1 1 17 18 Nineteen Services?


By Anna Von Reitz

This is a reply to a reader who noticed that, hey, under the Constitution, our States only agreed to receive nineteen services from these vandals, but this has now proliferated to hundreds if not thousands of government services.  What is going on here?

The perpetrators making all these offers of services are not really your government.  That’s for starters.  They are foreign, for-profit corporations in the business of providing government services.

That lack of disclosure is a large part of the whole problem — they have been “offering” services as private commercial corporations and people have been mindlessly accepting all sorts of “services” —- and then have to pay for these services they accepted above and beyond those that the States agreed to.

It’s like the magazine publishers back in the 80’s — you’d get a “free subscription” to something like “Outdoor Life”.  It would just show up in your mailbox, “Absolutely Free!”  — and when you read the fine print, “If you like “Outdoor Life” just keep this complimentary copy and three more months of the magazine will be sent to your door absolutely free!”

Okay, so typical American — whether they like “Outdoor Life” and read it or throw it out with the Junk Mail — thinks nothing of it.  Three months go by.  The magazines come. In the third magazine is a postcard-like insert and in absolutely tiny print it says, “We are happy you have enjoyed your subscription to “Outdoor Life”. To continue, simply do nothing and the magazine will continue to be delivered every month.  To “unsubscribe” simply check the box on this return postcard and you will receive no additional copies.”

Well, guess how many people saw that card and read It?

Pretty soon folks are getting all these magazines they don’t want and scratching their heads.  And then they start getting all the bills attached to these “Free Offers”.  And the complaints start piling up with the Congressional Delegations about these “unfair” solicitations and “subscription scams”.  And the magazine publishers got their hands slapped and prohibited from doing this kind of “promotion” through the U.S. Mail.

Unfortunately, the government, operating as a foreign, for-profit governmental services corporation has done the same sort of thing with governmental services.  They have “offered” services, often for free, and as people having unknowingly used these services (probably thinking that it was just part of the program) they have been “subscribed” — exactly like the magazine subscriptions — to receive these “unearned benefits”.

When they unknowingly sign up to receive these benefits by enrolling in or applying for what appears to be a “government service” they become identified as “U.S. Citizens” — that is, British Territorial United States Employees or Dependents or Corporations or Political Asylum Seekers.   The British Territorial United States Government Corporation, like the magazine publishers, readily agrees. That’s what the “offer” was all about from their perspective in the first place.

What they don’t tell their new subscribers is that: (1)  In exchange for all these wonderful new “free” services, the perpetrators are going to “take title” to their names and land and all their assets including their children to pay for these “benefits”, and (2) the victim’s political status is going to be altered to that of a British Territorial United States Citizen, a subject of the Queen and the British Crown, no longer a free and independent American.

Just like the magazine subscriptions, these subscriptions to what-appear-to-be government services have unseen costs that no right thinking American would accept, if the cost were fully disclosed.  Just like the magazine subscriptions, there isn’t a clear, clean up front offer involved.  Just like the magazine subscriptions, the process of ensnarement is gradual —  you have to accept the proverbial  “additional three months of free magazines” — before they shut the trap door.  That extra “three months” in commerce is the equivalent of three months of Due Process Notice that you are being offered and are accepting a magazine subscription.

This creates an implied contract between you and the magazine publisher and it is then “presumed” that you are knowingly accepting the product and are expected to pay for it, whether you ever read your copy of “Outdoor Life” or not.

Same thing with what appears to be the government.  All those services you “apply for” ignorantly, like Social Security, and Selective Service,  and all those benefit programs you “enroll in” like Medicare — have a cost that you are not being told, which results in an undisclosed contract, called an “adhesion contract”.

It is primarily undisclosed on two counts: first, you are misled to think that you are dealing with your own government when you are dealing with a foreign, for-profit corporation in the business of providing “governmental services” instead, and second, you are not being told about the actual cost of participation in all these “offers” — that you will be “gifting” yourself, your good name, your credit, your land, and all your assets to these Grafters in exchange for these comparatively petty freebies, and that you will be subjecting yourself to the British Queen as a member of the British Commonwealth System, too, and selling yourself and your children into eternal pauper-hood, a form of debt slavery.

That something like this could happen in the modern world is beyond abhorrent, but the combination of commercial fraud opportunity combined with the ability to enforce these bogus contracts under color of law was apparently too great a temptation, and now we have the ugly and inevitable confrontation between the purported “subscribers” and the “magazine publishers”.

The fact is that we didn’t knowingly, willingly or “voluntarily” subscribe to this fraud scheme at all, because it lacked disclosure and lacking disclosure, no offer accepted can be considered “conscious”  (therefore the whole offer is “unconscionable”) and therefore cannot be “voluntary” either.

Essentially, all these international corporations in the business of providing “governmental services” have sought to expand their control and improve their bottom-lines by preying upon the people that they were hired to serve.  They have done this by the same process as the erstwhile magazine publishers: “voluntary” subscription that in this case, is not voluntary because it is never fully disclosed and because it is falsely presented as a “government mandate” to people who are not naturally subject to the British Territorial United States Government.

As a result, the consequences in commerce are already well-established.  First and foremost, the British Territorial United States Government corporations must stop making all these undisclosed “offers” and demands.  The property and assets they seized upon under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure have to be returned to the States and People they have harmed and imposed upon.  Any services or payments that they legitimately owe to the victims — such as vested Social Security accounts to which the victims and employers contributed and paid for — must be paid out as commercial obligations without any presumption of ownership interest or pretense that these are “welfare benefits”.

As for the States of the Union, they have been dis-served, too, and all their land patents and titles must be returned to the States and the People. Our country is not going to be bought and sold for the sake of British and Belgian and French false claims in commerce, and our People are not going to be considered British Subjects or Paupers of the British Commonwealth for the sake of similar false claims in commerce.

We have caught them at it and we have the patents that the perpetrators used to set up and automate this gigantic fraud scheme.

See this article and over 1300 others on Anna’s website here:


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: