Step One Complete. Now What…. Dear Ernie.

06/20/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/06/step-one-complete-now-what-dear-ernie.html

By Anna Von Reitz

I keep getting questions from people who have sent back their endorsed Birth Certificates to the Secretary of the Treasury and their Form 56 and instructions, etc., and they are asking me—- now what?

Step Two:  You have to do the expatriation and the revocation of Voter Registration, too.

This is a double-whammy trap they have created—- both Municipal “citizenship” and Territorial “Citizenship” have to be renounced.

Returning the BC to the Secretary of the Treasury “surrenders” the “criminal” PERSON back whence “he” came and cashiers the MUNICIPAL “citizen”—- now you still have to deal with the Territorial Citizen—- the presumed Foreign Situs Trust operating under your Upper and Lower Case name.

Your name in the form “John Michael Doe” is a Trade Name when domiciled on the land, and a Foreign Situs Trust when domiciled on the sea.  You have assumed all your life that you are acting on the land and are a landsman, but thanks to the surreptitious corruption and falsification of the public records which your Mother unknowingly signed at the hospital, you have been mis-identified as a orphaned, fatherless child donated to the “State of………” organization, which is a foreign corporation operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

It is that fundamental “misunderstanding” that you now need to address.

I posted a good example of an Act of Expatriation on my website yesterday.  It’s better than most of the examples you can find because it is simple, direct, and takes care of the issues of both domicile and political allegiance.  Most Acts of Expatriation simply declare what you are not and leave the rest hanging.  This one declares both the permanent domicile of your names (that is, your “vessels” in trade) and your allegiance to the land and soil of your actual birth state.  You will find it at the bottom of the list.  Look for “Improved Act of Expatriation”.

You also have to get rid of any “Voter Registration”.  You do this by notifying the State of State Voter Registration Office and having your name removed.  Once you realize that what they are doing is operating a foreign corporation on your soil and are offering you “enfranchisement” —- as in Dairy Queen franchise — and voting rights in exchange for your natural right to elect your own public officials and conduct your own government and live under your own law, you should have absolutely no regret about no longer being a “voter” and no longer participating in their private, foreign corporate elections.

That completes the rebuttal of both forms of federal citizenship— both MUNICIPAL and Territorial.  If you use my Act of Expatriation, it also clears up the matter of your actual permanent domicile being on the land of your native state of the Union and makes your allegiance to that state clear.

Having completed Step One and Step Two (which has two parts– the recorded Act of Expatriation and the revocation of Voter Registration) you are back on the land of the state where you were born, a free American.

Step Three is to “retire” from any presumption of federal employment.  Notify the private “Social Security Administration” that you have retired from all federal employment and have returned to your native birthright political status.  If they have any objections or claims give them five (5) business days to reply and tell them that if you do not hear from them in that time you will accept their agreement that all insurances, services, and benefits of the Social Security program are due and owing to you regardless of political affiliation or lack thereof and that you are free to receive your pension and other program services without prejudice, presumption or claim otherwise.

As part of Step Three you are free to revoke your election to pay federal income taxes, so long as you are not actually a federal civilian or military employee or dependent, political asylum seeker or otherwise prohibited from relinquishing this particular duty.  If you work for the corporation, you have to do what the corporation says.  The corporation has the right to dock your pay, if you agree to it, as a condition of employment—- if they call this a “tax” it is in the euphemistic sense, because they are not actually a government, but a governmental services corporation.  They can also “tax” that part of your retirement pension that comes from actual federal employment.

Most Americans have (a) never worked in any capacity for the federal government in their lives or (b) have spent a couple years in the military, which upon retirement accounts for such a tiny part of their pension that it is far, far below the amount of the standard deduction and can be totally discounted as taxable pension “income”.

You have instead been misidentified as an unpaid “volunteer” warrant officer in the Merchant Marine Service, known as a “Withholding Agent” and you have contributed to the confusion by agreeing — under penalty of perjury no less — that you are a “Withholding Agent”.

Now that you know that you are not a voluntary warrant officer in the Merchant Marines, you can admit the “mistake” and revoke your election to pay federal income taxes.

Driver Licenses?  We all know that if you don’t have a DL you are subjected to endless harassment and there is also a possible presumption that you are not a “safe” driver, etc., so, what to do?   Place a label stating “Retired. Not for Hire.” on the back of the license or write the same in permanent marker on the back of the license.  This gives any arresting officer proper notice of your status.

If he gives you a ticket anyway, sign it with your Trade Name, using the word “by” to create a “by-line” for your version of “John Henry Doe”, and add the words “Without Prejudice” or “All rights reserved” as part of your signature.  He will give you a copy of the ticket, not the wet-ink original.  Return the copy to the Clerk indicated on the ticket within 3 days, and simply ask them to send you the original ticket— there must have been a mistake, because you were only given a copy and you can’t pay based on a copy.

The problem for them is that they have already cashed in the original wet-ink copy of the ticket and been paid.  Their additional effort to charge you a second time is just plain old double-dipping.  So do your public duty and help put an end to corruption of the police forces.

You can buy “forever” tags for your car.  These “Z tags” are a one time charge and they place your car in a private category amounting to a recording of foreign property.  This is not ideal, but it beats being harassed by ignorant hyped-up patrolmen.

Passports?  Same thing.  It doesn’t really matter what they say, it matters what you say and do.  Every Passport has a signature line confirming your identity, etc., so, again, write “Retired” and “by:” and add your disclaimers— without prejudice, all rights reserved, UCC 1-308 to your signature.  You aren’t a federal citizen and aren’t a federal employee. You are traveling under one of their passports because of their incompetence, so make it clear that you have “retired” from any such presumption  and let the public record you have established and the Treasury Department take over from there.

We have discovered that all court cases—- all court cases—– are decided based purely and simply on the public records.  Nothing else.  If you are a Municipal citizen operating under an account name like JOHN MICHAEL DOE, you are guilty by definition and all that goes on from there is a discussion about how much you owe and how long you will be in jail.

If you are a Territorial Citizen operating under the name of a Foreign Situs Trust, the situation is a little different, but not much. If you haven’t taken steps to correct the false public record, your name will show up in the same status as a Puerto Rican visiting America and you will still be under the federal classification, obligated to pay federal income taxes, presumed to be operating in commerce not trade, etc.

You have been “subjected” without your knowing consent and it is up to you to object to this and the enslavement and false presumptions that go with it.  You must place the corrected records and deeds and other information into the public record to rebut all these falsified claims.

This includes Steps 1, 2, and 3.

You also need to waive all “benefit” of limited liability provided by the governmental services corporation to its employees and either post a private registered indemnity bond with the Treasury Department or place your “vessels”—that is, all your names and accounts and deeds— under the protection of the indemnity bond established for the actual state where you were born:  AMRI00001  RA393427640US – Missouri for example.

When that happens, those responsible for operating this “System” against you don’t have the means to oppose you or claim any jurisdiction over you or your property.  You come “home” to the actual states of the Union and assume your lawful standing as an American state national—- and also inherit the responsibility of operating your own local and state government.

Work on Steps One, Two, and Three.  Read the information contained here until it begins to make sense and then read it again.  And again.  And again.  It will slowly begin to take shape in your mind and you will grasp the monstrous nature of the fraud that has been committed against you by people who were supposed to be here providing you and your states with “essential governmental services”.

Get yourselves free and then get to work restoring your fifty nation states, one county at a time.

See this article and over 600 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com


Democracy Is A Front For Central Bank Rule

06/19/2017

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/06/19/democracy-front-central-bank-rule/

Paul Craig Roberts

Several years ago when the Federal Reserve had its Fed funds rate at zero to 25 basis points (one-quarter of one percent—0.25%), there was a great deal of talk, somehow presented as urgent, whether the Federal Reserve would raise interest rates.

RT asked me if the Fed was going to raise interest rates. I answered that the purpose of low interest rates was to restore the solvency of the balance sheets of the “banks too big to fail” by raising debt prices. The lower the interest rate, the higher the prices of debt instruments. The Fed drives bond prices up by purchasing bonds, and the Fed raises interest rates by selling bonds, or by purchasing fewer of them than previously.

I told RT that a real increase in interest rates would undercut the Fed’s policy of rescuing the balance sheets of the big banks whose balance sheets were loaded up with bad debt that desperately needed a rise in debt prices for the banks to remain solvent.

When shortly thereafter the Fed raised the overnight funds rate, it blew my credibility with RT. RT did not understand that real interest rates had not increased. Indeed, two days after the “rate increase” the nominal interest rate had not changed. It was still 18 basis points. The announced rate had gone from the old range of zero to 25 basis points to a new range of 25 basis points to 50 basis points. The former max was the current minimum.

Moreover, over the long time period in which there was such well marketed concern over whether such an inconsequential interest rate rise would occur, inflation had risen, making the real interest rate negative well below the 18 basis points official interest rate. By the time the Fed raised the nominal rate, the real rate was already more negative. Thus, there was no rise in real interest rates.

The financial press did not explain this, either from incompetence or collusion. RT accepted the fake news as reality and wrote off my credibility. I am often interviewed by RT, but no longer on economic matters, about which I know the most.

A couple of days ago, after a long period of waiting for another interest rate rise, an announcement from the Fed, amidst further indication of US economic decline, announced another 25 basis point increase in the target range for the Fed funds rate.

Inflation aside, in fact interest rates declined, as my sometime co-author Dave Kranzler reports. http://investmentresearchdynamics.com/has-the-fed-actually-raised-rates-this-year/
Despite this publicized “rise” of the Fed funds rate, the 10-year interest rate on Treasuries “has declined 30 basis points this year. Thus for certain borrowers, the Fed has effectively lowered the cost of borowing.”

Kranzler goes on to point out that “the spread between the 30-day Treasury Bill and the 10-yr Treasury has declined this year from 193 basis points to 125 basis points – a 68 basis point drop in the cost of funding for borrowers who have access to the highly engineered derivative products that enable these borrowers to take advantage of the shape of the yield curve in order to lower their cost of borrowing.”

Kranzler provides a chart that shows that the spread between the 30-day Treasury bill and the 10-year Treasury bond is narrowing. As the short-term rate rises, the long term rate is falling, and the spread between the long and short rate has declined 68 basis points from almost two percentage points to one and one quarter percentage point.

Clearly, this is not a rise in interest rates.

Clearly also, a rise in the Fed funds rate no longer signals a rise in all interest rates.

Why is the Fed raising short rates when the long rates are falling?

Why do “democratic Western democracies” have central banks that do nothing except protect big banks at the expense of the people?

How long will the insouciant peoples of the West continue to conspire in their own demise?

Olddogs Comments!

Now, will someone please tell me; why are Americans so stupid they participate in their own demise? A Democracy does not empower the people to use their influence in government! A democracy is the government’s biggest tool to totally control the people. It is the corporate structure of the government that allows them to operate like a for profit company. And THAT! is why they are getting richer and we are getting poorer. All this, because the people are too stupid to govern themselves.


General Lee Speaks: Had it Figured Out

06/17/2017

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/06/fred-reed/general-lee-right/

 

By Fred Reed

“The consolidation of the states into one vast empire, is sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home and the certain precursor of ruin which has overwhelmed all that preceded it.” Robert E. Lee

The man was perceptive. Amalgamation of the states under a central government has led to exactly the effects foreseen by General Lee.

In, say, 1950, to an appreciable, though imperfect extent America resembled a confederacy. Different regions of the America had little contact with each other, and almost no influence over one another. The federal government was small and remote. Interstates did not exist, nor of course the internet, nor even direct long-distance telephone dialing. West Virginia, Alabama, Massachusetts, New York City, Texas, and California had little in common, but a little conflict arose since for practical purposes they were almost different countries. They chiefly governed themselves. The proportion of federal to state law was small.

It is important to note that regional differences were great. In 1964 in rural Virginia, the boys brought shotguns to school during deer season. Nobody shot anybody because it wasn’t in the culture. The culture was uniform, so no one was upset. It is when cultures are mixed, or one rules another, that antagonism comes.  Such shotgun freedom would not have worked in New York City with its variegated and often mutually hostile ethnicities.

Regions differed importantly in the degree of freedom, not just in the freedom of local populations to govern themselves but also in individual freedom. It made a large difference in the tenor of life. If in Texas, rural Virginia, or West Virginia you wanted to build an addition to your house, you did. You didn’t need licenses, permits, inspections, union-certified electricians. Speed limits? Largely ignored. Federal requirements for Coast Guard-approved flotation devices on your canoe? What the hell kind of crazy idea was that?

Democracy works better the smaller the group practicing it. In a town, people can actually understand the questions of the day. They know what matters to them. Do we build a new school, or expand the existing one? Do we want our children to recite the pledge of allegiance, or don’t we? Re-enact the Battle of Antietam? Sing Christmas carols in the town square? We can decide these things. Leave us alone.

States similarly knew what their people wanted and, within the limits of human frailty, governed accordingly. Then came the vast empire, the phenomenal increase in the power and reach of the federal government, which really means the Northeast Corridor. The Supreme Court expanded and expanded and expanded the authority of Washington, New York’s storefront operation. The Federals now decided what could be taught in the schools, what religious practices could be permitted, what standards employers could use in hiring, who they had to hire. The media coalesced into a small number of corporations, controlled from New York but with national reach. More recently we have added surveillance of everything by Washington’s intelligence agencies.

Tyranny at home said General Lee. Just so. This could happen only with the consolidation of the states into one vast empire.

Tyranny comes easily when those seeking it need only corrupt a single Congress, appoint a single Supreme Court, or control the departments of one executive branch. In a confederation of largely self-governing states, those hungry to domineer would have to suborn fifty congresses. It could not be done. State governments are accessible to the governed. They can be ejected. They are much more likely to be sympathetic to the desires of their constituents since they are of the same culture.

Aggressive abroad, said General Lee. Is this not exactly what we see? At this moment Washington has the better part of a thousand military bases around the world, unnecessary except for the maintenance of empire. America exists in a state of constant war, bombing Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Somalia, recently having destroyed Iraq and Libya. Washington threatens Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China. Its military moves deeper into Africa. Washington sanctions Cuba, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, to no effect. It constantly tries to dominate other nations, for example adding to NATO.

None of these wars and little if any of the imperial aggression interests more than a tiny fraction of the country’s people. To whom can the war against Afghanistan matter? Libya? Few people have heard of Montenegro. Does its membership in NATO or lack of it affect Idaho?

In a confederacy, states would have to approve a war. Few would unless the United States itself were threatened. They might well refuse to pay for wars, not for their benefit or to allow their sons, daughters, and trans-genders to be conscripted.

But with a central government, those benefiting from war can concentrate money and influence only on that government. For example, military industry, Israel, big oil, Wall Street. Wars might carry the votes of states with arms factories. Other states would decline.

.In principle, the Constitution should have prevented the hijacking of the military that we now suffer. As we all should know, and some do, America cannot under the Constitution go to war without a declaration by Congress, the last one of which occurred in 1941. But a single central government can be corrupted more easily than fifty state governments. A few billionaires, well-funded lobbies, and the remoteness of Washington from the common consciousness make controlling the legislature as easy as buying a pair of shoes.

And thus, just as Marse Bob expected, the Federals are out of control and make war without the least reference to the nation. If America attacks North Korea, or Russia, or China, we will read of it the day after. The central government and only the central government decides. A few days ago I read that the Pentagon contemplates sending thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan. This combines tyranny at home and aggression abroad. Who wants to send them? A few neocons in New York, the arms industry, a few generals, and several senators. It could not happen in a confederacy.

Will this, as General Lee predicted, prove “the certain precursor of ruin which has overwhelmed all that preceded it.”? Wait.

The Best of Fred Reed


The Economic Collapse

06/16/2017

Not even during the worst parts of the last recession did things ever get this bad for the U.S. retail industry. As you will see in this article, more than 300 retailers have already filed for bankruptcy in 2017, and it is being projected that a staggering 8,640 stores will close in America by the end of this calendar year. That would shatter the old record by more than 20 percent. Sadly, our ongoing retail apocalypse appears to only be in the early chapters. One report recently estimated that up to 25 percent of all shopping malls in the country could shut down by 2022 due to the current woes of the retail industry. And if the new financial crisis that is already hitting Europe starts spreading over here, the numbers that I just shared with you could ultimately turn out to be a whole lot worse.

I knew that a lot of retailers were filing for bankruptcy, but I had no idea that the grand total for this year was already in the hundreds. According to CNN, the number of retail bankruptcies is now up 31 percent compared to the same time period last year…

Bankruptcies continue to pile up in the retail industry.

More than 300 retailers have filed for bankruptcy so far this year, according to data from BankruptcyData.com. That’s up 31% from the same time last year. Most of those filings were for small companies — the proverbial Mom & Pop store with a single location. But there are also plenty of household names on the list.

Yes, the growth of online retailers such as Amazon is fueling some of this, but the Internet has been around for several decades now.

So why are retail store closings and retail bankruptcies surging so dramatically all of a sudden?
Just a few days ago, another major victim of the retail apocalypse made headlines all over the nation when it filed for bankruptcy. At one time Gymboree was absolutely thriving, but now it is in a desperate fight to survive…

Children’s clothing chain Gymboree has filed for bankruptcy protection, aiming to slash its debts and close hundreds of stores amid crushing pressure on retailers.

Gymboree said it plans to remain in business but will close 375 to 450 of its 1,281 stores in filing for a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. Gymboree employs more than 11,000 people, including 10,500 hourly workers.
And in recent weeks other major retailers that were once very prosperous have also been forced to close stores and lay off staff…

This hemorrhaging of retail jobs comes on the heels of last week’s mass layoffs at Hudson Bay Company, where employees from Saks Fifth Avenue and Lord & Taylor were among the 2,000 people laid off. The news of HBC layoffs came on the same day that Ascena, the parent company of brands like Ann Taylor, Lane Bryant, and Dress Barn, told investors it will be closing up to 650 stores (although it did not specify which brands will be affected just yet). Only two weeks ago, affordable luxury brand Michael Kors announced it too would close 125 stores to combat brand overexposure and plummeting sales.
In a lot of ways this reminds me of 2007. The stock market was still performing very well, but the real economy was starting to come apart at the seams.

And without a doubt, the real economy is really hurting right now. According to Business Insider, Moody’s is warning that 22 more major retailers may be forced to declare bankruptcy in the very near future…

Twenty-two retailers in Moody’s portfolio are in serious financial trouble that could lead to bankruptcy, according to a Moody’s note published on Wednesday. That’s 16% of the 148 companies in the financial firm’s retail group — eclipsing the level of seriously distressed retail companies that Moody’s reported during the Great Recession.
You can find the full list right here. If this many major retailers are “distressed” now, what are things going to look like once the financial markets start crashing?

As thousands of stores close down all across the United States, this is going to put an incredible amount of stress on shopping mall owners. In order to meet their financial obligations, those mall owners need tenants, but now the number of potential tenants is shrinking rapidly.

I have talked about dead malls before, but apparently what we have seen so far is nothing compared to what is coming. The following comes from CNN…

Store closings and even dead malls are nothing new, but things might be about to get a whole lot worse.

Between 20% and 25% of American malls will close within five years, according to a new report out this week from Credit Suisse. That kind of plunge would be unprecedented in the nation’s history.

I can’t even imagine what this country is going to look like if a quarter of our shopping malls shut down within the next five years. Already, there are some parts of the U.S. that look like a third world nation.

And what is this going to do to employment? Today, the retail industry employs millions upon millions of Americans, and those jobs could start disappearing very rapidly…

The retail sales associate is one of the most popular jobs in the country, with roughly 4.5 million Americans filling the occupation. In May, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics released data that found that 7.5 million retail jobs might be replaced by technology. The World Economic Forum predicts 30 to 50 percent of retail jobs will be gone once struggling companies like Gymboree fully hop on the digital train. MarketWatch found that over the last year, the department store space bled 29,900 jobs, while general merchandising stores cut 15,700 positions. At this rate, one Florida columnist put it soberingly, “Half of all US retail jobs could vanish. Just as ATMs replaced many bank tellers, automated check-out stations are supplanting retail clerks.”
At this moment, the number of working age Americans that do not have a job is hovering near a record high. So being able to at least get a job in the retail industry has been a real lifeline for many Americans, and now that lifeline may be in grave danger.

For those running our big corporations, losing these kinds of jobs is not a big deal. In fact, many corporate executives would be quite happy to replace all of their U.S. employees with technology or with foreign workers.

But if the middle class is going to survive, we need an economy that produces good paying jobs. Unfortunately, even poor paying retail jobs are starting to disappear now, and the future of the middle class is looking bleaker than it ever has before.


The “UN” Swamp Draining, and Today’s Situation Report

06/15/2017

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/06/the-un-swamp-draining-and-todays.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN is not the United Nations, in the same way that the UNITED STATES is not the United States.

By the fall of 1943 the Vichy French government knew the jig was up.  Herr Hitler’s plan to borrow all he could from the Jews of Europe and then murder his priority creditors wasn’t working out so well.  So the Vichy began quietly moving their own ill-gotten gains to Switzerland and not a small number of the vermin paid off Swiss officials to become Swiss citizens.  Some of these characters and their friends even took over de facto ownership of certain Swiss banks where they deposited the wealth they pillaged from their neighbors and from the dead.

Against this general backdrop two corporations were formed in France, one was called the UN Corporation, and the other was the IMF. Both the UN Corp and the IMF were spooled up by the same group of Rothschild-Rockefeller-Railroad Baron and Big Oil interests.  This version of “UN” was and is a privately held commercial corporation created some years before the actual United Nations charter was signed.

This then allows the same kinds of deceptively similar names deceits and frauds that arise when we mistake the UNITED STATES for the United States; by that point in history, this misuse of similar names to promote constructive fraud schemes had become completely routine.  Rumor has it that Dag Hammarskjold, the second Secretary-General of the United Nations, decried this cozy deceit and was going to expose it for what it was, but was killed before he could do so.

Thus, when the news media today is talking about “UN Peacekeeping Forces” you never know– except by context– whether they  are talking about commercial mercenaries hired by the UN Corp to protect its business interests or if you are talking about combined actual military forces contributed by member governments of the United Nations.  Both are called “UN Peacekeeping Forces” though obviously the nature, intent, standards, motivations, and behavior of the two so-called “Peacekeeping Forces” are dramatically different and often at odds.

One final fact needs to be added to the mix before we can wrap up the explanation you want.  There are in this world approximately a hundred stunningly large Historic Trusts.  Many of these Historic Trusts stem from the days of the Spanish Conquistadors, when vast fortunes were made and for the most part, kept, in family trusts.  These so-called Spanish Trusts have moved with their owners all over the world, so that there are heirs of Spanish gold in China, the Philippines, Indonesia, the Middle East, Turkey, England, the United States and Canada that I know of.  Other Historic Trusts started out as Royal Grants of land or gold or as similar Public Grants.  The SwissIndo Trust is only one of these many huge Historic Trusts.

So, what you are referencing as “UN-SWISSINDO” is a Joint Venture between the privately owned Vichy French Commercial Corporation calling itself the “UN Corporation” and the SWISSINDO Corporation spun off the Historic Trust of the same name.  As such UN-SWISSINDO is a commercial mercenary organization wedded to a corporation funded by a Historic Trust, both of which are basically under the control of FRANCE and the Bank of France, that is, Jacob Rothschild, and his Vichy French turned Swiss friends, and the same group of bloodline families that sponsored the IMF.  The “UN-SWISSINDO Initiative” is also being supported behind the scenes by the British Crown Corporation.

Same old crap, different day.  The UN “Peacekeeping” Mercenaries are being paid by the SWISSINDO Historic Trust and together they promote the Nazified vision of the New World Order which is also largely supported by the Roman Catholic Church under the domination of the Jesuit Order founded by yet another Spanish Soldier and Heir of the Spanish Conquest, Ignatius Loyola, whose mad dream was create a worldwide Christian government by force of arms.

So when you read that the Canadians have taken over the Vatican Bank and are cleaning it up, interpret that as: British Crown affiliates working in tandem with the Roman Catholic Church, the Vichy French UN Corporation and Swissindo Trust, and Jacob Rothschild’s Bank of France interests, are helping Mom do the laundry. Or, put another way, the foxes are cleaning the hen house and building new nesting boxes for the hens.

Isn’t that heart-warming?   They are all gathered round to bankrupt “Mom” — the Vatican — and Cousin Beth (Puerto Rico), too, to save their assets unscathed in the coming economic blood bath, and they are using old Nazi plunder to pay their private army as muscle to open up the USB Swiss Bank and plunder it of the SwissIndo Trust assets and at the same time are keeping the other Historic Trust deposits held hostage in the banks they directly control so that other Historic Trusts can’t compete or do anything with their assets unless they all fund a private mercenary army themselves and start World War III against the fake “UN” and its “Peacekeeping Forces”.

La, la, la, how the world does spin.  Compare this seamy underbelly with the public image of New Age light, love, and power to the people coming to save them from oppression and I think you can see why I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Privately, I call this development “Neu Republique 2.0”.   We started out with “Neu Republique 1.0” with the French Rothschild interests paying the ticket for General Dunford et alia and sponsoring the “New Republic” as Successor to Contract replacing the bankrupt UNITED STATES, INC.   We said, thanks, but no thanks; we accept a month by month quid pro quo to pay for services rendered, nothing more. So now they have turned around and upped the ante, brought more of the old bloodline families and industrial upstarts together to front “Neu Republique 2.0” — with all the rotten European interests represented and using the SwissIndo Historic Trust to fund their rampages.

We say, “Thanks, but no thanks.” to this development, too.  We don’t want to cheat anyone.  We agree to pay for services rendered month to month, but no assumption of contract and only conditional acceptance of the New Republic 2.0.

And where is Donald Trump?  He thumbed his nose at Rothschild’s offer of the first New Republic sales pitch, but then, turned right around and fell for New Republic 2.0.   This is not unlike a man divorcing his wife, and then getting back into bed with her and her three ugly step-sisters, too.  Why would he do such a thing?  Maybe they sweetened the pot.  Maybe he doesn’t know much world history.  Maybe his advisors suck wind.  What The Donald needs to do, if he wants to be free and if he wants America to be Great Again, is to talk to the other Historic Trusts and order the Department of Defense to open their accounts so that there is détente and a counter-balance and more funding sources to choose from.

I have heard the “five million dollars to everyone and a lifetime stipend” being promoted by UN-SWISSINDO, but don’t believe for a moment that this offer is coming without awful strings attached.  I haven’t seen any contracts– also known as “applications” and “enrollment forms”, etc.,— so far, so I don’t know the particulars of the deception, but I can guarantee you that some kind of gross deception and false counterclaim will be involved, of the sort that whoever signs on the dotted line loses everything including their soul.  Just like the Mothers of newborns have been coerced and their children have been “enrolled” as wards of the state without anyone providing full disclosure, you can bet that UN-SWISSINDO’s offer and your receipt of it, will result in you and your property being owned by unsavory interests.

All the while, these shameless frauds will be singing “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and accusing everyone and everything else of doing what they are doing themselves, either because they really do suspect everyone else of thinking and doing the same things they do, or because they hope to keep scrutiny focused on anything and anyone other than on who they actually are and what they are actually doing.  They will continue to encourage, exploit, and promote the confusion of the “UN” corporation with the United Nations organization.  They will continue to misrepresent who and what they are.  They will continue to try to two-block efforts of the other Historic Trusts to bring their assets to bear on the world’s problems.  They will continue to try to cast themselves as angels of light.

As Will Rogers said, “It’s hard to cheat an honest man.”  — but even honest men need to keep grounded and focused and be suspicious that something shady is going on when somebody offers to hand out five million dollars and a lifetime living stipend for free— especially when the persons making the offer have a bad history and have made deliberate efforts to obscure who and what they are.

As for your last question — how can the government still be operating if it is being liquidated — the answer is simple.  They just booted up new corporations, gave them new deceptively similar names, and skated right on with an empty balance sheet and “YOUR NAME” and estate left holding the bag for it all.

Someone should ask Mr. Trump what he thinks he is doing and why he is allowing all this to go on, when he has all the other Historic Trusts supporting his efforts?  Why get into bed with Rothschild, Rockefeller and the whole Vichy Company again?

This is even more senseless when you realize that we already have the assets to pay for our own expenses and the expenses of the federal government, too. It’s high time for Mr. Trump to put DOD to good use and open up our accounts.  What excuse can there be, for not letting the American people have access to their own Historic Trust accounts?  Hmm?  Are all 390 million of us supposed to be “terrorists”?   Are Donald Trump’s actual employers– the people who ultimately pay his salary — his “enemies”?  And by what logic is our money being “blocked” by the U.S. Treasury/IMF and the American people are instead being kept purposefully poor and desperate and fed offers from “UN-SWISSINDO”?

No doubt it has a lot to do with the fact that the IMF has been functioning as the U.S. Treasury for many years now and both the “IMF” and the “UN” were spun off by the same bad actors.  Their object is to feed upon us under the guise of serving us. Donald Trump is following a long string of “US Presidents” by sitting on his hands and doing nothing about it.

Someone should ask Mr. Putin— who has been around the barn longer and accordingly knows more than Mr. Trump — why he hasn’t tired of this game and put an end to these banker “wars” when his own country has been hurt by them, and everyone can see that just a handful of evil old men have caused and are continuing to cause the unnecessary suffering of millions?   The whole world is like it is constipated and can’t manage to dump the load.

Same thing for the Chinese government.  You want to deal in gold and silver?  Why aren’t you expediting that process for us via an honest means, instead of standing by and letting these same old parasites have their way?  Certainly, the Chinese know that the Americans have always traded in silver?  Surely, they know that our national trust does not belong to the Territorial or Municipal United States?  We have opened an International Trade Bank allowing free trade between the United States of America and the rest of the world.  Why aren’t the Chinese beating a path to our door, complaining about the US Trade Deficit, swapping U.S. Treasury Bonds for asset-backed bonds—- and demanding that we have full access to our Historic Trusts?

Again, it’s still just the same old group of the same old nasty men playing the same old nasty games.  Nothing new.

They have been caught red-handed in bankruptcy and probate fraud, trying to steal your assets, so now they are going to keep you poor—keep you from accessing your own Historic Trusts, your lawful inheritance— and offer you fairytales and “money of account” instead, and then claim that they gave you “equitable consideration” for everything you are and all that you naturally own, when in fact five million and a lifetime stipend is nothing compared to what they are trying to take from you.

So, now, I will a few question back to you—- how long before people wake up?   How much longer before the American people stand up and get moving instead of waiting for someone or something else to come save them?  How long before they speak with one voice and say “Enough!”  to all this international piracy and coercion on our shores?  How long before we all put enough pressure on the members of Congress to crack them open like so many Brazil Nuts and force them to do what is right by the American people they are supposed to be serving in Good Faith?  How long before our own trust accounts get opened up?  How long before we come by the millions to throw the so-called “UN” and everything and everyone associated with it back into the sea where it belongs?

How long before somebody, somewhere, wises up enough to recognize the alligators even when they wear cute costumes and whisper sweet nothings?

The whole purpose in draining the swamp is getting rid of the snakes and crocodiles.  The “UN” in any guise is a snake operation and the DOD is not doing its job to protect our ESTATES and the Treasury is balking from what it needs to do— which is to stop babbling about “terrorists” like a confused old ninny and unblock our Historic Trust accounts so that we can pay our own bills — at home and worldwide — with no help from the “UN” nor “SWISSINDO” nor the “IMF” nor the Neu Republique in any form whatsoever.

The Marshal Plan is done and over.  No more excuses for picking our pockets or keeping the American people in a state of perpetual “war” and charging us “Victory Taxes” 72 years after the war ended and continuing to hold title to our land as any “Victory” program, either.  Time for the Europeans to get to off our soil, off our backs, thank us for rebuilding their entire universe, and get smart enough to drain their own swamp.

 

And that is what I have to say about the “UN” and “UN-SWISSINDO” and the current situation.  The only message that Pope Francis and Donald Trump and the “DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE” need to hear and hear it loud and clear is— get off the pot and open up our Historic Trust Accounts.  I have nine of them and together they make “SWISSINDO” look like a small hill of beans.  It’s past time to get beyond this, stop the fraud, and move on.

See this article and over 600 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com/


Lynching Free Speech: The Intolerant State of America

06/14/2017

http://mailchi.mp/rutherford/commentary-lynching-free-speech-the-intolerant-state-of-america?e=84f74f6a6a

By John W. Whitehead

June 13, 2017

“What are the defenders of free speech to do? The sad fact is that this fundamental freedom is on its heels across America. Politicians of both parties want to use the power of government to silence their foes. Some in the university community seek to drive it from their campuses. And an entire generation of Americans is being taught that free speech should be curtailed as soon as it makes someone else feel uncomfortable. On the current trajectory, our nation’s dynamic marketplace of ideas will soon be replaced by either disengaged intellectual silos or even a stagnant ideological conformity. Few things would be so disastrous for our nation and the well-being of our citizenry.”—William Ruger, “Free Speech Is Central to Our Dignity as Humans”

My hometown of Charlottesville, Va., has become the latest poster child in a heated war of words—and actions—over racism, “sanitizing history,” extremism (both right and left), political correctness, hate speech, partisan politics, and a growing fear that violent words will end in violent actions.

In Charlottesville, as in so many parts of the country right now, the conflict is over how to reconcile the nation’s checkered past, particularly as it relates to slavery, with the present need to sanitize the environment of anything—words and images—that might cause offense, especially if it’s a Confederate flag or monument.

In Charlottesville, that fear of offense prompted the City Council to get rid of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee that has graced one of its public parks for 82 years. In doing so, they have attracted the unwanted attention of the Ku Klux Klan.

Yale University actually went so far as to change the name of one of its residential colleges, which was named after John C. Calhoun, the nation’s seventh vice president, a secretary of state, secretary of war, senator and Yale alum who supported slavery.

New Orleans ran up a $2 million tab in its efforts to remove its four Confederate monuments, with the majority of the funds being used for security to police the ensuing protests and demonstrations.

With more than 1,000 Confederate monuments in 31 states (in public parks, courthouse squares and state capitols), not to mention Confederate battle flags on display in military cemeteries, and countless more buildings and parks named after historic figures who were slaveholders, this isn’t an issue that is going away anytime soon, no matter how much we ignore it, shout over it, criminalize it, legislate it, adjudicate or police it.

The temperature is rising all across the nation, and not just over this Confederate issue.

The “winter of our discontent” has given way to an overheated, sweltering summer in which shouting matches are skating dangerously close to becoming physical altercations.

As journalist Dahlia Lithwick writes for Slate, “These days, people who used to feel free to shout and threaten are emboldened to punch, body-slam, and stab. It is a short hop, we are learning, from ‘words can never hurt us’ to actual sticks and stones and the attendant breaking of bones. That is what has become of free speech in this country.”

Here’s the thing: if Americans don’t learn how to get along—at the very least, agreeing to disagree and respecting each other’s right to subscribe to beliefs and opinions that may be offensive, hateful, intolerant or merely different—then we’re going to soon find that we have no rights whatsoever (to speak, assemble, agree, disagree, protest, opt in, opt out, or forge our own paths as individuals).

The government will lock down the nation at the slightest provocation.

It is ready, willing and able to impose martial law within 24 hours.

Indeed, the government has been anticipating and preparing for civil unrest for years now, as evidenced by the build-up of guns and tanks and militarized police and military training drills and threat assessments and extremism reports and surveillance systems and private prisons.

Connect the dots, people!

The government doesn’t care about who you voted for in the presidential election or whether you think the Civil War was fought over states’ rights versus slavery. It doesn’t care about your race or gender or religion or sexual orientation.

When the police state cracks down, it will not discriminate.

We’ll all be muzzled together.

We’ll all be jailed together.

We’ll all be viewed as a collective enemy to be catalogued, conquered and caged.

Thus, the last thing we need to do is play into the government’s hands by turning on one another, turning in one another, and giving the government’s standing army an excuse to take over.

The police state could not ask for a better citizenry than one that carries out its own censorship, spying and policing.

This is how you turn a nation of free people into extensions of the omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent police state, and in the process turn a citizenry against each other. It’s a brilliant ploy, with the added bonus that while the citizenry remains focused on and distrustful of each other, they’re incapable of presenting a united front against the threats posed by the government and its cabal of Constitution-destroying agencies and corporate partners.

Unfortunately, we have already become a nation of snowflakes, snitches and book burners: a legalistic, intolerant, elitist, squealing bystander nation eager to report fellow citizens to the police for the slightest offense.

Mind you, once the police are called in, with their ramped-up protocols, battlefield mindset, militarized weapons, uniforms and equipment, and war zone tactics, it’s a process that is near impossible to turn back and one that too often ends in tragedy for all those involved.

So how do we stop this train from barreling down the tracks past the police state and straight into martial law?

Let’s start with a little more patience, a lot more tolerance and a civics lesson on the First Amendment.

As my good friend Nat Hentoff, that inveterate champion of the First Amendment, once observed, “The quintessential difference between a free nation, as we profess to be, and a totalitarian state, is that here everyone, including a foe of democracy, has the right to speak his mind.”

What this means is opening the door to more speech not less, even if that speech is offensive to some.

Understanding that freedom for those in the unpopular minority constitutes the ultimate tolerance in a free society, James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, fought for a First Amendment that protected the “minority” against the majority, ensuring that even in the face of overwhelming pressure, a minority of one—even one who espouses distasteful viewpoints—would still have the right to speak freely, pray freely, assemble freely, challenge the government freely, and broadcast his views in the press freely.

We haven’t done ourselves—or the nation—any favors by becoming so fearfully polite, careful to avoid offense, and largely unwilling to be labeled intolerant, hateful or closed-minded that we’ve eliminated words, phrases and symbols from public discourse.

The result is a nation where no one really says what they really think anymore, at least if it runs counter to the prevailing views. Intolerance is the new scarlet letter of our day, a badge to be worn in shame and humiliation, deserving of society’s fear, loathing and utter banishment from society.

For those who dare to voice an opinion that runs counter to the accepted norms, retribution is swift: they are shamed, shouted down, silenced, censored, fired, cast out and generally relegated to the dust heap of ignorant, mean-spirited bullies who are guilty of various “word crimes.”

We have entered a new age where, as commentator Mark Steyn notes, “we have to tiptoe around on ever thinner eggshells” and “the forces of ‘tolerance’ are intolerant of anything less than full-blown celebratory approval.”

In such a climate of intolerance, there can be no freedom speech, expression or thought.

We have become a nation of snowflakes.

We have allowed our fears—fear for our safety, fear of each other, fear of being labeled racist or hateful or prejudiced, etc.—to trump our freedom of speech and muzzle us far more effectively than any government edict could. Ultimately the war on free speech—and that’s exactly what it is: a war being waged by Americans against other Americans—is a war that is driven by fear.

By bottling up dissent, we have created a pressure cooker of stifled misery and discontent that is now bubbling over and fomenting even more hate, distrust and paranoia among portions of the populace.

The First Amendment is a steam valve. It allows people to speak their minds, air their grievances and contribute to a larger dialogue that hopefully results in a more just world.

When there is no steam valve to release the pressure, frustration builds, anger grows and people become more volatile and desperate to force a conversation.

The problem as I see it is that we’ve allowed ourselves to be persuaded that we need someone else to think and speak for us. The result is a society in which we’ve stopped debating among ourselves, stopped thinking for ourselves, and stopped believing that we can fix our own problems and resolve our own differences.

Not only has free speech become a “politically incorrect” four-letter word—profane, obscene, uncouth, not to be uttered in so-called public places—but in more and more cases, the government deems free speech to be downright dangerous and in some instances illegal.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the U.S. government has become particularly intolerant of speech that challenges the government’s power, reveals the government’s corruption, exposes the government’s lies, and encourages the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices. Indeed, there is a long and growing list of the kinds of speech that the government considers dangerous enough to red flag and subject to censorship, surveillance, investigation and prosecution: hate speech, bullying speech, intolerant speech, conspiratorial speech, treasonous speech, threatening speech, incendiary speech, inflammatory speech, radical speech, anti-government speech, right-wing speech, extremist speech, etc.

The powers-that-be understand that if the government can control speech, it controls thought and, in turn, it can control the minds of the citizenry. In fact, some of this past century’s greatest dystopian authors warned of this very danger.

In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, reading is banned and books are burned in order to suppress dissenting ideas, while televised entertainment is used to anesthetize the populace and render them easily pacified, distracted and controlled.

In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, serious literature, scientific thinking and experimentation are banned as subversive, while critical thinking is discouraged through the use of conditioning, social taboos and inferior education. Likewise, expressions of individuality, independence and morality are viewed as vulgar and abnormal.

In George Orwell’s 1984, Big Brother does away with all undesirable and unnecessary words and meanings, even going so far as to routinely rewrite history and punish “thoughtcrimes.”

And in almost every episode of Twilight Zone, Rod Serling urged viewers to unlock their minds and free themselves of prejudice, hate, violence and fear. “We’re developing a new citizenry,” Serling declared. “One that will be very selective about cereals and automobiles, but won’t be able to think.”

It’s time to start thinking for ourselves again.

It’s time to start talking to each other. It’s time to start listening more and shouting less.

Most of all, it’s time to start acting like people who will choose dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.

As Dahlia Lithwick concluded for Slate:

To guarantee an escape from conflict, from violence, requires censorship. To have free speech in this moment, when the stakes are so high, is to live with fear. This is not an easy thing to confront—or to accept… Conversation might still be our best chance of getting out of this mess. Free speech is just free speech. It takes actual humans making the effort to talk to each other to transform speech into something more vital and more valuable. Conversations don’t always work. They may sometimes go wrong—horribly, terribly wrong… The First Amendment will never be able to protect us from horrible words and horrific acts. It does guarantee that we’ll keep talking.

This commentary is also available at http://www.rutherford.org.

ABOUT JOHN WHITEHEAD

Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at http://www.amazon.com. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org. Click here to read more of John Whitehead’s commentaries.

PUBLICATION GUIDELINES AND REPRINT PERMISSION

John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact staff@rutherford.org to obtain reprint permission. Click here to download a print quality image of John W. Whitehead.


Dear Leftist, Good-for-Nothing, so called journalists in “our” media:

06/13/2017
  1. You said nothing when Obama used drone strikes to execute people abroad.
  2. You said nothing about Russia for 50 years until Trump was inaugurated.
  3. You said nothing about Hillary’s campaign manager’s brother being paid $175,000 to lift U.S. sanctions on Russia.
  4. You said nothing when Obama engaged in military interventionism in Libyawithout Congressional approval.
  5. You said nothing when Obama greatly expanded presidential power through the use of Executive Orders.
  6. You said nothing when Obama filled his White House with lobbyists after he said he wouldn’t.
  7. You said nothing when Obama gave 47 of his fund raisers’ Administration jobs.
  8. You said nothing about the murders and rapes at the hands of illegal immigrants.
  9. You said nothing when Hillary’s net worth rose over $100 million as Secretary of State, in part, because her husband took money from foreign governments.
  10. You said nothing after Obama’s net worth rose over $10 million as President.
  11. You said nothing when Obama’s Justice Dept. wiretapped/surveilled reporters such as James Rosen and the AP.
  12. You said nothing when Obama restricted immigration 6 times with Executive Orders.
  13. You said nothing when Obama set a record for deportations.
  14. You said nothing when Bill Clinton met Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac during the Clinton investigation.
  15. You said nothing when Hillary was fed debate questions.
  16. You said nothing when Obama and Hillary lied about a video and Benghazi
  17. You said nothing when Obama’s IRS abused the rights of taxpayers.
  18. You said nothing when Obama’s White House held meetings with lobbyists in coffee shops near White House to avoid disclosure requirements.
  19. You said nothing when Eric Holder sold the guns you hate to criminals and some were used to kill Americans.
  20. You said nothing when the Clinton’s took White House property.
  21. You said nothing when Hillary laughed off defending a child-rapist.
  22. You said nothing when Hillary lied about her private use of a private email server as Secretary of State.
  23. You said nothing when Janet Reno, under Bill Clinton, used a tank to kill the Branch Dividians.
  24. You said nothing when, on May 13, 1985, a bomb was dropped on a row house in Philadelphia to uproot the black liberation group known as Move, resulting in a fire that eventually burned down 61 houses, killed 11 people (including five children) and injured dozens.
  25. You said nothing when Elian Gonzales was forcibly deported using guns.
  26. You said nothing when George Soros paid protesters to burn parts of Ferguson.
  27. You said nothing about states’ rights until Trump’s Executive orders on immigration.
  28. You said nothing about Obama’s smoking.
  29. You said nothing about the record numbers of people on government assistance.
  30. You said nothing about the number of part time and low paying jobs under the Obama recovery.
  31. You said nothing when Obama had SWAT teams raid a Gibson guitar factory and seize property, on the purported basis that Gibson had broken India’s environmental laws-but no charges were filed.
  32. You said nothing when Obama claimed that the Fort Hood shooting was “workplace violence” rather than terrorism.
  33. You said nothing when Obama ended some terror asylum restrictions, by allowing asylum for people who provided only “insignificant” or “limited” material support of terrorists.
  34. You said nothing when the national debt doubled under Obama.
  35. You said nothing when 9 times the Supreme Court unanimously overturned Obama’s expansive use of Executive Power.
  36. You said nothing when Obama dismissed charges filed by the Bush Administration against New Black Panther Party members who were videotaped intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling station during the 2008 election.
  37. You said nothing when Obama released Guantanamo detainees who then went back to kill Americans.
  38. You said nothing when Obama unilaterally changed Congressional law by Executive Order.
  39. You said nothing when Obama fired an inspector general after investigating an $850,000 AmeriCorp’s grant received by a nonprofit run by former NBA star and Obama supporter Kevin Johnson.
  40. You said nothing about the 36 Obama’s executive office staffers that owed $833,970 in back taxes
  41. You said nothing when Obama Killed four Americans overseas in counter-terrorism operations without a judicial process.

So NOW, you are voicing your objections about three months of Trump, I’m sorry… we can’t hear you because you said NOTHING before!!! This was copied and shared . . . keep it going, not mine but I agree.

Olddogs Comments!

Don’t misunderstand because I have no use for anyone in this illegal government and if there are any who do not know they are crooks it can only be because they are too stupid to be in any kind of government. Demorats and republrats are all the same to me, but because there are so many of you still stuck in this charade, have a good laugh.

By the way, this is our real flag of peace.