The Masonic Hand
That Governs And Enforces
In retrospect, it is unfair of me to merely criticize an entire population who, like myself, grew up in government indoctrination centers called public schools. Like most parents, mine believed it was their duty to send me to a government school, and that it was my duty to pledge my allegiance to that government. I was fooled equally as well as everyone else; becoming part of the amorphous mass of brainwashed human commodities trained to be work-ready by age 18 with my hand on my heart, worshiping the corporate flag of that holy corporate district called United States.
But then in my late 20’s, as buildings were falling in New York City and military men were blocking the streets; as the world was morphing before my very eyes despite anything the constitution may or may not say – I actually read the constitution seemingly for the first time…
Over and over I poured through its legal language, defining its words, shocked at its blatant amendments, and confounded by its true history. And with the comprehension of every new Article and Amendment my belief turned to horror; the realization that I was part of something more sinister than I could ever have imagined. I realized that this corporation was literally killing in my name; with my permission – in the name of “the people”. For every crime that the United States commits is done so with its presumed consent of the people it represents… one nation that is certainly not under God.
And today, having just turned 41 this month, I have the dubious duty to report my findings on this holiest of fallacies called the United States constitution.
World peace through law???
Law = military police force, for law holds no power without force.
Force = Peace
Force = Liberty
Force = Law
So let’s talk about just who or what this trademarked
and supposed “global force for good” actually is.
Notice the Trademark symbol for this military corporation?
How does the Government define a trademark?
“A trademark is a brand name.“
Care and Compasion Hand Delivered?
Which picture is real, and which is print media propaganda?
A military needs public affairs for its commercial activities and advertising.
And somehow it has salvaged its completely corrupt and tainted reputation
among the American people who unwittingly support it through debt and tacit consent.
But is there more to the military and its “Authority” than we’ve imagined?
When considering the masses of enlisted soldiers in the military, we must apply the same logic and reason as we do to common members of churches and citizens under governments. Obviously, a kid straight out of high school will not be privy to the sacred secrets and mysteries held by the Masonic Generals of that Army. So it would be foolish again to compare the useful idiots (useful innocents) in the military, that would obey orders to attack their own people on command, to that of the leadership and government of the military. And of course the same holy and sacred oath apparently gives authority to those leaders and allows unquestioning soldiers to die and kill in the name of some deistic god and nation.
The profits from war, occupation, and conquest are a multitude and come in many forms. No one can dare declare this to be a false statement with a straight face. It controls the common-blood population and brings booty into the government’s sacred coffers. But we never seem to consider that the for-profit model of war is literally a corporate business of the Untied States, under the command of the Commander in Chief of that corporation.
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, defines the Army as:
ARMY. The armed forces of a nation intended for military service on land. An “army” is a body of men whose business is war. While the “militia” is a body of men composed of citizens occupied temporarily in the pursuit of civil life, but organized by discipline and drill, and called into the field for temporary military service when the exigencies of the country require it.
REGULAR ARMY. The permanent military establishment, which is maintained both in peace and war according to law.
There are two very important distinctions here; one between the nation and the countries within, and the other between the militia and a regular army (business). In fact, one of the chief complaints against the King within the Declaration of Independence was that:
“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.”
And yet in stark contradiction, the constitution in Article 1, Section 8 gives the United States Legislature (Congress) the Power:
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years…”
“To provide and maintain a Navy…”
“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Force…”
Of course, this deceptive language is similar to the language used for national emergencies. Like those, the “Appropriation of Money” is legislated every two years in congress in its appropriations bills – the funding of military rule and foreign and domestic occupation with public moneys out of the public debt or “God Trust”. So while the constitution states a seeming restriction, it also states how to simply work around that restriction in congress.
A standing army is just fine as long as congress consents to and supports it?
The “Federal Farmer” wrote a series of letters published in the Poughkeepsie County Journal in late 1787 and early 1788, where he predicted that under the new Constitution:
“(Congress) will have unlimited power to raise armies, and to engage officers and men for any number of years.”
“I see so many men in America fond of a standing army, and especially among those who probably will have a large share in administering the federal system; it is very evident to me, that we shall have a large standing army as soon as the monies to support them can be possibly found. An army is not a very agreeable place of employment for the young gentlemen of many families.”
“…we all agree, that a large standing army has a strong tendency to depress and inslave (enslave) the people.”
So why is it that in the American states we had individual state militias, whereas in the nation we have a standing army as a business? Just what is the difference between these two words that we so commonly intermingle without care or concern?
COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. 2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence.
Ah, so a man in a country is still considered under the natural law; not being forced to submit to that government.
So what the is a nation, and why is it so important to get men to enter into the jurisdiction of the nation despite being perfectly comfortable in his or her country (state)?
NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. 2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. 3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.
NATIONALITY. The state (disposition) of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born. 2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicil; Expatriation; Naturalization…
NATIVES. All persons born within the jurisdiction of the United States, are considered as natives.
Are you a native of the United States? Do you think this legal status was a choice? It means that you were born in a state (country) and are a citizen (artificial person) of the United States (the nation).
These words are not interchangeable. In America, there are 50 countries that are members of the nation called the United States.
The United States is not a country, it is a nation.
California is not a nation, it is a country (state).
The 50 “states” of America are all individual countries bound to the nation of the United States under military force of its “spiritual jurisdiction”.
The name United States is very confusing, for it is not representative of the true nature of the countries within. The United States is nothing but the name of the corporation of a district. I could call myself “Dog” as my official name, but that doesn’t make me an actual dog. I am man. Just because the nation calls itself “United States”, that does not mean that it is a country. For the nation is a series of countries that under contract make up the body politic of that nation. The name of the government of that conglomeration of states is the “United States”.
In its simplest terms, a nation is nothing but a “jurisdiction”. It’s sort of like a masonic club, where you can check in but you can’t check out. The civil war is evidence of this fact, supported by the Lieber Code and the United States military occupation of each country (state) of its nation today. Just as a nation’s members are countries (or “states” as artificial corporations), so too are the persons who are citizens of the nation – members of the club. To claim to be a natural-born citizen of the United States means that you were born in a country (state) and are a contracted artificial person corporation of the United States jurisdiction. You are like a Starbuck’s, and there’s one of you on every corner. You see, a natural born man cannot him or herself be an artificial person. For this, the United States corporation (district) created the “14th amendment citizen” and requires you (the man) to be surety for that artificial person in order to be legally called a “citizen” – to be considered a thing instead of a living man – to be a chattel commodity instead of a sentient being.
A citizen is nothing but a piece of paper, assigned a number, and filed away in a cabinet.
But most relevant to this topic is the difference between the militias of the individual countries (states) as compared to the standing army of the nation. For the last thing that the occupying military force of the United States (nation) would desire is for the individual countries (states) to have their own military power to stand in protection of the county (state) against the Masonic United States (nation/jurisdiction). The purpose of minimizing and diminishing the State militias was to create a central army that would occupy and “keep the peace” in each country (state) in order to ensure the military rule of the nation over the countries (states).
In essence, the ability of each state to protect itself from the jurisdiction (rule) of the sovereign (ruler) has been conquered and eradicated by simply destroying the organization of the people of each country (state) as their own military force. The last thing a bully wants is for his victims to fight back.
And this is the forced contractual nature of the word “united” – a nation of tyranny over countries (states).
E Pluribus Unum – out of many (countries), one (nation)…
The Masonic Charter Of Freedom:
Constituting The United States
“Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA has many, many Masonic Connections. It stands on land purchased by Wm. Allen, Grand Master of PA. The ground was staked by Edmond Wolley, a Mason. Thomas Boude, the brick mason, was the first Secretary of St. John’s Lodge of Philadelphia and later Deputy Grand Master. Benjamin Franklin laid the cornerstone while Grand Master (1734) with the assistance of St John’s Lodge. Brother Andrew McNair of Philadelphia rang the bell to call the populace on July 8, 1776, to hear the reading of the Declaration of Independence. The Liberty Bell cracked in 1835 when it tolled the death of Chief Justice John Marshall, past Grand Master of Virginia.”
–Missouri Lodge of Research, “Did You Know?”, Wes Cook publisher, 1965
The comprehension that our most cherished of declarations and the corporate charter called the constitution are a fraud is very much like losing one’s faith in the religious doctrine that controls the minds of good Christians, turning them away from God and natural law. The cult of patriotism that has sprung forth from this particular religion of national constitutionalism is one that I believe must come to an end… yet another pledge of allegiance without comprehension of its consequences. For the constitution is the basis for all fairy tales and faith in and of what would otherwise be a free land and country, and it represents the very foundation of power and tyranny by the corporation for which it chartered. It grants no rights to men, for it only applies to government and artificial corporate persons. It gives no true recourse for the grievances of men, for the courts are government owned. It perverts the natural state of man and binds us in contractual chains of artificial person-hood and obligation. And it offers nothing but debt and subjection to its believers who voluntarily and falsely embrace it as God-given.
The constitution is nothing more than the foundation and Masonic cornerstone of a cult, and its leaders are steering its followers into destitution and despotism…. and world war.
This is done by continuously using the promise of freedom – a word very few common men understand. For in true Orwellian double-speak, the Freedom that is prescribed “eminently” by the constitution is not what we believe it to be. As I will show further into this essay, freedom actually means tyranny. And ironically, the more tyranny that citizens have forced upon them, the more freedom they enjoy. If you are intrigued and skeptical by this statement, it will all make sense later…
For those brave enough to challenge their own belief system by reading and considering what is written below, I would absolutely invite you to ardently attempt to challenge the following information without patriotic dogma (religious belief). I would invite you to suspend your belief and realize your self; stepping outside of the group-think model you’ve been trained to accept and into the world of individual thought, reason, and unbiased logic. And for God’s sake, literally… search your soul. For if this constitution is truly what you believe it to be, surely you can disprove what I am about to reveal. I wholeheartedly encourage you to attempt to do so.
But first you must read…
Before we can examine the rhetoric of this constitution, we must first understand who the Authors of this “Charter For Freedom” were and why they chose to grammatically pen the constitution as they did. This documented history will be followed (in Part 3) by a step by step examination of each myth and fallacy surrounding the constitution and its verbiage. Now, we will expound upon the actual language and define the words written within this debt compact.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.”
To institute or establish; to make an
ordinance; to enact a constitution or law.
To confer on a person the holy orders of priest or deacon.
Ceremony by which a bishop confers on a person
the privileges and powers necessary for the execution
of sacerdotal (priestly) functions in the church.
Civil and ecclesiastical law.
The act of conferring the orders of the church upon an individual*.
***Individual means a single artificial person
In old English law. Those of the religious who deserted their houses,
and, throwing off the habits, renounced their particular
order in contempt of their oath and other obligations.
Ever wondered why certain words are capitalized in the constitution? People, Order, Union, Welfare…?
It would seem that this was just some random quirk by the author in his penmanship, until we take a closer look at those capitalized words.
Let’s take for example this phrase “in Order”, which takes upon itself a very different meaning than the phrase “in order” – where the word order is not capitalized as it is in the Constitution.
Since the constitution was written as: “We the People, in Order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this Constitution…”, we have grammatically and in meaning a very different legal document than what might otherwise be – one issued and ordained by a specific “Order” of men as a small society of specific “People” with a certain self-granted ecclesiastical status of eminence and domain, who thus signed this Constitution in an Order as the only People. But who or what exactly gave them the eminent power and authority to do this?
***Note: We will be using the “Masonic” edition of the Holy Bible throughout this discourse to help in our comprehensions.
It is stated, according to the Masonic “Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic Indexed King James Bible”, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942), that:
“George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons’ of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly Love, Faith, Hope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masons, proving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master Masons. Now as then, masonry’s challenge is the Holy Bible, its teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.” L. J.
Did you notice some of the same grammatical capitalization processes here as were written into the constitution in that City of Brotherly Love?
On the same opening page, it states:
“Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
So just who was this man, George Washington?