Federalism personage and freedom

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2015/08/06/federalism-personage-and-freedom/#more-10169

 CLINTON GAVE US THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE OUR “LEGAL CHARACTER”, BUT DIDN’T BOTHER TO TELL US!

8-7-2015 1-24-13 PM

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and AntiCorruptionSociety.com is acknowledged.

On August 10, 1999 President Clinton, as CEO of USA INC, signed an Executive Order called “Federalism” that few people know about.

NOTE: Since March, 1933 USA INC has been kept in a permanent state of “national emergency” by those sitting in the White House. (See: Senate Report 93-549) This report officially validates that during a state of emergency or war, the office of the President can exert unlimited power, as demonstrated by the thousands of Executive Orders, Signing Statements, and secret Presidential Policy Directives, etc. that they have signed since 1933. During the state of emergency Congress is powerless, which explains why they have so many hearings which result only in recommendations, never in policy changes.

President Clinton’s (who, like all Presidents, was just another a puppet for the Federal Reserve banksters) EO 13132 redefined freedom as it applies to the “people of the States”.

Executive Order 13132
Federalism

Section 2
(d) The people of the States are free, subject only to restrictions in the Constitution itself or in constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define the moral, political, and legal character of their lives.

While this information is readily available to anyone who knows to look for it, it is not taught in our schools, including our law schools.

The freedom to choose your political and legal character is everything.

  1. If you have registered to vote for politicians running for office, you have chosen to recognize the bogus corporate network now calling itself our government as legitimate, which it is not.
  2. All of the corporate government network’s rules and regulations (that they refer to as laws) are written for dead legal fiction “persons”. If you choose not to define your “legal character” as a “person” but as a living flesh and blood man or woman, you have removed yourself from their statutory jurisdiction.

This is so very important to know and understand. All of the corporation’s rules and regulations that we are told are “laws” are just creations of the corporate (legal fiction) so-called government and only apply to their creation – the dead legal fiction referred to as a “person”.

A great example of this nonsense can be found in the definition of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA’s definitions regarding their statutes:

  1. “Person” includes any person, firm, association, organization, partnership, limited liability company, business trust, corporation, or company.

SO, DON’T DEFINE YOUR LEGAL CHARACTER AS A DEAD LEGAL FICTION “PERSON”!

The public is not told of this fraud many refer to as “personage”, so they blindly volunteer themselves into this legal character. As our courts are run under the principle “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, assent to choose to define yourself as a “person” is presumed – unless denied.

What has happened to our government and legal system, since the permanent state of emergency made room for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to be implanted across the country (without the people’s knowledge or consent), is nothing short of absolute fraud.

For people to regain control over their lives they MUST understand three primary principles:
1) All government entities are now corporations operating under the UCC aka the laws of contract. So, we have to educate ourselves on the basics of contract law and demand they perform honorably.

2) All statutes are written for “persons” by the government-corporate entities. An assumption is made that we have chosen to define our legal character as “person”. We can choose to define our legal character as the living flesh and blood men and women we actually are and rebut this assumption.

3) BAR attorneys can’t help us as they created this system and are trained to implement it and keep it in place. In fact, the American Bar Association is an arm of Rothschild’s London BAR Guild and was established to create a legal system whereas contract law was above both Constitutional Law and Common Law. Therefore, they cannot help us challenge it unless they are willing to sacrifice their BAR cards. Very few will choose that path.

SO, DON’T ASSENT (CONSENT) TO HAVING YOUR LEGAL CHARACTER DEFINED AS A “PERSON”!

Claim yourself as a living flesh and blood human in all of your communications and interactions with ALL corporate government entities.

Here is an example of a notice that can be handed to any law enforcement employee that attempts to interact with you.https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/pocket-card-notices.pdf

 This is a notice of non-consent.

FACTS:

  1. All law enforcement employees in the UNITED STATES work for private corporations listed on Dun and Bradstreet that use private commercial script (FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES) and are bound by the laws of contracts (UCC). [See Clearfield Doctrine]
  2. Laws, statutes, rules and regulation passed by FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL corporations are for non-human legal “persons” . . . not for living flesh and blood men and women – unless we consent or agree to contract!
  3. No agency or employee of the corporate (or private) government network can be granted the authority to deprive living men and women of their human unalienable rights – unless we consent or agree to contract!
  4. Enforcement of private corporate statutes, rules, regulations or Presidential Executive Orders by law enforcement employees upon flesh and blood men and women – without consent to contract – are unlawful and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions.
  5. Enforcement of corporate statutes, rules, regulations or Executive Orders by law enforcement officers – without full disclosure and written consent – are unlawful and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions.

VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE

“. . . a vague law is a violation of due process because the law does not provide fair warning of a prohibition and fails to set standards for enforcement that would govern the exercise of the police power.” http://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/void-for-vagueness-doctrine.html

Name of corporation employee notified:

I am not a non-human legal “person”.

I do not consent to your request. __________________________________

I do not wish to contract with you.

_____________________

Badge or ID #

_____________________________________________________ _______________

Signature: first and last name Date

_____________________________________________________ _______________

Witness (if available): first and last name Date

– Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal – Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent –

This ‘notice of non-consent and no contract’ should be taken under advisement.

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM

 

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: