05 19 18 Holy Moly!!!!!!! This Is the BIG ONE! + The UN Trusteeship + The Public Law and the Private “Law”

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/holy-moly-this-is-big-one.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial.  It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit.

TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12).

I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven’t studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken.  It doesn’t work the way it should. Specifically, affidavits don’t work.  The courts ignore them.

Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it’s stupid.

First, via the “US Citizen” political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as “decedents” — that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.  Next, they “enfranchised” us — created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us — all that remained  on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.

And the “Rest of the Story is…….”  —- incorporated entities can’t create affidavits. They have no ability to take Oaths, swear to anything, or provide any testimony.

So by enfranchising us, the demons both subjected us to commercial law and rendered us helpless under it.

Quote my new BFF, Magnus….

“…..The Undeniable Fact That Artificial Entities (Corporations) Cannot Take Oaths, They Cannot Make Affidavits. See, E.G., In Re Empire Refining Co., 1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (Sd Cal. 1932) (It Is, Of Course, Conceded That A Corporation Cannot Make An Affidavit In Its Corporate Name. It Is An Inanimate Thing Incapable Of Voicing An Oath); Moya Enterprises, Inc. V. Harry Anderson Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand Restaurant Co. V. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9a T. Bjur C. Slezak, Fletcher Cyclopedia Of Law Of Private Corporations § 4629 (Perm. Ed. 1992) (“A Document Purporting To Be The Affidavit Of A Corporation Is Void, Since A Corporation Cannot Make A Sworn Statement”) – (Footnote Omitted). Rowland V. California Men’s Colony • 506  U.S. 194, 203 (1993).”

And he is absolutely correct!

This, at last, is why there has been no remedy and no hearing for the victims of this fraud scheme.  Commercial law can’t work without an affidavit, and incorporated entities — public trusts and public transmitting utilities — can’t issue affidavits. End of story.

We were totally boxed in, so that the judge couldn’t even hear us.  Literally.  We had no recourse, and only the “appearance” of justice.  They let us talk and run the meter, charged us for their “service”—and left us without any possible relief.

The Bar Association Members — British Merchant Marine Shipping Clerks — colluded with the politicians and the banks to set up the Perfect Crime, an ultimate Identity Theft Scheme that rendered the victims voiceless and helpless and without recourse.

It’s almost funny when you finally see it— a real guffaw-worthy sleight of hand, something so preposterous, so obvious, and yet — unless you had cause to think about both the identity theft and this particular bit of commercial law, you’d never put it together.

So, everyone ever issued a BIRTH CERTIFICATE has been trafficked, impersonated, and defrauded. Every such PERSON ever addressed by one of these COURTS has suffered barratry and been subjected to a foreign jurisdiction and form of law, within which they were specifically disabled and unable to defend themselves.

No more filthy, repugnant, criminal scheme, nothing more unjust, despicable, cynical —- and in the end, cowardly, can be imagined.  They attacked little babies in their cradles and used a petty, pathetic scheme like this to steal them blind and enslave them for life.

Even I am stunned.

But there it is, and there you have it.

We have come full circle at last.

In the end, this is all that anyone needs to know — what they did and how they did it.  That, and the realization of how many million— nay, billions— of innocent people have suffered because of it.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The UN Trusteeship

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-un-trusteeship.html

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN Trusteeship

According to this mammoth fraud against the American States and People, we just disappeared one day, like the ships of the Dutch East India company or the Templar Fleet before them, and deserted all our property here in America, leaving it behind in the care of our servants for hire — the British-controlled Territorial United States.

As such, we were deemed by those same dishonest servants to have “donated” our “abandoned” estates to the good of whomever, and most likely, to ourselves, should we ever “return” from “over the sea”.

Of course, we were never informed of our purported absence, nor of our supposed donation of our good names and assets.

As Mark Twain noted when this fraud first started — rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated.

In 1976, the traitors responsible for this debacle passed two Acts in the Territorial United States Congress — the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and in tandem with it, the International Organizations Immunities Act.

These two Acts together provide for individual still owed their lawful birthright estates to claim them as “Foreign Sovereigns” —- that is, “foreign” with respect to the Territorial United States, and to otherwise wash the hands of the perpetrators by naming the United Nations as the Trustees responsible for administration of our state laws and assets.

This manipulation (invalid as it is) is the equivalent of taking your money out of one pocket and putting it in the other, as the UN Corporation is owned and operated by the same people and interests as the US Corporation.

So now we are being treated to the spectacle of “UN Commissioners” disguised as County Commissioners arriving on our soil to tell us how to live our lives and how high to jump — except for one important fact.

We, the supposed “Donors” of the Trust they are administering have also seized claim as the “Beneficiaries” of all the Cestui Que Vies and related State assets and invoked the Doctrine of Merger.

This means that when the (merely presumed to be) Donor of a Trust is also the Beneficiary of a Trust, that Donor has the absolute right to collapse the Trust and receive back all the assets of that Trust. This is called a “reversionary trust interest”— which we have, and which we have invoked on the public and international record. We have merged the various entities established in our NAMES and returned them to the land and soil of our birth.

Read that— we have already told the UN to get off our soil and stay off and to prove any legitimate interest granted to them by the foreign Territorial United States Congress acting in Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract.

There is absolutely nothing in the Delegated Powers suggesting that the Territorial United States has now nor ever had any ability to dispose of our assets in any jurisdiction of the law. Therefore, the Territorial United States cannot grant to the UN what was never theirs to grant.

The actual presumed “Donors” have come home and claimed back the entirety of their land and soil as well as their Persons/PERSONS. Kindly inform the United Nations Secretary General and all the new “County Commissioners”.

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 

05 19 18 The Public Law and the Private “Law”

http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/the-public-law-and-private-law.html

By Anna Von Reitz

More mirroring.

Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which “United States” is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.

This process of “mirroring” everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down.  It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been “mirrored” by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name “United States”, too.

This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system.  They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself.

The Public Law is mirrored by their private law.

Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers.  Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers.

These are two different offices, one public, one private, both called “Sheriff”.

Yet another similar names deceit.

The vermin attempt to confuse one with the other, and to convince you that you are subject to their private “club” law, which amounts to the “public policies” of a corporation.

Yesterday, we also discussed the Clearfield Doctrine.  When an entity exercising our delegated powers debases itself and engages in commercial activity as an incorporated entity, it loses any special governmental powers or sovereign immunity and descends to the nature of any other commercial corporation.

Very clearly what has happened here is that private commercial corporations have been entrusted with governmental functions.  They have then hidden behind their government “identity” and used those delegated but still coercive powers to benefit their own bottom lines and protect their own corporate interests at the expense of competitors.

Imagine giving Exxon the ability to act as “the government”?

So how is it possible that you, a free born American, could become liable and subject to the public policies of a foreign corporation merely under hire to provide stipulated governmental services?

By contract — and in this case, undisclosed and unconscionable contract  employing semantic deceit  (Are you a US [Territorial] Citizen?) and improper use of the coercive powers of what appears to be government (You have to sign up for Social Security in order to have a [Federal] job….) to feather the nests and extend coercive power to private corporations.

Reclaiming your Trade Name re-establishes your identity as an American eligible to claim back your birthright estate as a living man or woman, and enables you to then lay claim to the derivative NAMES that the vermin have established “for” you in the following forms:  JOHN DOE (a public charitable trust),  JOHN M. DOE (a public transmitting utility) and JOHN MARK DOE (a constructive foreign grantor trust ESTATE)—-and return all them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth.

This effectively severs the unconscionable contract that they have created for their own benefit and the benefit of their foreign commercial corporation, which is supposed to be providing your States with good faith service, and corrects the falsified public records they have used against you.

Put another way, when you remove your names from their jurisdiction they no longer have a “handle” to seize upon and manipulate you and your assets.  Whatever contract there is, is re-written in your favor.  It is therefore of the utmost urgency and should be of your utmost concern to “come home” and take care of your own affairs, shed yourselves of these unconscionable presumptions, and stand in your true nature again.

If anyone asks, tell them that you have “retired” from all obligations and duties of Territorial and/or Municipal Citizenship and “returned” to your birthright political status on the land and soil of your native state, without prejudice.

This is equivalent to saying— “Hey, fella, you can do what you want to do. If you want to subject yourself to the Queen and be plundered for your trouble, that’s your business.  Leave me to mine. I obey the Public Law, which is sufficient.”

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: