Proclamation 2038 – Calling Congress into Extraordinary Session, March 5, 1933

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Whereas public interests require that the Congress of the United States should be convened in extra session at twelve o’clock, noon, on the Ninth day of March, 1933, to receive such communication as may be made by the Executive;

Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim and declare that an extraordinary occasion requires the Congress of the United States to convene in extra session at the Capitol in the City of Washington on the Ninth day of March, 1933, at twelve o’clock, noon, of which all persons who shall at that time be entitled to act as members thereof are hereby required to take notice.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the great seal of the United States.


Indeed, Congress was so assembled on March 9th, 1933, and the spawn of that assemblage gave to the office of president powers not only outside of and above the Constitution of the United States, but the Executive power to ignore congress and its processes altogether. There, president Roosevelt presented an Act enabling a declared national emergency in banking and for other purposes, stating:

“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application.”

This became the “Act of March 9, 1933”, as written into Congressional law.

And this uniform national emergency power has been with us and over us ever since, as we will see… The only difference is that congress now allows the president to declare His own emergencies with no oversight or vote from congress as to its legitimacy or lawfulness. The congress acts as a “rubber stamp” for the presidential declaration of emergency without deliberation.

This “uniform” national application  mentioned here made way for the private enactment of what are called the “Uniform Acts”, including Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which was first published in 1952.

Of the many states, one government…

In the United States, uniform laws are created through what are called “Uniform Acts“, which are bills proposed as state law by a private association. These Acts are drafted of course by the BAR association (part of the Executive Branch), mostly through their United States Uniform Law Commission (ULC), which is then approved by another private association: The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). The NCCUSL is a body of BAR Association lawyers, private and government attorneys, state and federal judges (attorneys in black robes), and university law professors (attorneys perverting young minds), typically appointed by the governor of each state. They draft laws with the goal of uniform enactment by each state, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. But the NCCUSL does not have any direct legislative power in and of itself as an appointed private association. Its drafted uniform acts become law only to the extent that they are enacted into law by state legislators (those Masonic blood-right representatives of the people) – not the actual vote of the masses of people of each state.

This is the horror of “representative democracy” – the mob rule of millions controlled (governed) by a few bloodline men.

And here we see again the importance of taking the power away from the masses of people (E-Pluribus Unum) and handing it over to these “representatives”. For the people would never vote to enact such uniform laws of debt and enslavement upon themselves to take away state’s rights. The people must be made impotent by the legal system and its quorum. Our 100’s of millions of voices must be squelched by “representative democracy”. Their BAR lawmakers must be appointed so that their congressmen can thus approve those laws as supposed representatives of the people. In the end, the people do not make law; the BAR and private corporations draft law and the Congress approves it!

Over 100 uniform laws and acts have been created by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), which have since been approved and adopted for the people (not by the people) under this Executive national emergency status. Chances are at least one of these effects your life in “interstate commerce”, including the Child Protection Services (CPS) agency that has kidnapped, harmed, and murdered so many of our children as “property” of government. They include:

  1. Uniform Adoption Act (1994)
  2. Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act (1971)
  3. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006)
  4. Uniform Apportionment of Tort Responsibility Act (2002)
  5. Uniform Arbitration Act (2000)
  6. Uniform Athlete Agents Act (2000)
  7. Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings (1936)
  8. Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act (1995)
  9. Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act (2006)
  10. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (1968)
  11. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (1997)
  12. Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act (2009)
  13. Uniform Commercial Code (2001)
  14. Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act (1982) (1994)
  15. Uniform Common Trust Fund Act (1938) (1952)
  16. Uniform Comparative Fault Act (1977) (1979)
  17. Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (proposed, 1999; withdrawn, 2002)
  18. Uniform Condominium Act (1977) (1980)
  19. Uniform Conflict of Laws—Limitations Act (1982)
  20. Uniform Conservation Easement Act (1981)
  21. Uniform Construction Lien Act (1987)
  22. Uniform Consumer Credit Code (1968) (1974)
  23. Uniform Consumer Leases (2001)
  24. Uniform Controlled Substances Act (1990) (1994)
  25. Uniform Correction or Clarification of Defamation Act (1993)
  26. Uniform Custodial Trust Act (1987)
  27. Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (1964) (1966)
  28. Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (1922)
  29. Uniform Determination of Death Act (1978) (1980)
  30. Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act (1999)
  31. Uniform Disclaimer of Transfers by Will, Intestacy or Appointment Act (1978)
  32. Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (1971)
  33. Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (1957)
  34. Uniform Dormant Mineral Interests Act (1986)
  35. Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act (1979) (1987)
  36. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (1999)
  37. Uniform Employment Termination Act (1991)
  38. Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (1964)
  39. Uniform Environmental Covenants Act
  40. Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act (1958) (1982)
  41. Uniform Exemptions Act (1976) (1979)
  42. Uniform Extradition and Rendition Act (1980)
  43. Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act (1978) (1982)
  44. Uniform Fiduciaries Act (1922)
  45. Uniform Foreign Money Claims Act (1989)
  46. Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act (1962)
  47. Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities Act (1987)
  48. Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (1984)
  49. Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
  50. Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act (1997)
  51. Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act (1993)
  52. Uniform Health-Care Information Act (1985)
  53. Uniform International Wills Act (1977)
  54. Uniform Interstate Arbitration of Death Taxes Act (1943)
  55. Uniform Interstate Compromise of Death Taxes Act (1943)
  56. Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (2007)
  57. Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act (2000)
  58. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (1992) (1996) (2001)
  59. Uniform Intestacy, Wills, and Donative Transfers Act (1991) (1993)
  60. Uniform Land Security Interest Act (1985)
  61. Uniform Land Transactions Act (1975)
  62. Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (1996)
  63. Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001)
  64. Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (1972)
  65. Uniform Management of Public Employee Retirement Systems Act (1997)
  66. Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (1958)
  67. Uniform Marital Property Act (1983)
  68. Uniform Marketable Title Act (1990)
  69. Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (1970) (1973)
  70. Uniform Mediation Act (2003)
  71. Uniform Money Services Act (2000)
  72. Uniform Multiple-Person Accounts Act (1969) (1989)
  73. Uniform Nonprobate Transfers On Death (1989)
  74. Uniform Notarial Acts (1982)
  75. Uniform Parentage Act (1973) (2000)
  76. Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (2010)
  77. Uniform Partnership Act (1994) (1997)
  78. Uniform Periodic Payment of Judgments Act (1990)
  79. Uniform Photographic Copies As Evidence Act (1949)
  80. Uniform Planned Community Act (1980)
  81. Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act (1980)
  82. Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (1983)
  83. Uniform Pretrial Detention Act (1989)
  84. Uniform Principal and Income Act (1997) (2001)
  85. Uniform Probate Code (1969) (1975) (1982) (1987) (1989) (1990) (1991) (1997)
  86. Uniform Probate Code Vi (1989) (1998)
  87. Uniform Prudent Investor Act (1994)
  88. Uniform Punitive Damages Act (1996)
  89. Uniform Putative and Unknown Fathers Act (1988)
  90. Uniform Real Estate Cooperative Act (1981)
  91. Uniform Real Estate Time-Share Act (1980) (1982)
  92. Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (2004)
  93. Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1968)
  94. Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (1972)
  95. Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act (1989)
  96. Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure (1974) (1987)
  97. Uniform Rules of Evidence Act (2005)
  98. Uniform Securities Act (1956) (1985) (amended 1988) (2002)
  99. Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (1940) (1993)
  100. Uniform State Administrative Procedure Act (1981)
  101. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act (1988)
  102. Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act (1995)
  103. Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act (1988)
  104. Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (1986) (1990)
  105. Uniform Supervision of Trustees for Charitable Purposes Act (1954)
  106. Uniform Surface Use and Mineral Development Accommodation Act (1990)
  107. Uniform Tod Security Registration Act (1989)
  108. Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trusts Act (1960) (1991)
  109. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (1979) (1985)
  110. Uniform Transboundary Pollution Reciprocal Access Act (1982)
  111. Uniform Transfer of Litigation Act (1991)
  112. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (1983) (1986)
  113. Uniform Transfers Under Nontestamentary Instruments Act (1978)
  114. Uniform Trust Code (2000)
  115. Uniform Trustees’ Powers Act (1964)
  116. Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995)
  117. Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act (1992) (1996)
  118. Uniform Victims of Crime Act (1992)

Imagine… all of these “Acts” are unlawful, de facto, prima facie, absolutely demolish any form of State’s sovereignty, and are created under military occupation and rule by a corrupted law society. They are then forced upon we, the contracted people/commodities of that corporate occupation. And none of them were written by the people or by the representatives of the people, but by the very BAR attorneys who administrate their own uniform codes for profit on an international scale and in their own court system.

For those of you who still believe in the mythological “States Rights” we so often hear about but never actually see, this uniformity of law – especially the UCC and Acts like #100 from the above list (Uniform State Administrative Procedure Act) – destroys any such notion. Like the people, States rights have been usurped by uniform codes that turn all 50 States into one powerless voice as represented. Of course under the rules of war, States only really exist at the discretion of the Executive Commander in Chief and those who control Him under military rule, as we will see. Of course, this does something much worse than eliminate states rights, for it implements international laws between nations, including the United States.

In the United Nations, the United States is not referred to as a “nation”, but is instead referred to as a “State” of the United Nations, just as California and New York are referred to as “States” of the United States. The word “of” means belonging to under law. And each nation as a member of the United Nations is now operating under these same or similar internationally scaled uniform codes. Thus the illusion and conceptual romanticism of the word sovereignty must also be stated here as a patriotic fallacy promoted by this militarily ruling United States corporation and bloodline through its media monopolies and its similar monopoly on the university and public school system’s curriculum.

Bouvier’s 1856 explains some important aspects of just what sovereignty is, and we must always remember that sovereignty does not exist if challenged and defeated or taken via treaty by a military force greater than the sovereign’s… as is the case with the former militias of each state of America and each individual that is allowed to believe he or she is a sovereign on the land. Only a nation or kingdom with a military force can truly be sovereign…

SOVEREIGN. A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. It is also applied to a king or other magistrate with limited powers. 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people.

For those “man on the land” free men out there who also claim that each man is a sovereign or king of himself or that the constitution states as much, you couldn’t be more erroneous in your summation of what this word sovereign means. For a man cannot be a sovereign unless he unlawfully or lawfully rules other men, which always means the use of force of law. Thus, no honorable man can justify this position of sovereign ruler of men. Note here also the fallacy that claims sovereignty has residence in the “body” of people. But this would mean that all people rule over all other people simultaneously (i.e. self-government), and this just isn’t the case. The “body politic” is ruled by government (mind control) and its congress, not by the common people. No matter how you define this word, there can be no honor in being a sovereign, for it requires the forceful subjection to your will by other men. In other words, a man with no subjects is not qualified to claim sovereignty because there is no body to rule over. And this again shows that force is absolutely necessary in any form of law, be it defense or offense. A republic is the law of one man over himself in agreement with other like-minded individuals. The problem is that honor is not a requirement in law as force is. And the people delegate their individual power over to the government.

Your pet is about the closest thing you might be considered a sovereign of, and yet government requires vaccines, tags, licenses, papers, and other permissions letting you know you are not a sovereign. Same goes with your children.

Keep in mind that if law is considered to be the sovereign law of the land, then the supreme chief ruler is the law, and the creators via the enforcers of that law are thus the true sovereign ruler with supreme violent power. A sovereign is a dictator, no matter how moral or full of ethics and niceties you set that dictatorship up to be. For the sovereign dictates the law, be it one man or many men on a council. So here we can see again that the patriotic and romantic idea and belief in and of sovereignty is more dangerous than the standing army behind the real sovereign. No natural man should claim legal status under any sovereign authority, for a sovereign must by necessity act as if it were above God’s law (natural law).

The reality is that if you have a legal status as “equal” people and citizens then you are also subject to all other rights and devices of that sovereign, including pain, punishment, taxes, and extortion (exaction). There is nothing in between. If you are equal under the law, then you are in a state of servitude to a sovereign. Only an outlaw (a lone ranger) can be a free man, and then only while he can defend his or here realm (land, home, possessions, and life) against other sovereign powers who seek his or her subjection to that sovereign authority. To do this, that man must be sovereign over other men for purposes of defense, which makes being a sovereign always either a position of no honor as forceful ruler or a pointless endeavor due to lack of military force that will protect that status.

The Masonic trick, of course, is to convince all or most of the individual people to all give up their individual natural rights, which otherwise gives them a naturally free disposition as “outlaws”, to become a member of the body politic via accepting membership (citizenship) and contractually assigning their sovereignty over to a “representative”. In the U.S. Code, a representative Congressman or Senator is defined as an “employee of the United States” government. Of course, only corporations can have employees. As per the above definition and all that has been disclosed thus far, it should be obvious that the OFFICE of the president of the United States is now the CHIEF RULER WITH SUPREME POWER!

SOVEREIGN STATE. One which governs itself independently of any foreign power.

Here again, it should be obvious that no State within the union of the United States governs (controls) itself independently from any foreign power. The foreign power is the United States central government (Washington D.C.) – the sacred theocracy!!!

SOVEREIGNTY. The union and exercise of all human power possessed in a state; it is a combination of all power; it is the power to do everything in a state without accountability; to make laws, to execute and to apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to make war or peace; to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations, and the like. 2. Abstractedly, sovereignty resides in the body of the nation and belongs to the people. But these powers are generally exercised by delegation (i.e. power of attorney). 3. When analyzed, sovereignty is naturally divided into three great powers; namely, the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary; the first is the power to make new laws, and to correct and repeal the old; the second is the power to (violently) execute the laws both at home and abroad; and the last is the power to apply the laws to particular facts; to judge the disputes which arise among the citizens, and to punish crimes. 4. Strictly speaking, in our republican forms of government, the absolute sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation; (q. v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each state, not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state.

So a sovereign is not under or subject to even its own law! Welcome to the United States…

It acts “without accountability” according to its own created sovereign law. So why would any man wish to be a citizen under a sovereign, be it another man or government? In truth, this question only becomes apparent to ask when one finally realizes he is enslaved by his sovereign – his Ruler and Chief military officer behind the force of law – and that he in no way lives in a “free country”.

Far from it…

Remember, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary was commissioned and compiled well before Roosevelt’s first national emergency was declared, and is the most representative and honest legal view of the time per the creation of the constitution and its legal language, commissioned by and entered officially into the constitution, congress, the Supreme Court, etc. And also remember that in 1933, congress as the representatives of the people of all states, voted to (temporarily) suspend the constitution and grant the “power of the people” and of the “states” to the newly granted extraordinary powers of the Executive Office to act as temporary sovereign through emergency declaration; an act that has never been repealed. And this action is perfectly constitutional!!!

It is also extremely important to comprehend that just like the kings and queens of England who gained their authority from the office granted to them via the crown temple (Masonic church), the president is only the current person (lesser monarch) occupying the Office, which is the corporate entity that holds the authority (permission) granted by the people (via Congress). It is the United States corporation that holds this tyrannical  power, not the president as a man. For the man is appointed by the government (church). So blaming the man is a worthless endeavor, especially when the man is just the latest in a series of blood-cousins of the Monarchs of England who’s Corporation Sole will simply be passed on to his cousin. More importantly, it is the people’s belief in that power and authority (the people’s permission) that gives legitimacy to that power of the United States and its current president as their “Chief Ruler”.

As with any cult, belief by its members is the key to a cult’s authority – the permission of the people to rule over them.

The Ritual Mocking Of God

Before we continue with this national emergency status as it applies today, it is interesting to note that the Divine Right Monarchs are granted their powers only when sanctioned by the process of religious Coronation (custom), which literally means that they are anointed with oil in the Church. This custom extends to both Judaism and Masonry, as well as many forms of Christianity.

The Hebrew word for Christ or “Christos” translates to mean “anointed”, or “the anointed”.

Thus when we say Jesus the Christ, we are really saying Jesus the Anointed.

The difference between the Biblical Christ and the Monarch men and women who claim the Christ-like power of God on Earth is that in the story of the Bible, the living Christ did not need the temporal Churches’ approval to be the chosen (anointed) by and as the Son of God, while inversely these bloodline cousins who psychotically claim to be and rule through “God” by their Crown and Coronation rituals must be appointed and physically anointed by the church in a ceremonial custom. While Christ was spiritually anointed without ritual or ceremony, Monarchs and president/prophets of incorporated churches must be temporally anointed in ritual fashion.

Considering the fact that King James and other Royal Monarchs commissioned their own versions of the Holy Bible (certainly a fact that bears at the minimum several conflicts of interest about the true history of the Lord of Lords and King of Kings), don’t you ever wonder why the Church of England and its anointed Christian (God/Christ-like) kings and queens should seemingly be so afraid of and demonize the Biblical “Anti-Christ” in their own re-translated Bibles? Just why would these sovereign rulers claiming to rule by God’s power wish to make the people who are subject to the will of the church and of that king or queen so very afraid of the “anti-Christ”?

Anti-Christ = Anti-Anointed = Anti-Monarchs.

The allegory of the Anti-Christ… A scary story told to ensure the strangle-hold of the appointed/anointed Monarchs who claim God’s kingdom for themselves over the people. Beware the anti-Christ!!!

Are not the Coronation (anointed) Monarchs and Ecclesiastical churches and the Pope claiming to be God; claiming to rule by God’s word and authority (permission)? Does this not make them as an artificial Christ/God on Earth – the great pretenders acting in Christ’s place? And if indeed their power is blasphemously derived from the personification of the Christos as God, church, and government, would these artificial Christ-men and women not certainly wish for their subjects to fear the thought of an anti-Christ that would strip them of that Divine Right to Rule God’s earthly kingdom?

After all, according to their sacred articles and doctrines, they rule in God’s absence not in His presence.

And this begs an examination of the Christ story itself, especially when considering that Freemasonry refers to it as an allegory of the Sun (god), and that the Crown Queen of England is a most high Masonic seat…

And so I have my own thoughts on the subject, which I include here only as food for thought:

Death is anti-Life. For life is truly the opposite of death, and life on Earth is certainly the opposite of any possible “after-life”. The concept of reincarnation is not after-life, for it is the karma of the next life, and therefore not necessarily opposed to nature on Earth. Living in this life on Earth is natural, while living in or after death is wholly unnatural (not of nature/Earth). Very importantly and as we have discussed, these words natural and unnatural very much relate to law as well. Natural law is also called “God’s Law”. This natural law is what the Biblical Jesus the “Christos” reportedly taught to his disciples when he was in the form of a natural man and only when He was alive on Earth – as written in the story of the Bible. But in the legal realm of artificial things and citizens (artificial persons), man’s (man-made/artificial) political contract law is actually very much against or anti-natural law (anti-God’s Law). Governments and churches certainly could be said to be against or “anti-Christ’s” terrestrial teachings of nature to do no harm to others or their property, for government and ecclesiastical law is a violation of natural law in that a political right is designed to take away a natural right (to enslave). And so it is my opinion and thesis here that a great and deceitful trick has been played upon the people of Earth, using the rituals and ceremonies of religions to cover up the true Christian teachings of the translated Bible in order to use “Christianity” and other forms of corporate religion to justify the bloodline rule of the common people – for men to rule as if they were gods. The same could be said about the Declaration of Independence and its use in justifying the constitution, despite the fact that the constitution is in direct violation of that Declaration. The Monarchy and Corporate religions are in direct violation of Christ. These churches could, in this light, be referred to as anti-Christ.

 “Pharaoh… Let my people go, that they may serve me.”


Pharaoh – Hebrew פַּרְעֹה (par‘ōh), from Egyptian pr ˤ3 (“palace, pharaoh”),
literally pr (“house”) + ˤ3 (“great, big”):

The supreme ruler of ancient Egypt; a formal address for the sovereign seat of power
as personified by theking’ in an institutional role of Horus son of Osiris;
often used by metonymy for Ancient Egyptian sovereignty.

Could not the same be said of and to reigning sovereigns of government today? For “Pharaoh was an office, not a man. It was the “House” that claimed superiority and “sovereignty” over the people via the Pagan gods.

And so the holy book of today might be written:

Obama… let my people go!

Queen Elizabeth II… let my people go!

Pope… let my people go!

Mormon Prophet… let my people go!

Israel… let my people go!

…So that we may all serve God and His nature instead of worshiping and tithing in your artificial ritualistic anti-God corporations.


10 13 11 flagbar

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: