Clinton’s Latest Lies Threaten Her Candidacy: Are the Elite Moving Away From Clinton?

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/08/26/clintons-latest-lies-threaten-her-candidacy-are-the-elite-moving-away-from-clinton/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=clintons-latest-lies-threaten-her-candidacy-are-the-elite-moving-away-from-clinton

8-27-2016 10-22-23 AM

Mark Twain once said, there are liars and there are damn liars. I would go one step beyond Mark Twain and add, there are liars, there are damn liars and then there is Hillary Clinton. Hillary is even a bigger liar than husband, in name only, Bill.

As the saying goes, if Clinton lips are moving, they are lying. They are America’s Bonnie and Clyde.

The Ultimate Lie: The Clinton Foundation

8-27-2016 10-22-46 AM

The Clinton Foundation is under fire like no other private organization in American History. The Clinton Foundation is the most corrupt organization in the history of the United States. Never before in American politics do we see a presidential candidate so clearly connected to organized criminal activities.

In her latest round of lies which falls right into line with Benghazi, selling uranium to the Russians through the Clinton Foundation’s front company, Uranium one, and of course, the email scandal, Clinton is now lying about the mixing of Clinton Foundation activities with her duties as Secretary of State. This is a major revelation that reveals a criminal conflict of interest.

The Ultimate Oxymoron: Clinton Signs an Ethics Agreement

Did you know that Clinton actually signed an ethics agreement saying she would not be personally involved with State Department matters and mix these issues in relation to the beleaguered Clinton Foundation? However, Lying Hillary found a loophole. Her State Department Staff did not sign any such prohibitions according to a recent State Department release.  Therefore, Clinton’s ethics agreement at the time she was Secretary of State did not prevent her State Department staff from representing Clinton Foundation matters in relation to the State Department.  This stunning revelation was offered by spokesperson Mark Toner during the State Department press briefing on Monday of this week. Is the State Department throwing Clinton under the bus?

Even the Daily Mail has entered into this controversy when they said “Hillary is simply using Huma and Mills to run her scams for her.”  In other words, even the press is reporting that Hillary has outsourced her conflicts of interest and criminality to her staffers. Of course, should we expect anything different from the greatest liar in American history?

The significance and importance of this revelation cannot be overstated. Does this apparent betrayal by her former employees represent a coming shift away Clinton by the criminal elite? If I were a betting man, I would be of the opinion that criminal elite have already written Clinton off as their representative in the White House, even when the media has not yet written her off. The canary in the mine moment will come when we see cracks, by the MSM, which suggests that they are less than supportive of Clinton’s candidacy.

Why the shift? Why would the criminal elite be preparing to move in another direction away from Hillary? The answer is simple and requires little speculation. Simply put, Clinton cannot win this election. Her criminality is front and canter for all to see. And Clinton is in such a state of physical and cognitive decline, she cannot even carry out her duties as a presidential candidate. She goes days between public appearances. And when she has been appearing in public, her appearances are controlled and very, very brief.

Here is Hillary in public on August 25th in which she is dismissive of the nearby reporters, thus missing an opportunity to make several points in her behalf.

Remember, all political candidates want face time on the TV cameras. Clinton is avoiding this like the plague. Why? IS her political campaign going to fade into oblivion and become the first campaign to be conducted by stealth an their media proxies?

In Another Lie, Hillary Proclaims She Is In Good Health

8-27-2016 10-23-08 AM

There are numerous pictures and videos portraying Hillary’s physical and massive cognitive decline. It is one thing when the body starts to decline. However, it is quite another when physical decline is accompanied by overt cognitive decay and an inability think coherently as evidenced by pronounced difficulty expressing coherent verbal content. Who will ever forget the following recent moment on the campaign trail?

This represents cognitive confusion of the highest order. It is akin to what happens when a dementia patient wanders away from a care facility and becomes “lost”. Hillary Clinton is quickly becoming “lost”.

If the public truly wanted to know about Hillary’s health, we would be demanding the MRI’s of her hypothalamus, often an indicator of good mental and physical health in the elderly With her pronounced state of cognitive confusion, I guarantee she has had multiple MRI’s on that region of the brain. Since she is running for the most important office in the land, the American people should be demanding to see her MRI’s of her hypothalamus. I can guarantee that this revelation will not be forthcoming, or they will use fake MRI’s of another’s brain.

Can Clinton Make It To November?

How can the powers that be keep her on her feet to November.  The rate of decline since the height of the Democratic Primary, since early April, is stunning. I had a neurosurgeon tell me, off the record, that he does not think she will be alive in a year based on the progressive set of photos and videos he has seen.  Yet, Clinton and her handlers keep doing what they do best, they continue to lie. Clinton is a person in serious trouble from a health perspective. Below we see another picture portraying Hillary’s near and ominous demise.

8-27-2016 10-23-34 AM

A Message to All Democrats

Even for democrats that will support Clinton despite her very public criminal activities, how can this amoral block of democratic supporters continue to fall in line behind a woman that cannot even walk a straight line? Please Mr. and Mrs Democrat, tell me how supporting Clinton, at this point, helps the country?

Don’t look for any admissions of the truth from the MSM or the Clinton camp as they will continue to do what they do best, lie!

One final point, if the criminal elite are moving away from Clinton, what do you think there Plan B consists of? Please leave your answer in the comment section.

 

Show This To A Democrat So They Can See What They Are Voting For

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/08/26/show-this-to-a-democrat-so-they-can-see-what-they-are-voting-for/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=show-this-to-a-democrat-so-they-can-see-what-they-are-voting-for

8-27-2016 10-24-01 AM

An attorney in 1975 uses some dirty tricks to get a child rapist off for raping a 12 year old girl. And the lawyer is none other than….

Show this to a Democrat and they will never vote for Hilary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdNHf1g4ivA

Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?

By Glenn Greenwald

As the numerous and obvious ethical conflicts surrounding the Clinton Foundation receive more media scrutiny, the tactic of Clinton-loyal journalists is to highlight the charitable work done by the foundation, and then insinuate — or even outright state — that anyone raising these questions is opposed to its charity. James Carville announced that those who criticize the foundation are “going to hell.” Other Clinton loyalists insinuated that Clinton Foundation critics are indifferent to the lives of HIV-positive babies or are anti-gay bigots.

That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.

The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.

Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?

Here’s one of the Clinton Foundation’s principal objectives; decide for yourself if its tyrannical donors are acting with the motive of advancing that charitable goal:

 

Lots of Smoke Here, Hillary

http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2016/08/25/lots-smoke-hillary/

 

by Patrick J. Buchanan, August 26, 2016

Prediction: If Hillary Clinton wins, within a year of her inauguration, she will be under investigation by a special prosecutor on charges of political corruption, thereby continuing a family tradition.

For consider what the Associated Press reported this week:

The surest way for a person with private interests to get a meeting with Secretary of State Clinton, or a phone call returned by her, it seems, was to dump a bundle of cash into the Clinton Foundation.

Of 154 outsiders whom Clinton phoned or met with in her first two years at State, 85 had made contributions to the Clinton Foundation, and their contributions, taken together, totaled $156 million.

Conclusion: Access to Secretary of State Clinton could be bought, but it was not cheap. Forty of the 85 donors gave $100,000 or more. Twenty of those whom Clinton met with or phoned dumped in $1 million or more.

To get to the seventh floor of the Clinton State Department for a hearing for one’s plea, the cover charge was high.

Among those who got face time with Hillary Clinton were a Ukrainian oligarch and steel magnate who shipped oil pipe to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and a Bangladeshi economist who was under investigation by his government and was eventually pressured to leave his own bank.

The stench is familiar, and all too Clintonian in character.

Recall. On his last day in office, Jan. 20, 2001, Bill Clinton issued a presidential pardon to financier-crook and fugitive from justice Marc Rich, whose wife, Denise, had contributed $450,000 to the Clinton Library.

The Clintons appear belatedly to have recognized their political peril.

Bill has promised that, if Hillary is elected, he will end his big dog days at the foundation and stop taking checks from foreign regimes and entities, and corporate donors. Cash contributions from wealthy Americans will still be gratefully accepted.

One wonders: Will Bill be writing thank-you notes for the millions that will roll in to the family foundation – on White House stationery?

By his actions, Bill is all but conceding that there is a serious conflict of interest between his foundation raking in millions that enhance the family’s prestige and sustain its travel and lifestyle, while providing its big donors with privileged access to the secretary of state.

Yet if Hillary Clinton becomes president, the scheme is unsustainable. Even the Obama-Clinton media might not be able to stomach this.

And even Clinton seems to be conceding the game is up. “I know there’s a lot of smoke, and there’s no fire,” she said in self-defense this week.

She is certainly right about the smoke.

And if, as Democratic apparatchik Steve McMahon assures us that there is “no smoking gun,” no quid-pro-quo, no open-and-shut case of Secretary Clinton taking official action in gratitude to a donor of the family foundation, how can we predict a special prosecutor?

Answer: We are not at the end of this scandal. We are at what Churchill called the “end of the beginning.”

Missing emails are being unearthed at State, through Freedom of Information Act requests, that are filling out the picture Clinton thought had been blotted out when her 33,000 “private” emails were erased by her lawyers.

Someone out there, Julian Assange, Russia, or the rogue websites doing all this hacking, are believed to have many more explosive emails they are preparing to drop before Election Day.

And why is Clinton is keeping her State Department calendar secret from the AP, if it does not contain meetings or calls she does not want to defend? She has defied requests and the AP had to sue to get the schedule of her first two years at State.

Moreover, the AP story on the State Department-Clinton Foundation links was so stunning it is sure to trigger follow-up by investigative journalists who can smell a Pulitzer.

Then there are the contacts between Huma Abedin, her closest aide at State, and Doug Band at the Clinton Foundation, the go-betweens for the donor-Clinton meetings, which has opened a new avenue for investigators.

These were unearthed by Judicial Watch, which is not going away.

The number of persons of interest involved in this suppurating scandal, which has gone from an illicit server, to a panoply of Clinton lies to the public that disgusted the FBI director, to erased emails, to “pay for play,” and now deep into the Clinton Foundation continues to grow.

All that is needed now, to bring us to an independent counsel, is calls for the FBI to reopen and broaden its investigation in light of all that has been revealed since Director Comey said there was not evidence enough to recommend an indictment.

If Clinton controls the Justice Department, calls for a special prosecutor will be resisted, but only until public demand becomes too great.

For there were independent counsels called in Watergate, Iran-Contra and the scandals that led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton says there is no fire. But something is causing all that smoke.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.

Emails Show Clinton Foundation Donor Reached Out To Hillary Clinton Before Arms Export Boost

By David Sirota @davidsirota

Emails just released by the State Department appear to show Clinton Foundation officials brokering a meeting between then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a top military leader of Bahrain — a Middle Eastern country that is a major foundation donor. Soon after the correspondence about a meeting, Clinton’s State Department significantly increased arms export authorizations to the country’s autocratic government, even as that nation moved to crush pro-democracy protests.

In a statement quoted by the Wall Street Journal, a Clinton spokesperson, Josh Schwerin, said of the newly released correspondence: “The fact remains that Hillary Clinton never took action as secretary of state because of donations to the Clinton Foundation.”

The emails, which were obtained through a lawsuit by the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, detail how foundation operations and State Department business intersected, even though they were supposed to be walled off from one another. Last week, Clinton’s campaign said the foundation would stop accepting foreign government donations if she is elected president — but did not explain why it accepted that money while Clinton was America’s top diplomat.

8-27-2016 10-24-35 AM

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shakes hands with Crown Prince of Bahrain Sheikh Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa, May 9, 2012 before a bilateral meeting at the Department of State in Washington, DC. Photo: KAREN BLEIER/AFP/GettyImages

A 2015 International Business Times investigative series examined how, in that role, Clinton ran an agency that is responsible for regulating U.S. arms exports, and how those State Department exports approvals substantially increased to governments that donated to the Clinton Foundation. Federal law explicitly designates the secretary of state as “responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales” of arms, and early in her term, the State Department called one arms deal a “top priority” for Clinton.

The email exchange about Bahrain shows the Clinton Foundation’s top executive Doug Band in 2009 asking Clinton’s State Department aide Huma Abedin to set up a meeting between Clinton and Crown Prince Salman, who had recently been named the deputy supreme commander of Bahrain’s armed forces. Band referred to Salman as a “good friend of ours.”

Abedin told Band that Clinton had initially rejected a previous request for a meeting with Salman because “she doesn’t want to commit to anything for thurs or fri until she knows how she will feel.” Soon after, though, Abedin told Band that the State Department was now offering Salman a meeting with Clinton.

Salman has directed $32 million to a Clinton Foundation program, and the Kingdom of Bahrain has donated up to $100,000 more. As Bahrain money flowed into the Clinton Foundation, State Department documents showed that between 2010 and 2012 the Clinton-led State Department approved $630 million worth of direct commercial arms sales to Salman’s military forces in Bahrain. That was a 187 percent increase from the period 2006 to 2008, and the increase came as Bahrain was violently suppressing uprisings.

8-27-2016 10-24-53 AM

Prince Salman bin Hamad Al-Khalifa of Bahrain (R) speaks as former U.S. President Bill Clinton looks on during a special session on peace in the Middle East at the annual Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) September 21, 2010 in New York City. The sixth annual meeting of the CGI gathers prominent individuals in politics, business, science, academics, religion and entertainment to discuss global issues such as climate change and the reconstruction of Haiti. The event, founded by former U.S. President Bill Clinton after he left office, is held the same week as the General Assembly at the United Nations, when most world leaders are in New York City. Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

Related Stories

During those Arab Spring uprisings of 2011 — when Bahrain was accused of using tear gas on its own people — the Clinton-led State Department approved more than $70,000 worth of arms sales classified as “toxicological agents.” That compared to just $700 worth of such sales in the immediate prior period.

In the same period, the Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced proposals to sell missiles and armored vehicles to Bahrain. The office notes that “the Department of State approves individual programs on a case-by-case basis.” The State Department itself says it “is responsible for managing all government-to-government transfers of military equipment to other countries.”

At the time of the armored vehicle proposal, Foreign Policy magazine reported that Clinton’s department “has not released details of the new sale, and Congress has not been notified through the regular process”; instead, the State Department “simply briefed a few congressional offices and is going ahead with the new sale, arguing it didn’t meet the threshold that would require more formal notifications and a public explanation.”

The deal was stalled after congressional opposition — but Clinton’s State Department a year later announced it was again moving forward with arms approvals for Bahrain. That resumption followed a meeting between Salman and U.S. officials including Clinton, according to Reuters.

 Paranoid Hillary Smears Alex Jones During Conspiracy Obsessed Rant

http://www.infowars.com/paranoid-hillary-smears-alex-jones-during-conspiracy-obsessed-rant/

 Claims Vladimir Putin is “Godfather” of the ‘Alt-Right’

Paul Joseph Watson

Hillary Clinton claimed that Donald Trump was embracing “dark conspiracy theories” before going on a conspiracy theory-obsessed rant in which she attacked Alex Jones and claimed that Vladimir Putin was the villainous mastermind behind the ‘Alt-Right’ movement.

The speech in Reno was billed as Hillary’s moment to demonize Trump by equating him with racist, white supremacist conspiracy theorists, but she ended up weaving a giant fairytale of her own, reinvoking the vast “right wing conspiracy” that she has been ridiculed for hammering on in the past.

Except this time it’s former KGB agent and Russian President Vladimir Putin who is somehow the evil genius secretly controlling Infowars, Breitbart, Nigel Farage and the entire Alt-Right. Hillary said Putin is, “The godfather of this global brand of extreme nationalism.”

But Trump is the conspiracy theorist.

Yeah, OK Hillary.

Hillary also accused Trump of “taking hate groups mainstream,” the very thing that her and Barack Obama have done by supporting ‘Black Lives Matter’ – a group that has inspired the murder of police officers and whose ideological inspiration is a convicted cop killer on the FBI’s Most Wanted Domestic Terrorists list.

Clinton attacked Trump for appearing on the Alex Jones Show, claiming that Jones “said the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre were child actors and no one was actually killed there.”

In reality, Jones has never claimed that nobody died at Sandy Hook. As Infowars Editor-at-Large, I’ve been attacked repeatedly for saying the very opposite.

Hillary also savaged Trump for becoming embroiled in 9/11 conspiracy theories for saying that Muslims celebrated on 9/11. As we have documented, reports from the day itself clearly suggest that yes Muslims in New Jersey did indeed celebrate the 9/11 attacks.

Clinton is nervous about 9/11 because of her connections with the Saudi government, which as the leaked 28 pages prove, was directly involved with the hijackers who carried out the attacks.

Clinton was also forced to address concerns about her health during the bizarre speech, another nod to the fact that her campaign is rocked about an issue that has gone viral since our video re-ignited the controversy earlier this month.

The fact that Hillary is being forced to resort to the tired old mantra of demonizing her political opposition as “racists” – the same tactic that spectacularly failed during the Brexit campaign in the United Kingdom, proves that she has run out of ideas.

In the days to follow, the Clinton mouthpiece media will dutifully regurgitate Hillary’s race-baiting talking points, absent the fact that she praised Ku Klux Klan leader Robert Byrd as her “friend and mentor,” a man who called black people “mongrels” and fought against the Civil Rights Act.

Hillary’s rampant paranoia about Infowars, Breitbart and the ‘Alt-Right’ illustrates how panicked her campaign is about this movement.

The fact that she committed the ridiculous mistake of driving hundreds of thousands and potentially millions of new people our way by directly attacking us proves that her campaign has absolutely no idea about how the Internet works or how the ‘Alt-Right’ actually operates.

Hillary’s attacks will only succeed in amplifying the message of Infowars, Breitbart and the ‘Alt-Right’ – which is that Hillary is a hideously corrupt career politician who represents the interests of the globalists and the Washington elite and is not fit to serve as President of the United States.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufkHt8dgG8I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cfEW9av2XU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1hBQ_6FYso

YOU GUESSED IT FOLKS

I THINK

HILLIARY IS A PIECE OF SHIT

10 13 11 flagbar

 

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: