It is apparent from reading your open letter to our military personnel that you are acting under some common misconceptions.
The word “citizen” has a legal definition and you need to take note of it. Citizens of all kinds are obligated to serve the government. While employed in military service, all personnel function as “citizens of the United States” and are de facto slaves under the municipal law of the foreign, independent international city state of Washington, DC which is run as a plenary oligarchy of the members of the United States Congress.
However, that same “Congress” is under contract and obligation to our states occupying the land jurisdiction of this country and by subrogation to us— and so are you.
Federal civilian employees and federal dependents also function as citizens— “United States Citizens”.
Such citizens are all British Subjects and part of the democracy adopted by the United States of America (Minor)—- a “union” of “American states” comprised of the “State of New Columbia” and the so-called Insular States, including Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the “State of State” franchises, sometimes called “inchoate states”, such as the “State of Florida”.
These are all purely secondary adjuncts to the actual, factual, physical organic states and living people and their states of the union operating as, for example, the “Florida State”. You are now talking to your actual employers, the “people of the United States”, not the “People of the United States of America”.
All “citizens” of the “inchoate states and territories” are obligated to serve the government and obey all its codes—including military codes, statutes —which are supposed to be applied only to entities created by statute—and administrative regulations promulgated “as” law by administrative agencies.
Please note that all the above applies only to “citizens” and none of it applies to the American states occupying the land jurisdiction of this country and the living, breathing people occupying the land jurisdiction who are known as American State Nationals: Ohioans, Virginians, Wisconsinites, and so on.
Just as the citizens exist to serve the government, the government exists to serve the organic American states and the people who live in these organic states of the Union — the American State Nationals who by their labor and the expenditure of their natural resources are your actual employers and benefactors.
The “civilian government” you invoke as the leadership that you and other military personnel are obligated to follow and obey is in fact composed of citizens, like yourselves, not American State Nationals, the actual people you (and they) are under obligation to serve and protect.
Our contract is called The Constitution for the united States of America, not The Constitution of the United States of America.
The word “of” means “without” or “outside of” or “of” in the sense of possession, as in “Anne of Green Gables”.
The Constitution of the United States of America translates as “The Constitution Without the United States of America”—–and it governs only the United States of America (Minor) — the Insular States and Territories and States of States which are franchises of the federal corporation and their citizenry all of whom are British Subjects or foreign Municipal Subjects—- not the actual, factual states of the Union and not the actual “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States” defined in The Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783.
You are being deluded, Sir, regarding who you actually work for and what your actual job duties are.
As “citizens of the United States” or “United States Citizens” you may vote in your own private foreign government’s elections and you may for the purposes of those governmental functions administer things however you and the President and the members of Congress please, but with respect to our nation composed of fifty republican states of the Union, you are under obligation to perform nineteen enumerated services, one of which is to defend our states from “enemies both foreign and domestic”.
That word “domestic” in your Oath refers to those fellow-civilians of yours who are citizens of the United States of America (Minor) and the Municipality of Washington, DC.
In other words, Sir, you are under obligation to protect us, the American states on the land and the American State Nationals living here—the ones who actually pay your payroll and whose sons and daughters serve under your command— from ALL enemies, including any you find in the White House or occupying seats in Congress, or administering government agencies are fair game.
You are not compelled to take any orders repugnant to human decency, nor violate any of the Organic and Public Law underpinning this nation of nations, nor are you allowed to do so.
You are empowered and commanded to remove any threat to our peace and have been duly notified of all these facts since July of 2014.
The most cogent threat to our peace is the rampant criminality infesting Washington, DC, and secondarily, the offensive attempts made by the various federal corporations to mischaracterize all of us as “citizens” under obligation to serve the government which we created to serve us.
Thank you, very much, but we do not need or desire any such interference from or misunderstanding with our Hired Help and with respect to us and our states, the “federal government” together with all its parts is exactly that— Hired Help.
In July of 2014 we informed you and the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of a clear and present danger on our shores—- the presence of a burgeoning private commercial mercenary army composed of corporate federal agency subcontractors— IRS, BATF, FEMA, DHS, BLM, FBI, CIA and so on—all operating under color of law on our soil and making obvious preparations for war on our soil.
As American State Nationals who hold your foreign governments–both the district government and the municipal government— under contract to our states of the Union, we ordered you and the other Joint Chiefs to take action to honor your commitment to protect us from ALL enemies both inside and outside —“foreign and domestic” —-of the civilian administration of the various federal commercial corporations responsible for providing our states with the nineteen enumerated services, including the honoring of our National Trust set forth in the Preamble and Bill of Rights.
It is important for you to realize that when and if any President or member of Congress fails to act as a Fiduciary and Protector of the land and the people of our fifty organic states of the Union, he or she is committing treason and Breach of Trust and must be removed from any office public or private and remanded to custody as directed by our General Civil Orders.
It doesn’t matter what powers or authority these people assume within the foreign and territorial governments of the United States of America (Minor) or the municipal government of Washington, DC. When these people betray our trust, attempt to mischaracterize, defraud, cheat, or commit any crime against us, it is your job before God and Man to protect us against them and to punish them for their crimes.
They— the District and Municipal governments which are foreign to us –are under martial law. We are not.
Our states and people have been at declared peace since 1865 and we mean to stay that way.
In case it has escaped your attention, we have been targeted and dragged through private bankruptcy proceedings that we are not subject to, have had false claims of surety-ship attached to our names and estates by foreign corporations, have been mischaracterized as foreigners on our own soil, suffered what can only be termed a national level identity theft at the hands of our own employees. and private undeclared foreign agents (for example, the BLM) and bill collectors (IRS) pretending to be part of our lawful government have deceitfully abused and misidentified our people and overrun the country while perverted lunatics are holding sway under the Capitol Dome—and yes, General Dunford, this is your fault and that of the other Joint Chiefs.
You have failed to protect us from domestic enemies—enemies operating the –to you and other citizens– domestic government of the so-called Federal United States.
You have a contract with the American people that supersedes all and any other domestic contracts you may have with the UNITED STATES, INC., the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, or any other “domestic” institution.
And you can’t shrug and tell us that, “Gee, folks, I’m just a simple soldier and I don’t know what “domestic” means.”
The actual fifty states and nations have suffered numerous outrages for the past 150 years and it is more than past time for this sick and sorry non-performance of your duty to address the criminality of the “domestic” leaders of the District of Columbia and Municipality of Washington to stop.
Their crimes against us are war crimes under the Geneva Conventions— mischaracterization of non-combatant Third Parties– as well as vast commercial crimes that have been committed against the American People while those under contract and oath to protect us have stood around with their thumbs up their rumps.
These crimes have been duly witnessed, reported, published, signed and sealed and properly witnessed wet-ink copies of our affidavit of probable cause have landed on your desk.
You have obviously been mistaken about who your real employers are and where your real duties lie. A prompt resignation or equally prompt action to apprehend the criminals responsible —-all of whom are operating under martial law as citizens and civilians and who are foreigners with respect to us and our states— would be your best reply.
As part of our General Civil Orders— that is, orders to the civil government, including all citizens thereof— we, American State Nationals instructed the Joint Chiefs to fully re-commission the Grand Army of the Republic and to offer the command of it to General Carter Ham, if he would come out of retirement and accept it.
Either get off your laurels and do your job or abdicate it in public, so that everyone can see that you have chosen to betray your duty.
Anna Maria Riezinger, one of the “free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States”.
c/o P.O. Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska
Unprecedented letter from Chair of Joint Chiefs suggests U. S. military does not want a President Hillary
by Dr. Eowyn
Four days ago, on October 24, 2016, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joe Dunford sent a fascinating piece of communication, titled “Upholding Our Oath,” to every member of the U.S. Armed Services.
Note: General Joseph Dunford Jr., 60, was the 36th Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps. Nominated by Obama, Dunford became the 19th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 1, 2015.
This is what Gen. Dunford wrote:
“As the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff…as our country again prepares for a peaceful transfer of power to a new administration, I write to share my views regarding our mutual obligations as military professionals and rights as citizens during this election season.
Every service member swears “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” This oath is embedded in our professional culture and underpins the values that shape and define our all-volunteer force. Beginning with General George Washington resigning his military commission, our deliberate and disciplined commitment to upholding the principle of civilian control of the military underpins not only our warrior ethos but also the expectations of how we conduct ourselves while in uniform.
While we must always safeguard our professional integrity, extra vigilance is required during any political transition. Our individual and collective obligation during this election season is twofold. First, we must recognize that we have one Commander in Chief, and until authority is transferred on January 20, 2017, the Joint Force must remain clearly focused on and responsive to the existing National Command Authority. Second, the Joint Force must conduct itself in such a way that the new administration has confidence that it will be served by a professional, competent, and apolitical military. This is especially important in the context of delivering the best military advice.
Every member of the Joint Force has the right to exercise his or her civic duty, including learning and discussing — even debating — the policy issues driving the election cycle and voting for his or her candidate of choice. Provided that we follow the guidance and regulations governing individual political participation, we should be proud of our civic engagement. What we must collectively guard against is allowing our institution to become politicized, or even perceived as being politicized, by how we conduct ourselves during engagements with the media, the public, or in open or social forums.
We are living in the most volatile and complex security environment since World War II. Whether confronting violent extremist organizations seeking to destroy our way of life or dealing with state actors threatening international order, threats to our national security require a Joint Force that is ready, capable, and trusted. To that end, I have a duty to protect the integrity and political neutrality of our military profession. But this obligation is not mine alone. It belongs to every Soldier, Marine, Sailor, Airman, and Coastguardsman. Thank you for joining me in honoring our history, our traditions, and the institutions of the U.S. Armed Forces by upholding the principle of political neutrality.”
Even without reading between the lines, General Dunford clearly has concerns about politicization of the military and its obligation and commitment to political neutrality and noninterference in politics. That the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff must remind members of the Armed Forces that they must “uphold” their oath both suggests and implies that the opposite is going on, i.e., the military is politicized and there are fears that it will intervene in civilian politics.
If this pic (below) of a young U.S. Marine is any indication, Gen. Dunford has good reasons to issue the “Upholding Our Oath” communication.
A year ago, a Rasmussen Reports national survey of active and retired military personnel found that only 15% had a favorable opinion of Hillary Clinton, with just 3% who viewed her very favorably. A staggering 81% had an unfavorable opinion of her, including 69% who had a very unfavorable view of her.
A similar survey today is sure to find even higher unfavorable ratings for Hillary among those whom she would command as their Commander in Chief.
H/t GiGi and TruthFeedNews
- 184 U.S. generals and admirals endorse Trump for Commander-In-Chief
- State Dept phone transcripts show Hillary knew at the time that Benghazi was a terrorist attack
- Hillary: I Didn’t Lie to Benghazi Families — It Was ‘The Fog Of War’
- Why this military K-9 handler will not vote for Hillary Clinton
- Trump considering a military general for VP