, Governor of New york and twice appointed Justice of the Supreme Court said. “The Constitution is whatever the Supreme Court says it is.” This is as frank an assessment of the true situation as you will ever get from a government official. George Bush said practically the same thing when he declared “The Constitution is just a piece of paper.” …the Northwest Ordinance shows why the Federal government has no legal jurisdiction over any territory but that which is owned by the United States of America. …The fact is, the Constitution, for all practical purposes, annuls the Declaration of Independence.”
–Lawrence Berg

having a de jure form ofgovernment
Of right; legitimate; lawful; by right and just title; “by law”
–Black’s Law Dictionary sixth edition
de facto government
In fact, in deed, actually; a state of affairs; but is illegal or illegitimate; “by equity” and not “by law”; is not constitutional. Thus an officer, king. or government de facto is in actual possession, but by usurpation, or without lawful title.
–Black’s Law Dictionary sixth edition
Created by Sovereigns Created by merchants, bankers,
and their cohorts by acts of treason.They also forced the South
and other states to secede.

Pres. Lincoln fell into their scheme
and went along for awhile.

This Martial Law government
[actually: “Martial Rule”]
is a fiction managing civil affairs

Introduction INTRODUCTION
Philadelphia is the CapitolThe Articles of Confederation
were agreed to by the united states in Congress assembled on November 15, 1777 and were ratified March 1, 1781. From the time of the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776, to the time of the Articles of Confederation there was a space of time of sixteen months and eleven days. During this period of time, the several nations, states, countries were sovereign unto themselves as relates to foreign earthly powers.

There was an outstanding debt of 17 million silver Lira from French banks over 21 separate occasions all due on December 1, 1789.

Therefore, a bankruptcy Charter had to be drafted. On September 17, 1787, twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors.

Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt.”
–Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.

The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not. The people are not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote.

The judge in the Padleford case stated; “But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do, they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain.”
–Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520

Articles” establish a sovereign nation of people, but all “Constitutions” are bankruptcy charters or compacts.

President Andrew Jacksonpaid the debt in the 1830’s. In 1832, while discussing the Bank Renewal Bill to a delegation of bankers, he said, “You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”

The Articles of Confederation
are still in operation.

“He [Patrick Henry] boycotted the Constitutional Convention of 1787 because, as he so eloquently put it, “I smell a rat ” and suspected the worst: that the independent colonies that had thrived for over a century were to be herded under one consolidated government, a vast government apparatus founded not on liberty, but on the bureaucratic dreams of monarchists and mercantilists like Alexander Hamilton.”
–Ryan McMaken, columnist forLewRockwell.com

…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it isthe Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
–Declaration of Independence

Samuel Adams said, ‘When the people fear the government they havetyranny, when the government fears the people they havefreedom.

Many governments are established by good people having good intentions. But, certain men with bad intentions or another agenda get into government office by some means, lawful or otherwise, find loopholes, revise government and its laws to suit their needs and agenda, and build an empire within government itself. Through deceit and lies and through the absence of truth, gain power and control over the people, extracting the people’s well earned money from the people’s labor to finance and increase the empire to such an extent that it would seem difficult for people to rise up against it.

“Apathetic and dependant Americans today are unsuspectingly going into bondage unless America wakes up.”
–Jack Slevkoff 2006

 

Certain members of Congress created the District of Columbia (DC) from portions of two states; Virginia (Virgin) and Maryland (Mary). Physically united together they are “Virgin Mary ,” to form a more perfect union as
a new “United States“.US Titles and Codes,
in their awkward definitions,
call “DC” the “United States”

The new “United States” includes States such as District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands. It does not include the 50 states united.
i.e. Title 26 Section 7701 Definitions (a) (9) and (10) 42 U.S.C. 405 (2)(c)(vii)

All Titles of the United States Code (USC) are strictly meant for the United States and none of the 50 states of the Union. Each of the 50 states have their own constitutions and laws. See Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445, 452, and John Barron v The Mayor and City of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243 (1833). These last two cases clearly state that the United States is not the 50 states of the Union.

All Rule comes from
District of Columbia
which is run by the Gnostic Priesthood of the undisclosed mystery Babylon.

“Masonic Rule”
Some of the Masonic symbolism is found in the layout of the District’s streets, the Washington monument (Obelisk), the Pentagon, and on the back of the One Dollar Federal Reserve Note.

DC Layout
One Dollar

 

” The best place to hide something
is in full view”

 

Columbia” is a name for “Goddess of Creation, War, and Destruction” more known as the goddess of death and pain. She is derived from the imagery of Semiramis, wife of Nimrod, and Queen of Babylon.

The statue on top of the Capitol building called the Statue of Freedom is actually Persephone, meaning “She who Destroys the Light”. She is the queen of the underworld. She is crowned with pentacles (pentagrams–stars with five points). When someone stands on something, it is usually an indication of ownership. Therefore, she owns the facility she stands upon. Although the dome on top of the Capitol building was not finished until 1868, the final installation of this statue on top of the dome took place on December 2, 1863. The original Capitol building, without the dome, was completed in 1826.

Columbia and Persephone are seen as other statues around Washington D.C. area.

Some of the Gnostic Priesthood include:IlluminatiSkull & Bones Society, Hospitaliers, Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Knights of the Round Table, Oddfellows, Society of Jesus, Jesuit Priesthood, Club of Rome, Knights Templar, Freemasons, Scottish Rite Temple, York Rite Temple, Shriners, Inner Temple Bar, International Temple Bar Association, Barrister’s Inn, Zionists, Jesuits, Jesuit Brotherhood, Milner group (a.k.a. Milner’s Kindergarten, Round Table Group, Rhodes crowd, Rhodes Scholars, The Times crowd, All Souls goup, Cliveden set, The Society of the Elect, The Association of Helpers, Junta of Three, the Secret Society of Cecil Rhodes, Chatham House crowd, Commonwealth of Nations, Royal Institute of International Affairs), Tri-laterial Commission, Bilderberg group, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Magistrates, Bar Attorneys.

“Since 1873, the Global Elite Has Held Secret Meetings in the Ancient Redwood Forest of Northern California. Members of the so-called “Bohemian Club” Include Former Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan. The Bush Family Maintains a Strong Involvement. Each Year at Bohemian Grove, Members of This All-Male “Club” put on Red, Black and Silver Robes and Conduct an Occult Ritual Wherein They Worship a Giant Stone Owl, Sacrificing a Human Being in Effigy to What They Call the ‘Great Owl of Bohemia.'”–Alex Jones;InfoWars.com

There is a small owl just to the left of the “1” which appears on the upper right hand corner of the One Dollar Bill.

The Constitution
for The United States of AmericaNow known or referred to as
the organic constitution.
This Constitution established a central government with limited powers to do the will of the people. Its purpose was to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

The Constitution (a bankruptcy compact) designates and limits the powers of the newly established central government and restrict its venue to a district not exceeding 10 miles square and areas purchased for forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings.

The organic Constitution was
created in 1787,
adopted in 1789, and
amended in 1791

“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
— Patrick Henry

The Constitution
of the United StatesThe original organic Constitution
was adopted by the corporation as
its “By-laws“. The original Thirteenth Amendment was replaced, and other amendments added, some by fraud.

The 14th Amendment
was not ratified.
Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646)

Also see:
The 14th Amendment Never Passed

The 16th Amendment
was not ratified by the states.
–documented research in THE LAW THAT NEVER WAS by Bill Benson and “Red” Beckman

Republic DEMOCRACY
“Libera Res Publica”
Free from Things Public”I pledge allegiance to The United States of America, andto the Republic for which it stands, One nation under God”
Emphasizes “Democracy” which is the next thing to “Socialism” which is another form of“Communism”.Did you say Communism?
Can’t happen here? Check this out!

Communist Manifesto
“Republican”
(means “common rights”)
form of government”Government of the people
and by the people”

republic is a self governing forum wherein a free, sovereign, moral, and enlightened people guarantee to one another and to all minorities the right and obligation to have, retain, and protect each other’s God given common Rights to Life, Freedom, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness in their separate capacities as free inhabitants and or as free Sovereign people within a nation, state (nation state), and or a country, all by positively accepting the Oaths as recipients of the oaths of their servants holding public office.

The people created a republican form of government with limitations on their servants.

The people are the government,
not their servants.

…shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government”
–Constitution, Art. IV Sec 4

At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs Powel anxiously awaited the results, and as Benjamin Franklin emerged, asked him directly: “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” “A republic if you can keep it”responded Franklin.

James Madison, the fourth president, known as “The Father of Our Constitution” made the following statement:
“We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the
Ten Commandments of God.”

“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” — Patrick Henry

The Tenth Amendment
clearly states:
“The powers not delegated to the united states by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to thepeople.”
–ratified December 15, 1791

Article I, Section 8 of the original Constitution allowed the creation of certain federal areas and a district for certain limited purposes:
“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Placespurchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings.” —Wikipedia

It is very important to know that
Congress has exclusive Legislative power andauthority only over certain specified areas purchased for certain reasons by consent of the state in which they lie.
These are the only areas whereby a democracy is allowed to exist. Outside of these areas, a republican form of government is guaranteed.

The Residence Act of 1790, established the actual location
of the district.

“Our country’s founders cherished liberty, not democracy.” –Ron Paul, Historian and Congressman

“A pure Republic allows the people the power of choice.   They may retain their right to choose or waive it for what they believe is profitable or for gain.”–Brother Gregory Williams 2010
from article titled DEFINING LIES

The republic
has been hi-jacked
by the usurpers

Democracy
(means “Priest rule”)”A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage.”
–Attributed to Scottish History Professor at University of Edinburgh Sir Alexander Fraser Tytler (1747-1813) and others

“…often the most tyrannical government
on earth.”
–Noah Webster

Democracy can be explained as “two wolves and a lamb, voting on what to have for dinner” or “A political system calculated to make an intelligent minority subject to the will of the stupid.”
–Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900)

A “Mob Rule” form of government giving the impression of representation and rule by it’s citizens. But, today, if one follows the paper trail one will come to believe that it is Rule by:Crown of EnglandCrown Templar, and theVatican together pulling the strings in Washington D.C. as well as utilizing the “Mob Rule” principle.   Some believe the Roman Pope is in control, but actually, the unseen, behind the scenes, “Black Pope” is the one in power; the one most people never hear about or knows exists. The other Pope is just a figure head for the people to see and relate with.

“One must admire the craft of the priests, spawn of satan, [known as] Esquires, members of the Court of Saint James of the Middle Temple BAR of the Knights Templar which is headquartered in “The Crown” which is inside of the ancient walled City of London and is a sovereign nation just like the Vatican and Washington, D. C., i. e.: the triad that controls the world. “–author?

A large Egyptian symbol called the obelisque (obelisk) can be found in each of the three locations: The London financial area, The Vatican, and Washington DC (Washington Monument: 555 feet 5.5 inches). These three have been ruling the world and setting up the One World government system. These three places are NOT in UK, Italy or USA.

The Rockefeller grave site has an obelisque. Many national cemeteries have an obelisque. New York City has one that is 70 feet tall and weights 193 tons.

The obelisk symbolizes the sun god Amon Re (Ra) as a petrified ray of the Aten, the sundisk.–wikipedia

There are two entities known as the “Crown“. One is the king’s corporation, setup to do the king’s business and protect the king of England from liability. The other is the “Knights Templar” (Temple) a.k.a. “Crown Templar”, a secret society.

Those in power behind the scenes dress up their candidates for office, help them get elected, and then control them while in office. Supposedly giving you a choice when both major Political parties and other parties are controlled by them. Their controlled major media is used to control and direct public opinion. So, you wonder who is really in control–It’s definitely not the people.

“Democracy is the road to socialism.” –Karl Marx

Plato postulated “Dictatorship naturally arisesout of democracy…”

Republican government” isdefined as one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and areexercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specifically delegated.
–Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edition, pg 695
Democracy” is defined as that form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representatives.
–Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edition, pg 432
The rights of the people and the protection of the people of America are its main concernand maintains that all states shall be guaranteed a Republican form of government.”I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Expands and conquers by
deceit and fraud.
and uses “words of art” to deceive.
Convinces Americans to utilize
such words and terms as “Residence,” “Reside”, and “US citizen,” regional designations (fictional overlays) such as “CA”, “NV”, “TX” etc. in addresses to expand its venue and control, and to obtain “Certificates of Birth” and to sign up for “Social Security”to gain and maintain jurisdiction.
The central government is limited in power and ability and its venue is restricted by the Constitution to the 10 miles square district now called “Washington, D.C.” and its enclaves for forts and arsenals. Gives away American rights, land, parks, and streams over to a foreign government such as the United Nations by Executive Orders or by decree and calling them “Biospheres,” “Biosphere Reserves,” “World Heritage Sites” or some other designated name.
As planned according to Article 4 of UNESCO’s Statutory Framework for U.N. Biosphere Reserves

List of Biospheres in USA
Represents “We the people” and the “state Republics” among nations. Represents its own supposed sovereignty among nations.
Living souls are created by God and are answerable to their Maker who is Omnipotent.”…one nation under God…”

The Bible is the Basis of all Law and moral standards. In 1820, the USA government purchased 20,000 bibles for distribution. Also take note ofPUBLIC LAW 97-280 approved October 4, 1982

Separation of God and state?

“We recognize no Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus!”
John Adams and John Hancock gave this response to a British major who ordered them and those with them to disperse in the name of George the sovereign King of England on April 18 1775.
— American History

“It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”–Patrick Henry

“Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers.”
–John Jay (very first Supreme Court Justice )

 

This corporate so-called government
sees itself as god.It sets morals and values of those in its jurisdiction without any basis. These values are ever changing at their whim and are influenced by opinion and the media.

Emphasizes religious and social tolerance butdiscourages Christianity.

It provokes the godly to give up their stand and to go with the crowd.

Homosexuality and abortions are no longer discouraged, but are now protected.

“Thus it is easy to understand how law, instead of checking injustice, becomes the invincible weapon of injustice. It is easy to understand why the law is used by the legislator to destroy in varying degrees among the rest of the people, their personal independence by slavery, their liberty by oppression, and their property by plunder. This is done for the benefit of the person who makes the law, and in proportion to the power he holds.”
“…it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice. No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.”
–1848 “THE LAW” by Claude Frederic Bastiat, a French economist, statesman, author, and philosopher.

No state of Emergency
and is not at war
US continues to be in a permanent state ofnational emergency since March 9, 1933, and possibly as far back as the Civil War
–Senate report 93-549 (1973)
Adjournment of Congress
sine die
a Latin term meaning
“without [fixed] day”;
(No day is set for reconvening)

Seven southern nation States of America walked out of the Second Session of the Thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, 1861.

In so doing, the Constitutional due process quorum necessary for Congress to vote was (temporarily) lost and Congress was adjourned sine die, or “without day.” To some, this meant that there was no lawful quorum to set a specific day and time to reconvene. Some say that according to Robert’s Rules of Order, Congress automatically dissolved because there are no provisions within the Constitution allowing the passage of any Congressional vote without a quorum of the States. Keep in mind that Robert’s Rules of Order was created and published by Henry Martyn Robert who was born in South Carolina in 1837. He sold a half million copies of his rules by 1914. Those rules were not made a part of the Constitution or any Amendment to the Constitution. According to The Constitution, Congress was only required to meet at least once in every year on a specific date unless changed by law and a smaller number may adjourn from day to day. Therefore, because there were no other provisions, dissolution does not take place unless “the people”, the creators thereof, or the posterity thereof, the sovereigns of the states, say so.

Because the King’s men did not attend a meeting required by Him does not constitute a loss of the King’s kingdom or His government. It just means that such men may loose their heads for not obeying the King.
The King in this case is the people
or “We, the people”

“…to prevent abuses in our government, we will assemble in Convention, recall our delegated powers, and punish our servants for abusing the trust reposed to them.”
–paraphrased by Patrick Henry, June 1788

On April 15, 1861,
President Lincoln reconvened Congress under the Executive branch by proclamation (number 1):
“I do hereby, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution, convene both Houses of Congress.”
– President Lincoln

Caesar (President) is now in full control even over the Senate (Congress).

A Presidential dictatorship has been imposed on U.S. citizens. The sad thing is, “Most American people do not realize it yet.”

The corporate government created in 1871 will continue to exist as long as:

  1. “state of war” or “emergency” exists (War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Iraq, etc.),
  2. the President does not terminate “martial” or “emergency” powers by Executive Order or decree, or
  3. the people do not resist submission and terminate by restoring lawful civil courts, processes and procedures under authority of the “inherent political powers” of the people.

The Fourteenth Amendment for all intents and purposes does not exist. On March 28, 1861 Congress adjourned sine die and never has reconvened de jure.

The original Thirteenth Amendment (no title of nobility), approved by 13 of the 17 states March 12, 1819 and thereby ratified, is the last proper draft of a de jure Amendment but is not recognized by the corporate (de facto) UNITED STATES.
The original 13th Amendment prohibits “Esquires” (Attorneys) from holding positions of public office.

Flag FLAG
The United States of America Military Flag

plain and simple–no gold fringe or other ornaments and symbolism attached

Not the original
USA Military flag
Some say it is a flag of Admiralty/Maritime type jurisdiction and is not suppose to be used on Land. Others say it’s not a flag at all, but fiction.

However, the gold fringe which surrounds the flag gives notice that the American flag has been captured and is now being used by the corporate so-called government to give notice of its jurisdiction.

Prior to the 1950’s, state republic flags were mostly flown, but when a USA flag was flown, usually only at USA facilities, it was one of the following:

 

  1. Military flag–Horizontal stripes, white stars on blue background

Has no fringe, braid (tassel), eagle, ball, spear, etc.

Some say the correct size ratio is 1 x 1.9

  1. Civil Flag–Created in 1799 by Secretary of the Treasury Oliver Wolcott. Intended for peace time usage, denoting civil jurisdiction under the Constitution and common law. Has vertical stripes, blue stars on white background–last flown before Civil War with a few exceptions.

 

A 1913 Postcard has a civil flag flying
on the Customs House in San Francisco
Click on picture to enlarge

 

Another example of
the vertical stripes:
“The Coast Guard Ensign (flag) was first flown by the Revenue Cutter Service in 1799 to distinguish revenue cutters from merchant ships.”
–Wikipedia

This flag was a symbol of law enforcement authority, not Military authority.

 

The flag shown above appears to be a “USA flag” but has one or more of the following:

  1. Gold fringealong its borders (called “a badge”)
  2. Gold braided cord(tassel) hanging from pole
  3. Ballon top of pole (last cannon ball fired)
    Mainly used at induction centers.
  4. Eagleon top of pole
  5. Spearon top of pole

Some people see them as ornaments but all symbols have a meaning and purpose.

The flag shown above is Not described in Title 4 of USC and therefore is illegal on land except for maybe (1) the President since he is in charge of Naval Forces on high seas, and (2) naval offices and yards.

President Eisenhower settled the debate on the width of the fringe.

The so-called justification for a Naval/Maritime flag to be on land is that all land was under the high water mark at one time even if it was eons ago.

Flags on poles flying at the same height as other flags have equal status. A flag flying higher than the flag below indicates superiority over the flag below. Note that corporate state flags fly below the US flag.

Keep in mind that the states were originally Sovereign over the central government and only the state flags were flown except in the District of Columbia not exceeding 10 miles square, its territories, forts, dockyards, arsenals, and other needful buildings, such as Post Offices, purchased with the consent of the legislature of the affected state.
(Constitution, Section 8, Clause 17)

The people in the geographic continental USA are at peace but the corporate government continues to be at war to exist, to increase and perpetuate debt, and to enrich others through Defense contracts.

Governing Body GOVERNING BODY
The Free Inhabitants are
a government body unto themselves.
Not forced to join a “state”
Not forced to be a citizen of any group.
Not forced to inhabit any territory.
Not forced to join the militia or military.
Not forced to pay un-requested services.The Northwest territory and possessions were governed by three separate and distinct Branches or Departments equal to each other as to power and control of a segment of government while being on the same playing field laterally in position to each other.

  • Legislature
    (Constitution; Article I)
    –can enact positive law
  • Executive
    (Constitution; Article II)
  • Judicial
    (Constitution; Article III)
    –known as article III courts

 

The purpose of having three separate and distinct branches at the same level is for checks and balances so that no one man or branch of government has complete power.

The legislative Branch consists of the Senate and Congress.

The purpose of the Senate was originally designed to voice states rights while Congress voiced the peoples rights.

The Senators were chosen by the states and were not elected by the people.

Together, they can come to a conclusion that meets the rights, interests, and benefit of both the state and the people.

 

Separation of Powers

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
–Theodore Roosevelt, 1912

“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, … if the persons entrusted with supreme power becomeusurpers, … The citizens mustrush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.”
–Federalist #28 – Hamilton

The President (a Caesar)
rules by Executive Order
(Unconstitutional)Congress and the Courts
are under the President.
Did you ever wonder why Congress is ignored by the President?

The President is the Chief Executive Officer (C.E.O.) of the government corporation. Impeachment today is nearly impossible, unless it is in the best interest of the controlling bankers and the one-world government elite.
Also, what most people do not realize is that most courts today are legislative courts
and not Judicial.

The so-called (corporate) Congress
sits by resolution
not by positive law.

Therefore, the position of power is as follows:

  1. President (C.E.O of the corporation sits as Caesar
    –does not need congressional approval)
  2. Legislature (The new Congress and Senate voices Public Opinion)
  3. so-called Judicial (Legislative, Article I courts) opinionate what’s best for the corporate so-called government and the elite
  4. Non-existent Judicial
    (Article III courts)
    except for Special circumstances
    that benefit the elite

The top position has control over the second position and the second position has control over the last position vertically and not laterally.

There are no checks and balances unless the President is concerned with a potential revolution based on the outcry of its citizens.

Each puppet that comes into office wears a different costume but ends up serving the same master. (The Masters are the Elite and Bankers operating behind the scenes)

Only two executive orders
were overturned:

“The Supreme Court ruled in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952) that Executive Order 10340 from President Harry S. Truman placing all steel mills in the country under federal control was invalid because it attempted to make law,…” See: Opinion of Justice Black and Case Law

“…a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the U.S. government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[6] Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order.”

Medium of Exchange MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE
Lawful Money  Legal Tender
Units of Monetized Debt
Has substance Has no substance–Built on credit
Controlled by
Treasury of the united States of America
Controlled by US Treasury
Real Money
Assets of value such as gold or silver
or can be exchanged for same.Many of the older generations of the American people were taught to write the “S” with two lines through it. The two lines was a derivative of the “U” inside the “S” signifying “Units of Silver”. The United States of America silver dollar is the accepted and approved uniform monetary unit (coin standard). The United States of America did not issue paper money until 85 years after its independence from Britain, and when it did, it was backed by silver or gold. Even at that, early Californians refused to accept and use paper currency, especially the people in San Francisco.
Phony Money
Not backed by assets
but thrives on faith alone.Today, all computer programs, stock certificates, financial paper, accounting records, balance sheets and summaries, bills, bonds, Promissory notes, bank paper such as checks, et cetera use the familiar symbol having only one line through it to denote the amount of debt considered.

All Notes are “I Owe You’s” (IOU’s)
including Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s) All Notes represent debt. The corporate UNITED STATES is in bankruptcy and has no assets but can only monetize debt.

Lawful Money
consist of:

  1. Silver coins* (Silver Specie)
    Silver dollar–standard unit of value containing 90% silver
  2. Gold Coins* containing 90% gold
  3. Spanish milled dollar called the “real.” and its fractional parts such as the “medio” (half-real).
  4. Warehouse receipts or certificates redeemable in gold or silver* such as “Silver Certificates” and “Gold Certificates” are not in itself money but is an exchange for a specified amount of lawful money.
    *Issued by the Treasurer of the United States of America.

“The first coins issued by authority of the United States were the “Fugio” cents. Entries in the Journal of Congress . . .” “Saturday, April 21, 1787. . .”
“That the board of treasury be authorized to contract for three hundred tons of copper coin of the federal standard, agreeable to the proposition of Mr. James Jarvis, . . . That it be coined at the expense of the contractor, etc.” “On Friday, July 6, 1787, there was “Resolved, that the board of treasury direct the contractor for the copper coinage to stamp on one side of each piece the following device, viz: thirteen circles linked together, a small circle in the middle, with the words ‘United States,’ around it; and in the center, the words ‘We are one’; on the other side of the same piece the following device, viz: a dial with the hours expressed on the face of it; a meridian sun above on one side of which is the word ‘Fugio,’ (The meaning is, ‘time flies’) and on the other the year in figures ‘1787’, below the dial, the words ‘Mind Your Business.’ The legends have been credited to Benjamin Franklin by many, and the coin, as a consequence, has been referred to as the Franklin Cent.”
“These cents were coined in New Haven, Conn., and possibly elsewhere. Most of the copper used in this coinage came from military stores. It is believed to have been the copper bands which held together the powder kegs sent to us by the French.”
–A GUIDE BOOK of UNITED STATES COINS 35th Edition

Historical review:

Lincoln, Gold, and Greenbacks
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo

Did you ever wonder where the words “bank” and “currency” come from?  Keep in mind that a river has two banks that control a current of water running between them. Therefore, that is what the bankers do, they control the current or flow of money called currency.

Legal Tender
consists of:

  1. Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s)***
  2. Bonds
  3. Other Notes–evidences of debt.
  4. Tokens–clad coinage having no inherent asset value.
  5. “A unit of debt” in a cashless society–Electronic banking.

***Issued by the Federal Reserve Bank(FRB)–A private corporation created by the Bank of England in 1913 and is owned byforeign bankers/investors

The Federal Reserve is a continuation of the “Exchequer” of the Crown of England.

Edward Mandell House was instrumental in setting up the Federal Reserve.

“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders.” Chairman Louis T. McFadden, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

Federal Reserve is not listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true. And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: “Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality’s . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations – federal reserve banks are listed neither as ‘wholly-owned’ government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as ‘mixed ownership’ corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671.”

Congressman McFadden
Speaks Out (1934)
Congressman Traficant
Speaks Out (1993)
Congressman Ron Paul
Speaks Out
February 15, 2006
Payable, in Specie
Means “In coin”
from Latin, in kind

 

The “Dollar
“The dollar, or “thaler” (which did not originate with the Spaniards), is short for the ” Joachimsthaler” of Joachimsthal, a mining town in the Joachims Valley in Bohemia, where the coins were first struck in the sixteenth century.”

“Thomas Jefferson recommended on September 2, 1776, to the Continental Congress, that the United States adopt the silver “Spanish Milled Dollar” called “Pillar Pieces of Eight”, as our monetary unit of value, since daily trade was transacted in that coin.”
–The United States Mint

“dollar” was defined by law (Act of April 1792) as 371.25 grains of pure silver, which was the amount contained in a One-Dollar silver coin.

The gold eagle was equivalent to Ten silver dollars and had 247.50 grains of pure gold.

Therefore, 371.25 grains of pure silver was equivalent to 24.75 grains of pure gold; a15:1 ratio.

Coinage started in 1783. The first gold coins were made July 31, 1795 and consisted of 744 half eagles.

Coinage of Silver coins for circulation ended with the 1964 coins.

Under the “free coinage”provision, no charge was to be made for converting gold or silver bullion into coins “weight for weight.” At the depositor’s option, however, he could demand an immediate exchange of coins for his bullion, for which privilege a deduction of one-half of one percent was to be imposed.

Redeemable Certificates

Although the first paper currency was issued in 1862, redeemable certificates were not issued until 1886

Silver Certificates were contracts initially redeemable in face value silver coin or silver bullion. Silver Certificates were released into circulation in 1878, redemption in silver dollars ceased in 1934, last printed in 1957, and redemption in all forms ceased on June 24, 1968.

Gold Certificates were contracts initially redeemable in face value Gold coin or gold bullion. Gold Certificates were released into circulation in 1882 and ended in 1928.

Mints

Although a government mintwas approved February 21, 1782, no immediate action was taken. The first mint building was erected in 1792 on Seventh Street near Arch in Philadelphia. The first coin struck was the half disme (half-dime). Fifteen hundred were produced during the month of July 1792 before the mint was completed. File marks on early coins was a mint process of weight adjustment.
–A GUIDE BOOK of UNITED STATES COINS 35th Edition

The Mint was initially a part of the Department of State, became an independent agency in 1799, and became part of the Department of the Treasury in 1873 when the Mint’s administrative headquarters moved from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C.

The amount of FRN’s printed is based upon the corporate government’s borrowing or appetite for debt. For example: If the corporate government prints $100 billion in interest-bearing U.S. bonds and takes them to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve places the $100 billion in a checking account and the government writes checks or prints debt currency against the balance. In other words, this private banking system creates so-called money out of thin air and the bankers get interest on it forever. In addition, new debt and debt currency has to be created just to cover the compounding interest. An ideal “Ponzi scheme.”Keep in mind that bonds are IOU’s and are to be paid back by the people through their future labor or the labor of their posterity. That is why wars are created and perpetuated, government bureaucracy and empire building increases, and superfluous spending continues. They create an ongoing and ever increasing debt to enslave the people and their posterity. Debt must be continually created to feed the debt-credit economy system.

The so-called expanding economy always needs new debt notes (FRN’s) and therefore more debt must be created. Budgets can never be balanced in this type of system. If the budget is balanced, the economy will collapse because no new FRN’s can be printed and no new debt credit created.

The FRB pays 2½ ¢ per FRN note printed whether $1 or $1000. The US in-turn pays FRBinterest indefinitely for each outstanding note or representation of a note. With electronic banking FRN’s are created out of nothing and nothing being printed. What a deal!

Central Banking and credit

Beginning in 1963, the words ” redeemable in lawful money ” and ” will pay to the bearer on demand ” were removed from future issues of Federal Reserve Notes

Public Law 88-36, approved June 4, 1963 made Silver certificates redeemable for silver bullion in the form of pellets or granulations and not in silver dollars. The exchange could only take place at the U.S. Assay Office in San Francisco up to June 24, 1968. After that, Silver certificates were no longer redeemable and are only legal tender having same value as Federal Reserve Notes.

The silver content of the dimes and quarters was completely eliminated under the Coinage Act of 1965 and the silver content of the half dollars was greatly reduced and or eliminated since then. Coins that no longer have silver content are called “Copper-nickel clad coins” or just “clad coins” and have no intrinsic value.

In 1982, the cent was changed from being 95 percent copper and 5 percent zinc to copper plated zinc weighting 20 percent less. The cent is now just like a token.

“In My opinion, the purchasing power of the debassed coinage and the increasingly inflationary currency system is undeniable proof to substantiate extortion and embezzlement by the banking industry and those who hold office in the corporate government system.”
–Jack Slevkoff 2008

Debt Currency
Money Fraud

In My opinion, it is impossible to pay the entire US debt because there is not enough money in circulation and not enough money created to cover the principle let alone the interest being created and accumulated.
–Jack Slevkoff 2008

A Maxim of Law:
“One is not required to do the impossible.”

America’s wealth
would be like a “Pot of Gold”Fore warned:
“If the American people ever allow private banks (the Federal Reserve Banks) to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until theirchildren wake up homelesson the continent their fathers conquered..” –Thomas Jefferson

The Law, which still stands, stated:
Individual states are “not allowed to make any things but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.” The Constitution also stated: “Congress has the power toCOIN money and regulate the value thereof.”
–Article I Section 10 of the Constitution

Notice that it states the word “coin”
and not “print paper currency.”

Our Founding Fathers knew how a central bank printing paper money would collapse our economy.

“And to preserve their independence,
we must not let our rulers [leaders] load us with perpetual debt.”
–Thomas Jefferson

“Until we realize that our money power is our sovereign power we cannot act as sovereigns”
–E.C. Riegel.

“Gold will always remain the ultimate form of payment in the world.”
–Alan Greenspan, Testimony before US House
Banking Committee, May 1999.

The Greenback Acts of 1861 allowed the Union (during the Civil War) to print and issue paper currency in 1862 for the first time in US history. Prior to that, the federal government restricted itself to coins. The paper money was not backed with gold or silver but simply with the full faith and credit of the Union government. The ink chosen for the back side was a peculiar green; thereby nicknamed “greenbacks”.The confederate states did the same thing and their currency were called “bluebacks” and “graybacks.”

One year later, the 1861 Acts were revoked and replaced with the National Banking Act in 1863. An Act passed on April 12, 1866 authorized the sale of bonds to retire currency called greenbacks.

FRN’s were first issued in 1914.

The Independent Treasury Act of 1921 suspended the de jure Treasury Department of the United States government and turned it over to a private corporation called the Federal Reserve
(de jure means “by right of lawful establishment”)

Just prior to the Stock Market crash of 1929, millions of dollars of gold was taken out of this Country and transferred to England.

All of the remaining assets of the US citizens, including their person, are held by the Depository Trust Corporation (DTC), the central securities depository, at 55 Water Street, New York, NY – secured by Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as “debt money” by the Federal Reserve.
Under the umbrella of the DTC lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation and the American Bar Association, the “legal arm” of the banking interests.

Return Money To The People

In 2010, the popularity of the dollar
has fallen behind the Euro.
“the euro is the currency with the highest combined value of cash in circulation in the world, having surpassed the U.S. dollar (USD).” —Wikipedia

Sovereigns SUBJECTS
Living Souls coming out of mother’s womb onto the land of one of the several states of America are “Sovereign”, “Freemen”, “Free inhabitant”, and “Freeborn” unless that right is given up knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily upon full disclosure.Amendment X
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, …are reserved to …the people.”
US citizens (Chattel Property) are belligerents in the field and are
subject to its jurisdiction
(Washington DC)U.S. citizens are 14th Amendment citizensimplemented by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 originally established for the newly freed slaves.
That is to say: “Now slaves of the corporate government plantation”
The people are Sovereign“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects… with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”
–Chisholm v. Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @Dall 1793 pp471-472

Sovereign
A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. (q. v.);
2. In the United States thesovereignty resides in the body of the people.
Vide Rutherf. Inst. 282.
–Bouvier’s Law Revised
6th Edition, 1856

“[It is] the people,
to whom all authority belongs.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821.

“There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: all else is withheld.” –Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. S. 421

A piece of paper does not give people the right to walk the earth as one of God’s creatures. People have that right without the Constitution, without the Amendments some people call the “Bill of Rights,” and without a Birth Certificate.

No Political or Royal figure can give one the right to be free or take that right away. The idea that one is “given” what one already has is an illusion created for the purposes of control, power, and manipulation. Such an idea exists only when people allow it to exist or are ignorant of their rights.

Today, almost all mothers, black or white, unknowingly inform on their own babies. Take a look at the so-called “Birth Certificate” CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH where the mother signs and you will see the title of the box stating in small print:“MOTHER OR OTHER INFORMANT”.
The word “OTHER” makes the mother “an informant.” By signing the “Birth Certificate” as an informer, she contracts with the government putting her child and her child’s future labor as collateral for the national debt (servitude–slavery). The father or mother can rescind the contract within three business days (Truth-in-Lending).

Since the Birth Certificate neither lists the father as the husband nor lists the wife’s acceptance of the father’s surname as her own but has the mother’s maiden name instead, the baby is considered a BASTARD. Bastards are therefore under the care and control of the Priest Rule (democracy) and can be taken from the mother at any time.

The hospitals receive a fairly large monetary benefit ($3,000, more or less, per child) from the corporate government for having Birth Certificates filled out and signed.

The Wizard of Oz

“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government”
–Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

Judicial Name
(Appellation)Name of a living soul
in a flesh and blood man.
(‘man’ includes woman and child).

John James, Christianson

Note upper and lower case
(Proper by Rules of English Grammar)

Christian Appellation: John James
(Sole property)
Family Name: Christianson
(Common property)

Here is an example of how
Jack, the author, declares who he is:

Jack, the son of Jack, of the family named Slevkoff (surname), a living soul in a flesh and blood man on the land, [hereinafter I, Me, My, or Myself], is an American having Sovereign status [Declaration of Independence: anno Domini, Seventeen seventy-six for America], a native of California, thereby being a California national, California being one of the Republics and a nation unto itself [an Act establishing government in California: anno Domini,
eighteen hundred forty-nine]

Legal Name
is a “Prisoner of war” name
Fictitious ” nom de guerre  name
for a non-living entity:
also referred to as the “Strawman
and/or “Transmitting Utility“JOHN DOE
Name is in all capital letters
a.k.a. all CAPS
which is in a format called
Capitus Diminutio Maxima

Capitus Diminutio Maxima
(Maximum diminished status)
means that a man’s condition changes from freedom to bondage
and becomes a slave or an item of inventory.
–Blacks Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition 1968

John C. Doe
Note: middle initial
(No name at all–A fiction)

First Name: JOHN
Middle Initial: C.
Last Name: DOE

fictional persona
being surety for the debt
as a fiction in commerce

Also known as an “ Ens Legis ”
which means ‘legal entity’.
It is non-human, ‘civilly dead’.

Look at the name on Drivers Licenses, Social Security cards, Credit Cards, Deeds, Bank Accounts, etc.

Name in all CAPS
Maintaining SovereigntyAs a result of a king’s uncontrolled spending spree, France had severe inflation which resulted in a monetary crisis. A group of people stormed the Bastille in Paris on July 15th 1789, and the French Revolution was born. The ‘Rights of Man’ was declared on August 26, 1789. By midsummer of 1792, the king was dethroned and the royal family was imprisoned. Since the people no longer had any use for a king and queen, Louis XVI was beheaded on January 21, 1793 and Marie Antoinette was beheaded later that year.

Therefore, it is the people who are really in control. It is intended for government to be the servants and the people to be the masters. It is better for the government to fear the people than the people fear their government.

“..whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,..”
–Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” –Samuel Adams

U.S. citizens were declared enemies of the U.S. by F.D.R. by Executive Order No. 2040 and ratified by Congress on March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1FDR changed the meaning of The Trading with the Enemy Act of December 6, 1917 by changing the word “without” to citizens “within” the United States
People become surety for the debt by a number of different ways. One way is by aBirth Certificate when the baby’s footprint is placed thereon before it touches the land. The certificate is recorded at a County Recorder, then sent to a Secretary of State which sends it to the Bureau of Census of the Commerce Department. This process converts a man’s life, labor, and property to an asset of the US government when this person receives a benefit from the government such as a drivers license, food stamps, free mail delivery, etc. This person becomes a fictional persona in commerce. The Birth Certificate is an unrevealed “Trust Instrument” originally designed for the children of the newly freed black slaves after the 14th Amendment. The US has the ability to tax and regulate commerce.The government issued Birth Certificate is now a Registered Security which initially has an estimated value of One Million dollars. They are circulated around the world as collateral for loans and entered on the asset side of ledgers just like any other security. That is why they are initially filed with the Commerce Department.

The central banks now have a negotiable instrument against which credit is advanced by the international funding community, namely The World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, Bank of England, Federal Bank of America etc

Freeborn
Free inhabitant
Freeman
Freeholder
A member of the Sovereign
“We the people…”
Bond Servant
To cover the debt in 1933 and future debt, the corporate government determined and established the value of the future labor of each individual in its jurisdiction to be $630,000. A bond of $630,000 is set on each Certificate of Live Birth. The certificates are bundled together into sets and then placed as securities on the open market. These certificates are then purchased by the Federal Reserve and/or foreign bankers. The purchaser is the “holder” of “Title.” This process made each and every person in this jurisdiction a bond servant.”None are more enslaved
than those whofalselyy believe
they are free.”
–Goethe
Inherent rights
present at birth
but not necessarily hereditaryUnalienable rights
Rights from God
that are not lienable.
Inalienable rights
Rights from the corporate government that can be liened against or taken away at any time. Very much like a ‘privilege’.

Unalienable vs Inalienable
Elector VOTER
The “Electoral college of electors” are the ones that actually determine who will be President – not any popular vote, poll, media, or statistic.An Elector
is Not subject to
exclusive legislative power
of Congress.

Almost anyone can
become an elector.
Did not have to be a registered voter
or a party member.

Currently, there are
538 elector positions.
It now takes 270 Electoral Votes
to win the Presidential Election.

The total number of electors a state can have is equal to that state’s total representation in Congress. Less populated states such as Wyoming, North Dakota, and Vermont have at least one Representative and two Senators. Therefore, they have only three electoral votes. California, for instance, with 52 Representatives and two Senators, have 54 electors.

“Numerous constitutional amendments have been introduced in the Congress seeking to alter the Electoral College or replace it with a direct popular vote; however, no proposal has ever passed the Congress.” –Wikipedia

Members of Congress or anyone holding any Federal office cannot be an elector based on what the Constitution refers to as:
trust or profit.’

The Founding Fathers did not intend to have institutionalized party systems such as Democrats, Libertarians, and or Republicans.

“Registering to vote” is an admission that the declarant is subject to the exclusive legislative power of the corporate Congress and is a 14th Amendment citizen residing in federal territory.”…the right to vote at any election… is denied… except for participation in rebellion, or other crime…” –Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, U.S. Constitution

Rather than remaining a state national, one becomes a U.S. citizen participating in the rebellion by voting in the corporate government system and or signing up for benefits and privileges.

“Stop and think for a moment as to voting. When you vote for an office to be filled in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or one of its SUB-CORPORATIONS (THE STATE OF TEXAS), you have voted to fill a fictional corporate position designed to represent the CORPORATION, not a political position to represent the people. All elections in the “United States” are nothing more than proxy fights in a board room!”
–Ed: Brannum (Secretary of Privatization;
Provisional Government; Republic of Texas)

There are more people receiving government benefits today than ever. Most of these people are Democrats and vote for people who are Democrats. Reason being; the Democratic party provides and creates more benefit programs and services to obtain votes and popularity. Also, there are more people coming from Mexico, legally or illegally, amnesty or not, who know that the benefits are mostly created by Democrats and will always vote for the Democrats or convince others to do so. As these numbers increase, it will be very difficult for any non-democrat to win an election.

“The elite and the major media have the people pitting the democrats against the republicans or vise versa.
The democrats get in, the people find negative consequences and then vote republican.
The republicans get in, the people find negative consequences and then vote democrat next election.
In the meantime, the one-world government elite’s agenda is being fulfilled.
People have to wake up and realize that this is a corporation doing business disguised as the former government and is not the government originally instituted in the 1700’s.
Stop playing their game.”
–Jack;Slevkoff 2009

“You know, comrades. That I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this – who will count the votes, and how.”
–Joseph Stalin

An Elector’s choice (election) or decision counts like one on the Board of Directors A voter’s vote
is a recommendation only
Votes are counted at a poll
or polling station.
“Poll” is defined as an inquiry
into public opinion.
Justice System “JUST-US” SYSTEM
Free inhabitants are under God’s commandments, one’s conscience, and the English Common Law (Jury)Citizens within the Northwest territory are under the written legislated laws created by Congress which is adjudicated via the Judicial Branch of government established by”Article III” of the Constitution So-called Judicial system
and Legislature
are under the President
Most courts today are Article I
or Article II courts.
Separate from Executive and Legislative branches of government
serving the People”
under Constitutional mandates.
The so-called Judicial is not separate
although it may appear that way.Most so-called courts today
are listed in Dun & Bradstreet as
private company or corporation,
operating as a business for profit.
judicial venue federal (feudal) venue
Ministerial court system
To serve the people–“Servant”
Administrative court system
Responsible to the administration
–“Support”
General Law
Common Law
“The nature of law is to maintain justice.”
–Bastiat 1848
Private, internal law
“…the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.”
“Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it.” –Bastiat 1848
Common Law
(Law not written)Common Law is based on custom and usage and includes the Magna Carta and The greatCharter of the Forest

Common Law has two basic requirements:

  1. Do not Offend Anyone
  2. Honor all contracts

 

The 7th Amendmentguarantees a trial by jury according to the rules of thecommon law when the value in controversy exceeds Twenty dollars [in silver specie; not FRN’s]

“When injustice becomes law,
resistance becomes duty.”
– Thomas Jefferson

Civil Law
based on the Roman Civil LawCovers a vast number of volumes of text that even attorneys can’t absorb or comprehend such as:

  1. Regulations
  2. Codes
  3. Rules
  4. Statutes

There are now over 60 million of these so-called laws on the books. Keep in mind “ignorance of the law is no excuse” Everyone must be guilty of something. The more so-called laws, the more revenue generated.

“The more corrupt the State,
the more numerous the laws.”
–Cornelius Tacitus (c. 55-117 A.D.)
“The more numerous the laws,
the more corrupt the state.”
–Bastiat law (1936-)

 

Prior to bankruptcy of 1933
Public Law

Now the so-called courts administer “Public Policy” through the
Uniform Commercial Code
(instituted in 1967)

Public Policy and UCC
Constitution
Supreme Law of the land restricting a central government, appointed and elected officials, and their staff.The “organic” Constitution and its amendments are created by the states united to institute, restrict, and restrain a limitedcentral government and to protect the people from such central government from infringing on the peoples God-given rights.
No stare decisisMeans no precedent binds any court, because they have no law standard of absolute right and wrong by which to measure a ruling—what is legal today may not be legal tomorrow.

So-called “court decisions” are administrative opinions only and are basically decided on the basis of
“What is best for the corporate government.”

Most so-called laws today don’t protect you against them, but protects them against you.

Grand Jury composed of
25 people who are Sovereigns–Magna Carta, Article 61
so-called Grand Jury
composed of 24 US citizens
Judicial Courts
with real Judicial Officers and
real Juries who can judge the law
as well as the facts
Jury decisions cannot be reversed by the judge
The so-called courts are actually
Corporate Arbitration Boards
Consisting of an Arbitrator
(so-called “Judge”)
and sometimes a panel of corporate employees
(so-called “Juries”)
Panel decisions (recommendation)
can be reversed by the Arbitrator
Judges
(No black robes)The judicial officer is actually a coordinator who sits in on behalf of the people, for the good of the people, who swears by full oath of office to abide by and uphold the Constitution, and is there to give presenters and counselors equal opportunity to present their case, with fairness and un bias to all, whether it is pertaining to a controversy or one suspected of a crime or injustice, to produce and provide an impartial and fair trial or suite in Law by bringing forth the facts and the law to be judged by the people who are peers.

The people are the ultimate “judges” of both the law and the facts.

The so-called judge, a corporate “black-robe”referee, an actor (acting judge), on a fictitious stage, sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag, becomes the “captain” or “master” of that ship or enclave and has absolute power to make the rules at his whim as he goes; all the while talking to or about the fictitious PERSON.The so-called judge will sometimes not allow all of the facts to be heard or the so-called law examined because of his bias or is following orders of the corporate so-called government who may even want to have the case sealedfrom the public.

If one does not conform to the judge’s wishes, the judge, without proper cause, will send the non-conformist to a psychiatric ward for evaluation (intimidation) and sometimes left there to be drugged and not released until one is willing to conform to the judge’s bias.

This has happened many times in the latter years and has been personally witnessed by Myself concerning friends.

“…the judiciary has usurped the law for its own purposes and replaced constitutional guarantees with a system in which judges rule by decree.”– www.tulanelink.com

Common Law Court
is a “Court of Record” that proceeds according to Common Law, keeps a record of the proceedings, has power to fine or imprison, and the tribunal is independent of the magistrate. (May also have a seal)
These so-called courts are not “in law” but are simply acting on behalf of a corporate business enforcing it’s contracts under the disguise of Equity Courts, Superior courts, Federal courts, District courts, Municipal Courts–Merchant Law, Military Law, Marshall Law, Summary Court Martial proceedings, and administrative ad hock tribunals (similar to Admiralty/Maritime) and appear to be governed by “The Manual of Courts Martial” (under Acts of War) and the “War Powers Act of 1933.”
Lawful or UnlawfulBased on God’s law, the common law, and any law that any prudent man will abide by under normal circumstances without giving up one’s rights or infringing upon another’s rights. Legal or IllegalAll legal actions are pursued under
the “color of law”

Color of law means
appears to be” law, but is not

“Because of what appears to be lawful commands on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance.”
–United States Supreme Court
US. v. Minker ,
350 US 179 at 187 (1956)

Trial by Jury
of one’s peers,
whether Civil or Criminal.The people have
the ultimate say
in any matter.
Provides “hearings
whenever possible
for total control
unless one insists on
having a jury trial.
Jury Trial” (recommendation) is not the same as “Trial by jury of one’s peers.”So-called judges have been known to
overturn jury trial recommendations.
Hearings are not mentioned
in the constitutions.
Suit Action
Crime
(a noun)
Injury to a man, woman, or child;
or damaged their property
Must be an injured party
Must show actual harm or damage
Criminal offence
“criminal” is an adjective; not a noun
An offence is not a crime
but is a violation of a policy
Enforcement of policies
The name “Police”
came from “policies”
Accusor Plaintiff
Informant
Complainant
Accused
No defense necessary unless evidence and witnesses is overwhelming.
Defendant
Needs to defend against
guilt assumption.
Accusation“Claim”
other terms used: “true bill,” “libel”

“In-jury”
Latin for infringement-of rights

“Charge”
Charged with…(a negative)
(payment or retribution is the positive)
“an assertion that someone is guilty of a fault or offence”
“(criminal law) a pleading describing some wrong or offense”When asked, “Do you understand the charges…?”, actually means “Do you stand under the charges…?”
“Writ”
Form of written command in the name of one in authority such as a Sovereign, such as a member of “We the people”Some examples are as follows:
Writ of Habeas corpus,
“An order to bring forth the body”; usually from jail or prison.
Writ of Mandamus
“Commanding an official to perform a ministerial act.”
“Used only when all other judicial remedies fail”
Writ of Prohibition
“An order prohibiting an act”
Writ of Certiorari
“An order demanding the record”

Although most definitions today only mentions that writs can be issued by a judge or are a court order, in reality, almost anyone, except “US citizens” (subjects or slaves), can issue such writs. Writs are tools of the common law.

“Motion”
“A formal application to a court (so-called judge) for its (his or her) order, ruling, judgement or decree.” –Ballentines Law DictionaryA motion must be supported by an affidavit but the affidavit cannot be read during the hearing.–lectlaw.com

“hearings are conducted as oral arguments in support of motions,” —Wikipedia

Emit writs Submit documents
Writ of Error Appeal
“Present”
Present as ones self.
“Represent”
derived from re-present.
To present as someone else.
To re-present as the “Ens Legis”
a.k.a. STRAWMAN name
If you are represented, you are a ward of the court and are incompetent or a juvenile.
“Venue”
(A place)
“the county from which the jury are to come, who are to try the issue” –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
“Re-venue”
Now often seen as “revenue” which refers to monies collected by changing ones venue to a corporate government venue.
“in-law”
(i.e. “Son-in-law” or a “covenant in law”)Submersed in (true) law.
Dealing with Law itself.
“at Law”
“Attorney at law”Can be at something
but not submersed in it
or a part of it.
On the outside of law, not in it.
“Private” side “Public” side
man, woman, child
“one of the people”
“a living soul”
“flesh and blood”
“Person”
defined as a corporation, trust, partnership,…
“artificial legal entity”
All fictions
mirror-like identity recognizable in written form; usually in all caps
The word “person” originated from the Latin word “persona” derived from Etruscan “phersu” which means “mask.”
Is the STRAWMAN masquerading
as the real man?
“Husband”
“Wife”
“Spouse”
Neither feminine nor masculine.
A spouse is a “partnered trust” produced by marrying or merging two trust accounts.
“the people”
mankind
Persons
various trusts, partnerships, corporations, or fictional entities of some kind.
“Sui Juris”
Latin, of one’s own right
One who has all the rights
to which a freemen is entitled;
one who is not under the power of another,
as a slave, a minor, and the like.
To make a valid contract, one must,
in general, be sui juris.
www.lectlaw.comAppearing on one’s own behalf– meaning you are not beholden to or obligated to anyone in or out of government.

Referring to people who present themselves as a living soul
in a flesh and blood body
presenting the law and the facts.

“Pro se”
Re-presents one’s self “in person”
or “in persona” (mask)
as a fiction.
Serving as one’s own attorney.
A privilege that can be
taken away at anytime
United States v Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1122“Pro per”
short for “propria persona”
meaning “proper person”
Since “Person” is a fiction
you are telling them you are
in your proper person (mask)
and not a man by any means.

Keep in mind that pro per
is better than pro se.

Jurisdiction not admitted,
if no attorney pleads.

Affirmation
testify to the facts
written testimony of the facts
witness statement of the factsDeclaration
To declare
“…by these Presents”

“…being of sound mind, over the age of 21 years, competent, and having first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein, do hereby tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and herein say, saith, declare, proclaim, and claim as follows:…”

Affidavit
(statutory venue)
“An affidavit is an oath in writing, sworn before and attested by him [officer/notary] who hath authority to administer the same.”
Speak the Truth
“My word is My Bond”
Cannot swear or make an oath
Matthew 5:33-37, James 5:12
Oath
an external pledge
to swear or affirm
usually under penalty of perjury
“I do not accept
“I take exception” to that
“I Object
“Objection, please”
Counsel
or “Counsellor in-Law”

Lawyer
defined here as
One who studies
and understands
the law or laws

No license required

No registration required

No Bar card required

Just need to know the Law.

The Law is simple
Do not Offend Anyone
Honor all contracts

And of course
one has to recognize
God’s Law
some refer to as
“Natures law”
such as “gravity”
or “breathe air to live.”

Another basic choice one may live by
is the Golden Rule
“Do unto others
as you would have them
do unto you.”

And others acknowledge
and abide by the
Ten Commandments

These laws are simple
easy to understand
not hard to know
and do not change

There are no “codes”

Almost anyone
can become a Lawyer

Attorney
an Esquire (British nobility)
a title meaning “Shield Bearer”Attorney-at-law
The defense Attorney, the Prosecutor, and the so-called Judge are all attorneys doing business in the corporate administrative courts (tribunals) of the U.S. as agents of the Crown of England

Attorneys swear an oath
to uphold the
“BAR ASSOCIATION”.

The BAR ASSOCIATION is registered with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE as a
501(c)(3) organization
like a religious tax exempt organization.

Some people believe that the first letter ofB.A.R. stands for “British”.
(British Accredited Registry).
This could be a myth, although the “bar” term may have originated in London having to do with an obstruction that denies or allows entrance such as “raising the bar” being a bridge or a gate.

The BAR in the U.S. was first organized in Mississippi in 1825.

The “integrated bar” movement, meaning “the condition precedent to the right to practice law,” was initiated in the US in 1914 by the American Jurisprudence Society.
–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

“When only attorneys can understand the codes, statutes, and regulations (so-called laws), then only attorneys should be required to obey them.” –Jack; Slevkoff–2002

Should I hire an attorney?
The Supreme Court
for The United States of America
the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
The District Court
for The United States of America

were implemented for territories
that were not states.
the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Lawyer or counsel
for the states united
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Prosecutor
“In the early days of our Republic, ‘prosecutor’ was simply anyone who voluntarily went before the grand Jury with a complaint.”–United States v. Sandford, Fed. Case No.16, 221 (C.Ct.D.C. 1806)
PROSECUTOR
A government official who
conducts criminal prosecutions
on behalf of the corporate STATE.An attorney who works for the LOCAL, STATE or FEDERAL government to bring and litigate so-called criminal cases.

At the LOCAL level, the prosecutor will usually be the COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’s Office. In some cases the prosecutor may be from the CITY ATTORNEY’s Office. The PROSECUTOR reviews evidence to determine if a complaint may be filed.

Counsel to help the accused
or the lawyer who knows
and studies the law
Defense Attorney
A so-called court can safely assume jurisdiction when one is re-presented by an attorney.
Must have damaged party Compels performance
No damaged party is necessary.
Maintains rights, freedoms, and liberties
of the people
No rights except Civil Rights.
and privileges that can be taken away at any time. Restricts freedoms and liberties.
Unalienable rights, fundamental rights, substantial rights and other rights of living souls are all protected by The Law and protected by The “organic” Constitution and its amendments. US citizens are at the mercy of government and the administrative courts and tribunalsServants (subjects/ bond-servants)
cannot sue the Master
(Corporate government)
unless allowed to.
The first ten articles
of amendment to the constitution
are sometimes refereed to as
Bill of Rights
which is incorrect.
They are not a “Bill”
but are simply “amendments.”
The actual “Bill of Rights” was a declaration in 1689 by King William and Queen Mary to their loyal subjects of the British crown.
If you are in this jurisdiction,
you are a subject of the crown as well?
Due Process is required Due Process is optional–Sometimes Gestapo-like tactics without reservation.
Innocent until proven guilty“No Bill Of Attainder
or Ex-post Facto Law,
shall be passed.”
–Constitution, in Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 3
Guilty until proven not guilty
(Especially, when faced with issues relating to the corporate government, its agents, and or its highwaymen.)
The so-called judge will ask if one is “guilty” or “not guilty.”
Always claim to be “innocent.”
A “plea” enters one into a binding contract with the so-called court.
Jurors judge the law
as well as the factsJurors are the last bastion of hope
to free one from tyrannical or unjust laws imposed by government.

Jury nullification
“Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of “not guilty” despite the common belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is immoral, unconstitutional or is wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate it is charged with deciding. Traditionally jurors are free to disregard the judge if they feel he is part of the system of oppression. Jury nullification is an essential protection for citizens against governmental tyranny.” –John Tiffany; AmericanFreePress.net

The judge instructs the jurors to try only the facts (not the code, statue, et cetera).The judge usually gives the statute, regulation, code, rule, etc. that will most likely convict the defendant.

If there is any dispute with the
so-called law, the judge will declare
“I say what the law is”.
If there is any more dispute with the law,
the judge will say,
“I will hold you in contempt if you continue in this manner.”

Marcella Brooks testimony on video
before the National Press Club
on November 3, 2006 (14 min 24 sec)

Crime
A crime is an offence against a public law. This word, in its most general signification, comprehends all offences but, in its limited sense, it is confined to felony.
1 Chitty, Gen. Pr. 14.
2. The term misdemeanorincludes every offence inferior to felony, but punishable by indictment or by-particular prescribed proceedings.
3. The term offence, also, may be considered as, having the same meaning, but is usually, by itself, understood to be a crime not indictable but punishable, summarily, or by the forfeiture of, a penalty.
Burn’s Just. Misdemeanor.
4. Crimes are defined and punished by statutes and by the common law. Most common law offences are as well known, and as precisely ascertained, as those which are defined by statutes; yet, from the difficulty of exactly defining and describing every act which ought to be punished, the vital and preserving principle has been adopted, that all immoral acts which tend to the prejudice of the community are punishable by courts of justice.
2 Swift’s Dig.
All from Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
All crimes are considered
Commercial crimes.
“Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws;burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses);extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.”.
27 CFR Sec 72.11 (4-1-02 Edition)”Poor people have access to the courts in the same sense that the Christians had access to the lions.”- Judge Earl Johnson, Jr.

“…there simply is too much law (government) to even function – we cannot get out of our own way, we have tied ourselves in knots – when we were supposed to have a limited government and the purpose of the Constitution was to tie government down to the EXPRESS powers given it. There simply is nothing left that government does not touch, have its hands on, and has not made a mess of. More law, more government will not save us – they are the problem.” –from an article written in 2006 by Attorney Gary Zerman, titled: “South Dakota Government Acted In Concert Against The People”

Most courts have become the collection agency of the corporate government system for the debt created by said system to be paid in part by the people who come before the so-called court.

Lawful determination 
Judicial determination“The people’s one supreme Court is the county Court of record; the highest Court in the Land. Once it rules, the United States Supreme Courts, Federal or State, can not question the ruling; read the 7th amendment. The State and federal Courts are inferior tribunals to We the People’s one supreme Court. The one supreme Court exist wherever the People convene it! …the People have agreed to convene it at the county seat and the county judge is elect[ed] by the people as the administrator of their one supreme Court of Record. He makes no judicial ruling. He is only there to keep the Court open and see that it is run orderly and enforce the judgments of the Court of the People. When the jury is called and has been sworn from among the People they are the twelve justices sitting as the one supreme Court of Record for the People of that county.”

Thomas Jefferson worried about that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law, an oligarchy, the rule of few over many.

The very first Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, said, “Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers.”

Legal determination
“THERE IS NO LAWYER OR JUDGE THAT CAN OR WILL GO AGAINST THIS COLORABLE SYSTEM!!”
“Under this system, the judge makes “legal determinations” which is in accord with the creditors of this country. No Lawyer (Ly’Er) will demand a “JUDICIAL DETERMINATION”. Legal Determinations ARE NOT appealable as are Judicial Determinations!! Legal determinations are anything the judge says they are under their colorable Public policy laws. However, Judicial determinations are in accordance with the Public Law and are subject to CONstitutional constraints.””Since the Erie RR v. Tompkins decision in 1938, the courts have been operating under Public Policy, in the interest of the “nations creditors,” instead of Public Law in accord with the CONstitution.”
“The judges are not allowed to consider any case law prior to 1938! BUT, there is one case,Clearfield Trust, et al v. US, 318 US 363 (1943), (see attachment). All courts are Administrative Tribunals, operating under a Colorable Admiralty Jurisdiction called Statutory Jurisdiction and all judges are Administrators, and all Lawyers (Pronounced Ly’Er) are officers of the colorable courts.”
“The whole judiciary is administering the Bankruptcy of the US, declared by Roosevelt in 1933!!…”
–2004 Billy-Joe..Mauldin
Everyone is responsible for
their actions and words spoken.It does not matter what position
or title one has in life.
The United States Supreme Court gave full immunity against both civil and criminal prosecution for perjury to Judges, Attorneys, Court Reporters, Stenographers, Law Enforcement Officers and Expert Witnesses,
who testify for the STATE.
See: A Brief on Judicial Immunity
and Judicial Immunity vs Due ProcessThe deck is stacked against
the ordinary people and even the innocent.
Prisons forincarceration PRISONS FOR PROFIT
To Protect Society

The responsibility, accountability,
and liability for incarceration
belongs to the state.

Inmates are not merchandise
to be sold or used for profit.

The initial purpose of prisons is to protect the people from criminals.

Prisons were also created to punish the guilty for offensive crimes against victims of such crimes.

The amount of punishment
was to fit the crime.

There are too many innocent people, in recent times, sent to prison.

Today, ordinary people, innocent people, non-criminals are found guilty of so-called crimes and are sent to prison as a result of excessive needless so-called laws, overly zealous, ambitious, and or corrupt prosecutors and judges.

Many people, today, are sent to prison, for one reason or another, to silence them for speaking and sharing information one would find on this web page.

Today, many people are not receiving a fair, impartial, and unbiased trial and or not receiving a trial by their peers, especially if it affects the pocket books of such prosecutors and judges such as a tax issue or revenue issue.

A Commercial BusinessMore and more prisons today are privately owned and run as a profit making commercial enterprise creating products and services for sale. It is believed that many judges hold stock or an interest in these privatized prisons. These commercially run prisons do not have the best interest of the Inmates or Staff in mind but the bottom line–PROFIT. They need a continuous supply of low-cost labor (slaves) to produce products in order to increase profits. Even when the crime rate is down, these privateers lobby the appropriate governmental and judicial authorities to increase the incarceration rate in order to add to their already substantial profit taking. There are no checks and balances for monitoring this type of system.

To name a few privateers:

  • Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)–founded in 1983, based in Nashville, Tennessee, now operates more than 77 facilities across the USA
  • Wackenhut Services, Inc. of Florida
  • Wackenhut Corrections Corp.(WCC)–misappropriated over $700,000 of funds in Texas, which were allocated by that state for drug rehabilitation programs.

Directors consists of former members of the FBI and CIA.

  • Becon-Wackenhut Inc. of Florida
  • U.S. Corrections Corporation, a private company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky–since 1986
  • Rehabilitative Industries & Diversified Enterprises Inc. (PRIDE), a firm based in Clearwater, Florida, now manages all 53 Florida prison work programs as a for profit operation. PRIDE has made a $4 million profit in one year. Many states considering privatization of prison industries are studying the PRIDE operation. PRIDE products range from optical and dental items to modular office systems.
  • Pricor Corporation
  • American Correctional Systems, Inc.
  • Corrections Development Corporation
  • Buckingham Security Ltd.
  • Cornell Corrections–currently has contracts to operate 81 facilities in 17 states and the District of Columbia
  • Correctional Services Corp.(CSC)
  • UNICOR–a federal government-owned corporation established by the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration in 1934 otherwise known as “Federal Prison Industries.” UNICOR maintains factories in every Federal Prison in the country. Nationwide sales of “PRISON PRODUCED PRODUCTS” in year 2000 was 8.9 billion dollars. Some products produced are; office furniture, high tech military cable and wiring systems, mattress and box springs, camouflage military uniforms, sheets, towels, pillow cases, brooms, mops, et cetera. UNICOR has now partnered with Spire, an American solar company, to manufacture photovoltaic modules and systems.

Best Western International, Inc, a major hotel chain, employs over thirty Arizona prison workers to operate the hotel’s telephone reservation system. Trans World Airlines, Inc. hires young offenders from the Ventura Center Training School in California to handle “over the phone” flight reservations.

Guarantees “QUARANTINES”
Amendment IV

 

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularlydescribing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Warrantless and unreasonable searches in homes, airports, corporate government facilities, on the roadways (highways), etc.Government may search and seize Americans’ papers and effects without probable cause to assist in so-called terror investigation. –Patriot Act

In Nazi Germany, It started with:
Where’s your papers?
or Your papers, please?!

History repeats itself. Now, it is:

“ID, please?”

The I.D. called “Real ID” with biometrics is on the horizon and about to be implemented if not already.

Amendment V
“…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
“Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the ceaseless application of his of his faculties to natural resources. This process is the origin of property. But it is also true that a man may live and satisfy his wants by seizing and consuming the products of the labor of others. This process is the origin of plunder.” “…the proper purpose of law is to use the power of its collective force to stop this fatal tendency to plunder instead of work. All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder.”
“Thus it is easy to understand how law, instead of checking injustice, becomes the invincible weapon of injustice. It is easy to understand why the law is used by the legislator to destroy in varying degrees among the rest of the people, their personal independence by slavery, their liberty by oppression, and their property by plunder. This is done for the benefit of the person who makes the law, and in proportion to the power he holds.”
–1848 “THE LAW” by Claude Frederic Bastiat, a French economist, statesman, author, and philosopher.
Property is constantly, currently, and consistently being taken for alleged taxes without due process and without just compensation.Land and property is now being taken by EMINENT DOMAIN for purposes not originally intended.

All kinds of fees and penalties are being extorted from the people for so-called laws. The people can no longer win in court against the corporate government system. If one tries, one may be held “in contempt of court” and fined

The Senate examined exactly what powers they had granted the President by amending the Trading With the Enemy Act on March 9, 1933, they concluded that: “Under these powers the president may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law [actually: Martial Rule];
seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private industry; restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”
–Senate Report 93-549.

Amendment VI

 

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury…, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to beconfronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
(does not say “attorney”)

Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial. –Patriot ActSo-called Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny counsel to Americans accused of crimes.

Fascism police-state tactics and methods, similar to Nazi Germany

“The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873). Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”
–Jones v. Temmer, 829 Fed. Supp. 1226 (1993)

States STATES
“state” when used by itself refers to the “Republics” of Theunited states of America In U.S. Titles and Codes “State” refers to U.S. possessions such as Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.
All of the states are”Republics“e.g. “California republic”
“California state”
or just “California”
abbreviated “Calif.”

Each state is a sovereign
nation unto itself; free and independent

The book “Golden Fleece in Nevada” written by Judge Clel Georgetta states “In 1780, the Continental Congress adopted a resolution requesting the thirteen original states to surrender to the central government (the Confederation) all the lands they claimed in the territory west of their original boundaries [west of the Appalachian Mountains] to the Mississippi, so such lands could be sold to private interests for money to pay off the debt incurred by the Revolutionary War, and then the area would be divided into new states to be admitted into the Confederation on the same basis as the original states.” Judge Georgetta continues “The thirteen independent sovereign states were first joined together in a Federal Union known as ‘The Confederation’ and in 1781 ratified ‘The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.’ Those Articles contain the following words: Article II. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled. Article IX. …provides also that no state shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. There can be no doubt that the purpose of guaranteeing each state its complete sovereignty was to waylay all fear of joining the organization. It was those words of guaranty in the Articles that the various states joined the ‘Confederation’ in order to form a Central Government to perform certain functions for all the states as a group. It was to be a central government with very limited power.” written by Dick Carver, Nye County Commissioner, member of the Nevada State Land Use Planning Advisory Council

“I am neither a “Resident,” nor a “Non-resident,” neither “in this state,” nor “within this state” and certainly not a UNITED STATES citizen. If I am to be categorized or described, one can consider Me a living soul in a flesh and blood man on the land, a free inhabitant, a California native.”
–Jack; Slevkoff

All States are corporations incorporated with the federal corporatione.g. “State of California”
corporate California
California State
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CA

Politicians and the legislature of each state formed a new so-called government (de facto) and incorporated it into the corporate US commercial corporation a.k.a. UNITED STATES, Inc. and are therefore under its jurisdiction. This so-called government is actually a limited-liability corporation (Limited Liability Act of 1851), chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the flag and the creation of a new constitution. Each “STATE OF…” collects whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States of 1933.

In this state” or “within this state” includes all federal areas lying within the exterior boundaries of the state. –Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 82.04.200 found at:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.04.200

The citizens of the corporate States, federal areas, are “subjects” and are called”Residents
Derived from “res” meaning “the thing” and “ident” meaning “identify.” Therefore, a “resident” is
“a thing identified.”
And, “President” is “P-resident,” meaning“Principal resident” enjoined in the federal area.

Nonresident” means any person whose residence is outside “this state” and who is temporarily sojourning “WITHIN THIS STATE”. [1961 c 12 §46.04.360. Prior: 1959 c 49 § 37; prior: (i) 1943 c 153 § 1, part; 1937 c 188 § 1, part; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 6312-1, part. (ii) 1937 c 189 § 1, part; RRS § 6360-1, part.] (emphasis added).

“We the people” created the states (the republics) and are Sovereign over the states.Certain powers are granted tothe state,
not by the state.

A document made by the people to create a state purposely limits the powers granted to the state; said document does not measure the rights of those governed, but is to assure that those rights are not trampled upon.

Sovereigns of California are sometimes referred to as “California nationals.” In Texas, “Texas nationals,” etc.

Likewise, “We the People” made the document that created the government of the United States of America (USA) and are therefore sovereign over the USA government.

Also, people from each individual state of the states united participated in the creation of the document that created the government of the united states of America with limited power. The people from each state accepted and gave their approval with the conditions that each individual state gave up only certain portions of their power on an equal basis but retained all other rights and powers in the states and in the people. Thereby, the states and the people in each state retained their Sovereignty over the government of the united states of America.

The creator is over the created, not vise versa

All state governments today
are corporations,
not sovereign states.The corporate states were created by incorporation into the corporate federal United States as corporate entities appearing to be similar to and overlaying the republics so as not to rouse suspicion. Likewise, the corporate states created political subdivisions of the corporate state such as COUNTY OF FRESNO being similar to Fresno county but is not; COUNTY OF MADERA being similar to Madera county but is not; etc.

The corporate States are controlled by the corporate US government by its purse strings such as grants, funding, matching funds, revenue sharing, disaster relief, etc.

Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report

Section 666 of the Federal Social Security Code (42 USC §666) preempts Idaho’s Free Exercise of Religion Act (FERA) and similar acts of other states. Section 666 appears to mandate that every State is to force everyone to identify with a Social Security Number (SSN) in order to obtain a professional license, occupational license, recreational license, driver’s license, and or marriage license in spite of ones religious beliefs based on Revelation, Chapter 13, of the Bible which warns of a beast that requires every person to identify with a number in order to engage in a livelihood.`The Bible clearly states that one is not to accept a number whereby one cannot buy or sell without it.

Indirect tax versesDirect
In some states, an indirect tax is implemented on certain specific items. Other states may not have any indirect tax, while others may have an indirect tax on all items sold by corporations. Although “direct taxes” are unconstitutional, “indirect taxes” are acceptable. A man or woman still has a choice to pay the tax or not. For example: Do not buy cigarettes if you do not want to pay the indirect tax. a “direct tax” is appropriate only by means of apportionment under certain circumstances.
Sales Tax and Sales Permit
Only corporations are required to pay sales tax. The sales tax is what corporations are required to pay as creatures of the corporate government. But they got ordinary people volunteering to pay up front sales tax on their behalf directly. They also got other companies to collect sales tax up front as well by making a “Sales Permit” mandatory to enter corporate trade shows. A “Sales Permit” is a license and makes one obligated to collect taxes and to turn them over to the corporate government. Out of ignorance, most companies volunteer to obtain a license even though it is voluntary. Most government people enforcing Sales licenses assume every company is required to collect sales tax. That is what the majority believes.
California state
republic Flag

“A nation unto itself”

This flag was first flown onJune 14, 1846 in Sonoma, California, by American settlers in California who revolted against Mexican rule in California and proclaimed California an independent republic.

The short-lived revolution ended on July 9, 1846.  Eventually the war with Mexico ended May 30, 1848 resulting in a treaty signed at Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico, whereby, Mexico gave up “Alta California” (Upper California).  Baja California being the lower California.  Monterey was the capital of Alta California under Spanish and Mexican rule since 1775.

They raised a bear flag that had a Red star, red bear, and red stripe from “Old Glory” The animal silhouette was a rendition of the California Grizzly. However, the silhouette did not actually look like a bear.  A 4-inch strip of red flannel from a petticoat worn by Mrs. Sears was sewn onto the bottom to produce a red stripe. Blackberry juice was used for the words ‘California Republic’ in Roman letters.  The whole flag was about three by five feet.

Some people believe it was a gold star and bear, But, I did not find anything to substantiate that claim.

The Bear Flag
was a result of a mistake

(More Historical info)

corporate flag
of the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
being incorporated within
the corporate UNITED STATESThis flag design was adopted as the official flag of California in 1911 with minor changes in design from time to time. The last known design change was made by prominent California historian and artist Donald Kelley in 1953

This flag is seen today in the corporate STATE OF CALIFORNIA usually with a gold fringe around it or with gold tassels, or with a ball or spear on top of the pole. The Grizzly bear design on the flag is based on Charles Nahl’s rendition on paper and in sculpture.

In California, the US corporate military flag is required to be flown above the corporate California flag indicating which one is superior or submissive to the other.

The corporate STATE OF CALIFORNIA is actually a fiction, overlaying the original California state, a republic.

Government buildings of the original state, government buildings of the original counties, and buildings of the original government of the united states of America have been abandoned and become museums until such a time the original government is re-established and or re-convened.

California’s original constitution was created by 48 delegates from 10 districts of California who were called to convene a Constitutional convention onSeptember 1, 1849 in the Colton Hall building in Monterey. Said constitution was signed October 13, 1849, adopted by the people of California and went into effect on November 13, 1849. Said 1849 constitution designatedSan Jose as the capital. California was admitted into the union as a Republic onSeptember 9, 1850.
–Volume 9, Statutes at Large, Page 452
The people created the original state constitution to give the government limited powers and to act on behalf of, and for the people.Four days after being admitted, the President said “…which, on due examination, is found to berepublican in its form of government…”
The original constitution was revised and adopted by the corporate State of California
on May 7, 1879
It has been revised many times hence.On April 24, 1950, the U.S. District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, State of California, with Justice Wilson presiding in a case titled “SEI FUJI v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” decided that the Law of the Land is the United Nations Charter

Maxims Of Jurisprudence
Of The California Civil Code
3527 “The law helps the vigilant,
before those who sleep on their rights.”
3516 “Acquiescence in error
takes away the right of objecting.”
3521 “He who takes the benefit
must bear the burden.”
3523 “For every wrong there is a remedy.”
3526 “No man is responsible for that
which no man can control.”
From the “Lectric Law Library’s Stacks”

Preamble
“We the people of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom: in order to secure its blessings, do establish this Constitution”
Preamble
“We the People of the State of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom: inOrder to secure and perpetuate its blessings, do establish this Constitution”
Adjournment sine die occurred
in California on April 27, 1863

For more history on California, see: Alta California,
History of California,
Raising the Bear Flag,
Flag of California,
Fremont in the Conquest of California, and California Bear Flag: Symbol of Strength

End California state info

A one word change in the original State (California) constitution from “unalienable” to “inalienable” made rights into privileges”Inalienable” means government given rights that are “in-a-lien-able” condition.
“Unalienable” means God given rights that are “not-in-a-lien-able” condition.

Unalienable vs Inalienable

End STATE OF CALIFORNIA info

Debt DEBT
None!Wouldn’t it be nice to be completely out of debt, personally, and have a stash of gold and silver besides?

“The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, Public Debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance.” – Cicero, 55 B.C.

Trillions of Dollars
First bankruptcy was in 1863
In 1865 the total debt was$2,682,593,026.53
A portion was funded by 1040 Bonds to run not less than 10 nor more than 40 years at an interest rate of 6%
When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty.In 1933 the U.S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt’s Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 (Public Law 73-10) of June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463) confirmed in Perry v. U.S. (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912, as well as 31 United States Code (USC) 5112, 5119, Senate Report 93-549, and 12 USC 95a.
Members of Congress are the official Trusteesin the bankruptcy of the US and the re-organization
Taxation TAXATION
Limits on taxation No limit on taxation
Direct taxes such as “Income taxes
are unlawful
Income taxes are legal when properly applied and are ever increasing.
Indirect taxes such as
excise tax and import duties
are lawful
Other taxation’s such as inheritance taxes are legal when properly applied.
IRS’s 1040 forms originated from the 1040 Bonds used for funding Lincoln’s War
1863, first year income tax was ever used in history of US. The taxes were collected to help finance the civil war.
The IRS is a collection arm of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve was created by the Bank of England in 1913 and is owned by foreign investors. The IRS is not listed as a government agency like other government agencies.The IRS does not have franking privileges. The IRS has to pay for postage.

United States Government Attorneys deny Internal Revenue Service is agency of United States Government.

The Constitution provides for imposts, excises, and duties to provide funds for running the government.Jesus asked Peter “From whom do the kings of the earth collect duty and taxes–from their own sons or from others?” Peter replied “From others. Jesus said to him “Then the sons are exempt” –Matthew 17:25

Understanding Jurisdiction

“Taxes are not raised
to carry on wars,
wars are raised to carry on taxes.”
–Thomas Paine 1737-1809

“All individual Income Tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on services taxpayers expect from government”
–Ronald Reagan, 1984Grace Commission Report
provided the information
Reagan used

This corporate Government is actually funded by the trillions of dollars collected from duties on import/exports and the excise taxes placed on cigarettes, Liquors and other products. Not one cent of the trillions collected from income taxes by IRS runs the government. Highways are funded by Gasoline taxes. The Postal Service is run like a business and is funded by postage
(stamps and the like).

Internal Revenue Laws
were Repealed in 1939

 

What former IRS agents have to say:

Sherry Peel Jackson, CPA
Joe Bannister and John Turner

 

County Recorders commit fraud
together with IRS.

“Our federal tax system is, in short, utterly impossible, utterly unjust, and completely counterproductive it reeks with injustice and is fundamentally un-American… it has earned a rebellion and it’s time we rebelled
–President Ronald Reagan, May 1983, Williamsburg, VA

Benefits BENEFITS
Unalienable rights
(are “not-a-lien-able” condition)
meaning “can not be liened”
in other words,
“cannot be infringed upon”
(rights that can not be taken away
or lost) 

Composed of:
God given rights,
Substantial rights,
Fundamental rights,
Natural rights (breathe, locomotion etc.)

Flesh and blood people have unalienable rights granted to them by their Creator, which can never be sold, given away, or contracted away.

Unalienable vs Inalienable

 

Right to Enjoy:

  1. Life
  2. Liberty
  3. pursuit of Happiness
  4. full property ownership.

 

“The Master does not
ask his servants
or slaves for benefits.”

No US benefits–Every living soul is responsible for themselves and has the option of helping others.

Each living soul gives accordingly to help others in need and receives the credit or gives the credit to his Maker and Provider.

No tax burdens
or government debt obligations.

 

Inalienable rights
(are “in-a-lien-able” condition)Government given rights
that are really Privileges.
Can be taken away at any time

Persons (legal fictions) have only inalienable rights, which may be surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.

So-called Benefits are as follows:

  1. Social Security Applying for and receiving an “SS card” makes one a member of the“US DC Communist Party” and is eligible for benefits of the party membership. Since one is eligible for benefits, 100% of ones earnings (wages) belongs to the party and the party determines what they will keep and how much you will get back. (You paid all your working life and there are no guarantees that there will be money for you to help in retirement)The Supreme Court ruled that Congress has no constitutional authority whatsoever to legislate for the social welfare of the worker. The result was that when Social Security was instituted, it had to be treated as strictly voluntary.

Railroad Retirement Board vs Alton Railroad
(1935) 295 US 330

There is no law that requires one to get a Social Security card.

  1. Medicare
  2. Medicaid
  3. Grants
  4. Disaster relief
  5. Food Stamps
  6. Licenses and Registration (Permission)
  7. Privileges only, no Rights
  8. Experimentation on citizens without their consent.

 

Corporate government takes your money and gets credit for helping others. Politicians in return create more such programs to get more votes. Eventually there is no more to collect and give. Everyone becomes takers and there are no givers. The government then collapses within. That is why democracy never survives.

 

“As a matter of law, anyone that participates or takes from the system is responsible for what is being done to us as Americans.”

“The only way out of this is to abstain from the system,
and expose it.

We may want to refer to it as
The Gandi Method“.”
–LB Borg (Excerpts: email August 18, 2010)

 

Records RECORDS
Ex-officio clerksCounty Clerk is also Clerk of
the superior court,
(i.e. a court of common law)
and “courts of record

Records are also kept by Sovereigns
such as in a family Bible

Churches, in the old days were also known to keep records.

County ClerkRecorders Office
Created by statute to keep track of the corporate government’s holdings which are applied as collateral to the increasing debt. The written records are a continuation of the “Doomsday Book” which keeps track of the Crown of England’s holdings. The “Doomsday Book” originated as a written record of the conquered holdings of king William, which was later the basis of his taxes and grants.

Whenever something is registered it is actualy being put into the kings domain. The word “registered” is derived from the word “regis” which means “kingly.” Therefore, recording a document today is the same as registering it and putting it into the kings domain.

Property recorded or registerd at the recorders office makes the corporate de facto government “holders in due course.” Anything registered can be taken away at any time; that includes cars, guns, and your home.

Your TV is not recorded there, therefore you are “holder in due course” for the TV.

Record the date family members are born, married, and the date they pass on in theFamily Bible Birth Certificate” is required. It creates a trust and puts one into commerce as a fictional personaThe “Death Certificate” closes the trust
Common Law Marriage
1. Agreement of the two parties and consent of the father of the bride is all that is really required to be married, and/or
2. Married by a minister or pastor constitutes a marriage, and/or
3. Living together for more than 7 years constitutes a marriage.A ceremony was optional. The seven years is only encountered when one of the two requirements for common law marriage was missing, presumably the consent of the father. The seven years is the law of Jubilee which is the forgiveness of the obligation to allow the marriage to be lawful.

Certificate of Matrimony

Both George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were married without a marriage license. They simply recorded their marriages in their Family Bibles.

Marriage License“.
Invokes the Corporate State to be the third party to your union and whatever you conceive is theirs and becomes their offspring (children).
That is why they can take away your children at any time at their discretion. The State leaves them in your custody and care unless or until they find reason not to.Definitions from
BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, 4th Ed:

license
“The permission by competent authority to do an act which without such permission, would be illegal.”

marriage license
“A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry.”
What if you apply
and the State says “no”?

Intermarry” is “Miscegenation”

Miscegenation
“mixture of races; marriage between persons of different races, as between a white and a Negro.”
Some marriage licenses will actually state that its purpose is for interracial marriage.

marriage certificate
“An instrument which certifies a marriage, and is executed by the person officiating at the marriage; it is not intended to be signed by the parties, but is evidence of the marriage.
It seems that a certificate would be more appropriate than a license.

Pastor Matt Trewhella
Secular Contract

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.”
–Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

Property PROPERTY
Full and complete ownership

  1. Allodial Title–Land Patents–Allodial Freeholder
  2. Can not be taxed (Only voluntary)
  3. You are king of your castle
  4. No government intrusion, involvement, or controls

 

 

Privilege to use

  1. Fee title–Feudal Title
  2. Grant Deed and Trust Deed Note: GRANTOR and GRANTEE in all caps arefictional persona
  3. Property tax (Must pay)
  4. Other taxes (such as water district taxes)
  5. Subject to control by government
  6. Vehicle Registration
    (The incorporated State owns vehicles on behalf of US)
  7. Property and vehicles are collateral for the government debt
“The ultimate ownership of all property
is in the State”

“All the property of this country now belongs to the state and will be used for the good of the state.”– FDR, 1933

Mortgage

Latin word “Mort” means ‘death’ and “gage” means ‘pledge’. Therfore, a mortgage is adeath pledge.   Most people never really own their house, even unto death.   End up paying more than twice the initial cost of the house.   A mortgage is designed so that someone else will make money on you during your lifetime.
for the bank loan

Free Enterprise CORPORATISM
The people engage in free enterprise by trading ones labor for another’s labor.There is no filing, registering, or obtaining permission or licensing from any government structure.

The people are responsible for themselves and each other.

The people do not rely on insurance to overcome irresponsibility and capriciousness.

Composed of, encourages, and creates a corporate structure of corporations and big businesses that use people as human resources to further its goal to grow and expand and become more powerful thereby eliminating competition and becoming more controlling.The thing created (the corporation) becomes more powerful than the creator (man) who created it. Man is no longer free but is subservient (a slave) to the corporate structure. The corporate structure needs to reduce the wages of its human resources to decrease cost to increase profit to keep growing.

Corporations eat each other and grow bigger and more powerful thereby allowing fewer persons having big egos controlling the lives of the common folk from cradle to grave.

Corporations have no feelings. Corporations primary purpose is to grow and are thereby less responsible and less sympathetic towards the people, thereby rely on and utilize insurance or other resources such as the corporate government to bail themselves out of irresponsible critical situations.

Most often, people start with a free enterprise but choose to be incorporated into the government structural system. To incorporate is to become a part of something bigger. Therefore, corporations are creatures created by the so-called government and are no longer a free enterprise. Corporations become big uncontrollable monsters who eventually control government by putting their people into office to maintain control. These monsters got out of their cages when they made fictions such as corporations equal with people by calling them “persons” having the rights equal to people. Most corporations eat each other up and become huge monsters, thereby creating monopolies that stifle “capitalism” in its true meaning. Corporations do not want competition. They want to eliminate competition using their power and politicians they purchased. They want to capture the system and use it for their benefit.

Common Way ROADWAYS
Sovereigns have a right to use the common way such as the traveled way (Public right-of-way) for locomotion purposes.The right to travel is an ancient right;
acknowledged by the Magna Carta.

The right to travel was recognized in the Articles of Confederation.

Drivers Licenses are required, because driving is a privilege.First state law requiring all drivers to pass an exam before receiving a [commercial use privilege] license took effect in July of 1913, in New Jersey
Beginning in 1920, courts began to hold that driving is not a right, but a privilege that the state may revoke
Liberty of the common way” May lose licensed privilege or have it suspended at the whim of government
No “Driver’s License” is required for private, personal, and recreational use of the common way.A “driver’s license” can only be required for those people using the common way for hire for commercial purposes such as Taxi Drivers, Truck Drivers, Bus Drivers, Chauffeurs, etc. Must comply with the Department of Motor Vehicles, the Vehicle Code, which is ever changing, and the Highway Patrol.Even the ordinary “Class C” Driver’s license is a “commercial” license.

See document
Private Conveyance
or “Private Car
–a mode of conveyance or a means of locomotion for travel purposes;
being private and not for hire.”Car” is short for “carriage”
such as “horseless carriage”.

Carriage is an English word
derived from
Old North French word “carier”
which means “to carry”

Hackney is a coach
or carriage for hire
and “hackneying” means
“to hire out.”
–TheFreeDictionary.com

By law, the state can only
regulate intrastate commerce.

By law, the government of the united states of America can only regulate interstate commerce.

10 min. video
Go past ½ min. advertisement

Motor vehicle
“(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.”
“(10) Used for commercial purposes. – The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.”
 Title 18, Section 31(a)(6) & (10) United States Code

The Motor Vehicle Act (Stats. 1913, p.639) is not unconstitutional…in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license tax, but exempts all others operators of such vehicles from such tax and regulation.” In re Stork, (1914), 167 C. 294.

“A chauffeur is one who is paid compensation for his services.” Hunton v. California Portland Cement Co. (1942), 50 C.A. 2d 684, 123 P.2d 947.

Bovier’s Law Dictionary describesTRANSPORTATION as: “punishment. In the English law, this punishment is inflicted by virtue of sundry statutes; it was unknown to the common law. 2 H. Bl. 223. It is a part of the judgment or sentence of the court, that the party shall be transported or sent into exile. 1 Ch. Cr. Law, 789 to 796: Princ. of Pen. Law, c. 4 2.”

Guest“–One who comes along for pleasure, recreational, or private reasons without cost or without having to pay. Passenger“–One who pays, employs, or hires someone to transport themselves to another location
Traveling on the common way”–The act of locomotion and conveyance on the common way for private, personal, and recreational purposes Driving on the road”–The act of propelling a motor vehicle on the roadway or highway by one who is employed or hired to transport goods or passengers.
Control“–The act of having power over locomotion or to direct locomotion. Drive“-The act engaging locomotion and control of an automobile, bus, or truck by one who is employed or hired to transport goods or passengers. Operating Motor Vehicles on the roadways for commercial purposes.
Controlling the Car”–The act of having power over a car in a safe manner as it is propelled.
Steering the car”–Directing the path of the car as it is propelled.
Driving the truck”-The act of controlling or steering a truck by one who is employed or hired to transport for commercial purposes.
Traveler“–One who uses any means of locomotion, from point to point, for private and personal reasons, convenience, and pleasure. Driver“–One who is for hire or employed to transport goods or passengers upon the roadways and highways.

Are you a Driver?
“Traveling” and “Locomotion”
are unalienable rights
“Driving” is a licensed privilege that can be taken away at any time.
Travelers“–A number of people who use some form of locomotion, from point to point, for private and personal reasons, convenience, and pleasure. TRAFFIC“–. Commerce, trade, sale or exchange of merchandise, bills, money and the like.
–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1914
Peace Officer
Maintains the peace
and the safety
of the people
Police Officer
A re-venue agent that enforces corporate government contracts and protects the assets of the corporate government including human resources. Compels performance, no injured party necessary. One who has policing powers as found in a “POLICE STATE” i.e. Nazi Germany.
An enforcer of policies
The name “Police”
came from “policies”
Americans have the right to travel freely in their cars…
Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221
Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579
Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125
Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941
1890 Swift v. City of Topeka
1889 Indiana Supreme Court, Holland v. Bartch
King v. New Rochelle Housing Authority (1971)
Rumford v. City of Berkeley, 31 Cal. 3d 545, 550 (1982)

The state cannot issue a license or charge a fee for the exercise of that right…
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105

If the state does try to license or charge for the exercise of a right, the people may engage in that right with impunity…
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, AL, 373 US 262
Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489
Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946

A right cannot be made into a privilege…
Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, U.S Supreme Court
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60
Article Six of the U.S. Constitution

All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491

““Law enforcement” out there has changed drastically over the past few years. It used to be that you would be pulled over for bad or dangerous driving to protect other drivers and property.

Today’s traffic court is nothing more than a collection agency for the government. The cops are the collection agents, and the judge is the “Head Collector” who plays God over the lives of unsuspecting Americans.

A “Good” motorcycle cop will write as many as 75-100 tickets in one day with his trusty radar gun… (Hmmmmm…10 cops each write 75 tickets totaling 750 tickets @ $200 each = Why that’s $150,000 PER DAY!!)”
–James R. Butler, Beat The Court.Com

DUI checkpoints and other traffic stops bring in a lot more revenue to the cities via car impoundments. Tow truck companies are in bed with the city police for monetary gain. Both are committing theft and are in violation of the RICO Act (racketeering) and the Hobbs Act (Extortion). Extortion is defined as “the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” 18 U.S.C. § 1951

“Between February 1, 2007 and April 30, 2007, the Maywood Police Department towed and impounded some 17,773 vehicles.”
News Release by Attorney General, California

Cities collect an impound release fee varying from $100 to $500 for each returned vehicle or sell the car at auction.
Therefore, 17,773 vehicles at $100+ each = Almost 2 million dollars collected in three months time not including citation fines and penalties.

City of Fresno collects $184 release fee plus $110 for driving without a license, suspended license, or under the influence. —Fresno Bee

 

 

A Maxim of LawFree people have a right to travel on the roads which are provided by their servants for that purpose, using ordinary transportation of the day.

“The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and every citizen of the state has a right to the use thereof,…. “The use of highways for purposes of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right, of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived … [A]ll persons have an equal right to use them for purposes of travel by proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding rights of others…”
–Rumford v. City of Berkeley,
supra, 31 Cal.3d 545, 549-550
and: City of Poway v. City of San Diego (1991)
229 Cal.App.3d 847, 280 Cal.Rptr. 368

VEHICLE Codes
do not have an enacting clause
on their face to qualify as a law
that binds People
to obedience.Taking on the restrictions
of a license
requires the
surrender of a right.

 

Mail MAIL
Post Office
of the united states of AmericaCreated in Philadelphia under Benjamin Franklin on July 26, 1775 by decree of the Second Continental Congress. Based on the Postal Clause in Article One of the United States Constitution, empowering Congress “To establish post offices and post roads,” it became the Post Office Department (USPOD) in 1792. It was part of the Presidential cabinet and the Postmaster General was the last one in the United States presidential line of succession.
wikipedia
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICEThe Postal Reorganization Act signed by President Richard Nixon on August 12, 1970, replaced the cabinet-level Post Office Department with the independent United States Postal Service. The Act took effect on July 1, 1971.
wikipedia
Non-domestic 
Mail that moves outside of D.C. its possessions and territories

DOMESTIC
Mail that moves between D.C., the regions of the US, and possessions and territories of the U.S.
“I believe, Zip Codes must not be used for one’s self and never use CA, NV, AZ, etc. for one’s self. Best to spell out completely or abbreviate the state properly in upper and lower case letters such as “Calif.” or “Nev.” or “Ariz.” ” -Jack; Slevkoff Zip Codes are required
when using “federal regions”
such as CA, NV, AZ, etc.

FEDERAL REGIONALISM
The Abolishment of Local Government
3 cents–Sovereign to Sovereign
labled properly and is from
general Post to general Post.
“Non-domestic” inscribed
on both labels.
(Old 3 cent postage stamps preferred) Otherwise,
current Postal Service rates
Cost is 44 cents for first class
in 2009.
Write out the state completely such as “California” or abbreviated “Calif.”. Never use “CA” for the mailing location of a Sovereign or in your return mailing location. Must now use “jurisdictional regions or zones” such as “CA”, “NV”, “AZ”, etc.
that are not abbreviations but are “two-digit designations” of the federal fictional overlays (Counterfeits) of the states.
Non-use of ZipThe latest cite for the statement
zip codes may be omitted
is now ”
DMM 602 1.3e (2)
(last printing on January 8, 2006).
previously it was “DMM 122.32
DMM” is “DOMESTIC MAIL MANUAL

The U.S. Postal Service cannot discriminate against the non-use of ZIP codes, pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403 (Public Law 91-375).

Samples of Mail Received

 

18 USC Sec. 1726.
Postage collected unlawfullyWhoever, being postmaster or other person authorized to receive the postage of mail matter, fraudulently demands or receives any rate of postage or gratuity or reward other than is provided by law for the postage of such mail matter, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
AMENDMENTS
1994 – Pub. L. 103-322 substituted
“fined under this title”
for “fined not more than $100”.
Last modified: April 13, 2006
Mail Delivered Privately
“The American Letter Mail Company was started by Lysander Spooner in 1844, competing with the legal monopoly of the United States Post Office (USPO) (now the USPS) in violation of the Private Express Statutes. It succeeded in delivering mail for lower prices, but the U.S. Government challenged Spooner with legal measures, eventually forcing him to cease operations in 1851.”
Wikipedia
Titles of Nobility
Do not use or accept titles of nobility such as “Mister” meaning “Master” (has authority over servants) and abbreviated “Mr.”; “Esquire” abbreviated “esq.”; and others like “Missus”, “Madame” (non-English nationality) or “Mesdames” meaning “Mistress, feminine version of Master ” and abbreviated “Mrs.”; “Missy” meaning “unmarried young mistress” and abbreviated “Miss.”

Zip Code Implementation

“on July 1, 1963, non-mandatory ZIP codes were announced for the whole country”

“In 1967, these were made mandatory for second- and third-class bulk mailers, and the system was soon adopted generally.”

“a cartoon character, Mr. ZIP, to promote use of the ZIP code.”

In 1983, “add-on code 9998 for mail addressed to the postmaster

“9999 for general delivery

Wikipedia

Federal Districts

The corporate de facto government utilizes the “ZIP-Code” system to prove that one actually resides in a “federal district of the District of Columbia”. This is why the IRS and other government agencies (federal, state, and political subdivisions thereof) assert jurisdiction by sending letters and notices with zip codes required. They claim that this speeds up the mail, but this is a sly and subtle deception. It is also prima facie evidence that one is “a subject” of corporate U.S. Congress, a “citizen of the District of Columbia”, and is a “resident” in one of the several States although not a state Citizen or National of that state.

the IRS has adopted ZIP code areas as “Internal Revenue Districts”. See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, for Wednesday, March 19, 1986

The corporate so-called government attempts to assert jurisdiction by sending letters with ZIP codes, when jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking.

Patrons receive mail
by “general delivery
or “general Post
at main post office or post offices in existence prior to the creation of corporate government

Post used since
Biblical times
Since July 1st, 1863
Customers receive
Free delivery
to any location
having a mailing address or PO Box. Rural Free Delivery became an official service in 1896This is a corporate government benefit. Receiving a benefit admits that one has a contract with the corporate government. There is usually an exchange, consideration, or payment made for a “benefit.” So, what price is paid for this benefit? If the price is “loss of freedom and liberty”. Is the price too high?
Examples of
Mailing Labels:
John-David: Christian
general Post (general delivery)
Franklin [Main] Post Office
California state
[NON-DOMESTIC to corp. US]John David
general Post-office
Franklin
California state

John-David; Christian
general Post
Franklin Post Office
California

John-David; Christian
in care of temporary Post location
1324 West Weldon Avenue, Suite 7
Franklin [Non-Domestic]
California

John; Christian
c/o 1324 West Weldon Avenue, Suite 7
Franklin [Non-Domestic]
California [Zip exempt]

Some people who are afraid to leave off a zip use the format below. I prefer not to use any zip at all unless out of absolute necessity (rarely). I receive hundreds of mail and packages without a zip code, without delay.

John David; Christian
in care of 1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin,
California republic [near 54321]
Non-Domestic

John David, Christian
c/o 1324 West Weldon Avenue, Suite 7
Franklin
Nevada state [Postal zone 54321]
NON-DOMESTIC

Anything in brackets or boxes is considered to be excluded from the rest of the document.

JOHN C. DOE
1324 WEST WELDON
FRANKLIN NV 66633DOE JOHN C
1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin, NV 66633

JOHN C DOE
1324 WEST WELDON
FRANKLIN NV 66633

JOHN DOE
GENERAL DELIVERY
FRANKLIN MAIN POST OFFICE
FRANKLIN NV 66633

John C. Doe
General Delivery
Franklin Main Post Office
Franklin, Nevada 66633

Mr. John C. Doe
1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin, NV 66633

Mr. John C. Doe
c/o 1324 West Weldon Ave.
Franklin, NV 66633

John C. Doe
1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin, Nevada 66633

John Doe
1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin, NV 66633

Mr and Mrs. John Doe
c/o 1324 West Weldon Avenue
Franklin, NV [66633]

Note: All caps and/or Middle initial makes the name a fiction–a non-living entity

Schools Human Resource
DEVELOPMENT
Enroll your child
“sign up,” “join”
Register your child
“put into inventory”
Home taughtCommunity or town schools

Parochial schools

Children who knew how to handle a gun safely, went to school with one for protection along the way.

Prayer was respected

Children learned
according to their abilities.

Children were taught
to respect their elders.

Discipline was respected and taught in the schools as well as at home.

The rod was not spared.

The “Ten Commandments” were respected and cherished as good rules to live by.

No worshipping of a flag

No blind obedience

“Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” –Thomas Jefferson

Public Schools
are actually government schools
paid for by forced taxation
whether they want it or not.Teaches blind obedience
to the central STATE.
Similar to Nazi Germany.

“Give me a child
and I’ll shape him into anything.”
— B. F. Skinner, Jewish psychologist and pioneer of behaviorism “..modern methods of propaganda.”

“The populace will not be allowed to know
how its convictions were generated.
When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able tocontrol its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen…”
— Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society”

“…in the communist ideology … education is tied directly to jobs — control of the job being the critical control point in an authoritarian state.”
–Eugene Maxwell Boyce, Professor of Educational Administration at the University of Georgia, The Coming Revolution in Education, 1983.

Pledge of Allegiance
and Flag Salute

Pledge of Allegiance (a loyalty oath) to one nation. Not to one particular state of the several states or to God.
“one nation, indivisible”
“one nation under God”
Which God? whose God?

Individualism and the love of liberty of the American founding fathers would always stand in the way of achieving the socialist utopia

National Public School Celebration
in 1892 was the first national propaganda campaign

Originally, “students were taught to recite the Pledge with their arms outstretched, palms up, similar to how Roman citizens were required to hail Caesar, and not too different from the way in which Nazi soldiers saluted their F^ºhrer. This was the custom in United States public schools from the turn of the twentieth century until around 1950, when it was apparently decided by public school officials that the Nazi-like salute was in bad taste.”
— Thomas J. DiLorenzo author of The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War (Forum/Random House, 2002) and professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland.

The origin of this practice was instituted by Pharaoh Akhenaten in his worship of the glory of Aten, the Sun Disc (the Sun god).

No government bureaucracyNo bureaucratic costs

No additional overhead cost

No government control

No superfluous costs or spending

No government influence programming children’s minds and belief system.

No Secret Society hidden agenda

No special interests hidden agenda

Freedom to teach without government influence or intervention

In 1867, President Andrew Johnson signed legislation creating the first Department of Education. Its main purpose was to collect information and statistics about the nation’s schools. However, many people feared the Department would exercise too much control over local schools and called for its abolition. Thus, the new Department was demoted to anOffice of Education in 1868. In 1979, Congress passed Public Law 96-88 creating the Department of Education.In the 1860’s, a budget of $15,000 and four employees handled education fact-finding. By 1965, the Office of Education employed more than 2,113 persons with a budget of $1.5 billion. As of early 2002, the U.S. Department of Education has about 4,800 employees and a budget of $54.5 billion.
Private Schools
Colleges and universities were originally privately owned and run by religious groupsUsually opened and closed with prayer to God
Colleges and universities changed over to government control through grants and other privileges such as accreditation.
Guns GUNS
Sovereigns have a right to own and use guns–“Right to bear arms” against “enemies foreign and domestic“.The founding fathers knew the importance of protecting themselves from governments who get out of hand.

“Guns in the hands of
good people is a good defense.”
–Jack; Slevkoff 2012

This government wants to disarm the Citizens so as to have complete control and power. Every tyrannical government in the past has taken away the guns to prevent any serious opposition or rebellion. History continues to repeat itself because the new generations who come along don’t know or tend to forget about the past and will say it will not happen here.

Guns Australia
2nd Amendment
“…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Guns are Tools

“Those who hammer their guns
into plows will plow
for those who do not.”
–Thomas Jefferson

“Those who trade liberty
for security
have neither.”
~ John Adams

Free men do not ask permission
to bear arms.

You only have the rights
you are willing to fight for.

When you remove the people’s right
to bear arms, you create slaves.

The Second Amendment is in place
in case the politicians ignore the others.

64,999,987 firearms owners
killed no one yesterday.

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
–Thomas Jefferson

“The strongest reason for the People to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselvesagainst tyranny in government.”
–Thomas Jefferson

Disregards the 2nd Amendment or justifies what weapons should not be legal. Ever changing and ever restrictive.

The corporate government system requires:
Registration of guns.
Means to bring them into the corporate registrar.
Then becomes the property of the corporate government, and that is why they can take them at any time.
The constitutions make no mention of registering guns.

If any of you saw the motion picture called “Red Dawn” would realize that the enemy finds these lists and then goes door to door collecting all of the guns.

Gun Control–Human Cost

Must see two videos

and

This is why
We say no to Gun Control

Militia MILITARY
Amendment II
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
–Constitution for the united states of America
“The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that declares a well-regulated militia as “being necessary to the security of a free State” and prohibits infringement of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”””In United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875), the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment is only a limit on the power of the federal government, but some people contend that it also limits the power of each State.[4] In the landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court ruled a Washington, D.C. ordinance, that was an outright firearm ban, to be unconstitutional. In doing so, the Court identified a personal right of self defense protected by the Second Amendment.
Wikipedia
An oath most Americans have taken in times past,
some even to this day:
“I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign anddomestic

Some oaths today have been manipulated and changed to reflect service to what the President requests and for service to what the United Nations desires; being completely different than the Constitutional oath.

The real problem is that these “US citizens,” so-called Americans dressed as soldiers, are not protecting the people from domestic enemies within, but have joined with the enemy. The enemy are now in high places and have taken over this country, usurping the powers within, while ignoring the Constitution, and some do not even take a valid oath based on the Constitution, especially the so-called judges and those Americans appearing as UN Peacekeepers.
“He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”
– Thomas Paine

“Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”
Henry Kissinger, as quoted in “Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam”(1990) and as found at
Portland Independent Media Center 

Armed Forces

“I believe:that being in the Militia, based on the Declaration of Independence, declares and maintains one’s Sovereignty, but joining the US military, no matter which department (Navy, Army, Marines, etc), one loses all rights and privileges and becomes the property of the US so-called government to do with what they may; therefore a subject (slave). Everyone in the military have volunteered even if and when summoned under the draft system. When they ask for everyone to take a step forward or backward, or give an oath, it is a voluntary action. At that moment, is when one is actually inducted. The one that does nothing or the opposite maintains all rights and privileges. Yes, they will try to persuade you or make you look bad in front of everyone else, and may even yell at you. But, if you maintain your stance, in spite of it all, you will most likely be released; cognizant of your belief and understanding.”
–Jack the son of Jack of the family Slevkoff
sent above in an email on the Third day of the Eleventh month, 2008

Infantry

derived from the word infant.
Infant: One under the age of twenty-one years. Co. Litt. 171
–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
Infancy: Minority; the state of a person who is under the age of legal majority,–at common law, twenty one years.
–Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.

“War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today.” – John F. Kennedy

 

Faith and Worship RELIGION
Churches exist alone.
No permission of government required.1st Amendment
Protects against government making a law that would respect an establishment of religion or prohibit the free exercise of ones belief.

The French and other romance languages get their word for church from the Greek word “ekklesia,” meaning “called out” referring to all those, living or dead, who have accepted what Jesus, The Christ, has offered.

“I do not go to a specific church
but am just one member of The Church.”
–Jack; Slevkoff 1986

This government wants to control religious institutions by having them come under
their jurisdiction as
corporations
under
Section 501(c)(3).
under Title 26 of the
Internal Revenue Code (U.S. Code)
This is to prevent the clergy, Pastors, Ministers, etc. from having any political influence on its members or the public in general. This government regulates what is to be said and not to be said.These churches also display the
gold fringe flag.
Their faith is in the government and not in God. They exist by permission of this government not by God alone.
They signed away their Birthright
for a so-called benefit:
“Tax-exempt corporation.”

 

All rights are reserved by “Jack; Slevkoff”, a living soul, a flesh and blood man on the Land, a natural born Sovereign, a California national, a child of God whereby all offenses committed by Jack, whether in the past, present, or future, have been paid in full by Jesus, The Christ. All rights are protected under the common law and under God’s Law that says “Thou shalt not steal.” No publishing or copying allowed without prior written consent.Although PrintedCopies may not be available at this time, you can obtain written permission via email or snail mail to print, copy, and or reproduce this Web Page directly from the Internet.
Monetary consideration is not required to view this web page, however, a recommended donation, preferably in pre 1964 Silver coins, will be gratefully appreciated for each print, copy, or reproduction you intend to make from this web page upon receiving My permission that gives you the limited and temporary right to make prints, copies, and or reproductions of this web page. The donations would help us share this truth and information with others. If you cannot donate silver coins, a Postal money order or some other form of donation would also be welcomed. If you do seek permission, let Me know in advance of how many you intend to make. A printable Microsoft Word version without the sidebar advertizements can be emailed to you upon request.
Recommended Donations:
1 copy–donate $5
5 copies–donate $10
10 copies–donate $15
20 copies–donate $20
30 copies–donate $25
50 copies–donate $30
100 copies–donate $50
1,000 copies–donate $300
5,000 copies–donate $1,000
10,000 copies–donate $1,500
unlimited copies–donate $3,500 per year

Send donations or gifts to:
Jack; Slevkoff
general Post
Post Office (Main)
Fresno
California

Before sending donation,
let Me know via email
that a donation or gift is being sent and or how many copies, prints, and or reproductions you seek permission to make.

“The labourer is worthy of his hire.”
Luke 10:7

Please contact us immediately if you find any information contained herein to be false or misleading. Corrections will be made immediately upon written proof and verification.

Click on button to send email:
“Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you” — Benjamin Franklin

“You will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” — Winston Churchill

“Education is the best security for maintaining liberties, and, a nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny reigns.”– Benjamin Franklin, Autobiography

“It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow.” — James Madison, Federalist no. 62, February 27, 1788

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget ye were our countrymen.”– Samuel Adams

“The problem isn’t what we don’t know, the problem is what we believe to be so and isn’t so.”– Will Rogers

“..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds..” — Samuel Adams

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” — Benjamin Franklin

“As such, the United States now no longer exists as “united states”; rather, it is now simply a single entity known as “America” whose state-boundaries are now secondary, and which exists as a shell of its former self. It is no longer a land of peace and prosperity, except what little can be maintained in an atmosphere of violence and hostile competition as its inhabitants fight for freedom against one another, each struggling via the law of the jungle to “tax or be taxed, regulate or be regulated.” This is only possible in an oppressive, captive environment, which the original system was created to preclude; the only solution, it seems, is to restore this former system, ending federal supremacy and once again restoring supreme sovereignty to the states as a check on such federal excess.” — Defining ‘America’ July 5, 2004 by Brian McCandliss who is a business and economics graduate of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, a law student, and a businessman in Detroit, Michigan.

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” –Harry S Truman

Only two people signed the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, John Hancock and Charles Thomson. Most of the rest signed on August 2, but the last signature wasn’t added until 5 years later.

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”
Sound familiar? It should.
It is from the second paragraph of the American Declaration of Independence.

“A great industrial nation is controlled by it’s system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world–no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.”
— President Woodrow Wilson

“Every act of resistance makes tyranny weaker. Many, many acts of resistance, even small ones, can topple it. I don’t wish suffering on myself or anyone else, but I am proud of people who have stood up for truth and justice when it was dangerous to do so. And I’ll be proud to BE one of those people, no matter what happens to me.” –Tessa David Rose (Wife of Larken Rose)

“Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a Citizen acknowledges that the government under which he lives is lying and corrupt, the Citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one’s self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.” –Michael Rivero

“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors andschoolteachers.” –Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” –Edmund Burke

“No man survives when freedom fails; the best men rot in filthy jails; and those who cry “Appease! Appease!” are hanged by those they tried to please” –Hiram Mann

“Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic, throng the coward and the meek who see the world’s great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak.” — Ralph Chaplin

“Cowardice asks the question: is it safe? Expediency asks the question: is it political? Vanity asks the question: is it popular? But conscience asks the question: is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor political, nor popular – but one must take it simply because it is right.” –Martin Luther King, Jr.

“They don’t realize no man escapes when freedom fails because the best men rot in filthy jails and those who cried, ‘Appease, Appease’ are hung by those they tried to please.” –From Betty Freauf web site

“What good fortune for those in power that people do not think.” –Adolf Hitler

“Fascism will come to this country and it will come disguised as Americanism.” Governor Huey Long.

“If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”–James Madison

“First they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up, because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.”
–Rev. Martin Niemoller (1945)

“The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who would pervert it!” –Abraham Lincoln

“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” –Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”–Thomas Jefferson.
[Silence is consent]

“Our government conceived in freedom and purchased with blood can be preserved only by constant vigilance.” —William Jennings Bryan

“Man is not made for the State but the State for man and it derives its just powers only from the consent of the governed.” —Thomas Jefferson

“Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.” —Thomas Jefferson

“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.” —H.L. Mencken

Here’s a little story from Plato’s most famous book,The Republic.  Socrates is talking to a young follower of his named Glaucon, and is telling him this fable to illustrate what it’s like to be a philosopher — a lover of wisdom: “Most people, including ourselves, live in a world of relative ignorance.  We are even comfortable with that ignorance, because it is all we know.  When we first start facing truth, the process may be frightening, and many people run back to their old lives. But if you continue to seek truth, you will eventually be able to handle it better.  In fact, you want more!  It’s true that many people around you now may think you are weird or even a danger to society, but you don’t care.  Once you’ve tasted the truth, you won’t ever want to go back to being ignorant!”

“First they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they fight you.
Then you win.”
–Gandhi

 

“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted
as self-evident.”
— Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher
1788-1860

 

“Come out of her my people,
that ye be not partakers of her sins”
Revelation 18:4″If my people, which are called by my name, humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”
II Chronicles 7:14

“The earth is the Lord’s,
and the fullness thereof.”
Psalm 24:1

“We fought the Revolutionary War for no taxation without representation, seems to me we are much worse off today, because we are heavily taxed, and only the king’s corporations control this Country, together with mob rule, of the special interests”–James Montgomery; A.D. 2001

“The Truth As I See It” No. 2
Pertaining to HIERARCHY
Who submits to who

“I believe that America is the greatest country in history and for good reasons, but America has been changing and not for the better. Our free society has been falling prey to a more repressive system with methods for the increased control of people. The return of groups and individuals to the controlling ideology of Imperialism and Marxism using the structures of Corporation, Socialism and Democracy. The result is that this nation’s foundational principles based on the ideology of Liberty are now in danger of extinction.”
–Darren Perkins; A.D. 2002

“There are many people involved in the fight to return our country to a sovereign nation and there are many people who are just plain sick and tired of the “governmental” controls placed on our every day lives. The “government” controls our lives via taxation, levies, traffic tickets, code enforcement, licensing, permits, registrations, inspections, the mails, banking, child protective services, airport “in”-security, etc…. They listen to our telephone conversations, read our e-mails, rifle through our belongings during roadside searches and now they can come into our homes without a search warrant – even when we’re not home. Troops are already being trained to stop us on the highways and demand to see our “papers please.” Does any of this sound remotely familiar? Think it can’t happen here? When is enough going to be enough? At what point do we say “NO MORE!”?”–Ann Sims 2003

“Warning to Americans from a Russian Emigre. … I came to the United States in the ’70’s from the very possible future of America – Russia. The longer I live in this country the more ominous signs of the Soviet Union I see around me. I feel like I am on the trip “Back to the Future” – The United States of Socialist Republics. …” — Anonymous

“Why of course the people don’t want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don’t want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”–Hermann Goering1946 (1893-1946) Commander-in-Chief of the Luftwaffe, President of the Reichstag, Prime Minister of Prussia and, as Hitler’s designated successor, the second man in the Third Reich. [Göring] Nuremberg Diary (Farrar, Straus & Co 1947), by Gustave Gilbert (an Allied appointed psychologist), who visited daily with Goering and his cronies in their cells, afterwards making notes and ultimately writing the book about these conversations.
Was that what 911 was all about?…To entice public opinion in favor of the Patriot Act(s), Homeland Security, and to bring Afghanistan and Iraq under the rule of the New World Order

“Simply put, freedom is the absence of government coercion.”–Ron Paul (United States Representative from Texas) February 7, 2005 from:http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2005/tst020705.htm

“As government expands, liberty contracts.”–Ronald Reagan

“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.”–Henry Kissinger

“There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpation”–James Madison (1751-1836)

“When you conquered with armies, everyone knew you were conquering….. When you conquered with economic hitmen you could do it secretly.” –ANTHONY PERKINS (former World Bank economist) “THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE”

…the most devastating weapon-of-mass-destruction ever deployed against any particular national population has always been its own unrestrained government, armed with powers ceded during moments of real or imagined crisis.–Peter Hendrickson

“Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state has become lawless or corrupt. And a citizen who barters with such a state shares in its corruption and lawlessness… Every citizen is responsible for every act of his government… There is only one sovereign remedy, namely, non-violent non-cooperation. Whether we advertise the fact or not, the moment we cease to support the government it dies a natural death… My method is conversion, not coercion, it is self-suffering, not the suffering of the tyrant…”–Mahatma Gandhi “We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.” –Ayn Rand, The Nature of Government

“When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket, and then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter. Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch Money. Money is a barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see men get richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that our society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-! property, half-loot. Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men’s protection, and the base of a moral existence.” –Ayn Rand, whose given name is Alissa Rosenbaum was a witness to the socialist horrors of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. She escaped and arrived in the United States in 1926 on a visitor’s visa, but never returned. Ayn Rand became a successful novelist and popular philosopher of reason and individualism after working as a screenwriter in Hollywood. She helped inspire the modern libertarian movement.

“I LOVE MY COUNTRY,
I DESPISE WHAT MY COUNTRY HAS BECOME!!”
–Billy-Joe..Mauldin 2003

“the systematic repression of all our freedoms under the pretext of “Homeland Security” modeled after the Gestapo and the Security Service [SS] of Nazi Germany. I don’t think I need to say more about that, but please make strong efforts to inform others of this who are still afflicted with mass-media brainwashing. Keep throwing the facts in their faces until they can no longer dispute you. We cannot take our country back unless the people are educated and quick!”–Paul Walker –Aftermath News

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.”– Thomas Jefferson

I believe that resistance to tyranny is obedience to The Creator. Once I learned the truth I had to do something about it. There’s no way in good conscience I can allow my posterity to grow up in today’s world as it is. I must be one of the People that do something.
–Rae Copitka, 2007

“Regarding the pledge of allegiance to the “Republic.” When one “pledges” anything and particularly allegiance he/she is making an oath. We have had oath discussions before but I don’t think we take it seriously enough. Though I have MAJOR issues with the Jehovah’s Witnesses I must agree with them that taking an oath or a pledge goes against Scripture. Even they do not obey this when it comes to signing “under penalty of Perjury.” In my correspondence with Al Thompson he is adimate about this point. He spends a great deal of time in the Bible and has concluded that this is the trap that gets us into those adhesion contracts and entanglements with the “system.” I tend to agree with him more and more. Technically, the only people that should work for [corporate] government, most of which requires an oath, are the non-believers. When they become believers they should “come out of Babylon” so to speak and disengage themselves from satan’s system. As much as we can rely on the constitution it DOES require oaths. Kinda makes you wonder, doesn’t it? I’ve long since retired from making my “patriotism” a religion. My wife and I both are military kids. We grew up Very patriotic. Making the pledge, singing the anthem hand over heart, signing under “penalty of Perjury.” We no longer claim a citizenship anywhere but God’s Kingdom because of His promise. Once the veil is lifted and satan’s deception is exposed that is really all that we as believers have left. It was really all that we had to begin with and that is what God has been trying to tell us since the Garden of Eden. Blind loyal nationalism has been the gravestone and suffering of so many millions of people it almost makes me ill. America, despite its roots is NOT a Christian nation and will likely never be one. The membership role of the Kingdom of Heaven is ours to expand no matter where we live. THAT is my country. HE is my King and whom I will serve. He has jurisdiction. I will give to Him that which is His and to Caesar that which is Caesar’s (nothing.) I am a bond servant of Christ and will take NO oaths to any other man, beast, or fiction for that would be trying to serve two masters. That cannot be done.”
–Rick; Hartz (Rickity) 9/30/2005

“I could send you the information on how the pledge of allegiance got started and by whom [if you want] but a Christian could never give their allegiance to anyone other than God. I would give my loyalty to this country which I have done, [being USMC retired] but my allegiance is to God only.”–Al Beyer 10/1/2005.

“Fear can only prevail when victims are ignorant of the facts.”–Thomas Jefferson

“The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions. In this way, the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which these changes cannot be reversed.”–Adolf Hitler

I would suggest reading the following books:

The Creature From Jekyll Island (2002) by G. Edward Griffin Reads like a detective story –cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation, depression, prosperity, etc and who is behind it all.

None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen

Death of a Nation; None Dare Call It Treason by John A. Stormer

Tragedy and Hope (1977) by Dr. Carroll Quigley a Harvard professor and an intimate, high level member of the international elite, more commonly known today as the New World Order. 1,348 pages. This book is important to read because Quigley meticulously details the carefully planned and orchestrated scheme of the capitalistic elite and their plot to establish a one world government.

“Having heard all of this, 
you may choose to look the other way… 
…but you can never say again 
that you did not know”
–William Wilburforce 1759-1833

The information provided is for educational purposes only and is subject to change at any time.The videos that are linked to this web site present solely the opinions of their makers. Links to these videos are made available as a resource for ones own research and evaluation not as an endorsement. Date of First Publication
The Twenty seventh day of the fourth month in the Year of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus, The Christ, Nineteenth hundredth and ninety eight and the Two hundred and twenty third year of the Independence of America 

“Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The trouble-makers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules, and they have no respect for the status-quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them. But the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.”
— Apple Computers, from “Think Different” Advertisement

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear.”
–Cicero Marcus Tullius – Born on January 3, 106 BC and was murdered on December 7, 43 BC

“Rothschild, the lord and master of the money markets of the world, and of course virtually lord and master of everything else. He literally held the revenues of southern Italy in pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions. Governments do not govern but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand.”
–Benjamin Disraeli, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
(February 20, 1874 – April 21, 1880)

“In Politics, nothing is accidental.
If something happens, be assured
it was planned this way.”
–Franklin D. Roosevelt,
32 Degree Mason

10 13 11 flagbar


Gold and Silver Derivatives Gutted Rigging Henchmen Being Suicided as the End of the World As We Know it Arrives

10/27/2014

http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2014/10/alert-gold-silver-derivatives-gutted-rigging-henchmen-being-suicided-as-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it-arrives-2671314.html

10-26-2014 6-21-28 PM

By Bix Weir, Road To Roota: Sunday, October 26, 2014 11:11

I have been warning everyone that the gold and silver derivative markets were being “set blaze” for the last few months and that the backrooms of these major participants (Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Citibank, HSBC, et al) are being gutted. These banks are not long for this world.

News coming out this weekend that a MAJOR, MAJOR player in this “Mafia-Like” banking cabal has been found dead in the midst of the chaos.

Check this out: Deutsche Bank Lawyer Found Dead by Suicide in New York

Yes – this likely part of the Gambino crime family is knee deep in gold and silver derivatives…surprise! The Gambino family found out long ago that a life of crime in the Stock Market is much cleaner and much easier than the ways of their ancestors!

The “Good Guys run” Zerohedge (of course) put two and two together with the previous suicide of Deutsche Bank’s William Broeksmit back in January…

Another Deutsche Banker And Former SEC Enforcement Attorney Commits Suicide

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-25/deutsche-bank-lawyer-and-former-sec-enforcement-attorney-found-dead-apparent-suicide

From Zero Hedge:

“Another exhibit released by Levin was an August 25, 2009 email from William Broeksmit to Anshu Jain, with a cc to Ramakrishna, where Broeksmit went into copious detail on exactly what the scheme, internally called MAPS, made possible for the bank and for its client, the Renaissance Technologies hedge fund.”“Broeksmit goes on to say that most of Deutsche’s money from the scheme “is actually made by lending them specials that we have on inventory and they pay far above the regular rates for that.”

“Recall from around the time when the first DB banker hung himself: it was then that Elke Koenig, the president of Germany’s top financial regulator, Bafin, said that in addition to currency rates, manipulation of precious metals “is worse than the Libor-rigging scandal.”

It remains to be seen if Calogero’s death was also related to precious metals rigging although it certainly would not be surprising. What is surprising, is that slowly things are starting to fall apart at the one bank which as we won’t tire of highlighting, has a bigger pyramid of notional derivatives on its balance sheet than even JPMorgan, amounting to 20 times more than the GDP of Germany itself, and where if any internal investigation ever goes to the very top, then Europe itself, and thus the world, would be in jeopardy.”

So here’s what we have to look forward to next week…

– Breaking stories of the largest derivative holder in the world, Deutsche Bank, having derivative problems in their quarterly report to be released on the 29th.

– News over the weekend of at least two newly suicided banksters that dealt in complicated derivative transactions…potentially more on the way.

– Ebola outbreaks in New York City as fear spreads throughout the subway every time someone sneezes.

– The long term manipulation of the stock market bubbling up to it’s all time highs.

and – With physical Gold and Silver demand at ALL TIME HIGHS the manipulated prices are at 5 year lows…

What could go wrong?!

Strap in my friends.

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.

Bix Weir
RoadToRoota.com

PS – Hundreds of trillions in derivative transactions going sideways might sound bad for the Banks but it’s 100x worse for the Average Joe who saved his whole life and put his money into their system for retirement. Sean and I have tried to spread the truth and we are closing in on 200,000 views of this explosive interview: The Shocking Truth the History Channel Can’t Tell You!


 

China launches new World Bank rival

http://rt.com/business/198928-china-world-bank-rival/

10-26-2014 6-37-33 PM

China and India are backing a 21 country $100 billion Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to challenge to the World Bank and Asian Development Bank.

Memorandum of understanding were signed with 21 Asian countries in Beijing Friday. Australia, Indonesia and South Korea were absent following hidden pressure from Washington.

The development bank was proposed a year ago by Chinese President Xi Jinping, and is to offer financing for infrastructure projects in underdeveloped Asian countries.

Headquartered in Beijing, former chairman of the China International Capital Corp investment bank Jim Liqun, is expected to take a leading role.

The bank will initially be capitalized with $50 billion, most of it contributed by China. The country is planning to increase authorized capital to $100 billion. With that amount the AIIB would be two-thirds the size of the $175 billion Asian Development Bank.

India will be the second largest bank shareholder though Kuwait, Qatar, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Nepal, Oman, and all the countries of the Association of Southeast Asia, except Indonesia are involved.

Australia, Indonesia and South Korea did not participate following US claims of ‘concerns’ about a rival to Western-dominated multilateral lenders.

Japan, China’s main rival in Asia, which dominates the Asian Development Bank along with the United States, did not attend but had not been expected to do so.

Indonesia refused to participate claiming it needs time to discuss China’s proposal.

The Australian Financial Review said US Secretary of State John Kerry had personally asked Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to “steer clear” from joining AIIB.

“Australia has been under pressure from the US for some time to not become a founding member of the bank and it is understood Mr. Kerry put the case directly to the prime minister when the pair met in Jakarta on Monday following the inauguration of Indonesian President Joko Widodo,” the paper said.

South Korea, one of America’s closest allies in Asia, is also prevaricating. Its finance ministry said it spoke with China to request more time to consider details such as the AIIB’s governance and operational principles.

US officials have said they do not want to support an initiative Washington thinks is unlikely to promote good environmental, procurement and human rights standards in the way the World Bank and ADB are required to do.

But Chinese officials are convinced the American opposition is an attempt to contain the global rise of China and its ambition to remain the dominant power in Asia.

“You could think of this as a basketball game in which the US wants to set the duration of the game, the size of the court, the height of the basket and everything else to suit itself,” Wei Jianguo, a former Chinese commerce minister, told the Financial Times.

Matthew Goodman, scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC believes the initiatives of a BRICS Bank and AIIB “represent the first serious institutional challenge to the global economic order.”

Chinese Finance Minister Lou Jiwei said the AIIB will set high standards, safeguard policies and improve on bureaucratic, unrealistic and irrelevant policies, according to the Xinhua news agency.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 

 

 


U. S. Aid

10/26/2014

http://ifamericansknew.org/

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the world’s major sources of instability. Americans are directly connected to this conflict, and increasingly imperiled by its devastation.

It is the goal of If Americans Knew to provide full and accurate information on this critical issue, and on our power – and duty – to bring a resolution.

Israel has a population of approximately 7.7 million, or a million fewer than the state of New Jersey. It is among the world’s most affluent nations, with a per capita income similar to that of the European Union.[1] Israel’s unemployment rate of 6.8% is better than America’s 7.3%,[2] and Israel’s net trade, earnings, and payments is ranked 30th in the world while the US sits at a dismal 193rd.[3]

Yet, Israel receives more of America’s foreign aid budget than any other nation.[4] The US has, in fact, given more aid to Israel than it has to all the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean combined—which have a total population of over a billion people.[5]

And foreign aid is just one component of the staggering cost of our alliance with Israel.

Given the tremendous costs, it is critical to examine why we lavish so much aid on Israel, and whether it is worth Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars. But first, let’s take a look at what our alliance with Israel truly costs.

Before the Iraq War in 2003

Direct Foreign Aid

According to the Congressional Research Service , the amount of official US aid to Israel since its founding in 1948 tops $118 billion (adjusting for inflation, $233.7 billion as of March 2013), and in the past few decades it has been on the order of $3.1 billion per year.[6] (In 2013, for example, this amounted to $8.5 million every single day.)

But this money is only part of the story. For one thing, Israel gets all of its aid money at the start of each year, rather than in quarterly installments like other countries.[7] This is significant: It means that Israel can start earning interest on the money right away – interest paid by the US since Israel invests these funds in US Treasury notes. In addition, because the US government operates at a deficit, it must borrow money in order to give it to Israel and then pay interest on it all year. Together these cost US taxpayers more than $100 million every year.

Israel is also the only recipient of US military aid that is allowed to use a significant portion annually to purchase products made by Israeli companies instead of US companies. (The costs to Americans caused by this unique perk are discussed below.)

In addition, the US gives roughly $1.6 billion per year to Egypt and Jordan in aid packages arranged largely in exchange for peace treaties with Israel. The treaties don’t include justice for Palestinians, and are therefore deeply unpopular with the local populations.[8]

On top of this, the US gives more than $400 million to the Palestinian Authority each year,[9] much of it used to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by Israel and to bolster an economy stifled by the Israeli occupation.[10] This would be unnecessary if Israel were to end the occupation and allow the Palestinians to build a functioning and self-sustaining economy.

Yet, there’s still much more to the story, because parts of US aid to Israel are buried in the budgets of various US agencies, mostly the Department of Defense. For example, since at least 2006, the American Defense budget has included between $132 and $479 million per year for missile defense programs in Israel.[11]

In all, direct US disbursements to Israel are higher than to any other country, even though Israelis only make up 0.1% of the world’s population. On average, Israelis receive 7,000 times more US foreign aid per capita than other people throughout the world, despite the fact that Israel is one of the world’s more affluent nations.[12] And that number rises significantly when one considers disbursements to Egypt, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority and Defense spending on behalf of Israel.

Additional Ad hoc support for Israel

Dr. Thomas Stauffer, a Harvard economist and Middle East studies professor who twice served in the Executive Office of the President, wrote a comprehensive report about all components of the relationship with Israel’s cost to American taxpayers for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs in 2003. He wrote:

“Another element is ad hoc support for Israel, which is not part of the formal foreign aid programs. No comprehensive compilation of US support for Israel has been publicly released. Additional known items include loan guarantees… special contracts for Israeli firms, legal and illegal[13] transfers of marketable US military technology, de facto exemption from US trade protection provisions, and discounted sales or free transfers of ‘surplus’ US military equipment. An unquantifiable element is the trade and other aid given to Romania and Russia to facilitate Jewish migration to Israel; this has accumulated to many billions of dollars.”[14]

Israel has often used its privileged access to US military technology against both the US government and US corporate interests. According to the Associated Press in 2002,

“In France, Turkey, The Netherlands and Finland, Israeli companies have edged such U.S. firms as Raytheon, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics out of arms deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years. The irony, experts say, is that tens of billions of U.S. tax dollars and transfers of American military technology helped create and nurture Israel’s industry, in effect subsidizing a foreign competitor.”

The AP article quoted a vice president at the Aerospace Industries Association of America, who bluntly said, “We give them money to build stuff for themselves and the U.S. taxpayer gets nothing in return.”[15]

Meanwhile, according to the Christian Science Monitor , Israel has also “blocked some major US arms sales, such as F-15 fighter aircraft to Saudi Arabia in the mid-1980s. That cost $40 billion over 10 years.”[16]

Even worse, Israeli weapons “buttress the arsenals of nations such as China that the United States considers strategic competitors, alarming US military planners,” the Associated Press article went on to report. “[In 2001] US surveillance planes flying along China’s coast were threatened by Chinese fighter jets armed with Israeli missiles… Had Chinese fighter pilots been given the order to fire, they could have brought down the US planes with Israeli Python III missiles… US defense chiefs say Israel sold China the missiles without informing the United States.”[17]

Lost jobs, trade, and standing

One of the most devastating indirect costs of the US alliance with Israel was the Arab oil boycott of 1973. The Arab states imposed the boycott in protest of U.S. support of Israel during the 1973 war, in which Arab countries attempted to reclaim lands Israel had invaded and occupied in 1967.

“Washington’s intervention triggered the Arab oil embargo which cost the U.S. doubly: first, due to the oil shortfall, the US lost about $300 billion to $600 billion in GDP; and, second, the US was saddled with another $450 billion in higher oil import costs,” wrote Stauffer in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.[18]

Then there’s the cost in lost jobs. “US policy and trade sanctions reduce US exports to the Middle East about $5 billion a year, costing 70,000 or so American jobs,” Stauffer estimates. “Not requiring Israel to use its US aid to buy American goods, as is usual in foreign aid, costs another 125,000 jobs.”[19]

But perhaps the most damaging cost to the US has been its loss of standing in the Arab and Muslim worlds, where US largesse towards Israel as it commits human rights violations[20] provokes deep resentment. “To many of the world’s Muslims, it places the US taxpayer on the Israeli side of its conflicts with Arabs,” observed the Associated Press article.[21]

According to Harvard professor Stephen Walt, “The 9/11 Commission reported that 9/11 plotter Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s ‘animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with US foreign policy favoring Israel.’ Other anti-American terrorists—such as Ramzi Yousef, who led the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center—have offered similar explanations for their anger toward the United States.”[22]

There are many more potential categories of costs that are even more difficult to quantify. All in all, Stauffer estimates that Israel cost the US about $1.6 trillion between 1973 and 2003 alone—more than twice the cost of the Vietnam war.[23]

Costs since Stauffer’s study in 2003

Israel’s cost to American taxpayers has remained high since Stauffer’s 2003 study. The US currently gives Israel an average of $3 billion a year in military aid, under an agreement signed by the Bush administration to transfer $30 billion to Israel over ten years, starting in 2009.[24]

All of the other extras and costs remain and in some cases have increased since 2003. For example, “Despite a tough economic climate and expected US budget cuts—including drastic cuts to the US military budget—US lawmakers will provide $236 million in fiscal 2012 for the Israeli development of three missile defense programs,” reported Israeli newspaper Haaretz.[25]

In addition, the US government “has provided $205 million to support the Iron Dome, manufactured by Israel’s state-owned Raphael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. The system uses small radar-guided missiles to blow up in midair Katyusha-style rockets with ranges of 3 miles to 45 miles, as well as mortar bombs… Legislation moving through the Republican-controlled US House of Representatives would give Israel additional $680 million for the Iron Dome system through 2015.”[26]

And if, as many experts believe, the US would not have invaded Iraq without intense and sustained pressure from Washington insiders who advocate actively on behalf of Israel,[27] this adds yet another dimension of staggering cost to the equation: “hundreds of billions of dollars, 4,000-plus U.S. and allied fatalities, untold tens of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and many thousands of other US, allied, and Iraqi casualties,” according to retired US foreign service officer Shirl McArthur.[28]

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard professor Linda Bilmes put the cost of the Iraq War at over $3 trillion, and incalculably more if you take into account the opportunity costs of the resources spent on this unproductive war. For example, higher oil prices due to the war have had a devastating impact on America’s economy, and so have the surging federal debt and the servicing of that debt. Without the war, the 2008 financial crisis almost certainly would not have been as severe, and the Afghanistan war most likely would have been shorter, cheaper, and more effective.[29]

The Israel lobby and partisans are currently gunning for a war with Iran with the same zeal they showed in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[30] By all estimates, the costs of a war with Iran will be much higher than the Iraq war. In addition to the loss of life, analysts predict, for example, that if Iran’s oil production were taken out of the world market, gas prices would rise 25-70 percent.

If the Straits of Hormuz (straits adjacent to Iran through which 20% of the world’s oil production passes on a daily basis) were attacked or blockaded, the cost of oil would skyrocket to a level never seen before, and the economic recession or depression that followed would be nothing short of “apocalyptic,” according to Matthew Yglesias writing for Slate .[31]

Reasons and Consequences

So now we are back to the question of why America continues to pour money into a state that commits daily human rights violations, defies US strategic interests,[32] provokes rage and resentment among billions of people,[33] competes with and crowds out US interests using technology subsidized by US taxpayers, and sells America’s military secrets to its enemies.[34]

The answer is simple and summed up well by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer in their ground-breaking article in the London Review of Books , “The Israel Lobby,”[35] and their book The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy .[36]

“Why has the US been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?” the article asks. “One might assume that the bond between the two countries was based on shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives, but neither explanation can account for the remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that the US provides.

“Instead, the thrust of US policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics, and especially the activities of the ‘Israel Lobby.’ Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that US interests and those of the other country—in this case, Israel—are essentially identical.”[37]

AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is consistently ranked in the top two most powerful lobbies in Washington.[38] And it is only one arm of the much larger, multi-faceted, and well-financed Israel lobby.[39]

According to Congressman Jim Moran, “AIPAC is very well organized. The members are willing to be very generous with their personal wealth. But it’s a two edged sword. If you cross AIPAC, AIPAC is unforgiving and will destroy you politically. Their means of communications, their ties to certain newspapers and magazines, and individuals in the media are substantial and intimidating. Every [Congress] member knows it’s the best-organized national lobbying force.”[40]

Senator Joseph Lieberman proudly stated, “Any attempt to pressure Israel, to force Israel to the negotiating table by denying Israel support, will not pass in Congress… Congress will act against any attempt to do that.”[41]

It’s true: The US Congress, along with the executive branch, overwhelmingly support virtually any action or wish of the Israeli government, no matter how at odds with US national interest or security,[42]primarily because of the power of the Israel lobby.[43]

Even when two AIPAC employees were indicted on espionage charges in 2005, and it was determined that they had obtained classified US government information illegally and passed it to Israeli agents, the charges were quietly dropped on technicalities.[44] AIPAC fired both employees and issued a statement that they were fired because their actions did not comport with AIPAC standards.[45] One of the fired employees, Steven Rosen, filed a lawsuit for defamation, claiming his actions were, in fact, common practice at AIPAC.[46]

When Israel attempted to sink a U.S. Navy ship, the USS Liberty , in 1967, killing 34 Americans and injuring over 170, it still failed to put a dent in aid to Israel.[47] Indeed, aid quadrupled the following year.[48]

Though Congressmen receive payments and support from the lobby in exchange for their loyalty, the American taxpayer is left footing the bill. As detailed above, the total cost has run from a bare minimum of $118 billion since 1948 (the cost of foreign aid alone) to $1.6 trillion or more, factoring in Defense appropriations, oil crises, the sinking of the USS Liberty , the heightened risk of terrorism, lost trade and co-opted technology, and countless other factors. If the Iraq war and the increased risk of a war with Iran are factored in, the cost skyrockets even higher.

Critics point out how much brighter our future would be if we had invested these billions or trillions in veteran rehabilitation and care, education, job creation, social security, housing, environmental clean-up and prevention, roads, bridges, health care, and scientific and health research. Or if Americans had simply held onto their tax dollars and used them as they saw fit, in our own economy. If some of the higher estimates are closer to the mark, our support for Israel could easily have covered the $700 billion TARP bailout with a great deal left over for massive stimulus spending and/or tax breaks.

If Israel were using these funds for a good purpose, one could debate whether the price was worth it. But Israel uses most of the money to prolong a 46-year military occupation (which regularly involves gross violations of international law),[49] commit egregious human rights violations,[50] and destroy billions of dollars worth of Palestinian homes and infrastructure[51] (resulting in still more U.S. tax money being sent to Palestinians to rebuild demolished homes, hospitals, and schools), while building illegal, Jewish-only settlements on Palestinian land.[52]

It makes the prospect of peace ever more distant, creates dangerous hostility to the US, placing Americans in peril, and puts the US Congress in violation of the Arms Export Control Act,[53] all for the sake of campaign contributions.

There is no good reason to keep throwing good money after bad in a failed, ill-founded policy. It’s long past time for a fundamental rethinking of the American government’s blank check to Israel.

#

This report was produced by If Americans Knew analysts, particularly Pamela Olson, a President’s Scholar at Stanford University 1998-2002 with a major in Physics, a minor in Political Science, and 1600 GRE scores. Before coming to IAK, Olson lived and worked in the West Bank; worked as a researcher in Moscow, Siberia, and China; and was a research analyst at the Institute for Defense Analysis. She is the author of Fast Times in Palestine.

This analysis updates the groundbreaking 1998 work by Richard Curtiss, The Cost of Israel to U.S. Taxpayers,” published in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Mr. Curtiss, following military service in World War II, served for 30 years as a career Foreign Service Officer. He received the U.S. Information Agency’s Superior Honor Award and the Edward R. Murrow award for excellence in Public Diplomacy, USIA’s highest professional recognition. Upon retirement, Mr. Curtiss co-founded and the American Educational Trust, which produces the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. He is also the author of two books on U.S.-Middle East relations. A more extensive bio can be read here.

[1] “Country Comparison: GDP Per Capita (PPP),” CIA World Factbook, 2012.https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html

[2] “Country comparison: Unemployment rate,” CIA World Factbook, 2012.https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2129rank.html

[3] “Country comparison: Current account balance,” CIA World Factbook, 2012.https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2187rank.html

[4] US Department of State, “State and USAID – FY 2013 Budget,�? February 13, 2012.http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/02/183808.htm

[5] Richard Curtiss, “The Cost of Israel to the American People,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, 1998. http://www.ifamericansknew.org/download/cost-new.pdf

[6] Ora Coren and Nadan Feldman, “U.S. aid to Israel totals over 233.6b over six decades,” Ha’aretz, March 20, 2013. http://www.haaretz.com/business/u-s-aid-to-israel-totals-233-7b-over-six-decades.premium-1.510592

Jeremy Sharp, “US foreign aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2013.http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

[7] Clyde R. Mark, “Israel: US Foreign Assistance,” Congressional Research Service, April 26, 2005http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/IB85066.pdf

(Particularly noteworthy is the subsection of this report entitled, “Special Benefits for Israel.�?)

[8] US Department of State, “State and USAID – FY 2013 Budget,” February 13, 2012.http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/02/183808.htm Most of this money goes to elites rather than the general population, adding to the resentment about these policies.

[9] Jim Zanotti, “US foreign aid to the Palestinians,” Congressional Research Service, September 30, 2013. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS22967.pdf

[10] “Sustaining Achievements in Palestinian Institution-building and Economic Growth,” World Bank, September 18, 2011. http://unispal.un.org/pdfs/WBank09-2011_AHLCReport.pdf Quote from the report: “Ultimately, in order for the Palestinian Authority to sustain the reform momentum and its achievements in institution-building, remaining Israeli restrictions must be lifted.” See also: Dan Murphy, “Amid Palestinian statehood push, a grim World Bank report on the West Bank, Gaza,” Christian Science Monitor, September 14, 2011. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2011/0914/Amid-Palestinian-statehood-push-a-grim-World-Bank-report-on-the-West-Bank-Gaza Quote from the article: “The World Bank says that recent economic growth in Gaza and the West Bank has been almost entirely thanks to foreign aid, that a slowing of foreign aid delivery has presented the PA with a possible fiscal crisis, and that Israeli policies continue to stand in the way of sustainable economic improvement in the territories.”

[11] Jeremy Sharp, “US foreign aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2013.http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

[12] US Department of State, “State and USAID – FY 2013 Budget,�? February 13, 2012.http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/02/183808.htm

[13] ‘Illegal transfers’ refers to several instances in which Israel has been accused of violating the Arms Export Control Act, which prohibits the use of US military assistance for purposes other than legitimate self-defense. For example, during Israel’s invasions of Lebanon in 1982 and 2006, the Israeli air force dumped tens of thousands of cluster bomblets over wide civilian areas, resulting in horrific and long-lasting civilian casualties with dubious military utility. That’s not even to begin to touch on daily Israeli violations of human rights in the Palestinian territories. Despite overwhelming evidence of Israeli violations of international law using US-supplied weapons, the US Congress has done little to comply with its own laws against funding such violations.

[14] Thomas Stauffer, “The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion,”Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 2003. http://ifamericansknew.org/stat/stauffer.htmlStauffer’s original paper, prepared for the conference: “The United States and the Arab World: Challenges and Opportunities” at the William S. Cohen Center for International Policy, University of Maine, and the US Army War College in October 2002, is posted here:http://www.solargeneral.com/library/cost-of-us-middle-east-policy-an-economic-overview-dr-thomas-r-stauffer.pdf (PDF) and here: http://www.scribd.com/Abegael88/d/88696279-Cost-of-Us-Middle-East-Policy-an-Economic-Overview-Dr-Thomas-r-Stauffer

[15] Jim Krane, “U.S. Aid to Israel Subsidizes a Potent Weapons Exporter,” Associated Press, June 20, 2002. http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/p-krane.html

[16] David Francis, “Economist tallies swelling cost of Israel to US,” Christian Science Monitor , December 9, 2002. http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

[17] Jim Krane, “U.S. Aid to Israel Subsidizes a Potent Weapons Exporter,” Associated Press, June 20, 2002. http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/p-krane.html

[18] Thomas Stauffer, “The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion,”Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 2003. http://ifamericansknew.org/stat/stauffer.htmlStauffer’s original paper, prepared for the conference: “The United States and the Arab World: Challenges and Opportunities” at the William S. Cohen Center for International Policy, University of Maine, and the US Army War College in October 2002, is posted here:http://www.solargeneral.com/library/cost-of-us-middle-east-policy-an-economic-overview-dr-thomas-r-stauffer.pdf (PDF) and here: http://www.scribd.com/Abegael88/d/88696279-Cost-of-Us-Middle-East-Policy-an-Economic-Overview-Dr-Thomas-r-Stauffer

[19] David Francis, “Economist tallies swelling cost of Israel to US,” Christian Science Monitor , December 9, 2002. http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

[20] For a small sampling of Israeli human rights violations, see Amnesty International’s “Annual Report: Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories 2013″http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-israel-and-the-occupied-palestinian-territories-2013, Human Rights Watch’s most recent reportshttp://www.hrw.org/search/apachesolr_search/israel, and the publications of B’Tselem (the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories) http://www.btselem.org/publications

[21] Jim Krane, “U.S. Aid to Israel Subsidizes a Potent Weapons Exporter,” Associated Press, June 20, 2002. http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/p-krane.html

[22] Stephen Walt, “Whiff of Desperation,” Foreign Policy, April 25, 2011.http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/25/whiff_of_desperation?page=full

[23] David Francis, “Economist tallies swelling cost of Israel to US,” Christian Science Monitor , December 9, 2002. http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

[24] Shirl McArthur, “A conservative estimate of total direct US aid to Israel: more than $130 billion,”Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, November 2008. http://ifamericansknew.org/stat/130bill.html

[25] Natasha Mozgovaya, “Obama signs bill that includes added U.S. military assistance to Israel,”Haaretz, December 24, 2011. http://www.Haaretz.com/blogs/focus-u-s-a/obama-signs-bill-that-includes-added-u-s-military-assistance-to-israel-1.403268

[26] “U.S. eyes funding boost for Israel’s ‘Iron Dome’ shield,” Reuters, May 17, 2012.http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/18/us-usa-israel-irondome-idUSBRE84G10P20120518

[27] John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, “The Israel Lobby,” London Review of Books , March 23, 2006. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby See also: Stephen J. Sniegoski, “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel,” Ihs Press, September 1, 2008.

[28] Shirl McArthur, “A conservative estimate of total direct US aid to Israel: more than $130 billion,”Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, November 2008. http://ifamericansknew.org/stat/130bill.html

[29] Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, “The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond,” Washington Post , September 5, 2010. http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2010/09/stiglitz-and-bilmes-the-true-cost-of-the-iraq-war.html

(Update: the original article has been removed from the Washington Post website, as well as the cache.)

[30] See articles at http://www.councilforthenationalinterest.org/new/lobby/targeting-iran/

[31] Matthew Yglesias, “War for No Oil,” Slate, March 7, 2012. view link

[32] See, for example: Mark Landler, “Obama Presses Netanyahu to Resist Strikes on Iran,” New York Times, March 5, 2012. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/world/middleeast/obama-cites-window-for-diplomacy-on-iran-bomb.html And: “Biden condemns new Israeli settlement plan,” USA Today, March 9, 2010. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-03-09-Israel_N.htm

[33] Andrew Sullivan, “Why Continue to Build the Settlements?” The Daily Beast, March 30, 2012.http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/03/why-beinart-matters.html Excerpt: “The deliberate population of occupied lands violates the Geneva Conventions. The occupation itself enrages the Arab and Muslim world and creates a huge drag on the US’s strategic need to build up allies among emerging Arab democracies, and defuse Jihadism across the globe.” See also: Philip Weiss, “Former State Department official says Obama calls for human rights and democracy are ‘undercut’ by position on Palestinians,” Mondoweiss , April 2, 2012. http://mondoweiss.net/2012/04/former-state-dept-official-says-obama-calls-for-human-rights-and-democracy-are-undercut-by-position-on-palestinians.html

[34] Jim Krane, “U.S. Aid to Israel Subsidizes a Potent Weapons Exporter,” Associated Press, June 20, 2002. http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/p-krane.html

[35] John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, “The Israel Lobby,” London Review of Books , March 23, 2006. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby

[36] John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, August 2007.

[37] John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, “The Israel Lobby,” London Review of Books , March 23, 2006. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby An earlier book by former Congressman Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby, first exposed this in 1985. Findley and others founded the Council for the National Interest to try to counter this.

[38] Jeffrey Birnbaum, “Washington’s Power 25: which pressure groups are best at manipulating the laws we live by?” CNN Money , December 8, 1997.http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/12/08/234927/index.htm Other top contenders include the American Association of Retired Persons, with over 40 million members, and the National Rifle Association.

[39] “Introduction to the Israel lobby,” Council for the National Interest , August 19, 2011.http://www.councilforthenationalinterest.org/new/lobby/

[40] Michael Lerner, “The Israel Lobby,” Tikkun Magazine , September/October 2007.http://www.tikkun.org/article.php/Lerner-the-israel-lobby

[41] Jeremy Sharp, “US foreign aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2013.http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

[42] Max Fisher, “Should U.S. Veto UN Measure Condemning Israeli Settlements?” The Atlantic Wire , January 20, 2011. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/01/should-u-s-veto-un-measure-condemning-israeli-settlements/21438

[43] “Even if Democrats and Republicans bicker on every other issue, AIPAC leaders seemed constantly eager to stress that one thing on which the parties can come together is unswerving devotion to Israel.” Gregory Levey, “Inside America’s powerful Israel lobby,” Salon , March 16, 2007.http://www.salon.com/2007/03/16/aipac Just recently has there been some high-level pushback against AIPAC’s hegemonic power in Washington. See, for example: Robert Dreyfuss, “AIPAC: Still the chosen one?” Mother Jones , September/October 2009. http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/09/aipac-still-chosen-one And: Alex Kane, “Sunlight on the lobby: AIPAC’s push for war exposed in ‘Atlantic’ magazine blog,” Mondoweiss , February 24, 2012. http://mondoweiss.net/2012/02/sunlight-on-the-lobby-aipacs-push-for-war-exposed-in-atlantic-magazine-blog.html

[44] Wikipedia, “Steven J. Rosen.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_J._Rosen#The_indictment_of_Rosen_and_Weissman

[45] Nathan Guttman, “AIPAC Gets Down and Dirty in Pushback vs. Defamation Suit,” The Forward, November 16, 2010. http://forward.com/articles/133172/aipac-gets-down-and-dirty-in-pushback-vs-defamatio

[46] Jeff Stein, “Ex-AIPAC official got at least $670,000 from donors,” Washington Post, November 19, 2012. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/11/ex-aipac_official_got_670000_from_private_donors.html

[47] The findings of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty , the Recall of Military Rescue Support Aircraft while the Ship was Under Attack, and the Subsequent Cover-up by the United States Government can be read at http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/ul-commfindings.html

[48] Jeremy Sharp, “US foreign aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2013.http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

[49] Jeremy R. Hammond, “Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions,” Foreign Policy Journal, January 27, 2010. http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/01/27/rogue-state-israeli-violations-of-u-n-security-council-resolutions

[50] For a small sampling of Israeli human rights violations, see Amnesty International’s “Annual Report: Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories 2013″http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-israel-and-the-occupied-palestinian-territories-2013, Human Rights Watch’s most recent reportshttp://www.hrw.org/search/apachesolr_search/israel, and the publications of B’Tselem (the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories) http://www.btselem.org/publications

[51] See, for example, “Frequently Asked Questions,” The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions. http://www.icahd.org/faq And Rory McCarthy, “Hamas offers $52m handouts to help hardest-hit Gazans,” The Guardian, January 25, 2009.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/26/hamas-payout-gaza-infrastructure

[52] “Israeli Settlements on Palestinian Land,” If Americans Knew, May 2002.http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/settlements.html

[53] The Arms Export Control Act prohibits the use of US military assistance for purposes other than legitimate self-defense. Despite overwhelming evidence of Israeli violations of international law using US-supplied weapons (a few of them outlined in citations above), the US Congress has done little to comply with its own laws against funding these violations.

While Americans loose their Homes, go hungry, kids w/o proper care, single Mothers to Elders working passed their ability to work

US Aid laws state NO Countries with WMD SHALL NOT receive any form of US Aid nor does America need any “allies” as zionisreal

 10 13 11 flagbar


3 Simple Ways to Block the Damaging Effects of Mainstream Media

10/25/2014

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/10/3-simple-ways-to-block-damaging-effects.html

By Bernie Suarez

Activist Post

Life is one huge psychological journey. This is what I believe. You are what you think you are. You control your journey and how much you actually enjoy it. You control how happy (or for that matter how sad and miserable) you will be because you control your own thoughts. Yes, you make decisions everyday on what thoughts you will allow into you mind. You also make decisions about how you will approach things in your life including new information. The choice of personal attitude toward things, preconceived notions, and good or bad assumptions about the world around us is all within our reach and control. For this reason I want to discuss a bit about how your mind should operate when you come across mainstream media news.

Believe it or not there are several thought processes you could and should practice to essentially keep your mind free of mainstream media’s poisonous lies and deceit. Anyone who believes some mainstream media news will likely find this article ridiculous, untrue, nonsense perhaps, exaggerations, or whatever. Those who think this way only do so because they are attached subconsciously to mainstream media news and the paradigm it offers them in their daily perception of the world. It feels real and your mind simply cannot fathom that mainstream media news is fabricated.

Well, it is.

It absolutely is, and that is why you should be noticing and asking question like why is it that all standard (big six) Western mainstream media outlets all report the same stories and all of them present the stories in the exact same way? Isn’t that a bit of a coincidence? Can you see the oddity in this? When was the last time CNN disagreed with NBC on a major story narrative? Start asking yourself, how can the entire mainstream media including the newspapers and magazines likeNewsweek and TIME and including politically competing networks (like NBC versus FOX) all narrate stories in the exact same manner?? In a world where we know factually that humans commonly have difficulties agreeing on anything, in this mainstream media system of controlled news there are never any disagreements. The big six private corporations that own all of the news in the United States and many regions throughout the world now, never disagree and always stay perfectly on script even when the script makes no sense and needs real-time revision. Isn’t that amazing?

While you are ruminating on that extremely intriguing oddity, let’s get to some nice tricks you can practice everyday to clear and protect your mind from mainstream media’s ambush-style lies and hypnotic deceit. These techniques will help exercise your mind in order to maintain a healthy strong mental freedom. Remember when you try these techniques you will be exercising how to remain mentally free from their enslavement. Recall that mainstream media didn’t just happen one day. The mass media in the United Statesdates back for over two hundred years, dating back to the founding of America. Media was always a part of the plan. Fast forwarding to today, be aware that government Intelligence took control of the media as early as 1948 and even earlier. Try to appreciate the importance that media means to government and the control system, then push away any thoughts of the unrealistic argument that mass media news is all somehow coincidental and innocent honest news. If you really believe this then you are in deep trouble and need to get help. For everyone else let’s get started. Here are three simple things you can do to read mainstream media news and know instantly what to make of the story and how to categorize the story in your mind before believing the story blindly just because you saw it on TV or read it in a mainstream media website, or in a newspaper or magazine. Think of this as an exercise in mental freedom.
I – Look at the news through the eyes of history 

Step number one:  look at each breaking mainstream media news story through the eyes of true history instead of the artificial context in which the mainstream media presents the story. Does it fit into what we know of historical events? Or are those enforcing mainstream media narratives asking you to believe a sequence of events or a narrative that doesn’t add up logically?

Here’s an example: The mainstream media is reporting yet another new war on terror, but historically speaking we know that the war on terror equals massive loss of liberties and freedoms, massive increases of the State’s power and control over you, and no real evidence of terrorism being stopped. So why then would you, in light of history, accept this piece of mainstream media news?

In the bigger picture, history is a very significant tool for gauging where we are headed. As you practice these techniques you will notice your core beliefs will strengthen until finally news delivered by mainstream media will be powerless against you. You will no longer be vulnerable to artificial mainstream media contexts that allow mainstream media stories to expand in any direction that suits their long term plans perfectly.

II – Look at the news in light of stated goals of the State 

If you were captain of a ship would you ever go out to sea without a compass and a map? So why would you watch and blindly believe mass media news for what it is without gauging where you are and where this story may be going. It is very important to be aware of all stated goals of the State. In the case of today, we know factually that the government and control system is focused on getting their new world order done. They have admitted and stated this publicly and many papers have been written, illegal wars launched, and decisions and legislation has been passed consistent with these publicly stated goals of controlling the world. Believe these clearly stated goals of the State and then consider all pieces of mass media events in light of these clearly stated goals. Then try to see how the agenda fits into the goals.

Remember that government is made up of people who (like you and I) have the need to organize and create plans for the future. Like everyone else, government systematically plans out its future. See how those at the highest levels of government have systematically controlled narratives to suit their stated goals of domination. Stop believing that governments and global elites put out stated goals just for fun without any meaning and significance to them. This is the world that those who are blind and lost live in. They actually believe the direction of the world and the news is all one big coincidence without any connection to it. They’ve been brainwashed into thinking that the simple and easy patterns we observe are all coincidence. This magical coincidence theory of life and news is a signature of a brainwashed state and a symptom to be avoided at all costs.

III- Try to appreciate what it is media is NOT saying 

Like looking at something from the inside out, critically analyze mainstream media news. Focus on what it is they are not saying. Put their information through the fire then try to reconcile the reality of this non-coverage as significant and not an innocent oversight. Why should you focus on what it is the media is not telling you? Because that is a major part of critical journalism. Mainstream media has admitted that their stories are controlled by the government. They are not even hiding this fact. It is up to you, however, to critically walk yourself through the process and convince yourself why you will not blindly believe mainstream media news.

These three quick and easy suggestions will help break through mainstream media hypnosis and arrive to the other side of life known as reality. It’s about reshaping how you think and arming your thought process with common sense in light of known historical events and stated goals instead of being sucked in by professional powerful in your face CIA propaganda. You may think that propaganda won’t get to you, but these CIA propaganda and media techniques are proven to work.

They are proven to convince even the smartest of people throughout history and they will fool you too if you are not astute and watching carefully with a vigilant mind. These techniques are thus simple things you can do to be a smarter, more aware and resilient human being instead of a brain-dead zombie who absorbs mainstream media CIA lies and propaganda with every day that goes by. Keep in mind that literally as you sleep at night they are brewing new stories every single day. This is about protecting your mind and your thoughts from the outside world of deception and lies.

With time you will notice as you become solidly grounded in truth and reason, that mainstream media is not even that good at shaping their lies and deceit. You will start to see the comedy and surreal nature of the whole circus known as mainstream media news. You will also see the wide disconnect mainstream media has from the actual reality of truth and reason. Once you see it this way you will notice that you are completely mentally free from fake and deceptive government-controlled mainstream media lies. That is a huge reason to celebrate.

All aside, every day I personally enjoy a unique warm feeling of what I refer to as mental freedom. I wake up every single morning knowing that there is no mainstream media news that will penetrate my mind enough to alter my perception of reality in any way. I get it – we are and have long been in an informational war zone, we are at war, the enemy is fighting hard and we are conscious human beings inserted into this information battlefield whose goal is human enslavement. There are no amounts of “breaking news” that will dramatically alter this reality I live in. I clearly understand this overall scenario, thus from one day to another my life is stable and unchanging. In this example, waking up to the news of ISIS is no big deal. ISIS is another new fake terror experiment that the Intelligence agencies have funded and armed in order to maintain their long-term plans. I get it – the stated goals are clear and easy to understand. Why then would I spend extra energy actually believing that ISIS is coming for us here in America?

In this example, my response to ISIS is more of a fun chuckle and my life goes completely unchanged. That is, we are still in an informational battle, the new world order is still here and the mainstream media is still the mouthpiece of this empire.

Understanding these simple techniques to help shape your mental thoughts prior to hearing mainstream media breaking news will give you a mental stability that you cannot imagine. I leave the rest for you to critically think through and find ways to apply to your own life. Till then remember that life is simple not complicated.

It’s been said that there are two kinds of people on earth and nothing more. Those who want to control you and those that want to be left alone. Yes, life really is that simple. Once you begin to see the simplicity of all of this, you can be sure that you are beginning to taste of true freedom, mental freedom which is akin to spiritual freedom which is where true freedom actually begins. These are the foundations of physical freedom which is the freedom we tend to think of as the only kind of freedom. On the contrary, before you can truly be free you must be mentally and spiritually free. Are you making steps toward the latter? Or are you vulnerable to enslavement every day that you wake up?

Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project, where this first appeared. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists. 

10 13 11 flagbar

 


Death of Western media looming on horizon

10/23/2014

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2014/10/23/death-of-western-media-looming-on-horizon/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

 

 10-23-2014 8-37-15 AM

By Truther

Several recent events have “burned” the press, sometimes called the “mainstream media” or “the news.”

At one time, the great newspapers, the New York Times, The Guardian, a list of a dozen or so, combined with CBS News, the home of media “stars” such as Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow and the BBC, kept the world abreast of events.

Those days are long gone.  The great writers are gone, investigative journalism is dead, replaced by “blogging,” a haphazard affair of “robo-lies” overwhelming a very few newer unfunded and largely unnoticed “media stars.”
The events we speak of are the ISIS/ISIL phenomenon, the coup in the Ukraine and the current Ebola crisis.

All three expose huge problems with the media, not the simple bias which has plagued the mainstream news for decades, not even the laziness of actors reading press releases replacing reputation and renown.

The press is dead.  News is an information business, dependent on sources, on ability to check facts, to discern reality from fantasy.  For decades the corporations that bought the world’s media had been able to sell their advertising and peddle propaganda, even hide scandals and spin events.

In America, the fall came when the Murdoch media empire, a collection of sex, fear porn and conspiracy theory “married” America’s pro-Wall Street political party, the “GOP,” becoming its “mouthpiece.”
In Britain, the Murdoch empire became the mechanism of corruption, bribery, blackmail and espionage, all hidden behind a veneer of “phone hacking,” soft pornography and Islamophobia.

In America, Murdoch not only owns Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, both laughable if their content weren’t insidious, but Murdoch also owns half a dozen “entertainment” networks as well, blending television drama of surprising quality with endless plotlines about “Iranian and Pakistani terrorists.”

The same actors who, in one show play Mossad agents always helping out their slovenly American counterparts, alternate playing Iranian nuclear plotters.

Burned by Events
ISIL/ISIS has been a news disaster.  Nothing whatsoever has come out of regions controlled by ISIS/ISIL.  They refuse to “embed” reporters, choosing instead to stick to operational security that, to any trained analyst, should have revealed long ago that they are not what they seem.

The media has left their audience not only with questions but with the certainty that there is both no ability to report on the Middle East and a strong desire to keep information from audiences.  This isn’t the first time something like this has happened but, due to the nature of the dramatic acts, rape, beheadings and the like, normally the press would want as many details as possible.  There is a longtime saying at American schools of journalism which is, “If it bleeds, it reads.”

Ukraine is another problem for the media.  Time and time again, the media have announced the fall of pro-Russian regions of Ukraine and then, only days later, has to announce the Ukrainian army in full retreat.

Then, there is the story about Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, the blatant attempt to blame rebels or Russia using altered satellite photos, forged documents and wild conjecture.  When the Russian government repeatedly released exculpatory evidence, clearly demonstrating the press to be “making it all up,” simply walking away from the scene of their own crimes no longer worked.

Ebola may kill the press more quickly than some of those infected with that horrific disease.  The press has been shown to have no assets in Africa at all, no press relationships, no government sources, no bureaus. Press TV, Russia Today and Veterans Today have more press assets in Africa than the British, French and US media combined.

Thus, when entire nations are “locked down” and entire villages, even cities, are cordoned off and dozens or hundreds, no one really knows, of dead bodies lie in the streets, no one is there to report it.  Worse still, the seriousness of the problem becomes fodder for outright fabrication by the media, based on the election year political agendas.

Some networks report the potentiality of million deaths while others claim the whole thing is invented.  Are there villages with dead bodies in the streets and dying people who could be saved if proper resources were made available?  Were one to depend on the media, it would be impossible to answer that as the desire to delve into conspiracies of bashing political enemies has proven to outweigh informing the public.

Ebola has proven, not only that the press can’t be relied on but, moreover, that they are dangerous as well.

Laziness
The world’s largest network is CNN, formerly part of Turner Broadcasting, an organization “gobbled up” by Time Warner Broadcasting.  With nearly 100 million people  viewing CNN around the world each day, it is surprising how CNN, in actuality, does very little news analysis and will at times run the same online web “front page” for 4 days in a row.

Of that potential viewership, individual news shows often have fewer viewers or listeners than amateur podcasts, with numbers being well under 500,000.  For internet traffic with regard to CNN, the majority of “time on site” is spent waiting through commercials and slow load times to view the injured from train wrecks.  Seventy percent of their “traffic,” web and broadcast, is tied to gossip and subjects involving sexuality.

For news sources like Huffington Post, same ownership, over 95% of their traffic is sexually oriented; making their news reporting only a “front” for what is, in actuality, a pornography website.  The same can be said of all Murdoch owned media though it is difficult to ascertain how much time is spent looking at “dirty pictures,” a mainstream of Murdoch papers, except the Wall Street Journal.  The Journal has moved from financial reporting to conspiracy theories and propaganda.

Foreign Alternatives
The first foreign owned network to be seen in the US and Britain is Al Jazeera, owned by the royal family of Qatar, host to a number of American military bases and primary financier of what “conspiracy theorists” call “false flag terrorism.”

For years, millions of Americans advocating blocking Al Jazeera and even shooting down its satellite facilities with air defense missiles, unaware that the owners of Al Jazeera are closely aligned with the US.

The least well known of alternative news media are the Israeli newspapers, particularly the Times of Israel, openly run by the Mossad, the Jerusalem Post and Haaretz, supposedly  representing Israel’s “liberal left.”  Surprisingly, though Israeli’s own or control over 90% of US media, imbuing both censorship and heavy doses of propaganda, their own media is relatively free and surprisingly competent but for one critical issue.

Except for extensive military censorship of Israeli press, something crippling to their credibility, their overall competence is admirable.

Iran has, by far, the most controversial and most powerful media presence outside the US and Britain with its Fars News Network.

Below, Fars takes on CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, whose recent interview with Iranian President Rouhani was altered and some fabrications closely aligned with recent Israeli attacks on Iran were inserted:

The CNN aired its interview with Rouhani on Tuesday but the news channel added to or changed parts of his remarks when Christiane Amanpour asked him about the Holocaust.

Here is the exact English translation of President Rouhani’s remarks:

Rouhani’s: “I have said before that I am not a historian and historians should specify, state and explain the aspects of historical events, but generally we fully condemn any kind of crime committed against humanity throughout the history, including the crime committed by the Nazis both against the Jews and non-Jews, the same way that if today any crime is committed against any nation or any religion or any people or any belief, we condemn that crime and genocide. Therefore, what the Nazis did is condemned, (but) the aspects that you talk about, clarification of these aspects is a duty of the historians and researchers, I am not a history scholar.”

And here is what the CNN translation says:

CNN Question: “One of the things your predecessor (President Ahmadinejad) used to do from this very platform was deny(ing) the holocaust and pretend(ing) it was a myth, I want to know you, your position on the holocaust, do you accept what it was, and what was it?”

CNN’s Translation: “I’ve said before that I am not a historian and then, when it comes to speaking of the dimensions of the Holocaust, it is the historians that should reflect on it. But in general I can tell you that any crime that happens in history against humanity, including the crime that Nazis committed towards the Jews as well as non-Jews is reprehensible and condemnable. Whatever criminality they committed against the Jews, we condemn, the taking of human life is contemptible, it makes no difference whether that life is Jewish life, Christian or Muslim, for us it is the same, but taking the human life is something our religion rejects but this doesn’t mean that on the other hand you can say Nazis committed crime against a group now therefore, they must usurp the land of another group and occupy it. This too is an act that should be condemned. There should be an even-handed discussion.”

Of the Iranian president’s statement, the areas in “bold” are mistranslations while the areas in “italics” are utter fabrications.

Fars, Press TV and al-Alam typically present in depth reporting, not seen in the west often focused on exposing propaganda and bias in media.

The response in the west has been to ban access to commercial broadcast capabilities, block satellite access and continually subject these news organizations to cyber-attacks.

Age of Ignorance

The end result of using information and media as a weapon of war, of turning what should be the basis of building historical context into a bizarre mix of pornography, conspiracy theory and propaganda, is having its toll. The result is uninformed voters — nations capable of being manipulated into immoral wars on a whim and of following policies rooted entirely in fiction.

10 13 11 flagbar

 


Global Justice or World Domination

10/21/2014

http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-justice-or-world-domination/5409049

By Zivadin Jovanović

History is a teacher of life, says the old proverb. Hence, it should be regarded as a part of life and the future, not only a part of the past.

We recall that the drive for redrawing the borders was one of the key objectives of aggressors in the First World War. The revision of history and results of the First and Second World Wars could prove to be but a front for the revision of borders.

The Great War began following the Austro-Hungarian ultimatum, one that everyone clearly knew that Serbia could not have possibly accepted. At the end of that same, 20th century, Serbia (the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) was given A similar ultimatum by NATO in Rambouillet, also one that obviously could not be accepted. The request contained therein was: either accepting unconditional occupation of the entire country, or having war. NATO aggression against Serbia (the FRY) of 1999 was the turning point in global relations, marking the transition from the relative peace and a sort of observance of the UN system, towards the global interventionism and violation of the basic principles of the international relations. Many intellectuals, including the speakers at this Conference, believe that this has triggered the Third World War.

The post-2008 period is marked by a serious global economic crisis. The military spending in the world is heading to reach two trillion US dollars. Step by step, the world has entered a new spiral of arms race. Are we going to respond to it by launching initiatives and activating mechanisms to put it to an end, or are we, just like on the eve of the World War I, going to let this race throw all of us once again into the chasm of disaster?

A short period of global partnership is being replaced by an increasing global distrust. Is there any readiness to seek just compromises in resolving outstanding problems and revert to general interests of the humanity, as embodied in peace and progress for all peoples and nations?

The narrow circles of the privileged ones are amassing enormous wealth. In a stark contrast, misery, poverty, illnesses, extremism and terrorism are on the rise. How can we possibly seek to develop and spread human and civilization values and rights against the backdrop of such misery, poverty, illnesses, extremism and terrorism? Do we realize the danger entailed by the boiling social discontent? Are we ready to concede that the previously applied methods of combating international terrorism exclusively by military force, have instead been actually powering its further strengthening and dissemination?

The poverty suffered by a major share of human kind is not a mere result of the growing population, but rather an outcome of the increasing iniquity in distribution of assets, within the system that defends the privileges of the rich and prevents development of the poor. The roads to both First and Second World Wars were paved by egotism, denial of equality, and trampling the interest of other nations. The ball is in our court. Shall we continue to speak up and fight for a just international order, or shall we assert that the era of liberal capitalism aggression is not the right moment for such an action? Are we aware that external and forcible imposition of internal systems in target countries, pursuant to the “one-for-all” model, gradually emerges as the foundation of global domination, interventionism, and neo-fascism?

The question at hand is, do we opt for the global domination of “exceptional” ones, or for the multi-polarity and a democratic world order of all equal sovereign nations?

What is left out of the UN’s and the OSCE’s functions of preventive action and peaceful resolution of disputes? Should we, really, consent that the policies of force and of double standards have become legitimate or we should oppose it and struggle for civilization of peace, dignity and freedom for all? There is growing evidence that we have entered the age of hybrid democracy and ersatz civic values and human rights. Institutions of democratic state became the service of the most powerful corporations possessing military-industrial and financial capital.

Although the institutional formations persevere, an even the new ones are being created in the international domain, the true power is steadily shifting into the narrow and usually informal groups, councils or commissions directly influenced by such military-industrial and financial capital. Issues of war or peace are rarely discussed in parliamentary proceedings; at best, they are being decided in a summary procedure.

Democratic public debates on vital issues have definitely become a rarity.

The tangible aspect of militarization is expressed in rapid growth in numbers of foreign bases, especially on the European soil. Presently, Europe hosts more foreign military bases that at the peak of the Cold War. Why? After the USA Military base Bond-steel, erected in Kosovo and Metohija in 1999, there mushroomed four more USA bases in Bulgaria, additional four in Romania, and so on. Pre-1999 existing bases are being upgraded, either by anti-missile shields, or by new facilities for revolving rapid-response task forces. All are creeping closer to the borders of Russia. We are witnessing a new edition of the old, almost forgotten doctrine, “Drang nach Osten”. In parallel, the media, including even in countries of the oldest democratic traditions, are having increasingly less freedom.

Is it possible to maintain THIS unipolar world and privileges by inciting wars, fratricidal conflicts, coups, or colored revolutions?

On the eve of the First World War, it was obvious that certain countries were rapidly arming, and, in parallel, that their appetites for territories and resources were growing. The true meaning of these trends was played down. This illusion was, alas, paid dearly, in millions of human lives. The ”September Program”, authored by that-time German Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg, dated 9 September 1914, one hundred years ago, openly stated German territorial pretensions aimed at neighbors, customs union in the form of an expanded market, and “German colonial Africa”, as considered by Franz Fischer, a prominent German historian. Hollweg’s “September Program” had a clearly invading, expansionist character. Hollweg’s plan triggers various reminiscences, such as this one:

In April 2000, ten months after the end of NATO’s armed aggression against Serbia (the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia), Bratislava hosted a summit of heads of governments and states, and ministers of foreign affairs and of defense of that-time candidate states for joining NATO, and senior public officials of the USA. At this Summit, the American representatives presented their plan for rearranging the relations in Europe. Willy Wimmer, Germany’s State Secretary in the Ministry of Defense, and at that time Vice-President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, who was present at the Summit, wrote about this “April Plan”:

“European legal order is an obstacle for implementation of NATO plans. For this purpose is much more convenient to also apply American legal order in Europe. During the expansion (towards the East, added by Z.J.), it is necessary to reinstate the same spatial situation between the Baltic Sea and Anatolia (in Turkey, added by Z.J.), as existed at the heyday of the Roman Empire expansion. This is why Poland has to be encircled from the north and the south by democratic states as neighbors. Romania and Bulgaria have to ensure land connection to Turkey, whereas Serbia has to be permanently excluded from the European development. North of Poland, a complete control over the Sanct Petersburg access to the Baltic Sea must be ensured.” (Published in: Actual Issues of Foreign Policy, the Belgrade Forum for the World of Equals, Belgrade, 2006, pages 73-77).

Almost imperceptibly, the war marketing evolved into a new discipline. It seems that we got accustomed to that “science” very quickly and underestimating the risks. At present, even the non-professionals can easily recognize the pattern of preparing, propagating, and justifying all kinds of aggressions and instigating civil wars. The process comprises these steps: choosing the target; demonizing its legitimate leadership via the media; promises of democracy and fast “better life” that serve to disorientate the public; funding and, as necessary, arming the “pro-democratic” opposition; intensification of destabilizing actions of the NGOs; staging massacres/poisoning by chemical warfare/humanitarian disasters, i.e.: event brands like “Markale” in Sarajevo, “Racak” in Kosovo and Metohija, “Majdan” in Kiev; then follows instigating civil wars or armed aggression; toppling legitimate authorities; installing “pro-democratic” opposition in power; and, finally, assuming the target country’s natural and economic resources by the corporations and even by individuals from administrations of the aggressor countries by the so-called transition, also known as the predatory privatizations.

One of disturbing contemporary phenomena is a very extensive interpretation of the notion of national interests. The USA was the first to appropriate the right to proclaim its national interests in practical terms, in any corner of the Planet, and to defend them by armed force. European partners followed suite. Particular attention provoke statements of Joachim Gauck, President of Germany, that Germany must be ready to defend its national interests abroad by force, if needed. State sovereignty over its natural resources is derogated. Brzezinski and Albright openly claim that natural resources in Siberia cannot belong to Russia only, but rather to the so-called international community! The claims for redistribution of natural wealth of the planet are clearly articulated. Here, one may recall the consequences the humanity suffered owing to German ambitions for redistribution of colonies in the run-up to the World War I.

Back in 1914, that-time aggressors solely relied on brute force. Austro-Hungary sought to halt its declining power and decreasing control over other nations’ territories, whereas Germany wanted to effect its burgeoning economic and military might by invading neighbors’ territories, and by imposing its control over the Berlin-Bagdad route and, eventually, over the entire Europe and Africa. The lessons from World War I show that reliance on force exclusively, coupled with arrogance and disregard for the rights and interests of other nations are not advantage but rather a major weakness.

Another great danger for the contemporary world stems from the presence of power centers which believe they are destined to govern the word, and entrusted with this mission by providence. They hold anyone else in the planet to be handicapped and obliged to do as told and obey directives of the “exceptional” ones. Such centers do not recognize profound changes bringing new distribution of global power. They apply the logic of uni-polar world order not recognizing that this concept is gone and that the history cannot be stopped.
Therefore, having regard to the lessons of history, we may conclude, that it is not the time to seek privileges and domination by force; it is in the interest of humanity to accommodate to the new multi-polar reality, to accept righteous compromises and work for peace.

Notes

[i] Address at the International Conference “World War I – Messages to Humanity”
Belgrade, 17 September 2014

Copyright © 2014 Global Research

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

Blame no-one but yourself for global war when it comes. You could have recognized that our people were being subjected to brain washing from the get go. Now, we have a group of Monster’s in charge of nearly every Nation on earth, all because we did not stand up and demand peace. All of the tyranny you read about globally and here in the U.S.A. is controlled right here in our back yard.

That’s right folks, and we are going to pay with our lives for our ignorance. Either Global Nuclear war, or our own military will annihilate us. Keep on supporting those psychotic war mongers in D.C. and see what you get. To turn our lives around all you have to do is READ! Once the ignorance is gone, you will know what to do. False patriotism is akin to supporting treachery.

START HERE

Terrorism… Military invasions… Resources wars… We can call it what we want, but the bottom line is that there is no end to greed until we stand up and say “enough is enough”. In fact, it’s too much. The drums of war are beating and it’s up to us to choose whether we march along, or we rewrite the score.

In an era of media disinformation, our focus at Global Research has essentially been to center on the “unspoken truth”. Since its inception in 2001 we have established an extensive archive of news articles, in-depth reports and analysis on issues which are barely covered by the mainstream media. From modest beginnings, with virtually no resources, the Centre for Research on Globalization has evolved into a dynamic research and alternative media group.

What motivates us? The same thing that motivates you to visit our website and read the articles, watch the videos and share them with your networks: we want the truth. We NEED the truth. Our lives and the lives of future generations depend on it.

“Global Research is one of the finest and most easily accessed research tools on the web. A vast array of articles by the best known researchers are instantly available. Michel Chossudovsky’s meticulous research, perspicacity and courageous reporting offer the reader credible and in-depth analyses of the complex and controversial events of our time.”
Bonnie Faulkner, Producer/Host, Guns and Butter, The Pacifica Radio Network

It’s true that you will NEVER have to pay to access the information you need to understand what is happening in the world around you. Some things you can’t put a price on. However, maintaining our operations and supporting our contributors does present a financial challenge, and since we will always insist on remaining independent, we need the support of our readers to help us continue our battle against disinformation.

If you are in a position to support us by making a donation (and truly, EVERY amount helps), then please visit our Donation page and find out how you can process your payment online instantly, or else by mail or fax. And know that your contribution is as much appreciated as it is needed.

Recognizing that many of our readers may not be able to include a donation or membership in their budgets, we ask that you nonetheless continue to spread our articles and videos far and wide. Sign up for our free newsletter mailing list. Join the discussion on Facebook. Let’s use our strength in numbers to fight the well-funded corporate media and break through their lies.

We all have a role to play in the peace process, and every effort makes a difference.

10 13 11 flagbar

 


EXCLUSIVE: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION QUIETLY PREPARES SURGE OF MILLIONS OF NEW IMMIGRANT IDS

10/20/2014

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/19/Exclusive-Obama-Admin-Quietly-Prepares-Surge-Of-Millions-Of-Immigrant-IDs

10-20-2014 11-29-18 AM

By JONATHAN STRONG

Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale executive amnesty may have already begun.

*EMBEDDED VIDEO ON WEB PAGE***

10-20-2014 11-32-40 AM

Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.”

The request for proposals says the agency will need a minimum of four million cards per year. In the “surge,” scenario in 2016, the agency would need an additional five million cards – more than double the baseline annual amount for a total of 9 million.

“The guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards,” the document says.

The agency is buying the materials need to construct both Permanent Residency Cards (PRC), commonly known as green cards, as well as Employment Authorization Documentation (EAD) cards which have been used to implement President Obama’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program. The RFP does not specify how many of each type of card would be issued.

Jessica Vaughan, an immigration expert at the Center for Immigration Studies and former State Department official, said the document suggests a new program of remarkable breadth.

The RFP “seems to indicate that the president is contemplating an enormous executive action that is even more expansive than the plan that Congress rejected in the ‘Gang of Eight’ bill,” Vaughan said.

Last year, Vaughan reviewed the Gang of Eight’s provisions to estimate that it would have roughly doubled legal immigration. In the “surge” scenario of this RFP, even the relatively high four million cards per year would be more than doubled, meaning that even on its own terms, the agency is preparing for a huge uptick of 125 percent its normal annual output.

It’s not unheard of for federal agencies to plan for contingencies, but the request specifically explains that the surge is related to potential changes in immigration policy.

“The Contractor shall demonstrate the capability to support potential ‘surge’ in PRC and EAD card demand for up to 9M cards during the initial period of performance to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements,” the document says.

A year ago, such a plan might have been attributed to a forthcoming immigration bill. Now, following the summer’s border crisis, the chances of such a new law are extremely low, giving additional credence to the possibility the move is in preparation for an executive amnesty by Obama.

Even four million combined green cards and EADs is a significant number, let alone the “surge” contemplated by USCIS. For instance, in the first two years after Obama unilaterally enacted DACA, about 600,000 people were approved by USCIS under the program. Statistics provided by USCIS on its website show that the entire agency had processed 862,000 total EADs in 2014 as of June.

Vaughan said EADs are increasingly coming under scrutiny as a tool used by the Obama administration to provide legalization for groups of illegal aliens short of full green card status.

In addition to providing government approval to work for illegal aliens, EADs also cost significantly less in fees to acquire, about $450 compared to more than $1000. In many states, EADs give aliens rights to social services and the ability to obtain drivers’ licenses.

Vaughan noted there are currently about 4.5 million individuals waiting for approval for the green cards having followed immigration law and obtained sponsorships from relatives in the U.S. or otherwise, less than the number of id cards contemplated by the USCIS “surge.”

USCIS officials did not provide additional information about the RFP by press time.

10 13 11 flagbar

 


11 Reasons Why The Federal Reserve Should Be Abolished

10/18/2014

www.theeconomiccollapseblog.com

10-18-2014 8-57-24 AM

Written by Michael Snyder of www.theeconomiccollapseblog.com

 If the American people truly understood how the Federal Reserve system works and what it has done to us, they would be screaming for it to be abolished immediately.  It is a system that was designed by international bankers for the benefit of international bankers, and it is systematically impoverishing the American people.  The Federal Reserve system is the primary reason why our currency has declined in value by well over 95 percent and our national debt has gotten more than 5000 times larger over the past 100 years.  The Fed creates our “booms” and our “busts”, and they have done an absolutely miserable job of managing our economy.  But why do we need a bunch of unelected private bankers to manage our economy and print our money for us in the first place?  Wouldn’t our economy function much more efficiently if we allowed the free market to set interest rates?  And according to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Congress is the one that is supposed to have the authority to “coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”.  So why is the Federal Reserve doing it?  Sadly, this is the way it works all over the globe today.  In fact, all 187 nations that belong to the IMF have a central bank.  But the truth is that there are much better alternatives.  We just need to get people educated.

The following are 11 reasons why the Federal Reserve should be abolished…

#1 The Greatest Period Of Economic Growth In The History Of The United States Happened When There Was No Central Bank

Did you know that the greatest period of economic growth in U.S. history was between the Civil War and 1913?  And guess what?  That was a period when there was no central bank in the United States at all.  The following is from Wikipedia

The Gilded Age saw the greatest period of economic growth in American history. After the short-lived panic of 1873, the economy recovered with the advent of hard money policies and industrialization. From 1869 to 1879, the US economy grew at a rate of 6.8% for real GDP and 4.5% for real GDP per capita, despite the panic of 1873.  The economy repeated this period of growth in the 1880s, in which the wealth of the nation grew at an annual rate of 3.8%, while the GDP was also doubled.

So if our greatest period of economic prosperity was during a time when there was no Federal Reserve, then why shouldn’t we try such a system again?

#2 The Federal Reserve Is Systematically Destroying The Value Of The U.S. Dollar

The United States never had a persistent, ongoing problem with inflation until the Federal Reserve was created in 1913.

If you do not believe this, just check out the inflation chart in this article.

The Federal Reserve systematically penalizes those that try to save their money.  Inflation is a tax, and the value of each one of our dollars goes down a little bit more every single day.

But over time, it really adds up.  In fact, the value of the U.S. dollar has fallen by 83 percent since 1970.

Anyone that goes to the grocery store on a regular basis knows how painful inflation can be.  The following is a list that shows how prices for many of the things that we buy on a regular basis absolutely skyrocketedbetween 2002 and 2012

Eggs: 73%

Coffee: 90%

Peanut Butter: 40%

Milk: 26%

A Loaf Of White Bread: 39%

Spaghetti And Macaroni: 44%

Orange Juice: 46%

Red Delicious Apples: 43%

Beer: 25%

Wine: 60%

Electricity: 42%

Margarine: 143%

Tomatoes: 22%

Turkey: 56%

Ground Beef: 61%

Chocolate Chip Cookies: 39%

Gasoline: 158%

Even the price of water has absolutely soared in recent years.  According to USA Today, water bills have actually tripled over the past 12 years in some areas of the country.

So how can the Federal Reserve get away with claiming that we are in a “low inflation” environment?

Well, what Ben Bernanke never tells you is that the way that the government calculates inflation has changed more than 20 times since 1978.

The truth is that the real rate of inflation is somewhere between five and ten percent right now, but you will never hear about this on the mainstream news.

#3 The Federal Reserve Is A Perpetual Debt Machine

The Federal Reserve system was designed to be a trap.  The intent of the bankers was to trap the U.S. government in an endless debt spiral from which it could never possibly escape.

But most Americans don’t understand this.  In fact, most Americans don’t even understand where money comes from.

If you don’t believe this, just go out on the street and ask regular people where money comes from.  The responses will be something like this…

“Duh – I don’t know.  I’ve got to get home to watch American Idol.”

This is why it is so important to get people educated.  I think that most Americans would be horrified to learn that the creation of more money in our system also involves the creation of more debt.

The following is a summary of money creation that comes from one of my previous articles

When the U.S. government decides that it wants to spend another billion dollars that it does not have, it does not print up a billion dollars.

Rather, the U.S. government creates a bunch of U.S. Treasury bonds (debt) and takes them over to the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve creates a billion dollars out of thin air and exchanges them for the U.S. Treasury bonds.

So what does the Federal Reserve do with those Treasury bonds?  I went on to explain what happens…

The U.S. Treasury bonds that the Federal Reserve receives in exchange for the money it has created out of nothing are auctioned off through the Federal Reserve system.

But wait.

There is a problem.

Because the U.S. government must pay interest on the Treasury bonds, the amount of debt that has been created by this transaction is greater than the amount of money that has been created.

So where will the U.S. government get the money to pay that debt?

Well, the theory is that we can get money to circulate through the economy really, really fast and tax it at a high enough rate that the government will be able to collect enough taxes to pay the debt.

But that never actually happens, does it?

And the creators of the Federal Reserve understood this as well.  They understood that the U.S. government would not have enough money to both run the government and service the national debt.  They knew that the U.S. government would have to keep borrowing even more money in an attempt to keep up with the game.

Men like Thomas Edison and Henry Ford could not understand why we would adopt such a foolish system.  For example, Thomas Edison was once quoted in the New York Times as saying the following…

That is to say, under the old way any time we wish to add to the national wealth we are compelled to add to the national debt.

Now, that is what Henry Ford wants to prevent. He thinks it is stupid, and so do I, that for the loan of $30,000,000 of their own money the people of the United States should be compelled to pay $66,000,000 — that is what it amounts to, with interest. People who will not turn a shovelful of dirt nor contribute a pound of material will collect more money from the United States than will the people who supply the material and do the work. That is the terrible thing about interest. In all our great bond issues the interest is always greater than the principal. All of the great public works cost more than twice the actual cost, on that account. Under the present system of doing business we simply add 120 to 150 per cent, to the stated cost.

But here is the point: If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good.

Unfortunately, today most Americans don’t even understand how the system works.  They just assume that we have the best system in the entire world.

Sadly, the reality is that the system is working just as the international bankers that designed it had hoped.  The United States has the largest national debt in the history of the world, and we are stealing more than 100 million dollars from our children and our grandchildren every single hour of every single day in a desperate attempt to keep the debt spiral going.

#4 The Federal Reserve Is A Centrally-Planned Financial System That Is The Antithesis Of What A Free Market System Should Be

Why do we need someone to centrally-plan our financial system?

Isn’t that the kind of thing they do in communist China?

Why do we need someone to tell us what interest rates are going to be?

Why do we need someone to determine what “the target rate of inflation” should be?

If we actually had a free market system, the free market would be the one “managing” our economy.

But instead, we have become so accustomed to central planning that any alternatives seem to be absolutely unthinkable.

For example, CNBC cannot possibly imagine a world where the Fed (or some similar institution) was not running things…

But suppose the law were taken off the books? The Fed’s job—in simple terms—is to manage the nation’s money supply and achieve the sometimes-conflicting tasks of full employment, stable prices while fighting inflation or deflation.

How would the U.S. economy then function? Something has to take its place, right?

Global markets would also need some sort of economic direction from the U.S. The Fed manages the dollar — and as the world’s leading currency, a void left by a Fed-less America could throw those markets into chaos with uncertainty about who’s managing U.S. interest rates and the American economy.

I’ve got an idea – let’s let the free market “manage” U.S. interest rates and the American economy.

I know, it’s a crazy idea, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it just might work beautifully.

#5 The Federal Reserve Creates Bubbles And Busts

Do you remember the Dotcom bubble?

Or what about the housing bubble?

By dramatically distorting interest rates and financial behavior, the Federal Reserve creates economic bubbles and the corresponding economic busts.

And guess what?

Now it is happening again.

When will the American people decide that they have had enough?

If you can believe it, there have been 10 different economic recessions since 1950.  And of course the Federal Reserve even admits that it helped create the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Perhaps it is time to try something different.

#6 The Federal Reserve Is Privately Owned

It has been said that the Federal Reserve is about as “federal” as Federal Express is.

Most Americans still believe that the Federal Reserve is a “federal agency”, but that is simply not true.  The following comes from factcheck.org

The stockholders in the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are the privately owned banks that fall under the Federal Reserve System. These include all national banks (chartered by the federal government) and those state-chartered banks that wish to join and meet certain requirements. About 38 percent of the nation’s more than 8,000 banks are members of the system, and thus own the Fed banks.

And even the Federal Reserve itself has argued that it is “not an agency” of the federal government in court.

So why is there still so much confusion about this?

We should not be allowing a private entity that is owned and dominated by the banks to make decisions that dramatically affect the daily lives of all the rest of us.

#7 The Federal Reserve Greatly Favors The “Too Big To Fail” Banks

Since the Federal Reserve is owned by the banks, should we be surprised that it serves the interests of the banks?

In particular, the Fed has been extremely good to the “too big to fail” banks.

Over the past several decades, those banks have grown tremendously in both size and power.

Back in 1970, the five largest U.S. banks held 17 percent of all U.S. banking industry assets.

Today, the five largest U.S. banks hold 52 percent of all U.S. banking industry assets.

#8 The Federal Reserve Gives Secret Bailouts To Their Friends

The Federal Reserve is the only institution in America that can print money out of thin air and loan it to their friends any time they want to.

For example, did you know that the Federal Reserve made 16 trillion dollars in secret loans to their friends during the last financial crisis?

The following list is taken directly from page 131 of a GAO audit report, and it shows which banks received secret loans from the Fed…

Citigroup – $2.513 trillion
Morgan Stanley – $2.041 trillion
Merrill Lynch – $1.949 trillion
Bank of America – $1.344 trillion
Barclays PLC – $868 billion
Bear Sterns – $853 billion
Goldman Sachs – $814 billion
Royal Bank of Scotland – $541 billion
JP Morgan Chase – $391 billion
Deutsche Bank – $354 billion
UBS – $287 billion
Credit Suisse – $262 billion
Lehman Brothers – $183 billion
Bank of Scotland – $181 billion
BNP Paribas – $175 billion
Wells Fargo – $159 billion
Dexia – $159 billion
Wachovia – $142 billion
Dresdner Bank – $135 billion
Societe Generale – $124 billion
“All Other Borrowers” – $2.639 trillion

If you will notice, a number of the banks listed above are foreign banks.

Why is the Fed allowed to print money out of thin air and lend it to foreign banks?

#9 The Federal Reserve Is Paying Banks Not To Lend Money

Did you know that the Federal Reserve is actually paying U.S. banksnot to lend money?

That doesn’t make sense.  Our economy is based on credit, and small businesses desperately need loans in order to operate.

But the Fed has decided to pay banks not to risk their money.  Section 128 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allows the Federal Reserve to pay interest on “excess reserves” that U.S. banks park at the Fed.

So the big banks can just send their cash to the Fed and watch the money come rolling in risk-free.

As the chart below demonstrates, the banks have taken great advantage of this tremendous deal…

10-18-2014 8-57-00 AM

#10 The Federal Reserve Has An Astounding Track Record Of Failure

Over the past ten years, the Federal Reserve has been an abysmal failure when it comes to running the economy.

But despite a track record of failure that would make the Chicago Cubs look like a roaring success, Barack Obama actually decided to nominate Ben Bernanke for a second term as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

What a mistake.

Just check out some of the things that Bernanke said prior to the last financial crisis.  The following is an extended excerpt from an articlethat I published previously

*****

In 2005, Bernanke said that we shouldn’t worry because housing prices had never declined on a nationwide basis before and he said that he believed that the U.S. would continue to experience close to “full employment”….

“We’ve never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis. So, what I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit. I don’t think it’s gonna drive the economy too far from its full employment path, though.”

In 2005, Bernanke also said that he believed that derivatives were perfectly safe and posed no danger to financial markets….

“With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.”

In 2006, Bernanke said that housing prices would probably keep rising….

“Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”

In 2007, Bernanke insisted that there was not a problem with subprime mortgages….

“At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained. In particular, mortgages to prime borrowers and fixed-rate mortgages to all classes of borrowers continue to perform well, with low rates of delinquency.”

In 2008, Bernanke said that a recession was not coming….

“The Federal Reserve is not currently forecasting a recession.”

few months before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac collapsed, Bernanke insisted that they were totally secure….

“The GSEs are adequately capitalized. They are in no danger of failing.”

*****

There are many, many more examples that could be listed, but hopefully you get the point.

And now it is happening again.  Bernanke is telling the American people that everything is going to be just fine and that no major problems are ahead.

Do you believe him this time?

#11 The Federal Reserve Is Unaccountable To The American People

What is the most important political issue to most Americans?

Survey after survey has shown that the American people care about the economy more than anything else.

So why do we allow an unelected, unaccountable entity that is privately-owned to make our economic decisions for us?

The Federal Reserve has become so powerful that it has been called “the fourth branch of government”.  Every four years, presidential candidates argue about who will be best at managing the economy, but the truth is that it is the Fed that manages our economy.

We are told that the “independence” of the Federal Reserve is absolutely critical, but don’t the American people deserve to have a say in the running of the economy?

Our system is broken.  It is a system that will continue to create more bubbles and more debt until the entire thing finally collapses for good.

Thomas Jefferson once stated that if he could add just one more amendment to the U.S. Constitution it would be a ban on all government borrowing….

I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution. I would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of our government to the genuine principles of its Constitution; I mean an additional article, taking from the federal government the power of borrowing.

But instead of banning government borrowing, we have allowed ourselves to become enslaved to a system where government borrowing actually creates our money.

We do not need to have a central bank.  There are much better alternatives.  We just need to get people educated.

Please share this article with as many people as you possibly can.  These are things that every American should know about the Fed, and we need to educate the American people about the Federal Reserve while there is still time.

10-18-2014 8-56-38 AM

10 13 11 flagbar


Ukraine Crisis: Pervasive Lying in U.S. & UK News Media

10/17/2014

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-crisis-pervasive-lying-in-u-s-uk-news-media/5408026

10-17-2014 10-57-21 AMBy Eric Zuesse

The lying is intentional, and it is systematic; but it is so on only the most important news-topics, the ones that affect the nation’s aristocracy as a whole, rather than competing interests within it. On these issues, the lying is pervasive.

What, precisely, are the most important news-topics to America’s aristocracy? The questions that aren’t being asked in a given nation’s press  are what show, in the clearest way, what the most important facts are, in order for an ordinary citizen to be able to understand the world without  the oligarchs’ systematic distortions and colorations of it.

A case-in-point is the events in Ukraine during this year:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhrUX53hQOU

And (to penetrate even deeper into the same topic) what about this cover-up, too? (Especially since there’s also this, and this, that seem to be basic to it?) Russia got slapped with international sanctions for this one — for having supposedly caused the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, to be shot down on July 17th, flying over the Ukrainian civil-war zone — but, as you can see there, the entire presentation was a frame-up, and the real perpetrators were Obama and the Ukrainian Government, both of whom lied, and were allowed (by the Western ‘news’ media) to do it and to get away with having done it. (Similarly, Bush’s stenographic press got away with spreading his lies about “Saddam’s WMD.”)

There’s no demand from Western ‘news’ media to get the evidence (such as the black-box data), much less to investigate it independently (as an authentically free press would be doing); and, when the Ukrainian and U.S. Governments refused to let it be released to the public, Western ‘news’ media simply remained silent about the cover-up, instead of making ceaseless headline news about the government’s lies, until the information becomes forced out, by pressure from the public.

These ‘news’ media, the entire Western press, don’t report certain things at all — they choose instead to participate in the Government’s lies about those matters.

The public are clearly being manipulated, not just by the government, but by ‘our free press,’ which are owned by, and financed largely by advertisements from, America’s aristocrats.

Here is a brilliant, and brilliantly researched and documented, 37-minute video on the history of how this control of the public’s perceptions of public events and of politics in our ‘democracy’ evolved, or came about. You can even see speaking there some of the people who developed it, and who carried it out for the oligarchs — the controlling aristocrats — and who thereby played key behind-the-scenes roles in shaping 20th-Century history. This video comes from the same genius, Aaron Hawkins, who researched and produced the best videos on the Ukrainian coup, and on the resulting Ukrainian civil war, and on the MH-17 shoot-down in Ukraine. Each one of these videos presents the visual and audio evidence, and places it into historical context so that it can be understood truthfully, and it coordinates that evidence with all of the written and other documentary evidence, so as to provide, in each one of these brief videos, authentic history, not myth, regarding its subject-matter. It penetrates through the lies, and gets to the truth about the matters that are being covered.

But, though these videos on the 2014 events in Ukraine were posted to the Internet quickly after the events that they are analyzing, and though each of the videos constitutes, even today, the most-credible reconstruction that’s available about how these historic events actually happened, all Western ‘news’ media ignore them; they ignore the historical evidence. In those videos, you can see and evaluate this evidence for yourself; and, to me, it’s damning against the Western press.

And furthermore, here, from (amazingly, a mainstream news source) the BBC in 1992, is a very long but stunning documentary about the history of “Operation Gladio,” the OSS-CIA operation that started in 1945 and that continues even today, to deceive and manipulate the publics in the U.S. and Europe. Again: the documentation here is of the highest quality; nobody can reasonably contest that what’s shown in this video, and the current applications of it continuing today, are real, are historical, not mythological at all. Moreover, a leading German journalist decided just recently to quit his thriving career and to go public with his having prostituted himself to America’s aristocracy in order to rise to the top in Germany’s major ‘news’ media; and this testimony sounds like a direct extension from what the BBC documentary on Operation Gladio was reporting. (He even explains there the type of “non-official cover” that is used to pay such outside or unofficial CIA agents. The CIA also operates a network of corporations to handle that.)

In a world that has no government, this is how international relations are handled: by subterfuge, deceit, and corruption. The publics just shed blood and pay taxes to fight and finance their wars, using weapons from their factories; and the ‘news’ media fool them to do it willingly — or as willingly as possible.

All that has been discussed here is important history, and (except for that BBC documentary) has been hidden instead of reported by the respected news-media.

Another example of that is this, which concerns the 9/11 attacks. (This was on C-span, which is government-financed but not government-controlled, it’s unique; and the oligarchs consider it to be insignificant, because its audience is small and politically diverse, neither large nor politically partisan nor influential. Anyone who sees this video will recognize that the standard account of 9/11 is mostly lies.)

Sometimes, what a nation’s ‘news’ media don’t cover, is more informative about that nation’s real state-of-affairs, than is what they do cover.

Sometimes, the media actually are  the message. They become the message, when they — and not  the reality that they claim to be representing — produce or generate the message, which is the regime’s lie, which is then being pumped by all of the regime’s ‘news’ media: that’s now effectively all  ’news’ media.

The ultimate lie, in such a matter, is that there is no “regime” — that it doesn’t exist; that democracy is what exists.

Are we there, yet? Have we reached that ultimate lie — the lie about whether our country is a democracy?

Have we yet reached the point where the biggest cover-up of all is the one that all of the ‘news’ media participate in: hiding the fact that, even though the media collectively offer a ‘range’ of ‘news’ and ‘diverse opinions’, they’re all really mouthpieces for the very same group: for the oligarchy that own them, and that pay money to them by advertising in them?

Or, have we perhaps been there ever since the non-existent “Saddam’s WMD,” which supposedly “caused” us to invade Iraq in 2003 (producing thousands of U.S. deaths, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, millions of Iraqis displaced, and over $3 trillion in costs to the U.S. economy), or perhaps even ever since before  that (maybe since 9/11, or even before that)?

Why do the public not boycott all ‘news’ media that charge for their ‘news’? These media constantly misrepresent reality.  What they charge should be nothing, because deception is actually worth less  than nothing.

Why does anyone subsidize any ‘news’ medium any longer by paying a subscription to it, if all of the mainstream, and almost all of the ‘alternative,’ ‘news’ media, are really just propaganda-media — the type of media that cover-up, instead of report about, the Government’s lying (such as all that lying about Ukraine)?

If there’s something like Obama’s coup in Ukraine and subsequent ethnic-cleansing there, that’s so central to the American regime as to be effectively banned from the West’s ‘news’ media, then that must be especially  worth the public’s knowing about. When the Establishment — both its ‘left’ and its ‘right’ — is united in a lie, then that lie has to be extremely important to the individuals who collectively hold the real power in a ‘democracy.’

Is this actually  a democracy? How can people intelligently vote, if they’re constantly being lied-to about the most-important things?

Where does this con against the public actually end — or is it endless?

Do you subscribe to The New York Times, or Washington Post, or Fox News Channel, or any other propaganda-vehicle? If so: why do you subsidize them?

Here are the authentic  news-media that I have found (and though they’re not many, they are all free, and each one of them invites each reader to be skeptical and to check out and verify any factual allegation made, because they’re all online, and most of them issue news-reports that have links to their sources online, and so these news-reports are just a click or two away from being able to be verified or else disconfirmed, which means that the standard form of deceiving the readers of a printed  news-medium, which is the inaccessibility of the sources, is not present here; the website cannot so easily deceive, and deceive repeatedly, without suffering a major loss of credibility):

washingtonsblog.com,

rinf.com,

opednews.com,

smirkingchimp.com,

globalresearch.ca,

infowars.com, and

thepeoplesvoice.org.

Perfection doesn’t exist, and I am by no means endorsing the veracity of each article that’s on each one of these seven sites. I happen to disagree with some editorial positions of some of them. For example, I believe that InfoWars is more-open to news-reports from conservatives and from libertarians than they should be; that the editor at GlobalResearch bends over backwards to accept news-stories that place things out of a scientific context regarding the existence of global warming (it seems he doesn’t believe in it, though it is true); and that ThePeoplesVoice isn’t sufficiently skeptical of submitted left-slanted articles.

However, I have found all seven of those news-sources to be honest, none of them to deceive intentionally. And, furthermore, very importantly, the percentage of false assertions is far lower in each one of these sites than it is in the mainstream ‘news’ media.

Any ‘news’ site which has covered-up the Obama Administration’s having committed a bloody coup d’etat in late February of this year in Ukraine that installed nazis – racist fascists – in control there, should simply be boycotted. None of the seven sites that I list here has covered-up that (though practically all other U.S. and UK sites have). And all seven of them are free: there is no subscription-fee for any of them.

I have had my own news-submissions that deal with other  topics than the Ukrainian coup published by mainstream ‘news’ sites, but that’s not the case about the Ukrainian matter. The virtual universality of the ‘news’ blackout on this topic is amazing — far worse than even the blackout on the truth about the 2008 economic collapse. The blackout on the truth about the February 2014 coup and subsequent ethnic-cleansing in Ukraine is nearly total on all U.S. and UK ‘news’ sites, except for the seven authentic news-sites that I link to above. (Each of these 7 sites also has been honest about other things, such as the 2008 collapse, and the 9/11 attacks; however, some of the 7 also go farther into speculation about those partly unresolvable matters than a news-site should. When the government and the mainstream press so constantly lie, speculation as to why that’s happening isn’t entirely bad; it’s forgivable as an attempt to fill in the blanks when the actual evidence is incomplete. But the mainstream press is also full of speculation: only, theirs is dishonest, it is intended  to deceive.)

I have also found one honest German-language news site: deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de, “German Economic News.”

In addition, there are hundreds of specialized news-sites online that are also honest, and free, such as, for example, on the subject of economics, nakedcapitalism.com/ritholtz.com, and wallstreetonparade.com.

So: will someone please explain to me why anyone should subsidize  propagandists?

Maybe if we didn’t do that, the oligarchs would just decide to switch to the news-business, and quit the propaganda-business, because a market for truth in news-reporting might actually develop here, somehow?

But, of course, it should only be so easy, to rectify our corrupt political and economic system.

Anyway, this would be a start in the correct direction. And it’s something anyone can do. And it will save wasted money, for anyone who does it.

That’s a good deal, don’t you think?

Obama Fights Ebola With A Czar and Soldiers

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/10/17/obama-fights-ebola-czar-soldiers-paul-craig-roberts/

Paul Craig Roberts

The public continues to be reassured that ebola is not a problem for the US, but CNN reports that Obama has appointed an Ebola Czar. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-17/meet-americas-new-ebola-czar The Czar is not a medical person but an insider lawyer who served as chief of staff to Vice President Biden.

Little wonder ebola conspiracy theories are spreading faster than ebola. And as far as any of us know, the conspiracies could be true.

University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle, an expert of the perfidies of the US government, reminds us that Sierra Leone and Liberia, the countries most affected by the ebola outbreak, are two West African countries that host US biological warfare laboratories. Professor Boyle asks how the disease, which is mainly associated with equatorial Congo reached West Africa thousands of kilometers away.

Washington’s response is itself peculiar. The Obama regime sent 4,000 US soldiers to West Africa to fight ebola. Soldiers don’t have training or equipment with which to combat ebola. Why expose 4,000 Americans to an epidemic? This seemingly pointless decision has raised suspicions that Washington is exposing troops to ebola so that vaccines or treatments can be tested on the troops.

Other commentators have noticed that West Africa is an area of Chinese investments. They wonder if Washington is using the cover of ebola to occupy the countries or even set the disease loose in order to drive out the Chinese. The new US Africa Command was formed to counteract Chinese economic penetration in Africa.

The incompetence of US public health authorities in responding to ebola gives legs to these theories. Real conspiracies abound. Those who say “it’s just a conspiracy theory” need to look up the meaning of conspiracy. As one commentator observed, the CDC’s response to ebola is too stupid for stupid.

The CDC’s protocol is based on assumptions about ebola that do not seem to be true for the current strain. A nurse, who treated the ebola patient in Dallas who died, was given the green light to fly commercially even though she reported to CDC that she had symptoms. She exposed 132 passengers on the flight, and these passengers have since been in contact with thousands of other people. The Daily Mail has published photographs of an American with a clipboard and without protective suiting boarding the nurse on a private airplane on way to hospital quarantine.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2794854/what-thinking-mystery-man-without-hazmat-suit-seen-helping-2nd-ebola-nurse-board-plane-atlanta-joining-them.html

US public health authorities have imposed no quarantine on travel to the US from infected countries. US airlines continue to fly to and fro from the infected countries despite the risk of introducing new infections into the US.

African countries are doing a much better job than the hegemonic superpower. They have closed borders, prevented air travel, and tracked down infected persons and those exposed to them.http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AF_EBOLA_AFRICA_CONTAINMENT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-10-16-14-24-38

Instead of taking sensible precautions, the Obama regime appoints an Ebola Czar and sends 4,000 Americans into the areas where the disease rages.

Little wonder that Americans have no confidence in their government.

As the Republicans want to privatize and outsource everything, why not close down Washington and outsource our governance to a more competent country?

 10 13 11 flagbar


The Hidden Government Group Linking JFK Watergate Iran Contra and 911

10/16/2014

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2014/10/16/the-hidden-government-group-linking-jfk-watergate-iran-contra-and-911/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

 By TRUTHER

For some time now, I have been analyzing American history in the light of what I have called structural deep events: events, like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, Iran-Contra, or 9/11, which repeatedly involve law-breaking or violence, are mysterious to begin with, are embedded in ongoing covert processes, have political consequences that enlarge covert government, and are subsequently covered up by systematic falsifications in the mainstream media and internal government records.

10-16-2014 11-55-22 AM

The more I study these deep events, the more I see suggestive similarities between them, increasing the possibility that they are not unrelated external intrusions on American history, but parts of an endemic process, sharing to some degree or other a common source.

For example, one factor linking Dallas, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11, has been the involvement in all four deep events of personnel involved in America’s highest-level emergency planning, known since the 1950s as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, or more colloquially inside the Pentagon as “the Doomsday Project.” A few of these actors may have been located at the top, as overseers of the secret COG system. Others – including some I shall talk about today – were located further down in its secret communications network.

I see this planning group as one among many in what I have chosen to call the American deep state, along with agencies like the CIA and NSA, the private groups like Booz Allen Hamilton to which more than half of the US intelligence budget is outsourced, and finally the powerful banks and corporations whose views are well represented in the CIA and NSA. But if only one group among many, the COG planning group is also special, because of its control of and access to a communications channel, not under government control, that can reach deeply into the US social structure. I discuss these matters at some length in my next book,The American Deep State, due out in November.

COG planning was originally authorized by Truman and Eisenhower as planning for a response to a crippling atomic attack that had decapitated government. In consequence its planning group contemplated extreme measures, including what Alfonso Chardy in 1987 called “suspension of the Constitution.” And yet in Iran-Contra its asset of a secret communications network, developed for the catastrophe of decapitation, was used instead to evade an official embargo on arms sales to Iran that dated back to 1979. My question today is whether the network could have been similarly misused in November 1963.

The Iran-contra misuse has been well-documented. Oliver North supervised the sale of arms to Iran by using his resources as the National Security Council action officer for COG planning, under cover of a “National Program Office” that was overseen by then Vice-President George H. W.  Bush. North and his superiors could thus use the COG emergency network, known then as Flashboard, for the arms sales to Iran that had to be concealed from other parts of the Washington bureaucracy as well as the public. So when North had to send emergency instructions for arms delivery to the US Embassy in Lisbon, instructions that directly contravened the embargo prohibiting such sales, he used the Flashboard network to avoid alerting the Ambassador and other unwitting personnel.

The documented example of Iran-Contra allows me to explain what I am saying about the users of the COG network, and also what I am not saying. To begin with, I am not saying that a single “Secret Team” has for decades been using the COG network to manipulate the US Government from outside it. There is no evidence to suggest that North’s actions in Iran-Contra were known to any of his superiors other than CIA chief William Casey and probably George Bush. The point is that a very small group had access to a high-level secret network outside government review, in order to implement a program in opposition to government policy. They succumbed to the temptation to use this secure network that had been designed for other purposes. I have argued elsewhere that this secure network was used again on 9/11, to implement key orders for which the 9/11 Commission could find no records. Whether it was also used for illicit purposes is not known.

It is certain that the COG emergency network program survived North’s demise, and continued to be secretly developed for decades, at a cost of billions, and overseen by a team including Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. It is relevant that the two men’s presence on the committee spanned three administrations – those of Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton — even though at one point under Clinton neither man held a position inside the U.S. government. Such continuity was essential for a group so secret that few records existed of its activities. And on 9/11 COG plans were officially implemented for the first time, by Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, the two men who had planned them for so many years.

Whether or not they knew about Iran-Contra, Cheney and Rumsfeld were on the COG planning committee at the time of Iran-Contra. There is no such obvious link between COG planning and Watergate, but the involvement of COG personnel in Watergate is nonetheless striking. James McCord, one of the Watergate burglars, was a member of a small Air Force Reserve unit in Washington attached to the Office ofEmergency Preparedness (OEP) that was assigned “to draw up lists of radicals and to develop contingency plans for censorship of the news media and U.S. mail in time of war.” His unit was part of the Wartime Information Security Program (WISP), which had responsibility for activating “contingency plans for imposing censorship on the press, the mails and all telecommunications (including government communications) [and] preventive detention of civilian ‘security risks,’ who would be placed in military ‘camps.’” In addition, John Dean, perhaps the central Watergate figure, had overseen secret COG activities when serving as the associate deputy attorney general.

In the case of the JFK assassination, I wish to focus on two men who functioned as part of the communications network of the Office of Emergency Planning (OEP), the agency renamed in 1968 as the Office of Emergency Preparedness (to which McCord was attached), and renamed again in 1982 as the National Program Office (for which Oliver North was the action officer).

These two men (there are others) are Winston Lawson, the Secret Service advance man who from the lead car of the motorcade was in charge of the Secret Service radio channels operating in the motorcade; and Jack Crichton, the army intelligence reserve officer who with Deputy Dallas Police Chief George Lumpkin selected the Russian interpreter for Marina Oswald’s first (and falsified) FBI interview.

Lawson has drawn the critical attention of JFK researchers, both for dubious actions he took before and during the assassination, and also for false statements he made after it (some of them under oath). For example, Lawson reported after the assassination that motorcycles were deployed on “the right and left flanks of the President’s car” (17 WH 605). On the morning of November 22, however, the orders had been changed (3 WH 244), so that the motorcycles rode instead, as Lawson himself testified to the Warren Commission, “just back of the President’s car” (4 WH 338; cf. 21 WH 768-70). Captain Lawrence of the Dallas Police testified that that the proposed side escorts were redeployed to the rear on Lawson’s own instructions (7 WH 580-81; cf. 18 WH 809, 21 WH 571). This would appear to have left the President more vulnerable to a possible crossfire.

Early on November 22, at Love Field, Lawson installed, in what would become the lead car, the base radio whose frequencies were used by all Secret Service agents on the motorcade. This radio channel, operated by the White House Communications Agency (WHCA), was used for some key decisions before and after the assassination, yet its records, unlike those of the Dallas Police Department (DPD) Channels One and Two, were never made available to the Warren Commission, or any subsequent investigation. The tape was not withheld because it was irrelevant; on the contrary, it contained very significant information.

The WHCA actually reports to this day on its website that the agency was “a key player in documenting the assassination of President Kennedy.” However it is not clear for whom this documentation was conducted, or why it was not made available to the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on Assassinations, or the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB). It should have been.

For one thing, the WHCA tape, as Vincent Palamara has written, contains the “key” to the unresolved mystery of who, after the shooting, redirected the motorcade to Parkland hospital. The significance of this apparently straightforward command, about which there was much conflicting testimony, is heightened when we read repeated orders on the Dallas Police radio transcript to “cut all traffic for the ambulance going to Parkland code 3” (17 WH 395) – the ambulance in question having nothing to do with the president (whose shooting had not yet been announced on the DPD radio). In fact the ambulance had been dispatched about ten minutes before the assassination to pick someone from in front of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD), who was wrongly suspected of having suffered an epileptic seizure.

Lawson later reported to the Secret Service that he heard on his radio “that we should proceed to the nearest hospital.” He wrote also that he “requested Chief Curry to have the hospital contacted,” and then that “Our Lead Car assisted the motorcycles in escorting the President’s vehicle to Parkland Hospital” (17 WH 632), cf. 21 WH 580). In other words, after hearing something on the WHCA radio, Lawson helped ensure that the President’s limousine would follow the route already set up by the motorcycles for the epileptic. (In his very detailed Warren Commission testimony, Lawson said nothing about the route having already been cleared. On the contrary he testified that “we had to do some stopping of cars and holding our hands out the windows and blowing the sirens and horns to get through” (4 WH 354).

The WHCA radio channel used by Lawson and others communicated almost directly to the WHCA base at Mount Weather in Virginia, the base facility of the COG network. From there, Secret Service communications were relayed to the White House, via the

batteries of communications equipment connecting Mount Weather with the White House and “Raven Rock” — the underground Pentagon sixty miles north of Washington — as well as with almost every US military unit stationed around the globe.

Jack Crichton, head of the 488th Army Intelligence Reserve unit of Dallas, was also part of this Mount Weather COG network. This was in his capacity as chief of intelligence for Dallas Civil Defense, which worked out of an underground Emergency Operating Center. As Russ Baker reports, “Because it was intended for ‘continuity of government’ operations during an attack, [the Center] was fully equipped with communications equipment.” In retrospect the Civil Defense Program is remembered derisively, for having advised schoolchildren, in the event of an atomic attack, to hide their heads under their desks.But in 1963 civil defense was one of the urgent responsibilities assigned to the Office of Emergency Planning, which is why Crichton, as much as Secret Service agent Lawson, could be in direct touch with the OEP’s emergency communications network at Mount Weather.

Jack Crichton is of interest because he, along with DPD Deputy Chief George Lumpkin of the 488th Army Intelligence Reserve unit, was responsible for choosing a Russian interpreter for Marina Oswald from the right-wing Russian community. This man was Ilya Mamantov, who translated for Marina Oswald at her first DPD interview on November 22. What she allegedly said in Russian at this interview was later used to bolster what I have called the “phase one” story, still promoted from some CIA sources, that Russia and/or Cuba were behind the assassination.

As summarized by the FBI, Mamantov’s account of Marina’s Russian testimony was as follows:

MARINA OSWALD advised that LEE HARVEY OSWALD owned a rifle which he used in Russia about two years ago. She observed what she presumed to be the same rifle in a blanket in the garage at [Ruth Paine’s residence]…. MARINA OSWALD stated that on November 22, she had been shown a rifle in the Dallas Police Department…. She stated that it was a dark color like the one that she had seen, but she did not recall the sight.

These specific details – that Marina said she had seen a rifle that was dark and scopeless – were confirmed in an affidavit (signed by Marina and Mamantov, 24 WH 219) that was taken by DPD officer B.L. Senkel (24 WH 249). They were confirmed again by Ruth Paine, who witnessed the Mamantov interview, (3 WH 82). They were confirmed again the next night in an interview of Marina by the Secret Service, translated by Mamantov’s close friend Peter Gregory. But a Secret Service transcript of the interview reveals that the source of these details was Gregory, not Marina:

(Q) This gun, was it a rifle or a pistol or just what kind of a gun? Can she answer that?

(A) It was a gun

Mr. Gregory asked: Can you describe it?

NOTE: Subject said: I cannot describe it because a rifle to me like all rifles.

Gregory translation: She said she cannot describe it. It was sort of a dark rifle just like any other common rifle…

Subject in Russian: It was a hump (or elevation) but I never saw through the scope….

Gregory translation: She says there was an elevation on the rifle but there was no scope – no telescope.

We have to conclude not just that Gregory had falsified Marina’s testimony (“a rifle to me like all rifles”); but so probably had his friend Mamantov, who later testified no less than seven times to the Warren Commission that Marina had used the word “dark” to describe the gun. There were others in Dallas who claimed that Oswald’s gun indeed had been scopeless, until Oswald had a scope installed on it by Dallas gunsmith Dial Ryder. The Warren Report elaborately refuted this corroborated claim, and concluded that “the authenticity of the repair tag” used to support it was “subject to grave doubts.” (WR 317).

We can see here, what the Warren Commission did not wish to see, signs of a conspiracy to misrepresent Marina’s testimony, and possibly to link Oswald’s gun to a dark and scopeless rifle he had in the Soviet Union. Our concerns that Mamantov misrepresented her lead us to concerns about why two Army Intelligence Reserve officers from the 488th unit (Jack Crichton and Deputy DPD Chief George Lumpkin) selected Mamantov as her interpreter. Our concerns are increased when we see that B.L. Senkel, the DPD officer who took Marina’s suspect affidavit, was the partner of F.P. Turner, who collected the dubious rifle repair tag (24 WH 328), and that both men spent most of November 22 with DPD Deputy Chief Lumpkin. For example, they were with Lumpkin in the pilot car of the motorcade when Lumpkin was communicating with Winston Lawson in the lead car behind them.

I conclude that when we look at the conduct of the two men we know to have been parts of the COG emergency communications network in Dallas, we see patterns of sinister behavior that also involved others, or what we may call conspiratorial behavior. These concatenated efforts to implicate Oswald in a phase-one conspiracy narrative lead me to propose a hypothesis for which I have neither evidence nor an alternative explanation: namely, that someone on the WHCA network may have been the source for the important unexplained description on the Dallas Police tapes of a suspect who had exactly the false height and weight (5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds) recorded for Oswald in his FBI and CIA files.

Note that there are no other known sources ascribing this specific height and weight to Oswald. For example, when he was arrested and charged in Dallas that same day, Oswald was recorded as having a height of 5’9 ½ inches, and a height of 131 pounds. The first reference to Oswald as 5’10”, 165 pounds, was that offered by Oswald’s mother Marguerite to FBI Agent Fain in May 1960, when Oswald himself was absent in Russia.

The DPD officer contributing the description on the Police Channel was Inspector Herbert Sawyer, who allegedly had heard it from someone outside the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) whom he could not identify or describe. The Warren Report said categorically that his source was Howard Brennan (WR 5

and that on the evening of November 22, Brennan “identified Oswald as the person in the lineup who bore the closest resemblance to the man in the window but he said that he was unable to make a positive identification” (WR 145). But there are many reasons to doubt this, starting with conflicts in Brennan’s own testimony (as Anthony Summers reported in Conspiracy, pp. 109-10) . And Ian Griggs has made a strong case that Brennan never saw Oswald in a line-up that evening. (There are police records placing Oswald in three line-ups that day, and corroborating witness reports of them; but there is no evidence whatever that Brennan attended any of the three.)

There is another strong reason to doubt that the source was Brennan. Brennan testified later to the Warren Commission that he saw his suspect in a window of the Texas School Book Depository, “standing up and leaning against the left window sill.” Pressed to describe how much of the suspect he saw, Brennan answered, “I could see probably his whole body, from his hips up. But at the time that he was firing the gun, a possibility from his belt up” (3 WH 144).

The awkwardness of Brennan’s language draws attention to the fundamental problem about the description. It is hard to imagine anyone giving a full height and weight estimate from seeing someone who was only partially visible in a window. So there are intrinsic grounds for believing the description must have come from another source. And when we see that the same description is found in Oswald’s FBI and CIA files — and nowhere else – there are reasons to suspect the source was from government secret files.

We have seen that there was interaction in Dallas between the WHCA and DPD radio channels, thanks to the WHCA portable radio that Lawson had installed in the lead car of the presidential motorcade. This radio in turn was in contact by police radio with the pilot car ahead of it, carrying Dallas Police Department (DPD) Deputy Chief Lumpkin of the 488th Army Intelligence Reserve unit. At the same time, as noted above, it was in contact with the COG nerve center at Mount Weather, Virginia. And Mount Weather had the requisite secret communications to receive information from classified intelligence files, without other parts of the government being alerted.

10-16-2014 11-54-55 AM

Permit me at this moment an instructive digression. It is by now well established that Kennedy in 1963 was concerned enough by “the threat of far-right treason” that he urgently persuaded Hollywood director John Frankenheimer “to turn [the novel] Seven Days in May into a movie.” In this book, to quote Wikipedia, a

charismatic superior officer, Air Force General James Mattoon Scott, intend[s] to stage a coup d’état …. According to the plan, an undisclosed Army combat unit known as ECOMCON (Emergency COMmunications CONtrol) will seize control of the country’s telephone, radio, and television networks, while the conspiracy directs the military and its allies in Congress and the media from “Mount Thunder” (a continuity of government base based on Mount Weather).

It is no secret also that in 1963 Kennedy had aroused major right-wing dissatisfaction, largely because of signs of his increasing rapprochement with the Soviet Union. The plot of the book and movie reflects the concern of liberals at the time about generals like General Edwin Walker, who had resigned in 1961 after Kennedy criticized his political activities in the Army. (Walker had given his troops John Birch Society literature, along with the names of right-wing candidates to vote for.) We can assume however that Kennedy had no firm evidence of a Mount Weather conspiracy: if he had, it is unlikely his response would have just been to sponsor a fictionalized movie.

It is important at this stage to point out that, although COG elements like Mount Weather were considered part of the Pentagon, the COG “government in waiting” was at no time under military control. On the contrary, President Eisenhower had ensured that it was broadly based at the top, so its planners included some of the nation’s top corporate leaders, like Frank Stanton of CBS. By all accounts of COG leadership in the decades after Reagan took office in 1981, this so-called “shadow government” still included CEOs of private corporations, like Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, as well as three former CIA directors: Richard Helms, James Schlesinger, and George Bush.

Alfonso Chardy wrote in 1987 that the “virtual parallel government” empowering North to run Iran-Contra had also developed “a secret contingency plan that called for suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the United States over to FEMA.” Subsequently North was questioned in the Iran-Contra Hearings about this charge, but was prevented by the Committee Chairman, Democratic Senator Inouye, from answering in a public session.

Later, investigating the powerful COG planning group, CNN called it “a hidden government [in the USA] about which you know nothing.” James Mann emphasized its hawkish continuity, unaffected by changes of presidency in the White House:

Cheney and Rumsfeld were, in a sense, a part of the permanent, though hidden, national security apparatus of the United States, inhabitants of a world in which Presidents come and go, but America always keeps on fighting.”

10-16-2014 11-54-15 AM

Going one step further, Andrew Cockburn quoted a Pentagon source to support a claim that a COG planning group under Clinton was now for the first time staffed “almost exclusively with Republican hawks.” In the words of his source, “You could say this was a secret government-in-waiting. The Clinton administration was extraordinarily inattentive, [they had] no idea what was going on.”

The Pentagon official’s description of COG planners as a “secret government-in-waiting” under Clinton (which still included both Cheney and Rumsfeld) is very close to the standard definition of a cabal, as a group of persons secretly united to bring about a change or overthrow of government. A very similar situation existed under Jimmy Carter, when some of those who would later figure in Iran-Contra (notably George H.W. Bush and Theodore Shackley) worked with chiefs of foreign intelligence services (the so-called Safari Club) “to start working with [former DCI Richard] Helms [then U.S. Ambassador to Iran] and his most trusted operatives outside of Congressional and even Agency purview.” This group began by backing guerrilla forces in Africa (notably UNITA of Jonas Savimbi in Angola), which they knew would not be backed by the CIA under William Colby or Stansfield Turner.

But some of these figures, notably Alexandre de Marenches of the French spy agency SDECE, became involved with Casey, Bush, Shackley, and others in a 1980 plot – the so-called Republican “October Surprise” – to prevent the reelection of Jimmy Carter. The essence of this plot was to frustrate Carter’s efforts to repatriate the hostages seized in the U.S. Tehran Embassy, by negotiating a Republican deal with the Iranians that would be more to their liking. (The hostages in fact were returned hours after Reagan took office in 1981.)

This Republican hostage plot in 1980 deserves to be counted as a fifth structural deep event in recent US history. Unquestionably the illicit contacts with Iran established by the October Surprise Group in 1980 became, as Alfonso Chardy wrote, the “genesis” of the Iran-Contra arms deals overseen by the COG/ Mount Weather planners in 1984-86.

In an important interview with journalist Robert Parry, the veteran CIA officer Miles Copeland claimed that a “CIA within the CIA” inspired the 1980 plot, having concluded by 1980 that Jimmy Carter (in Copeland’s words) “had to be removed from the presidency for the good of the country.” Copeland made it clear to Parry that he shared this view that Carter “represented a grave threat to the nation,” and former Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe told Parry that Copeland himself was in fact “the conceptual father” of the 1980 arms-for-hostages deal, and had “brokered [the] Republican cooperation with Israel.” And Copeland, together with his client Adnan Khashoggi whom he advised, went on with Shackley to help launch the 1984-85 Iranian arms deals as well.

However, just as Knebel in Seven Days may have overestimated the military component in the COG Mount Weather

10-16-2014 11-53-53 AM

leadership, so Copeland may have dwelt too exclusively on the CIA component behind the October Surprise Group. In The Road to 9/11, I suggested that this CIA network overlapped with a so-called “Project Alpha,” working at the time for David Rockefeller and the Chase Manhattan Bank on Iran issues, which was chaired by the veteran establishment figure John J. McCloy.

I will conclude by again quoting James Mann’s dictum that the Mount Weather COG leadership constitutes a “permanent, though hidden, national security apparatus of the United States, … a world in which Presidents come and go, but America always keeps on fighting.” And I would like this audience to investigate whether elements of this enduring leadership, with its ever-changing mix of CIA veterans and civilian leaders, may have constituted “a secret government-in-waiting,” not just under Clinton in the 1990s, not just under Carter in 1980, but also under Kennedy in November 1963.

Footnotes

[1] Peter Dale Scott, The American Deep State: Wall Street, Big Oil, and the Attack on U.S. Democracy(Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014 [forthcoming]). 1.

[2] For a partial list of anomalies between the JFK assassination and 9/11, see Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War (New York: Skyhorse, 2013), 341-96.

[3] Tim Shorrock, Spies for Hire (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008), 6.

[4] Alfonso Chardy, “Reagan Aides and the Secret Government,” Miami Herald, July 5, 1987,http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=9877 [18]: “Some of President Reagan’s top advisers have operated a virtual parallel government outside the traditional Cabinet departments and agencies almost from the day Reagan took office, congressional investigators and administration officials have concluded.”

[5] Iran-Contra Committee Counsel Arthur Liman, questioning Oliver North, “had North repeat his testimony that the diversion was Casey’s idea” (Arthur Liman, Lawyer: a life of counsel and controversy [New York: Public Affairs, 1998], 341).

[6] James Bamford, A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq, and the abuse of America’s intelligence agencies (New York: Doubleday, 2004), 72.

[7] Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 213-14, 219-29.

[8] Bamford, A Pretext for War, 71-81.

[9] Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, All the President’s Men (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974), 23.

[10] Jim Hougan, Secret Agenda (New York: Random House, 1984), 16. For more on WISP, see David Wise, The Politics of Lying: Government Deception, Secrecy, and Power (New York: Random House, 1973), 134-37.

[11] John Dean, Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush (New York: Little Brown, 2004), 120. In addition Howard Baker, in 1973 the ranking Republican member of the Senate Committee that investigated Watergate, was later  part of the COG secret leadership (CNN Special Assignment, November 17, 1991).

[12] James Mann, Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet (New York: Viking, 2004), 142.

[13] Warren Commission Hearings, Vol. 9, p.106 (or 9 WH 106) ; Scott, Deep Politics, 275-76; Russ Baker,Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2009), 119-22.

[14] “White House Communications Agency,” Signal Corps Regimental History,http://signal150.army.mil/white_house_communications_agency.html.

[15] In the 1990s the WHCA supplied statements to the ARRB concerning communications between Dallas and Washington on November 22 (NARA #172-10001-10002 to NARA #172-10000-10008).  The Assassination Records Review Board also attempted to obtain from the WHCA the unedited original tapes of conversations from Air Force One on the return trip from Dallas, November 22, 1963. (Edited and condensed versions of these tapes had been available since the 1970s from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library in Austin, Texas.) The attempt was unsuccessful: “The Review Board’s repeated written and oral inquiries of the White House Communications Agency did not bear fruit. The WHCA could not produce any records that illuminated the provenance of the edited tapes.” See Assassinations Records Review Board: Final Report, chapter 6, Part 1, 116, http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/review-board/report/chapter-06-part1.pdf [19].

[16] 17 WH 394-95, 23 WH 841; 17 WH 368, 395; Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 273-74, 278. The alleged epileptic walked away from the ambulance after it arrived at Highland (Warren Commission Document 1245, 6-10).

[17] Statement of Special Agent Winston E. Lawson [to Secret Service],” 17 WH 632; Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 278.

[18] Richard Pollock, “The Mysterious Mountain,” The Progressive, March, 1976; cf. “Mount Weather’s ‘Government-in-Waiting,’” http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/mt_weather.htm.

[19] Russ Baker, Family of Secrets, 121.

[20] Dee Garrison , Bracing for Armageddon: Why Civil Defense Never Worked

(New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 46.

[21] Warren Commission Exhibit 1778, 23 WH 383-84.

[22] Commission Document 344 – SS Howard Tape Copy of 01 Dec 1963, p. 23.

[23] Lee Harvey Oswald fingerprint card, 17 WH 308. The heaviest Oswald actually weighed was 150 pounds, when he left the Marines in 1959 (19 WH 584, 595).

[24] FBI report by Special Agent Fain, dated May 12, 1960, 17 WH 706. In the same report Marguerite named Oswald’s father as “Edward Lee Oswald.” His actual name was Robert Edward Lee Oswald (WR 669-70).

[25] Testimony of Inspector Herbert Sawyer, 6 WH 321-22:  “I remember that he was a white man and that he wasn’t young and he wasn’t old.” Cf. Dallas Police Channel Two Tape at 12:25 PM (23 WH 916).

[26] Ian Griggs, “Did Howard Leslie Brennan Really Attend an Identification Lineup?”

http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/28th_Issue/id_draft.html.

[27] Statement of Secret Service Winston Lawson, 17 WH 630: “I checked with Chief Curry as to location of Lead Car [at  Love Field] and had WHCA portable radio put in and checked.”

[28] “The lead car was in radio contact with the pilot car by police radio, and with the Presidential limousine by Secret Service portable radios” (Pamela McElwain-Brown, “The Presidential Lincoln Continental SS-100-X,” Dealey Plaza Echo, Volume 3, Issue 2, 23,http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=16241&relPageId=27 [20]). Cf. Scott,Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 272-75 (Lumpkin).

[29] David Talbot, Brothers: the hidden history of the Kennedy years (New York: Free Press, 2007), 148.

[30] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_in_May.

[31] Jonathan M. Schoenwald, A time for choosing: the rise of modern American conservatism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), .

[32] Hope Yen, “Eisenhower Letters Reveal Doomsday Plan: Citizens Tapped to Take Over in Case of Attack,” AP, Deseret News, March 21, 2004, http://www.deseretnews.com/article/595050502/Eisenhower-letters-reveal-doomsday-plan.html?pg=all [21].

[33] CNN Special Assignment, November 17, 1991.

[34] Alfonso Chardy, “Reagan Aides and the Secret Government,” Miami Herald, July 5, 1987,http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=9877 [18]: “Some of President Reagan’s top advisers have operated a virtual parallel government outside the traditional Cabinet departments and agencies almost from the day Reagan took office, congressional investigators and administration officials have concluded.”

[35] Iran-Contra Committee Counsel Arthur Liman, questioning Oliver North, “had North repeat his testimony that the diversion was Casey’s idea” (Arthur Liman, Lawyer: a life of counsel and controversy[New York: Public Affairs, 1998], 341). Cf. The “October Surprise” allegations and the circumstances surrounding the release of the American hostages held in Iran: report of the Special Counsel to Senator Terry Sanford and Senator James M. Jeffords of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Volume 4, p. 33 (October Surprise Group).

[36] CNN Special Assignment, November 17, 1991.

[37] James Mann, Rise of the Vulcans, 145.

[38] Andrew Cockburn, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy (New York: Scribner, 2007), 88.

[39] Joseph J. Trento, Prelude to terror: the rogue CIA and the legacy of America’s private intelligence network (New York: Carroll & Graf, 2005), 61.

[40] Piero Gleijeses, Visions of Freedom: Havana, Washington, Pretoria and the struggle for Southern Africa, 1976-1991 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, [2013]), 66-68; Elaine Windrich, “The Laboratory of Hate: The Role of Clandestine Radio in the Angolan War,” International Journal of Cultural Studies 3(2), 2000.

[41] Alfonso Chardy, “Reagan Aides and the Secret Government,” Miami Herald, July 5, 1987,http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=9877 [18]: “The group, led by campaign foreign policy adviser Richard Allen, was founded out of concern Carter might pull off an “October surprise” such as a last-minute deal for the release of the hostages before the Nov. 4 election. One of the group’s first acts was a meeting with a man claiming to represent Iran who offered to release the hostages to Reagan.

Allen — Reagan’s first national security adviser— and another campaign aide, Laurence Silberman, told The Herald in April of the meeting. they said McFarlane, then a Senate Armed Services Committee aide, arranged and attended it. McFarlane later became Reagan’s national security adviser and played a key role in the Iran-contra affair. Allen and Silberman said they rejected the offer to release the hostages to Reagan.” [The Iranian was Houshang Lavi, and after Lavi’s death Robert Parry confirmed from Lavi’s diary that the meeting did take place].

[42] Alfonso Chardy, “Reagan Aides and the Secret Government,” Miami Herald, July 5, 1987,http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=9877 [18].

[43] “America’s False History Allows the Powerful to Commit Crimes Without Consequence,” Mark Karlin Interview of Robert Parry, January 15, 2013, Truthout Interview, http://www.truth-out.org/progressivepicks/item/13904-americas-false-history-allows-the-powerful-to-commit-crimes-without-consequence [22].

[44] Robert Parry, Trick or Treason, 175.

[45] Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America

(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 81-83, 88. A key figure was CIA veteran and Copeland friend Archibald Roosevelt, in 1980 a Carter foe and also  employee of the Chase Manhattan Bank.

[46] Mann, Rise of the Vulcans, 145.

Intro, Images, and Original: http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/05/the-hidden-government-group-linking-jfk-watergate-iran-contra-and-911/

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

One thing is for sure, when it comes to BALLS, this author is a heavyweight. Can you imagine how many people he has just made into a personal enemy? For my money, I believe if he lives another year it’s because he has zero evidence to back up this article and the people concerned know they can ruin him publically WHENEVER THEY WANT. On the other hand, and more likely, he won’t live long enough to grow a beard. ATA BOY TRUTHER! Now, who in the hell is going to indict and prosecute these scumbags?

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 


The Globalization of War

10/15/2014

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2014/10/14/the-globalization-of-war/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

Prof Michel Chossudovsky

The world is at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history. The U.S. and its NATO allies have embarked on a military adventure, “a long war”, which threatens the future of humanity. This “war without borders” is intimately related to a worldwide process of economic restructuring, which has been conducive to the collapse of national economies and the impoverishment of large sectors of the World population.

10-15-2014 9-25-00 AM

The U.S. weapons producers are the recipients of  U.S. Department of Defense multibillion dollar procurement contracts for advanced weapons systems. In turn, “The Battle for Oil” in the Middle East and Central Asia directly serves the interests of the Anglo-American oil giants. The U.S. and its allies are “Beating the Drums of War” at the height of a worldwide economic depression.

The military deployment of US-NATO forces coupled with “non-conventional warfare” –including covert intelligence operations, economic sanctions and the thrust of “regime change”– is occurring simultaneously in several regions of the world. 

Central to an understanding of war, is the media campaign which grants it legitimacy in the eyes of public opinion. War has been provided with a humanitarian mandate under NATO’s “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P). The victims of U.S. led wars are presented as the perpetrators of war.  Civilians in Ukraine, Syria and Iraq are responsible for their own deaths.

Meanwhile,  the Commander in Chief of the largest military force on planet earth is presented as a global peace-maker. The granting of the Nobel “peace prize” in 2009 to President Barack Obama has become an integral part of the Pentagon’s propaganda machine. It provides a human face to the invaders, it demonizes those who oppose US military intervention.

The Nobel Committee says that President Obama has given the world  “hope for a better future”.   The prize is awarded for Obama’s “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”

…His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population. 1 (The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009: Barack H. Obama, Press Release, October 9, 2009)

Realities are turned upside down. “War is Peace”  said  George Orwell.  The media in chorus upholds war as a humanitarian endeavor. “Wars make us safer and richer” says the Washington Post.

The Big Lie becomes The Truth. In turn, upholding The Truth –through careful documentation and investigative analysis of the horrors of U.S. led wars– is casually categorized as “conspiracy theory”.

While Washington wages a “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), those who forcefully oppose America’s wars of aggression are branded as terrorists.  War becomes peace, a worthwhile “humanitarian undertaking”.  Peaceful dissent becomes heresy.

With unfolding events in Ukraine and the Middle East, humanity is at a dangerous crossroads.  At no time since the Cuban Missile Crisis has the World been closer to the unthinkable: a World War III scenario, a global military conflict involving the use of nuclear weapons.

The killing machine is deployed at a global level, within the framework of the unified combat command structure. It is routinely upheld by the institutions of government, the corporate media and the mandarins and intellectuals of The New World Order in Washington’s think tanks and strategic studies research institutes, as an unquestioned instrument of peace and global prosperity.

A culture of killing and violence has become imbedded in human consciousness.

War is broadly accepted as part of a societal process: The Homeland needs to be “defended” and protected.

“Legitimized violence” and extrajudicial killings directed against “terrorists” are upheld in western democracies, as necessary instruments of national security.

A “humanitarian war” is upheld by the so-called international community. It is not condemned as a criminal act. Its main architects are rewarded for their contribution to world peace.

Nuclear weapons are heralded by the US government as instruments of peace. The pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons is categorized as an act of “self-defense” which contributes to an illusive concept of “global security”. (see Chapter II).

The so-called “missile defense shield” or “Star Wars” initiative involving the first strike use of nuclear weapons has been developed globally in different regions of the world. The missile shield is largely directed against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

Meanwhile, in the context of unfolding events in Syria and Ukraine, there has been a breakdown of international diplomacy. Whereas a Neo-Nazi regime directly supported by the West has been installed in Kiev, the Russian Federation is now threatened by US-NATO with military action on its Western frontier. (See Chapter IX).

New Cold War?

While this renewed East-West confrontation has mistakenly been labelled a “New Cold War”, none of the safeguards of The Cold War era prevail. Russia has been excluded from the Group of Eight (G-8), which has reverted to the G-7 (Group of Seven Nations). Diplomacy has collapsed. There is no Cold War East-West dialogue between competing superpowers geared towards avoiding military confrontation. In turn, the United Nations Security Council has become a de facto mouthpiece of the U.S. State Department.

Moreover, nuclear weapons are no longer considered a “weapon of last resort” under The Cold War doctrine of “Mutual Assured Destruction” (MAD).  Nuclear weapons are heralded by the Pentagon as “harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground”. In 2002, the U.S. Senate gave the green light for the use of nuclear weapons in the conventional war theater.  Nukes are part of the “military toolbox” to be used alongside conventional weapons.

The “Communist threat” of The Cold War era has been replaced by the worldwide threat of “Islamic terrorism”. Whereas Russia and China have become capitalist “free market” economies, a first strike pre-emptive nuclear attack is nonetheless contemplated.

China and Russia are no longer considered to be “a threat to capitalism”.  Quite the opposite. What is at stake is economic and financial rivalry between competing capitalist powers. The China-Russia alliance under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) constitutes a “competing capitalist block” which undermines U.S. economic hegemony.

In Asia, the U.S. has contributed under its “Pivot to Asia” to encouraging its Asia-Pacific allies including Japan, Australia, South Korea, The Philippines and Vietnam to threaten and isolate China as part of a process of “military encirclement” of China, which gained impetus in the late 1990s.

Meanwhile, war propaganda has become increasingly pervasive. War is upheld as a peace-making operation.

When war becomes peace, the world is turned upside down. Conceptualization is no longer possible. An inquisitorial social system emerges. (See Chapter X). The consensus is to wage war. People can longer think for themselves. They accept the authority and wisdom of the established social order.

An understanding of fundamental social and political events is replaced by a World of sheer fantasy, where “evil folks” are lurking. The objective of the “Global War on Terrorism” narrative –which has been fully endorsed by the US administration– has been to galvanize public support for a worldwide campaign against heresy.

Global Warfare

The Pentagon’s global military design is one of world conquest. The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the world simultaneously.

The concept of the “Long War” has characterized US military doctrine since the end of World War II. Worldwide militarization is part of a global economic agenda.

Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the U.S. military’s Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska plays a central role in coordinating military operations.

While surrounding and confronting Russia and China, new U.S. military bases have been set up with a view to establishing U.S. spheres of influence in every region of the World.  There has been a reinforcement of the six geographic commands including the creation in 2008 of United States Africa Command (AFRICOM).

As heralded by the Pentagon, AFRICOM becomes a “full-spectrum combatant command” responsible for what are described as “defense” and U.S. “national  security” operations “through focused, sustained engagement with partners in support of our shared security objectives”. AFRICOM’s area of jurisdiction extends to the entire “African continent, its island nations, and surrounding waters”. 2 US Africa Command, “What We Do”,

This US militarization of Africa supports the concurrent economic conquest of the continent, the pillage of its natural resources, the acquisition of its extensive oil and gas reserves, etc.

AFRICOM is an instrument of a U.S. led neocolonial project in alliance with the United Kingdom which consists in expanding the Anglo-American sphere of influence specifically in Central Africa, Francophone West Africa and North Africa largely at the expense of France.

While the US has military bases and/or facilities in more than 150 countries, with 160,000 active-duty personnel, the construction of new military bases is envisaged in Latin America including Colombia on the immediate border of Venezuela.

Military aid to Israel has increased. The Obama presidency has expressed its unbending support for Israel and the Israeli military, which is slated to play a key role in US-NATO led wars in the Middle East. The unspoken agenda is outright elimination of Palestine and the instatement  of “Greater Israel”.

10 13 11 flagbar


Mainstream Media A No Fly Zone For Truth

10/14/2014

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/10/mainstream-media-no-fly-zone-for-truth.html#more

10-14-2014 12-12-58 PM

By Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post

It just keeps coming. The pro-war propaganda touting the necessity of intervention and invasion of Syria and the attempt to paint President Bashar al-Assad as a villain and butcher shows no sign of letting up anytime soon, at least not until the goal of the destruction of the secular Syrian government is completed and the Anglo-American oligarchy turns its sights on Iran.

And why would it let up? Such is the nature of war propaganda. Its purpose is to goad a gullible public, made up of individuals who would, in ordinary circumstances, not desire war and, in virtually all circumstances, have nothing to gain from it, into supporting an unfounded, immoral, and costly military operation against a people who are very similar to themselves.

It is precisely because of this fact that the propaganda must be incessant and continual. With every report drumming up support for US military intervention in Syria and coloring every report of events taking place inside or surrounding the country, there is no article in any mainstream media outlet that does not make a series of unfounded claims and reinforce the propaganda narratives provided by the State Department.

Such is the case with an article posted by VOX on October 9, entitled “Buffer Zones: the New International Plan For A Mini-Invasion Of Syria, Explained.” Although certainly not the only example of Western pro-war propaganda, it is certainly a perfect one to demonstrate how far the American people are being led astray by their supposed “fourth estate.”

 

In its report, which is centered around the idea of buffer zones, a topic which a number of writers in the alternative media have been discussing since the very beginning of the crisis, Max Fisher writes,

The idea of a buffer zone is that some outside country or countries would occupy a little slice of Syria and turn it into a haven for displaced Syrians. The idea is being proposed in response to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)’s invasion of the Syrian town of Kobane, which is creating a refugee crisis along Turkey’s border.

Fischer continues his description of the plan for a buffer zone by writing,

The idea was to protect Syrian civilians from Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, who was (and still is) slaughtering people en masse, by carving out small pieces of territory within Syria that would be safe from Assad. The idea now is fundamentally the same, except that the safe zones would be protect civilians from Assad and from ISIS.

Bullshit!

There has never been any evidence that Bashar al-Assad’s forces have ever intentionally targeted civilians. In fact, there never would have been a civilian crisis to begin with had the United States, NATO, and the GCC not funded death squads, terrorists, and mercenaries to create such a crisis in the service of attempting to overthrow Assad’s government.

The buffer zone will not turn into a haven for displaced Syrians. It will be turned into a haven for death squads and terrorists funded, armed, controlled, and directed by the United States, NATO, and the GCC.

Indeed, a “buffer zone,” in Northern Syria, has been a wish of NATO since the beginning of the Syrian crisis. With the establishment of this “buffer zone,” a new staging ground will be opened that allows terrorists such as ISIS and others the ability to conduct attacks even deeper inside Syria.

Working together with its NATO/GCC allies as well as the ever-present provocateur Israel, the United States is helping to create a buffer zone in the North and East of Syria while continuing to facilitate the opening of a “third front” on the Syrian border with Israel.

Such a strategy was discussed in 2012 by the Brookings Institution in its publication “Assessing Options For Regime Change,” where it stated

An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.

In addition, Israel’s intelligence services have a strong knowledge of Syria, as well as assets within the Syrian regime that could be used to subvert the regime’s power base and press for Asad’s removal. Israel could posture forces on or near the Golan Heights and, in so doing, might divert regime forces from suppressing the opposition. This posture may conjure fears in the Asad regime of a multi-front war, particularly if Turkey is willing to do the same on its border and if the Syrian opposition is being fed a steady diet of arms and training. Such a mobilization could perhaps persuade Syria’s military leadership to oust Asad in order to preserve itself. Advocates argue this additional pressure could tip the balance against Asad inside Syria, if other forces were aligned properly.

It is important to remember that the U.S. airstrikes and its attempts to create a “buffer zone” inside Syria are nothing more than a farce. The death squads running amok in Syria are themselves entirely creatures of NATO and they remain under NATO’s command. The true enemy of ISIS, Khorasan, and the cannibals of the Levant has always been and continues to be Bashar al-Assad.

Nevertheless, Fischer continues his propaganda spiel by stating that the idea of a “buffer zone” was “an idea that got heavy discussion in 2012, when it was raised by a number of foreign policy thinkers, including former State Department Director of Policy Planning Anne-Marie Slaughter, as a way to ease the killing in Syria.”

Again, Fischer’s statement is grotesquely false. Slaughter’s raising the idea of a buffer zone in Syria had nothing to do with a desire to “ease the killing in Syria” but a desire to increase it. Even more dangerous to the rest of the world, Slaughter’s idea was based on the desire to attack Russia using an attack on Syria as a proxy.

Slaughter’s op-eds, of course, betray an underlying reason for her obsessive warmongering against Syria – the strategic desire to weaken Russia. In this, Slaughter reveals herself as an adherent to the Brzezinski doctrine as it is espoused in The Grand Chessboard.[1] Even if Slaughter does not openly state her affinity for such a destructive and provocative foreign policy by name, her ideology is revealed by both her actions and her work.

Indeed, in her April, 2014 op-ed for Project Syndicate, entitled “Stopping Russia Starts In Syria,” Slaughter is nothing if not obvious about her offensive geopolitical targeting of the Russian Federation as well as that of China and Japan. She writes that

The solution to the crisis in Ukraine lies in part in Syria. It is time for US President Barack Obama to demonstrate that he can order the offensive use of force in circumstances other than secret drone attacks or covert operations. The result will change the strategic calculus not only in Damascus, but also in Moscow, not to mention Beijing and Tokyo.

Slaughter essentially argues that Putin is much too strong to inflict damaging geopolitical costs in Ukraine. She suggests that Putin is much weaker in Syria, however, and, therefore, it is Syria where the United States must strike. Slaughter states,

Regardless of Putin’s initial motivations, he is now operating in an environment in which he is quite certain of the parameters of play. He is weighing the value of further dismemberment of Ukraine, with some pieces either joining Russia or becoming Russian vassal states, against the pain of much stronger and more comprehensive economic sanctions. Western use of force, other than to send arms to a fairly hapless Ukrainian army, is not part of the equation.

That is a problem. In the case of Syria, the US, the world’s largest and most flexible military power, has chosen to negotiate with its hands tied behind its back for more than three years. This is no less of a mistake in the case of Russia, with a leader like Putin who measures himself and his fellow leaders in terms of crude machismo.

It is time to change Putin’s calculations, and Syria is the place to do it.

After repeating the tired, disproven, and borderline idiotic propaganda of Assad’s alleged “chemical weapons attacks,” “killing his own people,” and “barrel bombs,” Slaughter attempts to cover up what is nothing more than a geopolitical strategy as a humanitarian issue.

Slaughter laments the fact that “It is impossible to strike Syria legally so long as Russia sits on the United Nations Security Council, given its ability to veto any resolution authorizing the use of force.” However, she continues her article by stating that the United States should act anyway, unilaterally or multilaterally, by striking Syria and, at the very least, destroying its “fixed wing aircraft.”

The US, together with as many countries as will cooperate, could use force to eliminate Syria’s fixed-wing aircraft as a first step toward enforcing Resolution 2139. “Aerial bombardment would still likely continue via helicopter, but such a strike would announce immediately that the game has changed. After the strike, the US, France, and Britain should ask for the Security Council’s approval of the action taken, as they did after NATO’s intervention in Kosovo in 1999,” she states.

Slaughter continued by writing,

Equally important, shots fired by the US in Syria will echo loudly in Russia. The great irony is that Putin is now seeking to do in Ukraine exactly what Assad has done so successfully: portray a legitimate political opposition as a gang of thugs and terrorists, while relying on provocations and lies to turn non-violent protest into violent attacks that then justify an armed response.

Slaughter, of course, was angry that the incessant and nonsensical propaganda of her former office, the US State Department, and other Western governments across the world largely failed to manufacture a string of lies that would serve to effectively motivate Americans to gear up for war yet again.

By no stretch of the imagination is Fischer and VOX’s blatant propaganda piece an isolated or especially significant presentation. The article is, however, representative of the incessant propaganda fed to Americans day in and day out. It is an example of just how far astray the general public in the United States has been led. It is also an example of just how discredited mainstream media and Western media outlets actually are.

Notes:

[1] Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives. 1st Edition. Basic Books. 1998.
Recently from Brandon Turbeville:

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom7 Real ConspiraciesFive Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 300 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.  He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. 

10 13 11 flagbar


Our government is just another corporation!

10/13/2014

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/

 OLDDOGS COMMENTS

For absolute proof of how fortunate we really are, please visit this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation . Now please consider that soon we will be totally without any means of protecting our family and property if we are forced to join these other Nations, and depend on our government’s mercy, when there is so much evidence they intend to kill us off. Only a fool or coward will bend over and submit to this kind of tyranny! As for me and my house, an honorable death on my feet is preferred over slavery on my knees. Those of you who support the confiscation of personal weapons deserve what you will surely get, and do not deserve a chance of dying honorably. Even the scumbag soldiers who kill me will respect me more than you who only give them your backside as a target. To those traitor soldiers, I have only this to say; bring extra body bags for your Butt Buddies! Not even my considerable foul vocabulary can describe the contempt I have for these killers, and cowards.


 

By AL Whitney (C) copyright 2013

Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged

“We’ll know our disinformation campaign is complete, when absolutely everything the American people believe is false”.

Wm Casey, Director of the CIA (1981)

10-13-2014 8-22-47 AM

Departments of USA INC – including it’s own logo

While most of us recognize that lobbyists for major corporations seem to control Washington, few people know that Washington, D.C. is a corporation itself. The so-called ‘federal government’ is actually the Mother Corporation of a vast network of state and local governments and governmental ‘agencies’ that is actually a CORPORATE franchise system. [1]

To understand, what our ‘government’ really is, we have to review the history that is not in most history books.  Did you know that the original ‘organic’ Constitution of 1787 was hijacked just after the Civil War? [2]

1871, February 21: Congress Passed an Act to provide a government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.

With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten square mile parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62). [3]

The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.

Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotaged — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The country was changed, by stealth, from a Constitutional Republic to a corporation. [4]

Now we can better understand why the following occurred:

•    USA INC granted ‘corporations’ the rights of ‘persons’, in a slurry of lawsuits by corporations shortly after the end of the Civil War.
•    USA INC turned control of credit and currency over to the same international bankers by passing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 [5] and initiated a taxation scheme on the people via the 16th Amendment [6]
•    USA INC turned the US Treasury Department (including all its assets) over to the private Federal Reserve in 1920 (Independent Treasury Act – 1920) [7]

The Bankruptcy of USA INC – 1930′ s
•    USA INC, after being pillaged and bankrupted by the Federal Reserve banking cartel [8], turned over the entire country – including the people – as collateral on its corporate debt in 1933 and bound the individual states to ‘its’ bankruptcy obligations. [9]
•    USA INC gave its CEO (the President) the authority to call a national emergency (a banking ‘holiday’) and establish Executive Branch ‘agencies’ to manage the state of emergency. The “national emergency” has never been removed and is still in effect. [10] Hence we have far reaching unconstitutional  “Executive Orders”.
•    USA INC declared the American people “enemies of the state” to force them to surrender their gold [11] and use Federal Reserve debt ‘notes’ as currency [12]
•    USA INC issued Birth Certificates and Social Security Numbers whereby making the people registered ‘collateral’ for the payment of the debt owed to the same banking cartel
•    USA INC started requiring the American people – as enemies – to get licenses to do business
•    USA INC gradually altered the legal system and implemented corporate commercial Admiralty law (aka statutory law) throughout all of the states, counties and municipalities. [13] Statutes are for THEIR corporations and agencies. They only apply to us if we agree to contract with them. [14]

Then in the 70’s – 80’s USA INC (passing as a legitimate government) removed the gold standard from the dollar, tricked the states into sending their tax revenues to the District of Criminals (‘revenue sharing’) and even authorized the Department of Defense to wage war on the general population [15] – which it is now doing! There is an ongoing electro-magnetic radiation attack, it is a US military operation, and it is being inflicted on us all via the wireless communication and surveillance network. http://smartmetersmurder.com/

In 1992 the CEO of USA INC ordered the corporate states, counties and municipalities to sell off their public’s assets.

[16] In 2001 USA INC passed the Patriot Act, which permits unlimited spying on the American population and in 2011 Obama, the CEO of USA INC, signed the National Defense Authorization Act,  permitting the arrest, and indefinite detention of ANYONE on US soil for merely displeasing the office of the President.

Why aren’t the American people told that they are still classified as “enemies of the state” by the so-called federal government?

[17 Why haven’t folks heard about the USA INC bankruptcy of ’33 and the severe changes that came thereafter

Why aren’t we told our justice system is based on corporate/commercial law and not on justice?

Because all lawyers (including those calling themselves constitutional ‘experts’) have to swear an oath of secrecy and agree to administer the bankruptcy. [18] [19]  And a vast number of our so-called elected representatives are lawyers themselves! Very few lawyers will admit to these facts – that many might not even be aware of!

And here is the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM The American people did not and would not have agreed to any of this. They were kept in the dark and today find themselves unwittingly ‘contracting’ with a completely corrupt corporate franchise system, that doesn’t represent their best interests and that they don’t even know is in place. Therefore, the CIA has achieved their goal:” . . . everything the American people believe is false.”

So, let’s stop calling these bodies and agencies our government. They are not. They are only posing as government. They do not serve us, but are actually private corporations listed on Dunn and Bradstreet by their all caps corporate names. We owe them no loyalty and it is our duty to expose the fact that they are fraudulently receiving public funds and ‘governmental immunity’ while they are actively profiting from and harming us all . . . even if many of their employees are as much in the dark as the rest of the population.

We simply must understand that as dead legal fictions they can only control us by our ‘consent’, and retired Judge Dale did an excellent job explaining how the ‘system’ really works. A MUST READ: Judge says USA INC is just a corporate franchise network

References and Links

[1] Democratic-Federal Franchise;

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/03/26/democratic-federal-franchise/

[2] The Act of 1871: The United States is a corporation

http://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/

[3] “27 CFR 72.11”  U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html

[4] “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15) http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html

(15) “United States” means- -A Federal corporation.

[5] “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed United States enjoys immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in name only. http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.html

http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htm

and http://www.geocities.com/chrisforliberty/lewis.html

[6] – “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, Cover letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12, 1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffet of his time, and the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.) http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html or http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm

[7] Independent Treasury Act, 41 Stat. at L. 631, CHAP. 214 http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/federal/acts/41_stat_631.html

[8] “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax remedies.”) http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html or http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden

[9] Who is Running America?

http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

[10] – “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report 93-549, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973Foreward:

Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”) http://www.scratchinpost.net/barefootbob/war_ep1.html

[11] “Executive Order 6102”: Government’s confiscation of your family’s gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and members of the armed forces.) http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611 or http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html

[12] “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging” debts) http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm or http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html

[13] James Trafficant (D-OH) speech on floor of Congress of March, 1993 exposing the bankruptcy; http://www.afn.org/~govern/bankruptcy.html

[14] “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

[15] The United States Congress actually gave ‘approval’ to the Dept of Defense (and their private corporate contractors) to wage biological warfare on all of us!

The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].” -SOURCE- Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375

[16] Executive Order 12803.  http://www.waterindustry.org/12803.htm

[17] We are the Enemies of the State.

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2011/02/25/we-are-the-enemies-of-the-state/

[18] Who is Running America;

http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

[19] The Bankruptcy of America – 1933 by Judge Dale:

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/the-bankruptcy-of-america-1933/ we need to get the people to rise up to tear down the multinationals like big gobal finances take back your countries central bank..the mass media which is owned by a few elites like richard Murdoch..big pharmaceuticals..oil companies..All owned by a few ELITES who made fast sums from illegal wars..gun running..white slavery..child pornogrophy..drug running.

WE MUST STOP THEM BEFORE F.E.M.A STYLE EXTERMINATION CAMPS ARE OPENED, AND THIS SEEMS TO APPEAR TO BE THEIR INTENDED GOAL..TO DEPOPULATE THE PLANET to between 500 million to 1 billion slaves.

Americans; I beg of you DO NOT allow gun control to take place you might have to fight for freedom. Sadly in the UK no one can own a GUN except a SHOTGUN (farmers mainly) plus elites who enjoy killing many forms of wildlife. No government can stand if the masses rise up in arms, but if we have no arms but those on our bodies, what then? Yet I’d gladly sacrifice my life so children can live in peace, and not to be used for Vatican underground sacrifices. As always I plead with you to Please research this, and its out there on the internet. Illuminati agenda of the new world order. committee of the 300. Share this and spread the word of this urgenctly from an ex head trainer who is ex illuminati. WE CAN STOP THIS VILE PLAN though we must act together. It is so serious that even Christianity is corrupted!!! http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/breakingthechain/svali-articles.htm

10 13 11 flagbar

 


Preventing the Transformation of America into GAZA II

10/11/2014

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/07/preventing-the-transformation-of-america-into-gaza-ii/

10-11-2014 3-31-23 PM

by Preston James

What can be done to thwart the Israeli Nuclear Blackmail that produced Homeland Security and other abominations after their 9/11/01 Nuclear Attack on America?

How can Israeli-American Dual Citizen Israeli-first Traitors be prevented from transforming America into the World’s largest Prison Camp, GAZA II?

What must Americans do to take back their country from these soulless, criminal psychopaths who serve Israel first and are hell-bent on destroying America after completely asset stripping it and then systematically mass-murdering all Americans, just as they are now doing in Palestine to the Palestinians?

Obviously the American Government should be protecting Americans and America from outside infiltration, especially Israeli penetration. The government has not. All the talking points and narratives during the last 20 years about attacking terrorism at its home base in the Mideast are lies and war propaganda. Their purpose? To manipulate “We the People” into supporting phony wars for Israel, for huge war profits, and for the capture of natural resources and oil.

The biggest Terrorists in the World are the Israeli Leaders and those WZs behind them, then America (which has been hijacked by Israel), and then England and Saudi Arabia. NATO’s job, rather than to keep us safe, has been to work hard covertly to start wars so that the Banksters and Defense Contractors can earn huge war profits fighting illegal, Unconstitutional wars of aggression and acquisition.

10-11-2014 3-31-44 PM

The whole War on Terror Narrative is a Big USG Lie concocted and dispensed by the Controlled major mass media (CMMM) to allow the transformation of America into a Military Police State controlled by Israeli infiltrators through Homeland Security DHS and label you an Enemy of the State.

To protect We the People from outside infiltration and foreign espionage such as that done by Israel is the basic responsibility that the USG exists for and is mandated by the US Constitution and was truly the main reason for any federalization of the various States into one Confederation of United states in the first place.

Instead of the federal Government being used as it was designed by the Founding fathers and mandated in the US Constitution, it has been hijacked by World Zionist City of London Banksters (the Rothschilds) and their illegitimate stepchild Israel and has been turned against the American People as an “Enemy within the gates”.

Obviously this is High Treason and Sedition, both Capital Offenses that can receive the death penalty. And such sentences were delivered in the past for folks like the Rosenbergs and others. And yet now the crimes, espionage, Sedition and Treason of over 100 of our members of Congress and the Israeli espionage fronts that control them are coming to light and being revealed for the first time ever. And it is now known that all secrecy is ending.

If you are a Member of Congress or a high ranking USG official who has been “on the take” (and there is now Intel soon to enter the Public domain that shows that over 100 Members of Congress are, as well as who they are) or an agent of foreign espionage, here is a suggestion for you. Retire now, take your massive holdings and leave in peace before you get caught and prosecuted by the New Sheriff which is now on the horizon and closing in fast.

Not only will all secrecy be ending and all your evil crimes be exposed if you stay in power, but a new very powerful populism is spontaneously emerging in America and almost every other nation and will make it impossible for you and your ilk to continue ripping off “We the People” and breaking the laws and violating the US Constitution for the massive bribes you now receive and have been receiving.

Some of the Super-elites, the one-percenters already know this new and powerful Populism is coming and cannot be stopped. Nick Hanauer is a one-percenter with a warning for other Plutocrats, and he says “the Pitchforks are coming”.(1) Listen to his banned TED Talk which was considered to be “too controversial” to be released by TED because he told the truth about the coming Populism followed by “Pitchforks” if the massive inequality in America is not remedied. By the way, this man claims to have good intuition about the future. He is not exaggerating. He is 100% accurate as to what is on the horizon and coming on fast, Worldwide Populism.
YouTube – Veterans Today –

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=q2gO4DKVpa8)

Anyone who deeply researches the rise of one-percenter wealth in America will discover that it was only possible because of rampant corruption in Congress, the Judiciary, the Administration, the alphabets and Law Enforcement. And all this massive corruption can be traced back to an invasion and subsequent Coup d’État in 1913 by the Rothschild foreign Banksters operating out of the City of London, the true source of everything that is wrong in America today.

______________________________

Why has the USG not protected America and Americans from infiltration and hijacking by a foreign power? The answer to this is complex and involves the incremental rise in corruption that has progressively infiltrated every institution of the American Government and the private Defense Contractors. Basically all institutions of the USG have been infiltrated by organized crime comprised of the Bush Crime cabal (BCC) and the International Zionist Crime Syndicate (IZCS aka Kosher Nostra or Red Mafiya, and this includes Dual and Triple Citizen Traitors and Infiltrators).

The Italian Mafia was completely taken over by Meyer Lansky, who stayed home from their Council Meeting in Appalachia NY and then “dropped a dime” on them, bringing the NY State Police. Anyone who researches the Viet Nam war will soon come to understand the real reasons for it were to generate massive war profits for the soulless Banksters and the Defense Contractors and get control of the Golden Triangle opium to finance Black ops that Congress would never approve or finance with taxpayer Dollars. This was actually a continuation of the family opium trade set up during the time of the Opium Wars between the British Families (American Delanos included) which ended up creating the Russell trust, aka the Skull and Bones Fraternity at Yale, a fraternity based on Luciferian death-Cult worship.

The BCC and the IZCS worked hand in hand to capture this black tar opium and set up processing and distribution networks all over the world. And even today the RCC is doing exactly the same thing in Afghanistan — all done in the open, with the opium fields being protected by the US Army.

______________________________

What is the foreign power that has hijacked America and how did this occur?

Initially the foreign power that first infiltrated the United States of America was the City of London Rothschild Zionist Banksters, through their franchises, the federal reserve System. This Federal Reserve System was set up through stealth when numerous Members of Congress were paid off or coerced to pass the federal reserve Act in 1913. Actually it was never passed because there was no required quorum, but because most of Congress was compromised and paid plenty of baksheesh, this completely illegal, monstrous and massive “beyond imagination” Unconstitutional financial fraud/scam was allowed and persists even today.

Over time and after the WZs formed Israel to serve as their main base of Intel and political espionage operations, Israeli American Israel-first dual citizen Traitors were placed in high positions of power inside the USG and around it and used to hijack America and transform it into a slave state of Israel and the WZs.

These WZ forces became entrenched in Israeli/WZ espionage fronts inside America in AIPAC, the ADL, Bnai Brith, SPLC, JDL, Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Cell in Denver, and various WZ controlled Defense Policy Boards as well as the CFR, Trilateral Commission and the like. And Many synagogues are used as Israeli espionage fronts unknowing to the Judaic worshippers.

Why did the Rothschild Zionist Banksters work so hard to create Israel using land illegally seized from Palestinians?

The Rothschild City of London Banksters (hard core World Zionists) made so much money in France, Germany and England in the late 1800’s that they decided they needed their own new nation to serve as a money dump and Intel center from which to branch out and take control of the whole world. They also wanted a safe haven for their own retirement, a place where they could not be extradited for their crimes, which were legion. So they formed a long-term complex plan to build up Bolshevik Russia, and then also build up Fascist Nazi Germany as a counter-force to deploy one against the other. This engineered battle between Bolshevik Russia and Fascist Germany was to be used to set the stage for various crafty operations needed to set the stage for a takeover of the whole world by World Zionism (WZ), a nice name for Bolshevism, the world’s largest Luciferian death cult.

Because the WZs worked so hard over many years to retake and re-occupy the “Holy Land”, just as they tried before in the the first Crusades but failed, they are now called by insiders the “New Crusaders” for the successful 1947 attempt.

And why are the WZs so obsessed with re-taking the “Holy Land” and occupying it? Because they want to set up a worldwide pure Luciferian kingdom run out of Jerusalem and set their Anti-Christ Lucifer himself in person.

They plan on calling this new worldwide pure Luciferian Kingdom “Greater Israel”. Plus the City of London WZs needed a new base of operations from where they could manage the Mideast oil situation for the Major Oil Companies (AKA the “Seven Sisters” or Big Oil, now consolidated to the “Five Sisters”).

I know this sounds nuts, but this is actually their goal to hijack the American Defense System and use it to wage wars for Israel and the WZs in order to hijack the whole world. It’s a crafty plan hundreds of years old and is deeply embedded in what is called the “Old Black European Nobility”, folks who have used the Dark powers of Lucifer for many hundreds of years to attain power, riches and status above all others.

The WZ Plan to create Bolshevist Russia and Nazi Germany in order to pit them against each other.

The WZ City of London planners worked hard in their think-tanks (e.g. “Roundtables”) to create and actuate plans to create Bolshevik Russia and then Nazi Germany and to pit them against each other. By doing so, America could be transformed into a very large war-based economy that they could then hijack to wage wars around the world necessary to build a greater Israel.

Before WW2 started, Judaics were targeted in the Press for their oddities, endemic selfishness and inability to mix into normal German Society. After they were thus smeared, it was easy to convince most other Germans that it was appropriate to intern all Judaics in work camps and persecute them. This could later be used to create a “get out of jail free card” for the WZs, because from that time forward, any criticism toward the WZs would be called anti-semitism — the greatest con job in history, but a tactic which is now being fully exposed and losing its salience and hubris very rapidly. Insiders know that a wooden stake has already been driven through AIPAC’s vampire heart, and it is only a matter of time before we see its principals brought to justice and its power taken from it.

Insiders also know and sometimes admit that Israel, the renegade criminal nation and Rothschild Military Intel outpost, will be a thing of the past within ten years because of their belligerent hubris, mass-murder, continuing land theft and apartheid against Palestinians. Top Israeli WZ leaders have been scheming to establish the New Israel in the Ukraine as a backup if their plans to create a Greater Israel in the Mideast and then the whole world fail (which is now a certainty).

The six-million dead figure was taken from Judaic propaganda going back to the early 1900’s and was a fabrication. Official Red Cross figures recorded approximately 200,000 Judaics who died in the Work Camps, but there were also a lot of dissidents and others suspected of being disloyal to the Third Reich who were killed. WW2, as any major war, was used by the WZs to mobilize and industrialize America into a massive war industry based machine that they could hijack and use to later fight their own wars with the goal of a new worldwide greater-Israel, based on pure Luciferians, aka Neo-Bolshevism.

After WW2, the WZs were able to seize land from Palestinians through manipulation of the United Nations. Soon they violated all the UN rules provided and have been doing so ever since, always taking more land from the Palestinians, while blowing up their homes or demolishing them and mass-murdering many men, women and children.

10-11-2014 3-32-06 PM

All Wars are Bankster’s Wars and all Western banks are WZ owned, franchised or controlled, one way or another.

The WZs have effectively hijacked the US Congress, the Judiciary and almost every department of the USG. How have they done this? The Israelis are very good blackmailers and human compromisers. If they can’t buy someone, they work hard to entrap them. They usually work hard to prevent anyone from rising in political office unless they have a shameful vice or bad habit through which they can be blackmailed or “human-compromised”.

When you have access to WZ Banksters who can create as much money as they want from nothing (FIAT debt-notes accepted only because it has been mandated by illegal, Unconstitutional laws), obviously there is plenty of money to buy, bribe or influence politicians and USG officials with. And that is exactly what has been done. The phony, illegal Unconstitutional Federal reserve System is the head of this octopus of WZ/Israeli international corruption, known by insiders as the International Zionist Crime Syndicate (IZCS).

The IZCS essentially merged with the Bush Crime Cabal (BCC) during the Viet Nam War after the BCC mass-murdered JFK and over 100 witnesses who could testify about “who done it”. This new system has been called the Ruling Crime Cabal, and has now compromised almost every single USG Official and Politician inside the Beltway, one way or another. If money fails, then blackmail is used. If that fails, redistricting may be used and various measures to un-elect them. If that is not enough, as with Senator Paul Wellstone… well then, they are murdered. Senator Wellstone was warned a week before his murder by VP Cheney that there would be serious ramifications if he did not vote for the war. Many believe that “Chicanery” followed through on his threats and used JSOC to assassinate Senator Wellstone and his family.

10-11-2014 3-32-25 PM

 

There were cataclysmic changes inside America after the Israeli nuclear attack on America on 9/11/01.

After the Israeli nuclear attack on America on 9/11/01, America has become an Occupied Nation, infiltrated and hijacked by the foreign power, Israel, as action-agents of the Rothschild International Money-changers working out of the City of London. The Israelis went to the Administration and basically claimed that if they were not allowed to streamline all American Alphabets and Law Enforcement into one central Organization under their control as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), they would detonate more nukes in other American cities.

And we now know that high ranking CIA man Roland Carnaby was hot on their trail when a Mossad Agent sheep-dipped as a Houston Police Officer premeditatedly murdered him in cold blood, supposedly over a minor traffic infraction which never occurred. We now know that Israel has planted 25 more nukes inside America in major Cities as a part of their infamous “Samson Option”. Some believe they even planted more in major European Cities, such as London, Paris and Rome.

Thanks to the massive Intel Data dump by Russian and French Intel recently, it is no longer secret that the attack on America on 9/11/01 was a nuclear attack. W-54 Pits supplied by Bush-1 regime were taken out the backdoor at Pantex, moved around and finally repackaged in Israel, and shipped to the Israeli Embassy in NYC in Diplomatic trunks. It is also known that a high ranking Member of Congress was appropriated Billions of dollars to acquire and decommission numerous Ukrainian S-19 and S-20 Nuclear warheads when the Soviet Union fell in the early 1990’s.

It is also known that this individual transferred some to the Israelis, and these are city busters unlike the W-54 Davy Crockett types, which are Building Busters. It is also known that this member of Congress took billions of dollars from the sale of these warheads and distributed it to himself and other USG Officials and key Members of Congress to keep it covered up.

10-11-2014 3-32-48 PM

These mini-nukes were stored in the Israeli Embassy until moved into position by Mossad Agents using the cover of “Urban Moving Systems”. We now know that the Israelis had a great deal of help from their stateside assets in PNAC, including high ranking NeoCons, and high ranking officials in the Administration, the JCS, NORAD, the USAF, and the FAA. Veterans Today sources have all the names of the perps and all the secret files, and if a proper grand Jury with a fully independent prosecutor is set up, all Intel files including some America Files which have been deeply hidden will be provided and will blow the whole case wide open.

Many involved at the perimeter will come forth and testify as to who did it, how they did it, and how it is still being covered up. If you dig deep, most of the names have already been included in numerous VT articles and their references over the last two years. If you want more information on the espionage and use associated with these stolen American Nuclear Pits, refer to Senior Editor Gordon Duff’s incredible series on Veterans Today entitled “Nuclear Education”.

The sinister role of the Controlled major Mass media (CMMM) the main propaganda arm of the USG and the RCC that control it through sophisticated human compromise operations in place over 50 years under Bush-1 and the IZCS.

We now know that the CIA has spent billions of dollars taking over almost all American media and public institutions of higher learning. William Colby once stated, before he was murdered by the RCC, that the CIA’s greatest achievement was the takeover of all Major Mass media through Operation Mockingbird, and that this included every single major newscaster.

Just recently, a top German Journalist and Editor, Dr. Udo Ulfkatte, went public and talked about how the CIA gets control over all the major journalists. As I predicted two years ago and have continued to do so, all secrecy is ending and every single deep dark secret of the USG, which is criminal and out of control, is going to be fully exposed, bit by bit. This is just one of many breakthroughs coming — expect many, many more. This man is a great international Hero and a great friend of humanity. This is the kind of courage that you will see emerging everywhere, including inside America. His motive is to expose the use of journalists to beat the drums of war, and he is afraid that is what is being done now to start a WW3 with Russia — a war that would cause Europe to once again become a battlefield. This video affidavit provides an astounding X-ray or snapshot inside journalism as it exists in most of the west, bought and paid for by the CIA and Mossad.
YouTube – Veterans Today –

______________________________

There are now some interesting rumors from the inside which have been leaking out.

Supposedly, the new US Military High Command has communicated to Israel that if any more nukes are detonated inside America, those responsible will be immediately hunted down and exterminated, even to the ends of the Earth. Supposedly there had been plans for September, one was called Blackjack and was portrayed in a special BBC slideshow. So far there has been no clear October surprise.

Could this recent Ebola problem be another form of Israeli blackmail of the USG to get troops on the ground in Iraq, and fight more Mideast wars for Israel or else?

The timing is very suspicious, and the pressure being exerted by the illegal Israeli/NeoCon espionage fronts inside America on Congress and the Administration are noticeable and extreme. So far they have failed, and President Obama is reluctant to enter into any new major ground war. Instead he has deployed air attacks against the ISIL/ISIL forces, who are also known as Al Qae Da or Al CIA Duh Version 2. How come wounded ISIS/ISIL are being taken to Israel for treatment?

10-11-2014 3-33-06 PM

Of course, if Israelis set off nukes in more American Cities perhaps DC, NYC again or Chicago or Houston, you can bet they would use their Controlled major Mass media (yes, the WZs own it) to blame it on the Iranians, Syrians, Russians or Al CIA Duh. Or, if American troops are not deployed in Iraq to become deeply entrenched in another major war for Israeli, will more Ebola be dispensed into numerous American cities to create a real pandemic?

Are the current cases just a shot across the bow? And is it any coincidence that a new engraving was made in the Georgia Guidepost arch stone of the number 2014. Does this signify the WZ’s deployment of major eugenics measures to lower the earth’s population by 90% as is stipulated in the Georgia Guidestones, the Illuminati’s plan for the NWO written in stone, which also lists the new Ten Commandments of the NWO?

How do we prevent GAZA II in America and make America prosperous for all Americans?

What specifically must be done to take back America from the Israeli/WZ hijackers and prevent them from transforming America into GAZA II and then tyrannizing, terrorizing, asset stripping, interning in FEMA Camps and systematically mass murdering us?

  1. Homeland Security (DHS) is basically an East German Stasi Terrorist Organization designed by Marcus Wolfe, former head of the Stasi hired as a consultant to set up DHS. DHS must be Destroyed, that is, completely de-funded, and broken up into the sub-units it used to be, once again establishing separate independent Alphabets and Law Enforcement Agencies. Those agents and staff that have not committed RICO crimes who have prior experience in previous Alphabet agencies must be reassigned after those Alphabets are set up again and functioning independently. Those USG officials and Members of Congress who committed Treason and Sedition in setting up DHS must be indicted, arrested and fully prosecuted for these Capital Offenses. Many could be given immunity for full honest confessions, as long as they did not murder anyone. Learn the secret history of Homeland security (DHS) Here.
  2. All those PNACers, NeoCons, Israeli-American Israeli-first, US Military and Administration Officials involved in the 9/11/01 nuclear attack on America must be fully brought to justice. Interpol and other warrants must be issued for those Mossad Agents and assets such as the “Dancing Israelis”. A fully independent Grand Jury and Prosecutor must be set up and many indictments must be issued. Many witnesses are ready to come forward if good protection is provided, and a great deal of very revealing Intel documents from many sources are ready to be submitted as evidence. There is no doubt as to who did it, how may were involved, how it was done and why. All the facts are available, and many will be easy to convict. So far what is lacking is any real “Rule of Law” inside America.
  3. America must re-establish the Rule of Lawthat was destroyed by the Bush Crime cabal when Bush-1 ran the Assassination of JFK, which was a major Coup d’État. Bush seized control over the USG and American Intel at that time, and his Crime cabal has been in power ever since and is just being exposed and displaced now. If the BCC cannot get one of their elected in the next presidential election, or if a true 9/11/01 investigation occurs, the BCC is toast. The BCC went into the illegal narcotics and arms trafficking business and specialized in bribery and murder to stay in power. It merged with the IZCS and formed an even larger more onerous Ruling Crime Cabal (RCC). Narcotics are strongly addicting, but drug money is even more addicting and the whole USG and the major Wall Street Banks are addicted to it for a variety or reasons. It funds black ops and the secret Space war, as well as provides huge payoff for Politicians and USG Officials who desire to have multimillion-dollar estates when they leave office. This means the US Constitution must be fully restored and the simple terms used in it must be enacted with no absurd, extended complex interpretations by the crooked, bribed courts. The BCC and the IZCS must be fully prosecuted and all Crime Cabal Kingpins (AKA the Illuminati, the Denver Circle of Twelve/Thirteen who call themselves the “Disciples of Lucifer”) arrested and all their assets seized and clawed back. This includes a majority of the commercial Real Estate inside America. These seizures must be equitably distributed to “We the People”.
  4. The Supreme Court must be eliminated as the final court of the Land, which is Constitutionally the District Court of Washington, DC. The Supreme Court was set up as a phony construct of Congress and is a political animal, not a real legal entity.
  5. America must eliminate the Federal Reserve System and set up its own US Central Bank based on real money. This is key and is the head of the system of corruption (aka the Octopus) that has infiltrated and hijacked American Politics and Government. Decapitate the Ruling Crime Cabal (RCC) from their money and they will wither up and die on the vine. All assets of the Federal Reserve System must be immediately seized, and all personal assets of the bank member owners must be 100% clawed back. All so-called USG debt must be defined as fraudulent and cancelled, and all usury must be re-established as a serious crime and eliminated with all assets seized and clawed back. No more payday-type loan scams at ridiculous interest rates. A real US bank must be set up with real money backed by Gold, Silver and other assets, such as commodities. All FINCEN records must be publicly released and used to prosecute all RCC, USG Officials and Members of Congress on the take who accepted bribes.
  6. All Israeli Dual- and triple-Citizens must be immediately adjudicated. Those involved in anti-American activities must be deported. Others who wish to stay must be clean of any espionage or culture-war offenses against America such as hard-core pornography, and must be willing to renounce all other Citizenship but America and take a loyalty oath to America alone. This was recently done in Argentina, and must be done in America, as soon as possible.
  7. All Israeli/WZ espionage fronts such as AIPAC, the ADL, Bnai Brith, the JDC, SPLC, must be immediately classified as agents of foreign influence, and fully investigated. They must have any tax-exempt status revoked and must be declared illegal espionage fronts against America and prevented from ever organizing or operating again. All their assets must be seized.

 The Major Mass media must be broken up under the proper enforcement of anti-trust laws, and all media must be prevented from forming large international corporate monopolies. There are laws on the books already which make it illegal to publish stories that are known to be false, but this occurs now almost constantly, as well as all the purchased stories disguised as truthful reporting of newsworthy events. No Israeli ownership or control can be allowed anymore, and all such news corporation must be seized and broken up, with their assets seized too.

All political contributions by PACs or Corporations must be eliminated, and all must be highly limited and regulated. The Major Mass Media must be required to provide free Television, radio and newspaper to candidates who have a set number of petition signatures, and all of the candidates must be allowed in any debate. No more control of debates by the two major parties’ Republicans and Democrats will be permitted. A multi-party system with coalitions formed at each election must be encouraged.

 Senators must once again be chosen by their State Legislatures as required by the US Constitution.

All electronic voting must be eliminated, and all voting must be by paper ballot, hand-counted publicly and videoed to prevent vote fraud, which is now the norm. New laws must be passed, and a news system providing good opportunities for new candidates to be heard and get support must be created. No more foreign-owned or -operated voting machines; no more electronic voting machines; no more Voter News Services agencies, which have been alleged to have falsely fixed and reported the national votes in past years. It is now known that electronic voting machines are easy to rig, even remotely by satellite.

  1. 10-11-2014 3-33-27 PM
    1. Lee Wanta must be immediately allowed access to all his money so that he can instantly begin his well-developed, ready-to-go plans to revitalize and re-industrialize America. These plans include building a new inter-coastal High Speed state-of-the-art Maglev Railroad System which would provide 2 million well-paying job opportunities in short order. The Wanta story and all related documents were highly classified and buried, so when he went public with how the BCC blocked his access to his funds and had him kidnapped and wrongfully jailed and how his earnings totaled 27.5 Trillion Dollars, most readers initially ridiculed his story and felt it was completely incredible. Now many of the key documents have been recovered, so his story can easily be shown to be true. But even more than that, Veterans Today now has a very important recorded message left on Ambassador Wanta’s Washington DC embassy phone answering machine. This message was part of a conference call between former Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist and former South Dakota State Senator Sheldon R. Songstad, who apparently thought the answering machine had shut off when Lee Wanta didn’t answer. In a previous phone call, these men had described themselves as “Puppetmasters”. Now for the first time ever, the public has an X-ray or snapshot into how Congress and American politics really works. Informants have provided Intel to Veterans Today that over 100 Members of Congress and five Supreme Court Justices are now “on the take”. You can listen to this very important phone call Here. Note, this phone call has been voice-grammed to be identical to public voice grams taken from youtube.com videos of both of these men, and there is a match. If any prosecutor wants the originals or any relayed evidence, please contact the Veterans Today Editorial Board. Ambassador Wanta’s claims can no longer be denied. This phone message is smoking-gun evidence, and we know that Lee Wanta has been telling the truth all along — down to the smallest claim and detail, every single bit.(2)
    2. Right now, there are approximately 130 members of congress and five Supreme Court Judges who are on the take, receiving regular bribes to keep the nuclear attack on America on 9/11/01 and other assorted RCC crimes covered up. All NSA files regarding this must be seized by the First US Army, if necessary, and used to indict, convict and impeach (remove) all involved in this crime of Bribery and corruption.
    3. The NSA must be seized and shut down, and removed from sharing any files with Israel or any other nation. If necessary, it must be surrounded and seized by the US Army. All of its files must be gone over by an independent grand jury, and declassified if they involve any crimes. All such evidence must be used to generate indictments of any USG official or citizen involved. No more NSA spying on American Citizens or American politicians. Bluffdale NSA building must be destroyed after all the employees and staff are taken out of the building.
    4. Area 51 and Area 52, as well as all entrances to the American Deep Underground Bases, must be surrounded by the US Army. These DUMBS are run by private contractors, many foreign-based, who are Traitors committing Treason and Sedition against America and must be fully prosecuted for it. All secrets kept in these bases will be televised and published on the Internet so everyone can know all the serious demonic crimes committed there against the Citizens of the United States of America, AKA “We the People”. If any of these bases are going to be allowed to continue existing, We the People must become fully informed and provide majority consent.
    5. All Corporations doing business inside America must have a one-year license granted only, just as the Founding Fathers did, and no corporation should be allowed to have the rights of an individual person ever again. Only when determined that these entities are serving the needs of America and based in America should they be allowed to continue operating.
    6. The IRS is Unconstitutional and must be eliminated. It is a private corporation, incorporated in Puerto Rico, and serves as the illegal collection agency for the federal reserve System. All federal taxes are illegal the way they are now being assessed. Federal Income Taxes and all real estate Taxes are Unconstitutional and must be eliminated. A fair tax system can be implemented using sales taxes, excise taxes or other Constitutional means, properly proportioned. Income cannot be legally taxed unless it is from a Federal District of Colombia Job.
    7. All Public Education must be de-federalized and all the Neo-Bolshevik programs like “No Student left behind” must be eliminated. All sex education policies must be determined solely by the majority vote of each community within each school district, and NO DC control. The Department of Education must be eliminated. All history books must be revised and must contain the real history of America, warts and all, and how all Americans have an obligation to pursue character and morality, support the US Constitution and fight corruption.
    8. All Police and Sheriff Departments must be completely de-militarized. Any training relations with Israelis or their espionage fronts like the ADL must be completely and forever severed, and no more all expenses paid junkets to Israel allowed, because The Israeli leadership and their Intel is a foreign invader and enemy of the We the People. Serious Citizen oversight committees with real muscle must be set up for each department and all constant-on pulsed beam microwave radios must be re-evaluated and modified to prevent entrainment of aggressiveness and violent psychomotor seizures.
    9. All so-called Federal lands and Federal Forests must be re-titled back to the individual States, and they can decide how the lands will be used. Land grants can once again be provided if the majority of voters want that.
    10. It must be generally acknowledged that every President since Ronald Reagan has been a fraud, since President Reagan was the last duly-elected President. If you are interested, you can read how this occurred. This also means that all laws passed by Congress since President Reagan left office are completely Null and Void. An independent special Commission must be set up to evaluate this and eliminate the effects systematically, without disrupting the public order too much.
    11. A major emphasis must be placed on providing jobs for everyone who is willing to work. This could be done setting up state agencies funded by all the assets seized and clawed back from the Federal reserve owners and BCC and IZCS Kingpins of the RCC organized crime system, which hijacked America and has been progressively asset-stripping We the People of all our wealth and property.
    12. A whole new legal system must be mandated in each State, adequately staffed with enough public defenders and for trials to be held soon after the alleged crime or offenses. No more Unconstitutional offenses, all statutes must be completely vetted by independent legal experts.
    13. A whole new system of public jobs must be substituted for the out-of-control multi-generational welfare system. Welfare must be provided only for those severely-handicapped or who need short-term help. A job should be provided for everyone else out of work and can consist of picking up trash on the highways, mowing public lawns, working as a file clerk, doing computer work at home with a government-provided computer.
    14. Marijuana and other drugs (not all) must be legalized, but controlled like alcohol with mandatory education about the real facts and risks taught in the public schools. Many thousands of Non-violent drug prisoners must be released as long as they complete a short drug education program. Addictions must be treated like Alcohol Addiction and viewed as a disease. The existing cartels in Mexico, Central and South America must be given a short time to surrender or be attacked by the US Military. This means the US Military will be attacking part of the CIA (the Bush faction, aka the BCC) if these cartels do not surrender. The southern US border, as well as all other US borders, must be completely sealed and an equitable policy for illegals must be created and implemented. Any illegals with a criminal history must be immediately deported.
    15. All Constitutional Civil Rights must be restored, and the Bill of Rights must be followed to a “T”. This means the illegal, Unconstitutional Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act and the NDAA and all like them must be immediately declared Null and Void. All black prison sites in foreign countries, including the mysterious black prison ships used to torture and then murder those kidnapped must be shut down, and the Guantanamo base must be shut down too. No more illegal, Unconstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared wars of aggression and acquisition for the secret Shadow Government or Israel or the Banksters or the defense Contractors. All Defense contractors who want to continue must be transformed into automotive, truck manufacturers or some other Industry that benefits America. Only a few select defense contractors will be allowed to continue, and they must be licensed and approved and located inside America.
    16. All so-called Free Trade treaties are cancelled, considered UnConstitutional, Illegal and null and void, and Fair Trade with adjusted tariffs that favor America producers that manufacture inside America and sell to Americans must be implemented.
    17. All GMO foods must be labeled, and special independent commissions set up to examine and regulate Big Pharma and Monsanto-type companies. Only One-year licenses to be granted, if conditions serving the public needs are met and no abuse or danger to the public created. All vaccine research must be seized and published publicly and completely re-examined for soft-kill eugenics, and if found to be dangerous, completely eliminated. No more suicide seeds allowed. All the secret big pharma files going back to Nazi Germany must be opened and examined and made public, except for the recent trade secrets regarding current pending patent applications.
    18. All secret records of so-called Chemtrail spraying (aerosol spraying into the atmosphere) must be seized and published for the public to evaluate. A special commission must be set up to evaluate these poisonings of the public and the plants, trees and soil. If related to any secret Space war matters, the public must be fully informed of all the facts. No more secrecy of anything except launch codes and banking algorithms or security codes. The RCC has used Secrecy as a buffer and cover to protect itself from any accountability or prosecution for its ongoing RICO activities.
    19. All public Universities must become dedicated to truth and exposing corruption. There must be a mandatory curriculum consisting of the following subjects, taught in multiple class with majors: USG organized crime, crimes and corruption in the US Congress, Supreme Court and the Administration; the abuse of national security and secrecy to serve as a false cloak to protect from criminal acts; abuse and criminal behaviors of Intelligence agencies including the Mossad; the history of WZ/Israeli foreign espionage fronts inside America, such as AIPAC, the ADL, JDL, Bnai Brith and the like; how phony FIAT money is manufactured and distributed and the history of the crooked, fraudulent Unconstitutional Federal Reserve System and its collection agency the IRS, which has been incorporated in Puerto Rico; all the secret files related to major bribery of Congress, including seized NSA phone taps and relevant documents as well as FINCEN records; the complete history of the Italian Cosa Nostra, the kosher Nostra/Red Mafiya; the history of USG/American Intel illegal narcotics and arms trafficking and how they started the Cartels; actual facts about the Secret Space War, free energy, anti-gravity and Alien ETs, just for starters. No more forbidden knowledge, as has been the usual practice for all major Universities, especially the Ivy league ones.

    These suggested changes are just for starters. Each reader can come up with their own ideas. If everyone works together to build up America and take care of each other, America’s prosperity and greatness can be quickly restored with good job opportunities for everyone. Can you imagine how many terrific changes can be conceived and implemented if everyone including children and youth works together to come up with ideas how to make America prosperous for everyone?

    ______________________________

    Conclusion:

    Unless Americans wake up and take back their nation from the RCC and the Israeli hijackers, Homeland Security (DHS) — the private Israeli Occupation army — will be used to lock down Americans, tyrannize them, terrorize them, finish asset-stripping all their property and wealth, intern them in over 750 FEMA camps, and then begin their long-planned systematic mass-murder of We the People.

    It is a basic necessity for DHS to define all dissidents, all those who are anti-war, all “Truthers” and all Americans who support the US Constitution as “Enemies of the State” as in Their State, not ours and that is what they have been doing. This criminal conspiracy to transform America into GAZA II, the World’s largest prison camp and death camp, must be completely exposed for what it is — foreign espionage against America, resulting from the infiltration of Israeli espionage units into America, empowered by the World Zionist Rothschild City of London Banksters and their stateside franchise at the federal reserve System and the large Wall Street Banks.

    Addendum: Know your enemy within the gates, know who and what you are fighting.

    If you dig deep enough you will likely discover that the root of the evil that has “infected” the “Bloodline Families” is Luciferianism aka Babylonian Talmudism which is based on the black arts aka Babylonian Black-magick. Some who have studied the origins of this deeply trace it back to the Bloodline of Cain or the Kenites as its origin. It is important to note that this “infection” of Babylonian Talmudism, whatever it is based on expresses itself as a secret “Tribal” hatred of mankind in general and a mass subconscious desire to destroy existing society. The basic rule of these Bloodline folks (and they are a very small proportion of the World’s population) is just the opposite of the Golden Rule. It is “Do what thou Wilt and “screw everybody else”, and secretly infiltrate all levels of society and use all tribal connections and power to extend the Tribe’s power and cover it up. Note that not all Luciferians that are part of this “ruling Crime cabal” are Judiacs or impersonating that they are.

    Many are just from these twelve Luciferian Bloodlines. Remember their basic tribal desire is to capture the earth by use of secrecy, stealth, selfishness, and use of unbridled evil to blackmail, coerce and murder to get their way. They specialize in various methods of sophisticated mind-kontrol, destruction of the family, basic morality, and basic character. They use flesh-peddling, promote smut and pornography and “stoke the flesh for profit and power, always demanding their basic human and Constitutional Rights while they violate everyone’s else. They also accept new recruits and allow them to enter through satanic cults and Luciferian circles but these folks must sell out to Lucifer completely and this is evidenced by willingness to participate in human blood sacrifices and ritual murders, of young children.

    Basically their group theme is to destroy society and mass-murder all of mankind, a truly inhuman base instance that is against nature, thus qualifying for the classification of as a plague or virus upon mankind. They can easily rise to power because they have no limits or basic morality as to what they are willing to do and will murder with no remorse, lie, steal cheat, pedophile young children, murder them and eat their hearts. By any ordinary definition this is Pure Evil. And that is why their exposure for that they have historically done in secret will be their Waterloo. They need and crave secrecy because they know exposure will bring the pitchforks.

    ________________________

    References:

    (1) http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html#.U62q-LFqeWV

    (2) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/17/puppetgate/

     10 13 11 flagbar


An Ebola Outbreak Would Be Advantageous For Globalists

10/10/2014

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2354-an-ebola-outbreak-would-be-advantageous-for-globalists

10-10-2014 11-03-32 AM

By Brandon Smith

It’s sad to say with such finality, but a universal fact of existence is that most of the people you meet in this life are fundamentally and functionally ignorant. Not necessarily stupid, but certainly ignorant. Ignorance comes not from a lack of intelligence, but from a denial of knowledge and truth. That is to say, ignorance takes hold when people decide to act as though they know and understand a thing, even if they do not. Ignorance prevails when a society or nation chooses to value the appearance of expertise, to value the theater of overconfidence, and to cheer for the bluster of morons rather than admit that they have unanswered questions on subjects they do not yet grasp. For nothing is worse for the self absorbed than to acknowledge that they do not know.

Entire nations have fallen throughout history because of this terrible weakness…

By extension, such ignorance is not just an inherent disease but also an easily exploitable disease. When we refuse to think critically and examine our surroundings thoroughly, we become like grazing gazelles oblivious to the predators encircling us in the tall grass. And, just as there are predatory individuals that hide amongst us, there are are also predatory oligarchs that camouflage themselves as benevolent politicos and financial professionals standing above us. Normal predators we fear, establishment predators we invite into our homes as protectors, saviors, and partners.

The disease of ignorance leaves us vulnerable to many other plagues, including literal plagues like the Ebola virus. When we take the establishment at its word concerning the threat of Ebola outbreak, we make ourselves vulnerable. When people assume that the worst could never happen to them, history shows us that it inevitably does.

The recent discovery of an Ebola infected patient in Dallas, Texas has led to reasonable concern from the general population, but mainstream media efforts along with CDC and White House spin have subdued any practical response by the citizenry. The constant droning voice of the establishment claims there is nothing to be worried about; that even if there was an outbreak in the U.S., it would be quickly squashed by highly prepared medical response teams.

First and foremost, the existence of just one Ebola infected person within America’s borders indicates a likelihood of others, or the possibility of others in the near future unless policies and procedures are changed. As far as I can tell, the government has no intention of introducing rational fail-safes such as requiring mandatory quarantine for those seeking to reenter the U.S. from known outbreak regions, shutting down unrestricted travel into the country from countries with Ebola, training hospitals properly in the identification of the disease, or committing mass resources to quelling Ebola in hot zones before it reaches our shores, at least not in time to make a difference.

Secondly, the establishment also has no intention of giving the general public accurate information as to the behavior and dangers of Ebola. Those I have spoken with in the medical field including some who work within major city hospitals have related to me that the CDC has not been honest in its assessment of the probability of outbreak. For example, the CDC is consistently reminding the public that Ebola is not an “airborn” disease, and this is technically true as far as the science indicates. However, they forget to mention that it is indeed a “droplet born” disease, meaning, it can travel through the air carried in an infected cough or sneeze. The tight quarters of an airplane make for a perfect petri dish, with droplets and particulates passing back and forth through the same space and oxygen for hours at a time. The spread of Ebola is nowhere near as containable as the CDC claims.

I have been told that most hospitals are completely unprepared to fend off an outbreak of a virus as destructive as Ebola. Little to no standardized training has taken place, and some facilities are only now putting together a list of emergency procedures. Human error within the chain of care also occurs often, as we saw in Dallas, Texas, and these errors can lead to greater infection in a hospital environment.

CDC and WHO efforts in countries like Liberia have been so ineffective and halfhearted it leads one to question why their budgets are in the billions of dollars? Where is all their capital and their resources going if not to bring an unprecedented hammer down on a clearly dangerous outbreak of Ebola? Why is the virus being allowed to flourish rather than being destroyed right where it started? Where has the full force of the CDC been for the past several months while death gestates in Africa?

The one legitimate function of government, any government, is to protect the right of the people to pursue their own life, liberty, and happiness. I think stopping the invasion of mortal viruses would fall into this category. The one job our government is MANDATED to do, and it refuses to do it. Why?

I have made the point many times in the past and I’ll make it here again; when a catastrophe takes place, or a crisis is imminent, ask yourself, who ultimately benefits? I believe that the lack of strong prevention response from our government, an inadequacy which is obvious to all of the health care workers I have talked with and to anyone who has the sense to do their own research, could be absolutely deliberate. I believe the spread of Ebola may be desired by certain power brokers, and here is why:

The Perfect Cover Event

I have been warning for quite some time that the banking establishment in particular is well aware that an economic collapse of incredible proportions is coming. In fact, they have done everything in their power to make one possible. This collapse, according to my research, is designed to clear the way through monetary carpet bombing for a new international Bretton Woods-style agreement which will plant the foundation of a truly global economic system centralized and controlled by a highly select few elites. Needless to say, the internationalists would prefer not to take the blame for such a calamity.

Regional or widespread war, terrorism, cyber attacks, etc, are all useful vehicles to conjure mass confusion, and can also be used as scapegoats for the eventual downfall of our economy. That said, a viral pandemic truly surpasses them all in effectiveness. All other tragedies could easily be tied to the first “domino” or “linchpin” (as Rand Corporation calls it) of Ebola transmission, but the strategy goes deeper than this…

An Act Of Nature

Even though most people are well aware of the fact that governments have been engineering biological weapons for decades, few people think political leadership would ever use them at all, let alone use them on the people they are tasked to protect. Even with the complacency and inaction of our government in terms of the response to Ebola, the general assumption by most of the American population will be that any viral outbreak is a product of nature, not of men.

Acts of nature are not things that the common man can easily rebel against. People rebel against governments and corrupt despots all the time, but not the plague. If a viral pandemic strikes, nearly everything a government does after the fact, no matter how corrupt or destructive, can be rationalized as necessary for the greater good of the greater number. If anyone does rebel, they will be labeled as pure evil, for they are now disrupting the government’s ability to stop the pandemic from spreading, and thus, are partly responsible for the mass deaths that follow.

During a viral outbreak, government becomes mother, father, nurse and protector. No matter how abusive they are, most people will still look to them for safety and guidance, primarily because they have no knowledge of disease. What they do not understand, they will fear, and fear always drives the ignorant into the arms of tyrants.  One should also take into consideration the fact that most globalists lean towards the ideology of eugenics and promote the concept of population reduction.  A pandemic would fulfill this desire nicely…

Rationalized Economic Collapse

Who would question the event of an economic collapse in the wake of an Ebola soaked nightmare? Who would want to buy or sell? Who would want to come in contact with strangers to generate a transaction? Who would even leave their house? Ebola treatment in first world nations has advantages of finance and a cleaner overall health environment, but what if economic downturn happens simultaneously? America could experience third world status very quickly, and with it, all the unsanitary conditions that result in an exponential Ebola death rate.

The treasury, labor department, and private Federal Reserve have gone to vast lengths to skew statistics and rig markets with trillions in fiat dollars. Despite historic numbers of Americans falling off unemployment rolls, imploding shipping and manufacturing statistics, and the U.S. teetering on the edge of global “de-dollarization”, a large portion of the citizenry has been led to believe that economic recovery is assured. What they do not understand is that fiscal implosion is unavoidable, and the whole bull market is a circus designed to distract.

Amidst even a moderate or controlled viral scenario, stocks and bonds will undoubtedly crash, a crash that was going to happen anyway. The international banks who created the mess get off blameless, while Ebola, an act of nature, becomes the ultimate scapegoat for every disaster that follows.

Rationalized Travel Restrictions

If you want to lock down the movement of a population to prevent the spread of dissenting groups or ideas, I can’t think of a better way than to claim it is to prevent the spread of a deadly virus. Our government and world health officials are approaching Ebola with an attitude of nonchalance right now, because prevention is NOT part of the plan. When Ebola strikes hard within our country, that is when they will finally decide that strict measures are needed. Suddenly, those borders that they could never secure before will become impassable for you and I. And traveling between states or perhaps even counties may be extraordinarily difficult. “Papers please…” will become the new mantra of petty authority.

Forced Health Measures

Do not be surprised if an Ebola vaccine of some kind suddenly appears on the market just as the situation begins to turn tragic. And, do not be surprised if said vaccine is a total sham that ends up making more people sick. Expect that forced vaccinations will take place, especially as a prerequisite for receiving treatment from CDC or FEMA hazmat facilities. Expect that these facilities will become nothing more than obscure prisons for the sick where people quietly die. Expect that every American will be required to be tested and screened, with biometric data carefully stored, beginning with airport travel (once the virus is already entrenched).  The options are endless for abuse in terms of totalitarian health laws when the public thinks they could end up bleeding from every orifice and dying of liver failure.

Rationalized Martial Law

Imagine if some Americans decide they don’t like being poked, prodded, tagged and bagged by the establishment. Imagine they decide to fight back, Ebola be damned. An already uphill battle becomes an epic struggle when a large percentage of the population thinks you are a monster that wants to hasten the spread of Ebola. Not that the ignorant count for much in the grand scheme of history, but waking at least some of them up in the future to the bigger threat (the globalists) is hard to do when all they can see is devilish microbes. Those who plan to combat the rise of the internationalists, as I plan to, should accept now the likelihood that the only people we will have on our side tomorrow are the people we have been able to wake up today. Martial law will be welcomed by the rest.

International Response

An international response is almost guaranteed during a major pandemic. Sovereignty will be tossed in the dirt. UN and WHO teams and perhaps even troops could accompany an aid package to the U.S. Think of the glorious propaganda, as globalists tell stories of how they “saved humanity” by surpassing the barbaric practices of national and individual sovereignty, defeated the Ebola virus (after millions of deaths, of course), and out of the ashes, the “phoenix” of global governance was born. If they succeed, imagine what the history books will say for the next several centuries.

What Do We Do?

There are no silver bullet solutions. There never have been and there never will be. People looking for them will be sorely disappointed and ill prepared after wasting so much time searching for an easy out. The only answer is for communities of people to take their own survival into their own hands and become as self sufficient as possible. This means that neighborhoods, towns, and counties will have to take precautions now to steel themselves for a pandemic event, instead of simply sitting on their hands and expecting government officials to save them.

The treatments for Ebola in most cases involve nothing more than the steady replacement of vital fluids, electrolytes and plasma until the patient’s body can build up an immunity to the virus. Those with stronger immune systems before contraction are more likely to survive and beat back the disease. Government care, for the most part, is NOT going to save many people either way. That is to say, your survival will depend on you and your immune system, not them. Communities that make efforts to prevent contact and that strengthen individual immunity will have a better chance of survival than going into any government run hazmat facility. Government is not needed, and will often end up being more of a threat than the virus itself. Groups I work closely with and talk with, many with their own doctors and nurses, are already setting prevention guidelines in motion.

If you can prove you don’t need the system to save you, their rationale for attempting to control you is weakened. The ignorant will still try to demonize us for our efforts, but self sufficiency is all we have in the face of this kind of storm. If we can lead by example with our own successful health standards while saving people where the establishment could not, perhaps we can turn the tide.

You can contact Brandon Smith at:  brandon@alt-market.com

Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense.  Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.

To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page here:

http://www.alt-market.com/donate

Silver and Gold are on their way back to historic highs, and now is the time to buy.  LetLibertyCPM.com help you decide how to best protect your savings and insulate you from an ever destabilizing dollar.

Do you have enough Non-GMO seeds in case of economic collapse?  Seeds are the OTHER alternative currency, and if you aren’t stocked, then you aren’t prepared.  To buy top quality non-GMO seeds at a special 10% discount, visit Humble Seed, and use the code Alt10

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

Sad to say, but this Olddog does not have much faith in the average American’s ability to survive an Ebola pandemic; when most of them eat at the elites table. They are addicted to the intellectual poison served around the clock, and have no faith in their ability to protect or be responsible for their self. Their faith is in big government’s ability to protect them because they believe God does not exist, and they cannot protect themselves.

 10 13 11 flagbar


New Ordinance Would Allow Cops to Enter Private Property Without a Warrant

10/09/2014

http://www.pakalertpress.com/

10-9-2014 10-02-19 AM

By  TRUTHER

Montville, N.J. – In the upscale New Jersey community of Montville, in Morris County, a proposed ordinance could give sweeping power to law enforcement that would allow officers the right to enter private property without a warrant if underage drinking is simply suspected.

Under the new ordinance officers would have the ability to search homes with probable cause, without any warrant required, if underage drinking is even suspected.

Residents are understandably questioning whether the privacy gutting and property rights destroying ordinance gives law enforcement too much discretion.

“I just feel that it’s not really their business to be going into people’s houses,” said high school senior Brendan Zevits in an interview with CBS 2. “If you want to do that, you need to get a warrant.”

“Just coming in our houses searching – eventually, it’s going to turn into hunches and all that, and once you base it on a hunch, then it’s all downhill from there,” said high school senior Stephen McManus.

Attorney Fred Semrau, who wrote the memorandum for the Montville Township Committee disagrees, claiming that police won’t have any new power to enter a home. In an interview with NJ.com, he says that if the ordinance passes the police will have exactly the same power to enter a home as what currently exists. “All the same rules apply,” he said.

Semrau states that if police have probable cause to think teens are drinking at a party without authorization from adult relatives, they can already enter a home — because the homeowner can be held criminally responsible for allowing teens access to the alcohol.

Semrau’s assessment seems flawed and here is why.

Standard operating procedure for law enforcement when coming to a residence where underage drinking is suspected would typically consist of coming to the door and asking if anyone is underage drinking in the residence and asking the homeowners permission to enter to be sure.

If refused entry, and the officer feels they have probable cause, the officer can then petition a court to grant a warrant for entry into the residence.

The language of the new ordinance gets rid of the need to procure a warrant and would simply allow officers to enter a private residence if they believe probable cause exists, without judicial oversight.

Just think of the potential for abuse such an ordinance would have. ANY residence that law enforcement wants to search, but doesn’t have enough probable cause to get a warrant from a judge, they could simply have a fellow officer make an anonymous phone call that there is underage drinking taking place and officers could then show up and enter the property without a warrant.

This is extremely dangerous ground to tread upon, and presents a very slippery slope into a tyrannical future where the rule of law is simply a relic of days gone by.

The basis for the ordinance is the “exigent circumstances” exception to the Fourth Amendment, which according to a gloss by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit states, “exigent circumstances are present when a reasonable person [would] believe that entry…was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of the suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.”

Warrant requirements were placed upon law enforcement to prevent against abuse of authority and when those requirements are swept away by technicality of law and stretching terms like “exigent circumstance,” there is a serious danger to peoples rights.

Law enforcement continually pushes the limits of what they are allowed to do constitutionally, judicial review is often the only thing that keeps law enforcement from turning the U.S. into a total police state.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

Electing a city or county council and leaving all power in their hands is not working folks, so get informed and create oversight committees to advise your leaders you will not stand for more attitude changes IN YOUR LOCAL POLICE OFFICERS. Make it plain that they can go into the military if they want to kill people, but the streets of America must remain free of tyrants with impunity.

10 13 11 flagbar

 


Financial Regulators Bend Rules for Banksters

10/08/2014

http://www.batr.org/corporatocracy/100814.html

By James Hall

The cozy relationship between financial institutions and their respective regulators has long been known. Concern from reformers and activists comes from all stripes of ideological perspectives. With the attention that Carmen Segarra, the whistleblower of Wall Street, has gained, the noise from the banking establishment pushes back. Here comes the expected spin from the Fed, The New York Fed Slams Tape-Recording Whistleblower, Says She Was Fired After Just 7 Months Over Performance. Read their Statement Regarding New York Fed Supervision. So what is this controversy all about?

How dare a mere low level regulator document the goings on within the financial establishment, Inside the New York Fed: Secret Recordings and a Culture Clash, writes.

“As ProPublica reported last year, Segarra sued the New York Fed and her bosses, claiming she was retaliated against for refusing to back down from a negative finding about Goldman Sachs. A judge threw out the case this year without ruling on the merits, saying the facts didn’t fit the statute under which she sued.

At the bottom of a document filed in the case, however, her lawyer disclosed a stunning fact: Segarra had made a series of audio recordings while at the New York Fed. Worried about what she was witnessing, Segarra wanted a record in case events were disputed. So she had purchased a tiny recorder at the Spy Store and began capturing what took place at Goldman and with her bosses.

Segarra ultimately recorded about 46 hours of meetings and conversations with her colleagues. Many of these events document key moments leading to her firing. But against the backdrop of the Beim report, they also offer an intimate study of the New York Fed’s culture at a pivotal moment in its effort to become a more forceful financial supervisor. Fed deliberations, confidential by regulation, rarely become public.”

In an attempt at damage control, the Fed was looking for a favorable review. What they got was not what they wanted, N.Y. Fed Staff Afraid to Speak Up, Secret Review Found.

“The investigation, conducted by Columbia University finance professor David Beim, was initially confidential but was later released by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

Mr. Beim’s report called on the New York Fed to demand that its regulatory staffers maintain a “more distanced, high-level and skeptical view” of how the banks they oversee make money.”

A Short History of the Breathtaking Cluelessness of U.S. Financial Regulators, is outlined by the Motley Fool analysis. Any serious observer of the cozy relationships that permeate the financial community knows all too well, that the revolving door turns when favorable regulation decisions spin in the right direction.

The significance of this latest scandal, points out just how the regulation process is conducted in the suites of money manipulation. This next account is most telling; You Should Listen To The Goldman New York Fed Story.

“This American Life has a banking supervision story that turns on secret recordings made by a former employee of the New York Fed, Carmen Segarra, and it’s pretty good, because it shows how regulators basically do a lot of their regulating of banks through meetings, with no action items after. That’s weird, and it’s instructive to see how intertwined banking and supervision are. There’s a killer meeting after a meeting with Goldman Sachs where Fed employees talk about what happened, and – though we don’t know what was left on the cutting room floor – the modesty of the regulatory options being considered is fascinating. Nothing about fines, stopping certain sorts of deals, stern letters, or anything else. The talk is self-congratulation (for having that meeting with Goldman) and “let’s not get too judgmental, here, guys.”

The takeaway of the story, which is blessedly not an example of the “me mad, banksters bad!” genre, is that this kind of regulation isn’t very effective. It clearly hasn’t prevented banks from being insanely profitable until recently, in a way that you’d think would get competed away in open markets.”

Why is Goldman exempt from any meaningful oversight? William D. Cohen over at Politico provides an answer to the question, Why the Fed Will Always Wimp Out on Goldman.

“Although Michael Silva, Segarra’s superior, didn’t doubt that the Goldman-Santander transaction was legal, he didn’t think it passed the smell test. “It’s pretty apparent when you think this thing through that it’s basically window dressing that’s designed to help Banco Santander artificially enhance its capital position,” he told his New York Fed team before a meeting on the topic with Goldman executives.”

Segarra thought her boss’s pre-occupation with whether Goldman “should” have done the deal, or been allowed to do the deal, was all just a big waste of time and obfuscated the larger issue that Goldman, and other Wall Street banks, were busy pushing around a key regulator – the New York Fed – rather than the other way around. She worried that her bosses were focusing on “fuzzy” and “esoteric” issues such as Goldman’s “reputational risk.” Silva also shared with Segarra that it was all moot anyway, because Tom Baxter, the New York Fed’s general counsel, had, he said, “reined him in” on the subject. “I was all fired up, and he doesn’t want me getting the Fed to assert powers it doesn’t have,” Silva tells Segarra, according to the tape recording.”

Breaking down all the details and dialogues that transpire in the normal course of banking reviews comes down to the undeniable fact that Goldman is in charge of the process. The ownership of the Federal Reserve, a private entity, is ultimately owned by the shadow families that control the major financial institutions. Only a very naïve analysis or a compromised minion of the financial elite Plutocracy would dispute the power and clout that is applied to the political nature of regulatory oversight.

Bankster’s earn this graphic title by the way they conduct their protection racket. Courageous regulators like Carmen Segarra are treated as traitors to a system that is designed to facilitate every abuse that firms like Goldman can devise. Now you know who really owns the gold, because they make up whatever rules that foster their financial corruption.

10 13 11 flagbar


The History and Danger of Administrative Law

10/07/2014

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/current

Philip Hamburger

Columbia Law School

PHILIP HAMBURGER is the Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. He received his B.A. from Princeton University and his J.D. from Yale Law School. He has also taught at the University of Chicago Law School, the George Washington University Law School, the University of Virginia Law School, and Northwestern Law School. A contributor to National Review Online, he has written for several law reviews and journals, including the American Journal of Legal History, the Supreme Court Review, the Notre Dame Law Review, and the Journal of Law and Politics. He is the author of Separation of Church and State, Law and Judicial Duty, and, most recently, Is Administrative Law Unlawful?

The following is adapted from a speech delivered on May 6, 2014, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series.

There are many complaints about administrative law—including that it is arbitrary, that it is a burden on the economy, and that it is an intrusion on freedom. The question I will address here is whether administrative law is unlawful, and I will focus on constitutional history. Those who forget history, it is often said, are doomed to repeat it. And this is what has happened in the United States with the rise of administrative law—or, more accurately, administrative power.

Administrative law is commonly defended as a new sort of power, a product of the 19th and the 20th centuries that developed to deal with the problems of modern society in all its complexity. From this perspective, the Framers of the Constitution could not have anticipated it and the Constitution could not have barred it. What I will suggest, in contrast, is that administrative power is actually very old. It revives what used to be called prerogative or absolute power, and it is thus something that the Constitution centrally prohibited.

But first, what exactly do I mean by administrative law or administrative power? Put simply, administrative acts are binding or constraining edicts that come, not through law, but through other mechanisms or pathways. For example, when an executive agency issues a rule constraining Americans—barring an activity that results in pollution, for instance, or restricting how citizens can use their land—it is an attempt to exercise binding legislative power not through an act of Congress, but through an administrative edict. Similarly, when an executive agency adjudicates a violation of one of these edicts—in order to impose a fine or some other penalty—it is an attempt to exercise binding judicial power not through a judicial act, but again through an administrative act.

In a way we can think of administrative law as a form of off-road driving. The Constitution offers two avenues of binding power—acts of Congress and acts of the courts. Administrative acts by executive agencies are a way of driving off-road, exercising power through other pathways. For those in the driver’s seat, this can be quite exhilarating. For the rest of us, it’s a little unnerving.

The Constitution authorizes three types of power, as we all learned in school—the legislative power is located in Congress, executive power is located in the president and his subordinates, and the judicial power is located in the courts. How does administrative power fit into that arrangement?

The conventional answer to this question is based on the claim of the modernity of administrative law. Administrative law, this argument usually goes, began in 1887 when Congress created the Interstate Commerce Commission, and it expanded decade by decade as Congress created more such agencies. A variant of this account suggests that administrative law is actually a little bit older—that it began to develop in the early practices of the federal government of the United States. But whether it began in the 1790s or in the 1880s, administrative law according to this account is a post-1789 development and—this is the key point—it arose as a pragmatic and necessary response to new and complex practical problems in American life. The pragmatic and necessitous character of this development is almost a mantra—and of course if looked at that way, opposition to administrative law is anti-modern and quixotic.

But there are problems with this conventional history of administrative law. Rather than being a modern, post-constitutional American development, I argue that the rise of administrative law is essentially a re-emergence of the absolute power practiced by pre-modern kings. Rather than a modern necessity, it is a latter-day version of a recurring threat—a threat inherent in human nature and in the temptations of power.

 The Prerogative Power of Kings

The constitutional history of the past thousand years in common law countries records the repeated ebb and flow of absolutism on the one side and law on the other. English kings were widely expected to rule through law. They had Parliament for making law and courts of law for adjudicating cases, and they were expected to govern through the acts of these bodies. But kings were discontent with governing through the law and often acted on their own. The personal power that kings exercised when evading the law was called prerogative power.

Whereas ordinarily kings bound their subjects through statutes passed by Parliament, when exercising prerogative power they bound subjects through proclamations or decrees—or what we today call rules or regulations. Whereas ordinarily kings would repeal old statutes by obtaining new statutes, when exercising prerogative power they issued dispensations and suspensions—or what we today call waivers. Whereas ordinarily kings enforced the law through the courts of law, when exercising prerogative power they enforced their commands through their prerogative courts—courts such as the King’s Council, the Star Chamber, and the High Commission—or what we today call administrative courts.

Ordinarily, English judges resolved legal disputes in accordance with their independent judgment regarding the law. But when kings exercised prerogative power, they expected deference from judges, both to their own decrees and to the holdings and interpretations of their extra-legal prerogative courts.

Although England did not have a full separation of powers of the sort written into the American Constitution, it did have a basic division of powers. Parliament had the power to make laws, the law courts had the power to adjudicate, and the king had the power to exercise force. But when kings acted through prerogative power, they or their prerogative courts exercised all government powers, overriding these divisions. For example, the Star Chamber could make regulations, as well as prosecute and adjudicate infractions. And defenders of this sort of prerogative power were not squeamish about describing it as absolute power. Absolutism was their justification.

Conceptually, there were three central elements of this absolutism: extra-legal power, supra-legal power, and the consolidation of power. It was extra-legal or outside the law in the sense that it bound the public not through laws or statutes, but through other means. It was supra-legal or above the law in the sense that kings expected judges to defer to it—notwithstanding their duty to exercise their own independent judgment. And it was consolidated in the sense that it united all government powers—legislative, executive, and judicial—in the king or in his prerogative courts. And underlying these three central elements was the usual conceptual justification for absolute power: necessity. Necessity, it was said, was not bound by law.

These claims on behalf of absolutism, of course, did not go unchallenged. When King John called Englishmen to account extralegally in his Council, England’s barons demanded in Magna Carta in 1215 that no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or even summoned except through the mechanisms of law. When 14th century English kings questioned men in the king’s Council, Parliament in 1354 and 1368 enacted due process statutes. When King James I attempted to make law through proclamations, judges responded in 1610 with an opinion that royal proclamations were unlawful and void. When James subsequently demanded judicial deference to prerogative interpretations of statutes, the judges refused. Indeed, in 1641 Parliament abolished the Star Chamber and the High Commission, the bodies then engaging in extra-legal lawmaking and adjudication. And most profoundly, English constitutional law began to develop—and it made clear that there could be no extra-legal,   supra-legal, or consolidated power.

 The Rise of Absolutism in America

The United States Constitution echoes this. Early Americans were very familiar with absolute power. They feared this extra-legal, supra-legal, and consolidated power because they knew from English history that such power could evade the law and override all legal rights. It is no surprise, then, that the United States Constitution was framed to bar this sort of power. To be precise, Americans established the Constitution to be the source of all government power and to bar any absolute power. Nonetheless, absolute power has come back to life in common law nations, including America.

After absolute power was defeated in England and America, it circled back from the continent through Germany, and especially through Prussia. There, what once had been the personal prerogative power of kings became the bureaucratic administrative power of the states. The Prussians were the leaders of this development in the 17th and 18th centuries. In the 19th century they became the primary theorists of administrative power, and many of them celebrated its evasion of constitutional law and constitutional rights.

 

This German theory would become the intellectual source of American administrative law. Thousands upon thousands of Americans studied administrative power in Germany, and what they learned there about administrative power became standard fare in American universities. At the same time, in the political sphere, American Progressives were becoming increasingly discontent with elected legislatures, and they increasingly embraced German theories of administration and defended the imposition of administrative law in America in terms of pragmatism and necessity.

The Progressives, moreover, understood what they were doing. For example, in 1927, a leading Progressive theorist openly said that the question of whether an American administrative officer could issue regulations was similar to the question of whether pre-modern English kings could issue binding proclamations. By the 1920s, however, Progressives increasingly were silent about the continuity between absolute power and modern administrative power, as this undermined their claims about its modernity and lawfulness.

In this way, over the past 120 years, Americans have reestablished the very sort of power that the Constitution most centrally forbade. Administrative law is extra-legal in that it binds Americans not through law but through other mechanisms—not through statutes but through regulations—and not through the decisions of courts but through other adjudications. It is supra-legal in that it requires judges to put aside their independent judgment and defer to administrative power as if it were above the law—which our judges do far more systematically than even the worst of 17th century English judges. And it is consolidated in that it combines the three powers of government—legislative, executive, and judicial—in administrative agencies.

Let me close by addressing just two of many constitutional problems illuminated by the re-emergence of absolutism in the form of administrative power: delegation and procedural rights.

One standard defense of administrative power is that Congress uses statutes to delegate its lawmaking power to administrative agencies. But this is a poor defense. The delegation of lawmaking has long been a familiar feature of absolute power. When kings exercised extra-legal power, they usually had at least some delegated authority from Parliament. Henry VIII, for example, issued binding proclamations under an authorizing statute called the Act of Proclamations. His binding proclamations were nonetheless understood to be exercises of absolute power. And in the 18th century the Act of Proclamations was condemned as unconstitutional.

Against this background, the United States Constitution expressly bars the delegation of legislative power. This may sound odd, given that the opposite is so commonly asserted by scholars and so routinely accepted by the courts. But read the Constitution. The Constitution’s very first substantive words are, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” The word “all” was not placed there by accident. The Framers understood that delegation had been a problem in English constitutional history, and the word “all” was placed there precisely to bar it.

As for procedural rights, the history is even more illuminating. Administrative adjudication evades almost all of the procedural rights guaranteed under the Constitution. It subjects Americans to adjudication without real judges, without juries, without grand juries, without full protection against self-incrimination, and so forth. Like the old prerogative courts, administrative courts substitute inquisitorial process for the due process of law—and that’s not just an abstract accusation; much early administrative procedure appears to have been modelled on civilian-derived inquisitorial process. Administrative adjudication thus becomes an open avenue for evasion of the Bill of Rights.

The standard justification for the administrative evasion of procedural rights is that they apply centrally to the regular courts, but not entirely to administrative adjudication. But the history shows that procedural rights developed primarily to bar prerogative or administrative proceedings, not to regulate what the government does in regular courts of law. As I already mentioned, the principle of due process developed as early as the 14th century, when Parliament used it to prevent the exercise of extra-legal power by the King’s Council. It then became a constitutional principle in the 17th century in opposition to the prerogative courts. Similarly, jury rights developed partly in opposition to administrative proceedings, and thus some of the earliest constitutional cases in America held administrative proceedings unconstitutional for depriving defendants of a jury trial.

In sum, the conventional understanding of administrative law is utterly mistaken. It is wrong on the history and oblivious to the danger. That danger is absolutism: extra-legal, supra-legal, and consolidated power. And the danger matters because administrative power revives this absolutism. The Constitution carefully barred this threat, but constitutional doctrine has since legitimized this dangerous sort of power. It therefore is necessary to go back to basics. Among other things, we should no longer settle for some vague notion of “rule of law,” understood as something that allows the delegation of legislative and judicial powers to administrative agencies. We should demand rule through law and rule under law. Even more fundamentally, we need to reclaim the vocabulary of law: Rather than speak of administrative law, we should speak of administrative power—indeed, of absolute power or more concretely of extra-legal, supra-legal, and consolidated power. Then we at least can begin to recognize the danger.

Copyright © 2014 Hillsdale College. The opinions expressed in Imprimis are not necessarily the views of Hillsdale College. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the following credit line is used: “Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.”

10 13 11 flagbar