By Anna Von Reitz
One of the most frustrating parts of the current situation is that Americans continue to respect and trust the very people that have betrayed them.
This is what makes “breach of trust” such a difficult and reprehensible crime — difficult in that the victims often resist those who are trying to help them and deny that their beloved “Trustees” would ever cheat or harm them, and reprehensible in that the guilty parties have knowingly traded upon this trust placed in them and in the positions of power entrusted to them to implement the crime.
If the members of Congress had done their actual jobs, if former Presidents had acted with Honor, none of the evils infesting our monetary and political and court systems would exist. And we, ourselves, had we done our job and been less trusting and more vigilant— this situation wouldn’t exist, either.
One of those who has done his best to truly represent the people who placed their trust in him, New Hampshire Representative Richard Marple, has recently raised the issue of postal fraud and the misuse and abuse of the postal service to deliver bogus court documents and bills–essentially promoting a scam– so a group of us have been discussing and I share my comments below:
It IS both grammar fraud– they know that when they address anything to RICHARD MARPLE they are addressing a public trust that they set up and named after you without your knowledge or consent– and postal fraud.
The use of all capital letters is known as “DOG LATIN”. In this country it has been used as “American Sign Language.”
If you look it up in Black’s Fourth or in the Chicago Manual of Style you will get an eye-full. Friends in Australia have tracked its use and misuse all the way back to the Emperor Justinian. They have an entire WordPress site dedicated to the subject– The Justinian Deception. It is very well documented.
So when they create a public trust named after you without your knowledge or consent they are creating an “unconscionable” contract. You are literally not conscious of any of this.
Right out of the box any such contract in any jurisdiction of the law is null and void the moment you object to it, but how are you going to object if you don’t know that any such THING exists?
The one contract that you can’t break is the one you are not aware of.
They know the scam they have set up, but you don’t. So they send you mail addressed to their PUBLIC TRUST as if you were the Trustee responsible for this, and you mistakenly think it is addressed to you and answer the summons or whatever else without objection so— gotcha! They shirk off their responsibility for their creation and hang it around your neck instead.
Now, they are committing fraud against average Americans when they set up this whole system and start using a foreign language–DOG LATIN — to secretively mis-address us. They are committing mail fraud by sending their solicitations through the mail to us “as if” we were the Trustees responsible for IT.
And the only way they get away with this is by pretending that this is all “voluntary” and we are knowingly and willingly allowing them to do this.
It is criminal and may not be excused in terms of private contracts. An illegal private contract is still illegal. Slavery and involuntary servitude have both been outlawed worldwide since 1926. Any contract voluntary of involuntary yielding that result is also null and void.
But we have to object to being bonded and we have to object to any presumption of Trusteeship related to IT and we have to object to the Mail fraud and so on—and how are The People going to do that if (1) they don’t know this ugly foreign system exists and (2) they don’t know they have been targeted and included in this foreign system by these scam artists and (3) they trust and respect the vermin doing this to them and think you are a crackpot when you try to warn them?
A Purgatory Oath is an Ecclesiastical/Canon Law Oath that has no place in a Commercial Court. Just like Writs don’t work in a Commercial or Administrative Court.
You have three different systems — air, land, and sea — and they all have different conventions — different means of expression, different forms to fill out, different courts to invoke.
A lot of the confusion in the courts comes about because people think they are in one kind of court when in fact they are in another kind of court. It is necessary to nail them down as to what the declared and actual jurisdiction of the court is before you make ANY reply to them at all, and once they commit to a jurisdiction you have to watch them to make sure they stay in that jurisdiction. If, after declaring jurisdiction, the judge makes an excuse and gets up and leaves the room and then comes back in, you have to repeat the demand for him to declare the actual jurisdiction of the court again. They use this as a trick to switch jurisdictions when the court appears to be in continuous session.
All these courts that the Bar Attorney (shipping clerks) operate are commercial courts and the Judges won’t budge from that jurisdiction absent action on your part forcing them to move from Maritime to Admiralty to Ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Maritime deals with trusts and contracts that are implied, Admiralty deals with actual factual contracts and trusts that are written and present as evidence, Ecclesiastical Courts deal with moral issues and contracts we have with God —- and no judge wants to enter there.
Maritime is the easiest jurisdiction for these yahoos to fudge around in, so that is where they dearly like to stay. In Admiralty they have to hear the facts, which are often detrimental to the Court’s advantage. In Ecclesiastical Law the Judge is put at risk and anything up to and including his life can be forfeit, so they avoid going into the realm unless they are utterly desperate and have no choice.
And the moment you enter upon the land and soil jurisdiction of this country they have to vacate — simply dismiss and run — because they have no jurisdiction related to the land and soil at all and are obligated to obey the Law of the Land while on our shores, and they have often abundantly violated the Law of the Land, so best not to even discuss it from their standpoint.
I have had so many of these courts return fees, release bonds and dismiss charges by now that this is set in cement and completely reliable and predictable. They will not engage any issue on the land and soil jurisdiction nor can they operate any Court in the land and soil jurisdiction, because the Territorial United States has no such jurisdiction delegated to it.
They can only succeed in their objective — which is to traffick you into their jurisdiction and fleece you — if you let them, which means you have to learn how to effectively shut them down and recognize all the tricks they use to weasel you into admitting, accepting, submitting, etc.
Along with re-affirming the land and soil jurisdiction courts owed to this country and populating those courts with properly trained Counselors-at-Law, and properly informed Jury Pools that are aware of and ready to use their nullification powers, we have to re-educate and discipline the Territorial Courts and the members of the Bar Associations.
They do have a job to perform, but unfortunately, they have been usurping and presuming upon the American people and their assets, and have been subjecting millions of innocent people to unconscionable contracts under color of law.
This has to stop and right about now. It is nothing more or less than a venal international crime spree and if it means confiscating pensions, arresting judges, outlawing the Bar Associations on our shores — whatever it takes, must be done.
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com
05 23 18 I Double Dog Dare the Territorial United States Supreme Court
By Anna Von Reitz
Let’s begin this discussion with this realization: you can be a king in one country and a slave in another.
Is that clear enough?
Is it also clear that different countries operate under different laws?
The United States is and has always been a different country with respect to the Territorial United States. They function under two separate systems of law.
This leads to a situation where the States (members of The United States land jurisdiction Union) function under a different system than the Territorial States of States (international jurisdiction of the sea).
We have lawyers who are Counselors at Law and Justices (of the Peace) who administer the Public Law, which in a State is known as the General Session Law, even if the “State” is being represented as a Public Trust, and the Public Law generally, known as the Law of the Land.
They have Attorneys at Law and Judges who administer the Private Law, which in a State of State is known as the Statutory Law. Strictly speaking, only State of State officials, employees and dependents — all known as “residents” of the State of Alaska (for example) are required to obey the Statutory Law.
So you have Counselors at Law and you have Attorneys at Law. I am a Counselor at Law.
If you occupy an office of the soil or land jurisdiction courts you must be a Counselor at Law and CANNOT be a Bar Attorney. Period. So there is no basis whatsoever for anyone supposing that I would be or even could be a Bar Attorney.
It is totally ignorant to look for me among the members of the Bar Association. They can’t operate a State Court and I can’t operate a State of State Court BY DEFINITION.
So, no, I am NOT a member of the Bar, am not required to be a member of the Bar, and could not operate a land or soil jurisdiction court as a member of the Bar.
Bar Attorneys can act as administrators but can’t sit on the bench or otherwise operate in any public capacity in a State Court.
People have become so ignorant that they don’t know the difference between the “Alaska State Court” and the “State of Alaska Court”.
Nor do they know the difference between a Counselor at Law (required to run land and soil jurisdiction courts) and Attorneys at Law (required to run Maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction courts).
Obviously, I know what I am doing, the rules of the Office I am occupying, and the State I serve; just as obviously, I am not serving in nor have I ever claimed to serve in any of the capacities you mention.
And again, there is no factual controversy about this whatsoever.
There are land courts and there are sea courts and this is the way it has always been.
All that has happened is that as more and more Americans have been unknowingly press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, they have unwittingly subjected themselves to the sea courts and the land courts have become rare as hen’s teeth as a result.
That does not mean that my court does not exist– it is clearly established under the General Session Laws of Alaska. Nor does it mean I am doing anything wrong or making any false claims. I am not impersonating a judge of any sea jurisdiction court or claiming to be a Bar Member or any other such ignorant meandering.
I am here serving my State– not any “State of State”.
And I am serving the honest Tradesmen engaged in private international trade and the living people who have rejected FDR’s unconscionable New Deal contract and who have returned to the land and soil of Alaska.
And I Double-Dog Dare any member of the (Territorial) United States Supreme Court to say otherwise.
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com